ML20195K051

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Oyster Creek,12R Outage,Igscc Insp/Stress Improvement Plans
ML20195K051
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 05/26/1988
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20195K049 List:
References
PROC-880526, NUDOCS 8806290331
Download: ML20195K051 (11)


Text

b b' f f a e d /71 8 /t / $

4 OYSTER CREEK 12R OUTAGE i

IGSCC INSPECTION / STRESS IMPROVEMENT PLANS l

GPU NUCLEAR CORP.

MAY 26,1988 l

1 G806270331 880616 PDR hDOCK 0500021t)

O purg

OUTLINE 3

OYSTER CREEK IGSCC EXPERIENCE l

12R OUTAGE INSPECTION AND STRESS IMPROVEMENT PLANS BASIS FOR INSPECTION PLAN PERCENTAGES TECHNICAL BASIS FOR INSPECTING (100% OF STRESS IMPROVED WELDS GENERAL ALARA TECHNICAL COMPARISON OF GPUN PLAN AND 84-11 REINSDECTIONS NEW INSPECTIONS POST-STRESS IMPROVEMENT INSPECTIONS

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS i

neef 3_

4531 H

BACKCROUND/ HISTORY OF WELDS IN 84-11 SCOPE NO ICSCC DETECTED PI 10R REINSP PI TOTAL 10R IN llR TOTAL ICSCC DETECTED, ICSCC DETECTED, SYSTEM WELDS NI*

ONLY IIR ONLY INSP NOT REPLACED REPLACED RECIRC.

89 20(5) 2 28 36 66 3 - 2 OL, 1 SI O

SHUTDOWN COOLING 14 8(0) 0 2

4 6

0 0

CORE SPRAY 26 18(0) 0 1

7 8

0 0

RWCU 51 35(5) 6 2

8 16 0

0 ISO CONDENSER l

INSIDE 2ND VALVE 58 34(14) 12 6

6 24 0

0 i

OUTSIDE 2?JD VALVE 131 19(2) 54 39 0

93 19 - All OL 9 w/ IGSCC. 17 new welds in 10R I

CLOSURE HEAD 8

8(0) 0 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 377 142(26) 74 78 61 213 22 o UNINSPECTABLE WELDS IN "( )"

a GPUN 12R IGSCC INSPECTION PLAN TOTAL BUTT PREV.

(GSCC SYSTEM WELDS WELDS INSP.

WELDS RECIRC 89 10 7

3 SHUTDOWN COOLING 14 3

0 0

CORE SPRAY 26 9

0 0

RWCU 51 10 0

0 ISC CONDENSER INSIDE 58 14 3

0 OUTSIDE 1 31 15 11 4

CLOSURE HEAD 8

2 0

0 TOTAL 377 63 17 7

, l l

4531 H l

12R SI PLAN 2 DECIRC SAFE ENDS (4 WELDS) 2 CORE SPRAY SAFE ENDS (4 WELDS) 2 ISO. CONDENSER SAFE ENDS (4 WELDS) 22 CORE SPR AY PIPE WELDS (8" NPS) 9 ISO CONDENSER PlPE WELDS INSIDE DRYWELL (10" NPS)

I l

t e 4531 H

j BASIS FOR GPUN's 12R PLAN FOCUS ON WELDS NOT INSPECTED IN 10R (TO 82-03) OR 11R (TO 84-1 1)

PERCENTAGES ARE A COMBINATION OF 84-11 AND DRAFT REV. 2 OF NUREG 0313 1

STRESS IMPROVED IN 11R (RECIRC-61, ALL POST-Si INSPECTED): 10% (50% EVERY 10 YRS.)

INCLUDES WELDS REQUIRING ADDITION AL EXAMS TO DISPOSITION.

REMAINDER OF SYSTEMS INSIDE 2nd VALVE: 20%, MOSTLY UNINSPECTED IN 10R OR 11R ISO CONDENSER OUTSIDE 2nd VALVE: 10% (ALL INSPECTABLE WELDS INSPECTED IN 10R,17 NEW WELDS INSTALLED IN 10R)

IGSCC FOUND IN 11R: FOUR WELDS (100%,3 IN REClRC.,1 IN IC OUTSIDE ?.ND VALVE; 2 WERE INSPECTED IN 10R, DISPOSITIONED AS GEOMETRY) 3 M OF THE OL's DEPOSITED IN 10R (IC): 10%

ALL SAFE END WELDS (12) INSPECTED AFTER SI ALL NOT PREVIOUSLY INSPECTED DUE TO AS-WELDED CLADDING ON OD, SAMPLE EXPANSIONS, SHOULD IGSCC BE FOUND, IN ACCORD ANCE WITH 84-11 4

e 4531 H

BASIS FOR GPUN's 12R PLAN (cont'd) 84-11 REQUIRED REINSPECTION OF WELDS INSPECTED TO 82-03 84-11 INSPECTIONS PERFORMED UNDER PERSONNEL REQU ALIFICATION PROGRAM VERIFIED ADEQUACY OF 82-03 INSPECTIONS HWC TO BE IMPLEMENTED START OF CYCLE 12 NWC CONDUCTIVITY SINCE 82-03 INSPECTIONS EXCELLENT AVER AGE 4 0.11 pS/cm., FEW UPSETS CRACK GROWTH VERY SLOW UNDER THESE CONDITIONS DR AFT REV. 2 OF NUREG-0313 DOES NOT REQUIRE SUCCESSIVE-OUTAGE INSPECTION OF CATEGORY D WELDS i

