ML20214V540

Rev 2 to QCI-12, Plant Performance & Mgt Improvement Program. W/Revised Procedure Index

ML20214V540
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	03/03/1987
From:	SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20214U944	List: ML20214U940 ML20214V508 ML20214V525 ML20214V540
References
QCI-12, NUDOCS 8706120145
Download: ML20214V540 (35)

Text

,

QCI No.12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 RANCHO SECO QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION APPROVAL SHEET REVISION NO. 2 APPROVED BY:

MANAGER,. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING <%Md 7 .d7 MANAGER, NUCLEAR PLANT / ,

D /E /I'7 MANAGER, QUALITY , -[/ 'd$ f- .

JT' MANAGER, LICENSING w

d b't. [e

/

Date#

I f[Q MANAGER, TRAINING l' u , " ~ f:  ?

Date MANAGER, IMPLEMENTATION i'

/ -

?/. - ,-

-- t MANAGER, RESTART IMPLEMENTATION #f'[/h//k '

0' ate 3 /5/V2 Date EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT / //

MANAGER, NUCLEAR PROJECTS /A #/ VT /, /f, DGM, NUCLEAR h-[ [

~"

M /

Date.

h -

s s' ,

s.

P 870604

$DS*$bll0500033p PDR . ..

OCI-12 INDEX PAGES SECTION 20 pages 001-12 Procedure Selected Projects 1 page (Supplement)

Attachment 1 Precursor Review 1 page (Supplement)

Attachment 2 Attachment 3 Plant Staff Interview 6 pages Attachment 4 Deterministic Failure 1 page (Supplement)

Consequences Attachment 5 B&WOG Safety & Performance 2 pages Improvement Program 12/26/85 Event /NUREG-1195 1 page (Supplement)

Attachment 6 Action List RRRB Guidelines i page (Supplement)

Attachment 7 Charter for RRR8 1 page (Supplement)

Attachment 8

~

Attachment 9 Charter for Perfomance 3 page

Analysis Group-Attachment 10 Management Process Group 3 page ,

Attachment 11 Restart System Review 8 pages and Test. Program Attachment 12 QCI-12 Tracking System 4 pages FIGURES Figure 1 QCI-12 Process Flow Chart Figure 2 Recommendation / Resolution Cover Sheet Figure 3 Recommendation Report Form Figure 4 Restart Organization Chart Figure 5 Request for QCI-12 Recommendation /

System Report Review Figure 6 QTS Data Entry Form Figure 7 Minor Change Form

~.

Figure 8 .

Minor Chan.ge Log ,

1 e

QCl No. 12, Rev. 2 J anuary 29, 1987 Page 1 of 21 RANCHO SECO UNIT NO. 1 QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION (OCI)

TITLE: PLANT PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (PP&MIP) 1.0 PURPOSE To delineate a phased approach to perfomance improvement and restart of Rancho Seco.

This QCI is a living document to provide instruction until transitioned into a long term process and a directive from the DGM, Nuclear terminates this instruction. As such, revisions to this instruction identify the phases and processes to be completed at the time of the revision.

However, the body of the procedure will maintain the instructions for all

. phases, with a leading caveat explaining the current status of the phase / process.

A Supplement to this QCI will contain the Attachments for those phases /

processes which are complete at the time of the revision.

This Supplement has been approved as a part of the Revision, but will be distributed only on request.

" 2.0 SCOPE _

This procedure defines and controls the flow of the major steps in the PP&MIP. These steps are: Investigation, Validation, Approval, Implementation and Closure. Attachments to this. procedure and other approved District Procedures will be used to control the individual activities within a particular step.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES Executive Assistant / Manager, Nuclear Projects is responsible for and has tne authority for tne conouct of tne PP&MIP.

The Nuclear Department Managers are responsible to provide the resources necessary for the conouct of tne PP&MIP.

The Ouality Department is responsible for providing surveillances for the overall processes outlined in this QCI.

The organization chart for the PP&MIP is shown in Figure 4.

4.0 REFERENCES

The following referenced documents provide the basic requirements, direction, documentation, and controls for implementation of the program:

a) 10CFR50, Appendix 8 b) . Quality Assurance Manual '

c) Nuclear Engineering Procedures d) Administrative Procedures

- el QCI-16, Recommendation. Resolution Procedure .

OCZ No.12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Page 3 of 21 6.1 INVESTIGATION PHASE The Investigation Phase is complete at the time of this revision.

Two of the Investigation areas, Plant Staff Interviews (Attachment 3) and the B&WOG SPIP (Attachment 5), require follow-up action, and the Attachments have been retained. The Attachments for all other Investigation areas have been placed in the Supplement to QCI-12, Rev. 2.

6.1.1 This phase consists of six (6) areas:

a) SELECTED PROJECTS, Attachment 1 b) PRECURSOR REVIEW, Attachment 2 c) PLANT STAFF INTERVIEW, Attachment 3 d) DETERMINISTIC FAILURE CONSE0VENCES, Attachment 4 e) B&WOG SAFETY & PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, Attachment 5 f) 12-26-85 EVENT /NUREG-1195 ACTION LIST, Attachment 6 6 .1. 2 Each of the six areas will have an Input Group Leader. The

- Input Group Leaders are responsible for maintaining schedules for their individual groups.

6 .1. 3 Input from the investigation phase shall be forwarded to the

Recommendation, Review and. Resolution Board (RRRB) for s validation.

6.2 VALIDATION PHASE The RRR8 validation of the Investigation Phase is complete at the time of this revision. The RRR8 Guidelines (Attachment 7) and the Charter for the RRR8 (Attachment 8) have been placed in the Supplement to QCI-12, Revision 2.

