Text

Forwards Tabulated Summary of Occupational Exposure History at Plant.Related Info Also Encl
	ML20206B727
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	07/11/1986
From:	Bellamy R; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:	Kister H; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20206B722	List: ML20206B717; ML20206B727; ML20206B741; ML20206B760; ML20206B770; ML20206B780; ML20206B784; ML20206B792; ML20206B810; ML20206B825; ML20206B838; ML20206B847; ML20206B859; ML20206B915; ML20206B960; ML20206B970; ML20206C001; ML20206C010; ML20206C025; ML20206C041;
References
	FOIA-88-198 NUDOCS 8811160003
	Download: ML20206B727 (278)
	v • d • e

- - - -

[:. :-. a . .

I .., s.

l. 6 p . .-

l1 .- Jul.111966 l

l MEMORANDUM FOR: Harry B. Kister, Chief, Projects Branch No.1, DRP FROM: Ronald R. Bellamy, Chief. Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch. ORSS

SUBJECT:

SU W AY OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE HISTORY AT PILGAIM STATION l

Attached is a tabulated sungnery of the occupational exposure history at l Pilgrim Station. The unnormalized annual collective man-rem per operating I reactor (pressurized and boiling water reactors) for the period 1976 through 1985 is 643 man rom / year. The same ten year average for boiling water .

reactors is 853 man-rem / year. The 1976 through 1985 average collective radiation dose for Pilgrim Station is 2127 men rea/ year. Examination of exposure history at all boiling water reactors indicates that Pilgrim was

- among the ten units with the highest collective radiation dose on several years. -

7 Should you need to further discuss the expcsure history at Pilgrim and these man-rem values in relation to the radiar'on control program performance, I will be glad to discuss them with you.

M.

Ronald R. Bellamy, Chief Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards cc: T. E. Murley J. M. Allan R. W. Starottecki T. T. Martin J. R. $trotnider M. M. $hanbaky 1

6811160003 001020

' f

$NSO ~190 PDR l

4:.. . .

...s.

, . .. J . a . : i . - - .. - . \'

{ . -a l

t i

>: t b [,

- P!LGRIM EXPOSURE HISTORY j 1

Avera9e Collective R4diation Oose at Pilgrim Since 1973 !

!, 1. l y

i l,j Veer Collective Dose (Man rem) f 1973 126 ;

415 i; 1974 1975 7M '

l ls 2648 1976

, 1977 3142 f

< 1978 1327

'i 1979 1015 1M0 3626 I

1981 1836 i

1M2 1539 f l

1M3 1162 1984 4082 (Recirculation Piping [

- 1985 693 Replacement) j 9

I i

f l

l

.- . .. 1 .. . . . . .. .. .. ...

o e

2. Average Industry wide Collective Radiation Oose Per Operating Unit For Each Year Year Collecti'.'e Dose (Man rem) 1973 582 1974 404

> 1975 475 1976 499 -

1977 570 1978 497 1979 597 1980 191 1981 773 1982 705 1983 753 1984 710 1985 530 l

I l

t I

i I

I F

.c,. ,

. . . . . ... - i.. .. . . _ _ . . . _ . . . .

6 4 i .

i .,

3. Average SWR Collective Radiation Dose Per Operating Unit For Each Year

. Year Collective Oose (Man reel

> 1973 384 1974 50/

1975 701 1976 549 1977 828 1973 604 1979 733 1980 1D6 1981 - 900 1982 940 1056 1983 1964 1003 1985 700 o

i . .

l' ,_

FI .

k 4 Average Radiation Dose Per Individual

At Pilgrim for Each Year Year Average Individual Dose (rem)

I

, 1973 0.55

'~

1974 0.91 1975 1.69 1976 2.01

.' 1977 1.68 0 80 .

' 1978 1979 0.41 1930 1.02 1981 0.66 :

1982 '.54 u '

1983 0.50 1984 0.90 !

1985 0.40 ,

i Includes all individuals receiving measurable dose during the year, l

I

. - 21

, .a . . .. .a . ..-_ . . .. . . . . . ._ _. . ....

R -

i ..

t.: .

.. .} g ,.

i-a*g

ts

r 1

5. Overexposures Per Year At Pilgrim 6

j Year Overexposure 1973 0 i

, 1974 0 ;

1975 1 e

1976 2 ;

.- 1977 1 !

" 1978 0 !

1979 0 1980 0 1981 0 1982 0 1983 0 1984 0 1985 0 9

i

4. ,

t 4

6 I

I t

1e a

d I

b 1

f i

i E

i .

r 1

1 I

i i

'P 6

a i

I

' i

r I

i t-4 t

P

- ,.--- - - - . , . , - , - ~ , - . . . _ , , - . _ - - .

1 . ~. .. . . ._ . . . ..

, s OFFICE MEMORANDUM Boston Edison Company RMG Control Number M

r;N To: Olstribution From: Mr. M.N. Brosee g

- Mr. R.V. Fairbank V' ~

Record Type A4.08 Oate: April 14, 1986 . Dept. Doc. OMC86-126 Non-Safety Related MSM86-16 Subjectt PLANT EVALUATION TEAMS Olstributton:

NED Group Leaders N00 Group Leaders / Chiefs A.L. Oxsen J.E. Noward C.J. Mathis K.P. Roberts R.N. Swanson Plant Evaluation Team Members

.o Attachment (1) provides a revision to the composition of each Individual team.

a L

Attachment (1): Team Composition P

1 9

e

' - - -r---- - . _ , . _ , _ _ . , , _ _

PLANT EVALUATION TEAMS -

MODE SWITCH MSIV RHR VALVES ,

Compilance - P. Hamilton Conference Roorn #1 Conference Room #3 Maint. Plan Area ,

0-843 4347 - W-8302 X8296 X8467 X8142 NRC Teae M. Chiramal L. Doerfl,2in K. Murphy J. Strosnider; S. Pullant R. Fuhrmeister I Technical Lead M.T. McLoughlin P. Smith S.S. Wollman i H-479-8536 - W-8481 H-224-3761 - W-8146 H-747-0452 - W-8283

'I Malatenance P. Moraltes J. Gaedtke M. Maguire Implementor H-746-9280 - W-8237 H-335-0389 - W-8142 H-888-4153 - W-8114 Tcchnical J. Smith Atword Morrill Atlantic Valve Support H-585-8837 - W-8207 T. Beneduct H-293-5574 - W-8323 Kent Green (G.E. )

Room 216 Gov. Carver John Scammen (GE) 746-7100 Planner L. Mcdonald D. McGee D. Phinney

X-826-2259 - W-8309 H-746-8603 - W-8309 H-944-8451 W-8567 ,.

NED Lead F. Mogolesko J.S. Roberts D. Heard .

H-826-7465 - W-75-8832 H-845-6068 - W-75-8858 H-888-2873 - W-75-8938 ,

FS&MC P. Cafarella J.S. Roberts P. Cafarella H-545-5997 - W-75-8867 .'

.j.

i

' k

i MODE SWITCH MSIV RNR VALVES , ,

I&C L. Namer R. Andrews L. Judge I.

H-659-2083 - W-75-8825 H-238-8672 - W-75-8823 H-%3-4160 - W-75-8824 r PSG-Ron Kirven (Lead) J. Neville S. Das J. Coughlin H-828-2589 - W-75-8848 H-961-2397 - W-8854 H-762-4164 - W-75-8851 .

4 S&SA R. Williams 8. Tucker P. Doody H-826-8907 - W-75-8834 H-630-1725 - W-75-8807 H-696-1037 - W-75-8869 .

ADM J. Manning D. Whitney NdC Team Conference Rm #2 H.P. Interface - X8463 H-749-5337 - W-8182 H-335-2039 - W-8182 X8468 K. LeBlanc. J. Babyak OMG Days - R. Stefan 12 Noon - 12P - J. Gerety 12P - 12 Noon E. Menslage '

X8254 X8245 X8266 NRC M. McBride NRC Team Gov. Bradford 0-746-0218 .

"Rev. (1) Attachment (1) 5 l

1 .

i i ,

)

I I s l

{~

w

. . . . . . - . .. . ; a .,

. r a g, g/th li i ntJ'

gC)Q: G 1

lld ff0]AfiddX

_j fA6 P I L GR I't EDO HIGHLIGHT 4/25/Oc Tlw AIT had tts c:: s t trioet a ng uri t hur stf a y. April 24. It han been deter stia riced that seperetion of t h c. pa1ot poppet. I nt entied to equal 3re p r e t.t.u r e acronc the Valves, wa r, t h e r e a son t her M 51 '/ n could not L t-1 nirned t tri el y op ren r#d a f t r.r the unint c1 pated c. o n t a s n m e n t I s 01 at 3 ons that occurred ori April 4 and 12. Ihtsp i t e r++ orts to d r. t e . the cause of t h r, unavit Ic a pate d conte:nmont solAt1ciis har n o '. b re en d ra t or n.1 n ed . Lacontee eri f or t - to deter mine the c a u tire art contanu)nu .3 n d w311 be elcsely (ol1oucd b, f ei)i cr i 1. The 11consee in pr epar a ng i e E ps;r t deexr1b1ng proposed 6'tave act1ons to addrous the RH'-- .elve J cr a l e g e problen. The curcent c u t e t) + will most probably c ont i nue at Inst e n o t h er- tour ueon s. E' '. the Apr11 12 Corifirmatcry Action Letter, the 1 1 c a n n + <t wt11 subn.2 t ta the rJRC 0 repert r.o.e.rtng each of the above. acess and mv7t ha e Regtonel Admintettstor approval prier te restertanQ the r> lent.

a H. k,s W ' -

w .

yvm: J. sn;& j -

PRIORITY ATTENTION REQUIRED MORNING REPORT - REGION I PRIORITY ATTENTION REQ'JIRED ,

DATE g/ 2A '

T0: James Blaha, Chief, Program Support Branch, IE :

FROM: Thomas E. iturley, Regional Administrator, Region I ?-

Licensee / Facility Notification / Subject Description of Items of Events I g[

[ qcsb ( Q g The "D" outboard and ~B" inboard valves have been disassembled and inspected. The pilot poppet on the "D" outboard valve *as '

I qq still attached to the valve stem but had backed off the threadec collar approximately 3/8 of an inch. As in the case of the *A" -

t putboard valve, the set screw did not preclude the pilot poppet

! from unscrewing from the collar. The pilot on the 'B" inboard *

! valve was found f ully engaged on the threaded collar. However, the pilot poppet could moved along the axis of the stem approximately 1/8 of an inch, exceeding design tolerances.

l t

Indications of cracking have been observed in the pilot springs of the *A and *D" outboard valves and are under examination. It is planned MSIV's.

to disassemble and inspect the Internals of all eight '

Testing of the PCIS high reactor water level circuitry has been performed with each channel instrumented to monitor for interaction between logic channels or divisions. PCIS functional testing and continuity testing are in progress. Nothing has been observed to date to explain the unanticipated Isolations that have occurred. The AIT exit meeting will be held today at 4:00 p.m. In an unrelated matter, 1.aspections of the low pressure ~

I turbine blades and alterex shaft in the main turbine generator -

have been completed. No indications were found.

l _

?

p s b

> vr a e u nc . . p E m '. T % o. kr _

PRIORITY ATTENTIC'4 REQUIRED HORNIflG REPORT - REGI0f4 I PRIORITY ATTENTION REQUIRED l DATE 4/.2 a /gt, ,

T0: Jarres Blaha, Chief. Program Support Branch, IE FROM: Thoc.as E. Murley, Regional Administrator, Region I ,

l.icensee/ Facility Notification / Subject Description of Items of Events

^

R\<ns 32iE4es A The "A" outboard MSIV was disassembled on Monday, 4/21 after

~

hD-Jg3 testing indicated that the pilot poppets in the outboard valves bl_i M k ll*t[f were not functioning properly. Inspection of the "A" valve revealed that the pilot poppet, Intended to equalize pressure kcly gm,3 across the valve, had become disconnected from the valve stem. -

The pilot poppet is threaded to a collar which is secured to th end of the valve stem by a split retalning ring. Preliminary indications are that the pilot poppet had become disconnected 8 the threaded connection due to a failure of a set screw to stop '

the pilot from rotating on the collar. The floating pilot desig ,

in these valves is a modification that was made during the 1984 refueling outage. All eight MSIV's are susceptible to the same failure mode. The "B* Inboard and "D" outboard MSIV's are being '

disassembled today.

At 11:07 p.m. on 4/22, a reactor scram and a secondary containment isolation occurred while the reactor was in cold shutdown. The scram and isolatione was generated by a spurious low reactor water level signal during a trouble shooting test when a technician intentionally bumped an instrument rack. The shutdown cooling mode of the RHR system also isolated. The licensee was intentionally bumping the instrument rack in an attempt to generate a spurious group one primary containment i isolation. The scram and isolations were promptly reset and the test suspended. ;

y.

b &

8

t,. . . - . . .

. ..: . . . . . , . : e. .. . .

.. ;a f.'.

I '

,',, fgry( . sf .57do.CN!dEd "Pum av Maar

'/:z/u 7L AzT wL 4 pk .L&L 3 -

l 0/A ya 6,1 p u y c h i n W c14 a r/u, .

e-d2h , aJ s) d LL~,< cd JbdadM4 udu. wQ

. I'l/4. /uidi acJLud ecAsf n Ch:A g,1/is wask SJ e

& aJ a, % ~ Qt n/KJ,n/A og o,jkk ,k A y a d~y z Jk . k *.

,. 6a

& m yL u .

A ej6J nu t' r.:<.< clanJdI I

M k(w $ Al J I'j; )<*sy; 5 A i

dW 'nw W r" n h -

}&'f . Mj!'< % Vu 4 UJUN N$% "

o N * (,s w *b !

I h a n n o r a s i . A s ,. A s n e -

- '- =s. . . . ._ .. ' , , , , , j r,,' , ., , : , ' , ,i,,

4 t r e e e

+

I ww@ # b aa .mk afx. ,

')

anL(ma,3 m)pa1n)&% as a,cLe l

?

k e n 0 % k up (a p a $ o.s y.-) a ydu.A&& N

^

.~

~

k% a< & A y ,fra ) .

GA4 1 8

h $

4 a s

i I l.

P i

I

! i

.(

I i

I I

i 4

(

I

- - ' " - - ~

--D ( $ i l ( Qx Y

bem ; 7%s .Oek , f

=

PRIORITY ATTENTI0fi REQUIRED MORft!!4G REPORT - REGI0f4 I PRIORITY ATTENTION REQUIRED DATE 4 /.2 n / g 6 , ,

TO: Jarres Blaha, Chief, Program Support Branch, IE ,

l FROM: Thomas E.11urley, Regional Administrator, Region I l

Licensee / Facility flotification/ Subject Description of Items of Events -

^ SRIA a~d Es The "A outboard MSIV was disassembled on Monday, 4/21 after I h0-Jog 3 testing indicated that the pilot poppets in the outboard valves ,- '..

I hl_i /4fdak 4.+tp were not functioning properly. Inspection of the "A" valve I revealed that the pilot poppe t , intended to equalize pressure ,

kc}y g% across the valve, had become disconnected from the valve stem.

The pilot poppet is threaded to a collar which is secured to the ,

end of the valve stem by a split retaining ring. Preliminary :

indications are that the pilot poppet had become disconnected 8 4 the threaded connection due to a failure of a set screw to stop the pilot from rotating on the collar. The floating pilot desig ,

in these valves is a modification that was made during the 1984 refueling outage. All eight MSIV's are susceptible to the same failure mode. The ~B- inboard and "D" outboard MSIV's are being disassembled today.

At 11:07 p.m. on 4/23, a reactor scram and a secondary containment isolation occurred while,Jt e reactor was in cold shutdown. The scram and isolations w W generated by a spurious low reactor water level signal during a trouble shooting test when a technician intentionally bumped an instrument rack. The shutdown cooling mode of the RHR system also isolated. The licensee was intentionally bumping the instrument rack in an ,

attempt to generate a spurious group one primary containment isolation. The scram anC isolations were promptly reset and the test suspended. .

I

=

e I,

. E

[6

h. d. STtesuhwt - f;p

0RITY ATTENTION REO'JIRED MORNING REPORT - REGION I PRIORITY DATE Acril 16. 1986 AITN REOL' IRED TO James Blaha, Chief, Program Support Branch, IE FROM: Thomas E. Murley, Regional Administrator, Region !

Licensee / Facility Notification / Descriotion of items of Events Subject i

Pilgrim AIT The AIT continues to follow activities of the three licensee teams that are evaluating

/*Ii3 three aspects of recent events: (1) the leaking '

RHR check and injection valves, (2) the spurious.

Group ! primary containment isolations on 4/4

, and 4/10, and C) the inability to re-open the outboard MSIVs immediately after the isolations.

Walkdowns of portions of the RHR system and main ,

steam system have been performed. No physical l anomalies have been observed that would have affected any of the above areas. Procedures for

leak rate testing of the RHR valves using water >

and air have been developed and are under review. Testing of the MSIVs is not anticipated before Friday. Surveillance functional testing of the reactor vessel high water level PCIS channels was completed last night with satisfactory results. An isolation of the MSIVs occurred earlier in the day while performing

! tests on one of the channels. This may havs been caused by a technician bumping the pressure j sensor in a second instrument channel when a j half isolation had already been inserted in the i l test channel. A safety evaluation testing the j mode switch in the run and st rt up positions l ,

~

, while the reacter is shut down has been developed and is under review.

l CECc announced this morntng that they have !

decided to perform inspections and testing of 3 i the icw pressure turbine, per GE directive, j during this outage.

I

{

(

l

,i

! I l

l l

l P

b l ?

I

~. l' I

i

> tL W Pm a . s-k.O, A '.

L PRIORITY ATTENTION REQUIRED MORNING REPORT - REGION I PRIORITY ATTENTION REQUIRED

. DATE 4h4/RO l TO: James Blaha, Chief Program Support Branch, IE FROM: Thomas E. Murley, Regional Administrator, Region I Licensee / Facility Notification / Subject Description of Items of Events The licensee has established evaluatton teams to investigate 9d e-TM $R) Q /A17 three aspects of recent events: 1) the leaking RHR check and f.

b# - D k{ injection valves, 2) the spurious Group one primary containment 1solations on 4/4 and 4/12, and 3) the inability to re-open the q!!9 outboard MSIV's for at least an hour after the isolations.

Current activities include walkdowns of portions of the RHR fg} system, reviews of similar spurious isolations at other utilities, surveillance tests of primary containment isolation logic, and discussions with the MSIV vendor. A walkdown of the MSIV's is planned. Other vender representatives are also onsite to assist in the evaluations. The NRC Augmented Inspection Tear (AIT) 1s onsite and following the licensee's actions. An NRC '

radiation specialist is also onsite, evaluating radiological control activities.

9 e

k f'

i t

i . . . .,

, s . .m .

) sn s e .-o-,

L, : 'T % widew

~

1 4/14/86 EDO Highlight Pilgrim Augmented Inspection Team An Aumented Inspection Team (AIT) was dispatched to the Pilgrim site on Saturday, April 12, 1986, to investigate anomalies that occurred while the reactor was being shut down early that -

morning. An unusual event had been declared at the site on Friday evening at 4:53 p.m. and the reactor was being shut down due to leakage by three valves in the LPCI injection line (a check valve and two injection valves) that were being used to isolate low pressure LPCI piping from reactor pressure. At 1:56 a.m. on Saturday morning, the reactor scrammed on a primary containment isolation signal and MSIV closure that apparently resulted . rom a problem with the reactor mode switch. Following the scram, problems were encountered in reopening the MS!V's. The plant was safely brought to cold shutdown using the HPCI system to draw steam off the reactor untti the MS!V's were reopened. Similar problems with the reactor mode switch and the MSIV's were encountered in a reactor shutdown / scram on April 4, 1986 an had supposedly been resolved. On Saturday, April 12, the Regional Administrator issued a Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) to the utility and dispatched the AIT to investigate the events. The CAL states that Regional Administrator approval is required prior to restarting the plant.

h l

l i

, . - - - - _ , - - - _ - - - - - -- m _A - ._a - a_ s.-.

4 l

--> tt gis Pwt i M M .

PRIORITY ATTENTION REQUIRED MORNING REPORT - REGION I

~ ~~

PRIORITY ATlENTION REQUIRED D4TE 9/H /Bc, ,

TO: Janes Blaha, Chief. Program Support Branch, IE FROM: Thomas E. fturiey, Regional Administrator, Region I .

Licensee / Facility Notification /50jec On 4/11 at 4:53 p.m., a reactor shutdown was initiated after an RHR system high pressure (>400 psig) annunciator alarmed in the

( ]'{) g , g g gg control room. At that time, the licensee determined that the RHI system was being pressurized by reactor coolant leakage past a kyc [ pg check valve and two closed LPCI injection valves in the ~B- loog h-M D \foke h M qc of the RHR system. Normally, only one injection valve is closet ,

in the ~B" RHR loop. However, a seco7' injection valve had been v closed and the LPCI system declared 1 soperable about two hours i

b b*C earlier after an RHR high pressure alara had been received.

Previous alarms had been received on 4/10 and in February of th I

I 6Ctr# year (see 2/14/86 Morning Report). An Unusual Event was declart at 4:53 p.m. on 4/12, due to the coolant leakage.

l O l

The reactor scrammed from low power after the main steam line isolation valves (MSIV) unexpectedly closed at 1:56 a.m. on 4/12/86 during the reactor shutdown sequence. The licensee believes that a mode switch problem caused the MSIV's is isolate 4 on low reactor steam line pressure (less than 880 ps 8g>. Howeven the MSIV's did not close (with the associated reactor M: ram) untti about 30 seconds after the 880 pelg annunciators had been

,g recieved. The mode switch was in the startup position with its key removed at the time of the scram. The low steam line pressui isolation is normally bypassed in the startup mode. A sin 11ar reactor scram sequence occurred on 4/4/06 (see 4/7/86 Morning Report). On that occasion, the MSIV's closed at the same time tl 880 psig alarms were recieved.

The outboard MSIV's could not be reopened for at least an hour following both scrams. The HPCI system was used to draw off ste.

and control the reactor cooldown. The reactor was subsequently placed in the cold condition and the Unusual Event terminated a 9:08 a.m. on 4/12/86.

Regional and Headquarters NRC management discussed the RHR valv. '

leakage problem with licensee during the reactor shutdown en 4/

and dispatched an Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) to the site following the scram on 4/12. The team is currently onsite and f011owing the 1leensee*s acttons. The 1leensee has agreed to see ,

. NRC concurrence prior to starting the reactor up from this

E- . ,

. w.o 1

BECO/NRC MEETING 11/24/86 AGENDA TAB 1 NRC Opening Remarks T. E. Murley -

TAB 2 Hork Activities Management J. M. Lydon TAB 3 Backlog Resolution R. E. Grazio TAB 4 Management Performance Indicators J. W. Ashkar

Pilgrim Station Status:

TAB 5 - Operations Status S. D. Hudson

~29 6 - Radiological Status T. L. Sowdon :

RIP Order Closeout

. TAB 7 - Technical Status J. A. Seery TAB 8 - Maintengnce Status M. N. Brosee I

TAB 9 - Management Service Status E. J. Ziemianski TAB 10

Containment Enhancement Design / R. N. Swanson Schedule Status t TAB 11 Organization and Staffing A. L. Oxsen R. N. Swanson ,

s TAB 12 Appendix R/ Fire Protection R. Velez f

RFO-7 Schedule /Startup Checklist K. P. Roberts TAB 13 TAB 14 Emergency Planning R. E. Silva I i .

A. L. Oxsen

, TAB 15 BECo Up,date on Various Activities l 6

I 6

- - - --- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s6___. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

\

t' VARIOUS ACTRTITY STATUS .

RHR/ CORE spray pump inspection

- Defective cable C

Fitness for duty ;

480V breaker study

- INPO accreditation

- BECo/NRC office space

. Fire water system anomalies ,

1 l '

i .

l l

ORGANIZATION .

r EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION i

Site organization structure undergoing review .

l - Significant authorized complement increase burdens existing structure i

! - Work activities management review process has identified ,

l areas for improvement I

Retaihed management consultant firm - NCA -,

- Interviewed 45 management employees .

- Structured feedback sessions beginning 11/24 c

- Structure ~d management seminars beginning 12/15 Comparin.g PNPS structure to top SALP BWRs Monticello

- Millstone Ongoing Management search for best talent available in industry ,

Goal is to develop best nuclear team in Region I -

8

j .

9 f VARIOUS ACTIVITY STATUS i

J RHR/ CORE spray pump inspection ;

- Defective cable -

Fitness for duty 480V breaker study :

j

- INPO accreditation .

i J

j - BECo/NRC office space

- Fire water system anomalies i .

i

4 0.

l ORGANIZATION QY l

b I P r

CHANGES SINCE 9/9/86 -

) -

Created Security Group .

l

- Reports to management services section .

! - Group leader on board - 11/17 Created Fire Protection Group Reports tc management services section ,

! - Group leader on board - 12/1 Created Systems Analysis Group '

1

- Reports to technical section Group leader being selected 12 systems analysts j

Created Waste Management Group

- Reports to radiologocal section Group leader being selected .

I .

i

! ORGANIZATION :

l .

CHANGES SINCE 9/9/86 i :

1 i

i Upgraded training group to section level j .

I -

- Section manager being selected ,

. Chief radiological engineer hired C. Gannon on board - 10/20 l

Vice President-Nuclear Operations Onsite -10/22 1 . . ,

l . Authorized complement increased 109 (30%)

j since1/86 l .

E 1

p -.

..--_,,.__y

1 1

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART .

l l .

A. L. OXEEN

' VICE PRESIDENT ,

NUCLEAROPERATIONS ,

l 4

^

R. E. SILVA

UNCDU EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS

' PREPAREDNESS -

J COORDINAMR COORDINAMR l

1 1

i .

N. S. MCKENNEY M. F. GEDUTIS J.F. CROWDER EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS g l drill & EXERCISE COORDINATOR NUCLEAR TRAINING I ASSMM l SPECIALIST nev.2 -

1 t

Proposed Emergency Preparedness Organizational Chart Manager, Emergency

~

Preparedness ,

Clerk l

i Onsite Offsite Emergency Admin Emergency Preparedness Asst. Preparedness Coordinator Coordinator

~

Plan, Procedures

, Training Drilland Exercise Facilities -

Coordinator Coordinator Coordm.ator 4

1 i

l i

i I 1986 Milestones: Completed to Date:

{ {.

j

Successfully conducted FEMA siren test - 88.2%

} :

Relocated to state-of-the-art E.O.F. :

Reorganized other emergency facilities-for better workability ,

Installed teleconferencing system at all emergency facilities -

l

Increased Permanent Staff Complement .

from 1 to 5

]

Successfully conducted Semi-Annual H.P.

Drill l

l

1 EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS MIi.ESTONES(CONT.)

l ,

1

~. Conducted E.O.F., T.S.C., O.S.C., Mc iia .

j Center and Recovery Center walk-tInu i drills

~

i

Conducted 2 full scale drills

Commissioned new Evacuation Time Estimate (E.T.E.) and comprehensive o traffic management plan -

I

!

Revised PNPS Emergency Plan, Procedures

! and Emergency Notification List

)

Reorganized PNPS Emergency Response

! Organization

!

Developed and submitted Annual Exercise -

Objectives I .

SfERGENCYPREPAREDNESS MILESTONES (CONT.)

i

Instituted action item tracking system

Conducted successful call out of assigned emergency personnel e

-

Conducted training sessions for approximately -

100 local and state officials -

Represented company at local town meetings and State Senate Meeting

~

Visited other S.A.L.P. -1 Sites

Staff Attended N~umerous Emergency Preparedness Seminars and Courses

Attended Millstone's Annual Exercise

+

4 4

8

^

., ~ . $ _

N * % * . ' , 4 ..A .. ',, ,

4 4

4 i ..

4 k

f o8 e i ONE CHECXLIST WIll NOT BE SVfflCIENT TO ENSURE !9.! CCR SAFETY, COMPLIANCE, ;

MANAGEMENTEffICIENCY,RADIATIONANDEXPOSUREARENET!

WEWILLUTIlllECHECXLISTSFOREACHHAJOR"0PERATIONALCOND CHANGE.

l i

l I

1

-_. - - - - - - ,- ------w-

,. . . +:. '. . .. : . ... . . . ......:.. .

.,.':. ..,aa..,

?

ATTACHMENT 11 WILESTONESICHECKLISTSTHATWILLBEUTIlllEDF0R.

~

REFUELOUTAGE#7

i. TESTING OF REFUEL BRIDGE COMPLETE - 0FF LOAD CORE CHECKLIST

r

2. COMMENCE RELOADING FUEL CHECKLIST l

I

3. RELOAD COMPLETE CHECKLIST

4. HYDRO CHECKLIST i

5. ILRT CHECKLIST j i

6. PRE-CRITICAL CHECKLIST I r

t I

7. HEAT-UP CHECKLIST .

i

8. POWER ESCALATION CHECKLIST I

i I

PAGE 1 0F 1 t

i

, m .~ ... _. ..- . . . , ,, , . _

I O

CHECKLISTf0RMT A11acicitsr 111 CHECXLISTQ-REFUELBRIDGETESTINGC0HPLETEl0FFL I.0 HARDWARE ITEM ,

I.1 Systems / Equipment 9.* Quired I,2 Plant Hodification'. ??DC's)

I.3 Plant Temporary Modifications ((M's) (TM Log Bock) -

. I.4 S'ystem/ Equipment Maintenance Requests and Precedures, including Preventive Maintenance (PM) 1.5 Failure and Malfunction Reports (F&MR's)

~

11.0 SOFTWARE ITEMS II.1 Operating / Maintenance - Surveillance Procedures (ST's)

II.2 Temporary Procedurr,i (TP's) 11.3 New or Revised Operating / Surveillance / Maintenance Proceduret

!!.4 Deficiency Reports (DR's) 11.5 Non-Conformance Reports (NCR's)

II.6 Potential Conditions Adverse to Quality (PCAQ's)

II.7 T:'alning II.8 Engineering Support Requests (ESR's) 11.9 Drawings and Vendor Manual (Associated with Modifications) 11.10 Operating Expertence Review (OER). Including "Conditional" Safety Evaluations 111.0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ITEMS III.1 Appilcable Technical Specification including Changes III.2 Technical Specification Co6cerns IV.0 NRC RELATED !TEMS IV.1 NRC Comitments/ Concerns and I.icensee Event Reports (LER's)

V.0 EMERGENCY PLAN ITEMS V.1 Emergency Plan !ssues for Criticality / Power Operations V!.0 BACrlor. PROJECT ITEMS VI.1 Sacklog ,Recomendations VII.0 PROGRAM !TEMS (Rad Protection. Fire Protection. Security. Housekeeping, Decon, etc.) .

VI!!.0 "Pt#CHLIST" AND OTHER !TEMS W

.. . .o - . ..

~

_ ~ . - , . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - ~._ _ _

k g .

~

.m s

. W8 M s

U

~

2 8 .

t.g. -

._. W I U

aa 8 h

w M 5 3 E -

5 ! s =

$ Q E

N

= G R g@5B I s ge *$

o In :5

- a- Eg e g ur a u 8 p f dl a g i4s g g-g gg - _

3 m

m, 3 -

H e U M Em2 g

a s 8 e -

se

- g E -

_sg e .g g "

m l M I G1 g s a =

l I~5 l

l

! c=, .

u u-m g -

_a l .

as . . .o . . . .: . . . . . . , . . ~ . _

4i l

t t

t

, E_ECO/NRC MEETING 11/29/86 AGENDA

/

NRJ Opening Remarks T. E. Murley j

,i

Work Activities Management J. M. Lydon* /

2 Backlog Resolution R. E. Grazio J*

M* Management Performance Indicators J. W. Ashkar / s Pilgrim Station Status:

f - Operations Status S. D. Hudson !

d - Radiological Status T.L.Sowdon!

P RIP Order Closeout 7 - rechnicai Statui J. A. Seery / i M. N. Broste /

p - Maintenance Status ,

Management Service Statu E. J. Ziemlanskt /

f -

R. N. Swanson

. /d

Containment Enhancement Design /

Schedule Statur, t

// ' Organization and Staffing A. L. Oxsen/R. N. Swanson

/2* AppenJim R/ Fire Protection R. Velez /

i

/3

RFO-7 Schedule /Startup Checklist . K. P. Roberts i I

) [M* Emergency Planning R. E. Silva /

/[ BEco Update on Various Activities A. L. Orsen / ;

I e .

s l

i e

l I

_ _ _ , _ , . _ - . _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . - . . . . , _ , _ . . ~ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ . ~ _- .-

i l

I i

i l

I l

FIRE PROTECTION / APPENDIX R STATUS -

R. Vdiez i Project Manager November 24, 1986 9

BOSTON EDISON HAS TAKEN PRUDENT STEPS TO IMPROVE THE FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM Comprehensive Program Review Completed Candidate improvements Targeted Program Integrated With Appendix "R" Project Goals Set To High Standards Strong Corporate Support Committed Project Controls Developed 1

Schedule Supports Pilgrim Startup

%,,y_

~

THE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INCLUDES HARDWARE AND PROGRAMMATIC ELEMENTS ',

Walkdown Of Installed Equipment l Repair, Replace Or Test Units As Required '.

Establish Individual Qualification Files i

l Comprehensive Review Of Licensing Commitments Simplified Procurement Specifications l Review Of Surveillance Requirements .'

Use Of Computer Data Base Management Systems -

i l

THE FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM AND ,

APPENDIX 'R' PROJECT ARE CLOSELY TIED -

. Fire Protection The establishment of Fire Boundaries, Hardware, and

~

Procedures necessary to contain and combat a fire within a specified area.

. 10 CFR50 Appendix R The establishment of Systems and Procedures ,

necessary to ensure that the plant can be (

safely shutdown in the even; of a fire c coincident with a loss of offsite power. :

--, ,_____ _ _ _ a

t BOSTON EDISON HAS COMBINED THE FIRE PROTECTION ,

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND APPENDIX 'R' PROJECT UNDER ONE MANAGER Programs Are Closely Related And Must Remain Current for the Life .

of The~ Plant Program Requirements Are Similar To EQ .

Manager's Previous EQ Experience Is Transferable and Can Achieve Similar Results 1

e t

_m. _ _ .

er 9

THE FIRE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IS A MAJOR ..

UNDERTAKING ADDRESSING MANY INTERRELATED CONCERNS :

" , _h

,, m ,, - - ,

E- .

o =.,er.

l

,e J

f ' #"~

e

- _._i _.e

1. SommeCeeeng l

s peero co g,,,,, g cm e

At:"** =,vc -

c_.e e s O'2"- ,,,c.,

Precedwee PenetreGes. Tests 1

, \1 Deveeop '

%, i h 4. oecusenne tusenesses.

'" I

\ ' 85'P*8' -

i w eer ne

s. m casuponeseery e

se Perni sT. '"*

csieck si-os

~

% Seene Coot Fin

THE MAGNITUDE OF THE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM .

REQUIRES SUBSTANTIAL RESOURCE COMMITMENTS Each of 4100 Components Require

- Independent Field Verification

-As-Built and Qualification Records Searches j - Administrative Control Systems Required To Ensure

- Prioritization of Walkdowns

! - Proper Notification of Deviations

- Adequate Definiton of Corrective Actions l Options To Be Considered include: s 1

l - Repair Existing Equipment

! - Replace With Qualified Units , .

- Test To Prove Qualification I

~

Documentation Must Be:

- Complete

- Auditable

_._._=_--_; . _ - - _ _ _ -

i I

! RESOURCES TO UPGRADE THE FIRE PROTECTION - i

! PROGRAM HAVE BEEN MOBILIZED i

j Penetration Walkdown Preparations Complete

-Inspection Procedures Approved ,

- Team Members Trained -

- Walkdown Sequence Established 1

- Resources to Correct identified Deficiencies Available Walkdowns in Progress I

15 Full-time Engineers Assigned ^!

Licensing Specialist Expected Mid-December ,

Site Fire Protection Personnci Reorganized s :.

I Project Schedule Will Support Startup cl l

i

)

i ~l j

APPENDIX "R" MODIFICATIONS CONTINUE ON-TRACK ,

AND ARE NEARING COMPLETION ~

l i

l

- Project Records Are Under Compliance Review l

- Over 150 items Of BECc./NRC Correspondence -

I -2Y) Appendix "R" Plant Design Change Packages

- Support Documentation Being Assembled .

i

- Engineering Support Of Construction Continues '( '

- 5 PDCs in Engineering

- 5 PDCs Ready For implementation ,

} N - 6 PDC's Under Construction '

6 PDC's Completed i

- No Start-up Impact Expected For Appendix "R" Project

' i i

^

l

i

1 4 ~

INCREASED CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING EFFORTS ARE 1 '

! EXPECTED DURING THE NEXT CALENDAR QUARTER

I i

i

=

Walkdown Data Will Determine:

- Failure Modes and Trends '

- - Option Selection (Testing / Repair / Replacement) l . l' Staffing Will Adjust To Support Construction / Testing

- Construction '

- Health Physics ~l

- Quality Control

- Engineering l Deviation Reports and Compensatory Measures Will Conform ';

i To Tech Specs l ~

~

Resident inspectors Will Be Kept Informed Of Status i

~!

d 1

~

! THE PROGRAM PLAN iS AGGRESSIVE AND SUPPORTS i

t BECO'S COMMITMENT TO IMPROVED PLANT FIRE PROTECTION .

I I Dec . Jan '87 , Feb Mar ~ Apr l May l Jun Walkdowns

! Repair / Replace

Testing -

i Qual Files -

i i Procurement Spec

~

1 Commitment Eval .

I NRC Review $

! Upgrade Training 1

j s

~

l l

l

l ..

,\

~

} .

i

I i i 1

l i

1 NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING ~

l 1

FLN. Swanson .

f Nuclear Engineering Manager Nover.iber 24, 1986 m l

1 l

l NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MISSION.

I I

i Maintaining The Licensing And Design Bases

. Changing The Licensing And Design Bases

) Interpreting The Licensing And Design Bases i ,

l

.i

m NEM .

Deputy Mgr TQ ,>

Deputy Mgr P Secretary Civil Fluid Control Power Systems & Nuclear Site Project Structural Systems Systems Systems Safety Analysis Ersgineering Mgrs Analy is (3) .

-l 9

l i

THE NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WAS ,

REORGANIZED TO ENHANCE MISSION PERFORMANCE ,

i Organized By Major Functions ,

. - Reduces Number Of Direct Reports To NEM

- Places Senior NED Manager On Site Adds Licensing Capability Parallels Station Organization -

~

k e ,

NEM r p6 -

it, . ..

t '

l I ,

Secretary .

+

. l Design N "I Eng W g Andysis Section Section Section l

. 1 I -

Civil Fluid Control Power Site Regulatory Nuclear Systems & Rollat:llity . ,

Structural Systems Systems Systems Engineering Affairs Analysis Safety Analysis Office Analysis ;

1 E

9 o

Robert V. Fairbank, Jr.

Licensing and Analysis Section Manager Nuclear Engineering Department MBA - University of Pittsburgh ,

BSME - Northeastern University

_Otility (BECo.)

. Deputy Manager Nuclear Engineering

. Fluid Systems Group Leader

. Project M9 nager - Post TMI Response

. Control Systems Engineer Architect /Encineer (Bechtel Rower Coro.) ,

. Controi Systems Group Leader

. Fielti Engineer NSSS (Westinohouse Electric Corod

. Design Engineer n

2 Comoonent Manufacturers (Ruggles Klingemann Mfg. Co.)

(Lawrt.nce Pump & Engine Co.)

. Design Engineer

1

'l Charles H. Minott Design Section Manager ,

. Nuclear Engineering Manager l

i i

MSCE (Project Management) - MIT - :

BSCE University of Massachusetts (Amherst) l 1

l.

i

. Project Manager Engineering / Procurement / Construction ,

1

. Total Budget $25 Million I Average Variance 4%

I . Project Engineer Engineering Design Contracts 1 - Maintenance of Pilgrim 2 Equipment !

t 3

u l . Cost Control Engineer - Management Control System 4 j Development l . Research Assistant - Cost Estimating incorporating l

! Risk Assessrnent [

1

) . I i . Chairman Capital improvement Committee, y 4

a i Town of Hanover :

1

. 1 1

! . Past Member - United Cerebral Palsy Association , l

) Metro Boston .l 1 i 1 .!

l (

l 4 !

i i

i. ,

Robert E. Grazio Field Engineering Manager Nuclear Engineering Department MBA Babson College .

BSMET - Central New England College of Technology US Naval Nuclear Power Training

. Utility (BECo.)

. Systems & Safety Analysis Group Leader

. Senior Engineer Outage Management l

Senior Engineer - Systems A'nalysis Architect /Encineer (Stone & Webster)

. Design Engineer (Mechanical)

U.S. Navv 'l

. Nuclear Support Facilities Supervisor (Radiological) ;

. Engineering Watch Supervisor {

I k

I f

.n-~

-r---- , - - __-- _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - --,._ , , , - _ . - _

s.

NED STAFFING STATUS (11/24/86) -

Authorized Complement 94 .

Personnel On Board 81 Offers Extended 2 q Hiring Recommendations 3 Interviews in Progress 4 -

"Posted" 2 On Hold 2

-1 Possible Upgrade

-1 Fessible Transfer ,

Total NED Openings 13 -

e O e

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE -

R.N. S ccson Nuclear Engineering Macager November 24, 1986 -

9

THE SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM OUTAGE GOAL -

RESPONDS TO THE DRAFT NRC POLICY .

Respond And implement Containment lmprovements _

Responsive To Draft NRC Policy Prior To Startup.

Revise Procedures And . Train Operators To improve .

Operational Readiness For Beyond-Design-Basis l Events.

t l

1 i

i l

L . - -- .

- - . - .- - . . ._- - ._ .. . L------ - - - - -

PROPOSED NRC "SEVERE ACCIDENT -I es CONTAINMENT" POLICT FOR BWR'S .:;

- Hydrogen Control -

j

- Prevent Containment Failures in Expected 3 Accident Sequences including Station Blackout

- Reliable Containment Drywell Sprays .

e

- Operable For Broad Spectrum Of Accident Sequences including Station Blackcut

- Reliable Containment Wetwell Ventir.g ,)

- Operable At Design Pressure Conditions To Prevent Containment Overpressure Failure And To Maximize Use Of Suppression Pool As Filtering Medium

- Core Debris Barriers 3

- Evaluate Paths For Core Debris Travel

- Add Barriers if Needed To Protect Suppress ~mn Pool ,j

- Emergency Procedures And Training l - Review And Modify As Necessary To Ensure Operators Are

! Able To Recognize Severe Accident Conditions And Use Plant Equipment To Best Advantage ,

II

! T 1

) SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM STATUS - 11/24/86

~

i -

Issue improvements Comments ,

- No Major Change Consider More Restrictive Hydrogen Control Deinerting Limits Prior To

Startup Containment. Spray Firewater intertie To Valve Control Alternatives Containment Spray in Station Blackout !

- Optimize Drywell Conditions Under Study l Spray Rate '

, Containment Venting - 8" Hard Pipe Vent - Strict Operational From Wetwell To Guidance For Use To Main Stack Be Provided !

Core Debris Barriers No Design Changes Focus On Drywell i Sprays :

1 -

i i

i i .

i .

1 4

i SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM STATUS - 11/24/86 .!

i 1

I Issue improvements Comments Emergent:y Selected Revision To - Review Procedures -

Procedures Current EOPs Against

& Training Revise Procedures - Dra ops Based On :

For Station Blackout .

ev 4 EPGs % m'

'O i

- Train Operators l

} Other Third Diesel Generator To - Complete Root Cause Emer Buses Analysis / Upgrade Improvements Supply # g' 4 Reliability Of i

/ Complete AN Recirc Pump Trip Breaker ,f Rule Modifications s

% >~<!A W :

I

y i

i

-i 1

1 1

^:

l NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SUPPORT BACKLOG STATUS .

)

i R.N. Swanson Nuclear Engineering Manager .

November 24, 1986

.,,---,_-.-,--,,,.__----.,---,,,--n.-,_---,--,,,,---.n-._---,

e-. - -nn-, - _ . - - - - , - , -_ - . - - - ._,.,--- -.. -... -. -__ -_. _ -

l .

! NED IS COMMITTED TO ELIMINATE t-!

i SUPPORT BACKLOG BY STARTUP l

1

?

. Target is 80% Closed By Year End i

! . Target is Ambitious, involves Substantial Resources l

Scoping And Planning Required 280 Management i Manhours -

l - 4300 Manhours Of Contract Help Added To NED Staff i

. Progress To Date Shows That Target is Achievable l

3 I

l l

\ -

i l NED IS ATTENDING TO NEW WORK TO PREVENT .

1 ,

j RECURRENCE OF A BACKLOG ;

228 New Requests Received Since 9/1/86 .

Efforts To Resolve Open items Are Producing Results ~/

J1/1 11/17 Chance

-Items Actively Working 584 459 -

- Items Scheduled To Beain hi 1987 50 50 Total 634 509 125 .

NED Has Already Closed 210 Items 11/1 11/17 Change

- 9/1/86 Items Closed-Out 41 144

- New items Closed Out 28 66 Total Closed items 69 141 Q10 9 t

A

.l

0

,h l

l e

h

. I

~

4 8

e A

E 5

x e

C M

Aj l 5./

Na '

p C

F4 tn l

f...

t OBJECTIVES ,

s i Improve the overail physical protection program at Pilgrim Station through : -

- complete reanalysis of regulatory requirements -

- upgrade of program documents 3d .[

- upgrade of hardware j - strengthening of management controls 1

l OB-1 l

l __ _. . .

BENEFITS '

. E, e Increased awareness, visibility, emphasis [:

and sensitivity to security requirements Simplification of program documents .

to facilitate revisions and reviews .

- Enhanced Security Force performance with state-of-the-art hardware ;

ee BE-1 ,

. . _...m -. ,, , __ . . _ .. _ ,

4 OUTLINE

. Organization Regulatory Requirements Analysis ( :

Hardware 7

. Facilities ' .

Training ,

. Corrective Action Systems :

l Management Controls I

j .

OI,1 l

l

~

?

O NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES SECTION e

8 i -

Resource Protection Compliance Group Training Group

& Control Group ,,

- Fire Protection

- Security

- Industrial Safety I - Medical O-1

m.

i

! i l

NUCIEAR MANAGEl\ENT SERVICES SECTION i

j raining

~

I Compliance Fire Protection Security Group Leader Group .

Group' I Group Leader -

Leader /: Leader ,

l -

l 1 o

.i '

\ /

\b .

1 l

I l

O-2 l .

REG _ULATORY REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS l

, PURPOSE: To ensure that regulatory requirements are met :

l .

by existing programs and procedures. '.

PRIMARY PRODUCT: Revision to MASP consistent with '

/

format of NUREG 0908.

i i

l STATUS: All 10 modules completed.

! Preparing for working level ,

I meeting with NRC. ,-

\ l ## h

n \

d,d '#

l i

- @\

ve-lp f p#v'4 l

R-1 j

_._-._~ .___. _ _ _

D 1, ,

'l i

.I

) .

HARDWARE IMPROVEMENTS .

70 Barriers # .

i CCTV .

Intrusion Detection l

en1**"J M Y Access Control I Lighting i

i i

l I

l i

H-1 s-4 e

~e 4

OVERALL APPROACH .

Engineered improvements to provide ,

State-of-the-art equipment Increased design margin

- Accommodation for changes in '

physical arrangement of the Site

- Increased operational efficiency H-2 V

3 9 i e

l

. pW SCHEDULE .

l i

i Detailed design change packages

/r .

.\/p -

1 Working-level meeting with NRC

/

y j, y/A' '

/ i",J i

Implementation schedule commitments 1

1 H-8

l l .

l FACILITIES .

1 I .

1 j Private office location for BECo Security management -

Additional office / working!iunchroom space for .

Security force -

1 l

Improving various posts (Bechtel Warehouse; Alternate !.

j Access Gate) .-

f i Long-term space needs .

) .

i

F-1 j -

.:7 .. . . .. . r. . ..;.e. .. .. ., . . . - . . . . -

i ~

i l

TRAINING .

i ,

- Module to ensure Security takes responsive 4'

corrective action with thorough follow-up - 11/86 -

- Overview module for BECo Senior Management - 11/86 .

- Establish initial technical training module for -

the new BECo Security Management 4

T-1

e4 l

\ -

l i

~

CORRECTIVE ACTION SYSTEMS l

./

)

hij#

l NOP 83A9- Corrective Action Program I -

Monthly trends being established ;

l Initial trend analysis report (Jan.1987) i e

i I

i i C-1 l

l i

i i

MANAGEMENT CONTROLS '

l l

)

i - ~ Established separate group i

I 1

! . Strengthening controls over contractor performance t

j .

! - Adding key BECo positions Establishing performance objectives and criteria 1

l -

Continuing with inter-company comparisons i

M-1 .

t

~

FUTURE PLANS

. Continual improvement through a structured self-assessment process. g, WILER FQ Enhanced integration of security organization into overall station operations .

Continued reduction in dependency on contractor support xJuh %

FP-1

,... . . . . - - -r - - ,- - ,-- - - ._

1 I __

i 1

NMSS BACKLOG Status l

! Backlog identified and quantified 40 gp / ,

i Contractor selected and P.O. issued

'jry#

'F i 'p CY

~

l

! Plans -

l Contractor support at full strength by /

l December 1,1986 Disposition schedule established ,

i I

I BL-1 j .

^ - -

.. . . . -. . .a .. w i

I THE WORK CONTROL SYSTEM PROVIDES THE MANAGEMENT CONTROi_ OF THE MAINTENANCE ACTIONS -

1 J

i 1 4

- Maintenance Request Status Maintenance Planning j .

! - Scheduling Integration -

i 1

l i

) .

1 l TOTAL MAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE INCLUDES MANY CONSIDERATIONS

[

l l -

i l

- Task Priority I

-- Plant / System Conditions

- Fundamental Resources i

1 '

- Coordination & Availability of Support Activities -

J

- Related Tasks & Work Activities

I :

l THE CONDUCT OF MAINTENANCE SUPPORTS PLANT OPERATION IN A SAFE AND EFFICIENT MANNER .

- Activity Identification & Correction .

- Work is Properly Authorized & Controlled -

Adherence To Station Policies & Procedures

- Minimize Radiation Exposure c p

5 y .

MAINTENAN_CE GROUP I-CHEFMAINTENANCE ENONEER (C M E)

R E. SHERRY ,

i /SSISTANTTO CME CMEDIROS STAFFENGNEERS Cl,ERK (2) '

_MkCH (OPEN) ASSISTANT ELECT (OPEN) CHIEFMAINTENANCE ENQNEER ,

P.J.MORAITES

- CLERK r

~

INSTRUMENT MAINTENANCE EL8ECTRICAL MECHANICAL PLANNING g,

ENGNEER ENGNEER ,

R RE G.LAFOPo J. VENDER PS & CC --D J.RGAEDTKE .

2 SUPERVISORS 4 SUPERVISORS 4 SUPERVISORS 3 SUPERVISORS (OPEN) RMcCUE E.SPAKOSKI ,

(OPEN)

D.OLEARY RPJitEARDON RLYONS I g,ggg (OPEN) , (OPEN) J.SACCOACH l 14 ELECTRICIANS 22 NCT's Z/ MECHANICS l

e '

. . . . . s . . . . . . :. - . . . . c .. . m MAINTENANCE GROUP '.

CHIEFMAINTENANCEENGINEER (C M E ) '

R E. SHERRY ASSISTANTTO C M E C.MEDIROS biAFFENG2EERS CLERK (2)

~ '

ADDITIONA ASSISTANT STAFF ELECT (OPEN) CHIE NtNANCE ENGNEER P.J.MORAITES -

I 8 C (OPEN)

CLERK INSTRUMENT MANTENANCE m A OGEER ENGNEER ENGNEER ENGrEER -

MA MAGUIRE G.LANND J. VENDER JAGAEDTKE PS & CC --> ,

2 SUPERVISORS A SUPERVISORS 4 SUPERVtSORS 3 SUPERVISORS (E'I/C*M) ADDITIONAL RCOBB P. M PLANNERS (OPEN) R.McCUE E.SPAKOSKI (OPEN)

D.OLEARY RR REARDON R.LYONS M MONER (OPEN) (OPEN) J.SACCO#CH 14 ELECTRICIANS 22 NCT's 27 MECHANICS

[

l ADDITIONAL SUPERVISORS AND LABOR FORCE u .. - . . . . . _ _ . _ _ _- _- __ _ _ . __ _

4 OPEN MAINTENANCE GROUP BACKLOG MR'S -

OPEN BACKLOG MR'S AS OF 9/1/86 = 1891 -

BACKLOG MR'S COMPLETED 9/1/86 TO 11/19/86 = 288 '

B CKLOG MR'S OPEN AS OF 11/19/86 = 1603 i

! OF THE 1603 :

- OUTAGE MR'S = -491

1112 i ~

PM RilR'S = -15 -

1097 -

4

) '

TEST MR'S = -59 1039 ; '..

MISC - CMG,ETC. MR'S = .

-249 .-

790 I

I i

l O

4 i THE BACKLCG TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS WILL BE -

~

DISPOSITIONED PRIOR TO STARTUP ,

i i . r 1

l l

1 1

I i -

Maintenance 53 Technical 19 i

Operations 2 i

l Construction 2 Other 5 -

j 81 .

1

I-

-< W l

l .

l TECHNICAL SECTION BACKLOG DISTRIBUTION .

70-60-O 50- .

F 40-T A 30- -

S 20-l 0 W, , ,

, umuur , _ _ . ,E, , , , ,

! LER INPO OADR F&M EMER PIP TEMP NSRAC OAR NRC OERP UCEN [~,

PREP PK)DS -

DOCUMENT NAME E BACKLOGCOMPLETE E BACKLOG p6 N U"h M , o l' .

_ - - . - - , - , , , - - _ - _ , - - _ , , . -- ,,_,__,..____.,_.__,_.,__n., _._ __ __ _

s'

=

x 1

PILGRIM STATION :

l 1 TECHNICAL SECTION .

l 1

8

- TECHNICAL SECTION REORGANIZATIUON i

l

- Objectives .

]

i ~

! Old An'd New Organization -

1 -

) .

1 Benefits To Be Gained

] '

i Status And Plans j

TECHNICAL SECTION BACKLOG ShTUS

)

i I

t

z. .. ,

f:

CBJECTP/ES .-

- Develop "System SpeciaSsts", Accountable I For Performance And Material Condition Of .,

important Plant Systems .

[.

Strengthen Program And Methods For Review j .

! Of Operating Events At Pilgrim And Industry .

I

- Provide Operations Section With Dedicated n SrnI' W

~

Technical Resources

- Provide Software And Hardware Specialists, .

Dedicated To Support Three Major Computer ,

Systems: -

ll j Plant Process Computer And SPDS

! Security Computer Training Simulator Computer 4 l - Apply increased Emphasis To Programs For Containment Leak Rate Testing And j in-Service Testing

. ~. , . . . . . ... . , . .

,Sp OLD TECHNICAL SECTION :

ORGANIZ.ATION ,

l .

i

)

I Technical Section .

I Manager (1) :

} 1 I On-situ Safety & Technical Group .

l -

'i i ,

Performance Grouf Group Leader (1 l Chief Engineer (1) l -

i

- Shift Technical Advisor (10) - Sr. Mechanical Engr. (1) i

- Sr. Electrical Engr. (1) :

! - Performance Analysis Engr. (2)

- Sr. I&C Engineer (1) i l - Nuclear Technician (1)

- Sr Waste Mgmt. Engr. (1) .,i

- Sr. Reactor Engr. ?,

l

- Sr. Chemical Engr. (1) ,.

l - Reactor Engr. (1) l i - Nuclear Technician (3) ,

- S.O.D. Computer Support (4) lj !

l l

j

\ . . -

NEW TECHNICAL SECTION .

ORGANIZATION I

Technical Section Manager (1) Administrative

. Assistant (1)* .

1 i Technical Group ' On-site Safety And 1 Systems Performance Group Chief Engineer (1)

Group Leader (1) . Group Leader (1)

-Sr. Mechanical Engineer (1) -Sr. Reactor Engineer (1)"

-Sr. Systems Specialist (9)*

-Or. Electrical Enginoer (1)

-Reactor Engineer (1)"

-Systems Speciahst (3)* -Reactor Engineer Techs. (3)"

-Sr. Engineer - Operating -Sr. I&C Enginee- (1) ~

-Nuclear Ops. Dept. Computer Experience Review (1)" -Sr. Waste Management Engineer (1) .

Support Personnel (7)" ,

-Sr. Chemical Engineer (1)

-Admin Assist - Operating - ' '

Experience Review (1)" -Technical Engineer (1) eer 2)

-Nuclear Technicians (1) .'

-Sr. Engineer - LLRT/lLRT/

IST (2)" .

( )* New Position ,

( )" Existirr ' sition, But Reorganizt,d

( ) Existing + Not Georganized

_v-

- . . . .. . .. .~. . .. . . . . ..

TECHNICAL SECTION MANAGER -

i ADMINISTRATIVE F i

ASSISTANT l s

1

! SYSTEMS TECHNICAL ON-SITE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE

! GROUP GROUP GROUP _

i j

- System Specialists . Mech, Elc:t, And - Reactor Engineering i & C Component / '

! - Operating Experience Equipent Support - Computer Application, Review Operations And Maintenance l

]

- Redweste Support .

j - Programs For Containment '

- Chemistry Support Leek Rate Testing And l

1 in-Service Testing i - Temporary Mods

- Performance Analysis .

- Technical Reviews And DPU Suppsrt I

- Betterment Projects J

i i

l J

i i

i

. . , . . , - . . , . ., _. , - -. . . . - . = . . - . , - .- _ . . . . - . , ,

_, _1 .. .

^\

BENEFITS TO BE GAINED .

o

- Improved System Performance Cee To Sense of Ownership And Accountability By System Specislists

- More And Better Root Cause Evaluations Of in-House l And Industry Experiences Applicable To Pilgrim

- Operations Section Acquires Dedicated Technical Resources .I

- Maintenance Section Gains Significant Additional On-Site J, Technical Support :R Specified Regulatory Programs Get Additional Management l "

Attention By Dedicated, Fulltime Personnel l

- Support Of On-Site Computer Systems is Centralized ;

Within Technical Section

l STATUS .

- Technical Section Reorganization Authorized 9/86

]

l l

- Position Descriptions For New Jobs Approved 10/86

- Positions Posted 10/86 -

i

- 7 Steam Ops Computer Personnel Transferred 11/86

! To NOD Tech Section 1

i - Candidate For Systems Group Leader Recommended 11/86 l

i 1 : '

! FUTURE PLANS l .

f - Complete Screening Of Resumes For System 12/86 (Target) ,

J Specialists And Begin Interviews j t

{

- Complete Other Transfers Of Tech Section 1/87 (Target)

Personnel

- Systems Group Operational 2/87 (Target) i

I a

XBCRBMGH7el@X L NOV. 24,1986 6

BY i i THOMAS L. SOWDON i

) RADIOLOGICAL SECTION HEAD :

i :

l

, . t l

l .

l l

1 i t

i

.-- - _. _.. . . . - _ - -- - . __ __ ___ - _- .. - - _ - _ _ __ _- - - _ - __ ___ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _

d OBJECTJyES OF THE RADIOLOGICAL PRQTECTl_ON PROGRAM j.7 ;_3 QR@t STATION

1) PROVIDE A SAFL '>iWKlW 4NVIRONMENT AT PILGRIM STATION.

2) MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO RADIATION

. EXPOSURE.

3) MAINTAIN RADIATION EXPOSURE AT PILGRIM STATION AS LOW AS REASONABLY ACHIEVABLE ,

! (ALARA). ,

i ,

l 4) DEVELOP AN OUTSTANDING RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAM THAT TAKES FULL ADVANTAGE OF THE l' KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE AVAILABLE FROM THE l l

NRC, INPO, AND OTHER REGULATORY AND ADVISORY AGENCIES.

l l l i

1 2

5 I

] BENEFITS OF THE PROGRAM

1) IMPROVED HEALTH AND SAFE *N FOR THE WORKER.

2) IMPROVED WORKER EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS.

3) IMPROVED WORKER ATTITUDES. ;

4) REDUCED COSTS AND NUMBER OF WORKERS.

5) INCREASED CONFIDENCE IN BOSTON EDISON'S ABILITY TO OPERATE PILGRIM SAFELY AND EFFICIENTLY.

{

l l .

1 .

l i

3 l

~ ~

a. ,

.. .. ^l..

1

/ ,

l STATUS OF THE PROGRAM

1) SUBSTANTIALIMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE IN THE LAST 18 MONTHS IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS: .

. PROCEDURES AND COMPLIANCE WITH THEM

. ALARA PROGRAM AWARENESS .

. HEALTH PHYSICS EQUIPMENT E . ACCESSIBlLITY & INVOLVEMENT BY RADIATION PROTECTION MGMT

. TRAINING ( QUAIJTY, OUANTITY , AND DOCUMENTATION )

. STAFFING '

. DECONTAMINATION COMMITMENT

. . WORK CONTROL AND TRACKING SYSTEMS i

2) THE RECENT RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ljDIT SUGGESTED THAT WE ARE "OVER THE HUMP" BUT SOME WORK REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED. ge l

\

N ;

>a.

+ W. W.,y- ,

f g . N(2(, d M ^ M-4,uwdA+t -

l

, 4 [ d.w w h ,, c

FUTURE PLANS FOR THE PROGRAM

~ .

1) CONTINUE TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY AND QUALIFICATIONS OF RADIATION PROTECTION .

PERSONNEL.

2) FURTHER UPGRADE PROCEDURES AND EQUIPMENT.

3) FULLY lMPLEMENT THE ALARA PROGRAM AND REDUCE TOTAL STATION EXPOSURE TO A LEVEL WELL BELOW THE NATIONAL AVERAGE.

4) IMPROVE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE HEALTH PHYSICS STAFF AND OTHER PLANT GROUPS.

5) DEVELOP AN EXCELLENT RADIATION PROGRAM AND j EARN AN EXCELLENT SALP RATING.

I

\ .

4 5

. a ..

4

BACKLOG EFFORT

1) CONSIST OF ALL ITEMS IDENTIFIED PRIOR TO

. SEPTEMB.ER 1,1986 j 2) NRC INSPECTIONS, INPO ASSESSMENTS, ANI INSPECTIONS, QA SUGGESTIONS, LICENSEE IDENTIFIED OPEN ITEMS, AND OTHER OPEN ITEMS ARE INCLUDED.

3) ALL TASKS HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:

. TASK DESCRIPTION . ASSIGNED DATE ,

COMPLETION CRITERIA . DUE DATE PRIORITY . MAN HOURS REQUIRED RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER -

CHARGE NUMBERS

4) TOTAL MAN HOURS TO COMPLETE ALL ITEMS HAVE BEEN ESTIMATED. (APPROXIMATELY 6000 MAN HOURS)

5) NECESSARY STAFF TO COMPLETE ALL ITEMS IS BEING ASSEMBLED. ( 6 TO 8 CONTRACTOR ENGINEERS )

6) ITEMS HAVE BEEN PRIORITIZED.

I M sd cd J b **M

7) ALL ITEMS wet. BE DISPOSITIONED BEFORE RESTART.

l

( 130 ITEMS )

\ 6

l BREAKDOWN OF BACKLOG TASKS ISSUE . OPEN TASKS CLOSED TASKS

( SINCE SEPT.1,86) i NRCCC ITEMS 42 42 -

DEFICIENCY REPORTS 6 0 NSRAC ITEMS 2 0

', FAILURE AND MALFUNCTIONS 4 0 INPO ITEMS 2 0 EP ITEMS 8 2 OA RECOMMENDATIONS 21 o 1

REG AFFAIRS & PROGRAMS ITEMS 16 0 RADIOLOGICAL OVERSIGHT ITEMS 21 R i

TOTALS 130 44 ,

I i

i e

7 l

e .. ..

~

RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OPEN ITEMS

'l'. 1) ALARA PROGRAM -

2) ATTITUDE TOWARD RADIATION PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS

.. 3) ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ADHERENCE TO RADIOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS '

4 4

i a 5 j F l

l l

l

\

l l

l ALARA PROGRAM ;

9 i

1) 14 0UT' OF 18 PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY ORC FOR IMPLEMENTATION.

i

2) ONGOING ALARA TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR SUPERVISORS AND WORKERS. -

3) ALARA EXPOSURE BUDGETS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED FOR RFO #7 AND 1987 FOR EACH SECTION. THESE >

BUDGETS WILL BE ENFORCED BY EACH SECTION MANAGER.

o P

-I 9

l l

l ATTITUDE TOWARD RADIATION PROTECTION

_ REQUIREMENTS

1) UPPER MANAGEMENT FULLY SUPPORTS RADIATION

PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS AS AN INTEGRATED PART OF ALL WORK ACTIVITIES.

2) WE ARE IMPROVING THE INTERFACE BETWEEN ;

HEALTH PHYSICS, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATIONS.

3) HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL WILL NOT BE VIEWED AS "POLICEMEN" BUT AS CONSULTANTS TO ASSIST OTHER GROUPS IN EXPOSURE CONTROL AND REDUCTION. ;

l i

l 1

l I

10 l

l

ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ADHERENCE.

TO RADIOLOGICAL

. REG UIREMENTS I

1) ALL SECTION MANAGERS ARE TAKING AN AGGRESSIVE ROLE IN ENCOURAGING PERSONNEL ADHERENCE TO HEALTH PHYSICS REQUIREMENTS.

i

2) SECTION MANAGERS WILL HOLD THEIR SECTIONS ACCOUNTABLE FOR EXPOSURE BUDGETS AND WORKER COMPLlANCE.

[ 3) POSITIVE INCENTIVES WILL BE OFFERED FOR GOOD PERFORMANCE.

4) THE NUCLEAR OPERATIONS MANAGER HAS ASSUMED THE ROLE OF ALARA COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN.

i 5) ALARA PERFORMANCE WILL BE INCLUDED IN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS. l

, l l ,

l !

11 1

i

a ... . .

1 STATION DECONTAMINATION PROGRAM ;

i GOALS; .

. TO MAKE AS MANY AREAS OF THE PLANT AS PRACTICAL ACCESSIBLE IN STREET CLOTHES

. TO REDUCE RESPIRATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL IN ALL OTHER AREAS OFTHE PLANT .

l PLANS: !

. IDENTIFY EQUIPMENT CONTRIBUTING TO CONTAMINATION l.EVELS

. CONFINE LEAKS OR REPAIR EQUIPMENT ,

. DECONTAMINATE AREAS l ASSIGNMENTS: >

. OPERATIONS -IDENTIFY SOURCES OF !

CONTAMINATION AND CONFINE IF PRACTICAL

MAINTENANCE- REPAIR EQUIPMENT AND DECONTAMINATE AREAS ;

RADIOLOGICAL TRACK, SCHEDULE AND MONITOR :

f 12 i

,.,,-..___,.__,___-.._-..-_____,_..______,_.-___.___.--_.___,,_.4 _.,...m- - _ _ _ . _ _ , . - .

r

, , - . v. . ... .

Decontamination Project Goals Diaminated 1g880 0,3; I

f se Total Square Feet l

l e

l 1

I i

i

g.. -

. c. , . _

Controlled Area Contamination Status Areas by Contamination Level 4

Clean <1k 54.3%

. J

,,[ _

Cont. 250k 17.8%

I-Cont. hik <10k 15.8% . 'f = -

d

- Cont, klok <50k 12%

~

o Contamination Levels in Dpm/100 sq.cm.

4 9

4

l 1

1 PROGRESS ON DECONTAMINATION I

TO DATE

1) CONDENSER BAY-WILL BE "STREET CLOTHES' BY ,

NOV. 30,1986

2) HYDRO BLASTED FLOOR DRAINS REDUCED EXPOSURE BY 151 MANREM FOR RFO #7 f

3) HYDRO BLASTED CRD HEADERS REDUCED EXPOSURE BY 60 MANREM FOR RFO #7

4) ELIMINATED RESPIRATORY PROTECTION FOR 12 AREAS

5) REDUCED 14 AREAS TO "STREET CLOTHES" REQUIREMENTS i

0 l 13 l

l 1

l

l 4

Decontamination Project .

Goal !

1 e l

. r r

k' .

i Contaminated 12449 9.8" i

l i

i Clean 114900 90.2%

I i

Total, Square Feet 1

1 i

. l l

l I

t i

i i

...~.-- - - -- - - _,

'J Controlled Area Contamination Status Areas by Contamination Level 4

Clean <1k 54.3%

gr-

+i i '.'c .s.N W

=

s',s\'h'$$9(g: 5 n Cont.:250k 17.8%

M s- = =

Cont. :.1k <10k 15.8% N':(' =E

=_

V Cont. :a10k <50k 12%

i Contamination Levels in Dpm/100 sq.cm.

4

$d ?.. '.'. ,.

t s' -

a w . . ..

' . t 5 i

,84t* #e. l .

) ,.

IIIloth l i MCC4tmlu1IM btk( M t 804 PM 5 [

'.g I A8(4 uttt AR(4 !Niil&L C#fM!ballC4 *tCilff ($t Act Q. (ellet CMfMlui!M MAL (n( Hsg as 3 1, .

.? ! l IIIll/h pal, Mnta Mlle al3, p(A 13 Sa, (it 0 24 0 l s

'i E

~'

. 2 liill/h CMtuS(t NY 6' IIA Il St (it 3 24 0

.4 l I. 3 11/11/94 (Oaxmleft PUMP NY 21 (it 3 24 0 s i 4 till5th AN lt 7M (tr 3 24 6 .

1 2 3 11/15I84 lip #00R 3t (tr 3 24 0

- 6 il/22th IC;C (It 4R (It i 24 0 ;

7 III!!(96 (RD (*)AD (ItI/AOtt.T <!! l 24 0 f t

I 111:!/94 I IW8 valvt ROOM 78 54 ( l 24 0 l

., }

9 lI/2:lle (30 8(F41R IXM 3t (tr 6/4 (10t F T4 E 3 2 0 j

. t

'I I) 111:!/94 (84 510P6G( POOR 4t (It 3 24 0 i t

Il !!!!!Ik 4 f)* VALYE PXe 11 34< (*1900 (1t 1 ;4 0 \

l 0 !

!! !!!2:854 li(&9 IW4(l !!K (ICL 3 24 l

T: 0 i ll/2ile (5W th4CC(15ASLt 2 il 117fl.IMl(L8DLCCil ;

A bt p)sQ lt 4$X (11 1 144 4 14 11/29/06 15 lis;eih I sht l'J40 It :04 1860tl ill i 144 e i 16 I!M6ih lu:0PA'I:tM 1108 tilla) (!t II8. 'lH PLil 3 4 0 (

' 0 17 it/0eelt 8t*') Ma tXR tr ??t (+6041 (it 1/A. (! W We 3 4 4 18 3 4 1 11 1:186Ih 8 (L F A 7ILilR ROC 9 58 (18 6/8. (l(t Nr 3 :4 0 l' I N6/04 ML 8M N POM lt1:t

) 1:106/l4 G llki I W I CM l'or (!(4' 3 4 0 14 10K <lt 3 4 0

1 1:/13th (kim silft Py locq 2 !!/13th Chip talTE IMn IX9 !!!t (14 3 l4 0 23 12/ll/h 18[4T10 met (R F"mP 8X9 4f 20s (11 3 4 0 -[

i 1 '

'lta 3 ;4 0

l4 1:/13'54 1F(4f(D e.1T(t TAM RZR lt i

(11 3 2 0

!$ 12/13th (ChCinflaiORCCtS3LE6Antti :01 l

t

n 12dl3/N Ild RCal104 PW IX9 70s (tr 3 l4 f ;

i I

1 1

^

', a . . .

> t .. ; * -1.; ,

.2 , ,. ,. .

.: 'Y. _ . ,

l

. . Fate me. 2 11114I94 NCMtM!WilM SCWildt FCt thf 5 6ata utti nata lulilat toutMlW1104 Pfl0f!!v ($1 Act i CMtMinettp $ cal COM Wel >R$ )

l C. thethG

... i t

- c l

($M 2 200 0

!? 1:113/84 9 O/u L*Mt W$ltL ofed l

~

20 17tl3/Se $LVfit PV"P ROM 27t (l(< 3 24 0

29 1: l:0/14 FlatH) FILita 9004 A 341:t (!M 3 24 0 1

30 1:I:6/04 FL&1N) Fit,ttR p0C8I I 6t3M I4Mt (IM 3 24 0 !

l (IM 3 *4 0 j j 31 !!/;4/96 $C,LilF6CP0OR 147K 32 !!/20/94 FLK ptCYCLE 9009 16tt (IM 3 44 6

{

n.

(It ,

33 1:l:0/06 $lt7pv fast aate it V 3 24 0 1

34 til

0lle CWER F!Litt POM SM (IM 3 24 0 f

31 12/20/84 108 ;f CMM FILitt ADOM lt (it 3 I4 0

4 0 36 1: 127/f6 FILilatt PL*' 1%ft St-lo(< (50t 3 f

(!48 3 24 0 I

37 !!I: 7'l6 Flu $ UMP Asta 61 10M l

6 30 121:7/06 6 I t BC(9 !Mt QM 3 24 0 f

38 1:l:7/l4 614i IOhi l'OR ,

!!M , ($M 3 it 0 i

/

40 12/27/16 litt' Itlls the AWO FL,M M e8:4 (1M 3 24 0

)

i4 41 !!I:7/96 !!'flulia 21 104 (It 3 24 0 i f

42 1:i: tile mt it 4r (11 : 24 9 l

0 41 llI!'ll6 P'IC. taitt P W R%e it4 ( 16 3 6 I

44 1*/:7ti, pil;. taltt tAhn FXp 3t (it 3 6 0 ,

3 24 0 45 til10/l? CCh). MRlt.fW IC04 4 e4 I 121 (it l

A 46 till6'If ( N . Itplu, ptiti. 5:09 lt!x (It 3 te e i

4? 01/16'57 lin;l;ILita.((itsk:etli :t ,

(it 3 *4 0 [

(10t 3 14 0 !

46 41/10/l? C3) L CLN.41 ll 1.54

-l; 48 0!!!Nif UT 8t114 CLEMini 68E4 !! (It 3 l4 0

)

< tk 3 24 0 S) (1110i17 leCleeid IEC. 14w an. F0itt Ilt (It 3 $04 0 !

51 61/lbl7 108'.5 IOM TOP 6tt. 9011. Ir (Ic4 ;4 0 !

5: till?ll? Cttat 645tt tatt 200m etes 3 i

.s 36 . . ;. .

e e f ait Jo. 3

t liitell6 CICC41AMlWAftt4$CWituttTCtPhil atta WE D' attA 19111AL CC4fA91NAf!C4 PRID4]ff ($1 ACT NO. th1thi C0t!Arthat!C4 63&L (Oct W1 El 33 01/17/l7 CLtak salit Ft# #NM etas (tr 3 24 0 34 41/17/17 P/d 18UC ( XK li 5K <tr 3 l4 0 51 2:r (It 3 24 0

33 01/17/07 H0f PACHINE D OP 16 01/17/17 f(PA Elul Pilt. P.K R ttalhs VI814 K g $16. CCit BAtt lip. 3 144 0 .

0 0 0 0 l I i

0 0 0 0 I I I

t e

4

~

i l., Controlled Area Contamination Status l Areas by Contamination Level

' Clean <1k 45.1%

1 Q

L Cont. 21k <10k 25.1%

gV - Cont. 250k 17.8%

J'

~

Cont 210k <50k 12% '

Contamination Levels in Opm/100 sq.cm. j Controlled Area / Contarninat. ion vs. Cle an i

Floor Space lr ;'l ,g

g ,

ee "

e -

Contaminated l h h ,h ,

f- f I fg !

. q

$!Ilq

. ; y f

4 y .. . .

}; }; ;

l

,l 1 ...

E L ?

[ j' i ... .

i b b i

i

\

\ ?

l l f

i ;

Deo Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov se of t1-7-se

.__u.m _ -._%-__- u a = - --- . .-_ .

S S

OPERATIONS STATUS .

=

- STAFFING

- - TRAINING

- SIMULATOR

- BACKLOG /

Steven D. Hudson OperationsSection Manager

- - - _ . _ _ . . - - . ___.l.__.._.. .. - __ __ _ _

z. g .

OPERATOR STAFFING OBJECTIVE -

A Sufficient Number Of Licensed And Non-Licensed Operators To ,

Man A'6 Section Watchbill -

Q, p.,m,-,_-----------,-- -

,g__ yew ,m-+we -,,--w ,gg,w wy-- --%-wyy--g pg,mg y-- p, y,--9,- 9 yw.~y,-a~ - -m -- -m 7 --+ t ----' v P---- - ---- T-- 7 * - 2- - -wrr - -

.c. .: .: ; . - ... /. ..

't.

1 I

i

~

! t, ,

l BENEFITS TO BE GAINED - D i

Normal 40 Hour Work Week Avoids Excessive Use of Overtime i

i

! - Allows For Training, Vacation, And Extended Absences .:

1 1 "

l - Minimizes Short Term Operator Fatigue .

] 7 1

- Prevents Long Term Operator Burn-out Which Aids Stability Of The Group I

l i

i i

i , .

1

c RECENT ACTIONS TO IMPLEMENT STAFFING PLAN L

.- Complement increased From 39 To. 42 A '

- 9 Men Take Aptitude Test Nov ,1936

'. 1 9 Men Take Aptitude Test Dec ,,1986 j

- Tour School Scheduled For Jan6,1987 l .

i .

l - 5 R.O. Candidates Begin School in Jan ,1987 .

l l

i i

1

( 1 i n

a W (

R LU

/

O oT J _

l

)

c e 1 O N o l w

n a M u0 e r P s I P c I F

r e

n t

M R Jy o

e M

n S c

h o

r e

p C J o O h o

o t

(

M l

I I

O n g o n k C l l

M

'i l

.t

+ k E 1 4

f 1

5

/

o 8a x

1 1

A 2 1 #

1 a S )m 1 1

1 M

. nog .

gpOQ.Q(*3j(u

. jX "i Sg =cE i

c 2g {

gJ i

- g gJ .

i -

O 8

n 1 1 A __

/

3 W a

g 1 1 -

0

/

t c 1 S

1 8 h 6

R 1 O 1 O

1 S

c t h

o i

l N

o t -

1 1

/

5 1

/ 1 1 DT _

H 1 -

/ 6 /

Ie

/ lt5 F T8 o7 8 7 /

8 1 1

J 'A _

e 1 u 7 1 I

.b 1 r M S7 E R I N

I 8

7 E

E S

c N O l l FN S N ho -

S c 1 G ;

p AT o h 1 M

y l

4

(

N o o

1 S . _

A C S / R l I c

g ooh 3 .1 5

/

8 1 6

/ U'Ex C l l

l H

E l

7 5 a i

/ i MD _

c7 8 m

) p U oN fJL J

u 1 n tL y E gl

.l 0 niN S y 8 uP R R l J

7 iO n

O2 O

% a8/

l 6 S S !

I A

cM I

1 M c 5 E hE I

/ .

oN S 8

7 N o l

W l l

1 4 1

1 1

0 .

1 l

/

1 i l

N 2 _,

/ t 8

7 i l

D O

- R O i l

J .,

S t c .

h t -

o i F o

l '

l .

l y{M g A l

f 1

1 1

M 7 1

/ 1 J

1 1

5

/ 1 8 1J 6 l 1

, 1

? ,

, .z

-- a , ,

.,. .7.. .

i LICENSED REACTOR OPERATOR COMPLEMENT j 25 - -

1 i '

l 20 -

I i 18 l

! 15 -

, 14 l 12 i

! t m -

! 10 O '

i E .

l 8 '

i . 7 5 - '

l l

i l NOV 86 APR 87 JUN 87 DEC 87 AUG 88 ASSUME: 1) R.O. Leaves Operations Before April 87 *

! 2) 85% Pass R.O. Exam (_i-s. 712M ,

i

3) 1 More R.O. Leaves Operations Before Aug. 88 l

.. . . .. .= = -

.e .

it SIMULATOR STATUS

- Plant Specific Being Built -

in Montreal ..

- Acceptance Test Program Complete - Feb ,1987

- Prior to Start-Up -

,20 Hours of Hands-On Training -

per Shift

, - Emphasize Normal Plant S/U '

i and Operating Transients .

! - Revised Emergency Operating Procedures

~

i l

l l

l 1

l

ACTIONS TO ADDRESS OPERATIONS SECTION BACKLOG i'

~

c.

204 Items in the Backlog ..

~

i j -

Goalis to Disposition Allitems Prior to Start-up i .

Implement Specific items Prior to Start-up q We-N 1

2 Beco Engineers Assigned fj i as Co-ordinators .~

~

l 6 Contractor Engineers on Board December 1,1986 21% Complete as of Nov 19,1986 l

^- -

- . . . . ........a.

. .a. . , .i. . . 1 ~ u.

I j 4

i #

1 -W -

1 I

~

PILGRIM STATION .

l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR PROGRAM l

i Backgroured 1 .

Purpose of revised indicator system '

Revision process and current status Remaining plans -

m l

l '

\ .

1-m '- .. Ta' ' '.. . ,.

^

0: *~

9 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR BACKGROUND .

Started In 1985 5

-] INPO Overall Indicators -

~ E Currently 39 Reports .

~

w b

l

'1 l

1

, i. .

5 . , ,

4

. ,. .w,. .nw ..w , e u vr w . . . . .

4.d Tf MNG

.n P

.f....w e

1 l

l 4

2 ,

Forced Outage Rate aw %- i

,m . .

m. .

=. .

art . . 8 8's 3 Asp.se C det . . 2 Assese C

m. .

f

m. .

,e- .-

n... . .+.... e; : =:

.-._. ...._. . 5 ._ .

... w :=; : : ;

%s.,onn,o mr. ws.,u,u u % a.,o. o = r* w seru.,a u %s.,os tese test ites l

t i

l l

g '

i

,, Percent of planned available tirne that the unit was not available for production. l

, L. _. ...

i

i-

s' l ..

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR PURPOSE l.

l

~

j 1

1 _ '

Focus on Overall Results (Mission) -

Establish Responsibiltiy

~

l .

Cover ALL Management Aspects ;.

l

{

l i

1,

. . u. e : . . :.i.

c.

9 l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Z l SELECTION PROCESS & CRITERIA .

Safety: ,q Control of Hazards and Risk .

Nuclear, Radiological, Fire, Security, Ind., Env.

