ML20207N564
| ML20207N564 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07001193 |
| Issue date: | 05/28/1974 |
| From: | Donahue J, Hind J, Patterson J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207N448 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-281 70-1193-74-04, 70-1193-74-4, NUDOCS 8701140292 | |
| Download: ML20207N564 (64) | |
Text
. v ,
(-- . . . .
~ .
D. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
" ~'
DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATION [
RECION I .
RO Inspection Report No. 070-119h74- 04
- Licensee: Kerr-McGee Corporation License No. SNM-ll74 Kerr-McGee Building *
. Category: A (1) a Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
. Cimarron Facility Plutonium Plant
- Crescent Oklahoma ,
Type of Licensee: Special Nuclear Material t
I Type of Inspection: Special: Announced Physical Protection Inspection .m l
.. .. i
- g. . Dates of Inspecti a: 4
- May 6-9;"1974.. -
I Dates of Previous pection: February 26-27, 1974 (M&PP)
(g Leid Inspector: J F. D n u 'M[ 7/
'(Data)
' ~
Accompanying Insp'ector:
s .
. P. Patterson b
g e (Date) '
Other Accompanying Perso~nnel: None
. Reviewed By': . ief 6 7'/ '
Materials and Plant . (Date)
. Protection Branch
Attachment:
Findings
. . (Exempt from Disclosure) -
8701140292 870109 ,
6-281 PDR 4Tg
- ~ e ;. .. .
7 ,.
. REPORT DETAILS i
~ ~
(SECTIONS I THROUGH XVI) ,
INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE l
, . SECTION I
.1. Persons Contacted: .
Morgan Moore, Cimarron Facility Manager .
Raymond Janka, Manager, Administration and Accountability Fred Welch, Security Officer Barbara Barrls, Guard L. J. Kephart, Guard (Shif t Supervisior)
- . 2. Scope i nis inspection covered the Kerr-McGee'(K-M) approved security plan, i License Conditions MPP-1 to License No. SNM-1174 (with exceptions)
) and 10 CFR 73 requirements, as applicable.
- 3.'_ Introduction g
I -
g D e ph'ysical security inspection of the K-M Plutonium Plant, a part 4 of the Cimarron Facility, was conducted on May 6-9, 1974.
, ne security plan, initially submitted on January 5,1974 to the ij Materials and Plant Protection Branch, Directorate of Licensing, 3 , was revised following a visit of[Dr. Frank A. CostanzCon February 6-8,
- j 1974. The revised security plan'was submitted to DL on" February 27, and March 6, 1974 and incorporated several modifications suggested by
~
In order to accept the revised plan, it was found
, necessary Dr. Costanzi'[ to issue Amendment MPP-1 to License No. SNM-1174 to a
. new License Condition 9.0, effective March 6, 1974. Some conditions were effective im: mediately; certain exceptions were granted with respect to placement of detection equipment and conducting of searches (with acceptable provisions) and certain exceptions were granted on equipnent installation, badging and the protective force but only until May 6, 1974 l (with acceptable provisions).
. H e nunerous violations disclos.ed by this inspection relate mainly to the licensee's inability to meet imposed requirements within the time allotted (March 6 or May 6, 1974). Most violations deal with three general areasi alarms, guards and detection aids, all long lead items.
l .
e e
--. . - - - - - - - =--- -
he f436 8WWLf}&
g ,
$UMMARY OF FINDINGS
. A.* Enfoteement Actions:
The following apparent violations of AEC requirements are considered to be of Category II severity:
- 1. 73.60(a)(7) states, " Methods to observe individuals within material access areas to assure that special nuclear material is not diverted shall be provided and used ,on .a continuing basis." , , ,
This matter was previously reported to K-M as item No. 3 in the enclosure to RO:III letter dated April 12, 1974. 'In the X-M response dated April 29, 1974, it was stated that the(TVcamera presently mounted on the outside of the Pu Building vill be moved
- inside the dock air lock area to enable the guard in the front lobby to have visual capability to survey the area of the dock exit Pu monitor as well as the exit door Contrarytotheabove,atthetimeoftheinspection,{theTVcamera was not relocated to inside the dock area to provide im=ediate visual capability of the guard upon activiation of the Pu monitor alarm. (See Report Details Page.30a( . I '
- 2. 73.50(f)(3) states Communications equipnent shall be tested foh operability and performance not less frequently than once at the beginning of each security personnel work shift."
.j In addition, the K-M Security Plan 'in Part 10.4 states,I'All e communication equipment is tested at least once each shift.'3 I
t Contrary to the above, the existing agreement with th@uthrie
; Police Department provides for conducting weekly tests of the I . emergency radio rather than once each security personnel work shift](SeeReportDetailsPage36a)
- 3. License Condition 9.3.1 requires submission of Drawing SG-2 to include levels of illumination at various points in the isolation
' . sone.
73.50(b)(5) states, " Isolation zones and clear areas between barriers shall be provided with illumination . . .not less than 0.2 foot candles." _3_
~
e l
Part'2.1.2.2of'theK-HSecurityPlanstates,('Theminimum illumination along the barrier (protected area perimeter fence) ,' is .2 foot candles at ground level. The front of the building and the entrance to the protected area is lighted by thg same i
- typeoffixturesandminimumilluminationisthesame.[
- Contrary to the above, a revised SG-2 drawing has not been jubmitted to Licensing to date to depict the levels Also, of during a night-
.. . gilluminationatpointsalongthebarrier.
time inspection on May 7.1974, the levels of illumination provided the southeast fence corner and fronting the Pu Building ~ main entry area and fence line do not appear to meet the minimum of 0.2 foot candles. (See Report Details Page 20ag
- 4. LicenseCondition9.3.2requireskIhesa=ple'windowintheeast vall of the plant shall be alarmed to detect una'uthorized opening andlockedfromtheoutside..."3
~
i Contrary to the above, 'the$ ample windos has not been equipped (See R
~
- with an alarm or exterior lock. ,
8
- 5. License condition 9.3.4 states in part. . . At the point of the exit scarch from a material access area, the licensee shall use a metal detector in conjunction with the special nuclear .
material detector." 6 . S
*
- Contrary to the'above, a metal detector has not been installed to date at the point of exit search from the material access area.
. (See Report Details Page 28a) a . ~
i- .. 6. License Condition 9.3.5 states,(The licmsee shall install a motion detector in the storage vault. . ."3 l - 4
!, Contrary to the above, thehotion detectw was only partially installed but was not operable or tied into the alarm console.
. (See Report Details Page 32ag ,
- 7. 73.50(a){1) states, "The licensee shall establish a security
- t 'p. organization, including guards. . ." Part 5.2 of the K-li Secur ty Plan states, "The shif t organization wi13 consist o@wo armed l guards at guard posts 1 and 2, and a supervisor. The guards and *
- 8 the supervisor will be armed and uniformed."
~
e Contrary to the above, protective personnel assigned to post and
' supervisory duties were neither$rmedfior uniformed and therefore did not meet the definition of " guard" as spe' c ified in 73.2(c).
(See Report Details Page 13a) - i 4 1
% pee un kre % J k Ud _ _ _ _ . . . ._._. .. ._ _ ... .
I i , 8. Licenza conditien 9.5 states, "Iha dosr batveen th(xhaust. air { ' fan room (Room 201) and the supply air far (sic) room (Room 202) shall' be alarmed to detect unauthorized openingin accordance with
, 1,0 CFR 73.50(d)(2) and 73.60(c)."
; , Contrarytotheabove,anklarmhadnotbee nstalled on the
- . subject door. (See Report Details Page 33a
, 9. License condition 9.7 states,", . .The licensee hall install balanced magnetic switch type intrusion alams (on all emer ency
.- crits and all nomally lock d points of ingress and egres in -
accordance with 10 CFR 73.50(d)(1) and (2) and 73.60(c). Contrarytotheabove,theseportalsarektillequippedwith non-acceptable plunger-type alams which have not been rep 1 ed
,- by balanced magnetic switches. (See Report Details Page 33a '
- 10. LicenseCondition9.8 states,(Thelicenseeshallpro de for both
.l t
central alam stations to be continually manned. . . " I 73.50(d)(1) states that, "All alams required pursuant to this part shall annunicate in a continuously manned central alarm station located sithin the protected area and in at least one other continuously =anned station, not necessarily within the
- .~
. . protected area. . ." -
*4 ,
~
Also,LicenseCondition9.18.1g@rantedanexceptionfromthe requirementfora,decondary. alar -station only until May 6, 1974, with certain conditions. Contraryto'theabove,althoughbothpostshPuPlantPostNo.h and U Plant Post No. 2) are continuously manned, thohecondary alam
" annunicator was not installed or operable at U Plant Post No. 2 at the time of this inspectiond (See Report Details Page 32a)
- 11. License Conditions 9.16.1 and'.2 - A exception to the requirenent for
' ' search of individuals anipackages at the entrance point into the protected area provided:f','That a weapon (metal) detector is located outside the guard station (Post No. 1). . . such that an individual i is searche'd for weapons prior to entry into the guard station"; and that "an electric door lock is provided c,n the outside door to he guard station which is operated from within the guard station.'
Contrarytotheabove,thehetaldetector,thoughinstalledatthe location specified, was not operable at the time of this inspection. Also, the electric door lock on the entry door had not been installed} asyet.[(SeeReportDetailsPage 32ah
. s 9 -
e I
; / n p fe ca, 1e ceL,se) m Ma / _
~
, r!
..,s
- fs N
- 12. License Condition 9.17.2 states that "That storage areas in the fabrication area and in the (inspection and) assembly area shall be protected by intrusion alarms when these areas are unoccupied."
Contrary to the above, intrusion alarms were not installed i or
, operable at these locations at the time of this inspect on.
(See Report Details Page 29a) ndition 9.18.2 - An exception until May 6,1974 was
- 13. License grante rom the cournitment to use detectors to search individuals entering the plutonium plant protected area provided-a hands on search is performed under the surveillance of a guard.- The licensee
- shall conduct the searches at the poin s indentified in License.
Condition 9.16." (See Citation No.11). - Contrary to the above, thketal detector although installed in t exterior breezeway was not operable. (See Report Details Page 32a)
- 14. License condition 9.'18.3 states,kThe licensee shall employ the i
' ' contract guard service as specified in ,he t licensee's security plan, as revised, provided that the size of the temporary guard force is as
' specified in the licensee's plan (two arned uards and armed shift supervisor) for the permanent guard force." -
- 9 Contrary to the above, as of May 6,1974, only(one contractor guard was assigned to each shif t and the K-M esployees who have been
, trained to act a4 guards were not armed er uniformed. (See Report Dee mih Tage 13a)g 1 * .
j . The hollowing apparent violations are considered to be of Category III
* . severity.
f
- 15. License condition 9.18.4' - Until May 6,1974,dthe licensee is granted I an exception to the requirenent that all alarms meet Interin Federal i ~~~ Specification W-A-00450B (CSA-FSS) provided existing alarms are paintained until replaced with alarms meeting the above spec a
Contrary to the above, as of May 6,1974)fexisting (See alarms wereDetails Report not replaced with alarms meeting the specifi: ations. . Page 33a&33bd i ,
- 16. 73.70(d) states, "Each licensee. . . shall keep the following records.
A log indicating name, badge number, ti::e of entry, reason for entry and time of exit of all individuals granted access to normally
' unoccupied vital area."
i .
- Contrarytotheabove,[p.logcontaining s information is not
; maintained. (See Report Details Page 402) i m e .. ~ u u m i.
- ~ ~ ~ ~
I y actiens Tzken on Previous Items of Noncomplirnee RO:III Inspection Report 070-1193/74 ,02 (March 11-13,1974) identified ~ the two items of noncompliance, one program weakness and three i discussion items:
'I. Th@ombination lock of the Material Storage vault was fo und to be broken and inoperable and rep for approximately three weeks. tedly had been in this condition Action taken:
A.nedargeant-Greenleaf three position, changeable combinationlockwasinsi:alledonthevaultdochndisoperating sa tis fac torily. 2. The visitor log used to record individuals who visit the Plutonium Plant did not provide a section for " purpose of visit','" Also,
, several log sheets did not indicate the identity of an assigned
; of the person visited within the protected area. escort either by n Action taken:
record visitors The licensee has developed a new form on which to to the protected area. This new log contains a section for purpose of visitor and the nane of the person visited. f .' Security personnel have been instructed to have escorts sign the log to the within acknowledge protected area. responsibility for praviding escort while Y .- 3.. Program Weakness - There is no capability for the to visually determine the cause for a (Pu monitor)hatchman alarm (at the (guard)
~l dock lobby.exit door) from his vantage point in the Pu Building's front
.l: .
Mile it is standard practice to notify personnel within the Pu area that an alarm has been receimd, there is n'o assurance or record to indicate that each such alazn is checked out by authorized personnel to determine its caxse] Action taken: The licensee has initiateff ectiondo move a TV camera, presently mounted on the building's exterior, to inside the
. dock area air lock to afford the lobby guard visual capability to survey the door.'
as the exit area where the dock exit Pu manitor is located, as well
- Also, the licensee is exploring the use of
. additional instrumentation on the Pu monitor to compensate for background levels during moveme .
corridor and adjacent rooms] nt of matarial within the building Since pr'ompt and effective remedial actim has not been accomplished, a citation for noncompliance with 10 CFR 73.60(a)(7) is in order. (See Citation No.1 ) . M Tis pge m,, be relem) n, Mal
' " * . _- . . = --
, Other mstters meeting discussp on March 13, 1974with licensee representatives at the close-out .
The status of these-matters is as follows:were also reviewed during the current inspection. 4.
,The devices system for recording appeared required tests and maintenance of security to need revision.
Creation of individual records on required tests, responses and inspections was deemed advisable. Action taken: The licensee has set up separate records for communications tests, daily fence and gate in.spections, alarm annunci--ions and response - m1mrm and detection aid tests and unusual incident reports. , 5. The K-M agreement with theI;uthrie Police Department, where a radio receiver has been placed, provides for weekly tests of communications
- equipment] Since this arrangement did not meet the. spirit and intent
. of 10 CFR 73.50(f)(3) the licensee was requested to resolve this matter.
Action taken: While the licensee is aware that regulations require tests of all co==unications equipment at the beginning of each security force
! work shiftho arrangements have been made to date with the Guthrie Police to conduct thrice-daily tests of the radiol.Accordingly, a
! citation for noncompliance with 10 CFR 73.50(f)(3) was'made. (See Citation No. 2) 6..
Eecause the configuration of the protected area fence perimeter was N. ' changed, the licensee had been requested to re-evaluate protective light-ing to assure that illumination requirements are met. , Action talom: I ( reevaluation of protective lighting had not been made and
; . - a plot plant to reflect the levels of lighting (as requested by DL in License Condition 9.3.1) had not been submitted. " Visual inspection of the light levels provided at the protected area fence (Southeast Corner) and
. the front of the Pu Building (Main Entry Point to Protected Area) indicated that acceptable light levels are not apparent] Accordingly, a citation
, for noncompliance appears in order. with License Condition 9.3'.1 and 10 CFR 73.50(b)(5)
> . (See Citation No. 3) *
. g
. . - m ,
e
.' 'L e
, cm k rekd n N/ .
O e
'm ,
S
= = -
_ . . . ==-
==.py F-
- r w v ,
C CENERAL_ . SECTION II . C ... 1.. Deter'mine that the f ac'ility's plot plan indicates all , changes in physical aspects of the security program, since g' the previous inspection, in accordance with TI-9000, .Up to Date Appendix A. . C
. r - 4- -
-(. Fred Welch]
- 2. Who is' the site security officer?
C . 1
- 3. Does the site security of ficer have additions 1 responsi- .
bilities? If so, what are these responsibilities.and - yes' - - Q ~ how riuch time is spent on additional responsibilities? - l - p .
. . .Materiai'.Accountabil i ty. -
20%... . . C .. ...
* . .'.MhEonium . Security . . . 75% ' . f Past 3 Months.
b
~ -
m . .. ... -
...tlyaniumSecurity- . .5% . .Y- .
70%. Security
. . .M4%1f. Average. about. .-
' j- . ,
.......... 30%. Accountability . . Q-O
- 4. Who is responsible for providing (written or oral) instructions to individuals used to protect: ~
Fred Wel d-A. The site against industrial. sabotage. axst/or .
- z. sua at the site against theft or aiversson? _
"*d "*d-C ,
- 5. nas the licensee been grantea specific(If exceptions. -
C . from the requirements of 10 CFR 737 yes, explain yes in Section IV.) C
- e 4
C. .
- C 1 .
- e g e
- C * ~. . . ,,
.Redne G"kArp.e . . . . . -
N.aisseuse w
?. .. ,
.! O
. .r
- 6. 170.22(h)] Has the licensee audited all phases of their ,
'C physical prorection program for effectiveness during theDay to day -
last 12, months? , Cs Cferations P A. Who perforced audit? .
Did the results of the licensee's audit require .
C - B. corrections?
~
yes . C 0.) ' Have all corrections been implemented? . y ,. . f If not, explain: , O. . O c . .
..a c
i -
. n v
~
o' -
. e c . . .
.'C .
c .. i c . 7ua pp &-ypcha;4 , gj .
.C . .
. s
*C -
e -a
U - L/L@
! C. SECTION 111 .
SECURUT PLAN - e.
. 1. '[70.22 (h)] .
)
Physical Security Plan (PSP)?Doestheli Q -
- 2. [70.32(e))
*C -
effectiveness?Did any change in the PSP decreasc If yes, explain: - Q.
. 1 .
. C - -
~ .
1
~- .
' A.
Did the licensee secure AEC approval prior g making changes in the PSP which decrease effectiveness? *
, , (1) If yes, were approvals:
. .O .
(i) Written, and/or ' t g (b) Verbal? .. 1 - O g' 3. ; ,' . [70.32(d)] 4 ' For changes in the licensee's ISP wh j . decreased its effectiveness, did the licensee su g i -
%*N
- Technical Specifications incorpo D.2 .-
g -
- 4. [70.32(e)]
o did notd/ctesse its effectiveness?Were any C If 7*8 list ch8=8's- - A.- C . . . g,. . ( C.' - \ p,.............. . . . .. C ...
'5. [70.32(e) -
g . which di Did the licensee make changes in t!ie 9 proper notifications?ot decrease its effectiveness w Q l g * -11.
. g i .
; ..e.a e w ,,u o v. . n u .
C - stCnon IV. FACIM TY LICENSE CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS
-C ~
a l Attach current copy of specific license conditions applicable to the facility. C . See attached list. - ( .- . C - - C -.
~
. .. O
( : .
,Q ,
c .
.s.
.q. .. .
- 1 I
e - e s6
.C .- .
1 rc *
. 0C ,- . .
C
. e
. . d.. .
( /1 .y i , C - .
-).2-C .
... , [
r-t.
-n LL&5URE 9.0 ~ '
. FACILITY SECURITY ,
9.1 The licensee shall implement and comply with the facility ..
' security plan for the plutonium plant dated Januazy 5,1974, . .
as revised February 27, 1974, and as modified by these - license conditions. - 9.2 . No statecent in the licensee's facility security plan shall . relieve the licensee of a requirement of 10 'CFR Part 73 unless granted in a specific exemption .or exception set forth as a condition of this license.
.-
- 9.3 In addition to the commitments contained in the licensee's ;
~.
,. facility security plan, as revised, the following additional .
conditions shall be complied with on and after March 6,1974. '
~
.In any conflict between the licensee's facility security plan
..- and a condition below, the condition shall be complied with ,
T...-.* , .' by the licensee.
, . ; . y;.
, ;f,. -
, ,. , , 7". ; - ..:. -
. , '. 9.3.1 The licensee shall include drhwing SG-2 of the facility
~
, security plan dated January 5,1974 as an addendum to
~
.".,~
the February 27, 1974 revision to the plan, or modify i . , -
, drawing SG-2. of the February 27, 1974 revision, to
. ' . . ~ J- f
' include the levels of illumination at the, various j,~ *'
, , . points in the isolation zone. .;.;,.,g 1
~.:. .- .
,i . ~ i ' .,. ;
.9.3.2 he sample window in the east wall of the plant shall be ' ~
, ,, ., . . ~ , :. ,. , , alarmed to detect unauthorized opening and locked from 4., .'. . .- thei outsidegIn addition, the licensee shall comply
" ' l
}'...- .
, with the search requirements of 10 CFR 73.60(a)(6) and.
t t , 73.60(b) for any transfers through this access point. i'- . . - f -
'9.3.3[in
.- a manner such that removal m the exterior is fro 11 door hinges shall ,
- - b Precluded] . .. .. . . . . . . ,
. 9.3.4 The licensee shall selec tal, explosives, and special nuclear material detecto hich have the det m. tion capabilities specified in Regulatory Guide 5.7 " Control . l of Personnel Access to Protected Areas, Vital Areas, and 1
Material Access Areas." - - At the point of the exit search from a material access * ~ area, the licensee shall use a metal detector in conjunc-
.. tion with the specini nuclear material detector . .
l e
* .* e
~ .
- - . l t
{ *
. 1
{
~
~
9.3.5 n e licensee G storage vaultl 2
. .10CFR73.50(d B
- 913.6 n e licensee a licensee's see
- ' . as appropriate from theft and
. , .s
~~~
9.3.[,' supplement
. The license to C threats to the t ..
~ :., ;-
9.3.8 During any emes F -
. access area whe be met, the lie conditions whie observation unt
.' or until a nor
" ~
.' minimize the op
.i- '-
~ ',
- ', s ., ; ~ ' material during'
~* . .
g i,
. 1.
~ * *
*l ' 9.3.9 : ', .' ~
The licensee shs
,.,, , been made with 2
's . , , -
; .f. concerning assig s* J .. .
' . ' 9.4 ,
j .' -
-l [ ;, The inner barrier of tD8
, h i
,' ~ psubstant;ial ys cal barrier of the
,~
,constructic i oq) -.
' . . 9.5 l
p t
'The door between the eg
. supply air far room (Ro.
J>
', authorized opening in a<
x6 3 . . 73.60(c) . -
/g(" 9.6
/ . In addition to the visi?
.the licensee's facility
," - ' ~
shall require all visite to be visited in accords
' 9.7. ,n e plunger type intrusi of Interin Federal Speci l not tamper indicating, magnetic switch type int-all normally locked poin E with 10 CFR 73.50(d)(1) .
m . 6.. 4 - - .. .:...
..um,.
. m.
61 9.8 FThe licensce shall provide for both central alarm stations to be ~
,i , -
. continually manned in accordance with 10.CFR 73.50(e)(1) a
[J the central alarm stations are required to be manned.During a sec
'~
9.9 The licensee shall assure that an individual is' not used as a guard cr a watchman unless such individual has been properly trained and equipped.
. 9.10 De licensee shall report security threats to the AEC in accord- '
I
; ance with 10 CFR 73.71(b) . ,
.. 9'.11 The licensee shall submit all changes or revisions to the facility security plan to the AEC in ,accordance with 10 CFR
.. f 70.32(e) . ,.,.; a:... . .y.,
9.12 The licensee shall test all intrusion alarms for operability ' and required performance in accordance with 10 CFR 73.SO(f)(2)
- .'*.-g.. . -
and 73.60(d)(2). -
. ..: _M-},r . = . .. 1,.-.M
~.< .... .
,.,l 9.13 ne licensee shall caintain records of the names and addresses of all authorized individuals as required.by 10 CFR 73.70(a) . .
;._ .y.e.. . , ,
- - . . 9.1'4 .De licensee is granted an exception from the requirement that .
Z -(- .J.the emergency power supply be located wi.hin a vital area pro-
. . - .. ,.. ..- vided that the licensee complies with the co=mitment for a .
. l
~
secondary energency power supply as specified in paragraph 2.2 1 -- f,' of the licensee's facility security plan..as revised. . g,. .- . 9.15 The licensee is g' ranted an exception to 15e requirement that j' '. . . . the search for concealed SNM be conducted at the material access ; i -
. '. -area exit point provided: 'c .
.. . n . ,
;. . .? . .,.~, %. .:. . -
~
. . , . . - ., .9.15.1 Such search of all individuals is conducted within -
- , , ..- ,'- pthe corridor im=ediately outside the locker rooms N ,
~
. s as indicated on drawing SG-1 of tte licemee's > .
, ,usecurity plan, as revised 8ne 15censee shall-locate .
the detectors such that the locat5on of the detectors in the corridor precludes any individual from exiting i . l
- - the material access area and not deing searched for
- i . concealed special nuclear materia!. . ..
e . . . l .
'9.15.2 ' nat an SEI detector be maintainei and employed within l
r e airlock adjacent to the shipI ng/ i receiving dock on the. west side of the plutonium bui.1 ding. . 9 - -
. e T h E p p % / e e c /c e / m h d [
9.15.3 All packages exiting the material access area via the carridor shall be searched by the individual manning alarm station fl. , . 9.16 The licensee is granted an exception to the requirement for search of individuals and packages at the entrance point into the pro-tected area provided: ..
. 9.16 1 "That a weapon (metal) detector is located outsid,e i
'~
the guard station (alam station #1) either in the , Areezeway or within an enclosure constructed within [.. Athe breezeway such that an individual is searched K s
. for weapons pribr to entry into the guard station.- .
9.16.2 That an electric door lock is provided on the outsid7
~
? . (door to the guard station whi~ch is operated from K within the guard station.
W. .
.I ~ , g' 9.16.3 That the guard station is protected as specified in nl -
. .. Appendix A n the three exposed sides (west, south,
,. and east - .
,7gg.p ...;, ; - -
.. 9.16.4 All handcarried packages remain 'outside the. guard 7 '
!e
station until an authorized individual or the l.. ..
~~
,' i.'; (guard Jupervisor can relieve the guard at the alam br -
l
.;r* .
station such that the guarti can retrieve and ' search
.)-the packages. .
..~ .
..v.;.
.yf..&.
. ,:.;g.
.s...- .; . .s.
f
;9.17. Ihe licensee is granted an exception to the definition of.
~- * '
. .. . .s. material access area and the pemissible -activities therein with
- respect to the various laboratozy and maintenance areas within
, the plutonium facili' t- as indicated by drawing SG-1 of the ) . , , .
security plan provided: .g,/. . ; . . .
.. .n -
9.17.1 That when an area.is shut down, after the plutonium .
. has been removed from that area, two individuals, at .
'~
least one of whom is an authorized individual, . inspect .
.- the area to verify that no plutonium remains within the area other than residual holdup n , allowed during tornado conditions. .
.- 9.17.2 he storage areas in the fabrication area and in the
. 1 hsembly' area shall be protected by intrusion alarms when)
.. {these areas are unoccupied. J'
- Appendix A contains details which could compromise the effectiveness of the licensee's security program and is therefore withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(d).
.12d-
- % -Puc ~f W <e k d ,,, M / " - - .
r ,
l 9.18 ** instellation of equiand requirements wh ments r pmentnot and/or completion of new constru tip This section does relieve the li c on.
.10 CFR Part 73 unlessnse, granted only until May 6,1974 specified censee from any cernitment or requir belowof the
. , and such excepeent of ions are of equipment er new construction for whi h
- has been granted is completed shall comply with the security plan c
a specific prior exception to Stay 6
,1974, the lic
.. - . requirements of 10 CFR part 73, granted.
' c from whi h, conditions and of lic
- the exception is
^
9.18.1-for The a licensee is granted an e of su[c'E_ secondary central alam statiojun alarmconstruction and B** thethat installation of all i 1 , ,,. *
;i
, conditions systems provided set forth in Appendix thentrusion e licen ce follo
, 9.18.1.
9.18.2
'Jf ,,. .
{.
- he licensee is granted an exception fro
. [. .
6~ i,.f' ,
.to use detectors to searchering individuals the entm search is nerformed under the surveillplu l -~ ,'.,. .
1 .. . ' ' a hands-on. \
.a ..
ance of a guard.
'.The licensee shall conduct the 916 search at y .* .
identified in License Condition the points i '
- r. . , - J. . ' . .
".9.18.3 The licensee shall employ the cont.,*
l '.. . U .'
' . , . *L t
d y-- ', ..- .,
,T -
l.
~ as specified in tiie licensee's securityract guard sezvice
. .provided that the size of the temporary guard fplan,
. t as specified
*}
orce is permanent l .. '
,'~ . ] guard force. in the licensee's plan for the .
i- . s
- . - 9.18.4. The licensee is granted, an ex.
y * ,
.k".....
i that all alams r.eet Interim Fedception to the requirement . eral Specification
'. maintained until replW-A-00450 B (GSA-FSS) pro
~
, . ;' sting alams are
. above specification. aced with alams meeting the -
- 9.18.5 :
ments of the security oplan provided cuhe the badge require-9.18.6
- is continued until the newrrent b dbadge i practi*ce a g ng system is available.
y fThe licensee is granted an e l
- .("the requirement thatonemergency that patrols of 'the perimeter ba zone, and from exits b specified in Appendix B**. alamed provided rrier are maintained as
** Appendix 8. contains details which c ~
of the licensce's security progran public disclosure in accordance and iswith therefore 10 CF withheld fromoul . R 2.790(d) .
.g p w k relewYl h W .= ...
r _--'~ -- -
\ .
,P 5
This Appendix cor.
!. of the licensee's i
disclosure in acc e .- i 1 4
..n 3,-
9.16.*3 'Ihe . St2 H
. bd J
3 . fit 9' Of
'(bd
. E * .
.. * =*"
g , M* , . 1.
- 4
* ".tg
. , .e e
- I i f . .
..
- W.
.e..,*
* . . . g
, , S .*%
- g t
g
& +
- d
- 8
. 4 *. .
ciU ,.-. . .f..... .
,(
p , .. . 9 . .
- y ..
e s . <- *. T , 5 . . **
/ . *.
***a~
V ( * * - ,.' V, S , ..s .... 5
' e
% e g f
. Om.
. g O
t'
. *4 - .;* .
t
. L e .,
s
, , * *
- e
? .
h t
,e' *
- l. .
% h m
e 4 L
^
f.
' . ' = = = .. - , , - - ,yn - - - - , -
APPENDIX B . This Appendix contains details which could compromise the effectiveness of the licensee's security program and is therefore withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(d). .
, .. 9.18.1 The licensee shail ~ station an individual in the uranium plant office area and shall provide for . .
. . two-way radio communication capability between the
~
Primary central alarm station and this individual.
' 9.18.6 The interior portion of the isolation zone around
. the perimeter of the protected area shall be patrolled by a guard or watchman at fifteen (15) -
2
- minute intervals except .during the day 1'ght hours
^'
. when the patrols may be ardwo (2) hougintervals.
, .- The guard or watchman on patrol shall contact the
- 8. ..
individual in the guard house at least,.once during
. g..jk . . .
each patrol interval. .
.. . . .. .. ;.. ; : ... .,...t. r*. . . .
e
;* s .', .- ;. .'. .- . ..
,.N *
< ' .
- j . f *; -] . ;, . . . P., , , ,. *.,f,. ..
J. , . ... . , . t
... .. . .g -.
= . .. . . .,. .i..
p, : s . w .
'p.. .. :. .
*2*3 .,,. .
',.** , . T= .
.. .. . . .. g ; <. . ? .
,s . . *=.. * . .. .
=
il - . , .
. s, , - . . .
,l, * . .* . . .- . .
1 , * * . . .
- 8
. s .-
- g. 4 I ... . . .. '. . . . .s l , .
-. . t
.*,.,a" ".. . *
{f t J.,.* \*,. , . ,'
. 'f., ,
..* 9 * *
- 1. , .
L,,
.e
<. . . .o ,.
e
- a. . .
a.
.,s * ** - *
.s *
. .. . r. *
.t .
=
t .. .
* . . - . - a. * -
1
- a . .3. g l' . *[, . . . .* -
i
* - . a
, . s ,,
g ..re te +e/
'. f r') . .' .
# - q.4
.. y .
. . g. .
j
=
= .
. . . t .
* * . . n e
. e. *
- l
. ~ \
" l . . .. . . .
.O-
* *' SECURITY ORGANIZATION SECTION V.
. ~
O 1. IPSP][LC-9.1]I70.32(e)] Does the current facility organization chart indicate all individuals, groups, _- TES or organizations responsible for security? O .
- 2. noas the security organization assure continuous '
O . responsibility for physical protection practices by: Using a security organization [76.50(a)(1)] y - A. . g . including guards, to protect the facility and
- 3 I
SNH, and (See attached sheet)
~
B. [7f.50(a)(2)] Maintaining at least one (1) TES
~
security supervisor onsite at all times? l ., , . - O "
- 3. ' **curity
[70.50(a)(3)] Eas the licensee established written Procedures which document: ,
.O YES
. A. The structure of the security organization, and O B. The' duties of guards, vacchmen and other individuals YES responsible for security at the site? - .
g .
- 4. Are the following enployees used to protect the facility: '.
NO l g- , A. ,Cuards,
. . D
- 3. Watchmen, and/or Company employed pending being g .,
armed & uniformed YES
- C. Other i.ndividuals? ,
C . '
- 5. ' Are the following contracted _ individuals used to protect th* f**ili'Y:
C ** * *
,A'. Cuards, hinkerton1pershifh ~'
NO B. Watchmen, and/or l NO Other individuals?
<- C. . - .
- s (See attached sil eet)
- C .
.. ~'
M. 9 /vc or le "hd '" c ' (
'. h -* ~
.,, M
~ ~ ~ - - - - ' .
~ .
V
2 cf tva sa and the ,ocrm etsd the guards K-M Securi su ty Plan ests.blish "pervisor a at guard will be postsstates,"The 1 At 13 the time security organiz and shif of armed." 73.50(a)(1)L an {on'e individuals. armed this inspectio ation, including statessuperv" guard per Itw as al n, K-M was guards. ., . "Th. function not '\
- licenstrainedas guards none shift)soWhile the 13 contracting were their ee did not havin-depth amedand or me ec t.'
. order (security plan e a guardrely act as unifom K-M ed.
employee
- or as a ad b See Citation N o. 7 envisionedforce, se per visible The Pinke Basis for Citati in Summary ofin the ,regulati in thearmed number cos det According the to Li onItem V-5 Findings). ons, a cia is as contrace exception specified guard sercense Condition 9 w vice, pro I
The in as granted only the licensee'vided18.3, the the licens would besecurity size of ee was plan until May 6,1974s plan forg.t are s
. neither as ignedtospecified c at lea .
pomanentfcg shifarmedea hw , - t6 each nor st o (See Citatio t, the lice t 4 unifomed n No.14). nsee is in no there isSince licensguards 'a andork shif . tw arme
. ncompliance only withone Pinkerte o
e p' n Gut t I # a e License Co .
.e e
le V'p' . G g
~~ .
'N., .m N
r-
v., O .' ' 6. [73.50(a) (4)] Are the fol: protect the facility:
. C A. Cuards, (Were not arz:
g . B .* Vatchmen, and/or O' C. " Other individuals?
~
7. O' [73.50(a) (4)] Was each of t Provide duties:q training prior to C A. Cuards, (Were not armed
~
, B. Watchmen, and/or C.
Other individuals?
- v. .
"8.
Who provided training? _ "E
. Q ,
* * 'of Kerr- MeGee'
. ~
. C- .
9.
, s C Was the curriculum used by the in accordance v;Lth AEC furnist J'ht '
- A.
[RG-5.20] Points of Law,
- -C a%
, B.
I [RG-5.20] Security Skills
' C, *
. C.
[RG-1.17] Local Security 1 C
- 10. [73.50(a)(4)j Is the. licensee and watchmen to protect the fac C -
- 11. Are qualifications of all indiv purposes based upon: .
E
.A.
Written and oral e:daminatiot ( - B. _ On-the-job training, and/or C. Drills?,
- 12. the Listfacility:
equipment used by the following individuals to protect ' - A. Cuards s s
.v
.38 caliber revolver ,
Portable Radio y/ g -
.. Riot Cun available -
B. Watchmen, and/or Portable radio - - -
,Q C. .
Other individuals. Portable radio . I
'Q _ , .
'C - .
l i 13. [73.2(c)]
. loaded firearm?Is each guard on duty equipped with a- .
(Pinkerton Guard only) ..'
'C .
A. ' YES 1
- Describe firearm (at least . 38 caliber).
C -
'." in cylinder.~-t .
SmithandWesso[6rour a
~ . .-
C *
. 14.months? Has supervision of the licensee's s
a on secu C'- - - YES -
- 25. What. - - . . .were the results of this inspection? All__ operable C ~
C 16. [73.50(a)(4), 73.50(f)(4)] to the folioving individuals by the licenseeequate adIs the equipment p
- to aid in protecting the facility?
! C - A. Cuards. ' g . B. Watchmen, and/or . C. Other individuals? C
' _ YES
%i p9e ra, he rele v) m O,f _ _ _ . . _ . . . .
e
+
' 09% eoooeooec' O. .
- 17. If the equipmsnt provided by the licensee is considered DNA' inca:quste, what equipment is needed?
C. . C . g . C l - -
'18. [73.50(a)(4)] Have all guards and watchmen "eeployed by .C the licensee for physical proceetion purposes: . .
! A. Demonstrated their ability to understand the facility's . yrs ,
.C . security procedures, ,
.- s
~
g .. Written Fvamination - cla'sroom participation. 9 . C-
~
. 3. Demonstrated their ability to execute all required '
,~
duties, and l C Job performance
- gwt- - - .-
C Not to date C -
- c. gequattried ae 1 ease onnu ,117 ,
C 19. Has each individual used for security purposes been tested *
- and requalified according to the, following schedule?
c A [73.50(a)(4)] Annual 17 - General duties and . DNA responsibilities C B. Semi-annually - Specific duties an'd DNA [RG-5.20] responsibilities ,
)NA b* C. [RG-5.2,0] Semi-annually - communicat. ions equipment D. [RG-5.20]
Semi-annually - All other security- DNA 4 C equipment ' RC-5.20] Ahnually - Medical examinations ,
- Current protective. force only employed sin.cc early April, -1974 . -
e, b
{. . I
... 20.173.50(g) (2)J During this inspecticn period, did the
. security organization detect the abnormal presence or -
activity of persons or vehicles (unusual cecurrences) , within an: C . NO
. A. Isolation zone, .
1 NO B.' Protected. area,
- NO C. . Material access area, and/or -
[ ,
# NO D. Vital area? ,
C .
- 21. Upon detecticn of unusual occurrences within the PA, Isolation zone, VA and MAA, how did the security -
g- organization demonstrate their capability of: ' G
^. [73.50(g> (2) (i)) netermining - ******'
the. existence of a
- - - - DNA
. threat-
... . . ..... ... ....... .'................s.... ...
C *
....../........,..
Q -
- 5. 173.50(g)(2)(ii)] Assessing the-.extert. of the threat,-
O' . .. . .. . . . . ....... ........................... . nm
- * ..d..... .
( . , C . C. [73.50(g)(2) (iii)] Taking ir::nediate taasures to neutralize the threat by one of the.following mems:
. t~ (1) Appropriate action by facility, gue: ds , or * * * * * * * *
- DNA ,
~-
(- . ...... ......................'.......... .... { -
*
- DNA (2) Calling for assistance from LLEA, or * * ' ' ' ' * * * *
- r% .
y, . . . ... .........,.................. .... .. . {.
',. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n .n....: - ....... . ...
O T .'s p n _. t r. Le ye ).,.g ,,) x .}} } r
I . o f.'.n Perfoming both iters 1 and 2 above? DNA Q) .
. ~j .
.r......... .. ..... .
.o .
._./ .
O . O .
., . ~.
C. . .
*n V - .
.s 2
.C . .
. . . .:s- .
Q.. .. ... :;. . i..., 3.. ~.>. . . - ..s.- . ,. . c. ~. .- t , . .
. .. :: t 7 . . . . . .
O. .. C
.C s
.. C e .
. a.
s .
.- 1 . .
C. . \ . . r . s .. . MS ( g n .. ) ' . . 9_4jf . (> '1 _ 5O . 4 . 3w
'C .
- 13. . ' , . . .
~
,' SECIION VI.
PHYSICAL BARRIERS AND LIGHTING -
, f .
- 1. [73.50(b) (1)]
( vithin Vital Arcas (VA's)?Has the facility located Vital Equipment YES (V C 7
'. [73.50(b)(1)] Has the facility located VA's within a
~
PA? - YES
..C- .
- 3. - -
/ [73.50(b) (1) ] Does access to VA's require passage .
O- through at least two physical barriers? . YES
- 4. ..
!.C Are physical barriers surrounding PA's in 'accordance~with 73.2(f)?
,. . , YES . -
If not, explain: .- 9-
- Q - -
,9 .
- 5. .
~
C- [73.50(b) (3)] Is each PA physical barrier sep.arated from - any other physical barrier designatea as a physical barrier for VA's and HAA's? : . . YES Q -
~ '
- 6. '
[73.50(b) (3)], (73.50(b)(4)] Is an isolation zone estab: .hed L,. , around any portion'of a building wall used an a physical barrier to the PA's? , NO, L.. . 7. Do all physical barriers of VA's and HAA's meet the ' qualifications of 73.2(f)? . . YES l C _ 8. g [73.2(f)(2)] Do door, vindow and ' opening covers in walls
. . serving as physical barriers to the PA, MAA and VA provide .
lessened? sufficient strength that the integrity of ti.c wall is not C -
~ YES i :c -
n I h5 @g ran 'Le relea&d m YJ/ .
***e
O . 173.50(b)(3)] Does the licensee monitor or periodically check h- -;
\
- 9. l
,,J (at least once a day) the intervening space between the *
'M~ l PA physical barrier and VA and MAA physical barriers?
. i l
O' ' 10.173.50(b) (4)] Does the licensee continuously monitor. .. . . . . O ,
.......w .................,.............. .................,...... .
.'O ,'
\ i; c
~
....s............
Q _
.................:...................~.. ..............................
k- ,
- 11. [73.50(f)(1)], [73.6,0(d)(1)] Is 'the licensee i::aintaining physical barriers in an operable and effective condition? YES -
' ' ~
,C t .,
- 12. [ PSP] Does the licensee inspect all physical barriers -
used for physical protection purposes .st a frequency'
- g. .
of not less than once per day?
~
' * 'M *
- g. .
13 173.50(b)(5)] Is each isolation zone and all clear .
. areas illuninated sufficiently to aid guards and .
vatchnen in their response to the breaching of any .
.g ,
physical barrier? (See attached sheet) . NO C -
- 14. [73.50(b)(5)] Are isolation zones and clear areas
.- . illuminated not less than 0.2 feet candles' at * *
' all *
* 'N0'****
7 6..887 *
- 15. Are all entrances to th PA, VA, MAA illuminated
, sufficiently to aid guards or Vatchmen in performing *
, ,NO * *
- access controls? - .
C -
. ( - .
(~ .
-20 p
B uis for Citatio - VI 14-15 . l j In Part 2.1.2.2 of *he K-M Security plan, the licensee is committed to providing{.2 foot c ndle illumination along the protected area fence and at the front and entrance to the Pu Buildingg 73.50(b)(5) requires illumination of not less than 0.2 foot candles for isolation zones and clear areas. Ddring a n'ighttime inspection on May 7, 1974 it was noted that a change in the fence perimeter configuration resulted in arkened area at the southeast - corner g Also the h ear area and isolation zone fronting the main entry were only' indirectly lighted at an illuminat. ion level apparently less than 0.2 foot candles. The lighting provided ar 'the entry was deemed insufficient to adequately identify person desiring entry] , K-M had been requested by License Condition 9.3.1 to submit a plot plan drawing of the Pu Plant to depict the icvels of illumination at various points in the isolation zone. This drawing had not been submitted as* required. (See
~
Citation No. 3). - t - . e .
. .i . ,
.j I .
1 . e n;, ye wy k relend. 6 Mi -
. -20a-O u I - 3 l
7
l .- C 16. Does the licensee have emergency lighting that is capable of illu=inating all facility access controls '"
'J '
C' P 1"t"? .
~
- Describe methods of providing emergency lihting. -
o ,
. . . .gnerancy. ..er .gener,toa
.C
~ -
. . . .. ~
C. .. .
*C - . .
. 17. Describe mechanism to turn lig'hting "on and off."
O .. ..
..{iutematicswitcptonsetofaarkness.
C . , c. . C . . c . c . c . o % p.ge ca- le rel~ d " N "l . .
. . L .
C '
. C .
D
6.* SECTION VII KEYS, LOCgS, AND CO%" NATIONS C . .
- 1. [73.50(c) What controls does the licensee utilize C ,
to uini=F(7)]the possibility of co= promise for: .
* ' A. Keys,' Restrictive key issuance - Keys issued only when needed and C . are charged out by supervisory personnel.
'. B. Locks, and adlocksandkeyva'ysarerotatedperiodically3 c
C. -
. C. Cochinations?. Kn we solely by authorized personr.e1.. Combination of
~C *
[SNMvaultlimitedtoSafeguardsClerks [ C ~
- 2. [73.50(c)(7)) 'Upon evidence of compromise, did the licensee ~
.. promptly change: .
*C A.' Keys, ..
~
~
- No evidence B. Locks, and of compromise. .
.g
~ ~~~
, , C. Combination *s? -
C '
- 3. [73.50(c)(7)] Upon termination of any employee having access, did the licensee promptly cliange:
TES A. Keys, ,
-( B. Locks, and . ,
TES . c - . Combinations, and
.M I C. -
- M
. .
- D. Other security related ' equipment?
C- . i
- 4. ' [73.50(c)(7)l, [73.70(h)] Are records (procedures) being l ,
- g. maintained for controls of keys, locks, and combinations 33 ' ' '
l
. used for physical protection purposes? * * '
- l 1 - .
(- 5. Do all facility locks used for physical prctection purposes
~
meet the required specifications of 73.2(m)? YES - i 1 l C 22
' ~
_ t p.t.re es, le rakad m MI ,
.oso /y' d ed e@)(4 yegotion s ? at le s visitors)) , loAr e at en.
3 . . O ~. 173 c ated r pa uking fa i 0 lice.5 (c)(6)] ns ee c tside c li tie Q pe s fo 4 rim Under t the iso latio nr both e
, priv em 3 0 ate ergen zo e
- e vh cy c n ."
C ;. [7rted sco .5 at(c)(5) ] Ar e icle s odni tio wi all e drivers thin the Pns, s thedo 5 , e 3 tim es A?- C * [7n .50(c) while of deliv eide tificaa,ioP]t[73.6 n
.' C .
~ ter ing n an 0
(a)(5) v4 thin theA?Pery s v and er ic e e 6 A , VA ,d a Do . v.
, Do e adnutho]iz r a
es e n the for elicensee
.y fC N-C-
7 [RG mployms the lic n et ensee scre n us e ing ofe RG MAA? .tio gu5.20 as ah c vhe check icle the y ards n a
'the folloS.20]
the si Was . e ad guide v fo r . , te? wing c indivipr e
%yN .C . A. mploym ac hme n ? pre -
Cu dua ls re ent s spo cre n ards, * ' B. - nsibe ing
.C.
le forperfor e i C. O Watchm the en, and/o r ',- . se md fo cur i ty atr
* 'C .
r ind
- 8. ad -[73 ividua ls? *
c50( n . . .' C per foMAA i )s(4)] , Do e limi ted . YES C 9 rm theires?to individ
- s the lice duti nsee ,
**YES ua ls assur 173 50(c)(5)]
visi to rs
< whore that *?***YES'**
C- A. wi Do e , equire acces
~.
ss to VA Qu r a ds, thin theAPs icthe ens e l - acces to C , B. w s C. atchm n by u ing:e physic a lly ' YES O the e , a nd/o r esc ot r all
- r individu a st l
* * . . . No
. NO
~:
YES L
~
~~~-
r
,r
- 10. [73.50(c)(1)], [73.50(c)(5)) subsequent to search, are - .
drivers of delivery and service vehicles escorted at
. sj ' YE5 all times while within the PA? . .-( *
- 11. [73.50(c)(5)], [73.70(c)], [73.70(d)] Are all visitors required to register prior to being permitted into TES
'C . ?!.'s and VA's? . _
C 12. [73.60Ca)(5)] Are authorized individuals used 'to - TES control access to each MAA7 , g ..
.G .
i 1 O . . . g
- - ~~
g ,
'O
.g -
C -
'. . C
.r w
- C . .
.C - - -
. fhj; e (An >& V6lNY 'h b
c -
~ ~~i 7
- o. . .
~~ ~
** BADGING SECTION II
- C iC 1. [73.50cc)(3)] Has the licensee provided picture badges to all individuals who are authorized access to the PA
- YES without escort?
C ~
- 2. [73.50(c)(4)'], [73.50(c)(5)] Has .the licensec provided -
C - specially coded badges to non-escorted individuals which indicate PA's,'VA's and MAA's to which access authorization YES
~
~~
has been authorized? - C - 3.. [73.50(c)'(5)] Does the licensee provide badges to all TES C- visitors to the PA? C 4. '[73.50(c)(5)] Do all non-pictu're visitor badges indicate ~ g
- that an escort is required? .
'Q
- 5. [73.50(c) (5)] Are individuals not eeployed by the ,
I.- - licensee who require frequent and extended access to C. . a.PA or VA provided picture badges which:. , YES Are picked up on entrance to the PA, and
- - .A.
YES
~'
B. Are re, turned each time he leaves the PA? C - - 6 .- [73.50(c)(4)], [73.50(c)(5)] Do badges for individuals who require frequent and/or extended access to MAA's, VA's and C - PA's indicates: ,
. TES A. Nonemployee - no escort required, YES
~
B. Areas to which access is authorized, and _, YES C
~
- c. Period.for which access is authorized?
C 7. [73.50(c)(3)], [73.50(c)(4)] Do all facility badges indicate areas to which access authorization is "
, granted?
- s
- 8. Do all. badges used by the licensee display features which are unique to the facility and are easily
* * * * *
- YES -
identifhble? is rehk) in 'hkl
- C 974y e. com g
.#c*dgr ,o c 3 ud n bzdg*ty,T" .
.% i*e t is su .~eg.a.g+ '
- Ba i1
.C .
bac.k8ro
. . utho . ~
riz(
,, caf,ty .. co ud n 1f.8.ued "GC
.* Es c
....urs es, to n Pers Q
.r e,,, - onn e
%.o t. r .quir,,.ed.
ew '*Pleree
, u.
. **9Utred
. ....~~. .
~~...,
- I. Red 1 C~. ... ..
- . .: . ~ . . . . . . '. . . " .... . . .fyym L
.C .' ...... .
. ~ . . . .. .
~~'"';...'
C a* De c .
, e'erssoiibe badg
- fab ' '
o
Po i n ,, ,Avista %uon pro e
,p-
*
- co.s. tiv* Vicht O
,,,r,3 .
v Pay plas ti
- de,.ID n badi.eins e eg
**n m m r
. u ber. u be . Serg 3 # rt* ** lor C ,
y m 8' 1s Du be r . C ate Pass suanc e go
. C*' ,
nge r '
%;%g]c
- . a'-h ng s
C ,' n. e .
, areb -
*kib~~ ...ag ,, Proce g .......
q ~
. tatud
. Q, . ' . l, "~is ., .y. ... cted *sainst l
. ..~~. ... ev ,locked ' eo ~,,,__,,_. C ...,..
~
mpt,ag,e ', -
. . . . . . . . . . . . .c'ay ,-gg.
e'in s
..... erts e, C .... . '
r
.C ,
C .. **. ,
-====~ .
~ ~ ~ '
'~~.... .
,,,,~ -26
~ 4., L
~~ - -
I w
~4 X'-
//'x
*'SE
- 1. ,173.So(c)
C (1) ],[7 ARCHES ~ etha n tr ide tif . n . ance a
- ic the tio3.So(c)(2)]
C . A. ~ s to P Do e Pe rson nAad(ID) n a dac n . for:cess the lice
. 5 VA s
'C
- Pac ka nel, visitors r nsee
~ . se s? ' and e autho aiz tio n atche k c
2 mploye - O es, and
. 173.socc) 1) the follow (iDo)
.) .
A. A Physica l ng mannes e:r the lic ens e L B. se c e perfo y.
- Us e co uldequipm ar h, or rm se archei in O. '~ be et c n
- u e apable 3
sd of
.Do .
O lice-n for industri per c . es son the dete al a ting it e . '
, see s- botage?ems n l and A. which YE1 C ~
vehicleperform. s
~ e[73.so(c). (1 prio the r to followi ng s mployees? )] All ea c .
C ~ ~ individualsentry
- rinto hes . ~
. DNA (
- s. [73.5o(c)(1)]
clea red
, ex aP: A of
- c. cept .
employe Ar
,C ,,-
e? s andom se AEC cle . c ared [73.so(c)(1))
. ' D.
ar h (3-5%) of ' . All g C ea 173.5o(c)(2)] band c AEC- ' rried c Ar arried 4 pa kages? andom (,. Are r se Packages?
' c YES fr andom se equen ar h (3-5%) of PA is cy to as arche s a sea of non-hand YES C .
m intain rec rched at sure thatAEC clea least e c rd e .
- s. ords)? once ahemploy. employee C ..
per ee s on YES who
. 173.so(c)(1>1 e
v hicles se . Ar month (lic en te su h a rs the c
) .
arched e drivers ensee ut sm ' prior to of deliv '
. entry into n s thery ad .
M'
. EPA?ervice '
.- M.
- ~
. (
6 ,' f (Y ),c re1 w J 91 ~r -
,e f - )
2.[ m C
- 6. [73.60(a)(6)] Except when packages are searched prior
~
to entry into a PA and the package has been tampersafed
- O and escorted by an AI or is ic: mediately, escorted by two ,
(2) AI'S to the MAA, does the' licensee perform package , searches for the following items prior to entry into . O any MAA: A. Firearms, and ,
' YES' C .
'. 3. ' Explosives'and incendiary devices, and ,
YES , D
- C. Counterfeit itecs which could be used for theft or YES diversion of ShM? ,.
c' .
- 7. 173.60(b)] When exiting from a MAA; unless exit is .
into a contiguous MAA, is the licensee making scarches t O for concealed ShM of the following:
*YES but l A. Each individual, .
.C
. . YES Each vehicle, and
- 3. , ., ,
'C -
- c. Each packaset .
vES .
,- *(See attached sheet) ,
[C . a. Are recores maintained of a u routine searches' perfor=ed? - - NO
~
.O Ifnot,ehlain. Since searches performed are 100% as standhrd practice
.. creation of such a record would be superfluous. ,
C 1 _ C _ C - g 9. Describe methods employed by the licensee to perform searches.
.Open funcli b'ox'es, packages or brie.f . cases, for guard inspection.IHand C . . fir ed metal. detector 3 sed to scan individuais prior to entry. .
O , .. . , ( C ,
. . . . . ~ - - - - -
-T& e (n ., e r- -
The I, .-), /- /, l _ l__'.__ -
I .
. Basis for Citation - X-7 ' * - License Condition 9.3.4 states in part. . . "At the point of exit search from a material access area, the licensee shall use a metal detector in conjunction M th the specistl nuclear material detector."
l The licensee plans to install a metal detector, as well as an explosives detector and SNM detector, in a fully enclosed corridor which forms the At the time of this inspection entry-exit point of the material access area. the metal and explosives detector had not. been installed in this corridor. The SNM detector through which all ex'iting must pass is in the main building lobby. a portable metal detector, while used to search persons entering the building, is nc.t used for exit search. (See Citation No. 5), 4 l - l - - 1 1 t
~ Tim p y e ran de reltasd 19 WJ .
~28a- ,
i .
.. .. . - - , __s
- m. . .s Aro ..in C
. . MAA ell a PA?>(2)) Ha \
. .. of use dphysica l -
s the licensi \ Sh3 de ba r C . sby r the lic r iers 3 c ibed e 1 73
. nsed toad n
\
C 0 in the PSP co access co
\
o ugh o ntro l
thr .5 at(b)(2)J r lic the ntrois 4 leat s Do es ense c use a n\
1 tw acce s . od o 0 o (2) s to .eah n itiot, a 173.5 (c)(4)) that ccess access 3 physic l c a .haMAA equir x to r ie r?r
) .
5 perfo to ShH, I7 . 60(a)(3)) rm is l r s pas. e e pr 173 60(a)(1)] 0.25 gr their dutiimited es?.to inds the ic Dol ocess am ensee
. # . SNMs 5U-23 E$ fo r cept ividu ls whoass u.r a
t O* ,6 . n r reqd 0 o ly wiper th liter,sc $p ShH ~ g w . - e 173.6 (a) in the c do es co C other mployed than(1)] ofn inthe licntaining le tho Does es of ensee s any MA in procs A? ee thatthe licens 3,1g .c . rr o s s ing,require ae . pr h use e o ib aMAAT sto re sn tha ad n .., explain: adn ccess i t;(a sto rageto ShH ctivi
.. C ties of or
. . ShH viequipm n C .
thin et C _ ~ C. ..... ....... 7 ... .. [73 in a:
.60(c)(3))Doe A. . .
- s. . .
g B. Val,or u t s the lic ensee Vau l t stor .... _.. type e SNM ..... . c ro om? not in process
- y. .
See - explaat c ata he
-2 9 n tio n.d shee t for
, [Not at pr
[Y ) ES es n e)t
.. . . . ~ , g l.~
- L.t.
\ \ Y i 7 l _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ . _ _
a mu -- 4 l l l e F.e* 4 e i I . O e l' , e p , .
. V - -
8 i *# , i . -l ./ . i e /
- E .
.? . .
O e *
- I e e e
% 4 6 '
9 I , . , j '
' I i
cod - - 3,abT{c
- i l
l l * .
- l I
r i e .
* * , e ,
k J 4 l 6
, ~1
O, . O s. [73.60(a) (3)] Is each vault or vault type room used to - YES store SNM controlled as a separate MAA? O' l
- 9. [73.60(a)(5)] Does the licensee use Authorized YES Individuals (AI) to control admittance to each MAA?
C
~ .
- 10. [73.60(a)(7)] Does the licenseee u, se methods which ,
assure that when two individuals occupy a MAA, each
- individual is subject to observation of the other at Not at all points all times? .
g, If not, explain current practices:bt a portal leadine: to an air lock in the dock area, there are no neans tio readily deternine the cause or _ O_ - alarms transmitted by an SNM conitor'.X (See attached sheet for details.) O : - O .
.C .
~
II. [73.60(a)(4)] Does the licensee store any enriched O uranium (EU) scrap in a locked and separately fenced No outside storage area? ..
.t.
O-
- 12. [73.60(a)(4)] Is each outside storage area located within g , ... a PAT .
{ 13. [73.G0(a)(4)] Is each outside storage area located at
~ Icast 25 feet from the petimeter fencing of the protected -
ares? ' C . 14.173.60(a) (4)] Are 30-gallon or l'arger containers used DNA to store ,EU scrap in outside stroage areas? C . 25 173 60(a)(4)1 1s each.outside storage area maintained C in a, locked condition when not in use? , DNA . C 16. [73.60(a)(4)] Do the containers used for storing EU
~
scrap in an outside storage area contain less than o.25 DNA C sta=s u-235 per liter (~1 cm u-235/ cal) per container? e Ys~) / n
' .I Basis for Citation - XI-10 I'Ihe exit leading from the corridor of the Pu Building to the dock air lock area is equipped with an SNM monitor. Tne previous inspection sq q (March 11-13, 1974) identified a program weakness in that the SNM monitor' s frequently transmitted numerous spurious alarms and there was no assurance or record to establish that the cause for each alarm was checked out by ,_,)
authorized individuals)The licensee was requested to resolve this matter. In the K-M response dated April 29,~1974' to the RO:III letter dated April 12, 5 1974, the licensee proposed 6 install a TV camera inside the dock air lock area to provide the capability of the lobby guard to view the SNM monitor and exit doors immediately upon receipt of a monitor alar d Since this
@ual capabilit)3tras not provided as of the date of this inspection, the licensee was found in violation of 10 CFR 73.60(a)(7). ,(See Citation No.1) e i
1 t . , . .
,l .
i ". . 8 'e O .
~
/hi.s paje en le rele,w) ,, ffl .
\ .
-30a-i
* = = = -
. 'O. *
,. C . .
~
\
- 17. [73.60(a)(4)] Is each perimeter physical barrier of ,
g each unoccupied outside storage arca used for storing . EU scrap protected by:
- A. Random' guard or watchmen patrols at intervals not O.
exceeding 4 hours, or DNA i
~
C' - 5- ^" *"ti"* 1":'"Si a *l*r=?- ~.
""^ -
g 18. Describe EU scrap being stored in an 'outside storage area. DNA C- . ......... .. . u . .
, d' 19. How does the licensee control vaste ShM7 Waste in minute quantities is solidified within building and is stored in a stationary truck trailer l
*O . at the dock for off loading to the disposal truck. 'Ihe storage trailer is padl eked with key limited to shift supervisor.
O - O , C c . . C C 19:Y Gn k " l W 0 * A (? .
~'l~
- C . .
=.
.s
. SECTION XII DETECTION AIDS 3 .
lO l 1. [73.50(b) (4)] Are responses to all unusual occurrences within the isolation zone made by an armed member of
- the security organization? YES C 2. [73.50(c) (1)]J 73.60(b)] Are devices and equipment used -
by the licensee to search individuals and packages .
~
C8Pable of detecting the presedce of (must meet the G , ," requirements af RG 5.7): . . TES
** "'* * "8 (Por' table metal detector)
C' , NO
. B. Explosives, -
O. C. Incendiary devices, and - NO TES O . D. SP ecial Nuclear Material (See Attached Sheet)
- 3. [73.50(d) (1)] Do ail faciuty alarm systems annunicate eatpresent]
-C - in at 1 cast two (2) continuously anned stations?
(See Attached Sheet) - ~
-.c 4. [73.50(d) (1)] To eliminate the possibility that ngle act cannot remove the capability of calling for assis-tance or otherwise responding to an alarm, are the
'C
,. , fa.cility alarm systems annunciators located:
C*. A. Within a protected area and protected as 'a VA, and
. "B. At another location, not[necessarily onsite? NO
.Q
- 5. [73.50(d) (2)],(73.60(c)] Are ' emergency exif4 continuously
( . alarmed for: .
*- TES A. Protected, areas, .
TES 3., Vital arcas, and ,
- M C C. Material access areas? _
- 6. [73.60(a)(3)] Are all vaults and vault ty;e rooms used C to store SNM equipped withfotion detector intrusion i
0 alarmsTd (See Attached Sheet) c l .
-2, c
71,;, .. -
$_sf. con. Le velewd m Mal
---- 1
Basis for Citation - XII-2 License Conditions 9.16.1 and .2 grant an exception to the re that a weapon'(metal) detector is located outside the guard statio:t and that an electric door lock is provided on the outside door of the guard station which is operated from within the guard station.] fA metal detector This hasdetector been 'was' installed inside a breezeway immediately not' connected or oper'able at the X out the main entry door. Also, the electric door lock was not yet installed "* Mimeofthisinspection. ^ ~ i on the main door leading to the guard station. ,
. j An exception until May 6,1974, was granted from the coc=nitment to use g
detectors to search individuals provided a hands-on search is performed under J Instead of a hands-on search, guards were the surveillance of a guard. using a portable electronic squealer (metal (See Citation Nos. detector) a An to sea explosives detector has not been installed to date. . and 13). Basin for Citation - XII-3 License Condition 9.8 and 10 CFR 73.50(d)(1) address requirements ( Licensefor alarm
. annunciation at primary and secondary central alars stations.
Condition 9.18.1 granted an exception from the requirement of a secondary alarm station but only until May 6,1974. d 1 in the T** (The primary alarm stationAtistheinstalled and, operabic at Guard
~ time 4 this. inspection', the alare X ' r at Guard Post No. 1 in the Pu Plant,.
j blines were being run through underground conduit f:nm the The Pu Plant licem to ee the hoped ; U-Flant but the console had not been installed in Tlace. Ao complete installation by May 24th[ Request for time extension (See Citation beyond t May 6,1974 deadline for completion was denied 'by 111 censing. No. 10) .
~ Basis for Citation - XII-6 73.60(a)(3) requires that all vaults or vault type rooms used to store SNM .
be equipped with intrusion alarms.. As pointed out earlier, the fabrication room and the inspection and assembly rooms have SNM which is not in process. At the time of this they must be locked and protected by intrusion alzrms. inspection no work was in evidence to install intrasion. alarus in these rooms. Also, th4(SNM vault was being equipped with a motion detector alarm but the system was not completed or tied into the alarm console](See Citations No. 6 and 12) e
- h-Timpya w k a l c , , J ,,. O j. ._ - . . _ - _ . . . . . . .
C,. , '.
~ ~ - _
~
C. 6; 7. [73.50(d)(2)][73.6d(c)] Are the following areas protected by an active intrusion alam: YES BUT. . . A. Vital dreas, and . .
' MOT AT T-B. Material access areas?(See Attached Sheet)
IC : -
- 8. Are facility alarms systems insta11'ed in a manner such '
;C .
that each alarm system: . A. - [73.3(1)] Is capable of annunciating by means of TES audible and visible signals, and C . , B. - [73.50(d)(1)] Cocpenento are self-checking and' ' YES C_ tanPer indicatins? C. '[73.50(d) (1)] Is equipped with an emergency power C . swrce, that is protected as a VA, and that would pemit 24 hours of continuous operation af ter the YES loss of primary Tower? , T D. . [73.50(d)(1)] Annt[giatesattheonsitecentral - g , manned (primary) station to indicate: ,
- O The type of alarm (intrusion, emergency, etc.),
. },
- S) '
YES and -
.w - .
The location of each alarm? - m (2) - . j . i ..Q, l
- 9. [73.50(d) (1)] Do the following alarm systems meet the -
perfomance and reliability levels specified by GSA '
*C .
Inte'rim Federal Specification W-A-00450 B (CSA-FSS): (Isolation zone only) YES A. Intrusion alams,
*L. -
- 3. Emergency alarms, and(See attached Sheet) NO YES
*(
Line Supervisory systems? C. .. _
- 10. [73.50(f)(2)],(73.60(d)(2)] Is .each intrusion alarm .
, I.
functionally tested for operability and required per-formance at the following times: ( ' A. Beginning and end .of each interval for which it is used for security, but YES'
- n. Not less frequently than once every seven (7) days C .
YES when in use?
- O
Bases for Citations - XII - 7A and 1 g Li e._ Condition 9.5 requires e installation of an alarm on a door nhich separates Rooms 201 and_202 d the fan loft, a designated Vital areal The ] only means of entry to the second floor fan rooms are an exterior door lead-ing from an outside stairwell and an escape hatch leading from a 1st floor sb - Nacchanical room. Both the exterior door and the escape hatch are fitted j,
'with intrusion alams. It appears superfluous to install an alam on a conna.cting door which is within an alarm protected perimeter. Accordingly, J ythe licensee plans to submit an exception to License Condition 9.5f Since
- the alarm had not been installed as specified and in the absense of an exception to the requirement, a citation was made. (See Citation No. 8)
With respect to XII-7B, License condition 9.3.2 requires that the sampl \,' window in the plant's east vall be alamed and locked from the outside.
