ML20154B172

Informs That 850226 Deposition of C Van Vo Will Be Taken in Raleigh,Nc as Part of Ongoing Licensing Proceeding.Questions Should Be Submitted by 850220.Related Info Encl

ML20154B172
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	02/13/1985
From:	Bradley Jones NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Bemis P, Vorse J, Walker R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II), NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI)
Shared Package
ML20154B089	List: IA-85-173, Requests 3-wk Extension in Order to Consult W/Ofc of General Counsel & Commission Re Ofc of Investigation Testimony at Contested Licensing Hearings ML20154B084 ML20154B172 ML20154B358 ML20154B387 ML20154B435 ML20154B490 ML20154B568
References
FOIA-85-173 NUDOCS 8603040241
Download: ML20154B172 (46)

Text

(

ROBERT GUILD uTonny a uw 2135 Devine Street COLUMBIA SOUTH CAROUNA 29205 TELEPHONE 803-254-8132 March 12, 1985 Director, Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST Freedom of Information Act Request hh-7 M)

Dear Sir or Madam:

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552 and the Comnission's regulations, 10 C.F.R. Part 9.

I here'ay request a copy of any and all records in your agency's possession or subject to its control regarding the October 6,1984 Affidavit'of Chan Van Vo, also known as Van Vo Davis, the concerns expressed in that Affidavit by Chan Van Vo, and your agency's action, response to and investigation of those concerns and the content of that Affidavit, including, but not limited to any and all documents regarding these subjects which are the basis for Inspection Reports 50-400/84-43, dated 12/14/84 and 84-45, dated 1/11/85.

The FOIA also provides that if only a portion of a file or record is exempt from release, the remainder must be released. I therefore request that I be provided with all non-exempt portions which are reasonably segregable.

1, of course, reserve my right to apneal the witholding or deletion of any information.

I am prepared to pay reasonable costs for locating the requested documents and reproducing them. The Act does provide, however, that you must reduce or waive fees under certain circumstances. The information sought here will primarily benefit the public since it relates to concerns regarding the safety of construction of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, and is sought for in the pending operating license proceeding for this facility by citizen use intervenors who have raised claims regarding Chan Van Vo's concerns. I therefore, ask you to waive any fees.

If you have any questions regarding this request please telephone me at the above number.

As provided in the Act and your Regulations, I will expect to receive a reply within ten working days.

c rely 8603040241 851231 PDR FDIA GUILD 85-173 PDR Robert Gu id c

t -

• i. n

,,, Q,

• q Q q u L/%)M Y Y.

l

d :Ecg'o, UNITED STATES j

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

O'

?d REGION 11 I

I

O 101 MARIETTA STREET.N.W.

h.$, [g ATLANT A. GEORGI A 30323 FEB 131555 695 rgg g Ill 8 2 z.

MEMORANDUM FOR: Paul R. Bemis, Director, DRS~

N.. c -kN4p!,7/~lt Joger AJialker.lcling Dir_ector,JRP

' J,1 -

g<druno Uryc, investigation / Allegation cobrdinai.or Jame's Y. Vorse, Director, Atlanta Field Office, 01')

FROM:

Bradley W. Jones, Regional Counsel

SUBJECT:

DEPOSITION OF CHAN VAN V0 On February 26, 1985 at 10:00 a.m. in Raleigh, North Carolina, a deposition of Chan Van Vo will be taken by CP&L as part of the ongoing licensing proceeding. This will' be a good opportunity for the Staff to ask Mr. Van Vo, through ELD's representative, questions which might be of use in our ongoing review of concerns raised by Mr. Van Vo relative to the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant. Mr. Van Vo's testimony at the deposition will be under oath.

If there are questions the individuals reviewing Mr. Van Vo's concerns would like asked, they should be given to me no later than February 20, 1985. Also, if there is a desire to attend the deposition on the part of Region II personnel, that should be connunicated to me as soon as possible.

radley W. Jones cc:

J. 01shinski C. Barth, ELD j

J. Moore, ELD l

f\\

y A H1.

4

m

~ L.,

• p* "'49 j

UNITED STATES T'

i,h..,.k./

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20566 OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS 0Y pavcq A C zn H J

@0q 9f4 sssrs w a ro

'A Assr &m aeroae AAs%Q S w nAJ 4qD W#1N

'y, ygf_47pg r

mayae asr. xa suecae T

• f g

ff M$D k

y 4d

$%y$ 8b* r ps'"*

J vg t

</

W Nh I37

/:131 9

O A

Aww%,e

~

AaL.

saw, Mw

1. ss SD.

ZRoc WEdu 0&d Aog' f

EIO Abwse 4c

[h5 A0D12SSS Fo(2

.QOL.

m> an w/w t'

l e

AI37

sene ro,m so7 ALLE2ATION DATA FORM U.S. NUCLEAR CEGULATORY COMMISSION II N Instructions on reverse sede RECElVlNG OFFICE

1. Facility (les) Involved:

them.

Itf more then 3. or of

/7/// [$ [fu/[rar dd C $ O d d // 6 O genenc. wnte GENERIC)

D G o C 6 4t o I o S n h b y o 2

2. Functional Areats) Involved:

icheck appropriate boites) :

operations onsite health and safety construction offsite health and safety safeguards emergency preparedness other (Specifyl

==

s. Description:==

1 Al z_l z l F1c,1 elol I F141e Is1/171/ Ie14171/ loI ni le171 l

' ' * * '" ch"*c'"

ICIAI lblolCINVnlElnirt41rl/lolnl l IIIIl l l 1 II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

4. Source of Allegation:

Icheck oppropnete box) contractor employee security guard licensee employee news media NRC employee private citizen organization tspecifyl other (specify)

MM DD YY

5. Date Allegation Received:

j gg 0

6. Name of Individual (First two initials and last namel Receiving Allegation:

7. Office:

7 ACTION OFFICE bb

6. Action Office

Contact:

trirst two initiets and last name)

J

9. FTS Telephone Number:

g g 7 g j 9 j

10. Status:

icheck on,,

Open,if followup actions are pending or in progress

_ ) Closed, if followup actions are completed MM DD YY

11. Date Closed:

22. Remarks:

; jl ;;jl

ii;;;;i;;

,i i (Lwrut to 50 chara:ters) llIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII gq

13. Allegation Number:

2 r 1 f t/ -A-6 / // 3

r a

Rev. 3 9/81 Exhibit 1' CAROLINA PChu & LIGEI COMPANY TP-17 S

S1rrmN HAnTM NUCLEAR PohE1 PLANT I ' ~ " ' #' # ;z RFT DISCRIPANCY REPORT DE No. /11 //O.3

\\

Ita=/Activ1c7 Description Unic Location or Placement No.

)[AMCr 6 d c N N6d((c el I

M l Nb~k J irlated Section of Specification. Drawing, Procedura or other Esporting Construction

( Q % i'M R/3 Paro 333 - T P-5 3 Rle Para 4 3 i A A / N *M M 8156 3

)

!3cuconicN* Details:

Page 1 of

1. f MYCh?

TA /.,23c, / uv.s 96 / r Yf#

M "x h ijt 4/?4/$iLY

.42bittb.th 8 //c/3 6 7 T K !

.2 M.L n/s 94 -;2

/

1. d

..Att)

M IO N80.*ld fod' $'4a as a.amdb *le n r 2. -

4)

.Aub b q w.a 2 W "l f; E /9 2 /.

Ao ai x

p. o.,,,,a s. M o a s e s e c,e w,,- n e w - o,,a,. s.

,n,,,, &,e sax-9 l

& 1 rs m. **r s r d ei n t. &A-/z e nxN. s! sns dissa toisgo ca rwis cres.sscris v & FM4 c.r.. sus isces1oe xoweV6.4 4s o s: rvon v r,rr& Fam e o eswee e rs.* v "C

'vo '-

s Igen Avala=Han Ier AP-II-16:

8 6 4 ^' A'.r e.sre enes s o, EBot Reportable Far Paragraph 3 S /.2 j

O Item Travelar Required

[/ d s/, eft 8-24-/.5

/

i p%

Constructing ptspection Supervisor Data Corrective Action & lasolution.Detailst (Attach supporting documentation.)

i 1

l Attached Documents (Specify)

Principal Disciolice Engineer Data j Distribution:

Easolution Verified:

Original dem

% 14 P: mipal Disc 1pitsa "F N Conscruction inrpaetor Data 4

Sesior Rasidang F**f*M Resolution Accepted!

ec CI Unit Superviser

'M

'A/0C Unit SupsW.acr

,',fi Q q. dent inincto r

. l '3 g fpw,/ <5rr A 60 Construct 1o. Inspectic 7t: e rv'.s o r Date g

~

I ct

?I L

C AROLIN A POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURCH ASE OR:~ ER 3

%t As pa ANT CON 51 AUCiaON DE PARTME NT

• '3*<

._.t $ 8.,A R P O'.*. E A Pl A N I jj '. 3) 0 PO t3 O + 101 SA =1134 11-40924 NE W Hill. N C 27562 0101 F

c actia v.tetR MUST arst An ON ALL invoices CORRESPONOENCE SHIPPING PAPERS AND CARTONS

i; a ;ait

!

• UEa.1 eac=.t:MOE*

s~ia via l

FOB TERMS REO NO BuvEm CODE ILP/T " (L

-' 1 JS l'?-10 i/30 40924 Di 11-23-82 IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS

1. ADDRESS ORIGINAL & (2) COP 1ES 2 ATTACH ORIGINAE SILL OF LADING On OF YOUR ITEMlZED INVOICE TO 3 INvotCE MUST SHOW ITE M seuM BER IDtarlock Division THE ABOVE ADDRESS ATTENTION SHOWN ON PURCHASE ORDER a WHEN PR E P AID ATTACH O ntGIN AL 002 Industri.11 Ave.

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION RECEIPT Grecusboro, NC 27403 s EACH oisCOuNT PERioo witL CAT FROM RECEIPT OF INVOICE CORRECTLY E xF. CUTE D

'TE M DE SCRIPTION OUANTITY UNIT NET UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE Confiruing telephone order of 11-23-02 to 4

Larry Stanley IX) NOT DUPLICAE Ites 1-67 are alloy stud Lolta with 2 heavy hex nuts each.

Dolts: AST:1 A-l'J3 Cr. E7 1

0lUuta:

ASTH A-194 Gr. 211 1

1/;: Dia. x 21/2" L:;.

/'360 6

M ca.

P j

1 2

1/2" Dia. x 2 3/4" Lg.

k00, ca..

6 M

3 1/2 Dia. x 3" L.

• 400 ca.

r d

M M

4 1/2" Dia. x 3 1/4" Lg.

//20 es.

M M

ea.

M M

3 1/2" Dia. x 7 l1/4" Lg.

p10 M

m 6

5 /*.> Dia. x 2 3/4 " L ;.

c10 ea.

r t

7 5/ ' Dia. : a;.

. f.0

.a.

6 W

8 5/L' 31. x 3 1//." L;.

_ 743 es.

6 M

5/d Dia. a 3 a/G" i.;.

G*

ca.

m M

1.

, S/

.u.

1/'

L.:.

.' b75 lM M

ea.

NC St LES TAA ^'yg ATION REGISTR ATION NO 7

~

l

. E ~ & C A R O F The above order es subject to all instructions terms and cond.v.ons set forth on the face and reverse side herev This Order empressi, limits JCn t

!in., ".J*etivl -

acceptance to the terms stated beeren. and any

_ 2.'.. t' i'.:;; S 0 ky:,...;ts additional or different terms proposed by the G

Setier are teiected unless assentee t in writing

. a T E ___ _

i AG8 N C ** E :

' c:.' ace r3f t ms. Oc-

> *aturr'ed ta e: entir,n c,t trie ote Pr0 m.

F u n c h A d L C F.C E ;

GE v

C A aOLIN A POWE R 83 LIGHT COMPAR$Y CONTINUATION SnEE' a t n OL A 1 C ON S T R UC 110 80 D E Pa a T M E N T Il#.

P sacaast oaot a sg i.. i -....

t!.

.'7i l

' i !.L. j O

.Y E M DESCRIPisON QUANilTV UNIT NET UNif PAiCE TOTAL PRICE Q

O 11 5/G Dia. x.3 5/J' Lg.

60 ea.

ca.

m M,

j250,

12 3/U" Dia. = 3 3/4" L;,.

W 1.i

.i/J" i>12. x 4 1/4" L;.

y12 ca.

I 14 5/d" Cia. x 4 5/J" L;.

e.8 en.

M W

/

l i

15 5/o" Dic. :: 4 3/4" L.

Il0 3

ca.

W 6

M M

16 5/8" Dia. x 5 7/3 La.

L12 ca.

I i

17 5/U" sia. x 6' Lg.

_A 3 ea.

6 h

13 5/S Dia. x 6 1/4" Lg.

p10 ca.

6 W

19 5/G" 'Jia. x 6 3/4" La.

6d ca.

h M

M M

j 20 3/4" Dia. x 3 1/4" L.:.

/,12 ca.

ca.

Q 3/4" Dia. x 3 3/4" Lg.

d 22 3/4' Dia. x 4" Lg.

J00 ca.

m p

i M

M 23 3/4" Dia. x 4 1/4" La.

-340 es.

I j

24 3/4" Dia. :: 4 3/3" Lg.

, 12 en.

M M

25 3/4' Dia. x 4 3/4 L ;.

J[

h m

ca.

6 20, 3 /4 Dia. :s 5" Lg.

' 2b5 ca.

6 g

27 J/.

.ia.

x 5 1/4'i.3;.

,23j aa.

i

. J 1/2 L..

l 6

/ -,

. 1.

1

~2 f...

M l

M 2.'

3/4 uia. x 6 1/4' L.;.

i e p

33 3/4' m. :: E 3/S" La.

, 70 c r.,

ea.

h l

M 3A 3/4" :: :.. x 6.1/

• L...

,125 tt TE m s AN:

o:-

ou<

- 1E FACE Ar.D AEVERSE SIDE Of THE SiGNEC SHEET ARE EFFFr flVE COvipiw %E ALOVE ITEf.% As ouc-M am o m e. c.

M I

l l

l A i'b3 l

,n,---,

a w,

-w-,

_,n,-,,--,

.,---,,,,,_,w_

,~-nwnm

iLRCN :iEO'.ME j

.,4 C A DO LIN A POWE R & LIG HT COf.1P A N Y CONTINUATION SnE@

WI 84 PL AN T CONSTRUC TION DE P ART Mf N1

\\

?.J.

's.X l > l

......11 F.

PumCo. A st onDE R m.uw st ;

u

- - - - - - - - - - - -.2.' ; I LL.

.C.

27 k2 1

.~...t.

\\

p Yf DE SCRIPTION QUANilTY UNIT NET UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE

)

32 3/4" Dia, s 8" Lg.

C4S ea.

M h

M W

j 33 3/4" Dia. x 9 1/2" L';.

/ 12 ca.

l 34 3/4" Dia. :: 12 1/4 L;.

4 45 ea.

M m

35 7/8" Dia. x 5 3/4" Lo.

4 40 ea, he p

i M

3G 7/d' Dia. x 5 7/b" La.

f,. 20 ea.

i

{

37 7/8" Dia. x 6" Ls.

416 ca.

6 i

m l

36 7/3" cic. x 7 7/3'- L;.

'20 ca, g

m 3) 7/G Dia. :. o 1/4" '. ;.

_ 113 ca.

m p

l 40 7/G" Dia. x 10 1/2' L;.

1, ei.

m m

i 41 7/ 3" Dia. x 12" L.

f 60 t

en.

6 m

iO 7/8" Dia. x 14 3/4" L.

plS en.

m m

i 43 l

Jic. x 3 1/ f L.;.

4 ca.

6 m

6 6

44 1".>ia.

3 1/t." La.

/3 ca.

45 1" :>1a. x 5 3/4" L;;.

4,13 ea.

M w

46 l'

Lic. x 5 7/0" L.;.

,' 12 M

h eu.

47 1" 'aia. x 6 1/4" L..

I 78 ca.

M 6

46 1 ' u u. x 6 3/u' L,-;.

2G 3a.

M M

i

)

'. > ;1.'i.

1_

6 h l l

i M

l 6

',. s l 1 1/ w ' Lic. :: 0 1/4' L.;.

. As au.

i i

.,1 l11/3"Gio. :. 7" L;.

, JS 6

i M

i ea.

l

'; 2 ! 1 1/u' 01.... 7 J/4" L,.

21l) ca.

N 6

j A,<_ TE RMS AND COW'TIOf.S 07. THE 8 ACE M.0 S EVE %E SCE OF THf LG'.ED SHEET ARE EFFECTIVE COVEH t.G *HE Ab CVE lie MS A5 l ! K vG H F4 F 'E AT E D *". n O *.

2

.i i

i AGB

C a ' O Lir4 A P O '.*.* E. F. 6 U G " 1 C C T.1 P A f J )

C v '. '

vAllO.N SHEET O'

v.t A *LA%1 C ON ST RUC TIO N D E P A R T Mt 41

1. 1.

li-AA,.

P u es t.... g c, n g,, g se g u ge g g n

.;.T ! id LL.... C. 175n2 EM DESCHIPTION OUANTITY UNIT NET UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE l

M 3

1 1/b" Dia. x 11" L;.

L 96, ca.

6 1.1/3" Dia. :: 14" L;.

.,38 ca.

daemMai en M

d l

'.24 en.

M M

i 1 1/4 Dia. a 6 3/4" La.

3 6

1 1/4 ' Dia.

7 3/4" Lg,.

4 50 ca.

M M

j 7

1 1/4 ' dia. x J" L.;.

.' 2 0 ca.

M w

0 1 1/4" lJia. x 11 1/2 L.

0 24 ca.

N 6

3 i

9 1 1/4" Lia. x 13 1/4 L:;.

i'. G ca.

M W

es.

M M

0 1 3/3" Dia. x 0 3/4" La,.

f.J05 ca.

h M

i 1 3/8" Dia. n 10" L;.

/,43 3

1 3/8" Dia. x 10 1/4" Lg.

(-2d W

ea.

M M

1 1/2" Dia. 2 9" L:;.

G520 ea.

M W

!4 1 1/2 Dia. :. ? 1/4" I..;.

h10 ea.

l

5 1 1/2" Dia..

la J/4' i..;.

/ 24 ca.

m h

l 6

1 5/3" Dia. x 11 1/4" L.;.

' 24 ca.

6 M

t M

M

,7 1 3/4 ' oia. x 4" L.

6.12 ca.

i 1::e:.3 62-76 are alloy tap end studs uit.a 1

a. rry..e:

a t.:a c...

.a

. p n y..

e-

~

7e ca.

N 6

ai

,3/

31..

3 1/ " '...

1 I

o i 7/ >

.7,..

L,.

l ammune w

e

' 7J 1" ' a. : 4 L ;.

7 f,

.n.

M M

M 71 l

21 :..

1/4" L_.

-l '149 6

M en.

I,

.L TERYS AN? ccr.NTiONS OP. TmE r ACE AfsD SEVE RSE blDE OF THE biGt.E D SHEET ARE EF F EC'lV( COvi Al% 1"E A E... **t Mi a b 40uGn kiF Ea'ED st ni Ct.

i a

AG8

.-;cc t

ql

,,__. c 6 2.

C A R O LI N A P O'.'.T il & LI G Wi C O.'.1 P A N 't CONTINUATION Sn2G vvE C FLArmT CcN STcuCTION CE Pt.3TME NT

.t s

?.v.

. : v..' 1,1 -

c 11.,

va c h A sa ont;t a w ust -

..E W.il LL.

2..

C.

27562

. 43224 D

'W l OESCRIPTION OUA NTITY UNIT NET UNIT PRICE

, TOTAL PRICE 7"

l 1/d" Dia. x 4 3/U" L.

/ 12 ea.

N M

3 73 1 1/3" Dia. x 4 3/4 Lg.

ca.

N M

74 1 1/S" Dia. = 4 7/3" L;;.

bS6 M

ea.

75 1 1/8" Dia. x 5" Ln.

g,156

. ca.

M M

76 1 1/2*:Jia. x 6 3/4" L.

/ 76 ea.

N

'WW8 mum.

g M

all naterial covered by this purchaae order uust be furnished in accordance with the follo rin;; specifications; Stad bolts shall be threaded f ull len.;th, Lolts snall have hexagonal heada and be threaded full length.

1;otu shall confora to /l:S1 blG.2.1 dimensions.

Iluts shall be heavy series be ; confonain;; to L;1S1 E13.2.1 din.enciens.

icrainal diameters 1" and smaller shall be to coarsc-thread serics and lar;,cr than 1" uhall ec U-thread series.

Stud bolen and bolta shall Le to c.JI ~1.1 Clc.s 2.i caternal threads.

..ets uhall nave A.iSI 31.1 Class 20 internal t a r e.:d.i.

tiat.>rini shall be Arm A-193 Grada l',7 for utud

'uolts or bolt:. and.t.0T;i A-194 Grade 21; for auta (ar 4: 1;; A-3J7 Grade :; when apecified).

..,,.m-.-...

.. ' e * * (, ** 7* p 4 [.. f lF-t y

77 4

l.iccouluu;,e receipt une a"ceptance of tui:

l rchwa orde L/ return.all.

Oy s ilnin.' t:i.i i

. n a... s s-.

'.s..L c.>: t Ji t ;L

,* J G. s., : CL,. :

'..n. _ r i v e.,

i va. va e:ni. ic.,

t.m: all 4c. v..i l

lb.: u p p i l u. In accordance vit.: rc erence) l

~

3: t. l f i c - t i ons.

i

-.;2 nt i t.ea t.'i t;..e J :.ay va ry,+13.;.

l

r. "

ter

$.wa~,

l

{

a TE**.S 4

' t O N S O P.

'-E F ACE AP.D DE VE RSE SIDE Os THE SIG' E D SHEE T A AE EFF E CTM C A'E A '. " INE AliC t ' II '+'.a A S 10 ;O w 5i N _'+

-ON A\\38

4-o

' CA-1 CAROLINA POW'ER & LIGHT COMPANY DDR No. / 3 7 h^

c.'15/s3 CORP 0MTE QUALITY ASSURANCE DEI' ART!G.NT p

,og y

^a DEFICIENCY AND DISPOSITION REPORT RFT No W [$1ss" (Proceoure CQt-2)

' tem / Activity Name or Description Shop Order Code Class Quantit Unit Quality Assurance No lE 7-6

1. 1. y (PO & Item No.)

b>>.** h nek,

n_rA~._ rn o i h

Yl..r.E 9 - fW***

QA-V35~/] X i

e rial. Heat or 6ther Identitication No.

Supplier or itanuf acturer Type of Procurement 3

Mou/2 - 4 om.&

O CP&L Po O Transfer bn lh[mW df.t//-n.[

((_

3 A-E Po O NSSS PO i;o'ation (Specification, Drawing, Procedure or/Other)

NCR No.

Reporting Inspector

$L..n - /T.i.

An - Ma ui).wr,A, A1A - r) 4.1 k

de bia }--.

Y'/7-W h ficiency Detatls:

//

DDR Evaluation

~

b Construction Phase

@dg[,6d,4+

' ItcO4 /.4 W y Engineering Phase b+hrats id j&,

QA Program Violation

/

% Specification Deviation 6- ~ rat C C-/

aut. /

cc-/JM3 Procedural Deviation y Unacceptable Workmanship CC-l.Suf S t G, CC-I.2dC, r 7, cc-1.sd y __x_ Damage / Detect C C -1.2.ut 2 7, CC-A Asst. 2, Other Not Reportable a WWfm #

/D/

102, iEl,163.

qfjq'c g

UPLS NPCD i

7.

p Eva1.

b 4

Agis,

A Y.,. la.

By -

wJA M f u a

w M

Date b

b e2 5, Cic., at ?,o t o,o z 3

• # '" M Y **~ ) W V& LA B-IS -8 QA/QC Specialist / Engineer Date (19 La Q.ayL))?.2 o-.0J A C. w mng G e1 "us'positton:

Hold Tags Removed O Lem sk3:

Accepted By:

QA/QC Specialist /Ln :t neer Date e

Verified By:

QA/QC inspector Date Reviewed By:

QA/QC Specialist / Engineer Date

. i s t; t : a:I n :

ANI Concurrence (ASME Code Sect'on III Ice.s onlyp:

0-14 71re: tor - QA-QC SHSPP Authorized Suclear 'ntr Etar Date M r i e at ns)

I n. ' '.s t i n g specialist Report Closed:

4 marris Plant 2 M.; :

4L; Q h d.ll

.n.

Directer

-GL-

- W' bate 3

nt

@c te :-Jp C i... -

..(

6 E...

g' A138 osa notw

..s m.or DCA - L a cs. Q I

9IT ": L DDR

/ F 75~

Pasolcf 7s i

g QA !Jumber t'35~ / 2 A Date_3 f7.?}

Drawing !Jo._8)$ 2 2-l 132 Cd Inspectorg A,4,7 B o. 1,, m Specialist

. t+1 d Weld Spe c. ** *"~e oz m

j

.*a.18f Mark flumber Rev Def an Details

(.C -I Euf l I

I dS~0$/~ A " " ",/d'F~M *~ M k p /f. b.T MlA o,- M A

.2,"'--"

c at,,.sp)fof ce,x+7-ins./ P4s k s:4 & % ' 4 X '

/fe~4 4 IF I

r#

CL Nt" DL 24 -

cx n,n-~!a' Fod).

I Ot. hSAA/-N "

/N' "a at-c& & 04 NG".b n.

C

.as x-JG O

.T ot. f.Cgt/-f

/A' N ~& c& J OL cr,w r.M ' sis., owm M'

$'usi-4"4/1/ M'A,. A et M9 Mi I

ot.

Ir

,zt,% *

. 7?r % s A-

'"}

A-A

.a.

I ot

$~/X/~ /j '

/ 0

& G4 "'

' R " &,ZF2t#, A"A., 4h,;

2*F a x w x..... ' s 6,.

.,.. e

.T zf S~A A.l* r$

/di " b. } Z /~ fi* h p o y

OL Cl- $;' /3

1. x rst)->t"A K

///A

• J z?

I xc

~

A= -

'&' OL /

C7 Ot,c r Ns " bot., 4 ?/y* <x nf & i i

Ae &

2,. ~/J tT.

LE0E '

Type Of Welds I fillet Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations AS Arc Strike II Square Groove

Ji Added Weld NPD flot Per Design I.'.' V - 3rocVe b'E Ease l'etal heductior.

f.*4

! Jot Weldt;d OL Overlap

. Sire:

Seve; CE Crack pc, Porosity flor-r' e vel C

Crater Ile -

S:

Slag Ir.clusior.

EC Excesstve Convexity SF Spatte: i C l us te r o f :.i r. ear,'

l-L l'-

' Slot IC Interr.al Canca/ity SE Surfa s si a.g w/

IT Ir.ccr.plete Fusion

't L IT Ins af fic ie r.t Thrcat I W.

Tctal WeJ.c

.er..t In Ir.:afficien*. vield

'.J C Ur.ce r Under.

T.lI, Inc t. : *.'

tld Syr.bol Unce r.. e e.' h e.

t ta t.s ;'I al Li v =e Tr:: ?.on

',ie lc ' nac c e s - -... e.

A\\'h8' s.

7 pea. Ir.:. :.

tift?N6&/DC9- /$ 7b Pap J cf JC Da ts 5(- l7. 'S Ch Uu::Aer '{ 3$ ~ s' )1 Crawins No._52 S~21 -L432 ds O Inspectorp,r, K.u. A m.j_ Specialist ,N,2 tyd4 We ld Spe c. - '** g",T, *9 '# ,s,. - a s r Mark Nuc.ber

Rev, Def.

Mads d. N"'" OI CC-l LJl l I S #b"r A *' Al CTA psK, 7 & v fr & CT sus /2 & $'S,4f/- Af4V /Y.A -4 It'b'./n~y I .tr om > p a .T AS ~.'S1.-//- Y ' l l$ )% y & /iS.M *4 m% n se zr e x*.s,&y, c2 % x ,C OL l.sedo

• A- &

hCcf/-4,[ /)j' , g y g,)jg "y( X Oc. 0L X , pt y g ,g g p o-st~ A-4 1 S ft/ /- Uit '/d/d'.L '.'.4y J.ZrM .T T/= sp %'Jg,a M*J . A cr 4's y ( }j T,1C nVff .2 $ $ / ', 49.*y 34s?-_vsy* A )N uc.+ A nm n -> nr a I ' A.-K h,72 b A la.~s J sa b n. & r d/

• / O-%l4 w a

F n

• L 4 crue s-a n 'lE rd tids 2 N,,

4 p ./<!y.Myp J y,.u % fr.r" .s & L n L 4 1/,, J.6-r p. O,,,p d a s,t na J/N ' ull 17S }l,'f,y, eg jpfG,,, /l 6.Ql, p% c s. frooS J&LyS'2,.,/9N & 77 l4"// Yl c W , o s 4 x / y* y., c r L ' n,*. j p, v A' uc. o a g,)4,.ks, y e,.rik fi "@., oi ;f 1

ZF y,c g f h',"]

4 LEGIO: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations Fillet AS Arc Strike t;PD N t Per Design ~ 1: I:;uare Croove AW Added Wald if4 !;o; Welded II' - Crc ove EME Pme Metal Eccuction CL Overlap I'l 31ryle Eeval cts Crack F3 'Pcrosity F!srt Eevel CT Crater .SI Slag Ir.clun:,or. '/I Fla: c 'i LC Excessive Convexity SF rpatter (CluMir c car VII F ; LC 'e C '.:.. IC Ir.terna'. Conca 1ty S2 Surface Slag d CII SN' IF Incer.;1e te Fusior. -,:L Tota; Wele 1e _ 'i S' ad !T Ir.s uf fi: n.nt !nraat V: 'Jnde rc ut IW Insufficient Weld US '.'n "' r ice IWS '...t, rec.t We c Oyrici t,::t Un.c e : 'ne j '.6 ' * "3 t e r a; LI I mtar

• d.

.on W: Wel: I t.m e :.;.- u A t ?> 9 W. Me1L 2:~ a;

RIRe s.un.r DDR /T'77 Pag) */ o.2 Date,5 -/ 7-11 CA f4:::be. _ '/W / 2 d Drawing NO. S 2 5 J J -L 13,,J__ fis 6 3 J ~ Ir. spec tor g;4, g,,.,. /(,aL_.s Speci alist_, > ' Welo Spec.6 - w .h w-~*f,ty,ec h' Mark T.ur.ber Rev. Def. Detail.s A.A A A'/- ( & w 2 } *1"A<^< 5 $N n w,w.,:,,uwJ pl G, / Ruf / I I' r-w i 4 .ex4 W J Q rd,49.%. 9 ~w _e [3 NFD K 2 X/l./ -2 6 + q m jw & 2 W4.y 3. f /A A n awe & C d A )>.<1J u.x,4 ' f. J A /.a A l /&. r.4 4 *' a ~.A H,c,stA' AJu A wu.a f.&dtp, wl xD y o~.tipu-<1. a p L/4 & $y q u Mc;~.%.a u z + a.d u zuNw ./J J 7p != rf u e ' n ?'X % " / ~s T A A ;M'D i, uc Nw M.. L J L N tJ </ W. /?. L. r 22hd & %ali .4 yap t'fC 4 YAA'/-J= =' x fi' - //i'h I,v st/p h.r' A rl-J, /!. 4L d / M </E w /.es4 Y ;/~ A s : i v.s.; " 4,'7.. JJw A....H e.,aC M ma. JJs l'.K6 f /- A m n /2"o J.a.* / 1, N/Y' /,2N d w.2 & p /. &}G /2 .,e = % /p4~. .7~ tf,ct V4// ~ Zf Y , CL W.4 ve dif Y 5 " pi ut,w by,ra./A 'h'.C/JYnJG i LEGE!iD: T:ge Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations I fillet tu Arc Strike f.73 f4ct Per Design II Square Groove /JJ Added Welt t,,- t;ot Welded III V - Groove EMF Ease tietal Teduction OL Overlap IV Sirgle Eeve; CA Cra:K pc

Por o sit */

V Flt.re Eevel CT Crater SI Slas In'lusion VI Fitre - V EI Excessivr Conve xity CF Spatter (Cluster of Lineari V:I fly or cle: IC Irternal Concavitj Surfne Clag V VIII S p o*. IF In :,;;et, Fusien Tai Total Waid Length IX CSM IT Inn fficier.t Tnreat l' (!nde rcut I'. I.:uffin ent ',41: US Unders i:'e IJC 1r.c o r r e.

• Wel: Sy.bol t#'

Un:en:irad Weld Material L: Linecr Ir:icetton WI Weld Inat:e sable /)I ~38 t'! Pe lt Tr.r: g n

I % 75~ (' I? "'CR/DDR / $ 7E Page f of.7f, l?

• C '*

Date_ g./7 1 2 9 CA Nu:nber L/ 1<;~ ) 2 2 Drawing No. T2 S~21 - 1. ~) 3 2 L>0 Inspector m,4 e x.j,,.AmL_o Specialist We ld Spe c.*w"~i *,.y * .unc Mark Number Rev. f* Def. Details WW/- As N%,c,iJiy gm E'",yi S/' y.j.34; l j T %st A Tut. ) uwe 0.th/ - e1 % './, (/ & " ra/L) /v r ot by.<ti-uwm }{r'&' r vw (/);' rut.) V 1*F sf&A/-If Y& ( 15 Th/L ) '/X$/~UC'b$X51' &,Zfl0'& DM N* Y v<.iIf As,1w hr,$//- s9S,il' ,7w h% ,(/4TwL) Z n,ut $f.//./- #95 N' uc r,/j$)(k'&), EC }{s s R ot OL N " ( /8 '" TWA o YM/C/* O t Y j TWhk ., { lN # I* otoIt.< O Y w 4 ). f If &K /~ Zf Y (.2 " TivL ) ~ k W /- k _ f, q r-M C,a " Twi. ) q IP $ utt-se %.L., re l4 %y, e rXs ' sin. V os rr i p cT C / !$' 72)L) f vc u A Lx4/- Uc')1 X Ils "./n y,1 4, 7 t* N ' & s os.14'iny c.1 n'rwt ) or S $5p' d I.f*f /= 19S X ' , If $s ' ,, dt. 3 ^ A3 %m X ,4mt &x x 'Ay.$ elm 3 N' rws.) LECEND: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations I I Fillet AS Arc Strike tIPD Not Per Desigt II Square Groove AW Added Weld NW Not Welde:i !!! V - Groove EMR Base Metal h duction 01. Overlap I" SirEle Eevel CR Crack PO JPorosity 3 Flare Eevel CT Crator SI SlaE Inclusion Flare - V E: Ex:essive Convexity SP Spatter 'Cl w.cr of Lir. ear; V!' Siw or Slot IC Ir.ternal Conce/ity SS Surface Slag 'T ! 390' IF In:cr.plete Fusion WL Total Wel:: Lot.ith 'y S tur IT Insufficierit Threat UC '.'nd e rc u t !W Irnuffic. - UC . C*rcize 4

• k"

.. s ec* u .'t.:v.c.se : We d' l'a t e '" inea A id na: '.-. :. l e 4OE t'!

'. l t TI.

M:. n.VDDR /375' o eageA.. 7-Date 9 -/7 5 CA Nanter //]S~}} } Drautng No._ C'A S2* 2 -2172 Lh Inspectorpfy, g;,,,,, /2y L,_ 3pecialist [ M Weld Spec.Ia N.h N i Osn Upe j9,7, Mark Number Rev. pe-M. te,1d Details 3Z~ 23W YHX./- ff A Wl~ be)/ I (.24 7taL),OLJM M ".A, t.s* S/' .st-u, rA.W/- ue.!$lX4 izrl'/9 Gk'M S./ = OL % [ /N

• Tin /L )

f OL d 'It" 1~17 $l# 2Yk # (/ % E4/0 l r 1 l l l t l j - e l l i 6 l \\ l LEGEND: Type of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specificatier. Violetier.s I Fillet A5 Arc Strike tiPD fist Per Desipt II 04.are Croove Ab Added W11d fM Hot 'elded d III V - C-oove EM7 Base fMtal Fedue:1on CL Overlap l IV Sir.f.e Eevel C? Cra:k to ;rorosity V Flar Bevel C: Crater SI Slag Inclu:icn V Flare - V E: Exca::iva Conve xity f5 Spatter (Obster of Linear, ! VII Fig er Clot

• C I:ternal *.or.:.vitv S

Surface Sla V VIII spc t If It, rg e. e r ate.," 7,7-Total Welt [e r.rth IX Stud IT

ts af f'. :l er,t D.roct

'r Undercut !4 In:Uff1Cler.t Veld US Undersite l I'.;; In:r.,rre:' 'de ;d Iy-tc1 t'.'M Un:c nr,tr a: e e ; 5 'iv, e r i51 L' Linear '.r.01:siten w! '.lvid Inacee:ratte 4338

?

] l ** TYT &. -., ~- -~

-h;h...Oi/ DDR /P7f~ Page 7 o f.74 Datej -/7 -Y - ^ QA fiur:ber '/.3f/).1 Leawir.g f.'o._ f 62 2 l 7/O Inspectcr9w $1 bda A [.rfdSpecialistg2rt].A Weld Spec.b M I I ~ \\ turk I; umber Rev. Def. Details C C -l-3 1. a.s (QBdl Pt' T's de 1E. I us 'A' (<r 7 " wt TM 7' Lu t. 'Z HC 0 }?. 6 {c R.l tl 5 % ' fx .rp/x*> Tot. /jf ' ed. I ut (D Pc.T h R / UC > b ' a 2f4cu 3 " /m y e - (. T US 6) Bdl R. Eh b & J < < c~ ig y, ypl.< a Tut r esc (' I. 3* F @ it. T k R. / comer Ms 1.F W2 14 to.,, z p/e.s. h iil (4 f,T UL,,l%l has UC ?!62 X 4C. fx $ ^ /<,,. o i i ut @ Pc. V 'r }s k i k a c 7 Mz 5 p l.v > Tub / % ' e se l. l f 'c. 4'l 10 R.] het ll.C % ~ .T. U5' for y rt~ < s TJL / 4 ' u < l. T u"% @ jf. E +v R.. I ks M L//17 l E 14jw Pc $ h /1 l te u c y // u ' ? }}l$O LI U/U, [( / p ~ < e., Y9

• lpel),

i .Vblin LEGE!Q: Type Or Wel?.i 1 F il l e '. . Weld tefk:er.cies ar.d Qecification Violation: AS t.rc I tr,1xe 1;y; t;ot Fer Les if 11 Square f,rcove AW Addvs We)d tT,i t;at Welce: III V - Crtote B.P hace t<ctal fucattior. O,' Gverlap 1 J1tte hvel CF Crack PO lForosity C e 3ovel CT Crater SI Sins !rd a l '. Slu ~ - V E :: 7.x.mive Canvexity

P 5 patter iCla *.a of LI:x.sr

'.'j. l '.e ' r 01c t .I Inter t.sl Ccr.w/ity Serface 01ac v'.. IF In a,r.g le t e F u:J :.r. m;. Total '..el: L<,.. '~' 9 J'o

I 1 is'aff :leret 'nr e a*.

(); 'frm rc u t N ! r.c >f f. ::.e r.t. 'u Plc IJC 'Jn erti:e I c, c r. e, y.,;e ty-- 'l '

rcc'.c e.

$. la 'L;+ rial L 2 "< r l a 11

1..a r.

M * : x;en n.e $ l') K fT ^ I t ir.:

o M T,/ DOR //*7f Page l of Ng Date j :/7 t 435 / L 2 _ __ Drssing No. f~Lf ZZ k 1/0 q CA numer Inspectorb, Ja hdw h p Spe:ialist o q' .f[.gh, Weld Spec.j4f.u** *S Nw W w . f.% Mar < U ccer Rev. Def. Details C( -I 3 3[ OL & L 3 +s fe.] br W % ' /my f 1 @ /? 3 h R.I M TF Vr'lony UM.Also all$1 f UC 13 Pc. 5 h RJ /ws a c > % 5f Also If L p/nce5 l 2C [F ly R. 3 f Rf hm .7 f V52 / 4 /,P 5. /.,,,,. f I

q. F 17 Pc.1 h Ye l

.[ f N ', if ses k c 1. as Ifr Pe.1 +o Pe ( y s > '/p ' > l' Im> Tult L 4c @ Pc. 2 +1 Pn I A v u c. > lf x' ,) 2 i> t,us 2 CT L 20 [' l/ -/c R / /gs c *r 2 c l P * ' i f& /%h - 72c ene del) on but s:k of

11. % to n.t Jiov:y u/h k W hMe1 id shnll h A

/we ben /. = LECE"L: Tv

• Of Wein:

Weld Deficien Irs and S;.ecification Vic1st103

F il ' e '.

AS Ar: Strike tiPD tb t Pe r 'a :.' i'

• • . St &re Cr oavs A'.!

Ad:ed Welc !G tat We;t e 1:~ 'l - G r am e EMR Base tietal Feduction OL Overlso O vls. LevG CTt Crack PG Poros:.t y Flare h val CT Crater CI 01st Int. no 11are 'i EC !.x:essive Convexity SP Spatter i..u: e* .! Linear) 'lur 0-not IC Ir.tornal Corr:avity SS Surface !. V V: ' Mt IF Ir.::.plete Funion 74L Total Wu.' .tn E tud IT 1 safficier.t Thrxt UC ')nd erc u t I11 I r.:,f f i cie r

• rN1c t;::

Jndersi.>. I'.r . : re:t.w;; Sp Lv 'n ans .. n. a LI L-ter Irm ettion 'I

Ira.

AGE pT Thr: m

+F ' i D:. '- / T 7[ Page y cf 76 Date '5 -/ 7-71 1(/ 9.I V '/' $ *' y m a :.u.:<r y ~J$ ).2.2. trau1rs tto.:LtsAu4tt L O_ ed7700T A o) Ir.epec:crxx, K;a Aw/g Spe:ialts.t Qt-Q %LG Spec. n, w1

• se e

-Is r'r;.12cr hcv. i Lef. Lot 2113 n rn t -

==?, w, j l4 ' / 4 '4 CC-I gul S c6 z, v we 7 n s- .a. , x yt / M -.,a,,~ / A 1 (A p. f t',a./Y4"A,,ar h A 4-> g 1, v ut'P fl VA X / s JJ.* au m lo "&w 3 f"a &.s g M /v4., 4 s a4 .x,+-. %K i.4..tr R'/y; r.J us An t x rr \\ is '&. cis. ruu) v.> E,rr h u st-4 or.4'.x,y/y,zs s ,4 " x v e. ve,s. ru as&*x/3 v s.) as y is't,4 / ~.J.e os Ajmy,(Zw 1. Es."p.A 2 os., n 9 VS El X /"&, l ' Tws. ) / US ) 1* st,c r f.VMI* ).- VL *Nu"dpsX 4 z p'7WL)m su,,:a, m" co c y As (l 1 O.4'AX/~,j og,$ssJ.,s.X % dh f y ac a US L,.4 JL - y.x,., w / 4 A.y US ( I & T WA.) y ve,vs *xa/t-6 ve Mx /4 ".69,,, e > O s %,'$< k's,t /,ain- /4 /rf t'In nA > \\ 4.v'.4//.,J, r[ Ns' 4ry, v s N?X / V C/N TUL) ' Of % Jype of Uel:s }l eld reficiencies and Specification Vi:1ations i

Fil;.

AS /rc Strike fiPD lat Fer Det;n 1: Sq u.cre Or cae A'.l Adde: Ueld f;W IJot W lded ? Gr; y.w E/E hase ':etal Feauction OL Overla; i 31-(1, Level CE Cra:r: PO 'Fcrest. l 2 F1sre m el C; Crater 51 Slag 1 : at: Fla e E: Excessise Convexity SP $;attet 11utt-r. i na.t r l, M ?N.. ;1c: IC Ir. tert.21 Con:evity ts Surtne 01,sa l sp;; 17 incer.;lete Fu ler. 7,:L Tcta] W~*'. s 1 7 Ins.:fficier.t Throet U; Un:'v re.. I r. Ir. ffa lent '.! eld US Ur.: 2;w Ir.::rre: t M ; Oyr.:.x V',1! ! Ur.: e a 's to ;.1 LirM: I' ;1. c. rs

• 1 Uel: I r. :. : 0:

.< AG8 j ' ' e l. ! ".r -. r.

L' ?:'

:' ' )$ 7(

Fsp /6 M ~ L Date Y ;/y ;d 8/9)5~'/' $ Y .a :u : r y% / 21

r (c)

' rv m ':o.Snu s. '11L Ku.n s ? 70n 3 &. ~ rt;+::rener, f <. B p l e _,__ Spe ialist [2hQ ow Weld Spe c. o~*Jc v

• • ~=1

,, I e l Eev.ql C.uaniType

arv * "ar Def.

p,y Details S YA/./-L I[a'&, A x &s XW q.j y g,( j TF,el X A h

m. NE 4(4

. us.

M4 ru, es 7 /.<

• 74/ L )

C 's A/* A r W.,4 M".e 2 J Os EslX / W I ru Ar 'JS (/k'TwL) O +'A t / ~. h R S /! $. 4 *,. s ve *Nsx N d 1 As,Lt zu h.p*m us Mx /3 '& tv, es ci.+ r w G $ 14Al* ) Ut*NA X/N'

• • A. A
• V es Vs s% ".f A -

VC c /M rm )7'@ //f"$7 $ VJf/-)=.< VC *)S$dyX / "./q, f u V to. N'

• • P us x/if*. 4 kys',*tJK /k "

'1 #* ( / N 7~4) A ) Y 96(A)- L o n ' us AZx / '& c$'le.$w 1~ 04,g /C 14' a) as tA' X/*.A OL W&' TWL) f OL .+d ; U$ I'n .k' I}$ US / ( /4 r re, e, @,&,d /- A.rs 9;'.4y, o.n, K9'.,7 w&k .,4.y A A vs /*A X IN . lt & Tw tw es i $.tA' A./-Js. trh' Q.,.Tu g JV M iu t.?S T f,wJ. NsY /N' (lh TidL.) i t.EC CDt .Tyee of Ne.l.d,s_ Vt,.id Deficiereias crd !.t-acification vielations h 11_141 /% arc hl.*ike I.T.* ![c t I e r 1;e hi f f, I II S;uare crce'.e r.. Mae:

• - 1 c set voleco I * '.

- Cr00Va I* f *. 2 e l 9 ' d ! f

• d u". t '

r,

• ger'gp
• 'l 21rgle Bevel C.

Cr6D' ?' Ecrentj 'l flere Bave; C7 Crater al ag 1.,:1;e gn ': Flara V E-Exce:::.+ am/ey:t, n a t t,.r ( C l ue <*r M U. r.a: - VI Fl y or 2:e*

• C I r,t e r r > ! l ' m s.1
• a:

hern. 21q u) '!I IT Ir.:g']'?, 7.t.;. 7,{. ? {ir e,3 7, f a+ x 1 1:<,id La r.;

• r, I*3.

Ire.ff t,ne,, p I,M I'~"' if,g r : ,. e j J a t e r i h * [$ l1' f

• 1

,w'* ' 4; ie**!je lN a }.j

/375' % _.=coes e.4, itor 7e Date g /7 -Tj $/4 174 L Y u cu=te: 4'35 /2L n trw:1rs ua.32 5n i 9n. La[gyco y L. 0 I ) In:,re c:cru e L97 f5 Q spe:lalist )L g Q We1 Spe:.i N U N W [ N'S yJ' ':2rx :.ur:er Fev. oer. cetails ?(_.C-l2.acf. S t G

1. .!'Al/- Jr. UC *L'&X /hs 4 7 }Sc"*'if

/ y ve,er I y ysg g a ,w J-y, c i n ' r w u) y p x

1. st'.tA/- 4 oc*)i!dp<X N '

ZF }fs"A*y V

vcp vs usAr".4.A X/WA7 ( // TWL. S'A' A/*s/C'N'~W 555~ & > ()S E* lNk T VC-(/ g " rwz) us 94J// ue d'Jy/WL, en.,ke"1,., .r ,os x m afx x ix'2 y-w ru C/ 'TwL) I r rr jjf /- JF y% " ,ysjs'X /Z' h y US (/A' L. ) ["') A M t.) - a s, % '.'J y x 4 ' Ct. M ' A.p r r ve,e w, vs l'es! Jy,.5 o USNr.M (/ A' rwL) V vc u ,C VAX / = us *Ns'dy'.1( 8 ',.Q r U$ Es"$~ sk y) VS C / 4 rtu r.. %.t//- ac,&'Apx,N " ., sr Ji ~&, y ue,t o'".

• as 4 *

/ us

• /,a.*'

i &K 2" An p. (.;t //o" 1*v't f LE;E:D' Tyra Of Uelit Weld Deficiene.ies and Specification Violatior.3 I Fillet AS Arc Strike IrrD !;ot Fer Lesign I II Square Groove AW Added Weld trg t;ot Welde:

• I: '.' - Gr:c*.s EMF, Ease Metsl N.du:ticG CL Overla; 2.

Sir.gle Eevel Cfi Cra:M PO Forosity Fhre Ee.cl CT Crater SI Sla.* h:luzion Flare - t EC Excessive C:.nvexity SF 5;atter IClu:ter cf Linear) p .I: F;;i er Slot IC Ir.ternal C n:avity 05 02rface Clag l () .T

t IF In

c..ple te f u

1or.

st ;atal '.; eld Ler.ith I

L Lis: IT Ins;fficient Throat ec n.:er;. I'd I r.s ; f f i c i c r.; '..'e 1 d U r, Jnder. e DS h :trrect elc Cyr co;

?

Jn:cr Wela t'ater 1&! . -tr Ire:.vo-A l'58 !;I e. t it.ro ue -

J4bHefeiDDh / 37 b, ~ Pag 3 / 2 of 7 0 Q'/93S~4' $ 4' Date 9(-/ 7-t. QA t.t:ber ]S'} Z 1. Druuini tio. G $~11 L 9H />..O. 81706 3 L b Os Inspector,,,(, n m,, AmL,, _ Specialist bbr-id Weld Spec.igh r1A ~*er, a s.-_.w f"*" _ Details Mark !!ur.ber Rev. Def. }.l. }} ff l TX Y A l

5 "^

^^ o y.4sde ( A ); r" ,N s/l c- !. Y.4. If A ed.4< & w \\ HA~e Mf.Ltt p.i,- u,;+.;.,' u &. a en.us &A 2 4 ~ e w !,'.4=fr. / +% aw-1 s~ M A4 M"

• Vy '

L 4. 9% 4! N NLa NL)

p. MA:.sn*t Aw /d s) C be -8

$~N" h UC*)$?X Jr,'? . A J g,, C. f, it Hf$ /!24// f,',:y % y& AN o w fu x et & m a =A, .l<.A$' . sat //= =l A a n.it A.~14. WAf MW* tschad +d he. A re- $~ p a.t.W ' ~ e ; + 2, L a.N N& Af ~. L k Ntd

fl4,

• P 4 ; N k/ d f. )Vs s.% C/ & M.*.~/)

.T / .4.jK '/', J n rf L & a l LEGEllD: Type _Of Welos Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations 1 Fillet AS Arc Strike NPD tiot Per Design i II Square Groove AW Added Weld flW tiot Welded I III V - Gr:ove BMR Base Metal Reduction OL Overlap IV Sir.gle Bevel CR Crack PO . Porosity V Flare bevel CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion i i VI Flare - V EC Excessive Convexity SP Spatter (Cluster of Linear) VII Plc4 o-Slot IC Internal Concavity SS Surfa:e Slag VIII S y.t IF In:or.plete Fusion TWL Total Weld Length IX me IT Insufficient Tnroat UC Undercut IU Ir. sufficient 1.' eld US Ur.dersize IUS Ir.:carect Wela Sytatcl (Tu"- Jn.:.su~ied '.11c fiateri;l '. 7 Lirw r Ino kation W: '808 I:7 .telt Travugn

_ s,. m r.I n,. . d /f(7 7 Pag 213 of 14 Date %-/7-& f/*/J.5T d I CA tucter //$ c') l k 'T4Wirs 110 GT21 L 9H L O 9f 7 7d%") E $ 0 Specialist bMO Weld Spec. ,_D Inspectorg re (,,*-. A mL-. 2 s Mark Number Rev. Def. Details G./ Q $ f l AW 3Yl$ RW Af f K ECNA7 ~ &c, oK 760L i ec s+ r u> I 1[ $%Tfh MJ/~ L /9W /f & Ef 5 s,n a r.4,y, gs ' '.Ay.(v" rur), l c .Or $ws-wz I%# &. l

• /.wl p.r M" 4 y.

.xc w'I V,Z N/D $4.tX/- k - 1,'.' y ( a u f 2 x. 4 y & y Y s. d% u.L J < vb s,v p)'&y,4 x oe p' A us n m.t n t."4 y. os x 4 (/O " TLJ L.) $ 4.G A./.j_: } A 6 & y m u p = Y, [ NYD 4 ,- p - k.A

S Y

.he d oc s' ' , JL uc MZx 4" rF Zf W , b - *- ~ N d' u%s43a" y,9 &yr".Ay. N ~ vs ask (/O " wL )

• /.snt - 6 rrX"),y, rc f4.~4.y xt v, u C.2 rwx)

'l1~~ 11,/ N FAX 4 ~ IW A W, O 4 5 " ' y& ( /4#' 7Zd.) l .ma 1 FM 47 LEGEf1D: Tyce Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations I Fille t AS Arc Strike flPD tiot Per Design II Square Groove AW Added Weld Ifd flot Welded III V - Groove EME Base tietal Recuction OL Overlap IV Sir.gle Bevel CE Crack 'O . Porosity V Flare Bevel CT Crater ,1 Slag Inclusion VI Flare - V EC Excessive Convexity SP Spatter (Clus'_er of Linear) VII Plug or She IC Internal Concavity SS Surface Slag VIII Spot IF Incer.plete Fusion TdL Total Weld length IX Stu: IT Insufficient Throat UC Undercut IW Insufficient L' eld US 'Jrdersize IWS Incorrec'. Weld Synbol UW" "rr.onsirw W,: Material L ' iner I Nitat1on W.: 3- ...e - .ir A138 Mi eelt 'thre gn

. l O!n.". G /DDR / 3 7b' Page W o g ~ Date K. /7 -8 CA Number 435* 17 ~Z Drautng No.%/ f 35~'t b 'f ri c D L4 M A n cd7k13 L 0 Inspectorn.f, g;y _ gM Specialist f/nbrfLM Weld Spec. D M M i i f"*"d. Mark Number Rev. Def. W d Details [s".,'.,h' ) & Nf ( C -/.S J S y (, I ^ ' ' ' ~ yn

• ~.4*4c,satw,.m %

--^d. a m s, $ s u i w u s.!4 "x' / 4 ' ( IX"Tud 3~ vs x + J.W'M .4 Qf*-y L.a.. io r -- n 2 a y - no JC. $s%,u-; vs4'*X ~x2 *&, MS M * .I as,ru t'N '&(.;t." TW L )M.h & p / WFM./- A its 4WN'4. </X' rwa ) 2 os y .r opr *c1xt/,:,.ss AF'x2 " , zv-A'&in MS h"& C.2 " WL ). $r*H/ us WX /X'&'sr sJn'/* y 1 as ru i s CI) TW2. ) %d - yo.zw r.r sg

• q/s.1sy & K O:.4.#/l7.A ru M" rr;&"&

r,2T 2 d, / If>

• AM4A.;,

,JS f.c.2 8 "f. y / CgA* rwi) T,2T Wf W.C24 7 A IFlx t M .wdA s vs & (8 M* TwL) LEGEtrD: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations I Fille t AS Arc Strike !E D Not Per Design II Square Groove AW Added Weld t;W t;ot Welded III V - Groove EME Ease Metal Feduction OL Overlap IV Single Bevel CR Crack FO !Forosity V Flare Bevel CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion i VI Flare - V EC Excessive Convexity SF Spatter (Cluster of Linear)l VII Plug or Slot IC Internal Concavity SS Surface Slag O VIII Spot IF

n:enplete Fusion 7,il Tctal Weld Length IX 5'ud IT Insufficient Throat UC Undercut i

Id ns;fficient :l eld US Undersize IW3 In:crrect Kele Sy~,t.el D.i t Unconsu~.ed Weld flaterial LI 'irear Ir.dication

I teld Inaccessable Ai38

_..., " _ alt Throurh ItT

Ei h,. /873 Page i s'org Date E -/ 7 17 ' rawird flo.o(/ffS'Yh Y. 5 (~ CA IJuntrer 'I M /2 2_ e 3 3 A Sjt, f A. 77766 3 & // InspectorAtA'r A'/nc, N,u i,, Specialist,2[o d h Weld Spec. k % M / Mark Number Rev. Def. Details CL.-l 4d S'9--C, ( If* U I4 4-d 7-6 E/* [d / .J-us & > cg Wn y e& a = ;??

_ _ ? ='~ $ 4 A,4==.

',5 1%%.c +/: 7.x, r p "4 " A & us A x,rr,2 M.4 y & & N:: ?b=C8 WTwa) p :=y&z

== M k' 2/S'=. ) LEGE!!D: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations I Fille t AS Arc Strike !!PD Not Per Design II Square Groove AW Added Weld IN Not Welded III V - Groove EMR Base tietal Reduction OL Overlap IV Sir 41e Bevel CR Crack PO iPorosity V Flare Sevel CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion VI Flare - V EC Excessive Convexity SP Spatter (Cluster of Linear) VII Plug or Slot IC Internal Concavity SS Surface Slag b VII: Spot IF Inco.plete Fusion 3lL Total Weld Length IX Stud IT Insufficient Throat UC Undercut IU Insufficient Ueld 'JC Underr te IHS Incorrec* Weld Symbol ~~' "nc~

v1*ald Material L2

.ireE-Indic a t _c i. 1 Wei c -..t _tei stle A G9 IT tielt Througn

~ nih,.= /DDR /[I75'~ Page ja of 7L yj g y y g,,. 4 Date % t7.p. QA Number V' ].S ~ / 2 2 Draulns No. $*2 $~~22-L 11(, K.t).277tx);A.b InnpectorM r, I.,j Adm Specialist, k[ WeldSpec.YaO[ I Mark Nu=ber Rev. Def. Details d. d

• A4AA/-J-

=g 7' g~X/4'f I(C.j gg 6 +- 7 l 67 Neo e =a v - g gs y-9 A z7 yd y- & rr f-,y' 4pwa y, rr-4m us k'y2" US & ~ ts ' "X Y L -(!0"i~W H R US y '/6 Aft-2 %. AY y,r wo ~y & ?I. 4 N ul,; .b-uf xw k sy J ' - /" J r Vy ' us Y" Ass ~u.//.s7VX2'N sLusR'9f"&c A It'*.htd, us If M' (/ 74sL)

1. J. C+XS.h.- IT&"X /JE "A=y.. (t'ru'

.1C rr ) ?.s%C& - 4IwKs ".A~y- (i:K'rwO tz4.-/f.*A././--+, p R,"A r ntp n /f; y. /f -- ~ 1 m9 l 4 M M es o-j _L,,-J. N S$/l/ Ar..T4/), A"&,).tJS/sr"k Ns 7 m US /" ( /"74/A I US /lS>nVl/ % US 8 W 56 X E (2"TWL) /:rnfi-Aruk$" as Ar"wM'4 y-O

• E rw t

0S ( / <" YWA.) LEGEND: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations I Fillet AS Arc Strike NPD Not Per Design II Square Groove AK Added Weld if4 Not Welded III V - Groove EMF Base Metal Reduction OL Overlap IV Single Bevel CR Crack PC Forosity V Flare Bevel C~ Crater SI Slag Inclusion VI Flare - V EC Exces ive Convexity SF Spatter (Cluster of Linear)' O VII Plug or Slet IC Intern?1 Concavity SS Surface Slag VIII Spot IF Incer.plete Fusion F, L Total Weld Length I7 Stud IT Insufficient Throat UC Undercut IW Insufficient tlald US Undersize I'.lS Inccrra:* Ueld Synbol Ui.71 Uncensumed Weld Material LI Linear Ir11ca' inn 'g 7 ' laid Inaccessable b I3 8 flT f ia l t Th ush

EIE/iC. DDR /S77 Page / 7 of2 Date %.J7. M %!9JS'l N Y CA Number L/ 3( }} } Drautng No.c2s 22 2.4)(, Ls0. ir) 7Dh 'T AsO Inspector M.C K: ,Ans),~ Specialist Uf SW WeldSpec.N'AssY' Mark Number

Rev, U*I*

Details a vd. k o k W /- usa '4M "i2 " Joy (2 " rwa (QI 3J6 + 7 I I US rip ,. y..../.im 4 :,s., /0A.o L.f.- Af

• A S;&f/ us14 'k M "x.t "& C :t. " TWL-)

I VS .er J*- f A d* 3 8 " $ & f f V Nf0 A.Yhd/- [ /. ~ .A*- / .Jee<uld n s. a 7,n & Ipad*- A k Nw.

a. vp s v.&

• W.e.J A n % A *u h

7 dd /b'A-4 / pl.L n n 1).1' 'O 3 /0 ' O, 9 % " & / p /.,, f%- / & d /O.lL O 7'-4= A9'.4Z/- VC *)SL &" N'"&), TlJ 1,. N' Z~ L97L 9 C /Me 7'us. $t' -A/- Vc-Ez'x XI .7wJ JV& .I / g y $.& A/~ W '8z')(Ne' , yWnt b ' T IsJ Jy fi,4*y, (' / 7 WL. ) ve,lx of./ oc r/%"2*L 14' uwm it'A ::- r Ild & 5f" . (l 74/ L ) r sa LEGEND: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations I Fillet AS Arc Strike NPD Not Per Design II Square Groove AW Added Weld NW Not Welded III V - Groove EMR Ease Metal Eeduction OL Overlap IV Single Eevel CR Crack PO -Porosity V Flare Eevel CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion VI Flare - V EC Excessive Convexity SP Spatter (Cluster of Linear } s s VII Plug or Slot IC Internal Cencavity SS Surface Slag VIII Spot IT Incomplete Fusion Tn*L Total Weld. Length IX Stud IT Insufficient Throat UC Undercut IW Incufficiant Keld US Undersice IWS Incorrect Weld Sytbol UWM Unconsured Weld Material LI Linear Irdication UI wal r1 Ir w oerable N 6 n

-~ RIRac.'.i DDR /W 7 5' Page / For__? CA Number OTl25 G/4.75T M.M Date % -/7 -5 d Drauins No.SA T,U.L 9tt L O. 2 7 700 7 -F 0 Inspectorfew r,,),. /LL _ specialist _h ' Weld spec.4 M *I F Mark Nu=ber Rev. Def. d. d Details CC-1 .Ld. & t-1 l 15vc $ Y.df/- IT85X/5" , Uc 'h "X Nt " V rf i W @ %" c14TwL) $.VMi uc &"XN'&), I W ); & ' I us:ru ( l res L. $ML/- oc REX}ru )i ru 1 _T ucy C/4 9 $K+X/- rF 4' &,(Uc>& ^Xhi".

• l~

T5ut rw ru $ AC 9 lM"rwL) hif.4J./ oc.&"X Ka"' I ac,z ,Its1 & & 7 ( lM *. 7w V tx;1L 4sq/l./-Jc~8lWN' g, TWJ }s'"il.+y 0 vs us 8';4. A G CIh" wL) S.4+X/- OsL.;c Ky&x /)Z '&' v' os (/!,TuL) 1- $/.M/- vs L".$4" /X" I vs Tu ,zufM"4,y ( /4" rwt.) $. V.*// yc >& "X N .T uc. , ru J M '.4 y 7 Tid (/ f")~tdL f i 'I ILJ f.s&' dl~ Ile $ N"& ( l.% "7*tdL ) .T US .Y.ed./- d< r$2 )($C ' ,.Z W A N "& Zw y (/4~7ut I LEGER:D: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations I Fillet AS Arc Strike NPD Not Per Design II Square Groove AW Added Weld NW Not Weided III V - G.~aove BMR Esse Metal Fedu:tien OL Overlap IV Single Bevel CR . Crack PO 'Poresity V Flare Sevel CT Crater (Q/ SI Slag Inclusion VI Flare - V EC Excessive Convexity SP Spatter (Cluster of Linear)! VII Plug or Slot IC Internal Cencavity SS Surface Slag VIII Spot IF Incor.plete Fusien NL IX Stud IT Insufficient Tnroat Total Weld Length UC Undercut IW Insufficient kleid p 3,9 US Undersi:e IWS Incorrect Weld Syrkol UWM Unconsured Weld Material LI Linear Indica m uv u'

m. -_.-.a. L-RI",EMDDR / #d 7 [ Page g or - m OA Number t/7 S~ /21 %/9.3S~'/ & Y Date 9(-* 7 ~c' Drawir4 No.x 1 s D L9 /C f., O. 9( 7 7/Y) 7 gd Inspectorm x, floc,. Ami. Specialist _ Pfok4 d WeId Spec. %,i ya Mark Nu=ber Rev. Def. Details W.e n i us J V n x p H x I.M "A v vs (?-l hs' O 7 l y o M" rwO 9.un-oc -&'xx% & 2 rwO v o c. % u i ue j h "x % " &, T W L.) .x ve us /4 "&. C / 4" %.cn-oc-MxN' rw.4 -N "L, 1 vc. Iw (/M"7 Jh 7 O T Lt M.M/- oc. r/da"X / '&, (l.%" TWL ) &v.*xi-uc >.&"X 4" 2-uc y r "%. F t w.t c i l+ " w,s-) zu $Vt.u usfit/M " 9 Q TV Twl.) V US Q $. ftA.I us A "X l.N& (/ff

• ri.

y vs $a.cs./- % g n a y p g r,r upo 2 %. ( & fa./<o &" f d W

a. Ik 7% Jg" no&w

-JL .aal< n d +lS p o-A t .4,. a e m # y<d'sel.444 A W M /0 - 9m ** Ja %".;~.y' f0 w 4A) L a )V - -)( ' 2 n N k) % in / W dp. pd M 6 N6 A W v.zat w x ra LEGEND: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations 1 Fillet AS Arc Strike NPD Not Per Design II Square Groove AW Added Weld. NW Not Welded III V - G.Jove BMJ. Base Metal Reduction OL Overlap IV Single Sevel CR Crack PO 3 Porosity V Flare Bevel CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion O VI Flare - V EC Excessive Con exity SP Spatter (Cluster of Linea, VII Plug er Slot IC Internal Concavity SS VIII Spot IF Incor.clete Fusion Surface Slag TWL Total Weld. Length IX Stud IT Insufficient Threat UC Undercut IW Insufficient Weld Agg US Undersize IWS Incorrect '. eld Symbol UWM Unconsumed Weld Material LI Linear Int cat'

^ RIS/;'C /DDP. /3 7$ j. , Page_ 2 cofl ~ CA Number 9 3 T ~ / 7 2._ yqgq Date_ % -)7 Drawing No.rls 22-1M L O. g y 700 3 &g Inspectorpt;6 f;,, , /7 L, __ Specialist kM Weld Spec.I N I 1 Mark Nu=ber Rev. h* Def. Details g, 4g y .T,27~ tt/D dam /-6;if p + n)s;m y & = cy - > 1 a .a.s C *nsl.sa4), ale + N &m f 'X% A'@.,au/a/ o - d.fa & n .t0-jum2.aJ. n.K. :,7M4.aM- . w.. a.af, x.s.axp/d n.;tL &}&" .<sa . sal.e27v w.

• 2. L

/ h' Q 4554 N u d * ' - .2 L. gs io Y y_ =3nt M y~ A~y~ Obuug Yfd OL N' ) U UJ M H R su' 3 4X/~ AW R-A' g,' f Rn If'& TF If,ff *&, uc -J.W.dayXi % l/0 (Y $4 ^!b)L ). Q %ux/- A4>2Ws"&'g%IL) .a nw ows h'4 . [Y $e. 7 UkJMt $3x//- LvI /N'4., du 3 & "& a .2r un;A [( / 9 ZF$ '&' (sTUL EC,TF O C-ye >Rn'X ,,7 A4, fzer/ uff J.h" , sqW.A N'& ff,!d ' ,04 Nf [S~'Tk!l-f LEGEND: Ty e Of Welds. Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations. I Fillet AS Arc Strike NPD Not Per Design II Square Groove AW Added Weld NW Not Welded III V.- Groove BMR Base Metal Reductien OL Overlap IV Single Bevel CR . Crack PO :-Porosity V Flare Bevel CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion VI Flare - V EC Excessive Convexity SF Spatter (Cluster of Lineari Os VII Plug or Slot IC Internal Concavity SS Surface Slag VIII Spot IF Ince=plete Fusion TWL IX Stud IT Insufficient Throat Total Weld.-Length UC Undercut IW Insufficient Weld gg US Undersize IWS Incorrect Weld Symbc1 UWM Unconsu=ed Weld Material l ,LI Linear Indication MI Mold leweac m M a

"I"./NC:/DDR /T7$ Paga2Iorl it ! Date B'-)7-7; S'1135~4/ & N, $ / 21 Drawing No._<; 2 5 n A.9 f t,. AL/). e yporjT A O d (J Inspectorn.x X:,,3 3 QA Nunber / f , A-L _ Specialist eM Meld Spec. w*-": .u 1?< L I Mark Nu=ber Rev. Def. M els yd. d CC -/ Ad (o + 7 '?h.6 .1'l h. C n S/-w/ I g,93gy p y / 4 AM. 7-f.4 Nu A W ,.J r,7T Hw fr a aff L ]*f" n/ pl ( Ytv C Tail ) 15 NW #'ft fA7- ~ Nk.) 2 54' & i A A st M %y., r cc,rr ( C

• nk)

I,Y NW$44A7-D N w s;t % ' 8 m swy ,e oc a w.-D,eg.6,O-ANwt%"Q,1p L UC ".lS$Xk .s W 6 L fi,* .Z~f 7 " I $12-Si r LEGEND: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations I Fillet AS Arc Strike NPD Not Per Design II Square Groove AW Added Weld NW Not Welded III V - Groove BMR Base Metal Peduction OL Cverlap IV Single Bevel CR . Crack PO :-Porosity V Flare Bevel CT Crater SI Slas Inclusion p VI Flare - V EC Excessive Cercrexity SP S;:atter (Cluster of Linear: (__ VII PluE or Slot IC Internal Cor.:avity SS Surface Slag VIII Spot IF Ince plete Fusion 'iVL Total Weld. Length IX Stud IT Insufficient Ihroa t UC Undercut IW Insufficient Ueld US Undersize b IWS Incerrect J*11 Symbol (T,01 Unconsumed Weld Material LI Linear Ir"-:a*L ' WI Weld Inaccessable gr p.1+ e-

RIP 'MCP/DDR /f 7 Pag 2 h f 3a! Date T-/74d /48f/JJ Drawing No. Sff)2/ 9J2 a.vh CA Nunber s InspectorQ w k /)/s/iSpecialist 1;M WeldSpec.j7[b i a ~ ~dPEs. Mark Number Rev. Def. Details d. %. SU ([-/.24 0 $ c k ? (e t ?, % 5, l $ A.S b f vad sp*C$rrhkno9 i 1 ser@ A s ?! A / //ss DNx. @ A r-A A I ilns er 'bi'x N" 1 er log ,t places. 1 ag @ A 470 R /. as !ba '/ Place. I " log - n)k lKr" l ! As )-oA / P)nce, b%g I ol @ A. A ? I <1RM @ A 4 ?! A /.iaM-3Mnea @ Pc 3 $ A /- In $)'%g Yul 3 ' .22~ ji= 0

E a2M @ A 3 'b A. ] Dbhru.- / Msc es.

8 A$b RI '/$2 D l9en$.eb. 3 X ud Q Phees 72d ll 0 Ad b A /- cT' f!&"hg - / Place - I dr .Z ac, @ A A Yo A I De r '/ "E4ck 4 pisaa X net 0 / 4 a to A / -bb)>O, .r if G A2 / A/ fR C)) JF v 2 A Pinces, LEGEND: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations 1 Fillet AS Arc Strike NPD Not Per Design II Square Groove AW Added Weld NW Not Welded III V - Groove BMP Base Metal Reduction CL Overlap IV Single Bevel CR Crack PO JPorosity V Flare Bevel CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion VI Flare - V EC Excessive Convexity SP Spatter (Cluster of Linear) p VII Flug or Slot IC Internal Concavity SS Surface Slag t,y VIII Spct I? Incer.plete Fusion TWL Total Weld Length ) IX Stud IT Insufficient Inrcat UC Undercut IW Insufficient Weld US Undersize b@ IWS Incerract Weld Syr. bel 5;' Unconsumed Weld Material LI Linetr Indicatinn 'AI Weld Inaccessable gg MT. t>1t Through

&~

• • ^

m._____ mm -- - l ?!nl::~n/DDR /f ff - Page 2 3 of3 Date_ % - /y-1] cA Number $3[/22 Drawing No. ,$2$23) l)$2 _ adsi Inspector 3.(r>.I \\ Specialist Weld Spec. Yus 5 Pre., 1 Mark Number Rev. Def. Details .g, d C- /-.26 bC 0 /Je. 2 I A. I " Y3$ AJC / Mnc es. Ho7k. - 7//e ork UsU, on Back Sh or,4. flglA A l- &u O A: A Falle r-Ba Be. 9 F PA'o Beve.). .S a (- r l I l LEGE!ID: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations 1 Fillet AS Arc Strike NPD Not Fer Design II Square Groove AW Added Weld NW Not Welded III V - Groove S.MF Base Metal Peduction OL Overla; IV Single Bevel CF Crack po . Porosity V Flare Bevel CT Crater ~ SI Slag Inclusion VI Flare - V E: Ex:essive Convexity SF Spatter (Cluster of Linear) I VII Plug or Slot IC Internal Conta;ity SS Surface Slag I VIII SP:t IF In:c.clete Fusion TWL Total Weld Length v IX Stud II Ir,3 urric i en t hroat UC Undercut gy IW Insufficient Weld US Undernire l'.G In: rrect..'1 d Synbe ' lap Unconru ed Weld Material LI Linear Indi ='..m UI Weld Intccessable y ..~m

f RTR/W h/DDR /2 f[ Page_2 9'of, c hir Date_ K -/ 7 -Y ! ~ OA Number [/M 1 Drawird No._fRg 2 2 /_ 9.3 2 Inspectod. 3d.CbIs a M Specialist Weld Spec. NZ v i fe Mark Number Rev. Def.

d. W Details C.t:-X

.SEGb-17 / 1~ Atkls @ A C's 7Z /it./- No Wub D'k&&

• N stn W} N o.

5 C. T & c.T Dhg. y35y7s5 OWsn ok h, %F . [ F '/ h Z c.Y E cr oM % xjfL* Z DL O L ~ fs" Z pkk f/Whr .I UQ. @ R D. 75 M / - oc rkk / A'm f ZF Q) _rf %alog f)2sce r US @ D WG.{f)Ds [ X.t" m 8

2. Pucep I

OL M y Th A / - DLfg* / PLAs .T L> S DWe.bS")ps f.jiy/,a Q V" IF/V' s TAIL-//g 4/tnat h Z ZF 3 P4sczs 5 5 i W 0% 3 PLACES -2C OL & lb 372 A/- OL. W' / Pznes X D* l)h1h1 / fineE X EC Ec. / PJJc.E JE ON> Ukh) / PLACE 1[ oL. OL %" Lac,.2 Ane.z.S h/b7E" - THX 84L' } VELD oNBAt:A $iDE DF Pc./, DRAWiA/o eAttis FoM YJ"FitLLC8979A Bx n FAAxt BELEL - J/o'7'l ~ h/ FAD 5 o N /%, Y$ 7~e fca/ #ft off c.s p r6 r s " rne M. I _) LEGEND: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations I Fille AS Arc Strike NPD Not Per Design II Square Groove AU Added Weld NW Not Welded III V - Croove EMF Base Metal Feduction OL Overlap IV Single Bevel L? Crack PC ! Porosity V Flare Bevel CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion VI Flare - V EC Cxcessive Ccr.exity SP Spatter (Cluster of Linear O VII Plug cr Slot IC In ernal Ccn:s;ity SS Surface Slag VIII Spct IF Inco:alete Fusion TdL Total Weld Lenrth IX Stud IT Insurficier.t Inroat UC Undercut IW Insufficier.t ' Weld Ag US Undersize I'45 Incerrect

• leid Synbol U'4?! Uncensu.ed Weld Material LI Linear Indi wn WI Weld Inaccessable t'T

?>1t Thrm.:

~ illfi/ MD,'DDR // 7.3 Pad? 2 $~of 7 0 f 77003 ^O Date Q-]7 -63 o ' ") ' ~' ' ' ' '

• C' Inspector 0. Ad.bL p.t.2

^ ' v l -- Specialist MN Weld Spec.",7 % o, T 5 pe e. f"" j Mark Number Rev. Def. y Details C 0 2-L / 2t- / >= @Pc 4 To hi- >F 4b)gw lo z Place.s ( '0 os Tr* TQL - f 1 as Z BS (

• US /'N "X.T'l TWl.- J

.Z us l

• t/S
• t (" rb).-d'"

I DS l us "X 3 TUL - 3 z us, ft S-A: I 'X / & " 4 M aees. 1kyg iIQ) as ~ -I%'E4eb[ISa m s 1 W h y To t% 4,5 A I Vf Tw I J,1 e 4 2)J - l Places. I alS t' yS

• j f ja T WL W2 #

X /F Pc 2 Al-Irb s nees. .;lt uwn) / Pl4 ces $ ~ke E-ZC N'P.D 2$"466ll$Fonn0SJn a $too'eu fe kk Ed auD is {%els nis,'o y "Fi/Lr web n!! peasd ~ s N FjI,M We2 cauwaT,2w i >2nbe cal 71/s PAAtl,Sohu og Yde appaasn7s 5/3. os We. hp/ : row 7 &,w,a./ A Ageoovs sieE ofJ rae pa v 2 'n ft0 La Requiee k, ilAS *A '/5'ft/k?~ B4 U la & Top l'1Ahet!N,'f 'r/ lek a Is 2 ces, doc IJelled Dr 'Toivr, klfic is s/As R raraI combwed weld Laqra os j' kaTe;AoYbleA!Ds*F hc2 Ah du f/Soiht k %f* A y;a A I g ifjas $"AIN'I ,2PMus .I g U&lM - / PA4 des I gym /F Y3q"#le X /F A 3 To.h / CV '// i Olaeel .2C Cr 3C /F h3- / f r ' $'

05. I Y "

2 x xc. @ ac > k Te1 > 6 LEGEND: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations I Fillet AS Arc Strike NPD Not Per Design II Squa e Groove A'i Added Weld NW Not Welded III V - Groove EME Base Metal Reduction OL Overlap IV Single Bevel CR Crack PO. Porosity V Flare Eevel CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion VI Fla e - V EC Excessive Convexity SP Spatter (Cluster of Linear) O VII Plug or Slot IC Internal Concavity SS Surface Slag VIII Spot IF Incer.plete Fusion n't Total Weld Lensch IX Stt.c IT Insufficient Threat UC Undercut IW Insufficient Weld US Undersice IMS Incorrect Weld Syr'al UWP Uncons %-c Wele Material LI '_i re * *^ 'ndi c at w-WI Mld 3 Kessif 6 $IN f *.' Peit Isac ga

RIP "'C"/DDR /777 Page acof 74 Da te_g -))-13 QA Number W3//24 Drawing No.. f2$~22l Vol be Anasai Inspector _ Q. $.Q M D,[#/- Specialist h Weld Spee._i N N W E f f 4Ac. Def. Mark Number Rev. g Details CC2-1 1 32' aulm h 3 7. A l a um - fl ce) Z us A 4 7* fc / fUS KI IYJ /s jos QI Tt24 16 ' z yS l'//'Enef,k A ser, 1/S r N )X /'0 "A0 1 MS @ 2 Plac TJL l'a / .X /p s & 3 To A: I-Ip r d' ToA 2 Va, .x y.7 A /To A / us7 'Xl'li'EfeA 3 Plnees 1 ' rneh. 'rul4 4 I ub) & h I-13 Pc/-utJm l J ince). C O LEGEND: Type Of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specification Violations 1 Fillet AS Arc Strike NPD Not Per Design II Square Groove AW Added Weld NW Not Welded III V - G.~aove BME Base Metal Feduction OL Overlap IV Single Bevel CR Crack PO JForosity V Flare Bevel CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion VI Flare - V EC Excessive Convexity SP Spatter (Cluster of Linear) O' VII Plug er Slot IC Internal Concavity SS Surface Slag VIII Spo t IF Incer.olete Fusion TWL Total Weld Length IX Stud IT Insufficient Threat UC Undercut IW Insufficient Wald US Undersice I'W S Incorrect Weld SynM' 'J<l' t Unconsumed Weld Material LI Linear IMication W: Weld Inaccessable ur tae weawa

~ / k 7$ _ Pagel / of JC ^!T :::E/DDR Da'te R-/7-E'1 p

1. w AM Y}TlXL O

CA Nu=ber Drauing No.f2Tey jq L,4Y e-f M')/M 7 LD4 K:m,,. 1.1 n,jn, Specialist Mb ueld Spec./7u/S - D 9 I Inspector /1:Ke I Quan Type Mark Hu=ter i Reevd ,Jeld Deficier.cy Details ID/ i vrr, z %aL./ /.iA s:. / 6 2M .u eta v4 '.k/ y 2 y/~w A IF If J p4a.' Tf 4 " U C. / 4 VC r Az"&

QJA, f#d 5

y-If i-+- a L .J~17 Xy" & / jfS 4'# /A AS U C-Uc #8x r k "& / p I 1' IT JSa~ X r" & / & ee.s V$ Af[ 'x.74 ~ vs 1/ 4 ~. c &,) t u s s x )r - o-W cn A ~ ). vTI, r Am!IJ A.74-fi./6 w/R & St%y 2 4. L rF TP (q)~ IT i74.u 17 A's"x Fy'& s A i Us A U.S %"X-19" /4 (Po'6 -35 ") { / 9 " Q ). vt,x 7 &' i:. z,9 tr.; .A, A r n A s'4 %'k re%., UC-G uc rol e /;"& / A A, o e & ~ r.I 3& t c-T c T rs .* m- / // ~a.. I i i i i l i a LEGE!!': Tvre of Welds Weld Deficiencies r.d S:ecif :atic. 'liclaticns I Fillet AS Arc Strike

."4

ct Weldec Eutt (Full)

EXR Ease Metal Feducti:n CL Cverlap Tee (Full) CR Crack FC Perosaty Tee (Partial) CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion Stu: EC Excessive C:nvexity SP S:atter, cluster cf _ nea J: Spot IC Internal Centavit;- SS Surface Slag l2: Flare Eetel IF In:c=;1ete F.:sien 'Jnc er t.

T Insuf'1::en-s.r: n 7.:er. ;+

r.- s -.,.

s .. ~ MRIER/DDR _ /375'~ Fags _ 2 S( of 3 c Da'te ${~/7-g., m - ?= : -e ven* d e CA Number i/ T ci~ } 2 2 Drawing No.& 2T4 7 $( fL t///. L t/Ojo] L S i I Inspectorr r, x;m,, /t, n./~ Specialist MM W _, eld Spec. Azzrq - r) c.. Mark !! umber an Me Reevd Weld Deficiency Details 1 ' ID) I wrz,r .bM A. z.$-M /./,su :lM n 54"&.2 pka.u. Ww 1/s" C T TF >>lk" Jy, }i.. /pC & C T,k oc f-ar,- , v c rift t h "I::"~f 4 Q / k A .z A A s l US vs .p c-.kn cir A 4./ 3 .t dead A.] 44 4 '+A A - ~A.Ja. &,4q 9 A.x. 4 + - L % uc -WEAy r K",o.y /,ab.- v c-f 1 761A A. 7 en i & n.dA- ) k x;A H-*/ 4 ,~ J oc (

new, irc r&W r.% "9 / /....

/ vrr ys R. t y.,c A. 9 4 g.g. A,. p - --l @&y h"x / " l uc 3 x si :s.y. p,a q. uc> .M d e - - /4 As A. br --e5-@ ".Any.

l..

R W.

k. 9 (Assamosy) : "!! & s_ =-l T

k p MJk -f p s 3 /9'A l A 9'S'~" f w

• .....h.

K-24 xe ,d ~ -s.in, j. .r7 r,.s, /.p-LECE!D: l Ty:e cf Welds Weld reficiencies and S:ecificatier 'liolatiens ( Fillet AS Ar: Strike !!W !!ct Welded ) II Batt (Full 3"? 3ase Metal teducticn CL Cverlap III Tee (Full) CR Cra:k FC F:r sity IV Tee (Partial) CT Crater SI Slar Incluelen '1 Stud EC E.xcerrive C:rvext. SF 2:atter (Cluster cf L;r.ea 7: Spot !C

nternal C:.:avit:,

SS Surf ace she riara Ea el !F In ::.;1 e'.e 7 :510r I'C '?nc ercut IT

ne;: f t::e.--

'"r:-- I'S 'JMarri a r.- nrr: - /ll39 . ama

s.- /)'?h ^ ~~ 9?r,N P/DDR Page 21 of 76 fm Da'te 9y-/ 7 - g ) V 43 % ocwo # CA Nu=ber 4/ 7 $,. / J f Drawing No, t,2cs)yy.ti.. W v.(yn/03 f,oc Inspectorx te K:n . A w A w poeta11st @am Weld spec.ptus -9 9. i s .,/ i an Me Mark Number Deficiency Details Reevd Weld ' /DJ l m, r & A J 4.3 2-n. / % :21] 4 19 5 TV A &.J AS fe'& '/& J.#c rA5a" V C- & +ds & /f J k. g g o/ n & x & '& /plaa l tt 5 l c -. 2:-) cis.n a.L 4 2. V12,.T kWW X.14 /s. / L Ji 2. di rf c/c~ & 2 & A z.f 0.5 fr ' / . b US }si' X 2 'a ' 'A c,*m. K ') (> v ~ A 4f J. va, x TM /?. :r.cn/ 6 Al...../L f'/ Apw AK VC &* t/ C { ) /A.A ~ = _. A m A' & Fr"./ m /-p %. m,r W K z.cA. / 6 M-A a JL S*$ '& webt 'd=u, % w/A &.; . - ~ / A. X '. 4y /& r 2Al 4 6 AX.1 m =ss - At==/.s-5,A1 9 a x p=s LEGEND: Type cf Welds Weld Deficieticles a-d 5:e:ification viciatiens I Fillet AS Ar: Strike t.~. Not Welded II Butt (Fu;1! EMF Fase Metal Fed;:tien CL Overlap III Tee (Full) CF Crack FC Fcresity pd IV Tee fPartial' CT Crater Slag Ir.clusion V Stud E: Extersive Ccnvexit. SF Scatter (Cluster cf Linea VI spct IC Interr.a1 Cenca cit-/ 30 Surface Slag VII Flare Pa f a: IF Ince.plata Fus:c- 'I Undercut IT Ir.r;f ficient Tnr a* 'm ondarsize A \\~3 8 '!a l - Thrcuch

t.._ _....

e. a -.4 .v. MT ":C*'!DDB /H 7$~ Page 3 O of 7 C (] Da'te M- / 7 - $ 3 V de - Bm,* CA Number (/]$ / k Drawing No.&)s S ~jg f, '///, 4 </ola y b d 9 Inspectorp,y, f/f, . A jff). Specialist Weld Spec. AQ)S -D 9. / Quan Type Mark Number Deficiency Details Reevd Weld 1 0 2. I r L.6c. g. c x. d..y M s //. r~ A. c MJa. sv- *] f 7" A.Ly% # s A " s. n. Nw As 9 / M u c r & '. % '& /p c cS wy,c. vc + N' f, j j lll,, ' & & A 2. " ^a. / % &p&u&a /n n& .2 /N" /.

=

m 6 A I4 "&/p.Le. /l. 9 4 t p p u f M-O. M M 2a %a 2 % ~'

1. I4 "&,i:. w n

/ &,IM" /.,e 4 =. b. 9 (s ss em as11 pa/A- & l=4 - - = PA k te- = j y[", 4 yS * ** ^ ^ 'Y ' 4 pneusku As' Au s. W_"

==e A & 5 5 & }VJ y A,= 4 :"3 LEGEND: Type of Welds Weld Deficiencies and Specificatien Violations I Fillet AS Arc Strike fiW Not Welded II Butt (Full) E!'" Ease Metal Feducticn OL Overlap I!! Tee (Full) CP Crack FC Ferosity p/ I? Tee (Partial) CT Crater SI Slar Inclusion N_ V Stud EC Excessive Convexitf SF Spatter (Cluster cf Linee 'JI Spet IC Internal C:ncavity SS Surface Slag VI: Flare Fevel IF Incomplete Furien 'JC tJndercut pg IT Inrufficient Thrce' f.'s t'ndersize MI Pal-Thr:uch

i = i l$ b_ i 'r.in w.niDCR FMe __] ) of fC' M Date_q-l~). Y,5 (d .~ ce p' o / O.y < < 0 d QA Nu:nber 8/75./2 1 Drwing No. fl__ p .,# 4 2 C 9 'r T A,4 inspectcrn,Ks X:o,e. Dn]n spec 1n11st Q]u s4LR ueld spec.ALUS D.9 i // ~ l l Quan Me Mark Number Deficiency Details i Reevd Weld s !/El I YU A.aAd A. 7.M / A h.;- A* .p m A n xQ'4>.y.2I &y ?:- T W-- ocr& ". Jay.x M A 7 UC \\ gc-M" xAV./~y I& uC ocr&" . xJ5 TC-ycr &*4y x's./4" &l & j t UC \\ a s %.".4 ) C X s~'* /A, us a xrso r in. rr ( N"d(&M. VZT 2 itV< f A.J.4-/f./ k h =: ;A* pd-f= 2]f" - A&, .T vc uc.6 4.2 ,i n UC vc ##s" depe..i,Py " /A, UC VL sjn " X7% Ay/ & OC Uc.*/s" y //; " /p4 h~ l l d.J. t/ s K K C JG "s 9 /sv4e us C i Y ~ d v. fL, * ) LU A. 3.f /l / .J., & Y.2T p m e %.2.k ' &.2 I oe uc -A t/Cr%*.4 <s2y/

=,

UC e/ay n,JS' & /, A-UC d c > 82 4pe + / 4 %, t ' vc rf" eJ' uc g, U C-UC. '!it.<!* e 18' a'x /JG"fg/ye,dm.mn, 1~ T Y Q,.ET K '*s / ? U.S Y.'l # / Ub ~ .is. U$ 51 $*b's, !{v' "/ g l / ${ Y = =f-8). f'A_ + ? LEGEND: Ty;e of *.ields Weld Deficiencies and Specificatier. Violatiens I Fillet AS Ar: Strike

Ta' Net Welded

) II Eutt (Full) 9? Ease Metal Feducticn CL Cverlap III Tee (Tull) CP Crack FC F:r:sity ) I'l Ice (Partial) CT Crater SI Slar Inclusien j 7 Stud EC Excessive Cenvexity SF Seatter fClutter cf Lir.eq JI 5;:: IC

nternal Cencavity 25 Scrface Slac tlare Fevel IF

ncer;1ete Fusien "C

'fr.d ercu t IT Insuffi lent Threat '15 "ndarsice MOO "T "=1+ Thr uch

. _ < ~.... - 8 GE/:: "/DDR /T 7$ ~ Pue_,:rr of. J c l Da'te. R - / 7 -g r 6.s (,) QA N eeer 9'_76_/2 1 Drawing No. g 3 c4 yy & gt/ 4f0/Oy L g Inspect.cr # % ff,g,g,ml_ s Specialist M Weld Spec. Ara s. r) 9,f i - Mark N nter uan Type Deficier.cy Detail's

Pecn, Weld l

!/E/ I vzt %Aed f$. 3.4/l l./w - fit w t. y' _- - 2 J -- s,. f VC UC 'N5& +- A Y /k, = y ; i UC uc Mi t [.Jo>.y / &, l Uc ac -M e 34'" /.ssL- -- citwM ). .24 K & A /2.7 & 6 -A W y ef n M M. a UC An A A f= x~, a c. > -L &XW+^' /h, Vc *M. JC oe x.2 As~ x 3 ",,/my/4, w.7,: 9 M /l. d.>f f y. a /d.a

• h^

4 w$. (,, 6.5 J a..f'e Y b M- $ l-- m 4

('))

/ /+M =, AS.+17 /73 / /9 $ 4 * / R5 A S.3 '/A o r c M"& /ph,,uc.=hf uC GG X /"./ i A L uc r n. " Ay-Y Z";Q / &. 6 A 7 o es Le y - W rL-fY p.s,al .2 " .;~ .67.~f xA \\ ~ k-*-- na d s,/n }4f M i ~ ./a. t I i I i

• EGEh*D -

lece cf Welds Weld Defi:len:1er tr.d 5:e :f t:s:1:r 'Jielati:nr F;;;et A5 Art 5:rt', e 'W

ct We;

e:

E.:: - (Fu;;) E:'S Ease Meta; re u:::en 0teria; Tee (Full: CP Cra:k ?O F:r::: ; Tee 'Fartia;) CT Crater 2: 212c In:1urier. EC Ex ce s s; za ::- ;e x t :. -r

1-ar 'C.'ut*er cf !.:.r.e:

'J:

C Ir. tar.s; ::n:s c 22 2 -rs:e !!sr r.e-. pe-a; IF Int: :: ate r'. : :-

" rer:n Inr.;ff;::an-r - c =. - " :ar :. A l'38

-? T? 'e:n/DDR )f75-rage 3 3 of ; yc Date_f-/7 -%] (y') 6w.g ..gt .-s N QA Nu::ber 4/]$ / 2.2. Drawing No. 4 79 fu #4/ g fj/07g Inspector h$, x, e fd Specialist [f, M. Weld SpecIAWC; - 6 '/_ / I Quan Me Weld. Deficiency! .v. ark Hu ter Details t Reevd /El A. / % A-/l. 9 J : =A I v1T ~

u. &

s j ll, & 4 /. a. o f. d

y

,y -i ) VC .iu US .R. &M is i y A / A. I VS $ 9 C'oesseneaa).k VS '/tt"$ Yl $" t go ' fo &+< 4ln &g 2 vs-" ek/h A A = n.

.2_

44 a / h ca.. (.. } f +j I i i l s l i I LE~E' D: Tyre cf xelds Weld reficie.cies a.: 5:ectrica:: n Viclatier.: F ;;et AS Ar: Strike ?,,

ct Welded 3.::: (Tull) 3.'O EISe M?*El Fe:U:*ien O',

Cterla; Tee !?;11) C? Orack FC Feresit.

~;

Tee f?artial' C! Crater Slag In::::ien y sat I: tz e:::ce ::rc. ::. cr

atte.- o::urter er u

,1 l: 2::: Inte ns;

n:s"::-

Surface :;.g rl;-. 3.fel IT !r: :;ete r n :- " cercu: $I38

rturT: :er:

r;s - -. rs :.

• *.. 7 --

. p

i s' t' ~ M*far*R/DDR _ / [I[$ Pau rDr M d {Q

g. r A w #

%'-/7 _yd ' s Da'te CA tic.ber YTTl2h Dra'stng 50. L'2 To yf yn' V4/ f 9'f/01 LQ Weld Spec.gk/f-d 7, / Inspectorp ge 8,'rf7 A su e Specialist _M f Deficiency [ Details Mark !! umber /E7 1 rzt.1 L A ? /. J.;4 A / 6 n ll d.~a 0 - Tf.,4 [%' 2 &"i 5~V': VA-i rF ~s R. ' >.d -,.K " 4 y vc L u t.- y /pt , c r 1s "M /S cr rf re -&,a A,A, n, - ? n.;4 "s i t / .p(t , x r J i',e.7 /& rr i / 5 p l L & t <. 1 &f.Cu./ A 7.f.'-X /.4~ addA & - S~4' ' A 4 ue.~&xt'9 2 4 9.- A Uc. 7~F,* M .4 '~.,.4& ' rF u& 9'-- U c $*il l w *- W A r) uc s p,ucz x,t;Q ZF / , d I r d: "x/s$".,%- .TF fik \\ I T' A fs>p /f 'u. A s Y L / $ J D A /./**.*c E A & l ' S*Jp'Q Rp1~wA vc. uL 4 4 4 9"&, +w~, rf U C * %.h,,j upe, X j 4 rr n. t/L y' " ,. 7& i %y~.;- y, zr 4 77 .p IF 4.rF M ,2 $ w. (/?'~ 4. ), LEGEND: Type of Welds Weld Deficiencies a.nd S ecificatien Violations I Fillet AS Arc Strike ? n' Net Welded II Butt (Full) E!G Base Metal Feducticn OL Overlap III Tee (Full) CF Crack PO Perosity IV Tee (Fartial) CT Crater SI Slag Inclusion V V Stud EC Excessive Cerceexity SF S;atter (Cluster of Lin a VI Sp;t IC Internal Centavit. e5 Surface S1 w i VII Flara 9. =1 IF Ince nplete F':si:n "C Undercut IT Insufficient Th-rat SS Mndersize p fit " alt Thro': r

.. _ _.. - ~., -.,-.- - - - -.

s... -~

I eft 119?*1DDR / $ ~/$~ Fake y _cf E _ Da'te 7 - / 7_y.7 (3,) 6A;&*'~ Y WT$_/)) DrMng NoJ,W9M LW MDJAT $6 ^ CA *:c::nr InsFetter g d'n _ _ A o,1 w 5;e:ialist @ MfL4 Veld Spec.f L/$- 84, / __ ] Mark Numt.ec can J Typ C6Ticiency, Details ,Reevd Weld J 4 j j !/E). I ee, r w / 7:.1 M /.L m,a4L S"4 "fe.}/ b. - ff '.2, & A L I F ss x ,t? vC , yc un h "#' & &' Q / h l Nn o l LIC U C

• b$ & X 5$s uC Uc r.bE&X Jt
• 47 2p ? ? -

l OL. vc.h*4 x4" /A, l xr M r r N'x 4" /A C J V 'A. 4 ), l T A5 5%.M. A 4 6 A 3 L.WS l' '" s /., W-, a ~ < = c A n '7'f* 5 JA/,e4a,If<W" & / us pk,u.s4,'r8"/,./ & US (C'.a A H )o t/$ P.s5 X S ' h* h x C 4. yys. f (3"dA U -/ )a vs ip % c. ar.4.,oC

r uc A u /t c M 2 L uc 'A"4"x i.K x

M*.s.y n,& "A.&~ vs & vs i \\ /p4~. c t' c C.g #... art 9.c ). TT E 7 #s^X Ee*'.b 8 4 8 a pt,[ A, & < /d 2 y k. A /fg' g ge_,I.lR g w h LECDID: Type of k' elds Weld Cefi:leccles _and Specification Violations I ri;,le t AS Are Strike h"4 1ct Welded II E;tt (Full) LMF Bace Metal Feduction CL Overlap i I;T Tee (Fulli CR Crack F0 Foresity ) { IV Tee (Tartiall CT Crater S: Siar !n:lusien j s y S ;d EC Ix:as:2se Convexity EP patter (Cluster of Lus. VI et IC

• t er.al Centavity SC Surfa:e Slas VII Flera Pazal IF In:er;1e.e Fusien UC Undercut i

IT Inr afficia.r.* Ter-st Hndsar:1:a A)3% 1 MT U+ inrougr,

~..... . ~. -s.. - ~ ~ - u ---. i,. ,0.. ~ "!">"?"?DDR /EM~ Page ~J c of JC ,m Date T-/ 7 -9 ; f m t$muJif4y.y kg Z, y- / 1 k 9 Cfssw say) xsafd &,,b e= =-A l .T J.44 Ag X /4 A A : - ? - >l /YZ " .2. +'S *' 4.,6 5 md y 4 2 / f - ~t d 4 h m,,s.. ..f s @.Z~ & ),', /&,. 1 1 M j (V I 1 i i I l j-I LE T:D-T* :e of "ieldt Veld r e.' icier. 1es ar.d 5:e c t'i_c_ati rr *. elat ter.c ~ Fille AS Ar: Str:ke "?,'

• Welded 3;*. ! ( F u ll,'

3?? 232* et&l C*0u *it-C ', I'T r* a; ~, e. .e r...., ~n e.-z.y r-w.. w h .,w e Stud I: D:*::1.e C rrax: y ? en, a S w l

a..e.- t C.r t er of ': ed

m

.- er.n. ::r:a m

s s era:e ::3r j

l:: c =re 2.

F

!r : :;e e t t :. :- 7:

gr:c.

IT

. t :.' : : t.-

P r-,

• r

--.r $I3b ..a :. m. 37

/ g n g y m,p ,,D L&l--J) f T. N- ';jnr y % LX~- 2issfrs - $ q?{ a L - a UNITED STATES OF AtT.RIdA (.(N '\\ j >( EUC1 EAR,,f.,U1ATCBY COMISSION A54p33 h. 2 % S~ - ,..I r: i r, N L} ~r t.::3 \\ l ~ d & d ph M /Y\\00f 5 .i Ib 5 an. m......: doewsents respect to my sententions on Wich discovery 4 the minds of the etstf. a'nd this information is not co i tion ny

• ich the staff has 'provided to me, I an unable to obtain this inf Were the information is contained in a doeu f the fror. NRC (Public Docunent Room, etc). I still need the identif 1

ether means. The staff has resources and doc. ment in order telottain the information. ition and inforr.ation Wich exceed est I have, and as a party.' their pos infornstien are necessary to making my ease in this proce 1 s change. tories are continuing in nature and should be sup~pletented den ~~ DIKU.AL IW7DAOG ATOR17.5, In all interrogatories herein, "you* or" Staff" inear,s NRC Staff or l eonte,ntionse - ( Q $ ' Eddienan For each of es} tent (one tions. .3 please provide 'ine fo1{ ewing i$ form $ tion ny ' answering h euntr% # G (2 0 $ $ understanding of the, subject matter of this UCW1 ) Wat is MRCe s"taff' ~~ 1. A C $hfN.h d 'blig lbn $nto,(a) this contention (b) contentient tien the subject, matter 'of this contention (c) (sl

2 Eas in support of thisjoontentiont

3. For all parts of your response to Interrogatory 2 abo

i t o made ar.sver is affirmaiive, plasse provide the following informations

~ idered in the analysis, inqu;iry, study or investigation; dat was being cons ) tent of the such analysis, ir!quiry, study or investigation ('AI5I' ; the cen ther AISI, the results ;cf the A!SI, tether the AISI has been oo.plete [ Ag lt w:st that Ate is; an doc.ments used in the AI!I. all per

1. "GY t

s f ft-Al+t ( 5'

3 ' an 6:e.ents conteitifg it.fonttion 68N,d in the ie:-se of 0.e usIe er ar.dysis or study or inforstion developed faing er. as a rwat ef t% AISI (identify each such i$ocu.ent and state dat inferr.siich or F88'dta ei it cor.tair.s), Wether staff believes additional ar.alysis is warranted, l or further AISI needs or py need to be undertaken on this contention, an*

• ether any persons p'articipating in the AISI are to be sailed as witnesses ter the Staff in this esse,and ett questions the staff AISI is intended to anrwer and Wat information it seeks to develop if it is not ernplete.

For all responsei to parts of (2) above for which RC staff's or Trq tg, 4 amaver is other than affirmative, please state (a) dether EC staff o#-pgg plans to perform av A15T en this sentention (b) eether anyone es 4 EC Staff has stated that AISI of av(c) kind is arranted for this sente (even though it has not.tieen made) for ending such A2SI. l i .on this contention include a date for beginning er (d) those dates, for anJaffirr.ative answers to (e) above. (e) est AISI l [O@ orEC staff win undertake /en this sentention (f) what AISI EC sta to undertake en this contention (g) su reasons why no AISI is planned sa ) this e ntention if mone:is pisaned (h) all reasone ey no AISI kan been is ocntention if none has been done (1) Wat the responsibilities S d:ne yet on of EC staff hr pact to this contention are. a a4 FtM.. mp gy en 5 Identify an doch;ments the aff relied on in opposi,g the admission l of this centention, and-ay specif e facts not stated in the staff's opposition i to aidssion of auch contention (already filed in this case) apon eith Staff relied in s4Mng sach opposition. 4

6. Identify an desu.ents net identified in Staff's interrogatories to Veils 3ddle.an or to Joint Interveners (to present.. a ocntinuing interrogatory )

r 4 i upon dich th, Staff relied in making each aut.h interrogatorg. fbj%ft W.C ataff position 7. Identify by naie, pereensi er insiness address or title (if sy), and. telephone nr.ber (if known) eacM, person en EC staff cr eensultant to EC ' tAff or known to EC Staff or sonsulted by BC staff s in the staff's analysis of the subject matter of this sontention prior to (a) its filing (b) its -ad.ission; state for each such person what analysis l i was perforsed tg* that person. 8. stata au professional qualifications of each person identified in 4 j respcase to interrogatories 7, 13.4 in respense to in'.errogateries 3,0. er 7a above, and 1Nreons identif F. Provide n.y stat'e=ents of the analysis made by atify a n docunents eentaining rush infernation er statements not previously identified. Give the identifier snaber, date, sourse, and title of an iBodusents 10. identified in response' to interrogat*. aries above dish are ava*1able through Ei PL*F. (Patlic Zbec.ent Re:n.). j

n. nr.n EC Staff make available copies of docu-ents identified in 1

respense to the abcve.inteerogateriss to *,asua Eddleran for inspeetion and oo;ying, for dec.uis'nts not available through EC's PN.T .: FEM 4 C 12 Identify ny manegEC staff position it anr, address and telephone nu.ber each person een RC staff intends to azu use or eau as a witness I l in this p oceedLng.

13. State ft.ny the y-ofessional qualitioatiens of each person identified n ystp nse te hierregatory 12 above.

I [ $ \\fI

M, harite the pc11 tion (or placed testirc;y) with respect to ~ each contention on dich sud person in expected to testify, for each person iderAlfied in respense to ifAerrogatory 12 above. gDnh or 15 Ess nc staff, av witness identified in response to interrogatory a 12, or arycne acting in behalf of the Staff or auch a witness or at their direction.*.made av cateulation or analysis (not identified in response to interrogatories 1 through 4 above) with respect to this sentention? 16. If the answe.- to interrogatory 15 above is yes in any case, provide the mane,' business or personal address, telephone araber and professianal qualificatior.e of each person eo has nede auch calculation or analysis stating for each Wat contention it relates to, what person (or Staff), it was nade fer or at the direction of. and identifying all docu.ents eentaining auch calculationer analysis and all docu.ents used in s.aking such calculation er analysis or relied upon in it or supplying information used in it;

17. Provide a sumary of each AISI, oalculation or ardlysis idar. for dich the answer to interrogatory.15. or interrogatory 2 above, is yes.

i 1

18. Please give the secession au-ber, date and originatbr of each doccent identified in response to interrrgatory 16, which is available at the h?.C P m.

g MRof j

19. Will h co;ying all $o..C Staff ma).e available to Wells Edile..cn for inspection an:!

erents identified in response to interrogatory 16 above df ch are net available through the P2^.7

20. Identify each person, including tele of expertise and qualifications (co plete) (phone au.ber, address and field if av) fa do answered interrogatories with" respect to this contention; if.are thr.n one person contribated to an answer, identify each such person, providing the inforsation re:iuested above in this interrogatory for each auch person, and state dat each such person's contribution to the answer was, ter each answer.

21. Identify all-doeur.ents W ich the f

oposes or intends to use ~ as exhibits with respect to this centention during this proceeding, including exhibits of Staff witnesses (identifying the witness for each, if such a witness has been designated), and exhibits to be used during cross-exa.ination of witnesses of av party (stating for each Wish witness it is to be used j in cross-exa.ination 4f), and identifying for eaen the particalar pages i or chapters to be used as exhibits. f @k or Identify all doc.t-ents tich EC staff relied spen in answering i 22. interrogatcries with respect to this eontention, With have not been 4 identified in response to interrogatories 1 through 21 above, stating for each v5.ich ansver(s) ~re dich contentien(s) it was used for, and each s;ecific fact and page nrber therein on Wich EC staff relied or dich EC staff used in answering such.interrogastory. l

23. Please give the accession snnber, date, and originator of each docasant identified in response ~ to interrogateries 21 or 22 above which is availabit

) through the EC FE. FCMC. o r- ~ 21 F11.EC Staff provide Welle Eddlanan with oopies of the docu:eents identified ~in rerpens~s te interrcgatery 21 or 22 abeve Rich are net available at the P2. for inspection and co;7 ng? 1 AI41 8 e-r i

el4s 25 Identify any other inferrution or source of ir.fornr. tion not f*' identified in response to the the above interrogatories 1 thru 2g'Ohb1 V upon which any member of NRC staff reliefd, or which any such menber of staff used, in answering each. intern >gatory with respect to this contention, naming the contention and fesponse in which each such source was used, and the location of the information ured or relie6 on in such source (e.g. page number, section, chapter, e3 rffmar 26 (a) Does the Staff,new agree with the contention? (b) Does the staff net agree with iny part of the contention? 27. If answer to (b) above is affirnative, d.ich part(s) and why? 41-G-1. Please ident'ify fully all documents whichs (a) contain any of the following ' (i) any informaition in the personnel file of Chan Van Vo (also known as Van Vo Davis,or the same person under any other name) (11.) Chan Van Vo's application for employment, work assignments, werk record, transfers, applications for transfer, job performance evaluations, probation, disciplinary actions proposed or taken with respect to Chan Van Vo or Van Vo's ' termination from CF&L, any written or verbal warnings to Chan Van Vo s all records of Van Vo's attendance, hours j . worked, promotion (s), recommendations for promotion (s).. and any other information concerning Van Vo's employment, work performance, hiring, " counsel 11n6", or allegations ~ raised by Chan Van Vo concerning safety (or lack of it) of work related to the Shearon Harris Nuclear power Plant. (iii) Any records or documentation concerning, directly or indirectly, any and all meetings, conversations, inter-views, dis ~cussions, or information not to be discussed (in all cases including written or verbal, formal or infor-mal meetings, discussions, etc.) with anyone (including other CF&L and Daniel employees or other persons employed at the Shearon Harris site, supervisors, CpaL quality assurance personnel, M.A. McDuffie, E.E. Utley, NRC personnel "other investigators, news media, or anyone elce) which directly or indirectly concerne Chan Van Vo. hic work perforcance, his st.fety concerns. Eny othert concerns raised by him to CF&L supervicional management, disciplinary action against Chan Van Vo, " counselling

• Alkl n-

5 l or retaliating against Chan Van Voi or allegations raised f by Chan Van Vo with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Department of Labor- (DDL), Department of Justice (DOJ), Covernment Accountability Project (GAP), citizen intt.rvenor groups or individuals, news ~ media, or any government or private, investigatory body. (iv.) siny other information directly or indirectly concerning,- 4 evaluating, discussing, or in any way mentioning Chan Van Vo, any proposed or actual action inkan against him, or any other information concerning Chan Van Vo or his safety i-., . concerns er other concernes (v) any and all internal CP&L or external investigations or inquiries concerning Chan Van Vo, his work performance, f 'any action against Chan Van Yo, any action proposed-to f be taken with respect to Chan Van Vo, any allegations 'made by Chan Van Vo or any contacts between Chan Van Yo land NRC or DOL' or DOJ or CAP or any citizen intervenor i group, or any news media or any other persons (vi.)...any records or evaluations or Chan Van Vo's work performance. including evalutions made either before, at the time of, or after Chan Van Vo's being placed on probation L (vii) ~any evaluations or reports on Chan Van ~ Vo's allegations i Tincluding the Cobb Report), identifying each document i produced or used in preparing, or in connection with such evaluation (s) or report (s), and any information which was } 'avaliable to the. preparer (s) of such evaluation (s) or report (s) which was not used or reported in such evaluation (s). or report (s)s (viii) any internal or external investigation (s), evaluation (s), 1 i,, or inquiry (ies) into Chan Van Vo's character, employment q' ualifications, or job performance, including any informa- ,y tion requested or sought, any questions asked, and all i information received: j' (ix) medical or psychological reports, evaluation (s) and/or q record (s) concerning Chan Van Yo j (x) information "concerning the dates or matters discussed in meetings between Chan Van Vo and any higher ranking CP&L [ enployee, concerning any matters raised as concerns by ~ Chan Van Vo. A N4 i 4

3 a.-}' s a (b) Refer to$any of the'itens or matters listed in (a)(1)-(x) above (c) may [have contained or referred to any of the matters inquir'ed f about above but which has been (1) destroyed, (2) lost. (3) given I I away.7(l[) loaned to anyone (5) mislaid, or (6) otherwise found unavailable for inspection any copyirig. For each such. document please provide a summary of the contents of such document, the { date whki the document was destroyed, lost, loaned, given away, f mislaia, or otherwise became unav&ilable, and all reasons why: t and7he.name and address or any other person (s) who have or may havf said docuinent or a copy of it, or information the docu-ment contains or contained. 41-0-2(a) Please identif"y all documenta used by, reviewed by, or in the posse's's' ion of Alex Fulleri Ed Willett, E.E. Utley, M.A. McDuffie, I A. Parks Cobb, Jr., or any other person who was employed by CP&L and supervised or met with or investigated Chan Van Vo, which concern Chan Van Vo. or any action or allegation by Van Vo, including notes, recordings or~any other information, stating who possesses each item of information (including information used by or reviewed by i any person in~ luding those named above, which is not now in that person's c possession. (b) Please make available all statements, note's, or other information produced by or posessed-by any of the persons inquired about y i above, or an[other persons, concerning meeting with Chan Van Vo, l discussion (s),or conversation (s) with Chan Van Vo, or investigation of, disciplinary action against, or any other action against, Chan Van Vo. j 1 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Wells Eddleman hereby requests that any documents identified in respon~e to the above interrogatories be produced for inspection s and copying..In' light of the short dispovery deadline I request that any documents or parts of documeq found to be available be made avail-l able as soon as possible, regardless of the time it takes to locate or produce the rest of such documents or the time it takes to produce ] other documents. (This is not a waiver of production times, but -] m' request for rapid production). Chan Van Vo's counsel advises me i that Chan' Van'Yo is aware of tht... requests and has no objection to my receiving or reviewing any do~cuments concerning the matters inq'uired about above. 4 yebruary 1985 d

t v ~ -- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 3ry: LIAR RILULATORY COW.ISC20N in tr.e matter of CAROL 3A POWIlP. k 1,IGriT CD. It al. } Docket 50-h00 Shearen Narris Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1*z 1 0.L. j . CEJCIFICATEQF SERVICE ~ Diesel,,enerator Contentions and Info i I hersby certify that 'sopies of and or wation e-w e e r=%== + ' a-ae Order served 1-15-85 (41G), and of Discovery on h1-0 (1st set)4* p* day of Februarv _ 198,1, by deposit in MAYE been served this the, US Mail, first-class posta58 Prepaid, upon all parties whose '~ names are'11sted below, except the;se whose mane s are Parked with discovery on 14 n - an 'as'terisk, for whovs service was acconplished by _ delivery by hand this date to CP&L legal dent in Raleigh XC l o* ender agreement er counsel for Staff and Applicants of which the Board ie ' l auar Judge:s' Ja-as Kelley, Glenn Bright and Jar.as Carpenter b ecpy each) Atenic Safety and Licensty Board US Nu' ele ar Megulatory Con.ission Washin6 ton DO 20555 i

• George F. Trowbridge (atteme7 for Applicants)

Shaw, Pittr.an, Fotts & Trowbr.dge R.uthanne 9. Miller 1600 M St. NW ASLB Fanel { Washington, DC 20036 DSNRC Washington DC 2C55 J { e Offic~e~ of the Etecutive Le [ E '"C" I* I* PPT j P Attn Docke ts 50-400/k010.I.al Director pi d, $ ^C st. sh * [ngtonDC20555 C N Washington DC 20740 { Docketing and Service Section (3g) Dan Read y CEAWE /TL' 2 Atta keke ts 50-h00/hC1 0.L. Office of the Secretary Naleigh,7707 Vaveress d FC A7606 ,i V5NFC afashii4 ton Dc 20555 Dr. I.inda V. Little O tI>3 only) covernor's waste Mst. Bd. John Runkle , Steve Rochlais 511 Albenarie 53 ds.- 325 N. Sal *stu St. CCNC FEi%-Suite 700 Raleigh, RC 2 611 307 Granville Rd 137.1 Peachtree St.NE -l Chapel Mill Nc 2751h Atisr.ta GA 30309 Bra dley W. Jones Robert Gruber USNRC Region II j 'Trari a Fayne Exec. Director 101 Marietta St. i Edelstein k Payne Public Staff Atlanta GA 30303 Mex 12607 gox 991 i Raleigh FC 27605 Raleigh NC 27602 i Richard Wilson, M.D. Cartified by, h 729 Eunter St. Apex NC 27502 A141 i, i

,13 1 ii3 e.

• 61 R ACKWOOD, E. - 24359

' CONRAN, J. ~24354 COX, T. - 24357 GABRIEL, B. - 24350 KAtiE, W. (10 REGION I EFFECTIVE 1/14/85) SCHWINK, W. .24342 SMITH, D. - 29704 SNTEZEK, J. - 24350 STELLO, V. - 29704 ~ TAYLOR, M. .24356, .i MNBB 6201 ~~ NORRY, P. - 27335 SOLAN, J. - 27335 l SPRINGER, M.:- 27337 WATTS, H. - 27337 ~ _6209 MNBS ~ x27585 BRANDENBURG, P. FRIDGERS, H. DAY, D. DIRCKS, W. FEDERLINE, M. JORDAN, K. MORRIS, D. ( RABIDEAU, P. 1 REHM, T. ROE, J. SILVER, S. VITALE, P. ) ~ a { ~ i s k l t AW1 i

~ ' ' " ' ' ' ~ ' [ 08Mf / 'y V l' je+ + s set UNITED STATES CIf A[ERIdA i L. h NUCLEAR RIGMMRY COV. MISSION 854083 BEPORE THE A%MIC SAFETY AND LICD: SING BOARD 2"h3( GIenn O. Bright Dr. Jate s H. Carpenter Jc=e s L. Kelley, Chairman In the Matter of CAB 0 LINA POWER AND LIGHT CD. et a3. (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 -) ASL3P No. 82-1/l1-03 OL Wells Edde-an's" Interrogatories to EC Staff 'and PEMA ~ (f. g. Set) 86 G and FEMA requests the NEC Staff to answer the following 4 Wells Edde..an here interrogatories before,Q 19s5 or such other date as counsel for the Staff, FEMA Itese inserrogatories are sub.itted under 10 CTA 2.720(h)(ii) and I agree on. and inquire into the studies, infernation, and knowledge of NEC staff with Since I cannot read respect to ry contentions on Wich discovery is now open. the ninds of the staff, and this infernation is not contained in documents dich the staff has provided to ne, I an unable to obtain this infernation by Were the information is contained in a docunent I can obtain other r.eans. fron NRC (Publie. Document Room, etc), I still need the identification of the The staff has resources and docu-ent in order to obtain the information. infer-ation tich exceed Wat I have, and as a party,' their position and infernation are necessary to making my case in this proceeding. These interroga-tories are continuing in nature and should be supplemented den answers change. OD:ERAL IICERR03A70 RIES. ~ -~ In all interrogatories herein, "you" or" Staff" means NRC Staff.or' FEMA' For each of centention? Q g ' Eddle.an contentions g y '~ please provide ine fo1{owing inferr$ tion by ' answering sad of these qu'estiens. D*CW5 orJ a *3 g 's 1. Wat is NRC Staff' jun erstan ng e, subject matter of this j contentionf study or uiryti ation into,(a) this centention (b) f M er analysis,i 2. Eas C Staff nade an nyes ntion c) the allegation (s) in this contention the subject setter of this con (d) the basis of this contention (e). the informatio in support of this centention?

3. For all parts of your response to Interrogatory 2 above for sich your t o made answer is affirmative, please provide the following information:

the analysis, inquiry, study or investigation; dat was being considered in i such analysis, inquiry, study or investigation ('AISI"); the content of the AISI, the results of the AISI, Wether the AISI has been co.pleted, Wether a date for ee.pleting the AISI has been established if it is not complete, est th:t 6t-is, au doe.=ents ured in the AISI, all persens consulted @l Tt !" 9 P W w -r- -w i---, ,..m_g. -9,,,r

.2 discovered in the eerse of the USI, an doerents containing i. ortation or analysis or study or infornation developed during or as a result of the MSI (identify each such docu.ent and state dat inforration or results it contains), Wether staff believes additional analysis is warranted, or further MSI needs or may need to be undertaken on this contention, and Wether any persens participating in the MSI are to be caned as witnesses fer the Staff in this case,and eat questions the staff AISI is intended to answer and tat inforr.ation it seeks to develop if it a-ever is other than affirmative, please state (a) dether EC staff orfy b. plans to perform any MSI on this contention (b) tether anyone on EC Staff has stated that MSI of arJ) kind is warranted for this conten (even though it has not been made) (c on this contention include a date for beginning or for ending)such MSI, e st MSI (d) those dates, for an affirrative answers to (c) above (e {g[ ory:.C staff vin undertake on this contention (f) Wat MSI EC staff desires to undertake on this contention (g) an reasons 27 no MSI is planned on ,this contention if mone is planned (h) an reasons why no M of EC staff with respect to this contention are. V & K FLinh ry gy % Identify an documents theyta.f relied on in opposing the admission of this contention, and av specific facts not stated in the Staff's opposition 5 to ad ission of such contention (already filed in this case) upon dich Staff relied in taking such opposition. Identify an doe =ents not identified in Staff's interrogatories to Wens Iddle.an or to Jeint Interveners (to present -- a continuing interrogatory ) 6. upen which the Staff relied in making each such interrogator {. f E't h it W Identify by nane, personal or business address,yc staff position 7. or title (if any), and telephone nu.ber (if known) each person on NF.C staff or conr.:ltant to EC staff or kncvn to EC Staff or consulted by BC staff in the staff's analysis of the subject matter of this contention prior to (a) its filing (b) its ai.ission; staic for each such person what analysis was performed by that persen. State an professional qualifications of each person identified in 8. response to interrogatories 7,, ~ 1;4, Provide av statements of the analysis made by persons identified in res;ense to interrogatories 3,b, or 7a above, and identify an doeunents 9 containing such ir.fornation or statenents not previously identified. Give the identifier :::.ber, date, sourea, and title of an ilocuments identified in response to interrogatories above, dich are available through 10. EC PLT (Public Ibement Roor.). Win EC Staff make available copies of docu..ents identified in response to the above interrogatories to wells Eddle..an for inspection H. and copying, for decu:ents not available through EC's PIF.! FE P1h V EC staff position if ary, address and telephone

12. Identify by name,3 sn:.ber each person dem BC staff intends to acca use or call as a witness in this proceeding.

13. State funy the professional qualifications of each person identified in response to interrogatory 12 above.

AlW

l -)- l j 14 Sw:-ari: the position (or planned testi. y) with re:pect to each cor.ter.tien on dich such person is expected to testify, for each person identified in response to interrogatory 12 above. EhN # Ras (nC Staff, av witness identified in response to interrogatory 15 a 12, or agone acting in behalf of the Staff or such a witness or at their direction, made av calculation or analysis (not identified in response to interrogatories 1 through 4 above) with respect to this contention?

16. If the answer to interrogatory 15 above is yes in av sase, provide the nane, business or personal address, telephone nu-ber and professinnal i

gaalificttions of each person to has nade such calculation or analysis, ' stating for each what contention it relates to. Wat person (or Staff) it was nade for or at the direction of, and identifying an doeunents centaining such calculationer analysis and an docu..ents used in u.aking such calculation or analysis or relied upon in it or supplying infornation used in it.

17. Provide a su..ary of each AISI, calculation or analysis idst for dich the answer to interrogatory 15, or interrogatory 2 above, is yes.

18. Please give the accession nu.ber, date and originator of each de:a-ent identified in response to interrogatory 16, which is available l

at the EC PE. g M8of copying all $ocu Staff make available to Wens Eddle.an for inspection

• En hnC 19.

ents identified in response to interrogatory 16 above which are not available through the pet of expertise and qualifications (c:mplete) (phone na-ber, address, and f

20. Identify each person, including tele if av) fa who answered interrogatories with respect to this contention; if more than one person l

centribated to an answer, identify each such person, providing the information requested above in this interrogatory for each such person, and state what each such person's contribution to the answer was, for each answer.

21. Identify an documents dich the f

opeses or intends to use as exhibits with respect to this contention during this proceeding, including exhibits of Staff witnesses identifying the witness for each, if such a witness has been designated)(, and exhibits to be used during cross-exa.ination of witnesses of av party (stating for each which witness it is to be used in cross-exa..ination of), and identifying for each the particular pages or chapters to be used as exhibits.f %r or interrogatories with respect to this,EC staff relied upon in answering 22 Identify an docu.ents Wich, contention, W ich have not been identified in response to interrogatories 1 through 21 above, stating for each which ansver(s) re Wich contention (s) it was used for, and each specific fact and page nu.ber therein on Wich EC staff relied or Wich EC staff used in answering such interrogastery.

23. Flease give the accession ra.ber, date, and originator of each document identified in response to interrogatories 21 or 22 above Wich is available through the EC PE.

f-&thA o r -

24. Will EC Staff provide Wens Eddler.an with copies of the documents j

identified in response to interrogatory 21 or 22 above Wich are not available at the PE, for inspection and copying? A%F .E'*- ~ .----e--..,- e en.. ,--t ,. - ~ - - -.-,--.. - ----. --,,--, -, -, ~ - -, -

-h-Identify any other intornation or source of infornation not p*IvbIl 25 identified in response to the the above interrogatories 1 thru 2hsV De upon e.ich any member of NRC staff reliefd, or which any such in answering each interrogatory with respect ypp/ menber of staff used, I to this contention, naning the contention and

• response in which each such source was used, and the location of the information us ed or relief -on in such source (e.g. page nunber, section, chapter, etc).

v Ff& 26 (a) Does the staff now agree with the contention? (b) Does the ~ Staff now agree with $ny part of'the contentionT (b) above is affirnative, which part(s) and whyt 27 If answer to 41-G-1. Please identify fully all documents whichs (a) contain any of the followings. (i) any information in the personnel file of Chan Van Vo ~ (also known as Van Vo Davis or the same person under any other name) (ii) Chan Van Vo's application for employment, work assignments, werk record, transfers, applications for transfer, job performance evaluations, probation, disciplinary actions proposed or taken with respect to Chan Van Vo or Van Vo's termination from CF&L, any written or verbal warnings to Chan Van Voi all records of Van Vo's attendance, hours worked, promotion (s), recommendations for promotion (s), and any other information concerning Van Vo's employment, work performance, hiring.

• counselling", or allegations raised by Chan Van Vo concerning safety (or lack of it) of work related to the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant.

(iii) Any records or documentation concerning, directly or indirectly, any and all meetings, conversations, inter-views, discussions, or information not to be discussed (in all cases including written or verbal, formal or infor'- mal meetings, discussions, etc.) with anyone (including other CP&L and Daniel employees or other persons employed at the Shearon Harris site, supervisors, CP&L quality assurance personnel, M. A. McDuffie, E.E. Utley, NRC personnel, other investigators, news media, or anyone Chan Van Vo, else) which directly or indirectly concerns his work performance, his safety concerns, any others cc -" ns raised by him to CP&L supervisional management, ,:. Chth VL U.

• cC 'iric c ilini

.n E.r y b r ~ . Yo CL rh perfCJ' Er Eny rthr 1 M ea e

i' or re aliating cgainst Chan Van Vos or allegations raised by Chan Van Vo with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Department of Labor (DOL). Department of Justice (DOJ), Government Accountability Project (GAP), Citizen intervenor groups or individuals, news media, or any government or private investigatory body. ) ^ (iv) siny other information directly or indirectly concerning,- evaluating, discussing', or in any way mentioning Chan Van Vo, any proposed or actual action inkan against him, or any other information concerning Chan Van Vo or his safety concerns or other concerns: (v) any and all internal CP&L or external investigations or inquiries concerning Chan Van Vo, his work performance, any action against Chan Van Vo, any action proposed to be taken with respect to Chan Van Vo, any allegations made by Chan Van Vo or any contacts between Chan Van Vo and NRC or DOL' or DOJ or GAP or any citizen intervenor. group, or any news media or any other person: (vi) any records or eva3uations or Chan Van Vo's work performance, including evalutions made either before, at the time of, or after Chan Van Vo's being placed on probation (vii) any evaluations or reports on Chan Van Vo's allegations (including the Cobb Report), identifying each document produced or used in preparing, or in connection with such evaluation (s) or report (s), and any information which was avaliable to the, preparer (s) of such evaluation (s) or report (s) which was not used or reported in such evaluation (s) or report (s): (viii) any internal or external investigation (s), evaluation (s), or inquiry (ies) into Chan Van Vo's character, employment ,,l . qualifications, or job performance, including any informa-l tion requested or sought, any questions asked, and all information received (ix) medical or psychological reports, evaluation (s) and/or record (s) concerning Chan Van Vos (x) informa' tion concerning the dates or matters discussed in meetin'gs between Chan Van Vo and any higher ranking CP&L employee, concerning any matters raised as concerns by % V.m Vo. $ l$5'

(b) Refer to any of the items or matters listed in (a)(1)-(x) above (c) may have contained or referred to any of the matters inquir'ed about above but which has been (1) destroyed, (2) lost, (3) given away, (4) loaned to anyone, (5) mislaid, or (6) otherwise found unavailable for inspection any copying. For each such document please provide a summary of the contents of such document, the date when the document was destroyed, lost, loaned, given away, misaale', or otherwise became unav&ilable. and all reason's whys and the name and address or any other person (s) who have or may have said document or a copy of it, or information the docu-cent contains or contained. 41-G-2(a) Please identify all documents used by, reviewed by, or in the possession of Alex Fuller, Ed Willett E.E. Utley, M. A. McDuffie, A. Parks Cobb, Jr., or any other person who was employed by CP&L and supervised or met with or investigated Chan Van Vo, which concern Chan Van Vo or any action or allegation by Van Vo, including notes. recordings or any other information, stating who possesses each item of information (including information used by or reviewed by i any person including those named above, which is not now in that person's possession. (b) Please make available all statements, notes, or other information produced by or posessed by any of the persons inquired about j mbove, or any other persons, concerning meeting with Chan Van Vo, discussien(s) or conversation (s) with Chan Van Vo, or investigation of, disciplinary action against, or any other action against, Chan Van Vo. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Wells Eddleman hereby requests that any documents identified in response to the above interrogatories be produced for inspection and copying. In light of the short dispovery deadline I request that any documents or parts of documes4s found to be available be made avail-able as soon as possible, regardless of the time it takes to locate or traduce the rest of such documents or the time it takes to produce otner documents. (This is not a waiver of production times, but a request for rapid production). Chan Van Vo's counsel advises me that Chan Van Vo is aware of these requests and has no objection to my receiving or reviewing any do'cuments concerning the matters inquired about above. ~ - b A 14 5~ 47 r a y 1925 Ec11s Eddleman

UNITID STATES OF AMIRICA i NVOLIAM REl'IATORY C0!OiI5520R I n tt.e na t t e r of CA R OLIK A M EP. & LIG riT CD. I t al. ) Docket 50-L00 Shearen Earris Nuclear Power Pla nt, Unit 1* ) 0.L. CIRIIFICATE0F SERVICE Diesel Generator Contentions-and Info I hereby certify that copies of and of Mntier h Reeca=* 4>== +'an ne Order served 1-15-65 (41G), and of Discovery on k1-G (1st set)b h b g EAYE been served this day of _Februarv 198,1, by deposit in ~ the US Sil, first-class postage prepaid, upon all parties whose h Wer-) nar.es are listed bel =w, ex:ept 'the}se whose mane s are Parked with an asterisk, for whom service was accorglished by discovery op 1,1_g - F delivery by hand this date to CP&L legal dent in Raleigh NC

• • under a5reement of counsel for Staff and Applicants of which the Board is Judges Jams Kelley, Glenn D-ight and Jae.*s Carpenter (1* copy each)

Ater.!c Safety and Licens rt Scard US Nuclear tegulatcry Co :.ission Washir4 ton DO 20555

• George F. Trowbridge (atterney for Applicants)

Shaw, Pittr.an, Fotts & Trowbridge R. uthanne G. Miller 1500 M St. W ASLB Panel Washingten, DC 20036 USNRC Washington DC 2055 5 office of the Executive Legal Director [ Spence W. Ferry A t tn Dnke ts 50-400/h01 0.L. p;.i C St. 3 s ngton DC 20555 N Washington DC 20740 Dan Re a d Docketing and Service Section (3x) CFA!rr/FLP I Attn Decke ts 50-ko0/LC1 c.L. Raleigh,p07 v 27606 veros Office of the Secretary NC V 5 W, Dr. Linda V. Little s'a shir4 ton DC 20555 coy,7n 7,, y,g, yg, 33, g (E plan only) 511 Albe.arie B3 ds. John Runkle Steve Roch1 mis 325 N. Salfabu W 5t* CCNC FEI'.A-Suite 7 00 Raleigh, NC 27611 307 Granville Rd 137.1 Peachtree St.NE l Chapel Mill Re 2751k Atlar.ta GA 30309 Bra dley W. Jones Robert Gruber USNRC Region II 'Travi a Fayne Exec. Director 101 Marietta St. Edelstein & Fayne Public Staff Atlanta GA 30303 h x 12607 Box 991 Raleigh WC 27605 Raleigh NC 27602 Richard Wilson, ED. Certified by _//h 729 Eunter St. Apex N; 27502 AlW \\

t UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0tHISSION t BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of

l

)I Docket Nos. 50-400-OL CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY AND NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN MUNICIPAL l 50-401-OL POWER AGENCY h 4 / (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plaat, )J Units 1 and 2) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE James L. Kelley, Chairman

• Richard D. Wilson, M.D.

Administrative Judge 729 Hunter Street Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Apex, NC 27502 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Travis Payne, Esq. 723 W. Johnson Street Mr. Glenn O. Bright

• P. O. Box 12643 Administrative Judge Raleigh, NC 27605 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Dr. Linda Little Washington, DC 20555 Governor's Waste Management Building 513 Albermarle Building Dr. James H. Carpenter
• 325 North Salisbury Street Administrative Judge Raleigh, NC 27611 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Dr. Harry Foreman, Alternate
• Washington, DC 20555 Administrative Judge P.O. Box 395 Mayo Daniel F. Read University of Minnesota CHANGE flinneapolis, MN 55455 P. O. Box 2151 Raleigh, NC 27602 I

h\\4Y

~ z' . Robert P. Gruber John Runkle, Executive Coordinator Executive Director Conservation Counsel of North Public Staff - NCUC Carolina 307 Granville Rd. P.O. Box 991 Raleigh, NC 27602 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 George Trowbridge, Esq'. Bradley W. Jones, Esq. Thomas A. Baxter, Esq. Regional Counsel John H. O'Neill, Jr., Esq. USNRC, Region II Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 101 Marietta St., N.W. 1800 M Street, N.W. Suite 2900 Washington, DC 20036 Atlanta, GA 30323 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Wells Eddleman Panel

• 718-A Iredell Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Durham, NC 27701 Washington, DC 20555 Richard E. Jones, Esq.

Steven Rochlis Associate General Counsel Regional Counsel Carolina Power & Light Company FEMA 1371 Peachtree Street, N.E. P. O. Box 1551 Atlanta, GA 30309 Raleigh, NC 27602 ~ Spence W. Perry, Esq. Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Associate General Counsel Board Panel

• Office of General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission FEMA 500 C Street, S.W., Room 840 Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20472 Docketing and Service Section*

Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 i A1W

4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges: James L.'Kelley, Chairman l Dr. James H. Carpenter ( Glenn 0. Bright l l ) In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-400 OL ) CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ) t and ) (ASLBP NO. 82-472-03 OL) l NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN MUNICIPAL ) POWER AGENCY ) ) (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power ) January 14, 1985 Plant) ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruling on Certain Safety Contentions and Other Matters) We have heard argument (Tr. 5730-45) and received submissions from the parties on the Eddleman and CCNC. proposed contentions based on the Chan Van Vo affidavit of October 6,1984. We ruled on most of these contentions in the December 5 telephone conference. We now rule on the remaining four contentions. l l Eddleman Contention 41-G Concerning Harassment Mr. Eddleman's proposed Contention 41-G alleges harassment of employees at the Harris facility to discourage th'em from bringing forward safety concerns. It refers specifically to portions of the Van Vo affidavit of October 6,1984 Because this proposed contention was 1 m,_,, F< f lhf w- / JA -,.,

. filed " late" -- i.e., long after the initial 1982 deadline for contentions -- its admission is subject to the "five factors" balancing test,,(See Duke Power Co. (Catawba Nuclear Station),17 NRC 1041 4 (1983)), as well as to the specific basis requirement. The contention is drafted in rather general terms, but since it alleges intentional illegal behavior we find it sufficiently specific. See Duke Power Co., j s supra,19 NRC 1418,1433 (1984); cf. United States v. Screws, 325 U.S. 91(1945). In our balancing of the five factors, the following considerations are most pertinent: (1) Good cause -- The contention was filed reasonably soon after the Van Vo affidavit became available. Mr. Eddleman was not properly chargeable with notice of possible harassment problems before that time. t (2) & (4) -- Other Means and Representation by Existing 2 Parties. Both of these factors favor admission of the contention, i Compare Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Project), t 18 NRC 1167, 1173-75 (1983). We reject the Applicants' suggestion that a Staff investigation is an adequate "other means" to protect the intervenor's interest. However, these two factors are to be given less weight than the others. Detroit Edison Co. (Enrico Fermi Plant),18 NRC 1760, 1707 (1982). (3) Contribution to the Record. The s'ubject matter of this QA contention may not require particular expertise and we certainly do A145

= i not question Mr. Eddleman's willingness to work. On the other hand, the hearings on Mr. Eddleman's several safety contentions sometimes left us with the feeling that he had spread himself too thin. We note in that regard that in the coming months Mr. Eddleman will have a lot of work to do on his emergency planning contentions. Moreover, our experience indicates that a contention alleging a pattern of harassment -- broader ~ than the incidents Mr. Van Vo speaks of -- would require considerable time to develop. Factor 3 weighs against Mr. Eddleman. (4) Delay or Broadening the Issues -- allowance of a broad harassment contention, with full-scale discovery, could well lengthen this proceeding substantially,.and might even delay fuel loading, although that now seems unlikely. The fuel load delay is the more important concern. Obviously, allowance of Mr. Eddleman's broad contention as drafted would broaden the issues. In the cfrcumstances, this factor weighs somewhat against Mr. Eddleman. 2 In balancing the five factors together, they appear to tilt slightly against Mr. Eddleman's contention in its present form. However, the Van Vo allegations are serious and the balance is very close. We believe they should be scrutinized on the record under'a suitably narrowed version of Mr. Eddleman's contention. We revise Eddleman 41-G to read as follows: Chan Van Vo was placed on probation and later terminated from his job with CP&L because he had sought to raise nuclear safety concerns about the N, Harris facility, as he alleges, and not because of N poor job perfomance, as CP&L alleges, i } \\ 4s*

~~ 4 This contention should be understood as focusing on the reasons particular personnel actions were taken against a particular individual. The parties' attention should focus on particular incidents alleged in 9 the Van Vo affidavit -- e.g., the response to Mr. Van Vo's concerns about the " cold pulling" of a pipe (paragraphs 9-15 of the affidavit) and about pipe hanger material traceability (paragraphs 18-21). In admitting this contention, we are not opening for litigation Mr. Van Vo's broader and unparticularized allegations -- e.g., affidavit paragraphs 25 and 26 -- at least not at this time. Our rationale for this approach is that the contention grew out of the Van Vo affidavit, as Mr. Eddleman has made clear. Given the difficulties and large expenditures of time involved in discovery and hearing of a broad harassment contention and Eddleman 41-G's status as a late contention, it is reasonable to determine, first, whether the Van i i Vo allegations about his treatment can be substantiated in a relatively short time. If they are substantiated on the record, then the Board would consider a broader contention in this area. On the other hand, if the Van Vo allegations prove to be unfounded, as CP&L contends, and no other evidence of harassment surfaces, then presumably that issue would be closed. The "five factor" balance clearly favors this narrower version of Eddleman 41-G because the potential for delay in the original version does not obtain, and its presentation would be within Mr. j Eddleman's limited resources. l A I +s-

CP&L and Mr. Van Vo have entered into a settlement of any personal claims Mr. Van Vo may have had against the company. The Board asked for cnd received from the Applicants a copy of the otherwise confidential settlemen't agreement to detemine what bearing, if any, it might have on our disposition of Eddlecan 41-G. We also received and considered cor=ents from CP&L and Mr. Eddleman on that question. The settlement tems appear to be reasonable. The amount of the financial payment to Mr. Van Vo is certainly no more and probably much less than it might have cost CP&L to fully litigate Mr. Van Vo's possible personal claims. The agreernent does not purport to bar Mr. Van Vo from disclosing any information to the NRC. In short, our disposition of Eddleman 41-G was not affected by the settlement agreement. Eddleman Contention 41-G, as modified by the Board, is admitted and discovery on it is open. The contention is narrow and the Applicants and Staff, at least, have already investigated the Van Vo concerns. Mr. Eddleman has the Applicants' Cobb Report on the Van Vo allegations, and the Staff should soon be supplying the I&E Report on the same matters. Therefore, discovery is to close by March 1,1985, unless an extension is ebtained for good cause shown. Any party wishing to move for sumary disposition shall so advise the Board by March 8, 1985, and any such motions shall be filed by March 15, 1985. Should a hearing be necessary on this contention, the Board tentatively plans to schedule it for late April or early May. The Board realizes that there may be other employees, present or former, at the barris site who might have information about acts of I Al+5

i. harassment of workers because of their efforts to raise nuclear safety concerns. If so, they should come forward with that information now, on a confidential basis, if they wish. To,that end, we are directing the Applicants to post the notice attached to this Order in places where notices to employees are customarily posted at the Harris site. It invites employees who wish to provide infomation about any harassment incident related to nuclear safety to send it to the Board. Further, such infomation must be submitted by the deadline date of March 1, 1985. If the Board receives any. informa, tion pursuant to the notice, we will consider appropriate action on it, including broadening of Eddleman 41-G. If no such information is received, any further inquiry into incidents occurring prior to itarch 1,1985 will be i foreclosed (other than the Van Vo incidents). 4 Eddler:an Contention 41-C and CCNC WB-1 Both of these contentions are based on statements in fir. Van Vo's affidavit about a specific incident of alleged falsification of material 4[ 6 traceability records. Litigation of that particular incident is now \\p' allowable under modified Eddleman 41-G. Should the developed record show that falsification occurred, we can reconsider admission of a broader falsification contention. Eddleman Contention 41-C and CCNC WB-1 are rejected under the five factors balancing test, for the reasons stated under Eddleman 41-G as proposed. A l +s~

CCNC Contention WB-2 Concerning Improper Pipe Installation We tentatively rejected this contention in the December 5 telephone conference, subject to the possibility of receiving further coments from Mr. Van Vo, to be mailed by December 21, 1984 No such comments l were received and this contention is rejected for the reasons previously l j assigned -- basically, that the system in question is not sufficiently related to safety to warrant our consideration. The reasonableness of CP&L's responses to Mr. Van Vo's expression of concerns about that system is included under revised Eddleman 41-G. l Eddleman Contention 41-E Concerning Pipe Hangers i We previously rejected this contention on the grounds that it lacked specificity and because it appeared to be a " retread" of Eddleman

41. Mr. Eddleman seeks reconsideration, arguing that 41-E addresses

.) non-welding aspects of pipe hangers. The Applicants and Staff oppose the motion, arguing that lack of specificity alone should bar this contention. The Board agrees for the reasons they assign. Motion denied. e Applicants' Motion to Receive Additional Evidence The Applicants seek admission of two final reports on certain { matters that were litigated under Contention 41. They concede, however, that these documents do not " set forth any new substantive information j which would warrant additional cross-examination." Motion at 4. The Staff and Mr. Eddleman oppose the motion. We see no sufficient reason A l45 i

-E-to grant this motion over cpposition when the material is concededly unnecessary for decision; it is denied. Aspects of our rulings on Eddleman 41-G may raise questions in the parties' minds. Any party who wishes a telephone conference on that ruling should telephone the Board Chairrran promptly. THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD W

• es L. Kelley, Cha/Fman JMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

= h, ~61enn 0. Bright' / ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE W Y . b J (f.JamesH.Cargnter /DMINISTRATIVE JUDGE January 14, 1985 Bethesda, Maryland Attachment A l45

ATit.cHMENT i l t!NITED STATCS NUCLEAR REGULATORY COW.ISSION NOTICE The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is presently considering whether to authorire an operating license for the Carolina Power & Light Company's Shearon Harris f acility. One of the questions before the Board is whether there have been instances in which employees at the Harris site have been harassed or retaliated against because they have tried to raise nuclear safety cor.cerns about the faciltty. The parties in the. case are CP&L, the NRC Staff, Mr. Wells Eddleman and several intervenor groups. Any present or former employee at the Harris site who has personal knowledge about such acts of harassment or retaliation may submit on a confidential basis to the Board alone a statement which provides thTfollowing infont,ation: 1. The person's name and telephone number and/or address. 2. A description of the incident. 3. A brief explanation of why the individual desires his concern to be expr?ssed in closed, rather than public, hearings. The Board will review any statements it receives and then decide, in consultation with counsel for the parties to the case, whether and how to conduct a closed hearing in which the identities of the witnesses would be kept confidential. CP&L's attorneys and possibly other representatives of the company would attend the closed hearing, as well as Mr. Eddleman and representatives of the NRC Staff and possibly the intervenor groups. However, they would be ordered not to disclose the idtr.tities of the witnesses. Prospective witnesses should realize that, under this procedure, their identities would be substantially protected from any further disclosure, but complete protection from disclosare would not be guaranteed. A Hs'

2 Confidential statements must be mailed to the Board, h the_ deadline date of March 1.1985, at the following. address: Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Shearon Harris Proceeding U.3. huclear Regulatory Cornission W3shington, D.C. 20555 THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICEN51?tG ECaRD M __s L. Kelley, Co p..an Av 'INISTRATIVE JUDGT /$. W enn 0. Irright /- ADNINISTRATIVE JUDGE - -- w +f Ogr James H. Carpen p r A.,..INISTRATIVE JUDGE January 14, 1985 Bethesda, Maryland e 9 A l+r

Attachaent 2 t. l i l' l I l i l l

1. EPORT OF RESULTS OF INTERVIEWS l

'COMDL'CTED WITH CPAL PER50h%El I RELATED TO 5 ELECTED A5PECT5 0F l AN AFFIDAVIT SUBMllitD BY F64RER CPEL EMPLOYEE CHAN VAh VO l I f l l 1 ( t t s A Prepared by: . nfn y t A F

obb','Jr.

i Manager. Project Management Division Design Engineering Department Luke Power Company l t I i October 31, 1984 Revised Mcver.ber 9, 1984 ) i i 1 I t i i A l ' _1_ } \\ ib ,A - \\pp Aip f m., - l'f

1 t TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Subject Page 1.0 Overview ~1 i

2.0 Background

1 3.0 Paragraph #12 Items 4 4.0 Paragraph #13 Items 5 5.0 Paragraph #14 Items 6 6.0 Paragraph #15 Items 7 7.0 Paragraph 823 Items 9 8.0 Paragraph $24 Items 10 9.0 Events Related to Steam Generator 12 Feedwater Pump Piping Installation 10.0 Events Related to Phase II Hanger Program 14 11.0 Isolated Incorrect Statements in the Affidavit 16 i e A I40

e- . 1.0 Overview This report documents results of discuscions held with CP&L personnel related to statements contained in an Affidavit submitted by Chan Van Vo, a former CP&L employee in hhe construction organization at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant-(SHNPP). The discussions ' pertained to the statements made in Paragraphs #12,13,14,15, 23, and 24, which address CP&L management responsiveness to alleged safety concerns by Chan Van Vo. The purpose of the discussions with CP&L personnel was to ascertain facts related to CP&L involvement in the events cited in these paragraphs. Parties cited as contacts made by Chan Van Vo were interviewed, and others were interviewed who might have been in a position to confinn or contradict events recalled by those primary contacts., Personnel cited as contacts by Chan Van Vo and who were interviewed were Alex Fuller, Ed Willett, R M Parsons, M A McDuffie, and E E Utley. Others interviewed were John Ferguson, Dr. T S Elleman, and Darren Dasburg. 4

2.0 Background

4 Statements cited in Paragraphs #12, 13, 14, 15, 23, and 24 of the Affidavit were part of a sequence of events that occurred during Chan Van Vo's employment at SHNPP. Discussion with personnel involved, especially Alex Fuller and Ed Willett, provided a description of events related to Chan Van Vo's employment. This sequence of events is important to place i statements made in the Affidavit in perspective. e h \\40 1

1. Chan Van Vo was initially employed as an aide at SHNPP and was later promoted to technician. 2. Sometime later, in October 1980, Chan Van Vo was promoted to entry level engineer status after completing correspondence school training. 3. As an engineer, Chan Van Vo worked in the piping area under Ed l Willett. J 4. While working in the piping area, Chan Van Vo developed a history of problems associated with his work. There does not appear to be specific documentation available; however, Ed Willett was aware of

problems, both in his individual performance and with his interface with others. Because it was a

not clear as to the source of the problem, it was deemed appropriate to move Chan Van Vo to another area of work and provide an opportunity for a fresh start. ) 5. In April 1982, Chan Van Vo was assigned to work unde-Alex Fuller in the area of pipe, hangers. At the same time, Ed Willett contacted John Fergbson (CP&L Employee Relations) and arranged for Chan Van Vo to talk with Mr; Ferguson regarding concerns about his employment situation. 6. Chan Van Vo was promoted in October 1982 to the second level engineer classification at CP&L. This promotion was generally A I+o 2

in accordance with CP&L's promotion policy whereby an entry level engineer is promoted at the end of two years if perfomance is satisfactory. 7. Counseling for performance problems in Chan Van Vo's work under Alex Fuller began femally in March 1983. This counseling was received in a resentful hostile manner by Chan Van Vo, who denied any unsatisfactory performance even though he was presented with documented examples. 8. Counseling continued until August 1983, at which time Chan Van Vo was placed on probation and provided again with a clear statement of areas of his perfomance that were unsatisfactory. 9. Counseling continued from August 1983 until February 1984 without noticeable improvement in performance in the areas cited when Chan Van Vo was placed on probation. 10. In late February 1984, a final counseling session was held and Chan Van Vo was infomed that progress on items requiring improvement in performance had not been satisfactory. He was given an opportunity to resign in order to prevent having a job temination on his record. He refused to resign and was teminated on that same day. He was escorted to the gate on that day in accordance with standard procedure. li I h\\\\o 3

Technical items cited in the Affidavit which relate to the fitup of piping to a steam generator feedwater pump and related to the Phase II hanger program occurred during the time frame that Chan Van Vo worked under Alex Fuller's supervision in the hanger area and was receiving counseling for unsatisfactory perfonnance. Both the steam generator feedwater pump piping and the Phase II hanger program situations were i complex and covered a substantial span of time (months). Chan Van Vo became involved in these situations either due to actions of his own or by virtue of assignment and worked on isolated aspects of each. He collected an isolated sample of data, drew his own conclusions, and may have pursued some actions on his own as he was prone to do. Since both situations were already being attended to by assigned CP&L personnel who had knowledge of the entire s'i tuations, Chan Van Vo's information provided little help and nothing new and was likely not given special attention. As can be ascertained from information later in this report, l individuals who he supposedly contacted and provided specific infonnation regarding these two situations have no recollecticn of any such contacts. To aid in understanding of events that actually transpired related to steam generator feedwater pump piping and the Phase II hanger program, individuals interviewed provided an overview which is documented later in this report. 3.0 Paragraph *12 Items In Paragraph #12 of the Affidavit, Chan Van Vo made reference to " increasing pressure from Fuller and Willett." He stated that he sought a transfer which was refused by Willett. $ased on the time frame he is Al4o 4

referring to, this was the time frame during which counseling for performance problems unrelated to the steam generator feedwater pump piping was taking place. He requested a transfer and the transfer was approved by all levels of supervision. He was interviewed once or twice for assignment to other areas, but other organizations were not interested. Willett had no other areas under his supervision available in which to transfer Chan Van Vo and, in fact, needed his assistance in the hanger area due to the magnitude of the hanger work. Chan Van Vo did not contact R M Parsons directly with respect to his request for transfer or concerns with Fuller and Willett. Although he saw him frequently, Parsons recalls only two contacts with Chan Van Vo, one related to organizational infonnation which he provided and one contact made in the field where statements were made about the installability of diesel generator piping and pipe supports. 4.0 Paragraph #13 Items Chan Van Yo relates incidents associated with a discussion he held with M A McDuffie in 1982. According to McDuffie, he talked with Chan Van Vo sometime in 1982, the # xact date of which was not recorded. He recalls the discussion because Chan Van Vo requested to come talk with him on a Saturday morning, and McDuffie was particularly impressed that an employee would take his own time in the attempt to provide information which might improve the work situation at SHNPP. In that discussion, which lasted for a considerable time, Chan Van Vo complained about his work situation and expressed concern about not being fully utilized and wor'k in general being done in an inefficient and costly manner. There A)+o 5

was no suggestion or discussion from Chan Van Vo indicating that work was being performed incorrectly from a technical point of view or that items were being completed in an improper manner. He produced a number of organization charts that he had personally prepared and explained how he felt the site should be organized, and in so doing, he could be more fully utilized. There was no mention of safety concerns during this conversation. McDuffie expressed to Chan Van Vo the need to demonstrate to his supervision that he was capable of handling additional or higher l quality work and he would be given additional assignments. During the course of this conversation, Chan Van Vo criticized almost everyone above him in the management chain, but this criticism focused on their administrative capability and not their technical capability. As followup to this discussion with Chan Van Vo, McDuffie talked to R M Parsons by telephone and satisfied himself that personnel at the site were providing an audience to Chan Van Vo regarding his concerns with his job and that 6ction that they deemed appropriate was being taken. No further followup was considered necessary or was made. 5.0 Paragraph #14 Items In Paragraph #14, Chan Van Vo alleges that in March 1983 (assumed 1983), Alex Fuller increased pressure on him and threatened him with termination and subjected him to fomal counseling regarding job performance. He noted that this counseling required that he improve his understanding and explanation of problems. This information coincides with the point in time at which fomal counseling due to unsatisfactory job performance did ~ in fact start. This counseMng is documented thoroughly and spells out kl40 6

specifically the ' job performance-related concerns supervision had with Chan Van Vo. In Paragraph #14, Chan Van Vo noted that he requested assistance from R M Parsons; however, to the contrary, Parsons has no recollection of any contact from Chan Van Vo related to concerns about this counseling. There were no instructions provided from Parsons to Fuller and Willett to alter their course of counseling with Chan Van Vo. Parsons confirmed that he stayed aware of the counseling that was being conducted as he did with counseling of any person in the construction organization. 6.0 Paragraph #15 Items In Paragraph #15, Chan Van Vo refers to a second visit to M A McDuffie. McDuffie confirms that a second visit was held sometime in 1983, but events suggest this visit was held later than April. At this meeting, Chan Van Vo laid out a plan he had developed for the as-built program for piping and hangers at SHNPP. He provided a hand written document to McDuffie which consisted of a compilation of his ideas, along with information he had collected from sources at the site. Since this was the second proposition he had made to McDuffie regarding substantial reorganization of the operation at SHNPP, McDuffie was less interested and the conversation took less time. At no time 'in this conversation did Chan Van Vo raise concerns regarding the technical competence of work at the site or safety concerns in general. Mr. McDuffie has to racollection of making the quoted statement in the Affidavit which is attributed to him regarding Chan Van Vo being a soldier and Ed Willett being his lieutenant and that he should obey orders. As followup, McDuffie sent A i4o ~ 7

\\ the document provided to him by Chan Van Vo to R M Parsons via informal note for review and requested that they discuss the infomation with Chan Van Vo. The date on this note and McDuffie's recollection of when it was sent relative to the conversation he held with Chan Van Vo suggests that the meeting with Chan Van Vo actually was held in May or June 1983. The note to Parsons containing the package of infonnation was dated in July. The response to McDuffie by Parsons indicates that discussion was held with Chan Van Vo by Ed Willett and Alex Fuller and that the package of infomation was reviewed in detail. Willett and Fuller pointed out that a number of items contained in that proposal were in fact included in the current hanger program at the site. Other items were not included and were not deemed appropriate to include. Parsons' response to McDuffie was dated in late July 1983 and a copy can be obtained from Parsons. Chan Van Vo makes reference to pressure from Alex Fuller in the spring of 1983 and alleges that he was assigned more and more work and that this was more than his fair share. As noted earlier, ~in the spring of 1983, Chan Van Vo did receive fomal counseling which started in March 1983 because of poor performance. The areas of poor performance were ciearly cited in counseling documentation in March 1983. Subsequent counseling _ sessions monitored progress in areas cited as unsatisfactory. Fuller states that Chan Van Vo's assignment was changed during this period because work in this group was reorganized under lead personnel. Because he was experiencing perfomance problems, Fuller werked more closely with Chan Van Vo than others and utilized him in several activities in the attempt to find one he could handle satisfactorily. Assignment of Chan kl40 8

Van Vo to the QA surveillance activity was one such attempt by Fuller. Chan Van Vo's assignments did not constitute a disproportionate amount of work compared to others in the group, according to Fuller. 7.0 Paragraph #23 Items In Paragraph #23, Chan Van Vo states that he received a memo signed by Alex Fuller and Ed Willett in August 1983 that stated he was on probation due to perfornynce problems of the past year and one-half. He makes reference to being promoted by Fuller less than a year earlier and notes that he believes that this probationary action,was in retaliation for his expression of safety concerns. In October 1982, Chan Van Vo was promoted from entry level engineer to the next level. In March 1983, formal counseling on performance problems actually started. In August 1983, Chan Van Vo was placed on probation, and the basis for this probation is well documented. This was as a result of his failure to respond to unsatisfactory performance in areas documented earlier. Documentation related specifically to performance problems observed while working under Alex Fuller. Chan Van Vo was promoted based on CP&L's kystem which allows promotion from entry level engineer to the next level in two years if performance is at least satisfactory. At the time of the promotion, Fuller had concerns about Chan Van Vo's performance but they were not significant enough to block the promotion or to initiate formal counseling. By March 1983, the concerns reached a level to justify formal counseling and documentation. Chan Van Vo objected to the documentation that perfonnance was unsatisfactory and refused to sign the Alto 9

I counseling memo. There was no information to suggest that CP&L demonstrated that they wanted personnel to look the 'other way when they encountered deficiencies as alleged in Paragraph #23. 8.0 Paragraph #24 Items In Paragraph #24, Chan Van "o refers to a meeting with E E Utley in the fall of 1983. He refers to documentation of safety concerns and deficiencies which he carried with him and alleges that he explained these concerns to Mr. Utley, including the responses he received from his supervision. He goes on to state that:Mr. Utley did not ask questions regarding these concerns and that he promised to help him and did not. Contrary to the statements in the Affidavit, Chan Van Vo met with E E Utley on July 1983 as documented on Mr. Utley's calendar. -He brought with him a package of information two to three inches thick. His discussion with Utley consisted of expressing his concern with the way CP&L was managing the job with respect to pipe hangers. He noted that he had reviewed his concerns with his management, with personnel at the site, and with M A McDuffie and that they had not accepted his proposal for the way the job should be conducted and he was concerned about that. He noted that he felt that he had a much better understanding of how this work should be conducted than they did and had a thorough knowledge of his particular job. There was no expression of concerns,related to safety. In fact, the conversation did not at all involve the package of infortnation that he had brought with him, although he left that information with Mr. Utley. Mr. Utley made no specific promises to Chan Van Vo other than to give his input consideration. A MO 10

As followup to this meeting, E E Utley sent the package of information left with him by Chan Van Vo to Dr. T S Elleman, Vice President of Corporate Nuclear Safety, for his evaluation for potential safety concerns. At about this same time, Dr. Elleman had been made Chairman of a review panel to investigate potential concerns by personnel at SHNPP. Mr. Utley received no input from Chan Van Vo indicating that there were technical concerns contained in this package. Discussion with Dr. Elleman indicates that he reviewed the package and was unable to determine what Chan Van Vo was attempting to conynunicate. The package contained a collection of site procedures, non-conformance reports, and as he recalls, possibly some speed letters. There was no documentation as to what the compilation of information was intending to communicate. Dr. Elleman contacted Chan Van Vo by telephone and had a long and somewhat disjointed conversation. Chan Van Vo's main concerns expressed to Dr. Elleman related to his own job stability and the fairness of his supervision and the fact that people were not listening to his ideas about how the job should be conducted. Dr. Elleman tried to obtain spec;fic concerns from him. After a lengthy conversation, Dr. Elleman obtained information from Chan Van Vo regarding concerns he had on the following items: 1 1) Q-List nut and bolt control (PO-40924) 2) Purchase orders for steel plates (P0-21022, P0-21021) 3) Vibration of installed air compressor The first two of these items were converted to Review Panel Concern C-23, a which was addressed by the Review Panel and resclved. The third item was AMO 11

converted to Revie' Panel Concern C-24, which the Review Panel addressed w and resolved. In none of these cases did infomation provided by Chan Van Vo constitute new infomation that had not been obtained previously by means of programs in place at SHNPP and solution paths had either been already taken or were in process.- After the Review Panel completed its work on these items, Dr. Elleman made repeated attempts to get back in contact with Chan Van Vo to relate the resolution of these items to him. After repeated attempts, he made contact and explained the resolutions. Chan Van Vo indicated that he was satisfied and had no further concerns with these items. At that time, Dr. Elleman inquired as to the basis of information Chan Van Vo had provided to E E Utley. Chan Van Vo related ',to Dr. Elleman that this infonnation was brought to Mr. Utley to prove to him that Chan Van Vo was a capable performer and was doing his job satisfactorily. Following the completion of the Review Panel work, Dr. Elleman did not retain the package of infomation passed to him by Mr. Utley. 9.0 Events Related To Steam Generator Feedwater Pump Piping Installation Based on discussions primarily with Willett and Dasburg, the situation that existed with regard to installation of the ' steam generator feedwater pump piping was as follows. Nomal practice generally requires installation of piping such that the final closure weld does not occur at a piece of equipment such as a pump. Nomally, piping is installed beginning with the connection at the pump and installed moving away from ~ the pump, and a closure weld with other piping is made somewhere at a hWo 12

9 distance rethote from the equipment. The purpose of this is to ensure i ~ that any loading that may be necessarily applied to align the piping for the final closure weld is not transmitted to the nozzle of the equipment. In this particular case, craft personnel had requested approval to make the final closure weld at the pump. Because CP&L had concerns about potential loading on the pump, approval was granted with restrictions which included ensuring that hangers close by the pump were installed and would rigidly told the pipe in place after it was aligned to the pump, and secondly, that movement of the pump be monitored carefully to ensure that the welding process itself did not create pipe movement which woul,d provide loading on the pump. Actual construction of this particular closure weld was conducted utilizing continuous monitoring of pump movement by millwrights using dial indicators. During the process of welding, movement of the pump was monitored and if it moved in one particular direction, this could be corrected by welding on the opposite side of the piping and create a compensating movement. This iterative technique of welding, providing compensation for movement, would allow the welding to proceed in a manner not to create unacceptable pump loading and/or misalignment when welding was completed. During the course of this iterative technique, the two millwrights who had been monitoring movement were out of work one day, and two substitute millwrights were utilized. Craft personhel were reluctant to proceed with substitute millwrights, but decided to do so anyway in the interest of time. During the day when substitute millwrights were used, the l iterative technique was continued and it was believed that no adverse alignment was created. On the day that followed, when the two original millwrights returned to work and made readings 'with dial indicators, Al+o 13 -w

there 'was indication that adverse movement had in fact occurred and, because welding was virtually completed at that time, the misalignment could not be corrected by further iterative weldicg on one side or another. At this point, CI (Construction Inspection) Inspector Ed Williams wrote a non-safety nonconformance because the alignment was unsatisfactory. There were several options considered to correct or compensate for the unacceptable alignment. Two options considered were breaking the joint and rewelding or adjusting the motor installation position to compensate for the misalignment. Considerable amount of time passed while these options were being evaluated and work priori, ties in the field shifted such that the situation was not at that time resolved and had not as of the interview date been resolved. In the time that has passed since the welding to the p' ump, the pump vendor has visited the site and has observed that the barrel is out of round, which may now necessitate breaking the weld and rewelding. The nonconformance that was written at the time the misalignment was observed is apparently still open and will have to be resolved before the item can be considered closed. Based on the above sequence of events, it appears that CP&L was both knowledgeable and in control of events that occurred to the degree that could be reasonably expected. Although the pump welding did produce an unacceptable alignment, the program for inspection pi cked__up____the misalignment as a nonconformance. This particular event does not relate to safety since both the pump and piping in question are non-safety related. 14

8 10.0 Events Related to Phase II Hanger Program Early in the program for installation of the pipe hangers, CP&L utilized a two phase hanger program. Phase I consisted of partial erection.of hangers whereby some portion of the hangers was not installed or was left in an adjustable state to facilitate piping erection. The Phase II program was intended to complete the installation of partially installed hangers and to complete all necessary inspections. When the Phase II program was started, CP&L perfomed a number of routine checks to ensure that final inspections under Phase II were accomplishing the intended purpose. Most of these checks proved the opposite, and it was clear that they were not achieving the level of quality desired and required. The QA surveillance in which Chan Van Vo was involved was one such exercise initiated by CP&L that demonstrated to CP&L management that they were not achieving the desired level of quality in Phase II. This particular surveillancq was one of the final events before CP&L stopped the inspection program and redesigned the entire hanger erection and inspection program. The program was redesigned to utilize a one step-process whereby total hanger installation and inspection was perfortned at one time, as opposed to the original Phase I and Phase II approach'. Results of the particular QA surveillance activity to which Chan Van Vo was assigned produced several nonconfomance reports. These and others were written based on findings of surveillance activities. The stop work order referred to by Chan Van Vo was a stop work on inspection until a l formal and detailec checklist could be developed to ensure that hanger i inspections would achieve ~the level of. quality required by CP&L's QA i program. All of the hangers that had been installed and inspected under A MO 15

the old Phase II program were reinspected under the new program to ensure that the desired level of quality was achieved, Since restart of the program, which occurred approximately December 1, 1983, the hanger program at SHNPP has proceeded satisfactorily according to Parsons. 11.0 Isolated Incorrect Statements in the Affidavit Based on interviews with CP&L personnel and review of the Affidavit in

general, there appear to be several incorrect statements in the Affidavit.

Information related to these is provided below. Affidavit Paragraph # Information 6 Contrary to Chan Van Vo's claim that he contacted D M Dasburg regarding the steam generator feedwater pump piping, Dasburg has no recollection of ever being contacted by Chan Van Vo regarding concerns he had with l this piping installation. 9 Alex Fuller has no recollection of ever being contacted by Chan Van Vo regarding concerns he had with the steam generator feedwater pump piping installation. Fuller has no recollection of receiving a speed letter or throwing a speed letter in the trash can. Fuller acknowledges that he may have been contacted on the item and, if so, would have in turn contacted the A l+0 16

s responsible. piping engineer,' who would likely have confimed that they were aware of the situation regarding the installation of this piping and had it under control. Having received this feedback, he would likely have discarded any information he had received such as a speed letter. Again, he has no recollection of being contacted at all by Chan Van Vo, either verbally or by speed letter regarding steam generator feedwater pump piping installation. 9 Chan Van Vo refers to his concern with steam generator feedwater pump piping as a safety deficiency. CP&L engineering should be able to confirm that neither the piping nor the pump are safety related items at SHNPP. 9 Chan Van Vo alleges that speed letters are utilized in place of prescribed quality assurance documentation. There is no information to support this allegation. R M Parsons and others interviewed confirmed that speed letters are used to transmit infomation from one party to another, and occasionally the infomation contained on the speed letter is converted to a nonconformance if-deemed appropriate. The speed letter itself is not considered sufficient documentation for nonconfomances and is not used for that. s Ai+o 17 j

4 e o 19 Fuller denies ever calling Chan Van Vo a liar as alleged. Fuller confirmed that another engineer in his group was assigned to research the concern with PO-21022, that documentation associated with this P0 (Purchase Order) was found, and there was no residual safety problem. The particular PO had been used in a manner different from a normal P0 which did make the information in question difficult to find. This was one of the PO numbers provided to Dr. Elleman and was addressed in Review Panel Concern C-23. 21 Based on conversation with Ed Willett, Willett's memo of July 29, 1983 was stimulated by input received from INP0 (Institute of Nuclear Power Operations) and not by input received by Chan Van Vo. Willett, in fact, did not receive information from Chan Van Vo as a result of his QA ' surveillance activity, and the memo was unrelated to information eminating from the QA surveillance in which Chan Van Vo was involved. t l e AMo 18 .-}}