Text

Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors and Other Facilities 1985.Eighteenth Annual Report
	ML20151S619
Person / Time
Issue date:	04/30/1988
From:	Brooks B; NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
To:	;
References
	NUREG-0713, NUREG-0713-V07, NUREG-713, NUREG-713-V7, NUDOCS 8804280390
	Download: ML20151S619 (168)
	v • d • e

.

NUREG-0713 Vol. 7 4

Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors

^

And Other Facilities 1985 Eighteenth Annual Report s

l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory f

Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research B.G. Brooks p"' coq

~

PDR R

f 0713 R PDR t

Y j

i 4s NOTICE Availab;iity of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications Most documents cited in N RC publications will be available from one of the following sources:

1. The NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington DC 20555

2. The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Post Office Box 37082, Washington, DC 20013 7082

3. The National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited in NRC publications, it is not intended to be exhaustive.

Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public Docu-ment Room include NRC correspondence and internal NRC memoranda; NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement bulletins, circulars, information notices, inspection and investigation notices; Licen:ea Event Reports; vendor reports and correspondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensee documents and corrcapondence.

The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the GPO Sales Program: formal NRC stoff a' contractor reports, NRC-sponsored conference proceedings, and NRC booklets and brochures.,uso available are Regulatory Guides, NRC regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances.

Documents available from the National Technical information Service include NUREG series reports and technical repons prepared by other federal agencies and reports prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission, forerunner agency to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Documents available from public and special technical libraries include all open literature items, such as books, journal and periodical articles, and transactions. Federal Register notices, federal and state legislation, and congressional reports can usually be obtained from these libraries.

Documents such as theses, dissertations, foreign reports and translations, and non NRC conference proceedings are available for purchase from the organization sponsoring the publication cited.

Single copies of NRC draf t reports are available free, to the extent of supply, upon written request to the Division of information Support Services, Distribution Section, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington, DC 20555.

Cooies of industry codes and standards used in a substantive manner in the NRC regulatory process are maintained at the NRC Library, 7920 Norfolk Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland, and are available there for reference use by the public. Codes and standards are usually copyrighted and may be purchased from the originating organization or, if they are American National Standards, from the American National Standards Institute,1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018.

NUREG 0713 Vol. 7 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors And Other Facilities 1985 l

1 Eighteenth Annual Report ateYu she Ar 1 B.G. Brooks Division of Regulatory Applications l

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

,s "m.,,

l

PREVIOUS REPORTS IN SERIES WASH 1311 A Compilation of Occupa*lonal Radiation Exposure from Light Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, 1969 1973. U.S. Atoele Energy Commission, May 1974.

at Liiht Water Cooled Power Reactors, 1969 1974, U.S.

NUREG 75/032 Occupational Radiation Exposure t

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 1975 NUREG 0109 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Light Water Cooled Power Reactors, 1969 1975 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, August 1976.

NUREG 0323 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Light Water Cooled Power Reactors, 1969 1976, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Comission, March 1978.

NUREG 0482 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Light Water Cooled Power Reactors,1977 U.$.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 1979.

WREG 0594 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Cosmercial Nuclear Power Reactors,1978 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, November 1979.

NUREG 0713 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Comercial Nuclear Power Reactors 1979. Vol.

1.

U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Comission, March 1981.

NUREG 0713 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Comercial Nuclear Power Reactors 1980. Vol. 2 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission December 1981.

NUREG 0713 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Connercial Nuclear Power Reactors 1981. Vol. 3 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission November 1982.

NUREG 0713 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Connercial Nuclear Power Reactors 1982 Vol. 4 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Decemhr 1983.

NUREG 0713 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors 1983, Vol. 5 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Coanission, March 1985.

NUREG 0713 Occupational Radiation Exposure At Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors and Other Facilities 1984 Vol. 6 U.$. Nuclear Regulatory Comission. October 1986.

Previous reports in the NUREG 0714 series, which will are now crmbined with NUREG 0713 are as follows:

WASH 1350 R1 First through Sixth Annual Reports of the Operation of the U.S. ALC's Centralized lontaing through Radiation Exposure Records and Reporting System U.S. Atomic Energy Comission.

WASH 1350 R6

1974, NUREG 75/108 Seventh Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Report for Certain NRC Licensee $

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission, October 1975.

NUREG 0119 Eighth Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Report for 1975, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, October 1976.

NUREG 0322 Ninth Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Report for 1976.

U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Comission, October 1977.

WREG 0463 Tenth Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Report for 1977, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Connission October 1978.

WREG 0593 Eleventh Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Report for 1978, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Coastssion, January 1981.

NUREG 0714 Twelfth Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Report for 1979 Vol.

1, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Coenission, August 1982.

WREG 0714 Occupational Radiation Exposure. Thirteenth and Fourteenth Annual Reports, 1980 and 1981.

Vols. 2 and 3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission. October 1983.

NUREG 0714 Occupational Radiation Exposure, Fifteenth and Stateenth Annual Reports, 1982 and 1983.

Vols. 4 and 5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, October 1985.

ABSTRACT This report summarizes the occupational exposure data that are maintained in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Radiation Exposure Information and Reporting System (REIRS). The bulk of the information contained in the report was extracted from the 1985 annual statistical reports submitted by six of the seven categories

of NRC licensees subject to the reporting requirements of 10 CFR I 20.407. Since there are no geologic repositories for high level waste currently licensed, only six categories will be considered in this report. These Jix categories of licensees also submit personal identification and exposure information for terminating employees pursuant to 10 CFR l 20.408, and s me analysis of this "termination" data is also presented in this report.

Annual reports for 1985 were received from a total of 480 NRC licensees, 93 of whom were licensed nucitar power reactors. Compilations of the 480 reports indicated that some 215,800 individuals were monitored, 113,300 of whom received a measurable dose (Table 3.2). The collective dose incurred by these individuals was calculated to be 47,500 person-rems (porson-cSv)**

which represents a decrease of 20% from the 1984 value. Since the number of workers receiving a measurable dose remained about the same, the average measurable dose decreased from 0.55 rem (cSv) to 0.43 rem (cSv). About 13%

of the monitored individuals were found to have received doses greater than 0.50 rem (cSv), down from the approximately 20% found for the previous fuur years.

The number of individuals receiving doses greater than five rems (c3v) also continued to decrease.

Some 290,000 termination reports (Table 5.1) were a bmitted to the NRC which contained personal identification and exposure information for about 77,250 individuals who had completed their work assignment or employment with a covered category of NRC licensees during 1984. This number is approximately the same as reported for 1982 and 1983. Due to such a large number of

records, the termination data for 1985 is not yet available. It should be noted that the data presented herein are revised from last year's report as additional termination data for 1983 and 1984 have now been entered into REIRS.

The total number of monitored individuals for whom personal identification and exposure information has been incorporated into REIRS during the 17 years that it has been operating is now about 390,000, more than 300,000 of whom terminated from nuclear power facilities.

Analyses of these termination data indicate that about 7,400 individuals completed work assignments at two or more nuclear reactor facilities during calendar year 1984 and received a') average dose of 1.05 rems (cSv).

Approximately 3,000 of these individuals worked at two or more reactor facilities during one calendar quarter and received an average dose of 0.34 rem (cSv).

Commercial nuclear power reactors; industrial radiographers; fuci processors, fabricators, and reprocessers; manufacturers and distributors of byproduct material; independent spent fuel storage I

installations; facilities for land disposal of low level waste; and I

geologic repositories for high-level waste.

l In the International System of Units the sievert (SV) is the name given to the units for dose equivalent. Onecentisievert(cSv) equals one l

rem; therefore, person-rem becomes person-cSv.

iii

i i

EDITOR'S NOTE l

In the fall of 1987, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) was selected to assist the NRC Staff in the preparation of the NUREG-0713 series.

In the months and years ahead, SAIC-will be suggesting periodic changes in the presentation of certain data by

.the NRC in these reports. Readers should be alert to these

changes, and the NRC welcomes responses, especially where these changes can be improved upon.

Comments should be directed to B. G. Brooks, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S.

Nuclcar Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555 (301)492-3738.

I 1

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS PELT EDITOR'S N0TE.....................................................

iv ABSTRACT..........................................................

iii PREFACE...........................................................

ix 1

INTRODUCTION...................................................

1-1 2 LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA........................................

2-1 3 ANNUAL PERSONNEL MONITORING REPORTS - 10 CFR I 20.407..........

3-1 3.1 Definition of Terms and Sources of Data................

3-1 3.1.1 Stati stical Summary Reports........................

3-1 3.1.2 Number of Monitored Individual s....................

3-1 3.1.3 Number of Workers with Measurable Doses............

3-1 3.1.4 Collective Dose....................................

3-1 3.1.5 Average Indi vidual Dose............................

3-2 3.1.6 Average Measurable Dose............................

3-2 3.1.7 Number of Licensees Reporting......................

3-2 3.1.8 CR.................................................

3-2 3.2 Annual Whole Body Dose Di stributions...................

3-4 3.3 Summary of Occupational Exposure Data By License Category...............................................

3-4 3.3.1 Industriol Radiography Licenses, Single and Mul ti pl e Locati on s.............................

3-4 3.3.2 Manufacturer and Distributor Licenses, Broad and 0ther..........................................

3-9 3.3.3 Low-Level Waste Di sposal Licenses..................

3-10 3.3.4 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Licenses...........................................

3-12 3.3.5 Fuel Fabrication and Reprocessing Licenses.........

3-13 3.3.6 Light Water-Cooled Power Reactor (LWRs) Licenses...

3-17 3.3.7 High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Power Reactor (HTGR)

Licenses...........................................

3-19 4 COMMERCIAL LIGHT WATER REACTORS - FURTHER ANALYSIS.............

4-1 4.1 Introduction...........................................

4-1 4.2 Definitions of Terms and Sources of Data...............

4-1 4.2.1 Number of Reactors.................................

4-1 1

4.2.2 Electric Energy Generated..........................

4-1 4.2.3 Collective Dose per Megawatt-Year..................

4-1 4.2.4 Average Rated Capacity.............................

4-5 4.3 Annual Whole Body Dose Di stributions...................

4-5 v

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

P.191 4.4 Average Annual Whole Body Doses........................

4-5 4.5 Plant Rankings by Collective Dose per Reactor..........

4-11 4.6 Collective Dose by Work Function and Employee Type.....

4-16 4.7 Health Implications of Average Annual Doses............

4-22 5 TERMINATION DATA SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO 10 CFR i 20.408.........

5-1 5.1 Termination Reports, 1969-1984.........................

5-1 5.2 Limitations of Termination Data........................

5-1 5.3 Transient Workers per Calendar Quarter.................

5-3 5.4 Transient Workers per Calendar Year at Nuclear Power Facilities.......................................

5-3 5.5 Temporary Workers per Calendar Year at Nuclear Power Facilities.......................................

5-9 6 PERSONNEL OVEREXPOSURES - 10 CFR 8,20.403 and 10 CFR $ 20.405..

6-1 6.1 Control Levels.........................................

6-1 6.2 Summary of 0verexposures...............................

6-1 REFERENCES........................................................

7-1 APPENDIX A - ALPHABETICAL LISTING 0F ANNUAL EXPOSURE DATA COMPILED FOR CERTAIN NRC LICENSEES, 1985......................

A-1 APPENDIX B - ANNUAL WHOLE BODY DOSES AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES, 1985.....................................

B-1 APPENDIX C - PERSONNEL, DOSE, AND POWER GENERATION

SUMMARY

1969-1985............................................

C-1 APPENDIX D - NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND COLLECTIVE DOSE BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION, 1985...............,...................

D-1 APPENDIX E -

SUMMARY

OF ANNUAL WHOLE BODY DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS BY YEAR AND REACTOR TYPE, 1981-1985.....................

E-1 LIST OF TPt.ES Table Table 3.1 Annual Exposure Data for Certain Categories of Licensees, 1976-1985.................................

3-3 Table 3.2 Distribution of Annual Whole Body Doses by License

Category, 1985.......................................

3-5 Tabie 3.3 Summary of Annual Dose Distributions for Certain NRC Licensees, 1968-1985.................................

3-6 vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Table Pace Table 3.4 Annual Exposure Information for Industrial Radiographers, 1983-1985............................

3-7 l

Table 3.5 Annual Exposure Information for Manufacturers and Distributors, 1983-1985..............................

3-12 Table 3.6 Annual Exposure Information for Fuel Fabricators, 1983-1985............................................

3-15 Table 3.7 Annual Exposure Information for Fort St. Vrain, 1974-1985............................................

3-19 Table 4.1 Sumary of Annual Information Reported by Commercial

(

Boiling Water Reactors, 1973-1985....................

4-2 Table 4.2 Summary of Annual Information Reported by Commercial Pressurized Water Reactors, 1973-1985................

4-3 Table 4.3 Sumary of Annual Information Reported by Commercial Light Water Cooled Reactors, 1973-1985...............

4-4 Table 4.4 Sumary Distribution of Annual Whole Body Doses at Commercial Light Water Reactors, 1973-1985...........

4-6 Tabla 4.5 Boiling Water Reactors Listed in Ascending Order of Collective Dose per Reactor, 1981-1985...............

4-12 Table 4.6 Pressurized Water Reactors Listed in Ascending Order of Collective Dose per Reactor, 1981-1985............

4-13 Table 4.7a Five-year Totals and Averages Listed in Ascending Order of Collective Dose per BWR, 1981-1985..........

4-14 Table 4.7b Five-year Totals and Averages Listed in Ascending Order of Collective Dose per PWR, 1981-1985..........

4-15 Table 4.8 Annual Collective Dose by Work Function and Personnel

Type, 1985..........................................

4-18 Table 4.9 Percentages of Annual Collective Dose at LWRs by Work

Functien, 1975-1985.................................

4-19 Table 4.10 Annual Collective Dose by Occupation and Personnel

Type, 1985..........................................

4-20 Table 5.1 Termination Reports Submitted to the NRC, 1969-1984....

5-2 Table 5.2 Transient Workers per Calendar Quarter, 1973-1984......

5-4 vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Table P_agg Table 5.3 Transient Workers per Calendar Year at Nuclear Power Facilities, 1977-1984................................

5-5 Table 5.4a Reported and Corrected Dose Distributions of Transient Workers per Calendar Year at Power Reactors.

5-7 Table 5.4b Effects of Transient Workers on Annual Statistical Compilations........................................

5-8 Table 5.5 Annual Whole Body Doses Exceeding Five Rems at Nuclear Power Faclilities...................................

5-9 Table 5.6 Temporary Workers per Calendar Year at Nuclear Power Facilities..........................................

5-10 Table 6.1 Personnel Overexposures to External Radiation 1978-1985............................................

6-2 LIST OF FIGURES Fioures Figure 3.1 Annual Dose Distributions of Workers at Industrial Radiography Facilities, 1982-1985...................

3-8 Figure 3.2 Annual Dose Distributions of Workers at Manufacturing and Distribution Facilities, 1982-1985..............

3-11 Figure 3.3 Annual Dose Distributions of Workers at Low-level Waste Disposal Facilities and at an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility, 1982-1985..............

3-14 Figure 3.4 Annual Dose Distributions of Workers at Fuel Fabricators and Processors, 1982-1985...............

3-16 Figure 3.5 Annual Dose Distributions of Workers at Light Water Reactor Facilities, 1983 and 1985...................

3-18 Figure 4.1 Average Collective Dose and Number of Workers per

Reactor, 1973-1985..................................

4-7 Figure 4.2 Annual Values at BWRs and PWRs, 1973-1985.............

4-8 Figure 4.3 Average Annual Values at LWRs, 1973-1985..............

4-9 Figure 4.4 Average, Median and Extreme Values of the Collective Dose per Reactor, 1973-1985.........................

4-10 Figure 4.5 Collective Dose by Work Function and Personnel Type at BWRs and PWRs, 1979-1985............................

4-21 viii

PREFACE A number of HRC Licensees have inquired as to how occupational radiation exposure data (from reports required by the NRC) are used by the NRC staff.

This is a very appropriate inquiry that may be of importance to many I

affected licensees. In combination with other sources of information, the principal uses of the data are to provide facts regarding routine occupational exposures to radiation and radioactive material that occur in I

I connection with certain NRC-licensed activities, including individual and collective radiation doses from external sources as well as pertinent information on the inhalation of radioactive material (nuclides involved, bioassay results, exposure magnitude, etc.). These facts are used by the NRC staff as indicated below:

1.

The data permit evaluation, from the viewpoint of trends, of the effectiveness of the overall NRC/ licensee radiation piotection and ALARA efforts by certain licensees.

They al so provide for the identification (and subsequent correction) of unfavorable trends.

2.

The external dose data assist in the evaluation of the radiological risk associated with certain categories of NRC-licensed activities ana are used for comparative analyses of radiation protection performance:

US/ foreign, BWRs/PWRs, civilian / military, plant / plant, nuclear industry /other industries, etc.

3.

The data provide for governmental monitoring of the potential transient-worker problem.

4.

The data help provide facts for evaluating the adequacy of the current risk limitation system (e.g., are individual lifetime dose limits, worker population collective dose limits, and requirements for optimization needed?).

5.

The data permit comparisons of occupational radiation risks with potential public risks when action for additional protection of the public involves worker exposures.

6.

The data are used in the establishment of priorities for the utilization of NRC health physics resources:

research, standards development, and regulatory program development.

7.

The data are considered in reviews of inspection frequencies that are programmed for various categories of licensees and may influence licensing actions.

8.

The data provide facts for answering Congressional and Administration inquiries and for responding to questions raised by public interest groups, special interest groups, labor unions, etc.

9.

The data provide information that may be used in the planning of epidemiological studies.

With regard to routine workplace conditions, the annual statistical summary reports required by i 20.407, the termination reports required by i 20.408, ix

and the annual dose data reported by work furiction in accordance with Subsection 6.9.1.5 of the standard technical specifications for nuclear power plants provide the only centralized data base available to assist the staff in the performance of its duties as listed above.

It is to everyone's advantage if these duties are performed by a well-informed staff in the light of factual information.

w s

Robert E. Alexander, Chief Radiation Protection and Health Effects Branch X

Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors and Other Facilities Eighteenth Annual Report,1985 1

INTRODUCTION One of the basic purposes of the Atomic Energy Act and the implementing regulations in Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I, Part 20, is to protect the health and safety of the public, including the employees of the licensees conducting operations under those regulations.

Among the regulations designed to ensure that the standards for protection against I

radiation set out in 10 CFR Part 20 are met, is a requirement that licensees provide individuals likely to be exposed to radiation with devices to monitor their exposure.

Each licensee is also required to maintain indefinitely records of the results of such monitoring. However, there was no initial provision that these records or any summary of them be transmitted to a central location where the data could be retrieved and analyzed.

On November 4, 1968, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) published an amendment to Part 20 requiring the reporting of certain occupational radiation exposure information to a central repository at AEC Headquarters.

This information was required of the four categories

of AEC licensees that were considered to involve the greatest potential for significant occupational doses and of AEC facilities and contractors exempt from licensing. A procedure was established whereby the appropriate occupational exposure data were extracted from these reports and entered into the Commission's Radiation Exposure Information Reporting System (REIRS),

a computer system maintained at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Computer Technology Center in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The computerization of these data ensured that they would be kept indefinitely and facilitated their retrieval and analysis. The data maintained in REIRS have been summarized and published in a report every year since 1969. Annual reports for each of the years 1969 through 1973 presented the data reported by both AEC licensees and contractors and were published in six documents designated as WASH-1350-R1 through WASH-1350-R6.

In January 1975, with the separation of the AEC into the Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC),

each agency assumed responsibility for collecting and maintaining occupational radiation exposure information reported by the facilities under its jurisdiction.

The annual reports published by the NRC on occupational exposure for calendar year 1974 and subsequent years do not contain information pertaining to ERDA facilities or contractors.

Comparable information for facilities and contractors under ERDA, now the Department of Energy (D0E), is collected and published by DOE's Division of Operational Safety at Germantown, Maryland.

Commercial nuclear power reactors; industrial radiographers; fuel processors, fabricators, and reprocessors; manufacturers and distributors of specified quantities of byproduct material.

1-1

In 1982 and 1983, paragraph 20.408(a) was amended to require three additional categories of NRC licensees to submit annual statistical exposure reports and individual termination exposure reports.

The new categories are (1) geologic repositories for high-level radioactive waste, (2) independent spent fuel storage installations, and (3) facilities for the land disposal of low-level radioactive waste. Therefore, this document presents the exposure information that was reported by NRC licensees representing two of these new categories.

(There are no geologic repositories for high-level waste currently licensed.)

This report and each of the predecessors summarizes information reported during previous years.. However, more licensee-specific data, such as the annual reports submitted by each commercial power reactor pursuant to 10 CFR I 20.407 and their technical specifications, may be found in those documents listed on the inside of the front cover of this report.

Additional operating data and statistics for each power reactor for the years 1973 through 1982 may be found in a series of reports, "Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience" (Refs.

1-9].

These documents are available for viewing at all NRC public document rooms, or they may be purchased from the National Technical Information Services, as shown in the Reference section.

I i

1-2

2 LIMITATIONS OF THE DATA All of the figures compiled in this report relating to exposures and doses are based on the results and interpretations of the readings of various types of personnel monitoring devices employed by each licensee.

This information obtained from routine personnel monitoring programs is sufficient to characterize t'1e radiation environment in which individuals work and is used in evaluating the radiation protection program.

Monitoring requirements are based, in general, on 10 CFR I 20.202, which requires licensees to monitor individuals who receive or are likely to receive a dose in any calendar quarter in excess of 25% of the applicable quarterly limits.

For most adults the quarterly limit for the whole body is 1.25 rems (cSv), so 0.312 rem (cSv) per quarter is the level above which monitoring is required.

Depending on the administrative policy of each licensee, persons such as visitors and clerical workers may also be provided with monitoring devices for identification or convenience, although the probability of their being exposed to measurable levels of radiation is extremely small.

Licensees are given the option of reporting the dose distribution of only those individuals for whom monitoring is required, or the dose distribution of all those for whom monitoring is provided.

Many l

licensees elect to report the latter; howevsr, this may increase the number of individuals that one could consider to be radiation workers.

In an effort to account for this, the number of individuals reported as having "no measurable exposure" has been subtracted from the total number of individuais monitored in order to calculate an average dose per individual receiving a measurable dose, as well as the average dose per monitored in.dividual.

One source of error that is present in the calculation of the annual collective dose (i.e., the summation of each monitored person's whole body dose) incurred by workers is the assumption that the midpoint of the dose I

range is the mean dose of the individuals reported in each dose range.

This allows the collective dose to be calculated without knowing each person's actual annual dose.

Past experience has shown that the actual mean dose of the individuals reported in each range is usually less than the midpoint.

Thus, the collective doses presented for categories of licenses shown in this report may be 10% higher than the sum of the actual individual doses.

However, nearly half of the nuclear power reactors reported the actual collective dose so the figure shown for this category is more accurate.

The average dose per individual, as well as the dose distributions shown for groups of licensees, also could have been affected by the multiple reporting of individuals who were monitored by two or more licensees during the year.

Since individuals are not identified in the annual reports, an individual t

who was monitored by five different licensees would have been counted once on each repcrt. Therefore, when the data were summed to determine the total number of individuals monitored by a group of licensees, this person would be counted as five individuals rather than as one.

This could also affect the distribution of doses because the individual has been counted five times in the lower dose ranges rather than one time in the higher range in which his actual accumulated dose (the sum of his doses incurred at each facility) would have placed him. This source of error has the greatest potential impact on the data reported by power reactor facilities since they employ 2-1

many short-term workers.

Further discussion of this point is provided in Section 5.

Another fact that should be kept in mind when examining the annual statistical data is that all of the personnel included in the report may not have been monitored throughout the entire year.

Many licensees such as radiography firms and nuclear power facilities may monitor numerous individuals for periods much less than a year.

The average doses calculated from these data, therefore, are less than the average dose that an individual would receive if he were involved in that activity for the full year.

Also, it should be again pointed out that this report contains information reported by NRC licensees only. Since the NRC licenses all commercial nuclear power reactors, fuel processors, fabricators and reprocessors, and independent spent fuel storage facilities, information shown for these categories reflects the U.S. experience.

This is not the case, however, for the remaining categories of industrial radiography, manufacturing and distribution of specified quantities of byproduct material, and low-level waste disposal.

Companies that conduct these types of activities in Agreement States

are licensed by the state and are not required to submit occupational exposure reports to the NRC.

Therefore, information shown for these categories does not reflect the total U.S. experience.

States that have entered into an agreement with the NRC that allows each state to license organizations using radioactive materials for certain purposes.

There are now 29 Agreement States.

2-2

3 ANNVAL PERSONNEL MONITORING' REPORTS - 10 CFR I 20.407 3.1 Definition of Terms and Sources of Data 3.1.1 Statistical Summary Reports On February 4,

1974, 10 CFR I 20.407 was amended to require certain categories

of licensees to submit an annual statistical report indicating the distribution of the whole body doses incurred by individuals whom 'they monitored for exposure to radiation. Table 3.2 chows the dose ranges specified by 10 CFR I 20.407(b) among which the doses are distributed.

In prior years, the annual report was formatted differently and was not very useful as a basis for estimating the collective dose.

3.1.2 Number of Monitored Individuals This is the total number of individuals that the NRC licensees covered by 10 CFR i 20.407 reported as being monitored for exposure to external radiation during the year.

This number must include all individuals for whom monitoring is required, and may include visitors, service representatives, contract workers, clerical workers and any other individuals for whom the licensee feels that monitoring devices should be provided. Most licensees submit the dose distribution of the total number of persons for whom monitoring was provided in their annual i 20.407 reports, but a few report only those for whom monitoring was required.

3.1.3 Number of Workers with Measurable Doses The number of workers with measurable doses is obtained from the annual dose distribution reports submitted by NRC licensees pursuant to 10 CFR i 20.407 by subtracting the number of individuals having less than measurable doses from the total number of monitored individuals. This figure is used to calculate an individual's average measurable dose because it deletes those individuals who received exposures too small to be detected by personnel monitoring devices, many of whom probably did not routinely work in radiation areas (and were monitored for convenience or for identification purposes).

3.1.4 Collective Dose The concept of collective dose is used in this report to denote the summation of the whole body external dose received by each monitored individual and has the units person-rems (person-cSv)**.

The collective dose is not usually provided in the annual dose distribution reports Commercial nuclear power reactors; industrial radiographers; fuel l

processors, fabricators and reprocessors; manufacturers and distributors of byproduct material; independent spent fuel storage r

installations; and facilities for land disposal of low-level radioactive waste.

In the International Systems of Units, the sievert (Sv) is the name given to the units for dose equivalent. One centisievert (cSv) equals l

one rem; therefore person-rem becomes person-cSv.

3-1

submittec pursuant to 10 CFR i 20.407, but NRC staff calculated it from the reports by summing the products obtained by multiplying the number of individuals reported in each of the dose ranges (shown in Table 1) by the midpoint of the corresponding range. This assumes that the midpoint of the range is equal to the arithmetic mean of the individual doses in the range.

Past experience has shown that the actual mean dose of individuals reported in each dose range is less than the midpoint of the range, and the collective doses shown in this report for these may be about 10% too high.

In 1981, a few power reactor licensees began reporting the actual collective dose (as determined from official personnel dosimetry results) on the i

20.407 annual reports, and the NRC staff used these doses when provided, instead of the above-described calculations.

The staff would prefer to use the actual collective dose and encourages more licensees to make it available.

3.1.5 Average Individual Dose The average individual dose is obtained by dividing the collective dose by the total number of individuals reported as being monitored.

This figure is usually less than the average measurable dose because it includes the number of those individuals who received zero or less than measurable doses.

3.1.6 Average Measurable Dose The average measurable dose is obtained by dividing the collective dose by the number of workers that received a measurable dose.

This is the average most commonly used in this and other reports when examining trends and comparing doses received by workers in various segments of the nuclear industry because it reflects the deletion of those individuals receiving zero or minimal doses, many of whom were monitored by convenience.

3.1.7 Number of Licensees Reporting This is the number of NRC licenses issued to companies to use radioactive material for certain activities that would place them in one of the six categories that are required to report pursuant to 10 CFR i 20.407.

The third column in Table 3.1 shows the number of licensees that have filed such reports during the last several years.

State licensees do not submit such reports to the NRC.

3.1.8 CR One of the parameters that the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) recommends be calculated for occupational dose distributions to aid in the comparison of exposure data is a ratio "CR."

CR is defined to be the ratio of the annual collective dose incurred by individuals whose annual doses exceed 1.5 rems to the total annual collective dose. One UNSCEAR report (Ref. 10] states that normal values of CR should be t'etween 0.05 and 0.50.

This means that, usually, no more than 50% of the collective dose should be due to individuai doses that exceed 1.5 rems.

The last column in Table 3.1 shows the values of CR for the different types of licensees; one can see that CR is close to 0.50 for three of the categories and is much less than 0.50 for the remaining three categories for 1985. It should be noted that 1985 is the first year the CR 3-2

TABLE 3,1 ANNUAL EXPOSURE DATA FOR CERTAIN CATEGORIES OF LICENSEES 1976-1985 We ber of Cottoctive Avera9e Workers Dose Average Measurable tw ber of kaber With (persore trdividual Dose per License Cat erder Licensees of Monitored Meesurable reus or Dose (rams Worker (rass cat +w. c year eeoort t re t rdivicLa t s Dosee merson-esv) or esv) or esv) ce*

Ird2strist 1985 340 8,476 5,550 2,374 0.28 0.43 0.45 Radiogragby 1984 361 8,458 5,446 2,490 0.30 0.46 0.46 1983 340 8,624 5,131 2,384 0.28 0.46 0.45 1982 353 9,235 6,160 2,998 0.32 0.49 0.46 1981 266 9,938 5,486 2,652 0.27 0.48 0.48 1980 292 11,102 6,556 2,979 0.27 0.45 0.45 1979 341 11, % 9 6,904 3,461 0.29 0.50 0.47 1978 337 13,093 6,685 2,950 0.23 0.44 0.43 1977

.339 10,569 6,197 3,159 0.30 0.51 0.45 1976 321 11.245 6.222 3.629 0.32 0.58 0.51 starufacturing 1985 33 3,958 2,250 755 0.19 0.34 0.50 ard 1966 40 5,076 1,977 671 0.13 0.34 0.46 DistritxJtion 1983 33 5,051 2,003 824 0.16 0.41 0.54 1982 34 5,453 2,199 890 0.16 0.40 0.51 1981 29 4,846 2,395 904 0.19 0.38 0.52 1980 29 5,119 2,460 1,033 0.20 0.42 0.61 1979 28 3,937 2,219 888 0.23 0.40 0.55 1978 27 3,973 1,886 851 0.21 0.45 0.61 1977 30 4,243 2,459 1,329 0.31 0.54 0.63 1976 24 3.501 1.976 1.226 0.35 0.62 0.67 Lcw tevel 1985 2

1,240 252 70 0.06 0.28 0.24 Waste 1984 2

925 297 72 0.08 0.24 0.16 Disposat 1983 1

612 358 71 0.12 0.20 0.14 1982 1

M0 251 53 0.08 0.21 0.20 Indeperdent 1985 1

32 32 34 1.06 1.06 0.51 spent Fuel 1984 1

12 32 13 0.41 0.41 0.06 stora9e 1983 1

33 27 8

0.24 0.30 0.00 19*2 1

15 32 9

0.26 0.28 0.00 Fuel 1985 11 7,987 4,701 617 0.(2 0.13 0.05 retricat ion 1984 14 9,488 5,772 818 0.09 0.14 0.04 and 1983 15 9,023 5.013 835 0.09 0.17 0.19 Processing 1982 16 9,808 5,433 831 0.08 0.15 0.20 1981 18 10,552 5,942 940 0.09 0.16 0.09 1980 18 10,204 5,900 1,111 0.11 0.19 0.12 1979 21 9,946 5,365 1,268 0.13 0.24 0.16 1978 20 11,305 6,100 1,525 0.13 0.25 0.24 1977 21 11,496 7,004 1,725 0.15 0.25 0.34 1976 24 11.227 5.285 1.830 0.16 0.35 0.41 cc e ercist 1985 93 191,132 97,978 43.624 0.23 0.44 0.44 Light Water 1984 88 169,242 "

94,996**

55,353 0.32 0.58 0.55 R eactors"*

1983 80 139,885 "

83,546**

56,758 0.41 0.68 0.60 1982 79 127,904 "

do.871" 52,227 0.41 0.65 0.57 1981 73 123,978 "

80,664 " 54,271 0.44 0.67 0.58 1r,60 70 124,250 "

77,903 " 53,810 0.43 0.69 0.59 1979 69 99,463 "

62,316 "

39,759 0.40 0.64 0.57 1978 68 72,448 "

45,474 " 31,910 0.44 0.70 0.61 1977 65 67,130 "

42,867 " 32,731 0.49 0.76 0.64 1976 62 M.800 36.715 26.555 0.40 0.72 0.62 crard totals 1965 480 212,825 110,763 47,474 0.22 0.43 0.44 and Averages 1984 506 193,221 "

108,520 " $9,421 0.31 0.55 0.54 1983 4 70 163,238**

%,878" 60,880 0.37 0.63 0.59 1982 482 153,118**

94,946 " 57,008 0.37 0.60 0.56 1981 385 149,314 "

94,490**

58,767 0.39 0.62 0.56 1980 410 150,675**

92,819 " 58,933 0.39 0.63 0.57 1979 459 125,316 "

76,804**

45,376 0.36 0.59 0.55 1978 453 100,819 "

60,145**

37,236 0.37 0.62 0.59 1977 455 93,438**

58,527**

18,944 0.42 0.67 0.62 1976 428 92.773 50.19e 33.240 0.36 0.66 0.60

These categories consist ety of hec ticeesees. Agreesent states licerse organisaticris cordzting frdJstrial radiograsby, auriuf acturf rg ard distribution, ard low level waste disposat in those states do not report ocessetional espostre data to the hec.

CR is the retto of the arruel collective cbse delivered at arrual doses exceeding 1.5 raw to the total arruel collective cbse. (see section 3.1)

- These figures are adjusted to accomt f or the suttiple comtire of transient reactor workers (see section 5).

l

- - Irctudes att LWes that reported, although all of thee may ret have been in comercial operation for a futt year, ord escltades the gas cooled reactor.

3-3

for commercial LWRs (and the grand total for all licensees) has dropped below 0.50.

3.2 Annual Whole Body Dose Distributions Table 3.2 is a compilation of the statistical summary reports currently being submitted by six categories of licensees. In nearly every category some 40%-70% of the doses are less than measurable.

About 90% of the reported individuals continue to be monitored by nuclear power facilities where they receive atjut 90% of the total collective dose.

It should be pointed out that annual exposures that exceed five rems (cSv) are not necessarily classified as personnel overexposures.

Although 1.25 rems (cSv) is the quarterly limit set forth in paragraph (a) of 10 CFR i

20.101, paragraph (b) permits licensees, under certain conditions, to allow a worker to receive a whole body dose of three rems (cSv) per calendar quarter (up to 12 rems (cSv) annually.) The conditions are that the licensee must have determined and recorded the worker's prior accumulated occupational dose to the whole body and that the worker's whole body dose when added to his accumulated occupational dose does not exceed 5(N 18) rems (cSv), where N equals the individual's age in years. Although there is no annual limit, annual exposures that exceed 12 rems (cSv) indicate that an over exposure has occurred.

Any quarterly exposare in excess of the applicable quarterly limits must be reported. A discussion of various types of occurrences in which the limits have been exceedt;d is given in Section 6.

A summary of the annual whole body exposures reported to the Commission by certain categories of NRC Licensees required to s;bmit reports pursuant to 10 CFR i 20.407 is presented in Table 3.3, which shows that about 95% of the exposures have consistently remained less than two rems (cSv) since 1967.

The number of individuals receiving an annual exposure in excess of five rems (cSv) has declined to remain at about one-tenth of one percent of the total number of individuals monitored each year for the period 1982 through 1984, and in 1985 this figure dropped to less than 0.01%.

3.3 Sumnary of Occupational Exposure Data by License Category 3.3.1 Industrial Radiography Licenses, Single and Multiple Locations These licenses are issued to allow the use of sealed radioactive materials, usually in exposure devices or "cameras," that primarily emit gamma rays for nondestructive testing of pipeline weld joints, steel structures,

boilers, air craft and ship parts, and other high-stress alloy parts.

Some firms are licensed to conduct such activities in one location, usually in a permanent facility which was designed and shielded for radiography, and others perform radiography at multiple, temporary sites in the field.

The radioisotopes most commonly used are cobalt-60 and iridium-192. As shown in Table.

3.1, annual reports were received for 340 radiography licensees in 1985, which is about the same number as reported since 1982.

Table 3.4 summarizes the reported data for the two types of radiography licenses for 1985 and for the previous two years for comparison purposes.

The table shows that the number of workers receiving measurable doses (635) decreased by about 9%, while the collective dose (124) of workers at the 3-4

TABLE 3.2 DISTRIBUTION OF ANNUAL WHOLE B00Y DOSES BY LICENSE CATEGORY 1985 TOTAL TOTAL IReeER COLLECTIVE Ntaber of Individants with Whole Body Domes in the Ranges (rems or cSv)*

NtM9ER UlTN Dose LICENSE CATEGORY No Meas-Meas.

0.10-0.25- 0.50- 0.75-1.00-2.00- 3.00- 4.00- 5.00- 6.00-7.00- 8.00- 9.00-MON!-

MEAS.

(PERSON-urable <0.10 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 12.00 >12.0 TORED DOSE cSv)

INOUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPNV

$1ngte Location 1,068 469 74 46 11 11 15 6

1 1

1 1,703 635 124 Multiple Locations 1,858 2,318 728 619 368 269 383 137 61 21 3

5 1

2 6,773 4,915 2,250 Total 2,926 2,787 802 665 379 280 398 143 62 22 3

5 1

1 0

2 8,476 5,550 2,374 MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION sroad 1,493 1,269 239 127 77 63 102 58 31 1

3,460 1,%7 668-other 215 158 58 31 8

7 11 6

1 1

2 498 283 87 Total 1,708 1,427 297 158 85 70 113 64 32 2

2 3.958 2,250 755 us LLv-LEVEL WASTE DISPOSAL 1,240 252 70 Total 988 151 38 23 9

9 22 INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE 32 32 33 Total 0

2 1

5 7

4 9

4 FUEL FABRICATION Uranius Fuel Process.

3,045 3,140 947 518 101 13 11 2

7,777 4,372 575 Deconnoiss. of U and Pu 819 300 68 Fuel Facilities

$19 242 9

4 7

13 25 Total 3,564 3,382 956 522 108 26 36 2

8,5%

5,032 643

- COMMERCI AL POWER REACT.

Soiting Water Reactors 35,705 16,583 6,227 5,347 3,165 2,310 4,993 1, 731 468 42 76,5 71 40,866 20,855 Press. Water Reactors 55,718 29,136 8,615 6,898 4,125 2,606 5,587 1,586 248 42 114,561 58,843 22,769 1,929 370 40 15 7

4 7

2,372 443 35 Nigh imp. Gas Reactors Total 93,352 46,089 14,882 12,260 7,297 4,920 10,587 3,317 716 84 193,504 100,152 43,659 GRAND TOTALS 102,538 53,838 16,976 13,633 7,885 5,309 11.165 3,530 810 108 5

5 1

1 0

2 215,806 113,268 47,534

Dose values exactly equal to the values separating ranges are reported in the next higher range.

- Includes att reactors that reported although att of theva may not have been in corrmercial operation for a f t,tl year.

These values have not been adjusted for the puttiple counting of transient reactor workers.

+

TABLE 3.3

SUMMARY

OF ANNUAL DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS FOR CERTAIN NRC LICENSEES 1968-1985 Percent of Percent of Number of Total Number of Monitored Persons Individuals Individuals Individuals Reported (Corrected With Doses With Doses With Doses Year Number Number)

<2 rems

>5 rems

>l2 rems 1968 36,836 97.2%

0.5%

3 1969 31,176 96.5%

0.5%

7 1970 36,164 96.1%

0.6%

0 1971 36,311 96.3%

0.7%

1 1972 44,690 95.7%

0.5%

8 1973 67,862 95.0%

0.5%

1 1974 85,097 96.4%

0.3%

1 1975 78,713 94.8%

0.5%

1 1976 92,773 95.0%

0.4%

3 1977 98,212 (93,438)

S3.8%*

0.4%*

1 1978 105,893 (100,818) 94.6%*

0.2%*

3 1979 131,027 (125,316) 95.2%*

0.2%*

1 1980 159,177 (150,675) 94.6%*

0.3%*

0 1981 157,874 (149,314) 94.6%*

0.2%*

1 1982 162,456 (154,117) 94.9%*

0.1%*

0 1983 172,927 (164,239) 94.6%*

0.1%*

0 1984 204,136 (194,840) 95.9%*

0.1%*

0 1985 215,197 97.9%

<0.01%

2 Based on the distribution of individual doses after adjusting for the multiple counting of transient reactor works (see Section 5).

single-location facilities decreased by about 37% from the 1984 values.

This resulted in the average measurable dose falling to 0.20 rem (cSv) in 1985.

The number of monitored workers at firms having multiple-location licenses increased by about 1% but the collective dose decreased by about 2%.

This resulted in the average measurable dose decreasing slightly to l

0.46 rem (cSv).

Overall, the average measurable dose for radiography workers continues to remain at a little less than one-half rem (cSv), as it has for the last several years, while the average dose for workers performing radiography at a single location is usually about half this amount. This is probably due to the fact that it is more difficult for workers to avoid exposure to radiation in the field, where conditions are not the best and may change every day.

In order to see the contribution that each radiography licensee made to the total collective dose, a summary of the information reported by each of these licensees in 1985 is presented in alphabetical order in Appendix A.

3-6

TABLE 3.4 ANNUAL EXPOSURE INFORMATION FOR INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHERS 1983-1985 i

Collective Workers Dose Average Number Number of with (person-Measurable of Monitored Measurable rems or Dose (rems l

Year Type of License Licenses Individuals Doses person-cSv) orcSv) 1985 Single location 111 1,703 635 124 0.20 l

Multiple locations 229 6,773 4,915 2,250 0.46 Total 340 8,476 5,550 2,374 0.43 4

1984 Single location 129 1,778 701 196 0.28 Multiple locations 232 6,680 4,745 2,294 0.48 Total 361 8,458 5,446 2,490 0.46 1983 Single location 128 1,714 773 213 0.28 Multiple locations 210 6,910 4,358 2,171 0.50 Total 338 8,624 5,131 2,384 0.46 Since personnel monitoring data has freauently been found to have log-normal distributions

[Ref.

11],

trends in the data reported by radiography licensees may be observed from log probability plots

of data (see for example Fig.

3.1).

There are a few characteristics of these distributions readers should keep in mind. First, each single plotted point represents the total cumulative percent of all workers with measurable doses up to the plotted value. All measurable average doses up to 0.1 rem are included in the value plotted at 0.1 rem, and the values shown on the l

"Annual Dose" axis are derived from the dose ranges specified in 10 CFR I

20.407(b). Second, because it is not possible to plot 100% on these figures, the data for the highest dose group must be inferred from the plotted data.

For example, if the last plotted point on a curve represented 90% at one I

rem, it must be inferred that the remaining 10% of workers fell in the range one to two rems (ie., none exceeded 2 rems) Figure 3.1 displays such plots f

of the doses incurred by workers monitored by the two types of radiography licensees for each of the years 1982 through 1985.

The plots of the dose l

f distributions of workers at single-location radiography facilities, where the workers receive doses that are lower than those usually received by If the data have a log-normal distribution, the data points will form a straight line when plotted on log probability paper on which cumulative probabilities are laid off on the vertical axis at distances proportional to the corresponding number of standard deviations above or below the median and the dose is plotted on the horizontal axis with a logarithmic scale.

3-7

Figure 3.1 ANNUAL DOSE DISTRIBUTION OF WORKERS AT INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY FACILITIES 1982 - 19G5 99 99 I

i i

l l

l 1

1 I

i i I

. E.

99.9 99.8 1982 - Single Location 99.5 1984-Single Location 99 1985 - Single Locations 98 1983 - Single Location 5x 8

95 3

90 1982 - Multiple Locations 2y

\\ 1983 - Multiple Locations 5

80 c.

1985 - Multiple Locations Lu 2

70 5

60 3

1984 Multiple Location l

E I

8 50 RADIOGRAPHY 40 AVERAGE MEAS. DOSE i

(rem or cSv)

'CR I

30 SINGLE LCC. MULTI. LOC.

SINGLE LOC. MULTI. LOC. -

i 1985 0.20 0.46 0.34 0.45 20 1984 0.28 0.48 0.42 0.46 1983 0.28 0.50 0.40 0.46 1982 0.20 0.54 0.23 0.46 1981 0.19 0.54 0.21 0.48 l

l 1

l t

I l

l l 1 I l

0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 2

3 4

5 6 7 8 910 l

ANNUAL DOSE (rems or cSv)

'CR is the ratio of the annual collective dose delivered at individual doses exceeding 1.5 rems to the total annual collective dose.

Note: Each point on the curves represents the cumulative percentage of workers with measurable doses who received doses less than the indicated annual dove, i

3-8

workers at multiple-location facilities, form fairly straight lines and usually lie above those of the multiple-location facilities.

Another feature of these types of graphs is that several comparisons of I

various dose distributions can be quickly made. For example, one can easily see in Figure 3.1 that in 1985, about 87% of the workers monitored by firms licensed for radiography at multiple locations received doses that were less than one rem (cSv), while some 96% of the workers monitored at single location radiography facilities received such doses. Al so,

the relative positions and curvature of the graphs are indicative of certain characteristics of the dose distributions. This is demonstrated by the positions of the 1982 and 1985 plots of the dose distribution of workers at single-location facilities above that of the other plots indicate smaller values of the average doses and CR (as shown in the chart at the bottom of the graph). This is due to the fact that there was a smaller proportion of i

workers with doses that exceeded three rems (cSv) in 1982 and 1985 as i

compared to 1983 and 1984. The plots of the multiple-location licensees i

I appear to be inching upwards, and one finds that the average doses and l

values of CR exhibit a decreasing trend, overall.

The tendency of the plots to curve upward for doses greater than one rem (cSv) is typical of distributions having several workers with doses in the higher dose ranges (Refs.

10, 11),

and indicates that the entire distribution is not a log-normal one. Another theoretical analysis of occupational dose distributions [Ref. 12] has found that *.hese data may be fitted by a hybrid log-normal distribution. At low doses, this distribution is log-normal, but at higher doses, where radiation control programs very closely monitor each worker's total dose so that the frequency of doses approaching the dose limits is reduced, the distribution is normal.

3.3.2 Manufacturer and Distributor Licenses, Broad and Other Manafacturer and distributor licenses are issued to allow the manufacture l

and distribution of radionuclides in various forms for a number of diverse i

purposes.

The products are usually distributed to persons specifically licensed by the NRC or an Agreement State.

Broad licenses are issued to larger organizations who may use many different radionuclides in many different ways and who have a comprehensive radiation protection program.

The Other licenses are usually issued to smaller firms requiring a more restrictive license.

Some firms are medical suppliers that process,

package, or distribute such products as diagnostic test kits, radioactive surgical implants, and tagged radiochemicals for use in medical

research, diagnosis, and therapy.

Other firms are suppliers of industrial radionuclides and are involved in the processing, encapsulation, packaging, and distribution of the radionuclides that they have purchased in bulk quantities from production reactors and cyclotrons. Major products include gamma radiography sources, cobalt irradiation sources, well-logging

sources, sealed sources for gauges and smoke detectors, and radiochemicals for nonmedical research.

However, only those NRC licensees (about 35) that possess or use at any one time specified quantities of the nuclides listed in paragraph 20.408(a)(6) are required to submit annual (10 CFR i 20.407) and termination (10 CFR i 20.408) reports.

3-9

Table 3.5 presents the annual data that were reported by the two types of licensees for 1985 and the previous two years.

The total number of workers receiving measurable doses as reported by these types of licensees increased by about 14% to 2,250 workers in 1985. The collective dose also increased by about the same percentage so that the average dose remained about 0.34 rem (cSv).

Looking at the information shown separately for the Broad and Other licensees, one can see that the values of all of the parameters remain higher for the Broad licensees, probably because this type of license allows the possession of larger quantities of radioactive materials than do the Other licenses.

However, when attempting to examine trends in the data presented for this category of licensees, one should note that the types and quantities of radionuclides may fluctuate from year to year, and even during the year, so that some licensees may report dose data one year and not the next and may be included as a Broad licensee one year and an Other licensee at other times.

Since the number of reporting licensees is quite small, these fluctuations may have a significant impact on the values of the parameters.

In order to see the contribution that each of these licensees made toward the total values of the number of persons monitored, number of workers, and collective dose, Appendix A lists the values of these parameters for each licensee in alphabetical order by licensee name for 1985.

Figure 3.2 displays log probability plots of the doses incurred by workers under the two types of manufacturing and distribution licenses for the years 1982 throagh 1985.

The position of the curves plotted for the Other licenses above those plotted for the Broad licenses indicates that a larger portion of the workers reported by the Other licensees have lower doses than those reported by the Broad licensees.

For example, the graphs show that about 90% of workers monitored by the broad licensees received doses that were less than one rem (cSv), while about 93% of the workers monitored by the Otner licensees received such doses in 1985.