Reliability:

Power Generation-While At Power ,

Outage Control While Off - line E Management:

Effective Compliance with License & Tech Specs 'z Effective Prevention of Generation Loss '.

Effective Corrective Action Attainment of High, Third-party Ratings i

. . . ..V -

x - . .s a . *: : . t..

.a PERFORMANCE INDICATORS "

ROLE IN MANAGEMENT .

~

Performance Indicator Annual Reports Planning / budget

............................... Ex e c u t .ive

.......................... D e p a rt m e n t

~

Seetion Responsibility i

l Management ~i Reports

'r a a a A _

l l

l Performance > Performance Data -

1 N l

I -

. ., .. . m

. .w.m. u. . . .

, :N/

l .

l l .

l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS .

CATEGORIES i -

l Externalindicator sources

_ General plant / site indicators .

Work management system indicators l l Individualmanagement indicators ..

i .

i l General i

j Specific i

i

}

...y 1

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ;

EXAMPLES . ..

CRITERIA INDICATORS

of unplanned scrams, lost-time accidents O SAFETY:

radiation exposure, safety eystem unavailability O RELIABILITY: - Equivalent availability, forced outage rate,

' ~

outage duration / planned .

O MANAGEMENT: Expense / budget, backlog status, preventative .

maintenance overdue, training hours / planned, staffing status .

. .. .; .. . . .~- .

S l

REMAINING PLANS _

) '

l Performance Indicators Selected Complete Responsibilities Established Complete

_ Develop Goals (Trends) & Supporting December

] Plans i

Select Indicator Sub-categories December

~

i l

Plan for New Data Collection December l Revise Performance Monitoring January -

Report . .:

Revise Controlling Procedures February l

i l L_I implement New Data Collection As Pianned i Plans l

l -

l

,- -- - - - , , , - , . ~ ~ - - - -

.,-,r- -

. 5 ' -. ' * - r .

, - ' . . 9

=

r

. e g

a _

n .

- a M

n -

i o .

.. t c _

e -

S 6 .

- 8 g9 -

i n 1 r

N e4

. O o i i ne2 r z g e

. I T a r nb E

G m U .dl e

v

. L E. i e o R F N O

S E -

R _

G -

O L

K

. C

. A ~

B -

,4

I!lllb , ii s1]j; 1l!

j 4-

~

i BACKLOG RESOLUTION HAS BOTH A NEAR TERM l l

AND A LONG TERM PURPOSE

- N' ear Term: Recommend How The Backlog Will Be Dispositioned -

4 t

Long Term: Improve Work Management to Solve

- j Problems Rather Than Address Symptoms -

1 j -. *

4 BACKLOG WORK TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR - ,

r TO STARTUP HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTIFIED ,

Complete Commitments Required Before Startup ,

Address important Evaluation items (SALP, INPO) ; /.

Implement improvements Requiring Plant Outage

,

4

L' i -

i -

I SOME CURRENT BACKLOG WILL BE ,'

PERFORMED AFTER STARTUP i Long Term Program Will Become A Management Commitment Tool Emergent Work Will Be Integrated With Backlog

- Solution Of Broad Problems Will Become Basis For Setting Priorities Resolution Of Backlog Will Be_ Performed Aggressively f-e 3

g I '

l

.. . . . . . . . . .~ . - . . . . . . . ..

, o, e' ? ,

PART OF SUCCESSFUL BACKLOG RESOLUTION :

IS PREVENTING A NEW BACKLOG FROM FORMING Categorize Potential Work Based On Systems / Programs Define Problems On A System / Program Basis

) .

I . . :

Prioritize Work Based Upon Problem Solutions ;

I l

l Monitor Plant Performance To Verify Effectiveness Of Solutions O

e

.j'.-

TWO SEPARATE EFFORTS ARE _

ATTACKING THE BACKLOG f

Section Backlog" - Work Requiring Resources From A :

- Single Section/ Department .

- Work Not Yet Scoped Sufficiently For Planning

~

Organization Backlog" - Work Requiring Resources From More Than One Section/ Department . .

N' V :

d l - -

. .. - . . .. . . .. . , : . ,a .2 ,_

o.,

THE ORGANIZATION BACKLOG IS LARGE AND REQUIRES A SUBSTANTIAL COMMITMENT -

g/g*

- "Work Analysis And Review" Method Was Used y' l' Y V

- Key Managers Invested A Total Of 20 Man-Weeks ( 3'cd

~ ~

Over 1000 Significant Activities Were Analyzed ,

- Benefit

-Items Required For Startup

! - Problem Statements Generated Where Appropriate -

" /

3 War Room" Outputs input To Outage Planning And -

j Parallel Executive Review I

i Non Outage Scope Will Be Planned Before Startup l

i

-l _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . - - --_. . - . l

b e

THE WAR ROOM RECOMMENDS COMPLETION OF MORE' THAN 50% OF THE ORGANIZATION BACKLOG BEFORE STARTUP Sent To War Room 1261 Dispositioned To Section Backlog 425 Total Organization Backlog. .

856 Completed Or Cancelled During War Room 180 Complete Before Startup 332 Complete After Startup 306 Under Further Review 38 O

i O

i y

(

FUTURE USE OF WORK ANALYSIS AND REVIEW -

WILL IMPROVE PRESENT WORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

) :

b .

l System / Program Format Assures Common Basis For Work Management .

T i f - Problem Statements Provide Basis For Resource Allocation .

I i - Combining Operational And Engineering Perspectives Allows A

~

More Complete Perspective Monitoring Results Of Completed Work Will Verify Effectiveness Of Solutions .

2 l

l t

u.. . .-

i I

P ..

1 .

l WORK COXTROL PROCESS -

l .

i BACKUD P IOR 9/1186) .

\ . .

'l NEW WORK -

(AFTER 9/1/86) ::

i I _ , _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - - _

l :;-

OBJECTIVES g :

Q4~

- ~lDENTIFY ALL UNDERLYING WORK ACTIVITIES l ~ewn q -

i i -

ESTABLISH ACCOUNTABILTY j -

i DISPOSITION OF ALL ACTIVITIES .:

I i

l __.___-._.__:_. ._ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ - _ .

-y , ,

WORK SOURCE DEFINmONS NRCCO NRC ON SITE INSPECTIONS OPEN ITEMS D R'S OA DEFICIENCY R6 PORTS RESPONSE / ACTION ITEMS NSRAC NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW AND AUDIT COMMIME ISSUES RA&P (LIC) REG AFFAIR & PERFOoMANCE GROUP COMMITMENTS / ACTION ITEMS FaM FAILURE AND MALFUNCTIONS RESPONSE AND ACTION ITEMS INPO INSTTTUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS COMMITWNTS SALP SYSTEMAT1C ASSESSMENTOF UCENSEE PERFORMANCE REP ACT10N DEMS CT OPERATIONS REVIEW COMMITTEE REQUEST / ACTION ITEMS SPI SECURITY PROGRAM OF IMPROVEMENTS ACTION ITEMS OERP OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PROGRAM RESPONSES / ACTION ITEMS OAR QUALITY ASSURANCE RECOMMENDATION RESPONSES / ACTION ITEMS ANI AMERICAN NUCLEAR INSURERS COMMITMENTS' ACTION ITEMS E_P EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTION ITEMS ESR _ ENGINEERING SUPPORTPECUESTS PDC PLANTDESIGN CHANGES PCAO POTEFmAL CONDfTiON ADVERSE TO OUAUTY LSSUES MCAR P.%NAGEMENT CORRECTIVE ACT10N REQUESTS NCR NONCCNFORMANCE REPORTS BNP BROKEN NOTIFICAT10N POINTS SMA STOCK MATERIAL AUTHORIZAT10NS

_ SPEC INO STORES DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATION INOUIR1ES TEMP MODS TEMPORARY MOOlFICAT10NS PIP'S PERFORMANCE lMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ACTION ITEMS RCCS RADIOLOGICAL OVERSITE COMMITTEE ACTION ITEMS RIP RADIOLCGICAL IMPROVEMENT Pt>N OPEN ITEMS LE R'S LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS RESPONSES' ACTION ITEMS T.S REV Pl&G PICKARD, LOWE, & GARRICK TECH. SPEC. REVIEW ACT10N ITEMS DON DES!GN DEFICIENCIES NOTICES RCA RADICLOGICALCCOJRFENCE REPORTS M R'S MAINTENANCE RECUESTS AIP'S __

AVAILABILITY IMPROVEMENT PRCGRAM o

7.w

e l

ACCOUNTABILITY (OWWRS) v NUCLEAR DEPARTMENTS / FUNCTIONS SECTIONS i -

ENGINEERING OPERATIONS

~

OUTAGE MANAGEMENT RAD lOLOGICAL l

- NUCLEAR 0PERATIONS TECHNICAL I

AINMANCE .

- QUALITY ASSURANCE /

QUAUTY CONTROL SECURITY / TRAINING FIRE PROTECTION / COMPLIANCE NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES

~

i ORGANIZATION STAFF l

l EMERGENCY PREPARED.500 :/

l i :

. ~ . . . . ..a . . . . . .

. . - - . .u..

pISPOSITION OF ACTIVITIES .,.

SOURCE DOCUMENTS V% .

CORRESPONDENCE -

y-(EXTERNAL / INTERNAL) (/ WAR ROOM l

- - ,ds SELECTlVE '

gY N REVIEW M'

(

th a M -

, DETERMINE,/ TRACK ASSIGN ACTION DEVELOP PROGRESS CORRECTIVE ACTION -

PRIMARY 4 REQUIRED,

PLAN & + & ;

PROGRAMS

' PRIORITY, SCHEDULE MONITOR OWNER PERFORMANCE

. & URGENCY i 'NDICATORS i

i 5

AUDITS / INSPEbTIONS -

j :

I

!< WORK ACTIVITIES O ACCOUNTABILIT @ ulCPOSITION & MANAGE > -!

q

. i.

^' '

. , - . . . ... .W .-

e.

t i

STATUS Or eAcut0c (m/L) BNt 200W (W/Its). A89 NDP Womt (per/ts() ITDES IN THE N.R.C. CobedlTMDif CONTROL PROGflM8 AS OF 11-19-es f sA sA sA w/ ins m/tes 1st/ sus ses

sm/tec am m .

RESPONSIBILITY...................... TCTAL OFLT OPDs TOTAL OFLT CPDG TOTAL C #LT CPoe sets 51 20 31 39 8 31 22 2 20 m 3 3 1 1 1 1 NOD 2 2 N00 - MAINTDwsCE SECT!Cli 77 to 83 38 8 31 16 3 13 ,j N00 - MANACDdDiT SDtVICES SECTIcel 54 22 28 19 7 12 18 3 15 NOD - OPDIATIONS SECTIDH 96 30 96 26 4 24 34 12 22 N00 - RADIOLOGICAL SECTION 84 42 42 2 2 18 9 9 N00 - T[DedICA. SECTION 31 5 23 4 4 4 6 ON 11 2 9 1 1 3 2

] 1

) QAD 14 9 5 2 2 V.P. - NUCLEAR DeG.* & QUALITY ASSUR. 7 1 8 2 2 V.P. - NUCLEAR OPERATIONS 21 8 13 1 1 2 1 1 447 154 291 134 27 107 124 32 92 l i 12 recorde IIsted. -

~

e a

n-e.

d

1 4

. _ _ . _ - - - . -,y -- - -

i t e

SUMMARY

OVERALL WORK CONTROL PLAN

^

1 i

j .

DISPOSITION BACKLOG WORK

! COMPLETE WORK PRIOR TO STARTUP PL N AND SCHEDULE WORK TO BE ACCOMPLISHED AFTER STARTUP DISPOSIT!ON NEW WORK TO PRECLUDE NEW BACKLOG FROM DEVELOPING MONITOR PROGRESS VIA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS e

____._,._._-.-------v-

. .e--O . . . . ... .w. .u, .

.e .

BECO/NRC MEETING 11/24/86 AGENDA TAB 1 NRC Opening Remarks T. E. Murley -

TAB 2 Mork Activities Management J. M. Lydon TAB 3 Backlog Resolution R. E. Grazio TA3 4

Management Performance Indicators J. M. Ashkar Pilgrim Station Status:

TAB 5 - Operations Status S. J. Hudson TAB 6 - Radiological Status T. L. Sowdon RIP Order Closeout TAB 7 - Technical Status J. A. Seery TAB B - Mainten4nce Status M. N. Brosee TAB 9 - Management Service Status E. J. Ziemlanski TAB 10 Containment Enhancement Design / R. N. Swanson Schedule Status TAB 11 Organization and Staffing A. L. Oxsen R. N. Swanson

Appendix R/ Fire Protection R. Velez TAB 12

RFO-7 Schedule /Startup Checklist K. P. Roberts TAB 13

R. E. Silva TAB 14 Emergency Planning TAB 15 BECo Update on Various Activities A. L. Oxsen m

(

c.

t

/

VARIOUS ACTIVITY STATUS .

t

- RHR/ CORE spray pump inspection .

- Defective cable ,

- Fitness for duty 480V breaker study .

- INPO accreditation ,

- BECo/NRC office space

- Fire water system anomalies .

^

e e

e

' ~

I ORGANIZATION l

EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION l '

i Site organization structure undergoing review

- Significant authorized complement increase burdens existing structure l - Work activities management review process has identified .

l areas for improvement .

Retaihed management consultant firm - NCA -

- Interviewed 45 management employees .

! - Structured feedback sessions beginning 11/24

)

{

- Structured management seminars beginning 12/15 I

Comparing PNPS structure to top SALP BWRs '

- Monticello ,

c Millstone Ongoing Management search for best talent available in industry Goal is to. develop best nuclear team in Region i

VARIOUS ACTIVITY STATUS .

RHR/ CORE spray pump inspection .

- Defective cable

- - Fitness for duty -

480V breaker study

- INPO accreditation .

V

- BECo/NRC office space

. Fire water system anomalies >

e

ORGAXIZATION Qfl O

P ,

CHANGES SINCE 9/9/86

~

Created Security Group i

- Reports to management services section

- Group leader on board - 11/17 Created Fire Protection Group Reports to management services section ~

Group leader on board - 12/1 Created Systems Analysis Group '

Reports to technical section Group leader being selected ,

12 systems analysts ,

Created Waste Management Group 'l Reports to radiologocal section Group leader being selected t

i l

i c ORGANIZATION i

l CHANGES SINCE 9/9/86

~

l 1

. Upgraded training group to section level *

)

- Section manager being selected

. Chief radiological engineer hired .!

C. Gannon on board - 10/20 I 'i

. Vice President-Nuclear Operations Onsite -10/22 ;

Authorized complement increased 109 (30%)

since1/86 l -l !

1 i

i i

i

'l

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART .

A. L. OKSEN VICEPRESIDENT NUCIEAR OPERNI10NS 1

R. E. SILVA

~ ASST. EMERGENCY -

N N PREP N PREPAREDNESS COORDINA1DR ,

I E F.GEDUTIS .-

N.S.MCKENNEY J. F. CROWDER NG MP N ADMINISTRATIVE drill & 5%ERCISE NUCLEARTRAINING COORDINNIOR SPECIALIST Rev.2

ri Proposed :

i Emergency Prenaredness Organizational Chart Manager, Emergency

~

Preparedness l - Clerk ,!

I I

j Cnsite Offsite

~

Emergency Admin Emergency -

l Preparedness Asst. Preparedness Coordinator Coordinator l Plan, Procedures, Training Drilland Exercise '

Facilities Coordmator Coordm.ator Coordinator I

1

1986 Milestones: Completed to Date:

~

~ Successfully conducted FEMA siren test - 88.2% i i

. Relocated to state-of-the-art E.O.F. .

. Reorganized other emergency

~

facilities for better workability . .

i

. Installed teleconferencing system at all emergency facilities

Increased Permanent Staff Complement from 1 to 5

. Successfully conducted Semi-Annual H.P. ,

Drill b

l ,

EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESSMILESTONES (CONT.) .

~

~ Conducted E.O.F., T.S.C., O.S.C., Media Center and Recovery Center walk-thru drills ,.

Conducted 2 full scale drills

Commissioned new Evacuation Time '

Estimate (E.T.E.) and comprehensive -

traffic management plan

Revised PNPS Emergency Plan, Procedures '

and Emergency Notification List

Reorganized PNPS Emergency Response c Organization

Developed and submitted AnnualExercise '

Objectives .

I

7 , ,

1 6

)

1 I

EMERGENCYPREPAWDNESS MILESTONES (CONE) i *. Instituted action item tracking system i

Conducted successful call out of assigned emergency personnel l -* Conducted training sessions for approximately '

! 100 local and state officials l

l

Represented company at local town meetings .

I and State Senate Meeting

Visited other S.A.L.P. -1 Sites

Staff Attended Numerous Emergency Preparedness Seminars and Courses .

j

Attended Millstone's Annual Exercise 1

7 . . ,.

t

START-UPCHECXLISTS i

ONECHECXLISTWILLNOTBESuffICIENTTOENSURETHATOURSAFETY, COMPLIANCE, :

P HANAGEMENTEffICIENCY,RADIATIONANDEXPOSUREARENET!

, WEWILLUTIlllECHECXLISTSFOREACHMAJOR"0PERATIONALCONDITIO CHANGE, i

l

\ -

(

l l !

I B

w;.

4.

. :.s . .ua..

ATTACHNENTII

'4 .

MILESTONESlCHECKLISTSTRATWILLBEUTILIZE0f0R-REfUELOUTAGE#7

1. TESTING OF REFUEL BRIDGE COMPLETE - 0FF LOAD CORE CHECKLIST

- 2. COMMENCE RELOADING FUEL CHECKLIST 4

3. RELOAD COMPLETE CHECKLIST l '4 MYORO CHECKLIST

S. ILRT CHECKLIST

6. PRE-CRITICAL CHECKLIST

7. HEAT-UP CHECKLIST .

8. POWER ESCALATION CHECKLIST 1

,i i

PAGE 1 0F 1 i

f.. l. . . N . . . . . ..

CHECXLISTF0NT mAc = m CHECXLIST Q - RERlEL BRIDGE TESTING CWLETEl0 1.0 HARDWARE ITEM ,

!.1 Systems / Equipment Required I.2 Plant Modifications (PDC's) 1.3 Plant Temporary Hodifications (TM's) (TM Log Book) 1.4 S'ystem/ Equipment Maintenance Requests and Procedures, including Preventive Maintenance (PM) 1.5 Failure and Malfunction Reports (F&MR's)

~

I !!.0 SOFTWARE ITEMS

!!.1 Operating / Maintenance - Surveillance Procedures (ST's)

II.2 Temporary Procedures (TP's)

!!.3 New or Revised Operating / Surveillance / Maintenance Procedures II 4 Defletency Reports (DR's) '

II.5 Non-Conformance Reports (NCR's)

II.6 Potential Conditions Adverse to Quality (PCAQ's)

II.7 Training II.8 Engineering 5-upport Requests (ESR's)

II.9 Drawings and Vendor Manual (Associated with Modifications) 11.10 Operating Expertence Review (OER), including "Conditional" Safety Evaluatious III.0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ITEMS

!!!.1 App 1tcable Technical Specification Including Changes

!!!.2 Technical Specification Concerns IV.0 NRC RELATED ITEMS 1V.1 NRC Commitments / Concerns and Licensee Event Reports (LER's)

V.0 EMERGENCY PLAN ITEMS V.1 Emergency Plan Issues for Criticality / Power Operations VI.0 BACKLOG PROJECT ITEMS VI.1 BacAleg ,Recommendattons VII.0 PROGRAM ITEMS (Rad Protection, Fire Protection, Security, Housekeeping, 6 econ,etc.) .

VIII.0 "PUNCHLIST" AND OTHER ITEMS

4 , 8 . . . . . . .

g

- II es m

. W B M M o E

3 .

s , .

U aa 8 a.

0

M g -5 8 - w 5 $ =

$ !l !$

5 l ga m

~

li, e

a

_ lilli!I!!ililli i,

E E - * -

8 $ W e

g sE WWm 55 -

H

- - g af g; w B -i O .

m cs: M u .<

8

. e,,

.s. -c

~. . , . ,. . .'

i SEC0/NRC MEETING 11/29/86

~

AGENDA

/

NRC Opening Remarks T. E. Murley j ,

2

Work Activities Managemens J. M. Lydon * /

R. E. Grazio J* Backlog Resolution M* Management Performance Indl utors J. H. Ashkar /

Pilgrim Station Status:

.7 - Operations Status S. D. Hudson !

f - Radiological Status T.L.Sowdon!

RIP Order Closeout 7 - Technic i Statui J. 4. Seery /

p - Maintenance Status ,

M. N. Brosee /

E. J. Zieslanskt /

f - Management Service Statu

/O

Containment Enhancement Design /

Schedule Status R. N. Swanson

//

Organization and Staffing A. L. Orsen/R. N, Swanson

/2* Appendin R/ Fire Protection R. Velez /

/3

RFO-7 Schedule /Startup Checklist . K. P. Roberts

/M' Emergency Planning R. E. Silva /

/[ BECo Update o,n Various Activities A. L. Ousen [

9 9

0

?^

FIRE PROTECTION / APPENDIX R STATUS -

t t

i R. Vdiez -

Project Manager :

November 24, 1986 -

P e

1 ~

/

BOSTON EDISON HAS TAKEN PRUDENT STEPS TO IMPROVE THE '

FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM ',

Comprehensive Program Review Completed Candidate improvements Targeted j Program Integrated With Appendix "R" Project Goals Set To High Standards Strong Corporate Support Committed Project Controls Developed .

Schedule Supports Pilgrim Startup ,

a

?

~

THE IMFJOVEMENT PROGRAM INCLUDES HARDWARE AND PROGRAMMATIC ELEMENTS Walkdown Of installed Equipment Repair, Replace Or Test Units As Required

, Establish Individual Qualification Files 1

Comprehensive Review Of Licensing Commitments Simplified Procurement Specifications i i

Review Of Surveillance Requirements 1

- Use Of Computer Data Base Management Systems t I ;!

t

!_____l_____-_..____.___.___.._.__.________ -

.i_- _ _ _ _ __ _

l l .,

i :-

! THE FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM AND -

i APPENDIX 'R' PROJECT ARE CLOSELY TIED. ;i

~:

. Fire Protection The establishment of Fire Boundaries, Hardware, and

~

I Procedures necessary to contain and combat a fire within a specified area.

10 CFR50 Appendix R

. a The establishment of Systems and Procedures .!

necessary to ensure that the plant can be safely shutdown in the event of a fire coincident with a loss of offsite power. ,

i . .!

l .q l .

. _ ~

i l .:

j .

I BOSTON EDISON HAS COMBINED THE FIRE PROTECTION .

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND APPENDIX 'R' PROJECT l

UNDER ONE MANAGER ,

1 i !

. Programs .'.re Closely Related And Must Remain Current for the Life of The Plant Program Requirements Are Similar To EQ i

1

- Manager's Previous EQ Experience is Transferable and I '

l Can Achieve Similar Results ,

s l i

t i

j___________-_-___--________-.______

a o w a O'

THE FIRE PROTECTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IS A MAJOR cl UNDERTAKING ADDRESSING MANY INTERRELATED CONCERNS m

MEFEREMCE POINTS T

,%ce a.

seens.y ;____ _

1

=,

/ 8"*****

"* 1. asem c.eens oN, j ['*****

w

?

DM gg o

n., c "a'::::"*"

. g *a*:;*

,c -

L ; 11 1a.-. -

y c,

"****' i

4. Decommune husennesen m_ 7-_ :

c ".::'::::"

J N ,,,,,,

,R***4' i s.10 m l

,=

o i Ch.ch 31-05 e aseen Caet Fim i

e

THE MAGNITUDE OF THE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ._

REQUIRES SUBSTANTIAL RESOURCE COMMITMENTS -

Each of 4100 Components Require ',

-Independent Field Verification

~

-As-Built and Qualification Records Searches Administrative Control Systems Required To Ensure

- Prioritization of Walkdowns

- Proper Notification of Deviations

- Adequate Definiton of Corrective Actions Options To Be Considered include: .

- Repair Existing Equipment .

- Replace With Qualified Units

- Test To Prove Qualification

- Documentation Must Be:

- Complete .

- Auditable

4

! .t j

~

l RESOURCES TO UPGRADE THE FIRE PROTECTION -

=<

PROGRAM HAVE BEEN MOBILIZED Penetration Walkdown Preparations Complete .j

-Inspection Procedures Approved ,

- Team Members Trained .

- Walkdown uence Established

} - Resources to rrect identified Deliciencies Available

~

Walkdowns in Progress r

l 15 Full-time Engineers Assigned

- Licensing Specialist Expected Mid-December ,

i i Site Fire Protection Personnel Reorganized I

Project Schedule Will Support Startup I i 1 i i i

! -i

APPENDIX "R" MODIFICATIONS CONTINUE ON-TRACK i AND ARE NEARING COMPLETION -

i R

- Project Records Are Under Compliance Review

- Over 150 items Of BECoJNRC Correspondence f 22 Appendix "R" Plant Design Change Packages

- Support Documentation Being Assembled t

- Engineering Support Of Construction Continues ;

- 5 PDCs in Engineering

- 5 PDCs Ready For implementaten , 1 i

3 - 6 PDC's Under Construction 6 PDC's Completed j - No Start-up Impact Expected For Appendix "R" Project l .! '

i i ,.

E l C'

'/

INCREASED CONSTRUCTION AND TESTING EFFORTS ARU ,

EXPECTED DURING THE NEXT CAi_ENDAR QUARTER Walkdown Data Will Determine:

- Failure Modes and Trends

- - Option Selection (Testing / Repair / Replacement)

Staffing Will Adjust To Support Construction / Testing

- Construction .

- Health Physics

- Quality Control

- Engineering Deviation Reports and Compensatory Measures Will Conform To Tech Specs

- Resident inspectors Will Be Kept informed Of Status i

'a l

^

~

THE PROGRAM PLAN IS AGGRESSIVE AND SUPPOWTS ' .;

BECO'S COMMITMENT TO IMPROVED PLANT FIRE PROTECTION .

9 Dec . Jan '87 Feb . Mar' Apr--

May = Jun l

l Walkdowns Repair / Replace

! Testing Qual Files -

1 Procurement Spec l

l C%'mitment Eval N,'.? Review l

. Upgrade Training -

i e

9

t I

i i

i .

~

J l

i

! NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT .

ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING

~

j l

I

! i I

i l

i l R.N. Swanson '

l Nuclear Engineering Manager l

November 24, 1986

i. ,

i e

e

l <

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MISSION.

t

) - Maintaining The Licensing And Design Bases i

\ .

) Changing The Licensing And Design Bases 1

i i

Interpreting The Licensing And Design Bases i

i l

I j .

~~ ~ --- - --

~

. - s. . . . . ._ _ .. -

4 9

NEM

Deputy Mgr TO 4 Deputy Mgr P Secretary i

l j Civil Fluid Control Power Systems & Nuclear Site Project -

, Structural Systems Systems Systems Safety Analysis Engineering Mgrs i Analysis (3) 4 I

l 1

1 i .

I i

e

, 9

l .

i THE NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WAS S' ;

REORGANIZED TO ENHANCE MISSION PERFORMANCE : l-Organized By Major Functions =

i Reduces Number Of Direct Reports To NEM r l _

Places Senior NED Manager On Site .

Adds Licensing Capability Parallels Station Organization

~.

+

! t l r i

I !

j .

. r.

.g NEM />/ p6 -

) \\ ,

e t

Secretary .e

?

9 Fleid Licensing &

sign Analysis

~

Section Engineering Section Section ,

I l

Civil Fluid Control Power Site Regulatory Nuclear Systems & Reliability Structural Systems Systems Systems Engineering Affairs Analysis Safety Analysis Office Analysis

k Robert V. Fairbank, Jr.

Licensing and Analysis Section Manager Nuclear Engineering Department MBA - University of Pittsburgh ,

BSME - Northeaster.. Jniversity Otility (BECo.)

. Deputy Manager - Nuclear Engineering ,

. Fluid Systems Group Leader

. Project Manager - Post TMl Response Control Systems Engineer Architect /Enaineer (Bechtel Power Coro.)

. Control Systems Group Leader

. Field Engineer NSSS (Westinahouse Electric Coro.)

Design Engineer 2 Comoonent Manufacturers (Ruggles Klingemann Mfg. Co.)

(Lawrence Pump & Engine Co.)

. Design Engineer

~ -

Charles H. Minott Design Section Manager Nuclear Engineering Manager MSCE (Project Management) - MIT -

BSCE - Univeisity of Massachusetts (Amherst)

. Project Manager - Engineering / Procurement / Construction

-Total Budget $25 Million

- Average Variance 4%

. Project Engineer- Engineering Design Contracts

- Maintenance of Pilgrim 2 Equipment

. Cost Control Engineer - Management Control System Development Research Assistant - Cost Estimating incorporating Risk Assessment

. Chairman - Capital Improvement Committee, -

Town of Hanover .

Past Member - United Cerebral Palsy Association ,

Metro Boston .

4 4 p - ,

Robert E. Grazio Fleid Engineering Manager Nuclear Engineering Department MBA - Babson College .

BSMET - Central New England College of Technology

- US Naval Nuclear Power Training . ,

, Utility (BECo.)

. Systems & Safety Analysis Group Leader

. Senior Engineer - Outage Management

. Senior Engineer - Systems A'nalysis Architect /Enaineer (Stone & 'Nebster)

. Design Engineer (Mechanical)

U.S. Navv

. Nuclear Support Facilities Supervisor (Radiological)

. Engineering Watch Supervisor 1

4

. 0.

, ~-, - - . _ . - - - - - _ _ _

?

1 5

j NED STAFFING STATUS (11/24/86) ,

d IL 1 .

l Authorized Complement 94 ,

i .

l Personnel On Board 81 -

Offers Extended 2 f

\

Hiring Recommendations 3 j ..

Interviews in Progress

! 4

! "Posted" 2 .

I

! On Hold 2

-1 Possible Upgrade l

-1 Possible Transfer

}

I Total NED Openings 13 ,

l

\'

q- -_ -_- _.

~

i' j

I i SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM .

l, - :-

l ~

UPDATE i

4 1 .

1 ,

0

)

1 R.N. S son j'

Nuclear Engineering Manager November 24, 1986 i

\ . . . . .. .

l l

y j h

.i _

i i

THE SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM OUTAGE GOAL i RESPONDS TO THE DRAFT NRC POLICY ,

l Respond And implement Containment improvements

! Responsive To Draft NRC Policy Prior To Startup.

J I Revise Procedures And. Train Operators To improve Operational Readiness For Beyond-Design-Basis 1 Events. -

) .

i l

I 1

l t .

! e

. 5

e 1

! PROPOSED NRC "SEVERE ACCIDENT T

( -

-CONTAINMENT" POLICY FOR BWR'S ,

1 l

l Hydrogen Control -

s j - Prevent Containment Failures in Expected i, Accident Sequences including Station Blackout :

l i Reliable Containment Drywell Sprays

- Operable For Broad Spectrum Of Accident

, Saquences including Station Blackout f.

I Reliable Containment Wetwell Venting

! - Operable At Design Pressure Conditions To Prevent ,

l Containment Overpressure Failure And To Maximize j Use Of Suppression Pool As Filtering Medium I Core Debris Barriers '.

1 l - Evaluate Paths For Core Debris Travel

- Add Barriers if Needed To Protect Suppression Pool i

j Emergency Procedures And Training l - Review And Modify As Necessary To Ensure Operators Are i Able To Recognize Severe Accident Conditions -

u l And Use Plant Equipment To Best Advantage -

4 j

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM STATUS - 11/24/86 Issue improvements Comments Hydrogen Control No Major Change Consider More Restrictive -

Deinerting Limits Prior To Startup Containment. Spray Firewater Intertie To Valve Control Alternatives Containment Spray in Station Blackout Optimize Drywell Conditions Under Study Spray Rate Containment Venting 8" Hard Pipe Vent Strict Operational From Wetwell To Guidance For Use To '

Main Stack Be Provided -

( %T5 .

Core Debris Barriers No Design Changes Focus On Drywe:I Sprays .

t

. k

f . .,

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM STATUS - 11/24/86 Issue improvements Comments e

Emergency Selected Revision To - Review Procedures -

Procedures CurrerJ EOPs Against .

& Training ^

Revise Procedures - Dra EOPs Based On For Station Blackout ev 4 EPGs -g N 'W

- Train Operators , W Other Third Diesel Generator To - Complete Root Cause improvements Emgrgenp Buses Analysis / Upgrade -

SupplyW 4 gjo Reliability Of Complete ATW Recirc Pump Trip Breaker Rule Modifications

% MJ Exnov W

~

( .

1 4' l

l

~

l :

i 4

~

l t

l NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT -

~

4 SUPPORT BACKLOG STATUS l -

i R.N. Swanson Nuclear Engineering Manager i November 24, 1986 l

i

)

{ .

l I ..

NED IS COMMITTED TO ELIMINATE r i

SUPPORT BACKLOG BY STARTUP .

. ?

! . Target is 80% Closed By Year End 1 :

. Target is Ambitious, involves Substantial Resources .

j -

t Scoping And Planning Required 280 Management 1, Manhours 1

- 4300 Manhours Of Contract Help Added To NED Staff

. Progress To Date Shows That Target is Achievable ,

i I

l l

\

j I NED IS ATTENDING TO NEW WORK TO PREVENT RECURRENCE OF A BACKLOG .

i I

l 228 New Requests Received Since 9/1/86 ,

{ - Efforts To Resolve Open items Are Producing Results J

! 11/1 11/17 Change '

-Items Actively Working 584 459 .'

j .

- Items Scheduled To Beain Iri 1987 50 50 1 I

Total 634 509 125 .

NED Has Already Closed 210 items ~

11/1 11/17 Change

- 9/1/86 Items Closed-Out 41 144 -

) - New items Closed Out 28 66 Total Closed items 69 141 Q10 i

j ,

. gi < g* , , e ,

l 9

3 3

H

. g '

w

{,

N SE .

C -

C ,

g

>w '

r b

A O .

N Cc r

i I

i .

j i

) OBJECTIVES 1

j '..

improve the overall physical protection .

program at Pilgrim Station through :

- complete reanalysis of regulatory requirements -

i .

upgrade of program documents $d (

es r upgrade of hardware

~

- ~/.

i .

- strengthening of management controls l

0 41 e 9

~

BENEFITS -

9

~

- Increased awareness, visibility, emphasis and sensitivity to security requirements ;

Simplification of program documents I

to facilitate revisions and reviews ,

i,

- Enhanced Security Force performance ),

with state-of-the-art hardware .

9 -

i 4

V BF1 , ,

Q

) >

OUTLINE .

i .

j . - organization

e

! - Regulatory. Requirements Analysis ~

1 l

1 4

- - Hardware .

j - Facilities ' !

l r l

- Tra. .ining a,

- Corrective Action Systems ,

l Management Controls :

1 2 .

l f-e OIA .

i

. +

+ - - -

JOT '

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES SECTION

~

Resource Protection -

Training Group Compliance Group

& Control Group .

- Fire Protection -

- Security .

- Industrial Safety ;

- Medical O-1

- - ' ~ ' ' ~ ~ ' ~ '

, . _ . . . . . .~ , , . . , .

O J

4 l

4 . .

~

NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES SECTION i

j

-~

Compliance Fire Protection T' Security . Trainin9 l ~

group Leader 4-Group l

Group $ Group l ; Leader Leader Leader .

1 .

i

\

a1

)

f' O-2 l

1 i .

l

\

1

.l

)

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS .

I 9

PURPOSE: To ensure that regulatory requirements are met l.

l .

by existing programs and procedures.

l PRIMARY PRODUCT: Revision to MASP cor.sistent with

) format of NUREG 0908.

All 10 modules completed.

l STATUS: .

j . Preparing for working level l meeting with NRC. e' i

^qg d

! ,g\h% pgf p A h\f i

! ue

) R-1 i

t I

1 i

i i

l HARDWARE IMPROVEMENTS ~

a l

Barriers g# ' ~

l -

1 . ,

! CCTV l .

I i

Intrusion Detection i

~

Access Control ruf W M Y l Lighting ;

i l

)

II-1 1

Sc OVERALL APPROACH J Engineered improvements to provide .

State-of-the-art equipment :

Increased design margin

- Accommodation for changes in physical arrangement of the Site Increased operational efficiency O

H-2 e

i 1

i I

\

^

. pd i

SCHEDULE .j j

Detailed design change packages

[ gi i d Working-level meeting with NRC yj (W

i I / -

Implementation schedule commitments l .;

l 1

i l

i i

l 11-8 I

i , .

s, .-

FACILITIES .

i

- Private office location for BECo Security management ,

( i i

! - Additional office / working / lunchroom space for

}

j -

Security force -

.l ,

l

- Improving various posts (Bechtel Warehouse; Alternate '

i Access Gate) :

l - Long-term space needs '!

l b

t t

! . l l F-1 t

l . --

. h.

~

I 1 TRAINING ':

I -

l

! - Module to ensure Security takes responsive .

corrective action with thorough follow-up - 11/86 l .

i

- Overview module f5r BECo Senior Management - 11/86 I -

l Establish initial technical training module for

~

f -

the new BECo Security Management

i -

T-1 ,

3,_.--.- ---

j .

i i

l I . .

i -

M j '

j CORRECTIVE ACTION SYSTEMS '

\ .h h

/

~

i h{

~

! NOP 83A9- Corrective Action Program Monthly trends being established i ~

1 Initial trend analysis report (Jan.1987) ll 1

t

~!

I j C-1

[.

d MANAGEMENT CONTROLS ..

- Established separate group

~

. Strengthening controls over contractor performance l

- Adding key BECo positions

- Establishing performance objectives and criteria

- Continuing with inter-company comparisons .

M-1 ,

e

.V w

FUTURE PLANS A

~

f

. Continual improvement through a structured ,

self-assessment process. g, W flgR FQ Enhanced integration of security organization into overall station operations -

Continued reduction in dependency on

~

contractor support ,

FP-1

}

e '

4 1

l 1

~

l NMSS BACKLOG i .

1 Status j

Backlog identified and quantified 40 j yr p /

Contractor selected and P.O. issued 'Y.

~

.c f Plans I

Contractor support at full strength by '

December 1,1986 :

i i

! Disposition schedule established B1,1 l _. .

L 1 -

THE WORK CONTROL SYSTEM PROVIDES THE u l MANAGEMENT CONTROL OF THE MAINTENANCE ACTI~ONS l

l

- Maintenance Request Status 9/ '

]

l l

- Maintenance Planning i

1

- Scheduling Integration ,

~!

~

I l

i

.e i .

TOTAL MAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE INCLUDES MANY CONSIDERATIONS -

4 ,

I r f

i

) -

i i - Task Priority -

i

-- Plant / System Conditions :;

1

! - Fundamental Resources ,

i l - Coordination & Availability of Support Activities

! - Related Tasks & Work Activities I

i ,

I i

I ~

j .x

', E I -

1 THE CONDUCT OF MAINTENANCE SUPPORTS PLANT -

OPERATION IN A SAFE AND EFFICIENT MANNER l

i .

i Activity identification & Correction

~

l _

1 -

Work is Properly Authorized & Controlled

'l

- Adherence To Station Policies & Procedures l

- Minimize Radiation Exposure ..

i '

r'-

i i . .

. , .=. .. ,. . .: . ,

- --c. .- ;p i

f-MAINTENANCE GROUP f, '.

c o.

CHEFMANTENANCE ENGINEER (C M E )

R E. SHERRY ~

s ASSISTANTTO CME C.EDIROS ,

STAFFENGtEERS CLERK (2)

_ht CH (OPEN) ASSISTANT ELECT (OPEN) CHEFMANTENANCE ENGNEER .

P.J.MORAITES

_ LLC (OPEN) .

- CLER(

t INSTRUMENT MANTENANCE ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL pg SN EFGNEER ENGNEER m ,

M.R.MAGUIRE q 1 VENDER PS & CC --- #' JA N .

2 SUPERVISORS 4 SUPERVISORS 4 SUPERVISORS 3 SUPERVISORS .

P.GNETTY (E.UC.M)

B.COBB (OPEN) R.nkCUE E.SPAKOSKI -

(OPEN)

! HS.SHIDNER ISAOCOACH (OPEN) (OPEN) *

! 14 ELECTRICIANS 22 NCT's 27 MECHANICS 4

t

. r

t MAINTENANCE GROUP ,.,

CHEFMANTENANCE ENGINEER '

(C M E)

R ESHERRY s ASSISTANTTO C M E C.MED=YS -

STAFF ENGrEERS CLERK (2)

ADDITIONA ASSISTANT CHIEFMANTENANCE ENGINEER -

STAFF ELECT (OPEN)

~

I & C (OPEN)

CLERK -

~

ELECTRICAL RECHAMCAL A

ENGREER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER ,

MA MAGUIRE G.LAR)ND J. VENDER JAGAEDTKE PS&CC &

2 SUPERVISORS 4 SUPERVISORS 4 SUPERVISORS 3 SUPERVISORS (E*I/C.M) ADDITIONA .

RCOBB P. N PLANNERS '

(OPEN) R.McCUE ESPAKOSKI (OPEN)

D.OLEARY RR REARDON RLYONS E M DNER J.SACCOACH (OPEN) (OPEN) ,

14 ELECTRICIANS 22 NCT's 27 MECHANICS .

lI - l l l ADDITIONAL SUPERVISORS AND LABOR FORCE W i

j ..___.....~s ._ . ,. .._ . . ..

.y i

~

! OPEN MAINTENANCE GROUP BACKLOG MR'S i

f 1

OPEN BACKLOG MR'S AS OF 9/1/86 = 1891 .

BACKLOG MR'S COMPLETED 9/1/86 TO 11/19/86 = 288 ,

l BACKLOG MR'S OPEN AS OF 11/19/86 = 1603 i ,

OF THE 1603

. OUTAGE MR'S = -491 1112 PM MR'S =

~

l -15 j 1097 TEST MR'S = -58 l 1039 -

! MISC - CMG,ETC. MR'S = -249 i 790 ,

i l

i i l l .

O.

t l

l THE BACKLOG TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS WILL BE .

i DISPOSITIONED PRIOR TO STARTUP . ,.

2 i 1

3

! r i

Maintenance 53 :

I l

Technical 19

~

Operations 2 .

-l Construction 2 1

i Other 5 l.' i.

l

.t q

i 81 t

. . - , , . . - - . . _ , , . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --,----,--.-.r-, - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - .- . - - - . - , . - - , ., m. .

) i 1 ;t i i l

l .:

+

1. (

l i

TECHNICAL SECTION BACKLOG DISTRIBUTION

.J i

70-60 -

O 50- . '

F 40- i T 30 A

S 20-K 10-0 Eii i i " i -- i i i i i i i LER INPO QADR F8M ENER PIP TEMP NSRAC OAR PFC OERP UCEN PREP MODS .

DOCUMENT NAME .

l E BACKLOGCOMPLETE E BACKLOG 6 '

l i

(1/ pi o 7' CPh

V .

I l 1 l

j - ,

I_ -

l

> PILGRIM STATION TECHNICAL SECTION .

l, l

~

1 TECHNICAL SECTION REORGANIZATlUON ., .

i Objectives

)

Old An'd New Organization ,

I Benefits To Be Gained i

i Status And Plans -

I I TECHNICAL SECTION BACKLOG ShTUS l :.

(

i

. . . m m . r, i

l L

1 .

l OBJECTIVES L v!

- Develop "System Specialists", Accountable :

For Performance And Material Condition Of R l Important Plant Systems . j

! t i

i

- . Strengthen Program And Methods For Review

, Of Operating Events At Pilgrim And Industry ;

- Provide Operations Section With Dedicated l n 3gg W

~

Technical Resources

- Provide Software And Hardware Specialists, Dedicated To Support Three Major Computer '

l Systems:

l '

l Plant Process Computer And SPDS [

Security Computer -

Training Simulator Computer .i

'i

- Apply increased Emphasis To Programs For '

.[

Containment Leak Rate Testing And f in-Service Testing l1 i

. l

'J OLD TECHNICAL SECTION ORGANIZATION t

~

Technical Section -

Manager (1)

. I I On-site Safety & Technical Group Performance Group Leader Grouf (1 Chief Engineer (1)

- Shift Technical Advisor (10) - Sr. Mechanical Engr. (1)

- Sr. Electrical Engr. (1)

- Performance Analysis Engr. (2)

- Nuclear Technician (1) - Sr. I&C Engineer (1)

- Sr. Waste Mgmt. Engr. (1)

- Sr. Reactor Engr. :

- Sr. Chemical Engr. (1)

- Reactor Engr. (1) .;

- Nuclear Technician (3) ,

- S.O.D. Computer Support (4) -

S

NEW TECHNICAL SECTION 7 ORGANIZATION Technical Section Manager (1) Administrative '

Assistant (1)*

1 1 Technical Group On-site Safety And Systems Performance Group Chief Engineer (1)

Group Leader (1) . Group Leader (1)

-Sr. Mechanical Engineer (1) -Sr. Reactor Engineer (1)"

-Sr. Systems Sp'ecialist (9)*

-Sr. Electrical Engineer (1) -Reactor Engineer (1)"

-Systems Specialist (3). -Reactor Engineer Techs. (3)"

-Sr. Engineer - Operating -Sr. l&C Engineer (1)

-Nuclear Ops.. Dept. Computer Experience Review (1)" -Sr. Waste Management Engineer (1)

Support Personnel (7)"

-Admin Assist - Operating -Sr. Chemical Engineer (1) " '

Experienco Review (1)" -Technical Engineer (1) E n er f2) -

-Nuclear Technicians (1)

-Sr. Engineer - LLRT/lLRT/ -

IFT (2)"

( )* New Position '

( )" Existing Position, But Reorganized

( ) Existing Position Not Reorganized I

e 9

TECHNICAL SECTION .

MANAGER -

jj i ADMINISTRATIVE

! ASSISTANT -

~

i I

! SYSTEMS TECHNICAL ON-SITE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE j GROLP GROLP GRCU)

! - System Specialists . Mech, Elect, And - Reactor Engineering I & C Component /

- Operating Experienc' Equipant Support - Computer Application, Review Operations And Maintenance I

- Radwaiste Support I

- Programs For Containment

! - Chemistry Support Leak Rate Testing And In-Service Testing -

l

- Temporary Mods

- Performance Analysis ,

jl - Technical Reviews And DPU Support -

l 1

- Betterment Projects 3

l i

i I

l , .

eg i BENEFITS TO BE GAINED 1 l

- Improved System Performance Due To Sense of Ownership And Accountability By System Specialists ;-

- More And Better Root Cause Evaluations Of in-House And Industry Experiences Applicable To Pilgrim .

- Operations Section Acquires Dedicated Technical Resources

- Maintenance Section Gains Significant Additional On-Site Technical Support

- Specified Regulatory Programs Get Additional Management ,

! Attention By Dedicated, Fulltime Personnel .:

i t

l

- Support Of On-Site Computer Systems is Centralized j i Within Technical Section ,

j l

. . ..- . x .. . .

~

STATUS ..

- Technical Section Reorganization Authorized 9/86 i

~

- Position Descriptions For New Jobs Approved 10/86

. Positions Posted 10/86

. 7 Steam Ops Computer Personnel Transferred 11/86 To NOD Tech Section

. Candidate For Systems Group Leader Recommended 11/86 FUTURE PLANS

- Complete Screening Of Resumes For System 12/86 (Target)

Specialists And Begin interviews -

- Complete Other Transfers Of Tech Section 1/87 (Target)

Personnel .

- Systems Group Operational 2/87 (Target) -

O

t 1

i i

i

.K BC2M383NT&T:@X NOV. 24,1986 BY THOMAS L. SOWDON l t

RADIOLOGICAL SECTION HEAD l 1

l s

i i I I

! - l 1 !

i.

1 I f 1

1 1

1

? l

_7

1 1

OBJECTIVES OF THE RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PROGRAM t

AT PILGRIM STATION

1) PROVIDE A SAFE WORKING ENVIRONMENT AT PILGRIM STATION.

)' 2) MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS PERTAIN!NG TO RADIATION EXPOSURE.

3) MAINTAIN RADIATION EXPOSURE AT PILGRIM

STATION AS LOW AS REASONABLY ACHIEVABLE

) (ALARA).

4) DEVELOP AN OUTSTANDINd RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAM THATTAKES FULL ADVANTAGE OF THE KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE AVAILABLE FROM THE

! NRC, INPO, AND OTHER REGULATORY AND ADVISORY AGENCIES.

l l -

i l

l l 2 L

1

. . a .. .

l l

1 BENEFITS OF THE PROGRAM

~

1) IMPROVED HEALTH AND SAFETY FOR THE WORKER.

2) IMPROVED WORKER EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS.

3) IMPROVED WORKER ATTITUDES.

4) REDUCED COSTS AND NUMBER OF WORKERS.

5) INCREASED CONFIDENCE IN BOSTON EDISON'S ABILITY TO OPERATE PILGRIM SAFELY AND ,

EFFICIENTLY.

f i

I i

1 l

l STATUS OF THE PROGRAM

1) SUBSTANTIALIMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE IN THE LAST 18 MONTHE IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS: -

PROCEDURES AND COMPLIANCE WITH THEM ALARA PROGRAM AWARENESS

. HEALTH PHYSICS EQUIPMENT

ACCESSIBILITY & INVOLVEMENT BY RADIATION PROTECTION MGMT

. TRAINING ( QUALITY, QUANTITY , AND DOCUMENTATION )

. STAFFING

DECONTAMINATION COMMITMENT WORK CONTROL AND TRACKING SYSTEMS

2) THE RECENT RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UDIT SUGGESTED THAT WE ARE "OVER THE HUMP" BUT SOME WORK REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED. gg N

U heb.Pe y/> 8, g y p' y . yecn -, L&: 7 e a,~u s e .

,xf d.ww kh ,

4

. .,. . s FUTURE PLANS FOR THE PROGRAM

1) CONTINUE TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY AND QUALIFICATIONS OF RADIATION PROTECTION .

PERSONNEL.

2) FURTHER UPGRADE PROCEDURES AND EQUIPMENT.

3) FULLY IMPLEMENT THE ALARA PROGRAM AND REDUCE TOTAL STATION EXPOSURE TO A LEVEL WELL BELOW THE NATIONAL AVERAGE.

4) IMPROVE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE HEALTH PHYSICS STAFF AND OTHER PLANT GROUPS.

5) DEVELOP AN EXCELLENT RADIATION PROGRAM AND EARN AN EXCELLENT SALP RATING.

(

j .

i

) -

l l 5

)

BACKLOG EFFORT

1) CONSIST OF ALL ITEMS IDENTIFIED PRIOR TO SEPTEMB.ER 1,1986

2) NRC INSPECTIONS, INPO ASSESSMENTS, ANI INSPECTIONS, QA SUGGESTIONS, LICENSEE IDENTIFIED OPEN ITEMS, ;

AND OTHER OPEN ITEMS ARE INCLUDED.

3) ALL TASKS HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED THE FOLLOWING ,

INFORMATION:

- TASK DESCRIPTION . ASSIGNED DATE COMPLETION CRITERIA . DUE DATE !

. PRIORITY . MAN HOURS REQUIRED i

RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER . CHARGE NUMBERS i t

4) TOTAL MAN HOURG TO COMPLETE ALL ITEMS HAVE BEEN ESTIMATED. (APPROXIMATELY 6000 MAN HOURS) l L 5) NECESSARY STAFF TO COMPLETE ALL ITEMS IS BEli4G .

i ASSEMBLED. ( 6 TO 8 CONTRACTOR ENGINEERS ) l

6) ITEMS HAVE BEEN PR'M iZED.

4 l [g xd CJ U W M AER' f j 7) ALL ITEMS Wii BE DISPOSITIONED BEFORE 4 RESTART. l l ( 130 ITEMS )

1 6 l l

l

.L

<; ... .. . . .- 2. .,. .

t u BREAKDOWN OF BACKLOG TASKS ISSUE , OPEN TASKS CLOSED TASKS R

( SINCE SEPT.1,86)

. NRCCC ITEMS 42 42 -

~

DEFICIENCY REPORTS 6 0 NSRAClYEMS 2 0 FAILURE AND MALFUNCTIONS 4 0 INPO ITEMS 2 0 EPITEMS 8 2 QA RECOMMENDATIONS 21 o REG AFFAIRS & PROGRAMS ITEMS 16 0 i

RADIOLOGICAL OVERSIGHT ITEMS 21 R TOTALS 130 44 e

t 7

RADIOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT

. PROGRAM

-OPEN ITEMS

1) ALARA PROGPAM ,

2) ATTITUDE TOWARD RADIATION PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS

3) ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ADHERENCE TO RADIOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS

/

0 0

8

'.- A. ;

. . ~ ! ', :, ~. , , Th* . 8

t. .. [, . . . ~ .

.. c ' ' i. , .

.j l t

ALARA PROGRAM

1) 14 OUT' OF 18 PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY ORC FOR IMPLEMENTATION.

2) ONGOING ALARA TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR SUPERVISORS AND WORKERS.

1

(

3) ALARA EXPOSURE BUDGETS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED FOR RFO #7 AND 1987 FOR EACH SECTION. THESE BUDGETS WILL BE ENFORCED BY EACH SECTION MANAGEF.

4 o

G 9

c..= .. .. .-..

ATTITUDE TOWARD RADIATION PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS u

1) UPPER iviANAGEMENT FULLY SUPPORTS RADIATION '

PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS AS AN INTEGRATED PART OF ALL WORK ACTIVITIES.

2) WE ARE IMPROVING THE INTERFACE BETWEEN HEALTH PHYSICS, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATIONS.

3) HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL WILL NOT BE VIEWED AS "POLICEMEN" BUT AS CONSULTANTS TO ASSIST OTHER GROUPS IN EXPOEURE CONTROL AND REDUCTION.

/

4 1

4 10

p . . .. . . . . .

O ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ADHERENCE TO RADIOLOGICAL

. REQUIREMENTS

1) ALL SECTION MANAGERS ARE TAKING AN AGGRESSIVE ROLE IN ENCOURAGING PERSONNEL ADHERENCE TO HEALTH PHYSICS REQUIREMENTS.

2) SECTION MANAGERS WILL HOLD THEIR SECTIONS ACCOUNTABLE FOR EXPOSURE BUDGETS AND WORKER COMPLIANCE.

3) POSITIVE INCENTIVES WILL BE OFFERED FOR GOOD PERFORMANCE.

4) TNE NUCLEAR OPERATIONS MANAGER HAS ASSUMED THE ROLE OF ALARA COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN.

5) ALARA PERFORMANCE WILL BE INCLUDED IN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS.

11 ,

l I

--- - , , , , - - , - - - - n--, --

--,- , - - - - - - - , - - . - - ,,,--_-,--,------.-----,,n- , , , - , _ , ,- - , , - . , ,, , - - , , ,,_._,,,ea - - , - -

[ r u

?

H L STATION DECONTAMINATION PROGRA.M GOALS:

l

. TO MAKE AS MANY AREAS OF THE PLANT AS ll PRACTICAL ACCESSIBLE IN STREET CLOTHES .

. TO REDUCE RESPIRATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL IN ALL OTHER AREAS OF THE l PLANT PLANS:

. IDENTIFY EQUIPMENT CONTRIBUTING TO CONTAMINATION LEVELS

. CONFINE LEAKS OR REPAIR EQUIPMENT

. DECONTAMINATE AREAS ASSIGNMENTS: '

. OPERATIONS-IDENTIFY SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION AND CONFINE IF PRACTICAL

. MAINTENANCE- REPAIR EQUIPMENT AND DECONTAMINATE AREAS

. RADIOLOGICAL- TRACK, SCHEDULE AND MONITOR t

12 i

1.. , . .: ;. v r. . ..

4 1

Decontamination Project

Goals s;

ContamLnated 12669 9.8.5

/e i

e l

V W-h

\

4 Total Square Feet 9 5

1 Controlled Area Contamination Status Areas by Contamination Level Clean <1k 54.3%

i

~.R:l

. r n E

s , ,/ b n Cont. 250k 17.8%

Cont, hik <10k 15.8%

. 'l[

l W

Cont. :t10k <50k 12%

! /

l Contamination Levels in Dpm/100 sq.cm.

.. ., . r . ,..

2 PROGRESS ON DECONTAMINATION TO DATE

1) CONDENSER BAY - WILL BE "STREET CLOTHES' BY NOV. 30,1986

2) HYDRO BLASTED FLOOR DRAINS - REDUCED EXPOSURE BY 151 MANREM FOR RFO #7

3) HYDRO BLASTED CRD HEADERS - REDUCED EXPOSURE BY 60 MANREM FOR RFO #7

4) ELIMINATED RESPIRATORY PROTECTION FOR 12 AREAS

5) REDUCED 14 AREAS TO "STREET CLOTHES" REQUIREMENTS e

1 l'

l.

i 13 l

w

. .. .r.'. . > > .

. . =

.1 s

s Decontamination Project Goal Contaminated 12449 9.8%

J Clean 114900 90.2%

I' Total, Square Feet

. Controlled Area Contamination Status Areas by Contamination Level t

e

~

Clean <1k 54.3%

,'b -

.c W9 5 '

.h' 'k ' ,

3 Cont. 250k 17.8%

Cont. :.1k <10k 15.8%

v; ' '[

3 2

=

= ~

W

[ Cont. 210k <50k 12%

1 Contamination Levels in Dpm/100 sq.cm.

I l

I ,; b , 'f. J ' " N .ci[.. - c. ;,. ,. . ._.

. ,c e, ; 0 * . ' , , , . u ;; ,e '

a .

,i l

, Fate 50.

illts/36 N,)

DECONTAMINAi!ON SCHEDULE FOR PNPS

. COEA NEEK AREA INiilAL CONTAMINAll04 PRIORIIY EST ACT NO, ENDIN6 CONTAMINAIl0N 6 CAL COM Hl3 MR$

i FAD, DERIN RESIN ADO. AREA IK 5K (!K 0 24 0

.i i 11/15/84 (lK 3 24 0 2 11/15/84 CoultNSERBAT6'6/A 1K-5K 2K (IK 3 24 0 c 3 11/15I86 CONMNSalt PunP BAY 4 11/15/84 A06 ?K-70K (lK 3 24 0 .

3K (lK 3 24 0 5 11/15/84 TiP ROOM

(!K 40K (lK 1 24 0

,' 6 11/22/84 RCIC 7 11/22/96 CR) CUA0 (!K6/ADNLY (It i 24 0 (IK 1 24 0 8 il/22/06 8 FHE VALVE ROOM 2K 5K 3K (IK 6/A, (10r F TAWK 3 2 0 9 11/22/06 CFD FEFAIR ROGM

, 10 11/22/86 E80 STOPAGE P00M 4K (It 3 28 0 A F}* VALVE F00M IK 34K H160K) (!K l 24 0 11 11/22/06 21K (lCK 3 24 0 il 11/22i86 STEA9 TUNNEL (5W 2 12 0 13 11/22/06 !!7'F8 SHIELO IL0 cts (NACCESSASLE (1K 1 144 0 14 11/29/06 A CMS QUA0 8t 450K 15 11/29/86 PF>t.QUA0 lt 20K 060K) ilk 1 144 0 12/06/86 FWCU FUPJ F00M IK 40t H180K) (It GIA, (10K PLPJS 3 24 0 J 16 t

12/06/96 FW'.9 Hr ROCM IK-20r H606) (lr 6/A, (10K .h 3 24 0 17 FUEL FOOL FILIER ROC 1 5K (16 3 24 )

18 12I % /06 IN 12/06/06 FUEL. P00L H POCM 1K 12K (It 6/A, (10K Hs 3 24 0

. 20 12/06/86 R.'L0lks HJFI ROOM lHr <lcr 3 24 0 106 80K (18 3 24 0 21 12/13/84 CrEM WASTE P2P'F009 e

15!K (10V 3 24 0 22 12/13/06 CHIM HASTE IAN6 FOCM 23 12/13/06 TREeiED NATER FURP FCC9 4K 20K (It 3 24 0

'l0L 3 *4 0 24 12/13'86 TFEalE0 NaiER ihr R00M 8t (lK 3 2 0 25 12/13/96 (ChCENTRATOR CONSOLE GARERT 20K 8/N P4411CR Pump P001 (lK 3 24 0 In 12/l3/84 78K

. d ';n jr/ , ;6s: l i ,,' Lt

, .-> - , , < ,, _, t ,; .

.y .: *T.

'. . . . , y :. . .

b h , Fale No. 2

, 11/14I86 DECONTAMINATION SCHEDRE FOR FWFS 4

AREA WEEK AREA INiilAL CONTAMINATION PRIORiff Est ACT

, NO. EN0lkG CONTAMINATION 60AL CODE Nts NRS i

i

-9 D/W Uht(R VESSEL eRad (50E 2 288 0 27 12/13/B6

!?/13/96 SLU0[tPUMPROOM 27K (10K 3 24 0 28 12/20/96 FLAfill FILTER ROON A 3K 1 K (10K 3 24 0 29 12/20/f6 FlaiBE0 FILTER ROCM 8 6K-30K (860KI (10K 3 24 0

30 147K (10K 3 24 0 31 12/20/86 SCLIDFACPOOM

' 161K (10K 3 48 0 32 12/20/86 FLOC RECYCLE ROOM 33 12/20/86 SLLM Y IANK AREA IK-6r (tr 3 24 0 11/20/86 CHEM FILTER POOM 50K (10K 3 24 0 34 35 12/20/86 TCP OF CHEN FILTER R30M 2K (lK 3 24 0 12/27/!6 FILituTE FUMP ROCM 8K-100K (50K 3 24 0 36 37 12/27/86 F/W $URP ASEA 6K-100K (!R 3 24 0 500L (50K 3 24 0 38 12I:7/96 61 6 ROCM IING FON6 F00M 220K (50K 3 24 0 39 12/27/96 ,

SFE%f FE5!N TAvr AND FLN M ePad (50K 3 24 0 40 12/27/86 41 12/27/f6 13'P/VG/A 2K 108 (IK 3 24 0 42 1;/27/96 14Cl tr 4r slK 2 24 0 Pl?C. W45f t NM8 ROOM IC4 (it 3 6 0 41 12/27/96 44 12/:7/16 P150. Wasit TA W POOM 3r (it. 3 4 0 45 01/10/87 CCh3. CEMlW.iAW ROOM A and 8 12r (Ir 3 24 0 46 01/10/87 (0%D,CEPIN.RESEN.SCOM IL !K (lK 3 24 0 47 01/10/97 53360!ARE4.E[5TshDilli Ir , <it 3 4 0 1.5 (10r 3 24 0 48 01/10/87 (80aCCUPaA10FS ei 01/10/17 UT 8 Ell 4 CLEA%ING APEA 28 (lr 3 24 0 0

ti (1/10/17 IAthe!H PEC.14n H. F01ER 81K (10V 3 24 TOP 6W 80ff. IK (It 3 504 0 51 01/10'87 108t$FOCR CLE N talit TA W ROOM eted (ik 3 24 0

$2 C1/17/67

: .Y..jk@[.':I.' ,

'~~,'

.v_,: ;,; ;. . , . ~ , .. :

A:

a ;.

E . ' ', r . . - ~' ,',

^;

1 .

' e e

s.

[, e- Fate No. 3 11114/94 fl CECONTAMINAllM $CHECULE TCR 7NFS r'

A*EA - utEK MCA 14111AL CONTAMINA!!ON PRIORlif EST ACT NO. (W0lt6 CONTAMINAil04, 60AL C00t MS HR$

I.

53 01/11/17 CLEAN ue$lt PUMP POOM erd (Ir 3 24 0 l; 54 01/l7/07 R/W fDUCr LOCK lt 5K (lK 3 24 0-

$5 01/17/07 HOT PACHINE SHOP SK-2;r (It 3 24 0 56 01/17/87 PEMAININS MISC. FLOOR DRalNS VMIAKE $l6. COSE PAft RLD. 3 144 0 .-

0 0 0 0 / /

0 l I 0 0 0 4 '

4 e

8 t

I. Controlled Area Contamination Status s Areas by Contamination Level

' Clean <1k 45.1%

Cont. 21k <10k 25.1% Cont. 250k 17.8%

1

=J Cont. 210k <50k 12%

Contamination Levels in Opm/100 sq.cm.

i Controlled Area / Contamination vs. Cle an

"" rioor space g ,

j , f E contarninated l

5 s

s s

$ ;l l

clean so- $

s I ?

? ? N ? $ $ .

~

t "' l l h'-$2 h !- l 3' c -

". 5 b $ $ $

l- l fs i : G i s l $ 3 sc E

i i 5

?

1 I,

4o- f S 7 :

o i 1 ; S f 5 5 5 '

ga.! .. - i ? ? ? 5 : ? s y i s ? i 1 ; s

< - r - - - -

!' so- i 5' 7 I: ? i ? I i 5 $ $ i ? 5 %'

i i ; i ? ? ?

i ? ? si 7 5 ; y 3..

? ? $ $ ? 5 $ ;

y ? ; E i 1 ? ?

. c ; p < ? < C Jun Jul Aug Sep Oot Nov Deo as of ti-7-Se

(

's .

OPERATIONS STATUS .

- STAFFING '.

- TRAINING ,

- SIMULATOR

- BACKLOG .

Steven D. Hudson Operations Section Manager ,

4 a I

.'s

e.

j .

i 4 a l .

.l OPERATOR STAFFING -

. OBJECTIVE -

l -

I A Sufficient Number Of Licensed And Non-Licensed Operators To

! Man A 6 Section Watchbill -

i '

i l '

1

?,

e BENEFITS TO BE GAINED -

- Normal 40 Hour Work Week Avoids .

Excessive Use of Overtime .

.1

- Allows For Training, Vacation, And Extended Absences l l

- Minimizes Short Term Operator Fatigue

- Prevents Long Term Operator Burn-out Which Aids ,

Stability Of The Group

.~.

e

?

6 4

t' i

91

. . . . . _ .. . .a s ...:..=-

o

~

RECENT ACTIONS TO IMPLEMENT STAFFING PLAN

.- Complement increased From 39 To 42 A

- 9 Men Take Aptitude Test Nov ,1986

~

y

- 9 Men Take Aptitude Test Dec ,1986

! - Tour School Scheduled For Jan{}, 1987 -

1

! - 5 R.O. Candidates Begin School in Jan ,1987 ,

i 4

l l

i

TRAINING SCHEDULE y J F M A u J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N l} J F M M J A J

!!! 111 Ill 111 Ill jygfl 111 Ill 111 111 Ill til til 111 Ill lii g } l lli ll1 111 til I I III til ;jg g Ili iis iti 115187 11/12187 h ; 7 MEN 2 MEN RO School ==

RO School lia 5 S

. McN 0 .

h2W86 (NRC Exam)

ULNPO Cont. " '

RO Schoot (RO PrepJ d ?

e N 6116187 NL.NPO OS'050I 7/16/06 2 continuina i RO School

' ~ ~

10 AEN 1113 5118 Tour School ID 118187 '

(3 On Watch -

C Men (

Q.

O -

l-- 115187 4/15/07 g) iTour School 7, 3%

8130'86 i 11 MEN I 10 Man g O

Licensed RO comps no ^ "g,,3 STA school ,

(a) Cwrent ' 4-7AAEN

l i

9

t LICENSED REACTOR OPERATOR COMPLEMENT "

i 25 1

' ~'

i 20 -

18 l

) 15 - '

, 14 -

12 --------------- - ------- ------- - - - - - - -

-u) 10 - o E

l 8 s

. 7 5 -

NOV 86 APR 87 JUN 87 DEC 87 AUG 88 l ASSUME: 1) R.O. Leaves Operations Before April 87

2) 85% Pass R.O. Exam (_ i-s. r y 2 M -

3) 1 More R.O. Leaves Operations Before Aug. 88 I

i - . __

1 I

i .. -

I SIMULATOR STATUS E j '

l

- Plant Specific Being Built j

in Montreal .

Acceptance Test Program Complete - Feb ,1987 i ':

I j - Prior to Start-Up

.20 Hours of Hands-On Training per Shift ,

- Emphasize Normal Plant S/U .

j and Operating Transients 9 j - Revised Emergency Operating Procedures .

l 4 i

l

{

l -

I >:-

ACTIONS TO ADDRESS OPERATIONS SECTION BACKLOG 204 Items in the Backlog I -

Goalis to Disposition Allitems Prior to Start-up Implement Specific items '

q W- 8

Prior to Start-up 9 f

) 2 Beco Engineers Assigned l as Co-ordinators 6 Contractor Engineers on Board December 1,1986 -

21% Complete as of Nov 19,1986 l

.~

I g

x .. . . . .

3 -

s.

PILGRIM STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATOR PROGRAM _ .

1

. Background .

~

Purpose of revised indicator system j Revision process and current status .

4 Remaining plans W

e j .

5'

i

. \

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR BACKGROUND .

,~ '

l l

_ Started In 1985 .

) -

INPO Overall Indicators I

l

~ E Currently 39 Reports

c 2

1 s

i i

1 t , , .

e .e m new e e aa vr w. . . . . 444T( HIN(3 N .f w . ..

1 i

Forced Outage Rate EW 9" % suwege

]. i on , , i w

, tes . .

M4 .

M< .

m4m s gyg , , 9EE M 3 Appenas C Opuot.P e.sf M ,

m. . s ano-e c t

m. .

l m. .

ma- .- -------- -

-= e - S - a -a a X nma l l es < -e+e+e+ e+e?;=;=;": :=- :=- :e+e M =4=; :=:=; - -

%s.,omn 1994 o ar.u. *um,a u %s o.m o mr*u wu.,a u %s o. -

1958 1 *AS y

I

( ,

. 1 n

l-t

,, Percent of planned avail.1ble time that the unit was not avsilable for production. ,

i i t

s e s. . . .. . ~ . . . . ...

e m--- - - - - - . - - - - , - - , - - - , . -

9-T 9 ME....A.,l---m..r._,. - - - - , - . . . . . . , . . - . ,, . .-r-.-,---

.. s-w i

. X' e'

l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR PURPOSE t

4 i

i Z Focus on Overall Results (Mission) 1 -

1

-_ Establish Responsibiltiy Z Cover ALL Management Aspects

~

{

l i

l U

I ~

l '

.1

. X,'

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR F SELECTION PROCESS & CRITERIA Z Safety-Cohtrol of Hazards and Risk Nuclear, Radiological, Fire, Security, Ind., Env.

Reliability: l Power Generation-While At Power i Outage Control While Off - line Manasrement:

Effective Compliance with License & Tech Specs Effective Prevention of Generation Loss Effective Corrective Action ;

Attainment of High, Third-party Ratings

1 .

PERFORMANCE TNDICATORS ROLE IN MANAGEMEM .

l l

l Performance Indicator Annual Reports Planning / budget ............................... E x e c u t . ave ,

.......................... D e p a rt m e n t Section i 'r

)

l Responsibility -

1 Management l Reports - -

l 'r a a a A l

l Performance

Performance Data .

O

x, 1

i

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ,,

CATEGORIES -

\ -

} Externalindicator sources .

-i

- General plant / site indicators L_ Work management system indicators 1 ;

_ Individual management indicators '

l 1

'l l,

General -

Specific l

j .

~.

.q PERFORMANCE INDICATORS -

EXAMPLES .

CRITERIA INDICATORS .

E SAFETY: # of unplanned scrams, lost-time accidents .

radiation exposure, safety system unavailability i

i l

RELIABILITY: Equivalent availability, forced outage rate, outage duration / planned MANAGEMENT: Expense! budget, backlog status, preventative 1

maintenance overdue, training hours / planned, ;

i staffing status i

iI L_ _ -

REMAINING PLANS Performance Indicators Selected Complete

] Responsibilities Established Complete

. Develop Goals (Trends) & Supporting December Plans Select Indicator Sub-categories December

~

I Plan for New Data Collection December .

Revise Performance Monitoring January Report j t

~

Revise Controlling Procedures February '

i

_ Implement New Data Collection As Planned /.

Plans !

l l

i,

1

f' l .

-1 ,

i l

l j

l BACKLOG RESOLUTION i .

i 1

) .

'l

)

R.E. Grazio .

l Field Engineering Section Manager

November 24, 1986

i l

t -

. .. . . _ - - _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ i

~

.~

BACKLOG RESOLUTION HAS BOTH A NEAR TERP5 :

AND A LONG TERM PURPOSE s'

l

- tiear Term: Recommend How The Backlog Will Be Dispositioned -

l .

1 .

- Long Term: Improve Work Management to Solve .

Problems Rather Than Address Symptoms .

l

Y BACKLOG WORK TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR - :.

TO STARTUP HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTIFIED .

Complete Commitments Required Before Startup Address important Evaluation items (SALP, INPO) .

Implement improvements Requiring Plant Outage O

9 e

.f

~

SOME CURRENT BACKLOG WILL B_E .

PERFORMED AFTER STARTUP :

. Long Term Program Will Become A Management Commitment Toci (

Emergent Work Will Be Integrated With Backlog Solution Of Broad Problems Will Become Basis For Setting Priorities Resolution Of Backlog Will Be_ Performed Aggressively A

h*

4

+-

l 4 '

l

? . . -

! PART OF SUCCESSFUL BACKLOG RESOLUTION

~

l IS PREVENTING A NEW BACKLOG FROM FORMING l -

l :

l .

i

i Categorize Potential Work Based On Systems / Programs r

~

Define Problems On A System / Program Basis

~

! Prioritize Work Based Upon Problem Solutions -

1

^

l j .

Monitor Plant Performance To Verify Effectiveness Of Solutions ;

j De

. - ~. . . . ., . .. .. . . . ,

1 TWO SEPARATE EFFORTS ARE ATTACKING THE BACKLOG "

. "Section Backlog" - Work Requiring Resources From A :

. Single Section/ Department L

- Work Not Yet Scoped Sufficiently For Planning

. "Organization Backlog" - Work Requiring Resources From More Than One Section/ Department ,

Nt

- I ly .

~

S e

- _ _ - - _ =_ ---

i I

i j ~

i THE ORGANIZATION BACKLOG IS LARGE i

AND REQUIRES A SUBSTANTIAL COMMITMENT -;

-c j jf l

I - "Work Analysis And Review" Method Was Used y' Vl'g*Y g

1 Key Managers invested A Tota! Of 20 Man-Weeks ( 3'cd r

~

Over 1000 Significant Activities Were Analyzed

- Benefit

- Items Required For Startup

- Problem Statements Generated Where Appropriate -

I War Room" Outputs input To Outage Planning And

{ Parallel Executive Review . i l Non Outage Scope Will Be Planned Before Startup -

i I

.e l !?

1 .

! THE WAR ROOM RECOMMENDS COMPLETION OF MORE .l 1 :

l THAN 50% OF THE ORGANIZATION BACKLOG BEFORE STARTUP

.(

\ =;

.. 1 l

Sent To War Room 1281 Dispositioned To Section Backlog 425 ['

l Total Organization Backlog. .

856 !

~

l Completed Or Ca'ncelled During War Room 180

~i Complete Before Startup 332 Complete After Startup 306 Under Further Review 38

\

! b j

I I FUTURE USE OF WORK ANALYSIS AND REVIEW y i

i WILL IMPROVE PRESENT WORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ';

i l System / Program Format Assures Common Basis For Work Management -

i

)

i

! Problem Statements Provide Basis For Resource Allocation -

i -

1 i

j Combining Operational And Engineering Perspectives Allows A

! More Complete P'erspective Monitoring Results Of Completed Work Will Verify Effectiveness Of Solutions :

t

l Ak s.

WORK COXTROL PROCESS :

l BACKLOG -

(PRIOR 9/1/86? -

~

i .

i ,

! NEW WORK l

(AFTER 9/1/86)

I l '

i l '

i i

1 . .

.. . . x OBJECTIVES

,p,A -

w

~lDENTIFY ALL UNDERLYING WORK ACTIVITIES

~ e w n u 1):A ESTABLISH ACCOUNTABILTY l

l .

j i I

DISPOSITION OF ALL ACTIVITIES :

l l l l -

i

, 6. . . s. - ,

s

, WORK SOURCE DEFINITIONS NACCC NRC ON SITE INSPECTIONS OPEN ITEMS DR'S OA DEFICIENCY REPORTS RESPONSE / ACTION ITEMS NSRAC NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW AND AUDIT COMMITTEE ISSUES RA&P (LIC) REG AFFAIR & PERFORMANCE GROUP COMMITMENTS / ACTION ITEMS F8M FAILURE AND MALFUNCTIONS RESPONSE AND ACTION ITEMS INPO INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS COMMITMENTS SALP SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENTOF UCENSEE PERFORh%NCE REP ACTION ITEMS _

CFC OPERATIONS REVIEW COMMITTEE REQUEST / ACTION ITEMS SPI SECURITY PROGRAM OF IMPROVEMENTS ACT10N ITEMS OERP OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PROGRAM RESPONSES / ACTION ITEMS CMR OUALTTY ASSURANCE RECOMMENDAT)ON RESPONSES / ACTION ITEMS ANI AMERICAN NUCLEAR INSURERS COMMITMENTS' ACTION ITEMS EP EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTION ITEMS ESR ENGINEERING SUPPORT REQUESTS PDC PLANT DESIGN CHANGES PC40 POTENTIAL CONDITION ADVERSE TO OUAlfTY ISSUES MCAR MANAGEME?# CORRECT 1VE ACTICN REOUESTS NCR NON CONFORMANCE REPORTS BNP 8ROKEN NOT1FICAT10N POINTS' SMA STOCK h%TERIAL AUTHORIZATIONS ,'

SPECINO STORES DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATION INOUIRIES TEMP MODS TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS PIP'S PERFORMANCE NPROVEMEPR PROGRAM ACTION ITEMS

. ROCS RADOLOGICAL OVERSITE COMMITTEE ACTION ITEMS RIP RADOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OPEN ITEMS LER'S LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS RESPONSES' ACTION ITEMS T.S.REV PLAG PICKARD, LOWE, & GARRICK TECH. SPEC. REVIEW ACTION ITEMS DON DESIGN DEFICIENCIES NOTICES FOR RADOLOGCAL OCCURRENCE REPORTS M R'S MAJNTENANCE REQUESTS AIP'S AVAILABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM b, ., y N*

~.

l-ACCOUNTABILITY (OWNERS)

NUCLEAR DEPARTMENTS / FUNCTIONS SECTIONS ENGINEERING OPERATIONS OUTAGE MANAGEMENT RADIOLOGICAL NUCLEAR OPERATIONS

// TECHNICAL -

AINTENANCE .

OUALITY ASSURANCE /

OUALITY CONTROL SECURITY / TRAINING FIRE PROTECTION / COMPLIANCE NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES ORGANIZATION STAFF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS f

a

?

~

DISPOSITION OF ACTIVITIES -

v SOURCE DOCUMENTS -

v% 3.

CORRESPONDENCE -

y -

(EXTERNAL / INTERNAL) ,

(/ WAR ROOM d- SELECTIVE ~

REVIEW M'

(

[n.t a Yf

) DETERMINE,/ TRACK ,

ASSIGN ACTION DEVELOP PROGRESS l CORRECTIVE ACTION + PRIMARY 4 REQUIRED, + -* &

PLAN &

PROGRAMS MONITOR PRIORITY, SCHEDULE OWNER PERFORMANCE

. & URGENCY INDICATORS i

i i

AUDITS / INSPECTIONS -

l 5

DISPOSITION & MANAGE > J. .

11 WORK ACTIVITIES 9 ACCOUNTABILITY @

\

f l '

t

~

P STATie or encrtos (s/L). aan 200M (autflas). M MEW WomC (NW/uK) ITDE5 IN THE N.R.C. 00hesI1MDif CONTROL PROCsuas AS OF 11-16-es e sA or sA w/tes ist/las m jles nasjunc ess,w earjtec RESPONSIBIL*TY................... .. TOTAL OFLT OPD6 TOTAL OFLT OPDs TOTAL OFLT OPDs MED 29 8 8eED S1 31 39 31 22 2 20 /l 3 3 1 1 1 1 080 0 2 2 -

980D - 86AINTDWGCE 5[CTIC8d 77 14 83 39 8 31 19 3 13 NOD - heaNACDdDif SERVICES SECTION Se 22 28 19 7 12 18 3 15 N00 - OPDtATIONS SECTID88 98 3e S6 28 4 24 34 12 22 .

8e00 - RADIOLOGICAL SECTION 84 42 42 2 2 18 9 9 "800 - Y[OedICAL SECTION 31 s 23 4 4 a s

) ON 11 2 9 1 1 3 1 2 QAD 14 9 5 2 2 V.P. - NUCLEAR DdG.'& QUALITY ASSUR. 7 1 s 2 2 V.P. - NUCLEAR OPERATIONS 21 8 13 1 1 2 1 1 44F ISS 291 134 27 197 124 32 92 12 recerJe 18eled. .

e q.

. +

~ _ _ . _-- - . _ _ . .- _.

l t.-

4 ..

l

SUMMARY

OVERALL WORK CONTROL PLAN 1

i 1 .

l -

DISPOSITION BACKLOG WORK l

j COMPLETE WORK PRIOR TO STARTUP l PLAN AND SCHEDULE WORK TO BE ACCOMPLISHED AFTER STARTUP i

DISPOSITION NEW WORK TO PRECLUDE NEW BACKLOG FROM DEVELOPING U 1

{ MONITOR PROGRESS VIA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS J

j -

i

______.-__-~_-__.__._'__----__________ __

w_

,. e eosr w a s m Emergency Operatons FacAty Obery Heghts Ptymouth Massachusetts 02360 February 9, 1987 EPC #87-60 Mr. Robert Boulay, Director Massachusetts Civil Defense Agency and Office of Emergency Preparedness ,

4 400 Worcester Road P.O. Box 1496 Framingham, MA 01701-0317

Dear Mr. Boulay:

As per your earlier requests for our support of the Off-Site Planning surrounding the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Statien, I have enclosed a copy of evaluation of this subject prepared by the I@ ell Corporation.

This just completed report should be a valuable tool in developing a work plan and schedule to update off-site plans.

If you have any questions, plese do not hesitate to call me at 747-3449 or 424-3829.

S rely, oger E. Silva Emergency Preparedness Coordinator Enclosure ec: J. Lydon A. L. Oxsen C. Gustin P. Agnes (Enc.)

G. Parker (NDPH)

R. Hallissey (Enc.)

T. Rodger (C DA, Enc.)

J. Crowder C. Fuller M. McBrice (mC, Erc.) -

E. Thomas (FEM, Enc.)

RES/sb

ML20206B727

Contents

Text

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Dear Mr. Boulay:

Navigation menu