ML20207T134
ML20207T134 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 08/28/1985 |
From: | Goller K NRC - RESEARCH INDEPENDENT REVIEW BOARD |
To: | Gillespie F NRC - RESEARCH INDEPENDENT REVIEW BOARD |
Shared Package | |
ML20205D544 | List: |
References | |
FRN-52FR2540, RULE-PR-30, RULE-PR-32 AB34-1-26, AB34-2-40, NUDOCS 8703230237 | |
Download: ML20207T134 (1) | |
Text
. _ . _ . _ ~ . _ _ ,_ ._.
RE5 INDEPENDEG1 F.! VIEW BOARD VOTING SHEET 4
TO: F. P. GILLESPIE, CHAIRMAN, RIRB FROM: K. R. Goller, Member, RIRB TITLE OF RULEMAKING:
- b D\o 4-CS-R 32 3 % M 10 Seww36,M LSvw l'
AGREE WITH REC 0pmENDATIONS IN RES RULEMAKING REVIEW M
- PACKAGE .
MODIFY RECOMMENDATIONS IN NOT PARTICIPATING.
X RES RULEMAKING REVIEW '
- PACKAGE AS INDICATED BELOW ,
J CO W NTS AND SUGGESTIONS:
i' An important precedent is about to be set here and RIRB should consider carefully what this is.
Essentially the only reason given for recomending terminating this rulemaking is inadequate RES resources. In any case, terminating a rulemaking for .
this reason alone should be very carefully considered, including the possibility of transferring lead responsibility to another office. In this case, however, the " user" office has indicated willingness to assume such responsibility.
Therefore, it would be very bureaucratic to follow through with this independent l review and terminate this rulemaking and then perform another review to initiate
- the same rulemaking by another office. Instead, why not set a precedent that the consideration of the transfer of lead responsibility for a rulemaking (for any reason and at any time) is part of an independent review of a rulemakirig 1
' and that such a transfer and approval of continuing the rulemaking can result directly from a recommendation to this effect coming out of an independent review.
l l
l 8/2e for DAT[. -
! B703230237 870304 52 2540 PDR l
,, . nJ c, ;w . _ . . (*
.