)

1

}

i i

J 4 :

4531 H

t INSPECTION AFTER STRESS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2 RECIRC SAFE ENDS (4 WELDS)- INSPECT AFTER SI-2 CORE SPRAY SAFE ENDS (4 WELDS)-INSPECT AFTER Si 2 ISO. CONDENSER SAFE ENDS (4 WELDS)-INSPECT AFTER Si 22 CORE SPRAY PlPE WELDS (6" NPS) INSPECT 5, AIM TO PERFORM AFTER SI 9 ISO CONDENSER PIPE WELDS (10" NPS)- INSPECT 5, AIM TO PERFORM AFTER Si BASIS FOR INSPECTING < 100% OF SI'd WELDS GENERAL PHILOSOPHY - BETTER TO SI AND INSPECT < 100% THAN NOT PERFORM St.

ALARA - WELD CROWN REDUCTION AND INSPECTION HAVE BIG IMPACT ON DOSE (~ 18 MAN-REM FOR CURRENT PIPE SI SCOPE)

. 4531 H

i i

BASIS FOR INSPECTING < 100% OF SI'd WELDS TECHNICAL GROWTH OF EXISTING CRACKS IN PIPE <12" NPS l

AS-WELDED: SHALLOW CR ACKS COULD GROW TO UNACCEPTABLE DEPTH IN < 1 CYCLE.

AS SI'd: CRACK MUST BE DEEP (> 50% TW) TO GROW i

(BY ANALYSIS)

GPUN UNAWARE OF GROWTH OF CRACKS IN SI'd WELDS i

GPUN UNAWARE OF NEW CRACKING IN SI'd WELDS WITH NO j

INDICATlOM3 IN PREVIOUS INSPECTIONS

}

F-REYlOUS FINDINGS OF "NEW" CR ACKS IN Sl'd WELDS ATTRIBUTED TO MISlNTERPRETATION OF PREVIOUS i

INSPECTION DATA.

i GPUN INSPECTION PLANS INCLUDE REINSPECTION OF WELDS WITH INDICATIONS CONSIDERED POTENTIAL, BUT ONLY SLlGHTLY SO, "MIS-CALLS" i

o i

l i

j

. 1 l

d 4531 H

+- _ - -., _. -

.,,_-___,y,._,

m.

,.__...,-_.__-,,,m

,.,w--,,-,

.. _.......,,. - ~, _, - _ _.,

,,.-r,-.

GPUN PLAN AND 84-11 DIFFERENCES THESE ARE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OUR APPROACH TO APPLYING 84-11 TO A SECOND OUTAGE VS. LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF l

DOCUMENT INTENDED TO APPLY TO ONE OUTAGE.

REINSPECTIONS 84-11 REQUIRES 20%, NLT 2 GPUN: 10% of RECIRC (SI'd),10% ISO CONDENSER OUTSIDE DRYWELL (ALL INSPECTED IN 10R)

NEW INSPEC1!ONS 84-11 REQUIRES 20% OF THOSE WELDS NOT PREVIOUSLY INSPECTED, NLT 4 GPUN: 20% OF TOTAL SYSTEM WELDS, NOT PREVIOUSLY INSPECTED POST-El INSPECTIONS 84-11 IMPLIES 100%

GPUN: 47% IN 12R (20 OF 43), BUT 88% (38 OF 43) WILL HAVE BEEN INSPECTED IN 10,11, AND 12R RECIRC: 4 OF 4 TO BE INSPECTED IN 12R CORE SPRAY 9 OF 26 TO BE INSPECTED IN 12R 8 OF 26 WERE INSPECTED IN 11R (2 WERE REPEATS OF 10R INSPECTION) 9 NOT INSPECTED FOR IGSCC ISO CONDENSER INSIDE DRYWELL 9 OF 13 TO BE INSPECTED IN 12R 4 OF 13 WERE INSPECTED IN 11R (2 WERE REPEATS OF 10R INSPECTION) 4531H

\\

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS l

PLAN TO INSPECT AT LEAST 20% OF WELDS NOT PREVIOUSLY INSPECTED IN 10R OR 11R.

REINSPECTION OF 10% OF WELDS PREVIOUSLY INSPECTED OCCURS IN SYSTEMS WHERE ALL WELDS HAVE RECEIVED AT i

LEAST ONE INSPECTION IN 10R AND/OR 11R.

l RECIRC AND ISO CONDENSER OUTSIDE DRYWELL GPUN SATISFIED WITH ADEQUACY OF 82-03 INSPECTIONS GOOD WATER CHEMISTRY IN CYCLES 10 AND 11 SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCES POTENTIAL FOR NEW CRACKS AND GROWTH RATE OF EXISTING CR ACKS INSPECTION OF <100% OF WELDS AFTER Si JUSTIFIABLE FOR SMALL DIAMETER PIPING j

INSPECTION PLAN ADEQUATE TO DETERMINE IF MAJOR IGSCC PROBLEM EXISTS AT OYSTER CREEK l

. l l

4531 H

MEETING

SUMMARY

DISTRIBUTION g

~

?'

iDocketFiIel NRC PDR PDI4 Gray File S. Varga B.Boger J. Stolz A.Drorrerick OGC E. Jordan B. Grirres ACRS (10)

GPA/PA HBClayton NRC Participants A.Dromerick W.H. Koo

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _