ML20198L816

Partial Resopnse to FOIA Request for Documents Re Plants That Revieved OL After Mar 1979,including Number of Hours Spent on License Reviews.App B & C Documents Encl & Available in PDR

ML20198L816
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi, Catawba, 05000000
Issue date:	06/02/1986
From:	Grimsley L NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:	Evens L INTERNATIONAL ENERGY ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Shared Package
ML19264F027	List: ML20198L816 ML20198L821
References
FOIA-86-278 NUDOCS 8606040399
Download: ML20198L816 (3)

Text

, ..

$ "c o ==0

& q%g

~ UNITED STATES 8 o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5 C WASHING TON, D. C. 20555

%.....}

Ms. Lesley R. Evans M2 Ig86 Senior Consultant International Energy Associates Limited 2600 Virginia Avenue, NW LIN RESPONSE REFER Washington, DC 20037 TO F01A-86-278

Dear Ms. Evans:

This is in regard to your request, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, to which the NRC assigned the above number.

X This is a partial response to your request. We will notify you upon completion of search for and review of any additional records subject to your request.

The staff has completed the search for and review of records subject to your request, and this is the final response to your request.

The NRC has no records subject to your request.

X Records subject to your request are available for public inspection and copying at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR),

1717 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20555, as noted on the enclosure (s). The PDR accession number is identified beside each record description.

X Records subject to your request are being made available for public inspection and copying at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), 1717 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20555, in the PDR file folder under the above number and your name. These records are listed on the: enclosure. i We are enclosing a notice,that provides information about charges and procedures for obtaining records from the PDR.

Sincerely, -<

zai -

Donnie H. Grimsley, Director Division of Rules,and Records Office of Administration Enclosure (s): As stated 8606040399 860602 PDR FOIA EVANS86-278 PDR ,

F0IA-86-278 APPENDIX B

1. 09/30/82 NUREG 0940 - Enforcement Actions: Significant Actions Resolved - (Issued Quarterly) Accession No. 8210210024

2. 10/14/83 Forwards IE Management Meeting Report 50-206/83-22, 50-361/83-36 and 50-362/83-34 on 9/8/83 re: SALP Report for July 1982 - May 1983 (49 pages) Accession No. 8310200220

3. 12/15/83 Memo for Harold R. Denton from Richard C. DeYoung, subject: IDVP's for Calendar Year 1984 Plants (12 pages)

Accession No. 8312270199

4. 03/16/84 Letter to Harold R. Denton from N.W. Curtis Re:

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Notification of Unit 2 Construction Completion (2 pages) Accession No. 8403220040

5. 04/05/84 Letter to Commonwealth Edisor, from A. Bert Davis with enclosure re: Quality Assurance at La Salle Country Station (10 pages) Accession No. 8404120153

6. 02/07/85 SALP Reports 50-206/84-32, 50-361/84-31 and 50-362/83-34 on 9/8/83 re: SALP Report for July 1982 - May 1983 (49 pager) Accession No. 8310200220

7. 03/21/85 Letter to Mississippi Power and Light Company from James M. Taylor (4 pages) with enclosure: Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties (7 pages) Accession No. 8503260385

8. Undated NUREG 0750 - Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuance (Issued Monthly)

i  :

J. A 2r

. .w ,.".~ s F0IA-86-278

}

~

APPENDIX C -

. , . , ...s ..

1. 02/01/84 Memo for Richard DeYoung from Harold R.'Dedtob, subject;

^\ '

IDVP's for Calendar Year 1,984 plants :P,

! r

.t- ... ..

- j.. .

2. 12/84 ' Slides for Catjwbe, Unit 1 7 full power l ,',,, - % , -

~ ' ,. -

., r,.

3. 06/04/85 - ~ Memo for IMrold R. D,entonefr,om Aaries G'.' Kertler, subject; Fermi Unit 2 QA~ Report.- 7

~

, .I .

A. 07/10/85 Sifdes -for Fermj 2~ Cpnsnission Briefing j ,

. . _ . ~ e 'r

5. 03/05/86 Licensing. Status . for. Perry 1  ; ,

s ,, ...s

6. Undated Licensing' Status for' Perry,1 ' ,;q*. <

e. -; , n,.. , u

7. Undated LicensingStatbsfor.Fepjj2; .

f f s.

l 8. Undated NRC NDE Mobile Van Ins:.gcfinn' History o p

, 9. Undated Extracted pages from ASLBP's. Annual Report to the Commission foc. FY 85.'

r e

s s

• I b

t i

l t

,, .,r--.-- . - . 3 ,m,e , y _-y, -,% ,-4 w. e---mr w e w w- -T*-. -7 T w n wF""1 *T'-*--WMT"""** $ -"M"F -"F

% y f* "g '

• ENCLOSURE Q+7 g UNITED STATES

• t y p, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

p wassmcTow. o. c. 20sss

%...../

Docket Nos: 50-413 and 50-414 MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing ,

THRU: Elinor G. Adensam, Chief 4 u Licensing Branch No. 4 '#l

• Division of Licensing FROM: Kahtan Jabbour, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing

SUBJECT:

IMPLEMENTATION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE MEASURES SECY-82-352 FOR CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION -

Catawba's Safety Evaluation Report stated on page 1-3 that: "On August 20, 1982, SECY-82-352, which addressed quality assurance in the design and construction of nuclear projects, was issued. This document describes the measures that have been approved to provide quality assurance for near-tem operating license facilities.

They include the applicant's self-evaluation, regional evaluations, and, if neces-sary, independent design review. The staff will address appropriate implementa-tion of these measures for Catawba in a supplement to this SER." i The following information is provided regarding the activities that Duke Power Company had perfomed (or will perfom) as a result of significant events at other nuclear facilities, or in response to SECY-82-352 to provide assurance of quality at Catawba.

As a result of the seismic design problems that were discovered at the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Facility, Duke Power Company initiated a seismic design audit of the Catawba Nuclear Station in early 1982. The audit results were presented to Region II on May 25, 1982. The stated purpose of this audit was to identify deficiencies in Duke's seismic design infomation exchange process, to identify any inadequate seismic designs, and to recommend changes which would reduce the potential for breakdowns in Duke's seismic design program. A five member audit team of senior engineering personnel (not directly responsible for the areas under review) was, fomed by the Vice President, Design Engineering. The audit methodology consisted of sampling of infomation exchange adequacy at critical interfaces throughout the seismic design process. The audit team expended approximately 10 persorrmonths and while infomational exchange breakdowns in Duke's seismic design process were identified,there were no design inadequacies. The audit team deter-mined that sufficient data had been reviewed to conclude that design conservatisms would preclude any actual design inadequacies. There were no safety concerns resulting from this audit.

= .-

Thomas M. Novak In addition, in October 1982, Duke Power Company and TVA completed a design / construction audit of the Catawba Nuclear Station. The evaluation results (Enclosure) were transmitted on December 30, 1982, to J. O'Reilly, Region II. The Catawba audit was performed to INPD-developed criteria (Phase I) and took place from September 27 to October 14, 1982. During this time, Duke and TVA expended over 10 personemonths of effort. The audit team consisted of senior Duke and TVA personnel experienced in the design / construction of nuclear stations. The Duke personnel involved had no direct responsibility for the areas under review.

Fif ty-seven findings resulted from this audit, Duke took action on fifty-four of these. All of the findings were the result of isolated instances of inadequate implementation or interpretation of existing procedures. There were no major programmatic findings or deficiencies.

On March 1,1983, a meeting was held between Region II and Duke Power Company to discuss Duke's self-initiated evaluation of the project management, design and construction of the Catawba Nuclear Station. -

Furthermore, Duke Power Company stated at the March 11, 1983, ACRS meeting, that they will perform a Phase II INPO self-initiated evaluation for Catawba later in 1983* We expect that the evaluation results will be transmitted to Region II in December 1983.*(Now scheduled for February 1984).

I discussed the above activities performed by Duke with H. Dance of Region II. He stated that although Region II did not perform a formal assessment of Duke's activ-ities regarding quality assurance, they believe that an independent design verifi-cation program (IDVP) is not necessary for Catawba because Duke is an experienced and integrated utility that acts as its own A/E and constructor, and Catawba is very similar to McGuire 1 and 2. I would suggest that DL would wait for the results of Phase II INP0. However, based on the input received to-date from the Region and the resident inspector, and the results of the above activities, I would recommend that DL would not require an IDVP for Catawba.

gLh 5 h

• O l

Kahtan Jabbour, Project Manager i Licensing Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated cc: D. Eisenhut J. Taylor H. Dance V. Brownlee W. Haass P. VanDoorn

=.ce > DL:UL.AA.g.4M)Lh6/.... .. AD.: L :.D L. ..... . .. .. .. . . , .. . , ,

em % ) KJahhnurftync QQgm ,,,, .,TNovak_ ,,

om n 6AMBL., . 6/M23 6/ /83

FEB 1 EOS MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement FROM: Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

IDVPs FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1984 PLANTS As you have requested, we have sent the letters attached to your memorandum of December 15, 1983, to the appropriate applicants except for the letter addressed to Duke Power Company regarding Catawba Nuclear Station. For the reasons mentioned in the enclosure and consistent with the staff position being developed in response to the recent 10 CFR 2.206 petition from GAP, NRR does not believe that an IDVP for Catawba is necessary.

Original Signed by N. R. Dentes Harold R. Dentnn, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

As stated b0 h ..-

QIQf ll (V, -

i W

See previous w 'te I

DL:LB#4/s')

• KJabbour:eb *

1. 4 DL:AD/L .Alki NR / dM ,

nsan *TMNovak DGEisenhut HR ton l

• 01/p4784 *01/M/84 *01/12/84 14ff/84 4/,[/84 d,/ l

.3 __ __ _ _ __ g 5 V . - - - - - - -

/

COMMISSION BRIEFING CATAWBA, UNIT I FULL POWER e

4 e

DECEMBER , 1984 m

e* e *

=

e CONTACT:

K. .lABBOUR X27800

~

SLIDE'l

(

(

a4 1

CATAWBA 1 BRIEFING OUTLINE 5

i LICENSEES / PLANT BACKGROUND _

OVERVIEW INSPECTION PROGRAM .

r SHIFT STAFFING ,

M '

CONCLUSION -

.' l, 9

4 t

n. SLIOE ? I t

• '. i r

LICENSEES / PLANT BACKGROUND MULTIPLE OWNERS AND LICENSEES DUKE POWER COMPANY (25%)

NORTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION (56.25%)

SAI.UDA RIVER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. (18.757.)

DUKE POWER COMPANY OPERATOR AND AGENT FOR OTHER OWNERS s

• PLANT DESIGN ,

WESTINGHOUSE PWR - 3411 MWT (1145 MWE)

ICE CONDENSER CONTAINMENT SAFE SHUTDOWN FACILITY A/E AND CONSTRUCTOR: DUKE POWER COMPANY SITE '

LOCATED-AT LAKE WYLIE, YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA NEAREST CITY - ROCK HILL, S0llTH CAROLINA (6~ MILES)

POPULATION. -

35,344 (1980) -

POPULATION CENTER . CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA (11 MILES TO CITY LIMITS)

POPULATION -

314,477 (1980)

OFFSITE EMEP.GENCY PLANNING EMERGENCY EXERCISE -

FEMA EVALUATION SLIOE 3

t i

( OVERVIEW -

a

• i FSAR REVIEW  !

HYDR 0 GEN MITIGATION ONSITE POWER SUPPLIES (TDI DIESELS) 'l

, -i TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION  !

OL HEARING i t

w -

BIFilRCATED HEARING ASLB AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE FUEL T0ADING  !

- AND PRECRITICALITY TESTING LICENSE s t.

INSPECTION PROGRAM s SALP

)

i

• l SHIFT ST,AFFING

-l ADVISORS ON SHIFT ,

1

- LENGTH OF SHIFT i

OPERATING EXPERIENCE i

ALLEGATIONS I

1 St.IDE 4

INSPECTION PROGRAM CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PROGRAM PRE 0PERATION/0PERATION INSPECTION PROGRAM SPECIAL INSPECTIONS gy 4 #gA CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT- TW t gis 8v"i p SELF-INITIATED EVAltlATION FOLLOWUP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW PROCEDURES REVIEW ~m q %9 M**

TRAINING ASSESSMENT 'of N',U" / W' ' '

APPENDIX R NUREG-0737 IMPLEMENTATION I f '

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS READINESS REVIEW PANEL SLIDE 5 l  !

\

~ . ,; .m _ .. -

r.. .

SiliFT STAFFING 4 SHIFTS THROUGH STARTUP PROGRAM .

5 SHIFT ROTATIONA? HR SHIFTS NO OPERATORS HAVE 6 MOS H0T OPERATING EXPERIENCE '

SHIFT ADVISORS (7) MEET INDUSTRY STANDARDS AVG. M0S.

SHIFT COMPOSITION NIJCLEAR STAFF EXPERI5NCE

. SHIFT SUPV. (SRO) 5 104 UNIT SUPV. (SRO) -5 78 NUCLEAR CONTROL OPER (RO) 15 53 SHIFT TECHN! CAL ADVISOR (SRO) 8 33 OTHER:

SHIFTOPEllENGR (SRO) e 1 72 OPER ENGR (SRO) 2 -

80 TRAINING STAFF iSRO) 3 -

TOTALLIC5NSED: .

SRO 24 R0 15 I

Si.InE 6 J

, , . _ . . . ~ . , , , , - , , , , . . . . _ . - , , . , . . _

r k

CONCLUSION STAFF CONCLUDES THE LICENSEES SATISFY ALL THE REQUIR FOR ISSUANCE OF A FULL POWER LICENSE .

m O

SL10E 7-t

.