Letter Sequence RAI |
|---|
|
Results
Other: ML20202H611, ML20239A178, NRC-98-0123, Responds to 980903 RAI Re Plant Staff Qualifications.Util Requests That NRC Act in Timely Manner Toward Resolution,Re Adoption of Reg Guide 1.8,Rev 2,to Ensure That It Does Not Impede Issuance of Fermi 2 ITS SER in May 1999, NRC-99-0052, Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions, NRC-99-0077, Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS, NRC-99-0079, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev, NRC-99-0089, Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev
|
MONTHYEARML20239A1781998-09-0303 September 1998
Requests Addl Info Re Licensee Commitments Related to Plant Staff Qualifications.Response Requested within 45 Days of Receipt of Ltr
Project stage: Other
NRC-98-0123, Responds to 980903 RAI Re Plant Staff Qualifications.Util Requests That NRC Act in Timely Manner Toward Resolution,Re Adoption of Reg Guide 1.8,Rev 2,to Ensure That It Does Not Impede Issuance of Fermi 2 ITS SER in May 19991998-10-19019 October 1998
Responds to 980903 RAI Re Plant Staff Qualifications.Util Requests That NRC Act in Timely Manner Toward Resolution,Re Adoption of Reg Guide 1.8,Rev 2,to Ensure That It Does Not Impede Issuance of Fermi 2 ITS SER in May 1999
Project stage: Other
ML20155B7191998-10-26026 October 1998
Forwards RAI Re Conversion to Improved STSs for Plant,In Order to Complete Review of Util 980403 Amend Request
Project stage: RAI
ML20196F5701998-11-20020 November 1998
Forwards RAI Re Licensee 980403 Amend Request to Convert to Improved Std TSs for Fermi 2.Mutually Agreeable Completion Schedule of 45 Days for Response Was Established
Project stage: RAI
ML20198B8741998-12-0404 December 1998
Forwards RAI Re 980403 Amend Request to Convert Improved Std TSs Sections 3.4 & 3.9.Completion Schedule of 60 Days for Response Established Per Discussion with G Ohlemacher on 981109 & 10
Project stage: RAI
NRC-98-0150, Forwards Response to NRC 981026 RAI Re Fermi 2 Conversion to Improved Std Ts.Responses Reflect Results of Series of Meetings Between Util & NRC1998-12-10010 December 1998
Forwards Response to NRC 981026 RAI Re Fermi 2 Conversion to Improved Std Ts.Responses Reflect Results of Series of Meetings Between Util & NRC
Project stage: Meeting
ML20198J6761998-12-22022 December 1998
Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Conversion to Improved STS Section 3.8.Response Requested within 60 Days
Project stage: RAI
NRC-99-0001, Forwards Response to NRC 981120 RAI Re Fermi 2 Conversion to Improved Std Tech Specs.Plant ITS Submittal Will Be Revised to Reflect Response to RAI Following Completion of Remaining RAIs Re ITS Submittal,As Agreed Upon in Meetings with N1999-01-0808 January 1999
Forwards Response to NRC 981120 RAI Re Fermi 2 Conversion to Improved Std Tech Specs.Plant ITS Submittal Will Be Revised to Reflect Response to RAI Following Completion of Remaining RAIs Re ITS Submittal,As Agreed Upon in Meetings with NRC
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML20199G7561999-01-14014 January 1999
Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Conversion to Improved Stds Tss,Section 3.3 for Plant
Project stage: RAI
ML20202H6111999-01-25025 January 1999
Requests Addl Info Re Conversion to Improved Std Tss, Section 3.5 for Fermi 2
Project stage: Other
ML20202H8881999-02-0404 February 1999
Clarifies Intent of RAI Re Plant Staff Qualifications & Reg Guide 1.8,Rev 2, Qualification & Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants, Dtd Apr 1987.Staff Position on Issue Neither New Nor Different Position from Previous Position
Project stage: RAI
ML20203F6761999-02-11011 February 1999
Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Conversion to Improved Standard Ts,Section 3.6 for Fermi 2
Project stage: RAI
NRC-99-0032, Forwards Rev 4 to Fermi 2 Its,Per Submittal .Rev Provides Responses to NRC RAI Re ITS Sections 3.4 & 3.9 Contained in Ltr1999-03-30030 March 1999
Forwards Rev 4 to Fermi 2 Its,Per Submittal .Rev Provides Responses to NRC RAI Re ITS Sections 3.4 & 3.9 Contained in Ltr
Project stage: Response to RAI
NRC-99-0033, Submits Initial Responses to RAIs Re Conversion to Improved Tech Specs Contained in Noted Refs 1-5.Util Has Found Extensive Dialog with NRC That Has Taken Place to Date to Be Extremely Fruitful in Effectively Managing Fermi 21999-04-0808 April 1999
Submits Initial Responses to RAIs Re Conversion to Improved Tech Specs Contained in Noted Refs 1-5.Util Has Found Extensive Dialog with NRC That Has Taken Place to Date to Be Extremely Fruitful in Effectively Managing Fermi 2
Project stage: Response to RAI
NRC-99-0044, Forwards Rev 5 to ITS to Provide Responses to RAI Re ITS Section 3.6 (Except ITS Section 3.6.1.3) Contained in & Update in ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses1999-04-30030 April 1999
