ML20244D452

Forwards Revised SER Re Util 850813 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.1, Post-Trip Review,(Program Description & Procedure). Program & Procedure Acceptable.Salp Evaluation Also Encl

ML20244D452
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	09/03/1985
From:	Ziemann D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Lainas G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20149B797	List: BECO-84-061, Forwards INPO 84-010, Vendor Equipment Technical Info Program, Nuclear Operations Procedure,Operating Experience Review Program & Vendor Manual Control,In Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Section 2.2.2 BECO-87-113, Submits Addl Info in Support of Util 870529 Proposed Tech Spec Change Re Standby Liquid Control Sys for Compliance W/ 10CFR50.62(c)(4),ATWS Rule IA-87-644, Forwards SER & SALP Input Accepting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 1) Re Identifying, Classifying & Treating Components Required for Performance of Reactor Trip Function as safety-related ML20236D144 ML20236Y028 ML20236Y139 ML20236Y336 ML20236Y345 ML20236Y350 ML20236Y359 ML20236Y371 ML20236Y399 ML20244D310 ML20244D452 ML20244D774 ML20244E058 ML20244E375
References
FOIA-87-644 GL-83-28, TAC-52786, NUDOCS 8509060309
Download: ML20244D452 (2)

Text

'

y nauq'o h h

, 4,' =

g UNITED STATES ,

. .# g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 ,.

, .l -

N ' .. .. / '

SEP 031985 MEMORANDUM FOR: Gus C. Lainas, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors Division of Licensing FROM: Dennis L. Ziemann, Acting Deputy Director Division of Human Factors Safety

SUBJECT:

REVISED SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT FOR PILGRIM STATION, GENERIC LETTER 83-28, ITEM 1.1 (POST-TRIP REVIEW)

(TACN0.52786)

Reference:

Memorandum from D. Beckham to D. Crutchfield, " Safety Evaluation Report for Pilgrim Station, Generic Letter 83-28, Item 1.1 (Post-Trip Review)," dated April 18, 1985.

By the above referenced memorandum, we forwarded the LQB SER with regard to Pilgrim Station. In our SER, we stated that the licensee's response did not meet the guidelines developed for post-trip review in the following areas:

1. The criteria for determining the need for independent assessment of the event.

2. The method and criteria for comparing the event with expected plant performance.

3. A systematic safety assessment program to assess unscheduled reactor trips.

By letter dated August 13, 1985, the licensee provided responses for the above cited open issues. We have reviewed the licensee's responses and find that the above open issues have been resolved. Thus, we conclude that the Post-Trip Review Program and Procedures for Pilgrim Station are acceptable.

Our revised SER and SALP evaluation are enclosed.

on a  %

t Gus C. Lairas This review has bean conducted by D. Shum (x24906). There are no known dissenting professional opinions on this matter.

' d r%%

l' A- }bhm -

DennisL.Ziemann,ActMgDeputyDirector Division of Human Factors Safety

Enclosures:

1. Safety Evaluation

2. SALP Evaluation cc: D. Vassallo A. Bournia G. Holahan P. Leech l

1 l _ . _ _ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .