ML20236E657
| ML20236E657 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 02/24/1987 |
| From: | Wheeler J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236E191 | List: |
| References | |
| 235.1(B), 235.1(B)-R01, 235.1(B)-R1, NUDOCS 8710290302 | |
| Download: ML20236E657 (20) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:. _ _ _ .
.'s . . j TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 235.l(B)
SPECIAL PROGRAM f REPORT TYPE: SEQUOYAH ELEMENT REVISION NUMBER: 1 , l l' TITLE: ELECTRICAL SAFETY j 480V Power Receptacles Unsafe PAGE 1 0F 8 REASON FOR REVISION: ;
-i
- 1. Revised to incorporate.TVA comments, revised CATD 235.01(B)-SQN-02.- !
I i l P_RIPARATION ! PREP RED BY: l 2 k lAldM A 1. LUILOBIf/L 2 2d 87 51GNAlllRE ' DATE l i ILFVIEWS
--P E "R . REVIEH COMMIT
/ f f 1 W s h 8j b s l u / 8 7 l l D4TE (SJBNXTORE " " " [
i TAS: " SIGNATURE DATE CONCURREtLCES i e7 op, dempc LL 1 (g a/zy/gy 7 E C_E_G-H : 2 2447 SRP: , SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE
- DATE !
i APPROVED BY: DATE MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER DATE ECSP HANAGER CONCURRENCE (FINAL REPORT ONLY)
- SRP Secretary's signature denotes SRP concurrences are in files.
?
t -j .< , TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS ' REPORT NUMBER: 235.1(B) ; SPECIAL' PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 1 PAGE 2 0F 8 j
>(
11 1 '. . C11ARACTERIZAT10N Of_ISSHES1 Conngrni: Issue: WBM-5-002-003 .
- a. No means-of disconnect provided at "There are no means of-.discon- 480 V receptacles. ' Connect or
'nect provided immediately above disconnect of plugs from 480'V 480'Vl receptacles to. prevent. receptacles could cause flash burns
. flash burns' caused'by insertion, and other' injuries.
or removing." EX-85-154-007
" Personnel safety;is' seriously endangered by lack of disconnect switches at 480 volt. welding outlets. lMany personnel who connect'and disconnect welding
. conductors to these' outlets might not know if circuits are energized. Removing-or inserting the plug while energized could cause an. explosion and could
;' embed small metallic particles in the arms, face and torso of the person."
- 2. HAVE ISSUES BEEN IDENTIFIED IN ANOTHER SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS? YES N0 X_
Identi fied _by Not Aqplicable Date Not Apolicable-Documentation Identifiers: i Not Applicable
- 3. DQCUMfJtLEQS. . TAG NOS. . LOCATIQNS_.QR OTHER SPECIFIC DESCRIPTIVE IDENTIFICATIONS STATED IN ELEEENT: ;
No further information available. Employee concerns address problems with the 480 V receptacles not having a disconnect switch located near receptacle to prevent flash burns should the plug be inserted or removed under load. 0501D (01/14/87) h__---__.__-___-_. - _ _
t. TVA~ EMPLOYEE C0N'CERNS 'REPORTNUMBER:$235.l(B) SPECIAL PROGRAM-
< REVISION NUMBER: ~1 PAGE 3 0F 8 4, 4
- 4. . -INTERVIEW FILES REVIEHED:
The interview files for 'EX-85-154-007 and HBM-5-002-003 were
. reviewed by the evaluation team. The'.. files contained no additional-unreviewed information.
e
- 5. -DOCUMENTS-REVIEHED RELATED TO THE ELEMENT:
i See Appendix A. 1
- 6. NHAT REGULATIONS. LICfENSItiG_ COMMITMENTS _,_ DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OR OTHER APPLY 10R CONTROL IN THIS AREA?
cI See-Appendix A.
'i l
i
;7 . LIST REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION. MEETINGS. TELEPHONE CALLS, AND OTHER
- DISCUSSIONS RELATED TO ELEMENT.
See Appendix A.
- 8. EV LUATION PROCESS:
- a. Reviewed available transcripts of NRC investigative !
interviews for additional information on the concerns.
.b. ' Performed field walkdown to_ check and verify types of receptacles and plugs used at.SQN.
- c. Reviewed adequacy of specifications and requirements )
regarding application of 480 power receptacles. I Assessed overall adequacy of 480 V receptacles used at SQN.
- d. -1 l
05010 (01/14/87)
w -, I
'TVA~ EMPLOYEE ~ CONCERNS- ~ REPORT NUMBER: 235.l(B)l d
SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER:- 1 PAGE_4.0F 8-Y
- 9. DISCUSSI0L FINDINGS. AND CONCLUSIONS:
i Chronoloav: 11/25/85:. Concern EX-85-154-007. received by TVA for HBN.-- 01/16/86: Concern HBM-5-002-003 received by TVA for HBN. ' Discussion: The applicab.le Sequoyah drawing (App.' A, 5.b) and Master Bill of
-Materials (App. A, 5.a) specifyL Crouse-Hinds (C4 ) type AEQ1648, 600 V,:3 wire,.4 pole, 60 A-rated receptacles. similarly, Electrical Design Standard DS-E12.5.2 (App. A, 5.g) specifies these receptacles;to be "similar to Crouse-Hinds type'AEQ,'or . .
equivalent." . These receptacles.are Underwriters. Laboratory' tested and approved for connect and disconnect-under. full load.(circuit breaking):when used with mating C-H plug part' number APJ6485. The SQN Master Bill of Materials and the Electrical Design Standard, however, do not reference the type of plug to be.used-
.with the specified 'C-H. receptacle. During the field walkdowns (App; A, 7.f and g, 08/23/86 and 10/09/86), the evaluator noted that. Appleton ACP6034BC plugs were used in the C-H receptacles. : A review of the Appleton catalog found r. listing that cross referenced Appleton part number ACP6034BC as' interchangeable with C-H part. number APJ6485.
A review'of C-H catalogs-and a telephone conversation with.C-H l personnel (App. A, 7.b, 04/29/86) indicated tha+ L-H opposes the a practice of interchanging other. manufacturer's plugs or q receptacles, even though their charts cross reference catalog numbers to C-H parts. C-H opposes'.this for the following reasons: l
- 1) C-H has proprietary information not available to other manufacturers, 2) there is no national standard for mandating minimum performance requirements, and 3) "UL" does not test these parts as interchangeable, only as mated halves and lists them as
..- 'such. .
i Appleton states (App. A, 7.c, 05/05/86) that its plug is totally ^ compatible with the Crouse-Hinds receptacle. Appleton's list of plugs interchangeable with C-H plugs has been industrially used and accepted for more than 15 years without any noted problems. Since C-H and Appleton disagree about the acceptability of the 480 V receptacle and plug interchangeability, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and Tennessee OSHA l 05010 (01/14/87) h--mm._.--..a_______.
r_ . i* !
'i TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT _ NUMBER: 235.1(B)
- cSPECIAL-PROGRAM .. .
REVISION N' UMBER: 1: PAGE 5-OF 8' f i 1 L '(Tenn-0SHA) were contacted.(App. A,.5.d and:e; 05/09/86)'.. Both; a R
-0SHA.and Tenn-0SHA would. require;a review of.the plug or-receptacle
' configuration on their.own merits'should the question.be raised..
- Ifnit is'necessary to review the' acceptability of. this: assembly, . 1 fu11?lciei insertion and withdrawal . testing of. the plug would be ' R
' performed'to ensure that no. personnel safety hazard exi.sts. . d However, both OSHA agencies indicated that.no records exist'of'any. 1 concerns'regarding this interchangeability.
Underwriter's Laboratory (UL) was also contacted on this subject. UL~would not discuss;the acceptability of the interchangeability.of the plugs unless the request was submitted in writing. :However, UL ' did' acknowledge that.they were aware of this common practice of-using? interchangeable 480 V plugs:with the C-H receptacles. The assessment of the evaluation tcam after review of the. assembly and based on:the fact that similar-assemblies have been used by.the
. industry for over 15 years,'is that the assembly is.' acceptable._and
~
will not result-in personnel hazard. However, since the field l walkdown covered only a limited number of assemblies, in view of_ the lack of specifications for the plugs, no certainty exists that acceptable assemblies have been installed throughout the plant. L Lindinas: Electrical Design Standard DS-E12.5.2 and the Master Bill of L Materials do not specify the type of mating plug to be used with-l the specified' receptacles. A field walkdown by the. evaluation team identified the use of C-H receptacles with Appleton plugs. Discussions with UL, Tenn-0SHA, and OSHA indicate that this type of-
~
product interchangeability is_a general practice and no safety concerns or problems have been identified. Based on the construction of the assembly, the fact that the plug manufacturer.-
-(Appleton) lists it as an interchangeable part with the C-H plug, and considering that the interchangeability has been widely accepted by the industry for more than 15 years, the present l
installation of 480 V receptacles.and mating plugs is acceptable and will not present any hazard to personnel safety. However, without specified mating plugs required by the Electrical- Design Standard and the Master Bill of Material, there is no assurance k: that only acepetable " circuit breaking" plugs have been purchased and used. 05010 (01/14/87) N -----.---_.-a_.--___ -___.
1 9 TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS- REPORT NUMBER: 235.1(B) .
;SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 1-PAGE 6 0F 8
^ / ..
4 i
'}
Conclusion:
The' employee concern is not valid. The present C-H receptacles installed at SQN, if used with the. correct mating plug,- do not; require.the use of.any disconnect, switch because of their l
'" circuit-breaking'. 'feature .which is designed .to be disconnected and connected under fullLload'without causing.a personnel safety:
hazard. However, since Engineering Design Standards ~and:the Master
, Bill of Materials do not,specify the type of mating plug to be;used 1 with the specified. receptacles, there. is no. assurance that in all~
cases the' proper' mating plugs have been or will be used,or , specified .to' ensure " circuit breaking" assembly.
'(_
1 1 1 t 1 05010 (01/14/87) l d___n____________.________.__..____..-..____..__
s 's-TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS -REPORT NUMBER: 23'.l(B) 5 SPECIAL PROGRAM- -j REVISION NUMBER: 1
.] -
PAGE 7 0F 8
.]
1 1 APPENDIX A
~
- 5. DOCUMENTS REVIEHED RELATED TO THE ELEMENT:
- a. SQN Master Bill of Materials, (no date)
- b. TVA drawing E45N842-1, R41," Conduit and Grounding," (04/30/86)
- c. 1984 National Electrical Code
- d. 1983 Crouse-Hinds Electricci Construction Materials Catalog. -!
4700 and 1984 Product Data Sheet , i
- e. 1980 Appleton Electric'Co. cat' log, a and 1984 Condensed Catalog-
- f. 1982 Crouse-Hinds Guide to Selection, Installation, Use and Maintenance of Plugs, Receptacles and Cord Connectors
- g. TVA Electrical Design' Standard DS-E12.5.2, " Cable, 480 V Power. Receptacles," R1 (11/23/82)
- h. TVA Office of Nuclear Power Employee Safety Handbook.
(-
- 6. WHAT REGULATIONS. LICENSING COMMITMENTS. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OR OTHER APPLY OR CONTROL IN THIS AREA?
None ,
)
- 7. LIST REOUESTS FOR INFORMATION. MEETINGS. TELEPHONE CALLS. AND OTHER DISCUSSIONS RELATED TO ELEMENT.
- a. Telecon from Wheeler, Bechtel, to Brickey, TVA, (04/29/86),
IOM # 066
- b. Telecon from Wheeler, Bechtel, to Ewing, Crouse-Hinds, (04/29/86), IOM # 068
- c. Telecon from Wheeler, Bechtel, to Kennedy, Appleton, (05/05/86), IOM # 079
- d. Telecon from Wheeler, Bechtel, to Walker, OSHA, (05/09/86), ;
IOM # 096
- e. Telecon from Wheeler, Bechtel, to Bradley, TENN-OSHA, (05/09/86), IOM # 095
- f. Field walkdown at Sequoyah site conducted by Jack Wheeler, Bechtel, and N. Black, TVA, (08/23/86), BLT-080 t
- g. Field walkdown at Sequoyah site conducted by Jack Wheeler, Bechtel, and G. Bill, TVA, (10/09/86) 05010 (01/14/87) '
'\. i
'# TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS.- REPORT NUMBER: 235.l(B)- SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUM8ER: 1-PAGE 8 0F 8 CATD LISI
'The following'CATD forms are included'as part of this report:
235.01(B).SQN 01 , 235.01(B) SQN 02-(Revised 02/19/87) l i L,
- 05010 (01/14/87)
4' ( , ( IG C.3
. I Attachment A Page 3 of 1 Revision 2 - A lf ECSP CORRECTIVE
( Aetten Tracting Document (CATO) INITIATION
- 1. Imediate Corrective Action Required: D fes R No
- 7. Stop Vort Recomended: 0 Yes W No
- 3. CATD No. 2 3C. 01 5 94 - O l 4 INITIATION DATE //a DEC 66
- 5. RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION: hM G. Sod
- 6. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: O QP W NQR BLGarR,ICAL. DELS KM K'farb h fLb M- E-\E. 8r . Z AND rM rn1MTf/2 R I LL of~- M ATT20f AL 6 bd Nt7T l SPEC s GY -r H E ne c G PTABLE m wrs M 4 PLthCS 70 64 <>66b W IT tt ~1'HG SPGt~lC)Eh A VD V P A f. A f 7 6 C L & S . l
~~T O AT*ACHMENTS
- 7. PREFARED BY: N A.M E J A tt 3 . Ua .4E E.c_E.da DM DATE : /G A %
- 8. %% M WhM
~
CONCURRENCE: CEG-H f DATE: L-24.1n
- 9. APPROVAL: ECTG PROGFJ5 MGd. ()W/rd w f 6 DATE: F-N-f')
ER E C7 I'.*E ACT ION
- 10. FF0FOCED CORFECTIVE ACTION PLA.N:
O AT7 ACHMENTS
- 11. PROPOSED BY: DI F.E C T OR/ MG R : DATE:
12 CONCURRENCE: CEG-H: DATE: SRP: .,,,, D A T E : ECTG PROGR.LM MGR: ,DATE: VERIFICATION A.ND CLOSEOlfT
- 13. Approved corrective actions have been verified as satisfactorily i m p l e rne r. t e d .