.- is pointed out that this pass-through window is used solely for receipt solution samples of Sc.c. vials of. uranyl ~ nitrate from the Uranium Plant.
- These samples are destructively tested in a mass spectrometer in the Pu Building since the U Building lacks this capability. The samples are
- ,". . subsequently buried as vaste. The. pass through has an inner window which may
- . be locked on the inside by wing lo'cks and an outer window which has no locking mechanism. The space between the two windows, approximately 18", is protected by an SNM monitor capable of detecting .5 g. pu. Neither window is protected by an intrusion alam, however, this pass through is fitted on the (9
l outside by a box-type 3/16" ' sheet steel cover velded to the outside frame. At the bottom of this steel cover there is a small opening which pemits the exterior window to be raised just high enough (approximately 4") to insert
. the uranyl samples. A call bell notifies area occupants of the sample 8 delivery. The receiving employee assures that only the samp neer the
' building. The pass through is not used for outgoing materials t
; F3ecause of the snall opening provided in the sampl'e window, the SNM monitor in the space between the inner and outer window and the searching of receipts i by the receiving employee, a question was raised as to the necessity for placing this pass through under intrusica alam protection and for locking ;
the exterior window. It is understood that the licensee plans to solicit
- d, an exception to License Condition 9.3.2. ~Since at the time of this inspection.
the sample window was not under intrusion alam protection and locked on the outside and, in the absence of a granted exception, the licensee was found to Je in noncompliance with License Condition 9.3.2. *(See Citation No. 4) . p Bases fo~ Citations "XII-9B. ~ fInspection of the. alarms installed on the emergency exits and SNM Vaultrev
) [ License Condition 9.7 requires installation of balanced magnetic switch type alarms on all emergency exits and all normally locked points of ingress and
~
L egress.3 Accordingly the licensee was' found to be in noncompli'ance with this License Condition (See Citation No. 9) Until May 6,1974, the licensee was granted an exception to the requirement that alarms meet specification W-A-0045B provided' existing alarms are
-33a-
'. .TMs pye w k relead m kQ -
l , maintained until replaced with alarms meeting the specifications. Because existing alarms were not replaced, as of P.ay 6, 1974, the Licensee was found to be in nonconpliance with this License Condition. (See Citation - No. 15) . . ) 9 l 8 i l l
. . e
. I r .
)
l - l l l I \ \ e
)$ e, l
l
. N \
l l. 5 e r . ,i - u rele J l g,, pge c. n, d.) - y e i . i . _ _ . . . _ . . . . ____
*C .11. 173.60(c)3 Is each unoccupied MAA locked and protectedNot bf at present an active intrusion alarm? (See attached sheet) . .
C ~' - - 12.173.50(d)-(l)],[73.60(d)(1)] Is the licensee maintaining YES intrusion alarms in an operable and effective condition? C .
- 13. Does each alarm system operate in a ennner to adequately YES
.C .
protect the area for which it is used? C 14. Is each mechanica1 or electrical search device used to
- perform searches at the facility equipped with an YES alarm mechanism? * '
C .
- 15. 173.'50(f) (1)],{ 73. 60(d) (1)] Khen in use, does the licensee make a daily inspection of detection aids used to perf % nly the Sua C- ,
searches? ~ detector is press in use. C
~
.C
.C'
,c-
. =. *
'C .
C- . C, . . . c
. / A6. pye oh 3c nlej 'h y;j . .
C . .
.C -
-_.,__,--,,n-- - .- - , - - - , - - - - , - -
s - i Basis for Citation XII-II_ - i 3 The fabrication and inspection and assembly areas have SNM which *is not in process and therefore, when the. areas are unoccupied, accordingLicense to 73.60(c), they must be locked and protected by intrusion alarms. Condition ,9.17.2 specifically identifies these rooms as requiridg such protection. Alarms, as of the date of this inspection, had not been installed in the fabrication or inspection and assembly area. (See Citation No. 12) e I. e m
. 1 I
I ( .. e .I
. e e g
- e ,
e 9 m , h# 0D- . e e 9
. .. . . . g
~
*
- COMMUNICATIONS
, SECTION X111 , -
.C
[ .- C 1. 173.50(g)(1)] nas the licensee established liaison with i Law Enforcement Authorities (LEA's)? ..
) . .
- 2. Wat is the response time an.d manpower available from '
- icable LEA's? .
C O I i _. i 0 *- . O .. .' h. O .e - a --
- 3. [73.50(e) (1)] Is continuous coc=unications capability provided
. C '
with the central continuously cannea (prieary) station for
- each of the forloving individuals on duty:
~
O A. cuards, and : , YES
~
h tchmen? ! YES .
- 3. .
'O '
~
- 4. [73.50(e) (1)] Is an individual on duty at the.PA - .
C continuously manned (primary) station capabi. or ' cal 11ng for assistance from: . l
.. .. . .. ygg C A. Each guard on duty,
" YES
. B. Each watchman on duty', and ,
. YES C. LLEA's -
3 .
~~. - .
( . l
- 5. Has the licensee provided equipment, delegated authority and responsibility to the individual on duty at the PA .
C continuous 1y manned (primary) station for e,111ng for YES assistance from the above persons? . i c . .
'.6 [73.50(e)(3)] Is the continuously manned (primary)
, . alarm station equipped with conventional telephone V service and two-way radio voice cocmunication with . . . . . . ..
g ggi,7
.....YES g
.. . g __ __. . _....._;.___.._...___
O.- . Q . Does each two-way radio voice co==unications
- 7. 173.50(e) (3)]
system that is used for physical procedtion purposes
- C. terminate within the continously manned central (primary) ns station that is located within a PA7 O .
.- 8. [73.50(e)(4)],[73.50(f) (1)] Does each communications system have the capability of remaining in an operable . .
gg , - C- .. and effective condition af ter the loss of the primary ,_ _, power source? , O ~ - Is all communications equipment tested
- 9. 173.50(f) (3)] ~ -
for operability and perfor=ance not less frequently than once at the heginning of each security personner C- . NO work shift? (See Attached Sheet) - g . Are.all security.related - - . . .
- 10. [73.50(f) (1)],[73.60(d)(1)] . ......YES....
. devices maintained in, an operable condition?
C .. .. .
~
'll.'Is each point of entry into the PA and the alarm stations -
NO - O equipped with a panic button alarn rechanism?
- 1. ,:.i . ~ . . i; . .
. .O .
. g O
C , . . C . 4 e - . C . . . . C - . C .
% .4 4,, k <t h-) i , Mal .
e
'g
Basis for Citation - XIII-9 In the K-M Security Plan in Part 10.4Me licensee is comitted' to test all communications equipment at least once each shifd This comitment is consonant with 73.50(f)(3).
#Existing procedures do in fact ' provide for tests of conventional telephones and portable radios at the beginning of each shif t. The present arrangement for test of the emergency radio with the Guthrie Police De rtment is at a
. frequency of once each week. This matter was discussed pre iously with the
.) licensee at the conclusion of the RO:III inspection on March 13, 1974 and it was agreed that the Guthrie Police would be requested to permit thrice-daily tests. At the time of this inspection, the licensee had not negotiated this matter with the Guthrie Police and therefore a citation was issued. (See j L.-cteation No. 2) .
e ,, e 8 . g t .. I - 's , l ~4 d i - i - e .
# e I
i . T 6, e . , 4 8 E os dp j . 1
-36a-
. i O
l . .
- a. M
- SEcrION XIV _ SECURITY EDUCATION ,
O , 5 1. Does each rceber of .the security organization have a . O clear understanding of physical protection practices YES employed by the licensee? () ~
- 2. Does the licensee routinely indoctrinate new employees .
on physical protection practices employed at the NOT ALL C ; facility? C. 3. Is the indoctrination given prior to being permitted ON THE JOB
- access to vital equipcent, VA's, MAA's, and SNM7 O '
- 4. 'Is there a continuing security education program in effect at the facility? -
NOT AT PRESENT O . Are termination security interviews conducted? NOT AT PRESENT 5. O -
.6. . What actions are taken for . corrections of security' '.
. O ,
violations by employees and visitors?.
~-~
.- ,, ~
.'. Written reprimand for employees.
C
. Verbal admonition for visitors.
C' .
~ .
C - C
- 7. Does the licensee have an outline of all security indoctrinations used at the facility? NOT AT PRESENT g
C 156 pje 6)n be- e k w c) m fk) . c .
~
,3 j, -
C ,
7 Records AW REPORTS C . sEcTION XV o
. ~
C s. [73.soca)(3)] Does the licensee's possess written - security procedures which docu:nent: . . C A. The structure of the. physical protection -- YES
- organization, .
( - B. The detailed duties of the following ndividuals responsible for security at the site: ,
- - YES-(1) Cuaras (in-house or contrace),
.C ,
. . . WS (2) Watchmen, and
.C
'(3) Other individuals used for physical protection .
. YES purposes? -
O ,- . i
- 2. [73.50(a) (4)] Does the licensee maintain records of .
C traini.ng for: .
.. ' **YES A. Cuards, and - .
-C ' 7 * *
- 3. Watchmen? ,
O '
.. .- 3., [73.50(a)(4)] Does the licensee maintain records of the
- qualifications for: . -
,, 'Q '
~
. YES A. Cuards,'and*
YES C .
- n. watchmen?
~
~ ~
C
~
4. Does the licensee keep requalification( [73.soca)(4)]
- records of all guards and watchmen used for physical YES i
- protection purposes? ,
e'- 5. [73.7o(a)] Does the licensee maintain records of the 'YES names and addresses of all AI's? C" 6. [73.70(b)] Does the licensee maintain records which indicate names, addresses and badge nurbers of individuals authorized to have access to vital equipment, SNM, MAA's, YES
. (" e and VA's? .
^
I pajC On be' refe.w-) m bh/ - -
- C p '
;c .
- . . ...c,
= - . . . .. - . ..... ....
. .c .c . o o u om om .~-~..m
' l
..o .
- 7. Are records maintained to indicate control of all C badges issued and to ceployees who have b'een furnished -
picture badges to the PA7 YES l
~
'l C
- 6. Are records maintained of specially coded and numbered badges for employees and non-employees which indicate C VA's and MAA's to which authorization has been granted? -
YES C *
- 9. [73.70(c)] Do records of the registration of visitors to each PA. include: .
C . . YES
. A. Name of visitor, .. .
C- B. Purpose of visit, YES
- p. . .
C. ,Date, . . YES O , D. Time in and out, * - YES O . E. Employment affiliation,
.YES YES .
, . F. Citizenship, .
YES
. . . C. Name and badge number of escort, and
- O
.... YES
- n. Name of individual visitea?
l , C. 10. [73.70(h)] Does the licensee maintain up-to-date records and written procedures used for the control keys, locks
* **** 3' '
and comunications? . . 7.,. . . . p .
. 11. [73.70(h)] Does the licensee,s procedures reflect access
. controls for individuals, vehicles and packages at each entrance to the PA's?
. . YES-l . . .
- 12. [73.70(e)] Does the licensne maintain records which indicate the condition of all security related '
equipment? ....YES-
- 13. . [73.50(g) (1)] Has the licensee documented time and , .
manpower availabic for responses from the security organization and from LEA's? ....YES..
- 14. [73.70(c)] Does the licensee maintain records of random guard patrols? ,
YES w m ,
e.. b J4 _
.- /
s A// _ ._ ._ -. r
m C . Are records being maintained of all individua'.s
- 15. [73.70(d)]
granted access to a normally unoccupied VA, which include:
- C .yo A. Name, see Attached Sheet B. Badge number, .
Time of entry. C C. . , D. Reason.for entry, and , E. Time of exit? . C .
~
- 16. [73.70(c)] Does the licensee maintain records which .
C. document the results of: YES
- A. Routine Security tours and inspections, and O *
- 3. Tests, inspections and maintenance on: '
YES O- . (1) physical harriers, ,
. - YES (2) Intrusion alarms, . ,
.O '
(3) Con =unications equipment, and
. YES
.. YES O (4) 'other security relatea devices?
* . ..~ . .2 . . ..: . .
O 17. [73.70Ce)] Does the licensee have records of tests
. performed which indicate that the isolation zone and clear areas are illuminated to not less than 0.2 feet NO.
O candies at all timest (see citation.uo. 3) . O 18. Are records maintained of ecargency situations where a .#E3 private vehicle was permitted within 'the PA7 C.
. 19. [73.70(f)] Do, records of alarm system activities include:
C . YES A. Each onsite alarm annunication -
~
C -
- 3. tocation of each alarm, faise alarm and star. YES
*
- checks, and ,
' . - . YES C c. Ta=per indication alarms?
C
. -40 '
Q
,c .- .-
T1,,s pyc c,,l . .. . .. fa n,h c / ja M)
~- ~ ~ - - - . --- - . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-,...w_.--- ,,w,.,__,_,___,. . , . . , _ , , . _ y -,. ,, ._..w,_.___
m Basis for Citation - XV-15 73.70(d) requires that records be kept to. reflect the name, badge number, time of entry, reason for entry and time of exit of all individuals granted ' access to a normally unoccupied vital area. helicenseedoesnotmaintainsuchalogandholdsthepositionthattolog Only the limited number of peopl6 who require access would be superfluous. a few operating and maintenance employees are on the authorized access list and they require access in the normal performance of their surveillance r'oundsormaintenancechecks.)Thelicenseeindicatedintentto exception to this requirement In the absence of such an exception, the licensee was found to be in noncompliance with 73.70(d). (See Citation No.16) l - , l
*
- 8 l .: -
- q e
*g .
I - l . Rohaee c.AnJW .
, p ,.. .
.no rzcords ind'icete the felicving acta en ecch C -
- 20. alarm [73.70(f>) annun hated:
- s .
O A. Type of alam, - . YES Location of each alarm, 3. nS O - C. Alarm circuit,
- YES D. Date of alarm, and
~
- YES .
E. Time of alarm? - . O .
- 21. of [73.70(f)] Does the licensee maintain a detailed record O response by facility guards and/or vacchmen to each -
YES alarm and/or other security incident? s . O
- 22. Does the licensee maintain an outline of all aspects of.....NO.......
* ~ the security education program (See PSP)? '
O . .
. 23. [73.71(b)] During' this inspection period were there - -
O .
..ccurity incidents which involved: - -*
4 . NO -
"- .- A.. Attempted thef ts of SIM, . , _
O
. * *
- NO r
- 3. . Suspect.ed thefts of SNM, ..
- NO Attempted diversion of SNx, C C. -
NO ***- - D. Suspected diversion of SIM, and , Q ... . '
~
- -
- E. Acts of: '
NO. - O (1) Industrial sabotage and , .
'(2) Suspected or attempted acts of industrial .
u0 - O ...hoeas 7 C 24. [73.71(b)) Did the licensee im' mediately :2 Port security DNA
* -incidents of any of the above items to RO! .
C Was a written report of investigation of the *
- 25. [73.71(b))
above items reported to RO within 15 days from the date
- DNA-
. C of the initial report? .
O - n...u u m
- 41 .
. , u . . . . . . . . . . .. ,
- ~ . . . ~~
egg, 4
SECTION XVI HATERIAL IN TRANSIT Only domestic shipments of trigger quantities by road have been made by the licensee since March 6, 1974. A total of 4 shipments were made between the licensee's facility and Atlantic Richfield (ARCH 0), Richland Washington These shipments consisted of two round trips. The two shipments from K-M contained UO /Pu0 fuel pins and pellets. The return trips from ARCHO were 2 considered F.O.B.2the shipper's dock and contained PuNO feed material for 3
, the FFTF program at K-M. .
Documentation was reviewed which contained information required by the licensee's physical security plan for shipments in transit.' Included were the E.T.A. (Estimated' Time of Arrival) and A'.T.A.*(Actual Time of Arrival) as recorded by the licensee, routing including check call locations, telephone numbers of State Police along route used, telephone call log sheets,
- utilization of radio telephone coccunication between drivers.and escort vehicle, plus similar cocmunication equipment between each radio telephone
; and the Tri-State Motor Transit . Company terminal in Joplin, Missouri.
I t Other pertinent, required information reviewed included the tractor and trailer identification, seal numbers on tractor compartments as well as on the SNM containers, guards and ' drivers names, and telephone numbers of key personnel (home and business both) for the licensee, Tri-State and the
.. . recipient. Bills of lading and accountability documents were also reviewed.
. Equipment provided 'to protec't the shipment include (amper indicating seals
< on van door and the SNM containers, two uniformed, armed Wells Fargo guards in a 16,000*1b. armored escort vehicle, two armed drivers, and radio-telephone
' communication between tractor and escort vehiclejl Eac4(: vehicle was capable of independently contacting the Tri-State Dispatcaer's office 3 According to
' Welch]thetrailerusedforthelastshipmenthadhg,oldidentifyingnumberson the top but similar markings were not applied to the sides and rear of the trailer Welch. claimed he inquired of the Tri-States Dis atcher's office as to whyfmar ogs wer'e not on the sides and rear of the trail as prescribed by
- 73.31(e). He was told by the Dispatcher that carriers obtained an exception
- .
- .to[pideandrearmarkingsfromtheAE fIelc] was reminded that it is the
- i* licensee's responsibility to assure a erence to requirements and he was l
instructed to obtain documentation that would confirm an exception to marking
. requirements. This matter will be. explored further when in-transit inspections
- are made by RO:III. *
- Security equipment features and actual implementation of sealing the shipping containers and the trailer van itself were described to the AEC inspector by 3 red WelcQ, There were no AEC inspectors present at the actual time the
. shipments Icft the licensee's premises or when the F.O.B. shipments arrived from Richlar.d, Washington. '
O 4 9
-. - _ b?_Y # # -
- 5 I All applicable records and security provisions required are apparently being instituted by the licensee for protection of SNM in transit. One minor exception should be reported. A letter from the carrier, Tri-State, stated that their representative in the Dispatcher's office had not recorded 6;wo officialcall-insfromtheTri-Statedriver]whileashiptientwasenroute
- to Richland, Washington. The letter also stated that this oversight would not be repeated, and that those responsible will be reinstructed concerning Tri-State's responsibility under their plan, "SNM Security Transportation Plan No. 1." ,
o i, . l.
, i i .
1 . . (
% g e can Le die m .m /d i .
- 43a-iI -
i
r , , .
- 26. [73.71(b)) Was substantiative additional informatioh J
gathered subsequent to the written report ir=ediately * * * *
- DNA ' * *
- l
' ' reported to R07 . , Has the licensee submitted all reports to RO
- 27. [70.32(e))
which contain descriptions and the effects of all changes DM .
- in the facility PSP 7 r e ss -
Were all changes in the facility PSP subnitted .
- 28. [70.32 (e))
to RO within two months after the effective date of the. D"
. changes? .
O. . O - , , O .
- O- .
'7 , ,
. O .
~
O
. .e C -
e . * * . k#. ,
. *rg-tk..in -
~l .. .
- y. I h,s p ab g . t. e.n .
0
, g .' . ,
, . g 42-9 l *
. . . . . .. ... e E . ,, m, ,... .m . s u . . . ,4
i .. EN'CLOSURE d. , W - Kerr-McGee Corporation. o G. l' T-License No. SNM-1174 The following apparent violation of AEC requirements is considered to be of Category Il severity:
- 1. 10 CFR 73.3(j) (April 30, 1973) defines a security container as a-
" safe, vault, vault-type room or security cabinct". The term " locked'!
is defined in 73.3(e) as " protected by an operable lock". Contrary to the above,'(.the combination lock of the Material Storage
- Vault was found to be broken and inoperable and reportedly had been in that condition for approximately three.
The following apparent violation of AEC requirements is considered to be of Category III severity: .
- 2. License Condition 9.3.7 requires that visitors, vendors and other non-employees entering the protected area be registered and a record made of the name, date", time, purpose of it and person visited.
Also, License Condition 9.3.8 states tha itors, vendors and other non-e=ployees shall be escorted by a guard vacchman or authorized individual while withlm the protected area. - Contrary to the above, the visitor log sheet used to record individuals who visit the Pu Plant does not provide a section for purpose of visit. Over the past year,'(geveral sheets fail to indicate the identity of an
, , assigned escort by signed name or initials or fail to reficct the identityofthepersonvisitedwithintheprotectedarca]
The following item has been identified as a program weakness:
- 3. IAt the exit point within the Pu plant leading to the dock arca, the 9
Pu monitor has apparently given numerous spurious alarms for a period of several months. The security log maintained by the Pu Plant watchman , indicates that, on occasion, as many as 20 false alarms were transmitted 1 y during a given shift. While it is standard procedure to notify personnei
' within the Pu area that an alarm has been received, there is no assurance or record to ' indicate that each such alarm is checked out by authorized J personnel to determine its cause.
b , 7
1 . Possible causes for alarms have' be c.t identified as: r (1) Weather conditions. (2) ifaterial movement or storage wit.hin the corridor 'inside the exit . door. . sq . (3) Material received at the shippin. iock. , [ (4) Poor or faulty calibration or ins a umentation. Q . fresentlythereisnocapabilityforthet.: cause for an alarm at his vantage pointchman in t he to front visually buildingdetermine lobby. Wethe p g
; s feel that this matter should be resolved tc usure that prompt and effective -
1_ response to portal monitor alarms is realiz n. 1 e l 6 l . I ' I e e 0 l e - t po- O
- . b;s n e o" p rele,.
h i O r I . e l
- 4
. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . 1*
~ _ .
.c.,r*-*
carr 1. The tractor / trailer was a special vehicic wit The{ key lock doors, radio telephonc (communications with ce tral station), citizen band radio (communications with escort vehicle), a
,- , ' 'I ' '
f }c4W had locking doors and a burg ar alarm. The trailer r seals were provided for all containers and cargo doors. ,
- c. yraining
' Drivers and guarde were crossed trained to provide
_ maximum ficxibility. Based on interviews, all had attended hissouri Southern University where they received 80 hours of training. All had fired both weapon qualification courses as outlined in Regulatory Guide 5.20. All guards performed their duties with no deficiencies noted.
- d. Communications A total of 35 check calls were made between the shipment vehicle and the central station. Of those, 13 were made from pay telephoms and none of the 35
, calls exceeded a two-hour interval.
. s' .
lE .7aspection Rpt No. 070-1193/15-t opy No.
# . t l
-}}