ML20217C459

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Specs Re Containment Purge & Vent
ML20217C459
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 03/20/1998
From:
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20217C455 List:
References
NUDOCS 9803270031
Download: ML20217C459 (2)


Text

'

  • p y y.yz / srwn rs/he L

,[

vmps A&EEE: 3.7 (Cont'd)

The vacuum relief system from the pressure suppression chamber to Reactor Building consists of two 100% vacuum relief breakers (2 parallel sets of 2 valves in series). Operation of either system will maintain the pressure differential less than 2 psig; the external design pressure is 2 psig.

service there is no immediate threat With one vacuum to accident breakerorout of mitigation primary containment and, therefore, reactor operation can be continued for 7 days wh41e repairs are being made.

,The capacity of the. ten (10) drywell vacuum relief valves is sized to limit the pressure differential between the suppression chamber and drywell during post-accident drywell cooling operations to the design limit of 2 psig. They are sized on the basis of the Bodega Bay pressure suppression tests.

Code, The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Section (8) operable III, subsection B,'for this vessel allows eight valves, therefore, with two (2) valves secured, containment integrity is not impaired.

Each drywell-suppression chamber vacuum breaker is fitted with a redundant pair of limit switches to provide fail-safe signals to panel mounted indicators in the Reactor Building and alarnw in the

. control along the Room sealwhensurfacethe disks of theare open more than 0.050*'at all points disk. These switches are capable of transmitting the disk closed to open signal the switch plunger. ' Continued reactor operation with 0.01* movement of with failed components is justified because of the redundance of components and circuits and, most importantly, the accessibility of the valve lever arm and position reference external to the valve. The fail safe feature of the alarm circuits assures operator attention if a line fault occurs.

The requirement to inert the containment is based on the recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. This recommendation, in turn, is based on the assumption that several percent of the zirconium in the core will undergo a reaction with steam during the loss-of-coolant accident. This reaction would release sufficient hydrogen to result in a flammable concentration in the primary containment building. The oxygen concentration is therefore combustion.

kept below 4% to minimize the possibility of hydrogen gners -

General Electric has estimated that less than 0.1% of the zirconium would react with steam following a loss-of-coolant due to operation of emergency core cooling equipment. This quantity of zirconium would not liberate enough hydrogen to form a combustible mixture.

B. and C. Standbv Gas Treatment System and Secondary Containment System The secondary containment is designed to minimize any ground level release of radioactive materials which might result from a serious accident. The Reactor Building provides secondary containment during reactor operation, when the drywell is sealed and in service; the Reactor Building provides primary containment when the reactor is shutdown and the drywell is open, as during refueling. Because the secondary containment is an integral part of the complete containment system, secondary containment is required at all times that primary containment is required except, however, for initial fuel loading and low power physics testing.

In the Cold Shutdown condition or the Refuel Mode,the probability and consequences of the LOCA are reduced due to the pressure and temperature limitations in these conditions. Therefore, maintaining Secondary Containment Integrity is not required in the Cold Shutdown condition or the Refuel Mode, except for other situations for which

. Amendment No. 49, 0;;;; Og;..g;, 110, 147 165 9803270031 990320 POR. ADOCK 05000271

.p PDR t

$ W 9 S~ Y3 l Ar779eWW ~3ll4V 3 VYNPS BASES: , 3. 8 (Cont'd)

I. Ventilation Exhaust Treatment The requirement that the AOG Building and Radwaste Building HEPA filters be used when specified provides reasonable assurance that the release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be' kept

'as low as is reasonably achievable". This specification implements the requirements of 10CFR Part 50.36a and the design objective of Appendix I to 10CFR Part 50. The requirements governing the use of the appropriate portions of the gaseous radwaste filter systems were specified by the NRC in NUREG-0473, Revision 2 (July 1979) as a suitable fraction of the guide set forth in Sections II.B and II.C of Appendix I, 10CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents.

J. Erolosive Gas Mixture The hydrogen monitors are used to detect possible hydrogen buildups which could result in a possible hydrogen explosion. Automatic isolation of the off-gas flow would prevent the hydrogen explosion and possible damage to the augmented off-gas system. Maintaining the concentration of hydrogen below its flammability limit provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials will be controlled.

K. Steam Jet Air Eieetor (SJAE)

Restricting the gross radioactivity release rate of gases from the main condenser SJAE provides reasonable assurance that the total body exposure to an individual at the exclusion area boundary will not exceed a small fraction of the limits of 10CFR Part 100 in the event this effluent is inadvertently discharged directly to the environment without treatment. This specification implements the requirements of

L. Primary Containment (MARK I)

This specification provides reasonable assurance that releases from containment purging / venting operations will be filtered through the Standby Gas Treatment System (SBGT) so that the annual dose limits of 10CFR Part 20 for Members of the Public in areas at and beyond the Site Boundary will not be exceeded. The dose objectives of Specification 3.8.G restrict purge / venting operations when the Standby Gas Treatment System is not in use and gives reasonable assurance that all releases from the plant will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". The specification requires the use of SBGT only when Iodine-131, Iodine-133 or radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in containment exceeds the levels in Table 1, Column 3, to Appendix B of 10CFR 20.1001-20.2401 since the filter system is not considered effective in reducing noble gas radioactivity from gas streans. -

4 , & S&t 7" l M. Total Dose (40CFR190)

This specification is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40CFR Part 190 to Members of the Public in areas at and beyond the Site Boundary. The specification requires the preparation and submittal of a Specific Report whenever the calculated doses from plant radioactive effluents exceed twice the design objective doses of Appendix I. For sites containing up to 4 reactors, it is h'.ghly l unlikely that the resultant dose to a Member of the Public will exceed the dose , limits of 40CFR Part 190 if the individual reactors remain within the reporting requirement level. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation Amendment No. 64, 151 les