~
5:GNATURE TITLE DATE
c- .. ECTG C.3 i g Attachment A Page 1 of 1 Revision 2 - A ECSP CORRECTIVE'
, Action Tracting Document ICATD) l l
INITIATION . l l
- 1. Immediate Corrective Action Required: C Yes 5 No
- 2. Stop Wort Recorrenended: 0 Yes 5 No i
- 3. CATD No. 2 35'.08 ( B3 - 5 04 -0 7- a. INITIATION DATE - 02.f/9 $7 l S. RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION: DME GQd j
- 6. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: O QR E NQR TR E E E. is rue A ss oe n a c e. ]
'N AT '
Ctece r '6aE At.W6" iMuc, s Kwe B E E ^t l S P ECt F tEb O R. USED w i'M 'N E SPECi P L ED Ceouse - Li t o n s R EC EP TA C L E S ff4 A LL CASES. l _ O ATTACHMENTS
- 7. PREPARED BY: .NAME d AC k. B t>J o c ELE IE Xfro rkf)(M DATE : 02/19/8 7
- 8. CONCURRENCE: CEG-H b ww4 W,W' W, _
V DATE: '
- 2. i.4-?7
- 9. APPROVAL: ECTG PROGRAM MGRY fM8da+$4. % DATE: 7-/S-#9 ARECTIVE ACTION
- 10. PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN.
1 1 O ATTACHMENTS
- 11. PROPOSED BY: DIRECTOR /MGR: DATE:
- 12. CONCURRENCE
- CEG-H: DATE:
( SRP: DATE: ECTG PROGRM MGR: uaTE: VERIFICATION AND CLOSEOUT l
- 13. Approved corrective actions have been verified as satisfactorily
!. i rep l erne n t e d .
! \ SIGNATURE TITLE DAIE
l Bechtel Western Power Corporation l Enginee's - cons:rwetors Fitty Beate Sweet '. San Francisco. Oamo<nia l Ma# Accrees PC Boa 3955 San Erare,eco CA 94tte July 28, 1987 BLT-359 r! Mr. George R. McNutt Engineering CEG-H l, l Tennessee Valley Authority !! Knoxville,-Tennessee 37902 o
Subject:
Wat*s Bar Concerns va uation Program ,
. Te nessee Valley Authority p 5U Hi PLANT CotRECTIVE ACTION PLAN 235 01 SQ I
Dear Mr. McNutt:
responds to The subject CAP, as transmitted by TCAS-096 dated 06/25/87, Corrective Action Trac'<ing Document 235 01 SQN 01 and -02. C The implementation of the corrective action to the CAP indicated in the for CATD 235 01 sup memo,J.B.HosmertoR.C.Denny[B25870717009),S into the subcategory report. Very truly yours, t
., l) hv w' 4 G. L. Parkinson 1
)# Project Manager 1
g GLP/j / /32420 u l 1
~
t I IO:"I if '2iH.~23 CE:M ;$, {I Tf
, , ,. ?.iL wm
- m E '
r 'M' ?0 - m J. 1,wsame. % T 2 5. 8 7 0 8 O!4 -8G4- [ .T msin:nstms ciwi:ima:sr TENNESSEE VAliEY AUTHOT:ITY > J$ Ncm OTd M ditin
,70 : : 'H. LAbercrombie,' Site Director, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant.ONP ,
i W.IR3 Brown, cJr. , Program Manager, Employee. Concerns Task Group,
'FROM? :
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant ONP' b lDATE! :: AUG 0 4 MT L :
SUBJECT:
SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT:(SQN).- EMPLOYEE CONCERNS TASK L -
'ELEMENTcREPORTS - ENGINEERING CATEGORY - CONCURRENCE 0 . ACTION' PLAN (CAP).
ci The category evaluation' group leader,-Engineering, concurs with the CAPS for the.following.CATDs. . 23501-SQN-01 23501-SQN-02
.This concurrence is based upon the. CAP.and the supplemental' information'in the Hosmer to Denney memorandum (B25 870717 009.)
Please inform me when your corective action is complete and you are ' ready for:me to close out the CATDs. NW. R. Brown, Jr. GRM:GB. Attachments cc (Attachments): RIMS, KR 4N 72A-C l R. C. Denney, DSC-P, Sequoyah L ' Jack Howard, ECTG Blds, ONP, Watts Bar Guy Huff, ECTG Bldg. ONP, Watts Bar J. - L. McAnally, ONP, Watts Bar G. R. McNutt. ECTG Bldg. ONP, Watts Bar i
. 6118T f* -
,;ggi - - - _ _ - - _ -
- j. . ...
UNrtED STATts 00VIRNMENT TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY McmOrandum QA Record B25 '870717 009 e C.o : R. C. Denney, Employeo Concerns Special Project Manager, DSC-P, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant L l PROM i J. B. Hosmer, Project Engineer, Sequoyah Engineering Project, DSC-E, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant .
' JUL 1719BT .
su m ecT: SEQUDYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SON) - EMPLOYEE CONCERN TASK GROUP (ECTG) ELEMENT l REPORT NO. 235.01 SQN R1 - REVIEW AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP) - SUPPLEMENTAL. REVIEW l l
Reference:
Hy memorandum dated June 12,1987 (B25 870612 010) This is in supplement to the re'sponse provided in the referenced memo-randum for the-subject ECTG clement e' valuation report. Further review of Sequoyah Nucicar Plant electrical bill of material indicated mark number "SRT" as a mating plug for use with 480-V plug receptacle with mark numbers 'SRA' and " SRB". However, the words "or caual" have been inadvertently omitted for mark number "SRT" which will allow the project to procure equivalent plugs for use with the 480-V ' plug receptacles. We have revised the master bill of material for mark number "SRT" to include the equivalent materir.l. Considering the above, no further corrective' action is required on this ECGT element. j t*
' ' J. B. Hosmer j
~
CW:A3:BE - (8 Attachment \ RcVg cc (Attachment): RIMS, SL 26 C-K
\
H. L. Abercrombie, OLPS-4 sSequoyah G. P. Cooper,' 5-215 SB-K G. T. Hall DSC-P, Sequoyah \ 3 T. C. Price, S-233 SB-K % - R. D. Rudder, DSC-E, Sequoyah P. c. Willi p . gg, $9qq9yg l
- n. xa]u'l IISI, , equoyah
. , . . . ~ . . . . - . . ..: .,..-a
. AND' RECIFTACLE HOUSINCS-CDIERAL */ sr '.(sbocitf (Electrical Material Group) (Kay Letters)
. ' *', - . . ;~. _;sc, .as
'~ .....-
HASTER BILL OP HATERIAL POR ELEU'TRICAL EQUIPMENT
......._._.v
.. w.
Knoxville, Tennessee - - k . Division of Design DESCRIPTION MFR. -- CAT. No. - g
~ PLUC RECEPTACLE HOUSDiG, 250V DC, 200 amp, 2 W. C-H . AR 2021 srm
- 2P, style 1, with cap-CONDULET 2", for use with dark. arm C-H AJ 68 srn PLUC RECEPTACLE ASSEMBLY, consisting of one C-H AAP9548 sro 30-amp,120V, 2W. 3P male receptacle, one 60-amp, 480V, 3W 4P female receptacle, .
complete with undrilled weather-resistant - enclosure for flush mounting in top of - concrete deck , srp PLUG,100 sep, 600V AC, 3W, AP, with cable grip and neoprene bushing org PLUG, 3O amp, 600V AC, 3W, 4P, style 2, with C-H APJ 3483 cechanical grip and rubber bushing arq-1 Same as org, except f eraloy unterial C-H APJ 34857-WOD , PLUG RECEPTACLE, 2W, 2P, 250V DC, 60 amp, C-H AEQU1627 C crr complete with plate and cap, less box srs PLUG 2W, P for 0.5" dia cable, for use C-H APJ 6273 with mark ser srt PLUG, 3W, 4?, for use with marks cra and erb . C-H : APJ .6485, or e' qual cru PLUG, 2W, 3P, 600V,100 a=p, with mechanical C-R APJ 10367-grip and neoprene bushing _ srv TLUG, 3V, grounding, 15 amp, 125V AC, cap, Rubball 5280, armored, with anchor lock or equal i -
-{ erv t
srv-1 TLUG HOLD, with 12 prewired outlets spaced on Wiremold 201B606 l inch centers,1-9/32." wide, 6' long. 3W 1-ekt Co. arrangement, with insulated, isolated ground, No.12 conductors,120V AC,15 amp, series 200001C srw-2 . PLUG HOLD, with 3 prewired outlets spaced on Wiremold 201C606
'g
- 6" centers, 1-9/32" wide, seccini order: 18" co.
.k inne, Su, 1.ekt... u a3.,,..ou, 16n lu.uteovo, isolated ground No.12 conductors,120V AC, h
15 amp, series 20001G a.
**' "T. # S"8"E " s . .JNMs N b kl M.*14 *** ' i 't,' .I? lM * ' ' ' ~~~ ~~"'~~
D' *5M M ' ' Y*'* ** " '" "
.m---_ _ s s .;T . .
^
.'T 4 1 S.700 i4r b a 1 .
..M- -
rva s4 ;os.wss to,....e TENNESSEE VALLEY- AliTHORITY~ ,j g tsrt D :TATES GOVERNMENT - 76m07gytdum. t
+
" :. W. R.: Brown. 'Jr.. Program Manager. Employee Concerns _ Ta
.TO' Watts Bar Nuclear Plant ONP
.:' James.L. McAnally, Corrective Action. Program Manager', Hatt
=
- FROM Nuclear Plant,0NP
- DATEl : i b.gt4 gg
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR (CATD). PLANT (WBN) - TRANSMI ACTION TRACKING _ DOCUMENT (S):
~
ECSP' Fact Sheet Number:- :~ A=Me t - So r&Di . v1
'ECSP CATDCs)-Numbers
.__ ,' &W mc r?
The above listed,~ completed CATD(s) are being returned a . your instructions. o [Q - pmes L. McAnally
+ .
JLMc:NLC RECE!VED Attachments . .
- (Attachments):
RIMS, MR 42 72A-C , ;i ;;. ),7 / ', l n.w::= u..=.s a C .tx WPJ -
$?./l! *.i--1 *.* I %,s: f I* ;
. . x; . o_li.it._ _ *;
~
f_ '- 1 WBEP-2286d 2/6/87 m
?
f%' , _ .. _4
, t
~-
^Y'*"*~k l MST j- -
-[b b-~~.'.., -
L5;u, s ; i l' j Mt v 4 ; ; I *U i j g a? t .?: " ) c t g, p. nn . _ . . _ . .. i OI$,,d i L _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _
=t 194 u .on. u> . - S03 870617 851 I 4
, ggg3 Ep STATCS GOVERNMENT Memorandum TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY l T9 :
J. L. McAnally, Corrective Action Program Manager, A108108, ONP, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant FROM- : 'H. L.' Abercrombie, Site . Director, OLPS-4 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant-
.DATE : June 20, 1987-
SUBJECT:
SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SON) - EMPLOYEE CONCERNS TASK GROUP (ECTG) ELEMENT REPORT 235.01 SON - ENGINEERING CATEGORY - CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP)
Reference:
' Your memorandun4 to R. C. Denney dated May 19,1987, " Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) - Transmittal of Employee Concerns Special Program (ECSP) Fact Sheets and Corrective Action Tracking i
Documents (CATDs) - WBN" , ,
- 1 I acknowledge Mceipt of your ' element report and in accordance with your !
request (see reference) Element Report 235.01 SQN has been reviewed for 1 applicable corrective action. i By way of this memorandum, I am endorsing the site-line organization CAP, returning your CATD Nos. 235.01-SON-01 and 235.01(B)-SQN-02, and attaching the i CAP for your review / concurrence. This CAP i's not a restart requirement. h~ If ECTG. agrees with the proposed CAP, please have them sign the ECTG concurrence space below item 9 on the CAP checklist and return the CAP i tracking checklist. ; Y$k : ' g H. L. Abercrombie RCH: RCD:JB:CNA : Attachments i cc (Attachments): RIMS, MR 4N 72A-C (B25 870612 010) (w/ reference) T. C. Price, 5-212 SB-K (w/ reference) 03600 8 yes' l k Y
- P,w I
- C Ce. :.. n e % ., ele D , , % !. . a. .. o I, a D...e!IC-..~-*D'=-
C '. s
~
s , q
'; ..,ffel . . 2 4,. ~( IG C.3 j Attachment A- l ; 4
[' ; H ,.~ ' , ' Pag'e 1 of-1 !
' Revision 2---A~ . ECSP CORRECTIVE-Action Tractint Document I ICATD) g<-
f. WJ< INITIATION-w q
- 1. 'Inroedi ate Correit t'i ve JActi on Required: - C3 , Ye s .E ' No -
- 7. -Stop' Wort Reconnended: O.Yes a .No'
- 3. CATD No. 2 E D3*5 N ~ Ol 4 INITIATION DATE //c DSC.dI,
- 5. ~ RESPONSIBLE ORGAN]IATION: hN E.- Sod
- 6. ' PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:.O QR 5 NQR ELErs/ElCA L bE s t4N 1-r'4ufst-iLb '
M- EE-tr . sr,2. ANb' M rmkvC? R I LL MF fr) Amor AL 4 he wcri specrGY -r H E ~DecGPYABLE m wr s rJ 4'. ' P L th4 5 70 64 t)?4b w IT v+ *1~n C S M r t C'11Eh- 9 P D V etcs t 1Rctas . 1 O AT ACMF.ENTS
- 7. PREPARED BY: N A.",E J A C.t 3 . W .ac.E.c s M , W&f D AT E : - n, O.s.e., g.,
'E. CONCURRENCE: CEG-H h p W % M-- ~ _ " DATE : 4-24A 7 9 '. ' APPROVAL: ECIG FROGF.Mi.MGd. l')wIntaaf 30,- DATE: 7-ic -f")
. ERECII'lE ACTION , '
- 10. -FEDFO:!D COF.EECT:VE. ACTION PU.N: _ Tc2:' $WE' Af If4Akhf//f76D s B Y AftsbEwvDUM E *? T - 8'~7 0 &,1 3 o l o -
i. r 1 ,
. l 4 ist .5ver3*% Mdk A be in men e
;' C A*' TACH *.ENTS
- 21. 77t0P05ED BY: DIRECTOR /?g'R: //L( A 2 *
/4 DATE: t . /J ,m I
- 12. MDHCURRENCE: CEG-H: Dh 4/// cM DATE- 7 W iP-7 SRP: Af /# _
DATE: ECTG PRDGFJM MGR: ##li(X 4 DATE: eg)We r f1 VERIFICATION A.ND CLOS!OUT _ _ _ , _ _ _ . ._.___ ..-.. --- - - -
- 23. Approvec corrective actices have been verified as satisfactorily
. implemented.
>: ) SIGNATURE IIT L.E DATE 1 _z _ _ _ _- _ _ _ - _ J
9
.f
~
l
.,.a E07G C.3-Attachment-A j Pate'I of 1 Revision 2 - A i'
ECSP COERECTIVE-Action Tractint Document j (CATD) i
.1NITIATION , , , ,
- 1. Irumediate Corrective Action Required: ' O Yes 5 No:
- 2. Stop Wort Recommended: 0 Yes a No
~
- 3. CATD No. 2 S E OI ( O - 5 0*J -0 7 4.- INITIATION DATE - O? !/3.h 7
- 5. RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION: DNE 6CAI '
- 6. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: O QR S NQR T u E e. E. is No A Es OR 4 a c e.
*h-l Af - CiEC M ~6CE Abedt," 'P L.A (,, 5 ' y AV6 B E 6 Al f _.
S FEci p tEb o tt. 05Et win w)4 speciFtEd Ceou ss -
- tito a s _'RE.cEornc a s f4 A LL C ace S. [
. O ATTACH".ENTS . .
- 7. PREPARED..EY: NAME d Acx 'E w w eet.a rt. & rk'XtA DATE: _ 02 /14 I B T . I
- 3. CONCURRENCE: CEG-H W T?.,M W, ?-DATE:~_t i4-FI
- 9. APPROVAL: ECTG PROGRAM MGR! IRMDund. -4 DATE: 7-/f -F ')
.p.RECTIVE ACTION
-j
- 20. PROPOSED CORRECiIVE ACTION PLAN: 665~ '7M' f 8 '7,'E / M 4 / 6 E D RV Mf./A>24vbt)M B M" 1!r~7 0 4 /2 of O l
4l .$te Suss4mra/J /A b Nr /NAs O A*~ACHMENTS q
- 11. PROPOSED BY: DIRECIDR/MG3: # # ATM /4. DATE: /- / 9- M l
- 12. # CONCURRENCE: CEG-H: bW /2/A'# DATE: 7' J8 4 7 l SRP: ///APL
~
DATE: l ECTG PROGR.LM MGR: ###M. 4,DATE: f7WB 7 p 77.- v t r J P TTATION AND' dLOS EOtT*
- 13. Approvec corrective actions have bee:2 verified as satisfactory 3y
.) implemented.
1 A SIGNATURE TIT LE DA!E _____.____-._m._____m_ _ - . _ . - - - _ - - - _ - - - _ - - -
.I , ,
- Standard Practice Page 8
' SQA166 '
Revision 9 :
, ~
Attachment A Page 1 of 2 ,.,, Corrective Action Plan of Employee Concern Investigation f Tracking Checklist 2 M.ol- M N~#I $ 4 CP 'd' " O 2 - l l ECTG Report /CATD Number '2 3!~ o/ #Q n/ 8 / /2.3 5- o / (B) D /V6 - Lead Organization Responsible for Corrective ' Action Plan Initiation Date d - / /- 8 7 [ CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP)
*r-G .1. Does this report require corrective action?
(If yes, describe corrective action to be taken, if no,Mprovide Yes No / r4 Y; w t;,justification) PL.005 [_
- 1. -9 8 o V P O WEtt. K CC E/TA C L R*,C Arvh
-s' f'N *-% '~ A SE~ M A rv o f A B T ilte e 2> /tv t'\ te o R M tv't E ' Ws+H '7* M r-A10 IV A *T t o N A L.
R oP Ut. ~ 4-9 W,.514 K B*O U l RG m E evia PLELYRICAL C es h f.
,, u .
- 2. - 2 Ec El' T A C L E E H A vr F U_L L >C t97 t tV G, C1a cutt f '
J3 R.E A k I rv G, C A P A _X I t 1 'r- V A w_h WITH A WikL ev v'7-blSPEnt e ?~
/c)C n C P 7 ' M hTI H % P L U KJ '
. .v[,T2. Identify any sip.ilar item / instances an'd corrective action taken{C.ory'"I' A o IV di
[. -' ///A
- 1. .'.; . f- .,
f .s-.o,,
- 3. Will corrective action preclude recurrence of findWs? .Yes N//9 '. No N//Y' (CAQ);
q
, .. .;, ,. 4. Does this report contain findings that are conditions adverse YES to cuality No 7
. #. . E as defined by AI-12 or NEP 9.17 ..
- 5. IF a CAQ condition exists,.what CAQ document was initiated?
u N//9 [ ". _..:5 6. Which site section/ organization is / responsible for corrective action? l., #d A /v//i a ~ .,e
- 7. Is corrective action required for ' restart? Yes Vh9 No g
(This determination is to be made using Attachment C of SQA166 7MM9
- 8. P2 cone number for restart corrective action? Zone /v/ /9 4
{ 9. Estimate co=pletion date for correction action. .
' Date 6 8 Co=pleted By Approved By/6 6%./C Date (, - /2 - # 7 ECTG Concurrence Date l
l l
)
~
0206S/m1t lus.
't . s x
~-
'.,I,;._ .
,*( ..' e;'0<5;s * .
* ;, ? , ,
1_ *: .
. ,.*=
Standard Practice Page.9 4 W- * ' SQA166
' Revision.9
.,,s ,
n -
' ' ATTAC10ENT A
(:.l Page 2'of 2 1 [ .;
- g. . , . ,
;( g -
'10. Was your corrective action' initiated and completed in'accordance with' step 17
'Ev . Yes N')O No .
~ f-111. If step 10;is no,-describe'the corrective action taken. -
/v",//9 ij. .
'2 '12. Is the corrective. action implementation complete?- Yes ,,wjg No j ,,,,,
- 13. Is the corrective ~ action. documentation closed? -Yes g/ r No //9 .
- 14. What. documents were used to implement the corrective actioni -'
f- ' Date [L ' l Completed By: 9 --
' Verified By: i.
' -- Date -
-'- ECTG Closure: , Date - .
. . .- - -- e . .. : ,,, .s , ,
'"(Step No.). ,
i . .'.. ;*
.Descripti9a .
-m . .
y, : ~ g- ."
- c ..
. [" ' k C o u Tf. .,b , Fit.o rn jjI, lf VbL y A C, E' o'R C,U A R E N T R.A TitVfs,.
DY - P L* L,. L t r.r G . T"/Y C A L Co TRE A&c - ); o k tn s h CNU#FC) ' I V YM f .h 2C P , P 1 U C 3 /WJ T A to 7t :'Y k' c e w't=lri p h JW 111 i A TF) #9 L ' C. I N & O H A m ):E/R.
- H/ nt L E THE P t 'u C, . Ct o wTA e. T ' 11' & nb u A-C o rv a s .h G eL e .R t 2
- b/ZTAWe e JtfJt) A
. TN6'#9eC
' ~ L, ;
'.il ,
; C A re woT' Tk.,AV'Cl Tb TNG -o YM rA. dix -o P THE*
,; Ro uJrw R, -
C 1 & tt u t T
- O r- - Tn M 2 PC WE/2. /tv/*u V Col J) Awh 3.- R E O f>1 2 1: M &~rv T.? no f: -
ARC' tv3C M At=IM C AC.L.E ) Pt U C. M= A , , A t a me n T' V 7/L't& A Y/ 0 W SCD U/P tv Wrv ';"~ Atoroprtnck 6 tt 7
.Sprcrptn.--A~rIn.N.
/W TR E ic r.~.b 1
fe - s. Pe a CS N J7 A w.b AD he n c T! C2 M SGA-/k+
/ WJ';~A U c.T t cr . v' '7' =~ /4- * / . ALL M A trr T E tt/t9 H l' i'~
~
W E 1 , h I r** A tv A O M IN F.J / P 0 u !=-/L T ODGol f* & (E
.b .
AEq v/ K6' b 'I6 3 G" Yln fTE b A o' N C/ A ( t Ad
'l 7 A K CtV To AEPnle/wfG ncs y..Defec n N eevnenm on cu v.n~ s ca.u g swn) _>
L 19 C 1"lo rv THE Q.BoVC Np Co
. - A c- na dJ ebER-lw .u & ne Quine.b k raunAcc7)yE" ec74 \
R GPop r. N L .ef e m a w 7
.) m-1, ,, ) 0206S/mit l
i _______________J}}