ML20235E005

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Evaluation Re Proposed Use of Reflood 04 Computer Program to Correct Errors in GE LOCA ECCS Evaluation Model,Per Aj Levine 770120 Notification of Error in Reflood 3 Program.Use Acceptable
ML20235E005
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/28/1977
From: Parr O
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Sherwood G
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML20234E460 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-40 NUDOCS 8707100381
Download: ML20235E005 (2)


Text

- - - - - -

6/14 l

/

UNITED STATES g.y %fg y

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

.<:g meu sum

'%/

  • o JUN 2 81977

'JUL 011977

{

eu

a,-

7 8,910111&l 2;3,1.-

Central Files - Topical Reports 1

1 3

General Electric Company c

f C_

ATTN: Dr. G. G. Sherwood, Manager

/ ; #j ?

e Safety and Licensing

../'

175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, Califronia 95114 plSTRfM1TB TO ACRS MEMBERS q

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

CORRECTIONS TO THE GENERAL ELECTRIC LOCA ECCS EVALUATION MODEL.

On December 15, 1976, we were informed by General Electric of several errors in the plant calculations performed in accordance with the approved GE LOCA ECCS Evaluation Model. Additional information pertaining to the effect of each of these errors on typical plant applications was provided in a meeting on January 12, 1977. At these meetings GE claimed that the errors were only errors in code input and did not constitute model changes to the approved evaluation mode. The net effect of implementing these corrections would be a small reduction in the MAPLHGRs for some operating BWRs.

1 Subsequent to the above discussions, we were infonned by letter from A. J.

Levine to D. F. Ross on January 20, 1977, that a logic error existed in the REFLOOD 03 computer program under certain conditions. This letter requested that we approve use of the REFLOOD 04 computer program which corrected the logic error.

The four errors discussed at the referenced meetings and the proposed use of REFLOOD 04 have been reviewed. We have concluded that the corrections to the GE Evaluation Model are acceptable as discussed in the attached safety evaluation.

Sincerely,

\\

W b.t Olan D. Parr, Ilef i

l Light Water Reactors Branch No. 3 Division of Project Management j

Enclosure:

l as stated

==dCRSOFFICECDPY @4 aH Jo Nontemove rom ACRSTice l

8707100381 870623 PDR FOIA l

THOMAS 87-40 PDR

.__ ___ __ - ___ _ L

4'.

General Electric Company,

cc w/ enclosure:

'- 'Mr. L. Gifford General Electric Company 4720 Montgomery Lane Bethesda, Maryland 20014 1

\\

O 9

o i

i I

__J