ML20207S866

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards marked-up Comments Based on Review of Draft Proposed Rule Re Mfg Registration of Radiation Safety Info for Certain Devices & Sealed Sources.Addl Info Required in Regulatory Analysis & Regulatory Flexibility Certification
ML20207S866
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/12/1986
From: Grimsley D
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Cunningham R
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20205D544 List:
References
FRN-52FR2540, RULE-PR-30, RULE-PR-32 AB34-1-12, AB34-2-26, NUDOCS 8703200346
Download: ML20207S866 (1)


Text

--- ~ _ .. . - - - . . . - . . . -

.._......~.

/

[ g UNITED STATES t

  • NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION '

wAsHWGTON, D. C. 20666 AB34-1

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Richard E. Cunningham, Director '

Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety FROM:

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Donnie H. Grimsley Director Division of Rules a,nd Records

' ~ ~

~

Office of Administration

SUBJECT:

~~

14ANUFACTURERS' REGISTRATION OF RADIATIO SAFETY INFORMATION FOR CERTAIN DEVICES A SEALED SOURCES concerning manufacturers' registraThe Division of Rules and certain devices and sealed sources. tion of radiation safety information forproposed rule package that sets out our specific comments.We have enclosed a marked-up copy of t Addf tional information is required in both the ysis Regulatory and the the Anal Regulatory Flexibility potential economic effect of this proposed rule Certification statement to indicate cost impact and manufacturer in developing and submitting an ave. The costs incurred by a thedescribed.

be NRC that is sufficient for NRC review andeinclusion registry should in thrage info license applications that use information contained s ry and the c in averagethesavings Finally, analyses accruing to a license should indicate the costsapplicant incurred because b

ry. of the reg manufacturer's license ' applications. submittal vis-a-vis the costs in reviewing multiple sy pecific Consission's backfit analysis requirements.We cability of thenote that th appropriate language concernin The proper approach and Office of the General Counsel.g this matter should be coordinated with the We have suggested a revision to the Summary statement that is Register (OFR). needed to more clearly comply (NUREG/BR-0053 the Susmary paragraph shou with the publication req)uiremen e Federal document the action does,)w,hy the action is necessary,ld succinctly indica language an.

In addition, we have made additional changes in the ame 0FR pubitcation requirements.d the, presentation ofy with the amendmen Our comments in the regulatory text are designed to adopt the tion endorsed by the OFR to impose an obifgation or express standard conven-prohibition.

a this convention, discussed in section 13.27 of _

a the NRC Regul ti ons Handbook, In 8703200346 070304 N52h2540 PDR

..