ML20205S395
| ML20205S395 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 08/24/1982 |
| From: | Forney W NRC |
| To: | Danielson D NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205S388 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-88-344 NUDOCS 8811110051 | |
| Download: ML20205S395 (80) | |
See also: IR 05000454/1982005
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:____ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . ____.._ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _
, i i I , . . Aeguet 24, 1982 ! . h ,
! ISPORMIDtB4 FOR: D. Dealsloon . I
I ruoMi v. Forney !
sumJacT: 1.a. anyour us.'s 50-454/s2-05: 50-455/s2-o4 . , 4 1 Intygamrre (a) CBCD letter July 30, 1982 frasi usyne stiede to James G. Esppler
1 ! l (b) Esc Intter Jasm 24, 1982 frema C. 3. More11ue ' l to Cesdell need I meforearm (a) provided the ==har-ribed and seerm respanse ef the Licemene to ! the violation 2 forsorded by referemme (b). i
' } The recycase to violation 2 does not appear to properly and adsgestely address i i all of the aa-aarna os*14 ==d in the item of 4 tamos, in particular the concen of overall quality of onestzisetion. Specifloallye i l 1. Ttie Lionesee's response to action taken or planned to be taken
to assere that quality control inspectors emailmg for samtractors I that have completed safety-related work and no lemper have ! personnel on site este properly trained and gesa11 fled to perfons , i the iaepection functions ameigned, does not provide a esmeitment i for a date of onepleties of the (=dianted revies to be performed ] nor does it provide an adequate definitica for . M == the l j review scope udbes the reconde dumsestrata *eignificant diveagence". I 1 t , i 2. The Lioanese's respones to astian takes or p1====d to be taken to
assure " 1 of geslity for inopostimes perfossed by quality j i , eestrol inspectore that esse layreperly trained and goalified ~!i provides ser 'the es oetles of any one er m e==*t== ef the } j ! following...* le met entisfactory since the act of re-enanimiaq ! and eartifying merely estabt e h,== the eersumt gealificatise of l j l an individeal and does not establish the point in time the ' . j individual basens qualified sesegenart to taitial impsoper i oortifloatian. Therefore, further estion seest be moonsplished. , l l 2. ft. reopease did met indiosta Lisemene estion to be taken to
i essere that all sentreator goality hasaramos w = ensait
i the sentreetor to trat at eg, gealitioesione and eartif t==*ia= ' l in asserdamse with ausz-u 45.2.6, 197s. (see z.s. sen-4M/s2 05: )l 50-455/s2-04 at u. (2) a(1) Pepe 67). p,y ,e . f f . 3 sg i 60111100b1 881013 1 ^ M/3 ' 1 PDR liOIA l . I MU9PHYBO-344 PDit 3. L annier-mestemet .m , c" a k . i ...syram, station,J,,,,,,,, i. ,. . .. .. . l .I............! . .h .[ . .. . . 5""+ ... .. . i ew'.. . . ' I j ...h.... ...... ... l . ... .. .......... ..
- ' ** . ** *
i mc ,one ve osse acu om OFFICIAL RECORD COPY l .- - -. .. . - . -- - - - - - --- - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - _
___ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ .. _ . - . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ . . _ _ _ _____.. . _ _ _ . - . _ _ - I .l l ' - . , , e . . . . . l, - . .- . . . bn
- * *
. s; . . ' ' i s s ' ,1 - [ .., > a .- , , u. , s d 1 I* * ,a h* . *d Uf//E's: ~ .
> 1 2 &c. $t it / _/:.s wik L.. "?~M g* 4G., 9sp ,
- zaz _
c.,_m c6 rzu.am A i. ..i ! l f&', C.,.dt &W <- y 6,4yM-%*
- O
f% ' GNC/W/S w .I C k =' I 1 1 ] - ! ) /, c? . e-a ,, u ra e., n e2 4 ,, J., i , % 7 s . u , ,. cs. , w
i l j p ,.a 7* l 7 ' %/ w ir 4
. 1 '
a. c G. moi J u e. . r A
- .
.% .: . .- L'. t.
M Lk n .w w m , a .; c22 n ,r m ) 4 - l W. rw n . i 2 m & .. ' & ,La mp p- p p,J. e p. ..' .. a. r . . w , . z ~, ,a , .,, uy 3. c.:. , l
. .< __ ,w , 4 . - i } .o X.h ,s" ., p /--4 vs t ! 5 } 3, iA<. t : # s .. w , t.'s s .7. a, - <: < . - - ~ .: .m i / < - ~ i k lc <- a W * ,/ -
- e.e
) /<.
- ' '
sf . < < . .ar-'.. 'A....
- C
' . / I g - ,/ . < , a a s s'.. 7.. s . . ' . s ., a t
, . ' * , .2 a' .. . T&e l i , a . . c , p ,,,,,p /v r r a , l ' 'r - - 1 i i I < i 1 - l 3 + (Au h L., r' ft) Og' Sst A- 1. < k Cs* ,, i a) yAc4 cub . cou t 4 fuie %, . o cs, 1 < l }' . 2 euff-('4{ <o - f v'(2mtn .Lp n.- u 6/ h 't 4Q l . - - - - L vt., i l A syCes. n G t i , j u. ) 44- .4 - ,. -t:. s.T ;. . s 4 . k , m' . W ., , j
. l .'%y A.: 4 (c.) J. a<. eXc anLv-< w Lw ' l ,, w Ch 7 w* s G /- O PN , y 1 - . of .5-n c ej i ' j t- .?. * C n d.u- w p ,&w. .u j
- 3 4 -ep. J 4y
j - } 6/L [ 4 . . . - , - - - - ._--,-__,-,___._.,,_,.-,--..__,.--.__..-._,,--_..._-_-._--____.._--------_.--._,,,..,,._-m - _ _ . - . , , - - -
, . . . - l 6 I .<. . s * ' . . . f .- C. . .. e. ,J , . 2. m . c ..
/ . t., . - .. , ,! Js . . - E .-?'- C., r e .y . G.'uf ,f *. ..z . ,.J \\ s . E~. . /u . , - < > .. -. l /l ' ... i,.EA a k k 7.:. w xa q '. r e. . .n. <* e.w , ,,v. . . : ( ,/.e s.'.u s. ,ss :.4- < : - u,7,. .>....w,..<
. . , . .. . . . f. . c.. ,: <.'r.- <J * . . 1 '
. .. , . . . ,. .. . , , t . . t 9 .< c, - c. a. .s m w . . . , ". - n 'h 7' .'- t a. p .'t .c... Z n ts C ^ q* . ' ' *-.- i
. y , ? .
- /.t.
,; - /:s A e :-,. s*. G T af ,/ '/ '.4 t- < 1 / 4 :. ,ca. u ,, # e s- < * s. D <<., /. " ' . - . ' * H.~w - . G,1 L + , . v sg O ..v a , A.s <.,t e
- .o <. .(,
. ' - ., .. wi y. ' : , a c . .,* : . . , . > s.%. - ,r' t s . .. .% J '"'N ,.a .< r . ..e , i .4 s .*. . . / . '< , a:.jsasi., f =. T' g-t.' ' ,;t * d. s/ 4% . r L..e C,,, ,, ? 'Ys s'.* .# .. o'; * s*"r'e'. O. g i
+ o , .* . .
- .nsJ
- ) ' .,
f <* \\ ) o .* ,*4**- / / , * - ;
,4 L, s <<
) . - . t / ,,, e /. . ' :. .as. i .. .i . ' j. c.2 /.r - Ae < j,pd / .* * / .' Aw . . 7, ,4 ,l.u
.' .-: - -' : } . - . e f l .A.,f.g. cG sy< 'l f. y C.l. *C.*.*.-<, f.< q .<c. J .T<
- 1 d.s v( a .. n .. ... ,a .x e. a,,.y ~ ....r , i m. . . 4 'I** c L. n d -; " s /" <! * . x,. FWD)
- o .. .. .- 1 . . i - - . < .. c ,., ,/ .-us. y ,: .:<. > , , . .j /' K, ,.. o.x . . w.
- <
a t .. . < , , , . . I .j ma Ar/.
. . e. . i~ . ,
~:< . t. u i. . . , . ~ , , , . .. w . a. . ., " ,,$o,ld: j - '
'-
- .
- -. . . , . . . .. Amw(A <-
ci. j /- ?.: / , e' t > ' ' - j, t bra.t f i. h O - . ..( ,.S . ~ x.- w )
x. . f.o . - .. /, . . . , i , ,h t.L p'Lc +re G vt .,f '* ' . , ' ' . . ' . , -
- - - . I ' . - T's f' ,A s T i : . . . '. 1
" l ,o < .< u ." s [} ~'~ <. , / O /, . s t. s . % .z / ,fv _ .i . } 9 , .c .s J .. / L s- ., . . . , h .O AA C k G C O * = fr] h' h o ,,Y_,t, fC../ $. L . , " '* ' e i l , , - _ _ . _ . . . . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ ._. - , . .
. _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ , - . . i I
1 4 ,
A.>& ' ,%- %> ,.1:a. CG AcGl&> w M Ll 4 , 7 .c l s ~ s * -{. e 7 .* .
e'
c.'. T. L 7r ', , ,% x dc- ;/ ? ?.;.y ,\\ .> . t. :. .. .* .a.
- v e. r u.... ... f..
. . ,, . ,* j _ . . .p - . .. . , . 1 l , , , 05:.J
&., ' } v).-ES.A.a e. d. [ G .D i.1 f .' n ,r) v' .d' 1 / .k . u / Z u. M ,/2 & .. i n. .- r .e t .- .: .. . . ,
- ..-rw..
,..
- .~
=- ' i i 7k et * : m . . c. u. . n .z ,. . . & li. c1. Lcm. u I ' pJ<,4y 47 . , - - , ./.s$.udd.a ! A 't M'c ,- .y W w I >: A s.fva w % - < . sn ",c,;,,A-__M h 3 / & , - p m i-<r .pp d .Ch S , L. c- : .... y d Cw: ' > %GJ M u-y
, i j l i
f d'~~v- .. .:. . . , 7. ; , . s. . cts. mf.'. . g . w7 . ,, /ve I
y t - -p-es-l.hes C*w . h,a n , , . , . .c'c . ' a... c. . . a.< , .:.;: ~ . . :. . l . . . , .,
/ b*/ A# F^ 8 b sd *. ,.&f ( , w.9 e 4 . . -
. u.e ,m , & . . , n 2 wj m.w l 1 .n.. .J < - . l
- ; , f
t .d. f .- c G j; ,,c e - r e p o ,s t., ,4 % . i i , do L w ~/ 2ik ,,c n,/. u.'ip;c . .r%m, A L
,:L.. , / / . a , , f i i i I I i i k ' I ! t } , ' > < i r [ , ' n i ! j i t i I 1 - 1 P - - - - .-, -- - ,,, - , , - - , , - - - - , , _ - - . _ , _ - , , - _ _ - - _ , . _ _ , , . . _ . - , , , , , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , . , . _ _ _ _ . _
. . - - b% / T N T d /l. V i C r.4.) b [cw [[ t i tt M &~1 f\\l t? C fit 1' - /L yw Pg e.a 4 ,4se-4 T, Sep N /t c M . tL <> ; /> L C- 1E r-t rpr c i&, . . - j < llM N. ' . w .4 e. 2 - g xs c N RC R'1II F1RC def6tfrad l1. l.olt e< w a e Edo f407.ItEcti. 5 "!'h* VI ' O A d. Cuom exa cac. Ju L.% D. R WeUGuEC C 6Cs qC S s eee.v .c..e . $1L*b WA.D t k. C. T Co C2 d b K] , R , J, FA a n. Ceco G h Go e cnmee w. ff 84me csc. om.e nag- A n,o ,3ea r s c E co I .a e ,,1, se> ? i.i - .nsola,%~ c.r, he )r C 23 $ {NO f $ e /pon.7s5n v $<*e.op Y) W , 6Er tet s E t w C EE.C. f9 oa d e 6- Cr ' n g e Gue, .. cia 5 ..: . .
A. . .&,4 - ._-%...+--a ' cs +- -+--.1, .-44 -- .J a-.,- . - - . -
4* -,* I e a , I I . l . W
- Le V
' t =e - . . . . h E , .. .. w . . . . . . h ._. - - . . . - . n.el..b. O . bsepodx0$4acf -k. .f.* C) $ . - - -. .-- - . . . . ~ ~ - , - - , ! . . .._ .. . - . - . - -. - -
wm c m s,.> -<.0, .> m R= o m i /. M a.a* _ /30/ . _ . . . . - _ ~ . . - . . . . _ . .-- - i > 3 1 - ...-.. - ... )s.. C o . .. . . .. . . - . - - . _ . - . -. - . - .~..- ~ ~ ~ - - -.. ..- . ,\\ . . . - . . .. J , . e774*/v.s4 . /.h. .._. _ - _ .. . . . . _ . . _ . . . . _ ~ --.,-.. i , - . . , ~ . . . - - --.,.-==s ..+m -.. . .-. . - - .**-. * =~~-
- *.
P ..; ..- ... - - . - . . . . . - . . - . . , . . . - . . . . . - - - - - . . . . . . - . . . . . - . .- --- . - - - - . . -.. . . . ~ ) _. A 8_*ar..m. . C_4_/ th_ _fassioso.f.; -- _ .. -- , . , . - . I A 4 . /h .hw....,~ //2 -.._& __ .
7 . . .. - t . , . . _ . . . . _ . . . . _ . _ . _ - . _ . . . - ..- .~ ._ l l . . . . - . .D-. S W p .$_ Lab & f -. - - - O4 d'
- m
,/l.#4 ew . .- en ~ u. sp w c w % 4 /&w P . . . . .. . . . . . . . - . -. - . . . . . -. - y._ O y - . - _ . f..
~ Y , P $ . _ , _ -.-. _- . - . _ . _ . . . . . _ ... _ _Y._ . _ . _ &__ . _ _ ._ c- .[.M. _ Sr9. . - . .. - . - . . . . . . . .- ...-...d.. - i ._. . ,,) , ,J. , w t - _ _ .. .. _ .. - ___.. _ _ _ ._... _. . _ __... . , %. . .- ... . .. .h...- ,,# - ., . .- .. . . . _ - . . .. .. .. -- ? , .
V ._ _ _. . . .. .. . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . r. . Vm s. .,u.c.L ' ~. . . y.-. -.e .. a._... _ny ,.. . .. . { .. . . .nu . ..sKmr . m .. Ja/t. ..g ": m . . . _ . . - - . - A... .w n.am . .--- - . -- . . t k , . .== .e ~ ee -.c
- .*ww.
e4..,.e.==w w- - .e.u. e m % 4 .ms..* ,_ mhg . . * - N D 6 < m et.Ga.-4 6N asp $.9.- 6.. h*.>W N**6, . wg ep g .e- - - gW . .eg.,ema. .gg .,e4
- - - _ _ _ _--__ -_-- _ ___-- _ - -_ -- _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . l . . I 1
. . . . O p . . . . . .. /,. 5 ~e 2 4 A m . . . .
. .- .._ . . A . . cw J - . _ _ _ _ _. _. .. ... . __ _.... , l . . . 3- A.< 4 d<~ . .ap< - JJa yw, mT~ -co au.a ..%w a) , l' 4 " <<y el p G . . . . . . 1 l - - . - - - . . . i. -Wm.. cm <.4< % . . .- . l . - . . . - . . _ - . . . . . ._ .- . l ' _ _
- s,r #
t., . _ . E' . . - . - _ . . ~ . . . . _ _ ,
?- e s - u .< . n . D a J Jou.r/U? e2~ a_."e .k4 ' &_Jnc m em,s D r 3~p M.N 1 m M -.-- .. . . . . . . LAwy emo- AeQ /~* L cuwt c s.t<. W/w _
. ntn.~ rn e- & ny.aa.:./e 3 . /o_Aa e.A D 4 4 y,wrd . .-- D1~'-A Ae,aw % _ W ._rk_M W _L& i . . . . . - ?fJ.WO .. - . . _ _ - . . . . . _ . . . .
. . . - C&Ata - AAE:.'== _. t . . . . _ _ . . _ _ . ._. . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ ._ ,___..g . - ,.. k !'* % - $ k W %s $- .. Af%d % & % ... r . . } n A t.t l<.4.. <<iu aet-. w n s / ce k L - i . . . . . 24. . .a,y,Lw J' 4 f s Q ._ P C<a w Af,.o G,,<, <e~2.-- Le _. -... A _ ^<.s.e z n . p aa r ex J .9 s,v % -.~ox .ri. n . ir 4 ,.e<. 4 n y ._ . . . , - . - - apsJ A . 4<<n 7^M . 74 A% C<. _ .. . . _ . . .. .-.Aa.f.v .L- & ~ 4 . m n ,a m a/ .w-% .-. - . q re te.At p~Nm M t-<- Wp. ~C l . WGt - s sw . n- . ._<CJJ . - .u' . c . . . . . . - . _ . _
y - . - - - - . _ - _ 8 2 e i - <.* . w S e s * % J ' 4 h =- - .. _ a .- d. Aa a ,h +n . /% ~ ./ 4 ,Q '_ '_ m_%._.. . _ _ _ _ , . . - _ _ _ . . _ . _ . . . - M , _ _ ~ . , _ Y. Ws.e. ..dfa e.a. , _ . . _ . . _ . _ _ _ __ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ , . _ _ _ _ _- /f dwem .v o e 4= 1 A - ~ * , "'=1,__ . . _ . - -
- - - - - - - - , - - - , - - - - , . _ , - - - _ _ _ _ - , . , . _ _ _ _ - - _ _ , - - - - , - _ _ - , _ _ _ _ - , _ - - , _ _ _ . _ , , - - - - , _ - __. , _ -__ l . . i i ,
h ..l-<.en et w / c: % y as A,e W "* * *** <M , s d-s Y j l i .- - . . ~- i 4 ~ L \\ . . _ _ Q.:AY . $t,af W" : ^-:', ~ W M ****QA- e$ - .-. l' ^ S. -- - . ' -- - " ' i - . p w ..& ,e c . n-~*' </ . <*-u- n <% 'Wv i . . ~ en .es. J. - pu~ , ) p w, on p / a- e J > . .,) l1-- . - ~ .
' >- r*2 2 --, ,.,, ' - T.- y ._ - g*Q. Q pge 4 & .-..- - .-.. - ' '~**~~~ _ , . . .p. W . 4 . A C e : 3 4..&py w .c. J'. M m -. N pu ._ % z4.. %. M ei4 .. > 4 . ! .2=. . n,a n ur p.n w-. _.-- -- . 1 k . . 42 -.. J W ~. h. V & - . - . - . - - . - - - - - - - - -. J i , _ _ __,-. 1 .- - - - - . ! i . . - . .N _...'. u7- ). l - $ S *~' d& O N <.- ? **-4 I t - .- - -- , - . 1 No x f.% gh/1.Z.J.-..dAL- - // e..,_.u. m { , - - . -- i k AG.na.a _ c4~.a' z }. ,w r n...- - _l 1 i 4 i j . .. _._ . -.. 4 - -4 3 J~ h pf_[ ' $S$ /A W '=' t i _ ..... _. . _ . g J . [ _ ( _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . . . _ ( -" .'__t -.* ~-__[ .d M* _. _..__ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _; - 4
- . / 4
" 4"' D' . k _._ 4#**9 M* * . t
, h . , . _ . . - , . . ._,.-_ . ., . _. . _ . _ , . . _ _ _ . . .. .
e i ym, f,. . & .7/~ i) < +~.C. i . _/ :. W-
3 _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ . . . . _ . - - _ . _ -- ..JY$ $ . ^ N ^^ $ =.. //... % ' & . . . . . . . . _ .
a ! . / 41 U4'* , . Nh.W O. . M . 4**"I W *on.[ k . .. [ l, . . , / N M 4-+4.e . 8
4 i . _ . . _ . . - _ , , , . . . . . l . 6 / op. 4-N A b q.gr . ._ W , _ , , _ _ _ , _ , , , , , , _ , _ . .. A/ 5 /2 O $5s k~. . ! I- . WW_. . - . .. . __ . - . . _. . - _ . . . b \\ A.u ALua; u. - a w : aew.2.~-. . f ( ' j ? *A 0-4 ~.../_di_ A4 W . N / @ f #i, -C+w?_- h.. <' ^ - ' / E.
k __ .1 j .. .c6e&c. w.z w nu.~ w.-r.n x. - . i , - . . ! . - . . . _ . - - - . _ . > < . .e--- -v - ..,c. --- .n- ,.,,,vx--,--,.-.mr-- - e.- a . , - - . . --r.v .--
.--,---.oe,-,,m.,,-.nc.
n.m. - - -- - ~ . _ , ~.e- -
_ _ _ __.._________. - _ _ _ _____ - _ _ _ _ _ _ __
0 $ .L . . - .. e - - . ._ .. @ L /. . _ . ._. . e - ~e.._ . ..e.e_e- . _ . _ _..e ._ .. -u h .- .~. . -- ---..-.- - ...-e.e- m. -e ~ - -- - - ~~ e-
- = ---* --
- .,m _. .~. %-+.-goe -- w-+ pqm - e+.g- -N. w emm-g . e e em gom. m $h m aw - 4Ph -Mhe e4
- e
^ " "*NO*8 9 O ,..g as .my w +-e e e 9 9
+e e. mmde a, wasy m %e, e- % e. _ +==g@ _ WN N
- 8-*"
4"'** "*' ~ ' * 4 W 4-
- m66
he =-N 4 .6e'sD & e*
- * * *e.M
MN . .,. p6N =6 ' * - M - WW e.N egSe M8-WW W Mve r --96* 6e O
l l 4 m . . . . . _ - . . s ..-- - . ~ _ - e+ .-------4.--
ee-- - +=-- -e- - - *-+= - ,., .e m,,,-ag _ -Nhw= -6 hee emmee6- - ees====me= e em4 4 ** 9%eh. _ h ge e '- ,N we gy h wN eme N N-=9 68** 9--r MN M'N
MS- w-e em6M w 1 i l l l == m l , 1 l 1 l - - - - _ .- _ - _ -.- . . . . ..- -- - _-_. _ ... - - -e e _ e .- ___ --.., e-==.-+=em.,ow-hw .==.-mea e. -, , , - .... w., w%mm ,,,aw,% ,, .. , =-eesp-.. . e- -w w e-weh w..,- =m -+%m em.
'rimwhe +New=4ew awe h --* mm-eem--m.- emem ogsghe+g N**h he 6WM- 6 "- % e .- 4-m .-4 e-O$ wee > m em*wsums-,e==.. mpy-ww 4ww- wg--=<.me a m - m w+ gw. g whep,,w ,4 %.,g, , ,, W
- d
t & WM e4 6m'Sw eemIu*- = r e-o a.memism_h eur e.um e=g ew---gimpwe e- gamm-a w e-e-w._ ,4me.e .g ., emw.m m is .4 g. g O eg er-- - Mee e gesw- ge - ewe e@ -..+6-weg ee see,.mmg.., m-e.ew , - g.,.e g .- se. . ,g,, ,,, my. p,,4, ,, e.g p,,a ,m 9,, , ,,, e . _. . . . ._.. . = _ _ . . . -. ..._ -__ .ea - _ _ee . _ e. _._ __. e . . _ ..
- -ee--
Wm ,e w +w -= e. e, =sw.en,eg,- ,po.g+--een- 4 - t = = . une ==. e p .en , sagy *ee e-g ame e 6e.- _ . -% ,,og . a , , ee.- mee4m4,-muummm eem _.upm-w we e ggy, w e ew ,,, , ,,,. ,,,,, ,,, l _- ---__ e. a=== ====.-ee,me--w -e ee e > . ' , -% , M
- ' 6h
- 6
4 +- MN -M .h aee es eMg _mgm ga I t - _ - -
9 . l ' . 'p . ./s , "3 Q e
- b
,. >
,
4 .* t . . - . . ...p .. - -. . , r ('(. r / < _. : . . -. . .. . .. - - - . . -...s.. .. / }l* - s' ?/ e s ' y ;_t . .. ..- , r 3-- _ . - ,
< ' ' l / .- ~ - c a* ._ . __ ... _ . .,7 . - - . . . _ _ . , . _ . ._ .. y . . . .. f&y (..y,:< c d . . .. . ....- -- . , ..- - > i. - f, , . .. gc. . ..a .o o. .-.. /. .:, - .... u @.. . . .
.. - . - .. . , , . .. ' _
- , . -f) / - -as. . . . . .. . . .
& _ . ~. . - - - . . - . - _ . - - .
. .. . - . ,/ ,. , 's . / s , . , ' . , - --'-- '/- -- .- - --..._.l..L.-.--...- ' '
.-.--.: .- -. . -- ,.. = . . / 9 f , b / ._-_ _ _ . \\ .) . - _. L .. i e Im_ .1-n. a,.a f ')'. L l' < '- sse- 4! l*#- 's l " ' " ' .*f ? J.- - ._ ' Gv ,.<w.- < - .' f . p., . >~ v
. __..._4.. , ' , , - ,- .- .n.-. -t c~% - ' . . __ +- , / ) t [**
- ' e* /*
y) - ,
. -e e- m - f /hY *** > <t. /14
- e
4f .- . . / -.y. . - /$ ,$ *
O' lY ff .' / g ', f&* ,
> -
- p
./_ . - . / _- _ . , . _ ___._. _ _ _ . _ _ . - W.@ we O 6. . jw v<. t' .s..-. . Y - ' ' A .. . .s_._
.r d + . __ __ _ _ _ , _ _ . _ _ _ _ ____. , w e e ., nr .. N h-' WGu.
- *
o-*.- - 'ew _ _ -. w- - _ .. _ . . . - . . - . .. . . . . ._ . m.. _ . _ . , ___,. ,_ _,, ,_,,q , _ , , __ "' NW Mw' N-N.e.m.A a.q - . . , .m .. .,g_e .,g g____ _ ' M*
- 6"*
-.=
r4 e me ._ q, , _ , , __ .*e=m - -- - - .e. . e. - . . .._ .., ._ _ _ , , , g , ,,,_ ,, , , W*W 1*
4 e .p
- am
eme.ap 4 g g ye.meeaw yw.,og, ,- ,,, g ,, , , , , = ME . W h
- h-N
N * - .4 ..mg % --% ,, 4, - drew e----..s-= ..m ... -%.. p e m m. em % , -- _ _ , e'-C8"-- -- &. be m- 4M h- m , g,g,g gg _ _ .
, _p_ O k J P 8 I 8 , [ s e e .--. . -- ... . .. .- . .- - . . . .. .. . / - . . . . . . ... .. - kJ b . ,/ l /!s 1 ' * <*
- ^
, t . . . .. . . ....-.. ~ . . . . . ._ . - . - . . . .. .. . .. . . . g pf l 8 g .' ?r '/ - x,.,.,,-.. / u ^ o f. .o. e f . f .c .. , *.< . . , . . .- . -..-_.m s i.: ,.:-. /- , - - t a ' , - o ,.- ~, ...-.../ . . n . .-~ .. - .. -- -. . . . . - . . ... ... . .. . .. . .-.. - - ~ - , , . . ...- ..- . .-. . .. . , hf - . . . . _ _ _. . .. ~~ . . - i 4 d .'umas w .m sie M es.w.hN 0 . ..s. - w ... -.. . - . ._ --.. w--. - . . . . . he.- . ,. . 44 medNh e Ng- 8 em uh*m.---mme e a we a um- - aeme-ee M -gege m S m , p. h..M.M De.e-.We e e .umm .m9 .eum.g . 9 - MeM.m&Mr. M He me . r $ 9 $ . -. .-w.- .. .4 . . . . . , - - _ .. - .. I e. m.- 6N e 9h- s.. g a.m .a -es e w -N - m.- t m-a, mme. -gw. p b - - . . ~+-w - .-.u+..- ..., %,-.e..- , , .- e . , . . . . a. ew. - w we <^^.-$m-um. umgpume- en mm.%.mp.h e.a.equ=.==umeeme--
- .eum,e.eL.ow.a
w . m.- e e. . - -- g gu,
- -
. m% ww 948 m
- -
- 3
==-e ese .=. me6.ma-- h. - e& v=A. W eM*Na6*en e e. Nm-es 6N . m .- - m p. &a 6 we ese m e as e4A6m 64hh-mamm. heemagr 4 h es M-- S. gh m me e.* is aem e--.iee _w ee em - emy .p4e ww, e d4 . ehe dm. su. .mg, gp em. ., 9e m. Dub & a ba e A '+MW GW-6-O.e-M eue . g.e-.mm, 4 ewe.e 4 e Wr-.w-me ww-p ggp=kh - e e g we ..,ww og =.e am p .-w a ,s. $ aog e ame- . w.pm., e se,, g i . 1 f -- .. . . ,. . . ... .e. - . - - - + .g ==.hm .-. ..e e--. e e .,. m._ -_ a. . . - - - .e.a.m. -- 4 % .- -- . m. .., .1 .--.~. ._ - _ _ _ . ..._-. .. -- ..- -,- - - - -- __ - - ._ i . . . . . ..m . - __ -. _. . . , . , .- , - - . ~ - - - - . . . i '1 1 _. - _. __ . . . _ . _ - _ - - . _ .. _._.. . _. ,. _ _ _ -_ , . _ _ _ ., -- -p_r . - , - --
_ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ - -
d
,
e h }Y h$ f ////9 b by f$sYltff .fm/ froy2% /?McS l 1 1 - l l . 1 n l l l t 1 .. ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
." - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION fg ,, REGION III
,
. OUTGOING TRANSHISSION SERVICE REQUEST - _e . ..se 9/23/82 Number of Pages 1 73 (Name): Pay Iove - dehion III ___ ' - Trom Jim Binder r, roc office - Byron)
.
Des'cription Pan Inspection , . . Air Rights 31d3 FOR WP & D/C USE - I/W Towers System 6 (WP) , M Street Rapifax - , MiBB 3M EXT #727 Phillips Blds 3M EXT #728 '*1ver Springs FTS '.'111s te Bldg) Coc=ercial
Landow Bldg , Ragion 1 Time Started Region 11 Time Completed __ ,, Region IV Trans. Time ' (Actual Mins.) I Region V Operator
Rasident at . N. SAC - INFO . Corporate Office (Identify recipient & fax number) + ~ N'I9h Other (Designate - include fax number)
- /r
t Rev 4/82
Attachment 1 . . RP 0905 6'0906 . .
. - . . ,, . - 1 , ~ NATTIELD ELECTRIC COMPANY . BYRON UNITS I & 11 QAMC MEMORANDUM #295 TO: A.W. Koca, QC supervisor FROM: J. K. Buchanan, QA/QC Manager , . - l DATE: September 17, 1982 > SUBJECT: Pan In'sp ection , since beginning the cable pas reinspection, we have had a policy for acceptance of hangers which hive a connection assembly which is, covered by fireproofing, , I as recesfirming this making it impossible to verify the connection detail. i policy. i When inspectors are performing pan hanger or conduit hanger inspections they are required to verify the connection detail is as specified by the Architectural Engineer. Should the hanger its connection detail rendered inaccessable by fireproofing, che related weld the inspector should research the weld inspection file fer inspection for a given hanger. If the weld traveler has been accepted the inspector shall note the traveler on the hanger inspection report and shall , accept the detail. This acceptance is babed on the f act that the veld inspector is required to l identify the type connection detail for each veld. By virtue of this identification the welding inspector has confirmed the use of the correct detail by his acceptance of the Meld. , If there is no weld inspection in the file for the specified hanger, the fireproofing shall be removed and the required inspection performed and documented. (See Memo 216) i concerning this policy, pleas- Should you or your inspectors have any questionb see ww. l c., Ju- '= - ' J. Buchanan
. cc: J. O. Binder C. Vanderhei . ' File 9.12 i !
. ._ _ .. _ _ _ _ _. .
. .
- .
f ' . v , DNTRACTOR
- Chicago Bridge & Iron
-
, SCOPE OF E7K : Containment Liner (*
- DURATION
12/75 - 7/*/9 ) ACTION TO BE TANEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 ( 82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) All inspectors certified to SNT-TC-1A; no action to be tkken in response to Violation 2. W
W b' i - ,o ' lf s?" ' . . . V" 4 - ! For 4 -re- a yy "l1 \\ ' . - - - - - ---._ ..__. ., , , ,_ re 6-0
- . s .
- '
' CONTRACTOR
- Chicago Bridge & Iron
' SCOPE OF WORK : Field Erected Tanks . "URATION
- 9/77 - 12/78
ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) All inspectors certified to SNT-TC-1A: no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. . I , .- , D .. . . ' . . . _.. . ... . . . . , ,, "
- - - . . , s . e# CONTRACTOR
Pittsburgh - Des Moines , , SCOPE OF IdORK : Stainless 7 teel Liner DURATION
3/78 - 11/79 , ACTION TO BE TAMEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) All inspectors certified to SNT-TC-1A; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. l . % 9 $ e 4 I i 4 I i l 1 1 ' < i . 4
- N *
- W
+e=+a+ h- i % -y,,,, - ,,, , , ,, .,, _ o @qgQ '"" _ - . - . - - - . . . - , _,. _ , , m _ - , . . .,,_,-_-m__ r_- _- . ,,,, , -y_. . . - -- , .
. . s i l - CONTRACTOR
- Ebasco
"
) SCOPE OF WORK : Inservice Inspection - . i OURATION
5/81 - Continuing i ACTION TO BE TAMEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) All inspectors certified to SNT-TC-1A:'no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. , e W 4 s 4 t 9 1 9 4 ( ' , 4 t t ) . I J
- . . . . .._. . ._ , w w_,- w - . - - - - e - --,y -m -,, - ,, , -, - , - - - - , - g -- .g ---w-y- - - - - --,w,
- .
CONTRACTOR
- Delta - Delta Midstates
, SCOPE OF WORN : Reinforcinci Steel , DURATION
3/76 - 5/79 ACTION TO BE TANEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19: 455/02-04-19) All work is encased within concrete and therefore not accessible for reinspection: no cetion to be taken in response to Violation 2. . I b e + . 4 ( s a , 4 f , t
i ! - ' . . , +-su --- - - -- , ,, , , w,- --y,i-4 ,- v - - -. -- --- , , - , , . --w, ,, . . - - ---,-.,,---.r-w-%, - -- -
. . ,
CONTRACTOR
- Contracting & Materials Co.
I SCOPE OF WORK : Essential Service Water Make-Up Liner - "URATION
- 2/77 - 11/78
ACTION TO BE TAMEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) All wurk is encased in concrete and burried, and therefore not accessible for reinspection; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. b \\ , l ) l l l t
. 4 a . . % = we. - - - - . , _ . . , , , - - , , - - - - - - - - ~ . - - - - , . - - - --~.. , -3 , --.---r---- e , . - , - . - - - ,-- -,
. . . CONTRACTOR
- Ceramic Cooling Towers / Contracting & Materials Co. (Subcontractor)
. SCOPE OF WORK : Essential Service Water Cooling Towers Accessories
- DURATION
- 6/78 - 4/79
' ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) All work is encased within concrete and fill of cooling towers; and therefore not cecessible for reinspection; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. L ! e l .
1
l . ! " ( > , r f 4 , P I , - l . + 8 ! ') \\ > P '
t 1 '.
, .
.m -, , , - - , , - , - , - - - ,- . n - - - ,. _ . . _ , - .,.,, _ , - _ _ _ _ , - . _ _ . _ - _ . . - - . . ,,. , - . , _ _ _ , - .__ _
.
CONTRACTOR
Reliance Truck SCOPE OF WORK : Trsnsport & Lift NSSS , DURATION
- 7/76 - 4/80
. ACTION TO lf TAKEN IN RESPtNSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) Scope of work was riggP '. transporting, and lif ting operation and therefore, have no inspection elements which ars reinspectable; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. 4 I I e I . i } i d ( l . - 1
3 I
.
1 i _ -p, -s-% .- w- w-- g- 3-----v - - - - yy-+-e* ,----eep ww+.w------- - ---9 -v--- -w- -e,--o%--w-ye--,y p-- -n-i- y,y 9 -- --e--- - - - > --y.- --
. s i l I CONTRACTOR
- Rolicblo She:t Metal
, SCOPE OF WORX : HVAC Installation DURATION
11/77 - Continuing
'HCTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) Work is presently being reinspected to revised techniques which are more complex than previously employed. Hardware is being reinspected to the following attributes: weld quality, member size and configuration, material traceability, etc. of ductwork, cccessories, equipene.it and supports. All work is in scope of reinspection, even though it may have been previously inspected. No action to be taken in response to Violation 2. r n 1 . . , . l l 'I l .. _ _ _ _ , - . , , - ._ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - __
o . . , CONTRACTOR
- Jshnscn Controls
, SCOPE OF WORK : HVAC Controls DURATION
- 2/78 - Continuing
( ' MCTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) A reinspection wi!1 be performed in response to Violation 2. The reinspection will be conducted on a samplo size established as follows: Each quality con':rol inspector who has been certified since beginning of project will be selected and eac.) individual inspection performed during the inspectors first three months will be r# inspected, where accessible. Inace'essible shall be defined as: condition where ',ismantling would be required to gain access, or condition where process was an event wht:h can not be recreated. The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be established as follows: The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and
therefore have a ;11gher degree of re'pentability the acceptable quality level will be 5%. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 10%. Reinspection rejections on attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent. third party f espectors to et.tablish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on u;',ributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities appear to require evaluation. I io sample size expaision will be established as follows: Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributes or greater than 5% for objective sttributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months of irispection wort will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections ' continue to exceed the acceptable quality level af ter the completion of the additional thren month period for that individual, then all the individual inspections, of that attribute, performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be reinspected, where accessible. ' $PPENDIX: i Definitions: ' Inaccessible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples: fit-up gap of piping and fittings, internal cleanlines s , e t.al . , note : the requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not classify an item as inaccessible. , l ' - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated; examples: interpass temperature, element has been reworked as a result of revision or other cause, et.al. Obiective Inspection Attribute - feature which by its physical nature has a high degree l' of repeatability; examples: material size, s ha pe , traceability, dimensional configuration, examination reporting, et. al. 4 . - .. .. . _, .. . . __ _ _ -__
_ - . _ . - - , .. . , Subf ective Inspection Attributa - featuro which by it naturo has o lower degres of rcpeatchility du3 to its d: pend:nco upon human senssry qualitics: . examples visual weld examination, et. al, , , e a 1' P a* 4 . a 4 l i
, k I r '
, i i i , 5 ' l i I
! t , j ' .
I 4 I '
j i ' b i c l t j, . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . 5 _ . _ _ _ , _ , . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ - - . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ . . . _ _ _ . _ , _ . . . _ _ _ , - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ . _ -_, ___ _ .. _ . _ _ _ ,_. _ . . ,
o
CONTRACTOR
- Powers-Azcs-Pepe
i , SCOPE OF WORK : Instrumentation Installation . "URATION
- 8/75 - Continuing
ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19: 4$5/82-04-19) A reinspection will be performed in respons' to Violation 2. The reinspection will be c conducted on a sample size established as follows: Each quality control inspector who has been certified since beginning of project will be selected and each individual inspection performed during the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inaccescible shall be defined as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or condition where process i , was an event which can not be recreated. ! ! The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejactions) will be established as follows: The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 5%. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of I repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 10%. Reinspection rejections on attributes which are subjective in nature, will be evaluated by independent third party j inspectors to establish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independant third party inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities appear to require j evaluation. t .ie sample sizo expansion will be established as follows: Where truo rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributes or greater than 5% for obisctive attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three monthe of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptablo quality level. If the rejections continue to exceed the acceptable quality level af ter the completion of the additional
three month period for that individual, then all the individual inspections, of that attribute, performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be l reinspected, where accessible, fPPENDIX: Definitions: Inaccessible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples: , embedded or buried piping, internal diameter alignment of piping, and fittings, fit-up gap of piping and fittings, et.al. , note: the requirement to rehtove fire proofing and insulation will not classify an item as inaccessible, - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated; , ' examples: interpass temperature, element has been reworked as a result of revision or other cause, et.al .
l Objective Inspection Attribut3 - feature which by its physical nature has a high degree ! of repeatability; examples: material size, shape, traceability, dimensional configuration, examination reporting, et. al. __ ,,-_ , _ , - _ . - , - , _ , _ , , , . , . , , , , , . -- . , , . _ . _ . . , _ _ ,_, - _ , . - - , . . _ _ . - , . , . , , , . _ , - __ ,_ _ _ . , , , -_ _ , . - - _ - _ _
_ ,._ - , _ - .
' Subiective Inspection Attribute - featuro which by it nature has o lower degroo of repeat bility due ta its d: pend:nco upon human scnstry qualitics;
examples: visual weld examination, et. al. ' l
. l f y 1 e f I . 6 ' > li a 1
., l . .i ! - o d i
! 1 l i i . ,j . !
. i ( ' , < l , , f e , i t i -- . -m... ...__ ___ . , i P _-- _ ,- . . _ . _ .. . , , ~ . _ _ . , _ _ . _ . . , _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _ _ - - , - - . _ - . . ._. ___.. _.. _ . , _ . - _ , _ _.- - - - _ . _- . . _ _ _ -._ _ __. _
' . . CONTRACTOR
- B1 cunt Brothers
. . SCOPE OF WORK : Plant Structures DURATION
- 6/75 - Continuing
, ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) A reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The reinspection will be conducted on a sample size established as follows: F From a chronological listing based on date of certification of each quality control inspector Lho has been certified since beginning of project, every 5th inspector beginning with the 5th will be selected and each individual, inspection performed during , the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inaccessible shall be defined as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or condition where process was an event which can not be recreated. If an in'.pector is selected who has no inspections accessible, the next succeeding inspector will be - selected. The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be established as follows: The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be , 5%. For attributes which are subjective in nature End therefore have a lower degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 10%. Reinspection rejections on attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party , inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities appear to require evaluation. The sample size expansion will be established as follows: ! Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributes or greater than 5% for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the , type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections ' continue to exceed the acceptable quality level after the completion of tne additional three month period for that individual, then all the individual inspections, of that attributs, performed by that inspector for the renninder of his work will be .I reinapected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspectors being reviewed will be increased by 50%. LPPENDIXi , Definitions: , Inacc,tAsible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain eccess; examples: I encased structural steel and encased block wall columns, shear studs and deformed wire anchors encased in concrete, concrete and block well reinforcement, et.a1. , note: the requirement to remove fire proofing and ) insulation will not classify an item as inaccessible, ( l - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated; examples: concrete placement, receiving inspection, post tensioning , pre-load values, element has been reworked as a result of revision or 4 i other cause, et.al. i d - -
s . . Objective Inspection Attribute - featuro which by its physical naturo has o high degr:3 ef rcpeatability; cxampics: matcrici sirs, shape, tr ceability,
dimensional configuration, examination reporting, et. al. l Subioetive Inspection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower degree of ,_ ' repeatability due to its dependence upon human sensory qualities: examples: visual weld examinatior, et. al. 1 > b
f 1 ! > 4
. i . I ! i , . i ! i I . m-- -- --- , - _ - - - - - - - ,un,,- , - , + , - - - +- m. . , __ --c ~- , , - ,- -
-. . , . - CONTRACTOR
- Hunter Corpor ticn
' , , SCOPE OF WORK : Piping System Installation DURATION
1/77 - Continuing ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) A reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The reinspection will be conducted on a sample size established as follows: i From a chronological listing based on date of certification of each quality control inspector who has been certified since beginning of project, every 5th inspector beginning with the 5th will bo selected and each individual inspection performed during the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inacces sible shall be defined as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or condition where process was an event which can not be recreated. If an inspector is selected who has no inspections accessible, the next succeeding inspector will be s elect ed . The acceptable quality level (i.e. man:imum percent rejections) will be established as follows: The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 51. Fur attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of ' repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 10%. Reinspection rejections on attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on
attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities appear to require evaluation. ' The sample size expansion will be established as follows: , Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributes or greater than 5% for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the type of indpection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections continue to exceed the acceptable quality level af ter the completion of the additional three month period for that individual, then all the individual inspections, of that attribute, performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be reinspected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspectors being reviewed will be increased by 50%. OPPENDIX: Definitions:
Inaccessible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples: embedded or buried piping, internal diameter alignment of piping and fittings, fit-up gap of piping and fittings, et.al. , note: the requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not classify an item as inaccessible. I - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated; examples: post-weld heat treatment, interpass temperature, element has been reworked as a result of revision or other cause, et.al. . . 1 -- - - , - - - - ,-- ,_.-4 _ _ _ _ - , , . - . - - - - - - - , , _ _ - -, - - ,- ,, - - - - , - - - -
o I
l Obiective Inspection Attribute - featuro which by its physical naturo has o high degroo of repeat bility; cza.mpics: materici siro, shape, trcccchility, . dimensio.nal configuration, examination reporting, et. al. , ' Subiective Inspection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower degrad of repeatability due tn its dependence upon human sensory qualities; examples: visual we'.d examirwtion, et. al. , d ,
, , . . . 't ] i , d i , a 9 1
1 i l --..-... - . . . . . . -. - , - - - ---w- - y,,wy, , 7,e,--w,---g ,-----,,w y- - - , - --,,--4 -- -- ,.,----m
. CONTRACTOR
- Hatfield E10ctric
SCOPE OF WORK : Electrical Installation
- DURATION
7/76 - Continuing ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19: 455/82-04-19) A reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The reinspection will be conducted on a sample size established as follows: From a chronological listing based on date of certification of each quality control inspector who has been certified since beginning of project, every 5th inspector beginning with the 5th will be selected and each individual inspection performed during the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inaccessible shall be defined as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or condition where process was ar. event which can not be recreated. If an inspector is selected who has no inspections accessible, the next succeeding inspector will be s elect ed . The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be established as follows: The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 5%. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 10%. Reinspection rejections on attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on { attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities appear to require evaluation. The sample size expansion will be established as follows: Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributes or greater than 5% for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months < of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections continue to exceed 'the acceptable quality level af ter the completion of the additional three month period for that individual, then all the individual inspections, of that attribute, performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will De reinspected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspectors being reviewed will be increased by 50%. (PPENDIX: . Definitions: Inaccessible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples: embedded conduit, buried and embedded duct runs, cable splices, et.al. , note: the requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not classift an item as inaccessible. . - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated; k examples: cable pulling, handling of equipment, receiving inspection, et.al, i . -. . . .. , , - - - , - -- --- - .-.-- . , - .
, . . Obf ective Inspection Attributa - featuro which by its physicci naturo has o high degroo of repeatability; examples: material size, shape, traceability, . dimensional configuration, examination reporting, et. al. , Subjective Inspection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower degree of repeatability due to its dependence upon human sensory qualities; examples: visual weld examination, et. al. ! ! . O 1 J l ' .! l t I ., r I i i < I l ., I ! ! . ! . ., ....- . _ _ . . _ . . , _ . - - . , - . - _ _, ._-.,__e--g7y---+ --- . -,,7,, --- 9 p,_-,.
- _ - - - - - .- -- -- ._ _ .. . .- . _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . { CONTRACTOR
- Nuc1ccr Inst 311ction Ssevices Co.
, , SCOPE OF WORK : NSSS Assembly DORATION
6/78 - Continuing f ACTION TO BE TAMEN IN RESPONSE TO VI'OLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) I A sampling reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The sample size I will be established as follows: ' ' From a chronological listing based on date of certification of each quality control , ,
inspector who has been certified since beginning of project, every 5th inspector l j beginning with the 5th will be selected and each individual inspection performed during l l the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inaccessible { ' shall be defined as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or
! condition where process was an event which can not be recreated. If an inspector is l
selected who has no inspections .secessible, the next succeeding inspector will be
i selected. ~ ! } l l The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be established as ! follows: 3
1 The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and j
therefore have a higher degrew of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be l
55. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of ' repeatability the acceptable quality level will be los. Reinspection rejections on " j attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectabtlity; additionally reinspection rejections on ( attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities appear to require l j evaluation, j , i The sample size expansion will be established as follows:
, t i 1 Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributes or greater than 4 p I 5% for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months l j of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for" the l type of inspection atcribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections , i continue to exceed the acceptable quality level af ter the completion of the additional three month period for that individual, then all the irdividual inspections, of that attribute, performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be l l reinspected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspectors being reviewed 4 will be increased by 50%. I
CPPENDIX: 1 Definitions: , j Inaccessiblg, - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples: ! components and assemblies contained within reactor vessel shroud, et.al. , I l note: the requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not ] i classify an item as inaccessible. i \\ < 3 ' - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated, i ! examples interpass temperature, element has been reworked as a result of l revision or other cause, et.al. l - . I, i , - - - - - . - . , _ . . . ,f -
- - . . , Objective Inspection Attribute - featuro which by its physical natur3 has o high degros cf rcpeat bility; cxamplos: materic1 sizo, shape, tr:cscbility,
dimensional configuration, examination reporting, et. al. i Subiective Inspection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower degree of (- repeatability due to its dependence upon human sensory qualities: ' examples: visual weld examir.ation, et. al. ' . I t , a \\ I i f '
( ' i
l i , ! l ^ t \\ < i f . i i 1 < l i P 1 % i . a
. ~. _ , , _ - .- _ - _ . __ __ . _ _ - . _- . _ - . . . _ _ _ . . . . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ~ _ __ - . _
. - . _ _ . _ . - . - . . - . e j ,
CONTRACTOR
Peabody Testing . , , SCOPE OF WORK : Independent Inspection , DURATION
6/75 - 8/79 (' ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIO , (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19)
i e sampling reinspection will be performed in response to violation 2. The sample size 1 will be established as follows: i ! From a chronological listing based on date of certification of each quality control inspector who has been certified since beginning of project, every 5th inspector s beginning with the 5tn will be selected and each indsvidual inspection performed during
the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inaccessible ! shall be definsd as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or
condition where process was an event which can not be recreated. If an inspector is ( 4 selected who has no inspections accessible, the next succeeding inspector will be 3 4 selected, t
The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be established as , follows: ! The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to ' the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be t 55. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of l repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 10%. Reinspection rejections on attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party
{ inspectors to establish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on i ' ( attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party , i inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends med quantities appear to require . ! ' evaluation, t r The sample size expansion will be established as follows: ' Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributes or greater than l
55 for objective actributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections i
continue to exceed the acceptable quality level af ter the completion of the additional j three month period for that individual, then all the individual inspection., of tnet i ' attribute, performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be { reinspected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspecto*s being reviewed j Q will be increased by 50%. I i i APPENDIX ! a l l Definitions: ) i i } Inaccessible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples:
embedded structural bolts, cadwelds, soils tests, et.al. , note: the ' j requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not classify an j item as inaccessible.
, j - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated; '
( examples: concrete placement, et.a1. 4 I . 1 , i ! l j '
1, . h ' . . - . - - - - - - - . - -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . ~ _ . l Objective Inametion Attribute - featuro which by its physical natura has o high degroo Cf repeatability; CMamp1CO: torqu3 che?.ks, Ct. 01, .
t Subjective Insnection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower degree of ~ repeatability due to its dependence upon human sentory qualities; [ examples: visual weld examination, et. al. ( 1 l l } . . ( . t 9 - -M - e w*=' w- -
- aa
. w._. % ., __ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ . _ _ _
-- _
- ____-.
_ _ _ ._ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - . . _ . _ < .
,. CONTRACTOR
- Pittsburgh Testing
$ ' - . SCOPE OF WORK : Independent Inspection DURATION
- 9/79 - Continuing
l ACTION TO DE TAMEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/02-05-19; 455/02-04-19) . ! l A sampling reinspection will be performed in response to violation 2. The sample size 4 will be established as follows: ! s , l From a dronological listing based on date of certification of each quality control i ' ins per ro.4 who has been certified since beginning of project, every 5th inspector
I beginning with the 5th will be selected and each individual inspection performed during ] the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inaccessible - 1 shall be defined as condition where dismentling would be required to gain access, or ! ] condition where process was an event which can not be recreated. If an inspector is [ selected who has no inspections accessible, the nemt succeeding inspector will be ! , j selected. l
J l The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be established as
j follows: j I The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to i
the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and
l therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be
] 55. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of f
repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 105. Reinspection rejections on !
attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independetit third party
j inspectors to establish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on l l { attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party i
inspectors to establish true rejectability if trend; and quantities appear to require ! j evaluation. [ i i l The sample size expansion will be established as follows: !
! Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributes or greater than [ J 55 for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months ! ! of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for thet individual for the l ! type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections i ! continue to exceed the acceptable quality level af ter the completion of the additional ' l three month period for that individual, then all the individual inspections, of that i ! attribute, performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be i 1 reinspected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspectors being reviewed I i will be increased by 501. ! ! QPPENDIXt , l l Definitions: 1 g Inaccessible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples: I
embedded structural bolts, non-destructive examination of field welds embedded in concrete, et.al., note: the requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not classify an item as inaccessible. ' 1 ll ' - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated; t I f examples: concrete placement, in process non-destructive examinations of i j welt s, electr ical cable pulling, calibrations, et.al. { ' 1
. . . _ - . _ _ . _ . _ _. _ . t , . - - - - . - . - - - - .. - - . . . - _- - - . - .
.;. . _ _ - _ . . . - - _ _ , , Objective Inspection Attribute - featuro which by its physical naturo has o high degroo cf repeat bility; cuamp10s: final inspectinn non-d::structivo cxaminatten . of welds, torque checks, et. al. , Subjective Inspection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower degree of repeatability due to its dependence upon human sensory qualities: a ' examples: visual weld examination, et. al.
. I e a k a t i i s 4 l , k 4 e i , , t , , h h l
. , 1
1 <
i t ! ' , i - ,, 4 I .! i 8 i I l ! ' , t > 4 i ) . P i 1 , ! ,, - . , , . ~ , - . . . - . . . , . ..... ... , , .. ._ ., ~ . - _ . , , . _ _ , , , ,.. _ , . _ ,, _ . , l I . - . . m- - - - . . -- .e.-* r- -- -.9 -
, ________ . CONTRACTOR
- Mid-City Architectural Iron
SCOPE OF WORK : Ca11ery Work (included structural steel) DURATION
3/77 - 12/80 %. ACTION TO BE TANEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOL ATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) Structural steel installations are being reinspected on a sampling basis; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. The structural steel reinspections are being performed on the following basis: l A reinspection is '91ng performed on structural steel members to verify that structural steel is in conformance with design requirements. The structural steel members See being reinspected on a statistical sample established in accordance with MIL Std. 1050 with data base parameters to establish 95% con. ;dence/951 reliability. Reinspection i program has been named Quality Control Structural Steel Review (QCSSR). l I l l l l l k . l l l i . .u = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
, - __ . _ _ _ _ _ _ __. ___ _ ._ _. _ ___ __ _ . _ _ ' . CONTRACTOR
- American Bridge
I . SCOPE OF WORK : Structural Steel Erection DURATION
2/77 - 5/78 ' ACTION TO BE i' AMEN IN RESPoddSE To vrotArroN 2 (4s4/s2-os-1,- 4s5/s2-o4..m Structural steel installations are being reinspected on a sampling basis; no action to be taken in response to V';1stion 2. ,
The structural steel reinspections are being performed on the following basis: Structural steel bolting was reinspected on a statistical sample established in ' ] accor11ance with MIL Std. 1050 with data base parameters to establish 951 confidence /95% , l reliability. The .4 inspection was the subject of a 10CFRSO.55.e, reference reportable deficiency 82-08, which was communicated by final report dated January 14, 1983.
Additionally, a 1einspection is being performed on structural steel members to verify that structura! steel is in conformance with design requirements. The structural steel 1 members are being reinspected on a statistical sample established in accort!ance with j MIL Std.1050 with data beso parameters to, establish 95% confidence /95% reliability. Reinspection program has been named Quality Control Structural Steel Review (QCSSR).
4 ! I I e t , 1 ! ! ' ] ) . ! r I i , L l 4 N w I i I ( i ( i i + 4
i l i ' l !
\\ l > .. . .- _ . - _ . _ _ _ . . . . _ . . __ _m.. - l L --..--. . - -. --.. . . - - .-- . . . - . . - . - - _ _ . _ - _ - - - - . - . . - -
, _ ___ _ _ ____ ._ _ W . r CONTRACTOR
- Midway Industric1
. SCOPE OF WORK : Field Finish Coating DURATION
- 5/78 - Continuing
' ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19)
The field finish coating work has been overview inspected by the Commonwealth Edison Operational Analysis Department; the overview inspection consisted of check 00 ambient conditions, inspection of surface properation, batch mixing, film thickness measurements and visual examinatior, of finish coatings, and insrection of stored materials. Due to the comprehensiveness of overview inspections no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. , 4 1 5 l . ! ! (
I l i ! I 1 4 l l 4 1 , , l l 4 i f i l l ! ! ' 1
l
< 1 . - - - . . . _ ._. . _ . _ _ _ . _ . .
4 ^ ' _ _ _ _ _ . ._ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - , _ _ _ .- __-___- _ . . _ _ _ . - _ - _ _ . _ _ _ . . . _ . . _ _ _ _
,_ __. . =- _ _ _ . . . . 9 . i l t ., CONTRACTOR Chicago Bridge & Iron ' . . SCOPE OF WORK Containment Liner
DURATION 12/75 - 7/79
( ' ACTION TO BE TAMEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/02-05-19; 455/02-04-19) - All inspectors certified to SNT-TC-1A; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. , $ 5 4 t ' t ' i
I j . i . y l' = + r g j e & ( 1 , i i I ,
, , l ! ' ! , i , h
4 A
< i l , i } t b i . i r i ! , - .I , f i i b
! r ! . , ! l r q , , 5' ,.
I . , ? \\ ? t I.
- '
.... . . . . , .- ._... .._ _ ..,_...... ., _ .. _ ._ _ , . _ _ _ _ . . . . .
, - _- . ._ _ . . .
CONTRACTOR
- Chicago Bridge & Iron
.
- SCCPE OF WORK : Field Erected Tanks
NRATION
- 9/77 - 12/74
! ! @ TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/02-0S-19; 455/82-04-19) ! All inspectors certified to SNT-TC-1A; re action to be taken in response to Violation 2.
& l ' .I 4 . i , J . . ! , k j i . l ' , , , l
' 1 't k . E ', , [ .- .. , . m- _ . - --. _ . ._, . . . . s .
- ,n , - - - --v -. - g -- e , . - . , ,. -. . --, ,,. p -r e- - , _ -_mn, , , , -, -,
.. .. - - _ _ _ - - - - . ! . t + l CONTRACTOR
Pittsburgh - Des Moines l
. , SCOPE OF WORK : Stainless Steel Liner DURATION
3/78 - 11/79 ' ACTION TO BE TANEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) All inspectors certified to SNT-TC-1A; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. , t 9 i , 1 '{ i I Y % , I , i 4 L s . $ ' l ! 4 e e i ,
! 6 ' ! . , ' .[ - t t ' 1 < i 1 1 - , f ( - , , f 1 1 . i l ' i , i , == =w - .-= ~ . - - .. ,.. .. . . . _ _ . . _ . . , - . _ , _ - . _ . . _ ._ . _ _ _ .-- _.,_. . . . _ _ _, _ _ . _ . _ _ , - _ . _ - _ _ _ _ - - - _
-e , . - --- _ . CONTRACTOR
- Ebasco
- SCOPE OF WORK : Inservice Inspection . rMJRATION
- S/81 - Continuing
s MTION TO BE TANEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/02-04-19) d All, inspectors certified to SNT-TC-1A; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. . , 4 a I h ~ c l b t J . i
, 4 i c i . IJ > t j I ' t s t ' t < f ' I t , i j i . >. l
i , i . , 1 - I . i .
I h )
l i '
.' ..-._...,,,......_;.___,,_,-. . . . _ . . . _ . . , _ -- - - - . . . . e- e g y-- - - _ - - -- - -n - - _ - ,- ,, < , -
, _. -- _ - - . i ' CONTRACTOR
- Delta - Delta Midst:tOs
. ' SCOPE OF WORK : Reinforcing Steel , DURATION
3/76 - 5/79 a ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 4SS/82-04-19) All work is encased within concrete and therefore not accessible for reinspection; no , cction to be taken in response to Violation 2. , a ! 1 ! . f I , a P e 6 , i I 4 l 1 i " i e , i 6 l l l 2 4
.
,
\\ ! l 4 1 s 9
I I' l i , 1 h 1 > e I $ I , 4 9
- i
i t 1 > . ' I ! ' . ._. . ~ - . - ~ ~ - - - - _ . . . . . . _ . , -. . .- _ -. , , - , - .-n- , - .- - --- - - - .- - - - - ,.---------p
' . CONTRACTOR
- ContrOcting & Mettricts Co.
, -SCOPE OF WORK : Essential Service Water Make-Up Liner
- 00 RATION
- 2/77 - 11/78
' , ACTION TO BE TANEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/02-05-19; 455/02-04-19) All wnek is encased in concrete and burried, and therefore not accessible for reinspection; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. i
. , , 1 { ' I T l I i
' . ! = ' 4 , . , i 1 ( ) , f . [ i , I i f 4 I
1 i
k
j ., , j - . . . - - . . - - - - , - - - - - . . _ . _ , . - _ . , . _ , _ - _ _ - , . , _ . . , _- _. . _ _ - _ .-. -- _ - - . , . _ - . _
. - - ~ ~ ' - - ~ . . , . CONTRACTOR
- Ceramic Cooling Towers / Contracting & Materials Co. (Subcontractor)
. SCOP' 0F WORK Essential Service Water Cooling Towers Accessories , DURATION
- 6/78 - 4/79
( ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454,*02-05-19; 455/02-04-19)
All work is encased within concrete and fill of cooling towers: and therefor e not ' cecessible for reinspection; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. 3 I < d i 1 , I r D l 7 . r I i l. . \\ f J '
$ i s i ,' l 4 i . , f I i l i , I 4 (
< , ! - j ' ' , , i I I '
i
- 'h%++--
% . 's e ' + e.s . . . ., . ,,., _ , ..... - - - - - - . - . - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - . . - - -
__ _ _ ._. . , a h CONTRACTOR Reliance Truck . SCOPE OF WORK : Transport & Lift NSSF DURATION
7/76 - 4/40 - ACTION TO BE TAMEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) i scope of work was rigging, transporting, and lifting operation and therefore, have no f inspection elements which are reinspectable; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. l ! i
i . ! I i a ! s ! 3 . , I I i l t l l i t ' t + i ! i 1 ! l I ! d
t ,
t ! t ! ' , ' r - t l . J
! i t ., ! I
- .
! I i ' ! . . . . 1-(
r f . < , i f > , 1 f , -- - -- l __. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ __ _ -- - . . .- . - _ . _ - _ - . -. _
, - . _ - - . -. - _ _ =- . _ _ _ _ . - = . - . _ . - _. - _. l - t I 1 CONTRACTOR
R0110blo Shent Metal , SCOPE OF WORK : HVAC Installation DURATION 11/77 - Continuing . l ' eCTION TO DE TAMEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) i , Work is presently being reinspected to revised techniques which are more complow than i previously employed. Hardware is being reinspected to the following attributost weld , ' quality, member size and configuration, material traceability, etc. of ductwork, i accessories, equipment and supports. All work is in scope of reinspection, even though it " i may have been previously inspected. No action to be taken in response to Violation 2. ] ! . 4 4 . 9 i l l 4
I i ! ,
'. , 4 , ,
t J j r j
. 1 i ) ! l 3 , ! i ! c ]
. r ' i l I l .
, 9 l r I { l j - - . ., f ,, -_-__ . ._- - _ - . . _ _ - _ - - _ . - ___. . _ - . _ - - - - - - _ _ _ _ . _ - - _ . _ __ _ . _ _ _ _- _ _ _ __- _ _ - _ _ -
. - . , _ - - - . - - - - - - - - - . - - ~ - _ . - - - - --. , i ! . I 4 l l CONTRACTOR
- Johnsen Controls
. j t SCOPE OF WORK t HVAC Controls l DURATION
- 2/74 - Continuing
+ { ! k
' ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-0S-1g! 4S5/82-04-19) i t A reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The reinspection will be
conducted on a sample stro established as follows: l toch quality control inspector who has been certified since beginning of project will be j selected and each individual inspection performed during the inspectors first three
j months will be reinspected. where accessible. Inaccessible shall be defined as: ' condition where dismantling would be required to gain access or condition where process was an event which can not be recreated. j !. The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be establisnod as ! j follows: } j ) The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection critoria applicable to 1 the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and , 1 therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be l } 55. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 105. Reinspection rejections on
' j attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party l i inspectors to establish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on ' l attributes which are objective in r.ature will be evaluated by independent thiad party i inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities arpear to require I evaluation. - . 1 j
.se sample size expansion will be established as follows: i Where true rejectability is greater than 101 for subjective attributes or greater than { SX for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months ! l of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections j continue to exceed the acceptable quality level af ter the completion of the additional three month period for that individual. then all the individual inspections, of that
attribute. performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be
reinspected. where accessible. APPENDIX! l y Definitions: 1 l Inaccessible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples: ! j fit-up gap of piping and fittings. internal cleanliness, et.e1.. note: ! I the rwquirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not classify ' an item as inaccessible. I i j - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated; - examples: interpass temperature element has been reworked as a result of revision or other cause, et.al. Obieettve Inspection attribute - feature which by its physical nature has a high degree
I of repeatability; examples: material size. shape, traceability, dimensional configuration. osamination reporting, et. al. , l l l -.. ._ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ . . . , - __ .
. - . Subiective Inamection Attribute - feature which by it nature has O lower degrCo cf repeatability due to its deperufence upon human sensory qualities; . examples visual weld enasination, et. al. , . !' 4 b % h i +
f e h ' ! ! , l
i
! , t ! ! , ! i i t ! - ! < i , i j . i ! f . w. m . e %4 - .
- -
- - . -m . . -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ __ _ _~ __ . .____m . - _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ .__ _ \\ - f L t l CONTRACTOR t Powers-Azco-Pope i
! . SCOPE OF WORK : Instrumentation Installation l l DURATION t V78 - Continuing i ' ACTION TO gE TANEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATIOg_2 (454/02-0S-19' 4 % /82-04-19) , ! A reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The reinspection will be j conducted on a sample size established as followst
i i Each quality control inspectot* who has been certified since beginning of project will be t' i selected and each individual inspection performed during the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inaccessible shall be defined as: l condition whore dismantling would be required to gain access, or cornfition where process i j was an event which can not be recreated. l . The acceptable quality level (i.e. manimum percent rejections) will be established as l follows: l , $ The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to f the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and i therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be $ St. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of
! repeatability the ac.aptable quality level will be 105. Reinspectlon rejoctions on ( j attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party l inspectors to satablish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on
, attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party
'
inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities appear to require { evaluation, ' { l l .w sample size expansion will be established as follows: ' i
Where true rejectability is greater than los for sutijective attributes or greater than , ' 55 for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months ! of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the 4 i type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections , - continue to exceed the acceptable quality level af ter the completion of the additional i l three month period for that individual, then all the individual inspections, of that l ] attribute, performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be l r.insp.cs.d. where accessible. l l APPENDIX: ! ! I Definitions: i } ! 1 Inaccessible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; eaamples: ! ] embedded or buried piping, internal diameter alignment of piping, and i fittings, fit-up gap of piping and fittings, et.al., note: the
i requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not classify an } j item as inaccessible. l i
5 - condition where pro:ess was an event which can not be recreated: ' ! examples: interpass temperature, element has been reworked as a result of l l revision or other cause, et.al, i
QOeetive Insnection Attribute - feature which by its physical nature has a high degree
of repeatability; ennacles: material size, shape, traceability, i dimensional configuration, esamination reporting, et. al. i I , 3e s =-- _ - _ . , , ,
._ _- _. - . -- -. -. .. - . .. - - . t Subiettive Inanection Attribute - featuro which by it naturo has o lower degroo of l repeatability due 43 its d: pond:nce upon human s:nstry qualitics: l
examples visual weld examination, et, al.
, , . i J . . . L
i f e d I i
i i I i 1 < }
}
.
' a \\ \\ > ' 4 1 ' 1 4 1 - i f a > 4 % i < r 'l l 1 i , 4 i 4 4 I 1 , i
i l 4 i
!
. i ? - . i f l 4
. i . 1 , I ) ,
i j , i
< $ ! .; , - . _ . ,
- _ _ . - . _. -_ -. . CONTRACTOR
Blount Brothers
SCOPE OF WORK : Plant Structures . DURATION
6/75 - Continuing ( l ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOL ATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) A reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The reinspection will be conducted on a sample size established as follows: ' From a chronological listing based on date of certification of each quality control inspector who has been certified since beginning of project, every 5th inspector ' beginning with the 5th will be selected and each individual inspection performed during the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inacces sible shall be defined as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or condition where process was an event which can not be recreated. If an inspector is selected who has no inspections accessible, the next succeeding inspector will be selected. The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be established as follows: i The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be , 51. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 10%. Reinspection rejections on attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability 1.8 trends and quantities appear to require evaluation. The sample size expansion will be established as follows: . Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributes or greater than [ 51 for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months ' of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections ! continue to exceed the acceptable quality level af ter the completion of the additional three month period for that individual, then all the individual inspections, of that
attribute, performed by that inspector for the remetrrier of his work will be reinspected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspectors being reviewed will be increased by 50%. , ' OPPENDIXi
Definitions: Inaccessible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples: ! encased structural steel and encased block wall columns, shear studs and [ deformed wire anchors encased in concrete, concrete and block well reinforcement, et.a1. , note: the requirement to remove fire proofing and i insulaticn will not classify an item as inaccessible. 1 - condittor where process was an event which can not be recreated; examples: concrete placement, receiving inspection, post tensioning ' pre-load values, element has been reworked as a result of revision or other cause, et.al. I , I ! , . , - _ _ _ , - - - - - - -
- _ _ _ . , . i " Ohlective Insoection Attrih - feature which by its physical nature has o high degrO3
cf repeatability; c::amples: met:riO1 s tro, shape, trateability, . dimensional configuration, examination reporting, et. al. . subjective Insoection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower degree of < repeatability due to its dependence upon human sensory qualities; ' examples: visual weld emanination, et. al. l . I I i
, t h , 4 I i ' , I 1 ! t l j i l I i , ! , 1 ! ! . I t l . I I l > 4 f '
L - . <- - -- r-. - ,- ,---,-my+ - - . - - w - , - , -
__ - . _ _ _ ~ . l
i 1 \\ < j CONTRACTOR
- Hunter Corporation
[ + j SCOPE OF WORK : Piping System Installation . j , DURATION
1/77 - Continuing
- ACTION TO SE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19)
f - i l l A reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The reinspection will be i conducted on a sample size established as follows: i
t i From a chronological listing based on date of certification of each quality control " inspector who has been certif tsJ since beginning of project, every Sth inspector . beginning with the 5th will be selected and each individual inspection performed during i the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inaccessible ! shall be defined as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or conditten where process was an event which can not b4 recreated. If an inspector is selected who has no inspections accessible, the next succeeding inspector will be i selected. '
The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be established as ] follows: The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and ' . therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 5%. t'or attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of
I repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 105. Reinspection rejections on j attributes which are subjective in nature will 'oe evaluated by independent third party l inspectors to establish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on
l attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party l ! inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities appear to require ' evaluation. ' i j The sample size expansion will be established as follows: 1 - Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attribu'tes or greater than I 51 for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections ! continue to exceed the acceptable quality level after the completion of the additional j j three month period for that individual, then all the individual inspections, of that attribute, performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be , ) reinspected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspectors being reviewed l will be increased by 50%. i ] APPENDIC t
Definitions: , , Inaccr sible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples: 1 i embedded or buried piping. internal diameter alignment of piping and ] fittings, fit-up gap of piping and fittings, et.al., note: the )' requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not classify an item as inaccessible, i l - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated;
examples: post-weld heat treatment, interpass temperature, element has } been reworked as a result of revision or other cause, et.al, a I l ] - - _ _ - . . _ _ - . - . . . - - - .
. - . Obf ective Insnection AttrDmig, - feature which Cy its physical nature has o high degrco of repeatability; examples: mettrial stro, shape, traceability, i
' dimensional configuration, examination reporting, et. al. ( Subjective Inanection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower degree of repeatability due to its dependence upon human sensory qualities; , examples: Visual weld examination, et. al. 1 l ! t ! n i M
, 1 > I I. , n 1 I i 4 m 3
!
1 l , 1 ! l I ) i > , , 1 m . - - , _ _ -- - , - - - - - r - , , _ _ --- -- _ - , . - - - . _ 4 - -_ q
. . CONTRACTOR
- Hatfield Electric
SCOPE OF WORK : Electrical Installation DURATION
7/76 - Continuing ' ACTION TO BE TAMEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) A reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The reinspection will be ' conducted on a sample size established as follows: From a chronological listing based on date of certification of each quality control inspector who has been certified since beginning of project, every 5th inspector beginning with the 5th will be selected and each individual inspection performed during the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inacce s sible shall be defined as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or condition where process wa s an event which can not be recreated. If an inspector is ' selected who has no inspections accessible, the next succeeding inspector will be selected. The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be established as follows: , The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to the initial inspection period. For attribuces which are objective in nature and therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 5%. For attributes which are t;ubjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of repostability the acceptable quality level will be 10%. Reinspection rejections on l attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on l attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party ' inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities appear to require evaluation. The sample size expansion will be established as follows: Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributen or greater than 5% for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections continue to exceed the acceptable qu111ty level af ter the completion of the additional three month period for that individual, then all the individual inspections, of that attribute, performed ty that inspector for the reneinder of his work will be reinspected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspectors being reviewed will be increased by 50%. APPENDIX: - , Definitions: 1 Jnaccessible - condition where dtsmantling would be required to gain access; examples: embedded conduit, buried and embedded duct runs, cable splices, et.al. , note: the requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not 1 classify an item as inaccessible. - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated; ( examples: cable pulling, handling of equipment, receiving inspection, et.al. . .
r -- - . . Objective Inspection Attribute - featuro which by its physical naturo has o high degroo cf rcpeatability; cuamples: materici stra, shape, trceeability, , dimensional configuration, examination reporting, et. al. . Subleetive Inspection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower degree of repeatability due to its dependence upon human sensory qualities examples: visual weld examination, et. al. I 1 , ! i e e ) { ! r 5 L > b l l r
t ! , ( . i ., , - - ~ . . - - , ,n.- . , ,. .
