|
---|
Category:ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPRAISALS
MONTHYEARML20058D6751993-11-12012 November 1993 Environmental Assessment & Fonsi in Consideration of Issuance of Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR140.11(a)(4) to License DPR-54 ML20057A3291993-09-0202 September 1993 Environmental Assessment & Fonsi Re Exemption from Training Program Establishment,Implementation & Maint Requirements of 10CFR50.120.NRC Considering Exemption ML20045B8861993-06-16016 June 1993 Environ Assessment Re Request to Authorize Facility Decommissioning,Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station,Unit 1 ML20029B6751991-02-14014 February 1991 EA & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from 10CFR50-54(q) Requirements & Change 4 to Emergency Plan ML20056B4671990-08-22022 August 1990 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Supporting Proposed Exemption to 10CFR50.47 & 10CFR50,App E ML20042G1991990-05-0404 May 1990 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Supporting Exemption from Requirements for Simulation & Similator Training Per 10CFR55.45(b) & Requirements of 10CFR55.59(a)(2) & (c)(3) & 10CFR55.33(a)(2) ML20011F3091990-02-26026 February 1990 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Proposed Exemption from 10CFR50,App J ML20011F1831990-02-22022 February 1990 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Util 890925 Request for Exemption from 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Requirements ML20246B1041989-06-13013 June 1989 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Supporting Issuance of Exemption from 10CFR20,App A,Footnote d-2(c) Requirements ML20247D0761989-03-23023 March 1989 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App J ML20154P1241988-09-26026 September 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i) Requirements Concerning Increase in Amount of Onsite Property Damage Insurance Required to Be Carried by Licensees ML20215K5921987-06-17017 June 1987 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Supporting Requests for Exemptions from 10CFR50,App R Requirements Re Fire Protection Program ML20141M9551986-01-29029 January 1986 Notice of Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 850228 & 1107 Requests for Exemption from 10CFR50 App R Extending Time to Reach Cold Shutdown Under Natural Circulation W/No Offsite Power to 72 H ML20138K6991985-12-11011 December 1985 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Util 850412 Application for Exemption from 10CFR50.44(c)(3)(iii) Requirements Re Installation of Reactor Vessel Head Vent ML20031G7731981-10-0606 October 1981 Eia Supporting Amend 36 to License DPR-54 1993-09-02
[Table view] Category:TEXT-ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20207D4651998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Period Jan-Dec 1998, for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ML20204E6761998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Exposure Rept ML20205A1691998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Rept, for Jan- Dec 1998,for Rancho Seco Nuclear Station.With ML20236S6601998-07-20020 July 1998 NPDES Notification of Wastewater Discharge Permit Violation: on 980623,Rancho Seco Laboratory Records Indicate Combined Plant Effluent Ph Greater than Supply Water Ph.Caused by Improper Reporting of Ph Values.Reviewing Existing Methods ML20249B9021998-06-18018 June 1998 NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 980603,release of Small Amount of Low Ph Water from Plant.Caused by acid-water Solution Being Spilled Into Sump.Operator re-diverted Plant Wastewater Discharge & Flushed Outlet Ph Monitors Probe ML20217G8531998-03-31031 March 1998 NPDES Discharger Self Monitoring Rept ML20217G6821998-02-28028 February 1998 Discharger Self Monitoring Rept for Feb 1998 ML20203H7131997-12-31031 December 1997 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept ML20217H0491997-12-31031 December 1997 Reg Guide 1.16,1997 Annual Exposure Rept ML20216G8041997-12-31031 December 1997 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept,Jan-Dec 1997 for Rancho Seco Nuclear Station ML20137Y3411996-12-31031 December 1996 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for Period Jan-Dec 1996 ML20137D1081996-12-31031 December 1996 Reg Guide 1.16,1996 Annual Exposure Rept ML20135D9041996-12-31031 December 1996 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Jan-Dec 1996 ML20029C9641993-12-31031 December 1993 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept Jan-Dec 1993 Rancho Seco Nuclear Station ML20058D6751993-11-12012 November 1993 Environmental Assessment & Fonsi in Consideration of Issuance of Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR140.11(a)(4) to License DPR-54 ML20057A3291993-09-0202 September 1993 Environmental Assessment & Fonsi Re Exemption from Training Program Establishment,Implementation & Maint Requirements of 10CFR50.120.NRC Considering Exemption ML20056G6711993-06-30030 June 1993 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Jan-June 1993 ML20045B8861993-06-16016 June 1993 Environ Assessment Re Request to Authorize Facility Decommissioning,Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station,Unit 1 ML20012G5871992-12-31031 December 1992 1992 Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Rept ML20012G5791992-12-31031 December 1992 1992 Annual Exposure Rept ML20044E2481992-12-31031 December 1992 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept,Jan-Dec 1992 ML20034F3441992-12-31031 December 1992 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Jul-Dec 1992 ML20029B6751991-02-14014 February 1991 EA & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from 10CFR50-54(q) Requirements & Change 4 to Emergency Plan ML20029A7521990-12-31031 December 1990 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jul-Dec 1990. W/ ML20056B4671990-08-22022 August 1990 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Supporting Proposed Exemption to 10CFR50.47 & 10CFR50,App E ML20059E0091990-06-30030 June 1990 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept,Jan-June 1990 ML20042G1991990-05-0404 May 1990 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Supporting Exemption from Requirements for Simulation & Similator Training Per 10CFR55.45(b) & Requirements of 10CFR55.59(a)(2) & (c)(3) & 10CFR55.33(a)(2) ML20043B4281990-04-30030 April 1990 Monthly Discharger Self Monitoring Rept for Apr 1990 ML20042E5431990-02-28028 February 1990 Monthly Discharger Self Monitoring Rept for Feb 1990. W/ ML20011F3091990-02-26026 February 1990 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Proposed Exemption from 10CFR50,App J ML20011F1831990-02-22022 February 1990 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Util 890925 Request for Exemption from 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Requirements ML20033E9871990-01-31031 January 1990 Discharge Self Monitoring Rept for Jan 1990 ML20043G5801989-12-31031 December 1989 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept,Jan-Dec 1989 ML20059E0281989-12-31031 December 1989 Addendum to, Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept, Jul-Dec 1989 ML20033F0731989-12-31031 December 1989 Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Rept Personnel Whole Body Exposure for CY89 ML20059E0311989-06-30030 June 1989 Addendum to, Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept, Jan-June 1989 ML20246M1401989-06-30030 June 1989 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept Jan-June 1989 ML20246B1041989-06-13013 June 1989 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Supporting Issuance of Exemption from 10CFR20,App A,Footnote d-2(c) Requirements ML20245A0821989-05-31031 May 1989 Discharger Self Monitoring Rept,May 1989 ML20247F1221989-04-30030 April 1989 NPDES Discharger Self-Monitoring Rept for Apr 1989. Water Quality Violations Noted Re High Total Coliform Results & High Biological Oxygen Demand ML20247D0761989-03-23023 March 1989 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App J ML20248J5701989-02-28028 February 1989 Discharger Self Monitoring Rept for Feb 1989 ML20059E0351988-12-31031 December 1988 Addendum to, Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept, Jul-Dec 1988 ML20248J6081988-12-31031 December 1988 1988 Annual Exposure Rept ML20235U7841988-12-31031 December 1988 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept,Jul-Dec 1988 ML20154P1241988-09-26026 September 1988 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i) Requirements Concerning Increase in Amount of Onsite Property Damage Insurance Required to Be Carried by Licensees ML20207H9101988-07-31031 July 1988 Discharger self-monitoring Rept for Jul 1988 ML20154J3271988-06-30030 June 1988 Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept,Jan-June 1988,Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ML20196K3021988-05-31031 May 1988 NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for May 1988 ML20151V7541988-03-31031 March 1988 Discharger Self Monitoring Rept, for Mar 1988 1998-07-20
[Table view] |
Text
,_ _
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT DOCKET NO. 50-312 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT t
AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission (the Comission) is considering issuance of an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix J to the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD, the licensee) for the Rancho Seco s
Nuclear Generating Station located in Sacramento County, California.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Identification of Protosed Action:
The exemption would extend the interval between local leak rate tests of containment penetrations by a maximum of six months. The current interval between local leak rate tests is 24 months as delineated in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J.
The exemption is in response to a licensee request dated February 15, 1989. Further details regarding the request are contained in a related application for amendment of the plant's Technical Specifications, dated December 30, 1988, as supplemented March 6, 1989.
The Need for the Proposed Action:
Several of the local leak rate tests of containment penetrations can only be performed while the plant is in cold shttdowr. Following a 27-month reactor shutdown during 1986 and 1987, plant preparations for restart comenced in the fall of 1987 in anticipation of reactor criticality that, due to various reasons, was delayed until March 1988.
In preparation for the fall 1987 restart and an extended operating period following startup, local leak rate tests were completed during the.sumer of 1987. Since reaching criticality in 8903300372 090323 DR ADOCK 050
1 l
l 1 -
March 1988, the plant has not been in cold shutdown for any appreciable time and the licensee has been unable to complete all the local leak rate tests that, j
based on the 24-month interval, are due again in 1989. Rancho Seco is not scheduled to be-in cold shutdown until the next refueling outage, which is J
expected during the fall of 1989. The current 24-month interval for some local i
leak rate tests, which necessitates cold shutdown as a prerequisite, may expire prior to the projected refueling date. System perturbations associated with bringing the plant to cold shutdown and the increased potential for problems during 'this transient offset the enhancement in safety resulting from timely completion of local leak rate tests. A one-time extension of the 24-month test requirement appears prudent.
l 1
Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action:
A six month extension of the interval between local leak rate tests is not-i expected to have any impact on the environment. The test history of penetra-tions that may be affected by the extension indicates that the penetration isolation valves are reliable and there is little likelihood that both of the redundant valves on each penetration would fail and the failure remain l
undetected during the six month test extension. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that the need to isolate containment would occur during the period of the six month extension.
Moreover, the proposed change would not involve a significant change in the probability or consequences of any accidents previously evaluated, nor does it involve a new or different kind of accident. The proposed amendment does not otherwise affect routine radiological plant effluents. Therefore, the Connission concludes that there are no significant radiological environmental impacts.
v.
3
~
1 associated with the proposed amendment. The Commission also concludes that the action will not result in a significant increase in the individual or cummulative occupational radiation exposure.
With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed exemption involves features located entirely within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
It would not affect non-radiological plant effluents and would have no other environmental impact. Therefore, the Commission concludes that there would be no significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed exemption.
Alternative to the Proposed Actim Since the Commission has concluded there are no significant environmental effects that would result from the p.oposed action, any alternatives with equal or greater environmental impacts need not be evaluated. The principal alternative would be to deny the requested exemption. Denial of the request would not reduce environmental impacts of plant operation.
Alternative Use of Resources This action would involve no use of resources not previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement (operating license) for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station.
7 yg.g AgenciesandPersonsConsultqj The NRC staff reviewed the iscensee's request and did not consult other agencies or persons.
Finding of No Significant Impact The Commission has determined not.to prepare an environmental impact statemer.t for the proposed exemption.
Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, we conclude thht the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment.
For further details with respect to this action, see the licensee's application for the related amendment to the Rancho Seco Technical Specifications, which was submitted by letters dated December 30, 1988 and March 6, 1989. These submittals are available to the public at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC and at.the Martin Luther King Regional Library, 7340 24th Street Bypass, Sacramento, California.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/Yd' l
4 George. Kn ghto, Director Project Direct rate V Division of Reactor Projects III.
IV, Y and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of March,1989
- _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ -