|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20063N7471982-10-0606 October 1982 Motion for Termination of Proceedings.Util Decided to Cancel Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20063N7591982-10-0606 October 1982 Withdrawal of Application for CP ML20055A7221982-07-15015 July 1982 Memorandum & Order Denying Jf Doherty 820615 Submittals, Treated as Motion to Reconsider ASLB 820602 Order.Motion Untimely Filed & Failed to Show Significance or Gravity of Issues ML20055A3551982-07-12012 July 1982 Amended Contention 59.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L4521982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Fails to Establish Timeliness &/Or Significance of Issues Sought to Be Raised.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5531982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Should Be Considered Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 820602 Order.Timeliness & Significance of Issues Not Established.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054J9371982-06-28028 June 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Request to Reopen Record. Request Improper & Insufficient to Support Relief.Commission Rules Cannot Be Circumvented by Refiling Same Argument After ASLB Ruling Issued.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F9861982-06-15015 June 1982 Motion to Reopen Record to Take Evidence on Contention 59. Gravity of Issues Warrants Reopening ML20054G0171982-06-15015 June 1982 Contention 50 Re Brown & Root Deficiencies in Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20053D0861982-05-24024 May 1982 Response in Opposition to Util 820519 Motion to Strike Doherty Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations.Contention Should Be Treated as Such,Not as Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20052H8621982-05-19019 May 1982 Motion to Strike J Doherty Reply to Applicant 820507 Response to Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58. Commission Rules Do Not Allow Reply.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052H4441982-05-14014 May 1982 Reply Opposing Applicant 820507 Response to J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58.Contention Should Be Admitted W/Amends.Aslb Should Judge Conduct of Applicants. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052F3121982-05-0707 May 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention Re Alleged Failure to Rept Design Defects.Substantively, Motion Is Motion to Reopen Record & Stds Have Not Been Met. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052D1221982-04-29029 April 1982 Findings of Fact on Supplemental Issues to Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052A4541982-04-22022 April 1982 Submittal of Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations at Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054E0561982-04-21021 April 1982 Supplemental Findings of Fact on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Technical Qualifications.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050J1111982-04-0606 April 1982 Answers to Second & Third Sets of Interrogatories,Questions 29 & 8 Respectively,Re Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20050E2961982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Seventh Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050E2891982-04-0505 April 1982 Answers & Objections to Doherty Sixth Set of Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20050C4211982-04-0202 April 1982 Objections to Request for Admissions.Requests Untimely, Irrelevant to Issues Before ASLB & Extremely & Unduly Burdensome.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4081982-03-31031 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Fifth Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20050C4791982-03-29029 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Jf Doherty Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20042C6181982-03-29029 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820315 Motion for ASLB to Subpoena Quadrex Corp Employee Witnesses as ASLB Witnesses. Request Is Based on Misperception of Scope of Reopened Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C6431982-03-29029 March 1982 Motion for ASLB to Call DE Sells as Witness for Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Testimony Needed to Explain Why NRC Did Not Immediately Obtain Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5091982-03-26026 March 1982 Response to Jf Doherty 20th & 21st Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20050C5041982-03-26026 March 1982 Testimony of Lj Sas on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Quadrex Rept.Rept Raises No Issue as to Whether Ebasco Can Properly Engineer Project.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20050C5011982-03-26026 March 1982 Supplemental Testimony of Jh Goldberg on Technical Qualifications.Brown & Root Terminates Due to Lack of Engineering Productivity,Not Due to Allegations in Quadrex Rept ML20042C5201982-03-25025 March 1982 Motion to Compel Discovery from Applicant & to Postpone Evidentiary Presentations at 820412 Hearings.Applicant Objections to Interrogatories Unsupported & Necessitate Hearings Be Delayed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0671982-03-25025 March 1982 Reply to Tx Pirg 820315 Addl Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0801982-03-25025 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5481982-03-23023 March 1982 Fourth Set of Requests for Admissions Re Quadrex Rept & Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0841982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Third Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049K0941982-03-23023 March 1982 Answers & Objections to Second Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042A4791982-03-17017 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820310 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearings.Sufficient Grounds Not Provided to Justify Delay.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2351982-03-17017 March 1982 Seventh Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042B2381982-03-15015 March 1982 Sixth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20042B2451982-03-15015 March 1982 Motion for Subpoena of Quadrex Corp Employees.Testimony Necessary for Clear Understanding of Brown & Root Deficiencies Despite Util Supervision & Specific Steps Needed to Correct & Prevent Problems.W/Certificate of Svc ML20041F0761982-03-10010 March 1982 Fourth Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041F0871982-03-10010 March 1982 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearing on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Addl Time Needed to Complete Discovery.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049J6571982-03-0808 March 1982 Answers to First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1001982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1071982-03-0505 March 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Re Tx Pirg Contention 31.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1181982-03-0505 March 1982 Third Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Related Correspondence ML20041E1201982-03-0505 March 1982 Motion for Order Directing Applicant to Provide Forthcoming Bechtel Quadrex Rept Review.Rept Pertinent to Remaining Issue.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041E1741982-03-0505 March 1982 Brief Opposing R Alexander Appeal from ASLB 820112 Order Denying Petition to Intervene.Aslb Did Not Abuse Discretion in Denying Petition.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E0711982-03-0404 March 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 21 & Quadrex Rept Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20049H8881982-03-0101 March 1982 Response Opposing D Marrack 820213 Motion for Review of Dates for Reopening Hearings & Continuance.No Commission Regulations or Atomic Energy Act Provisions Require Applicant Irrevocable Commitment.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5381982-02-22022 February 1982 Reply to Intervenors Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041C0671982-02-22022 February 1982 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 820209 Motion for Addl Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law.Motion Mooted by Tx Pirg Filing Proposed Findings on 820212. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5421982-02-17017 February 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Tx Pirg Contention 31 & Quadrex Matters.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence 1982-07-02
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20063N7471982-10-0606 October 1982 Motion for Termination of Proceedings.Util Decided to Cancel Plant.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L4521982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Fails to Establish Timeliness &/Or Significance of Issues Sought to Be Raised.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5531982-07-0202 July 1982 Response Opposing Doherty 820615 Motion to Reopen Record to Add Contention 59.Motion Should Be Considered Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 820602 Order.Timeliness & Significance of Issues Not Established.W/Certificate of Svc ML20054J9371982-06-28028 June 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820615 Request to Reopen Record. Request Improper & Insufficient to Support Relief.Commission Rules Cannot Be Circumvented by Refiling Same Argument After ASLB Ruling Issued.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F9861982-06-15015 June 1982 Motion to Reopen Record to Take Evidence on Contention 59. Gravity of Issues Warrants Reopening ML20053D0861982-05-24024 May 1982 Response in Opposition to Util 820519 Motion to Strike Doherty Contention 58 Re Applicant Conduct on Reporting Violations.Contention Should Be Treated as Such,Not as Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20052H8621982-05-19019 May 1982 Motion to Strike J Doherty Reply to Applicant 820507 Response to Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58. Commission Rules Do Not Allow Reply.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052H4441982-05-14014 May 1982 Reply Opposing Applicant 820507 Response to J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention 58.Contention Should Be Admitted W/Amends.Aslb Should Judge Conduct of Applicants. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20052F3121982-05-0707 May 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820422 Motion to Add Contention Re Alleged Failure to Rept Design Defects.Substantively, Motion Is Motion to Reopen Record & Stds Have Not Been Met. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C6181982-03-29029 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820315 Motion for ASLB to Subpoena Quadrex Corp Employee Witnesses as ASLB Witnesses. Request Is Based on Misperception of Scope of Reopened Hearings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C6431982-03-29029 March 1982 Motion for ASLB to Call DE Sells as Witness for Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Testimony Needed to Explain Why NRC Did Not Immediately Obtain Quadrex Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042C5201982-03-25025 March 1982 Motion to Compel Discovery from Applicant & to Postpone Evidentiary Presentations at 820412 Hearings.Applicant Objections to Interrogatories Unsupported & Necessitate Hearings Be Delayed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20042A4791982-03-17017 March 1982 Response Opposing J Doherty 820310 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearings.Sufficient Grounds Not Provided to Justify Delay.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041F0871982-03-10010 March 1982 Motion for Postponement of 820412 Hearing on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 & Quadrex-related Matters.Addl Time Needed to Complete Discovery.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041E1201982-03-0505 March 1982 Motion for Order Directing Applicant to Provide Forthcoming Bechtel Quadrex Rept Review.Rept Pertinent to Remaining Issue.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20041E1741982-03-0505 March 1982 Brief Opposing R Alexander Appeal from ASLB 820112 Order Denying Petition to Intervene.Aslb Did Not Abuse Discretion in Denying Petition.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20049H8881982-03-0101 March 1982 Response Opposing D Marrack 820213 Motion for Review of Dates for Reopening Hearings & Continuance.No Commission Regulations or Atomic Energy Act Provisions Require Applicant Irrevocable Commitment.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041C0671982-02-22022 February 1982 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 820209 Motion for Addl Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusion of Law.Motion Mooted by Tx Pirg Filing Proposed Findings on 820212. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041B5901982-02-13013 February 1982 Motion for Postponement of All Action on CP Application Until Applicant States That Util Irrevocably Committed to Building Plant If CP Received.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040H0761982-02-0909 February 1982 Motion for 30 Addl Days to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Length of Record Necessitates Extension. Decision Would Not Be Delayed Since Addl Hearings to Be Held in Apr 1982 ML20040E2781982-01-29029 January 1982 Requests for Clarification Re R Alexander 811130 Petition to Intervene.J Silberg 820122 Ltr Indicates That Order Denying Petition Issued,But No Order Has Been Served.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039B7481981-12-17017 December 1981 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 811207 Motions for Addl Testimony, Further Development of Record & Admission of New Contention. Motion Superficial Attempt to Delay Proceeding & Totally Devoid of Merit.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M6441981-12-14014 December 1981 Response Opposing Doherty 811015 Renewed Motion for Addl Evidence on Tx Pirg Contention 31.Doherty Failed to Comply W/Aslb 811110 Order.Motion Is W/O Merit & Would Cause Unnecessary Delay.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M6241981-12-0707 December 1981 Motion for Tx Pirg to Present Addl Evidence,To Order Applicant to Serve Tx Pirg W/Quadrex Rept & to Rule That Need for Power Is Tx Pirg Contention.Alternatively,Requests Admittance as Tx Pirg Contention.W/Certificate of Svc ML20039B0771981-12-0707 December 1981 Renewed Motion for Addl Evidence on Tx Pirg Addl Contention 31 Re Applicant Technical Qualifications.Specifies Portions of Quadrex Rept,Indicating Organizational Changes That Should Be Made.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20038A8841981-11-20020 November 1981 Response Opposing Doherty 811106 Motion for Addl Testimony on Need for Power.Pleading Construed as Motion to Reopen Record.Burden of Explaining Why ASLB Would Reach Different Result Not Met.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20010F4791981-09-0303 September 1981 Response Opposing Further Consideration of Radon Releases. NRC Analysis of Radon Releases in Final Suppl to Fes Satisfies NEPA Requirements,Complies W/Commission 780414 Order & Supplies Sufficient Info.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010G1101981-09-0303 September 1981 Response to ASLB Request Re Positions on ALAB-640.Radon Emissions Determined by ALAB-640 Constitute Significant Addl Environ Impact.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20010A1171981-08-0505 August 1981 Motion to Strike Marrack Prefiled Testimony.Testimony Is Not Specifically Responsive to F Sanders 810205-06 Testimony. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20009B2031981-07-0707 July 1981 Response in Opposition to Intervenor Doherty 810622 Request for Leave to File Contention 57.No Good Cause Shown for Late Filing & No Specificity Provided.W/Science News Article & Certificate of Svc ML20005B3801981-06-22022 June 1981 Request for Leave to File & Submission of Contention 57 Re Vulnerability of Control Sys to Electromagnetic Pulses. Issue Has Not Been Made Public Until Recently.W/Certificate of Svc ML19347F4941981-05-0808 May 1981 Reply Opposing Doherty 810423 Filing Re Contention 56, If Filing Is Motion to Add Late Filed Contention. Contention Refs Alleged Problem at Browns Ferry Which Is Not Applicable to Mark III Containments.W/Certificate of Svc ML19347F4661981-05-0808 May 1981 Response Opposing Doherty 810423 Motion to Reopen Record on Need for Power Contention.Aslb Should Issue Order That Motion Is Moot & Direct Applicant to Update Testimony on Need for Power Testimony Later.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003H9551981-04-29029 April 1981 Motion for Order Adopting Specific Procedures to Govern Conduct of cross-examination During Health & Safety Phase of Proceeding.Procedures Will Ensure cross-examination Not Cumulative.W/Proposed Order & Certificate of Svc ML19343D3891981-04-27027 April 1981 Motion to Strike I Bross 810331 Affidavit.Affidavit Does Not Respond to Ld Hamilton Supplemental Affidavits But Constitutes Personal Attack of Affiant.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20126J9451981-04-24024 April 1981 Motion Opposing Applicant 810422 Motion to Preclude Jm Scott Testimony.Tx Pirg & Intervenor Doherty Are Separate Parties ML20003H7981981-04-22022 April 1981 Motion for Addl Testimony & cross-examination on Conservation Techniques,Interconnection & Effects of Const Delay.Proceedings Have Not Addressed These Issues. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003H7471981-04-22022 April 1981 Motion to Preclude Jm Scott Testimony.Intent of ASLB 810407 Order Was to Preclude Scott from Having Dual Role of Atty & Witness for Any Other Party.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20126H9601981-04-0707 April 1981 Request for Order Directing Util to Reissue 810331 Pleading W/Correct Title.Defective Title Did Not Put All Parties on Notice ML20126H9641981-04-0707 April 1981 Response in Opposition to Util & NRC 810330 Motions to Disqualify Tx Pirg Counsel,Jm Scott.Counsel Will Appear as Expert Witness.Public Interest Requires Counsel Presence. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19347D9721981-03-31031 March 1981 Response to NRC & Applicant Responses to J Doherty 810222 Motion for Reconsideration of Admission of Contention 21. Filing of Motion Was Timely Under Circumstances. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19345G4941981-03-30030 March 1981 Brief,In Form of Pleading,Addressing Need to Disqualify Tx Pirg Counsel Per Disciplinary Rules 5-101 & 5-102.Having Chosen to Appear as Witness,Scott Should Be Barred from Participation as Atty.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19345G5831981-03-24024 March 1981 Response for Order Allowing Intervenors to File Id Bross Supplemental Affidavit to Respond to Ld Hamilton Affidavit on Behalf of Util.One Day Delay Should Be Excused Due to Intervenor Attempt to Comply W/Rules.W/Certificate of Svc ML20003D2161981-03-0404 March 1981 Response Opposing Tx Pirg 810217 Motions on Procedural Matters,Referral of Interlocutory Appeal,Certification of Various Issues & Removal of Aslb.Motion Contains Misrepresentations of Alab Rulings.W/Certificate of Svc ML19341D4801981-02-25025 February 1981 Response to Intervenor Doherty Third Supplemental Response to Motion for Summary Disposition.Intervenor Has No Right to File Late Responses,Shows No Good Cause & Info Has No Relationship to Affected Contentions.W/Certificate of Svc ML20003C3161981-02-17017 February 1981 Requests to ASLB for Interlocutory Appeal & Certification of Questions & to ASLAP for Direct Certification of Question Re Ability of Intervenors to cross-examine Witnesses. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20003B0771981-02-0505 February 1981 Response in Opposition to Intervenor Jf Doherty Contention 55.Contention Does Not Address 10CFR2.714 Requirements & No Good Cause Established for Late Filing.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19345E8521981-01-30030 January 1981 Suppl to 810129 Motion Requesting Reversal of 810123 Ruling Denying Intervenor Rentfro cross-examination Opportunity.Evidence Supporting Intervenor Discernible Interest in Issues Outlined.W/Certificate of Svc ML19345E5721981-01-29029 January 1981 Requests ASLB Reconsider Ruling Restricting cross-examination,for Interlocutory Appeal & Certification of Questions.Also Moves Aslab for Directed Certification of Questions & Appointment of New Aslb.W/Certificate of Svc ML19341B6021981-01-29029 January 1981 Response Opposing Intervenor Doherty 810123 Motion to Change Cross Examination Procedures.Repetitious cross- Examination Would Be Avoided If All Intervenors Attended All Proceedings.Certificate of Svc Encl 1982-07-02
[Table view] |
Text
_ - _ _
United States Nuclear EcCulato Commincion Q 6 h BEFORS 'iHE ATOMIC SAETY AND L7 INSING@fd@UBLIC DOCUMENT R kg f
, 4b D. y In the Matter of Houston Lighting and Powor Company (A11cnc Croek, Unit 1)
) Dockot No. Sc-h66 :- % ;>4 I /
_M~-E. d;d@, b %
l00 8 ER r [ FRe msod'a Contant1~ no ,
N cs
- 1. The proposed Allenn Crcok Plant is planned to be loca~ted~tt riststEdt**t11.1 have an environmental i= pact on a prosently denco-populated area. This locatlen is in an area that 1o about the fastest growing arca in the nation, toth in numbers and in geographical dimencions. Applicant should to donied permit for conotruction until demographic ctudios aro made for a time framo during the life of the plant to ite demise in 30 yearc. Since the plant and its environs will otill be radioactive after ite dysfunctice, ctudios should be made on its environmental . impact into porpetuity, and demographic studies should. be mado for a timo frame af ter the initial 30 year period and thereafter, ad infinitum, cf thi::
population that will be burdened with this environmental impact.
N
- 2. Construction permit should be decled until studies are cado for the routes to be used for radicactive materials in the complete nuclear cycle from dolivery of fuel redo to the plant to the removal and trancport of radioactive wastos from the plant. Licence should be doniod until the public in informed of those routeo and is allowed adequate time to inter-vono at hearingo, as to the transport of radicactive materials and vactos to and from the plant, on the total spectrum of itc environmental impact.
3 Environmental impact studios, includir.g planned radiation emisciono and unple.nued radia-tion omiscions in an accident, during transport of radioactivo materials and wacten in the complete nuclear cycle relating to the Allens Croek Plant on these propoced routec chould be mado. My family will be subject to thin environmontal impact and radiation eminci onc since our residence is located a cloce proximity to tho 610 Loop and many other main froc-vaya and thoroughfarcu. Robert S. Frameen's job, which requiros 50% travel, includeu travel in the complete Brazoria, Colorado radiuc and of Heuston Waller and Harris County, and also into Fort Band, Wharton, Auctin, Ccuntics.
4 year.
An averago nuclear reactor can turn out as much as 32 tons of radioactivo spent fuel a DOE Aseistant Sacrotary John O'Loary and Dr. Ralph Lapp, utilitien consultant, in-dicato that there will bo at least too year on cito storago of hich levol radicactive vastes which =akos the Allens Crcek Nuclear Generating Station esecntially a Huclear Waoto Reposi-tory for at least ton years and porkaps, in porpotuity, sinco the problems of radioactivo vastos are insoluble. permit ehould bo denied until studios are endo of the radioactivo emissions from the otcady incremonts of radioactive wastos stored on citc. Thic itercaced s' storago time would necessar$ly increase hazards to the public's health and cafety. A sub-stantial increase in the amount of radioactivo vasto at the plant sito could force the plant to curtail.oporation.or chut .down altogether in ordor to ccaca the generation of wasten. Tho onvironmental, health and.cafety. issues are gormane to the interim and ultimato gorage of, radioactivo yantos not only to ithis genoration but to future gonorations. "+e o
. ,. c 4 . . .
.o .,- e i .: , i 4'5.W This incremont of radicactive vaates, which will includo weapons-grado pluton 4 bombs, stored on plant sito createn a serious socurity risk and makos thic arca vulnerabl e to).thof t, violence and nuclear terrorism. These acts of nuclear terrorica could triggor an accident of catastrophic porportions roloasing oxcessivo amounto of radiation, with resul-tant dostructivoc, effects.to the public and'the onvironment.
Q. .
6 .i Dre. John Gofman and Arthur Tamplin, world renown nuclear phyciciat and medical physi-cisto, both formerly connected with. the Atomic Enorgy Commission, in their many years of
.research of effects.of low levol radiation.indicato that there is no known " cafe n level of radiation. Also confirming their rosearch aroratudios by distinguished scientistic in thiu ~
country.,and, abroad. .recently rovcaled in spite of. attempted supprascion by certain gevorn- '
q,w M
.g
'g b il 210 d/ t
i
~ ~
, ,~n mhn agencico. Thace studios indicate that g rorement otandards for cafe invcle of rad.1a-tion aro flawed and erronecue. Drs. Karl 2. .:;rgan, former director of health phycico at I tho Oak Ridge, Tenn. Nuclear Facility for 30 years, Irwin Broos, Director of Bloctatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Inutitute, Thomas F. Mancuso Unircrcity of Pittsburg, ronearch acientict under EFDA grant, Alice Stewart, internatlocal]y regarded epidemiologist, Birmingham Univ. ,
Englandand her acaeciato, George Kncale, bloctatistician, are just scmo of tho scientiste whoce research data reficct: that levele of radiation enposuro that have been c:n aldered safe by the government are actually dangercus. These so-called government standarda have caused cancer and the implications are far rnaching in effecting not only nuclear workers but the populu tl e n- a t-la rgo. Dr. Mancunoban stated. "...the risk fcr tbc industrial pcyalution is 10 times c cater than wao cotimated beforo. Therefore, the standarda chould bo roduced by 10 tirou, accome 10 timou morn striegent, and consequently, the general population which is expened to a fractien of what the industrial population is, will havo to be reduced accord-ingly." Conctruction permit should be denica until non-government, independent investicatore study and reviso radiation limits for atomic workers and tho general public.
8
- 6. The po71bation-at-large should not be lumped into one stereotypical individual, with equal succeptibility to radiation. Badiation Las a cumulative facter. Particular health, disease, ago, pregnancies, genetica are just scmo of the factora effecting individualo' susceptibility to radiation. It is already medically known that the young, who make up the nijerity of the population, and pregnant wcmen are prodiapocod to radiation. Our family is alco one with high eusceptibility to radiation.
Madeline Ense Framoon hac pornicicus anemia, ccmpleto deficiency of hydrochloric acid and sericuo hypothyroidist. Ecr pbycicianc aro Chiefs of their Departmente, in recearch and tonehing, at the Baylor College of Medicino, Housto m Tczas. Thece physicians, ac well ao medical journals and textbccko indicate that these medical conditions make Mrs. Fra en one vf the highest cancer-prone riuka. Theco doctors havo advised Mrs. Framcon that if cancer occurred it would be "onvirocmontally triggered".
Robert S, Fra= son has cerious colon and prostrato conditionc and is also cencidered a high cancer-pronc patient. Both Mr. and Mrs. Framcon will havo to be examined periodically for the rest of their lives for cancer - several timeo a year.
My family's interest is not protected with the propoced Allena Crcok Plant and ito environ- l mental impact and I fool we roprosent the vast numborn in the general population wi th varicue medical problema, conditions and agon that aro highly susceptible to radiation. To licence this plant is to state that a largo segment cf the population is expendable. Conctruction po rmi t should be denied. /
7 The building of Allons Creek Muclear Plant will not only incrcace the danger to health and safety, bit will also cause decreased civil liberties. This is becauco of the extensive protective categuards required to protect againut sabotage and terrorism. Supposo sc=eone reported that a portable rocket capable of broaching the containment was in the area of the plant, do you suppoco that the police would wait to get a search warrant before conducting house to house scarchen at all homen closo enough to hit the containment with the reckot.
The Earten Report of Oct. 31. 1975 wao prepared under contract of the FRC, and it gives a ,
detailed discussion of the probicm. The EIS has not considered thio environmental impact '
and so is incomplote.
8 The safety analysis has fallad to concider the danger from inculator failurcs in con-tain=ent cloctrical ponctrationc. During October and November 1977, the Milletone plant had several failures due to the epoxy insulator intrucion into cabic aplices tha t led to ,
high recistance heating that caused shcrt circuits between conductors that wore to have -!
been isolated. At Allcas Creek, this can cause electrically operated valvos to be in the '
I incorrect position (an open when supposed to be clooed), and failure of alarma to operata ,
proporly which can endanger the public health and welfare. ;
i l
.% , 3 9 The EIs and safety Evaluation of Allonc 01 ek is def ective becauco they uced tha 4 ASH 1k00 Roactor Safety Study reevlte ao the ba:i; of expoeted :afety as the plant. 'lo t .
several recent studtcu have all indicated that the report in wrong in its calculation of the probabilitics of variouu accidents at tha plant. It faliled to account for the intor-action of various failurs mechanismo that are not independent cvonta ao assumed. It failed to account for the mistakec and feara aC ordicary human beinga that oporato planta euch ac Allone Creek. The report did not considor that a worker might use a candle to cet thu Brownc Ferry fire that almoot cauced two core melts. It claimed that no spaceman x)uld burn up on the ground while sitting in the space ahip, yet 4 cen have aircady done 30.
Until the data is convincing to the incurance industry cuch that they will insure all Icesea then the Allona Crack plant should not bo built.
- 10. The procent plan for decommissioning A11cno Creek to inadoquate becaucn it does not incuro that tho applicant will be able to properly deconmission the plant or pay for it if some way was available to do it catoly. Beforo building the plant acd sponding ovnr one .
billion dollars in construction costs, the applicant should post bonds hold in eacrow to J incure that the mency will bn available to properly decommiacion the plant. 3ath the CAO and tho Congraca have recently icaued reports cn this problem.
- 11. About 31 million acros of U.G. farmlands have disappearod in the lact decado, accord-ing to EPA. That's an area half the cito of the S' tate cf Wyoming. The diminiching cupply of food for our nations with its rapid growing population has corious implications for its econcey, etability and coeurity. In a world-vide contort, it's a peaco/wur factor. The EPA intends to limit thic adveran impact. The Allens Crook Plant abould not be cocatructed as it is obricucly contributing an advorce impact in dcatroying over 5000 acree of rich food-producing farmland, a dimininhing natural resourco.
- 12. A Inrgo number of cuvironmental and aafoty probless are acuociated sith the 2WR, Mark III co ntainment, Emergency Coro Cooling System, automatic Protection systema, etc. to be used in the Allonc Crook Plant, but I cuct stop ccw to get thin photocopied and mailod beforn deadline, although I hava ctudied and prepared almost full timo for t.ho 5 days cinco being told that contentions would have to be submitted by Nov. 2nd. I again wi ch to regiator my objections to tho arbitrary unfair acccleration of schedule not giving petitionera adequato time for proper preparation of contentions. If I am given sufficient time an allowed by my conctLtutional right of "real" due procosa, I vill submit more contentions and elaborato more on the above.
I
/
h i
4822 Waynesboro Drivo Houston,1. cas 77035 8
4 4
4
~ .