ML20245C503

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 70 to License DPR-34
ML20245C503
Person / Time
Site: Fort Saint Vrain Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/18/1989
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20245C494 List:
References
NUDOCS 8904270178
Download: ML20245C503 (2)


Text

_ _ - _ - - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - -

y .

r .' .

pmcoq

, - J je UNITED STATES 1 y ,, c ' gg NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

, .. p' WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

\ ..... /

SAFETY. EVALUATION.BY.THE OFFICE OF. NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED T0. AMENDMENT.NO.70 TO FACILITY .0PERATING LICENSE.NO. DPR-34 PUBLIC. SERVICE-COMPANY.0F. COLORADO FORT.ST..YRAIN. NUCLEAR GENERATING. STATION DOCKET.NO. 50-267 1.0' INTRODUCTION By letter dated January 13, 1989, the licensee requested that the staff amend the Facility Operating License No. DPR-34 to allow the possessien of an increased amount of radioactive material for calibration purposes. The licensee also requested that the license be reformatted to resemble recently issued licenses. These changes would allow the licensee to possess appropriate scurces for calibration of the high range detector instrumentation.

2.0 EVALUATION The specific portions of the license updated are as follows:

Parts 2.C.(2), 2.C.(3), 2.C.(4), and 2.C.(5) concerning receipt possession and use of. source, byproduct and special nuclear material.

In each case, these sections have been updated to reflect the format of . I newer licenses. Appropriate limits on the amount of materials received, i possessed er utilized are contained in the Regulations or the Final Safety )

AnalysisReport(FSAR). The format followed reflects that of licenses recently issued by the Comission and reflects an earlier request by the Comission to update this license.

The staff therefore concludes that these proposed changes are acceptable.

3.0 _ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION The amendment involves a change in the installation or use of a facility ccmponent located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.

The staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any l effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant '

increase in incividual or cumulative occupational radiation exposures.

The Comission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment i involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public I

comment on such finding. Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility 8904270178 890418 PDR ADOCK 05000267 P PDC

-__-._-_a _ - - - _ . - - - _ - - - _ _ . - . _ . - . - _ _ - - - _ _ _ - _ - . - . _ . _ - - _ _ _ _ - . - - . - _ _ . _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ . - . . . - . - - - - .

~

l l

critericforcategoricalexclusionsetforthin10CFRSection51.22(c)(9).

Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environ-mental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.

4.0 CONCLUSION

The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:

(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) public such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

Date: April 18, 1989 Principal Contributor: Kenneth L. Heitntr, PD-IV l

l

}

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _