Similar Documents at Zion |
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20217J4791999-10-18018 October 1999 SER Approving Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR73 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.NRC Concluded That Proposed Alternative Measures for Protection Against Radiological Sabotage Meets Requirements of 10CFR73.55 ML20211K0401999-08-31031 August 1999 SER Accepting Approval of Defueled Station Emergency Plan & Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.47, Emergency Plans for Plants,Units 1 & 2 ML20236U6331998-07-24024 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 179 & 166 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20236S3281998-07-20020 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Certified Fuel Handlers Training & Retraining Program ML20198P8721998-01-0909 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Request for Alternative Insp Requirements for Augmented Exam of Reactor Presure Vessels for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20198P8361998-01-0909 January 1998 SER Accepting Determination of Zone of Influnce for Coatings in Containment of Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20202F0761997-12-0202 December 1997 Safety Evaluation Denying Licensee Proposed Alternative Contained in Request for Relief CR-13,Rev 1,of Removing Only Insulation Classified as Removable.Staff Determined That Submittal Does Not Provide Acceptable Level of Quality ML20132F5111996-12-20020 December 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 177 & 164 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20135D8971996-11-25025 November 1996 Corrected SE Supporting Amends 176 & 163 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20134P7941996-11-25025 November 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 176 & 163 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20134H6781996-11-12012 November 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 175 & 162 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20134F9851996-11-0606 November 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 174 & 161 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20129H2901996-10-29029 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 173 & 160 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20059E2871993-12-30030 December 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 57,57,45,45,93,77,152 & 140 to Licenses NPF-37,NPF-66,NPF-72,NPF-77,NPF-11,NPF-18, DPR-39 & DPR-48 Respectively ML20058G2981993-11-29029 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 151 & 139 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48 ML20059M7851993-11-15015 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 150 & 138 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20059L7511993-11-10010 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Accepting Category 3 Qualification in Lieu of Category 2 for Pressure Monitoring Instrumentation ML20059L6801993-11-0909 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Re Update to Plant Reg Guide 1.97 Parameter Summary Table ML20059B1961993-10-22022 October 1993 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 930913 Reanalysis of Fuel Handling Accident Inside Containment ML20058E6661993-10-22022 October 1993 Corrected SE Re Revised Fuel Handling Accident Inside Containment.Se Mistakenly Gives Decontamination Factor for Elemental Iodine Value of 100 Instead of 133 ML20059A7211993-10-14014 October 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 149 & 137 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20059C5521993-10-13013 October 1993 Corrected Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 148 & 136 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20057F8351993-10-13013 October 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 148 & 136 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20057A2091993-08-31031 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Denying Addl Exemptions from Fire Protection Requirements of 10CFR50,app R.Conclusions Reached When Granting Exemptions in 830307 & 880607 SEs Still Valid ML20056H5001993-08-27027 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Re Fire Protection Open Items from Section 3.2.1 of 780310 Safety Evaluation ML20057B1711993-03-24024 March 1993 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief Requests to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48 Re Second 10-yr Interval Inservice Testing Plan for Pumps & Valves ML20056C0501992-06-0909 June 1992 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 138 & 127 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20058D8081990-10-31031 October 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 120 & 109 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20247E7421989-09-0808 September 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 118 & 107 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20245F1631989-08-0101 August 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 117 & 106 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20247P9591989-05-30030 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 116 & 105 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20247M7431989-05-22022 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Compliance W/Atws Rule 10CFR50.62 ML20245H8051989-04-27027 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 115 & 104 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20244E4141989-04-14014 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util post-accident Monitoring Instrumentation Per Reg Guide 1.97 & Generic Ltr 82-33 ML20196B8081988-12-0202 December 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.3 & 3.2.3 Re post-maint Testing Requirements ML20207K9971988-10-11011 October 1988 SER Supporting Amends 113 & 102 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48, Respectively ML20155G5771988-06-0707 June 1988 Safety Evaluation Recommending That Util 840727 Exemption Request from Sections III.G.2 & III.G.3 of 10CFR50,App R Be Granted.One Exemption Request Determined as Unnecessary ML20154A7781988-04-15015 April 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 112 & 110 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20151M1281988-04-0606 April 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 111 & 100 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20148P4951988-04-0404 April 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 110 & 99 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20150F0601988-03-28028 March 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 109 & 98 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20147B8831988-02-26026 February 1988 SER Re Matl Properties for Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events.Nrc Concludes That Many of 30 Measurements Added to List in WCAP-10962 Not Credible ML20149H5541988-02-0505 February 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 108 to License DPR-39 ML20237H5511987-08-17017 August 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 107 & 97 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20236J3961987-07-20020 July 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 106 & 96 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20235E9171987-06-23023 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 105 & 95 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20213G6351987-05-0808 May 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 104 & 94 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20215K3831987-05-0707 May 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Util 861229 Submittal Concerning Matl Properties for Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events,Per 10CFR50.61.Reported Values of Copper & Nickel Content Unacceptable ML20205Q9561987-03-26026 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 103 & 93 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20205G7221987-03-19019 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 102 & 92 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48 1999-08-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217J4791999-10-18018 October 1999 SER Approving Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR73 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.NRC Concluded That Proposed Alternative Measures for Protection Against Radiological Sabotage Meets Requirements of 10CFR73.55 A99026, Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20217A1691999-09-22022 September 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Engine Sys,Inc Controllers,Manufactured Between Dec 1997 & May 1999,that May Have Questionable Soldering Workmanship.Caused by Inadequate Personnel Training.Sent Rept to All Nuclear Customers A99023, Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20211K0401999-08-31031 August 1999 SER Accepting Approval of Defueled Station Emergency Plan & Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.47, Emergency Plans for Plants,Units 1 & 2 A99022, Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With A99021, Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With A99019, Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20195B2591999-05-19019 May 1999 Rev 66a to CE-1-A,consisting of Proposed Changes to QAP for Dnps,Qcs,Znps,Lcs,Byron & Braidwood Stations A99016, Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20195H9521999-04-30030 April 1999 Revised Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2 A99013, Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20207M9231999-03-12012 March 1999 Amended Part 21 Rept Re Cooper-Bessemer Ksv EDG Power Piston Failure.Total of 198 or More Pistons Have Been Measured at Seven Different Sites.All Potentially Defective Pistons Have Been Removed from Svc Based on Encl Results A990101, Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20205M7061998-12-31031 December 1998 Unicom Corp 1998 Summary Annual Rept. with A99002, Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With A98062, Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20196J0061998-11-19019 November 1998 Rev 66 to Topical Rept CE-1-A, QA Program ML20196A4191998-11-19019 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting QA TR CE-1-A,Rev 66 Re Changes in Independent & Onsite Review Organization by Creating NSRB A98057, Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With A98052, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With1998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With A98049, Special Rept 304-123-98-001SR:on 980902,valid Failure Rept for 2A EDG Occurred.Cause Unknown.Util Submitted Written Certification of Permanent Cessation of Operations at Zion Station,Units 1 & 21998-09-25025 September 1998 Special Rept 304-123-98-001SR:on 980902,valid Failure Rept for 2A EDG Occurred.Cause Unknown.Util Submitted Written Certification of Permanent Cessation of Operations at Zion Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20195D1221998-08-31031 August 1998 DSAR, for Zion Station A98048, Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 2.With1998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20237E2331998-08-21021 August 1998 Revised Pages of Section 20 of Rev 66 to CE-1-A, QA Topical Rept A98042, Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 21998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20236U6331998-07-24024 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 179 & 166 to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,respectively ML20236S3281998-07-20020 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Certified Fuel Handlers Training & Retraining Program A98041, Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Zion Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 21998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Zion Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20236J7911998-06-12012 June 1998 LER 98-S02-00:on 980517,first Shift Security Officer Reported Being Wounded by Unknown Subject Who Fled Area. Caused by accidental,self-inflicted Gunshot Wound.Removed Officer from Duty & Charged Officer W/Filing False Rept A98039, Monthly Operating Repts for May 1998 for Zion Generating Station,Units 1 & 21998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1998 for Zion Generating Station,Units 1 & 2 A98035, Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 21998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 2 A98033, Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 21998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 2 A98029, Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 21998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 2 A98015, Monthly Operating Repts for Jan 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 21998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Jan 1998 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20199K1651998-01-23023 January 1998 Rev 65h to Topical Rept CE-1-A, Comm Ed QA Tr ML20198P8361998-01-0909 January 1998 SER Accepting Determination of Zone of Influnce for Coatings in Containment of Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20198P8721998-01-0909 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Request for Alternative Insp Requirements for Augmented Exam of Reactor Presure Vessels for Zion Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2 A98034, 1997 Annual 10CFR50.59 Summary Rept1997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Annual 10CFR50.59 Summary Rept ML20216D3611997-12-31031 December 1997 Unicom Corp 1997 Summary Annual Rept A98004, Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1997 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 21997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1997 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20202F1451997-12-0303 December 1997 Independent Investigation Team Rept on Safety Conscious Work Environment at Zion Station ML20202F0761997-12-0202 December 1997 Safety Evaluation Denying Licensee Proposed Alternative Contained in Request for Relief CR-13,Rev 1,of Removing Only Insulation Classified as Removable.Staff Determined That Submittal Does Not Provide Acceptable Level of Quality A97076, Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1997 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 21997-11-30030 November 1997 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1997 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20199J5931997-11-26026 November 1997 SG Insp Results,Fall 1996 Refueling Outage 14 (Z2R14) A97063, Special Rept 295-123-97-002SR:on 971014,failure of 1B EDG Occurred.Exam of Nipple Fractured Surface Revealed Failure Occurred Through Thread Root.Unit 1 Defueled & Unit 2 in Mode 5 Throughout Event1997-11-13013 November 1997 Special Rept 295-123-97-002SR:on 971014,failure of 1B EDG Occurred.Exam of Nipple Fractured Surface Revealed Failure Occurred Through Thread Root.Unit 1 Defueled & Unit 2 in Mode 5 Throughout Event A97069, Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1997 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 21997-10-31031 October 1997 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1997 for Zion Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20211M0181997-10-0707 October 1997 Special Rept 295-123-97-001SR:on 970904,OA Motor Declared Inoperable Due to Pin Hole Leaks Identified on Pressure Regulating Relief valve,0FP0052.Procedure Was Rewritten to Ensure 0FP0052 Would Maintain Same Pressure When Fully Open A97058, Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1997 for Zion Generating Station,Units 1 & 21997-09-30030 September 1997 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1997 for Zion Generating Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20210V2401997-09-19019 September 1997 Rev 65g to Topical Rept CE-1-A, Comm Ed QA Manual 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
pastog[*g UNITED STATES
)+
- 'g NUCLEAR REGU!.ATORY COMMISSION 5 W ASHING TON, D. C. 20555
'l
\..../
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO.111 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-39 AND j AMENDHENT NO.100 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-48 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY ZION NUCLEAR POWER STATION. UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-295 AND 50-304 l
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letters dated December 24, 1987 and February 11, 1988, the Consnonwealth Edison Company, the licensee, submitted a request to change the technical specifications to allow for the installation of steam generator tube repair sleeves in the Zion Nuclear Power Station Units 1 and 2.
2.0 BACKGROUND
Zion Units 1 and 2 use pressurized water reactor (PWR) steam generators that are manufactured by the Westinghouse Electric Corporation. B0th units have four Westinghouse Series 51 vertical recirculating U-bend tube steam generators, and each has 3388 Inconel 600 tubes. The tubes have a 0.050 inch nominal wall thickness with an outside diameter of 0.875 inches. Zion 1 initiated commercial service in December 1973 and Zion 2 in September 1974.
Both Zion units have experienced steam generator tube degradation in the tube-sheet area. The degradation is believed to be corrosion induced intergranular attack (IGA). Because Zion Unit I has experienced one of the highest rates of tube plugging in Westinghouse Model 51 steam generators, Conrnonwealth Edison Company submitted a proposed Technical Specification change to the NRC on l April 24, 1986 that would allow Comt,ustion Engineering welded sleeves to be installed as an alternative to plugging for steam generator repair. On November 18, 1986, the NRC approved Commonwealth Edison Company's request to !
perform tube sleeving according to the Combustion Engineering procedure.
3.0 DISCUSSION Westinghouse Report WCAP-11669, "Zion Units 1 and 2 Steam Generator Sleeving Report," was submitted in support of the request for approval of sleeving.
Westinghouse provides a leak limiting sleeve which is secured to the steam gene-rator tube near each end of the sleeve. The sleeve spans the degraded area of the parent steam generator tube in and above the tubesheet region.
eso4220248 880406 ADOCK 050 5 gDR l
w -- -
2 The operation of pressurized water reactor steam generators het, in some in-stances, resulted in localized corrosive attack on the inside (primary side) or outside (secondary side) of the steam generator tubing. This corrosive attack results in a reduction in steam generator tube wall thickness. Steam generator tubing has been designed with considerable margin between the actual wall thick-ness anc the wall thickness required to meet structural requirements. Thus, it has not been necessary to take corrective action unless structural limits are :
being approached.
Historically, the corrective action taken where steam generator tube wall de-gradation has been severe, has been to install plugs at the inlet and outlet ends of the steam generator tube when the reduction in wall thickness reaches a cal-culated value referred to as the plugging limit. Eddycurrenttesting(ECT)has been used to measure steam generator tubing degradation and the tube plugging limit takes into account ECT measurement uncertainty.
1 The objectives of installing sleeves in the steam generator tubes are twofold.
The sleeve must maintain the structural integrity of the steam generator tube during normal operating and postulated accident conditions. Additionally, the sleeve must prevent leakage in the event of a through hole in the wall of the steam generator tube. Tests and analyses were perfonned to demonstrate the capability of the sleeves to perform these functions under nonnal and postulated accident conditions. Plugs are installed in the steam g2nerator tubes when the tubes cannot be successfully repaired with sleeves. l The sleeve designed by Westinghouse is inserted in a degraded or defective tube j 4 and spans the degraded region of the original tube. The sleeve length is con-trolled by the insertion clearance between the channel head inside surface and 1 the primary side of the tubesheet, and the tube degradation location above the l tubesheet. The remaining design parameters such as wall thickness and material i are selected to enhance design margins and corrosion resistance and to meet ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code requirements. The upper joint is located so as to provide a f ree length of sleeve above the degraded region of the original tube. This length is added so that if in the unlikely event the existing tube were to become severed just above the upper edge of the joint, the tube would be restrained by the sleeve from lateral and axial motion, and subsequent leakage i would also be limited.
The Zion steam generators were built to the 1965 Edition of Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code; however, the sleeves have been designed and analyzed b6 sed upon the 1983 Edition of Section III of the Code through the Winter 1983 Addenda as well as applicable Regulatory Guides. The associated materials and processes also meet the Code requirements and criteria.
The sleeve material, thermally treated (TT) Inconel 690, was selected to provide additional resistance to stress corrosion cracking. Evaluations were performed by Westinghouse which (1) verified that thermally treated Inconel 690 is a suit-able material for use in steam generator environments, and (2) verified that sleeving does not have a detrimental effect on the serviceability of the existing tube or the sleeve components, i
3 The sleeve installation consists of a series of steps including tube preparation, sleeve insertion, joint fonnation and finally joint inspection. In preparation for sleeve insertion, the inside diameter areas of the tubes to be sleeved are cleaned to prepare the surface for joint formaticn and removal of loose oxide and foreign material.
4.0 EVALUATION The staff evaluation of the amendment proposed by Comonwealth Edison Company and the WCAP-11669 report prepared by Westinghouse is based upon the following considerations: Steam generator tube sleeving is a repair technique that is an alternative to removing defective or degrading tubes from service by plugging. -
Sleeves are designed to span a defective or degraded region of a steem generator .
tube and to maintain the steam generator tubing primary-to-secondary pressure i boundary under normal and accident conditions. A successful sleeving system must provide a corrosion resistant sleeve material with structural integrity and leak tightness of the sleeved tube.
The staff concurs that the use of Inconel 690 TT sleeves is an improvement over the Inconel 600 material used in the original steam generator tubin Corrosion t testsconductedundertheElectricPowerResearchInstitute(EPRI)g. sponsorship l confirm WCAP-11669 test results regarding the improved corrosion resistance of Inconel 690 TT over that of Inconel 600. Accelerated stress corrosion tests in '
caustic and chloride aqueous solutions have also indicated that Inconel 690 TT resists general corrosion in aggressive environments. Isothermal tests in high purity water have shown that, at normal stress levels, Inconel 690 TT has high resistance to intergranular stress corrosion cracking in extended high tem- .
perature exposure. EPRI concluded as a result of these laboratory r.orrosion :
tests, that Inconel 690 TT material could be used for PWR steam generator tubing with all volatile treatment secondary water systems. Inconel 690 is a Code ap- :
proved material (ASME $8-163), covered by ASME Code Case N-20, and is acceptable to NRC under Regulatory Guide 1.85 (Rev. 24, July 1986). The NRC staff has approved Westinghouse's use of Inconel 690 TT tubing in replacement steam gene-rators to be placed in service.
