ML20235C941

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 750626 Meeting W/Ge & Southwest Research Inst (SRI) in San Antonio,Tx Re Seismic Slosh Test Program Being Conducted by SRI Under Contract to Ge.Meeting Agenda & Attendance List Encl
ML20235C941
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/09/1975
From: Cudlin R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Lainas G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20234E460 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-87-40 NUDOCS 8707090591
Download: ML20235C941 (3)


Text

- _ _ - _ - . _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - -

,f C L t. A V 6. i,

% UNITED STATES

  • NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO AMI ION '

,rg WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 ,

M 8 WC31Ij2Ig2h~ .

Gus C. Lainas, Chief Containment Systems Branch, TR i THRU: J. Kudrick, Section A Leader, Containment Systems Branch, T MEETING - SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE - JUNE 26, 1975 On June 26, 1975, a meeting was held with members of the NRC staff, the General Electric Company (GE) and the Southwest Research Institute (SRI) in San Antonio, Texas. A meeting agenda and attendance list are enclosed.

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the seismic slosh test program being conducted by SRI under contract to GE. The objectives of the program are to determine suppression pool response a.nd containment wall pressures for a Mark III containment during an earthquake. The tests utilize a 1/30th scale model of the Mark III containment and pool and the SRI shaker table to simulate the seismic response spectra. Brief highlights of the meeting were as follows:

1. The test model simulates the 238 standard plant containment. GE stated that the final report on seismic slosh will include a dis- '

cussion of the applicability of the results to other Mark III designs which might have different containment or suppression pool dimensions.

2. SRI indicated that early test results showed that pool velocities in the vertical direction due to seismic excitation were significantly less than those due to pool swell.
3. SRI stated that in the 104 frequency range of earthquake spectra containment wall pressures are dominated by suppression pool water slosh whereas in the high frequency range wall pressures are due to pool water inertia effects.
4. Testing should be comp 16te in two to four weeks with a final report to be submitted in November or December 1975, hb-<<W.j0AdA Robert L. Cudlin

.. Containment Systems Branch j stated Division of Technical Review i

cc: S. Hanauer 'E. Jacobs F. Schroeder RC .PDR , ,- . :.v.:n R. Tedesco n r /~ M (

a:

's -': .jf c . i: j.- Q J. Glynn R. Fraley, ACRS (3) p' M' " " ' ' .

"i -

.U - - *"

g d5T,,

_. - Jo Not Remove from ACRS 0f' ice 1 870623 l '/

'/ /s.o16 h70 THOMASO7-40 PDR e

g

N.

~= .

A Seismic Slosh GE/SWRI/NRC *

. s

TIME:

9:00 a. m. , June 26,' 1975 (Thursday)

PLACE: SwRI, San Antonio, Texas

' AGENDA: -

1. 0 - Introduction . Fred Reuter, GE Bob McCaffery, SwRI l 1.1 Objectives, Test Plan Fred Reuter, GE
1. 2 Mark III Configuration Fred Reuter, GE
1. 3 Scaled Test Model Bob McCaffery, SwRI
2. O Scaling Laws 3

-. Dan Kana, SwRI

3. 0 - Ea rthquake Input Bob McCaffery', SwRI

~

General description of how test '

spectra are derived from GE specified spectra - ,

4. 0 . Analytical Correlation ,

Frank Dodge, SwRI 4.1 Linear Analysis

, General discussion of how  ;

4.2 Wave Amplitudes test and linear analyses will be correlated 43 Dynamic Pressures 'i

5. 0 Scaled Model Test 5.1 Procedures Bob McCaffery, SwRI I i
5. 2 Instrumentation .

Lester Yeakley, SwRI

5. 3 Test Demonstration Dennis Scheidt i
6. O Summary Discussions ,

- - . - - - ~ . . . . - - - . . . - ~ . - - . - - - , - - + . - - - -

\

'l

.. )

u -

' t

ATTENDANCE j

- SWRI - 6/26/75 i

6 R. L. Cudlin NRC

.R. Stuart NRC S. Hou NRC Fred Reuter G.E.-

Bob McCaffery . SWRI' Dan Kana- -

'SWRI Frank Dodge SWRI Dennis Scheidt . SWRI H. N. Abramson -

SWRI 9

9 1

I O

O O

i l

-....._.l

_