ML20207S637

Forwards Draft Recommendations to EDO Re Continuance of Ongoing Rulemaking Sponsored by RES Concerning Rev to 10CFR30,32,40 & 70 for Licensing of Sources & Devices for Concurrence

ML20207S637
Person / Time
Issue date:	05/28/1985
From:	Gillespie F NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
To:	Cunningham R NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20205D544	List: ML20205D540 ML20205H439 ML20206R668 ML20206T160 ML20207A130 ML20207S558 ML20207S585 ML20207S596 ML20207S608 ML20207S622 ML20207S628 ML20207S637 ML20207S669 ML20207S695 ML20207S845 ML20207S866 ML20207S892 ML20207S910 ML20207S926 ML20207S935 ML20207S947 ML20207S955 ML20207S961 ML20207S964 ML20207S965 ML20207T123 ML20207T134 ML20207T142 ML20207T145
References
FRN-52FR2540, RULE-PR-30, RULE-PR-32 AB34-1-07, AB34-1-7, AB34-2-21, NUDOCS 8703200123
Download: ML20207S637 (2)

Text

i

@^RB r/f

~ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^

~-

3.'

Circ /Subj/Chron CBartlett

'Y JCBelote

.~

JMalaro MErnst ENE FGillespie Dross RMinogue l

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Richard E. Cunningham, Director Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards FROM:

Frank P. Gillespie. Director Division of Risk Analysis and Operations Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

SUBJECT:

DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS TO ED0 CONCERNING THE CONTINUANCE

7 0F ONGOING RULEMAKING SPONSORED BY RES

REVISIONS TO 10

/

CFR 30, 32, 40 AND 70--LICENSING OF SOURCES AND DEVICES 4

Enclosed for your concurrence are draft recomunendations to the EDO and a supporting Staff Analysis concerning the continuation of the subject rulemaking action for which your Division is identified as the User Office.

In sumary, we are reconumending that the subject rulemaking, in ~1ts present form, be teminated.

i This recommendation was discussed with members of your staff at a meeting March 19, 1985. At that meeting it was generally agreed that improvements in the procedures for licensing sealed sources and devices were indicated.

It was also agreed that there were alternatives to the subject rulemaking which might be more effective in achieving these improvements and that these alternatives should be investigated further.

This memorandum constitutes my concurrence with these draft recomunendations.

I plan to dispatch this package to the Director RES two weeks from the above date for subsequent transmittal to the EDO.

i I would appreciate it if you would provide your concurrence with or cooments on these recommendations by signing and returning the enclosed concurrence sheet.

Frank P. 0111espie, Director

% j32pg123 M0304 Division of Risk Analysis and Operations 30 52FR2540 PDR Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research l

l

Enclosures:

As stated i

L n.

R..A..M.....S..... R.A, RAMRh:RES DD:

0:RES

RE

. - = >

. J)...... ".

h...

' '8'5' *

"* ~ * '

• 'p' *"f"' * * "

4/..N.....85........../. 8 5 85 4

/85 ou=>

s l

~~ '

cc mu ne no soi uncu ono OFFICIAL RECORD COPY '

~ -g..

e USER OFFICE CONCURRENCE SHEET l

RECGMENDATIONS TO EDO 1

Receipt acknowledged. No Comment.

Receipt acknowledged. Comments as follows:

Richard E. Cunningham. Director Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards v

OPPICE) umme)

CATE)

__