ML20206F087

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Questions on 851025 Application for Amend to License NPF-2 Re Proposed Heatup/Cooldown Curves to 24 Efpy. Request Being Held in Abeyance Pending Resolution of Concerns.Response Requested by 860630
ML20206F087
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 06/16/1986
From: Reeves E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Mcdonald R
ALABAMA POWER CO.
References
TAC-60075, NUDOCS 8606240147
Download: ML20206F087 (3)


Text

Juna 16,1986 Docket No. 50-348 DISTRIBUTION nEliEiEi35Wi E. Reeyes (2)

NRC PDR D. Miller Local PDR ACRS (10)

Mr. R. P. Mcdonald PAD #2 Rdg

-Tcd 3, esch A ft4/or Senior Vice President T. Novak Gr3y File Alabama Power Company 0 ELD

/t'. 8/uae Post Office' Box 2641 E. Jordan Birmingham, Alabama 35291 B. Grimes J. Partlow

Dear Mr. Mcdonald:

N. Thompson, DHFT

Subject:

Information Request Relating to Proposed Heatup/Cooldown Curves to 24 EFPY - Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Our review of your license amendment request dated October 25, 1985, relating to the subject of this letter is being held in abeyance. During discussion between the NRC staff and your staff on May 1,1986, we identified concerns relating to the methodology used in evaluating the reactor vessel radiation damage. We also noted that the limiting portion of the reactor vessel is not properly identified in the submittal.

Please provide your response to the enclosed questions by June 30, 1986, if possible, to allow completion of our review.

Please advise us in your response of the new schedule need date for completion of our action on this matter.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than 10 respondents; therefore OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely,

/s/

Edward A. Reeves, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #2 Division of PWR Licensing-A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

As stated cc: See next page

/

LA 2

PM

  1. 2 DM, ler ER eves:he DMcDonald 6/

86 6/p/86 6/p/86 06240147 860616 R

ADOCK 05000348 p

PDR

Mr. R. P. Mcdonald Alabama Power Company Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant cc:

Mr. W. O. Whitt D. Biard MacGuineas, Esquire Executive Vice President Volpe, Boskey and Lyons Alabama Power Company 918 16th Street, N.W.

Post Office Box 2641 Washington, DC 20006 Bimingham, Alabama 35291 Charles R. Lowman Mr. Louis B. Long, General Manager Alabama Electric Corporation Southern Company Services, Inc.

Post Office Box 550 Post Office Box 2625 Andalusia, Alabama 36420 Bimingham, Alabama 35202 Chaiman Regional Administrator, Region I-I Houston County Comission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dothan, Alabama 36301 101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Ernest L. Blake, Jr., Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge Ira L. Myers, M.D.

1800 M Street, N.W.

State Health Officer Washington, DC 20036 State Department of Public Health State Office Building Montgomery, Alabama 36130 Robert A. Buettner, Esquire Balch, Bingham, Baker, Hawthorne, Mr. J. D. Woodard Williams and Ward General Manager - Nuclear Plant Post Office Box 306 Post Office Box 470 Bimingham, Alabama 35201 Ashfo-d, Alabama 36312 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Post Office Box 24 - Route 2 Columbia, Alabama 36319 State Department of Public Health ATTN: State Health Officer State Office Building Montgomery, Alabama 36104

)

^

s ENCLOSURE Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 Docket No. 50-348 Alabama Power Company Please provide the following additional information relating to the October 25, 1985, submittal:

1.

The licensee indicates that the amount of radiation damage is based on the methodology in Regulatory Guide 1.99, Rev. 2.

However, we have evaluated the licensee's submittal and have determined that the licensee has not included items a. thru c.,

below, in their evaluation of radiation damage.

Hence, we request that the licensee re-evaluate the Farley-1 Pressure-Temperature Limits, which are contained in a letter from R. P. Mcdonald to S. A. Varga dated October 25, 1985. Consider the effect of the following items on the limits:

d.

Displacements per atom (dpa) and uncertainty margins as defined in Reg. Guide 1.99, Rev. 2, which was issued for public comment, February 1986, b.

weld metal in the intermediate shell, longitudinal weld seams and intemediate to lower shell weld seam, c.

plate materials B 6919-1 and B 6919-2.

2.

Footnote [b] in Table B 3/4.4-1 indicates that the amounts of nickel are estimated for the weld nyatal in the intermediate to lower shell weld seam and the lower shell longitudinal weld seams. What is the basis for these estimates? When and by which vessel manufacturer were these welds fabri-cated? What type of filler metal was used to fabricate the weld seams?

Did the type of filler metal used to fabricate the weld seams produce low nickel welds?

I

\\

l