Forwards Rev 5 to ITS to Provide Responses to RAI Re ITS Section 3.6 (Except ITS Section 3.6.1.3) Contained in & Update in ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses
Project stage: Response to RAI
NRC-99-0045, Forwards Rev 5a to Fermi 980403 Submittal,Converting TS to Its.Encl Rev Provides Remaining Responses to NRC RAIs Re ITS Section 3.6 Contained in NRC 990211 Rai.Brief Abstract of Changes & Responses to Rai,Encl1999-05-0707 May 1999
Forwards Rev 5a to Fermi 980403 Submittal,Converting TS to Its.Encl Rev Provides Remaining Responses to NRC RAIs Re ITS Section 3.6 Contained in NRC 990211 Rai.Brief Abstract of Changes & Responses to Rai,Encl
Project stage: Response to RAI
NRC-99-0046, Forwards Rev 6 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal ,to Provide Remaining Responses to NRC RAI Re ITS Section 3.3, & Update ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses.Brief Abstract of Changes Contained in Attachment 11999-06-0202 June 1999
Forwards Rev 6 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal ,to Provide Remaining Responses to NRC RAI Re ITS Section 3.3, & Update ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses.Brief Abstract of Changes Contained in Attachment 1
Project stage: Response to RAI
NRC-99-0052, Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions1999-07-0707 July 1999
Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions
Project stage: Other
NRC-99-0054, Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal1999-07-13013 July 1999
Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal
Project stage: Request
NRC-99-0077, Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS1999-07-26026 July 1999
Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS
Project stage: Other
ML20211C4761999-08-0606 August 1999
Forwards Draft Safety Evaluation Re Proposed Conversion of Current TS to Improved Standard TS
Project stage: Draft Approval
ML20211C0521999-08-17017 August 1999
Forwards Tables for Sections 3.6 & 3.7 of Draft Safety Evaluation of Proposed Conversion of Current TS to Improved Standard TS
Project stage: Draft Approval
NRC-99-0089, Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-08-17017 August 1999
Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev
Project stage: Other
NRC-99-0078, Rev 14 to Application for Amend to License NPF-43,providing Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev & Revised Pages for Submittal & Rev Instructions,Included1999-08-25025 August 1999
Rev 14 to Application for Amend to License NPF-43,providing Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev & Revised Pages for Submittal & Rev Instructions,Included
Project stage: Request
NRC-99-0079, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-09-0808 September 1999
Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev
Project stage: Other
1999-02-04
[Table View] |
Similar Documents at Fermi |
|---|
|
Text
_
T November 20, 1998 Mr. Douglas R. Gipson Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation Detroit Edison Company l
6400 North Dixie Highway j
Newport, Michigan 48166 i
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONVERSION TO IMPROVED STANDARD TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 3.7 FOR i
FERMI 2 (TAC NO. MA1465) l
Dear Mr. Gipson:
i On April 3,1998, the Detroit Edison Company (DECO) submitted an amendment request to l
convert to the improved standard technical specifications for Fermi 2. By a letter dated i
September 28,1998, DECO provided a supplement to the original submittal. The staff has I
reviewed Section 3.7 of the proposed conversion. Additionalinformation, as discussed in the j
enclosure, is requested in order for the staff to complete its review.
The enclosed request was discussed with Mr. G. Ohlemacher of your staff on November 9, 1998. A mutually agreeable completion schedule of 45 days for your response was established. If circumstances result in the need to revise the schedt le, please call me at the earliest opportunity.
)
If you should have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at 301-415-2828.
l Sincerely, ORIG. SIGNED BY Andrew J. Kugler, Project Manager Project Directorate 111-1 Division of Reactor Projects - lil/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-341
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ encl: See next page t
TOossest19e3 PD3-1 RF 9fC)\\ g (
DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC AVegel, Rlli (AXV) q'"i 0 010 EAdensam (EGA1)
OGC ACRS JZwolinski JLuehman JFoster DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\WPDOCSVERMi\\FE-STS03.RAI To receive a copy of this document. Indicate in the bow' "C" = Copy without attachmertlenclosure "E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure "N"a No copy OFFICE PM:PD31 lE LA:PD31 g
E D:PD31 Ts-NAME AKugler:db O\\he CJamerson (1 /
CACarpenter ( @
DATE 11/ l6 /98 O
11/ 18 /98
/)
11/jn /98 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
$k A O h
O 00 1
- =.
Mr. Douglas R. Gipson Fermi 2 Detroit Edison Company cc:
John Flynn, Esquire SeniorAttomey Detroit Edison Company
-2000 Second Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48226 Drinking Water an'j Radiological Protection Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 3423 N. Martin Luther King Jr Blvd P. O. Box 30630 CPH Mailroom Lansing, Michigan 48909-8130 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rerident inspector's Office 6450 W. Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 Monroe County Emergency Management Division 963 South Raisinville Monroe, Michigan 48161 -
' Regional Administrator, Region lli U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 801 Warrenville Road Lisle, Illinois 60532-4351 Norman K. Peterson Director, Nuclear Licensing Detroit Edison Company Fermi 2 -280 TAC 6400 North Dixie Highway Nev, port, Michigan 48166 t
l 4
August 1997
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CONVERSION TO IMPROVED STANDARD TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 3.7 FOR FERMI 2 (TAC NO. MA1465)
General Note Throughout this request for additional information (RAI), references to a standard technical specification (STS) mean the standard version of the TS published by the NRC in NUREG-1433, " Standard Technical Specifications, General Electric Plants, BWR/4,*
Revision 1. References to an improved TS (ITS) mean the proposed converted TS submitted by the licensee.
All Sections RAI 0.0-1: There is a generic issue involving a number of the Less Restrictive Administrative (LA) discussions of change (DOCS) in the Fermi submittal. Refer to RAI 0.0-1 in the October 26,1998, RAl. Additional DOCS affected by this issue are listed in the following table:
ITS LA DOC 3.7.2 LA.1 3.7.2 LA.4 3.7.3 LA.1 3.7.4 LA.2 3.7.5 LA.1 3.7.6 LA.1 3.7.6 LA.3 3.7.7 LA.2 Section 3.7 RAI 3.7-1: There appears to be an inconsistency in the Bases for ITS 3.7.1. The background section indicate:: that each residual heat removal service water (RHRSW) subsystem has a nominal flow capacity of 9000 gpm. The applicable safety analysis section indicates that the RHRSW flow assumed in the accident analyses is initially 9000 gpm. Finally, the [ limiting condition for operation) LCO section indicates, in part, that an RHRSW subsystem is operable with flow greater than 8250 gpm. Explain or resolve this apparent inconsistency.
RAI 3.7-2: The STS markup and ITS Bases for TS 3.7.1, the bases for Action D.1 mentions the completion time for the re sidual heat removal system suppression pool spray function.
However, in its conversio.i the licensee removed this function from the TS. This reference to the completion time should be removed.
ENCLOSURE
///
' RAI 3.7-3: ITS surveillance requirement (SR) 3.7.2.1 for the ultimate heat sink (UHS) verifies "the water level of each UHS reservoir, and the average water level of each of the two reservoirs,. " Are those the same thing or is the second requirement intended to measure the average level of the two together? If the latter is what is intended, it is unclear because of the use of the phrase "of each of the two..." From a UHS volume standpoint that latter interpretation is acceptable and consistent with the Bases statement that "If either reservoir does not meet the water level requirement, verification of the UHS combined volume is required." However, from the standpoint of the net positive suction head and pump vortexing discussed in the Bases, an average levelis not an appropriate measurement (there is either acceptable actuallevelin each reservoir to prevent vortexing/ loss of head or not). Clarify what average measurement is to be made and the intent of using an average level measurement in the SR and the Bases.
RAI 3.7-4: In the background section of the iTS 3.7.2 Bases for the emergency equipment cooling water (EECW) system, in the second paragraph, it indicates that EECW initiates, among other things, on a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) signal. This is only partially correct.
One of the EECW initiation signals is high drywell pressure, which is also a LOCA signal.
However, there are other LOCA signals that do not initiate the EECW system, most notably low-low reactor vessel water level. This Bases statement should be clarified.
RAI 3.7-5: The Bases for ITS SR 3.7.3.2 state the SR verifies that the control room emergency filtration (CREF) system filter tests are performed in accordance with the Ventilation Filter Testing Program (VFTP) which is maintained in the Administrative Controls section of the ITS.
The next sentence indicates that the CREF system filter tests are performed in accordance with j
Regulatory Guide 1.52 and/or the unit current licensing basis. The second sentence is extraneous and could cause confusion concerning the differences between the first and second sentences. The VFTP provides details concerning the filter tests that are performed. Remove or modify the second sentence.