. ~ . . . CONTRACTOR t Nuclear Installation Services Co. . . SCOPE OF WORK : NSSS Assembly 00 RATION 6/78 - Continuing ACTION TO BE TANEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-191 45S/02-04-19) A sampling reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The eas41e size will be established as followst Frca a chronological listing based on date of certification of each quality control inspector who has been certified since beginning of project, every *th inspector I beginning with the 5th will be selected and each individua) inspection performed dur ing
the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inaccessible
thall be defined as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or [ condition where process was an event which can not be recreated. If an inspector is l selected who has no inspections accessible, the nest succeeding inspector will be i selected. I ! The acceptable quality level (i.e. manimum percent rejections) will be established as f follows: j f The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to j the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and f therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be I 55. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 105. Reinspection rejections on l attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party i inspectors to establish true rejectability; additionally reinspection rejections on ! i attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party ' inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities appear to require ' evaluation. ' The sample size expansion will be established as follows: t where true rejectability is greater than los for subjective attributes or greater than i SE for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months I of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for tFat individual for the type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections continue to exceed the acceptable quality level af ter the completion of the additional three month period for that individual, then all the trWividual inspections, of that < attribute. perforimod by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be { rennspected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspectors being reviewed
will be increased by 501. i I APPENDIFt ! I Definitionst i Inaccessible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples: l cos.ponents and assemblies contained within reactor vessel shroud, et.a1. , l note: the requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not ! classify an item as inaccessible. I ( - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated; { .mamp1.s: int.r se s.mp.ratur., .1. nt has b..n r. work.a as a r.sult or revision or other cause. et.al. J
, -- _ .. . u 2 ..- ~. - -, - - .- - , . - . - - . -
-- . . > .
r Objective Inspection Attrihq13 - feature which by its phy ical natura has O hi;h degree cf repeata2111tyl examples: material size, shape, traceability, . dimensional configuration, examination reporting, et. al.
. Subjective Inanection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower degree of repeatability due to its dependence upon human sensory qualities: , ' examples: visual weld examination, et. al. ' , ! I !
J f i l !
) ) ! . . t E 1 . I
- '
i > ! l i . b > i 4 !
, ! f r , ' I , 1
l ' l e
J f i e i , 4 - = , e- +, ,,% < %e- = =
- c
__ _ - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. _ _ _ _ . _. ._ .- . . CONTRACTOR
Peabody Testing
SCOPE OF WORK : Independent Inspection . DURATION 6/75 - 4/79 ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOL ATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) A sampling reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The sample size will be established as follows: .
From a chronological listing based on date of certification of each quality :ontrol j inspector who has been certified since beginning of project, every 5th inspector i beginning with the 5th will be selected and each individual inspection performed during ) the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inacces sible ' shall be defined as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or '; condition where process was an event which can not be recreated. If an inspector is selected who has no inspections accessible, the nemt succeeding inspector will be ] selected. , a
The acceptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be established as j follows:
The reinspection shall be accomptr swJ utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to j the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 1 51. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 10%. Reinspection rejections on attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party I inspectors to establish true rejectability, additionally reinspection rejections on j ( attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party ! inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and quantities appear to require
) evaluation. > 1 1 The sample size espansion will be established as follows: l Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributes or greater than t ! SE for objective attributes for an individual inspector, then an additional three months 1 of inspection work will b i reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the type of inspection attribate exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections j continue to exceed the acceptable quality level after the *ompletion of the additional three month period for that individual, then all the indiviouel inspections, of that i ' attribute, performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be - reinspected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspectors being raviewed will be increased by 50%. . APPENDIX . - , Definitions: , i' Ynaccessible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examplas: i ' embedded structural bolts, cadwelds, soils tests, et.al., note: the i requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not classify an j ttom as inaccessible. . I i - condition where process was an event which can not be recreated; I I examplos: concrete pir.coment, et.al. . . - .- ,,. . -----. _ - _ _ . _ . - , _ - - . _. - - . _ . ,. - - - . . , . . . . - . . . - . . - , . . . - - - , , - _ - - - ..
_ _. _ _ _ _ - . o Opfective Inspection Attribute - footuro which by i'.m physic 1 naturo has a high degree cf r0pe:tchility; cxamplos: tcrquo chseks, ct. cl. e
Subiective Inspection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower dogree of repeatability due to its dependence upon human senscry qualities; examples: visual weld examination, et. al. . e- 11 i e e . . . ! . , I ! e e P l s' i a 4 l l -> "'
' - * - %g a w -w . g e. . w a. .m., 4 , .g, , , .._ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . , . _ . _ . _ , . _ __. _ _ _ _ , _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . , _ _ , , _ _ . . . . . .
, - = _. _ - - _ _ __ . . - _ _ .
t l l CONTRACTOR
- Pittsburgh Testing
. I , SCOPE OF WORK : Independent Inspection nURATION
- 9/79 - Continuing
ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19: 455/82-04-19) A sampling reinspection will be performed in response to Violation 2. The sample size. will be established as follows: Frca a chronological listing based on date of certification of each quality control ' ' inspector who has been certified since beginning of project, every 5th inspector ' beginnin3 with the Stat will be selected and each individual inspection performed during the inspectors first three months will be reinspected, where accessible. Inaccessible shall be defined as: condition where dismantling would be required to gain access, or condition where process was an event which can not be recreated. If an inspector is l - selected who has no inspections accessible, the next succeeding inspector will be < , selected. ' . The acesptable quality level (i.e. maximum percent rejections) will be established as follows: The reinspection shall be accomplished utilizing the inspection criteria applicable to the initial inspection period. For attributes which are objective in nature and therefore have a higher degree of repeatability the ecceptable quality level will be 5%. For attributes which are subjective in nature and therefore have a lower degree of repeatability the acceptable quality level will be 10%. Reinspection rejections on l . , attributes which are subjective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability: additionally r: inspection rejections on i attributes which are objective in nature will be evaluated by independent third party inspectors to establish true rejectability if trends and ouantities appear to require evaluaticn. The sample size expansion will be established as follows: I Where true rejectability is greater than 10% for subjective attributes or greater than 5% for objective attributes for an individual ir,spector, then an additional three months of inspection work will be reinspected, where accessible, for that individual for the , type of inspection attribute exceeding the acceptable quality level. If the rejections continue to exceed the acceptable quality level after the completion of the additional 1 three month period for that individual, then all the individual inspections, of that , attribute, performed by that inspector for the remainder of his work will be j ' reinspected, where accessible; and the original sample size of inspectors being reviewed will be increased by 50%. l j APPENDIX: Definitions:
Inaccetsible - condition where dismantling would be required to gain access; examples: embedded structural bolts, non-destructive examination of field welds embedded in concrete, et.al. , note: the requirement to remove fire proofing and insulation will not classify an item as inaccessible, , [' - condit ion where process was an event which can not be recreated * eman .les: concrete placement, in process non-destructive examinations of i s welds, electrinn cable pulling, calibrations, et.al. < l o -. . . . , . .. .. . . . . . . . . 'm-v& ps.rP p < = - --wir--M -- rm- gr y-----gy
y*=g-
w-my .z.m- g y'y- yv . - . - -v T- g _ _ . _ _ _ _ . , _, .w--m^-+9"-"
- -
,
o i ' Obf ective Inspection Atthibute - fccturo which by its physicci naturo has a high degroo > cf rcpent:bility; cxamplos: final inspection non-dsstructivo cxamination . of welds, torque checks, et. al. , (' examples: visual weld examination, et. al. Subiective Inspection Attribute - feature which by it nature has a lower degree of repeatability due to its dependence upon human sensory qualities; . G 0 3 . , I I I . I a J \\ ' , \\
. I ~
.-mw-+~,.+. ,.m..._,_ ,_ _ _ . . .. .___ - - - - - - n .,, - - - - ' - r v-- ' - - * - -- - * ' --'- vT- ---T'=- v' ur- F- -*-' W
ry
. o CONTRACTOR
- Mid-City Architectural Iron
SCOPE OF WORK : Gallery Work (included structural steel) . DURATION
3/77 - 12/80 s ! ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19: 455/82-04-19) Structural steel installations are being reinspected on a sampling basis; no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. The structural steel reinspections are being performed on the following basis: A reinspection is being performed on structural steel members to verify that structural steel is in conformance with design requirements. The structural steel members are being reinspected on a statistical sample established in accordance with MIL Std. 105D with data base rarameters to establish 95% confidence /95% reliability. Reinspection program has been named Quality Control Structural Steel Review (QCSSR). . \\ e ' .
, . - - - , , , -_ ,,c, -- -
- ,
CONTRACTOR
American Bridge SCOPE OF WORK : Structural Steel Erection . DURATION
- 2/77 - 5/78
ACTION TO BE TAMEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATION 2 (454/82-05-19; 455'/82-04-19) Structural steel installations are being reinspected on a sampling basis, no action o i be taken in response to Violation 2. The struct:Jral steel *einspections are being performed on the following basis: ' Structural steel bolting was reinspected on a statistical sample established in accordance with MIL Std. 105D with data base parameters to establish 95% confidence /95% reliability. The reinspection was the subject of a 10CFR50.55.e, reference reportable deficiency 82-08, which was communicated by final report dated January 14, 1983. Nditionally, a reinspect. ion is being performed c.n structural steel members to verify that structural steel is in conformance with design requirements. The structural steel members are being reinspectsd on a statistical sample established in accordance with MIL Std. 105D with data base parameters to establish 95% confidence /95% reliability. ' Reinspection program hac been named Quality Control Structural Steel Review (QCSSR). . , 5 e ' 1 . - = = * -e e=
- ,- .
,,,.g ,'sg- e w=
- -
-. ,, , - . , . . - - - - , , - , - - ,._ , . _ - _ , _ _ _ - , , . - ---m - - . - , . - - - - - - -
. , o i 1 e. <
CONTRACTOR
- Midway Industrial
' SCOPE OF WORK : Field Finish coating DURATION
5/78 - Continuing - ACTION TO.BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO VIOLATIO4' ? (454/82-05-19; 455/82-04-19) The field finish coating work has bean overview inspected by the Commonwealth Edison Operai. tonal Analysis Department; the overview inspection consisted of check of ambient cond it ions , inspection of surface properation batch mixing, film thickness measurements and j , visual examination of finish coatings, and inspection of stored materials. Due'to the 1 comprehensiveness of overview inspections no action to be taken in response to Violation 2. a i .- . . . . . . . .. .. -... . .._ _. - -. . . _ _ _ _ . -, - w - - - - v w m- - -' --w -v- - - - -- -- -- - m - ~- - --w-~w -~ ' - - ' ~ ' ' "Ww w ""- " }}