|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217N3001999-10-21021 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Two Textual Errors & Changing Designation of Referenced Figure ML20217K8731999-10-18018 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Activated Charcoal Testing Methodology IAW Guidance Provided in GL 99-02 ML20212F6941999-09-21021 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Required Vol of Stored Fuel in Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tank ML20211J0211999-08-31031 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page 91,allowing Reactivity Anomaly BOC Steady State Core Reactivity to Be Normalized Between off-line (Predicted) Uncorrected Solution & on-line (Measured) 3D-Monicore Exposure Corrected Solution ML20211B7051999-08-18018 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Reactor Core Spiral Reloading Pattern to Begin Around SRM ML20211B6781999-08-18018 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definition of Surveillance Frequency to Incorporate Provisions That Apply Upon Discovery of Missed TS Surveillance ML20210D2481999-07-20020 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising & Clarifying Operability & SRs of High Pressure Core Cooling Systems ML20210D3371999-07-20020 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Enhancements to Support Implementation of Increased Core Flow ML20209G1671999-07-12012 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Value for SLMCPR & Deleting Wording Which Specifies These as Cycle 20 Values ML20196K2951999-06-29029 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Proposed Change 220,revising Leak Rate Requirements of TS 3.7.A.4 & 4.7.A.4 for Main Steam Line Isolation Valves ML20196H2881999-06-24024 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising & Clarifying Terminology Re Certain RPS Scram Bypass Permissives ML20195J8691999-06-15015 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Stis,Adding Allowable OOS Times,Replacing Generic ECCS Actions for Inoperable Instrument Channels with function-specific Actions & Relocating Selected Trip Functions from TS ML20195F9531999-06-0909 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Supplementing Proposed Change 213, Allowing Use of ASME Code Case N-560,per GL 88-01 ML20195C8841999-05-26026 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Clarifying Suppression Chamber Water Temp SR 4.7.A, Primary Containment & Modifying Associated TS Bases ML20206H3771999-05-0606 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages ,Eleting Specific Leak Rate Requirements of TS 3.7.A.4 & 4.7.A.4 ML20206J7231999-05-0505 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Proposed Change 212,modifying TS to Enhance Limiting Conditions for Operation & Surveillance Requirements Relating to SLC Sys ML20205S9431999-04-20020 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Reactor Core Spiral Reloading Pattern Such That It Begins Around Source Range Monitor ML20205T4721999-04-19019 April 1999 Marked-up Tech Specs Pages Re Suppl to 990201 Request for Amend to License DPR-28,revising Portions of Proposed Change 208 ML20205S4081999-04-16016 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Inservice Insp Requirements of Section 4.6.E to Allow NRC-approved Alternatives to GL 88-01 ML20205S3121999-04-15015 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revised Bases Pages 90,227,164 & 221a, Accounting for Change in Reload Analysis,Reflecting Change in Condensation Stability Design Criteria & Accounting for More Conservative Calculation ML20202E5451999-01-25025 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Technical Requirements Manual Content ML20206S0661999-01-22022 January 1999 Proposed TS to Change Number 189,proposing Relocation of Fire Protection Requirements from TSs to TRM ML20198D5381998-12-15015 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page 142,correcting Wording to Reflect Previously Approved Wording,Last Revised in Amend 160 ML20198B7421998-12-11011 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Wording of Primary Containment Integrity Definition to State That Manual PCIVs Which Are Required to Be Closed During Accident Conditions May Be Opened Intermittently Under ACs ML20197J4631998-12-10010 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.9.2,revising Info Re Calibr of Augmented Offgas Sys Hydrogen Monitors ML20197H0031998-12-0707 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Change 209,resolving Emergency Concern Re Potential Operation Outside of LCO Contained in Current TS & Potential USQ with Respect to Opening of Manual PCIVs During Plant Operation ML20155F7421998-11-0303 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Minor Corrections or Clarifications Which Enhance Clarity of TSs Without Materially Changing Meaning or Application ML20155G5061998-11-0202 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re ECCS Actuation Instrumentation - LPCI A/B RHR Pump Start Time Delay Requirements & CS Sys A/B Pump Start Delay Requirements ML20151U0131998-09-0404 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Spent Fuel Storage Capacity of Util Spent Fuel Pool from 2,870 to 3,355 Fuel Assemblies ML20236H4551998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Table 4.2.1 to Delete ECC Actuation Instrumentation Re Core Spray Sys & LPCI Sys Auxiliary Power Monitor Calibr Requirement ML20247E5671998-05-0808 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page 270,containing Wording Inadvertently Deleted from TS Proposed Change 202 ML20247J8121998-05-0808 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Normal Operating Suppression Pool Water Temp Limit & Adding Time Restriction for Higher Temp Allowed During Surveillances That Add Heat to Suppression Pool ML20217P4171998-05-0101 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Controls Section ML20217G7131998-04-23023 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Change 200 Revising Station SW & Alternate Cooling Sys Requirements ML20217C4591998-03-20020 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Containment Purge & Vent ML20217A1271998-03-13013 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section 3.10.B,updated to Require That Station Battery,Eccs Instrumentation Battery,Or Uninterruptable Power Sys Battery Be Considered Inoperable If Any One Cell Is Below Specification Cell Voltage ML20202H2611998-02-0606 February 1998 Revised TS Pages Re Change 190,w/typos Corrected ML20197E8481997-12-22022 December 1997 Replacement Pages 160 & 279 & mark-up Pages to Proposed TS Change 190 Containing Editorial Changes ML20203F0131997-12-11011 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Current Value for SLMCPR for Cycle 20,next Operating Cycle ML20199K8501997-11-21021 November 1997 Replacement Pages 147,156,157 & mark-up Pages to Proposed TS Change 190,removing Ref to Documents Outside of TS That Define Components to Which Program Applies ML20199J7661997-11-20020 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Requirements for Main Station Batteries ML20217H6931997-10-10010 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising & Clarifying Requirements for Offsite Power Sources ML20211A6461997-09-18018 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing marked-up Pages for Proposed Changes 192 & 193 ML20217Q3311997-08-22022 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 245 & 252,amending App a to Modify TS to More Clearly Describe Separation of Switchgear Room Into Two Fire Areas & Incorporate Specifications for New Low Pressure CO2 Suppression Sys ML20217N4111997-08-20020 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 270 & 270a,updating Section 6 in Order to Add & Revise Ref to NRC Approved Methodologies Which Will Be Used to Generate cycle-specific Thermal Operating Limits to COLR ML20141H1171997-07-11011 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Replacing Pages 147,156 Through 161,168 & 279 of Util TS W/Corrected Pages ML20148J1861997-06-0909 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Change 191,updating Section 6.0 Administrative Controls ML20132B5771996-12-10010 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.13 Re Fire Protection Sys ML20129C4521996-10-17017 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Pages 89,89a & 90 to Incorporate Changes from Amends 148 & 149 ML20128N6031996-10-11011 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Existing Requirements Re Amount of Foam Concentrate Required to Support Operability of Recirculation Motor Generator Set Foam Sys in TS 3.13.G.1 & 3.13.G.2 1999-09-21
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217N3001999-10-21021 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Two Textual Errors & Changing Designation of Referenced Figure ML20217K8731999-10-18018 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Activated Charcoal Testing Methodology IAW Guidance Provided in GL 99-02 ML20212F6941999-09-21021 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Required Vol of Stored Fuel in Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tank ML20211J0211999-08-31031 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Page 91,allowing Reactivity Anomaly BOC Steady State Core Reactivity to Be Normalized Between off-line (Predicted) Uncorrected Solution & on-line (Measured) 3D-Monicore Exposure Corrected Solution ML20211B6781999-08-18018 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Definition of Surveillance Frequency to Incorporate Provisions That Apply Upon Discovery of Missed TS Surveillance ML20211B7051999-08-18018 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Reactor Core Spiral Reloading Pattern to Begin Around SRM ML20210D2481999-07-20020 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising & Clarifying Operability & SRs of High Pressure Core Cooling Systems ML20210D3371999-07-20020 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Enhancements to Support Implementation of Increased Core Flow ML20209G1671999-07-12012 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Value for SLMCPR & Deleting Wording Which Specifies These as Cycle 20 Values ML20196K2951999-06-29029 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Proposed Change 220,revising Leak Rate Requirements of TS 3.7.A.4 & 4.7.A.4 for Main Steam Line Isolation Valves ML20196H2881999-06-24024 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising & Clarifying Terminology Re Certain RPS Scram Bypass Permissives ML20195J8691999-06-15015 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Stis,Adding Allowable OOS Times,Replacing Generic ECCS Actions for Inoperable Instrument Channels with function-specific Actions & Relocating Selected Trip Functions from TS ML20195F9531999-06-0909 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Supplementing Proposed Change 213, Allowing Use of ASME Code Case N-560,per GL 88-01 ML20195C8841999-05-26026 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Clarifying Suppression Chamber Water Temp SR 4.7.A, Primary Containment & Modifying Associated TS Bases ML20206H3771999-05-0606 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages ,Eleting Specific Leak Rate Requirements of TS 3.7.A.4 & 4.7.A.4 ML20206J7231999-05-0505 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages for Proposed Change 212,modifying TS to Enhance Limiting Conditions for Operation & Surveillance Requirements Relating to SLC Sys ML20205S9431999-04-20020 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Reactor Core Spiral Reloading Pattern Such That It Begins Around Source Range Monitor ML20205T4721999-04-19019 April 1999 Marked-up Tech Specs Pages Re Suppl to 990201 Request for Amend to License DPR-28,revising Portions of Proposed Change 208 ML20205S4081999-04-16016 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Inservice Insp Requirements of Section 4.6.E to Allow NRC-approved Alternatives to GL 88-01 ML20205S3121999-04-15015 April 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revised Bases Pages 90,227,164 & 221a, Accounting for Change in Reload Analysis,Reflecting Change in Condensation Stability Design Criteria & Accounting for More Conservative Calculation ML20202E5451999-01-25025 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Technical Requirements Manual Content ML20206S0661999-01-22022 January 1999 Proposed TS to Change Number 189,proposing Relocation of Fire Protection Requirements from TSs to TRM ML20198D5381998-12-15015 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page 142,correcting Wording to Reflect Previously Approved Wording,Last Revised in Amend 160 ML20198B7421998-12-11011 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Wording of Primary Containment Integrity Definition to State That Manual PCIVs Which Are Required to Be Closed During Accident Conditions May Be Opened Intermittently Under ACs ML20197J4631998-12-10010 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.9.2,revising Info Re Calibr of Augmented Offgas Sys Hydrogen Monitors ML20197H0031998-12-0707 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Change 209,resolving Emergency Concern Re Potential Operation Outside of LCO Contained in Current TS & Potential USQ with Respect to Opening of Manual PCIVs During Plant Operation ML20155F7421998-11-0303 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Minor Corrections or Clarifications Which Enhance Clarity of TSs Without Materially Changing Meaning or Application ML20155G5061998-11-0202 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re ECCS Actuation Instrumentation - LPCI A/B RHR Pump Start Time Delay Requirements & CS Sys A/B Pump Start Delay Requirements ML20196A7851998-10-0909 October 1998 Rev 19 to Vynp IST Program Plan ML20151U0131998-09-0404 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Spent Fuel Storage Capacity of Util Spent Fuel Pool from 2,870 to 3,355 Fuel Assemblies ML20237E9571998-08-27027 August 1998 Start-Up Test Rept Vynp Cycle 20 ML20236H4551998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Table 4.2.1 to Delete ECC Actuation Instrumentation Re Core Spray Sys & LPCI Sys Auxiliary Power Monitor Calibr Requirement ML20247J8121998-05-0808 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Normal Operating Suppression Pool Water Temp Limit & Adding Time Restriction for Higher Temp Allowed During Surveillances That Add Heat to Suppression Pool ML20247E5671998-05-0808 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page 270,containing Wording Inadvertently Deleted from TS Proposed Change 202 ML20217P4171998-05-0101 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Controls Section ML20217G7131998-04-23023 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Change 200 Revising Station SW & Alternate Cooling Sys Requirements ML20217C4591998-03-20020 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Containment Purge & Vent ML20217A1271998-03-13013 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section 3.10.B,updated to Require That Station Battery,Eccs Instrumentation Battery,Or Uninterruptable Power Sys Battery Be Considered Inoperable If Any One Cell Is Below Specification Cell Voltage ML20202H2611998-02-0606 February 1998 Revised TS Pages Re Change 190,w/typos Corrected ML20197E8481997-12-22022 December 1997 Replacement Pages 160 & 279 & mark-up Pages to Proposed TS Change 190 Containing Editorial Changes ML20203F0131997-12-11011 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Current Value for SLMCPR for Cycle 20,next Operating Cycle ML20199K8501997-11-21021 November 1997 Replacement Pages 147,156,157 & mark-up Pages to Proposed TS Change 190,removing Ref to Documents Outside of TS That Define Components to Which Program Applies ML20199J7661997-11-20020 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Requirements for Main Station Batteries ML20217H6931997-10-10010 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising & Clarifying Requirements for Offsite Power Sources ML20211A6461997-09-18018 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing marked-up Pages for Proposed Changes 192 & 193 ML20217Q3311997-08-22022 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 245 & 252,amending App a to Modify TS to More Clearly Describe Separation of Switchgear Room Into Two Fire Areas & Incorporate Specifications for New Low Pressure CO2 Suppression Sys ML20217N4111997-08-20020 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 270 & 270a,updating Section 6 in Order to Add & Revise Ref to NRC Approved Methodologies Which Will Be Used to Generate cycle-specific Thermal Operating Limits to COLR ML20141H1171997-07-11011 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Replacing Pages 147,156 Through 161,168 & 279 of Util TS W/Corrected Pages ML20148J1861997-06-0909 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Change 191,updating Section 6.0 Administrative Controls ML20149M7451997-01-24024 January 1997 Startup Test Rept,Vermont Yankee Cycle 19 1999-09-21
[Table view] |
Text
. .
! 1 August 31,1999 BVY 99-111 l i
1 i
, i i
(
Revision of Technical Specification Bases Page i
Marked-up Bases Page l
l
)
/
9909030018 99083i PDR ADOCK 05000271 P PM ,
]
)
ggLS: 3 . 3 ts 4.3 (Cont'd)
- 7. Periodic verification that the Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) drain and vant valves are maintained in the open position provides assurance that the SDV will be available to accept the water displaced from the control rod drives in the event of a scram.
C. Scram Insertion Times The control Rod System is designed to bring the reactor subcritical at a rate fast enough to prevent fuel damage. The limiting power transient is that resulting from a turbine stop valve closure with a failure of the Turbine Bypass System. Analysis of this transient shows that the negative reactivity rates resulting from the scram I with the~ average response of all the drives as given in the above specification, provide the required protection, and MCPR remains greater than the fuel cladding integrity safety limit.
The scram times for all control rods shall be determined during each operating cycle. The weekly control rod exercise test serves as a periodic check against deterioration of the Control Rod System and also verifies the ability of the control rod drive to scram. The frequency of exercising the control rods under the conditions of two or more control rods valved out of service provides even further assurance of the reliability of the remaining control rods.
D. Control Rod Accumulators Requiring no more than one inoperable accumulator in any nine-rod (3x3) square array is based on a series of XY PDQ-4 quarter core calculations of a cold, clean core. The worst case in a nine-rod withdrawal sequence resulted in a K,gg 5,1.0. Other repeating rod sequences with more rods withdrawn resulted in K,gg 3,1.0. At reactor pressures in excess of 800 psig, even those control rods with-inoperable accumulators will be able to meet required scram insertion times due to the action of reactor pressure. In addition, they may be normally inserted using the Control-Rod-Drive Hydraulic System.
Procedural control will assure that control rods with inoperable accumulators will be spaced in a one-in-nine array rather than ,
grouped together. ]
E. Reactivity Anomalies .j During each fuel cycle, excess operating reactivity varies as fuel i depletes and as any burnable poison in supplementary control is
- burned. The magnitude of this excess reactivity may be inferred from the critical rod configuration. As fuel burnup progresses, anomalous behavior in the excess reactivity may be detected by comparison of the critical red pattern selected base states to the predicted rod inventory at that state. Power operation base conditions provide the most sensitive and directly interpretable data relative to core reactivity. Fur,thermore, using power operating base conditions l permits frequent < reactivity comparisons.,gRequiring a reactivity will sures that a comparison comparison at the specified frequency as be made before the core reactivity changa exceeds 1% Ak/k.
Deviations in core reactivity greater than 1% Ak/k are not expected and require thorough evaluation. One pa ,e reent reactivity limit is reactivity into the core considered safe since an insertion of ti would not lead to transients exceeding < Lesign conditions of the Rwactor System. ,,
mm.m 4 % c Reu.4% eo% rs msa akawed .a c.cs ca.ac4wi4y duety rsus
_ pre.dtc.+td veIf A m s weta .44 p<s.Arikta 4.* ~qSoc.c.d 4. ^*+ cza b=A opwmM.6. c.cs, c adrhu, S & h Asetb*d ci dt Jearan for tde#4ts.A ***4
^$Pt*> *** As.au mf+4m.41,
" det+
Amendment No, M, y,148 aa4pra ,c As e,3 caw, us.a in pre Il ro4 JtesRy e49 6 4 hs e r.,W. If rs % .WeA 4 4 c.cg. rt wi3 mysms.4 h+ ween e % succ.J .44 prs rc.smay 4s oor* utsd twrab .4 thoc.3 As% As pesare+ ton 4* Ac v%svs.J v.A4
/
I August 31,1999 BVY 99-111 Revision of Technical Specification Bases Page l l
Revised Bases Page I
l l
l l
l l
,. VYNPS BASES: 3.3 & 4.3 (Cont'd)
- 7. Periodic verification that the Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) drain and vent valves are maintained in the open position provides assurance that the SDV will be available to accept the water displaced from the control rod drives in the event of a scram.
C. Scram Insertion Times The Control Rod System is designed to bring the reactor suberitical at a rate fast enough to prevent fuel damage. The limiting power transient is that resulting from a turbine stop valve closure with a failure of the Turbine Bypass System. Analysis of this transient shows that the negative reactivity rates resulting from the scram with the average response of all the drives as given in the above specification, provide the required protection, and MCPR remains greater than the fuel cladding integrity safety limit.
The scram times for all control rods shall be determined during each operating cycle. The weekly control rod exercise test serves as a periodic check against deterioration of the Control Rod System and also verifies the ability of the control rod drive to scram. The frequency of exercising the control rods under the conditions of two or more control rods valved out of service provides even further assurance of the reliability of the remaining control rods.
D. Control Rod Accumulators Requiring no more than one inoperable accumulator in any nine-rod (3x3) square array is based on a series of XY PDO-4 quarter core calculations of a cold, clean core. The worst case in a nine-rod withdrawal sequence resulted in a K.tr <l.0. Other repeating rod sequences with more rods withdrawn resulted in Kort >1.0. At reactor pressures in excess of 800 psig, even those control rods with inoperable accumulators will be able to meet required scram insertion times due to the action of reactor pressure. In addition, they may be normally inserted using the Control-Rod-Drive Hydraulic System. Procedural control will assure that control rods with inoperable accumulators will be spaced in a one-in-nine array rather than grouped together.
E. Reactivity Anomalies During each fuel cycle, excess operating reactivity varies as fuel depletes and as any burnable poison in supplementary control is burned.
The magnitude of this excess reactivity may be inferred from the critical rod configuration. As fuel burnup progresses, anomalous behavior in the excess reactivity may be detected by comparison of the critical rod pattern selected base states to the predicted rod inventory at that state. Power operation base conditions provide the most sensitive and directly interpretable data relative to core reactivity. Furthermore, using power operating base conditions permits frequent reactivity comparisons. Reactivity anomaly is used as a measure of the predicted versus measured core reactivity during power operation. If the measured and predicted rod density for identical core conditions at BOC do not reasonably agree, then the assumptions used in the reload cycle design analysis or the calculation models used to predict rod density may not be accurate. If reasonable agreement between measured and predicted core reactivity exists at BOC, then the prediction may be normalized to the measured value. Requiring a reactivity comparison at the specified frequency assures that a comparison will be made before the core reactivity change exceeds 1%
Ak/k. Deviations in core reactivity greater than 1S Ak/k are not expected and require' thorough evaluation. One percent reactivity limit is considered safe since an insertion of the reactivity into the core would not lead to transients exceeding design conditions of the Reactor i System. !
Amendment No. 36, 44, 148, BVY 99-111 91