ML20209D185
| ML20209D185 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 01/16/1987 |
| From: | Collins G TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20209B481 | List: |
| References | |
| 80503-SQN, 80503-SQN-R02, 80503-SQN-R2, NUDOCS 8702040429 | |
| Download: ML20209D185 (16) | |
Text
.
s ~7 a TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
REPORT TYPE SPECIAL PROGRAM 80503-SQN REVISION NUMBER:
Element Report 2
TITLE:
Document Distribution Control PAGE 1 0F 12 REASON FOR REVISION:
To incorporate SRP and TAS comments.
Note:
Sequoyah Applicability Only
^
PREPARATION PREPARED BY:
G. A. COLLINS ud f
h h4 lP 7
_e SIGNATURE JTATE /
REVIEWS PE
~
l l is 7 7 DATE #
[ ' SI6 NATURE TAS:
i SIGNATURE DATE CONCURRENCES A h l }.,,
g'7 ggK #Ky /-/6,5f, M N\\
SRP :
SIGNATURE DATE' SIGNATURE
- DATE APPROVED BY:
N/A ECSP MANAGER DATE MANAGER OF NUCLEAR DATE POWER 8702040429 870129 CONCURRENCE (FINAL PDR ADOCK 05000327 REPORT ONLY)
P PDR
- SRP Secretary's signature denotes SRP concurrences are in files.
r TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
SPECIAL PROGRAM 80503-SQN REPORT TYPE REVISION NUMBER:
2 Element Report PAGE 2 0F 12 TITLE:
Document Distribution Control 1.0 CHARACTERIZATION OF ISSUE 1.1 Introduction.
This report pertains to the Quality Assurance Category Evaluation Group (QACEG) investigation of an issue derived from seven employee concerns which were identified by the Quality Technology Corporation (QTC) during the Watts Bar Employee Concern Special Program.
This issue was evaluated at the Sequoyah Nuc lear Plant (SQN) because the concerns were considered to be either site specific or generically applicable to SQN as identified on Attachment A.
1.2 Description of Issue These concerns are grouped together into this issue because of their similarity; they each relate to the issue of Document / Drawing Con trol adequacy at SQN.
The concerns relate to:
maintenance of vendor drawings; document tracking; improper issuance of drawings / documents; the use of a master card file for control of drawings; and the correlation between drawing revisions listed in the Drawing Management Systems (DMS) and the drawing revisions located at TVA on-site and of f-site Document Control Centers (DCC).
2.0
SUMMARY
2.1 Sumary of Characterization of Issue The basic issue derived from the seven concerns is Document / Drawing Control adequacy.
The concerns identified specific instances where the document / drawing control program, procedures and instructions and their implementation were alleged to be inadequate.
2.2 Sumary of Evaluation Process The methodology used to evaluate the issue consisted of:
a.
Reviewing the following documents to determine the requirements and commitments applicable to this issue:
Appendix B to i
10 CFR 50, TVA's Topical Report, Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual (NQAM),
specifications, procedures, instructions, reports, and correspondence.
b.
Researching of Employee Concern Files including the Confidential Files for any additional information pertaining to this issue.
l c.
Reviewing and evaluating Nuclear Safety Review Staff (NSRS) l reports I-85-472-NPS, I-85-460-NPS, 1-83-13-NPS, R-85-07-NPS and I-86-129-rp.
to determine their validity regarding I
L
4 TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
SPECIAL PROGRAM 80503-SQN REPORT TYPE REVISION NUMBER:
Element Report 2
TITLE:
PAGE 3 0F 12 Document Distribution Control document / drawing control adequacy.
These reports were used as the basis for the Summaary and Findings sections of this report.
~se.m & ++.ge-w They.- are c included in Section,6 of. this report - as attachments. B,,
thru F respectively.
d.
Holding discussions with cognizant personnel that manage or supervise the document distribution control system to determine if applicable requirements and commitments are being implemented.
e.
Reviewing 212 as-designed drawings listed on the DMS data base to compare the latest drawing revisions identified on the computer printout and aperture cards at on-site and off-site Drawing Control Centers.
2.3 Summarv of Findings The concerns of record regarding this issue are substantiated.
The following negative findings were identified pertaining to the issue of document / drawing control adequacy.
a.
The SQN master index system is not a reliable drawing control system.
b.
There are no implementing procedures for drawing control at the off-site Drawing Control Center (DCC) as required by NQAM, Part I, Section 2.6, Paragraph 5.1.
c.
The revision of as-designed drawings identified on the DMS data base did not reflect the latest drawing revisions at on-site and off-site DCCs as required by NQAM, Part I, Section 2.6, Paragraph 5.1.
I d.
QA Staff Surveillance Section performed an inplant survey and issued report 10-85-S-002 which identified deficiencies regarding the control of ver. dor drawings.
A Corrective Action Report (CAR)
SQCAR-85-03-005 was initiated as a result of the deficiencies which established corrective action that revised the NQAM and implementing Administrative Instruction to define more restrictive controls on vendor drawings.
Corrective action was l
not requested or performed for the actual deficiencies of vendor drawings identified in the survey.
e.
Vendor manuals and drawings contained in Environmental Qualification (EQ) binders do not agree with plant controlled l
vendor manuals and information identified in the DMS.
TVA's upper and lower tier procedures were inadequate to control vendor drawings.
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
SPECIAL PROGRAM 80503-SQN REPORT TYPE REVISION NUMBER:
Element Report 2
TITLE:
PAGE 4 0F 12 Document Distribution Control f.
On-site Drawing Control Center (DCC) personnel failed to follow established procedures regarding drawing distribution as required
,,by implementing Office of Engineering Procedure (OEP) OEP-08.
g.
Deficiencies regarding microfilming, indexing and retrieval of the Quality Engineering Branch (QEB) and Office of Construction (OC) documents have not been identified and documented on a CAR as required by NQAM, Part I, Section 2.16, Paragraph 5.1.
k 2.4 Summarv of Corrective Action A CAR (SQCAR 86-01-004),
initiated by Quality Assurance (QA) on January 30, 1986, identified deficiencies regarding vendor manuals and drawings contained in SQN Environmental Qualification binders.
Specific site corrective action responsibilities have been defined for their resolution.
TVA is also providing an appropriate framework to resolve issues raised in NRC Generic Letter 83-28 with a commitment date of January 1, 1988.
Certain problem areas still exist and are being tracked for completion by TVA's QA Staff.
3.0 EVALUATOR (S)
G. A. Collins 4.0 EVALUATION PROCESS This section describes the general and specific methodology used in the evaluation of the issue dealing with document / drawing control adequacy.
4.1 General Methods of Evaluation The Employee Concern Files (including the Confidential File) were researched for additional information pertaining to this issue.
The basic contents of the files were K-forms, various NSRS investigation reports identified in Section 4.2,
" Specifics of Evaluation", and various memorandues pertaining to the employee concerns.
Upper tier programs and lower tier implementing procedures were reviewed to determine requirements and specific responsibilities.
Standards, instructions, audit and surveillance
- reports, and correspondence were reviewed to determine the extent of the issue of Document / Drawing Control.
Discussed the employee concerns with 26 individuals involved in the Document / Drawing Control Program to determine if requirements and commitments have been implemented.
,i
r-TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
SPECIAL PROGRAM 80503-SQN REPORT TYPE REVISION NUMBER:
Element Report 2
TITLE:
PAGE 5 0F 12 Document Distribution Control 4.2 Specifics of Evaluation Reviewed the. applicable requirements and commitments pertaining to Document / Drawing Control program:
Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 dated January 20, 1975 a.
b.
Topical Report, TVA-TR-1A revision 8 Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual (NQAM) dated December 23, 1985 c.
d.
Inter Divisional Quality Assurance Procedure (IDQAP) ID-QAP-6.1,
" Document Control", dated December 31, 1984 and June 18, 1986 e.
ID-QAP-6.2, " Configuration Drawing Control", dated December 31, 1985 and June 18, 1986.
f.
ID-QAP-17.1, " Transfer of QA Records", dated October 1, 1984 and June 18, 1986.
g.
