ML20244E582

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-369/89-11 & 50-370/89-11 on 890330-0421 & Notice of Violation.Nrc Concerned That Operating RHR Sys Was Lost on Three Separate Occasions. Response Should Include Actions to Prevent Recurrence
ML20244E582
Person / Time
Site: McGuire, Mcguire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/1989
From: Reyes L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20244E584 List:
References
NUDOCS 8906200403
Download: ML20244E582 (4)


See also: IR 05000369/1989011

Text

m,

_

g)

N

.

Mh Yo N8

.

p

u

Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370

License Nos. NPF-9, NPF-17

g.

Duke Power Company

E

ATTN: Mr. H._B. Tucker, Vice President

[

Nuclear Production Department

'

422 So .; Church Street

Charlotte, NC 28242

L

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION

NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-369/89-11 AND 50-370/89-11

(

,

This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted by

K. VanDoorn and T. Cooper on March 30,1989 - April 21,1989. The inspection

u

included a review of activities authorized for your McGuire facility. At the

'

conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of

your staff identified in the enclosed inspection report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report.

Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures

p

and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of

.

activities in progress.

'

-The inspection findings indicate that certain activities appeared to violate

.

NRC requirements.

Tl a violation, references to pertinent requirements, and

"

elements to be included in your response are described in the er. closed Notice

of Violation.

We are concerned that the operating residual heat removal system was lost on

three separate occasions as described in this report and the Notice of Violation.

' .

The first situation was especially significant in that air binding of the pump

-

occurred during mid-loop operations.

Your response to this report should not

--

only address your corrective actions in response to the Notice of Violation but

also a description of your actions to prevent a recurrence of loss of decay

z

heat removal during shutdown conditions and a schedule for their completion.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,

[.

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures

i

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

L

The responses directed by this letter and its enclosures are not subject to the

-

>

clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No.96-511.

L

Lr

~

8906200403 890608

,

PDR

ADOCK 05000369

i

O

PNV

j

,

2G o ( '

______________________

-

y .

- w n- - - - --

J 4-'!?

s*

y ' l*s

,

, ,

3

f.

r

., e

),(

M

,.

g

'p ,

'

Duke Power Company ~:

~ 2

.,-

<

~

P

JUN 0 81989

'

,

-

4

L

Should you'have.any; questions concerning this letter, please contact us.

,

,

4

Sincerely,-

,

4 '

Original Signed by

.

Charles E Hehl../for

<m

'

Luis A. Reyes, Director

~

".

.

Division of Reactor Projects

o

. .

, ,

Enclosures:c

.

..

1.-

Notice of. Violation

~ 2 .~

NRC' Inspection Report

4

cc w/encis:

T. L. McConnell, Station Manager

LSenior Resident Inspector - Catawba-

.

State of North Carolina

bec w/encis:

'

NRC Resident Inspector

'

D. Hood,'NRR:-

.

. Document Control Desk.

til.; Lieberman, Director, OE .

m

a

,

-

l

%

onser

.MSh lock'

4 <

, p,jy

j'w"

'

.g:

-

4

i

'

b_________.

. _ _ ' . _ . _ _ _

-______.._._..____m

_._.__...-.__._m__

_ _ _

._____._m

m__._

_..-___.___.___._m.

. _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _______ _ _ _ _

--_-___-_______-__._m_____

J

_

. _ - _ .

_. . _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _

s.

3

t

i/ 34

j

' " '

g^'

UNITED STATES -

,

.3

.g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.

'

}/)

o

!

REGION 11

[

101 MARIETTA ST., N W.

e,,,,

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323

_

Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370

JUN 0 81989

License Nos. NPF-9, NPF-17

Duke Power Company

ATTN: Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President

Nuclear Production Department

422: South Church Street

Charlotte, NC 28242-

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION

NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-369/89-11 AND 50-370/89-11

This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted by

K. VanDoorn and T. Cooper on March 30, 1989 - April 21, 1989. The inspection

included a review of activities authorized for your McGuire facility.

At the

conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of

your staff identified in the enclosed inspection report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report.

Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures

and' representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of

activities in progress.

The inspection findings indicate that certain activities appeared to violate

NRC requirements.

The violation, references to pertinent requirements, and

elements to be included in your response are described in the enclosed Notice

of Violation.

t

We are concerned that the operating residual heat removal system was lost on

three separate occasions as described in this report and the Notice of Violation.

The first situation was especially significant in that air binding of the pump

occurred during mid-loop operations.

Your response to this report should not

only address your corrective actions in response to the Notice of Violation but

also a description of your actions to prevent a rec.urrence of loss of decay

heat removal during shutdown conditions and a schedule for their completion.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,

Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

ihe responses directed by this letter and its enclosures are not subject to the

clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. Pub. L. No.96-511.

__

- _ _ _ - _ _ - .

._.

- _ -

_ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - - -

._ ___

._-

.

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - __ ________________

_ -____ _-

..

,

,

'

l.

='

,

l

' Duke Power Company

2

JUN 0 81989

I

'

Should you have any questioni concerning this letter, please contact us.

Sincerely,

J/

0

Luis A. Reyes, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

NRC Inspection Report

cc w/encis:

T. L. McConnell, Station Manager

Senior Resioent Inspector - Catawba

i

_ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -