ML20151B344

Notice of Violation from Insp on 880225-0325.Violation Noted:Failure to Follow Tech Spec Administrative Requirements for Approval of Mods

ML20151B344
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	03/31/1988
From:	Brownlee V NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20151B342	List: IR 05000413/1988013 ML20151B340 ML20151B344
References
50-413-88-13, 50-414-88-13, NUDOCS 8804080176
Download: ML20151B344 (2)

Text

. . - _.

o .

i ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION  !

Duke Power Company Docket Nos. 50-413, 50-414 i Catawba 1 and 2 License Nos. NPF-35, NPF-52 !

i

. During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on i February 25, 1988, through March 25, 1988, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure i for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), the violation is listed below:

Technical Specification 6.5.1.3 requires that "Proposed modifications to i 4 nuclear safety-related structures, systems, and components shall be l approved prior to implementation by the Station Manager" or his designated l 1

superintendent.

Contrary to the above, prior to August 1987, the Station Manager or his  !

designated superintendent did not approve station modifications. (

I This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).  ;

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company is hereby l required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory (

Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to r the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident i Inspector, Catawba, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this [

Notice. This reply should be clearly marked a, a "Reply to a Notice of  !

1 Violation" and should include: (1) admission Jr denial of the violation, {

l (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which '

4 have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will i l be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance  !

will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to  !

extending the response time. If an adequate reply is not received within the  :

.! time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the  !

i license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action I l as may be proper should not be taken. i

~

i f

i l J

i i

t L

8804080176 880331  ;

i PDR ADOCK 05000413  ;

i o DCD  !

)

I 3 '

a  ;

i .

Duke Power Company 2 Docket Nos. 50-413, 50-414 Catawba 1 and 2 License Nos. NPF-35, NPF-52 Security or safeguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to facilitate withholdir.g it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d) or 10 CFR 73.21.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ORIGIN Al SIGNED BY Jg I

MARvIN V. SINKULE Virgil L. Brownlee, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Project Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 31 day of March 1988 1

I l

,