3.3.3 Low-Level Waste Disposal Licenses These licenses are issued to allow the receipt, possession, and disposal of l

low-level radioactive wastes at a land disposal facility.

The licensee has I

the appropriate facilities to receive wastes from such places as hospitals and laboratories, store them for a short time and dipose of them in a properly prepared burial ground. The licensees in this category are located in and licensed by Agreement States that have primary regulatory authority over its activity.

However, they also have an NRC license that covers certain special nuclear material they might receive. The annual dose reports submitted by these licensees include all doses received during the year regardless of whether they were due to NRC or Agreement State licensed material.

l The requirement for this category of NRC licensee to file annual reports became effective in January 1983.

Two licensees in this category submitted annual reports in 1984 and 1985, while in 1982 and 1983 there was only one licensee in this category. Table 3.1 summarizes the data reported for 1982 through 1985.

In 1985, the total number of monitored individuals increased by about 34% to 1,240 individuals.

However, the number of workers receiving measurable doses decreased somewhat so that although the collective dose, 70 I

3-10

Figure 3.2 ANNUAL DOSE DISTRIBUTION OF WORKERS AT MANUFACTURING & DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES 1982 - 1985 99 99 I

I I

l l

1 1

I I

I I I 99.9 99.8

~

1984 - Other 99 98 1983 - Other W

1985 - Other y 95 1982 Other 1982 - Broad o

3

$g 1983 - Broad 1985 - Broad U

a: 80 E

1984 Broad

$ 70 5

30 MANUFACTURING & DISTRIBUTION y

g 50I AVERAGE MEAS, DOSE

' rems or cSv)

'CR 40 Broad Other Broad Other 30 1985 0.34 0.31 0.50 0.49 1984 0.35 0.29 0.48 0.34 20 1983 0.44 0.22 0.54 0.20 1982 0.43 0.22 0.52 0.38 1981 0.44 0.17 0.55 0.33 10 1

1 l

l l

1 l

l i

I I l 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 2

3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 ANNUAL DOSE (rems or cSv)

'CR is the ratio of the annual collective dose delivered at individual doses exceeding 1.5 rems to the total annual collective dose.

Note: Each point on the curves represents the cumulative percentage of workers with measurable doses who received doses less than the Indicated annual dose.

3-11

TABLE 3.5 ANNUAL EXPOSURE INFORMATION FOR MANUFACTURERS AND DISTRIBUTORS 1983-1985 Collective Workers Dose Average Number Number of with (person-Measurable of Monitored Measurable rems or Dose (rems Year Type of License Licenses Individuals Doses person-cSv) orcSv) 1985 M & D-Broad 12 3,460 1,967 668 0.34 M & D-Other 21 498 283 87 0.31 Total 33 3,958 2,250 755 0.34 1984 M & D-Broad 13 4,625 1,716 594 0.35 M & D-Other*

27 451 261 77 0.29 Total

40 5,076 1,977 671 0.34 1983 M & D-Broad 16 4,332 1,744 767 0.44 M & D-Other 17 719 259 57 0.22 Total 33 5,051 2,003 824 0.41 The figures for 1984 were corrected to include data for two licensees that had been erroneously excluded from this category.

person-rems (person-cSv),

remained about the same as that found for the previous two years, the average measurable dose rose slightly to 0.28 rem (cSv).

Figure 3.3 displays log probability plots of the doses incurred by workers at the low-level waste disposal facilities from 1982 through 1985. One can quickly see that the distributions are quite similar, with all of the doses being two rems (cSv) or less, and 96% of the doses being less than one rem (cSv) each year. However, the position of the plot for 1985 below that of the others is indicative of the increases in the average dose and CR.

Appendix A summarizes the exposure information reported by these two licensees in 1985.

3.3.4 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Licenses These licenses are issued to allow the possession of power reactor spent fuel and other associated radioactive materials for the purpose of storage of such fuel in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI).

Here, the spent fuel, which has undergone at least one year of decay since being used as a source of energy in a power reactor, is provided interim

storage, protection, and safeguarding for a limited time pending its 3-12

ultimate disposal. Presently, there is only one license for a facility that is not located at a nuclear power plant. Two other licenses have been issued to nuclear power utilities and any doses due to the storage of spent fuel are included in the annual dose report submitted for the utilities' nuclear power plants.

Table 3.1 summarizes the data submitted for 1982 through 1985 by the only ISFSI that is separate from a nuclear power plant. Only about 35 individuals have been monitored at the facility each year.

However, in 1984 the collective dose increased to a value of 13 person-rems (person-cSv), and in 1985 the collective dose increased to 34 person-rems (person-cSv).

The number of workers receiving measurable doses, however, remained at 32 so that the average dose increased to 1.06 rems (cSv) in 1985. These increases were primarily due to significant increase in the amount of incoming spent fuel.

Also, the licensee reports the doses of only those workers reauired to be monitored for exposure to radiation instead of the doses of all individuals for whom monitoring was orovided.

This results in the calculation of a higher average dose.

Figure 3.3 displays log probability plots of the doses incurred by workers at the ISFSI for the years 1982 through 1985.

The plots are quite similar for 1982 and 1983 when all doses were less than 0.75 rem so the value of CR was zero each year. The position of the plot of the 1985 data considerably below that of the previous years indicates more doses in the higher ranges and is reflected in the higher value (0.51) of CR.

However, the figure shows that all doses remained less than 3 rems (cSv).

3.3.5 Fuel Fabrication and Reprocessing Licenses The fuel fabrication licenses are issued to allow the processing and fabrication of reactor fuels.

In most uranium facilities where light water reactor fuels are processed, uranium hexafluoride enriched in the isotope U-235 is converted to solid uranium dioxide pellets and inserted into zirconium alloy tubes.

The tubes are fabricated into fuel assemblies which are shipped to nuclear power plants.

Some facilities also perform chemical operations to recover the uranium from scrap and other off-specification materials.

On a much smaller scale, fuel assemblies containing plutonium oxide pellets can be similarly fabricated and used in reactors for experimental purposes.

However, there are no NRC licensees engaged in this activity at this time.

The number of facilities licensed by the NRC to fabricate fuel, especially plutonium fuel, has been decreasing for the last several years (Table 3.1).

Therefore, a number of licensees ceased fuel fabrication and began decommissioning activities so that the information that was provided for these years is shown as "Decommissioning" in Table 3.6.

Table 3.6 shows that in 1985 the number of licensees involved in fuel fabrication and decommissioning activities continued to decline, as did the collective dose. One of the licensees (SNM-0021, see Appendix A) that was included with the uranium fuel fabricators in previous years had fuel fabrication activities dropped from their license in 1984.

Therefore, in

1985, this licensee's data are shown in the "Decommissioning" category.

However, most of the dose incurred by workers monitored by this licensee 3-13

Figure 3.3 ANNUAL DOSE DISTRIBUTION OF WORKERS AT LOW. LEVEL WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND AT AN INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE FACILITY 1982 - 1985 99 99 I

I i

l l

1 l

l l l AVERAGE MEAS. DOSE trem or cSv)

'CR 99.9 1985 1984 1983 1982 1985 1984 1983 1982 99.8 Low Level Waste Disposal 0.28 0.24 0.20 0.21 0.24 0.16 0.14 0.20 99.5 Independent Fuel Storage 1.06 0.41 0.30 0.28 0.51 0.06 0

0 99 98 E

Low-Level Waste - 1983

$ 95

~

f Low. Level Waste - 1982 0 90 - Low Level Waste 1985 p

2 Low Level W Storage - 1984 U

Disposal 1984

/

5 80 n.

ua 70 g

b Independent Fuel Storage 1985 ndependent Fuel Storage - 1982 Independent Fuel 8 50 Storage 1983 40 30 20 10 4

I I

I l

l l

l I

I I I i 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 2

3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 ANNUAL DOSE (rems or cSv)

'CR is the ratio of the annual collective dose delivered at individual doses exceeding 1.5 rems to tiae total annual collective dose.

Note: Each point on the curves represents the cumulative percentage of workers with measurable doses who received doses less than the indicated annual dose.

3 14

TABLE 3.6 ANNUAL EXPOSURE INFORMATION FOR FUEL FABRICATORS 1983-1985 l

l Collective Workers Dose Average Number Number of with (person-Measurable of Monitored Measurable rems or Dose (rems Year Type of License Licenses Individuals Doses person-cSv) orcSv) 1985 Uranium Fuel Fab 9

6,920 4,244 519 0.12 Pu Decommissioning 2

1,067 457 98 0.21 Total 11 7,987 4,701 617 0.13 1984 Uranium Fuel Fab 11 9,379 5,947 815 0.14 Pu Decommissioning 3

109 25 3

0.12 Total 14 9,488 5,772 818 0.14 1983 Uranium Fuel Nb 11 8,440 4,746 748 0.16 Pu Decommissioning 4

583 267 87 0.33 Total 15 9,023 5,013 835 0.17 continues to be due to hot cell operations involving the examination of post-irradiated fuel. As annual exposure reports are not required to be submitted for this type of licensed activity, information for this licensee will not be included in this report. Also, for similar reasons, those licensees that were included in the "Decommissioning" category in previous years are no longer required to file annual reports, and they are no longer included in this document. Appendix A lists alphabetically each of the eleven licensees reporting in 1985, with the number of persons monitored, the number of workers receiving measurable doses, and the collective dose for each licensee.

Figure 3.4 consists of the log-normal plots of the dose distributions of workers at fuel fabrication facilities for the years 1982 through 1985. The plots for 1982 and 1983 are quite similar, with all doses being less than five rems (cSv) and about 99% of the doses being less than two re..is (cSv) each year. The average dose and the value of CR were therefore about the same for each year.

However, in 1984 and 1985, there were so few doses greater than two rems (cSv) that the value of CR fell to 0.04 and 0.05, respectively.

Fuel reprocessing licenses are issued to allow the separation of usable uranium and plutonium from spent nuclear fuel.

There was only one commercial facility that was ever licensed to reprocess fuel, and it has been shut down since 1972. However, the licensee did some decontamination work and stored radioactive waste at the facility for several years, and the annual report that was submitted each year was usually grouped with those of 3-15

Figure 3.4 ANNUAL DOSE DISTRIBUTION OF WORKERS AT FUEL FABRICATORS AND PROCESSORS 1982 - 198G EU i

l l

l 1

I i 1 99.9 99.8 1985 g

99.5 1983 99 98

$ 9s 1984 0

3 Ei 90 H

5 e

80 e

y 70' i:

60 FUEL FABRICATORS 50 AVERAGE MEAS. DOSE 0

(rems or cSv)

'CR 40 1985 0.13 0.05 30 1984 0.14 0.04 1983 0.17 0.19 20

~

1982 0.15 0.20 1981 0.16 0.09 10 I

i 1

l 1

I I

f I I 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 2

3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 ANNUAL DOSE (rems or cSv)

'CR is the ratio of the annual collective dose de'ivered at individual doses exceeding 1.5 rems to the total annual collective dose.

Note: Each point on the curves represents the cumulative percentage of workers 'vith measurable doses who received doses less than the Indicated annual dose.

3-16

[

the fuel fabricators.

In February 1982, the Department of Energy assumed possession and control of the reprocessing facility to conduct waste solidification activities necessary for final decommissioning.

During this

period, the NRC license will, in effect, be suspended, and no reports will I

be filed with the NRC.

3.3.6 Light Water-cooled Power Reactor (LWR) Licenses These licenses are issued to utilit M : ) allow them to use special nuclear material in e reactor to produce hea generate electricity to be sold to consumers.

There are two major types of commercial LWRs in the United States -pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and boiling water reactors (BWRs)

- each of which uses water as the primary coolant.

As shown in Table 3.1, annual reports were received from nuclear power facilities for 93 licensed, LWRs where 191,132 individuals were monitored for exposure to radiation in 1985. Of this number, 97,978 workers received a measurable dose and incurred a collective dose of 43,624 person-rems (person-cSv). This is a significant decrease (21%) in the collective dose from that reported for the previous two years.

However, the number of workers has continued to increase somewhat. This has resulted in the average measurable dose continuing to decrease to an all-time low of 0.44 rem (cSv) in 1985. The dose distribution of workers monitored at each plant site is presented in alphabetical order by site name in Appendix B.

Figure 3.5 presents the log-normal plot of the distribution of the whole body doses received by radiation workers at nuclear power facilities in

1983, 1984, and 1985. The position of the plots of the 1985 data above the others inJicates a smaller portion of doses were distributed in the higher ranges.

For example, in 1984 about 78% of the workers receiving measurable doses at BWRs received doses that were less than ona rem (cSv), but in 1985 about 82% of such workers at BWRs received doses of less than one rem (cSv).

l The plots for the PWRs showed a similar shift. However, the position of the BWR plots below those of the PWRs each year indicates that higher average dases were received at BWRs. Also, departures from a straight line for doses that exceed one rem are again seen, and, according to the hybrid leg-normal method [Ref.12] of analyzing these dose distributions the sharpness of the departure indicate; that a strong feedback mechanism operates when workers begin to incur larger doses and may reflect efforts to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable (Ref.13].

Listed at the bottom of the figure are the values of the average measurable dose and of CR for the last five years.

These show that both parameters continue to be larger at BWRs, but that there were significant decreases in the values of both in 1985. The portion of the collective dose due to doses greater than 1.5 rems (cSv) fell to 40% at PWRs and 47% at BWRs (less than 50% for the first time), and the average doses fell to 0.39 rem (cSv) and 0.53 rem (cSv) at PWRs and BWRs, respectively. More detailed presentations and analyses of the annual exposure information reported by nuclear power facilities can be found in Section 4.

3-17

1 Figure 3.5 h

ANNUAL DOSE DISTRIBUTION OF WORKERS AT

{

LIGHT WATER REACTOR FACILITIES 1983 - 1985 l

88 88 l

l l

l l 99.9 1985 PWRs 99.8 1985 BWHs mg 99 1984 PWRs g

\\

1983 BWRs 95 g

1983 PWRs O

5 90 c.

5 Pg 80

~

1984 BWRs s!

70 U

60 BWRs PWRs

~

i AVERAGE MEAS. DOSE AVERAGE MEAS. DOSE g

frems or cSv)

CR (rems or cSv)

CR 1985 0.53 0.47 0.39 0.40 30' -

~

1984 0.66 0.57 0.49 0.48 1983 0.82 0.63 0.56 0.50 20 1982 0.76 0.59 0.53 0.49 1981 0.73 0.57 0.61 0.52 I

I I

l i

I I

I l

i I I 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 2

3 4

5 6 7 8 910 ANNUAL DOSE (rems)

CR is the ratio of the annual collective dose delivered at individual doses exceeding 1.5 rems to the total annual collective dose.

Note: Each point on the curves represents the cumulative percentage of workers with measurable doses who received doses less than the indicated annual dose.

3-18

3.3.7 High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Power Reactor (HTGR) Licenses A license to operate a power reactor is issued to utilities to allow them to use special nuclear material in a reactor to produce heat to generate electricity to be sold to consumers.

In this type of a reactor, a gas, usually helium, is used as the primary coolant.

Fort St. Vrain near Greeley, Colorado, is the only such reactor in operation in the U.S.

As shown in Table 3.7, annual whole body doses incurred by workers at the plant have been minimal.

No one exceeded an annual dose of 0.25 rem (cSv) until 1985 when the highest annual dose was between 1 and 2 rems (cSv).

Also, in 1985 the average dose per worker increased to 0.08 rem (cSv). The reactor has not operated near full power for significant periods of time since July, 1984, with most of the collective dose in 1985 resulting from maintenance activities. These activities resulted in the largest annual and average collective doses in the history of the plant, though these figures still remain much smaller than for PWRs and BWRs.

TABLE 3.7 NNUAL EXPOSURE INFORmTION FOR FORT ST. VRAIN 1974-1985 No. of Individuals with Annual DosesinRanges(remsorcSv)

Annual Average Total Collective Gross Measurable No No. of Dose Electricity Dose per Meas'ble Meas'ble 0.10- 0.25-Individuals (person-rems Generated Worker Year Dose Dose <0.10 0.25 2.00 Honitomd orperson-cSv)

(HW-yr)

(remorcSv) 1974 1,597 63 1

0 1,661 3.3 0.0 0.05 1975 1,263 0

0 0

1,263 0.0 0.0 0.00 1976 1,362 25 0

0 1,387 1.3 2.8 0.05 1977 946 55 1

0 1,002 2.9 29.8 0.05 1978 896 34 0

0 930 1.7 75.7 0.05 1979 1,149 120 2

0 1,271 6.4 28.6 0.05 1980 902 57 1

0 960 3.0 83.2 0.05 1981 1,096 31 0

0 1,127 1.0 93.6 0.03 1982 978 22 0

0 1,000 0.4 72.6 0.02 1983 965 48 0

0 1,013 1.0 94.4 0.02 1984 1,616 62 8

0 1,686 3.0 10.9 0.04 1985 1,929 370 40 33 2,372 35.0 3.8 0.08 l

3-19

4 COMERCIAL LIGHT WATER REACTORS - FURTHER ANALYSIS 4.1 Introduction General trends in occupational radiation exposures at nuclear power reactors are best evaluated within the context of other pertinent information.

In l

this chapter, some of the tables and appendices that summarize exposure data also show the type, capacity, and age of the reactor; the amount of electricity generated; the type of workers being exposed; and the sort of tasks being performed. Exposure data is then presented as a function of these data.

4.2 Definitions of Terms and Sources of Data 4.2.1.

Number of Reactors The number of reactors shown in Tables 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 is the number of

BWRs, PWRs, and LWRs, respectively, that had been in commercial operation for at least onc full year as of December 31 of each of the indicated years.

This is the number of reactors on which the average number of workers and average collective dose per reactor is based.

Excluded are those reactors that may have been in commercial operation for only a few months during the first year and reactors that have been defueled and declared that they will not be commercially operated again. This yields conservative values for many of the averages shown in the tables. The date that each reactor was declared to be in commercial operation was found in Reference 14.

4.2.2.

Electric Energy Generated The electric energy generated in gross megawatt-years (MW-yr) each year by each facility is shown in Appendix C.

This number was obtained by dividing the gross megawatt-hours of electricity annually produced by each facility by 8,760, the number of hours in the year, except for leap years when the number is 8,784 hours0.00907 days 0.218 hours 0.0013 weeks 2.98312e-4 months . The gross megawatt-years of generated electricity that are presented in Tables 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 are the sums of that produced by the number of reactors included in each year.

These sums are divided by the number of those reactors included in each year to yield the average amount of electric energy generated (MW-yr) per reactor, which is also shown in Tables 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3.

The number of gross megawatt-hours of electricity produced each year was also found in Reference 14.

4.2.3 Collective Dose per Megawatt-Year The number of megawatt-years of electricity generated was used in determining the ratio of the average value of the annual collective dose to the number of megawatt-years of electricity generated.

The ratio was l

calculated by dividing the total collective dose by the total gross megawatt-years generated and is a figure that is a measure of the dose incurred by workers at power plants in relation to the gross electric energy produced.

This ratio was also calculated for each reactor site and is presented in Tables 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 and Appendix C.

4-1

I TABLE 4.1

SUMMARY

OF ANNUAL INFORMATION REPORTED BY COMMERCIAL BOILING WATER REACTORSt 1973-1985 l

Average I

Annual Collective Average No.

Collective No. of Average Dose Per Personnel Average Average Number Doses Workers Gross Dose Per Reactor With Collec-Electricity Average of (person-With Electricity Worker (person-Measurable tive Dose Generated Rated Reactors rems or Measurable Generated (rems or rems or Doses per Per Reactor Capacity Year Included perso.1-cSv)

Doses (HW-yr) cSv) person-cSv) Per Reactor MW-yr (MW-yr)

Net (MWe) 1973 12 4,564 5,340 3,394 0.85 380 445 1.3 283 459 1974 14 7,095 8,769 4,059 0.81 507 626 1.7 290 513 1975 18 12,611 14,607 5,786 0.86 701 812 2.2 321 611 1976 23 12,626 17,859 8,586 0.71 549 776 1.5 373 647 1977 23 19,042 21,388 9,098 0.89 828 930 2.1 396 645 1978 25 15,096 20,278 11,774 0.74 604 811 1.3 471 668 1979 25 18,322 25,245 11,671 0.73 733 1,010 1.6 467 669 1980 26 29,530 34,094 10,868 0,87 1,136 1,311 2.7 418 664 1981 26 25,471 34,832 10,899 0.73 980 1,340 2.3 419 674 1982 26 24,437 32,235 10,665 0.76 940 1,240 2.3 410 674 1983 26 27,455 33,473 9,730 0.82 1,056 1,287 2.8 374 675 1984 27*

27,074 41,105 9,963 0.66 1,003 1,522 2.7 369 722 1985 28**

20,572 38,237 11,461 0.54 735 1,366 1.8 409 766 tincludes only those reactors that had been in commercial operation for at lease one full year as of December 31 of each of the indicated years, and all figures are uncorrected for multiple reporting of transient individuals.

In 1984 it was decided that Humboldt Bay, a plant that has been shut down since 7/76, would not be put in commercial operation again, and it is no longer included in this count of reactors.

- In 1985 it was decided that Dresden 1, a plant that has been shut down since 10/78, would not be put in commercial operation again, and it is not included in this count of reactors.

I

TABLE 4.2

SUMMARY

OF ANNUAL INFORMATION REPORTED BY COMMERCIAL PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORSt 1973-1985 Average Annual Collective Average No.

Collective No. of Average Dose Per Personnel Average Average Number Doses Workers Gross Dose Per Reactor With Collec-Electricity Average of (person-With Electricity Worker (person-Measurable tive Doses Generated Rated Reactors rems or Measurable Generated (rems or rems or Doses per Per Reactor Capacity Year Included person-cSv)

Doses (MW-yr) cSv) person-cSv) Per Reactor MW-yr (MW-yr)

Net (MWu) 1973 12 9,399 9,440 3,770 1.00 783 787 2.5 314 533 1974 20 6,627 9,697 6,824 0.68 331 485

.l.0 341 619 4,

1975 26 8,268 10,884 11,983 0.76 318 419 0.7 461 643 1976 30 13,807 17,588 13,325 0.79 460 586 1.0 444-675 1977 34 13,469 20,878 17,346 0.65 396 614

- 0. 8 510 699 1978 39 16,713 25,720 19,840 0.65 429 659 0.8 509 723 1979 42 21,659 38,877 18,249 0.56 516 924 1.2 434 729 1980 42 24,266 46,237 18,287 0.52 573 1,101 1.3 435 721 1981 44 28,671 47,351 20,552 0.61 652 1,076 1.4 467 745 1982 48 27,753 52,147 22,141 0.53 578 1,086 1.3 461 773 1983 49 29,016 52,173 23,196 0.56 592 1,065 1.3 473 778 1984 51 28,140 56,987 26,478 0.49 552 1,117 1.1 519 805 1985 54*

22,470 54,634 30,140 0.41 416 1,012 0.7 558 826 t Includes only those reactors that had been in commercial operation for at least one full year as of December 31 of each of the indicated years, and all figures are uncorrected for multiple reporting of transient individuals.

In 1984 it was decided that Indian Point 1, a plant that has been shut down since 10/78, would not be put in commercial operation, and it is no longer included in this count of reactors.

TABLE 4.3 SUttiARY OF ANNUAL INFORMATION REPORTED BY COMMERCIAL LIGHT WATER COOLED REACTORSt 1973-1985 Average Annual Collective Average No.

Collective No. of Average Dose Per Personnel Average Average Number Doses Workers Gross Dose Per Reactor With Collec-Electricity Average of (person-With Electricity Worker (person-Measurable tive Dose Generated Rated j

Reactors rems or Measurable Generated (rems or rems or Doses per Per Reactor Capacity l

Year Included person-cSv)

Doses (MW-yr) cSv) person-cSv) Per Reactor MW-yr (MW-yr)

Net (MWe) l 1973 24 13,963 14,780 7,164 0.94 582 616 1.9 299 456 1974 34 13,722 18,466 10,883 0.74 404 543 1.3 320 575 1975 44 20,879 25,489 17,769 0.82 475 579 1.2 404 630 1976 53 26,433 35,447 21,911 0.75 499 669 1.2 413 663 l

1977 57 32,511 42,266 26,444 0.77 570 742 1.2 462 677 1978 64 31,809 45,998 31,614 0.69 497 719' l.0 494 702 l

1979 67 39,981 64,122 29,920 0.62 597 956 1.3 447 705 1980 68 53,796 80,331 29,155 0.67 791 1,181 1.8 429 699 l

1981 70 54,142 82,183 31,451 0.66 773 1,174 1.7 449 719 l

1982 74 52,190 84,382 32,795 0.62 705 1,139 1.6 443 738 1983 75 56,471 85,646 32,926 0.66 753 1,142 1.7 439 742 1984 78*

55,214 98,092 36,441 0.56 708 1,258 1.5 467 776 1985 82**

43,042 92,871 41,601 0.46 525 1,132 1.0 507 806 t Includes only those reactors that had been in commercial operation for at least one full year as of December 31 of each of the indicated years, and all figures are uncorrected for multiple reporting of transient individuals.

In 1984 it was decided that Humboldt Bay and Indian Point I would not be put in commercial operation again, and they are no longer included in this count of reactors.

- In 1985 it was decided that Dresden 1, a plant that has been shut down since 10/78, would not be put in commercial operation again, and it is not included in this count of reactors.

4.2.4 Average Rated Capacity Average rated capacity, shown in Tables 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 was found by dividing the sum of the net maximum dependable capacities (net MWe) of the reactors by the number of reactors included each year.

The net maximum dependable capacity is defined to be the gross electrical output as measured at the output terminals of the turbine generator during the most restrictive seasonal conditions, less the normal station service loads.

This "capacity" of each plant was found in Reference 14, and it is shown for each site in Appendix C.

4.3 Annual Whole Body Dose Distributions 1

1 Table 4.4 summarizes the distribution of the annual whole body doses received by workers at all commercial LWRs during each of the years 1973 through 1985. This distribution is the sum of the annual dose distributions reported by each licensed LWR each year. As previously mentioned, the distribution reported by each LWR site for 1985 is shown in Appendix B.

The table shows that the number of monitored individuals continues to increase somewhat while the collective dose, after leveling off for a couple of years, declined sharply in 1985. The values of CR show that the fraction of the collective dose due to individual doses greater than 1.5 rems (cSv),

also decreased significantly, falling to a value (0.44) less than 0.50 for the first time.

However, the distribution shown in Table 4.4 for 1985 has not been corrected for the number of individuals that may have been reported by more than one site (see Section 5) and the corrected value of CR would probably be slightly higher.

Appendix D provides uncorrected dose distributions for BWRs and PWRs separately for 1985.

4.4.

Average Annual Whole Body Doses Some of the data presented in Tables 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 are graphically displayed in Figure 4.1, where it can be seen that the average collective dem and average number of workers per BWR have been higher than those for PWRs since 1974 and that the values of both parameters, in general, continued to rise at both types of facilities until 1982. At that time, the average collective dose per reactor appeared to begin leveling off or decreasing slightly, as did the number of workers. However, in

1985, the collective dose decreased sharply at both types of facilities so that the average measurable doses fell to 0.54 rem (cSv) and 0.41 rem (cSv) at BWRs and PWRs, respectively.

Figures 4.2 and 4.3 are plots of much of tne information that is given in Tables 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3.

The values of all of the parameters plotted, except for the electricity generated, decreased significantly from last year's values. These figures and the fluctuations in the parameters for the years following the accident at the Three Mile Island plant in 1979, may reflect some of the impact that this incident had on the nuclear power industry. The recent reversal in dose trends may be attributable to several factors.

Utilities have completed most of the tasks initiated as a result of the lessons learned from the Three Mile Island accident and they are increasing efforts to avoid and reduce exposure. The importance of exposure control and the concept of keeping exposures as low as reasonably achievable is continually being stressed, and programs to collect and share information 4-5

1 TABLE 4.4

SUMMARY

DISTRIBUTION OF ANNUAL WHOLE BODY DOSES AT C0tmERCIAL LIGHT WATER REACTORS

l 1973 - 1985

- Col lec- -

'tive Nwrtw*r of Individuals with Whole Body Doses in the Ranges f rtes or c5v)

N&r.- Oose No Total with. (person-Meas *ble Meas *ble 0.10-0.25-0.50-0.75-1.0-2.0-3.0-

.4.0-5.0-6.0- '

7.0-8.0-9.0- 10.0-Nueer Measurable rems or Year Exposure

<0.10 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 1.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 12.0..>12.0 Monitored bposure. c5v)

CR***

1973 19.043 5.494 1.698 1.214 740 652 2.468 1.584 422 251 125 71 38 16 7

33.823 14.780 13.963 0.72 1974 20.472 6,735 2.887 2.056 1.182 906 2.503 1.378 471 226 86 30 6

38.938 18.466 13.722 0.63 1975 18.854 8.841 3.674 2.750 1.685 1.339 3.948 1.872 691 423 169 60 24 12 0

1 44.343 25.489 20.879 0.65 1976 25.704 12.821 5.130 4.135 2.520 2.030 4.880 2.354 789 487-188 70 26 11 5

1 61.151 35.447 26.433 0.62 1977 23.502 12.395 6.030 4.518 2.890 2.220 5.649 2.856 1.288 661 186 89 47 23 6

62.360 38.858 32.511 0.64 m.

1978 28.372 15.101 6.342 4.998 3.088 2.247 5,995 3.034 1.197 514 109 37 9

0 1

0 2

71.046 42.674 31.804 0.61

& 1979 39.434 22.711 9.020 7.400 4.755 3.206 7.536 3.403 1.404 545 117 42 17 3

0 1

99.594 60.160 39.981 0.57-1980

'4.703 26.903 10.676 8.904 5.570 4.134 10.671 4.607 1.816 831 235 119 29 7

-1 119.206 74.503 53.796 0.59 1981 39.245 26.836 11.226 9.330 6.042 4.497 11.170 4.811 1.999 585 122 96 11 3

1 0

1 115.975 76.730 54.142 0.58 1982 41.713 29.226 11.713 9.903 6.229 4.420 10.220 4.716 2.066 5%

97 31 5

0 1

1 120.937 79.224 52.190 0.57~

1983 48.545 29.774 11.413 9.522 5.998 4.366 11.553 5.390 2.276 716 121 38 8

2 129.722 81.171 57.212 0.60 1984 55.606 37.723 13.936 10.734 6.689 5.061 12.026 5.364 2.153 485 52 19 149.848 94.252.57.487 0.55 1985 64.470 39.991 14.115 11.978 7.214 4.897 10.557 3.317 716 84 157.339.

92.869 '43.042 0.44'

'Sweery of reports submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 20.407 by plants that had been in comunercial operation for at least one full year as of Deceeer 31 of each of the indicated years. Figures shown for the years 1977-1984 have been adjusted for the muliple reporting of transient individuals (see Section 5).

- Not all plants

col xtive dose and no values of CR were reported by the utilities; they were calculated by the NRC staff using methods described in this document.

- - CR is the ratto of annual collective dose delivered at indivl&al doses exceeding 1.5 rens (c5v) to the total annual collective dose.

Figure 4.1 AVERAGE COLLECTIVE DOSE AND NUMBER OF WOf!KERS PER REACTOR 1973 - 1985 AVERAGE ANNUAL COLLECTIVE DOSES AVERAGE NUMBER OF WORKERS 1800 1800 g

y g

BWR

--- ~ ~ BWR PWR 16oo

.. - PWR 1600 LWR LWR sg s -

vs; uoo in f

i -

j

,c xj g,m

,m l

E l

. ^.

5 fs,

p..

- ~

s','T 1000 f

2 1000

/

' %./

3 s

r 1

l

's

- i

/\\f.

5 aoo fs,

's a Soo

,~,.s' l

a

[

\\.

s' s,

l g

5 o

~

a 9

1 N

o m

3,oo

\\f' r-

/

V

^.

_\\

/

s s, J

/

% -m.\\

5

~

8 s/

./

a g ~/

s f.~ w. /

\\

i

400 +

4oo 3

/

m m

o I

I I

I I I o

I I

73 74 75 76 77 78 79 10 '81

'82 13 14 ~B5 73 74 75 ~76 7/ 78

'79 10 11 12 13 '84 '85 l

Yea, Year l

t I

l Figure 4.2 ANNUAL VALUES AT BWRs AND PWRs 1973 - 1985 120 NUMBER OF WORKERS

$ BWRs PWRs 33o COLLECTIVE DOSE (person-rems) g E BWRs

[

% PWRs 100 w

g ELECTRICITY GENERATED (MW yrs) h BWRs z

w 2

PWRs 7

90 0

O g

AVERAGE ANNUAL 34 MEASURABLE DOSE d

8o 7

y,:.

m o

m

g e

eEo

}

x 5 ~t b 70

, S <:

3 w

g

-a 4

<m a:

Y""" -,In w

w V

OH g

i 404 V

8(3 t

L3 60

't Em$

l I

W f.

o z z a o

z

>;q 4

1

q u.

f, o

?,

,w w e 1

o g, 5 50 NUMBER k

l.,2 g

g ow as OF LWRs k

'.!'k ;.l<

i.

w>2 M

4 g

><m i.

. y 40

'b 7

1 i

h i

/.'k g

k I* k

!!k_ Ikl 0

54 h

h s

T n- &

!!n!

gI a%_

5

,g sg-iiga c

e g-S t

'4 i

g y

30

) -

ki

> *.k:

a k

o l'

2 M

9-

,.:g! ini

!:g i!g!

3%- N il ph g h!

%f

~

y g; t

g 20 E

e

il n

<ll l

2 5

.1, s

3o _ '.

E r,

p

,,h f i3 5

s s'

J..

r i

?g

.q J

p Pl

-)

P i

N

.i I

ii t

0

't2 h

I II Y

[g M

s 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 YEAR 1

4-8

Figure 4.3 AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUES AT LWRs 1973 - 1985 14 l

1 l

l l

l 1

1 I

l AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUES:

.8 (1) Workers Per Reactor a

m (2) Collective Dose Per Reactor

/%

(3) Collective Dose Per Megawatt-Year

/

'g e

12 p

%s g

D (4) Dose Per Worker g

i

/ VVorkers Per Reactor

/

8 1

g

--8x 10 f

Ie

/

a2 I

e o

e m

/

8*

1 OD 8

f 31 E

,/~~= s r

e.

$ 0

/

N8

/

Collective Dose Per Reactor 25 6

g hE

%,.W O

OO O 4

o o

oOm Collective Dose Per Megawatt-Year c

2

\\

/'===.

""==

,,,N

\\

/

.E

-- %s#

N

'**==-------.._,_....%,%**"=

O 3:

Dose Per Worker 0

I I

73 74 75 76 77 78

'79 "80

'81

'82

'83

'84

'85 Year

Figure 4,4 AVERAGE, MEDIAN AND EXTREME VALUES OF THE COLLECTIVE DOSE PER REACTOR 1973 - 1985 8,000 5.000 g Middle 50% of BWRs

"'Mj j

~5

/ Middle 50% of PWRs

~[

2 3,500

@ Average Collective Dose

@ Median Collective Dose 7

SI

$ 3.000 h

T E

O ai E 2,500

~

e 7

E E 2.000 4

a:

j T

g i,500

'I

~

i T

2 0

r II 1,000 -

i u s

a e!

g.

e M

$s 4

J pI eo

=

3 E

U i

~

y i

m' T T-1.

" c'- m

_i i--

i_

o r m o

e i

i i--

i c-

-i..

_i 0

1973 1974 1975 1976 1PR 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1M6 Year 4-10

l relative to tasks, techniques, and exposures have been established.

To further assist in the identification of any trends that might exist, Figure 4.4 displays the average and median

values of the collective dose per reactor for BWRs and for PWRs for the years 1973 through 1985.

The ranges of the values reported each year are shown by the vertical lines with a small bar at each end marking the two extreme values.

The rectangles indicate the range of values of the collective dose exhibited by those l

plants ranked in the twenty-fifth through the seventy-fifth percentiles.

Since the median values usually are not as greatly affected by the extreme

.va ues of the collective doses, they do not normally fluctuate as much from l

year to year as do the average values. The median collective dose for PWRs continues to range between 400 and 500 person-rems (person-cSv).

At BWRs the median fluctuates more from year to year, but in 1985 the median decreased to 550 person-rems (person-cSv), which is closer to that found for PWRs (400 person-rems (person-cSv)).

Figure 4.4 also shows that in 1985 fifty percent of the PWRs reported collective doses between 220 and 540 person-rems (person-cSv) while fifty percent of the BWRs reported collective doses between 375 and 1,070 person-rems (person-cSv).

Nearly every year, the median collective dose is less than the average, which indicates that the collective dose for most plants is less than the average collective dose per reactor (the value that is widely quoted).

4.5 Plant Rankings by Collective Oose per Reactor The number of reactors from which data have been collected is still rather

small, and the information reported by a few reactors where unusual conditions or problems may have occurred could have a large impact on some I

of the statistics presented in this report.

In an effort to identify those plants, Tables 4.5 and 4.6 list the BWRs and PWRs in ascending order of person-rems (person-cSv) per reactor for each of the five years from 1981 through 1985. Two other parameters, dose per worker and collective dose per megawatt-year, are also given for each plant and could hrve been used in ranking the plants as well. Also shown is a parameter "CR" which is defined to be the ratio of the annual collective dose delivered at individual doses exceeding 1.5 rems (cSv) to the total annual collective dose.

In 1985 the value of CR continued to decline for most plants so that about 80% (up from j

about 65% in 1984) of the U.S. LWRs fell within the range 0.05 to 0.50 which is recommended by the UNSCEAR [Ref. 10). Most of the reactors having values of CR greater than 0.50 were BWRs, the highest value being 0.68.

Table 4.7 lists the plants that had been in commercial operation for at least five years as of December 31, 1985, and shows the values of several

~

parameters for each of the sites.

It also gives a number of averages for 4

the two types of reactors. Based on the 123 reactor-years of operation accumulated by the BWRs listed, the average annual collective dose per reactor was found to be 996 person-rems (person-cSv), the average measurable dose was 0.72 rem (cSv), and the average collective dose per megawatt-year was 2.5.

The value at which 50% of the reactors reported greater collective doses and the other 50% reported smaller collective doses.

4-11 4

TABLE 4.5 BOILING WATER REACTORS LISTED IP* ASCENDING ORDER OF COLLECTIVE DOSE PER REACTOR 1981 - 1985 1981 1982 1983 Dese Dose Dese

Cell.

per Coll.

Coll.

per Coll.

Coll.

per

, Coll.

Dose Worker Dese Dese Werker Dese Dese tierher Dese per (ress per per (ress per per (rems per Site Name 5tte or c5v) MW-Vr

- CR Site name 5tte er c5v) faf-Vr

- CR Site llame Site or c5v) 18f.Vr

- C8 Mumboldt Bay 9

0.12 0.00 Mumboldt Bay 19 0.27 0.08 Musteldt Say 17 0.20 0.09 La Cresse 123 0.66 4.2 0.68 La Crosse 205 1.39 II.9 0.81 neaticello 123 0.29 0.2 0.16 Big Rack Potet 160 0.33 2.8 0.47 Vermont Yankee 205 0.43 0.4 0.24 millstone Potat 1 244 0.79 0.4 0.66 Cooper Statten 579 0.62 1.3 0.45 Duane Aroeid 22) 0.44 0.8 0.48 8tg Rock Point 263 0.53 6.2 0.44 Match I 2 1.337 0.46 1.5 0.35 8tg Beck Potat 329 0.63 7.5 0.58 La Crosse 313 1.96

' 12.6 0.90 Vermont Yankee 731 0.58 I.T 0.45 Cooper Statten 542 0.73 0.9 0.52 Match I. 2 1.299 0.30 3.4 0.29 Duene Arnold 790 0.61 2.8 0.50 Match j. 2 1.460 0.43 1.9 0.33 Nine Mile Point 360 0.61 2.6 9.45 Oyster Creek 917 0.54 2.9 0.40 Dyster Creek 865 0.60 3.6 0.51 Brenns Ferry 1. 2, 3 3.363 1.02.

2.0

' O.58 Browns ferry I. 2, 3 2.380 0.70 1.1 0.49 Browns Ferry I. 2. 3 2.220 0.68 1.1 0.51 Fit 7 patrick 1.090 0.64 2.0 e.64 Dresden 1. 2. 3 2.820 1.16 2.7 0.76 Mt11stene Point !

929 0.68 1.9 0.48 Duane Arnold 1.135 0.77 4.0 0.53 Monticelle 1.004 0.69 2.6 0.52 Dresden 1. 2. 3 2.923 1.14 2.7 0.73 Pilgrim 1.162 0.50 2.1 0.47 Peach Botton 2. 3 2.506 0.88 2.2 0.56 Peach Bottom t. 3 3.977 0.72 1.2 0.48 Dresden 1. 2. 3 3.582 1.26 3.9 0.75 Brunsenc6 1. 2 2.638 0.68 2.9 0.66 Monticelle 993 0.76 3.4 0.57 Ouad Cities I 2 2.491 1.38 2.3 0.77 F e tipatric k I 425 0.57 2.5 0.44 Fitzpatrick 1.190 0.51 2.0 0.37 Ceeper Statten 1.293 0.93 3.3 0.68 N611stene !

I 496 0.60 4.9 0.44 Nine Mlle Point 1.264 0.93 9.5 0.66 Peach Botton 2. 3 2.963 0.95 3.6 0.47 Quad Cettes 1. 2 3.146 1.40 2.7 0.81 Pilgrte 1.539 0.54 3.9 0.42 Vermont Yankee 1.527 1.16 4.4 0.61 asne Mile Potat 1.592 0.78 4.1 0.59 Ouad Cettes I. 2 3.757 1.62 '

3.7 0.79 Brunswick 1. 2 3.475 0.62 5.5 0.63 P41 ete I.836 0.66 4.5 0.44 Brunswick 1. 2 3.792 0.76 6.5 0.70 Cyster Creek 2.257 0.98 80.9 0.63 9

L

~

1984 1985 Dose Dese

Coll, per Coll.

Coll.

per Coll.

Dose Worker Dese Dose Werker Dose per (ress per per (rees per Site Name site or c5v) pad.Vr

- CR Site Name Site et c5v) MW-fr

- CR c

Sig Beck Point 155 0.52 3.1 0.52 wer 2 119 0.16 0.2 0.11 ta Salle 1. 2 252 0.20 0.4 0.07 La Crosse 173 0.46 4.4 0.68 Duane Arnold 189 0.31 0.6 0.19 Mine Mlle Point 1 265 0.26 0.5 0.25 La Crosse 252 0.87 6.5 0.87 Sig Rock Potat 1 291.

0.67 6.6 0.61 Susquehanna i 308 0.11 0.4 0.02 Monticello 327 0.56 0.6 0.42 Dr2sden I. 2. 3 I.774 e.78 2.2 0.54 La Salle I. 2 685 0.42 0.7 0.35 Vermont Yankee 603 0.63 5.5 0.39 Browns ferry 1. 2. 3 1.159 0.42 3.1 0.30 Browns Ferry 1. 2. 3 1.940 0.66 1.4 0.51 Match I. 2 818 0.29 0.7 0.19 Quad Citles 1. 2 1.579 0.94 1.6 0.63 Ouad Cities I. 2 990 0.84 0.8 0.54 Cooper Statten 799 0.50 1.9 0.53 Millstone Point I 608 0.83 1.1 0.60 Millstone Point 1 836 0.42 1.6 0.31 Oyster Creek I 748 0.32 1.7 0.33 Nine Mile Potat 890 0.58 2.1 0.50 Dresden 2.3 1.685 0.60 1.9 0.39 Pt1 rte 1 893 0.40 1.5 0.39 Fitzpatrick 977 0.60 1.7 0.57 9

Match 1,2 2.218 0.54 3.4 0.44 Fitzpatrick I.051 0.57 2.1 0.53 Peach Sottom 2.3 2.450 0.74

2. 3 0.57 Vermont Yankee I.051 0.76 2.9 0.42 Brunswic.k 3.2 3.260 0.66 4.3 0.62 SusquePanna l 3.106 0.30 1.8 0.20 Oyster Creek 2.054 0.87 55.4 0.60 Duane Arnold 1.!!2 0.79 4.7 0.30 feonticello 2.462 1.32 73.1 0.79 Cooper Statten 1.333 0.67 10.5 0.59 Pilgrim 4.082 0.90 0.65 Srunswick 1.2 2.804 0.69 3.4 0.65 Peach Botten 2.3 3.354 0.80 4.9 0.59

For sites with more than ene operating reacter, the

- CA is the ratte of the annual collective dose delivered at collective dose per reacter is obtained by dividing the individual deses exceeding I 5 roms (c5v) to the total collective dose for the site by the number of reacters.

cellective dese.

TABLE 4.6 PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS LISTED IN ASCENDING ORDER OF COLLECTIVE 00$E PER REACTOR 1981

1985 1981 1942 lH3 Dese Dose Dese

Ce11.

per Coll.

Cell.

per Coll.

'CeII.

per Call.

te ter Oose Due sorter Dese Dese verter Due Dese r

per (rees per we (reen Per pr (rees per lite name

$tte er clel au vr

Mt lite name lite er cle) ses - v e

- C a lite knee et te or tiv) 4 tr

- C0 Divts lesse 58 0.10 01 0.04 Le.aee.ee 101 0.29 9.8 S.!!

Yaates towe 64 0.17 9.4 0 te e sseeaee 141 8.37 0.3 0.10 trairie Island I, t tit 0.H 0.2 0.16 barns lesse to 0.11 0.1 0.04 Svarte Island 1. t 329 9.39 0.4 0.H Maddas mett lit f.23 0.2 0 #7 tratrie Islead 1, t III 0.34 9.3 0.24 These skie Islaas 1. #

376 0.18 0.04 Caets lesse 164 9.12 0.4 0 04 San Omefre i lit t it 4.11 8eatw valley its 0.19 8.4 0.10 nc 6= 6 re let 9.11 0.3 0 03 metae vantee 164 0.18 0t 0.14 satee i 164 0.15 0.3 0 09 Crystal steer 177 9 33 03 0.13 B ewavaee ill 0 37 0.4 0.24 Pelet Seett I. 2 lH e.??

48 0.46 f eet Caineva 217 0.36 0.5 0.42 Indiaa totat 1. t est 9,46

0. 7 4 e6 es&kee some 302 0.16 f.8 0 43 Farley 1. 2 444 0.33 04 0.10 leseveren 1. I all 0.20 9.3 9 14 Calert Citff s 1, 2 637 0.39 04 0.19 lt. Luce

!?!

0 26

0. 3 0.10 Selee 1. !

581 0.24 00 0.16 Coos I I llt 0.49 04 0.29 Potet Basen 1. I 609 0.79 t0 0 le f rejaa HF 0.32 06 0 25 morth Anas I, 2 640 0.70 0.5 0.37 Pal t sace s 3 30 0 21 00 0 20 Coot 1. !

653 0.46 0$

0.33 ladtaa Poet 3 He 0.54 1.0 8.6%

teache Sece 337 0 44 08

c. 34 north Anet 1. t ul 0.30 0.6 0 3e 432 0.52 1.3 0 28 Coot 1. I ett 4 se

0. 5 9.27 Calvert Citf f s 1. I M4 0.35 0.6 9.32 ta=cte, nece Oc eae

1. 2. 3 1.211 0 50 07 0 45 Artaasas 1. !

803 0.50 0t o 40 Oce*+e 1. 2, 3 1.207 0 63 86 0.46 Crystal Otver 3 406 0.36 4.0 0.23 Trojan 419 0 42 0.7 0.35 f ort Calhewn 433 4 50 1.3 0.30 maine f antee 424 0 89

0. 7 0.29 teates towe 474 0 64 44 4.14 f arley 1, #

1.021 0 l) 0.8 9 41 Feet Catheva 4 14 6 le

1. 0 0.50 Yhree pile Islead 1,2 3.004 0.47 0 44 nc5stre i til 8.30

0. 9 8.32 f eeley 511

9. H 1.6 0.78 C alveet Ci t f f s 1. I 1.017 0 59 9.0 0 4C Crystal niver

$52 0.32 1.2 0.19 Ihlistene Potet !

$31 0.60 07 0 44 Seeverah 670 6 ft 1.0 0.10 7hree pile Island 1. I 1.llo 0.73 0 57 Arasasas 1. I 1.102 0W l.0 0.39 Oceaee 1. f. 3 1.782 0.73 14 0 la Indiaa Potat 3 607 9 el 77.4 0 44 f rej aa 609 0 46 94 0.33 6earer talley 199 4.34 1.0 0.16 Itea 1. I 1.311 1.02 1.1 0 52 6 t *aa 615 0.71 1.4 0 45 Sales 1. I 1.203 9.37 60 0 ft Artansas 1. I 1.397 6 66 1.1 0 Gl m nne taakee 619 0 46 1.1 6 32 Potat suca 1. I 1.403 4 ti t2 0 13 0,tiasse !

733 0 50 1.7 0.51 a

tien I I 1.720 0 94 13 0.69 Stery 1. I I.4 60

$ 79 1.1 0.7) teaver f ailey 772 0.62

1. 4 0 42 Palt sades 902 9 42 22 0 41 ladtaa Potet 1, t 1.635 6 76 31 0 52 eaache bete 787 9.99 f.3 0.39 St. Lec te ett 0.63 3.6 0.43 laa Onefre lit 0.27 13.8 0 35 G i a* a til 0 to 1.3 0.55 hasons tech 1.0H 0 47 f.1 0.57 herit Anna 1. I 1.915 0 67 1.5 0 67 Ac41

sen 923 0 41 8.3 0.04 Tereir Potet 3. 4 2.211 0 77 3.4 0 il t * ** 1. I t.153 1.34 l.0 0.76 Pal t s ade s 977 9 45 i!

O 64 Indian Potat 1. 2 f.731 1 06 7.4 0 65 turney Potet 3. 4 P.119 0.72 1.3 0 as St. Lecie 1.704 0.54 4.4 0.47 tu key Potat 1. 4 f.641 4 92 3.8 0.H her,1, #

4.244 1.13 47 0 77 4 taae 140 1 et 39 4 45 r

laa baef te 3.823 1.11 33 6 4.72 lastaa Petet 3

.t!6 0 83 7.1 4.62 masses nect 1.384 4 64 33 6 67 0 40 Surey 1. #

3,270 1.17 3.6 0.70 t.4 etilstone Point t

,.413 0 la 63 4 46 millstone Potat i 1.081 0.79 64 0.67 to6tessa !

. 426 0 71 1964 1945 Due Dese

Coll.

per te11.

'Cet t,

per Coll.

Dese nrter Dose Dese poeter Dese per (rees pe r per t rees per lite na*e lit e er civ) m ir

- c a lite haae safe er cle) no er

- C a Crystat si,er 49 0.09 s.1 0.00 Callaway I H

0 04 00 00 Prairse Islaas 1. I 147 8.27 0t a le 6eaver valley 60 0,10 0.1 6 Oc evilsteae Potet i 120 0 42 02 0 31 Dav i s -le s se 71 0.10 9.3 0.04 towev ee 139 0 29 63 0.15 kaodas heck 101 0 #6 0.2 0 t3 e

Dai s 6 esse 177 0 16 03 0 of Sales 1. I 204 0.18 01 0.15 t

Banche nece fit 0 28 0$

6 !!

Art aa s a s 1. I 296 0 23 02 0.10 laciaa Po et 3 130 0 35 03 0 El te.aucee 176 0H 94 4.11 Caturt Citf f s 1. I 479 6 In 83 0 13 las caefre i nel 0 of 96 0.06 lesser ill 0.26 0.6 0 11 ladtaa Point i 192 0 27 0.2 0 te 416 8.34 46 0 31 Prarie Is. land 1. t la t ee 1. I 641 9.49 1.0 0 Il f aan ee.t o

til 3 32 16 0.te twree ude islaat 1. k 644 4 64 0 46 tasan towe 340 0 53 20 0 44 Peiet Beach 1. t ett 0.72 06 0 41 Oceau 1. 2. 3 1,106 0 il 05 0H laa caef re 2. 3 633 0.17 0l 0.10 CMt 1. t 762 0 et 0.5 0.32 Robi*soa #

311 0 23 0.5 0 20 fita 1. !

746

0. ? !

8O C 47 Calvert Clif f s 1. !

694 0 43 06 0 37 E i *e a 3 64

0. 5%

!0 0 39 T rej aa 343 4 43 9.4 8.26 Pe+ot teact 1, !

709 8 54 1.0 0 to f eet Calhava1 373 9 le 3.0 0 37 a naasas I. 2 836 0 46 05 9 37 Leser a 379 9 37 06 0.34 Tre $an 433 4 42 0.0 0 34

cGe're 1. I 771 0 35 0.1 0.19 f arler 1. I 9Ct 9 44 06 6 el Farley 1. I 799 9 31 84 6M les Daef re 1. t 946 0 15 07 6 14 torth Aaea 1. I til 0 34 0.6 0 31 Bearer valley M4 0.36 0t e.32 E t an a ett 0.60 19 9 37 nr.Gutre !

$07 4 30

9. ?

O 26 Three eile Isisad 1. I 857 9 45 43 0M leoveyan 1. 2 1.117 0 47 00 0M Oc eate I, t. 3

1. M4 0 48 0.6 0 42 f eet C a'hova 643 0 62 20 0 47 Ceet 1. I til 0 48 89 0 31 Palisades 173 0 43 50 0 41 Palis ade s 50' 0 37 00 0 27 Tvrtey Peset 3. 4 1.255 0 62

1. 3 0 13 Seeveyah 1. I 1,071 8 54 00 6 47 St. Lucie 1. I l.183 0 60 1.1 4 49 Indiaa totat 3 579 0 52 10 0 20 meine vaanee 464 0.70 Il 0 of Itea 1. I 1.164 0 70

1. 0 0 15 Fu ies Point 3, 4

1. t 5 3 e 64 1.3 e et herth &**a 1. I 1.945 8 64 1.9 0 19 r

Sorry 1. #

2.287 0 70 t!

O 61 St. tve te I, t 4.344 0 to 06 e 60 mesdea but 1.fle 0 85 30 0 66 Cryst al ti=*r 3 689 4.H t0 9 20 lasian Peiet i 2.644 0 91 63 0 61

a5me Taaaee 700 0 69 1.1 6 4e esasesea i f.440 0.70 0 69 Beache nece 756 4 43 32 0 27 Svery 3. I 1.015 0 57 16 4 64 Filisteae i 1.581 9.83 38 8 64 re thgm goe opergttag retcter, t he

- CB 13 the egtle of the a**wal cellect two gese eel tveeed gt of er sites sitt oe'er reacter is attaihed ty diettl#g the todicidwal esses er(eed'pg i l rees (ctr) la the let ti cellect tee Gese p tellective esse for the atte by the eveter of renters cellective cose 4 13

TABLE 4.7a FIVE-YEAR TOTALS AND AVERAGES LISTED IN ASCENDING ORDER OF COLLECTIVE DOSE PER BWR 1981-1985 Average BWRs

Total Workers Dose per Total Average Collective with Worker Mega-Collective Dose per Measurable (remor watt-Dose per

- Site name Site Doses cSv) years MW-yr la Crosse 1,066 1,156 0.92 149.3 7.1 Big Rock Point 1,197 2,225 0.54 236.9 5.1 Duane Arnold 3,455 5,303 0.65 1,404.8 2.5 Hatch 1, 2 7,132 16,696-0.43 4,443.2 1.6 Browns Ferry 1, 2, 3 11,062 15,675 0.71 7,599.4 1.5 Millstone 1 4,113 6,909 0.60 2,499.2 1.6 Vermont Yankee 4,117 5,407 0.76 2,035.7 2.0 Cooper Station 4,546 6,639 0.68 2,015.2 2.3 Nine Mile Point 4,871 7,323 0.67 1,856.2 2.6 Monticello 4,907 5,627 0.87 1,718.5 2.9 Dresden 1,2, 3 12,766 12,915 0.99 4,727.4 2.7 Fitzpatrick 5,727 9,982 0.57 2,761.2 2.1 Quad Cities 1, 2 11,963 9,224 1.30 5,526.7 2.2 Peach Bottom 2, 3 13,250 16,220 0.82 5,418.3 2.4 Oyster Creek 6,841 9,973 0.69 1,068.6 6.4 Brunswick 1, 2 15,969 23,516 0.68 3,685.7 4.3 Pilgrim 9,512 14,734 0.65 1,947.0 4.9 (123 reactor-years)

Grand Totals and Averages 122,494 169,521 0.72 49,093.1 2.5 Averages per Reactor-year 996 1,378 399

For sites with more than one operating reactor, the collective dose per reactor is obtained by dividing the collective dose for the site by the number of reactors.

- Sites where not all reactors had completed five full years of commercial operation as of 12/31/85 are not included.

4-14

TABLE 4.7b FIVE-YEAR TOTALS AND AVERAGES LISTED IN ASCENDING ORDER OF COLLECTIVE DOSE PER PWR 1981-1985 Average PWRs

Total Workers Dose per Total Average Collective with Worker Mega-Collective Dose per Measurable (remor watt-Dose per

- Site name Site Doses cSv) vaars MW-vr Davis Besse 550 4,452 0.12 2,271.1 0.2 Prairie Island 1, 2 1,354 3,756 0.36 4,565.9 0.3 Kewaunee 722 2,182 0.33 2,252.7 0.3 Yankee Rowe 1,403 3,036 0.46 650.2 2.2 Calvert Cliffs 1, 2 3,505 8,242 0.43 6,594.4 0.5 Cook 1, 2 3,719 7,829 0.48 6,926.9 0.5 Crystal River 3 1,875 6,145 0.31 2,650.7 0.7 Point Beach 1, 2 3,879 5,285 0.73 3,786.0 1.0 Three Mile Island 1, 2 4,084 8,787 0.46 103.6 39.4***

Fort Calhoun 2,044 4,181 0.40 1,655.5 1.2 Trojan 2,131 5,151 0.41 3,245.4 0.7 Beaver Valley 2,164 6,489 0.33 2,755.7 0.8 Arkansas 1, 2 4,394 8,946 0.49 5,406.5 0.8 Oconee 1, 2, 3 6,620 11,606 0.57 9,375.3 0.7 Rancho Seco 2,504 5,442 0.46 1,777.3 1.4 Main Yankee 2,791 5,026 0.56 3,084.9 0.9 Indian Point 3 2,997 4,846 0.62 1,827.7 1.6 North Anna 1, 2 6,044 13,014 0.46 5,896.2 1.0 Palisades 3,289 8,571 0.38 2,014.8 1.6 Ginna 3,470 4,569 0.76 1,867.8 1.9 Zion 1, 2 7,086 7,222 0.98 6,353.4 1.1 Haddam Neck 3,863 5,572 0.69 2,445.2 1.6 Turkey Point 3, 4 9,559 12,733 0.75 4,429.7 2.2 San Onofre 1 4,912 14,725 0.33 491.2 10.0 Millstone 2 5,526 7,546 0.73 2,812.8 2.0 Robinson 2 6,273 11,222 0,56 1,771.4 3.5 Surry 1, 2 13,016 14,789 0.88 5,340.2 2.4 Indian Point 2 7,688 9.423 0.82 2,810.6 2.7 (200 reactor-years)

Grand Totals and Averages 117,462 210,784 0.53 95,163.3 1.2 1

1 Averages per Reactor-year 587 1054 475.8

For sites with more than one operating reactor, the collective dose per reactor is obtained by dividing the collective dose for the site by the number of reactors.

- Sites where not all reactors had completed five full years of commercial operation as of 12/31/85 are not included.

- - These two units were shut down after the 1979 accident at unit 2. Unit I was unable to begin normal power generation during this period. Most of the collective dose during 1981-1985 was the result of recovery effort at unit 2 and steam generator repairs at unit 1.

4-15

Based on the 200 reactor-years of operation at the PWRs listed, these averages were found to be 587 person rems (person-cSv), 0.53 rem and 1.2, respectively.

All of these values, at both types of facilities, are lower than those found for the previous five years.

In 1985, there were five BWR units where collective doses exceeded 1,300 person-rems (person-cSv) per reactor. Although these five units represented only 18% of the 28 BWRs, they contributed nearly 37% of the total collective dose incurred at BWRs in 1985. Most of the collective dose accumulated at the BWR site with the highest collective dose (3,354 person-rems (person-cSv)) was attributed to routine maintenance activities, such as snubber and control rod drive repair, standing fire watches, and pipe safe-end replacement (weld overlays).

At PWRs, there were three units where the collective dose exceeded 900 person-rems (person-cSv) per reactor. Although representing less than 6% of the 54 PWRs operating in 1985, they contributed over 15% of the total collective dose at PWRs in 1985.

The plant with the highest collective dose (1,581 person-rems (person-cSv)) in 1985 accumulated most of the dose during cleaning, decontamination, plugging and sleeving of steam generators.

In general, particularly for BWRs, the plants having the lower values of most of the parameters shown are usually the newer plants.

Some of the

older, smaller plants also appear near the top of the listings since they report small collective doses; however, the ratio of their collective dose to the number of megawatt-years of electricity generated will be higher because of their limited power generation capacity.

In the case of PWRs, this generalization does not always apply.

For example, Prairie Island 1 and 2 and Kewaunee, three reactors that have been operating for 11 or 12

years, have experienced lower collective doses than many new reactors for years.

Usually, the combination of a large annual collective dose and a large collective dose to megawatt-year ratio for a plant indicates that extensive maintenance or modifications were undertaken during the year.

For example, maintenance jobs that were large contributors to BWR doses in 1985 included replacement of recirculation system piping, inspection for intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC), IGSCC repair, induction heating stress improvement (IHSI) of welds, reactor vessel component inservice inspection, and plant decontamination activities.

At PWR facilities, the major contributors to the collective dose have been extensive tube inspection, sleeving, and plugging related to the repair of steam generators.

Even with the use of better techniques and robots, these tasks continue to be a major source of exposure.

It should be noted that the differences in nuclear plant designs and the ages of the plants (Ref.15), even between plants of a given type, affect the nature of these parameters. Therefore care should be exercised when attempting to draw conclusions from these data.

4.6 Collective Dose by Work function and Employee Type A second type of annual statistical report that is required by each plant's technical specifications provides the collective dose of workers monitored at each plant site by employee type (plant, utility, or contractor) and by work and job functions. A copy of the report submitted for each reactor 4-16

site, is provided in Appendix D.

Table 4.8 and Figure 4.5 are presented to summarize the 1985 data. The collective doses obtained from these reports are not used in any other tables in this document for the following reasons:

the technical specifications of each plant requires only 80% of the plant's collective dose be accounted for, and some utilities do not use the official dosimeter results in compiling the data. Also, when examining the number of personnel shown on these reports, it should be kept in mind that individuals who perform tasks in more than one category may be counted more than once.

Table 4.9 shows that workers performing special maintenance usually incurred the largest portion (35%-45%) of the collective dose and that workers performing routine maintenance activities usually incurred between 30% and 35%.

The figures have been fairly stable over the years with these two l

categories always accounting for the majority of the collective dose. Figure 4.5 graphically shows the trends in the collective dose by work function and type of personnel for the years 1979 through 1985 for BWRs and PWRs separately.

Contractor personnel incur most of the collective dose during special maintenance while it is nearly equally divided between contractor and plant and utility personnel during rout'.ne maintenance and waste processing.

Table 4.10 presents the distribution of the collective dose for 1985 at all LWRs among five occupations. As expected, maintenance personnel incurred the majority (67%) of the collective dose with contractor maintenance personnel receiving about twice as much as the station and utility maintenance employees combined. This is about the same as that reported for 1984.

Supervisory personnel received 3.1% of the dose, compared to 4.1% in 1984, while workers in the remaining three occupations--operations, health physics, and engineering--received 9.3%, 13%, and 8.3% respectively, of the collective dose.

None of these values changed very much from those found for 1983 and 1984. The collective doses shown in Tables 4.8 and 4.10 do not equal those shown in other tables in the report because they are the sum of the doses taken from the type of annual reports shown in Appendix D rather than the collective dose that was obtained or calculated from the i 20.407 annual reports.

Another use mede of the reports given in Appendix D is in proportioning the collective dose obtained from the i 20.407 annual reports into the work functions and personnel types shown in Appendix C.

This was done in the following way:

(1) The collective dose incurred by workers in the work function "Reactor Operations and Surveillance" on each plant's annual report submitted pursuant to their technical specifications (the first number in the last column in Appendix D) was determined.

(?) The ratio of this dose to the total collective dose (the last number in the last column in Appendix D) was calculated and multiplied by the total collective dose that had been estimated or obtained from the i

20.407 annual report.

This product is the collective dose shown in the column headed "Operations" in Appendix C.

(3)

The collective dose shown in the column headed "Maintenance and Others" in Appendix C was determined by first summing the collective doses 4-17

l TABLE 4.8 ANNUAL COLLECTIVE DOSE BY WORK FUNCTION AND PERSONNEL' TYPE 1985 WORK STATION EMPLOYEES UTILITY EMPLOYEES CONTRACT WORKERS TOTAL PER FUNCTION FUNCTION PERSON-REM % OF TOTAL PERSON-REM % OF TOTAL PERSON-REM % OF TOTAL PERSON-REM 10F TOTAL

801 LING WATER REACTORS REACTOR OPS & SURV 1.399.699 7.02%

354.807 1.78%

735.848 3.691 2.490.354 12.491 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE 2.137.180 10.72%

962.727 4.83%

4.221.369 21.171 7.321.276 36.71%

IN-SERVICE INSPECTION 134.393 0.67%

267.932 1.34%

316.130 6.601 1.718.455 8.621

~)

SPECIAL MAINTENANCE 869.333 4.36%

456.970 2.29%

5.919.359 29.681 7.245.662 36.331 l

I WASTE PROCESSING 347.800 1.74%

17.666 0.091 375.753 1.88%

741.219 3.721 REFUELIE 180.344 0.90%

35.145 0.18%

212.257 1.061 427.746 2.13%

TOTALS 5.068.749 25.41%

2.095.247 10.51%

12.780.716 64.081 19.944.712 100.001

PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS REACTOR OPS & SURV 1.815.508 7.55%

161.315 0.671 1.177.418 4.891 3.154.241 13.11%

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE 2.618.156 10.88%

678.291 2.82%

4.587.473 19.07%

7.883.920 32.771 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION 341.003 1.42%

370.901 1.54%

1.332.540 5.541 2.044.444 8.501 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE 1.775.804 7.38%

841.856 3.50%

4.441.228 18.461 7.058.888 29.34%

WASTE PROCESSI E 642.477 2.67%

60.398 0.25%

780.442 3.241 1.483.317 6.17%

REFUELIE 781.935 3.25%

359.409 1.491 1.290.225 5.361 2.431.569 10.111 TOTALS 7.974.883 33.15%

2.472.170 10.28%

13.609.326 56.57%

24.056.379 100.00%

ALL LIGHT WATER REACTORS REACTOR OPS & SURV 3.215.207 7.31%

516.122 1.17%

1.913.266 4.351 5.644.595 12.83%

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE 4.755.336 10.811 1.641.018 3.73%

8.808.842 20.021 15.205.196 34.56%

IN-SERVICE INSPECTION 475.396 1.08%

638.833 1.45%

2.648.670 6.021 3.762.899 8.55%

SPECIAL MAINTENANCE 2.645.137 6.01%

1.298.826 2.95%

10.360.587 23.551 14.304.550 32.51%

WASTE PROCESSING 990.277 2.25%

78.064 0.18%

1.156.195 2.631 2.224.536 5.06%

REFUELIE 962.279 2.19%

394.554 0.90%

1.502.482 3.41%

2.859.315 6.50%

TOTALS 13.043.632 29.64%

4.567.417 10.38%

26.390.042 59.98%

44.001.091 100.00%

Table does not inicude results from the PWRs at Point Beach 1. 2 (444 person-rems) and the BWR at Shoreham (19.21 person-rems), because the data for these plants were not submitted in the suggested format.

i i

TABLE 4.9 PERCENTAGES OF ANNUAL COLLECTIVE DOSE AT LWR'S BY WORK FUNCTION PERCENTAGE OF COLLECTIVE DOSE EACH YEAR WORK FUNCTION 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 REACTOR OPERATIONS AND SURVEILLANCE 10.8% 10.2% 10.5% 13.3% 12.2%

9.5%

8.9%

9.4% 10.1% 11.4% 12.8%

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE 52.6% 31.0% 28.1% 31.5% 29.2% 35.5% 36.1% 27.9% 29.7% 26.9% 34.6%

INSERVICE INSPECTION 3.0%

6.0%

6.4%

7.7%

9.0%

5.5%

5.3%

6.5%

7.6%

6.3% 8.6%'

SPECIAL MAINTENANCE 19.0% 40.0% 42.5% 35.9% 39.4% 40.6% 40.5% 46.8% 43.9% 45.4% 32.5%

e WASTE PROCESSING 6.9%

5.0%

5.8%

5.0%

3.6%

3.0%

4.2%

5.0%

4.6%

3.6% 5.1%

REFUELING 7.7%

7.9%

6.7%

6.6%

6.1%

5.0%

4.4%

4.1%

6.4% 6.5%

f 1

1 1

E 4

L

=--,-

m e---

==

r

TABLE 4.10 ANNUAL COLLECTIVE DOSE BY OCCUPATION AND PERSONNEL TYPE 1985 STATION EMPLOYEES UTILITY EMPLOYEES CONTRACT WORKERS TOTAL PER FUNCTION OCCUPATION PERSON-REM % OF TOTAL PERSON-REM % OF TOTAL PERSON-REM % OF TOTAL PERSON-REM % OF TOTAL 1

4

BOILIE WATER REACTORS MAINTENANCE 2.605.499 13.06%

1.603.877 8.04%

10.094.016 50.61%

14.303.392 71.72%

OPERATIONS 1.163.361 5.83%

206.333 1.03%

384.173 1.93%

1.753.867 8.79%

HEALTH.'HYSICS 700.327 3.51%

90.095 0.451 1.045.809 5.24%

1.836.231 9.21%

SUPERVISORY 280.383 1.41%

34.962 0.181 394.704 1.98%

710.049 3.56%

EEINEERING 319.179 1.601 159.980 0.801 862.014 4.32%

1.341.173 6.72%

TOTALS 5.068.749 25.411 2.095.247 10.51%

12.780.716 64.08%

19.944.712 100.00%

PRES $tRIZED WATER REACTORS MAINTENANCE 4.439.867 18.46%

1.907.124 7.93%

8.768.051 36.45%

15.115.042 62.83%

OPERATIONS 1.410.701 5.86%

229.810 0.96%

680.201 2.83%

2.320.712 9.651 E3 HEALTH PHYSICS 1.216.539 5.311 73.333 0.301 2.348.569 9.76%

3.698.441 15.37%

O SUPERVISORY 367.705 1.53%

4i. 088 0.19%

217.021 0.90%

630.814 2.62%

EEGINEERI E 480.071 2.001 215.815 0.90%

1.595.484 6.63%

2.291.370 9.521 TOTALS 7.974.883 33.15%

2.472.170 10.281 12.609.326 56.57%

24.056.379 100.00%

I

ALL LIGHT WATER REACTORS MAINTENANCE 7.045.366 16.011 3.511.001 7.98%

18.862.067 42.87%

29.418.434 66.86%

OPERATIONS 2.574.062 5.85%

436.143 0.991 1.064.374 2.42%

4.074.579 9.26%

i HEALTH PHYSICS 1.976.866 4.49%

163.428 0.37%

3.394.378 7.71%

5.534.672 12.581 SUPERVISORY 648.08m 1.471 81.050 0.18%

611.725 1.391 1.340.863 3.05%

EEINEERIE 799.250 1.82%

315.795 0.85%

2.457.498 5.59%

3.632.543 8.261 TOTALS 13,083.632 29.64%

4.567.417 10.38%

26.390.042 59.98%

44.001.091 100.00%

Table does not include results from the PWRs at Point Beach 1. 2 (444 person-rems) and the BWR at Shoreham (19.21 person-reus), because the data for these plants were not submitted in the suggested format.

Figure 4.5 COLLECTIVE 005E BY WORK FUNCTION tinti PERSONNEL TYPE N000 AT BWRs.

1979-1985 G Ops, & Surveillance E Special Maintenance

~ E Routine Maintenance O Waste Processing E Inservice Inspection 0 Refueling f25000 P= Plant Personnel C= Contractor Personnel 12com C

g

, 15000 l

E P

-P P

P P

p

' twoo

lliIilIi 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 YEAR 35000 AT PWRs, 1979-1985 O Ops, & Surveillance u Special Maintenance

' B Routine Maintenance O Waste Processing E Inservice Inspection U Refueling 250C0-P= Plant Personnel C= Contractor Personnel 20000 b

C C

C

!=

15000 C

f

'f-hp p

e

-i 1iEEl k10000.P p

h 5 k g ~~

l 9

som B

I c.

1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 YEAR 4 21

incurred by workers in the five remaining functions given in Appendix D and then calculating the fraction that this dose is of the total collecti',e dose.

This fraction was multiplied by the total collective dose estimated from the i 20.407 annual reports to yield the collective dose shown in this column of Appendix C.

(4) A similar procedure was followed in determining the collective dose for the columns headed "Contractor" and "Station & Utility" in Appendix C.

4.7 Health Imolications of Averaae Annual Doses Of interest to individuals exposed to radiation in the workplace, are the potential health risks associated with occupational exposure. If any damage to health is caused by exposure to radiation in the workplace, it would likely manifest itself as certain types of cancer in the exposed worker or, less likely, as inherited genetic damage in the first few generations of the workers' offspring.

However, the likelihood of cancer or genetic damage occurring as a result of radiation exposure experienced by workers in the nuclear industry is small. A vast amount of scientific information is available from which estimates of these risks can be made. Much of this information, however, has been obtained from epidemiologic studies of human 3

populations at levels of exposure considerably higher than those normally experienced in the workplace.

Complementary to this, information obtained from many animal and cell biology studies have greatly enhanced our knowledge and understanding of the biological effects of ionizing radiation.

Although using this information to estimate risks in the workplace introduces uncertainties, these uncertainties can be dealt with in such a manner that the risk is r.ot likely to be underestimated.

Thus, the discussion below is likely to overstate the health implications rather than understate them.

Cancer induction as a result of radiation exposure has been examined by many organizations having scientific and medical expertise in the subject.

One of these, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), published a comprehensive review of the biological effects of ionizing radiation in 1980 (Ref.

16].

Based on this report, a large working population receiving one million person-rems (person-cSv) might suffer an estimated 100 to 200 additional cancer deaths over the remaining years of their lives.

This risk estimate can be applied to the 47,474 person-rems (person-cSv) (Table 3.1) and the 110,763 workers who received measurable exposures in 1985.

The result is that for these workers the expected number of additional cancer deaths that might result from radiation dose received that year would be about ton.

1 These deaths would occur many years following the exposure and would be in addition to the approximately 20,000 cancer deaths that occur normally in a population of 110,763 workers without exposure to this amount of radiation.

Perhaps more meaningful to the individual workers are the health implications to the workers receiving the average dose of 0.43 rem (cSv) or i

l the maximum dose of 27 rems (cSv) during 1985.

The estimated increased cancer death risk is about one chance in 10,000 for the average dose and about three chances in 1000 for the maximum dose.

Should a worker receive 0.43 rem (cSv) per year continuously during his entire working career (working from age 20 until age 65) his risk of dying from cancer could i

increase by less than 2% over the normal risk of dying of cancer.

These risks can be compared to the American Cancer Society's estimates of one 4-22 l

L

chance in four of developing cancer and one chance in five of dying of cancer.

The potential genetic effects from a worker population receiving about 47,474 person-rems (person-cSv) is very small compared to genetic damages that normally occur spontaneously in a population of this size.

Approximately 100,000 serious genetic defects occur normally in one million live births, i.e., an average of about one serious defect in every ten live births.

Theoretically, the total genetic damage in the first generation children of the 110,763 exposed

workers would, according to the 1980 NAS report, be an increase of three or less cases (less than 0.05%) compared to the expected 10,000 cases that occur normally. No significant increase in the number of genetic defects has been observed in the children of individuals exposed to much higher levels of ionizing radiation at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan.

i l

l l

I Assuming that, on the average, each exposed person will have one live born child in the future, i.e., 110,763 children born to this worker i

population.

4 23

5 TERMINATION DATA SUBMITTED PURSUANT T0 10 CFR I 20.408 5.1 Termination Reoorts. 1969-1984.*

In 1969, the Atomic Energy Commission (predecessor of the NRC) began requiring certain categories of licensees **

to submit personal identification and exposure information upon the termination of each monitored person's employment or work assignment at their facility.

The appropriate information on each report has been manually coded and entered into the Commission's cc,mputerized Radiation Exposure Information Reporting System (REIRS) for permanent retention. The data are retrievable by several which allows social security number, name, facility, etc.

criteria statistical analysis of the data as well as the tracing of individual dose histories. During the years that this information has been collected, some 1,600,000 termination records have been received for approximately 390,000 individuals who have been reported as having terminated their employment at facilities in one or more of the categories of covered licensees.

The figures given for the number of reports and the number of individuals are different because numerous individuals have been terminated more than once over the years and because some individuals may have had external doses reported for more than one part of the body, as well as estimates of internal depositions of radioactive material, each of which is counted as one record.

Due to the large number of records, it takes a considerable amount of time to process these records so that the termination data for 1985 are not yet available. It should be noted that the data presented in this section are revised from last year's report as all the termination data for 1983 and 1984 have now been entered into REIRS. Table 5.1 provides a breakdown of this information for individuals terminating during each of these 16 years and, since the majority of termination reports are now submitted by nuclear power facilities, the number of records and individuals that they reported are displayed separately. As shown, the number of records continues to increase each year, primarily because of the growing need for workers at power reactors.

5.2 Limitations of Termination Data When examining or using the statistics that are based on the termination data, one should keep in mind that these data have various limitations:

(1) some licensees submit a termination report for each monitoring period rather than waiting until the individual actually completes his work assignment at the facility, (2) the period (s) of exposure that are reported for terminating individuals may indicate the monitoring period during which he may have been exposed to radiation rather than the actual dates of exposure, Updated for 1983 and 1984 data which have now been entered into REIRS.

Commercial nuclear power reactors; industrial radiographers; fuel processors, fabricators, and reprocessors; and manufacturers and distributors of specified quantities of byproduct material.

Three other types of NRC licensees are now required to submit reports pursuant to 10 CFR I 20.407 and i 20.408: geologic repositories for high-level radioactive waste; receivers of radioactive waste from other persons for land disposal; and independent installations for the storage of spent fuel.

5-1 1

(3) some licensees report cumulative periods of exposure and doses rather than the actual periods and dose incurred during each period, and (4) licensees having more than one licensed facility sor.etimes include in the termination report submitted when the individual leaves the second facility the dose that he incurred at the first facility, which may already have been reported.

Although attempts have been made to correct for some of these

problems, they are still a small additional source of error in any statistics developed from the termination data.

TABLE 5.1 TERMINATION REPORTS SUBMITTED TO THE NRC 1969 - 1984**

All Cov,ered Cateoories*

Power Reactor Licensees Number of Number of Number of Number of YEAR Termination Terminating Termination Terminating Records Individuals Records Individuals i

1969 5,009 3,992 790 727 1970 8,606 6,069 2,126 1,908 1971 12,955 8,874 2,246 2,197 l

1972 15,685 10,353 4,997 3,888 1973 19,985 15,588 11,525 9,071 1974 30,389 21,499 16,946 11,603 1975 44,676 27,415 38,376 22,327 1976 70,230 40,079 63,593 35,294 1977 88,295 42,183 81,074 36,864 1978 96,010 44,541 85,308 37,359 1979 133,470 58,913 118,218 48,305 1980 175,408 73,662 162,515 65,092 1981**

205,103 73,004 196,104 67,908 1982**

200,191 67,589 192,314 63,848 1983**

243,229 76,202 234,803 72,869 1984**

294,556 77,251 284,144 74,182

Commercial nuclear power reactors; industri&1 radiographers; fuel processors, fabricators, and reprocessors; manufacturers and distri-butors of specified quantities of byproduct materials; low level waste disposal facilities; and independent spent fuel storage installations.

- Additional termination data for these years have now been entered into the REIR System and the corresponding figures have been updated.

52

5.3 Transient Workers oer Calendar Ouarter One use of the information contained in the termination reports is the examination of the doses being received by short-term workers. Since nearly half of the termination reports indicated periods of exposure that were less than 90 days, it is possible that several thousand individuals could have been employed by two or more licensees during the same calendar quarter.

Thus, in this report, a "quarterly transient" worker is defined to be an individual who began ud terminated employment at two or more different licensed facilities within one caler.dar quarter. This allows one to examine the doses of those workers most likely to approach the quarterly limits without their employer's knowledge since they move so rapidly among facilities.

l Table 5.2 displays some of the information gathered from these termination reports that were submitted by all covered licensees and by licensed nuclear power facilities, separately. One can quickly see that the vast majority of these individuals are monitored by nuclear power facilities.

The number of these individuals in:reased about tenfold during the past ten years from 332 in 1974 to 3,284 in 1984, and yet the average individual dose (which is close to being 6 quarterly dose for these workers) has steadily decreased over these years i e a value of.34 rem (cSv) for 1984. As previously noted, there are no data s t aval' ?ble for 1985.

e The bottom half of the table separates the information shown for power reactor licensees into that for reactor workers employed by two, three, and four or more different reactor licensees. The table shows that most of these transients were reported by two different licensees during a quarter.

The smaller number of workers terminated by three licensees received the same or higher average doses than those terminated by two employers every year until 1983. In 1983, for the first time workers terminating from three nuclear power licensees received a lesser average dose than those workers terminated by two auch licensees, and ir 1984 the average dose is about the same for these workers.

This is believed to be a reflection of the industry's efforts to reduce the exposure of all individuals

.arking at their facilities.

Examination of these records also revealed that some individuals have worked for as many as six different NRC licensees during one calendar quarter.

However, on the average, less than two instances per year have been found in which a worker exceeded his qu5rterly limit of three rems (cSv) as a result of his working at two or more different licensed facilities within one calendar quarter, in a few of these instances, the doses that the workers had received while employed by the first utility were revised upward later in the year.

The underestimates resulted in quarterly doses that slightly exceeded three rems (cSv). A very few quarterly exposures exceeding three rems (cSv) may have gone undetected because a worker's dose was received over a period spanning a calendar quarter and was reported for the entire period.

When this happens, it is not possible to determine the portion of the dose received during each quarter.

5.4 Transient Workers Der Calendar Year at Nuclear Power facilities Since the number of transient workers per calendar quarter comt ise only a

E-3

TABLE 5.2 TRANSIENT WORKERS PER CALENDAR QUARTER 1973 - 1984 All Covered Licensees Power Reactor Facilities No. of Persons Collective Average No. of Persons Collective Average Year Terminated by Two Dose Individual Year Terminated by Two Dose Individual or more Licensees (person-rems Dose (rem or more Licensees (person-rems Dose (rem Within One Ouarter person-cSv) or cSv)

Within One Ouarter person-cSv) or cSv) 1973

-157 138 0.88 1973 146 123 0.84 1974 332 170 0.51 1974 285 158 0.55 1975 709 508 0.72 1975 684 493 0.72 1976 1,299 904 0.70 1976 1,257 889 0.71 1977 1,481 870 0.59 1977 1,437 851 0.59 1978 1,570 720 0.46 1978 1,500 680 0.45 1979 1,809 836 0.46 1979 1,754 802 0.46 1980 2,355 1,063 0.45 1980 2,218 1,033 0.47 1981 2,344 955 0.41 1981 2,335 952 0.41 1982*

2,428 935 0.39 1982*

2,396 914 0.38 u,

1 1983*

2,774 913

-0.33 1983*

2,728 886 0.32 1984*

3.284 1.122 0.34 1984*

3.223 1.090 0.34 Power Reactor Facilities No. of Workers No. of Workers No. of Workers Year Terminated by Collective Average Terminated by Collective Average Terminated by Collective Average Two Licensees Dose Dose Three Licensees Dose Dose

>Three Licensees Dose Dose 1973 133 108 0.81 11 13 1.18 2

2 1.00 1974 255 132 0.52 28 24 0.86 2

1 0.50 1975 609 427 0.70 70 6.'

O.89 5

4 0.80 1976 1,095 720 0.66 145 146 1.01 17 23 1.35 1977 1,271 7:8 0.56 147 115 0.78 17 18 1.06 1978 1,303 570 0.45 165 75 0.45 32 15 0.47 1979 1,527 647 0.43 178 130 0.73 49 25 0.51 1980 1,896 856 0.45 259 140 0.54 63 36 0.57 1981 1,967 780 0.40 308 145 0.47 60 27 0.45 1982*

2,047 789 0.39 288 113 0.39 61 12 0.20 1983*

2,276 767 0.34 362 101 0.28 90 18 0.20 1984*

2.677 907 0.34 414 146 0.35 132 37 0.28 0 Figures for these years have been updated because additional termination data have now been entered into the REIR System.

l

~

l l

TABLE 5.3 TRANSIENT WORKERS PER CALENDAR YEAR AT NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES 1977 - 1984 l

Collective No. of No. of Workers Dose Average Year Commercial Terminated by (person-rems

. Dose Reactors Two or More Licensees person cSv) frems or cSv) 1 1977 57 3,161 3,776 1.19

(

1378 64 3,202 3,231 1.01 l

1979 68 3,938 3,891 0.99 l

1980 69 5,463 6,028 1.10 1981 71 5,425 5,381 0.99 l

1982 75 5,303 5,610 1.06 cn 1983*

76 6,340 6,675 1.05 Ei 1984*

79 7.403 7.763 1.05 No. of Wcrkers No. of Workers No. of Workers Year Terminated by Collective Average Terminated by Collective Average Terminated by Collective Average Two Licensees Dose Dose Three Licensees Dose Dose

>Three licensees Dose' Dose 1977 2,166 1,987 0.92 572 842 1.47 423 947 2.24 1978 2,119 1,490 0.70 621 792 1.28 462 949 2.05 1979 2,761 2,097 0.76 688 805 1.17 489 989 2.02.

1980 3,772 3,444 0.91 959 1,245-1.30

'732 1,339 1.83 1981 3,745 3,033 0.81 924 1,172 1.27 756 1,176 1.56 1982 3,645 3,349 0.92 913 1,131 1.24 745 1,130 1.52 1983*

4,203 3,624 0.86 1,256 1,694 1.39 881 1,357 1.53 1984*

4.868 4.034 0.83 1.420 1.924 1.35 1.115 1.805 1.62

Figures for these years have been updated because additional termination data have.now been entered into the REIR System.

small percentage of the total number of individuals terminating each year, it was decided to change the criteria so that the records of more workers would be examined.

This was done by selecting the records of all individuals who began and terminated two or more periods of employment with at least two different reactor facilities within one calendar year and summing each worker's whole body doses. An examination of these data would allow one to determine the number and average dose for these "annual transients."

Since more than 95% of these transients are reported by nuclear power facilities, only the termination records of these individuals were examined in detail.

Table 5.3 summarizes the number and doses of the transients found among the individuals terminating during the eight years from 1977 through 1984.

The number of these workers increased from about 3,200 workers in 1977 to about 7,400 in 1984. After a sharp peak of about 6,000 person-rems (person-cSv) in 1980, the collective dose incurred by these workers decreased to about 5,400 person-rems (person-cSv) in 1981 and then began increasing again to a value of 7,763 person-rems (person-cSv) in 1984.

The average dose, however, has remained constant at about 1.05 rem (cSv) during this period.

The lower portion of Table 5.3 shows the number and doses of workers who were terminated by two, three, and four or more different licenseas during each calendar year.

i Another way in which the distribution of the doses received by transient workers can be useful is in the determination of the impact that the inclusion of these individuals in each of two or more licensee's annual reports had on the annual summary (Table 4.4) for all nuclear power facilities (one of the problems mentioned in Section 2).

Table 5.4a shows the corrected distribution of transient worker doses as determined from the above-mentioned termination reports and compares it with the distribution of the doses of these workers as they would have appeared in a summation of the annual statistical reports submitted by each of the nuclear power facilities.

During each of the years shown, each of the transient workers was counted an average of 2.6 times.

This was not surprising because some individuals were reported by as many as nine different facilities.

Table 5.4b illustrates the impact that the multiple reporting of these transient workers had on the staff's summation of the annual statistical reports for the years 1978 through 1984.

Since each nuclear power facility reports the distribution of the doses received by workers while monitored by the particular facility during the year, one would expect that a summation l

of these reports would result in individuals being counted several times in dose ranges lower than the range in which their total accumulated dose (the sum of the personnel monitoring results incurred at each facility during the l

year) would actually place them. Thus, while the total collective dose would remain the same, the number of workers, their dose distribution, and average dose would be affected by this multiple reporting.

This was found I

to be true because too few workers were reported in the higher dose ranges.

l For example, in 1983 the summation of annual reports indicated that 85,839 workers received a measurable dose, 85 of whom received doses greater than five rems (cSv). After accounting for these individuals that were reported more than once, the corrected distribution indicated that there were only 81,177 workers that received a measurable dose and that 169 of them received l

doses greater than five rems (cSv). This resulted in an average measurable dose of 0.76 rem (cSv) rather than the 0.65 rem (cSv) obtained from a summation of the reports.

5-6

g.-

1.-

TABLE 5.4a REPORTED AND CORRECTED _ DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS OF TRANSIEdT WORKERS PER CALENDAR YEAR AT POWER REACTORS Type of Distribution Number of Individuals with Whole Body Doses in the Ranges (rems or cSv)

Avg.

He s able and (Person-Dose '. Dose Year less than Meas *ble 0.10- 0.25- 0.50- 0.75-1.00- 2.00- 3.00- 4.00-5.0- 6.0- 7.0- 8.0- 9.0-Total rem or (ran or ' (rem or Measurable

<0.10 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.0 -7.0 0.0 9.0 10.0 >10 Individuals ~ -cSv) c5v)'

c5v) 3 Corrected Distribution of Transients - 1978 308 885 317 282 177 131 463 307 168 107 42 13 1

0 1

3.202 3.231 1.01 1.12 Reported Distribution of Transients - 1978 2.079 2.423 918 788 488 382 873-262 51 11 0

2 8.277 3.231 0.39 0.52 Corrected Distribution of Transients - 1979 373 883 398 358 281 240-678 410 195 71 32 14 4

1 3.938_

3.888 0.99 1.09

+

Reported Distribution of Transients - 1979 2.130 2.676 1.259 1.048 673 460 1.040 313 46 13 1

9.649 3.888 0.40 0.52 Corrected Distribution of Transients - 1980 533 1.175 565 482 388 277 829 595 353 174 47 25 15 4

1 5.453 6.028 1.10 1.22 Reported Distribution l

O' or 'ransients - 1980 3.207 3.910 1.639 1.398 900 661 1.632 503 74 29 4

4 4

13.955 6.028

'O 43 0.56 i

N Corrected Distribution of i

Transients - 1981 562 1.271 482 422 380 310

'954 614 275 107 30 17 0

1 5.425 5.381 0.S9 1.08' Reported Distribution of Transients - 1981 3.640 3.767 1.473 1.418 963 716 1.550 349 69 8

1 1

'13.955 5.381 0.39

'O.52 Corrected Distribution of Transients - 1982 623 1.226 452 397 332 286 867 536 339 184 42 18 1

0 0

1 5.303 5.610 1.06 1.20 l

Reported Distribution of Transients - 1982 3.803 3.480 1.432 1.308 842 661 1.502 506 87 20 1

13.642 5.610 0.41" 0.57 Corrected Cistribution of

)

Transients - 1983 881 1.480 513 445 367 320 975 663 420 185 61 24 4

2 6.340

.6.675 1.05 1.22 -

1 j

Reported Distribution of Transients - 1983 4.404 4.273 1.529 1.397 986 752 1.801 642 101 13 5

2 16.405 6.675 0.41 0.58 l

Corrected Distribution of Transients - 1984 1.043 1.748 539 510 406 361 1.148 844 536 19/ 52 19 7.403 7.762

'1.05 1.22 i

Reported Distribution of Transients - 1984 5.757 5.120 1.826 1.692 1.184 930 2.335 611 93 7

0 19.555 7.762 0.40 0.56

Includes data from Fort St. Vrain.

'i bCollective dose found by suming the actual doses reported for those workers on tr 2ir termination reports.

l

' Distribution found by rubtractirg the corrected f rom the reported distribution shown in Tahle 5.4a and then subtracting this difference, from the reported statistical distribution shown in Table 5.4b.

i

_1

\\.

TABLE 5.4b.

EFFECTS OF TRANSIENT WORKERS ON ANNUAL STATISTICAL COMPILATIONS bM lect M Ntaber of Individuals with Whole Body Doses in the Ranges (rems or cSv) 00se Avg.

Measurable Type of Distribution and (Person. Oose Dose Year less than Meas'ble 0.10- 0.25- 0.50- 0.75-1.00- 2.00- 3.00- 4.00-5.0 r 7.0- 8.0- 9.0-Total rem or - (ren or (rem or Measurable

<0.10 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 - 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 >10 Individuals -cSv) cSv) cSv)

Reported St.tistical Otstributton - 1978 31.039 16.673 6.943 5.504 3.399 2.498 6.405 2.989 1.080 418 67 26 8 0

0 2

77.051 31.806 -

0.41 0.69' I

CCorrected Statistical Distributton - 1978 29.268 15.135 6.342 4.998 3.088 2.247 5.995 3.034 1.197 514 109 37 9 0

1 2

71.976 31.668 0.45 0.74

Reported Statistical Otstelbution - 1979 42.340 24.632 9.883 8.090 5.147 3.426 7.898 3.306 1.255 477 86 28 13 2

0 1

106.584

.39.987 0.38 0.62 CCorrected Statisticel Distribution - 1979 40.583 22.831 9.022 7.400 4.755 3.206 7.536 3.403 1.404 545 117 42 17 3

0 1

100.865 39.525 0.39 0.66 "Reported Statistical Olstributton - 1980 47.377 29.695 11.751 9.820 6.082 4.518 11.474 4.515 1.537 686 192 98 18 3

123.668 53.799 0.42 0.67

orrected Statistical C

T Distribution - 1980 44.703 26.9#,0 10.677 8.904 5.570 4.134 10.671 4.607 1.816 831 235 119 29 7

1 120.166 53.626 0.45 0.72 CD Reported Statistical Distribution - 1981 42.323 29.332 12.217 10.326 6.625 4.903 11.766 4.54 6 1.763 486 93 81 11 2

1 1

124.506 54.152 0.43 0.66 CCorrected Statistical Distributton - 1981 39.245 25.836 11.226 9.330 6.042 4.497 11.170 4 811 1.969 585 122 91 11 3

1 1

115.946 54.142 0.47 0.71

' Reported Statistical Distributton - 1982 45,871 31.502 12.693 10.814 6.739 4.795 10.855 4.686 1.814 432 56 13 4 0

1 130.275. 52.191 0.40 0.62 CCorrected Statistical Otstribution - 1982 42.691 29.248 11.713 9.903 6.229 4.420 10.220 4.716 2.066 596 97 31 5 0

1 1

121.937 52.191 0.43 0.66

' Reported Statistical Distribution - 1983 52.568 32.567 12.429 10.474 6.617 4.798 12.379 5.369 1.957 544 65 16 4 139.787 57.212 0.41 0.65 CCorrected Statistical Otstributton - 10!3 48.545 29.774 11.413 9.5?? 5.998 4.366 11.553 5.390 2.276 716 121 38 8 2

129.722 57.212 0.44 0.76

' Reported Statistical Distribution - 1964 60,330 41.095 15.223 11.916 7.467 5.630 13.213 5.140 1.710 295 162.019 57.487 0.39 0.58 CCorrected Statistical Otstribution - 19A4 55.606 37.723 13.936 10.734 6.689 5.061 12.026 5.364 2.153 s95 52 19 149.848 57.487-0.51 0.72

!ncludes data from Fort St. Vrain.

bCollective cmse found by suming the actual doses reported for those workers on their termination reports.

0tstribution found by subtracting the corrected from the reported distribution shown in Table 5.44 and then subtracting this difference f rom the reported statistical distributi C

shown 6 n 7able 5.4b.

Since the number of transient workers receiving measurable doses is only about 5% of the total number of workers receiving measurable doses during the year, their impact on most of the statistics derived from compilations of the annual summary reports is not very great.

However, when examining the number of annual doses exceeding five rems, one finds that the corrected statistical distribution (Table 5.4a) indicates that the number of workers who received doses greater than five rems (cSv) was between 50 and 70 more than the number found in the reported statistical distribution for each year. This is more clearly shown in Table 5.5, where it can be seen that in 1984 the corrected number of transient workers receiving doses greater than five rems (cSv) was 71, as opposed to zero reported doses in excess of five rems. This corrected number of workers (71) represents a significant decrease from previous years and reflects the industry's concerted efforts to keep annual doses of all workers under five rems.

TABLE 5.5 ANNUAL WHOLE B0DY DOSES EXCEEDING FIVE REMS (cSv)

AT NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES Reported Number Corrected Number Percent of Year

>5 Rems (cSv)

Workers i

l 1977 270 351 0.9 1978 103 158 0.4 1979 130 180 0.3 1980 311 391 0.5 1981 189 235 0.3 1982 74 135 0.2 1983*

85 168 0.2 1984*

0 71

<0.1

Figures for these years have been updated because additional termination data have now been entered into the REIR System.

5.5 Temoorary Workers Der Calendar Year at Nuclear Power Facilities To complete the examination of the doses received by the short-term workers employed at nuclear power facilities, Table 5.6 summarizes the data compiled on "temporary workers." For purposes of this report, temporary workers were defined to be those individuals who beaan and ended their employment at only one nuclear power facility during the calendar year.

Table 5.6 shows that the number of these temporary individuals has increased by 77% between 1977 and 1984 while the number of reactors has increased by about 40% during this time. The number of temporary workers receiving a measurable dose, however, has increased by only 51%. The average dose per monitored individual remains at about 0.30 rem (cSv) and, since about half of them received less than measurable doses, the average measurable dose for 1984 is 0.54 rem (cSv).

Comparison of these figures with those in Table 5.4b reveals that 5-9

these workers comprised 31% of the total number of workers receiving a measurable dose in 1984 (94,242), while their collective dose was only 27%

of the total collective dose. Their average measurable dose of 0.54 rem (cSv) was also considerably less than the overall average of 0.72 rem (cSv).

TABLE 5.6 TEMPORARY WORKERS PER CALENDAR YEAR AT NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES (Individuals Terminated by Only One Employer)

Collective Average Average Number of Number with Dose Dose Measurable No. of Temps.

Measurable (person-rems (rem or Dose Year Reactors Monitored Doses person-cSv) cSv)

(rem or cSv) 1977 57 29,090 19,094 11,373 0.39 0.60 1978 64 28,864 17,110 9,821 0.34 0.57 1979 68 38,347 21,491 9,488 0.25 0.44 1980 69 48,383 28,305 16,168 0.33 0.57 1981 71 48,265 28,675 16,755 0.35 0.58 1982 75 44,505 25,646 14,266 0.32 0.56 1983*

76 50,903 26,682 16,007 0.31 0.60 1984*

79 51,502 28,820 15,549 0 30 0.54

Figures for these years have been updated because additional termination data have now been entered into the REIR System.

1 l

5-10

6 PERSONNEL OVEREXPOSURES - 10 CFR I 20.403 and 10 CFR I 20.405 6.1 Control Levels One requirement of the above-referenced sections of Part 20, Title 10, Chapter I, Code of ~ Federal Regulations, is that all persons licensed by the NRC must submit reports of all occurrences involving personnel radiation exposures that exceed certain control

levels, thus providing for investigations and corrective actions as necessary. The term "overexposure" is not necessarily intended to indicate that a worker has been subjected to an unacceptable biological risk. Based on the magnitude of the exposure, the occurrence may be placed into one of three categories:

(1) Category A 10 CFR I 20.403(a)(1)

- Exposure of the whole body of any individual to 25 rems (cSv) or more; exposure to the skin of the whole body of any individual to 150 rems (cSv) or more; or exposure of the extremities (feet, ankles, hands or forearms) of any individual to 375 rems (cSv) or more. The Commission must be notified imediately of these events.

(2) Category B 10 CFR I 20.403(b)(1)

- Exposure of the whole body of any individual to 5 rems (cSv) or more; exposure of the skin of the whole body of any individual to 30 rems (cSv) or more; or exposure l

of the extremities to 75 rems (cSv) or more. The Comm hsion must be notified within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months of these events.

(3) Category C 10 CFR i 20.405 - Exposure of any individual to radiation or concentrations of radioactive material that exceeds any applicable quarterly limit in Part 20 [I 20.101 or i 20.104(b)] or in the licensee's license but is less than the values given above.

This includes reports of whole body exposures that exceed 1.25 rems (cSv),

or that exceed 3 rems (cSv), as discussed in Section 3.2.

Reports of skin exposures that exceed 7.5 rems (cSv) and extremity exposures that exceed 18.75 rems (cSv) are included, and reports of exposures of individuals to concentrations in excess of the levels given in 10 CFR I 20.103 and Appendix B usually fall into this category as well. These reports must be submitted to the Comission wiihin 30 days of the occurrence.

6.2 Sumary of Overexposures Table 6.1 sumarizes all the occupational overexposures to external sources of radiation as reported by Comission licensees pursuant to i 20.403 and i 20.405 during the years 1978 through 1985.

For 1983, 1984, and 1985, it shows the number of individuals that exceeded various limits while employed by one of severai types of licensees.

For the years 1978 through 1982, only the overexposures reported by licensed industrial radiography firms are shown separately. Most of the occurrences included in the "Others" category 6-1

TABLE 6.1 PERSONNEL OVEREXPOSURES TO EXTERNAL RADIATION 1978-1985 TYPES OF OWREXPOSJtES AW DOSES LICENSE PERSONS AM)

WHOLE BODY (REMS)

SKIN (REMS)

EXTREMITY (REW3)

TEAR CATEGORY.

DOSES (REM)

(<5)

(>5<25)

(>25)

(>T.5<30) (>30<150) (>150)

(>18.75<75)

(> 75 <375) (>375)

IkDUSTRIAL NO. OF PERSONS 5

3 1

1 RADIOGRAPHY SW 0F DOSES 13.3 32.6 27.0 288 POWER NO. OF PERSONS 3

1 REACTORS SLN OF DOSES 3.3 10.8 MEDICAL NO. OF PERSONS 3

1985 FACtllTIES SLN OF DOSES 6.7 MARKEllNG NO. OF PERSONS 2

1

& MAWFACT.

StM 0F DOSES

",8. 7 93 NO. OF PERSONS 1

1 1

OTHERS SW OF DOSES 1.8 38.0 21.5 INDUSTRIAL ko. OF PERSONS 3

1 3

RADIOGRAPHY StM 0F DOSES 12.5 8.2 127.9 POWER NO. OF PERSONS 3

EACTORS SLM OF DOSES 7.6 MEDICAL NO. OF PERSONS 2

1 1

1984 FACILITTES StM 0F DOSES 5.7 5.2 18.8 MUtKETING NO. OF PERSms 1

& MA WFACT.

StN OF DOSES 21.8 NO. OF PERSm S 1

3 CDERS SW 0F DOSES 1.7 70.1 INDUSTRIAL NO. OF PERSONS 1

1 RADIOGRAPHY SW OF DOSES 4.7 650 POWER No. OF PERSW S 8

REACTORS SW 0F DOSES 14.9 MEDICAL No. OF PERSm S 3

1983 FACILIT'ES StM OF DOSES 5.2 MARKEi1NG h0. OF PERSONS l'

2

& MA WFACT.

SLN OF DOSES 25 49.5 No. OF PERSONS OWS 25 2

StM 0F DOSES l'37 228 lhDUSTRIAL NO. OF PERSONS 6

3 1982 aADt0GoAPwY SW 0F DOSES

16. t 20.7 NO. OF PERSm s 5"

1 15 2

ALL OTHERS StM 0F DOSES 12.5 9.4 569 206 IkDUSTRIAL NO. OF PERSONS 7

1 1901 RADIOGRAPHY StM 0F DOSES 12.2 7.1 No. OF PERSm$

10 2'

1 4

ALL OTHERS SLM OF DOSES 24.1 30.9 8.1 102.9 thDUSTRIAL No. OF PERSONS 4

1 1

1000 eAD10 GRAPHY StM 0F DOSES 23.6 7.7 56 NO. OF PERSONS 84 3

3 ALL OTHERS SLM OF DOSES 285.4,

73.5 33.000 IkDUSTRIAL h0. OF PERSONS 8"

3 ION RADIOGPAPHY Stm 0F DOSES 25.9 34.6-h0. OF PERSm S 30 3'

7 1

2' 15 1"

ALL OikERS StM OF DOSES 65.0 39.0 125.7 40.0 327 468.1 147 thDUSTRIAL No. OF PERSm $

4 1

1 1978 RADIOG#APHY SLM 0F DOSES 15.3 21.6 150 No. OF PERSONS 12 4

1 2

2 ALL C hERS SLM OF DOSES 36.0 51.9 27.3 18.2 49.2

This person strutterwously received an extremity overexposure of 61 rema (cSv) that is not shwn.

p* Ore of these perscns sisultaneously received a skin overexposure of 15.2 rees (cSv) that is not shom.

e of these perscos afruttaneously received an extremity overexposure of 21 rems (cSv) that is not shom.

"One of these perses sfruttaneously received an extremity overexposure of 46 reas (cSv) that is not shom.

0ne of these persms slauttaneously received an extremity overexposure of 45 reps (cSv) that is not shom.

9These two persons sinultaneously received extremity overexposures of 82 ard 38 rems (cSv) that are not shown.

9This person sinultaneo.esty received a skin overexposure of 13 rams (cSv) that is not shown.

62

come from research facilities, universities an' measuring and well-logging activities.

In 1980 the total number of ind, biuals reported as being overexposed was 96, a considerable increase i

, ; e nt..abers reported for other years.

This increase was due to over*xposure of some 67 individuals at one nuclear power facility ou..

1 steam generator repair work. They received doses between three and fiv.

ims.

In 1984, the total number of overexposed individuals was 19, which was the lowest number reported during the years shown.

In 1985, the number of individuals increased somewhat to 23, and the highest whole body dose was 27 rem (cSv).In each of the years from 1978 through 1984, the highest whole body doses were 27.3, 17.0, 7.7, 21, 9.4, 25, and 8.2 rems (cSv), respectively.

In 1985, there were six incidents in which external exposures of the magnitude described in Category A or B were received by seven individuals. A summary of these incidents is provided below. The first four incidents l

occurred during industrial radiography operations, and the remaining two incidents occurred at a chemistry laboratory and a university.

On February 7, 1985, two radiographers were conducting radiography of reheat tubes located inside the reheat boiler of a fossil fuel power generating station.

One radiographer received a whole body dose of 7.96 rems when he failed to completely retract the 93-curie iridium-192 source to its shielded

position, and he entered the radiation area without surveying the exposure device.

The second radiographer surveyed the device, alerted the first radiographer to leave the area and properly retracted the source.

On June 14, 1985, two nnsupervised radiographer's assistants were performing radiographic exposura

2 furnace boiler tubes using a 61-curie iridium-19/

source.

One radiott w 3' s assistant received an extremity dose be: ween 96 and 288 rems to the a:

and when he failed to properly perform a survey of the exposure device and as a result, his hand was in close proximity to the unshielded source when he disconnected the guide tube.

During August I and August 2, 1985, two radiographers were conducting radiography on a pipeline near Table Rock, Wyoming.

They received whole body doses of 27 rems and 9 rems when a 28-curie iridium-192 source failed to retract and remained in the unshielded tube.

They failed to conduct proper surveys of their equipment, and the source remained undetected at the end of the source tube for two days.

The fourth radiography overexposure occurred on October 8, 1985, when two radiographers were conducting radiography on small diameter piping at an industrial facility in Olean, New York. When the radiographer noticed that the number on the film being used was incorrect, he started to retract the 100- curie iridium-192 source so that he could change the film number.

However, after a conversation with the assistant radiographer about the

problem, he neglected to retract the source, failed to survey the exposure

device, entered the radiation area and received a whole body dose of 15.59 rems.

On November 18, 1985, a chem-technologist received an extremity dose of 93 rems averaged over a one square centimeter area on the thumb of the left hand.

The chem-technologist was manipulating 200 mci of carbon-14 (acetic anhydride) when she experienced difficulty in removing the syringe from the 6-3

rubber septum and attempted to grasp the needle with her PVC gloved hand.

Contamination from the syringe and septum passed through the gloves to her hand during the attempt.

On the morning of May 7,1985, a researcher at a university opened a vial containing 1.8 millicuries of a phosphorus-32 labeled compound.

The researcher, who was not working behind a shield nor wearing a lab coat, was sprayed with the material when he opened it.

It is believed that the vial somehow became pressurized either in the preparation for shipment or during shipment.

The researcher did not survey himself or his lab after opening the vial, and the incident was not discovered until late in the day when another researcher was surveying nearby areas.

Calculations determined that the researcher received a dose of approximately 38 rems to the skin of the whole body.

There were no instances in 1985 in which the intake of radioactive material

)

exceeded the quarterly intake limit, nor were there any reports of personnel exposure to airborne concentrations of radioactive material in excess of i

applicable limits.

l l

6-4

REFERENCES 1.

U.S. Atomic Energy Comission, "Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience During 1973," USAEC Report 00E-ES-004, December 1974.*

2.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, "Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience 1974-1975," USNRC Report NUREG-0227, April 1977.*

3.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, "Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience 1976," USNRC Report NUREG-0366, December 1977.*

4.

M.R. Beebe, "Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience 1977," USNRC Report NUREG-0483, February 1979.*

5.

"Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience 1978," USNRC Report NUREG-0618, December 1979.*

6.

"Nuclear Power Plant 0parating Experience - 1979," USNRC Report NVREG/CR-1496, May 1981.*

7.

"Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience - 1980," USNRC Report NUREG/CR-2378, ORNL/NSIC-191, October 1982.*

8.

"Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience - 1981," USNRC Report NUREG/CR-3430, ORNL/NSIC-215, Vol. 1, December 1983.*

(

9.

"Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience - 1982," USNRC Report NUREG/CR-3430, ORNL/NSIC-215, Vol. 2, January 1985.*

l l

10. United Nations, "Report of the Scientific Comittee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation," Annex H, General Assembly of Official Records, United Nations, New York, 1982.

11.

A. Brodsky, R. Specht, B. Brooks, et al., "Log-Normal Distributions of Occupational Exposure in Medicine and Industry." Presented at the 9th Midyear Topical Symposium of the Health Physics Society,1976, 12.

S. Kumazawa, and T. Namakunal, "A New Theoretical Analysis of Occupational Dose Distributions Indicating the Effect of Dose Limits,"

Health Physics, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1981.

13.

S. Kumazawa, and T. Namakunai, "A Method for Implementation of ALARA for Occupational Exposure Using the Hybrid Lognormal Model."

Presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society, July 1,1982.

14.

"Licensed Operating Reactors, Status Sumary Report," USNRC Report NUREG-0020, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 1985.*

Report is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161, and/or the NRC/GP0 Sales Program, Division of Technical Information and Document Control, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.

7-1

15.

L. A. Cross and A.P. Cross, "Trends in Nuclear Power Plant Man-Rem Per Megawatt-Year," presented to American Nuclear Society-European Nuclear Society International Conference, Washington, DC, November 17-20, 1980.

16. National Academy of Sciences, "The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation:

1980, "Comittee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations, July 1980. Available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20418.

I l

7-2

i i

APPENDIX A Alphabetical Listing of Annual Exposure Data Compiled for Certain NRC Licensees 1985

APPENDIX A INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHERS Single Location - 1985 Total Workers with Collective Average Licensee WaM License Number Individuets Measurable Dose Meas'ble cose Monitored Dose (person rems) (rems or esv)

ABEX CORP 48-13776-01 9

3 0

0.05 ABEX CORP.

34-24346-01 11 11 1

0.07 ABEX CORPORATION 29-01208-02 5

0 0

0.00 AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, IN 37-05105-05 17 4

0 0.05 ALLOY CRAFTS COMPANY 13-17511-01 5

4 0

0.08 ALONSO & CARUS IRON WORKS 52-21350-01 7

3 0

0.13 l

ANCHOR / DARLING VALVE COMPANY 37-15476-01 6

4 0

0.05 ARMY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 13-18235-01 159 22 1

0.05 ARMY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 29-00047-06 166 39 2

0.05 ARRDW TANK & ENGINEERING COMPA 22-13253-01 4

4 0

0.05 ATLANTIC RESEARCH CORPORATION 45-02808-04 16 16 5

0.34 BABC0CK & WILC0X COMPANY 34-02160-03 37 37 2

0.05 BELOIT CORPORATION 48-02412-02 2

0 0

0 00 BORG-WARNER CORPORATION 37-16828-01 11 2

0 0.05 BRAND EXAMINATION SERVICES 06-17156-01 20 15 16 1.04 BRIGHTON CORP.

34-21480-01 3

3 3

0.83 BUCKEYE INTERNATIONAL 34-06627-01 3

2 0

0 05 CALUMET TESTING SERVICES INC.

13-16347-01 38 25 21 0 82 CATERPILLAR TRACTOR COMPANY 12-18023 01 6

0 0

0 00 CHICAG0 BRIDGE AND IRON COMPAN 12-05639 01 7

6 0

0.05 COLT INDUSTPIES OPERATING CORP 48-02387-03 5

0 0

0.00 COLT INDUSTRIES OPERATING CORP 48-02387-03 5

0 0

0.00 CONNECTICUT, STATE OF 06-06472-03 36 2

0 0.05 CONSOLIDATED FOUNDRIES & MFG, 34-04657-02 0

0 0

0.00 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CONSU 37-18456-01 22 8

1 0.08 COPES-VULCAN 37-19530-01 1

1 0

0.38 CRANE COMPANY - INDIAN ORCHARD 20-00518-02 2

0 0

0.00 DAY AND ZIMMERMANN INC.

42-15051-02 3

3 0

0.05 DELTAK CORP.

22-21447-01 0

0 0

0.00 DEPT. OF ARMY, MCALESTER ARMY 35-19189-02 29 1

0 0.05 DEPT. OF THE NAVY. NONDESTRUCT 04-06145-03 11 0

0 0.00 00DGE FOUNDRY AND MACHINE COMP 37-15324 01 5

3 0

0.05 DRAVO CORPORATION 34-00850-02 10 2

0 0.05 DUNCAN F0YNDRY & MACHINE WORKS 12-09587-01 0

0 0

0.00 DUPALOY CCMPANY (THE]

37-02279-02 6

5 1

0.24 DUltIRON COMPANY INCORPORATED 34-06398-01 5

5 1

0.27 EMPIRE STEEL CASTINGS, INC.

37-02448 01 3

1 0

0.38 EXXON COMPANY U. S. A.

25-03375-02 7

0 0

0.00 A-1

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHERS Single Location - 1985 Totet Workers with Collective Average Licensee Name License Number Individuals Neasurable Dose Mees'ble cose Monitored Dose (person rens) (rems or ctv)

GENERAL ELECTRIO COMPANY 20-00815-05 12 1

0 0.05 GENERAL ELECTRIC CDNPANY 34-00499-10 3

1 0

0 05 GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

21-08678-04 4

0 0

0.00 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION 12-02251-01 4

0 0

0.00 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION 21-02392-01 3

0 0

0.00 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION 34-15315-02 8

0 0

0.00 GLOBE X-RAY SERVICES INC 35-15194-01 22 22 25 1.14 GREDE FOUNDRIES INCORPORATED 48-02844-01 3

1 0

0.05 HARRISON STEEL CASTINGS COMPAN 13-02141-01 6

4 1

0.31 HESS OIL VIRGIN ISLARD CORPORA 55-15533-02 11 4

0 0.08 H8GH STEEL STRUCTURES INC.

37-17534 01 9

5 0

0.05 INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHIC SERVIC 5'5-16734-01 0

0 0

0.00 SNGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY 29-02015-02 2

2 1

0.40 INTERIOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE 24-02619-02 6

3 0

0.05 TNTERIOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE 36 01142-03 6

3 0

0.05 JOHN DEERE FOUNDRY 12-0911b 01 3

3 0

0.05 KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY INCORPORA 12-02360-02 4

0 0

0.00 LABARGE INC.

35-15514-01 4

4 1

0.19 LUKENS STEEL COMPANY 37-02827-0i 9

0 0

0.00 LVNCHBURG FOUNDPY COMPANY (5-17464-01 9

2 0

0.05 hASON & HANGER SILAS MASON COM 16-17692 01 106 11 1

0.05 MAYNARD E!.ECTRIC STEEL CASTING 48-07080-01 4

4 2

0.46 H3NNEAPOLIS ELECTRIC STEEL CAS 22-05572 02 2

2 0

0.05 MINNESOTA VALLEY ENGINEERING 22-24393-01 6

4 1

0.28 Mf SSOURI STEEL CASTINGS C0:4 PAN 24-15152-01 5

0 0

0.00 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND S* ACE 34-00507-04 34 15 1

0.06 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE 45-08886-02 4

0 0

0.00 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 04-06145-01 37 7

1 0.07 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 04-09369-01 99 1

0 0.05 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 28 01012-02 53 49 5

0.10 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 37-00314-06 44 11 1

0.07 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 39-06126-01 57 50 5

0.10 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 39-19047-01 10 0

0 0.00 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 39-19047-01 10 0

0 0.00 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 45-02757 01 26 2

0 0 05 NAVY, DF.PARTMENT OF THE 45-17845-01 7

1 0

0 05 t

NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 46-09611-01 3

0 0

0.00 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 46-19259-01 26 25 1

0 05 A-2

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

INDUSTRIAL RAD 10GRAPHERS Single Location - 1985 Total Workers with Collective Average Licensee Name License Number Individuals Measurable Dose Mees'ble Dose Monitored Dose (person rems) (rems or cSv)

NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 53-06007-01 32 28 1

0.05 NAVY, DEPT OF THE NAVAL AIR 29-14031-02 4

0 0

0 00 NAVY, DEPT. OF, USS FRANK CABL 31-19283 01 14 13 3

0.25 NILES STEEL TANK COMPANY-21-04741-01 4

1 0

0.05 NORTHWEST AIRLINES INC.

22-12080-01 30 8

0 0.05 OKLAHOMA STEEL CASTINGS CO.

35-21159-01 7

2 0

0.05 OZARK AIR LINES. INC.

24-13591-01 24 2

0 0.11 P. X. ENGINEERING COMPANY INC.

20-15102-01 2

1 0

0.05 PL'. TON CASTEEL INC 48-02669-02 3

3 0

0.05 PENNSYLVANIA SHIPBUILDING CO.

37-21067-01 7

6 0

0.05 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRI 12-21501-01 15 15 1

0.05 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRI 24-20039 01 11 1

0 0.05 7ROGRESSIVE FABRICATORS 24-21200-01 0

0 0

0.00 QUAKER ALLOY CASf!NG COMPANY 37-03671-01 19 16 4

0.24 REFINERY PRODUCTS CORPORATION 48-036K5-02 3

3 1

0 33 RICHMOND ENGINEERING COMPANY I 45-02884-01 15 1

2 1.50 SAWYER RESEARCH PRODUCT INC 34 02044-01 6

3 0

0.09 SHAFER VALVE CO.

34-21198 01

'5 1

0 0.05 SOUTHWESTERN ENGINEERING CO.

24-19500-01 4

2 0

0.11 ST. LOUIS STEEL CASTING, INO.

24-01587-01 3

3 C

0.05 STRUTHER$ WELLS CORPORATION 37-11152-01 15 8

0 0.05 TAYLOR AND FENN COMPANY 06-02024-01 2

0 0

0.00 THIOKOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION 01-00856-02 16 0

0 0.00 THIOKOL CORPORATION 17-16380 01 58 32 2

0.05 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES INC 24-05151-05 28 7

0 0.05 U.S.A. WORTHINGTON PUMP CORPOR 29 02210-02 4

0 0

0.00 UNITED STATES PIPE AND FOUNDRY 29-07262-01 3

0 0

0.00 VOLLRATH COMPANY [THE) 48-05395-01 6

0 0

0.00 WEATHERLY FOUNDRY AND MANUFACT 37-09859-01 2

0 0

0.00 WEHR STELL COMPANY 48-02005 02 4

3 1

0.24 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORAT 37-05809 02 5

1 0

0.05 WHITING CORPORATION 12-04921-01 4

0 0

0.00 WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY (THE) 34-02963 01 6

1 0

0.05 WISCONSIN CENTRIFUGAL INCORPOR 48-11641-01 4

4 3

0.70 YUBA HEAT TRANSFER CORPORATION 35 13735-01 3

3 2

0.60 A3

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHERS Multiple Location - 1985 Total Workers with Collective Average Licensee Name Licente Number Individuelt Measurable Cote Meas 8ble Cose Monitored Dose (person rems) (rems or esv)

A-1 INSPECTION, INC.

49-21496-01 3

2 2

1.06 ABC TESTING 20-19778-01 18 10 2

0.20 ADVANCED RADIATION SERVICE INC 29-14171-01 8

3 2

0.71 ADVEX CORPORATION 45-16452-01 15 10 9

0.94 A2R FORCE, DEPARTMENT OF THE 09-15149-01 7

7 1

0.07 A'.ASKA INDUSTRIAL X-RAY 50-16084-01 7

6 1

0.23 ALASKA WELDING CENTER 50-19202-01 65 58 54 0.94 ALLEGHENY LABS.

37-20734-01 2

2 3

1.44 ALLIED INSPECTION SERVICES INC 21-18428-01 9

6 6

0.93 ALLIS-CHALMERS HYDRO 37-16280-03 14 5

0 0.05 AMERICAN AIRLINES INC 35-13964-01 92 32 2

0.08 AMERICAN OIL COMPANY [THE) 13-00155-10 21 17

'l 0.07 AMOCO OIL COMPANY 45-01378-02 14 4

1 0.14 ANP PIPELINE CO, LABORATORY SE 21-24502-01 6

3 0

0.09 ARMY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 30-02405-05 4

4 1

0.11 ARNOLD GREENE TESTING LABORATO 20-01074-02 42 23 7

0.24 ASTR0 TECH INC 37-09928 01 13 12 4

0.35 BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. (THE) 34-02160-04 101 38 6

0.16 CAkER TESTING SERVICES INC.

20-19067-01 4

3 0

0.09 BQSIN INDUSTRIAL X-RAY, INC.

42-19906-01 0

0 0

0 00 BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION 18 00828-04 15 3

0 0.05 BENJAMIN F.

SHAW COMPANY 39-13318 01 1

1 0

0.38 BILL MILLED JNC.

35-19048 01 31 27 22 0.82 BRANCH RADIOGRAPHIC LABORATORI 29 03405-02 66 66 8

0.12 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTIhG, INC 22-16537-02 0

0 0

0,00 BRIGGS ENGINEERING & TESTING C 20 16401-01 8

8 1

0.15 BRISTOL STEEL AND IRON WORKS I 45 16947-01 8

6 2

0.37 BOOTHE-TWINING.INC 04-19522-01 68 59 58 0.98 C & R LABORATORIES 53-19179-01 4

4 0

0.05 CAPITAL X-RAY SERVICE 35-11114-03 25 25 59 2.35 CARIBE SHELL & TUBE, INC.

52-19438-01 5

5 3

0.58 CATERPILLAR TRACTOR COMPANY 12-00013-02 3

0 0

0.00 CERTIFIED TESTING LABORATORIES 29-14150-01 47 47 9

0.20 CHERNE CONTRACTING CORPORATION 22-18342-01 6

4 1

0.23 CHoCAGO BRIDGE AND IRON COMPAN 42-13553 02 97 83 82 0.99 CLEVELAND X RAY INSPECTION INC 35 15205-01 45 44 44 1.01 COLBY AND THIELMEIER TESTING C 24 13737 01 4

4 4

0.95 COLONIAL GAS CO 20-15003 01 5

0 0

0.00 A-4

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHERS Multiple Location - 1985 Total Workers with Collective Average Licensee Name License Number Individuals Measurable Cose Meas'bte cose Monitored Dose (person rems) (rems or csv)

COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORP 47-16060-01 7

4 1

0.24 CDM8USTION ENGINEERING INC 06-04154-01 24 22 4

0.18 CONSOLIDATED X-RAY SERVICE 29-21452-01 108 98 49 0.50 CONSOLIDATED X-RAY SERVICE COR 42-08456-02 113 113 122 1.08 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY 21-08606-03 20 12 2

0.17

-CORPORACION GEOTEC 52-21486 01 3

3 0

0.05 CRAMER & LINDELL ENGINEERS 06-20794-01 4

2 0

0.05 CRANE COMPANY 24-00563-02 9

9 3

0.32 CTL ENGINEERING INC.

34 08331-01 2

2 2

1.06 CYCLOPS TESTING LABS.

07-23400-01 0

0 0

0.00 l

D & S TESTING, INC.

34-21458-01 11 11 13 1.15 f

DANIEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATI 39-01261-02 0

0 0

0.00 DAYTON X-RAY COMPANY 34-06943-01 20 20 9

0.47 DEPT. OF NAVY. USS AJAy. (AR 5) 04-17872-01 17 2

0 0.05 DEPT. OF NAVY, USS DIXON (AS-J 04-17976-01 13 13 1

0.05 DEPT. OF NAVY, USS HECTOR (AR-04-18130-01 32 2

0 0.11 DEPT. OF NAVY. USS JASON (AR-2 04-17765-01 34 0

0 0 00 DEPT. OF NAVY. USS PRAIRIE (AD 04-18013-01 12 0

0 0 00 DEPT. OF NAVY, USS PROTEUS (AS 04 18041-01 19 19 1

0.0%

DEPT. OF NAVY, USS SAMUEL GOMP 04-18082-01 18 3

0 0.05 DEPT. OF THE NAVY 09-21465 01 13 10 1

0.11 DEPT. OF THE NAVY 31-17825-02 71 60 4

0.06 DEPT. OF THE NAVY, COMMANDING 38-05314-05 8

0 0

0.00 DEPT. OF THE NAVY, USS SIERRA 09-19770-01 15 1

0.05 w

DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY 37-17507-01 14 10 3

0 25 E. L. CONWELL & COMPANY 37-17637-01 0

0 0

0.00 EASTERN TESTING AND INSPECTION 29-09814-01 32 32 15 0 46 EBASCO SERVICES INC.

29 07056-03 63 42 10 0.24 EG & G FLORIDA. INC.

09-21233-01 52 13 2

0.15 ELPASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY 42-03201-02 5

5 2

0 31 EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY 37-17491-01 7

1 0

0 18 EXAM COMPANY 35-16191 01 474 474 81 0 17 FACTORY MUTUAL RESEARCH CORPOR 20-04007 02 7

5 0

0 05 FINLAY TESTING LABORATORIES 53-17854 01 7

7 8

1,17 FOSTER Wu!ELER ENERGY CORP.

31-01776 05 28 16 6

0.40 FRANKLIN RESEARCH CENTER 37-00637-11 17 0

0 0.00 FROEHLING & ROBERTSON INC.

45-08890 01 11 8

4 0 45 GAMMA FIELD RADIOGRAPHIC FACIL 12 13858-01 28 18 8

0.42 A-5

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHERS Multiple Location - 1985 Total Workers with Collective Average Licensee Name License Number Individuals Measurable Dose Meas'ble cose Monitored Dose (person rems) (rems or c$v)

CENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION 06-01781-08 92 91 18 0.20 GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION 20-11915-01 12 6

0 0.07 GEO CONSTRUCTION TESTING 04-00616-04 175 118 42 0.36 GLITCH FIELD SERVICE 34-14071-01 41 37 20 0.54 GREAT LAKES TESTING CORP.

13-21306-01 0

0 0

0.00 GRINNELL COMPANY, INC.

38-02839-01 50 29 2

0.07 H. C. NUTTING CO, 34-14924-01 4

4 0

0.08 H. R.

INSPECTION SERVICE INC.

15-06209-01 8

6 5

0.83 H&H X-RAY SERVICES INC.

17-19236-01 0

0 0

0.00 H&H X-RAY SERVICES INC.

17-19236-01 9

8 10 1.21 HERRON TESTING LABORATORY INC.

34-00681-03 9

9 1

0.14 HOUSTON INSPECTION SERVICE, IN 42-23150-01 5

5 11 2.15 HUNTINGTON TESTING LAB 47-23076-01 17 16 8

0.50 HUTCHINSON AREA VO-TECH INSTIT 22-15554-01 219 45 3

0.08 2NDEPINDENT INSPECTION. C/0 P 42-19441-01 3

2 2

0.88 8NDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORI 03-15981-02 46 46 17 0.36 8NDUSTRIAL GAMMA INSPECTION 24-19850-01 1

1 0

0.18 ZNDUSTRIAL LABORATORIES INC 41-04226-02 5

5 8

1.64 INDUSTRIAL NDT COMPANY 45-19494-01 16 15 6

0.43 8NDUSTRIAL NDT SERVICES DIVISI 13-06147-04 12 11 2

0.17 ZNDUSTRIAL TESTING LABORATORY 37-16406-01 14 3

1 0.20 2NSPECTION SERVICE CORP OF PEN 37-11636-01 4

3 5

1.54 INSPECTION SERVICE. INC.

41-21154-01 34 16 15 0.93 3NTERMOUNTAIN TESTING COMPANY 05-07872-01 22 22 20 0.89 INTERNATIONAL TESTING LABS. IN 29-14027-01 8

2 0

0.05 J.T. CULLEN COMPANY INC.

12-15025-01 8

5 8

1.50 JACKSONVILLE SHIPYARDS INC.

09-15611-01 10 5

1 0.12 JAN X-RAY SERVICES INC.

21 16560-01 20 19 15 0.78 KELLOG RUST CONSTRUCTORS 42-16573-01 0

0 0

0.00 LAKEHEAD TESTING LABORATORY IN 22-14897 01 8

2 0

0.11 LATY INSPECTION SERVICE 37-21473-01 0

0 0

0.00 LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPAN 10 00346-03 289 135 18 0.13 LEHIGH TESTING LABORATORIES IN 07-01173-03 14 11 5

0.41 LOCKHEED SHIPBUILDING & CONSTR 46-06926-02 8

3 0

0.13 MAGNA CHEK, INC.

21-19111-02 9

8 1

0.15 MASSACHUSETTS MATERIALS RESEAR 20-19130 01 5

3 0

0.05 MATERIALS TESTING LARORATORY 0 45-17151 01 21 19 9

0.49 MATTINGLY & 01REILLY SERVICE 25-21479-01 5

4 3

0 67 A-6

)

l APPENDIX A (cont.)

INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHERS Multiple Location - 1985 Total Workers with Cottective Average Licensee mome License Number Individuals Measurable Dose Mess'ble Dese Monitored Dose (person rems) (rems or csv)

MET LAB INC 45 09963-01 7

5 4

0.70 MET-CHEM ENGINEERING LAB 43-19662-01 43 40 35 0.88 MET-CHEM ENGINEERING LAB 43-19662-01 42 39 32 0.83 MET-CHEM ENGINEERING LAB 43-19662-01 43 40 33 0.83 METALOGIC, INC, 02-19728-01 63 58 12 0.20 METILS INC.

42-16534-01 0

0 0

0.00 MID-CON INSPECTION 49-16670 01 102 102 29 0.28 MIDWEST INSPECTION SERVICE LTD 48-16296-01 14 10 4

0.37 MINNOTTE MANUFACTURING CORPORA 37-11460-01 1

0 0

0.00 MONROE X-RAY CO.

17-12201-02 0

0 0

0.00 MONTANA X-RAY INC.

25-21134 01 1

1 2

1.50 MORRISON KNUDSEN COMPANY INC 11-15946-01 12 11 9

0.78 MQS INSPECTION 12-00622-07 537 408 236 0.58 NATIONAL INSPECTION & CONSUL 09-21289 01 0

0 0

0.00 NAVY DEPT, NAVAL SUB BASE, DEP 53-10226-01 25 4

0 0.05 NAVY DEPT, USS ACADIA (AD-42) 04 19846-01 10 10 1

0.05 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF USS FULT 31-18014-01 12 12 1

0,05 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF USS L. Y 31-17970-01 13 13 1

0.06 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF USS ORIO 31-18096-01 14 11 1

0 05 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF USS PUGE 31-11328-01 23 7

0 0.05 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 04 03141 01 25 1

0 0.05 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 04-13252 01 18 0

0 0.00 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 06 07150 01 20 19 2

0.10 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 45-04052-03 66 59 7

0.11 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 45-15650-02 15 0

0 0.00 NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF THE 46-03078-01 86 85 12 0.15 NAVY, DEPT. OF THE, (USS CANO 09-19932-01 14 13 1

0.05 NAVY, DEPT. OF THE, USS MCKEE 04-19966-01 16 15 1

0.05 NAVY, DEPT. OF THE, USS CAPE C 04-21246 01 14 1

0 0.05 NAVY, DEPT. OF THE, USS EMORY 31-19040-01 12 12 1

0.05 NAVY, DEPT. OF THE, USS HOLLAN 31-18061-01 13 13 2

0.16 NDE SERVICES, INC.

05-19821-01 48 44 52 1.18 NEW YORK TESTING LABORATORIES 31-02933-01 4

2 0

0.21 NEWPORT NEWS INDUSTRIAL CORP.

34-16805-01 0

0 0

0.00 NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND 45-09428-02 87 86 26 0.30 NIC TESTING SERVICE 37-18348-02 19 10 3

0 29 NONDESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION SERV 47-11883-01 10 10 4

0 41 NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING CORP 29-19742 01 23

'16 5

0.28 N00TER CORPORATION 24-03783-01 21 14 1

0.07 A-7

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHERS Multiple Location - 1985 Total Workers with Collective Average Licensee Name License Number Iridi vidual s Measurable Dose Meas'ble Dose Monitored Dose (person rems) (rems or c5v)

NORFOLK SHIPBUILDING AND DRYDO 45-12042-01 14 11 1

0.08 NORTH AMERICAN INSPECTION, INC 37-23370-01 26 23 9

0.39 NORTHEASTERN RESEARCH & TESTIN 29-18006-01 0

0 0

0.00 NUCLEAR ENERGY SERVICE INC 42-16559-01 78 56 19 0.34 NUCLEAR INSTALLATION SERV. CO.

09-23042-01 8

4 0

0.08 OKLAHOMA TRSTING LABORATORIES 35-10577-01 15 5

1 0.14 OLD DOMINION IRON & STEEL CORP 45-15581-01 5

4 1

0.11 PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO 15-17729-01 9

7 1

0.20 PARKER INDUSTRIAL X-RAY LABORA 06-01337-03 18 13 3

0.21 PATZIG TESTING LABS INC 14-18897-02 15 9

1 0.11 PDM LATIN AMERICA, LTD.

10-19980-01 0

0 0

0 00 PENN INSP.!CTION CO.

35-21144-01 18 18 7

0.38 PERINI CORP.

20-21490-01 0

0 0

0.00 PHOTON FIELD INSPECTION, INC.

21-21010-01 4

2 0

0.05 PITTSBURGH DES MOINES STEEL CO 14-01837-04 12 8

2 0.19 PIT'SBURGH DES MOINES STEEL C0 37-02607-32 21 14 4

0.20 PITTSBURGH TE3 TING LABORATORY 37-00276-25 312 232 172 0.74 PLANT INSPECTION CO 04-21032-01 0

0 0

0.00 POGUE INDUSTRIES 24-24541-01 9

8 2

0.20 PORTABLE ATOMIC X-RAY COMPANY 35-07488-03 2

1 0

0 38 POWER INSPECTION, INC.

37-21428 01 0

0 0

0 00 POWER PIP 1NG COMPANY 37-09945-01 9

7 2

0.27 PRECISION COMPONENTS 37-16280-01 72 53 4

0.08 PROGRESS SERVICES,INC.

34-19592-01 15 12 3

0.23 PULLKAN POWER PRODUCTS, DIV. 0 37-08042-01 77 41 10 0.23 Q.C. LABORATORIES INC.

09-11579-03 27 25 9

0.34 QUAD CITY TESTING LABORATORY, 14-17989-01 9

8 5

0.64 QUALITY ASSURANCE INDUSTRIES 48-14158 01 0

0 0

0.00 QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORIES 18-19078-01 7

5 1

0.26 QUALITY SYSTEMS OF ALASKA, INC 50-23426-01 0

0 0

0.00 QUALITY TESTING INC.

34-17799-01 2

2 0

0.11 RADIOGRAPHY INSPECTION 35-26812-01 16 16 7

0.42 RADIOGRAPHY INSPECTION, INC.

15-21451-01 16 16 7

0.42 REACTOR CONTROLS INC.

04-15365-01 10 7

1 0.10 RELIANCE TESTING LABORATORIES 19-17176-01 21 16 5

0.31 RICHARD KRUEGEL, DBA GENERAL T 34-09037-01 0

0 0

0.00 ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL, SPACE 04-17624-03 0

0 0

0.00 S & S INSPECTION COMPANY 12-19780-01 20 17 6

0.38 A-8

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHERS Multiple Location - 1985 Total idorkers with Collective Average Licensee Name License Number individuals Measurable Oose Meas'bte Dose Monitored Dese (person rems) (ress or csv)

SMITH-EMERY COMPANY 04-19467-01 12 3

0 0.05 SOUTHWEST X-RAY CORP.

03-21354-01 25 25 37 1.46 SPACE SCIENCE SERVICES INC 09-07550-01 36 31 30 0.95 SPECTRUM LABORATORIES INC.

29-07266-01 7

3 0

0.05 SSW INSPECTION SERVICES 14-19899-01 0

0 0

0.00 ST. LOUIS TESTING LABORATORIES 24 00188-02 14 12 17 1,38 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CO 20-05600-02 84 23 1

0.05 SUN RAY TESTING INTERNATIONAL 04-19810-01 0

0 0

0.00 SUPERIOR INDUSTRIAL X-RAY COMP 12-02370-01 11 2

0 0 05 TENNECO INC 42-09073-02 22 22 5

0.21 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, D 41-06832-06 44 25 3

0.12 TEREX CORPORATION 34-19607-01 4

0 0

0.00 TESTING INSTITUTE OF ALASKA 50-17446 01 7

6 3

0.51 TOWNSENO AND BOTTUM INC.

21-17095-01 0

0 0

0.00 TRANS EASTERN INSPECTION SERVI 37-14855 01 107 91 16 0.17 TRANS-WORLD TESTING LABS., INC 04 23360 01 13 13 2

0.16 TRI STATE INSPECTION & CONSULT 37-19640 01 3

3 1

0.24 TRUTOM LTD.

06-20755-01 21 16 6

0.37 TULSA GA>NA RAY INC.

35 17178 01 26 25 24 0.97 TULSA INSPECTION SERVICE, INC.

35-23362-01 40 40 22 05'4 TUMBLEWEED X-RAY 03-23185 01 54 54 43 0 79 TWIN PORTS TESTING, INC.

48 23476-01 19 15 11 0.70 TWIN PORTS TESTING, INC.

48 23476-01 0

0 0

0.00 U.S. TESTING CO., INC.

29-02477 09 176 80 9

0.11 ULRA TECHNOLOGY, INC.

50-23363-01 15 11 6

0.50 UNITED INSPECTION, INC.

35-23436-01 18 18 25 1.39 UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL TESTING LA 37-00453-03 27 18 16 0 87 UNIVERSAL TESTING 43 11213-02 20 17 18 1.08 UNIVERSAL TESTING LABORATORIES 29-16397-01 6

3 0

0.05 VECTOR CORP.

37-20827-01 5

3 1

0.28 VENEGAS INDUSTRIAL TESTING LAB 28-14847-02 5

3 1

0.18 WALASHEK ENTERPRISES 53-23225-01 4

4 0

0.05 WESTERN STRESS, INC.

49-23490-01 30 26 29 1.10 WESTERN X-RAY COMPANY 35-19993-01 13 13 9

0 69 WISCONSIN INDUSTRIAL TESTING I 48-17480-01 73 68 46 0.68 X R-I TESTING OF MICHIGAN 21-05472-01 60 28 5

0.19 X RAY, INC.

46-03414 03 38 36 33 0 91 X-SCAN INSPECTION COMPANY 35-19507-01 11 8

16 2 01 A-9

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

MANUFACTURERS AND DISTRIBUTORS 1985 total Workers with Collective Average Licensee Name License Number Progree Individuals Measurable Dose Mess 8ble Dese Type Monitored Dose (person rees) (ress or csv)

ACCURAY CORPORATION 34-00255-03 BROAD 401 184 17 0.09 AMERSHAM CORPORATION 12-12836-01 BROAD 200 52 20 0.39 E. I, DUPONT (NEN) 20-00320-21 sROAD 873 657 302 0.46 E.P. SQUIBB AND SONS INC.

29-00139-02 3RCAD 364 241 48 0.20 HALLIBURTON COMPANY 35-00502-03 BROAD 406 350 42 0.12 MALLINCKRODT/ NUCLEAR 24-04206-01 880AD 352 320 204 0.64 NEW ENGLAND NUCLEAR CORPORATIO 20-00320 19 BROAD 4

4 1

0.11 NUCLEAR RESEARCH CORPORATION 29-04236-01 sa0AD 46 11 1

0.07 PITTWAY CORPORATION 12-15023 01 st0AD 101 7

0 0.05 RAMSEY ENGINEERING CO., TEXAS 42-01485-04 BROAD 91 82 22 0.26 TECHNICAL OPERATIONS INC.

20-00277 03 BROAD 68 43 11 0.25 UPJOHN COMPANY 21-00182-03 stoAD 548 16 1

0.06 ADVANCED MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC.

34-19089 01 OTHER 34 20 35 1.74 AIRCO INCORPORATED 29-02085-01 OtMER 18 3

0 0.05 ATOMIC ENERGY OF CANADA LIMITE 54-00300-09 OtMER 69 40 6

0.14 CAMBRIDGE NUCLEAR CORPORATION.

20-06799-02 OTHEa 24 17 3

0.19 GAWA DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORIES 20-15215-02 OTHER

}g 18 12 0,TS KAY-RAY INCORPORATED 12-11184-01 otNER 43 26 3

0.11 NUCLEAR RESEARCH CORPORATION 27-02401-01 OTHER 43 9

1 2 05 SEAKAN NUCLEAR CORPORATION 48 12016-01 ot>En 16 16 11 0.69 ELFRETH ALLEY AP0THECARY 37-18461-01 *0tNER 21 10 3

0 31 NUCLEAR PHARMACY, INC.

20-21227-01 +0tnfa 29 12 1

0.10 PHARMACO NUCLEAR INC.

37-18467-01

01 met 14 4

1 0.11 PHARKA10 PES INO.

21-19219 01 *0tnEn 17 3

0 0.05 PHARMATOPES INC.

34-16654-01 'otMEa 20 20 8

0.38 PHARMATOPES INC.

34-19007-01 *0THER 12 9

1 0 05 PHARKATOPES INC.

34-19008-01 *0tHER 7

1 0

0.05 PHARNATOPES & COMPANY 13-19451-01 *0tMER 0

0 0

0 00 SYNCOR CORP.

12-19333-01 +0tute 59 38 3

0 08 SYNCOR CORP.

24-19360-01

0 tufa 17 15 2

0.16 SYNCOR CORP.

34 18484-01 *0tura 14 14 3

0.18 SYN 00R CORP.

35-19583-01

0f>ER 9

2 0

0.11 SYNCOR CORP.

37-21092-01 *0fMEt 14 6

1 0.11

' Activity includes distribution of redfopherraceuticals.

A 10

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

1985 FUEL FABRICATORS AND PROCESSORS Total Workers with Collectlve Average Lleensee Name License Number Individuals Measurable Dose Meas'ble Dese Monitored Dose (person tems) (reas or csv)

BABC0CK AND WILC0X SNM-1168 160 160 43 0.27 8ABC0CK AND WILCOX INC NAVAL N

$NM-0042 2579 1663 142 0.09 COMBUSTION ENGINEERING INC.

SNM-1067 264 106 24 0.23 COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. C SNM-0033 70 46 5

0.10 EXXON NUCLEAR COMPANY INC SNM-1227 857 4t8 57 0.12 GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY SNM-0696 825 224 32 0.14 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.

SNM-1097 1151 617 75 0.12 NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES INC, SNM 0124 871 562 28 0.05 UNITED NUCLEAR CORPORATION NAV, SNM 0368 134 71 4

0.05 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP SNM 1107 865 795 219 0.28 ATOMICS INTERNATIONAL DIVISION' SNM-0021 819 300 68 0.23 LO. LEVEL WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES CHEM-NUCLEAR SYSTEMS 12-13536-01 636 183 32 0.17 U. S. ECOLOGY 16-19204-01 604 69 38 0.55 INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY SNM 2500 32 32 34 1.05

'ho longer engaged in fuel fabrication.

A 11

l l

APPENDIX B Annual Whole Body Doses at Licensed huclear Power Facilities 1985 B-1

APPENDIX B ANNUAL Wh0LE BODY DOSES AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES CY 1985 thaber of Individants with Whole Body Do es in the Ran

ges (rens or cSv)

TOTAL NUMBER PLANT MAME TYPE IRMBER WITH COLLEC-No Meas-Mees. 0.10-0.25- 0.50- 0.75-1.0G-2.00- 3.00- 4.00- 5.00- 6.00- 7.00-MONI-MEAS.

TIVE urable <0.10 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 1

>12.0 TORED EXPOSURE DOSE

...................................................................................... 2.00 AaKANSAS 1,2 PWR 1,341 630 2 73 219 93 40 37 2,603 1,262 286**

BEAVER VALLEY PWR 1,157 448 114 36 18 3

1,776 619 60**

BIG ROCK EWR 143 165 73 53 26 20 50 28 19 1

578 435 291 SROWNS FERRY 1,2,3 BWR 4,158 903 558 515 288 156 281 53 1

6,913 2,755 1,159 "

BRUNSWICK 1,2 BWR 1,707 1,682 429 340 260 220 630 395 tot 5,764 4,057 2,804**

CALLAWAY PWR 886 861 71 23 8

1 1,850 M4 36**

CALVERT CLIFFS 1,2 PWR 489 710 239 209 141 80 167 52 2,087 1,598 694 (DOK 1,2 PWR 776 637 377 328 254 100 245 40 3

2,760 1,984 945 (DOPER STATION SWR 1,503 816 210 198 151 99 302 151 50 3

3,483 1,980 1,333**

CRTSTAL RIVER 3 PWR 1,048 796 411 330 164 119 143 13 3,024 1,976 689 DAVIS SESSE PWR 1,748 497 154 51 10 2

4 2,466 718 71**

DRESDEN 2,3 SWR 1,059 945 388 357 233 229 578 81 6

3,87t>

2,817 1,685 DUANE ARNOLD SWR 1,029 342 203 207 149 124 217 148 23 1

2,443 1,414 1,112

~

FARLEY 1,2 PWR 246 1,276 393 320 218 129 170 43 2

2,797 2,551 799 "

FITZPATRICK 8WR 825 758 247 205 139 99 272 89 29 7

2,670 1,845 1,051 "

FORT CALMOUN PWR 195 419 84 112 93 70 122 48 21 13 1,177 982 373" CINNA PWR 436 322 114 130 80 66 102 29 1

1 1,281 845 426 NADDAM NECK PWR 804 224 59 37 24 9

28 3

1,188 384 101**

NATCM 1,2 sWt 1,500 1,275 558 434 246 150 167 9

2 4,341 2,841 818 "

INDIAN POINT 2 PWR 1,456 407 98 89 39 30 42 3

2,164 708 192 IN0!AN POINT 3 PWR 694 338 204 170 101 91 164 23 2

1,787 1,093 570 KEW4LstEE PWR 331 162 113 99 75 39 30 0

1 850 519 176**

LACROSSE SWR 291 267 13 6

13 to 27 32 5

664 373 1 73 LASALLE 1,2 BWR 723 71 7 247 243 140 112 115 57 4

2,358 1,635 685 MAINE YANKEE PWR 240 375 86 99 84 72 224 64 5

1,249 1,009 700 MCGUIRE 1 PWR 1,197 932 389 395 158 112 203 28 3,414 2,217 771**

MILLSTONE 1 BWR 485 196 96 91 70 46 130 76 22 5

1,217 732 608**

MILLSTONE 2 PWR 1,259 510 250 235 182 119 339 198 57 15 3,164 1,905 1,581**

MONTICELLO BWR 1,004 190 87 103 67 44 63 24 7

1 1,590 586 327 NINE MILE FOINT 1 BWR 788 62, 119 108 59 36 51 8

1 1

1,795 1,007 265 NORTH ANNA 1,2 PWR 1,069 1,423 246 202 186 128 209 41 1

3,505 2,436 839

- Indicates actual collective dose reported by facility, otherwise calculated tw staf f.

APPENDIX B(cont.)

ANNUAL WHOLE BODY DOSES AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES CY 1985 Number of Individants with Whole Bocht Dows In the Ranges (reas or cSv)

TOTAL NLMBER NLMBER WITN COLLEC-

--- --------------------------- ----------- ------------------------------- 7.00-PLANT NAME TYPE No Mees-Meas. 0.10- 0.25- 0.50- 0,75-1.00- 2.00- 3.00-4.00- 5.00- 6.00-MONI-KAS.

TIVE urable <0.10 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 12.00 >12.0 10 RED EXPOSURE DOSE OconFE 1,2,3 PWR 863 991 465 404 248 175 327 113 6

3,592 2,729 1,304 "

OTSTER CREDC BWR 439 1,361 285 252 153 93 147 40 11 2,781 2,342 748 PALISADES PWR 470 678 178 157 107 75 150 9

1 1,825 1,355 507 PEACM SOTT W 2,3 BWR. 2,080 1,004 607 621 384 329 794 295 156 19 6,289 4,209 3,354 "

PILGRIM 1 BWR 0

702 551 483 124 79 199 54 14 3

2,209 2,209 895" PCINT 3EACH 1,2 PWR 851 165 89 67 61 157 35 1

1,522 671 482 PRt1RIE ISLAND 1,2 PWR 511 399 280 161 86 45 87 21 3

1,593 1,082 416 CoAD CITIES 1,2 BWR 1,167 286 136 141 97 75 322 109 17 1

2,351 1.184 990 "

RANCHO SECO PWR 793 642 335 275 180 116 92 24 2,557 1,764 756 Rosins M 2 PWR 1,679 818 205 187 64 30 59 10 5

3,057 1,378 311 "

SALEM 1,2 PWR 1,214 752 162 44 24 31 3

2,326 1,112 204 cn SAN ONOFRE 1 PWR 8,153 2,264 233 120 44 17 15 10,881 2.693 189 "

O SAN ONOFRE 2,3 PWR 2.858 1,872 588 302 121 56 103 7

5,907 3,049 533" SEQUOYAN 1,2 PWR 1,804 581 280 284 193 134 264 111 7

3,658 1,854 1,071 "

ST. LUCIE 1,2 PWR 1,265 611 285 261 166 87 419 131 7

1 3,236 1,971 1,344 SWR 1 PWR 597 558 194 143 91 52 160 3

1,798 1,201 379 "

SURRY 1,2 PWR 365 1,670 288 267 181 109 421 211 52 7

3,5 71 3.206 1,815 susotKNANNA 1,2 BWR 920 1,501 846 551 299 191 272 9

4,589 3,669 1,106 "

THREE MILE ISLAND 1,2 PWR 1,005 1,068 176 157 109 90 188 72 30 2,895 1,890 857 TROJAN PWR 592 264 159 155 100 62 98 8

1,444 857 363 "

TURKEY POINT 3,4 PWR 1,505 535 299 312 185 116 324 115 19 3,410 1,905 1,253 l

l VERMONT YANKEE 1 BWR 930 223 189 223 176 169 339 73 2,32?

1,392 1,051 "

WPPS-2 SWR 1,310 489 115 87 33 14 17 2,065 755 119 "

YANKEE-ROWE i PWR 1,402 309 78 101 65 35 64 1

2,055 653 211 "

ZION 1.2 PWR 1,075 431 186 199 128 1C2 296 127 24 5

2/373 1,498 1,166 TOTALS - BWR's 22,061 14,446 5,957 5,218 3,107 2,295 4,975 1, 731 468 42 60,298 38,237 20,572 TOTALS - PW 's 42,409 25,545 8,158 6,761 4,107 2,602 5,584 1,586 248 42 97,042 54,633 22,470 TOTALS - U.:'s 64,470 39,991 14,115 11,979 7,214 4,897 10,557 3,317 71o 84 157,340 92,870 43,042 FT. ST. VRAIN HTGR 1,929 370 40 15 7

4 7

2,372 443 35 "

" Indicates actual cottective dose reported by facility, otherwise calculated by staf f.

APPtNDIX B(cont.)

ANNUAL WHOLE BODY DOSES,4T LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES PLANTS NOT IN COMERCIAL OPERATION OR IN OPERATION LESS THAN ONE YEAR CY 1985 Musber of IrdividJets with Whole Body Doses in the Ranges (rens or cSv)

TOTAL IAseER PLANT M TYPE ------------------------------------

=-- ----- -----------------------------------

IRsGER WITN COLLEC-No Mees-Mees. 0.10- 0.25- 0.50- 0.75-1.00- 2.00- 3.00- 4.00- 5.00- 6.00- 7.00-HONI-sIEAS.

TIVE urable <0.10 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 2.2 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 12.00 >12.0 70 RED EXPoststE DOSE c.............

BYRON 1,2 PWt 4,061 1,233 213 76 5

2 2

_- =_

5,592 1,531 135 CATAleA PWt 2,601 967 130 36 12 2

1 3,729 1,12B 63**

DIABLO CANYON 1,2 PWt 2,709 966 80 17 1

3,771 1,062 68 FEisel-2 out 3,245 323 2

1 3,571 326 17 GRAND GULF sut 1,933 510 165 95 40 10 9

2,M2 829 137 IRae0LDT aAf gut 233 96 27 26 15 4

11 1

411 175 51 LMRICK 1 But 5,109 491 30 3

5,633 524 31 PALO VERDE 1,2 Put 2,534 292 23 4

2.853 319 20 RIW R GE S 1 But 1,518 142 15 1

1,676 158 10 SNORENAM gut 1,606 577 31 4

3 1

2,222 616 38 WOLT0tEEE 1 Put 1,406 155 11 4

7 1,5 74 170 13 a.

TOTAIS 26,953 5, 728 72 7 267 7t 19 23 1

e 33,796 5,841 583

APPENDIX C*

Personnel, Doze and Power Generation Sumary 1969-1985 t

A discussion rf the methods used to collect and calculate the information contained in this appendix is given in Section 2.1.

C-1

Appendix C Fersonnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person rems Person-rems Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

(-c5v) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station K-(rems

(-c5v)/

(MW-Yr) factor able Doses or c5v) tions

& Others tor Utility or c5v)

MW-Yr ARKANSAS 1, 2 1975 588.0 76.5 147 21 0.14 0.0 Docket 50-313; DPR-51, NPF-6 1976 464.6 56.6 476 289 27 262 100 189 0.61 0.6 l

1st commercial operation 12/74,-

1977 610.3 76.8 601 256 28 228 111 145 0.43 0.4 l

Type - PWRs 3/80 1978 627.2 77.5 722 189 32 157 109 80 0.26 0.3 Capacity - 836, 858 MWe 1979 397.0 55.3 1321 369 54 315 252 117 0.28 0.9 1980 452.8 63.7 1233 342 81 261 213 129 0.28 0.8 1981 1104.7 68.3 2225 1102 130 972 843 259 0.50 1.0 1982 905.4 58.6 1608 803 97 706 505 298 0.50 0.9 1983 915.0 54.6 2109 1397 97 1300 1145 252 0.66 1.5 i

1984 1289.1 77.4 1742 806 89 717 533 273 0.46 0.6 1985 1192.3 73.6 1262 286 61 225 148 138 0.23 0.2 BEAVER VALL[Y I 1977 355.6 57.0 331 87 8

79 58 29 0.26 0.2

?

Docket 50-334; DPR-66 1978 304.2 40.8 646 190 11 179 152 38 0.29 0.6 1st commercial operation 10/76 1979 221.0 40.0 704 132 22 110 67 65 0.19 0.6 Type - PhR 1980 39.8 6.8 1817 553 76 477 4 77 76 0.30 13.9 Capacity - 810 MWe 1981 573.4 73.6 1237 229 38 191 142 87 0.19

.4 1982 326.7 41.6 1755 599 126 473 481 118 0.34

1. 8 1993 561.2 68.2 1485 772 158 614 615 157 0.52 1.4 1984 576.7 71.8 1393 504 125 379 302 202 0.36 0.9 1985 717.7 91.9 619 60 17 43 12 48 0.10 0.1 BIG ROCK POINT 1969 48.1 165 136 6.82

2. &

Docket 50-155, DPR-6 1970 43.5 290 194 0.67 4.5 1st commercial operation 3/63 1971 44.4 260 184 0.71 4.1 Type - BwR 1972 43.5 195 181 0.93 4.2 Capacity 69 MWe 1973 50.9 241 N

119 166 1.18

5. 6 1974 40.7 70.3 281 2,.

54 222 42 234 0.98 6.8 1975 35.1 59.8 300 180 58 122 20 160 0.60 5.1 1976 29.5 50.1 488 289 82 207 105 184 0.59 9.8 1977 43.6 73.4 465 334 94 240 60 274 0.72

7. 7 1978 48.5 77.9 285 175 93 82 9

166 0.61 3.6 1979 13.0 23.5 623 455 89 366 102 353 0.73 35.0 1980 48.9 79.0 599 354 16 338 91 263 0.59

7. 2 1981 56.9 90.6 479 160 68 102 38 122 0.33 2.8 1982 43.6 70.8 521 328 129 199 68 260 0.63 7.5

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person rems Person reas Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

(-cSv) per Meas *ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Tym Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-StationT (ress

(-c5v)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or cSv) tions

& Others tor Utility or c5v)

HW-Yr BIG ROCK POINT (Continued) 1983 42.3 71.0 493 263 32 231 55 208 0.53 6.9 1984 50.3 78.6 297 155 37 118 20 135 0.52 3.1 1985 43.8 73.5 435 291 54 237 E0 231 0.67 6.6 BROWNS FERRY 1, 2, 3 1975 161.7 17.8 2380 325 0.14 2.0 Docket 50-259, 50-260, 50-296; 1976 337.6 26.9 220/

234 0.11

0. 7 DPR-33, -52, -68 1977 1327.5 73.0 1858 863 60 803 243 614 0.46 0.6 1st commercial operation 8/74, 1978 1992.1 73.5 2376 1792 4

1788 259 1533 0.75 0.9 3/75, 3/77 1979 2393.0 79.1 2689 1667 0

1667 289 1378 0.62 0.7 Type - BWR>

1980 2182.1 73.6 2712 1825 4

1821 49 1776 0.67 0.8 Capacity - 1065, 1065, 1065 MWe 1981 2132.9 69.5 3379 2380 100 2280 4^4 1976 0.70 1.1 1982 2025.4 67.6 3277 2220 181 2039 317 1903 0.68 1.1 1983 1641.0

$4.3 3302 3363 276 3087 908 2458 1.02 2.0

?

1984 1431.9 54.2 2962 1940 229 1711 541 1399 0.66

1. 4

'd 1985 368.2 11.9 2755 1159 201 958 306 853 0.42 3.1 BRUNSWICK 2, 1 1976 297.2 56.0 1265 326 15 311 222 104 0.26 1.1 Docket 50-324, 50-325; DPR-62, -71 1977 291.1 55.7 1512 1119 48 1071 782 337 0.74 3.8 1st commercial operation 11/75, 1978 1173.1 83.7 1458 1004 99 905 695 309 0.69 0.8 3/77 1979 810.0 60.1 2891 2602 97 2505 2074 528 0.90 3.2 Type - BWR 1980 687.2 52.2 3788 3870 111 3759 3098 772 1.02 5.6 Capacity - 790, 790 MWe 1981 925.2 56.9 3854 2638 159 2479 1890 748 CJA 2.9 1982 540.3 50.3 4957 3792 162 3630 2841 951

't. ib 6.5 1983 636.7 40.6 5602 3475 152 3323 2428 ID47 0.62 5.5 1984 761.3 51.5 5046 3260 143 3117 2363 897 0.66 4.3 1985 822.2 58.4 4057 2804 121 2683 2078 726 0.69 3.4 CALLAWAY 1985 967.4 90.0 964 36 16 20 7

29 0.04 0.0 Docket 50-483, NPF-30 1st commercial operation 12/84 Type - PWR Capacity - 1120 MWe

Appendix C (Continued) i Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-rems Person-ress Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

(-cSv) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Cose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(ress

(-c5v)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or c5v) tions

& Others tor Utility or cSv)

MW-Yr CALYERT CLIFFS 1, 2 1976 753.4 95.2 507 74 28 46 8

66 0.15 0.1 Docket 50-317, 50-318; DPR-53, 1977 583.0 72.1 2265 547 36 511 224 323 0.24 0.9

-69 1978 1188.5 75.8 1391 500 13 487 143 357 0.36 0.4 1st commercial operation 5/75, 1979 1161.0 74.0 1428 805 33 772 423 382 0.56 0.7 i

4/77 1980 1309.9 84.1 1496 677 15 662 402 275 0.45 0.5 i

Type - PWRs 1981 1379.7 83.1 1555 607 29 578 378 229 0.39 0.4 Capacity 825, 825 MWe 1982 1238.3 73.7 1805 1057 84 973 402 655 0.59 0.8 1983 1397.2 81.6 1915 668 5

663 143 525 0.35 0.5 1984 1389.4 79.2 1369 479 61 418 78 401 0.35 0.3 1985 1189.8 68.4 1598 694 69 625 144 550 0.43 0.6 COOK 1, 2 1976 807.4 83.1 395 116 13 103 71 45 0.29 0.1 Docke' 50-315; DPR-58, -74 1977 573.0 76.1 802 299 21 278 138 161 0.37 0.5 7

1st commercial operation 8/75, 1978 744.8 73.6 77P.

336 49 287 139 197 0.43 0.4 7/78 1979 1373.0 65.3 1445 718 45 673 454 264 0.50 0.5 Type - PWRs 1980 1552.4 74.1 1345 493 46 447 323 170 0.37 0.3 Capacity - 1020 MWe, 1060 MWe 1981 1557.3 73.4 1341 555 48 607 442 213 0.49 0.4 1982 1461.6 69.8 1527 699 67 632 472 227 0.46 0.5 1983 1456.5 71.2 1418 658 50 608 467 191 0.46 0.5 1984 1526.0 75.3 1559 762 42 720 597 165 0.49 0.5 1985 925.4 47.6 1984 945 93 852 758 187 0.48

1. 0 COOPE R STATION 1975 456.4 83.6 579 117 30 87 19 98 0.20 0.2 Docket 50-298; DPR-46 1976 433.3 75.5 763 350 39 311 210 140 0.46 0.8 1st commercial operation 7/74 1977 538.2 86.2 315 197 50 147 66 131 0.63 0.4 Type - BWR 1978 576.0 91.0 297 158 40 118 58 100 0.53

0. 3 Capacity - 764 MWe 1979 591.0 87.6 426 221 50 171 89 132 0.52 0.4 1980 448.3 71.2 785 859 70 789 644 215 1.09 1.9 1981 457.1 71.2 935 579 63 516 382 197 0.62

1. 3 1982 622.3 84.6 743 54 2 66 476 361 181 0.73 0.9 1983 396.6 63.3 1383 1293 57 1236 1081 212 0.93 3.3 1984 411.9 67.2 1598 799 46 753 635 164 0.50

1. 9 1985 127.3 21.5 1980 1333 49 1284 1104 229 0.67 10.5

l i

l Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-rems Person-rems Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-cSv) per

(-cSv) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Heasur-rems Opera-Maint T Contrac-5tation &

(rems

(-c5v)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or c5v) tions

& Others tor utility or c5v)

MW-Yr CRYSTAL RIVER 3 1978 311.5 41.4 643 321 8

313 244 77 0.50

1. 0 '

Docket 50-302; DPR-72 1979 453.0 58.9 1150 495 29 466 346 149 0.43 1.1 1st commercial operation 3/77 1980 402.1 53.2 1053 625 24 601 382 243 0.59

1. 6 Type - PWR 1981 490.4 62.2 1120 408 18 340 236 172 0.36 0.8 Capacity - 821 MWe 1982 589.8 76.0 780 177 9

168 116 61 0.23 0.3 1983 452.1 58.8 1720 552 71 481 353 199 0.32 1.2 1984 774.2 94.5 549 49 10 39 22 27 0.09 0.1 1985 344.2 A7.6 1976 689 43 646 424 265 0.35

2. 0 DAVIS-BE55E 1 1978 326.4 48.7 421 48 13 35 14 34 0.11 0.1 Docket 50-346; NPF-3 19/9 381.0 67.0 304 30 8

22 5

25

0. 10 0.1 1st commercial operation 11/77 1980 256.4 36.2 1283 154 4

150 121 33 0.12 0.6 Type - PWR 1981 531.4 67.4 578 58 1

57 32 26 0.10 0.1 Capacity - 860 MWe 1982 390.8 51.5 1350 164 12 152 139 25 0.12 0.4 n

J.

1983 592.1 73.0 718 80 6

74 46 34 0.11 0.1 1984 518.5 62.5 1088 177 10 167 122 55 0.16

0. 3 1985 238.3 31.2 718 71 3

68 46 25 0.10 0.3 ORESDEN 1,* 2, 3 1969 99.7 286 2.9 Docket 50-010, 50-237, 50-249; 1970 163.1 143 0.9 DPR-2. -19. -25 1971 394.5 T.5 1.8 1st commercial operation 7/60, 1972 1243.7 728

' O. 6 7/70, 11/11 1973 1112.2 1341 939 143 796 344 595 0.70 0.8 Type - BWRs 1974 842.5 54.9 1594 1662 57 1605 1.04 2.0 Capacity - 0, 772, 773 MWe 1975 708.1 54.6 2310 3423 271 3152 2252 1171 1.48 4.8 1976 1127.2 80.8 1746 1680 228 1452 749 931 0.96 1.5 1977 1132.9 77.0 1862 1693 316 1377 693 1000 0.91 1.5 1978 1242.2 79.5 1946 1529 204 1325 619 910 0.79 1.2 1979 1013.0 74.7 2407 1800 191 1609 641 1159 0.75 1.8 1980 1074.4 55.0 2717 2105 236 1869 1093 1012 0.77 2.0 1981 1035.7 51.5 2408 2802 120 2682 1850 952 1.16 2.7 1982 1085.3 77.9 2572 2923 136 2787 1731 1192 1.14

2. 7 1983 913.6 65.6 2854 3582 176 3406 2127 1455 1.26

3. 9 1984 789.8 55.3 2261 1774 153 1621 814 960 0.78

2. 2 1985 903.0 64.5 2817 1685 473 1212 878 807 0.60 1.9 l

0resden 1 has been shut down since 1978, and in 1985 it was decided that it would not be put in commercial operation again. Therefore, it is no longer i

included in the count of commercial reactors.

l

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-reas Persc Trees Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-cSv) per

(-cSv) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(rems

(-cSv)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or cSw) tions

& Others tor Utility or cSv)

MW-Yr DUANE ARNOLD 1976 305.2 78.0 350 105 14 91 62 43 0.30 0.3 Docket 50-331; DPR-49 1977 353.6 78.9 538 299 36 263 220 79 0.56 0.8 1st comercial operation 2/75 1978 149.2 33.2 1112 974 59 915 932 42 0.88 6.5 Type - BWR 1979 352.0 78.0 757 275 35 240 219 56 0.36

0. 8 Capacity - 515 MWe 1980 339.1 73.3 1108 671 32 639 570 101 0.61 2.0 1981 277.7 69.8 1286 790 56 734 598 192 0.61 2.8 1982 278.5 74.7 524 229 18 211 175 54 0.44 0.8 1983 283.0 62.9 1468 1135 42 1093 1016 119 0.77 4.0 1984 329.4 72.9 611 189 27 162 117 72 0.31 0.6 1985 236.2 53.8 1414 1112 49 1063 954 158 0.79 4.7 FARLEY 1, 2 1978 713.8 86.5 527 108 39 69 34 74 0.20 0.1 Docket 50-348, 50-364; NPF-2, -8 1979 211.0 28.6 1227 643 108 535 460 183 0.52 3.0 7

1st commercial operation 12/77, 1980 557.3 69.3 1330 435 106 329 185 250 0.33 0.8 7/81 1981 310.2 41.4 1331 511 96 415 270 241 0.38 1.6 Type - PWR 1982 1271.5 79.2 1453 484 155 329 196 268 0.33 0.4 Capacity - 816, 807 MWe 1983 1356.5 82.9 1938 1021 241 780 479 542 0.53 0.8 1984 1447.0 86.6 2046 902 177 725 504 398 0.44 0.6 1985 1368.2 81.1 2551 799 157 642 443 356 0.31 0.6 FIT 2 PATRICK 1976 489.0 71.6 600 202 0.34 0.4 Docket 50-333; DPR-59 1977 460.5 68.4 1380 1080 14 1066 937 143 0.78 2.3 1st commercial operation 7/75 1978 497.9 72.1 904 909 166 743 597 312 1.00 1.8 Type - BWR 1979 349.0 50.8 850 859 169 690 538 321 1.01

2. 5 Capacity - 810 MWe 1980 509.5 70.3 2056 2040 118 1922 1808 232 0.99 4.0 1981 562.9 74.7 2490 1425 187 1238 1072 353 0.57 2.5 1982 583.6 75.0 2322 1190 136 1054 862 328 0.51 2.0 1983 546.2 70.6 1715 1090 158 932 667 423 0.64 2.0 1984 576.2 76.8 1610 971 82 889 467 504 0.60 1.7 1985 492.3 63.7 1845 1051 110 941 718 333 0.57 2.1 FORI CALHOUN 1974 294.0 83.5 327 71 24 47 0.22 0.2 Docket 50-285; DPR-40 1975 252.3 67.4 469 294 92 202 0.63

1. 2 ist commercial operation 9/73 1976 265.9 69.5 516 313 28 285 38 275 0.61 1.2 Type - PWR 1977 351.8 79.4 535 297 33 264 72 225 0.56 0.8 Capacity - 478 F4e 1978 342.3 75.1 596 410 59 351 151 259 0.69

1. 2 N

..-~ -

..~

I 1

,. ~l Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-rems Person-ress Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-cSv) per

(-cSv) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel, (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(ress

(-cSv)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or cSv) tions

& Others tor Utility or c5v)

MW-Yr i

FORT CALHOUN (Continued) 1979 440.0 95.7 451 126 19 107 47 79 0.28 0.3 i

1980 242.3 60.4 891 668 38 630 426 242 0.75

' 2. 8 1981 260.9 72.3 822 458 61

.397 254 204 0.56 1.8 1982 418.0 89.7 604 217 44 173 99 118 0.36 0.5 1983 330.4 73.1 860 433 66 367 205 228 0.50 1.3 1984 279.2 59.9 913 563 91 472 313 250 0.62 2.0 1985 367.0 73.7 982 373 54 319 231 142 0.38

1. 0 i

GINNA 1971 327.8 340 430 69 361 108 322 1.26 1.3 Docket 50-244; DPR-18 1972 293.6 677 1032 71

%1 278 754 1.52 3.5 1st commercial operation 7/70 1973 409.5 319 224 55 169-84 140 0.70 0.5 Type - PWR 1974 253.7 62.4 884 1225 1.39 4.8 Capacity - 470 MWe 1975 365.2 76.7 685 538 0.78 1.5 1

?

1976 248.8 58.2 758 636 29 607 210 426 0.84

2. 5 '

1977 365.6 85.5 530 401 15 386 120 281 0.76 1.1

~

1978 386.5 80.6 657 450 20 430 98 352 0.68

1. 2 l

1979 355.0 7?.8 878 592 68 524 207 385 0.67 1.7 4

i 1980 370.5 76.0 1073 708 64 644 302 406 0.66 1.9 1981 399.0 82.1 925 655 49 606 251 404 0.71 1.6 1982 289.0 58.8 1117 1140 80 1060 546 594 1.02 3.9 1983 365.0 74.6'

%9 855 42 813 378 477 0.88 2.3 1984 378.1 77.2 713 394 57 337 195 199 0.55 1.0 1%5 436.7 87.9 845 426 91 335 178 248 0.50

1. 0 HADDAM NECK (CONN. YANKEE) 1%9 438.5 138 106 27 79 0.77 0.2 Docket 50-213; DPR-61 1970 424.7 734 689 463 226 0.94

1. 6 1st commercial operation 1/68 1971 502.2 289 342 166 176 1.18

0. 7 Type - PWR 1972 515.6 355 325 181 144 0.91 0.6 Capacity - 569 MWe 1973 293.1 951 697 544 153 0.73 2.4 1974 521.4 91.2 550 201 0.36 0.4 1975 494.3 89.9 795 703 20 683 0.88

~ 1. 4 t

1 1976 482.9 82.5 644 449 5

444 253 1%

0.70 0.9 1977 480.7 83.9 894 641 59 582 440 201 0.72

1. 3 l

1978 563.4 98.6 216 117 25 92 18 99 0.54 0.2 l

1979 493.0 87.5 1226 1161 73 1088 783' 378 0.95 2.4 1980 426.8 75.0 1860 1353 175 1178 1076 277 0.73 3.2 1981 487.5 84.3 1554 1036 174 862 809 227 0.67 2.1 l

'1 1

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-rees Person-rees Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-cSv) per

(-cSv) per Meas *ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose reos Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-

' rems Opera-Main C Contrac-Station &

(rees

(-cSv)/-

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or cSv) tions

& Others tor Utility or c5v) led-Yr.

HADDAM NECK (CONN. YANKEE) 1982 543.9 93.4 559 126 46 80 22 104 0.23 0.2 (Continued) 1983 453.7 77.8 1645 1384 106 1278 1017 367 0.84 3.1 1984 404.0 71.7 1430 1216 154 1062 803 413 0.85 3.0 1985 556.1 98.4 384 101 21 80 22 79 0.26 0.2 HATCH 1, 2 1976 4%. 3 83.8 630 134 79 55 4

130 0.21 0.3 Docket 50-321, 50-366; DPR-57; 1977 446.8 66.3 1303 465 369 220 245 0.36

1. 0 NPF-05 1978 513.0 72.8 1304 248 88 160 52 1%

0.19 0.5 1st commercial operation 12/75, 1979 401.0 54.6 2131 582 85 497 382 200 0.27

1. 5 9/79 1980 1008.7 70.9 1930 449 143 306 163 286 0.23' O.4 Type - BWR 1981 870.9 64.3 2899 1337 200 1137 792 545.

0.46 1.5 Capacity - 752, 748 MWe 1982 768.0 56.6 3418 1460 218 1242 1064 3%

0.43 1.9 1983 934.7 68.6 3428 1299 253 1046 851 448 0.38 1.4

?

1984 658.6 117.3 4110 2218 311 1907 1861 357 0.54 3.4 1985 124.0 79.1 2841 818 182 636 507 311 0.29 0.7 HUpBOLDT BAY' 1%9 44.6 125 164 69 95 12 152 1.31 3.7 Docket 50-133; DPR-7 1970

49. ~

115 209 130 79 37 172 1.82 4.2 1st commercial operation 8/63 1971 39.6 140 292 114 178 65 227 2.09 7.4 Type - BWR 1972 43.1 127 253 81 172 57 1%

1.99 5.9 Capacity - 0 MWe 1973 50.1 210 166 60 206 1.27 5.3 1974 43.4 83.8 296 318 103 215 1.07 7.3 1975 45.3 83.9 265 339 131 208 112 227 1.28 7.5 1976 23.5 46.4 523 683 37 646 50 633 1.31 29.1 1977 0

0 1063 1904 24 1880 973 931 1.79 1978 0

0 320 335 13 322 145 190 1.05 19?9 0

0 135 31 11 20 2

29 0.23 1980 0

0 142 22 10 12 3

19 0.15 1981 0

0 75 9

0.12 1982 3

0 71 19 5

14 0

19 0.27 1983 0

0 84 17 4

13 0

17 0.20

'Humboldt Bay has been shutdown since 1976 and in 1984, it was decided that it would not be placed in operation again. Therefore, it is no longer included in the count of commercial reactors.

ee Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel, Sne and Power Generation Summary i

Collective

' Person-rems Person-rems Avera9e Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-cSv) per

(-cSv) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems

. Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(rems

.(-cSv)/

{

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or c5v) tiens

& Others tor Utility or c5v) -

MW-Yr INDIAN POINT 1

2, 3**

1969 206.2 298 1.4 Docket 50-3. 50-247, 50-286; 1970 43.3 1639 37.8 DPR-5. -26. -64 1971 154.0 768 5.0 1st commerctal operation 10/62 1972 142.3

%7 6.8 8/73, 8/76 1973 0

2998 5262 709 4553 2847 2415 1.75 Type - PWR 1974 556.1 59.4 1019 910

' O.89

1. 6 1975 584.4 74.8 891 705 1%

539 47 658 0.79 1.2 i

1976 273.9 34.8 1590 1950 154 17 %

172 1778 1.23 7.1 1977 1278.3 75.3 1391 1070 189 881 383 687 0.77 0.8 1978 1172.3 67.8 1909 2006 269 1746 759 1247 1.05 1.7 INDIAN POINT 1

2 1979 574.0 71.4 1349 1279 209 1070 612 667 0.95 2.2 Docket 50-3. 50-247, 1980 510.8 64.8 1577 971 181 790 398 573 0.62 1.9

?

DPR-5 -26 1981 367.5 46.0 2595 2731 237 2494 1595 1137 1.05 7.4 1st commercial operation 10/62, 1982 532.4 65.4 2144 1635 343 1292 883 752 0.76 3.1 i

8/73 1%3 702.6 84.0 1057 486 200 286 217 269 0.46 0.7 Type - PWR 1984 416.7 51.9 2919 2544 650 1994 1863 781 0.91 6.3 Capacity, O, 864 Pede 1985 791.4 95.7 708 192 123 69 95 97 0.27 0.2 INDIAN POINT 3**

1979 568.0 66.5 808 636

'3 573 482 154 0.79 1.1 Docket 50-286; DPR-64 1980 367.3 53.2 977 308 47 261 210 98 0.32 0.8 1st commercial operation 8/76 1981 365.8 59.8 677 364 46 318 255 109 0.54

1. 0 '

Type - PWR 1982 171.5 22.5 1477 1226 42 1184 1094 132 0.83 7.1 Capacity - %5 MWe 1983 7.8 2.6 941 607 38

%9 494 113 0.65 77.8 1984 714.4 76.3 658 230 48 -

182 127 103 0.35 0.3 1985 566.5 66.0 1093 570 35 535 455 115 0.52 1.0 I

KEWAUNEE 1975 401.9 88.2 104 28 1

27-12 16 0.27 0.1 l

Docket 50-305; DPR-43 1976 405.9 78.9 381 270 16 2'.S 193 77 0.71 0.7 1st commercial operation 6/74 1977 425.0 79.9 312 139 8

1h 76 63 0.44

0. 3 -

Type - PWR 1978 466.6 89.5 335 154 11 143 89 65 0.46 0.3 Capacity - 503 MWe 1979 412.0 79.0 343 127 6

121 79 48 0.37 0.3 1

1980 433.8 82.1 401 165 7

158 103 62 0.41 0.4 1981 451.8 86.7 383 141 7

134 94 47 0.37 0.3

]NDIAN POINT 1 was defueled in 1975 and in 1984 it was decided that it would not be placed in operation again. Therefore, it is no longe-included in the count of commercial reactors.

- INDIAN POINT 3 was purchased by a different utility and now reports separately.

I i

t

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-rems Person-ress Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

(-c5v) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur was Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(ress

(-c5v)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Dose

c-I5v) tions

& Others tor Utility or c5v)

MW-Yr KEWAUNEE (Continued) 1982 458.4 87.6 353 101 5

96 51 50 0.29

0. 2 1983 444.1 83.7 445 165 10 155 119 46 0.37 0.4 1984 455.3 85.7 482 139 7

132 90 49 0.29 0.3 1985 443.1 82.4 519 176 4

172 118 58 0.34 0.4 LACROSSE 1970 15.3 111 40 71 7.2 Docket 50-409; DPR-45 1971 33.1 218 158 0.72 4.8 1st commercial operation 11/69 1972 29.2 151 172 1.14 5.9 Type - BWR 1973 24.4 157 221 1.41 9.1 Capacity - 48 MWe 1974 37.9 81.0 115 139 89 50 6

133 1.21

3. 7 1975 32.0 69.6 165 234 1.42 7.3 1976 21.2 47.6 118 111 40 71 6

105 0.94 5.2 1977 11.3 33.7 141 224 60 164 8

216 1.59 19.8

?

1978 21.6 62.0 182 164 69 95 6

158 0.90 7.6

g 1979 24.0

/1. 8 153 186 65 121 21 165 1.22

7. 7 1980 26.4 68.5 124 218 63 155 11 207 1.76 8.3 1981 29.6 76.0 187 123 62 61 3

120 0.66 4.2 1982 17.2 44.6 148 205 65 140 16 189

1. 39 11.9 1983 24.8 59.7 160 313 103 210 31 282 1.96 12.6 1984 38.5 80.5 288 252 141 111 5

247 0.87 6.5 1985 39.2 86.7 373 173 76 97 22 151 0.46 4.4 LASALLE 1, 2*

1984 677.8 68.9 1245 252 30 222 86 166 0.20 0.4 Docket 50-373. -374; NPF-11. -18 1985 987.9 52.5 1635 685 88 597 420 265 0.42 0.7 1st commercial operction 1/84, 10/84 Type - BWR Capacity - 1036, 1036 MWe MAINE YANKEL 1973 408.7 782 117 59 58 0.15 0.3 Doc 6et 50-309; DPR-36 1974 432.6 68.7 619 420 64 356 188 232 0.68

1. 0 1st commercial operation 12/72 1975 542.9 79.9 443 319 15 304 181 138 0.72 0.6 Type - PWR 1976 712.2 95.0 244 85 27 58 26 59 0.35 0.1 Capacity - 810 MWe 1977 617.6 82.2 508 245 46 199 112 133 0.48 0.4 1978 64'.7 84.1 638 420 54 366 262 158 0.66

0. 6 1979 537.0 68.4 393 154 70 84 26 128 0.39 0.3

LaSalle 2 was counted for the first time in 1985.

r Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-rems Person-ress Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

(-c5v) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work function Personnel Type Dose rems i

Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(ress

(-c5v)/

l (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or c5v) tions

& Others tor Utility or c5v)

MW-Yr j

i MAINE YANKEE (Continued) 1980 527.0 72.2 735 462 117 345 277 185 0.63 0.9

)

1981 624.2 78.2 868 424 11 413 308 116 0.49 0.7 1982 542.5 69.1 1295 619 33 586 462 157 0.48 1.1 1983 677.1 83.6 592 164 40 124 72 92 0.28

0. 2 1984 605.7 74.4 1262 884 9

875 702 182 0.70 1.5 1985 635.4 79.2 1009 700 54 646 529 171 0.69 1.1 MCGUIRE 1, 2*

1982 524.9 80.4 1560 169 25 143 29 140 0.11 0.3 Docket 50-369 -370; NPF-9, -17 1983 558.3 55.4 1751 521 35 486 123 398 0.30 0.9 1st commercial operation 12/81 1984 764.1 68.5 1663 507 40 467 110 397 0.30 0.7 Type - PWR 1985 1477.6 68.1 2217 771 92 679 277 494 0.35 0.5 Capacity - 1180, 1180 MWe MILLSTONE POINT 1 1972 377.6 612 596 50 546 340 256 0.97

1. 6 Docket 50-245; DPR-21 1973 225.1 1184 663 125 538 422 241 0.56 2.9 0.58 3.3 1st commercial operation 3/71 1974 430.3 79.1 2477 1430 0.78 4.3 Type - BWR 19 75 465.4 75.6 2587 2022 Capacity - 654 MWe 1976 449.8 76.1 1377 1194 54 1140 955 239 0.87 2.6 1977 575.7 89.6 1075 392 118 274 159 233 0.36 0.7 1978 556.6 87.6 1391 1239 140 1099 907 332 0.89 2.2 1979 505.0 77.3 1769 1793 198 1595 1326 467 1.01 3.6 1980 405.8 69.0 3024 2158 100 2058 1864 294

0. 71 5.3 1981 304.3 51.6 2506 1496 96 1400 1201 295 0.60 4.9 1982 490.2 79.9 1370 929 78 851 587 342 0.68

1. 9 1983 640.1 95.6 309 244 63 181 74 170 0.79 0.4 1984 516.1 78.8 1992 836 80 756 532 304 0.42 1.6 1985 548.5 83.6 732 608 65 543 369 239 0.83 1.1 MILLSTONE POINT 2 1976 545.7 78.7 620 168 26 142 13 95 0.27 0.3 Docket 50-336; DPR-65 1977 518.7 65.7 667 242 38 204 153 89 0.36 0.5 1st commercial operation 12/75 1978 536.6 67.3 1420 1621 72 1549 1534 87 1.14

3. 0 Type-PWR 1979 520.0 62.8 757 472 81 391 305 167 0.62 0.9 Capacity - 857 MWe 1980 579.3 69.2 892 636 76 560 514 122 0.71 1.1 1981 722.4 82.6 890 531 44 487 393 138 0.60 0.7 1982 595.9 70.6 2083 1413 27 1386 1219 194 0.68 2.4 1983 294.0 34.2 2383 1881 170 1711 1548 333 0.79 6.4

McGuire 2 was counted for the first time in 1985.

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-rems Person-rems Average s

Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

(-cSv) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(res:s

(-cSv)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or cSv) tions

& Others tor Utility or cSv)

MW-Yr MILLSTONE POINT 2 (Continued) 1984 782.7 93.5 285 120 11 109 63 57 0.42 0.2 1985 417.8 49.4 1905 1581 60 1521 1255 326 0.83 3.8 MONTICELLO 1972 424.4 99 61 40 21 1

60 0.62 0.1 Docket 50-263; DPR-22 1973 389.5 401 176 48 128 67 109 0.44 0.4 1st commercial operation 6/71 1974 349.3 74.9 842 349 91 258 0.41

1. 0 Type - BWR 1975 344.8 72.2 1353 1353 1.00

3. 9 Capacity - 536 MWe 1976 476.4 91.5 325 263 59 204 51 212-0.81 0.5 1977 425.6 79.9 860 1000 135 865 661 339 1.16

2. 3 1978 459.4 87.2 679 375 62 313 165 210 0.55 0.8 1979 522.0 97.6 372 157 62 95 51 106 0.42 0.3 1980 411.8 78.2 1114 531 82 449 248 283 0.48

1. 3 n

1981 389.3 72.6 1446 1004 101 903 756 248 0.69 2.6 1982 291.1 63.3 1307 993 130 863 760 233 0.76 3.4 1983 494.6 96.3 416 121 57 64 23 98 0.29 0.2 1984 33.7 9.2 1872 2462 208 2254 927 1535 1.32 73.1 1985 509.8 91.7 586 327 87 240 47 280 0.56 0.6 NINE MILE POINT 1 1970 227.0 821 44 12 32 17 27 0.05 0.2 Docket 50-220; DPR-63 1971 346.5 1D06 195 43 152 63 132 0.19 0.6 1st commercial operation 12/69 1972 381.8 735 285 59 226 28 257 G. 39 0.7 Type - BWR 1973 411.0 550 567 139 428 118 449 1.03 1.4 Capacity - 610 We 1974 385.9 70.5 740 824 42 782 279 545 1.11 2.1 1975 359.0 72.1 649 681 68 613 203 478 1.05 1.9 1976 484.6 88.2 392 428 52 376 229 199 1.09 0.9 1977 347.4 59.2 1093 1383 41 1342 883 500 1.26 4.0 1978 527.7 95.1 561 314 59 255 26 288 0.56 0.6 1979 354.0 66.1 1326 1497 106 1391 940 557 1.13 4.2 1980 533.9 92.3 1174 591 75 516 251 340 0.50 1.1 1981 385.2 66.0 2029 1592 144 1448 1064 528 0.78 4.1 1982 133.5 21.4 1352 1264 63 1201 944 320 0.93 9.5 1983 329.8 56.2 1405 860 50 810 576 284 0.61

2. 6 1984 426.8 71.9 1530 890 163 727 372 518 0.58 2.1 1985 580.9 96.4 1007 265 60 205 43 222 0.26 0.5

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-rems Person rems Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

'(-c5v) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-5tation & _

(rems

(-cSv)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or c5v) tions

& Others tor Utility or c5v)

MW-Yr NORTH ANNA 1, 2 1979 507.0 61.7 2025 449 78 371 190 259 0.22 0.9 Docket 50-338; NPF-04, - 09 1980 681.8 86.5 2086 218 128 90 85 133 0.10 0.3 1st commercial operation 6/78, 1981 1241.9 71.5 2416 680 188 492 343 337 0.28 0.5 12/80 1982 777.7 45.8 2872 1915 78 1837 1207 708 0.67 2.5 Type - PWRs 1983 1338.4 76.'.

2228 665 129 536 296 369 0.30

0. 5 -

Capacity - 893, 893 MWe 1984 1021.3 58.8 3062 1945 154 1791 1416 529 0.54 1.9 1985 1516.9 d6.1 2436 839 141 698 502 337 0.34 0.6 l

OCONIE 1, 2, 3 1974 odo.6 60.1 844 517 18 499 144 373 0.61 0.8 l

Docket 50-269, 50-270, 50-287; 1975 1838.3 75.5 829 497 72 425 90 407 0.60 0.3 l

DPR-38. -47, -55 1976 1561.4 63.0 1215 1026 65 961 219 807 0.84 0.6 l

1st commercial operation 7/73 1977 1566.4 65.9 1595 1328 244 1084 294 1034 0.83 0.8 l

9/74, 12/74 1978 1909.0 75.8 1636 1393 179 1214 340 1053 0.85 0.7 Type - PWRs 1979 1708.0 67.7 2100 1001 123 878 181 820 0.48 0.6-Capacity - 860, 860, 860 MWe 1980 1703.7 70.1 2124 1055 117 938 162 893 0.50 0.6 I

n 1981 1661.5 66.8 2445 1211 113 1098 275 936 0.50 0.7 1982 1293.1

$2.5 2445 1792 97 1695 364 1428 0.73

1. 4 1983 2141.5 82.2 1902 1207 88 1119 316 891 0.63 0.6 1984 2242.9 85.7 2085 1106 63 1043 260 846 0.53

0. 5 1985 2036.3 80.5 2729 1304 143 1161 378 926 0.48 0.6 OYS1ER CREEK 1970 413.6 95 63 21 42 11 52 0.66 0.1 Docket 50-219; DPR-16 1971 448.9 249 240 50 190 92 148 0.96 0.5 1st commercial operation 12/69 1972 515.0 339 582 150 432 167 415 1.72 1.1 Type - BWR 1973 424.6 782 1236 195 1041 683 553 1.58 2.9 Capacity - 620 MWe 1974 434.5 70.4 935 984 166 818 162 822 1.05 2.3 1975 373.6 73.3 1210 1140 169 971 271 869 0.94 3.0 1976 456.5 79.3 1582 1078 70 1008 587 491 0.68

2. 4 1977 385.7 70.1 1673 1614 76 1538 1048 566

0. %

4.2 1978 431.8 74.3 1411 1279 134 1145 6%

$83 0.91 3.0 1979 541.0 85.9 842 467 95 372 135 332 0.55 0.9 1980 232.9 41.4 1%6 1733 97 1636 1182 551 0.88 7.4 1981 314.8 59.8 1689 917 48 869 479

'438 0.54 2.9 1982 242.7 62.5 1270 865 33 832 491 374 0.68 3.6 1983 27.9 11.5 2303 2257 65 2192 1863 394 0.98 80.9' 1984 37.1

9. 6 2369 2054 134 1920 1538 516 0.87 55.4 1985 446.1 89.4 2342 748 116 632 318 430 0.32 1.7 m_

Appendia C (Continued)

Personnel Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person ress Person-ress Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-cSv) per

(-cSv) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type-Dose rems '

Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(rees

(-cSv)/'

(PW-Yr) Factor able Doses or cSv) tions

& Others tor.

Utility.

or cSv) ptf-Yr PALISADES 1972 216.8 78

0. 4 -

Docket 50-255; DPR-20 1973 286.8 975 1133 16 1117 661 472 1.16 3.9 1st commercial operation 12/71 1974 10.7

5. 5 774

' 627 0.81 58.6 Type - PWR 1975 302.0 64.5 495 306 0.62-

1. 0 Capacity - 730 MWe 1976 346.9 55.2 742 6%-

23 673 109 587 0.94 2.0.

1977 616.6 91.4 332 100 13 87 23 77 0.30 0.2 1978 320.2 49.7 849 764 52 712 173 591 0.90 2.4 1979 415.0 59.9 1599 854 99

-755 360 494 0.53 2.1 1

1980 288.3 42.9 1307 424 191 233 312 112 0.32 1.5 l

1981 418.2 57.2 2151 902 167 735 737 165 0.42 2.2 l

1982 404.3 54.7 1554 330 73 257 203 127 0.21

0. 8 i

1983 454.4 60.3 2167 977 145 832 494 483 0.45 2.2 :

l 1984 98.7 15.2 1344 573 79 494 339 334 0.43 5.8 i

{

1985 639.2 83.8 1355 507 105 402 239 268 0.37,

0. 8 -

PEACH BOTTOM 2, 3 1975 1234.3 80.9 971 228 0.23

. 0. 2 Docket 50-277, 50-278; DPR-44, -56 1976 1379.2 73.0 2136 840 180 660 434 406 0.39 0.6 1st commercial operation 7/74, 1977 1052.4 58.7 2827 2036 223 1813 1374 662 0.72

1. 9 12/74 197A 1636.3 84.0 2244 1317 162 1155 709 608 0.59 0.8 Type - BWR 197) 1740.0 84.5 2276 1388 245 1143 717 671 0.61 -

0.8 Capacity - 1051, 1035 MWe 1980 1374.2 66.3 2774 2302 311 1991 15 %

706 0.83 1.7 1%1 1161.8 58.0 2857 2506 273 2233 1880 626 0.88 2.2 1982 1583.3 76.9 2734 1977 313 1664 1347 630 0.72 1.2 1983 824.7 40.5 3107 2963 331 2632 2422 541 0.95 3.6 1984 1165.8 57.4 3313 2450 225 2225 2045 405 0.74 2.1 1985 682.7 42.5 4209 3354 3%

2958 2727 627 0.80-4.9 PILGRIM 1 1973 484.0 230 126 49 77 0.55 0.3 Docket 50-293; DPR-35 1974 234.1 39.2 454 415 0.91

1. 8 1st commercial operation 12/72 1975 308.1 71.3 473 798 142 656

'412 386 1.69' 2.6 Type - BWR 1976 287.8 60.7 1317 2648 66 2582 2270 378 2.01 9.2 Capacity - 670 MWe 1977 316.6 61.4 1875 3142 146 2996 2176 966 1.68 9.9' 1978 519.5 83.1 1667 1327 157 1170 895 432 0.80-2.5 1979 574.0 89.4 2458 1015 131 884 516 499 0.41 1.8 1980 360.3 56.2 3549 3626 207 3419 3076 550 1.02 10.1 1981 408.9 65.9 2803 1836-70 1766 1418 418 0.66 4.5 1982 389.9 63.9 2854 1539 314 1225 1094 445 0.54 3.9

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Sunnary Collective Person rems Person-ress Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

(-c$v) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work fur-tion Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(rems

(-c5v)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or c5v) tions

& Others tor Utility or c5v)

MW-Yr PILGRIM 1 (Continued) 1983 559.5 87.2 2326 1162 296 886 776 386 0.50 2.1 1984 1.4 0.4 4542 4082 647 3435 3767 315 0.90 1985 587.3 91.5 2209 893 13 880 718 175 0.40 1.5 P0lNT BEACH 1, 2 1971 393.4 164

0. 4 Docket 50-266, 50-301; DPR-24. -27 1972 378.3 580

1. 5 1st commercial operation 12/70, 1973 693.7 501 588 72 516 1.17 0.8 10/12 1974 760.2 81.3 400 295 70 225 81 214 0.74 0.4 Type - PWRs 1975 801.2 82.9 339 459 1.35 0.6 Capacity - 485, 485 MWe 1976 857.3 86.7 313 370 58 312 107 263 1.18 0.4 1977 873.9 87.3 417 429 63 366 212 217 1.03 0.5 1978 914.4 90.9 336 320 71 249 111 209 0.95 0.3 1979 808.0 80.8 610 644 65 579 449 195 1.06 0.8 rs 1980 727.2 82.5 561 598 60 538 420 178 1.07 0.8 1981 760.4 83.6 773 5%

83 513 364 232 0.77 0.8 1982 757.2 84.3 767 609 72 537 375 234 0.79 0.8 1983 648.2 72.7 1702 1403 81 1322 1179 224 0.82

2 1984 788.9 78.6 1372 789 121 668 457 332 0.56 1.0 1985 831.3 82.5 671 482 71 411 242 240 0.72 0.6 PRAIRIE ISLAND 1, 2 1974 181.9 43.9 150 18 5

13 0.12 0.1 Docket 50-282, 50-306; DPR-42. -60 1975 836.0 83.3 477 123 0.26 0.1 1st commercial operation 12/73, 1976 725.2 76.o 818 447 68 379 235 212 0.55 0.6 12/74 1977 922.9 87.2 718 300 73 227 60 240 0.42 0.3 Type - PWRs 1978 941.1 92.2 546 221 43 178 48 173 0.40 0.2 Capacity - 503, 500 MWe 1979 865.0 86.0 594 180 29 151 49 131 0.30 0.2 1980 800.7 79.9 983 353 40 313 141 21' O.36 0.4 1981 844.9 80.5 836 329 153 176 128 201 0.39 0.4 1982 944.9 90.4 645 229 30 199 68 161 0.36 0.2 1983 921.1 86.8 654 233 14 219 73 160 0.36 0.3 1984 972.4 91.7 539 147 18 129 52 95 0.27 0.2 1985 882.6 84.0 1082 416 31 385 136 280 0.38 0.5

l l

1 l

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel. Dose and Power Generation Summary CoIIective Person rees Person-rees Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-cSv) per

(-cSv) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dcse rees Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rees Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(rees

(-c5v)/

(W-Yr) Factor able Doses or cSv) tions

& Others tor Utility or cSv) -

W-Yr QUAD CITIES 1, 2 1974 958.1 72.3 678 482 36 446 0.71 0.5 i

Docket 50-254, 50-265; DPR-29, -30 1975 833.6 68.4 1063 1618 114 1504 692 926 1.49

1. 9 1st commercial operation 2/73, 1976 951.2 73.1 1225 1651 269 1382 648 1003 1.35

1. 7 3/73 1977 970.1 84.0 907 1031 108 923 373 658 1.14 1.1 Type - BWRs 1978 1124.5 88.6 1207 1618 156 1462 722 896 1.34 1.4 Capacity - 769, 769 MWe 1979 1075.0 84.6 1688 2158 215 1943 1250 908 1.28 2.0 l

1980 866.9 64.4 3089 4838 291 4547 3657 1181 1.57 5.6 1%1 1156.9 81.1 2246 3146 100 3046 2623 523 1.40

2. 7 l

1982 1018.7 76.0 2314 3757 177 3580 2653 1104 1.62 3.7 1983 1088.5 79.2 1802 2491 166 2325 1937 554 1.38 2.3 1984 994.6 65.7 1678 1579 122 1457 1078 501 0.94 1.6 1985 1268.0 82.7 1184 990 172 818 27

%3 0.84 0.8 7

RANCHO SECO 1976 268.1 30.4 297 58 6

52 17 41 0.19 0.2 Docket 50-312; DPR-54 1977 706.4 77.1 515 390 61 329 248 142 0.76 0.5 1st commercial operation 4/75 1978 607.7 80.5 508 323 76 247 176 147 0.64 0.5 Type - PWR 1979 687.0 91.1 287 126 27 99 64 62 0.44 0.2 Capacity - 873 MWe 1980 530.9 60.4 890 412 110 302 281 131 0.46 0.8 1981 321.2 40.2 772 402 83 319 266 137 0.52 1.3 1982 409.5 53.3 766 337 49 288 217 120 0.44 0.8 1983 347.9 46.8 1338 787 158 629 604 183 0.59

2. 3 1984 460.0

58..'

802 222 73 149 115 107 0.28 0.5

- i 1985 238.7 30.8 1764 756 183 573 583 173 0.43 3.2 RO8INSON 2 1972 580.0 245 215 42 173 137 78.

0.88 0.4 1

Docket 50-261; DPR-23 1973 455.1 831

^695 0.84 1.5 1st commercial operation 3/71 1974 578.1 83.3 853 672 185 487 0.79 1.2 Type - PWR 1975 5C1.8 72.7 849 1142 Capacity - 665 MWe 1976 585.5 84.7 597 715 1.34 2.3 30 685 457 758 1.20 1.2 1977 511.5 85.2 634 455 52 403 223 232 0.72

0. 9 1978 480.5 72.0 943

%3 63 900 529 434 1.02

2. 0 1979 482.0 70.8 1454 1188 60 1128 794 397 0.82 2.5 l

1980 387.3 62.2

'2009 1852 79 1773 1379 473 0.92 4.8 1981 426.6 73.0 1462 733 45 688 513 220 0.50 1.7 1982 277.5 48.9 2011 1426 128 1298 945 481 0.71 5.1 i

1983 409.8 75.5 2244 923 96 827 628 295 0.41 2.3

)

..---v,

~

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel. Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-ress Person-reas Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

(-c5v) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(rems

(-c5v)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or c5v) tions

& Others tor Utility or c5v)

MW-Yr ROBINSON 2 (Continued) 1984 28.0

1. 0 4127 2880 1%

2684 2549 331 0.70 1985 629.5 87.9 1378 311 52 259 165 146 0.23 0.5 SALEM 1, 2 1978 546.4 55.6 574 122 28 94 32 90 0.21 0.2 Docket 50-272.-311; DPR-70 -75 1979 250.0 25.5 1488 584 100 484 359 225 0.39 2.3 1st consnercial operation 6/77, 1980 680.6 69.2 1704 449 55 394 281 168 0.26 0.7 10/81 1981 743.0 78.1 1652 2 54 4

250 152 102 0.15 0.3 Type - PWRs 1982 1440.4 72.6 3228 1203 66 1137 846 357 0.37 0.8 Capacity - 1079, 1106 MWe 1983 742.0 35.4 2383 581 10 571 463 118 0.24 0.8 1984 650.1 31.8 1395 681 10 671 469 212 0.70

1. C 1985 1657.7 75.8 1112 204 26 178 91 113 0.18 0.1 SAN ONOFRE 1 1%9 314.1 123 42 10 32 5

37 0.34 0.1

?

Docket 50-206; DPR-13 1970 365.9 251 155 13 142 59 0.62 0.4 0

1st commercial operation 1/68 1971 362.1 121 50 12 38 3

47 0.41 0.1 Type - PWR 1972 338.5 326 256 29 227 117 139 0.78

0. 8 Capacity - 436 MWe 1973 273.7 570 353 40 313 168 185 0.62 1.3 1974 377.8 86.1 219 71 0.32 0.2 1975 389.0 87.4 424 292 0.69 0.7 1976 297.9 70.2 1330 880 147 733 629 251 0.66 2.9 1977 281.2 63.7 985 847 77 770 451 3%

0.86

3. 0 1978 323.2 80.2 764 401 25 376 234 167 0.52 1.2 1979 401.0 90.2 521 139 23 116 65 74 0.27 0.3 1980 97.3 22.3 3063 2387 219 2168 2018 369 0.78 24.5 1981 95.9 26.7 2902 3223 100 3123 3104 119 1.11 33.6 1%2 61.6 15.7 3055 832 81 751 729 102 0.27 13.5 1983 0.0 0.0 1701 155 31 124 113 42 0.09 1984 34.7 9.4 4374 513 67 444 432 79 0.12 14.7 1985 299.0 76.8 2693 189 46 143 126 63 0.07 0.6 SAN ONOFRE 2, 3*

1984 635.7 58.9 3140 473 38 435 398 75 0.15

0. 7 Docket 50-361. -362; NPF-10. -15 1985 1082.8 56.1 3949 533 12 521 455 78 0.17 0.5 1st commercial operation 3/83 Type - PWR Capacity - 1070, 1080 MWe

5an Onofre 3 was counted for the first time in 1985.

J Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-rees Person-rees Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

(~c5v) per Meas'ble ' Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-reos Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(rees

(-cSv)/

(W-Yr) Factor able Doses or c5v) tions.

& Others tor Utility or c5v) _ 18t-Yr SEQUOYAH 1, 2 1982 583.5 52.8 1%5 570 67 503 57 513 0.29 1.0 Docket 50-327 -328; DPR-77, -79 1983 1663.7 75.0 1772 491 74 417 46 445 0.28 0.3-ist commercial operation 7/81, 1984 1481.9 69.0 237?

1117 153 964 111 1006 0.47 0.8 6/82 1985 1151.3 51.3 1854 1071 118 953 243 828 0.58 0.9 Type - PWR Capacity - 1148, 1148 We ST. LUCIE 1, 2 1977 649.1 84.7 445 152 26 126 92 60.

0.34 0.2 Docket 50-335,-387;DPR-67;MPF-16 1978 606.4 76.5 797 337 15 322 140 197 0.42 0.6 1st commercial oper. 12/76, 3/83 1979 592.0 74.0 907 438 25 413 209 229 0.48 0.7 Type - PWRs 1980 62/.9 77.5 1074 532 82 450 195 337 0.50

0. 8 Capacity - 827, 837 We 1981 599.1 72.7 1473 929 20 909 556 373 0.63 1.6 n

1982 816.8 94.0 1045 272

'17 255 105 167 0.26 0.3 1983 290.3 15.4 2211 1204 5

1199 924 280 0.54 4.2 1984 1185.0 69.6 2090 1263 41

.1222 808 455 0.60 1.1 1985 1445.8 82.5 1971 1344 293 1046 809 535 0.68 0.9 SumER ?

1984 504.6 61.1 1120 295 29

.266 202 93 0.26 0.6 Dock.et 50-395; NPF-12 1985 627.7 71.6 1201 379 74 305 241 138 0.32 0.6 1st commercial operation 1/84 Type - PWR Capacity - 885 MWe SURRY 1. 2 1973 420.6 936 152 0.16 0.4 Docket 50-280, 50-281; DPR-32. -37 1974 717.4 49.8 1715 884 72 812 0.51 1.2 1st commercial operation 12/72, 1975 1079.0 70.8 1948 1649 27 1622 1065 584 0.85

1. 5 5/73 1976 930.7 60.4 2753 3165 444 2721 1873 1292 1.15 3.4 Type - PWRs 1977 1139..

72.2 1860 2307 348 1959 1380 927-1.24-

2. 0 Capacity - 781, 775 MWe 1978 1210.6 77.2 2203 1837 726 1111 1029 808 0.83

1. 5 1979 343.0 42.3 5065 3584 173 3411 2975 609 0.71 10.4 1980 568.2 40.3 5317 3836 353 3483 3117 719 0.72 6.6 1981 907.6 59.3 3753 4244 428 3816 3040 1204 1.13 4.7 1982 1323.3 88.5 1878 1490 399 1091 506

%4 0.79 1.1 1983 916.2 61.3 2754 3220 571 2649 1786 1434 1.17 3.5 1984 1026.7 71.0 3198 2247 536 1711 1575 672 0.70

2. 2 1985 1166.4 78.2 3206 1815 508 1307 1232 583 0.57 1.6 l

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel. Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-rems Person-ress Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

( c5v) per Meas *ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organitation Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-5tation &

(ress

(-c5v)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or c5v) tions

& Others tor utility or c5v)

NW-Yr SUSQUtHANNA 1 1984 719.9 72.6 2827 308 71 237 128 180 0.11 0.4 Docket 50-387; NPF-14 1985 628.3 62.5 3669 1106 77 1029 790 316 0.30

1. 8 1st commercial operation 6/83 Type - 8WR Capacity - 1032 MWe THREE MILE ISLAND 1, 2*

1975 675.9 82.2 131 73 18 55 0.56 0.1 Docket 50-289; CPR-50 -73 1976 530.0 65.4 819 286 23 263 69 217 0.35 0.5 1st commercial operation-9/74, 1977 664.5 80.9 1122 359 15 344 128 231 0.32 0.5 Type - PWRs 12/78 1978 690.0 85.1 1929 504 23 481 235 269 0.26 0.7 Capacity - 776, 880 MWe 1979 266.0 21.9 4024 1392 197 1195 907 485 0.35 5.2 1980 0.0 0.0 2328 394 29 365 234 160 0.17 1981

0. 0 0.0 2103 376 50 326 190 186 0.18

?

1982 0.0 0.0 2123 1004 62 942 433 571 0.47 G

1983 0.0 0.0 1592 1159 79 1080 637 522 0.73 1984 0.0 0.0 1079 688 49 639 330 358 0.64 1985 103.6 10.1 1890 857 85 772 591 266 0.45 8.3 l

TROJAN 1977 792.0 92.6 591 174 30 144 105 69 0.29 0.2 Docket 50-344; NPF-1 1978 205.5 20.6 711 319 81 238 124 195 0.45

1. 5 1st commercial operation 5/76 1979 631.0 58.1 736 257 74 183 113 144 0.35 0.4 Type - PWR 1980 727.5 72.5 1159 421 77 344 305 116 0.36 0.6 Capacity - 1080 MWe 1981 775.6 74.1 1311 609 113 4%

363 246 0.46 0.8 1982 579.5 60.8 977 419 76 343 168 251 0.42 0.7 1983 494.2 62.4

%9 307 35 272 129 178 0.32 0.6 1984 567.0 54.4 1042 433 40 393 230 203 0.42 7.8 1985 829.1 76.7 852 363 31 332 210 153 0.43 0.4 TURKEY POINT 3, 4 1973 401.9 444 78 0.18 0.2 Doc 6et 50-250, 50-251; OPR-31, -41 1974 953.6 794 454 88 366 202 252 0.57 0.5 1st commercial operation 12/72, 1975 1003.7 74.9 1176 876 270 606 559 317 0.74 0.9 9/73 1976 974.2 71.2 1647 1184 89 1095 868 316 0.72

1. 2 Type - PWRs 1977 979.5 72.1 1319 1036 94 942 522 514 0.78 1.1 Capacity - 666, 666 MWe 1978 1000.2 78.8 1336 1032 90 942 546 486 0.77

1. 0 1979 811.0 62.4 2002 1680 299 1381 997 683 0.84 2.1 "Three Mile Island 2 is shut down, but it is still included in the count of commercial reactors.

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel. Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person rems Person-reas Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

(-c5v) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-reos Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(ress

(-cSv)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Doses or cSv) tions

& Others tor Utility or c5v)

MW-Yr TURKEY POINT 3. 4 (Continued) 1980 990.6 73.6 1803 1651 232 1419 1218 433 0.92

' 1. 7 1981 654.0 46.8 2932 2251 274 1977 1854 397 0.77 3.4 1982 915.7 65.2 2956 2119 197 1922 1656 463 0.72 2.3 1983 878.4 62.8 2930 2681 272 2409 2119 562 0.92 3.1 1984 946.7 68.5 2010 1255 217 1038 876 379 0.62 1.3 1985 1034.9 74.7 1905 1253 91 1162 817 436 0.66 1.2 VERMONT YANKEE 1973 222.1 244 85 0.35 0.4 Docket 50-271; DPR-28 1974 303.5 357 216 24 192 103 113 0.60 0.7 1st consercial operation 11/12 1975 429.0 87.8 282 153 70 83 63 90 0.54 0.4 Type - 8WR 1976 389.6 77.1 815 411 36 375 246 165 0.50 1.0 Capacity - 504 MWe 1977 423.5 85.1 641 258 83 175 90 168 0.40 0.6 1978 387.5 75.9 934 339 78 261 158 181 0.36 0.9 n

4 1979 414.0 82.1 1220 1170 546 624 642 528 0.%

2. 8 1980 357.8 71.5 1443 1338 141 1197 926 412 0.93 3.7 l

1961 429.1 84.6 1264 731 121 610 408 323 0.58 1.7 1982 501.0 96.0 481 205 60 145 80 125 0.43 0.4 1983 346.1 69.3 1316 1527 2 15 1312 787 740 1.16 4.4 1984 398.1 79.0 954 603 80 523 307 296 0.63

1. 5 1985 361.4 71.8 1392 1051 164 887 898 153 0.76 2.9 YANKEE R0WE 1%9 138.3 193 215 83 132 78 133 1.11

1. 5 '

Doc 6et 50-29; DPR-3 1970 146.1 355 255 90 165 158 97 0.72

1. 7 1st commercial operation 7/61 1971 173.5 155 90 46 44 19 71 0.58 0.5 Type - PWR 1972 78.7 282 255 63 192 146 109 0.90 3.2 Capacity - 167 MWe 1973 127.1 133 99 47 52 0.74 0.8 1974 111.3 243 205 99 106 0.84 1.8 1975 145.1 82.4 249 116 52 64 66 50 0.47 0.8 1976 152.2 89.8 152 59 17 42 4

55 0.39

0. 4 1977 124.6 73.9 725 356 28 328 174 182 0.49

. 2. 9 1978 145.0 81.0 565 282 26 256 95 187 0.50 1.9 1979 149.0 81.6 441 127 16 111 52 75 0.29 0.9 1980 35.6 22.0 502 213 6

207 90 123 0.42 6.0 1981 109.0 74.4 515 302 8

294 136 166 0.59 2.8 1982 108.6 73.4 814 474 6

468 215 259 0.54 4.4 1983 163.5 91.4 395 68 19 49 4

64 0.17 0.4

Appendix C (Continued)

Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Collective Person-rems Person-ress Average Mega-Unit Total Dose

(-c5v) per

(-c5v) per Meas'ble Person-watt-Availa-Personnel (person-Work Function Personnel Type Dose rems Reporting Organization Year Years bility With Measur-rems Opera-Maint.

Contrac-Station &

(rems

(-c5v)/

(MW-Yr) Factor able Deses or (Sv) tions

& Others tor Utility or c5v)

MW-Yr YANM[ R0WE (Continued) 1984 124.8 71.4 654 348 15 333 141 207 0.53 2.8 1985 144.3 85.3 653 211 17 194 81 130 0.32

1. 5 WASHINGTOM NUCLEAR 2*

1985 616.0 87.6 755 119 42 77 42 77 0.16 0.2 Doc 6et 50-397; NPF-21 1st cosacrcial operation 12/84 Type - BWR Capacity - 1095 MWe 110N 1, 2 1974 425.3 71.1 306 56 13 43 0.18 0.1 Docket 50-295. 50-304; DPR-39 -48 1975 1181.5 74.9 436 127 17 110 49 78 0.29 0.1 1st commercial operation 12/73 1976 1134.9 61.9 774 571 64 507 257 314 0.74 0.5 9/74 1977 1358.6 75.0 784 1003 43 960 561 442 1.28 0.7

?

Type - PWRs 1978 1613.5 80.2 1104 1017 150 867 418 599 0.92 0.6 Capacity - 1040, 1040 MWe 1979 1238.0 67.6 1472 1274 168 1106 747 527 0.87 1.0 1980 1411.2 74.1 1363 920 97 823 560 360 0.67 0.7 1981 1366.9 72.3 1754 1720 50 1670 1155 564 0.98 1.3 1982 1186.4 64.3 1575 2103 42 2061 1688 4 15 1.34

1. 8 1983 1222.3 66.8 1285 1311 118 1193 905 406 1.02 1.1 1984 1389.9 69.5 1110 786 23 763 556 230 0.71 0.6 1985 1187.9 62.9 1498 1166 41 1125 184 382 0.78

1. 0

Washington Nuclear 2 was counted for the first time in 1985.

4

- - - ~,. -- -

APPENDIX D Number of Personnel and Collective Dose by Work and Job Function 1985 I

D-1

APPENDIX 0 4

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: ARKANSAS 1,2

........'..................................................................................TYPEt PWR WORK AND NUISER OF PERSONNEL U100 aREM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCil04 STAfl0N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STAfl0N UTILITY CONTRA

................................................................................................CT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 22 0

41 3.944 0

6.939 OPERATING PERSONNEL 50 0

0 15.557 0

0 NEALIN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 37 0

50 11.065 0 11.109 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.124 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

1 5

0 0.119

.0.938 TOTAL 110 1

96 207 30.69

................................................................................... 0.11?

966 49.795 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 50 1

4 10.539 0.147 0.538 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 9

0 0

1.554 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 59 1

4 64 12.093 0

..................................................................................... 147 0.538 12.778 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 31 0

0 11.207 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.697 0

0 NEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4

0 4

0.802 0

0.853 SUPERV!$0RY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 3

0 0

0.96 TOTAL 6

0 38 44 1

............................................................................ 499 0

13.02 14.519 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 99 5

213 42.552 0.784 54.265 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.597 0

0 NEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 31 0

44 7.409 0 13.443

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.15 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

3 19 0.356 0.591 9.305 TOTAL 136' 8

276 420 51 1.3 75 77.013 129.452 i

............................................................................ 064 WASTE PROCES$!NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 7

0 11 2.215 0

3.412 CPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 NEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 21 0

0 6.462 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 28 0

11 39 8.677

....................................................................................... 0 3.412 12.089 REFLELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 24 2

20 5.371 0.655 6.152 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 NEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 3

0 0

0.412 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 101AL 24 2

23 49 5.371

................................................................................... 0.655 6.564 12.9 TOTAL SY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 202 8

320 530 64.621 1.586 82.513 148.72 OPERATING PERSOVWEL 54 0

0 54 16,851 0

0 16.851 NEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 102 0

101 203 27.292 0 25.717 53.109 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 0

2 0.274 0

0 0.274 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

4 27 34 0.356 0.71 11 t

j

.............................................................................................. 203 12.269 i

GRAND TOTALS 363 12 448 823 109.394 2.2% 119.533 231.223

' Workers may be counted in pere than crie category.

D-2

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION i

r 1985 t

PLANT BEAVER VALLEY TYPEt PWR l

WORK AND EMBER OF PERSONNEL U100 sREM)

TOTAL PERSON REN r

JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STAfl0N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL l

REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 4.63 0

4.61 1.179 0

0.75 8 l'

QPERATING PERSONNEL 5.1 0

0 0.85 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PER$0HEL 15.9 0

0 4.912 0

0 SLPERvlSORY PER$0NNEL 3.79 0

0 1.154 0

0 ENGINEERING PCRSONNEL 0

0 0.28 0

0 0.03 TOTAL 29.42 0

4.09 34.31 8.095 0

0.788 8.883

-t ROUTINE MAINTENANCE I

MAlWTENANCE PERSONNEL 40.48 0

4.86 9.149 0

1.405 r

OPERATING PEPSONNEL 0.37 0

0 0.095 0

0 I

HEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 9.85 0

0 3.232 0

0 f

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1.08 0

0 0.362 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

0 0.8 0.042 0

0.08 i

TOTAL 54.78 0

5.66 60.44 12.88 0

1.485 14.365 i

IN.STRVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1.02 0

0 0.241 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1.53 0

0 0.532 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 EN U EERlWG PER$0NNEL 0.86 0

0 0.?.65 0

0 TOTAL 3.41 0

0 3.41 1.038 0

0 1.038 SPECI AL MAINTENANCE j

MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3.12 0

14.53 0.66 0

'3.516 OPERATlWG PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.272 0

0 MEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0.63 0

0 0.05 0

0 SLPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0.13 0

0 0.015 0

0.095 FfGINEERING PERSONNEL 0.14 0

0.92 0.99 0

0.29

+0TAL 4.07 0

15.45 19.52 1.967 0

3.901 5.888 i

WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6.75 0

2 1.395 0

0 l

OPERATING PERSONNEL 2.53 0

0 0.05 0

0 NEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0.09 0

0 0.425 0

0 i

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0.95 0

0 0

ENGlWEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 I

A TOTAL 10.32 0

2 12.32 1.87 0

0 1.87 t

REFUEllWG MAINTENANCE TERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERAflWG PER$0NNEL 0

0 0

0 MEALTM PHYSICS PE250NNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERV!$0RY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 1

ENGlWEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 7

TOTAL BY J08 FUNCTION

[

3 t

MAlkTENANCE PERSONNEL 56 0

26 82 12.624 0

5.679 18.303 OPERATlWG PERSONNEL 8

0 0

8 1.267 0

0 1.267 1

l HEALTH PHYSICS PER$0hWEL 28 0

0 28 9.151 0

0 9.151 l

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6

0 0

6 1.531 0

0.095 1.626 i

I ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

0 2

6 1.297 0

0.4 1.697 CRAND TOTALS 102 0

28 130 25.87 0

6.174 32.044 2

i D-3 i

ii

)

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

BIG ROCK TYPE:

BWR WORC AND NUMtER OF PERSONNEL D100 MEN)

TOTAL PER$0N+REN JOB FUNCTION STAfl0N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTA

.........................L....

REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 4

1 0

1.097 0.187 0.013 OPERATING PERSONNEL 34 0

0 35.758 0.1 0.019 MEALTH PNYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0

0 8.88 0.005 0.107 SLPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10 0

0 2.937 0.04 0.057 ENGINEERlWG PERSONNEL i

1 0

0.438 0.129 0.002 TOTAL 61 2

0 63 9.11 0.461 49.769

...........................................................................'................. 0.198 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 24 42 8

12.938 17.16 1.85 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6

0 0

4.828 0.01 0

NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 10 0

7 3.387 0.259 3.356

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

3 0

0.535 1.463 0.021 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.474 0.062 0.044 TOTAL 44 45 15 104 22.162 18.954

............................................................................................ 5.271 46.387 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

32 22 0.793 28.654 16.379 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.094 0

0 MEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

1 8

1.341 0.257 5.634

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

1 0

0.083 0.772 0

ENGINEEPING PERSONNEL 1

4 5

0.393 0.987 3.76 TOTAL 8

38 35 81 2.704 30.67

........................................................................................... 25.773 59.14/

SPECI AL MINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 25 58 30 24.45 25.299 7.985 OPERATING PERSONNEL 10 0

1 2.252 0.019 0.112 NEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0

8 9.103 0.145 3.405 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6

8 0

1.875 1.716 0.091 i

ENGINEERING PER$0NNEL 4

0 3

1.016 0.147 0.392 TOTAL 58 66 42 166 38.696 11.985 78.007

.................................................................................. 27.326 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 14 1

13 4.L 0.515 4.501 OPERATING PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0 W.

0 0

NEALYM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 6

2.48 0.019 1.756 SLPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.36 0.009 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.117 0

0 TOTAL 25 1

19 45 7.759

............................................................,..................... 0.543 6.25 7 14.559 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 13 4

3 4.734 1.332 1.812 OPERATING PERS0hNEL 21 0

0 6.415 0.087 0

NEALTH PHYSICS P:RSONNEL 5

0 0

1.098 0

0.048 SL.PERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.112 0.007 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

2 6

1.252 0.408 3.841 TOTAL 43 6

9 58 13.611 1.834 5

.............................................................................................. 701 21.146 TOTAL BY JOS FUNCil0N MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 81 138 76 295 48.029 73.147 32.54 153.716 OPERATING PERSONNEL 74 0

1 75 53.132 0.216 0.131 50.479 WEALTN PHYOICS PERSONNEL 52 1

29 82 26.28V 0.685 14.306 41.28 StPERVISORv PER$0NNEL 21 12 0

33 5.902 4.007 0.169 10.078 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 7

14 32 3.69

1. 733 8.039 13.46

....................................................................................................... 2...

GRAND TOTALS 239 158 120 517 134.042 79.738 55.185 269.015

Workers may be counted in more than me category, i

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

BROWNS FEttY 1,2,3 TYPE:

BWR WORK AND WUMER OF PER$0NNEL (>100 MREM)

TOTAL PERSON

REM JOS FUNCTION STAfl0N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL

..................................................s......................................................................

REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PER$0 d EL 738 48 30 35.749 3.931 2.306 l

OPERAflWG PER50NNEL 77 2

0 15.936 0.28 0

i NEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 96 4

111 26.681 0.859 42.411 6

$UPE2VISORY PERSONNEL 15 4

1 2.131 0

0.015 ENGINEERING PERSCMEL 133 12 44 17.519 1.792 6.103 t

TOTAL 1059 66 186 1311 98.016 6.862 50.835 155.713 r

I ROUTlut MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 854 44 94 249.317 4.844 28.191 l

OPERATING PERSONNEL 75 2

0 5.654 0.007 0

l NEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 92 3

109 11.692 0.522 19.894 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 13 1

2 1.217 0

0.247 l

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 137 12 43 25.903 0.865 2.604 TOTAL 1171 62 248 1481 293.783 6.238 50.936 350.957 i

t IN SEtvlCE INSPECTION

[

MAINTENANCE PER*.JessEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 t

HEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0

$UPERVisotY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 L

ENGINEtt!NG PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 L

TOTAL 0

0 0

0 4

l SPECIM MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PER$0NNEL 664 73 126 175.136 41.738 98.323 OPERATING PERSONNEL 31 0

0 1.147 0

0 MEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 56 0

100 4.44 0 29.805

$#ERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 1

2 2.559 0.314 0.14 j'

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 96 5

22 16.327 0.2 73 4.T32 T07AL 858 79 250 1187 199.609 42.325 133 374.934 WASTE PROCES$1NG

(

MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 129 0

6 4.613 0

0.56 OPERATING PERSONNEL 13 0

0 2.089 0

0 MEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 62 1

42 1.859 0

0.813 t

SUPERVisotY PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0 i

ENGINEERING PER$oNNEL 3

0 4

0.006 0

0.56 T0TAL 207 1

53 266 8.567 0

1.933 10.5

[

REFUEllWG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 88 0

0 4.282 0

0 OPERAflWG PERSONNEL 22 1

0 0.891 0.004 0

KEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 15 0

21 0.047 0

0. 735 SWERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

C 0

0 0

0 i

ENGINEERikG PERSONNEL 30 0

0 0.464 0

0 TOTAL 156 1

21 178 5.684 0.004

0. 735 6.423 I

TCTAL BY Joe FUNCTION i

MAINTruANCE PEin0NNEL 2473 (870) 165 (73) 256 (151) 2094 (1094) 469.097 50.513 179.38 648.99 OPERATING PERSONNEL 218 (76) 5 (2) 0 (0) 223 (78) 25.717 0.291 0 26.008 NEALTH PMYSICS PERSONNEL 321 (96) 8 (4) 383 (110) 712 (210) 44.719 1.381 93.658 139.75$

SWERVISORY PERSCmEL 40 (16) 2 (1) 6 (2) 48 (1f) 5.907 0.314 0.402 6.613 l

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 399 (931) 29 (8) 113 (46) 541 (185) 60.219 2.93 13.9Y9 77.148 i

I GR m TOTALS 3451 (1189) 209 (88) 758 (309) 4418 (1586) 605.659 55.429 237.439 898.527 l

t

+

j

Workers say be counted % ecce than one category. NJeers in parentheses are total rueers of ledivi&ols I

I J.

D5 y.

,r-

. i,.

APPENDIX 0 (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ANC PERSON REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: 8RUNSWlCK 1,2 TYPE:

BWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL D100 saEM)

TOTAL PERSON' REM JOS FLRICTION STAT! Cat UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL

.....-........................................................... 4.........................................

REACTOR OPS & SURV MINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

0 1

1.096 0.01 4.387 OPERATING PERSONNEL 92 0

0 74.176 0

0 NEALTM FNYSICS PERSONNEL 26 0

11 23.284 0

9.475 SUPERVISORY PG SONNEL 1

0 0

0.835 0.06 0.035 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 12 0

1 3.718 0.04 0.568 TOTAL 122 0

13 145 103.109 0.11 14.465 117.684 RCRJTIME MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 262 75 387 235.527 72.429 384.043 OPERATING PERA*WEL 0

0 0

0 NEALTN PNYSICS PERSONNEL 15 0

22 13.97 0 18.946

$UPERVISORT PER$0NNEL 4

0 11 0.M7 0.01 7.22 ENGINEERING Pitt0NNEL 23 4

131 8.234 1.361 106.593 TOTAL 304 79 551 934 258.698 73.8 516.802

.................................................................................................... 849.3 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAlWTENANCE PERSONNEL 39 15 67 17.646 4.042 55.138 OPERATING PER00Nril 0

0 0

0 NEALTN PHYSICS PERS34WEL 10 0

22 9.323 0 18.716 EJiRVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 0

74 5.447 0.368 45.923 101AL 60 15 163 238 32.416 4.41 119

.............................................................................................. 777 156.603 SPECIAL MA!NTENANCE I

MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 129 3

745 99.715 1.655 989.035 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 NEALTN PHYSICS PER$0hWEL 36 0

134 32.597 0 113.684 SWERV:SORY PERSONNEL 0

0 11 0.084 0

8.272 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 13 11 204 8.58 6.28 149.894 TOTAL 188 14 1094 1296 140.976 7.935 1260,885 1409

....................................................................................................... 796 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONhEL 39 13 63 27.793 8.195 42.951 OPERATING PERSONNEL 11 0

9

8. 72 7 0

8.18 kEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0

21 9.32 0

18.947 SLPERVISOR* PER$0hWEL 0

0 0

0.035 ENGINEERlWJ PERSONNEL 1

0 1

0.54 0.07 0.415 TOTAL 62 13 94 169 46.38 8.265 70

.............................................................................................. 528 125.173 a

REFUEllkG MAINTEN O CE NR$0kNEL 31 24 67 20.935 6.656 30.336 OPERAT!NG PER$0hhEL 5

0 8

4.363 0

6.692 i

NEALTN PNYSICS PER$0hWEL 5

0 11 4.65 0

9.705 i

SUPERVISORY PER$0hhEL 1

0 0

0.18 0

0.03 ENGlhEERING PERSONWEL 2

0 17 0.765 0.125 9.58 I

TOTAL 44 24 103 171 00.893 6.781 56.343 94.017 TOTAL ST JOS FUNCTION M!NTENANCE PERSONNEL 501 130 1330 1961 402.712 92.987 1505.89 2001.589 OPitAflWG PERSONNEL 108 0

17 125 87.266 0

14.872 102.133 NEALTN PMYSICS PER$0NhfL 103 0

221 324 93.144 0 189.473 282.617

$UPEPVISORY P!950NhEL 6

0 72 28 2.066 0.07 15.592 17.728 ENG!hEERING PERS0WhE6 72 15 428 515 27.234 8.244 312.973 348.501 i

GRAND TOTALS 790 145 2018 2953 612.472 101.301 2038.8 2752.573

Workers my be comted in sore than one catepry.

i b

4 4

_+. _ _

m

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 TYPE:

PWR PLANT: CALLAWAY WORK AND NUMisER OF PERSONNEL 0100 WtEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JCS FUNCTION STATION U1!LITY CCNTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.003 0.719 3.468 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

15 1

0.029 5.777 1.285 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

20 1

0 6.304 0.003 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

1 0

0.028 1.082 0.029 ENGINEERING PERSONNSL 0

0 0

0.002 0.11 0.1C9 TOTAL 0

36 2

38 0.062 13.992 1.8%

15.948 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

36 15 0.041 9.98 4.668 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

2 1

0.012 1.405 0.215 NEALTH PHISICS PERSONNEL 0

10 0

0 1.948 0

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

1 0

0.002 0.246 0.017 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.204

0. 0 73 TOTAL 0

49 16 65 0.055 13.783 4.9 73 18.811 IN S!RVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.137 0.135 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.037 0.069 0.003 PEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.002 0.008

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.004 0.023 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0.001 0.217 0.15 TOTAL 0

0 1

1 0.042 0.448 0.296 0.786 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 EUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.012 0

OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.2 72 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.055 0.002 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.0 78 0

ENGINEER!kJ PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0.417 0.002 0.419 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PER$0hNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTICN MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

36 15 51 0.044 10.848 5.271 16.163 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

17 2

19 0.078 7.523 1.503 9.104 31 0

8.309 0.013 8.322 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

30 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

2 0

2 0.034 1.429 0.04A 1.509 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

1 0.003 0.531 0.332 0.866 GRAND TOTALS 0

15 19 104 0.159 28.64 7.165 35.964 D-7

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANTr *CALVERT CLIFFS 1,2 TYPE:

PWR WORX AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 WtEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM Jf'd FLWCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 52 8

5 10.849 1.019 1.25 CPERATING PERSONNEL 68 0

1 26.664 0

0.118 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 22 0

16 10.895 0

6.664

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.703 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.328 0

0 TOTAL 148 8

22 178 49.439 1.019 8.032 58.49 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 42 8

7 10.954 1.4%

1.5F3 CPERATING PERSONNEL 4

0 0

0.602 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 5

1.366 0

1.21 SUPERVISORY PERSONKEL 1

0 0

0.139 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 53 8

12 73 13.061 1.496 2.763 17.32 IN* SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 7

102 27 6.813 97.199 8.363 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4

0 0

0.692 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0

11 3.754 0

2.225 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 2

0.55 0

1.769 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 7

0 2

4.51 0

0.347 TOTAL 30 102 42 174 16.319 97.199 12.704 126.222

)

SPECIAL MAlWTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 150 119 97

%.99 51.92 30.487 OPERATING PERSONNEL 15 4

0 6.264 1.443 0

HEALTH PHu lCS PERSONNEL 28 0

84 14.851 0 36.102 SUPEWVISORY PERSONNEL 3

3 7

0.784 0.502 2.303 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 13 3

9 4.173 1.1 75 2.071 TOTAL 209 129 197 535 123.062 55.04

70. % 3 249.065 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

11 3

0.472 7.357 1.621 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 23 2

31 19.704 0.378 20.397

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.25 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 26 13 34 73 20.426 7.735 22.018 50.179 REFUELING MA!NTENANCE PER5CNNEL 59 46 3

50.863 19.121 0.584 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6

4 0

2.622 1.102 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 16 0

20 4.764 0

4.772 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.78 7 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

1 0

0.311 0.769 0

TOTAL 84 51 23 158 59.347 20.992 5.356 85.695 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION

.4INTENANCE PERSONNEL 312 (181) 294 (232) 142 (125) 748 176.941 178.112 43.858 *# S.?11 PERATING PERSONNEL 97 (92) 8 (6) 1 (1) 106 36.844 2A5 0.118 39.507 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 106 (49) 2 (2) 167 (123) 275 55.334 0.3 78 71.37 127.082 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 (8) 3 (3) 9 (9) 23 3.213 0.502 4.072 7.787 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 24 (Zo) 4 (3) 11 (11) 39 9.322 1.944 2.418 13.684 GRAND TOTALS 550 (356) 311 (246) 330 (269) 1191 281.654 183.481 121.836 586.971

Workers may be counted in more than me category. Ntrhers in patentheses are total rut >ers of Irdividuals.

DO

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSOE REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 TYPE:

PWR CATAWBA PLANT:

TOTAL PERSON REM NUMBER OF PER$dNNEL (>100 # FA)

STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL WORK AND JOB FUNCTION REACTOR O'.S & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 51 75 13 2.005 1.795 0.24 17 6.604 0.305 0.115 OPERATING PERSONNEL 30 4

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 29 0

18 5.755 0

1.84

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.1 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONkiL 12 11 2

1.495 0.15 0.045 143 90 50 283 15.959 2.25 2.24 20.449 Toi AL 9

R3JTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 51 93 14 5.735 15.17 1.58 OPERATING PERSONNEL 38 2

22 3

0.285 4.505 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 29 0

18 4.795 0

3.925

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.01 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 12 2

1,45 1.385 0.27 130 107 56 293 14.99 16.84 10.28 42.11 TOTAL IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PER!ONNEL 7

10 2

0 0.21 0.02 OPERATING PERSONNEL 15 1

7 0.005 0

0.01 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONMEL 13 0

6 0.175 0

0.095 SUPERVISORY PERSONNE'.

1 0

0 0.07 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONFiL 1

0 1

0 0

0.015 42 11 16 69 0.25 0.21 0.14 0.6 TOT (L SPECIAL MAINTEFANCE MAlWTENANCE PERSONNEL 21 6

1.41 0.92 0.28 OPERATING PERSONNEL 7

0 0

0.11 0

0 HEALTH PH'. SIC $ PERSONNEL 18 0

11 0.55 0

0.385

$UPERVIPURY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PEK30NNEL 6

0 0

0.075 0

0 TOTAL 56 21 17 94 2.145 0.92 0.665

3. 73 WASTE PROCESSING AAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 27 35 1

0.3'S 0.125 0

CPERATING PERSONNEL 9

2 22 0.665 0.325 3.88 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 24 0

15 0.43 0

0.49 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0 F

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

5 0

0.015 0.015 0

TOTAL 64 42 38 144 1.485 0.465 4.37 6.32 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

1 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

C HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0 TOTAL 3

1 0

4 0

0 0

0 TOTAL BY 78 FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 162 (52s 235 (93) 36 (15) 433 (160) 9.525 18.22 2.12 29.865 OPERATING PERSONNEL 119 (5?)

9 (4 )

68 (22) 196 (78) 10.384 0.915 8.51 19.809 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 118 (29) 0 (0) 68 (18) 186 (65) 11.705 0

6.735 18.44 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4 (1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (1) 0.18 0

0 0.18 EN31NEERING PERSONNEL 35 (16)

PA (8) 5 (2) 68 (26) 3.035 1.55 0.33 4.915 GRAND TOTALS 438 (150) 272 (105) 177 (57) 887 (330) 34.829 20.685 17.695 73.209 Ntrters in parentheses are total ruters of frdividuals.

I D-9

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLAVT :

COOK 1,2 TYP PWR

.........................................................................................................E:

WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 WtEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRAC TOTAL

............................................................................................................T..........

REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 13 0

52 3.12 0 19.266 OPERATING PERSONNEL 85 0

13 28.703 0

5.801 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 19 0

73 4.36 0.

17.638

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.481 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

1 2

0.229 0.328 0.231 TOTAL 12t 1

140 267

.56.89

.......................................................................................... 3 0.328 42.936 80.157 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 114 0

488 74.368 0 265.319 OPERATING PERSONNEL 23 0

39 5.487 0 24.879 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 17 0

101 3.994 0 49.511 SUPERV!SORY PERSONNEL 10 0

1 L f62 0

0.398 ENGlhEERING PERSONNEL 4

5 9

0.83 0.877 3.086 TOTAL 168 5

638 811 88.441 0.8 77

..................................................................................................... 343.193 432.511 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 13 0

211 4.55 0 80.436 OPERATING PERSONNEL 14 0

17 2.701 0

8.583 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5

0 47 0.653 0

13.026

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

0 0

0.721 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

4 4

0.304 0.706 0.801 TOTAL 38 4

279 321 8.92

.......................................................................................... 9 0.706 110.846 120.481 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 22 0

174 5.87 0 63.665 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

0 7

0.192 0

1.4M HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 14 0

0 3.352 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.132 0

0 ENGl'1EERING PERSONNEL 3

3 8

0.886 0.391 1.531 TOTAL 27 3

203 233 7.08

.............................................................................................. 0.391 69.979 77.45 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 37 0

120 10.343 0 68.615 OPEAATING PERSONNEL 1

0 1

0.23 0

0.4 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 10 0

6 2.699 0

1.074 SUPERVISORY PER$CHNEL 1

0 0

2.501 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

1.525 0

0 TOTAL 50 0

127 177 17.298 0 70.089 87.387 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 5

0 43 0.672 0

17.9 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4

0 11 0.802 0

2.578 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSCNNEL 0

0 2

0 0

0.285 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.14 TOTAL 9

0 57 66 1.474 0 20.903 22.377 TOTAL BY JOS FUNCTICN MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 209 (121) 0 (0) 1088 (786) 1297 (907) 98.923 0 523.201 622.124 OPERATING PERSONNEL 128 (105) 0 (0) 88 (64) 216 (169) 38.115 0 43.672 81.787 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 51 (31) 0 (0) 243 (106) 294 (137) 11.706 0 84,886 96.592 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 19 (17) 0 (0) 1 (1) 20 (18) 7.597 0

0.398 7.995 ENGINEERING FERSONNEL 11 (7) 13 (10) 24 (22) 48 (39) 3.774 2.302 5.789 11.865 GRAND TOTALS 418 (281) 13 (10) 1444 (979) 1^.75 (1270) 160.115 2.302 657.946 820.363

Workers may be counted in trore than one category. Ntrbers in parentheses are total rubers of irdividuals.

D-10

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 TYPE:

BWR PLANT

CUOPER WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 sitEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

0 20 0.315 0

2.284 OPERATING PERSONNEL 57 0

0 25.138 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 19 0

1 7.786 0

0.056 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8

3 8

1.559 0.95 1.083 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 15 5

10 6.438 0.359 1.074 TOTAL 101 8

39 148 41.236 1.309 4.497 47.042 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 120 0

102 120.596 0 49.477 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4

0 0

0.113 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0

0 3.636 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5

3 1

1.283 0.211 0.952 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

9 31 0.071 0.48 5.134 TOTAL 141 12 134 287 125.699 0.691 55.563 181.953 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 to 0

0 6.217 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.002 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.059 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 2

0 10 12 0.061 0

6.217 6.278 SPEC!AL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

1 651 3.485 0.191 823.412 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6

0 0

1. V.6 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 15 0

29 19.496 0 24.509 SUPERVfSORY PERSONNEL 7

6 96 0.568 5.288 133.685 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

15 11 9.28 6.713 3.312 TOTAL 33 22 787 842 16.815 12.192 984.918 1013.985 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 4

0 4

0.034 0

0.422 OPERATING PERSONNEL 30 0

0 5.825 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 14 0

1 5.203 0

0.405 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.119 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

0 0

0.985 0

0 TOTAL 55 0

5 60 12.166 0

0.827 12.993 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 13 0

0 2.253 OPERATlWG PERSONNEL 41 0

0 8.407 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.001 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

0 0

0.358 0

0 TOTAL 46 0

13 59 8.766 0

2.253 11.019 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 128 (122) 1 (1) 800 (749) 929 124.43 0.191 884.065 1008.686 OPERATING PERSONNEL 139 (59) 0 (0) 0 (0) 139 40.531 0

0 40.531 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 60 (19) 0 (0) 31 (29) 91 28.18 0

24.97 53.15 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 24 (12) 12 (6) 105 (101) 141 3.53 6.449 135.72 145.699 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 27 (15) 29 (16) 52 (41) 108 8.132 7.552 9.52 25.204 GRAND TOTALS 378 (227) 42 (23) 988 (913) 1408 204.803 14.192 1054.275 1273.27

Workers may be ccunted in more than one category. Nebers in perentheses are total rubers of irdividuals.

D-11

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION i

1985 PLANT: CRYSTAL RIVER 3 TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL D100 sREM)

TOTAL PERSON REM

~

JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL i

REACTOR OPS f. SURV MAINTENANCE FERSONNEL 0

2 2

0.159 0.857

0. 723 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

36 8

0 14.943 2.912 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

6 1

0 1.167 1.242 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

6 26 0.736 2.459 12.169 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

1 6

0.794 0.757 1.935 TOTAL 4

51 43 98 1.689 20.183 18.981 40.853 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 129 217 4*r 9 87.927 95.801 257.83 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

8 0

0 4.3%

0.025 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

18 83 0

9.593 56.7 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

1 9

0.929 0.8 77 3.4 73 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

7 61 1.124 2.718 36.908 TOTAL 134 251 632 1017 89.98 113.385 354.936 558.301 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 3

0.006

.004 1.764 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.869 0

0.002 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 2

0.002 0

1.226 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

3 15 1.644 2.109 9.582 TOTAL 3

3 20 26 2.521 2.113 12.574 17.208 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

1 9

0 1.502 5.%2 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

4 1

0 5.605 1.819 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

3 2

0 4.164 2.533 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.051 0

TOTAL 0

8 12 20 0 11.322 10.314 21.636 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 4

12 0

1.932 4.508 0.068 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

2 0

0 0.79 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PER$CNNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0.086 0.129 TOTAL 4

14 1

19 1.932 5.384 0.197 7.513 TOTAL BY J08 FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 133 232 493 858 90.024 102.672 266.347 459.043 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

50 9

60 0.869 25.734 4.75 8 31.361 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

24 84 108 0

10.76 57.942 68.702 i

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

10 39 53 1.667 7.5 19.401 28.568 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 7

11 83 101 3.562 5.721 48.554 57.837 GRAND TOTALS 145 327 708 1180 96.122.52.387 397.002 645.511 0-12

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1085 PLANT:

DAVIS BESSE TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 eftEM).

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 17 1

68 0.19 0.005 1.516 OPERATING PERSONNEL 85 0

11 4.483 0

0.282 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0

3 0.315 0

0.055 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 28 1

4 0.664 0.005 0.055 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 0

5 0.21 0

0.149 TOTAL 153 2

91 246 5.862 0.01 2.057 7.929 RCUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 130 11 346 7.074 0.322 18.122 OPERATING PERSONNEL 20 0

0 0.836 0

0 HEALTH PMYSICS PERSONNEL 31 0

49 4.366 0

9.465 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 25 0

6 0.593 0

0.26 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 28 1

21 0.67 0.005 0.671 TOTAL 234 12 422 66S 13.539 0.327 28,518 42.384 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 48 4

108 3.982 0.162 26.052 0?ERATING PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.035 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 9

0 0

0.106 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 1

0.035 0

0.01 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

0 8

0.385 0

0.682 TOTAL 55 4

216 275 4.437 0.162 26.85 31.449 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 98 3

123 7.05 0.23 7.798 OPERATING PERSONNEL 8

0 0

0.48 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4

0 6

0.04 0

0.055

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 17 1

5 0.56 0.02 0.055 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 1

17 0.224 0.01 0.79 l

TOTAL 138 5

151 294 8.354 0.26 8.698 17.312 1

WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 4

0 13 0.07 0

0.886 OPERATING PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.035 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 14 0

13 6.279 0

0.455 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

0 1

1.19 0

0.055 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 24 0

27 51 7.574 0

1.396 8.97 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 5

0 5

0.195 0

0.095 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.065 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.005 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.015 0

0 TOTAL 9

0 5

14 0.28 0

0 W5 0.375 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENAN 2 PERSONNEL 302 19 753 1074 18.561 0.719 54.469 73.749 CPERATING PERSONNEL 118 0

11 129 5.869 0

0.282 6.151 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 63 0

80 143 11.065 0

10.136 21.201 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 76 2

17 95 3.047 0.025 0.435 3.507 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 54 2

51 107 1.504 0.015 2.292 3.811 GRAND TOTALS 613 23 912 1548 40.046 0.759 67.614 108.419

' Workers may be counted in more than om category.

D-13

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 l

l l

PLANT: DIABLO CANYON 1,2 TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF *ERSONNEL (>100 eftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.039 0.252 0.311 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

1 1

0.068 2.134 0.522 HFALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

5 24 0.011 2.669 6.039 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.015 0.211 0.019 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.038 0.267 0.002 TOTAL 0

6 25 31 0.171 5.533 6.893 12.597 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

19 24 0.491 6.645 12.325 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0.054 1.184 0.682 HEALTH N YSIC2 PERSONNEL 0

3 8

0.002 1.091 2.818 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.018 0.008 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

1 0

0.035 0.366 0.004 TOTAL 1

23 33 57 0.582 9.304 15.837 25.723 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.025 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.002 0.044 0.008 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.026 0.038 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.001 0.047 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 0.003 0.071 0.118 0.191 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.036 0.012 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.002 0.003 0.013 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.019 4

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.001 0

TOTAL 0

0 0

0 0.002 0.04 0.044 0.086 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.007 0.012 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.009 0.04 0.001 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 2

0 0.281 0.29 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.001 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.004 0

TOTAL 0

0 2

2 0.009 0.332 0.304 0.645 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.013 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.002 0.001 0.008 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERv'ISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.009 0

TOTAL 0

0 0

0 0.002 0.01 0.021 0.033 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

19 24 44 0.53 6.94 12.698 20.168 OPERAT!NG PERSONNEL 0

1 2

3 0.137 3.406 1.234 4.777 NELLTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

8 34 42 0.013 4.067 9.204 13.234 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.015 0.229 0.028 0.272 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

1 0

1 0.073 0.648 0.053 0.774 GRAND TOTALS 1

29 60 90 0.768 15.29 23.217 39.275 D-14

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: *DUANE ARNOLD TYPE BWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 nitEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UU llTY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 49 1

136 2.99 0.02 5.576 OPERATING PERSONNEL 69 1

21 42.42 0.03 0.1698 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 23 0

73 2.656 0

5.09 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 24 5

72 1.223 0.029 5.354 ENGINEERlWG PERSONNEL 9

30 51 0.347 0.905 1.109 TOTAL 174 37 353 564 49.636 0.984 17.2988 67.9188 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 134 3

545 57.748 0.403 119.772 OPERATING PERSONNEL 38 0

40 1.638 0

4.604 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 29 0

111 8.199 0 11.592 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 17 4

74 0.814 0.016 4.411 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 23 15 105 1.156 0.67 8.09 TOTAL 241 22 875 1138 69.555 1.089 148.469 219.113 IN SERV!CE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 68 0

540 7./48 0 366.816 OPERATINC PERSONNEL 6

0 13 0.272 0

0.464 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 28 2

118 3.289 0.08 24.547 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 16 3

71 0.929 0.137 9.397 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 21 29 168 4.647 4.488 100.551 TOTAL 139 34 910 1083 16.745 4.705 501.775 523.225 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 116 9

711 23.507 0.32 442.987 OPERATING PERSONNEL 24 1

22 0.59 0.005 1.067 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 33 3

146 8.101 0.035 40.448 GUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 31 6

124 1.634 0.044 33.919 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 31 43 207 6.881 5.158 53.665 TOTAL 235 62 1210 1507 40.713 5.562 572.086 618.361 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 62 1

102 7.828 0.005 8.288 OPERATING P2RSONNEL 19 0

33 6.941 0

7.516 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 36 1.955 0

3.245 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 18 0.157 0

2.747 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5

1 8

0.2 0.015 0,095 TOTAL 94 2

197 293 17.081 0.02 21.S91 38.992 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 67 3

192 5.686 0.06 31.888 OPERATING PERSONNEL 51 2

6 2.344 0.06 0.085 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 23 0

58 2.343 0

7.756 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 24 1

26 0.415 0.02 2.424 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 17 13 72 0.748 0.252 11.091 TOTAL 182 19 354 555 11.536 0.392 53.244 65.172 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTICW MA!NTENANCE P:RSONNEL 496 (199) 17 (14) 2226 (863) 2739 105.367 0.808 975.327 1081.502 OPERATINO PERSONNEL 207 (93) 4 (4) 135 (103) 346 54.205 0.095 13.9058 68.2058 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 142 (53) 5 (5) 542 (213) 689 26.543 0.115 92.678 119.336

$UPERVISORY PERSONhEL 114 (67) 19 (15) 385 (255) 518 5.172 0.246 58.252 63.67 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 106 (61) 131 (76) 611 (358) 848 13.979 11.488 174.601 200.068 GRAND TOTALS 1065 (473) 176 (114) 3899 (1792) 5140 205.266 12.752 1314.763 1532.781

Workers may be counted in more than one category. Ntribers in parentheses are total rut >ers of irdividuals.

D-15

APPENDIX 0 (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: *FARLEY 1,2 TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMSER OF PERSONNEL U100 aftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 64 E

50 1.467 0

4.343 OPERATING PERSONNEL 160 8

17

44. % 7 0.178 0.78 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 64 7

130 28.979 1.093 49.46

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 74 9

'22 12.269 0.43 1.327 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 42 10 161 2.351 0.529-9.34 TOTAL 504 34 380 918 90.033 2.23 65.25 157.513 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 176 1

56 38.109 0.02 2.632 OPERATING PERSONNEL 86 7

2 35.226 0.366 0.12 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 9

0 12 0.921 0

0.383 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 46 1

2 4.17 0.02 0.054 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 16 10 278 0.287 0.231 14.438 TOTAL 333 19 350 702 78.713 0.637 17.627 %.977 IN SERVICE INSPECTION

. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6

0 77 0.159 0 22.443 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4

0 0

0.088 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5

0 2

0.176 0

0.239 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.13 ENGlWEERING PERSONNEL 11 2

125 0.697 0.612 32.485 TOTAL 26 2

205 233 1.12 0.612 55.297 57.029 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 167 1

482 132.626 0.03 183.332 OPERATING PERSONNEL 89 5

2 19.249 0.376 0.05 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 29 2

50 5.205 0.037 4.437 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 53 2

6 10.168 0.84 0.241 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 22 12 718 4.112 0.865 107.117 TOTAL 360 22 1258 1640 171.36 2.148 295.177 468.685 WASTE PROCESSING MAlWTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

0 2

0.007 0

1.098 OPERATING PERSONNEL 24 0

0 4.8 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 9

0 4

0.453 0

2.025

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 7

0 0

3.196 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

1 4

0 0.004 0.074 TOTAL 41 1

10 52 8.456 0.004 3.197 11.657 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 10 0

36 0.132 0

4.666 I

OPERATING PERSONNEL 6

0 0

0.14 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2

0 8

1.007 0

0.211 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 7

0 1

0.477 0

0.088 ENGINEERlWG PERSONNEL 3

2 3

0.052 0.119 0.114 TOTAL 28 2

48 78 1.808 0.119 5.079 7.006 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCil0N MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 424 2

703 1129 172.5 0.05 218.514 391.064 OPERATING PER$0JEL 369 20 21 410 104.47 0.92 0.95 106.34 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 118 9

20(

333 36.741 1.13 56.755 94.626 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 287 12 32 331 30.28 1.29 1.84 33.41 ENGINEERING FERSONNEL 94 37 1289 1420 7.499 2.36 163.568 173.427 GRAND TOTALS 1292 80 2251 3623 351.49 5.75 441.627 798.867

Workers may be counted in nere than one category.

D-16

APPENDIX 0 (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

FERMI.2 TYPE:

BWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL U100 RREM)

TOTAL PERSON

REM JOS FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.474 0

0.51 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

1.407 0.043 0.98 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.171 0

0.307 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.117 0

0.091 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.445 0.03 1.22 TOTAL 0

0 1

1 2.614 0.073 3.108 5.795 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.456 0.002 1.878 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.004 0

0.1 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.008 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.003 0

0.093 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.101 0

0.2 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 0.572 0.002 2.271 2.845 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.005 0

0.004 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONFEL 0

0 0

0.015 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.015 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 0.005 0

0.034 0.039 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.134 0

0.221 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.015 0

0.124 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.045 0

0.058

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.017 0

0.008 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 2

0.022 0

0.485 TOTAL 0

0 2

2 0.233 0

0.896 1.129 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.084 0

0.022 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.023 0

0.493 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.007 0

0.058 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.015 0

0.012 ENGINEERING FERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 0.129 0

0.585 0.714 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.002 0

0 CPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.005 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.001 0

0.001 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.008 0

0.009 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 0.016 0

0.01 0.026 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 1.155 0.002 2.635 3.792 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

1 1.454 0.043 1.697 3.194 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.232 0

0.439 0.671 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.152 0

0.204 0.356 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 2

2 0.576 0.03 1.929 2.535 GRAND TOTALS 0

0 3

3 3.569 0.0 75 6.904 10.548 D-17

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

FORT CALHOUN TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 sitEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3

1 5

1.614 0.978 3.771 1

OPERATING PERSONNEL 6

3 7

2.064 1.435 2.254 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.59 0.016 0

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 30 1

0 12.886 0.289 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 18 0

27 15.114 0.007 23.31 TOTAL 60 5

35 104 32.268 2.725 29.335 64.328 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 43 42 108 20.801 13.487 53.768 OPERATING PERSONNEL 5

0 16 1.828 0.694 5.472 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.35 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.592 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 20 0.433 0

20.83 TOTAL 50 42 144 236 24.004 14.181 80.07 118.255 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

1 45 0.33 0.265 28.623 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

1 1

0.061 0.707 0.207 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.005 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.153 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.12 TOTAL 2

2 47 51 0.549 0.9 72 28.95 30.471 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 33 45 144 12.338 19.061 96.367 OPERATING PERSONNEL 8

12 16 2.815 4.59 8.383 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.211 0.03 0.078 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6

0 0

1.823 0.008 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6

0 7

2.376 0

2.073 TOTAL 54 57 167 278 19.563 23.689 106.901 150.153 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PER$0NNEL 10 2

22 3.67 0.881 11 695 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.265 0.062 0.008 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3

0 0

2.57 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.%2 0.002 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5

0 7

7.955 0

3.69 TOTAL 19 2

29 50 15.422 0.945 15.393 31.76 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 16 38 31 6.572 17.57 14.179 OPERATING PERSONNEL 3

1 10 1.665 0.24 2.47 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5

0 0

1.088 0

0.025 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 32 2

0 8.423 0.469 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0.125 0

0.31 TOTAL 56 41 42 139 17.873 18.279 16.984 53.136 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 106 129 355 590 45.325 52.242 208.403 305.97 OPERATING PERSONNEL 22 17 50 89 8.698 7.728 18.794 35.22 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0

0 13 4.814 0.046 0.103 4.963 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 70 3

0 73 24.839 0.768 0 25.607 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 30 0

63 93 26.003 0.007 50.333 76.343 GRAND TOTALS 241 149 468 858 109.679 60.791 277.633 448,103

Workers may be counted in core than one category.

D-18 1

)

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

FT. ST. VRAIN TYPE:

HTGR WORK ANO NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 aftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SutV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.03 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 2

0.82 0

0.4 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 56 0

0 24.51 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TCTAL 6

0 58 64 0.82 0

24.94 25.76 ROJTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

0 2

0.34 1

0.37 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 L

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY F52SONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 2

0 2

4 0.34 0

0.37 0.71 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0'

O HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 l

TOTAL 0

0 0

0 1

WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSCNNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTICH MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

0 2

4 0.34 0

0.4 0.74 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 2

8 0.82 0

0.4 1.22 SLPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 56 56 0

0 24.51 24.51 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 GRAND TOTALS 8

0 60 68 1.16 0

25.31 26.47 M9

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: GINNA TYPE:

PWR WORK ANO NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 sREM)

TOTAL PERSON REN JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL i

REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 131 42 143 18.184 6.889 21.978 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

26 0

0.248 11.763 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 38 17 2

8.91 5.782 0

SLPERVISORY PERSONNEL 39 21 11 6.297 5.179 0.876 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 1

6 0.321 0.01 0.246 TOTAL 220 107 162 489 33.96 29.623 23.1 86.683

.................s............

RCUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 150 40 132 15.778 8.556 11.724 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

20 0

0.003 0.215 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 40 17 2

8.777 2.238 0.425

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 40 19 9

2.847 1.547 0.488 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 14 1

6 2.665 0

0.047 TOTAL 245 97 149 491 30.07 12.556 12.684 55.31 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 79 37 83 7.281 4.544 8.183 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

5 0

0 0.062 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PER30NNEL 31 3

0 1.59 0.2 0

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 25 11 10 1.56 0.664 2.916 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

1 5

0 0.01 0.177 TOTAL 135 57 98 290 10.431 5.48 11.276 27.187 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 164 41 146 39.347 10.631 117.59 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

7 0

0 0.144 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 39 17 2

4.624 1.746 0.01 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 42 18 8

11.209 1.761 2.827 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

1 6

0 0.12 0.231 l

TOTAL 245 84 162 491 55.18 14.402 120.658 190.24 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 36 25 18 2.4 2.132 1.352 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

6 0

0 0.576 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 36 13 2

6.295 1.895 0.485

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9

14 0

2.301 1.488 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 81 58 20 159 10.996 6.091 1.837 18.924 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 41 18 18 9.941 2.816 2.285 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

2 0

0 0.41 0

PEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 16 1

0 1.058 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 15 5

1 1.441 1.249 0.002 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 15 0

4 10.768 0

5.688 TOTAL 87 26 23 136 23.208 4.475 7.975 35.658 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 601 (180) 203 (43) 540 (146) 1344 (369) 92.931 35.568 163.112 291.611 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2 (1) 66 (26) 0 (0) 68 (27) 0.251 13.17 0

13.421 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 200 (42) 68 (17) 8 (2) 276 (61) 31.254 11.861 0.92 44.035 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 170 (43) 88 (22) 39 (11) 297 (76) 25.655 11.888 7.109 44.652 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 40 (15) 4 (1) 27 (6) 71 (22) 13.754 0.14 6.389 20.283 GRAND TOTALS 1013 (281) 429 (109) 614 (165) 2056 (555) 163.845 72.627 177.53 414.002

Workers rey be counted in more than one category. Ntrters in parentheses are total ntrbers of irdividuals.

D-20

h n

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER 0F PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 TYPE:

FVR PLANT: HADOAM NECK WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 sitEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL l

REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.19 0.01 0.27~

OPERATING PERSONNEL 24 0

2 14.72 0.01 1.1 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 16 0

0 5.97 0.05 0.8

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.22 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.51 0.18 0.04 TOTAL 41 0

2 43 21.61 0.25 2.21 24.07 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 46 0

15 21.88 0.59 9.93 OPERATING PERSONNEL 9

0 0

2.5 0

0.15 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 23 0

1 11.49 0.01 2.53 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.04 0

0 ENGINEERlWG PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.87 0.53 0.21 TOTAL 80 0

16 96 36.78 1.13 12.82 50.73 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0.02 0

0.53 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.23 0

0.01 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.14 0

0.03 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.71 0.08 0

TOTAL 3

0 1

4 1.1 0.08 0.57 1.75 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 7

0 3

2.97 0.1 1.57 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.17 0.05 0.01 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 0

1.57 0

0.1 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

1 7

0.12 0.39 4.7 TOTAL 13 1

10 24 4.83 0.54 6.38 11.75 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

0 1

0.42 0

0.36 CPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.23 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 21 0

6 24.11 0

2.71 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.17 0.01 0.09 TOTAL 23 0

7 30 24.93 0.01 3.16 28.1 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.05 0

0.01 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.03 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSOhWEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 0.08 0

0.01 0.09 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 55 0

20 75 25.53 0.7 12.67 38.9 OPERATING PERSONNEL 33 0

2 35 17.85 0.06 1.27 19.18 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 66 0

7 73 43.31 0.06 6.17 49.54

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

1 0.26 0

0 0.26 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5

1 7

13 2.38 1.19 5.04 8.61 GRAND TOTALS 160 1

36 197 89.33 2.01 25.15 116.49 D-21

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: MATCH 1,2 TYPE:

8WR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 sREM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOS FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

8 5

0.013 2.323 1.541 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

87 0

0.03 43.476 0.136 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

95 84 0.13 64.117 41.49 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

32 0

0.603 13.958 0.255 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

40 6

0.395 13.29 1.973 TOTAL 1

262 95 358 1.171 137.164 45.395 183.73 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

170 166 0.143 94.081 53.156 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

23 0

0 13.015 0.089 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

25 12 0.01 11.608 3.696 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

16 3

0.108 5.915 1.011 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

6 7

0.203 2.893 2.898 TOTAL 1

240 188 429 0.464 127.512 60.85 188.826 IN SERVICE INSPELTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 70 0

0.376 30.697 OPERATING PERSONFEL 0

0 0

0 0.054 0.057 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.0 74 0.012 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

1 8

0.019 0.181 3.218 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

1 18 0

0.161 10.408 TOTAL 0

2 98 0.019 0.846 44.392 45.257 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

71 688 0.045 27.482 306.723 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

5 1

0 2.2 0.625 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

10 17 0.014 3.246 10.415 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

2 17 0.074 0.834 7.704 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

11 83 0.141 5.789 29.977 TOTAL 0

99 806 905 0.274 39.551 355.444 395.269 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 9

0 0

3.2 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.035 0.057 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 2

0 0.074 2.493 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.019 0.005 0.015 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0.003 0.319 TOTAL 0

0 12 12 0.019 0.117 6.084 6.22 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

19 4

0 5.342 1.142 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

1 0

0 1.044 0.057 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.115 0.078 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.019 0.053 0.015 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.021 0.267 0.086 TOTAL 0

20 4

24 0.04 6.821 1.378 8.239 TOTAL SY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

268 942 1210 0.201 129.604 396.459 526.264 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

116 1

117 0.03 59.824 1.021 60.875 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

130 115 246 0.154 79.234 58.184 137.572 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

51 28 79 0.842 20.946 12.218 34.006 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

58 115 174 0.76 22.403 45.661 68.824 GRAND TOTALS 2

623 1201 1826 1.987 312.011 513.543 827.541 0-22

l APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

HUMBOLDT BAY TYPE:

BWR WORK ANO NUMBER OF PERSONNEL U100 sitEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STAfl0N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 CPERATING PERSONNEL 7

0 0

2.6 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2

0 0

1.4 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 t

TOTAf.

9 0

0 9

4 0

0 4

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 12.5 1

0 6.1 0.1 0

OPERATING PER$0NNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 12.5 1

0 13.5 6.1 0.1 0

6.2 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6.5 0

6 4.3 0

1 OPERATING PERSONNEL 9

0 0

5.1 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 11 0

0 7.8 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 1

0.6 0

0.4 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 17.5 0

18 35.5 10 0

9.2 19.2 WASTE PROCESSING MA!NTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 7

0 11 2.6 0

4.4 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 4

0 0

6

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.2 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 8

0 15 23 2.8 0

10.4 13.2 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTICN MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 19 1

6 26 10.4 0.1 1

11.5 OPERATING PERSONNEL 23 0

11 34 10.3 0

4.4 14.7 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2

0 15 17 1.4 0

13.8 15.2 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

0 1

4 0.8 0

0.4 1.2 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 GRAND TOTALS 47 1

33 81 22.9 0.1 19.6 42.6 OO

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER 0F PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND J08 FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: *!NDIAN POINT 3

..........................................................................................TYPEt PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL D100 eftEN)

TOTAL PERSON REN JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY TOTAL

.......................................................................................... CONTRACT REA"TOR OPS 8, SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

0 4

0.39 0

1.13 OPERATING PERSONNEL 41 1

1 16.94 0.26 0.11 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0

9 7.23 0

1.52 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8

0 0

4.46 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 3

0.12 0

0.46 TOTAL 64 1

17 82 29

............................................................................. 14 0.26

, 3.22 32.62 ROUTlWE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 19 0

95 4.77 0

67.99 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2

4 6

1.18 1.87 1.36 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0

39 10.61 0

29.15 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

0 0

2.19 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 2

0.44 0

0.15 TOTAL 38 4

142 184 19.19

.................................................................................. 1.87 98.65 119.71 IN SERVICE INSPICTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3

0 41 0.78 0

19.04 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4

4 8

1.06 1.63 2

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSCNNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.16 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.18 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 8

4 50 62 2.02

................................................................................. 1.63 21.2 24.85 SPECIAL MAlWTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 32 0

296 22.74 0 254.05 OPERATING PERSONNEL 18 4

15 7.37 2.48 3.93 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3

0 12 0.86 0

3.28 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10 0

1 5.07 0

0.13 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

0 1

0.55 0

0.11 TOTAL 65 4

327 396 3

2.48 263.5 302.57

.......................................................................... 6.59 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6

0 30 5.82 0

12.29 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

0 2

0.58 0

0.52 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

0 0

2.01 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 10 0

32 42 0

12.81 21.22

.......................................................................... 8.41 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6

0 26 0.97 0

18.89 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4

1 0

0.56 0.11 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 2

0.26 0

0.17 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5

0 0

1.84 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

1 1

0.27 0.16 0.11 TOTAL 18 2

29 49 3.9 0.27 19.17 23.34 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTICH MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 68 0

494 562 35.47 0 373.39 408.86 CPERATING PERSONNEL 70 14 32 116 27.69 6.35 9.92 43.%

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSCNNEL 28 0

63 91 18.96 0

34.28 53.24 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 31 0

1 32 15.75 0

0.13 15.88 ENGINEERlNG PERSONNEL 6

1 7

14 1.38 0.16 0.83 2.37 GRAND TOTALS 203 15 597 815 99.25 6.51 418.55 524.31

Workers may be comted in rmre than one category.

D-24

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: KEWAUNEE TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEt. D100 sitEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

0 11 0.494 0

0.94 OPERATING PERSONNEL 20 0

0 5,314 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8

2 0

0.798 0.384 0

ENGINEERING PER$0NNEL 9

1 4

0.598 0.338 0.393 TOTAL 39 3

15 57 7.204 0.722 1.333 9.259 ROUTINE MAINTENMCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 48 17 127 13.862 3.736 44.912 OPERATING PERSONNEL 16 0

2 1.92 0

0.44 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 17 0

18 10.345 0

9.068 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8

0 7

0.592 0

3.517 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8

0 5

0.912 0

0.959 TOTAL 97 17 159 2 73 27.631

3. 736 58.896 90.263 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 12 1

35 0.303 0.01 8.673 OPERATING PERSONNEL 3

0 8

0.593 0

3.857 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 2

0.018 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6

0 1

0.68 0

0.902 TOTAL 23 1

46 70 1.594 0.01 13.432 15.036 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MA!NTENANCE PERSONNEL 42 15 124 7.253 1.65 33.198 OPERATING PERSONNEL 7

0 1

0.368 0

0.011 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 10 0

0 0.377 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

0 0

0.113 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

2 5

0.075 0.3 71 0.87 TOTAL 67 17 130 214 8.186 2.021 34.079 44.286 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 18 12 6

0.4 1

0.54 7 OPERATING PERSONNEL 3

0 0

3.811 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7

0 2

3.314 0

0.91 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 0

1.069 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.401 TOTAL 30 12 9

51 8.594 1

1.858 11.452 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 8

4 12 0.407 0.288 4.878 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.001 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

0 2

0.097 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.028 0

0 TOTAL 15 4

14 33 0.533 0.288 4.878 5.699 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 130 49 315 494 22.719 6.684 93.148 122.551 OPERATING PERSONNEL 51 0

11 62 12.007 0

4.308 16.315 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSCNNEL 34 0

20 54 14.036 0

9.978 24.014

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 27 2

11 40 2.687 0.384 3.517 6.588 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 29 3

16 48 2.293 0.709 3.525 6.527 GRAND TOTALS 271 54 3 73 698 53.742 7.777 114.476 175.995

} 25

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

LACROSSE TYPE:

BWR WORE: AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 eftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM J08 FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 18 0

0 7.437 0.137 0.259 OPERATING PERSONNEL 21 0

1 38.293 0

0.61 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8

0' 0

11.305 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 12 0

0 6.688 0.01 0.532 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 0

0 4.479 0

0.159 TOTAL 70 0

1 71 68.202 0.147 1.61 69.959 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 18 7

0 15.638 4.655 0.004 OPERATING PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.634 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.284 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.08 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.32 0

0 TOTAL 24 7

0 31 16.956 4.655 0.004 21.615 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 3

0.075 0.004 5.297 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.245 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2

0 0

C.667 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 1

0.895 0

0.14 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

0 13 2.M2 0

11.281 TOTAL 6

0 17 23 3.9,'4 0.004 16.718 20.6 %

SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 17 6

0 9.918 3.431 0

CPERATING PERSONNEL 10 0

0 2.34 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.526 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

0 0

1.123 0

0.087 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

0 1

0.903 0

0.24 i

TOTAL 35 6

1 42 14.81 3.431 0.327 18.568 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTINANCE PERSONNEL 5

1 0

1.328 0.164 0.008 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6

0 0

1.622 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5

0 0

3.835 0

0 StPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.435 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.985 0

0 TOTAL 19 1

0 20 8.205 0.164 0.008 8.3 77 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 9

3 2

4.254 2.449 1.42 l

OPERATING PERSONNEL 20 0

0 6.595 0

0 l

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5

0 0

0.943 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

0 1

2.39 0.01 0.152 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8

0 0

2.393 0

0 TOTAL 46 3

3 52 16.575 2.459 1.572 20.606 l

l TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 67 (20) 17 (8) 5 89 38.65 10.84 6.988 56.478 OPERATING PERSONNEL 60 (21) 0 (0) 1 61 49.729 0

0.61 50.339 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 22 (8) 0 (0) 0 22 17.56 0

0 17.56 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 24 (15) 0 (0) 2 26 11.611 0.02 0.%1 12.592 l

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 27 (12) 0 (0) 14 41 11.172 0

11.68 22.852 l

GRAND TOTALS 200 (76) 17 (8) 22 239 128.722 10.86 20.239 159.821

Workers may be counted in more than me category. Ntrters in parentheses are total ntrbers of Irdividuals.

D-26

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: LIMERICK TYPE:

BWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL U100 sitEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

12 1

0 0.398 0.019 OPERATING PERSONNEL 10 1

22 0.568 0.02 1.153 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 24 0

17 2.209 0

2.033 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 4

0 0

0.086 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6

2 3

0.117 0.037 0.303 TOTAL 40 15 47 102 2.894 0.455 3.594 6.943 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

104 41 0

3.112 0.938 OPERATING PERSONNEL 21 24 120 0.543 0.648 3.125 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 16 1

10 0.489 0.022 0.286 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

7 8

0.182 0.214 0.166 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6

32 34 0.166 0.876 0.921 TOTAL 45 168 213 426 1.38 4.872 5.436 11.688 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.004 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 1

1 0

0 0.004 0.004 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 CPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.095 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 t

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 i

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 1

1 0

0 0.095 0.095 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

1 1

0 0.006 0.02 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

2 14 0

0.091 0.563 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4

0 1

0.089 0

0.04 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.044 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

1 0

0 0.026 0

TOTAL 5

4 16 25 0.133 0.123 0.623 0.879 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL BY J08 FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

117 44 161 0

3.516 0.981 4.497 OPERATIEG PERSONNEL 31 27 157 215 1.111 0.759 4.936 6.806 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 44 1

28 73 2.787 0.022 2.359 3.168 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

7 12 22 0.226 0.214 0.252 0.692 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 12 35 37 84 0.283 0.939 1.224 2.446 GRAND TOTALS 90 187 2 73 555 4.407 5.45 9.752 19.609 O-27

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

MAINE YANKEE TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL U100 rREM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UT!LITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3

0 0

1.275 0

0.27 OPERATING PERSONNEL 29 0

0 12.706 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 15 0

36 7.315 0

27.51 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 0

0 3.008 0

0.582 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 13 0

3 3.53 0

1.07 TOTAL 71 0

39 110 27.834 0 29.432 57.266 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 28 0

29 13.035 0.065 9.262 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6

0 0

1.895 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 2

2.315 0

0.43 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8

0 7

2.72 0

3.632 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 10 0

0 3.355 0

0.42 TOTAL 58 0

38 96 23.32 0.065 13.744 37.129 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 7

1 113 3.28 0.5 101.038 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.1 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

0 7

1.01 0

8.19 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

0 36 1.545 0

41.06 TOTAL 15 1

156 172 5.935 0.5 150.288 156.723 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3

0 72 1.52 0

37.59 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.61 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4

0 0

1.105 0

0.01 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 9

0.825 0

3.16 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

0 3

1.14 0

2.375 l

TOTAL 14 0

84 98 5.2 0 43.135 48.335 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

0 6

0.56 0

3.654 OPERATING PERSONNEL 5

0 0

1.635 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 0

3.51 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5

0 0

3.64 0

0.065 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.255 0

0.005 TOTAL 18 0

6 24 9.6 0

3.724 13.324 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 36 7

244 42.16 7.835 273.659 OPERATING PERSONNEL 36 0

0 32.072 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3

0 14 0.885 0

6.385 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 19 0

34 12.359 0 27.695 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 23 0

17 12.92 0.01 10.379 TOTAL 117 7

309 433 100.396 7.845 318.118 426.359 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSokNEL 78 8

464 550 61.83 8.4 425.473 495.703 OPERATING PERSONNEL 78 0

0 78 48.918 0

0 48.918 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 34 0

52 86 15.23 0 34.335 49.565

$UPERVISORY PERSONW!;

48 0

57 105 23.562 0 43.324 66.886 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 55 0

59 114 22.745 0.01 55.309 78.064 GRAND TOTALS 293 8

632 933 172.285 8.41 558.441 739.136

' Workers iney be counted in more than one category.

D-28

APPENDIX D (cont)

O NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 TYPE:

PWR PLANT: *MCGUIRE 1 WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 WtEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOS FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 169 450 177 7.294 5.7 3.325 OPERATING PERSONNEL 119 6

14 34.91 0.885 0.32 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 43 9

131 9.93 1,43 32.03 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 13 0

0 1.7 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 84 22 19 6.635 1.005 0.075 TOTAL 428 487 341 1256 60.469 9.02 35.75 105.239 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 174 462 165 59.665 82.39 55.95 OPERATING PERSONNEL 113 5

43 5.405 0.05 4.45 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 43 7

123 4.8 0.61 23.445

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9

0 0

0.68 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 85 20 24 17.76 4.035 8.71 707AL 424 494 355 1273 88.31 87.085 92.555 267.95 IN. SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 21 159 103 1.375 45.765 36.895 OPERATING PERSONNEL 5

0 18 0.015 0

0.42 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 18 1

65 2.385 0.005 12.625

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 33 8

7 14.54 2.255 6.7 5

77 168 193 438 18.315 48.025 56.en 122.98 TOTAL SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 140 396 157 9.99 140.455 54.405 OPERATING PERSONNEL 70 3

17 3.725 0.18 0.67 HEALTH PHYS!CS PERS0kNEL 35 4

100 5.045 0.2 9.62 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8

0 0

1.133 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 72 17 28 11.615 2.525 10.86 TOTAL 325 420 302 1047 31.508 143.36 75.555 250.423 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 76 98 52 2.%5 1.2 0.925 OPERATING PERSONNEL 25 2

43 0.57 0.15 22.855 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 42 8

100 0.4 0.16 14.23 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

0 0

0.12 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 18 4

1 0.43 0.06 0.01 TOTAL 165 112 196 473 4.485 1.57 38.02 44.075 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 72 100 34 9.925 49.205 2.365 OPERATING PERSONNEL 76 3

23 6.24 0.58 1.26 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 10 1

68 0.27 0.02 9.88 SUPERVISORY PER$0NNEL 4

0 0

0.235 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSchWEL 34 5

14 3.42 1.005 3.2t5 TOTAL 196 109 139 444 20.09 50.81 16,78 87.68 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 652 (174) 1665 (489) 688 (211) 3005 91.214 324.715 153.865 569.794 OPERATING PERSONNEL 408 (121) 19 (6) 158 (45) 585 50 865 1.845 29.975 82.685 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 191 (45) 30 (10) 587 (131) 808 2" 83 2.425 101.83 127.085 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 38 (12) 0 (0) 0 (0) 38 3.868 0

0 3.848 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 326 (86) 76 (21) 93 (47) 495 54.4 10.885 29.63 94.915 GRAND TOTALS 1615 (438) 1790 (526) 1526 (434) 4931 223.177 339.87 315.3 878.347

Workers may be counted in ricre than ene category. Ntrters in parentheses are total ruters of frdividats.

l l

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

WINE MILE Po!NT 1 TYPE:

BWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 eftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV-MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 223 1

18 12.96 0.005 0.866 CPERATING FERSONNEL 210 17 23 9.908 0.169 2.359 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 122 1

4 22.605 0.001 0.755 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 34 2

2 3.475 0.037 0.022 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 19 7

19 0.526 0.06 0.504 TOTAL 596 28 66 692 49.474 0.2 72 4.506 54.252 RGJTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 279 2

68 48.933 0.281 6.045 OPERATING PERSONNEL 116 17 57 9.297 0.1 73 12.679 FEALTH PHYS!CS PERSONNEL 59 2

3 6.161 0.025 0.512 SUPERVISORY PERSONEL 43 1

2 3.176 0.001 0.03 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 33 10 48 1.295 0.153 2.559 TOTAL 530 32 178 74 0 68.862 0.633 21.825 91.32 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.019 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.008 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 4

0 0

4 0.027 0

0 0.027 SPECIAL MA!NTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 328 1

12

'0.551 0.011 0.242 OPERATING PERSONNEL 103 3

11 4.12 0.0 73 3.404 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 74 0

3 3.119 0

0.175

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 26 1

0 0.673 0.005 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 20 3

17 0.567 0.06 1.287 TOTAL 551 8

43 602 19.03 0.149 5.108 24.287 WASTE PROCES$1NG tLAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1 72 1

21 33.577 0.06 0.811 OPERATING PERSONNEL 58 4

12 15.998 0.004 1.638 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 51 0

2 8.609 0

0.861 SUPERVISO.tY PERSONNEL 16 0

0 0.714 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 7

2 5

0.26 0.007 3.323 TOTAL 304 7

40 351 59.158 0.071 6.633 65.862 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PER$0kNEL 37 0

4 0.914 0

0.004 OPERATING PERSONNEL 61 0

48 0.54 0

0.255 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0

0 0.063 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

0 1

0.02 0

0.002 ENGINEERING PER$0hNEL 4

0 3

0.06 0

0.006 TOTAL 117 0

56 1 73 1.597 0

0.267 1.864 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1042 5

123 1170 106.954 0.357 7.968 115.279 CPERATING PERSONNEL 53?

41 151 730 39.863 0.419 20.335 60.617 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 317 3

12 332 40.557 0.026 2.303 42.886

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 124 4

5 133 8.066 0.043 0.054 8.163

- ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 83 22 92 197 2.708 0.28 7.679 10.667 GRAND TOTALS 2104 75 383 2562 198.148 1.125 38.339 237.612

Workers rey te counted in core than one category.

05

i APPENDIX D (cont) l NUMBER-0F PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

NORTH ANNA 1,2 TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PER$0NNEL U100 WtEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STAfl0N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 172 23 364 22.462 0.8 24.532 OPERATING PERSONNEL 230 0

19 33.361 0

1.099 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 62 2

152 31.361 0.066 14.613 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 38 4

6 2.301 0.03 0.048 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 51 19 70 0.839 0.2 2.103 TOTAL

$53 48 611 1212 90.324 1.096 42.395 133.815 RCUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 161 40 437 94.033 9.391 97.43 OPERATING PERSONNEL 111 3

10 32.171 0.079 2.4 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 51 6

142 14.686 0.39 50.332 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 21 2

4 2.588 0.05 0.02 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 33 7

56 11.769 0.234 4.426 TOTAL 377 58 649 1084 155.247 10.144 154.608 319.999 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

3 80 0

0.171 67.535 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6

0 1

1.883 0

0.005 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5

0 51 0.2 0

6.614

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

4 11 0.03 0.194 5.548 TOTAL 14 7

143 164 2.113 0.365 79.702 82.18 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 49 35 497 7.982 22.593 83.33 C*TRATING PERSONNEL 85 1

13 2.929 0.005 0.41 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 25 0

115 1.771 0 24.819 SUPERVIS3Y PERSONNEL 17 1

1 0.741 0.482 0.001 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 27 10 156 2.499 0.261 79.751 TOTAL 203 47 A2 1032 15.922 23.341 188.311 227.574 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 41 0

11 0.939 0

0.501 OPERATING PERSONNEL 16 0

2 3.007 0

0.135 HEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 27 0

10 2.764 0

0.224 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 1

0.16 0

0.03 ENG WEERING PER$ 2 EL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 66 0

26 110 6.87 0

0.89 7.76 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 46 4

21 11.07 0.235 1.h8 OPERATING PERSONNEL 31 0

0 1.583 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8

1 77 0.598 0.125 5.S$1 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9

2 0

0.265 0.635 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

5 19 0.56 0.387 3.186 TOTAL 95 12 117 224 14.076 1.382 10.855 26.313 TOTL BY JOB FUNCil0N MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 469 105 1410 1984 136.486 33.19 275.046 444.727 OPERATING PERSONNEL 479 4

45 528 74.934 0.084 4.049 79.06f HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 178 9

547 734 51.38 0.581 102.553 154.514

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 86 9

12 107 6.055 1.197 0.099 7.351 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 116 45 312 473 15.697 1.276 95.014 111.987 GRAND TOTALS 1328 172 2326 3826 284.552 36.328 476.761 797.641

Workers inay be counted in rnere than one category.

I D41

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM SY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: 'OCONEE TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL D100 aftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM J08 FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 197 434 166 6.075 3.61 2.045 OPERATING PERSONE L 146 1

16 70.522 1.335 0.605 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 62 0

119 15.695 0

42.57 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 31 0

0 2.105 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 100 29 8

11.525 1.065 1.02 TOTAL 536 464 309 1309 105.922 6.01 46.24 158.172 RCUT;NE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 208 586 245 103.496 126.394 100.327 OPERATING PERSONNEL 30 0

46 0.44 0 14.425 HEALTH PtYSICS PERSONNEL-57 0

118 7.033 0

21.07 SUF:RVISORY PERSONNEL 20 0

0 0.905 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 91 22 15 17.63 2.915 3.825 TOTAL 406 608 424 1438 129.504 129.309 139.647 398.46

!N SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 38 215 119 1.74 41.67 46.735 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4

0 19 0.055 0

0.56 NEALTr. PHYSIC *i PERSONNEL 16 0

83 0.975 0

8.%5 SUPERVISORY PE1SONNEL 2

0 0

0.25 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 59 13 6

13.84 2.82 4.195 TOTAL 119 228 227 574 16.86 44.49 60.455 121.805 SPECIAL MAINTE1ANCd

....s......................

MAINTENANCd PERSONNEL 144 630 140 48.215 360.025 52.81 OPERATING PERSONNEL 57 2

31 4.25 0.04 3.63 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 10 0

109 6.37 0 28.135 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 14 0

0

0. 75 5 0

0 ENGINE (RING PERSONNEL 7s 34 5

16.68 5.28 4.52 TOTAL 304 666 285 1255 76.2 7 365.345 89.095 530.71

ASTE PROCESSING MAIN 1LNANCd PE.%DNNEL 113 166 27 13.095 13.405 0.21 OPERATING PERSch,"'l 78 1

47 14.115 0.105 42.749 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 59 0

75 11.95 0

11.235 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 19 0

0 2.88 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 42 4

0 5.48 0

0 TOTAL 311 171 149 631 47.52 13.51 54.194 115.224 MFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 77 188 55 17.13 49.24 12.69 OPERATI O PERSONNEL 96 1

30 11.52 0.165 5.765 HEALTH fHYSiCS PERSONNEL 21 0

78 0.925 0

6.59 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10 0

0 2.185 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 21 6

3 3.205 0.555 0.865 TOTAL 225 195 166 586 34.965 49.%

25.91.10.835 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTICN MAlWTENANCE PERSONNEL 777 (215) 2219 (714) 752 (283) 3748 (1212) 189.751 594.M4 214.817 998.912 OPERATING PERSONNEL 411 (153) 5 (1) 189 (51) 605 (205) 100.902 1.645 67.734 170.281 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSO AEL 225 (63) 0 (0) 582 (119) 807 (182) 42.948 0 118.565 161.513 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 96 (30) 0 (0) 0 (0) 96 (30) 9.08 0

0 9.08 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 392 (113) 108 (38) 37 (16) 537 (167) 68.36 12.635 14.425 95.42 GRAND TOTALS 1901 (574) 2332 (753) 1560 (469) 5793 (1796) 411.041 608.624 415.541 1435.206

Workers Rey te counted in Fore than one category. Ntrters in parentheses are total tubers of f rdividuals.

M

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 TYPE:

BWR

0YSTER CREEK PLANT:

TOTAL PERSON.REN WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 sAEM)

STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL JOB FUNCTION REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 164 1

240 11.42 0.005 23.298 OPERATING PERSONNEL 215 0

64 61.775 0

0.932 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 48 0

31 6.639 0

4.746 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 64 1

11 4.477 0.005 0.418 ENGINEERING PER$0NNLt 45 0

32 3.393 0

3.245 TOTAL 536 2

378 916 87.704 0.01 32.639 120.353 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTEAANCE PERSONNEL 307 22 877 145.989 0.687 108.351 OPEAATING PERSONNEL 402 1

165 36.43 0.01 4.327 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 104 0

67 33.139 0 10.901 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 149 2

29 27.286 0.109 1.64 ENGINEERlWG PERSONNEL 170 0

142 8.956 0

5.787 TOTAL 1132 25 1280 2437 251.8 0.606 131.006 383.612 IN. SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 49 2

119 1.5 0.012 13.837 OPERATING PERSONNEL 21 1

9 0.781 0

3.3 73 HEALTH NYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 1

0.113 0

0.015 SUPERVISORY PEMOMEL 7

0 3

0.358 0

0.301 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6

0 10 0.235 0

2.52 TOTAL 89 3

142 234 2.987 0.012 20.046 23.045 SPECI AL MAINTEmCE MAIN'ENANCE PERSONNCt 155 19 429 61.72 5.411 68.334 OPERATING PER$0NNEL 52 1

10 7.754 0.005 1.344 HEALTH PPYSICS PERSONNEL 46 0

16 9.864 0

0.774 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 31 2

9 7.158 0.227 0.379 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 22 0

17 1.769 0

0.848 TOTAL 306 22 481 809 88.265 5.643 71.679 165.587 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 138 0

166

3. 711 0 59.523 OPERATING PERSONNEL 62 0

13 0.919 0

0.771 HEAL 1H PHYSICS PERSONNEL 42 0

22

2. 74 2 0

2.396 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 0

5 0.546 0

0.136 ENGINEERING PERSChWEL 4

0 10 0.034 0

0.591 TOTAL 257 0

216 473 7.952 0 63.417 71.369 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL

$5 0

62 0.431 0

9.636 CPERATING PERSONNEL 17 0

5 0.189 0

0.024 HEALTH PNYSICS PERSONNEL 15 0

9 0.122 0

0.525

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

0 0

0.019 0

0 ENGINEERlWG PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 91 0

76 167 0.761 0 10.185 10.946 TOTAL BY J08 FUNCTION MAINTENtNCE PERSONNEL 868 (317) 44 (25) 1893 (969) 2805 (1311) 224.771 6.115 282.979 513.865 OPERATING PERSONNEL 76 9 (420) 3 (1) 266 (187) 1038 (608) 107.848 0.015 10.771 118.634 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSchWEL 261 (104) 0 (0) 146 (T1) 407 (175) 52.619 0 19.357 71.976 SW ERVISORY PERSONNEL 266 (153) 5 (2) 57 (34) 328 (189) 39.844 0.341 2.874 43.059 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 247 (174) 0 (0) 211 (151) 456 (325) 14.387 0 12.991 27.378 GRAND TOTALS 2411 (1168) 52 (28) 2573 (1912) 5036 (2608) 439.469 6.471 328.972 774.912

Workers may be counted in rnore than one category. Ni.rters in parentheses are total ru.rbers of individuals.

0-33

1 APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

PALISADES TYPE:

SVR WORK AND WUDGER 0F PERSONNEL 0100 aftEM).

TOTAL PERSON REM JOS FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & St#tV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 13 1

3 3.433 0.491 1.~ 07 OPERATING PERSONNEL 60 0

30 27.449 0.08 E939 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 24 1

73 12.246 0.261

.. 665 SU"ERVISORY PERSONNEL 19 7

3 5.768 1.741 0.351 FNGINEERING PERSONNEL 9

7 3

2.764 1.412 1.373 TOTAL 125 16 112 253 51.66 3.988 43.035 98.683 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 81 80 82 48.378 55.977 28.474 OPERATING PERSONNEL 28 1

1 6.228 0.84e, 0.34 7 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 18 0

42 5.1 73 0

16.65 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 12 9

2 2.885 3.132 1.184 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5

14 41 2.296 7.946 42.121 TOTAL 144 104 168 416 64.96 67.903 88.776 221.639 IN SCRVICE INSPECTION MA!NTENANCE PERSONNEL 7

2 23 1.539 0.3 73 9.097 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6

0 0

1.323 0

0.006 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 2

0.29 0

0.657 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0.151 0.137 0.156 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

5 0

0.667 1.106 0.007 TOTAL 17 7

26 50 3.97 1.616 9.923 15.509 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

1 153 0.547 0.221 62.944 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 7

0.081 0

1.634 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL U

0 1

0.133 0

0.317 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 4

0.193 0.076 1.391 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

2 10 0.836 0.603 3.59 TOTAL 4

3 175 182 1.81 0.9 69.876 72.536 I

WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 17 0

15 5.039 0.305 8.237 OPEPATING PERSONNEL 0

1 0

0.225 0.1 0.003 HEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 1

4.079 0

0.321 SLPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.674 0.007 0

ENGINEFRING PERSCWNEL 0

0 0

0.073 0.067 0.001 TOTAL 25 1

16 42 10.09 0.479 8.562 19.131 REFUELING MAlWTENANCE PERSONNEL 10 34 6

5.136 29.73 0.898 OPERATING PERSONNEL 10 0

0 3.893 0.015 0.03 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 5

0.325 0

0.68 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9

2 0

2.406 1.669 0.076 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6

0 6

2.219 0 065 3.05 TOTAL 36 36 17 89 13.979 31.479 4.734 50.192 TO ML BY JOB FUNCil0N MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 130 118 282 530 64.092 87.097 111.357 262.546 OPERATING PERSONNEL 104 2

38 144 39.199 1.044 9.959 50.202 HEALTH PHTSICS PERSONVEL 50 1

124 1Ts 22.246 0.263

$0.29 72.799 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 42 18 10 70 12.077 6.762 3.158 21.997 ENGlhEERING PERSONNEL 25 28 60 113 8.855 11.199 50.142 70.196 GRAND TOTALS 351 167

$14 1032 146.469 106.365 224.906 477.74

Uorkers sney be counted in enore than one category.

D 34

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 TYPE:

BWR PLANT:

PEACH BOTTOM 2,3 WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL 0100 WtEM)

TOTAL PERSON' REM Joe FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STAT!nN UTILITY CONTRAC7 TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 8

290 1014 1.466 43.044 83.628 OPERATING PERSONNEL 91

-40 261 54.477 9.229 45.56 HEALTH PHYSICS PER$CWWEL 95 2

131 69.046 0.036 31.61 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

2 9

0.376 0.563 1.244 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 74 30 18 43.806 6.089 5.677 TOTAL 271 364 1433 2068 169.171 58.%1 167.719 395.851 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 10 728 2133 0.615 351.898 1764.162 OPERATING PERSONNEL 68 29 365 3.184 1.303 142.597 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNFL 76 2

166 14.103 0.067 116.938 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

9 12 0.006 0.536 0.202 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 50 40 21 3.69 4.1M 4.582 TOTAL 205 808 2697 3710 21.So6 358.003 2028.481 2408.05 IN SERVIC8 INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

11 123 0

5.5 73 40.745 OPERATlWG PERSONNEL 1

0 15 0.018 0

4.804 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONrEL 0

0 6

0 0

0.205

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 3

0 0

0.163 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

3 2

0 0.533 0.75 TOTAL i

14 149 164 0.018 6.106 46.667 52.791 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

28 644 0

1.163 357.073 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

0 58 0.009 0 44.867 HEALTH PHYS!CS PERSONNEL 6

0 27 0.372 0

1.358 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.043 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

2 3

0.079 0.024 0.864 TOTAL 11 30 733 774 0.46 1.187 404.185 405.832 l

WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

47 192 0.009 1.82 18.447 OPERATING PERSONNEL 5

1 30 1.345 0.015 2.419 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7

0 36 0.429 0

2.%1 SUPERVISORY PERSONkEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PTRSONNEL 8

4 1

0.371 0.107 0.013 TOTAL 21 52 259 332 2.154 1.942 23.84 27.936 REFUELING MAINTEN4NCE PERSONNEL 0

55 250 0

5.324 46.926 OPERATING PERSONNEL 12 0

38 1.097 0

1. 73 9 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 20 1

36 1.809 0.005 6.17

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 3

0 0

0.225 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 7

3 5

0.156 0.05 0.537 TOTAL 39 59 332 430 3.062 5.379 55.597 64.038 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENAN?E PERSONNEL 19 (10) 1159 (750) 4356 (2363) 5534 (3123) 2.09 408.822 2310.981 2721.893 OPERATING PERSONNEL 178 (97) 70 (45) 767 (476) 1015 (618) 60.13 10.547 241.986 312.663 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 204 (%)

5 (4) 402 (181) 611 (281) 85.759 0.108 159.242 245.109 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4 (3) 11 (10) 28 (16) 43 (29) 0.382 1.099 1.85 7 3.318 ENGINEERING PER$0NNEL 143 (75) 82 (54) 50 (29) 275 (158) 48.07 11.002 12.423 71.495 GRAND TOTALS 548 (281) 1327 (863) 5603 (3065) 7478 (4209) 196.431 431.578 2726.489 3354.498

Workers may be comted in were than one category. Ntrbers in parenthese9 are total rtrbers of f rdividuals.

D-35

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

PILGRIM TYPE:

BWR WORK AND NUNBER OF PER$CmWEL U100 efthM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOG FLNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTEkANCE PERSONNEL 26 0

47 0.4 0

1.62 OPERATING PERSONNEL 30 0

0 0.83 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 24 0

52 2.87 0

0.875

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9

0 0

0.325 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

5 12 0.155 0.17 0.295 total 93 5

111 209 4.58 0.17 2.79 7

........................................................................................................ 54 ROUTINE MAINTEN O CE

.........r.............

MAINTENANCE PER7)NNEL 96 3

525 36.945 0.22 296.575 CPERATING PERSONNEL 55 0

0 12.315 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 40 0

103 12.43 0

34.13 SUPERVISORY PERSCWNEL 39 18 17 4.415 0.26 1.655 ENIINEERING PERSONNEL 24 13 87 1.65 1.175 14.62 TOTAL 254 34 732 1020 67.755 1.675 346.98 416

........................................................................................................ 41 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE 71RSONNEL 34 0

95 0.235 0

1.275 OPERATING PERSONNEL 18 0

0 0.19 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSOUNEL 17 0

51 0.465 0

0.81 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 14 0

5 0.085 0

0.145 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 13 0

28 0.19 0

0.43 10TAL 96 0

179 275 1.165 0

2.66

................................................................................................... 3.825 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PCR$0NNEL 31 0

208 1.345 0

18.14 OPERATING PER$0MNEL 16 0

0 0.145 0

0 HEALTH PHYS!CS PERSONNEL 12 0

47 0.695 0

1.535 4

$UPERYlSORY PERSONNEL 7

0 3

0.155 0

0.36 i

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 20 0

0 1.89 TOTAL 66 0

278 344 2.34 0 21

............................................................................................. 925 24.265 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 60 0

208 4.195 0 45.495 i

OPERATING PER$0hNEL 39 0

0 5.075 0

0 l

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 30 0

83 3.255 0

10.54 l

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6

0 8

0.175 0

0.5 l

ENGINEERING PEL30NNEL 6

0 14 0.175 0

2.645 l

TOTAL 141 0

313 454 12.875 0

............................................................................................ 59.18 72.055 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 G

0 OPERATlWG PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

............................................................................................... 0............

TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 247 3

1083 1333 43.12 0.22 363.105 406.445 l

OPERATING PERSONNEL 158 0

0 158 18.555 0

0 18.555 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 123 0

336 459 19.715 0

47.89 67.605 SUPERVISORY PERSONWEL 75 18 33 126 5.155 0.28 2.66 8.095 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 47 18 161 226 2.17 1.345

.......................................................................................... 19.88 23.395 CRAND TOTALS 650 39 1613 2302 88.715 1.845 433.535 524.095

uorkers may be counted in sore than crie category. Nwbers in perentheses are total rubers of irdividuals.

M f

APPENDIX D (cont.)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: POINT BEACH 1.2 TYP2: PWR JOS FUNCTI(.SI GREATER TOTAL RDS REACTOR 79tAff FOlt OPEDAT100tS DOUTIMP.

SPflCIAL SEASTE 100 estEM 9108K Ca0UP

& SufuvEltlAssCE MAlarTEssAssCE ItasPsCT10seS tehIlf7ENA80CE PROCESSIIIC 3dEFUEL20sG

1. Company Employees Operetians 66 68.340 43.720 12.930 3.800 7.390 maintenance &

Peak staantenance 94 111.810 16.850 8.960 44.110 41.890 w

N

'Jemist ry &

2.310 3.320 Mealth Phyeles 27 27.170 21.540 instrumentation

& Control 15 8.640 0.990 0.710 6.040 0.900 teactor Engineering 4

1.590 0.170 1.420 Adat niat t at lon, Engineering Quality &

0.110 pegulatory Services 15 3.820 0.240 3.470

2. Contract esorkers s otte r s 285 222.680 0.140 14.320 193.760 14.460 3

65.640 17.840 40.560 243.910 20.570 SS.530 TorAIS 506 444.050 75.385 man-men of the above total to related to an EPRI steam generator tubestwet research project on steam generatore removed 3

from Unit 1.

i 1

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON. REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: RANCW) SECO TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL D100 sitEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FLNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 22 0

21 17.926 0 17.131 OPERATING PERSONNEL 52 0

1 30.327 0

1.LO5 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0

76 8.374 0 67.373 SCERVISORY PERS0sNEL 2

0 13 0.333 0

4.815 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 15 0

50 4.459 0

12.65 TOTAL 104 0

161 265 61.419 0 102.999 164.418 RGJTINE MAINTENANLE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 53 0

115 28.134 0 49.852 OPERATING PERSONhEL 0

0 0

0.746 0

0.107 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 0

1.389 0

1.475 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.097 0

0.349 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 7

0.778 0

3.495 TOTAL 56 0

122 178 31.144 0 55.278 86.422 IN+ SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

0 69 2.731 0 51.723 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.01 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSOFFEL 0

0 4

0.746 0

3.264 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 6

0 0

2.539 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8

0 12 2.244 0

7.601 TOTAL 10 0

91 101 5.721 0 65.137 70.858 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 36 0

295 24.92 0 184.334 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0.258 0

1.068 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4

0 3

3.835 0

8.265

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 8

0.11 0

2.503 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

0 45 1.783 0

19.257 TOTAL 45 0

352 397 30.906 0 215.427 246.333 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

0 74 4.869 0 41.411 OPEILATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.302 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0

13 12.34 0 11.293

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.058 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.019 0

0.165 TOTAL 15 0

87 102 17.53 0 52.927 70.457 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 5

0 23 3.45 0 24.233 OPERATING PERSONNEL 14 0

0 4.177 0

0.311 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.381 0

0.553 SUPERVISORY PER$0NNEL 1

0 1

0.15 0

0.93 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 6

0.487 0

5.297 TOTAL 21 0

30 51 8.645 0 31.324 39.969 TOTAL BY JOS PJNCil0N MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 120 0

597 717 82.03 0 368.684 450.714 OPERATING PERSONNEL 66 0

2 68 35.81 0

2.501 38.311 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 31 0

127 27.065 0 92.248 119.313 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5

0 28 33 0.69 0

11.194 11.884 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 29 0

120 149 9.77 0 48.465 58.235 GRAND TOTALS 251 0

843 1094 155.365 0 523.092 678.457

Workers may be ccunted in mre than ene cate9ery.

M

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 TYPE:

8WR PLANT: RlWR BEm WORK h 3 hUMBER OF PER$CHNEL (>100 sitEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB H 4CTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACT OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.149 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 10 0

0 0.582 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 10 0

1 11 0.582 0

0.149 0.731 RCU'.INE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.015 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 9

0 1

0.276 0

0.03 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 9

0 2

11 0.276 0

0.045 0.321 IN. SERVICE INSPECTION MAlWTENANCI PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8

0 0

0.609 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 2

0 0

0.347 TOTAL 8

0 2

10 0.609 0

0.347 0.95o SPECIAL MAINTENRNCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 2

0 0

0.468 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 1

0.211 0

0.092 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 6

0 3

9 0.211 0

0.56 0.771 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 GPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 3

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL C

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1L 0

1 0

0 0

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 2

0 0

0 TOTAL 10 0

6 16 0

0 0

0 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 (0) 0 (0) 7 (3) 7 (3) 0 0

0.632 0.632 OPERATING PERSorNEL 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (Os 0 (0:

0 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 43 (10) 0 (0) 3 (1) 46 (11) 1.678 0

0.122 1.8 SJPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 0

0 0

ENGlWEERlWG PERSONNEL 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (2) 4 (2) 0 0

0.347 0.347 GRAND TOTALS 43 (10) 0 (0) 14 (6)

N (16) 1.678 0

1.101 2.779 Nwbers in parentheses are total rubert d tru'diduals.

D-39

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: ROBINSON 2 TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL 0100 aftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STAtl0N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 12 0

24 4.585 0,42 16.645 OPERATING PERSONNEL 27 0

0 8.53 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 34 0

8 15.21 0.3 2.84 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.275 0.02 0.055 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6

5 7

2.62 1.7 1.95 TOTAL 79 5

39 123 31.22 2.44 21.4 55.15

................................................................................................ 9............

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 42 11 69 34.375 4.68 37.5 OPERATING PERSONNEL 9

0 0

1.995 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 18 0

5 13.04 0

2.505 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0.05 0.02 0.94 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

0 11 0.755 0.135 3.45 TOTAL 72 11 86 169 50.215 4.835 4

........................................................................................... 4.395 99.445 IW+ SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.07 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.125 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 0.195 0

................................................................................................ 0 0.195 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 54 40 185 23.95 14.805 78.425 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.275 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 20 7

27 8.69 1.4 8.86

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0.025 0

0.755 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

9 15 0.89 2.715 5.8 l

TOTAL 78 56 228 362 33.83 18.92

........................................................................................... 93.84 146.59 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

0 18 0.48 0 10.805 OPERATING PERSONNEL 13 0

0 6.98 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8

0 5

6.52 0

2.565 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.005 0

0.005 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

0 4

0.295 0

1.88 l

TOTAL 24 0

27 51 14.28

..................................................................................... 0 15.255 29.535 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 I

OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 l

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERv!SORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 j

TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION l

MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 109 51 296 456 63.46 19.905 143.375 226.74 i

CPERATING PERSONNEL 50 0

0 50 17.78 0

0 17.78 1

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 80 7

'.5 132 43.46 1.7 16.77 61.93 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 2

2 0.355 0.04 1.755 2.15 l

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 14 14 37 65 4.685 4.55 15.08 22.315 1

GRAND TOTALS 253 72 380 705 129.74 26.195 174.98 330.915

Workers tray te counted in ricre than one category.

i r

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

ST. LUCIE 1,2 TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUp6ER OF PERSONNEL (>100 sitEN)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STAfl0N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONhEL 137 39 139 50.528 11.838 44.519 OPERATING PERSONNEL 73 2

65 38.275 1.133 28.226 HEALTH PHv$1CS PERSONNEL 34 0

76 39.782 0 72.758

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 7

0 2

5.95 0.285 0.915 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8

5 4

3.691 2.0 78 2.187 TOTAL 259 46 286 591 138.146 15.334 148.605 302.085 ROJTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 124 47 103 46.253 13.975 38.246 OPERATING PERSONNEL 11 2

7 4.78 0.555 4.435 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2

0 1

0. 735 0

0.17

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.085 0.05 0.065 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.617 0.045 0.115 TOTAL 138 49 111 298 52.47 14.625 43.031 110.126 IN. SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 30 9

30 18.313 5.29 16,65 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4

1 50 1.48 1.445 42.705 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSCsiNEL 1

0 7

2.M 0

9.165

$UPERVISOPY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.115 0.055 0.13 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

0 16 1.055 0.13 6.72 TOTAL 38 10 103 151 22.973 6.92 75.37 105.263 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 158 101 211 84.446 99.45 166.45 OPERATlWG PERSONNEL 8

1 122 3.845 1.035 110.761 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 17 0

6 6.785 0

2.93 I

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 2

3 3.81 1.07 1.95 ll ENGINEECING PERSONNEL 2

2 20 0.86 1.05 16.515 TOTAL 196 106 362 666 99.746 102.605 297.881 500.2k WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTEhANCE PERSONNEL 7

0 0

2.02 0.045 0.355 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 2

0.27 0

0.845 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSChWEL 2

0 1

1.03 0

0.195 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 9

0 3

12 3.32 0.045 1.395 4.76 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 83 46 157 49.05 31.88 176.278 OPERATING PERSONNEL 25 2

107 8.107 1.195 75.681 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 1

0.27 0

1.535

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8

2 0

2.38 0.485 0.13 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 16 0.24 0.17 13.125 TOTAL 118 50 281 449 60.047 3 3. 73 266.749 360.526 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 539 (221) 242 (108) 640 (517) 1421 (846) 250.61 162.478 442.498 855.586 CPERATING PERSONNEL 121 (81) 8 (4) 353 (244) 482 (329) 56.757 5.363 262.653 324.773 NEALTH PNY$1CS PERSONNEL 57 (32) 0 (0) 92 (81) 149 (113) 50.612 0 86.753 137.365

$UPERVISORf PERSONNEL 26 (16) 4 (3) 5 (5) 35 (24) 12.34 1.945 2.465 16.75 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 15 (7) 7 (5) 56 (34) 78 (46) 6.383 3.473 38.662 48.518 GRAND TOTALS 758 (357) 261 (120) 1146 (881) 2165 (1358) 376.702 173.259 833.031 1382.992 Ntreers in parentheses are total ruters of irdividuals.

D41

i APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT! *SEQUOYAH 1,2 TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUMBER 0F PERSONNEL U100 eftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT. TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 613 4

2 35.468 1.042 0.06 OPERATING PERSONNEL 74 1

9 14.256 0.005 0.585 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 65 25 14 24.649 7.4 3.266 SUPERVISORY P!kSONNEL 33 21 2

3.305 0.916 0.19 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 119 49 50 17,799 3.104 0.792 TOTAL 904 100 77 1081 95.477 12.467 4.893 112.837 R3JTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 642 2

2 200,89 0.014 0.109 OPERATING PERSONNEL 66 0

5 1.224 0

2.922 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 64 23 11 8.549 0.735

1. 74 3 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 31 15 2

5.019 0.137 0.091 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 111 38 63 18.693 5.536 46.645 TOTAL 914 78 83 1075 234.375 6.422 51.51 292.307 IN+ SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 303 5

18

56. % 9 0.201 18.004 CPERATING PERSONNEL 33 2

4 0.599 0.057 0.055 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 48 19 9

11.978 3.982 3.019 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 17 17 3

0.398 1.753 0.163 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 77 42 63 7.84 34.478 42.012 ToiAL 478 85 97 660 77.784 40.471 63.253 181.508 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSON 4it 560 2

2 164.383 0.037 0.333 OPERATING PERSONNEL 52 0

3 0.385 0

0.34 2 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 62 18 10 5.784 2.742 2.037 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 25 1

2 1.52 0.005 0.008 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 108 31 109 14.717 2.157 102.805 TOTAt 807 52 126 985 186.789 4.941 105.525 297.255 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 306 0

0 14.453 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 73 0

5 11.417 0

2.548 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 63 9

5 4.451 0.054 0.265 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 17 0

0 1.179 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 43 2

1 0.182 0.022 0.306 TOTAL 502 11 11 524 31.682 0.076 3.119 34.877 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 115 2

2 70.886 1.85 1.5 OPERATING PER$0hNEL 46 3

2 6.563 0.328 2.335 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 39 15 5

1.469 2.965 1.423 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 16 0

2 7.39 0

0.023 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 70 21 4

11.379 1.153 0.056 TOTAL 486 41 15 54 2 97.687 6.2%

5.337 109.32 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2739 15 26 2780 543.049 3.144 20.006 566.199 OPERATING PERSONNEL 344 6

28 378 34.444 0.39

8. 78 7 43.621 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 341 109 54 504 56.88 17.878 11.753 86.511 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 139 54 11 204 18.811 2.811 0.475 22.097 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 528 183 290 1001 70.61 46.45 192.616 309.676 Gil(NO TOTALS 4091 367 409 4867 723.794 70.673 233.637 1028.104

Workers rey be counted in sore than one category.

042

APPENDIX D (cont.)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

SHOREHAM TYPE:

BWR Mumber of Personnel (> 100 stem)

Total Man-hem (2)

Contract ggy Work and Station Utility Contract Worker Station Utility Worker Job Punction Employee Employees and Others Employees Einoloy ee s and Others Reactor Operations and Surveillance Maintenance Personnel al Maintenance 3

None 3

1.568 Insignificant 3.214 None 1

0.525 2nsignificant 0.448 b) Instrument & Control 0.030 Insignificant None al computer Engineering Operations Personnel 1.109 Insignificant 0.076 e) Operstions 1

None None 10 0.212

. Insignificant 3.$45 b) Reactnr Engineering 0.144 insignificant 0.068 None c) Systems Engineering fadioloc.ieal Controle a) Nealth Physics 11 None 8

3.73 Insignificant 2.04 0.06 Insignificant 0.13 None b) Radiochemistry

=

0.17 Insignificant c) Redweste 1

None None 1

0.16 Insignificant C.410 Su pe rvi sory /Na n a g eme n t Engineerino (Not Opera

ions) 0.070 insignificant None a) Rad. Protection

=

0.140 Insignificant 0.010 None b) Nuclear Systems 0.140 Insignificant 0.290 None c) Project Engineering Outaae/ Modifications Insignificant None a) Outage Planning 0.010 Insignificant b) Planning & Scheduling None 0.050 Insignificant 0.10 i

None c) Modifications j

Nuclear Operations Support Department 0.116 Insignificant 0.012 None al QA/QC 0.010 Insignificant 0.430 None

=

b) Security 0.07 Insignificant 0.110 None c) Training Punetton Total Naintenance 3

None 4

2.12 Insignificant 3.66 Operettors 1

None 10 1.47 Insignificant 3.69 Radiological Controls 12 None 8

3.96 Insignificant 2.17 (includes n.P.)

None 1

0.16 Insignificant 0.41 Supe rvisory/Nanagement 0.35

' Insignificant 0.30 Engineering None (not operations) 0.06 2nsignificant 0.10 Hohe Outage / Modifications 0.19 Insignificant 0.56 None Nuclear operations Support GRAND TOTAL 16 23 0.32 10.89 (1) Doses associated with low power testing (2) Represents 100% of cumuistive man-ren exposures N

APPENDIXD-(cont)

, NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT

SUI 9IER 1

........................................................................................< TYPEt PWR WORK ANO

' JOB FUNCTION.

NUISER OF PERSONNEL D100 sREM)

TOTAL PERSON REM STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY C

...........................................................................................ONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 41 0

19 0.542 0

0.229 OPERATING PERSONNEL 72 0

43

'2.707 0

0.674 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 2

113 0.514 0.04 4.571.

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5

6 6

0.077 0.039 0.055 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5

16 12

.0.07 0.274 0.11 TOTAL 136 24 193 353 3

............................................................................. 95 0.353 5.639 9.942 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 137 2

267 4.753 0.04 7.891 -

OPERATING PERSONNEL 26 0

5 0.445 0

0.046 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5

0 59 0.119 0

1.643

- SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

3 0

0.03 0.036 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

25 M

0.03 1.04 0.993 TOTAL 1 74 30 387 591 5.377 1

..................................................................................... 116 10.573 17.066 IN SERVILE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 25 0

54 0.805 0

1.661 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

0 1

0.005 0

0.01 HEALTH PHYSIC 3 PERSONNEL 3

0 30 0.09 0

0.833 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

4 12 0.01 0.11 0.386 TOTAL 31 4

97 132 0

............................................................................ 91 0.11 2.89 3.91 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 79 1

130 3.05 0.02 5.41 OPERATING PERSONNEL 14 0

0 0.471 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7

0 42 0.3 0

1.702

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 2

0.01 0

0.035 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8

17 33 0.345 0.668 1.099 TOTAL 109 18 207 334 4

............................................................................ 176 0.688 8.246 13.11 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 11 0

31 0.141 0

0.764 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.005 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7

0 20 0.07 0

0.506 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSotNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 19 0

51 70 0

1.27 1.486

.......................................................................... 0.216 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 17 0

60 0.765 0

2.338 OPERATING PERSONNEL 17 0

0 0.635 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3

0 37 0.042 0

1.44

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.04 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

9 9

0.095 0.186 0.201 TOTAL 43 9

106 158 1

.......................................................................... 577 0.186 3.979 5.742 TOTAL SY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 310 3

561 874 10.096 0.06 18.293 28.449 OPERATING PERSONNEL 131 0

49 180 4.268 0

0.73 4.998 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 38 2

301 341 1.135 0.04 10.695 11.87

$UPERVISORY PERT 0NNEL 13 9

8 30 0.157 0.075 0.09 0.322 ENGIN({ RING PERSONNEL 20 71 122 213 0

........................................................................... 55 2.278 2.789 5.617 GRAND TOTALS 512 85 1041 1638 16.206 2.453 32.597 51.256

' Workers may be cce ted in rore than one category.

0-44

APPENDIX D (cont)-

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 TYPE:

PWR PLANT: *SURRY 1,2 WORK AND EMBER OF PERSONNEL U100 aftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REN JOS NNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV

- MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 35 15 142 1.143 0.063 13.623 OPERATING PER$0NNEL 247 15 57 141.84 1.355 3.89 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 66 7

240 48.522 2.392 229.66

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 36 2

0 6.911 0.082 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 39 17 60 4.579 0.243 6.068 TOTAL 423 56 499 978 202.995 4.135 253.241 460.371 ROUTlWE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 194 130 769 194.431 35.942 278.052 OPERATING PERSONNEL 81 8

45 10.002 0.208 6.223 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 25 5

97 4.617 1.975 25.981 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 29 1

0 11.575 0.02 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 22 3

54 2.683 0.079 6.469 TOTAL 351 147 965 1463 223.308 38.224 316.725 578.257

(

IN SFRVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 52 11 280 4.788 0.465 74.671 OPERATING PERSONNEL 20 4

9 1.799 0.207 0.896 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4

0 8

G.484 0

1.107 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10 0

0 1.602 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 12 1

16 1.316 0.083 3.901 98 16 313 42 9.989 0.755 80.575 91.319 TOTAL SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 58 14 551 8.561 0.305 416.411 OPERATING PERSONNEL 40 13 40 8.961 1.77 16.55 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 17 3

16 3.222 0.055 1.592 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6

0 0

C.319 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5

3 38 0.23 0.024 5.926 TOTAL 126 33 645 804 21.513 2.154 440.479 464.146 WASTE PROCESSING MAlWTENANCE PERSONNEL 11 1

147 0.038 0.001 6.784 OPERATING PERSONNEL 26 1

3 11.097 0.002 0.027 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 39 2.349 0

9.828

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6

0 0

0.547 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 2

0 0

0.026 TOTAL 49 2

191 242 14.031 0.003 16.665 30.6M REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 34 1

40 3.427 0.042 5.952 OPERATING PERSONNEL 26 9

5 4.821 0.452 0.655 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2

0 5

0.192 0

0.537

$UPERVISORY MRSONNEL 5

0 0

0.941 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.026 TOTAL 67 10 51 128 9.381 0.494 7.17 17.045 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 384 172 1929 2485 212.388 36.818 795.493 1044.6W OPERATING PERSONNEL 440 50 159 649 178.54 3.994 28.241 210.775 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 120 15 405 540 59.386 4.422 268.705 332.513 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 92 3

0 95 22.095 0.102 0 22.197 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 78 24 171 273 8.808 0.429 22.416 31.653 GRAND TOTALS 1114 264 2664 4042 481.217 45.765 1114.855 1641.837

Workers rey be counted in wore than one catsvory.

MS

-APPENDIX 0 (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: CJSQUEHANNA

.......................................................................................... TYPE:

8WR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL D100 aftEM)

TOTA' PERSON REM JOS FUNCTION STAfl0N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTIL TOTAL

.............................................................................. iY CONTRACT REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 14 1

7 4.339 0.122 1.08 OPERATING PERSONNEL 60 2

6 29.558 0.%7 1.182 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8

0 36 5.035 0 25.938 SUPERVISORY PERS0kNEL 2

0 0

1.007 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 84 3

49 136 39

............................................................................ 939 1.089 28.2 69.228 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 73

%9 125 49.306 101.722 52.906 OPERATING PERSONNEL 29 1

13 14.98 0.73 5.735 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0

44 8.907 0

29.88

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10 0

2 2.888 0

0.570 ENGINEER!NG PERSONNEL 12 1

23 3.667 0.232 15.381 TOTAL 136 171 207 514 79

............................................................................ 748 102.684 104.477 286.909 IN SERVICE INSPECTIO4 MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6

63 260 2.1t4 38.247 240.982 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

1 18 0.138 1.176 11.693 PEALTH PMYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

0 4

0.958 0

1.657 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

2 23 1.975 0.452 16.766 TOTAL 13 66 305-384 5

............................................................................ 185 39.875 271.098 316.158 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

18 439 0.46 4.839 244.978 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

3 27 0

0.587 11.022 HEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2

0 15 2.13 0

6.675 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

1 11 0.419 0.235 6.51 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

4 19 0.524 0.793 14.996 TOTAL 9

26 511 546

.......................................................................... 3.533 6.454 284.181 294.168 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

3 21 0

1.266 5.087 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2

0 13 0.478 0

7.401 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 5

0 0

2.417 3UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 2

3 39 44 1.266 14.905 16.649

.......................................................................... 0.478 REFUEllWG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.175 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.23 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSfANEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.12 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 3

0 0

3 0

........................................................................... 525 0

0 0.525 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 254 852 1202 56.394 146.1 % 545.033 747.623 OPERATING PERSONNEL 93 7

77 177 45.384 3.46 37.033 85.877 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 22 0

100 122 16.072 0

64.91 80.982 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 17 1

17 35 5.392 0.235 8.74 2 14.369 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 19 7

65 91 6.166 1.477 47 54. 786

................................................................................... 143 GRAND TOTALS 247 269 1111 1627 129.408 151.368 702.861 983.637 0-46

' APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

TROJAN TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUPSER OF PERSONNEL (>100 eftEN)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SLRV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 7

0 3

1.82 0.07 1.14 OPERATING PERSONNEL 22 0

0 6.35 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 23 0

34 8.15 0.05 13.79

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2

1 4

0.6 0.33 2.41 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.75 0.91 0.24 TOTAL 56 1

41 96 17.67 1.36 17.58 36.61 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 70 66 152 35.74 32.48 103.8 l

OPERATING PERSONNEL ff 0

0 4.38 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 30 2

70 11.64 0.22 36.99 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 7

9 4

2.57 3.82 2.07 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6

4 45 2.34 1.79 53.94 TOTAL 130 Si 271 482 56.67 38.31 196.8 M1.78 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

8 16 0.93 1.86 6.31 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.J2 0

0 HEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4

0 0

1.5 0

0.37

$UPERVISORf PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.08 0.13 0.06 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

2 0

0 0.34 0

TOTAL 6

10 16 32 2.53 2.33 6.74 11.6 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAlWTENANCE PERSONNEL 2

1 11 0.61 0.39 4.79 OPERAflWG PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.21 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 31 2

19 18.6 0.69 8.71 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.05 0

0.01 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 33 3

30 66 19.47 1.08 13.51 34.06 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 16 12 11 14.27 14.2 2.65 OPERATING PERSONNEL 12 0

0 6.02 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 2

28 3.34 0.73 9.85

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

7 0

1.14 1.27 0.06 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.18 0.08 0.06 TOTAL 41 21 39 101 24.95 16.28 12.62 53.85 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 97 87 193 377 53.37 49 118.69 221.06 OPERATING PERSONNEL 51 0

0 51 16.98 0

0 16.98 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 100 6

151 257 43.23 1,69 69.71 114.63 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10 17 8

35 4.44 5.55 4.61 14.6 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8

6 45 59 3.27 3.12 54.24 60.63 GRAND TOTALS 266 116 397 779 121.29 59.36 247.25 427.9

Workers may be counted in more than one category.

D-47

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT:

TURKEY POINT

......................................................................................................TYPEt PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 eftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOS FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STAT

.......................................................................................... ION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL' 43 3

37 16.59 2.465 13.875 OPERATING PERSONNEL 33 0

1 18.205 0

0.29 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 18 0

71 8.445 0

20.49

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8

0 8

3.43 0.295 2.61 ENGINEERING PERSCWNEL 24 2

36 7.15 0.735 14.435 TOTAL 126 5

153 284

..................................................................................... 53.82 3.495 51.7 109.015 RQJTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 209 36 134 146.03 21.575 46.5 OPERATING PERSONNEL 41 0

0 14.8 0

0.1 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 23 0

99 17.275 0.02 93.485 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 15 2

8 5.46 0.745 2.765 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 18 4

16 8.325 2.22 3.82 TOTAL 306 42 257 605

.................................................................................... 191.89 24.56 146.67 363.12 IN+ SERVICE INSPECTION MAlWTENANCE PERSONNEL 36 17 100 14.595 3.75 66.515 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1

0 1

0.555 0

0.205 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8

0 21 2.14 0

7.6

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6

1 7

2.535 1.125 1.905 ENGINEE' TING PERSONNEL 2

13 6

0.655 12.88 3.525 TOTAL 53 31 135

...................................................................... 219 20.48 17.755 79.75 117.985 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 49 1

662 24.155 0.88 629.324 OPERATING PERSONNEL 3

0 2

1.915 0

0.56 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0

26 2.785 0.035 12.785 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

2 43 0.925 0.395 22.505 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 14 8

33 5.995 3.35 18.93 TOTAL 80 11 766 8

1

.......................................................................57 35.775 4.66 684.104 724.539 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 8

1 4

2.385 0.275 2.075 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.01 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0

1 17.225 0

0.53 SUPERVIS08Y PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.135 0

0.01 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.165 0

0.09 V0TAL 22 1

5 28 0.275 2.705 22.9

.................................................................. 19.92 REFUEllWG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 137 41 16 84.655 40.35 7.165 l

OPERATING PERSONNEL 49 0

2 11.61 0.005 0.26 l

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4

0 9

1.93 0

3.595 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8

0 9

3.955 0

2.61 j

ENGINEER!NG PERSONNEL 10 1

2 7.75 0.31 0.6 l

TOTAL 208 42 38 288 40.665 14.23 164.795

.................................................................................. 109.9 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTICN MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 482 (225) 99 (45) 953 (746) 1534 (1016) 288.41 69.295 765.454 1123.159 OPERATING PERSONNEL 127 (79) 0 (0) 6 (5) 133 (84) 47.095 0.005 1.415 48.515 HEALTH PHTSICS PERSONNEL 77 (29) 0 (0) 227 (119) 304 (148) 49.8 0.055 138.485 188.34 SUPERVISORY PEkSONNEL 40 (22) 5 (3) 75 ($2) 120 (77) 16.44 2.56 32.405 51.405 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 69 (44) 28 (23) 93 (81) 190 (150) 30.04 19.495 41 90.935

....................................................................... 4 l

GRAND TOTALS 795 (401) 132 (71) 1354 (1003) 2281 (1475) 431.785 91.41 979.159 1502.354 l

OWorkers may be counted in more th ) one cate9ery. Nmbers in parentheses are total rLrt>ers of irdividuals, t

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 TYPE:

BWR PLANT VERMONT YANKEE 1 WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 eftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JCS FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 4

6 59 4.438 1.085 13.83 OPERATING PERSONNEL 40 0

1 23.6 0

0.087 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 21 0

148 17.17 0 89.518

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9

0 0

1.949 0

4.489 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3

1 9

5.214 0.209 1.86 TOTAL 77 7

217 301 52.371 1.294 109.784 163.449 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 35 106 939 39.993 27.09 339.68 l

OPERATING PERSONNEL 11 0

0 4.061 0

0 l

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5

0 99 4.176 0 47.367 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 1

0.912 0

0.27 TOTAL 52 106 1039 1197 49.142 27.09 387.317 463.549 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 14 0.02 0

2.271 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.038 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.02 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGlWEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.023 0

0.009 TOTAL 0

0 14 14 0.081 0

2.3 2.381 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6

24 705 6.336 5.008 383.599 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2

0 0

2.258 0

0 HEALTH PMYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 8

0.186 0

3.388

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

0 2

2.34 0

0.4 TOTAL 12 24 715 751 11.12 5.008 387.387 403.515 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 21 0.186 0.012 6.719 OPERATING PERSONNEL 3

0 0

5.473 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 12 0.629 0

3.582 SLPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.02 0

0 TOTAL 4

0 33 37 6.308 0.012 10.301 16.621 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 3

0.084 0.02 0.563 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.374 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 1

0 0

0.255

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.131 0

0.103 TOTAL 1

0 4

5 0.589 0.02 0.921 1.53 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 45 136 1741 1922 51.057 33.215 746.662 830.934 OPERATING PERSONNEL 56 0

1 57 35.804 0

0.087 35.891 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 27 0

268 295 22.161 0

144.13 166.291 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9

0 0

9 1.949 0

4.489 6.438 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9

1 12 22 8.64 0.209 2.642 11.491 GRAND TOTALS 146 137 2022 2305 119.611 33.424 898.01 1051.045 N9

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND J08 FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: WOLF CREEK

.......................................................................................... TYPE:

PWR WORY AND NUMBER OF PERSCWWEL U100 WtEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOS FUNCTION STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY

.......................................................................................... CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.178 0.055 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.164 0.025 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

4 8

0 1.015 2.622 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.005 0.066 0.019 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.003 0.046 0.079 TOTAL 0

4 8

12 0.008 1

..................................................................................... 469 2.8 4.277 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.472 0.567 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.054 0

NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.217 0.398 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.07 0.077 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.091 0.058 foiAL 0

0 0

................................................................................... 0.906 1.1 2.006 IN SERVICE INSPECTION j

MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.118 0.19 CPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.011 0.005 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.011 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.005 0.079 0.05 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.003 0.038 0.005 TUTAL 0

0 0

0.246 0.261 0.515

............................................................................ 008 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.084 0.059 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.007 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.048 0.093 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.007 0.006 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.005 0

T0TAL 0

0 0

................................................................................... 0.151 0.158 0.309 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.017 0.022 CPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.004 0

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.025 0.019 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0

.............................................................................. 0 0.046 0.041 0.087 REFUELIN3 MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 i

HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 l

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

..................................................................................... 0.....................

TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.869 0.893 1.762 OPERAllNG PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.242 0.03 0.2 72 NEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

4 8

12 0

1.305 3.143 4.448 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.01 0.222 0.152 0.384 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 0.006 0.18 0.142 0.328 GRA W TOTALS 0

4 8

12 0.016 2.818 4.36 7.194 1

h"

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 TYPE:

8WR PLANT:

WP.2 WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL D100 stem)

TOTAL PERSON REM Jos M CT!DN STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STAfl0N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 26.296 0

3.418 5.526 0

0.939 OPERAflWG PERSONNEL 24.476 1.14 0.443 8.645 0.407 0.439 HEALTH PNYSICS PERSONNEL 8.863 0 16.581 6.545 0

6.946

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6.186 0.101 0

1.611 0.081 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2.621 1.347 2.624 0.754 0.838 1.268 TOTAL 68.444 2.588 23.066 94.098 23.081 1.326 9.592 33.999 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 26.454 0 34.406 8.002 0 10.389 OPERATING PERSONNEL 7.929 0

0 2.788 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3.703 0

3.164 3.294 0

1.777 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2.211 0.043 0

1.227 0.034 0

ENGlWEERING PERSONNEL 1.922 1.407 3.113 0.46 0.526 0.448 l

TOTAL 42.219 1.45 40.683 84.352 15.771 0.56 12.614 28.945 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAlWTENANCE PERSONNEL 1.881 0

1.931 0.401 0

0.48 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0.422 0

0.02 0.135 0

0.02 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONMit 1.035 0

1.194 0.816 0

0.625

$UPERVISORY PEltSONNEL 0.302 0.4 0

0.097 0.32t 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1.411 1.208 3.708 0.639 1.159 0.905 T0TAL 5.051 1.608 6.853 13.512 2.088 1.48 2.03 5.598 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PER90NNEL 38.287 0 20.471 11.148 0

6.387 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2.143 0

0 0.715 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2.737 0

3.78 2.266 0

2.036

$UPERylSORY PERSONNEL 1.04 0.456 0

0.458 0.366 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2.4 2.829 3.131 0.911 1.451 0.443 TOTAL 46.607 3.285 27.382 77.274 15.498 1.817 8.866 26.181 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1.994 0

0 0.48 0

OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0.16 0

0 0.159 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0.143 0

0.178 0.114 0

0.15

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0.209 0.081 0

0.0 73 0.089 TOTAL 2.137 0.209 0.419 2.765 0.594 0.0 73 0.398 1.065 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 SLPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 ENGINEER!NG PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL 0

0 0

0 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 94.914 0 60.226 155.14 25.557 0

18.195 43.752 OPERATING PERSONNEL 34.97 1.14 0.623 36.733 12.283 0.407 0.618 13.308 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 16.481 0 24.897 41.378 13.035 0 11.534 24.569 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9.739 1

0 10.739 3.393 0.802 0

4.195 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8.354 7 12.657 28.011 2.764 4.047 3.153 9.964 GRAND TOTALS 164.458 9.14 98.403 272,001 57.032 5.256 33.5 95.783 D-51

APPENDIX 0 (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT: ' YANKEE RCWE TWE PWR WORK AND NUMBER OF PERSONNEL D100 MtEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOS FUNCTION STATION UTILITT CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

1 0

1.067 0.495 0.035 OPERATING PERSONNEL 27 0

0 10.507 0

0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0

1 7.03 0

0.195 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.04 0

0.06 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

2 0

0.185 0.485 0.15 TOTAL 40 3

1 44 18.829 0.98 0

............................................................................................... 44 20.249 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 21 33 10 6.402 9.25 2.765 OPERATlWG PERSNNEL 2

0 0

0.705 0

0 MEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNil 7

0 36 5.345 0 17.353 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.055 0

0.025 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

2 0

0.035 0.5 75 0.11 TOTAL 30 35 46 til 12.542 9.825 20.253 42.62 IN SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 9

29 16 3.423 9.345 12.708 CPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.29 0

0 NEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2

0 2

2.51 0

1.025

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4

0 0

4.215 0

0.005 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 7

1 0

8.185 0.34 0.045 TOTAL 22 30 18 70 18.623 9.685 13.783 4

.................................................................................................... 2.091 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 16 54 58 7.63 21.91 42.703 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.23 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSCWNEL 3

0 5

1.205 0

1.945

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.63 0

0.015 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

6 0

0.265 2.384 0.085 TOTAL 20 60 63 143 9.96 24.294 44.748 79

....................................................................................................... 002 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

2 0

0.485 1.36 0.045 OPERATING PERSONNEL 8

0 0

4.525 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5

0 25 7.09 0

9.65

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.01 0

0.01 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0

0 0

0.06 0.045 0.04 TOTAL 13 2

25 40 12.17 1.405 9.745

.................................................................................................... 23.32 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 19 56 6

5.433 19.843 1.88 OPERATING PERSONNEL 27 0

0 9.265 0

0 MEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2

0 13 0.515 0.015 4.47

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.725 0

0.105 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

4 4

0.89 1.197 1.846 TOTAL 55 60 23 138 16.828 21.055 8.301 46.184 TOTAL 8Y JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 66 1 75 90 331 24.44 62.203 60,136 146.779 CPEitAflWG PERSONNEL 64 0

0 64 25.522 0

0 25.522 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 31 0

82 113 23.695 0.015 34.638 58.348 SUPERVISORY PER @NNEL 8

0 0

8 5.675 0

0.22 5.895 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 15 4

30 9.62 5.026 2.276 16.922 GRAND TOTAt3 180 190 176 546 88.952 67.244 97.27 253.4M

Workers rey be counted in sore than cne category.

D-52 I

APPENDIX D (cont)

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND PERSON-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1985 PLANT

ZION TYPE:

PWR WORK AND NUNBER OF PERSONNEL U100 eftEM)

TOTAL PERSON REM JOB FUNCil0N STAfl0N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL REACTOR OPS & SURV MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 10 0

14 1.615 0

6.718 OPERATING PERSONNEL 62 0

7 16.W2 0

2.821 HEALTH PNYSICS PERSONNEL 9

0 2

6.551 0

1.436

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10 0

0 0.753 0

0 ENGlWEERING PERSONNEL 4

0 4

0.307 0

0.227 TOTAL 95 0

27 122 26.218 0 11.202 37.42 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 81 0

616 113.914 0 301.228 OPERATING PERSONNEL 41 0

0 11.991 0

0

-HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 27 0

140 27.332 0 106.596

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 58 0

0 29.66 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL.

53 0

280 20.991 0 36.908 TOTAL 260 0

1036 1296 203.888 0 444.732 648.62 INaSERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 7

0 211 0.%1 0 103.792 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2

0 0

0.488 0

0 NEALTN PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 9

0.032 0

9.672 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 7

0 0

0.563 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 16 0

19 6.566 0

4.642 TOTAL 33 0

239 272 8.61 0 118.106 126.716 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

145 23 0.01 10.737 10.094 OPERATING PERSONNEL 25 0

0 6.418 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSCmWEL 3

0 1

1.46 0

0.034 j

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1

0 0

0.004 0

0 t

l ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4

231 7

0.67 2.868 0.634 TOTAL 34 376 31 441 8.562 13.605 10.762 32.929 WASTE PROCES$1NG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 18 0

301 25.817 0 146.644 OPERATING PERSONNEL 3

0 0

0.615 0

0 NEALTM PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1

0 8

0.266 0

9.838

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 15 0

0 5.141 0

0 i

ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 13 0

-0 5.24 0

0 TOTAL 50 0

309 359 37.079 0 156.482 193.561 l

REFLELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 39 0

7 47.507 0

2.939

't OPERATING PERSONNEL 7

0 0

3.323 0

0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2

0 5

1.189 0

2.09

$UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 14 0

0 7.234 0

0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8

0 1

2.815 0

0.061 TOTAL 70 0

13 83 62.068 0

5.09 67.158 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 156 145 1F2 1473 189.824 10.737 571.415 771.976 OPERATING PERSONNEL 140 0

7 147 39.827 0

2.821 42.648 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 43 0

165 208 36.83 0 129.666 166.4 %

SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 105 0

0 105 43.355 0

0 43.355 ENGINEER!kG PERSONNEL 96 231 311 640 36.589 2.868 42.472 81.929 GRAND TOTALS 542 376 1655 2573 346.425 13.605 746.374 1106.404 l

' Workers risy be comted in sore than crie category.

W

f APPENDIX E Sumary of Annual Whole Body Dose Distributions by Year and Reactor Type 1981-1985 E-1

APPENDIX E*

SUMMARY

OF ANNUAL WHOLE BODY DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS BY YEAR AND REACTOR TYPE 1981-1985 Number of Irdividsats with Whole Sody Doses in the Ranges (rans or cSv)

TOTAL IU40ER YEAR AND REACTOR

- - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - -

- = ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - -

InteER WITM 00LLEC-TYPE mo hees-Mess. 0.10-0.25-0.50- 0.75-1.00-2.00- 3.00-4.0-5-

6-7-

8-9-

10-180u1-IEAS.

T!vE urable 4).10 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10 12

>12 TORED EXPOSURE U0SE i

1985 - SWR's 22,061 14,446 5,957 5,218 3,107 2,295 4,9 73 1,731 468 42 60,298 38,237 20,572 1985 - PW 's 42,409 25,545 8,158 6,761 4,107 2,602 5,584 1,586 248 42 97,042 54,633 22,470 1985 - LWR's 64,470 39,991 14,'15 11,979 7,214 4,897 10,557 3,317 716 84 157,340 92,870 43,042 1984 - BWR's 21,741 14.997 6,165 4,907 3,033 2,398 5,679 2,714 994 218 62,846 41,105 27,074 1984 - Pw 's 37,875 24,887 8,599 6,585 4,133 2,998 6,774 2,253 681 77 94,862 56,987 28,140 1984 - LWR's 59,616 39,M4 14,764 11,492 7.166 5,396 12.453 4,967 1,675 295 157,708 98,092 55,214 1983 - SWR's 17,721 10,475 4,317 4,036 2,607 1,925 5,659 2,890 1,252 299 63 16 4

51,264 33,543 27,455 1983 - PW 's 33,350 21,425 7,894 6,260 3,863 2,783 6,512 2,41 MS 315 2

85,523 52,173 29,016 1983 - LWR's 51,071 31,900 12,211 10,296 6,470 4,708 12,171 5,311 1,950 544 65 16 4

136,717 85,646 56,471 rn E

1982 - SWR's 15,661 9,944 4,431 4,403 2,839 2,046 4,794 2,358 1,183 230 7

47,896 32,235 24,437 1982 - PWR's 29,232 21,536 8,262 6,411 3,900 2,749 6,061 2,328 631 202 49 13 4

0 1

81,379 52,147 27,753 1982 - tm's 44,893 31,480 12,693 10,814 6,739 4,795 10,855 4,686 1,814 432 56 13 4

0 1

129,275 84,382 52,190 1981 - sw 's 15,345 11,130 4,869 4,536 2,939 2,326 5,373 2,485 911 224 32 4

2 0

0 0

1 50,177 34, 5 2 25,471 1961 - PWR's 26,978 18,202 7,348 5,790 3,686 2,577 6,393 2,061 882 262 61 77 9

2 1

74,329 47,351 28,671 1981 - LWR's 42,323 29,332 12,217 10,326 6,625 4,903 11,766 4,546 1,793 486 93 81 11 2

1 0

1 124,506 82,183 54,142

Figures contained hereits are uncorrected for suttiple reporting of transient IndividJets.

Q s. huctE A4 kleutif on y W,esiom i + 4Poaf %vWet A kWM er rioc. ese var w. # ears a.mC Pomas $3s E,

Bl8UOGRAPHIC DATA SHEET in msvauctio s o v e sv'"5' NUREG-0713. Vol. 7J s u ve n.

,,an.~o 9taa Occupa al Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reacto d Other Facilities 1985

o ^ " " "#o** " "

Eighteent gnual Report wo% f se 4 tan g

Januarf 1988 i wt-oatsi 9 [ IE#4704Tallvio WONT

tam Barbara Br

's Adi1 1988

.,aoxcr7v.o. v~o v.n a

,,t.. o. o o.s..a.i

...t *=o mmo.co.us,,,m

<, ce,

Division of R ulatory Applications

^ " " ' ' ' ' ' * * " "

Office of Nucl 13egulatoryResearch U.S. Nuclear Re latory Commission Washington, DC 5p ie 4*oNSomiNQ omGa%4 af tom maWE WeibeNG Aoomt ES,#arwee le coeer

'it.YvetofAttomt Division of Regulat Applications f

Office of Nuclear Re atory Research Annual U.S. Nuclear Regulato Commission

.na*waam ~~~=>

Washington, DC 20555

\\

1985 12 SUPPktWi%f am y gets

>>..n..ran This report summarizes th occupational adiation exposure information that has been reported to the NRC's adiation Ej osure Information Reporting System (REIRS) by nuclear power facilities nd certain other categories of NRC licensees during the years 1969 through 1985.

The,b61k of the data presented in the report was obtained from annual radiatio exposure reports submitted in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 20.407. Data on workers terminating their employment at certain NRC licensed facilities ere obtained from reports submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 20.408.

The 1985 anrytfa1 ports submitted by about 500 licensees indicated that approximately 216,0001ndiv als were monitored, 94,000 of whom were monitored bynuclearpowerfacilitj/s1 The) incurred an average individual dose of 0.22 rem (cSv) and an average me noreable d e of 0.43 rem (cSv). Termination radiation exposure reports were analyzed to r eal that about 77,300 individuals completed theiremploymentwitMoneormoreof he 500 covered licensees during 1984.

Some 73,200 of these ind $iduals terminate from power reactor facilities, and about 7,400 of them wer.* considered to be t nsient workers who received an average dose of1.05 rem (cSv) 0 p*

J' in a a tL iv is oocuvist asasvs s -. at,anoaus otScairroas occupatiopal radiation exposure industrial radiography Unlimited power r actors transient workers

'*"c'"'""'"*'

collec Ive dose fuel fabricators

.soir..a,v,gg gggg, U

assified

( The wt/

Unc1assified o %.ou a o..acu

.s..a

' U,5, C0vt 4%'4 4 7 pel4f the C/r ltt i t 939 732-79 2 it3S23

e i

UNITE : STATES t

NUCLEA J RE L ULATORY COMMISSION

,,,a,t,,,,n,35,;,,

h.

WASHINGTON,. D.C. 20555 PosTaos * *t.as **o PinwT p 3 G41 t

OFFICIAL BUSINESS -

PENALTY FOR PR VATE USE. $300 I

,1;11*E n >

') I ', I 4

c. ' *

.,i

,,,3; 1,4

- 2 :,

'y 9f

^ w..

,,_n.o t' C I 7

3 g e3t, P)

,3 l': T R

t.1 j{c{gi :b T l. *

.

ML20151S619

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML20151S619

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search