Corrosion test results presented in WCAP-11669 confirm that the expansion pro-cesses used to form the upper and lower sleeve-to-tube joints, while mechani-cally working the sleeve and tube, did not impose sufficiently high residual tensile stresses as to promote stress corrosion cracking in the tube-sleeve samples used in the tests.
There was some question concerning the adequacy of the combined allowance for eddy current uncertainty and operational degradation to be used in connection with the proposed amendment. After discussions with the staff, the licensee proposed to clarify the conservatism to be used and to adopt the staffs recom-mendation of a combined allowance of 20 percent. The licensee's letter of February 11, 1988 modified the sleeve plugging limit to 31 percent wall thick-ness in order to properly reflect this conservatism. Therefore the operational sleeve thickness of 69 percent includes the minimum calculated wall thickness based on normal loading conditions, which are controlling, plus the margin for eddy current uncertainty and postulatad operational degradation in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.121 and staff positions.
l l
l
M 4
Sleeving introduces special inspection problems in the eddy current testing of the sleeve-tube combination. First, a method confirming that the joints meet critical process dimensions is required. Second, it must be shown that the tube-sleeve assembly is capable of being evaluated through subsequent routine inservice inspection.
The staff finds that the use of the eddy current equipment and techniques as described in WCAP-11669, or their equivalent, is currently acceptable. However, the licensee has comitted to utilize advanced state of the art techniques as they are developed and verified.
The process of sleeving restores structural integrity of the degraded portions of the steam generator tubes. For that reason the steam generator's response to transients and accident scenarios previously analysed remains unchanged.
The sleeving process also does not create conditions leading to new accidents i' not previously analysed.
The Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) perfonnance analysis for Zion 1 and 2 supports operation with up to 10 percent of the steam generator tubes plugged out of service or the hydraulic equivalent ratio for sleeved tubes.
Implementation of the sleeving process will decrease the number of tubes which must be taken out of service with tube plugs. Both plugs and sleeves reduce the reactor cooling flow margin, but the use of sleeves will maintain a margin of flow that would othenvise be reduced in the event of plugging those tubes that are sleeved. Using the calculated sleeve to plug ratio, the Licensee has shown that for the level of sleeving projected to occur at Zion 1 and 2 no ECCS results are more adverse than those in the existing Safety Analysis. In addition, the non-LOCA analysis and the transient evaluation are not affected by the sleeving. The staff finds, therefore, that the operation of the facility in accordance with the approved sleeving process would (1) minimize the loss of margin in the reactor coolant flow through the steam generators in the LOCA analysis and (2) assure that :
minimum flow rates are maintained in excess of that required for operation at full power. Based on the above, the staff concludes that the proposed technical specification change does not result in a significant reduction of the margin of safety.
The staff's evaluation is based in part on the enclosed Technical Evaluation Report prepared by Science Applications International Corporation.
5.0 TECHNICAL FINDING The staff conclusions are based on a review and evaluation of the infonnation ,
and data presented in WCAP-11669, "Zion Units 1 and 2 - Steam Generator Sleeving I Report (Mechanical Sleeves)" dated December 1987. The staff concludes that the i request by Commonwealth Edison Company for a proposed amendment to Facility 1 License Nos. DPR-39 and DPR-48, Appendix A. Section 43, "Reactor Coolant System,"
that will allow Zion's steam generator tubes to be repaired by utilizing West-inghouse Electric Corporation mechanical sleeving methodology is acceptable.
4 5
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
These amendments involve a change in the installation or use of the facilities component located with the restricted areas as defined in 10 CFR 20. The staff has determined that these amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released of f site, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that these amendments involve no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public connent on such finding. Accord-ingly, these amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion setforthin10CFR51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of these amendments.
7.0 CONCLUSION
The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of these amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor: H. Conrad Dated: April 6, 1988
- --. . --,