ID-QAP-17.2, "QA Records for Design and Construction",
dated October 1, 1984 and June 18, 1986.
h.
Administrative Instruction (AI) - AI-25 Revisions 10 through 15,
" Drawing Control After Unit Licensing" i.
AI-23, revision 21, " Vendor Manual control" j.
AI-08, " Drawing and Reproduction", dated September 10, 1985 k.
Office of Engineering Procedure (OEP) OEP-08,
" Design Output" 1.
Nuclear Engineering Procedure (NEP)
NEP-5.1,
" Design Output",
dated July 1, 1986 Reviewed and evaluated previous NSRS Reports because of their relationship to document / drawing control adequacy and to determine their adequacy regarding this issue.
I-85-472-NPS, dated December 26, 1985, " Drawing Control Master Index System"; I-85-460-NPS, dated March 7, 1986, " Drawing Control at Off-Site Locations and DMS Accuracy";
I-86-185-SQN, dated March 5, 1986, "SQNP Vendor Drawing Control"; I 180-SQN, dated March 4,
1986, "SQN Drawing Control";
I-83-13-NPS, dated June 17, 1983, " Investigation of Concerns Regarding Quality Engineering Branch (QEB) Records"; R-85-07-NPS, dated May 28, 1985,
" Follow Up Review of Report I-83-13-NPS"; I-86-129-SQN, dated March 3, 1986, "Second Follow Up Review of QEB Records"; and documents and references identified in the reports.
r TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
SPECIAL PROCRAM 80503-SQN REPORT TYPE REVISION NUMBER:
Element Report 2
TITLE:
PAGE 6 0F 12 Document Distribution Control Reviewed applicable Corrective Action Reports (CAR) SQ-CAR-85-03-005, and SQ-CAR-86-01-004; Significant Condition Reports (SCR) GENIMS-8501, SQN SQP-8602,RO, and SQN SQP8604 R0; and QA Staff Survey Checklist Number I C-8 5'-s-00 2, to determine if Corrective Actions (C/A) were in compliance with program requirements and implementing procedures / instructions.
Reviewed 212 as-designed drawings listed on the DMS data base to compare the latest drawing revisions identified on the computer printout and aperture cards at on-site and off-site Drawing Control Centers.
5.0 FINDINGS 5.1 Finding on Issue -
Distribution of controlled drawings and revisions are not in accordance with applicable upper-tier QA program requirements.
Several conc ern s we re grouped together into one issue because they each relate to the issue of Document / Drawing Control adequacy at SQN.
Discussien TVA's current system for drawing control is the Drawing Management System (DMS) established in June 1984, not the master card file system as alleged.
TVA's QA program documents, upper and lower tier requirements such as NQAM, Part III, Section 1.1,
" Document Control";
NQAM, Part V,
Section 6.1, (ID-QAP 6.1),
" Configuration Drawing Control (CCD)"; and Administrative Instruction AI-25, " Drawing Control After Unit Licensing", do not allow the use of the master card file by Document Control Center (DCC) personnel for CCDs.
The Nuclear Safety Review Staff (NSRS) conducted an investigation pertaining to the master card system for drawings at SQN and issued report I-85-472-NPS that identified findings with recommendations for corrective action.
The SQN Site Director responded to the NSRS report stating that the recommendations could not be implemented at the pre sent time.
The NSRS Director issued a memorandum on February 28, 1986 regarding the corrective action response which stated the SQN response was rejected for conflicting and inconsistent d rawing control requirements.
In addition, statements contained in the response support the indication that dis tribution of controlled copies of drawings and revision controls at SQN are not being accomplished in accordance with applicable upper-tier QA program requirements.
Conc lu s ion Based on the evaluation and investigation by the Quality Assurance Category Evaluation Group (QACEG) it was determined that the NSRS
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
SPECIAL PROGRAM S0503-SQN REPORT TYPE REVISION NUMBER:
Element Report 2
TITLE:
PAGE 7 0F 12 Document Distribution Control report findings and recommendations we re valid and are still applicable.
The NSRS Director's rejection of the SQN Site Director's responses for, corrective actions have not been addressed.
5.2 Finding on Issue - There are no implementing procedures for the operation of drawing control at TVA off-site Drawing Control Centers (DCC).
Discussion The NSRS conducted an investigation pertaining to " Drawing Control at Offsite Locations and Drawing Management System Accuracy" and issued report I-85-460-NPS with recommendations for corrective action.
The QACEG concurs with the NSRS report findings and recommendations; however, inadequate drawing control requirements at off-site DCCs were not addressed.
As a result of the NSRS report, the Configuration Control Task Force initiated a DMS Interim Program Plan (Attachment G) to identify responsibility for implementation and schedule completion of the DMS program plan.
The concern was initiated in August 1985 but could not be evaluated in that time frame.
An investigation was performed at SQN on as-designed drawings for System No.
67, " Essential Raw Cooling Water (ERCW)".
This entailed identifying 212 of the latest drawing revisions listed on the DMS.
The list was verified in mid September 1986, against the latest computer printout, dated August 15, 1986 and the latest drawing revisions identified on aperture cards located at SQN Drawing Control Center (DCC), Chattanooga DCC, and the Technical Information Center (TIC) in Knoxville.
The computer printout is revised monthly.
The following discrepancies were identified:
DMS identified drawing 17W600-4 Revision 3, Chattanoooga DCC latest aperture card is Revision 2 dated 6/7/78; DMS identified drawings 47W450-28 Revision 3, 47W845-4 Revision 25, 47W845-5 Revision 13, 47W845-6 Revision 2,
- however, 2
aperture cards were not available for drawings at Chattanooga DCC; DMS identified drawings 47B601-55-23 Revision 1, and 45N706-1 Revision 22, where Chattanooga DCC and tic in Knoxville has aperture cards with a later revision.
Site DCC has an aperture card with a later revision for drawing 47N706-1 Revision 22, but no card for drawing 47B601-55-23 Revision 1.
The investigation of Chattanooga DCC and TIC in Knoxville revealed that no TVA lower-tier QA approved procedures or instructions were available.
The Chattanooga DCC had a Section Instruction Letter (SIL)
-3, dated February 21, 1985, which states in part:
I
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
SPECIAL PROGRAM 80503-SQN REPORT TYPE REVISION NUMBER:
Element Report 2
TITLE:
PAGE 8 0F 12 Document Distribution Control "The DCC is designed as a self service facility that offers up to date documented information on as-designed, as-constructed and vendor. drawings."
Conclusion Based on the investigation and evaluation by the QACEG it was determined that the NSRS report findings and recommendations still apply and that additional corrective actions are needed for findings identified on CATDs.
(See Paragraph 5.6) 2 5.3 Finding on Issue - Vendor drawings at SQN are not being maintained in an orderly system such that incorrect drawings may have been issued to engineers for use in the field.
Discussion A survey was conducted by the QA Staff Surveillance Section during February 19 thru 25, and March 4 thru 8,
1985, on vendor drawing control.
The survey was done to examine the control of vendor drawings and to verify the effectiveness of the plants in implementing applicable requirements.
The survey results indicated that controls were not adequate to ensure "as-constructed" vendor drawings were used in the performance of maintenance on Critical Structures, Systems, and Components (CSSC) equipment.
Revision levels of drawings contained in validated vendor manuals did not accurately reflect as-constructed drawing revision levels.
As a result, the subject vendor drawings did not depict the plants' as-constructed configuration.
Drawings in validated vendor manuals are routinely used to perform maintenance on CSSC rather than the as-:onstructed vendor drawings.
As a result of the survey, CAR SQ CAR-85-03-005 was issued.
The CAR was completed and closed out on April 11, 1986 by revising the NQAM Part III, Section 1.1, and Administrative Instruction AI-25, Revision 13, to define more restrictive controls on use of vendor drawings.
In discussion with the initator of the CAR, it was determined that no corrective actions had been performed or requested on the actual deficiencies identified in the survey.
SQ-CAR-86-01-004 was initiated on January 30, 1986 stating:
" Contrary to the requirements contained in AI-23, Revision 21, and NQAM Part V, Section 6.1, dated December 21, 1985, certain vendor manuals and drawings contained in SQN Environmental Qualification (EQ) binders do not match with plant controlled vendor manuals and information identified in the DMS."
The corrective action plan provided by the Enviromental Qualification (EQ) Project Manager for SQ-CAR-86-01-004 states in part:
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
SPECIAL PROGRAM 80503-SQN REPORT TYPE REVISION NUMBER:
Element Report 2
TITLE:
PAGE 9 0F 12 Document Distribution Control "A new vendor manual control program is being developed that not only solves the problem at hand but is also directed at providing an appropriate framework to resolve the issues raised in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Generic Letter 83-28 and this program will require a substantial commitment of resources through January 1, 1988.
The NRC Generic Letter 83-28 requires that "for vendor interface, licensees and applicants shall establish, implement and maintain a continuing program to ensure that vendor information for safety-related components is complete, current and controlled throughout the life of their plants, and appropriately referenced or incorporated in plant instructions and procedures."
NSRS Report I-86-185-SQN, "SQNP Vendor Drawing Control", was issued on March 5,
1986.
The report addressed five employee concerns that identified deficiencies with the vendor drawing control program within the Division of Nuclear Engineering (DNE).
Corrective actions were addressed throughout the report with no tracking document identified for the deficiencies such as CARS /DRs.
The NSRS recommendations stated:
" Corrective action concerning SQN vendor drawing controls is in progress through performance of a vendor drawing audit which began January / February 1986 and controlled replacement of drawings where needed."
As part of the QACEG investigation a discussion was held with the DNE Office Supervisor, and the document control clerk who is in process of doing an internal accountability audit on vendor drawings to verify compliance with the computer printout and the DMS.
They stated that forty percent of vendor drawings are in compliance; however, due to other priority tasks, the audit was suspended with no scheduled completion date.
Conclusion Based on the QACEG evaluation and investigation of the identified NSRS report, QA Survey and CARS, it was determined that vendor drawings and manuals at SQN were not adequately maintained.
Upper and lower tier procedures were inadequate to control vendor drawings to preclude issuance of duplicate drawings and drawings with conflicting information.
5.4 Finding on Issue - On-site Drawing Control Center personnel's failure to follow established procedures regarding drawing distribution.
Discussion Regarding drawings being improperly issued, Significant Condition Report (SCR)
SQN SQP8602, Revision 0 was initiated.
The SCR 2
identified design drawings on Engineering Change Notice (ECN), ECN
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
SPECIAL PROGRAM 80503-SQN REPORT TYPE REVISION NUMBER:
Element Report 2
TITLE:
PAGE 10 0F 12 Document Distribution Control
- L6027, that were issued on August 6, 1985, without the Project Manager's release for distribution as required by Office of Engineering Procedure (OEP), OEP-08.
NSRS Report I-86-180-SQN, "SQN 2
Drawing Control" was issued addressing the nonconforming conditions of these design drawings.
A review of the affected drawings by the QACEG revealed that the drawings were redistributed and initialed by the Project Manager.
The SCR stated the root cause of improperly issued drawings was due to new personnel in almost all clerical positions.
Conclusion Based on the evaluation and investigation by the QACEG it was determined that the NSRS report substantiating the concern is valid.
Additionally, the basic problem appears to be the failure of personnel to follow established procedures.
Corrective actions have been initiated by SQN to preclude this from happening in the future.
5.5 Finding on Issue - Inadequate system of tracking documents.
Discussion In regard to TVA's system of tracking documents, the QACEG identified three (3) NSRS Investigations performed at SQN regarding " Quality Engineering Branch (QEB) Records."
The investigations originated on March 16, 1983 and NSRS report I 13-NPS was issued on June 17, 1983, addressing extensive deficiencies involving the retrieval of information from vendor QA records at SQN.
The document tracking system was considered by NSRS to be inadequate due to the poor organization, lack of completeness, low level of indexing and lack of editing.
A follow up review was performed by the NSRS and report R-85-07-NPS was issued on May 28, 1985.
It revealed that corrective actions resulting from the original investigation had not been completely closed.
For example, QEB records were not adequately indexed and Records Retrieval Indexing (RRI) did not preclude the need to rely on individuals' memories to locate records.
The report recommended that Power and Engineering (Nuclear) appoint an upper level manager enpowered with the responsibility, authority and organizational freedom to assure that records associated with the procurement and installation of QEB source inspected equipment and materials are assembled, verified for completeness, indexed and stored for retreivability to include all past and future QEB records at SQN.
A second follow up review was performed by the NSRS and report I 129-SQN was issued on March 3,
1986.
The report revealed that corrective actions remained open; such as, indexing of records, microfilming of newly discovered Office of Construction records, manual indices, and rework of the RRI System at SQN by Nuclear Power.
g TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
SPECIAL PROGRAM 80503-SQN REPORT TYPE REVISION NUMBER:
Element Report 2
TITLE:
PAGE 11 0F 12 Document Distribution Control A status report was issued by the supervisor of Information Systems dated September 30, 1986 regarding SQN construction records which states in part:
"Because of problems associated with the retrieval of Sequoyah construction
- records, a uniform, computer-based construction 1
records system for all plant systems and components is being established and will provide all levels of plant supervision and engineering personnel with immediate access to construction information.
This program will provide a satisfactory method of tracking an item or activity in a systematic manner.
Considering the volume of records and people we now have, it will take until December 31, 1987 to mark the computer printouts and another fes.r to complete the data entry and verification into the computer."
~
Conclusion Based on the evaluation and investigation by the QACEG, it was determined that the NSRS reports findings are valid and open items still exist such as:
QEB identification, location, verification of a
completeness and micro filming of QA records; RRI of QEB and Construction records; and, as noted in the conclusion of Section 5.3.
the vendor drawings and manuals were not adequately maintained.
5.6 Corrective Action The investigation and evaluation revealed that the concerns identified on Attachment A are substantiated and could potentially impact sa fe ty.
As a result of the conditions identified in Section 5.1 thru 5.5, the QACEG issued the following Corrective Action Tracking Documents (CATDs) and are pending resolution of the SQN Site Director's 2
responses.
j
- a. CATD No. 80503-SQN-01 (Attachment H) was issued regarding the NSRS Director's rejection of the SQN Site Director's responses to NSRS Report No. I-85-472-NPS.
l
- b. CATD Nos. 80503-SQN-02 and 80503-SQN-03 ( Attachments I and J) were issued for SQN to identify implementir,g QA procedures and instructions at o f f-s ite DCCs and to correct identified de ficiencies of drawing revisions and missing aperture cards l
at on-site and off-site DCCs.
c. CATD No s. 80503-SQN-04 and 80503-SQN-05 (Attachments K and L) were issued to document the lack of corrective action for deficiencies identified in the QA Inplant Survey Checklist No.
l IC-85-S-002 dated 3/14/85 and NSRS Report No. I-86-185-SQN.
l l
f l-
e t
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
- g.g.
s SPECIAL PROGRAM 80503-SQN s
REPORT TYPE REVISION NUMBER:
Element Report 2
TITLE:
PAGE 12 0F 12 Document Distribution Control
- d. CATD No.
80503-SQN-06 was issued with Revision 0 of this Element but has been voided because of corrective actions initiated by SQN to preclude recurrence.
- e. CATD No. 80503-SQN-07 (Attachment M) was issued to document the lack of tracking documents such as a CAR for identified deficiencies noted in NSRS Report No. 1-83-13-NPS, R-85-07-NPS and I-86-129-SQN.
6.0 ATTACHMENTS **
A.
List of Employee Concerns In forma tion for Element 80503 dated Oc tober 3,1986 B.
NSRS Investigation Report ho. I-85-472-NPS C.
NSRS Investigation Report No. I-85-460-NPS D.
NSRS Investigation Report No. I-83-13-NPS E.1.'NSRS Investigation Report No. R-85-07-NPS F. 's NSRS Investigation Report No. I-86-129-SQN G.
Memorandum regarding " Sponsorship of the Drawing Management System and Program Plan".
'H.
Corrective Action Tracking Document 80500-SQN-01 1.
Corrective Action Tracking Document 80503-SQN-02 J.
Corrective Action Tracking Document 80503-SQN-03 K.
Corrective Action Tracking Document 80503-SQN-04 L.
Corrective Action Tracking Document 80503-SQN-05 g
M.
Corrective Action Tracking Document 80503-SQN-07 N.
Corrective Action Tracking Document 80503-SQN-06 -- Voided 1
- NOTE: Best available copies.
f 4
i 4
e h
I i
...---u -
O 4-
+
e e
ATTACHMENT A LIST OF FMPLOYEE CONCERNS INFORMATION FOR ELEMENT 80503 1
l
=
~
1 REFERENCE
- ECPS120J-ECPSI21C TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY PAGE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR P0HER RUN TIME - II
~
FREQUENCY
- REQUEST ONP - ISSS - RHM EMPLOYEE CONCERN PROGRAN SYSTEM (ECPS)
RUN DATE - 10 I
LIST OF EMPLOYEE CONCERN INF0dMATION CATEGORY: QA QA/QC PROGRAMS SUBCATEGORY: 80503 DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION CONTROL S
GENERIC KEYHORD A H
APPL QTC/NSRS P
KEYHORD B CONCERN SUB R PLT BBSH INVESTIGATION S
CONCERN
- KEYHORD C HUMBER CA1 CAT
.D LOC FLQB REPORT R
DESCRIPTION KEYHORD D w XX 062-0018 QA 80503 N NPS NNNY I-85-460-NPS NS BROHN'S FERRY, BELLEFONTE, SEQUOYAH DOCUMENT STATUS T50129 K-FORM CI HAS BEEN UNDFFICIALLY INFORMED T DOCUllENT CONTRt
- I /:
HAT THE LATEST DRAHIllGS ON ALL TVA N OPERATIONS
-e UCLEAR PDHER PLANT SITES ARE NOT, IN GENERAL
' no THE MAJORITY OF INSTANCES, THE LATE ST DRAHINGS AT OFFSITE TVA ADMINISTR g
ATIVE OFFICES / DEPARTMENTS, INCLUDING A COMPUTER PRINT-0UT THAT DOES NOT REFLECT THE CURREdT DRAHING REVISIDH THIS CAN, AND DOES, CAUSE DESIGN,
. MODIFICATION, AND/OR REPAIR PROBLEM S.
NUCLEAR PDHER. CI HAS NO MORE I as NFORMATION.
l XX 062-002' QA 80503 H NPS NNNN 1-85-472-NPS NS BROWN'S FERRY BELLEFONTE THE CURRE DOCUMENT STATUS
= <c T50129 K-FORM
.NT TVA SYSTEM OF USING A MASTER CARD DOCUMENT CONTRI
'g FILE OF DRAHINGS (THIS SYSTEM IN PL OPERATIONS ACE AT SEQUOYAH) IS INDEQUATE AND SN GENERAL DULD NOT BE IMPLEMENTED (IF NOT ALRE
'O
' ADY) AT HATTS BAR, BROHH'S FERRY, AH
'O D BELLEFONTE. THIS SYSTEM ALLOWS F0
'8 R INSTANT DISARRAY, DISTRUCTION OR L USS OF REFERENCE CARDS IF A DRAHER I S DROPPED OR THE SYSTEM SABOTAGED.
THE DATA FROM THE CARDS SHOULD BE IN PUT TO THE COMPUTER AND AVAILABLE TO ALL' APPLICABLE OFFICES HITHIN TVA.
NUCLEAR P0HER CONCERN. CI HAS 7 CONCERNS FOR CATEGORY QA SUBCATEGORY 80503 e.
e 9
e
" O
. s. 9: !-
g.,, - - -
e
~
\\
8 I
{3 REFERE'HCE
- ECPSI20J-ECPSI21C TENNESSEE VALLEY AUT!!ORITY PAGE 3
FREQUENCY
- REQUEST OFFICE OF NUCLEAR POWER RUN TIME - I'.
()
CNP - ISSS - RHM EMPLOYEE CONCERN PROGRAM SYSTEM (ECPS)
RUN DATE - 11 LIST OF EMPLOYEE CONCERN INFORMATION CATEGORY: QA QA/QC PROGRAMS-SUBCATEGORY 80503 DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION CONTRDL
()
S GENERIC KEYHORD A H
APPL QTC/NSRS P
KEYHORD 5 CONCERN SUB R PLT BBSH INVESTIGATION 5
CONCERN KEYHORD C NUMBER CAT CAT D LOC FLQB REPORT R
DESCRIPTION KEYHORD D 2 " RII-86-A-0014.*
QA 80503 N SQN NNNN NS AN ALLEGER INDICATED CONCERN THAT TH uo K-FORM E VENDOR DRAHINGS AT SEQUOYAH HAD NO i/.
T BEEN MAINTAINED IN AN ORDERLY SYST
{)g c-EM SUCH THAT INCORRECT DRAHINGS MAY HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ENGINEERS FOR US U
i E IN THE FIELD. FOR CLOSURE OF THIS ISSUE, TVA SHOULD DETERMINE HHETHER (3
OR NOT INCORRECT VENDOR DRAHINGS HER E USED RESULTING INIMPROPER INSTALLA TION AND OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT AND DOCUMENT THE RESULTS OF THE FINDINGS
()
ALSD, TVA SHOULD REVIEW THE VENDO R DRAHING PROGRAM AND DETERMINE THE CORRECTNESS OF THE DRAHINGS AND 1
O < SON-86-040-001 S GA 80503 N SQN NNNN NS DURING THE EXIT INTERVIEW THE CI EXP K-FORM REsSED HIS CONCERN HITH THe DRAHING H
CONTROL PROGRAM.
THE CI GAVE HIS CD M
i-
. HISH TO RESTATE IT OR TD HAVE IT INV i
t NCERN TO HIS SUPERVISOR AND DID NOT
()g ESTIGATED.
l u
.
- 4 U SQM-86'-003-001.g. QA 80503 N SQN NNNN I-86-180-54N SS SPECIFIC DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPROPE NONCONFORMANCE Q$4 T50253 RLY ISSUED.
(NAMES / DETAILS KNDHN TO DOCUMENT CONTR QTC, HITHHELD TO MAINTAIN CONFIDENT ENGINEERING IALITY.) NO FURTHER INFORMATION MAY REPORTS I
3D BE RELEASED. NUCLEAR PDHER CONCERN CI HAS H0 FURTHER INFORMATION HD FOLLOH-UP REQUIRED.
XX 053-N04 QA 80503 N SQN NNNN NS NRC IDENTIFI'ED THE FOLLOHING CONCERN K-FORM TE SYSTEM OF TRACKING DOCUMENTS."
i FROM REVIEN OF QTC FILE.
"INADEQUA k
1)
IN 108-001 - QA 80503 N HBN NNNN I-85-460-NPS NS CI HAS BEEN UNOFFICIALLY INFORMED TH DOCUMENT STATUS i
T50129 K-FORM AT THE L ATEST DRAHINGS ON ALL TVA NU DOCUMENT CONTRO CLEAR PDHER PLANT SITES ARE NOT, IN CCHSTRUCTION
= = -
THE MAJORITY OF INSTANCES, THE LATES GENERAL T)
T DRAHINGS AT OFFSITE TVA ADMINISTRA TIVE OFFICES / DEPARTMENTS, INCLUDING A COMPUTER PRINT-0UT THAT DOES NOT R EFLECT THE CURRENT DRAHING REVISION.
r
()
THIS CAN, AND DOES, CAUSE DESIGN, MODIFICATION, AND/OR REPAIR PROBLEMS I
NUCLEAR POWER. CI HAS NO MORE IN e
==
u 2ke
. r' FORMATION.
I
}' f
ATTACHMENT B NSRS INVESTIGATION REPORT No. I-85-472-NPS 9
9 i
I l
l I
-