ML20207N591
| ML20207N591 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07001193 |
| Issue date: | 06/09/1975 |
| From: | Devlin J, Donahue J, Hind J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207N448 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-281 70-1193-75-07, 70-1193-75-7, NUDOCS 8701140307 | |
| Download: ML20207N591 (48) | |
Text
a 1
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY OPERATIONS OFFICE OF INSPECTION ANp ENFORCDIENT l
i I
REGION III
~l 1
RO Inspection Report No. 070-1193/75-07 i
Licensce:
Kerr-McGee Nuc1 car Corporation Kerr-l!cccc Center License No. S:01-1174 Oklaboraa City, Oklahoma
- Priority: I t
l Cimarron Facility, Pu Plant I
Crescent Oklahoma i
Type of Licensec:
SNM t
Type of Inspection: Unannounced Physical Protection t
Dates of Inspection: May 20-22, 1975
,\\
a
\\.'. byn
- n. s 1
Lead Inspector': J. F. Donahuc l' ll L--
(,///(*7i, (Ddto) h
. Y.
- r.v..(iu.s Accompanying Inspector:
- J. W. Devlin, IE:1. t-
~
(
'I 7i.
(Datc)
I, si i
- d. f /, 4 i /.< ;c. ?. 1 Reviewed By:, J. A. Ilind, Chief
,P Haterials and Plant
_,4 /.'<
Protection Branch (Date)
Attachment:
Findings (10 CFR 2.790 Nnformation)
- g
.t e
ca, le re%)
i; f,M q.
.j' g.,.p4e 8701140307 870109 PDR FOIA CANTREL86-281 PDR WP
I.' '
i StD2fARY OF FINDINGS I
Enforcement Action The following items of noncompliance were identified during the inspection:
Violations: None
\\
Infractions Contrary to 10 CFR 70.32(c), a charige was made in the approved security plan which would decrease its ef fectiveness and prior approval for this 1.
received from IGC. [This change related to change was not solicited or the replacement of the cocbination lock on the door of the material storage vault with a key lock) (See Page No.13, Report Details)
Contrary to 10 CFR 73.2(m) and 3.7.1 of the approved security plan, the
) Clock on the door of the material storage vault is a key-lock nechanism 2.
rather than a combination lock as specified in the regulations and as described in the security plan] (Sec Page No.34
, Report Details)
ContrarytoSection5.6oftheapprovedsecurity' plan'6nlyoneformalized drill of the security o'rganization was conducted whereas the plan calls for 3.
conducting of quarterly drills including preparation of outline, evaluatien Also an annual of response and management revicu of utitten results.
report of all drills and summarization of results has not been completed and circulated to corporate nanagement for revici d (See Ppge No.43_,
Report details)
Deficiencies: None Licensee Action on previously identified natters:
An IE:III inspection of Smt in Transit conducted during the period of Thesc February 18-22, 1975 developed one infraction and six deficiencies.
19, 1975 items of noncompliance ucro contained in on IE:III Jctter dated Itarch The itemr. of non-which was responded to by Kerr-McGec on April 8, 1975.
compliance licensee response and current inspection findings on ther.e itern are as follows:
IE:III Letter dated March 19. 1975 Infraction _:
Contrary to 10 CFR 73.31(b), during a shipment of SNM from Crescent, Oklahoma to Richland, Washington on July 20-24, 1974, thegadiotelephong]Jn the transport IE Inspection npt No. 070-1193/75-04 IE:III Copy No.
o f,____
RJaw
(
d trip.
Th3 trreter was in:perabic fcr the outbound portion cf the roun
- required communication' was tot by thc[radioteleph:nhn tha c:ctrt v and/or by pay-tclephone calls.
i
,3;.M p.csponse dated April 8. 1975 tractor and the escort vehicic shall be 2$;adiotelephones}inthetransport d unlanding points.
operational upon departure from tenninal, pick-up point k
system shall be utilized until su'ch time as safety permits "the delay for repairs.
'nds i cident has been checked uith and' was concurred by T 1Yansit Company.
time.
Kerr-ifcGee shall verify equipment operations prior to departure from Cim Facility beginning with the next shipment.
Inspection Findings 14, 1975 titled The licensec generated procedurc K-M-Np-22-13 on Apr This procedure essigns responsibility to the Kerr-McGee Security Of ficer and/or.his' designated alternates 'to use a check list to Performance."
verify carrier requirements and records c'overing call-in log, enroute lis of telephone nur.hcrs, cecrgency notification numbers, communications f
i opcrobility, scheduled routes, trailer seals and innbers and certi icat on Included in this procedure are such items as
- logs, of guard qualifications. confirmation of shipment by telephone and TWX to performance of quarterly audits of carrier performanco, shipment management regarding carrier performance.
k The security officer produced records showing that for shipments which to 22-26, 1975 communications equipment was place on March 11-13, and April All other verified as operabic before the shipments Icf t the The checklist was used for the latter shipment.
on this item.
7E III Lett er dated March 19, 1975 Deficiencie.:
i Contrary to Licensing's Modification No. 3 to the Tri-State SNM Securit Transportation Manual at Pace 3,Section V, Paragraph 5, entitled 1.
. [* Firearms Training," only one of cicht 1thinthesixmonthrequirements]
p.
y em
[
- mmmm.e
v-r-
s K-M response dated 4/8/75 Documentation has been requested from Tri-State Motor Transit Company 1.
to assure that cach driver / guard used by'Tri-State in the transport Each driver / guard shall be queried a
of our SNM is currently qualified.
as to their qualification prior fo cach departure.
Departure shall not be allowed unicss qualified.
Qualifications were verified by Tri-State on March 7, 1975.
Inspection Finding, Verbal confirmation of the driver / guards qualifi' cation with fircares was received and documented by Kerr-McGec on March 7, 1975.
Also, verbal assurances ucre rcccived on qualifications prior to the March 11 and It is noted that uritten verification of drived/
April 22, 1975 shipments.
guard qualifications for the seven previously nonqualified personnel was provided to J. A. Hind of IE:III ny Tri-States letter dated April 3,1975, The Kctr-McGec security officer copy of which was provided to Kerr-McGec.
provided assurances that he vill personally revicu Tri-St'ates qualification records during his ncy.t quarterly audit at Tri-States headquarters in Joplin, Missouri.
IE:III has no further questions on this item.
IE:III Letter dated March 19. 1975 Contrary to Section 5.5.7 of the Kerr-McGeo Transportation Security Plan 2.
22, 1974, and cpproved by Licensing on ifarch 25, 1974, a dated February quarterly audit at Joplin, Missouri of the Carrier's (Tri-State) per-formance was not performed until August 7, 1974 although the first audit was due to have been conducted on or before June 25, 1974.
K-M response dated April S. 1975 Quarterly audits have been conducted in a timely manner since August 7, 2.
1974.
Inspection Findings The last audit performed at Tri-State headquarters by Fred Ucich, Kerr-licGec Security Officer was February 19, 1975.
Another audit for the next quarter was tentatively scheduled for the wech of May 28, 1975.
IE:Ill has no further questions on this matter.
s**
1% pq on k e tm.J
,, y.,
4
IE:III Letter dated Itarch 18, 1975 Contrary to Section 5.5.7, Paragraph 2, of the Kerr-ItcGec Transportation 22, 1974, and approved by Licenning on 3.
Security Plan dated Tcbruaryan in-transit shipment of S!Cf was not intercepted March 25, 1974, by Kerr-McGee representatives to examine the drivers at a planned stop No procedures and records during the cocvnitted-to-six-month interval.
such interceptions have been performed since approval of the Transporta-tion Security Plan.
_K-11_responne dated April 8.1975 The regulation indicates that the truck during 'a shipment must be inter-We have The stop is, houcver, not defined.
3.
copted at a planned stop.
As in the in the past, defined this stop as the Cimarron Facility.
following two discrepancies, a formal record of the required record check was not raade, although this check was completed.
In order that our operation is adequately described in the Transportation Security Plan, uithout decreasing the security, the plan will be revised to perf orm a check of the records every three months and audit the ca.11s to Tri-State during the quarterly audit.
Inspection Findingc_
According to Moscrs.hanka, Adhissohandh'c1 chit is Kerr-McC:.:c'c position that audits perforracd before a shipment is dispatched and at the time a return to meet the intent of the shipment is received at the Kerr-McGee site suffic requettedff.J.Shc11c]
security plan coteitnent.
On April 25,1975,@ ant-Director of P.cguintion and Control for Kerr-McGec, to revise the secur.ity plan to clarify the surycillance commitracnt and submit the re Licensing to date for the reason that the Kerr-McGee por.,ition does not decrean Licensing.
the effectiveness of the security p1'an.
It is planned 13oucver, to notify Licensing of the Kerr-!!cCcc position on in-transit audits.
It should he noted that IE:III has not accepted the Kerr-McGee position in this matter and by letter dated April 23, 1975, f
d
. the matter uns being referred to the Office of Nuc1 car !!aterin Security for resolution.
our pocition van stated and requent was made for referral of the matter by Such referral was made by IP.:llQ on itay 27, 1975.
Licensing.
Since a final determination has not been made on this item of noncompliance
.it is being held open oc an "unrce.olved item."
g 6
InIIIi.ctterdatedMarch 19, 1975
/.
Contrary to 10 CFR 73.70(g) records substantiating the consignce is notified imcediately of the time of the departure of shipments were not being maintained.
t g H response dated April 8, 1975 4.
Proper notification of shipments to the consignee were made by phone.
llowever, fornal records of thir. notification were not maintained.
Beginning with the next shipment, a record uill be r. tarted as proof of this notification as required by 10' CrR 73.70(g).
Inspection Findins Facility records on rec'ent shipments were reviewed to assure that proper records are being unintained to establish appropriate notifications.
Shipment of March 11,_1975 - Records reficct thathc1c1[jnotified Milton Rasmussen of 12DA - Richland by telephone at 1530 hours0.0177 days <br />0.425 hours <br />0.00253 weeks <br />5.82165e-4 months <br /> on March 31, 1975 that the shipment consigned to llEDL was departing the Korr-McGec site at 1535 and an ETA at the Richland site was established.
A Ti'X covering shipment details had been cent to Rasmussen at 1603 hours0.0186 days <br />0.445 hours <br />0.00265 weeks <br />6.099415e-4 months <br /> on March 10, 1975.
A shipment checklist form wus utilized to record this pertinent information.
Shipment of _ Agil 22, 1975 - Records v fy tj thilliamDcNarch f I!EDL-
~
.clcl t 1410 hours0.0163 days <br />0.392 hours <br />0.00233 weeks <br />5.36505e-4 months <br /> on April 22, 1975 Richland was telephonically notified b that a shipment consigned to liEDL had epartec the Kerr--}:cGee site at 1405 hours0.0163 days <br />0.39 hours <br />0.00232 weeks <br />5.346025e-4 months <br /> and an ETA - Richland was established.
Also recordn show that Kenneth Ridgway of IE:1II wac telephoqically notified of a revised ETD and ETA and a change in driver / guards on April 22, 197,4 and a 'IUX was dispatched to ERDA/
11EDL also reporting these changes.
IE:111 has no further questions concerning this matter.
IE:III Letter dated March 19, 1975 5.
Contrary to 73.70(g) records for return shipments to substantiate the shipper is notified of the arrival of the shipment.at its destination were, not being maintained.
K-H response dated Agri_1 8, 1975_
5.
Proper notification of roccipts to tha shipper were made by phonc, llowever, formal records of this notification wcyc not maintained.
Beginning with the next shipment, a record will be started as proof of this notification as required by 10 CTR 73.70(f,).
s s.
e e
g R dea n -
t u
+
I_nspection Findings With respect to the March 11, 1975 shipment of fuel pins to IIEDL, this wa All that one-way r.hipment with no return shipment of Pu nitrate from ARCit0.
i No notification to was brought back to Kerr-McGee was empty birdcages.
ERDA/ ARC 110 uns required in this instance.
the Tri-State truch brought back from 22, 1975 shipment, Itenarding the AprilARC110/Richland a shipment of Pu nitrate af ter ha Kerr-McCcc records indicate that on April 26, 1975 at 1530 hours0.0177 days <br />0.425 hours <br />0.00253 weeks <br />5.82165e-4 months <br />, Welch telephonically advised the ARC 110 duty of ficer, H. L. Thornton, th to llEDL.
date.
the shipment had arrived at the Kerr-McGeo site at 1510 hours0.0175 days <br />0.419 hours <br />0.0025 weeks <br />5.74555e-4 months <br /> that This telephonc conversation was backed up by a WX,to ERDA//aCH 1975.
IE:III has no further questions on this item.
IE:III Letter dated March 19, 1975_
Contrary to 10 CFR 73.70(c), record information portaining to ship 4
6.
made during the periods July 2-5, 1974, 17-19, 1974 and January 14-18, September 30 to Octobet 5, 1974, December 1975 was not maintained at Kerr-McCce.
);-11 respnse dated April 8,1975_
Records for the shipment dates indicated ucre r.ot maintained, but a In the future request was made to Tri-State requesting this information.
6.
all such data will be requested and maintained on file.
In order to provide additional assurance tha't the This will be co plcLe by April 35, 1975.
and chech list will be prepared.
In reference to the specific deviations sent to Tri-State by you, uc will i
request a copy of their response to you and follot.-up uith them to dete proper compliance in their response.
Inspection Findincn Kerr-ItcGee records were reviewed to assure that record information (telephonc logs, shipping rccciptn, emergency instructionn, esc
'the Kerr-McGec file has now been documented h d that been provided by Tri-States.
cover shipmento made on the above dates and nn n completion of each shipncut handled by Tri-States.
.~
. 'iE:111 has no further questions on this item.
~l E s p.9c o n k.eehad m ),4f.
Previ;u3 to th2 In-Tran::it inspection wh ch rc. cult d in tha oferementirned items of noncompliance, a follow-up physical protcetion inspection uns conducted on Septenber 11, 1974 by J. A. Ilind IE:III.
Resulting from'this inspection were the following items of noncompliance which were presented to the licensco by IE:III Ictter dated October 2,1974 and responded to by Kerr-licGec letter dated October 25, 1974.
The actions taken on these items of noncocipliance were evaluated during the current inspection.
\\
IE:III Letter dated October 2. 1974 Licene.ccondition9.3.4 states,(Thelicenseeshallsc1cetmetal, 1.
explosives and special nucicar material detectors which have the detection capabilitics,specified in Regulatory Guide 5.7...]
SecurityPlanctatesinparthxplosives Part 3.5.1.2 of th Kerr-!!c p will be detceted b k- _tector installed by April 15, 1974.
73.50(f)(1) states, '.'All alarms, communications equipment, physient barriers, and other security related devices or equipment shall be maintained in operabic and effective condition."
MContrary to the above, the install cplosive detcetorpsnotbeing I
k maintained in effective condition.
onexploeive type substancesysmoke /
q? g or instance)*siso activa he alar To date, your cIforts
.. to correct this situation have not been fully effective.
Lr K-)! response dated Oct'ober 25, 1974 e
1.
Licence Condition 9.3.4, Part 3.5.1.2 of Kerr-!!cGcc Security Plan and Regulation 73.50(f)(1) dxplosive Detector.]
As descr cd, during the audit by }!r.111nd, it was determined that other p types porssuchessmokeand.perfumpenusedaresponseinthe instruuc lt should also be noted, however, that explosives arc effectively detected as required by regulations and as indicated by the manufacturer.
Since the instruucut uns installed in our' plutonium plant, we'have conducted nany tests to determine its reliance and effective operation.
We will continue these tests to improve the effective operation of the unit.
Some of the tests indicate that modificationc can he perforned to accomplish this goal.
In addition to thenc tests, the operation of this specific instrument will be revicued with the manufacturcr.
Other types of detcetors for this application arc.being investigated.
We expect that thcoc tests and investigations should be completed by January 1, 1975.
y N.
.- ~.
g i
...L~--
~.
, 'ggn.pection Pindings_
l t kenccc representatives, in cor, cert with the explocivo detector manufacturcr.
./
3c,.nihteted numerous tests of thej{odc1[1T1-58 cxplosive detector and found that l
icre caused by ciga et or cigar smoke, perfume, l
gnrouscpuriousalarms Adjustments could not offectively be made to ot powdct and hair oi clininote spurious alarso without affecting the equipment's capability to n
Therefore, it was decided to diccontinue
'),telect the presence of explosives.se of the fixed cxplosives detector in the{ co Y
\\ 4 tebbducing a hand-held explosives detector,(H.dc1 to conduct the scorch of personnel for preccnce of ITI-58]nanufacturedby u
\\
Apparently this instruntnt, whc9 used as N Qen Track Instrurtent Corporation]d are $ was adversely offected by(vap
.i fixed detector $ 1 thin a confine The instrument has demonstrated rester other than caused by explosiver d device.
~~
,4 reliability when used in a more open area as a hand-hci The inspector observed use of the detcetor 'during shif t change and during the l
normal trcffic between shifts.
All inconing employees and visitors are examined for explosives by the hand-held detector.
Sampicsourceso{pla
.ic S
texplosives, TNT and gunpouderpre used to ancure effectiveness of the instrument and to calibrate its censitivity during the ucekly filter change.
IE:Ill has no further questions on this item.
[
IE:III Letter dated October 2, 1974 in anced etes, "...The licensee shall instal.
i 2.
License Condition 9.7 rusion alarms on all emergency exits and all magnetic switch type normally locked points of. ingress and egress in accordance with 10 CFR
- l 73.50(d)(1) and (2) and 73.60(c)_."
to the above, you are not in full compliance. Thohockair Theotherden)
Contrary"Jis still equipned uith the plunger ty alcro.
lock doo, alanced magnetic switch type intrur. ion clarms areas are equipped uit as required.
This is a repeat violation from L Hay 1974 incpection.
X-H responne dated October 25, 1974 License Condition 9.7 - Dalanced Magnetic Switch 2.
The'[hjtlancednacuaticswitc@onth airlockdoodhasnoubeeninstalled i
and was operational as of October 1, 1974.
l It should be noted that cufficient suitches were purchased to cover all ona of these required doora although during the installationThis uan returned to a supplier switchen uan found to be defective.
The delay in installation uns cauced as a
',. 'and a new unit requer.ted.
result of an execr.cive delivery time.
9 10 Crn 2.790 NORI.MTIOb'
.WW(/
L,fs.
,s I
g.. 4...et f on Findings
..,.g.,ntal in question has been fitted with alancedmagneticalardswitch
,. b. u n)) cmergency portals at the Pu Plant.
The licensco showed that an c..ite number of alarm switches had been initially ordered but one switch
.. w he returned to the inanufacturer for replacement,
\\
ttt has no further questions on this item.
. ;,q Channes
,:.ited earlier in the Summary of Findings, the licensec, since the last
,:.alprotectioninspection,(cutthreeholedfinthestecidoorofthe 1
~
.corage room and has replacca the combination lock of this door with a
- uck.
The matter of thepoles in the doot$1s pending resolution in
..: sing; the lock change resulte in a citation for noncompliance.
(See
~
.. tion No. 2).
aply with License Conditian 3.9.18, the licensee has established neu
. ;eilding evacuation routts, has constructed an additional cecrgency gate
. :he southwest section of the protected area fence and has crected a six high fence extending southward to the Decontamination and First Aid
- ding to assure control and surveillance of personnel'when evacuated from
- Pu Buildiag.
Lr Significant Findings Few persons within the Pu Plant were vcaring their identification hadges in cicar view.
The badges are norm;211y kept in the breast pocket of co:tpany-issued coveralls. Management uns asked to consider requiring employces to ucar badges in cicar sight to facilitate recognition as an authorized area occupant.
r l
Although Regulatory Guide 5.20 specifies annual physicals for guards, there are no cottuitments fonde in the security plan to satisfy this r.tandard.
Management was asked to consider the possibility of scheduling annual physical examinations and were informed that this matter vill'be explored further by IE:III with Licensing.
int ment Intervicu.
' Ihn conclusion of the inspection, a preliminary close out was held with
'. rn. Janka, Adhission and Ucich to discuss the inspection findings and items Representing NRC werc '. F. Donahuc of IE:III and J. W.
J
- .v.ncomplionec.
'lln of IE:1. A subsequent close out uns held with these Kerr-ifcGee
'" nentatives in the presence of }!r. iforgan licore, Cimarron Facility }tanger.
'" r'buttals were of fered to the identified items of noncompliance.
p ac h ecle o ) ;,,
4 4 l
~10-
- =*
- 8
REPORT DETAILS INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE i
Persons Contacted
\\ f }Raymond Janko,11 anger Administration and Accountability
! organ !!oore, Cimarron Facility Fianger
)
/ \\ Ronald Adhisson Supervisor, Safeguards and Security
\\
Fred l'cich,(Security _Of fice,r,_~..-
, !essrs. ?!cCoy, Sc1 mon, Icff rics, Johns,oh - Guards
}
Scope This inspection covered the Kerr-1!cGee Security Plan, portions of License Conditions !!PP-1, Section 3, all of License Conditions liPP-1, Section 9, and applicabic sections of 1C CFR 73. Also covered were licensee actions taken on items of noncompliance id.cntified during a follow-up inspection of September 11, 1974 and an S!Tr!
In-Transit inspection conducted on February 18-22, 1975.
Introduction An unannounced physical protection inspection was conducted during the period of 1:ay 20-22, 1975 by J. F. Donahuc of IE:III, assisted by J. W. Devlin of
~
IE:1.
All facets of the Kerr-ticGee security program ucre 4.nspectad.
In general, managccent cooperation was satisfactory and an effective and workable security program is being carried on.
e e
e e
W
,,e*.
q e
e
0, e - mwo n i..,
~
- 1. SECURITY PLAN
- 1. [70.22(h)]
Does the licensec possess an approved Physical Security Plan (PSP)?
Yes
- 2. ['70.32(c).]
Did any change in the PSP decrease its effectiveness?
Yes If yes, explain:be lock on the Vault door was changed from a combination locktoasixpintumblerlochithoutpriornotificationtoLicensing.
(Sec' attached shec't) i j
A.
Did the licensec secure AEC approval prior to, making changes No hi the PSP which decreased its effectiveness?
g
~
i (1) If yes, were approvals:
)
(a) Written, and/or (b) Verbal?
- 3. [70.32(d)]
For changes in the licensce's PSP which decreased its cffcetiveness, did the licensee submit an application to amend his license or to change the Technical Specifications incorporated in No his license?
- 4. [70.32(c)]
Were asy changes made to the PSP which did not decrease its effectiveness?
Yes If yes, list changes.
g, ' Sampic window in Pu Duilding.
B.
~
- - ]c
.?O S. [70.32(e))
Did the licensee makd changes in the PSP which did not decicase its e Teetiveness without proper notifications?
,~.
Q <
pa.>e ra n lc re in, I
- w. h*h l
.i.. tem of Noncompliance - Section 1.2 1)orJng the. course of this inspection; it was noted that the licensec modJfied the door of fhe material storage vault.
Inadditiontdutting3 threeportholes% nth Thornburg[portedinIE:III1ctterdated l door, re
(,etober 2,1974 to 11.3(meta hc locking mechanism - a dial type J.
combination lock, was replaced by a six pin Sargeant and Creenicaf key Joelg Since replacement of the lock represented a significant decrease in thr protection afforded the vault door and this change was not specifically reported to Licensing for approval as required by 10 CFR 70.32(c), the IJcensco was found to be in nonco:npliance.
With respect to thefhree holes cut the door, Licensing, by letter li
,da cd April 4, 1975, requested K-H to submit revisions of appropriate pages of the psp for Licensing review and approval.
As of, the date'of this inspection K-11 had not. submitted the requested revisions.
Further, in a telephone conversation held on June 3, 1975 between the inspector and George McCorkle of Licens,ing, it was developed that Licensing had no knouledge of K-M's action in changing the locking mechanism and no requests for exceptions have been submitted by K-!!.
(Set Infraction No. 1, Summary of Findings) 9 4
O e
9 e
I O
O r
G f,, ne en k relend.a kN I,
e l
e w
~
- 1. ;
j II. FACll.lTY LICENSE CONDITIONS AND ENCEPTIONS Attach current copy of specific license c'onditions applicable to the facility and comment on each condition as to compliance or noncompliance.
Amendment ifPP-1 to License Smi-1174,' Section 9 License Conditions dated l
March 6, 1974 as subsequently amended, were reviewed.
All Conditions, 9.1 through 9.18.6, ucre covered with no items of nonconpliance being disclosed.
.Certain of the license conditions in Section 9 are no longer relevant since submission of pertinent data or physical mcdifications have been accomplished.
License Condition 9.3.10 was for a one-time calibration test which has been completed.
License Conditions 9.18.1 through 9.18.6 related to time extensions which have expired.
It is understood, through telephone conversation with George McCorhic (Division of Safeguards) that the K-11 license is scheduled for revision and reissuance.
- j.
With respect to Section 3, license conditions, covered during this inspection were 3.9.11, 3.9.12, 3.9.13, and 3. 9.18 (1) through (5).
These conditions, t
.while appearing in a section relating more specifically to material l
accountability, pertain to physical secu'rity requirements and hence were j
covered during this inspection.
Other conditions in Section 3 were covered, in part, during the IE:III inspection of !! arch 6-12, 1975 (Report No.
070-1193/75-04) 8 l'
~
o a
D
.f e
t g
m
e-
~
et-
~
e Ill. SF.CUltiTY OltGAN17.AT10N s
- 1. [ PSP] LLC-9.1][70.32(c))
Does the current facility organization chart indicate all individuals, groups, or organizations responsible for security? A new position, manager.of Safeguards and Not entirely Security was added to the table of organization.(See atta'ched sheet)
~
- 2. Does the security o'rganization assure continuous responsibility for physical protection practices by:
A.
[73.50(a)(1)]
Using a security organization including s'uards, Yes to protect the facility and SNM, and B.
[73.50(a)(2)]
Maintaining at least one (1) security supervisor onsite at all times?
Yes 3...[73.50(a)(3))
lias the licensee establishad written securit'y procedures which document:
A.
De structure of the security organization, and Yes I
B.
The duties of guards, watchmen anil other individuals -
Yes responsib!c for security at the site?
- 4. Are the following employees used to protect the facility:
(.
Yes l
A.
- Guards, l
o No B.
Watchmen, and/or No C.
Other indivlduals?
- 5. Are the following contracted individuals used to protect the facility:
No
. A.
- Guards, No D.
Watchmen, and/or
. s-No C.
Other individuals?
,3
(
C A,,
bi YG
} _ i, lh.l l
Cotunent on'Section III, It'em 1 e
last inspection, a change in c security organization has taken Since thr:PreviouslytheSecurityOfficer,FredWelchheporteddirectlyto the Manager of Administration and Accountability (fRaymond JanLM A new place.
Safe uards and Se ity an its position was,, created as Supe visor n is Ronald Adkisson o whom 4elci Tow reports.
dhiss cports i
mbc3 rho reports tgorgan Moorc[ginarron Facility Manager.
The t Jank functional responsibility of the Security Organization is unchanged.
e 9
9 e
e e
4
- e e
e S
O r
e 9
9 e
e'*
p
(
.e*
D e
e.
1 e
111-2 1
i Were the following individuals trained prior to security duties:
i Yes DNA
.., and/or DNA Jaiduals?
- training? Oklahoma City Police, K-M security of ficer.
.8
-kulum used by the licensec for training purposes in
.::h AEC furnished Regulatory Guides for:
Yes
))
Poirits. of In, Yes D], Security Skills, and
'. 7 )
local Security Matters?
Yes I
is the licensee using qualified guards and Y*8
[
o protect the facility?
m
('
- : ions of all individuals used for security purposes Yes and oral examinations after training, Yes P,!, training, and/or Yes M
f9eb>leteler) iL isj l
m III.-3
- 7. <,-
- 11. List equipmeist used by the following individuals to protect the facility:
Guardsf38haliber revolvers,. nigh't sticks andh-12 guanchimtcunsk A.
p g i q
/
D.
Watchmen, and/or I
C.
Other individuals.
- 12. [73.2(c)]
Is cach guard on duty equipped with a loaded firearm?
Describe fircarm (at least.38 caliber). d.38haliber - montiv snith and ucsse-A.
e; or colts.
- 13. Ilas supervision of the licensec's security organization inspected all Yes security equipment.in the past three (3) months?
l l
- 14. What were the icsults of tids inspection? Equipment operated satisfactorily or I
l was otherwise in ununble condition.
../
ha pSe
< w Le veks d,- hl) l -
M l
~
l
e 111-4 173.50(a)(4). 73.50(f)(4))
Is the equipment provided to the
- .... niillowing individuals by the licensee adequate to aid in protecting th facility?
Yes Yes A.
Guards.,.
11 Watchmen, and/or C.
Other individuals?,
[73.50(a)(4)]
Ilave all guards and watchmen employed by the licensec for physical protection purposes:
A.
Demonstrated their ability to understand the facility's.
YC8 security procedures,
}{ow? Uritten test and annuni revinv and test condpnted during April 1975.
B.
Demonstrated their ability to execute all required dutics, and How? On-the-job perforriance
(
Yes C.
Requalified at least annually?
ihr. cach indivi.fual used for security purposes been tested and requalified according to the following schedule?
~
Ye8
/..
[73.50(a)(1)]
- Annually - General duties and responsibilities II.
IRG-5.20]
Semi-annually - Specific duties and responsibilities Y f h"T9
} Q peht CM C
'n
~
..{..
m
~
111-5
\\
Semiannually - Communications equipment C.
[RG 5.20)
Semi annually - All oiber security equipment Yes D.
(RG-5.20)
(i.e., arms.quali0 cation)
.Not;_c9muttd_en E.
[RG 5.20)
Annually - hiedical examinations s
annual physicals in I s
During this inspection period, did the security
- 18. 173.50(g)(2)}
organization detect the abnormal presence or activity of persons or vehicles (unusual occurrences) within an:
No I
A.
Isolation zone, No B.
Protected arca, No i
i hiaterial access arca, and/or C.
No b'
D.
Vital arca?
- 19. Upon detection of unusual occurrences witidn the PA, Isolation zone, VA and blAA, how did the security organization demonstrate their capability of:
DNA i
'A.
[73.50(g)(2)(i)]
Determining the existence of a threat, _
9 g
0 88 l
.s 4
i
- n h) page Con bc FCkM pg
~20-m ee
.,m._
e r,
i III6 C.
173.50(g)(2)(iii))
Taking immediate measures to neutralize the threat by one of the foll6 wing,means:
'DNA (1) Appiopriate action by' licensec guarc'.s, or
"^
(2) Calling for ass'istance from LLEA, or DNA (3) Performing both items 1.and 2 above? __
e e
e W
e e
e lO O*
N 0 fe.l f e
9 9
4
asummuumump
~
IV. PilYSICAL BARRIERS ASD 1.IGilTING 1
lias the licensee located Vital Equipment (VE)
YC8 (i.l.50(b)(1))
witidn Vital Arcas (VA's)?
YC8 Has the licensee located VA's within a. PA?
., [73.50(b)(1))
Does access to VA's require passage through at
. [73.50(b)(1))
Yes least two physical barriers?
~
Are physical barriers surrounding PA's in accordance with Y"8
(
73.2(f)?
If not, cxplain:
is each PA physical barrier separated from any other Yes
- 5. [73.50(b)(3)] physical barrier designated as a physical barrier for is an isolation zone established aroundYes
- 5. 173.50(b)(3)), [73.50(b)(4))any portion of a building wall use I
?. Do all physical barriers of VA's and MAA's meet the qualiiications
(
of 73.2(f)?
1 Do door, window and ' opening covers in walls serving i
[73.2(f)(2)]
as physical barriers to the PA MAA and VA provide sufficient i
Yes strength that the integrity of the wall is not lusened?
I Does the licensee monitor or ivriodically check i
yc,,, Fence l'l3.50(b)('t))
'A 6t ! cast once a day) the intervening stuce benveen the PA Twmec l'hysical barrier and VA and MAA physic.it banie,rs?
on cach r.h i
M/-
t-efea50Y '"
~22-cu D,s pyc
~.
v, \\r\\ 3
,4 IV-2 I
- 10. 173.50(b)(4)]
Does the licensee continuously monitor the PA
/
Yes isolation zone?
of' fence line.
nlarm,-
L
'/
Functional test performed by inspectors established its effectiveness.
5 i
-11. i?3.50(f)(1)], !73.60(d)(1 ]
Is the licensee maintaining physical y
barriers in an operable and effective condition?
- 12. [ PSP)
Does the licensee inspect all physical ba: Tiers used for physical protection purposes at a frequency of not less than y'
once per day?
- 13. 173.50(b)(5))
Is each isolation zone and 511 clear areas Minimum
. illuminated sufficiently to aid guards and watchmen in their YesLight 1.e i
l response to the breaching of any physical banier?
S.E. Sid:,
- 14. [73.50(b)(5)]
Arc isolation zones and clear areas illuminated Yes not less than 0.2 feet candles at all times?
i
- 15. Arc all entrances to the PA, VA, MAA illuminated sufficiently Yes to aid guards or watchmen in perfo'rming access ceatrols?
g
.-23
~
Nh W W ! -
m IV-3 l
- 16. Docs the licen ec have emergency lihiting that is c:pabic of.,
un Illuminating all facility access controls points?
/
Describe methods of providing emergency lighting.)< xternal illumina E
One light off,, top of staircase motor control room.
Ducrgen.cy Pouer.
r, Light Icvels in isolation zone exceed. 2 fc.
,/
- 17. _ Describe mechanism to turn' lighting "on and eff."
g g
g O
h F) fg,.pp.cu
,=
/
SS e
/-
.m.
f
i
+
V. KEYS, LOCKS, AND COMlilNATIONS s.
1, [73.50(c)(7)]
What controls does the licensee utilize to minime the possibility of compromise for:
Card Kc,ys, _ Card kcyd issued to croployees for access to main gate.
A.
key also serves as ID.
o B.
Locks, and Keys
[ault door 5&6 Special six tumblerl v
Combi: ations?
- Pu ckcept outer door - 30 day chhnge for change room
~
C.
doorstoprocessarca,pushbutton.(Combinationonvaultdoor
'changedtokey](
- 2. [73.50(c)(7))
Upon evidence of compromise, did the licensee promptly
~
' change:
Nonc A.
- Keys, Detected B.
Locks, and C.
Combiaations?
- 3. [73.50(c)(7))
Upon termination of any employec having access, did the licensee promptly change:
Yes A.
- Kep,
. D.
bcks, and
.,.1 Y8 C.
Combinations, and
~
card Key retrieve Other security related equipment?
j D.
- Procedure 10I-NC-22-8 Rev. 1. Dato 6/4/74 " Changing of lockn and 3
i combinations."
~71m p9e enn k re/ w d
,a -h U
t i
i
- 4. [73.50(c)(7)), {73.*
1 maintained for con for physical protec '
- 5. Do all facility loci '-
the required specifl
.i Vault - key iss key issued.
%e dic 6 pin t-s Tdico Mortice
N S
1
(
I c8 o 'he y/
p e
1 I
I h
e
)
/
e
M V!. PEllSONSEL AND VElllCLE CONTROJ.S_
- 1. litG-5.20]
Does the licensec have at least onc veldcle dedicated Not at present to security operations?
- 2. [73.50(b)(4))
Are parking facilitics for both' cmployces and YC8 visitors, located outside the isolation zone?
- 3. [73.50(c)(6)1 Under c'mcrtency conditions, does the license.c permit private vehicles within the PA?
- 4. 173.50(c)(5))
Arc drivers of delivery and service vehides y,,
escorted at all times whije within the PA?
- 5. [73.50(c)),173.60(aK5))
Does the licensec check the identification and authorization for cach vehidle entering Y*8 a PA, VA, and MAA?
- 6. [73.50(c)(4))
Does the licensec assure'that access to VA and MAA is limited to individuals who require access to yc, perform their duties?
- 7. 173.50(c)(5))
Does the licensee physically escort all visiters witidn the PA by using:
Yes A.
- Guards, D.
Watchmen, and/or v-e C.
Other individuals?
- 8. [73.50(c)(1)), [73.50(e)(5))
fubsequent to scarch, are drivers
.~ of delivery and service vehicles escorted at all times while within the PA?
Yu cn he reksd m hl-l
,3,,
p.yc
- N I-s r
VI 2 rcg s cr p,,? s Il 70(c)), [73,70(d)l Arc aII g7 g9
'n; permitted into PA's and
'M "Id to s?
10- l73.60(a)(5);
"Ut to cacin MAA?
lized individuals used to ea-
-s, 3
3 e
8 o
D f
~
1
+
l g
e S
e 6
9 e
D e
s'.*
.s I,
fa, bt fC' CMC' in U*
6 h
9
-,,-w
-,,,-,e-,------
V VII. BADGINQ j
- 1. [73.50(c)(3))
individuals who are authorized access to e PA without escort?
- 2. [73.50(c)(4)], [73.50(c)(5)] IIas the licens and MAA's to which a,ccess autho n
cate PA's, VA's en authorized?
I
- 3. [73.50(c)(5)]
Docs the licensec provide badges to al to the PA?
rs I'
,l
- 4. [73.50(c)(5)}
an escort is required?Do all non' picture visitor ba S. [73.50(c)(5)}
who require frequent and extended ac provided picture' badges widch:
r VA A.
Are picked up on entrance to the PA and 9
B Arc returned each time he leaves the PA
_Y 6 173.50(c)(4)], [73.50(c)(5)]
PA's indicates: require frequent and/or extended s, VA',s and A.
Nonemployee - no escort, required,
, B.
Areas to which access is authorized, and Ye:
d.
Period for which access is authorized?
1 Yet s
i Yes
- *[. [73.50(c)(3)), [73.50(c)(4))
nreas to which access authorization is granted?Do all f Yes fi,. t pf." L, neks) m MI 4
,/-
~
e
f
.t i
d VII2 oro ic t u r e bad.a r e. Pra nad tatc
- 8. Describe badges used at the. facility. Plasti strip - unlimited access - no escort required. RediPu Plant-No escort admittance permitted if approved by a work sch6dule maintained by Contd.
Gold - U Plant employee - escort required in Pu Plant.
White - Escort required (mainly for ' visitors) sign l'on.
Pink No: calth Safety traiufng - must sign log and
')
Green be,provided with escort.
I Security Officer controis-i l
- 9. Ilow are bad protged against compromise?
camera an loroic rt' ridges in locked cabinet.
f
).e erk-: d in >6LI p9e ro, g
9 6
m..
l.
m c
i Vill.
- l. 173.50(c)(1)l,173.50(c)(2)]
Does identification (ID) and access authol to the PA and VA for:
A.
Personnel, visitors and employc D.
l'ackages?
c 2 [73.50(c)(1)]
Does the licensec p:
fo!!owing manner:
t 1
A.
A physical scarch, or B.
Use equipment capable of d ti be used for industrial sabotage
- 3. Docs the licensee perform the foll:
and vehicles prior to entry into a p
0V A.
[73.50(c)(1)]
All individuals, 0
Y B.
[73.50(c)(1)]
A random scar f
f Yb
.C.
[73.50(c)(1)]
All hand carric 0
t y
l D.
[73.50(c)(2)]
A random scar packages? Packar.cs to Vare opened. These arc items
- 4. Are random se:irches of AEC-clear.
frequency to assure that each cmr is searched at least once per mon-records)?
l 5,. [73.50(c)(1)]
Arc drivers of deli-
,e*
scarched prior to entry into the I
- Active Q&L AAs are ponnenned by a nutabc personnel search procedure.
All wplo:
m
,/-
~
Vill 2
- .'.t.60(a)(6)]
Except when packages are searched prior to entry m:0 a PA and the package has been tampersafed and escorted s
by an Al or is immediately escorted by two (2) Al's to the v \\A, does the licensee p:rform package scarches for the ie;Liwing items prior to entry into any hJAA:
Y""
.\\.
Fircarms, and Yr =
3.
Explosives and incendiary devices, and c.
Counterfeit items which could be used for theft or y
diversion of SN.l?
\\
.;73.60(b))
When exiting from a MAA, unless exit is into a
- ntiguous MAA, is the licensee making searches for concealed 3:01 of the following:
Radiation Monitor A.
Each indivi tual,
. Do Not Enter 3.
Each vehic!c, and Not Perr.ftted C.
Each pack:ge?
/tre records maintained of all routine searches performed?
No Records,100% scorch entering,'ietal detector and gam n c
f not, exp!ain.
sean exiting.
I'Meribe methods employed by the licensec to perform searches.
Mern1
,1,.tectors, nniffern, radiation monitorn.
z meuma me w e*** N
/
Yt Paje en a ie ee/es:~ /
~V,]. j r
e ~.
i IX. SNM CONTROL.S' Pu. B]dg.
- 1. [73.50(b)(2)), [73.60(a)(2))
IIas the licensec located MAA's' only Yes witidn a PA?
- 2. Arc all physical barricts and access con'trols for cac1 MAA used by the licensee to control the use and storage of SNM described Yes in the PSP or license condition?
- 3. [73.50(b)(2)]
Does access to cach MAA require passage through YC8 at least two (2) physical barriers?
- 4. [73.50(c)(4)], [7i60(a)(5))
Does the licensec assure that access to SNM is limited to individuals who require access to perform.
Ycc their dutics?
t
=
t l
.. ~
Except for scrap SNM containing less than 0.25
- 5. [73.60(a)(1))
grams U.235 per liter, does the licensee store and process SNM Yes
'only within the confines of a MAA?
- 6. [73.60(a)(1))' Does the. licensee prohibit actiiities other than those that require access to SNM or equipment employed in Yes processing, use and storage of SNM within any MAA?
If no, explain:
'** 7
[73.60(a)(3))
Does the licensec store SNM not in process in a:
Vault, or< ghis room no lone,cr qualifies as a vnoit per 13.2 because p,.
s.
- A.
p dification to the door' and loching mechanir g Pecite an item of nonconpliance - See attached shbet'.
D.
Vault tyise room?
.:. ;,:.., g
_33
/ --
Tlms pay w fe ecl3,, j,g ffj
Item of Noncomplinnec,Section IX.7 The room which serves as the central storage location for Sini neither time.
Alth h
qualifics as a vault or vault-ty c room at the prescat ontact alar n
there is -.otion-detectog alar. uithin the r om and occhanis which I il to meet r uire-
- the door, eisth$ooryndlockin ments, p hree holes h q been cud i the stcc door which reduces the
' integrity of the barric gnd this m tter is currently being revicued by etter dated April.4,1975, R. G. Page toff. J.
p Licensin.
(Reference Shelle e
ed Uc1ch7thedombination locllon the ShH storage room was According t replaced by sixpinkey-loc 31naboutJanuary,1975becauseofthefrequent +
malfunctioning of thcd ombination loclh [ clch acknouledged that he had not solicited approval for this lock change from Licensing because he did not consider that it decreased the security of the storage room.
The inspector
[pointedoutthatinSection3.7.1oftheK-Msecurityplanitiss "a combination loch is installed in the metal door of a three positional Laboratories dial type chanceabic conbination meeting the Undervriters Further, the inspector quoted 30 CFR 73.2(m) uhich states..
standards.
" Lock in the case of vault,s or vault type rooms means a three position, manipulation resistant, dial-type, built-in combination lock or combination padlock...."
Because the existing lock failn to meet security plan commitments and the intent of Part 73.2(n), a citation for noncompliar.cc was issued.
(Sec Infraction No. 2, Summary of Findings) m o
D e
t 6
k g
..r*
m.
k8ff4 Y s
IX-2
- 8. [73.60(a)(3))
SNM controlled as a separatis cach vault or vau e MAA?
room used to store
- 9. [73.60(a)(5)}
Vault control admittance toDoes the license to Tisi~
cach MAA?
r zed Individuals (AI)
- 10. [73.60(a)(7))
when two individuals occupy a MADoes th Yo to observation A, each individual is subj of the other at all times?
lf not, explain current practic and each ItAA checked by th es: Procedure, explai Yes
.l r
the areas may be e supervisor all S::'1 entered by one person concerned and re to thi i
s-i
- 11. [73.60(a)(4))
Does the licensee scrap in a locked and separately f store :ny enriched uranium (EU enced outside storap arca?
.12. [73.60(a)(4))
go Is cach outside storage area l
- 13. [73.60(a)(4))
ocated with'n a PA?
i fcct from the perimetcr fcnciis each outside storage a DNA ng of the protected arca?.ea located a
- 14. [73.60
. /.
EU scr(a)(1))
DNA ap in outside storage areas? Arc 30g.dion or la ers us:d to store e
15 173.60(a)(.1)]
l locked condition when not iis each outside storage Y'8 area n use?
maintaised in s'
\\
Y,qa A
%ched Trailer w_
PA.
s, y m a,s ~ -> -
- me
~
IX 3
[73.60(a)(4)]
Do the containers used for storing EU scrap g o, In an outside stora;c area contain less than 0.25 grams Yes U.235 p:r liter (~1 cm U-235/ gal) pe,r containcr?
- -). 173.60(aX4))
is cach perimeter physical barrier of each
'No Patrols per shi unoccupied outside storage area used for storing EU scrap.
protected by:
1 outside cate-f ence c oneinsidepatrol) 2 A.
I'.andom guard or watchmen patrols at intervals not cxceeding 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, or D.
An active intrusion alarm?
s
$)sych l' I' -
- 18. Describe EU scrap being stored in an outside storage area.. scrap stored in 55 cal.
~
drums in a 3'ocked trailer (without whccis) within the PA.
1 19.11ow does the licensec control waste SNM?
Stored f.p_s.ane_ucich en1.u=n uithi:
ilAA until reprocesscd.
Colunns.riftunted within.the processign !irca.
~
/*
~
N' N
- I
m I
X. DETECl'lON AIDS
\\
Arc responses to all unusual occurrences within
- 1. [73.50(b)(4))
the isolation zonc made by an armed member of the security Yes or;;anization?
- 2. [73.50(c)(1)), (73.60(b))
Arc devices and equipment used by the licensee to search individtals and packa;;cs capabic of detceting the presence of,(must meet the requirements of RG.S.7):
Yes A.
- Fircarms, Yes D.
Explosives, C.
Incendiary devices, and' yes t
ye t.
h D.
- 3. 173.50(d)(1))
Do all facility alarm systems annunciate in at Yes least two (2) continuously manned stations?
To climinate the possibility that singic act
'4.
[73.50(d)(1))
cannot remove the capability of calling for assistance or otherwise responding to an alarm, are the facility alarm systems annunciators located:
- Yes Within a protected area and protected as i VA, and,
A.
Ico D.
At another location, not necessarily onsite?
- 5. 173.50(d)(2)),173.60(c))
Arc cmergency exits continuously alarmed for:
Yes Pu.
A.
Protected areas, Yes Pu
, /
D.
Vital areas, and Yes Pu C.
Material access areas?
W;,{mf4l ic releds
%,s pje can
./-
c
~
J X-2
- 6. [73.60(aK3))
Are all vault type rooins used to store SNM Yes equipped with intrusion alarms?
- 7. [73.50(d)(2)], ['i3.dO(c)]
Arc the following areas protected by an active intrusion alarm:
Yes A.
Vital areas, and D.
Matcrial access areas?
Yes
- 8. Arc facility alarms systerns installed in a manner such that' each alann system:
A.
[73.3(1))
Is capable of annunciating by means of Yes audible and visib!c signsis, and
'D.
[73.50(d)(1))
Components are self-checking and tamper indicating?
C.
[73.50(d)(1)]
Is equipped with an emergency power (Diesc1'gencru sourec, that is protected as a VA, and that would permit Yes 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of continuous operation after the loss of.
primary power?
D.
[73.50(d)(1)]
Annunciates at the onsite central' manned (primary) station to indicate:
Yes (1) The type of alarm (intrusion, cmergency, etc.), and Panci Yes Display (2) The location of each alann?
- 9. [73.50(d)(1)]
Do the following alarm systems meet the
.. pe formance and reliability levels specified by GSA Interim Federal Specitication W A 00450 B (GSA-FSS):
Yes A.
Intrusion alanhs, D.
Emer:;eney al.irms, and Yes C.
Line Suivsvisoiy systems?
bt h*h"Y g_"
I Tjg y CJr, I
.,,.. ~. '..
X-3
~
- 10. [73.50(f)(2)), [73.60(d)(2)]
is cach intrusion alarm functionally
~
tested for operability and required performance at the follmving
~
times:,.
A.
Eq', inning and end of each interval for which it is used ye,
~
for security, but -
B.
Not less frequently than once every seven (7) days
'y,3 when in use?
Emergency EY.it Door
~
alarmed - Main door,
- 11. [73.60(c))
is cach unoeupied MAA locked and protected.b ' roed guard.
an active intrusion alarm?
J
'l
- 12. [73.50(d)(1)], [73.60(d)(1)1 1s the licensee maintaining intrusion alarms in an operable and effective con'dition?
ve
- 13. Does cach alarm system' operate in a manner'to adequately YC8 protect the area for which it is used?
- 14. Is cach mechanical or electrical search device used to perform
~
Yes scarches at the facility equipped with an alarm mechanism?
Checked once a day
.15. [73.50(f)(!)], [73.60(d)(1)]
When in use, docs the licensec make a daily inspection of detection aids used to perform gecondshift scarches?
t e
8 l< '
gffg pe <n.Le 'eelew-] in /d[
g l
. s,s..
XI. COMMUNICATIONS lias tlic licensee established liaison with law Yes i
- 1. [73.50(g)(1))
Enforcement Authorities (LLEA's) Cave lucheon meeting l
last fall to all local PD and FBI.
Lecture on Sm1 identity shipments.
Guthric, OK
- 2. Name of LEA f
~
- 3. What is the committed response time and manpower to bc provided by LEA?
.....i...
Qib,thr.ic_fi.h1ff
~
}Janpower Allotted
~
nn e.,,ns,-_
Response Time
,,. g,
,7
, Tan,inr_y l ovu Date of Agreement Update agreement w/Iogan Co_u_nt'y 1,_.
is continuous communicatio:i capability piovided
- 4. [73.50(c)(1))
with the central continuously manned (primary) station for cach of the following individuals on duty:
Walkic Talkic A.
Guards, and DNA D.
Watchmen?
l
- 5. !?3.50(c)(1)]
is an individual on duty at the' PA continuous 19 manned (primary) station capable of calling i
for assistance from:
t Yes A.
Each guard on duty, DNA B.
Each watchman on duty, and Yes C.
LLEA's
- 6. Ilas the licensee provided equipment, delegated authority and responsibility to the individual on duty at the PA continuously
~
manned (primary) station for calling for assistance from the
~
Y"s
- above persons?
- /:
Is the continuously manned (priinary) alarm
~. 7. [73.50(c)(3)]
station equipped with conventional telephone service and YC8 I..
two way radio voice communication with LLliA's?
- Pu guard post has authority to call LIE \\ without checkiun supervicion.
\\
In emergency the guards may also en11 in pctnon6c1 an required before notifying cupervinion.
~40-
XI-2
- 8. [73.50(c)(3)]
Does each tsyo-way radio voice communication system that is used for ' physical protectiori purposes terminate
.witidn the continously manned central (pcimary) station that Yes l
is located within a PA?
1
. N.
y
- 9. [73.50(e)(4)}, [73.50(f)(1)]
Does cach conimunication system have the capability of. remaining in an operable and effective g
hYes condition after the loss of the primary power source?
.K atteries B
f.
q
- 10. [73.50(f)(3)] Are all communication equipment tested for.
operability and performance not Icss frequently than once at the beginning of each security personnel work sh,ift?
Yes
- 11. [73.50(f)(1)),173.60(d)(1)]
Arc all security related devices maintained in an operab!c condition?
Yes l
ge,e/e a l 1, MI
, Ins pne j
e
.E g.
g t
l
~
Xil. SECURITY EDl' CATION
- 5. Does the licensec routinely indoctrinate new employees on Yes physical protection practices employed at the facility?
i
- 2. Is the indoctrination given prior to 'being permitted access Yes to vital equipment, VA's, MAA's, and SNM?
- 3. Is there a continuing reindoctrination program in effect See attached shes at the facility? (Drills) for details
- 4. Docs the licensec have an outline of all security YCS
[
indoctrinations used at the facility?
l
.I e
i
\\
l e
==
e e
e g
e e
,e
,l I
' I
Ittn of Moncompliance - Section XII.3 Section 5.6 of the K-11 security plan states, "The security of ficer designs i
drills to test cach phase of the security program with one drill occurring at 1 cast quarterly.
The outline of the drill and the evaluation of the response in described in writing by the security officer and circulated to facility managenent for their review.
At 1 cast annually, all drills and their results are summarized by the security officer in uriting and circulated to Kerr-11cCcc Nuc1 car Corporation !!anagement for their review.
Corrective action determined as a result of observation of inadequacies in the drill arc determined jointly by the security of fdecr, manager of administration and accountability and the corporate security of ficer, and revised procedurcs and additional training inmediately instituted."
Contrary to this co:raitment, only one formalized dril'1 vas conducted on April 24, 1975 and this drill was documented in the files.
No other drills were conducted, no outlitics ucre prepared, only one summary report uas circulated to facility cr.nagement for review.
Also, although the security program has been in effect for over one year, no annual report of drills and their results have been su=narized in writing by the security officer and circulated to corporate management.
(See infraction No. 3 - Sunnary of Findings).
4 O
e y wend v Ud
, hits pf e
l l
l I
g a
D
\\
l
-ts 3-l O
em *
- g
M
\\
e:tig\\jl) IGPORTS
- 1. [73.50(a)(3))
Iw,:.
.,,.e nuint;dn written security
, procedures, whieh e e.
Yes.- P.S.P 5.2 A.
The struett:re ef :::e -lhys:e.!! protection organization, 5.3.3 B.
%c detailed d: e e:' :h. following individuals Ecsponsible f0: s:e. : :) at the sitc:
Company Employces (1) Guards (ir..::7 5e or contract),
None (2) Wa tchmen, 2:.!
Emergency Proced.:r (3) Other indi.i.! uts used for physical protection Use Emp. 6.2.7 of purposes?
P.S.P.
- 2. 173.50(a)(4)]
Dces the licensec maintain records of training for:
Yes A..
Guards, and DNA
~B.
Watchmen?
- 3. [73.50(a)(4)1 Dns the licensee maintain records of the qualifications fct:
Yes A.
Guards, and DNA B.
Watchmen?
- 4. {73.50(a)(4)l In:S the licensec keep requalifications records
'of, all guard. :uii w.itchmen used for physical protection Yes purposes?
p S. [73.70(a)] is,. the licens e maintain records of the names Yes (Note) and addie:..:. < f all Al's ?
Note: Adelt. rmn not ponted cince Karcii Silkwood af f air.
- 6. 173.700,);
!... the licenvie maintain recoids which indicate names, :nt.:,
..ind li.ut,e numbers of individuals authori/ed to Color coded badge:
s have au c.; '. il.il equipment, SN. l,. l ANs, and VNs?
\\
\\
be re MSW in &n'l p,y PaJ e ' C,Jn
ummuuummium Xill-2
,.swrds maintained to indicate control of all badges issued
... emp!oyces who have been furnished picture badges to yes*
A?
,.ecords maintained of specially coded. ' nd numbered badges a
. employees and non-employees which indicate VA's and s \\'s to which adthorization has been granted?
Yes
0(c)]
Do records of the rechtrati
.) of visitors to cach
,,nclude:
Visitor 1.ogc Name of visitor, Visitor Logn Purpose of Visit,
- Date, yg,tton.,,1,o g, Time in and out, Visitor Logs Employment affiliation, VisitorIlgo Citizensidp, Visitor Logs Name and badge number of escort, and Visitor Logs Name of indhidual visited?
Visitor Logs l
- /O(h)]
Does the licensec maintain up-to-date records and
,n procedures used for the control keys, locks and.
y,,
l
.inations?
\\
l
'/4(h))
Does the licensees procedures reflect access controls melividuals, vehicles and packages at each entrante to the PA's?
Yes 10(e)]
Does t,he licensec maintain records which indicate "mdition of all security related equipment?
yes hl be note'd that old and/or extra Photo Badge innerto nrc st.ored open folder on top of a desh, not in a Jocked container.
- r7,a geye. con le reked m Ma/
-Q.
1-a
XIll 3
\\
e licensee documented time and manpower
. 60m the security organization end from
,7,
NohandomPatrols
!!:ensec maintain rccords of randoni
- hift,
.Js being maintained "of all individuals '
c:mally unocuupied VA, which include:
Yes Yes Yes YC8
. and Yes
!!censec maintain records,which document s
tours and inspections, and 1
and maintenance on:
Yes
- ars, Yes
. mt, Yes
en. equipment, and.
Yes
- / related devices?
li' entec have records of tests performed i tst.ition zone and clear areas are Yes Hon 0.2 feet candles at allstimes?
s e..,. o..
0 Xill4
- 15. [73.70(f)]
Do records of alarm syste'm activities include:
A.
Each onsite alarm annunciation, yco D.
Location of each alarm, false alarm and alarm checks, and yes C.
Tampar indication alarms?
- 19. [73.70(f)]
Do records indicate the following data on cach alarm annunciated:
~
~
A.
Type of alarm, Yes
~
a
}
D.
Location of cach alarm, Yes t-
{
_C.
Alarm circuit, Yes D.
Date of alarm, and Yes l
E.
Time of alarm?
Yes 20 [73.70(f)]
Does the licensec maintain a detailed record of response by facility guards and/or watchmen to cach alarm and/or other security incident?
. YC8 Guard Training on Vide:
~
- 21. Does the licenscc maintain an outline of all aspects of Tape bployee trainin the security education prop. ram (See PSP)?
not dcretnt'ntn
- 22. [73.71(b)]
During this inspection period were there security incidents which involved:
No
'f
' A.
Attempted theft of SNhl, N
D.. Suspected theft of SNhl,.
No C.
Attempteil diversion of SNhl, No D.
Suspected diversion of SNhl, and E.
Acts of:
i rus pfe ce a rebs M 66/
f
h4
\\
i i
Xill-S i
(1) Industrial.vihotage and No,_,,,,,,,, ;
(2) Susprctest or attempted acts of industrial stibota2c?
Jo
- 23. (73.7 )(b)]
Did the licensee immediately (c;; ort secu:i:y incider Is of any of 11.6 sove items to 110?
,,,_,, j 96,,,,,,,..,,
- 24. 173 'il',1Cl Was a written repatt of inv sti;stk.r, of ihe above I:eins reimteri to RO within l5 da rs from the date of the mA 1 ntial repoit?
- 25. [7.';.71(c)]
b t!.: sn'.ntantiv. cd.htional ihfonnation 1ath.:..d D'\\
subx:gu.;d to the..litt;n tcport ii:uiudiately raparted to itO?
. 26. [ 70.3'.'(:)!
Iras tlie licens:c'submltted all reports to RO wl.it.'-
cor.tain deseriptione. :ad tiu effec:s of all chances in the facility PSl*!
27
[70..C(0)
We:c ali ch.:ngs la the !icensee PSP sub n,tha to PO ecitiiin twe me sh:. after the effective data of ti.:-
s.,0 i
l cll:ir.pi:n i
- Chan;;e to i md t i'.act, decreased ov :r;,'a]1 pretecLion.
e
/*
l g., g e eu Le. ee /eas*l h>
ohl l
4 e-
-