ML20244E058

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Electrical,Instrumentation & Control Sys Branch SER Supporting Util 831107 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.2, Post-Trip Review - Data & Info Capability. SALP Input Also Encl
ML20244E058
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 07/10/1986
From: Lainas G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Leech P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20149B797 List:
References
FOIA-87-644 GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8607160386
Download: ML20244E058 (2)


Text

_ _ _ - _ _ _

h gn uou 4

o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555

/

Docket No.: 50-293 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Paul Leech, Senior Project Manager, BWR Project Directorate #1 Division of BWR Licensing FROM:

Gus C. Lainas, Assistant D4 rector 'or BWR Division of BWR Licensing

SUBJECT:

SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT FOR PILGRIM STATION, GENERIC LETTER 83-28, ITEM 1.2 (POST-TRIP REVIEW -

DATA AND INFORMATION CAPABILITY) DOCKET N0. 50-293 Plant Name:

Pilgrim Station Docket No.:

50-293 Utility:

Boston Edison Company Licensing Status:

OR Resp. Directorate: PD #1/ DBL Project Manager:

P. Leech Review Branch:

EICSB/DPA Review Status:

Complete By letter dated November 7,1983, the Boston Edison Company responded to Generic Letter 83-28 with regard to required actions based or generic implications of Salem ATWS events. The enclosed SER and SALP were prepared by the Electrical, Instru-mentation 'and Control Systems Branch of DPA based upon TER input from its con-tractor, Scierce Applications International Corporat9 (SAIC), after having re-viewed the applicable portions of the licensee's.resonese to Generic Letter 83-28 for Pilgrim 5tation. The TER was discussed with the licensee in telephone con-

]

versations between Mr. W. Lobo, the licensee's representative, and Mr. Raj Auluck

)

and Mr. Joel Kramer of the NRC on February 12 and 26,1986.

Based on our review, we conclude that the licensee's post-trip review data and information capabilities for Pilgrim Station are acceptable.

This review has been conducted by J. J. Kramer (X28408) and SAIC. There are

)

no known dissenting professional opinions on this matter.

?I s.

s s

f, pal s'. Lhi k Assista t Director Di' vision of BWR Licensing

Enclosures:

1.

Safety Evaluation 1

2.

SALP Evaluation See a t a,cjed,l _is t cc:

/

E//r

P. Leech cc:

R. Liner, SAIC D. Gallagher, SAIC C. E. Rossi J. Zwolinski E. Adensam T. Bournia

}

I

.1