Text

Partially Deleted RO Insp Rept 70-1193/74-04 on 740506-09. Violations Noted:Tv Camera Not Relocated Inside Dock Area to Provide Immediate Visual Capability of Guard Upon Activation of Pu Monitor Alarm
	ML20207N564
Person / Time
Site:	07001193
Issue date:	05/28/1974
From:	Donahue J, Hind J, Patterson J; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20207N448	List: ML20207N446; ML20207N473; ML20207N508; ML20207N532; ML20207N564; ML20207N577; ML20207N591; ML20207N602; ML20207N625; ML20207N635;
References
	FOIA-86-281 70-1193-74-04, 70-1193-74-4, NUDOCS 8701140292
	Download: ML20207N564 (64)
	v • d • e

.

v

(--

~

D. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATION [

" ~'

RECION I RO Inspection Report No. 070-119h74- 04 Licensee: Kerr-McGee Corporation License No. SNM-ll74 Kerr-McGee Building Category: A (1)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma a

Cimarron Facility Plutonium Plant Crescent Oklahoma Type of Licensee: Special Nuclear Material t

I Type of Inspection: Special: Announced Physical Protection Inspection l

.m

May 6-9;"1974.. -

i Dates of Inspecti a:

g.

4 I

Dates of Previous pection:

February 26-27, 1974 (M&PP)

(g

'M[ 7/

Leid Inspector: J F. D n u

'(Data)

~

g s

b Accompanying Insp'ector:

. P. Patterson e

(Date)

Other Accompanying Perso~nnel: None Reviewed By':

ief 6

7'/

Materials and Plant (Date)

Protection Branch

Attachment:

Findings (Exempt from Disclosure) 8701140292 870109 4Tg 6-281 PDR

~

e 7

REPORT DETAILS i

~

(SECTIONS I THROUGH XVI)

INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE SECTION I

.1.

Persons Contacted:

Morgan Moore, Cimarron Facility Manager Raymond Janka, Manager, Administration and Accountability Fred Welch, Security Officer Barbara Barrls, Guard L. J. Kephart, Guard (Shif t Supervisior) 2.

Scope i

nis inspection covered the Kerr-McGee'(K-M) approved security plan, i

License Conditions MPP-1 to License No. SNM-1174 (with exceptions)

)

and 10 CFR 73 requirements, as applicable.

g 3.'_ Introduction I

g D e ph'ysical security inspection of the K-M Plutonium Plant, a part 4

of the Cimarron Facility, was conducted on May 6-9, 1974.

ne security plan, initially submitted on January 5,1974 to the ij Materials and Plant Protection Branch, Directorate of Licensing, was revised following a visit of[Dr. Frank A. CostanzCon February 6-8, 3

j 1974. The revised security plan'was submitted to DL on" February 27, and March 6, 1974 and incorporated several modifications suggested by

~

, Dr. Costanzi'[ issue Amendment MPP-1 to License No. SNM-1174 to a In order to accept the revised plan, it was found necessary to new License Condition 9.0, effective March 6, 1974.

Some conditions were effective im: mediately; certain exceptions were granted with respect to placement of detection equipment and conducting of searches (with acceptable provisions) and certain exceptions were granted on equipnent installation, badging and the protective force but only until May 6, 1974 l

(with acceptable provisions).

H e nunerous violations disclos.ed by this inspection relate mainly to the licensee's inability to meet imposed requirements within the time allotted (March 6 or May 6, 1974).

Most violations deal with three general areasi alarms, guards and detection aids, all long lead items.

l e

e

= - - -

he f436 8WWLf}&

$UMMARY OF FINDINGS g

A.* Enfoteement Actions:

The following apparent violations of AEC requirements are considered to be of Category II severity:

1.

73.60(a)(7) states, " Methods to observe individuals within material access areas to assure that special nuclear material is not diverted shall be provided and used,on.a continuing basis."

This matter was previously reported to K-M as item No. 3 in the enclosure to RO:III letter dated April 12, 1974. 'In the X-M response dated April 29, 1974, it was stated that the(TVcamera presently mounted on the outside of the Pu Building vill be moved inside the dock air lock area to enable the guard in the front lobby to have visual capability to survey the area of the dock exit Pu monitor as well as the exit door Contrarytotheabove,atthetimeoftheinspection,{theTVcamera was not relocated to inside the dock area to provide im=ediate visual capability of the guard upon activiation of the Pu monitor alarm.

(See Report Details Page.30a( I 2. 73.50(f)(3) states Communications equipnent shall be tested foh operability and performance not less frequently than once at the beginning of each security personnel work shift." .j In addition, the K-M Security Plan 'in Part 10.4 states,I'All communication equipment is tested at least once each shift.'3 e I t Contrary to the above, the existing agreement with th@uthrie Police Department provides for conducting weekly tests of the I emergency radio rather than once each security personnel work shift](SeeReportDetailsPage36a) 3. License Condition 9.3.1 requires submission of Drawing SG-2 to include levels of illumination at various points in the isolation sone. 73.50(b)(5) states, " Isolation zones and clear areas between barriers shall be provided with illumination...not less than 0.2 foot candles." _3_ ~ l e

Part'2.1.2.2of'theK-HSecurityPlanstates,('Theminimum illumination along the barrier (protected area perimeter fence) The front of the building is.2 foot candles at ground level. and the entrance to the protected area is lighted by thg same typeoffixturesandminimumilluminationisthesame.[ i Contrary to the above, a revised SG-2 drawing has not been jubmitted to Licensing to date to depict the levels of Also, during a night-gilluminationatpointsalongthebarrier. time inspection on May 7.1974, the levels of illumination provided the southeast fence corner and fronting the Pu Building ~ main entry area and fence line do not appear to meet the minimum of 0.2 foot candles. (See Report Details Page 20ag LicenseCondition9.3.2requireskIhesa=ple'windowintheeast 4. vall of the plant shall be alarmed to detect una'uthorized opening andlockedfromtheoutside..."3 i ~ Contrary to the above, 'the$ ample windos has not been equipped (See R ~ with an alarm or exterior lock. 8 License condition 9.3.4 states in part... At the point of the 5. exit scarch from a material access area, the licensee shall use a metal detector in conjunction with the special nuclear material detector." Contrary to the'above, a metal detector has not been installed to 6 S date at the point of exit search from the material access area. a . (See Report Details Page 28a) License Condition 9.3.5 states,(The licmsee shall install a ~ i-6. l motion detector in the storage vault..."3 4 Contrary to the above, thehotion detectw was only partially installed but was not operable or tied into the alarm console. . (See Report Details Page 32ag 73.50(a){1) states, "The licensee shall establish a security 7.t 'p. organization, including guards..." Part 5.2 of the K-li Secur ty l Plan states, "The shif t organization wi13 consist o@wo armed guards at guard posts 1 and 2, and a supervisor. The guards and

the supervisor will be armed and uniformed."

~ 8 e Contrary to the above, protective personnel assigned to post and supervisory duties were neither$rmedfior uniformed and therefore did not meet the definition of " guard" as spe' ified in 73.2(c). c (See Report Details Page 13a) i 4 1 - % pee un kre % J k Ud

Ii 8. Licenza conditien 9.5 states, "Iha dosr batveen th(xhaust. air { fan room (Room 201) and the supply air far (sic) room (Room 202) shall' be alarmed to detect unauthorized openingin accordance with 1,0 CFR 73.50(d)(2) and 73.60(c)." Contrarytotheabove,anklarmhadnotbee nstalled on the . subject door. (See Report Details Page 33a 9. License condition 9.7 states,",..The licensee hall install balanced magnetic switch type intrusion alams (on all emer ency crits and all nomally lock d points of ingress and egres in accordance with 10 CFR 73.50(d)(1) and (2) and 73.60(c). Contrarytotheabove,theseportalsarektillequippedwith non-acceptable plunger-type alams which have not been rep 1 ed by balanced magnetic switches. (See Report Details Page 33a LicenseCondition9.8 states,(Thelicenseeshallpro de for both 10. .l central alam stations to be continually manned... " t I 73.50(d)(1) states that, "All alams required pursuant to this part shall annunicate in a continuously manned central alarm station located sithin the protected area and in at least one other continuously =anned station, not necessarily within the protected area..." - .~

4 Also,LicenseCondition9.18.1g@rantedanexceptionfromthe

~ requirementfora,decondary. alar with certain conditions. -station only until May 6, 1974, Contraryto'theabove,althoughbothpostshPuPlantPostNo.h and U Plant Post No. 2) are continuously manned, thohecondary alam annunicator was not installed or operable at U Plant Post No. 2 at the time of this inspectiond (See Report Details Page 32a)

11. License Conditions 9.16.1 and'.2 - A exception to the requirenent for

' search of individuals anipackages at the entrance point into the protected area provided:f','That a weapon (metal) detector is located outside the guard station (Post No. 1).. such that an individual i is searche'd for weapons prior to entry into the guard station"; and that "an electric door lock is provided c,n the outside door to he guard station which is operated from within the guard station.' Contrarytotheabove,thehetaldetector,thoughinstalledatthe location specified, was not operable at the time of this inspection. Also, the electric door lock on the entry door had not been installed} asyet.[(SeeReportDetailsPage 32ah s 9 e I ' n fe ca, 1e ceL,se) m Ma / / p ~ , r!

f ..,s s N License Condition 9.17.2 states that "That storage areas in the 12. fabrication area and in the (inspection and) assembly area shall be protected by intrusion alarms when these areas are unoccupied." Contrary to the above, intrusion alarms were not installed or i , operable at these locations at the time of this inspect on. (See Report Details Page 29a) ndition 9.18.2 - An exception until May 6,1974 was

13. License rom the cournitment to use detectors to search individuals grante entering the plutonium plant protected area provided-a hands on The licensee search is performed under the surveillance of a guard.-

the searches at the poin s indentified in License. shall conduct Condition 9.16." (See Citation No.11). Contrary to the above, thketal detector although installed in t exterior breezeway was not operable. (See Report Details Page 32a) License condition 9.'18.3 states,kThe licensee shall employ the 14. contract guard service as specified in,he licensee's security plan, t i as revised, provided that the size of the temporary guard force is as uards and armed shift specified in the licensee's plan (two arned supervisor) for the permanent guard force." Contrary to the above, as of May 6,1974, only(one contractor guard 9 was assigned to each shif t and the K-M esployees who have been trained to act a4 guards were not armed er uniformed. (See Report De mih Tage 13a)g e 1 The hollowing apparent violations are considered to be of Category III j f . severity. License condition 9.18.4' - Until May 6,1974,dthe licensee is granted an exception to the requirenent that all alarms meet Interin Federal I 15. i ~~~ Specification W-A-00450B (CSA-FSS) provided existing alarms are paintained until replaced with alarms meeting the above spec a Contrary to the above, as of May 6,1974)fexisting alarms were not (See Report Details replaced with alarms meeting the specifi: ations. i Page 33a&33bd 73.70(d) states, "Each licensee... shall keep the following records. A log indicating name, badge number, ti::e of entry, reason for entry 16. and time of exit of all individuals granted access to normally ' unoccupied vital area." s information is not i - Contrarytotheabove,[p.logcontaining maintained. (See Report Details Page 402) i, i m e.. ~ u u m - ~ ~ ~ ~

I y actiens Tzken on Previous Items of Noncomplirnee RO:III Inspection Report 070-1193/74,02 (March 11-13,1974) identified ~ the two items of noncompliance, one program weakness and three discussion items: i 'I. Th@ombination lock of the Material Storage vault was fo broken and inoperable and rep und to be for approximately three weeks. tedly had been in this condition Action taken: A.nedargeant-Greenleaf three position, changeable combinationlockwasinsi:alledonthevaultdochndisoperating sa tis fac torily. 2. The visitor log used to record individuals who visit the Plutonium Plant did not provide a section for " purpose of visit','"

Also, several log sheets did not indicate the identity of an assigned of the person visited within the protected area. escort either by n Action taken:

The licensee has developed a new form on which to record visitors to the protected area. This new log contains a section for purpose of visitor and the nane of the person visited. Security personnel have been instructed to have escorts sign the f log to acknowledge responsibility for praviding escort while within the protected area. Y.- 3.. Program Weakness - There is no capability for the to visually determine the cause for a (Pu monitor)hatchman (guard) alarm (at the dock exit door) from his vantage point in the Pu Building's front ~l lobby. Mile it is standard practice to notify personnel within .l the Pu area that an alarm has been receimd, there is n'o assurance or record to indicate that each such alazn is checked out by authorized personnel to determine its caxse] Action taken: The licensee has initiateff ectiondo move a TV camera, presently mounted on the building's exterior, to inside the dock area air lock to afford the lobby guard visual capability to survey the area where the dock exit Pu manitor is located, as well as the exit door.' Also, the licensee is exploring the use of additional instrumentation on the Pu monitor to compensate for background levels during moveme corridor and adjacent rooms] nt of matarial within the building Since pr'ompt and effective remedial actim has not been accomplished, a citation for noncompliance with 10 CFR 73.60(a)(7) is in order. (See Citation No.1 ) M 7-Tis pge m,, be relem) n, Mal _-.. =

Other mstters discussp with licensee representatives at the close-out meeting on March 13, 1974 The status of these-matters is as follows:were also reviewed during the current inspection. 4. The system for recording required tests and maintenance of security , devices appeared to need revision. Creation of individual records on required tests, responses and inspections was deemed advisable. Action taken: The licensee has set up separate records for communications tests, daily fence and gate in.spections, alarm annunci--ions and response - m1mrm and detection aid tests and unusual incident reports. 5. The K-M agreement with theI;uthrie Police Department, where a radio receiver has been placed, provides for weekly tests of communications equipment] Since this arrangement did not meet the. spirit and intent . of 10 CFR 73.50(f)(3) the licensee was requested to resolve this matter. Action taken: While the licensee is aware that regulations require tests of all co==unications equipment at the beginning of each security force work shiftho arrangements have been made to date with the Guthrie Police to conduct thrice-daily tests of the radiol.Accordingly, a citation for noncompliance with 10 CFR 73.50(f)(3) was'made. Citation No. 2) (See 6.. Eecause the configuration of the protected area fence perimeter was N. changed, the licensee had been requested to re-evaluate protective light-ing to assure that illumination requirements are met. ( reevaluation of protective lighting had not been made and Action talom: I a plot plant to reflect the levels of lighting (as requested by DL in License Condition 9.3.1) had not been submitted. " Visual inspection of the light levels provided at the protected area fence (Southeast Corner) and the front of the Pu Building (Main Entry Point to Protected Area) indicated that acceptable light levels are not apparent] Accordingly, a citation for noncompliance with License Condition 9.3'.1 and 10 CFR 73.50(b)(5) appears in order. (See Citation No. 3) g m, e 'L , cm k rekd N/ e n O e 'm S

.==-

==.py F-

r w v CENERAL_ C SECTION II C Deter'mine that the f ac'ility's plot plan indicates all 1.. changes in physical aspects of the security program, since g' the previous inspection, in accordance with TI-9000, .Up to Date Appendix A. C Who is' the site security officer? -(. Fred Welch] r - 4 - 2. C Does the site security of ficer have additions 1 responsi-1 3. bilities? If so, what are these responsibilities.and Q how riuch time is spent on additional responsibilities? - yes' - - ~ l p 20%... ...Materiai'.Accountabil i ty. C '. f Past 3 Months. 75% ..'.MhEonium. Security ~ b ..5% m ...tlyaniumSecurity- .Y-70%. Security j- ...M4%1f. Average. about. .......... 30%. Accountability . Q-O Who is responsible for providing (written or oral) 4. instructions to individuals used to protect: d- ~ The site against industrial. sabotage. axst/or Fred Wel A.

z. sua at the site against theft or aiversson? _ "*d "*d-C nas the licensee been grantea specific exceptions.

C 5. from the requirements of 10 CFR 737 (If yes, explain yes in Section IV.) C e 4 C. 1 C e g e

C

~. .Redne G"kArp.e..... -

N.aisseuse w ?. .! O .r 'C 6. 170.22(h)] Has the licensee audited all phases of their physical prorection program for effectiveness during the Day to day last 12, months? Cs Cferations P A. Who perforced audit? B. Did the results of the licensee's audit require ~ yes C corrections? f C 0.) ' Have all corrections been implemented? y,.. If not, explain: O. O c .. a i c n. v ~ o' e c .'C c i 7ua pp &-ypcha;4, gj c .C s

C e

-a

L/L@ U ! C. SECTION 111 SECURUT PLAN e. 1. '[70.22 (h)] ) Physical Security Plan (PSP)?Doesthel Q 2. [70.32(e))

C effectiveness?Did any change in the PSP decreasc If yes, explain:

Q. 1 C ~ ~- A. Did the licensee secure AEC approval prior making changes in the PSP which decrease g effectiveness? (1) If yes, were approvals: ..O (i) Written, and/or t g (b) Verbal? 1 O g' 3. [70.32(d)] For changes in the licensee's ISP wh decreased its effectiveness, did the licensee su 4 Technical Specifications incorpo j g %*N D.2 i g 4. [70.32(e)] did notd/ctesse its effectiveness?Were any o C If 7*8 list ch8=8's-A.- C g,. ( C.' \\ p,.............. C '5. [70.32(e) Did the licensee make changes in t!ie 9 g which di proper notifications?ot decrease its effectiveness w Q l -11. g g i

..e.a e w,,u o v.. n u C stCnon IV. FACIM TY LICENSE CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS -C ~ a Attach current copy of specific license conditions applicable to the facility. C See attached list. ( C C ~ ... O ( ,Q c .s. .q 1 e I s6 .C e c r 1 C 0,- C e d.. /1 .y ( i C -).2-C [ r-t.

-n LL&5URE ~ 9.0 FACILITY SECURITY 9.1 The licensee shall implement and comply with the facility security plan for the plutonium plant dated Januazy 5,1974, as revised February 27, 1974, and as modified by these license conditions. 9.2. No statecent in the licensee's facility security plan shall relieve the licensee of a requirement of 10 'CFR Part 73 unless granted in a specific exemption.or exception set forth as a condition of this license. .-

9.3 In addition to the commitments contained in the licensee's

~. facility security plan, as revised, the following additional conditions shall be complied with on and after March 6,1974. '.In any conflict between the licensee's facility security plan and a condition below, the condition shall be complied with ~

T.*,.'

by the licensee. , ;f,. ,. ;. y;. 7". ; '. 9.3.1 The licensee shall include drhwing SG-2 of the facility ~ security plan dated January 5,1974 as an addendum to the February 27, 1974 revision to the plan, or modify f i., , drawing SG-2. of the February 27, 1974 revision, to ~ ~ . '.. ~ J- ' include the levels of illumination at the, various j,~ points in the isolation zone. .;.;,.,g.. 1 ,i. ~ i '.,. ; .9.3.2 he sample window in the east wall of the plant shall be ' ~ ~.:..- .,.. ~, :.,. alarmed to detect unauthorized opening and locked from 4., }'...- thei outsidegIn addition, the licensee shall comply with the search requirements of 10 CFR 73.60(a)(6) and. t 73.60(b) for any transfers through this access point. t '9.3.3[in a manner such that removal fro 11 door hinges shall b i'- f m the exterior is Precluded] 9.3.4 The licensee shall selec tal, explosives, and special nuclear material detecto hich have the det m. tion capabilities specified in Regulatory Guide 5.7 " Control of Personnel Access to Protected Areas, Vital Areas, and Material Access Areas." 1 At the point of the exit search from a material access

~

area, the licensee shall use a metal detector in conjunc-tion with the specini nuclear material detector. e e ~ l t

{ 1 { 9.3.5 n e licensee G ~ ~ storage vaultl .10CFR73.50(d 2 B 913.6 n e licensee a licensee's see as appropriate from theft and 9.3.[ The license ~ ~ ~ ,' supplement to C .s threats to the t ~ :., 9.3.8 During any emes access area whe F be met, the lie conditions whie observation unt or until a nor .' minimize the op ~ .i- ~ ', ~ ' material during' s ~* g i,

l ' 9.3.9 The licensee shs 1.

',.' ~

, been made with 2 ~

.f.

concerning assig 's.,, s* J ' 9.4 The inner barrier of tD8 j.' - [ ;, l h i ,' ~ p ys cal barrier of the substant;ial,constructic oq) ,~ i l p '.. 9.5 The door between the eg t . supply air far room (Ro. J> authorized opening in a< x6 73.60(c). 3 /g(" 9.6 In addition to the visi? / .the licensee's facility ~ shall require all visite to be visited in accords ' 9.7.,n e plunger type intrusi of Interin Federal Speci l not tamper indicating, magnetic switch type int-all normally locked poin E with 10 CFR 73.50(d)(1). m 6.. 4 ..um,. m-

61 . m. F ~ ,i, - 9.8 The licensce shall provide for both central alarm stations to be continually manned in accordance with 10.CFR 73.50(e)(1) a [J the central alarm stations are required to be manned.During a sec '~ 9.9 The licensee shall assure that an individual is' not used as a guard cr a watchman unless such individual has been properly trained and equipped. . 9.10 De licensee shall report security threats to the AEC in accord-ance with 10 CFR 73.71(b). 9'.11 The licensee shall submit all changes or revisions to the facility security plan to the AEC in,accordance with 10 CFR ,. :..y., .. f 70.32(e). ,.; a. 9.12 The licensee shall test all intrusion alarms for operability ' .'*.-g... and required performance in accordance with 10 CFR 73.SO(f)(2) ".. M-},r M.. and 73.60(d)(2). . =... 1,. ~. < ,.,l 9.13 ne licensee shall caintain records of the names and addresses of all authorized individuals as required.by 10 CFR 73.70(a).. .y.e... 9.1'4.De licensee is granted an exception from the requirement that Z -(- .J.the emergency power supply be located wi.hin a vital area pro- ..- vided that the licensee complies with the co=mitment for a secondary energency power supply as specified in paragraph 2.2 l 1 f,' of the licensee's facility security plan..as revised. ~ 9.15 The licensee is g' ranted an exception to 15e requirement that g,. j' . the search for concealed SNM be conducted at the material access i '. -area exit point provided: 'c ... n. .?..,, %..:.. .~ ~ .,.. -.,.9.15.1 Such search of all individuals is conducted within pthe corridor im=ediately outside the locker rooms N ~ s as indicated on drawing SG-1 of tte licemee's > ,usecurity plan, as revised 8ne 15censee shall-locate the detectors such that the locat5on of the detectors in the corridor precludes any individual from exiting i the material access area and not deing searched for l . concealed special nuclear materia!. i e l '9.15.2 ' nat an SEI detector be maintainei and employed within l e airlock adjacent to the shipI ng/ receiving dock on i r the. west side of the plutonium bui.1 ding. 9 e T h E p p % / e e c /c e / m h d [

9.15.3 All packages exiting the material access area via the carridor shall be searched by the individual manning alarm station fl. 9.16 The licensee is granted an exception to the requirement for search of individuals and packages at the entrance point into the pro-tected area provided: 9.16 1 "That a weapon (metal) detector is located outsid,e i the guard station (alam station #1) either in the '~ Areezeway or within an enclosure constructed within [.. Athe breezeway such that an individual is searched K . for weapons pribr to entry into the guard station. s 9.16.2 That an electric door lock is provided on the outsid7 ~ ? (door to the guard station whi~ch is operated from K W. within the guard station. g' 9.16.3 That the guard station is protected as specified in .I ~, .. Appendix A n the three exposed sides (west, south, nl ,7gg.p...;, ; and east .. 9.16.4 All handcarried packages remain 'outside the. guard 7 !e station until an authorized individual or the br ~~ l.. i.'; (guard Jupervisor can relieve the guard at the alam l .;r* station such that the guarti can retrieve and ' search .)-the packages. ..~ . yf..&.,:.;g..;.. .s...- s. v.;..

9.17. Ihe licensee is granted an exception to the definition of.

f .s. material access area and the pemissible -activities therein with ~- * ) $ - '

respect to the various laboratozy and maintenance areas within

, the plutonium facili' t-as indicated by drawing SG-1 of the .g,/.. ; security plan provided: .n 9.17.1 That when an area.is shut down, after the plutonium has been removed from that area, two individuals, at least one of whom is an authorized individual,. inspect. '~ the area to verify that no plutonium remains within the area other than residual holdup n, allowed during tornado conditions. 9.17.2 he storage areas in the fabrication area and in the 1 hsembly' area shall be protected by intrusion alarms when) {these areas are unoccupied. J'

Appendix A contains details which could compromise the effectiveness of the licensee's security program and is therefore withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(d).

.12d- -Puc ~f W <e k d,,, M / " r

l 9.18 instellation of equiand requirements wh ments pment and/or completion of new constru tip This section does not relieve the li r .10 CFR Part 73 unless specified belowof the c on. censee from any cernitment nse, or requir granted only until May 6,1974 , and such excepeent of of equipment er new construction for whi hions are has been granted is completed prior to Stay 6 c shall comply with the security plan a specific exception ,1974, the lic requirements of 10 CFR part 73, from whi h, conditions of lic granted. and the exception is c 9.18.1-The licensee is granted an e for a of su[c'E_ secondary central alam statiojun ^ construction and the installation of all i , alarm systems provided that the licen ce follo 1,,,. conditions set forth in Appendix B** ntrusion

i e

'Jf 9.18.2 , 9.18.1. he licensee is granted an exception fro {. .to use detectors to search individuals entm search is nerformed under the surveillplu . [.. - l -~ . i,.f', 6 ~ ering the .The licensee shall conduct the search at a hands-on. 1 \\ ' identified in License Condition 916 ance of a guard. .a y the points

r.., - J.. '.

l '.. U.' ".9.18.3 The licensee shall employ the cont.,* i t as specified in tiie licensee's securityract guard sezvice d '.,. *L l. ..provided that the size of the temporary guard fplan, ,T y-- ', ~ as specified t

}

. ] guard force. in the licensee's plan for the permanent orce is l.. , ' ~

. - 9.18.4. The licensee is granted, an ex.

i-s y that all alams r.eet Interim Fedception to the requirement. .k"..... i '. maintained until replW-A-00450 B (GSA-FSS) pro eral Specification sting alams are . above specification. aced with alams meeting the ~ 9.18.5 ments of the security plan provided cuhe

is continued until the new b d i o the badge require-rrent badge practi*ce a g ng system is available.

9.18.6 fThe licensee is granted an e l .("the requirement that emergency exits b . y that patrols of 'the perimeter ba on zone, and from alamed provided specified in Appendix B**. rrier are maintained as

- Appendix 8. contains details which c

~ of the licensce's security progran and is therefore withheld fromoul public disclosure in accordance with 10 CF R 2.790(d). .= .g p w k relewYl h W r _--'~

\\ ,P 5 This Appendix cor. of the licensee's i disclosure in acc e i 1 4 3,- 9.16.*3 'Ihe ..n St2 . bd H 3 fit J Of 9(bd E =*" g M 1. 4 ".t ,.e e

g I

i f W. .e..,* g S g t g + 8 d 4 *. ciU .f..... p ,( 9 y e s T, / 5 V ( . ***a~ V, S ,..s 5 e e Om. g f g O t'

4 t

L e s

e

? ht ,e' l. h m e 4 L ^ f. '. ' = = =.. ,yn ,,p,vy .w-w--w-- g w,w,-- -w-m

APPENDIX B This Appendix contains details which could compromise the effectiveness of the licensee's security program and is therefore withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(d). 9.18.1 The licensee shail ~ station an individual in the uranium plant office area and shall provide for two-way radio communication capability between the ~ Primary central alarm station and this individual. ' 9.18.6 The interior portion of the isolation zone around the perimeter of the protected area shall be patrolled by a guard or watchman at fifteen (15) - 2 minute intervals except.during the day 1'ght hours when the patrols may be ardwo (2) hougintervals. ^' The guard or watchman on patrol shall contact the 8. individual in the guard house at least,.once during each patrol interval. . g..jk...

..,..t. r*....

s.',.- ;..'.

e ,.N P., '.

j

. f *; -] ',f,. J. t .g ......,..i.. s

*3.,,.

= w p, : 'p.. 2 ?

- ,. T=.
=

..... g = ,s. il -. . s,, - ,l,

8

g. 4 I

. s 1 . s.- .*,.,a" l t {f * 'f., J.,.* \\*., t 9 1. . e L,, e a. .,s .o a. .s . r. . t = t a. a .3. 1 g

[,.

l' i a s g.. te +e/ '. f r'). ' re y - q.4 g j = =. t n e e. l ~ \\ l

.O-

' SECURITY ORGANIZATION SECTION V.

~ IPSP][LC-9.1]I70.32(e)] Does the current facility O 1. organization chart indicate all individuals, groups, TES or organizations responsible for security? O noas the security organization assure continuous O responsibility for physical protection practices by: 2. Using a security organization [7.50(a)(1)] 6 g including guards, to protect the facility and y A. 3 SNH, and (See attached sheet) I [7f.50(a)(2)] Maintaining at least one (1) TES ~ B. security supervisor onsite at all times? ~ l O

3. ' [70.50(a)(3)] Eas the licensee established written

- curity Procedures which document:

.O YES The structure of the security organization, and A. The' duties of guards, vacchmen and other individuals O B. YES responsible for security at the site? g Are the following enployees used to protect the facility: '. 4. NO l g- , A.,Cuards, D Watchmen, and/or Company employed pending being 3. armed & uniformed g YES - C. Other i.ndividuals? C

5. ' Are the following contracted _ individuals used to protect th* f**ili'Y:

C hinkerton1pershifh ,A'.

Cuards, NO

~' l B. Watchmen, and/or NO C. Other individuals? (See attached si eet) s l C le "hd '" M. ~' 9 /vc or c '. h -* ~ M ( ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - V

,o ets the K-M Securi sa 2 cf tva crm d and the su guards ty Plan ests.blish "pervisor at guard posts 1 will be states,"The a 13 the time security organiz and shif At armed." 73.50(a)(1)L an ation, including of {on' individuals. this inspectio statessuperv e armed Itw per al n, K-M w guards..,. "Th. function guard as as '\\ licenstrainedas guards shift)so not While the 13 contracting none ee did not havin-depth and me were K-M employee their ec t.' amed or . order (security plan a guardrely act as unifom d. e See Citation N e a ad b envisionedforce, per visible The Pinke or as Basis for Citati in Summary ofin the,regulati in thearmed det

o. 7 se number According to Li onItem V-5 Findings).

ons, a cos the cia contrace guard sercense Condition 9 is as specified ex in the licensee'vided18.3, the licens vice, pro ception I w as granted only the The size ee was until May 6,1974s plan for t ould besecurity of pomanent g w plan as igned specified at lea are s t6 each shifarmed nor neither g. to ea h w c st fc (See Citatio t, the liceunifomed andork shif. tw arme o t there isSince licensguards 'a n No.14). nsee is in 4 only one Pinkerte no ncompliance e p' with License Co on Gut I a t e .e e le V'p' G g ~~ 'N., .m N r-

v., O 6. [73.50(a) (4)] Are the fol: protect the facility: C A.

Cuards, (Were not arz:

g . B.* Vatchmen, and/or C. " Other individuals? O' ~ 7. [73.50(a) (4)] Was each of t O' Provide duties:q training prior to C A.

Cuards, (Were not armed

~ , B. Watchmen, and/or C. Other individuals? v. "8. Who provided training? _ "E Q

* 'of Kerr-MeGee'

~ . C-9. C Was the curriculum used by the s in accordance v;Lth AEC furnist J'ht

A.

[RG-5.20] Points of Law, a% - -C I , B. [RG-5.20] Security Skills ' C, . C. [RG-1.17] Local Security 1 C

10. [73.50(a)(4)j Is the. licensee and watchmen to protect the fac C

11. Are qualifications of all indiv purposes based upon:

E .A. Written and oral e:daminatiot ( B. On-the-job training, and/or C. Drills?,

12. List equipment used by the following individuals to' -

the facility: protect .38 caliber revolver A. Cuards s s .v Portable Radio y/ g .. Riot Cun available B. Watchmen, and/or Portable radio - C. Other individuals. Portable radio ,Q I 'Q 'C l i

13. [73.2(c)]

loaded firearm?Is each guard on duty equipped with a-(Pinkerton Guard only) 'C. YES A. Describe firearm (at least. 38 caliber). SmithandWesso[6rour C '." in cylinder.~-t 1 a ~

14. Has supervision of the licensee's secu C

a on months? s C'- YES -

25. What were the results of this inspection? __

All operable . C ~ C

16. [73.50(a)(4), 73.50(f)(4)]

to the folioving individuals by the licensee adIs the equipment p to aid in protecting the facility? equate C A. Cuards. g B. Watchmen, and/or C. Other individuals? C YES %i p9e ra, he rele v) m O,f e

I 09% eoooeooec' + O.

17. If the equipmsnt provided by the licensee is considered DNA' inca:quste, what equipment is needed?

C. C g C l '18. [73.50(a)(4)] Have all guards and watchmen "eeployed by .C the licensee for physical proceetion purposes: Demonstrated their ability to understand the facility's A. yrs .C security procedures, ~ g.. Written Fvamination - cla'sroom participation. s 9 ~ C-Demonstrated their ability to execute all required ,~ 3. duties, and l C gwt Job performance C Not to date C

c. gequattried ae 1 ease onnu,11,

7 C

19. Has each individual used for security purposes been tested

and requalified according to the, following schedule?

c A [73.50(a)(4)] Annual 17 - General duties and DNA responsibilities Semi-annually - Specific duties an'd DNA C B. [RG-5.20] responsibilities )NA b* C. [RG-5.2,0] Semi-annually - communicat. ions equipment D. [RG-5.20] Semi-annually - All other security-DNA 4 C equipment RC-5.20] Ahnually - Medical examinations

Current protective. force only employed sin.cc early April, -1974 e,

b

{. I 20.173.50(g) (2)J During this inspecticn period, did the security organization detect the abnormal presence or activity of persons or vehicles (unusual cecurrences) within an: C NO A. Isolation zone, NO 1 B.' Protected. area, NO [ C.. Material access area, and/or NO D. Vital area? C

21. Upon detecticn of unusual occurrences within the PA, Isolation zone, VA and MAA, how did the security -

g-organization demonstrate their capability of: G ^. [73.50(g> (2) (i)) netermining the. existence of a DNA . threat- .'................s.... C ....../........,.. Q O'

5. 173.50(g)(2)(ii)]

Assessing the-.extert. of the threat,- nm ..d..... ( C . C. [73.50(g)(2) (iii)] Taking ir::nediate taasures to neutralize the threat by one of the.following mems: . t~ (1) Appropriate action by facility, gue: ds, or * * * * * * * *

DNA

~- (- {

DNA (2) Calling for assistance from LLEA, or * * ' ' ' ' * * * *
r%

y, {. .............. n.n - O - T.'s p n _. t r. Le ye ).,.g,,) x.}} } r

I f.'.n. o Q) Perfoming both iters 1 and 2 above? DNA -. ~j .r......... .o ._./ O O . ~. C.

n

.s V 2 .C ..:s- .. :; i., 3..>...,.. c ~. t,. ... :: t Q. 7 . ~.. - .s.- O. C .C .. C a. e s s 1 C. \\ r s ( 9_4jf. (> '1 MS n.. ) '. g 5O 4 3w 'C

13.. ',

~ SECIION VI. PHYSICAL BARRIERS AND LIGHTING f 1. [73.50(b) (1)] ( vithin Vital Arcas (VA's)?Has the facility located Vital Equipment (V YES C 7 [73.50(b)(1)] PA? Has the facility located VA's within a ~ YES ..C-3. [73.50(b) (1) ] Does access to VA's require passage / through at least two physical barriers? O-YES 4. !.C Are physical barriers surrounding PA's in 'accordance~with 73.2(f)? YES. - If not, explain: 9-Q ,9 5. C- [73.50(b) (3)] Is each PA physical barrier sep.arated from ~ any other physical barrier designatea as a physical barrier for VA's and HAA's? YES Q ~ 6. [73.50(b) (3)], (73.50(b)(4)] Is an isolation zone estab:.hed around any portion'of a building wall used an L,. a physical barrier to the PA's? NO, L.. 7. Do all physical barriers of VA's and HAA's meet the qualifications of 73.2(f)? YES l C 8. [73.2(f)(2)] Do door, vindow and ' opening covers in walls serving as physical barriers to the PA, MAA and VA provide g lessened? sufficient strength that the integrity of ti.c wall is not C YES ~ i :c I h5 @g ran 'Le relea&d m YJ/ n

- - e

h- \\ O 9. 173.50(b)(3)] Does the licensee monitor or periodically check l ,,J (at least once a day) the intervening space between the 'M~ PA physical barrier and VA and MAA physical barriers? i O' 10.173.50(b) (4)] Does the licensee continuously monitor. O .......w.................,...............................,...... \\ i; ....s............ ~ O c ' ' Q .................:...................~................................ k-

11. [73.50(f)(1)], [73.6,0(d)(1)] Is 'the licensee i::aintaining physical barriers in an operable and effective condition?

YES ~ t ,C

12. [ PSP] Does the licensee inspect all physical barriers

g..

used for physical protection purposes.st a frequency' 'M ~ of not less than once per day? g. 13 173.50(b)(5)] Is each isolation zone and all clear areas illuninated sufficiently to aid guards and vatchnen in their response to the breaching of any NO .g physical barrier? (See attached sheet) C

14. [73.50(b)(5)]

Are isolation zones and clear areas . illuminated not less than 0.2 feet candles at all 'N0'**** 7 6 887

15. Are all entrances to th PA, VA, MAA illuminated

, sufficiently to aid guards or Vatchmen in performing ,,NO access controls? C ( (~ -20 p

B uis for Citatio - VI 14-15 l j In Part 2.1.2.2 of *he K-M Security plan, the licensee is committed to providing{.2 foot c ndle illumination along the protected area fence and at the front and entrance to the Pu Buildingg 73.50(b)(5) requires illumination of not less than 0.2 foot candles for isolation zones and clear areas. Ddring a n'ighttime inspection on May 7, 1974 it was noted that a change in the fence perimeter configuration resulted in arkened area at the southeast corner g Also the h ear area and isolation zone fronting the main entry were only' indirectly lighted at an illuminat. ion level apparently less than 0.2 foot candles. The lighting provided ar 'the entry was deemed insufficient to adequately identify person desiring entry], K-M had been requested by License Condition 9.3.1 to submit a plot plan drawing of the Pu Plant to depict the icvels of illumination at various points in the isolation zone. This drawing had not been submitted as* required. (See Citation No. 3). ~ t e ..i .j I 1 e n;, ye wy k relend. 6 Mi -20a-O u I 3 l 7

l C

16. Does the licensee have emergency lighting that is capable of illu=inating all facility access controls

'J ' P 1"t"? C' Describe methods of providing emergency lihting. ~ o ....gnerancy...er.gener,toa .C ~ ~ C.

C

. 17. Describe mechanism to turn lig'hting "on and off." O ..{iutematicswitcptonsetofaarkness. C c. C c c c % p.ge ca-le rel~ d " N "l o L C . C D

6.* SECTION VII KEYS, LOCgS, AND CO%" NATIONS C [73.50(c) What controls does the licensee utilize to uini=F(7)] 1. C the possibility of co= promise for:

' A.

Keys,' Restrictive key issuance - Keys issued only when needed and C are charged out by supervisory personnel. adlocksandkeyva'ysarerotatedperiodically3 B. Locks, and c C. C. Cochinations?. Kn we solely by authorized personr.e1.. Combination of ~C [SNMvaultlimitedtoSafeguardsClerks [ C 2. [73.50(c)(7)) 'Upon evidence of compromise, did the licensee ~ ~ promptly change:

C A.'

Keys,

~ ~ B. Locks, and - No evidence of compromise.. .g ~ ~ ~ C. Combination *s? ~ C 3. [73.50(c)(7)] Upon termination of any employee having access, did the licensee promptly cliange: TES A.

Keys,

-( TES B. Locks, and c .M I C. Combinations, and M

D.

Other security related ' equipment? C-

4. ' [73.50(c)(7)l, [73.70(h)] Are records (procedures) being i

maintained for controls of keys, locks, and combinations l g. 33 ' l . used for physical protection purposes? l 1 (- ~ 5. Do all facility locks used for physical prctection purposes meet the required specifications of 73.2(m)? YES - i 1 l C 22 le rakad m MI ~ t p.t.re es,

/y' d ed e@)(4 yegotion ? at le .oso visito )) s at Ar s 3 r, lo e s en. pa king fa i r O 173 ated c ~. lice.5 (c)(6)] c tside c li 0 u tie ns ri Under the is lat r both s fo ee Q pe m o 4 t em io e priv [7.5 (c)(5) 3 ate erge n n zon." 0 vh cy c e e rted ] e icle sco odni C s tio at Ar wi thin the Pns, do 5 all e driv e s the tim ers [7.50(c) es 3 A?- C of while deliv ide tific ]t , [73.6 (a)(5) v4 thin the Pery and n e te ing a P n a io 0 r .' C n ser ic A? v an utho]iz 6 A, V,d ~ e a Do v.e A r es Do the lic ad n e a mployms the lic MAA?.tio e n fo fC ensee r N-ensee e et ah che k n c scre vhe icle the c us 7 [RG e ing ofe RG n 5.20 .y C- 'the folloS.20] gu as a ds a y r Wa ad guide fo the s n %yN wing indivipr e si v e ac hme ? pr - te? c r mploym .C A. n e du ls ent Cu a s

ards, spo cre re n ibe ing n

B. .C Watchm le forperfor i s md en, a d/o e C. secu i fo n O r r the ty at

'C.

r ind r

8. -[73 50( ividu ls?

a ad c pe foMAA )s(4)] n C r i Do YES limi rm their duti e s the lice ted to individ C 9

- YES nsee 173 50(c)(5)]

es? assur u ls to who e that

?***Y a

visi ES'** rs C-wi r acces Do equire thin the Ps the l e A. s to V Qu ~. acces ic s A a ds, r A ens by u ing:e physic lly e to C B. s w atchm a YES e, a d/o n C. esc n O ot the r r all r individu l a st

*... No

. NO ~: YES L ~ ~ ~ ~ - r ,r

10. [73.50(c)(1)], [73.50(c)(5))

subsequent to search, are drivers of delivery and service vehicles escorted at YE5 . sj ' all times while within the PA? .-(

11. [73.50(c)(5)], [73.70(c)], [73.70(d)] Are all visitors required to register prior to being permitted into TES

'C ?!.'s and VA's?

12. [73.60Ca)(5)] Are authorized individuals used 'to C

TES control access to each MAA7 g .G i 1 O g ~~

g

'O .g C '.. C .r w C .C fhj; e (An >& V6lNY 'h b c ~ ~~i 7

o. ~~

- BADGING

~ SECTION II

C i C 1.

[73.50cc)(3)] Has the licensee provided picture badges to all individuals who are authorized access to the PA YES without escort? C ~ 2. [73.50(c)(4)'], [73.50(c)(5)] Has.the licensec provided C specially coded badges to non-escorted individuals which indicate PA's,'VA's and MAA's to which access authorization YES has been authorized? ~ ~~ C 3.. [73.50(c)'(5)] Does the licensee provide badges to all TES C-visitors to the PA? C 4. '[73.50(c)(5)] Do all non-pictu're visitor badges indicate g ~ that an escort is required? 'Q 5. [73.50(c) (5)] Are individuals not eeployed by the licensee who require frequent and extended access to I.- C. a.PA or VA provided picture badges which:. YES .A. Are picked up on entrance to the PA, and YES B. Are re, turned each time he leaves the PA? ~' C 6.- [73.50(c)(4)], [73.50(c)(5)] Do badges for individuals who require frequent and/or extended access to MAA's, VA's and C PA's indicates: TES A. Nonemployee - no escort required, YES B. Areas to which access is authorized, and ~ ~ YES C

c. Period.for which access is authorized?

C 7. [73.50(c)(3)], [73.50(c)(4)] Do all facility badges indicate areas to which access authorization is , granted? s 8. Do all. badges used by the licensee display features which are unique to the facility and are easily

* * *
YES identifhble?

is rehk) in 'hkl

C 97 4y

e. com

' g

.#c*dgr .~.a.g+ bzdg* T" Ba i1 3 c ,o .% i ba k ud ty,. n

e is t

su g e utho. ~ .C c . 8ro a ud riz( ,, c f,ty co n 1f.8 "GC e, e,,, .u d e Pers ....urs to onn Q .* Es s n c ew '*Pleree %.o t. r .r e.quir d. . **9Utr d e e , u. .... ~ ~. 1 .C C~.

..:. ~...... '

I. Red

~~..., ...fyym L . ~.... a* De s iibe badg ~~'"';. C c e'

fab er so n,,,Avista %u o

Po i on s tiv* Vicht pro,,,r,3 e ,p-

co..

de,.ID n pla ti badi.eins Pay O v s e u ber. u be. Serg 3 rt* ** lor m eg

- n m

r 8' 1s C Du be. C suanc m y r ate e go %;%g] Pass C*' nge r . a g n '-h c s C

n. e ar eb

kib~~...ag,, Pr g

tatud oce q '. l, "~is.,.y.... cted *sainst ~ Q, l ev,lo ked ' mpt,ag,e ', ~,,, _ _,, _. eo .. ~ ~. c C ~ ............c'ay,-gg e'in erts s C e, r .C C -====~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~.... ,,,,~ -26 L ~ 4., _ ~~ - I w ~4 X'-

//'x

1.,173.So(c)

'SE ARCHE C

S ~ tha ide tif ],[7 (1) e tr n n ic tio3.So(c)(2)] ance a C A. ~ s to the P n (ID) a d Do Pe e Aad s the lice n rson n ac VA Pa ka nel, visitors for:ces s 5 nsee autho iz tio che k 'C r c a c . se ? and s n ~ e at 2 mploye 173.socc) 1) es, a d O n the follow (i ) Do A. ng mannes the lic L .) A e: ens Physic l e perfo r e B. a

Us se e

c rm o ldequipm ar h, or sear hei y. c O. c u in et be n '~ sd apable c u 3 e es the lice-n for industri of .Do dete ting it O per c al son s botage? which YE1 n l and a ems e see C [73.so(c). v hicleperform. A. e ~ the followi s (1 prio e mployees? )] All ng s ~ r to . DNA (

s. [73.5o(c)(1)]

individualsentry into ea r he. ~ c C s ~ clea aP: of ~ A red , ex employe Ar cept c. AEC cle e? andom ,C [73.so(c)(1)) ar h (3-5%) of s se ared c ' D. 173.5o(c)(2)] . All band AEC-g C e arried c c Ar arried 4 pa kage ? andom Packages? s Ar se YES (,. e r ar h (3-5%) of c fr andom equen se PA is cy to ar he c non-hand YES s sea as m intain rched sur of a e thatAEC clea C at rec le rd e e ords)? ast ahemploy. employee YES c s. 173.so(c)(1>1 once per ee C s on who v hicle month (lice te su h e n c a rs the s . Ar ensee m se ar hed e driv c ) ut ers s prior to deliv of entry into thery a d M' n s ervice EPA? M. ~ ( ),c re1 w J 9 1 f (Y 6,' ~r ,e f )

2.[ m C ~ 6. [73.60(a)(6)] Except when packages are searched prior to entry into a PA and the package has been tampersafed O and escorted by an AI or is ic: mediately, escorted by two (2) AI'S to the MAA, does the' licensee perform package searches for the following items prior to entry into O any MAA: A. Firearms, and YES' C

3. ' Explosives'and incendiary devices, and YES D

C. Counterfeit itecs which could be used for theft or diversion of ShM? YES c' 7. 173.60(b)] When exiting from a MAA; unless exit is into a contiguous MAA, is the licensee making scarches O for concealed ShM of the following: t

YES but l

A. Each individual, .C .. YES 3. Each vehicle, and 'C

c. Each packaset vES

(See attached sheet)

[C.

a. Are recores maintained of a u routine searches' NO perfor=ed?

.O Ifnot,ehlain. Since searches performed are 100% as standhrd practice ~ .. creation of such a record would be superfluous. C 1 C C 9. Describe methods employed by the licensee to perform searches. g .Open funcli b'ox'es, packages or brie.f. cases, for guard inspection.IHand C .. fir ed metal. detector 3 sed to scan individuais prior to entry. O ( C, ..... ~ - - - - The I,.-), /- /, l -T& e (n., e r-l

I Basis for Citation - X-7 . At the point of exit search License Condition 9.3.4 states in part. from a material access area, the licensee shall use a metal detector in conjunction M th the specistl nuclear material detector." The licensee plans to install a metal detector, as well as an explosives l detector and SNM detector, in a fully enclosed corridor which forms the At the time of this inspection entry-exit point of the material access area. the metal and explosives detector had not. been installed in this corridor. The SNM detector through which all ex'iting must pass is in the main building a portable metal detector, while used to search persons entering the lobby. building, is nc.t used for exit search. (See Citation No. 5), 4 l l 1 1 t ~ Tim p y e ran de reltasd 19 WJ ~28a-i ' __s

m. ..in ..s a P >(2)) Ha C Ar o A? ell MAA ba s the lic us dphysic l \\ of e \\ by the lic Sh3 a ensi C de r ier r s c ibed r s 3 e ad ns d n 1 73 thr.5 (b)(2)J in the P e \\ to access 0 co \\ C SP ntr l co o ntr is ugh o o 4 le Do r lic the o at use ense es 1 at acce od s c an\\ 173.5 (c)(4)) physic l tw o 0 o (2) s to.e n itiot, s that ah c 3 a.haMAA r access a x to ShH, I7. 60(a)(3)) ccess r equi r ie ) to r?r pas. e 5 perfo s rm is l 173 60(a)(1)] their dutiimited Do e to inds the l 0.25 ic gr e ?. s ividu ls ensee pr s SNMs U-23 E$ cept am oces a ass 5 fo who u. r O* ,6 o ly wiper liter,sc $p ShH r r n r eqd t w 173.6 (a) in the th ~ do 0 other than(1)] c es co ofn inthe licntaining le g C e mployed tho Do es ensee s 3,1g. es any MA of e thatthe lic aMAAT sto s tha in s A? proc re ens es ing,requir ad c rr n s e. pr h e n, explain: o e o ib use access i ;(a t ad n .. C rageto ShH ctivi sto or tie of s ShH viequipm et n thin C C ~ C. 7 [73 in.60(c)(3)) a: Do A. e Val,o s the lic . s... u t ensee g B. r Va l stor u ty e e SNM t p not om? in ro c process y. Se e at ta he expla c [Y ) n tio.d she t a for [Not ES n e -2 at 9 pr ese)t n g ..... ~ l.~ *L.t. \\ \\ Y i 7 l

a mu -- 4 l l l F.e* e 4 e i I O e l' e p V 8 i i ./ -l / i e E .? O e I e e e % 4 6 9 I j i I cod 3,abT{c i l l l l I r i e e k J 4 l 6 ~1

O, O s. [73.60(a) (3)] Is each vault or vault type room used to YES store SNM controlled as a separate MAA? l O' 9. [73.60(a)(5)] Does the licensee use Authorized YES Individuals (AI) to control admittance to each MAA? C ~

10. [73.60(a)(7)] Does the licenseee u, se methods which assure that when two individuals occupy a MAA, each individual is subject to observation of the other at Not at all points all times?

g, If not, explain current practices:bt a portal leadine: to an air lock O_ in the dock area, there are no neans tio readily deternine the cause or _ alarms transmitted by an SNM conitor'.X (See attached sheet for details.) O O .C II. [73.60(a)(4)] Does the licensee store any enriched ~ O uranium (EU) scrap in a locked and separately fenced No outside storage area? .t. O- . 12. [73.60(a)(4)] Is each outside storage area located within a PAT g

13. [73.G0(a)(4)]

Is each outside storage area located at

{

Icast 25 feet from the petimeter fencing of the protected ~ ares? C 14.173.60(a) (4)] Are 30-gallon or l'arger containers used DNA C to store,EU scrap in outside stroage areas? C 25 173 60(a)(4)1 1s each.outside storage area maintained DNA in a, locked condition when not in use? C ~

16. [73.60(a)(4)] Do the containers used for storing EU scrap in an outside storage area contain less than o.25 DNA C

sta=s u-235 per liter (~1 cm u-235/ cal) per container? e Ys~) / n

'.I Basis for Citation - XI-10 I'Ihe exit leading from the corridor of the Pu Building to the dock air lock area is equipped with an SNM monitor. Tne previous inspection q s (March 11-13, 1974) identified a program weakness in that the SNM monitor' qs frequently transmitted numerous spurious alarms and there was no assurance or record to establish that the cause for each alarm was checked out by,_,) authorized individuals)The licensee was requested to resolve this matter. In the K-M response dated April 29,~1974' to the RO:III letter dated April 12, 1974, the licensee proposed 6 install a TV camera inside the dock air lock 5 area to provide the capability of the lobby guard to view the SNM monitor and exit doors immediately upon receipt of a monitor alar d Since this @ual capabilit)3tras not provided as of the date of this inspection, the licensee was found in violation of 10 CFR 73.60(a)(7).,(See Citation No.1) e i 1 t ,l i 8 'e O ~ /hi.s paje en le rele,w),, ffl \\ -30a-i

= = = -

'O. ,. C ~

17. [73.60(a)(4)]

Is each perimeter physical barrier of g each unoccupied outside storage arca used for storing EU scrap protected by: A. Random' guard or watchmen patrols at intervals not O DNA - exceeding 4 hours, or i ~ ""^ C' 5- ^" *"ti"* 1":'"Si a *l*r=?- ~. g

18. Describe EU scrap being stored in an 'outside storage area.

DNA C-u d'

19. How does the licensee control vaste ShM7 Waste in minute quantities is solidified within building and is stored in a stationary truck trailer

O l

at the dock for off loading to the disposal truck. 'Ihe storage trailer is padl eked with key limited to shift supervisor. O O C c C C 19:Y Gn k " l W 0 * A (? ~'l~ C

= .s SECTION XII DETECTION AIDS 3 lO l 1. [73.50(b) (4)] Are responses to all unusual occurrences within the isolation zone made by an armed member of YES the security organization? C 2. [73.50(c) (1)]J 73.60(b)] Are devices and equipment used by the licensee to search individuals and packages C8Pable of detecting the presedce of (must meet the ~ G requirements af RG 5.7): TES

- "'* * "8 (Por' table metal detector)

C' NO B. Explosives, O. C. Incendiary devices, and NO TES S ecial Nuclear Material (See Attached Sheet) D. P O -C 3. [73.50(d) (1)] Do ail faciuty alarm systems annunicate eatpresent] in at 1 cast two (2) continuously anned stations? (See Attached Sheet) -.c - ~ 4. [73.50(d) (1)] To eliminate the possibility that ngle act cannot remove the capability of calling for assis- 'C tance or otherwise responding to an alarm, are the , fa.cility alarm systems annunciators located: C*. A. Within a protected area and protected as 'a VA, and At another location, not[necessarily onsite? NO "B. .Q 5. [73.50(d) (2)],(73.60(c)] Are ' emergency exif4 continuously alarmed for: ( TES A. Protected, areas, TES 3., Vital arcas, and M C C. Material access areas? C 6. [73.60(a)(3)] Are all vaults and vault ty;e rooms used to store SNM equipped withfotion detector intrusion 0 i alarmsTd (See Attached Sheet) l c _-2, c 71,;, $_sf. con. Le velewd m Mal

1

Basis for Citation - XII-2 License Conditions 9.16.1 and.2 grant an exception to the re that a weapon'(metal) detector is located outside the guard statio:t and that an electric door lock is provided on the outside door of the guard station which is operated from within the guard station.] fA metal detector has been ' installed inside a breezeway immediately out X This detector was' not' connected or oper'able at the the main entry door. Also, the electric door lock was not yet installed Mimeofthisinspection. ^ ~ i on the main door leading to the guard station. An exception until May 6,1974, was granted from the coc=nitment to use j detectors to search individuals provided a hands-on search is performed under g J the surveillance of a guard. Instead of a hands-on search, guards were using a portable electronic squealer (metal detector) to sea An (See Citation Nos. a explosives detector has not been installed to date. and 13). Basin for Citation - XII-3 License Condition 9.8 and 10 CFR 73.50(d)(1) address requirements for alarm ( License . annunciation at primary and secondary central alars stations. Condition 9.18.1 granted an exception from the requirement of a secondary alarm station but only until May 6,1974. d 1 in the (The primary alarm station is installed and, operabic at Guard T* At the ~ time 4 this. inspection', the alare at Guard Post No. 1 in the Pu Plant,. X blines were being run through underground conduit f:nm the Pu Plant to the r The licem ee hoped j U-Flant but the console had not been installed in Tlace. Ao complete installation by May 24th[ Request for time extension beyond (See Citation May 6,1974 deadline for completion was denied 'by 111 censing. No. 10) ~ Basis for Citation - XII-6 73.60(a)(3) requires that all vaults or vault type rooms used to store SNM be equipped with intrusion alarms.. As pointed out earlier, the fabrication room and the inspection and assembly rooms have SNM which is not in process. At the time of this they must be locked and protected by intrusion alzrms. inspection no work was in evidence to install intrasion. alarus in these Also, th4(SNM vault was being equipped with a motion detector alarm but the system was not completed or tied into the alarm console](See rooms. Citations No. 6 and 12) e h-T i m p y a w k a l c,, J,,. O j.

C,., '. ~ ~ ~ C. 6; 7. [73.50(d)(2)][73.6d(c)] Are the following areas protected by an active intrusion alam: YES BUT... A. Vital dreas, and ' MOT AT T-B. Material access areas?(See Attached Sheet) IC 8. Are facility alarms systems insta11'ed in a manner such ,,;C that each alarm system: A. - [73.3(1)] Is capable of annunciating by means of TES C audible and visible signals, and B. - [73.50(d)(1)] Cocpenento are self-checking and' C_ tanPer indicatins? YES C. '[73.50(d) (1)] Is equipped with an emergency power C swrce, that is protected as a VA, and that would pemit 24 hours of continuous operation af ter the YES loss of primary Tower? T D.. [73.50(d)(1)] Annt[giatesattheonsitecentral manned (primary) station to indicate: g

O

}, S) The type of alarm (intrusion, emergency, etc.), YES and .w - (2) The location of each alarm? - m j ..Q, 9. [73.50(d) (1)] Do the following alarm systems meet the i l perfomance and reliability levels specified by GSA Inte' im Federal Specification W-A-00450 B (CSA-FSS):

C r

A. Intrusion alams, (Isolation zone only) YES

L.

NO Emergency alarms, and(See attached Sheet) 3. YES

(

C. Line Supervisory systems?

10. [73.50(f)(2)],(73.60(d)(2)]

Is.each intrusion alarm , I. functionally tested for operability and required per-formance at the following times: ( ' A. Beginning and end.of each interval for which it is YES' used for security, but C

n. Not less frequently than once every seven (7) days YES when in use?

O --,.

Bases for Citations - XII - 7A and 1 g Li e._ Condition 9.5 requires e installation of an alarm on a door nhich separates Rooms 201 and_202 d the fan loft, a designated Vital areal The ] only means of entry to the second floor fan rooms are an exterior door lead-ing from an outside stairwell and an escape hatch leading from a 1st floor s b Nacchanical room. Both the exterior door and the escape hatch are fitted ' 'with intrusion alams. It appears superfluous to install an alam on a j, conna.cting door which is within an alarm protected perimeter. Accordingly, J ythe licensee plans to submit an exception to License Condition 9.5f Since the alarm had not been installed as specified and in the absense of an exception to the requirement, a citation was made. (See Citation No. 8) With respect to XII-7B, License condition 9.3.2 requires that the sampl \\,' window in the plant's east vall be alamed and locked from the outside. is pointed out that this pass-through window is used solely for receipt solution samples of Sc.c. vials of. uranyl ~ nitrate from the Uranium Plant. These samples are destructively tested in a mass spectrometer in the Pu Building since the U Building lacks this capability. The samples are subsequently buried as vaste. The. pass through has an inner window which may . be locked on the inside by wing lo'cks and an outer window which has no locking mechanism. The space between the two windows, approximately 18", is protected by an SNM monitor capable of detecting.5 g. pu. Neither window is protected by an intrusion alam, however, this pass through is fitted on the l (9 outside by a box-type 3/16" ' sheet steel cover velded to the outside frame. At the bottom of this steel cover there is a small opening which pemits the exterior window to be raised just high enough (approximately 4") to insert the uranyl samples. A call bell notifies area occupants of the sample 8 delivery. The receiving employee assures that only the samp neer the building. The pass through is not used for outgoing materials t F ecause of the snall opening provided in the sampl'e window, the SNM monitor 3 in the space between the inner and outer window and the searching of receipts by the receiving employee, a question was raised as to the necessity for i placing this pass through under intrusica alam protection and for locking the exterior window. It is understood that the licensee plans to solicit d, an exception to License Condition 9.3.2. ~Since at the time of this inspection. the sample window was not under intrusion alam protection and locked on the outside and, in the absence of a granted exception, the licensee was found to Je in noncompliance with License Condition 9.3.2. *(See Citation No. 4) p Bases fo~ Citations "XII-9B. ~ fInspection of the. alarms installed on the emergency exits and SNM Vaultrev ) [ License Condition 9.7 requires installation of balanced magnetic switch type alarms on all emergency exits and all normally locked points of ingress and L egress.3 Accordingly the licensee was' found to be in noncompli'ance with this ~ License Condition (See Citation No. 9) Until May 6,1974, the licensee was granted an exception to the requirement that alarms meet specification W-A-0045B provided' existing alarms are -33a- .TMs pye w k relead m kQ

l maintained until replaced with alarms meeting the specifications. Because existing alarms were not replaced, as of P.ay 6, 1974, the Licensee was found to be in nonconpliance with this License Condition. (See Citation ) No. 15) 9 l 8 i l e I ) r l l I \\ \\ e ) e, l l N \\ l l. 5 e r ,i l c. u rele J n, d.) g,, pge y e i i

C

.11. 173.60(c)3 Is each unoccupied MAA locked and protected bf an active intrusion alarm? (See attached sheet) Not at present C ~' 12.173.50(d)-(l)],[73.60(d)(1)] Is the licensee maintaining YES intrusion alarms in an operable and effective condition? C

13. Does each alarm system operate in a ennner to adequately YES

. C protect the area for which it is used? C

14. Is each mechanica1 or electrical search device used to perform searches at the facility equipped with an YES alarm mechanism?

C

15. 173.'50(f) (1)],{ 73. 60(d) (1)] Khen in use, does the licensee C-make a daily inspection of detection aids used to perf % nly the Sua searches?

~ detector is press in use. C ~ .C .C' ,c =. 'C C-C, / A6. pye oh 3c nlej 'h y;j c C .C -_.,__,--,,n--

s i Basis for Citation XII-II_ i The fabrication and inspection and assembly areas have SNM which *is not 3 in process and therefore, when the. areas are unoccupied, according to License 73.60(c), they must be locked and protected by intrusion alarms. Condition,9.17.2 specifically identifies these rooms as requiridg such Alarms, as of the date of this inspection, had not been protection. (See installed in the fabrication or inspection and assembly area. Citation No. 12) e I. e m 1 I (.. e .I e e g e e 9 m, h# 0D-e e 9 g

~ SECTION X111 COMMUNICATIONS .C [ C 1. 173.50(g)(1)] nas the licensee established liaison with Law Enforcement Authorities (LEA's)? i ) 2. Wat is the response time an.d manpower available from icable LEA's? C O I i _. i 0 O...' h. O.e a 3. [73.50(e) (1)] Is continuous coc=unications capability provided C with the central continuously cannea (prieary) station for each of the forloving individuals on duty: ~ O A. cuards, and YES 'O YES ~ 3. h tchmen? ~ 4. [73.50(e) (1)] Is an individual on duty at the.PA - C continuously manned (primary) station capabi. or cal 11ng for assistance from: ygg C A. Each guard on duty, YES B. Each watchman on duty', and YES C. LLEA's 3. ~ ~. ( 5. Has the licensee provided equipment, delegated authority and responsibility to the individual on duty at the PA C continuous 1y manned (primary) station for e,111ng for YES i assistance from the above persons? c '. [73.50(e)(3)] Is the continuously manned (primary) 6 alarm station equipped with conventional telephone service and two-way radio voice cocmunication with V .....YES g ggi,7 g ... g __ __..

O.- - Q Does each two-way radio voice co==unications 7. 173.50(e) (3)] system that is used for physical procedtion purposes C. terminate within the continously manned central (primary) ns station that is located within a PA7 O Does each communications [73.50(e)(4)],[73.50(f) (1)] 8. system have the capability of remaining in an operable C- .. and effective condition af ter the loss of the primary gg, power source? O ~ - 9. 173.50(f) (3)] Is all communications equipment tested ~ for operability and perfor=ance not less frequently than once at the heginning of each security personner C-NO work shift? (See Attached Sheet) g

10. [73.50(f) (1)],[73.60(d)(1)]

Are.all security.related ......YES.... . devices maintained in, an operable condition? C.. ~ 'll.'Is each point of entry into the PA and the alarm stations NO O equipped with a panic button alarn rechanism?

1.,:.i.

~.. i;. .O g O C C 4 e C C C %.4 4,, k <t h-) i, Mal e 'g

Basis for Citation - XIII-9 In the K-M Security Plan in Part 10.4Me licensee is comitted' to test all communications equipment at least once each shifd This comitment is consonant with 73.50(f)(3).

Existing procedures do in fact ' provide for tests of conventional telephones and portable radios at the beginning of each shif t.

The present arrangement for test of the emergency radio with the Guthrie Police De rtment is at a . frequency of once each week. This matter was discussed pre iously with the .) licensee at the conclusion of the RO:III inspection on March 13, 1974 and it was agreed that the Guthrie Police would be requested to permit thrice-daily tests. At the time of this inspection, the licensee had not negotiated this matter with the Guthrie Police and therefore a citation was issued. (See j L.-cteation No. 2) e e 8 g t I 's l ~4 d i i e e I i T 6, e 4 8 E os dp j 1 -36a-i O l

a. M

SEcrION XIV

_ SECURITY EDUCATION O 5 1. Does each rceber of.the security organization have a O clear understanding of physical protection practices YES employed by the licensee? () ~ 2. Does the licensee routinely indoctrinate new employees on physical protection practices employed at the NOT ALL C

facility?

C. 3. Is the indoctrination given prior to being permitted ON THE JOB access to vital equipcent, VA's, MAA's, and SNM7 O 4. 'Is there a continuing security education program in NOT AT PRESENT effect at the facility? O 5. Are termination security interviews conducted? NOT AT PRESENT O .6. O . What actions are taken for. corrections of security' ~-~ violations by employees and visitors?. ~ .'. Written reprimand for employees. C Verbal admonition for visitors. C' ~ C C 7. Does the licensee have an outline of all security indoctrinations used at the facility? NOT AT PRESENT g C 156 pje 6)n be-e k w c) m fk) c ~ ,3 j, - C

7 Records AW REPORTS sEcTION XV C o ~ C s. [73.soca)(3)] Does the licensee's possess written security procedures which docu:nent: The structure of the. physical protection C A. YES organization, ( B. The detailed duties of the following ndividuals responsible for security at the site: YES- .C (1) Cuaras (in-house or contrace), ... WS (2) Watchmen, and .C '(3) Other individuals used for physical protection YES purposes? O,- i 2. [73.50(a) (4)] Does the licensee maintain records of C traini.ng for: ' **YES A. Cuards, and - C 7 3. Watchmen? O 3., [73.50(a)(4)] Does the licensee maintain records of the qualifications for: 'Q YES ~ A. Cuards,'and* YES C

n. watchmen?

~ ~ [73.soca)(4)] Does the licensee keep requalification( ~ ~ C 4. records of all guards and watchmen used for physical YES i protection purposes? 5. [73.7o(a)] Does the licensee maintain records of the 'YES names and addresses of all AI's? e [73.70(b)] Does the licensee maintain records which C" 6. indicate names, addresses and badge nurbers of individuals authorized to have access to vital equipment, SNM, MAA's, YES . (" and VA's? e ^ I pajC On be' refe.w-) m bh/

C p
c

...c, =

.c.c. o o u om om .~-~..m l ..o 7. Are records maintained to indicate control of all C badges issued and to ceployees who have b'een furnished YES l picture badges to the PA7 ~ 'l C 6. Are records maintained of specially coded and numbered badges for employees and non-employees which indicate C VA's and MAA's to which authorization has been granted? YES C 9. [73.70(c)] Do records of the registration of visitors to each PA. include: C YES A. Name of visitor, C-B. Purpose of visit, YES p. C.,Date, YES O YES D. Time in and out, O .YES E. Employment affiliation, YES F. Citizenship, YES C. Name and badge number of escort, and

O YES

n. Name of individual visitea?

l C.

10. [73.70(h)] Does the licensee maintain up-to-date records and written procedures used for the control keys, locks 3' '

and comunications? 7.,. p

11. [73.70(h)] Does the licensee,s procedures reflect access controls for individuals, vehicles and packages at each entrance to the PA's?

YES-l

12. [73.70(e)] Does the licensne maintain records which indicate the condition of all security related

....YES-equipment?

13.. [73.50(g) (1)] Has the licensee documented time and manpower availabic for responses from the security

....YES.. organization and from LEA's?

14. [73.70(c)] Does the licensee maintain records of random guard patrols?

YES w m, e.. b J4 .- / A// r s

m C Are records being maintained of all individua'.s

15. [73.70(d)]

granted access to a normally unoccupied VA, which include: .yo C A.

Name, see Attached Sheet B.

Badge number, C C. Time of entry. D. Reason.for entry, and E. Time of exit? C ~

16. [73.70(c)] Does the licensee maintain records which C.

document the results of: YES

A.

Routine Security tours and inspections, and O 3. Tests, inspections and maintenance on: YES O- . (1) physical harriers, YES (2) Intrusion alarms, .O YES (3) Con =unications equipment, and YES O (4) 'other security relatea devices? .. ~ ..2 O

17. [73.70Ce)]

Does the licensee have records of tests performed which indicate that the isolation zone and clear areas are illuminated to not less than 0.2 feet NO. O candies at all timest (see citation.uo. 3) O

18. Are records maintained of ecargency situations where a

.#E3 private vehicle was permitted within 'the PA7 C.

19. [73.70(f)]

Do, records of alarm system activities include: C YES A. Each onsite alarm annunication - 3. tocation of each alarm, faise alarm and star. YES C ~ checks, and YES C

c. Ta=per indication alarms?

C -40 ' Q c,,l f a n,h c / ja M) ,c T1,,s pyc ~- ~ ~ - - .-,...w_.--- ,,w,.,__,_,___,. ._..w,_.___ y

m Basis for Citation - XV-15 73.70(d) requires that records be kept to. reflect the name, badge number, time of entry, reason for entry and time of exit of all individuals granted access to a normally unoccupied vital area. helicenseedoesnotmaintainsuchalogandholdsthepositionthattolog the limited number of peopl6 who require access would be superfluous. Only a few operating and maintenance employees are on the authorized access list and they require access in the normal performance of their surveillance r'oundsormaintenancechecks.)Thelicenseeindicatedintentto exception to this requirement In the absence of such an exception, the licensee was found to be in noncompliance with 73.70(d). (See Citation No.16) l l 8 l q e

g I

l Rohaee c.AnJW

p,.. .no rzcords ind'icete the felicving acta en ecch

20. [73.70(f>) hated:

C alarm annun s O A. Type of alam, YES 3. Location of each alarm, nS O C. Alarm circuit, YES D. Date of alarm, and YES ~ E. Time of alarm? O

21. [73.70(f)] Does the licensee maintain a detailed record O

of response by facility guards and/or vacchmen to each YES alarm and/or other security incident? s O

22. Does the licensee maintain an outline of all aspects of

.....NO....... the security education program (See PSP)? ~ O . 23. [73.71(b)] During' this inspection period were there O ..ccurity incidents which involved: 4 NO - A.. Attempted thef ts of SIM, O

*
NO r

3.. Suspect.ed thefts of SNM, NO C

C. Attempted diversion of SNx, NO ***- D. Suspected diversion of SIM, and Q ~

E.

Acts of: NO. O (1) Industrial sabotage and '(2) Suspected or attempted acts of industrial u0 O ...hoeas 7 C

24. [73.71(b)) Did the licensee im' mediately :2 Port security DNA

-incidents of any of the above items to RO! C Was a written report of investigation of the

25. [73.71(b))

above items reported to RO within 15 days from the date DNA-C of the initial report? O 41 n...u u m u ~... ~~

egg, 4

SECTION XVI HATERIAL IN TRANSIT Only domestic shipments of trigger quantities by road have been made by the licensee since March 6, 1974. A total of 4 shipments were made between the licensee's facility and Atlantic Richfield (ARCH 0), Richland Washington These shipments consisted of two round trips. The two shipments from K-M contained UO /Pu0 fuel pins and pellets. The return trips from ARCHO were considered F.O.B.2the shipper's dock and contained PuNO feed material for 2 3 the FFTF program at K-M. Documentation was reviewed which contained information required by the licensee's physical security plan for shipments in transit.' Included were the E.T.A. (Estimated' Time of Arrival) and A'.T.A.*(Actual Time of Arrival) as recorded by the licensee, routing including check call locations, telephone numbers of State Police along route used, telephone call log sheets, utilization of radio telephone coccunication between drivers.and escort vehicle, plus similar cocmunication equipment between each radio telephone and the Tri-State Motor Transit. Company terminal in Joplin, Missouri. I t Other pertinent, required information reviewed included the tractor and trailer identification, seal numbers on tractor compartments as well as on the SNM containers, guards and ' drivers names, and telephone numbers of key personnel (home and business both) for the licensee, Tri-State and the recipient. Bills of lading and accountability documents were also reviewed. Equipment provided 'to protec't the shipment include (amper indicating seals on van door and the SNM containers, two uniformed, armed Wells Fargo guards in a 16,000*1b. armored escort vehicle, two armed drivers, and radio-telephone communication between tractor and escort vehiclejl Eac4(: vehicle was capable of independently contacting the Tri-State Dispatcaer's office 3 According to ' Welch]thetrailerusedforthelastshipmenthadhg,oldidentifyingnumberson the top but similar markings were not applied to the sides and rear of the trailer Welch. claimed he inquired of the Tri-States Dis atcher's office as to whyfmar ogs wer'e not on the sides and rear of the trail as prescribed by 73.31(e). He was told by the Dispatcher that carriers obtained an exception .to[pideandrearmarkingsfromtheAE fIelc] was reminded that it is the i licensee's responsibility to assure a erence to requirements and he was l instructed to obtain documentation that would confirm an exception to marking requirements. This matter will be. explored further when in-transit inspections are made by RO:III. Security equipment features and actual implementation of sealing the shipping containers and the trailer van itself were described to the AEC inspector by 3 red WelcQ, There were no AEC inspectors present at the actual time the shipments Icft the licensee's premises or when the F.O.B. shipments arrived from Richlar.d, Washington. O 4 9 b? Y #

5 I All applicable records and security provisions required are apparently One minor being instituted by the licensee for protection of SNM in transit. A letter from the carrier, Tri-State, stated exception should be reported. that their representative in the Dispatcher's office had not recorded 6;wo officialcall-insfromtheTri-Statedriver]whileashiptientwasenroute to Richland, Washington. The letter also stated that this oversight would not be repeated, and that those responsible will be reinstructed concerning Tri-State's responsibility under their plan, "SNM Security Transportation Plan No. 1." o i, l i i 1 ( % g e can Le die m.m /d i

43a-iI i

r Was substantiative additional informatioh

26. [73.71(b))

gathered subsequent to the written report ir=ediately

* * *
DNA ' * *
l J

' reported to R07 Has the licensee submitted all reports to RO

27. [70.32(e))

which contain descriptions and the effects of all changes DM in the facility PSP 7 e r Were all changes in the facility PSP subnitted ss

28. [70.32 (e))

to RO within two months after the effective date of the. D" . changes? O. O O O- '7 O O ~ .e C e k#.

rg-tk..in

~l y. p ab g. t. e.n I h,s 0 g g 42-9 l .......... e E . s u...,4 .,, m, .m

i.. W EN' LOSURE d. C o G. T-Kerr-McGee Corporation. l' License No. SNM-1174 The following apparent violation of AEC requirements is considered to be of Category Il severity: 1. 10 CFR 73.3(j) (April 30, 1973) defines a security container as a- " safe, vault, vault-type room or security cabinct". The term " locked'! is defined in 73.3(e) as " protected by an operable lock". Contrary to the above,'(.the combination lock of the Material Storage Vault was found to be broken and inoperable and reportedly had been in that condition for approximately three. The following apparent violation of AEC requirements is considered to be of Category III severity: 2. License Condition 9.3.7 requires that visitors, vendors and other non-employees entering the protected area be registered and a record made of the name, date", time, purpose of it and person visited. Also, License Condition 9.3.8 states tha itors, vendors and other non-e=ployees shall be escorted by a guard vacchman or authorized individual while withlm the protected area. Contrary to the above, the visitor log sheet used to record individuals who visit the Pu Plant does not provide a section for purpose of visit. Over the past year,'(geveral sheets fail to indicate the identity of an , assigned escort by signed name or initials or fail to reficct the identityofthepersonvisitedwithintheprotectedarca] The following item has been identified as a program weakness: 9

3. IAt the exit point within the Pu plant leading to the dock arca, the Pu monitor has apparently given numerous spurious alarms for a period The security log maintained by the Pu Plant watchman of several months.

indicates that, on occasion, as many as 20 false alarms were transmitted 1 y during a given shift. While it is standard procedure to notify personnei ' within the Pu area that an alarm has been received, there is no assurance or record to ' indicate that each such alarm is checked out by authorized J personnel to determine its cause. b 7

1 Possible causes for alarms have' be c.t identified as: r (1) Weather conditions. (2) ifaterial movement or storage wit.hin the corridor 'inside the exit door. s q (3) Material received at the shippin. iock. [ (4) Poor or faulty calibration or ins a umentation. Q fresentlythereisnocapabilityforthet.: chman to visually determine the cause for an alarm at his vantage point in t he front building lobby. We p g feel that this matter should be resolved tc usure that prompt and effective s 1_ response to portal monitor alarms is realiz n. 1 e l 6 l I I e e l 0 e t b;s n e o" p rele,. po-O h i O r I e l 4 1*

~ _. .c.,r*- carr 1. The tractor / trailer was a special vehicic wit The{ key lock doors, radio telephonc (communications with ce tral station), citizen band radio (communications with escort vehicle), a , ' 'I ' ' f }c 4W The trailer had locking doors and a burg ar alarm. r seals were provided for all containers and cargo doors. c. yraining ' Drivers and guarde were crossed trained to provide maximum ficxibility. Based on interviews, all had attended hissouri Southern University where they received 80 hours of training. All had fired both weapon qualification courses as outlined in Regulatory Guide 5.20. All guards performed their duties with no deficiencies noted. d. Communications A total of 35 check calls were made between the shipment vehicle and the central station. Of those, 13 were made from pay telephoms and none of the 35 calls exceeded a two-hour interval. . s'. ,. lE.7aspection Rpt No. 070-1193/15-t opy No. t l -}}

ML20207N564

Text

Attachment:

Navigation menu

Search