The Restart System Review and Test Program (Attachment 11) review of the Investigation Phase is still in process at the time of this revision.

This Yalidation Phase applies only to the reconnendations identified in the Investigation Phase.

Recommendations identified after this revision shall be processed according to Section 6.6.

6.2.1 The RRRB reviews the input from the Investigation Phase and enters their recommendations into the QCI-12 Tracking System (QTS) data base.

i .

QCI No.12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Page 5 of 21 6.2.4.2 PRIORITY 2 - NEAR TERM ACTIONS TO BE SCHEDULED AS PROMPTLY AS PRACTICABLE, SCHEDULE DEVELOPED, RESOURCES ASSIGNED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL COMPLETED (IT IS THE INTENT TO INITIATE THESE ACTIONS AS S0ON AS PRIORITY ONE ACTION COMPLETIONS MAKE RESOURCES AVAILABLE).

a) Enhance ability to remain in post-trip window.

b) Reduce reactor trips.

c) Reduce challenges to safety systems.

d) Produce near-term programmatic benefits.

6.2.4.3 PRIORITY 3 - LONG TERM ACTIONS TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE LONGER TERM a) Improve reliability.

b) Improve availability.

- c) Major programmatic enhancements.

6.2.4.? Judgement shall be used when evaluating the criteria to determine the priority of a recommendation.

6.2.5 After the RRRB makes the determinations outlined above, the recommendation shall be forwarded for review.

6.2.5.1 If the recommenda' tion applies to a specific system, it will be forwarded to the System Review and Test Program (SRTP) for additional review.

6.2.S.2 Recommendations designated as "MGT" and "MPS" shall be forwarded to the PAG for review and approval .

6.2.6 The SRTP shall review all system related recommendations from the Investigation Phase, as prepared by the RRRB, and forward them to the PAG.

6.2.6.1 The System Engineer shall include valid and valid-covered recommendations in the System Status Report or System Investigation Report (SSR/ SIR).

6.2.6.2 The System Engineer shall ensure that the valid-covered recommendation will be satisfied by the implementation of its' valid recommendations.

s

'  ?

3 ,

4 QCI No. 12, Rev. 2 January 23, 1987 Page 7 of 21 6.3.4 The PAG shall assign the organization responsible to implement the recommendation.

6.3.4.1 System related recommendations will be coordinated for implementation by the System Engineer.

6.3.4.2 Non-system related recommendations will be implemented by one of the organizations shown in Figure 4.

6.3.5 The' PAG meeting minutes shall document disposition of all recommendations.

6.3.6 The PAG shall notify the QTS of the approved disposition and priori ty.

6.3.7 QTS shall suamit to Implementation a list of the PAG approved . valid recommendations, their priority and assigned implementing organization.

6.3.8 Af ter the PAG has approved the reconnendation the following steps shall be taken:

6.3.8.1 If the recossendation is valid, it shall be sent

~) to the assigngd Implementing Organization for implementation.

6.3.8.2 If the recommendation is valid-covered, it shall be sent to Quality for verification of the valid / valid-covered relationship, and subsequent closure.

6.3.8.3 If the recommendation is invalid, it shall be sent to Quality for closure.

6.3.9 Recommendations shall be forwarded to the RIM for review.

Comments may be returned to the PAG for discussion and action. Copies of all correspondence shall be sent to QTS for filing.

l e

, _ _ _ _ . . , . , ,,,_-m_ _ , . - . . - . . _ _ _ . , , . - - . _ . _ , _ _ . . . . _ _ . - _ _ . _ _ _ _ - - _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ -

QCI No. 12, Rev. 2 J anuary 29, 1987 Page 9 of 21 6.4.5 When implementation of a reccmmendation is ccmplete, including testing, if appropriate, tne implementing organization (System Engineer for system-related items) shall prepare and sign a closure memo to the Site Quality Department Manager.

The closure memo shall indicate:

a) The QTS Log Number b) The date of completion, and c) List of documents (Work Requests, ECNs, procedures, Surveillance Reports, lesson plans, etc.) used to implement the recomendation.

Additionally, the closure memo shall have attached copies of the cover sheet for the top level documents to show their completi on.

6.5 CLOSURE PHASE Quality shall close reccumendations in accordance with QAIP-13.

6.5.1 For " invalid" recommendations, Quality shall ensure justification is attached to the recommendation.

6.5.1.1 If justificafTbn is not adequate, the recommendation shall be returned to the PAG. ,,

6.5.2 For " valid-covered" recommendations, the Quality Engineer and System Engineer (for system related recommendations) shall verify that the solution to the valid recommendation (s) resolves the valfd-covered concern.

6.5.2.1 If the System Engineer and Quality Engineer cannot agree, the discrepancy shall be brought to the PAG for resolution.

6.5.3 For "valfd" recommendations, Quality shall review the closure documents to ensure:

a) The implementation is complete. If it is determined to be incomplete, the recommendation shall be transmitted back to the System Engineer or assigned Implementing Organization.

b) The implementation appears effective. If it appears to be ineffective, the recommendation shall be transmitted back to the System Engineer or assigned Implementing Organization and a copy to the PAG.

.. 6.5.4 When it is determined the recommendation is ' ready for closure, Quality shall document the closure per QAIP-13. .

QCI No.12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Page 11 of 21 6.6.3.2 System Related: The System Engineer shall prepar'e the Approval . Package and route the package for approvals. The Approval Package shall contain:

the " Request for QCI-12 Review" form (Figure 5);

copies of the current and revised page(s) of the SSR/ SIR; and the copy of the QTS Data Entry form (or Recommendation Report).

If the Resolution and Resolution Summary have not been completed, the System Engineer shall do so at this time.

6.6.4 The Request fom in the Approval Package is the approval document and shall be signed and dated by all persons in the review / approval process.

6.6.4.1 Any differences of opinion during the review / .

approval process that cannot be resolved shall be. j documented and placed in the Approval Package with j the approval by the PAG determining the resolution.

6.6.5 The Design Engineer shall review all system related  :

packages, sign and date the Request fom.

f' 6.6.6 The orginating departmgnt manager shall review the Approval 3' s Package following the SRTP completion of the~ Resolution and Resolution Summary, sign and date the Request fom.

6.6.7 The PAG Chairman shall rev'iew the Approval Package, sign and l date the Request form. l 6.6.7.1 The PAG shall resolve any discrepancies documented in the package and verify that the QTS Data Entry fom accurately reflects the recomendation as f approved, marking any changes (including textual) on the Entry form.

I 6.6.7.2 The PAG shall document the approval action in the  :

Approval Canment section of the Data Entry form i

(or Recommendation Report). i .e.

PAG #, approved l

as Valid Priority One, assigned to Engineering.

6.6.8 The RIM shall review the Approval Package, sign and date the Request form. Comments may be returned to the PAG for discussion and action, with a copy of the correspondence placed in the Approval Package.

. 6.6.9 The DGM, Nuclear shall review the Approval package, sign and date the Request form. Comments may be returned to the Mil

- for discussion and action, with a copy of the correspommence placed in the Approval Package.

L .

= . ,

e t 4

-~

0C1 No. 12 Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Page 13 of 21 Figure 1 PLANT PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT FLOW CHART recuuos mer M 12/2s/es cm acnow tar a wuer ites m e m now N 8E as:n poucts otreassmc raamt constouem x'

/

'/////,4

/ *tm MW NTtmewn f////}/// g '/f///mn

( mutan cat %pW'//////

(Post 0a-12 av 2) l (Post oc-12 uv :)

T

, RECOWWENDA110N. RG1EW m REs0um0N 902 mann as ma

- l .u.

l l

YMH$$'$Y/l SM S /M J a -w

,, a,m- annas _a.v (

• '//f####10/

/

1. moWL PGFORMANCE mat ANN.YSIS GROUP (onet WMionL As MOWED er 00-12) vu wea vauo ma vauo- m-ma mutD cme!ED aun

't kPU30TADON mM mlEW 4 gyAg]y m et Mr malm 4---9 4--) O ROIEW/

gg y NUCLEAR DEPT.

re i

} mm gang trnr mm aosa MF9RT q aggg 2 muu === QUAUTY CLOSURE met MPer or RECOWWENDA110N l It i tr Pa8 APMionL 1

'///M/MM mg g &

QUAUTY/DCWCLOSURE m2 "

mr a4a arent Or ACTION PLAN f//////////////h

QCI No.12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Page 15 of 21 Figure 2 Page 2 of 2 LOG NUMBER = 29. N 97 SYSTEMS = WGS CATEGCRY = CM PROILEN DESCRIDf!ON: ,

THE AGREDENT TO 90RROW AN EITERNAL RECOM81lER FROM ARIZ(MR pufLIC SERVICE HAS LADSED, MQK!NG li DIFFICIA.T TO INSTALL A ECOMO!NER FILLOWING AN ACCIDENT. A STUDY & HOW TO KST RESOLVE THE 8ACBLEM 15 CURRENTLY UNMR WAY llMPELL TREK NO. 233) BUT CMS NOT HRW A HIGH PRIORITY.

REttN D OAi!ON1:

) - .

PROCUE A RECCM91PER !NDEPENDENTLY OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER UTILITIES, OR E-ESTABLISH AN AGEDUT TO 06TAIN A HYDROGEN ECOM81NER.

COMMENTS:

INVAL.10,OTHER: TK O! STRICT IS ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN A 000 LED INVENTORY MANAGEMNT DURCHASE OF A J0!NTLY CWrED HfDR0f4N ECCP9tNER. SEE PECURSOR REVIEW EC9mENDAi!(M Ot.-64-M-lR.

e 0

W e e e

U .

QCI No.12, Rev. 2 J anuary 29, 1987 Page 17 of 21 Figure 4 RESTART !MPLD4D4TATION ORGANIZATION

=crurr cucRAL WANac R.

NUCLEAR e

, e i i i

• Y8VO I - aw ' i C * "'#t WANACCWCNT (W I AIDEANCE I thr0pWA9CN ASSSTANT A$$37ANf ..g.C9CENC'WANact.33 4p(Op.(

. 40

. Nue e ...mts

.CSTAR f rWipt, Ens (N f afl0N W AN ACCR

Ecy t :esn'A^M l Ass % I P,'#.s.c;c: ,

s,eA<

ea:.o AN e i

J i i I i l i I NUC'.fAR $Up.CRT

%ANf pt.AN T thePLEheO4TAfl0N ?RAAN#44 UCEN9NC WANAGEM . WANA0(R WANAQ(R ENO EEN O MM WANAC(R WOOlF1CA110NS

+

.o. . 4,o e. . .. . .v...., ...c,,.~,, .W...-..

.W......

a .,~..,

W... aoi.

.., . c..A

....,.. . s ,.. 2. .. .:.m

....i... W.,.. . ,3 .. .

..c,,,.. .,...c.....

. r . .. . i .~. .. .. .c.. ,e. .. .. , -i,

. , As , . .....,...i.,,-.

. o..- ..... .

fe. tie, . TCt 8,. cts a

a s

- OCf No. 12, Rev. 2 J anuary 29, 1987 Page 19 of 21 Figure 6 QTS DATA ENTRY FORM ve. . ,<= -5 .n PROCEDURE: 1) CCWPLITE AU. d;MTCHED 80XES ON THl3 FCRW AiC SUSWIT TO 075.

2) QTS MU. ASSIGN A RDIRENCE NUW8ER AND RETURN A COPY Of THIS FORW TO YCU.

3) AFTER CETTNG APPROVALS ON THE

• REQUEST FOR QCI-12 RNEW" RETURN BOTH FORMS TO CTS.

INmAUNG OOCUMENT OTS LOG #

VAU0 TTY PRIORITY STATUS SYSTEM DESIGNATIONS

_ V - VAUD 1 - RESTART _ 3 - AWAmHG APPROVAL REPORT:

_l - MAUD _ 2 - NEAR TERM _ 4 - IN iMPLEMENTADON AP.3 CODE (S): l

_ tC - VAUD-COVERED BY: _ 3 - LONG TERM _ 5 - SEND FOR CLOSURE

_ 0 - NOT APPL l

CATECCRf: (CHECx A WAxwuW 0F t#0) WLDeflNG ORGANIZATION: (CHECK ONLY CNE)

CO - CONFIC. WCT WW - WAfDtW. UCT W - EWERGENCY PREP. A - PLANT WCO.

CW - CCWWT. WGT WP - MAINTD4ANCE E - ENGINED 8NG 0 - CUAUTY OC - PUWT WOO OP - CPS / PROCEDURES I - IMPLDOTATION $ - SAFETY EP - EWERGENCY P9EP. 00 - CUAUTY L - UCENSNC C - SECURflY HP - HEALTH PNYSICS RO - RECORDS /CATA WGT N - NUCLIAR PLANT U - buPPORT SUMCES LL - (ISSONS LIARNED 'R - TRANWG P - NUCLEAR PCECTS Y - Srs. RGEW & TEST uE - WCT ETTECTIVENESS NA - NOT APPUCMILI O - CRC. DTICTNENESS T = TRAINING ntsoum0N SuleWf 000 QWW"DS): .

s PROOLIM DESCMP11CN:

RESCLUTICH:

REMDI CCWWENTS:

AUTHORIZAfl0N TO ASSA QTS LOG NUMBER: AUTHORIZADON FOR DATA ENTRY OF APPROVAL CAIGIN4fhG 007. uwGER DATE PAC QWRMAN CATE s.- r mit < farA om , uit < M-y oft <

QTSDmty2/27/87

- OCI No.12, Asv. 2

! January 29, 1987

- Page 21 of 21 Figure 8 MINOR REVISIONS Minor Issue Permanent Rev. No. Date Description of Change Rev. No.

1 4

1 4

? .

s -

I I

I 4

.l 1

9 9

i m.

4

' -= . .

= ,

. QCI No. 12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Attachment No. 1 Page 1 of 1 SELECTED PROJECTS The Selected Projects Area of the Investigation Phase is complete at the time of this Revision.

The Attachment for this Area has been removed and placed in the Supplement to QCI-12.

S 0

mm 4

+

N.

g - . s e

OCI No. 12, Rev. 2 Janaury 29, 1987 Attachment No. 2 Page 1 of 1 PRECURSOR REVIEW The Precursor Review Area of the Investigation Phase is complete at the

.ime of this Revision.

The Attachment for this Area has been removed and placed in the Supplement to QCI-12.

5 e

J m

f 4

k S

i ns

o OCI No. 12 Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Attachment No. 3 Page 1 of 6 PLANT STAFF' INTERVIEW l.0 PURPOSE The interview process shall identify any previously unidentified, but "known" problems which may impact the safe or reliable operation of systems or components of the plant. This procedure is to provide guidelines for the interview process.

2.0 SCOPE Interviews will be conducted with, among others, plant operators, operations tech support engineers, plant engineers and technicians, training instructors, design engineers and quality department personnel. These personnel will be encouraged to identify system, component, or operational related problems, or concerns which they are aware of and any recommendations to resolve them.

It is intended to interview personnel from each' plant organizational group. Volunteers will be requested. All volunteers will be interviewed. If insufficient personnel volunteer, the interview program coordinator will perform a random selection of interviewees.

j The minimum number of personnel to be interviewed are derived from QAIP 3, which is based on MIL-STD-105D. Other interviewees may be added at the discretion of the Interview Program Coordinator (Enclosure 1).

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES -

The responsibility for the conduct and documentation of the interviews rests with the Interview Program Coordinator. The interview teams are responsible for conducting and documenting the interviews. The i Interview Program Coordinator is responsible for compiling the results

of the interviews. The Interview Program Coordinator shall ensure that interviews are thorough and are completed in a timely manner. The

!. Interview Program Coordinator is responsible to the Performance Analysis Group for the conduct of this program. -

l Initially four interview teams will be utilized consisting of human factors engineers and other knowledgeable plant representatives. These

. interviewers will be responsible for conducting the interviews and l

compiling the data. The interviewers are accountable to the Interview Program Coordinator for tabulation of interview recommendations.

Interviewers can be added or deleted as deemed necessary by the Interview Program Coordinator.

w

~ .

i QCI No. 12. Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Attacnment No. 3 Page 3 of 6 5.0 BUDGET AND PLAN The Interview Program Coordinator assesses the resources required to complete the tasks as prescribed and shall present the Performance Analysis Group with a plan that identifies the human and other resources required to execute the tasks and the approximate time required to complete all tasks. The PAG shall review the plan for completeness and for approach and shall direct approval to proceed or revise. The PAG shall ensure that resources are available for the approved plan.

6.0 INTERVIEW GUIDELINES The interviewers shall ensure that interviews specifically address the following plant systems / areas: Reactor Coolant System, Reactor Auxiliary Systems, Secondary Systems, Plant Support Systems, and Instrumentation and Control Systems and electrical distribution, as they apply to the interviewee's experience and knowledge.

The purpose of ,the interview should be kept obvious curing the interview: the identification of potential or known problems within -

systems, components, or operational guidance that could impact reliable

- plant operation. Remember that the main point of the interview is to

, / learn what others believe may be potential or actual problems. The interview team must stimulate the interviewee into describing total experiences.

The interviewers shall develop a questionnaire based upon the background of the interviewee. This questionnaitre shall be used during the

, interview to help the interviewee recall previous problems or concerns they or others have had.

l l . . .

l

{ ,

QCI No. 12. Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Attacnment No. 3 Enclosure 1 Page 5 of 6 MINIMUM NUMBER OF PERSONNEL TO BE INTERVIEWED NPS - 20 Licensing - 4 Training instructors Operations Training - 5 Maintenance Training - 3 General Employee Training - 2 .

Nuclear Engineering Electrical - 8 ISC - 8 ,

Mechanical - 8 divil-2 -

Project Engineering - 3 Ouality Deoartment Quality Assurance - 3 QC Inspectors - 3 Quality Engineering - 2 Corporate QA - 1 Rad Protection Senior Chem-Rad Assistant - 2 HP Tech - 5 Ch emistry Senior Chem-Rad Assistant - 1 Chem-HP Tech - 5 se ,%

• E ". .

CCI No.12, Rev. 2 J anuary 29, 1987 Attachment No. 4 Page 1 of 1 DETERMINISTIC FAILURE CCHSEQUENCES The Deterministic Failure Consequences Area of the Investigation Phase l is complete at the time of this Revision.

The Attachment for this Area has been removed and placed in the Supplement to QCI-12.

e O

%e.

e 89 6

9

CCI No.12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Attachment No. 5 Dage 1 of 2 B&WOG SAFETY & PERFORf1ANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (SPIP) 1.0 PURPOSE This document describes the interface between the B&W Owners' Group (B&WOG) Safety & Performance Improvement Program and the Rancho Seco Performance Improvement Program (PIP). The District intends to fully participate in the B&WOG SPIP. The results of the B&WOG Program are not startup restraints. The Rancho Seco PIP is expected to detemine Rancho Seco specific items. Participation in the B&WOG Program will ensure a broad perspective is taken with respect to plant improvement as well as allow the other B&W Owners to benefit from the Rancno Seco PIP.

2.0 SCOPE This procedure applies to all interface between the B&WOG SP!P.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITY The SMUD SPIP Coordinator (SPC) is responsible for providing the interface between the District and the B&W SPIP.

) 4.0 PROCEDURE - ,

The SPC shall receive the reconnendations of tne B&WOG SP!P and subnit them to the Recommendation Review and Resolution Board (RRRB) on a Recommendation Resolution Sheet per OCI-12. The SPC shall provide the RRRB amplifying information on specific recommendations as requested to pemit them to make informed judgements. The SPIP shall also monitor RRRB and PAG results for all SPIP recommendations and provide feedback to these groups to assure the intent of the recommendations has been accurately assessed.

The District's status on the B&WOG SPIP recommendations shall be reported to the B&WOG on a regular basis for inclusion of the Recommendation '

Tracking System report. This same status infomation shall be made available to the PAG. The SPC shall provide the B&WOG SP!P with the results of the Rancho Seco P!P as they become available. Thi's will be in the form of dispositioned recommendations. ,

Should the RRRB and the PAG have teminated their activities prior to receipt of future SPIP recommendations, the SPC shall enter any unresolved recommendations into the commitment tracking system and report status to the Manager, Nuclear Licensing.

Enclosure 1 is a flow chart of this procedure, e

e 1

a

QCI No. 12. Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Attachment No. 6 oage 1 of 1 12/26/85 EVENT /NUREG-1195 ACTION LIST The 12/26/85 Event /NUREG-1195 Action List Area of the Investigation Phase is complete at the time of this Revision.

The Attachment for this Area has been removed and placed in the Supplement to QCI-12.

e G

e e

4 M

• W >

b b

i

.- QC: No.12. Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Attachment No. 7 Page 1 of 1 RRRB GUIDELINES The RRRB Validation Phase is complete at the time of this Revision.

The Attachment for these Guidelines has been removed and placed in the Supplement to QCI-12.

4

. -.}

) -

e e

I I

it

+

e G

' QCI No.12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Attachment No. 8 Page 1 of 1-CHARTER FOR RECOPMENDATION REVIEW & RESOLUTION BOARD The RRRB Valfdation Phase is complete at the time of this revision.

The Attachment for the Charter for the RRRB has been removed and placed in the Supplement to QCI-12.

i i

0 .

J -

il

,f' 9

De 4

OCI No.12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Attacnment No. 9 Page 1 of 3 CHARTER FOR PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS GROUP I. AUTHORITY' The Perfonnance Analysis Group (PAG) is formed under the authority of Assistant General Manager's, Nuclear Directive ND-86-5-A. The PAG will disposition, assign priority, assign an organization for action and -

approve the recommendations for the Rancho Seco Performance Improvement Program.

II. PURPOSE The purpose for the PAG is to review, resolve, disposition, and prioritize recomendations. The recommendations will come from the systematic reviews of issues surrounding the 12-26-85 plant transient.

III. SCOPE .

1) The recommendations will be processed per QCI-12.

J

2) he PAG will have the authority to " add to" or " delete from" the recommendation,s. All changes must be documented.

IV. MEMBERSHIP

1) The PAG membership will be comprised of the Nuclear Department Managers which will review each proposed dispositioned recommendation.

2) The PAG membership will be as follows:(*)

Nuclear Projects (Chairman)

Nuclear Engineering Quality Training Licensing Nuclear Plant I (*) The names of PAG members and alternates will be delineated by memorandum from the Deputy General Manager, Nuclear, s* m e

i.

i

• e S

i

{ .. n

QCI No.12, Rev. 2

~ '

January 29, 1987 Attacnment .'lo. 9 Page 3 of 3 Enciosure i FLOW CHART FOR PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS GROUP Recommendation With Proposed Disposition, Priority and Dispositioning '

Organization from RRRB, System Engineering, MPG or Department Managers w

Request Provide Disposition Clari fication Priority and Assign from RRRB or Organization for

,) System Action Engineering w

, Forward Recommendation to Organization Assigned for Action t

1 l Closure by Quality l Assurance and PAG Approval of SSR l

l l

i

~

i .

l ,

l-

CCI No.12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1967 Attacnment No. 10 Page 1 of 3 MANAGEMENT PROCESS GROUP ,

1.0 PURPOSE Management and management process effectiveness have a major impact en the ability to operate the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station in a safe and relisble manner.

-2.0 OBJECTIVE The objectives of these actions are as follows:

2.1 To enhance the management process in support of the safe, reifaele and timely restart of the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station.

2.2 To develop guidelines and agreements by which the SMUD Board, as a governing entity, can improve its effectiveness in directing and monitoring the District's activities relating to the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station.

3.0 SCOPE --

3.1 Review and ensure that executive level management processes support the safe, reliable, and timely restart of the Rancho Seca Nuclear Generating Station.

3.2 Board of Directors / General Manager Improvement a) Establish within the Board, guidelines and agreements by wnich the Board, as an entity, can more effectively set policy and di rection.

b) Establish written performance measurement criteria, and a performance review process, for the General Manager (GM).

c) Clarify the Board / General Manager working relationship in writing, including the reporting desired by the Board from the General Manager. -

3.3 Corporate Management Improvement a) Develop and implement a program to provide the Board and General Manager assessments and recommendations 'of corporate management improvement.

"i . .

~

OC: No. 12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Attacament No. 1C Page 3 of 3 i) Improvement Department media and ccrnmunity relations by establishing a more proactive media / community. outreacn program.

j) !mprove Nuclear Decartment interfaces with all other Departments in the District by instituting additional interdepartmental communication and problem-solving processes on a regular basis.

k) Facilities improvement needs are to be established.

e 9

9

'- - = $

e

o '

QCI flo. 12, Rev. 2 January 29, 1987 Attachment 11 Page 1 of 8 1

RESTART SYSTEM REVIEW AND TEST PROGRAM 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This attachment defines the objectives and process of the Restart System Review and Test Program at Rancho Seco. Program details and procedures are established in the PDAP-4200 Series of Plant Department Administrative Procedures.

2.0 OBJECTIVES 2.1 The specific objectives of the Rancho Seco System Review and Test Program (SRTP) are as follows:

a Evaluate all system problems identified by the Plant Performance and Management Improvement Program (PP&MIP),

o Develop an integrated program of corrective actions for l implementation both prior to and after Restart wnich will addre'ss i system problems.

) e Implement those corrective actions required prior to Restart.

• Identify those systems which require special consideration under the SRTP.

I

• Identify systen functions important to the ' safe operation of the pl ant.

o Develop and implement a testing program which will demon. strate those functions important to safe plant operation. I 3.0 ORGANIZATION 3.1 The SRTP is to be developed and implemented by the SRTP Director. The organization and responsibilities specifically established to implement this program are descri bed in PDAP-4200, " System Review and Test Program Description and Organization."

3.2 A 'special committee, the Test Review Group, has been established to support the needs of the SRTP. The Test Review Group organization and responsibilities are described in PDAP-4203, " Test Review Group."

'eg

• e e 4  %

a OC: No'. 12, Rev. 2

- J anuary 29, 1987 l Attachment No. 11 Page 3 of 3 The SRTP Director has proposed, and the PAG has approved, the following lists of Selected and Additional Systens. The current listing of Selected Systems is as follows:

• Upgraded by PAG direction Power Systems:

- 125 Volt DC Non-Vital Power System (125NV)

- 125 Volt DC Vital Power System (125V)

- 120 Volt AC Vital Power System (120V)

- 480 Volt AC Distribution System (480V)

- 4160 Volt AC Distribution System (4160V)

- 6900 Volt AC Distribution System (6900V)

Steam Plant Systems:

- Auxiliary Feedwater System (AFW)

- Auxiliary Steam System (ASC) *

- Main Feedwater System (MFW)

- Main Steam System (MSS)

- Once Through Steam Generators (OTSG) g Control Systems: __

. - Emergency Feedwater Initiation and Control System (EFIC)

- Integrated Control System (ICS)

- Non-Nuclear Instrumentation (NNI)

- Radiation Monitoring System (RDM) *

- Reactor Protection System (RPS)

- Safety Features Actuation System (SFS)

Reactor Plant Systems:

- Decay Heat Removal System (OHS)

- Purification and Letdown System (PLS)

- Reactor Coolant System (RCS)

- Seal Injection and Makeup System (SIM)

Auxiliary Systens:

- Component Cooling Water / Turbine Plant Cooling Water Systems (CCW)

- Emergency Ofesel Generator System (EGS)

- Fire Protection System (FPS) *

- Instrument Air System / Service Air System (IAS)

- Nuclear Service Raw Water System (NRW)

- Nuclear Service Cooling Water System (NSW)

- Reactor Sampling System (RSS)

• S

]C. No.12, Rev . 2 J anuary 29, 1987 Attachment No.11 Page 5 of-S i i

Auxiliary Systems: ,

Cranes and Hoists System (CHS) -

- Carbon Dioxide System (C0S) l

- Demineralized Water System (DMW) i

- Hydrogen Gas System (HGS) j

- Main Condensate and Makeup and Air Ejectors System (MCM)  ;

- Main Circulating Water System (MCW)  :

- Nitrogen Gas System (NGS)  !

- Plant Buildings and Structures System (PBS)

- Plant Cooling Water System (PCW)  !

- Turbine Plant Sampling System (TSS)

- Secondary Chemical Addition System (SCA) -

- Site Reservoir System (SRS) l

- Service Water System (SWS) ,

- Clean Drain System Drainage and Sewage System (CDS)  ;

- Control Rod Drive System (CRD) l

- Fuel Handling System (FHS-)

- Reactor Coolant Drain System (RCD) ,

- Radioactive Waste System (RWS)  ;

- Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System (SFC) i'

- Waste Gas System (WGS).

HVAC Systems:

') __.

- HVAC Balance of P1 ant Systems (OHYS)

Other Systems:

- Main Control Room (MCR) 5.0 SYSTEM REVIEW A system review will be conductec on both the Selected and Additional

, systems as identified in Section 4.0. This review is intended to solve i

problems identified by the PP&MIP and other corrective action programs, and to prioritize the solutions. The prioritization criteria shall te a3 established in QCI-12 Section 6.2.2.4.

The review of the Selected and Additional systems under the System Review and Test Program will be documented in individual system reports. A System Status Report (SSR) will be prepared for each Selected System and a System Investigation Report (SIR) will document each Additional System review.

~

o 5 _

.g ~

OC: No. 12, Rev. 2 J anuary 29, 1987 Attacnment No.11 Page 7 of 8 4

A Rev. 2 SSR is prepared for each Selected System and is utilized for  !

final system acceptance. This report contains everything from Rev.1 l plus _ additional problem statements documenting the results of the system walkdown, a review of maintenance history trend investigation, and a review of the Davis-Besse SRTP results. This revision will also  ;

contain a summary of results of tests performed to date, address the  !

1 problem statement, and have an operability.  !'

status of each statement by thePriority'Ingineer.

Systen This revision shall also address the status of each Priority 1 problem statement, and wnen presented to PAG shall be accompanied by a report from the Quality Engineer addressing the same subject. This report is reviewed and approved by the Performance Analysis Group and Deputy General Manager, Nuclear, prior '

to restart.

i.

5.2 System Investigation. Report Overview ,

1 The SIR will be developed for all' Additional. Systems in two stages. The  !

- Rev. O SIR for each system will be utilized to get plant work started  ;

and to determine whether the systen should be uograced to Selected '

System status. The Rev. O report contains an Executive Smmnary, a '

System Functional Description, and a listing of Problem Statements  !-

. developed from.the PP&MIP process and from the results of a review of j open Work Requests, open NCRs, outstanding abnormal tags and open ECNs.

The report also contains a justification for upgrading the system to Selected status or for maintaining the Additional System status. This ,

report is reviewed hy the PAG and by. the Deputy General Manager, Nuclear. ,

Tecnnical changes required o'n SIRS shall be aandled in the same manner t as the changes to SSRs described above. i The Rev.1 SIR is utilized for final system acceptance and for

consideration for upgrading to Selected System status. The contents of -

the Rev. I status report contains the Rev. O SIR plus any additional j '

problem statements (amendments) and an Operability Finding. This  :

i report is approved by the Performance Analysis Group and the Deputy General Manager, Nuclear.

6.0 RESTART TEST PROGRAM Testing to be performed prior to restart will be identified by the SRTP and by other normal testing programs such as post modification testing, post maintenance testing and surveillance testing. To identify the functional testing for the SRTP, the System Engineer will first document the functions of the system. Testing to demonstrate each function is then defined. Current testing is considered in this review.

(

J f

-~ --y , -.- ,-- -,,,,y., , , . - . , . . . , - - ~v _,,,,7- - - - + ..,.%,--g ,e,- , ----e-g-

O I QCI No. 12, Rev. 2 J anuary 29, 1987 Attachment No. 12 Page 1 of 5 QCI-12 TRACKING SYSTEM (QTS) 1.0 PURPOSE To delineate the requirements and procedures for implementing a computerized data base to: track recommendations identified througn the QCI-12 process; and cross-reference the recomendations to plant documents, the Rancho Seco Action Plan for Performance Improvement, the 12/26/85 Transient Action List, the NRC Region V recomended Action List, NUREG-1195, and other cross-references as may be identified.  !

2.0 SCOPE This attachment defines the authority, accountability and responsibility for the input and reporting of recanmendations and cross-reference information to and from the QTS and for the maintenance of the QTS.

This Attachment also provides instructions for the entry and correction j of data, temporary storage and transmittal of OCI-12 records.  ;

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES The Quality Departnent is responsible for the maintenance of tne QCI-12 s Tracking System (QTS), with input 7esponsibility to Infomation Management Services with respect to design and development considerations. The Quality Data Supervisor shall ensure that the operational procedures are in place for the acquisition of data, data entry, data validation, report generation, daily backups, and filing of hardcopy documents. The Quality Data Supervisor is responsible to ensure that the data received are input and reported accurately, in a -

timely manner.

Other departnents and groups that provide the data input to tne QTS -

shall be responsible for the content of the data in the QTS. They shall I ensure that all data sent to QTS for entry are authorized and dated.

They shall ensure that originating data, updates and/or revisions to the data in the QTS is documented, authorized and dated and sent to the QTS for entry, in accordance with the procedures outlined 'in this attachment.

4.0 REFERENCES

QCI-12 QAIP-13 6

m e

\

- - - _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ - -_ - -)

^ ^* " ~ ~~'

U e

• QCI .No.12; Rev. 2 l

- J anuary 29, 1987

- Attachment No.12 Dage 3 of 5 6.1.1.4 Following PAG approval, enanges to the "distri bution f' fields" (i.e. Implementing organization, . i Implementing person assigned, System Report, System Engineer assigned and Quality Engineer assigned) shall be authorized by both the person currently assigned and the person to be assigned.~

6.1.2 The " Request for QCI-12 Recommencation/ System Report.

Review" form (QCI-12, Figure 5) shall be used to authorize new reconmendations and revisions to PAG approved reconsnendations.

6.1.3 The " QTS Data Entry" form (QCI-12, Figure 6) shall be i

used to document the data to be entered for new recommendations, as authorized. .

6.1.4 The QTS " Recommendation Report" (QCI-12, Figure 3) shall be used to document the data base edits to be made to .

existing recommendations, as authorized. {

e 6.1.5 The Authorizing person shall be accountable and l responsible to ensure that the data authorized for entry. l 1s accurate and complete, e.g. that data is proviced (or indicated as "NONE") for all fields of entry to the QTS, i.e. Validity, Priority, Implementing Organization, v System (s), Initiattng Document, text fields,'etc..

6.2 Data Entry Review 6.2.1 All documents subnitted for data entry to OTS shall be reviewed by QTS personnel to assure that the document is readable, reproducible and that the following minimum .;

legibility requirements are met: '

a) All document data is discernible to the naked eye.

b) Print is not blurred, marred or smudged so that it is not discerni bl e, c) Pertinent data does not run off the page.

6.2.1.1 All data entries to QTS records shall be ,  :

typewritten or made with black ball-point pen. Ink  :

shall not be susceptible to smearing or smudging, and shall be of the permanent type. I 6.2.1.2 Corrections shall be made via a single line through the incorrect data and entry of the correct data with initials and date indicated in an adjacent i area. Additional sheets shall be used if the c

adjacent area is not sufficient. Documents shall not be changed or corrected by use of_ white-out, J

correction tape, eraser or any other means which renders the original entry unreadable.

- - , , - - . , , , - - . , ,~.,,._-,-. - , . , _ , _ . , ,

s OC: No. 12, lav.

' January 29, 1987 Attachment No. 12 ,

rage o or o  !

6.5 Cross Reference of Occuments to OTS Items 6.5.1 QTS shall provide coordination with System Engineering, Implementing Organizations, Implementation and other groups for the identification and subsequent entry and reporting of identified process control documents (ECNs, i NCRs, 00Rs, Work Requests, etc.) relating to QTS items.  ;

6.6 Cross Reference of Procedures to OTS Items

_6.6.1 QTS shall provide coordination with the Practices and Procedures Coordination group, Implementation, Implementing Organizations and other groups for the

. identification and subsequent entry and reporting of all procedures, including Training Lesson Plans and courses, relating to QTS items.

6.7 OCI No.12 Document Control 6.7.1 QTS shall maintain a filing system by QTS Log Number for  ;

- the original documents signed by the RRRB, System  ;

Engineer, PAG, Implementing Organizations and Quality for their respective actions on 'the reconmendation.

3' ~

6.7.1.1 Following completion of the Action Plan -

closecut all documents will be forwarded to plant records in accordance with existing plant procedures .-

6.7.2 The QTS personnel shall receive requests for copies of the infonnation contained in the files and ensure that the request is filled in a timely manner.

6.8 Data Base Integrity and Security 6.8.1 QTS shall ensure data integrity and security by reviewing, researching, revising and backing up the database on a daily basis.

6.8.2 Backup copies of the data base shall be maintained for

. the prior six days and prior four weeks. Archive copies shall be generated on a monthly basis, t

. . s' .

[

T

,..--._---,.me- ~- -- e e ? . - - - . - - . . , _ , , - - - - - - - - , , ,a,,.--- ---E. ,-,

,,y-. . - - . , - - s-

a SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Distribution DATE: March 4, 1987

-/ s / /

FROM: Skip Wood ' d susJECT. QCI No. 12. P.ev. 2 Pt. ANT, PERF0PJ4Af!CE AND MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Attached for your use is a copy of the recently aporoved Plant Performance and Management Improvement Program (QCI No. 12).

Because of the transient nature of this QCI, it will not be distributed, nor is it to be placed in the QCI P.anual.

Upon receipt, please sign 'below and return to Document Control -

Procedures, MS 221.

I l

~.

This acknowledges receipt of QCI No. 12, Rev. 2.

DATE SIGNATURE OF MANUAL HOLDER e

4 t . - .

I

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _