ML20149K254
| ML20149K254 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/11/1993 |
| From: | James Buchanan NRC |
| To: | Roecklein A NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20149C780 | List: |
| References | |
| FRN-61FR52388, RULE-PR-20, RULE-PR-32, RULE-PR-35, RULE-PR-36, RULE-PR-39 AF46-1-004, AF46-1-4, NUDOCS 9707300088 | |
| Download: ML20149K254 (2) | |
Text
.-. ~.
AP-46-A I
PDR 1
From:
John D. Buchanan (JDB2)
To:
JXD1, AKR Date:
Wednesday, August 11, 1993 10:03 am l
Subject:
Part 20 fix needed Jack Bell noticed another error in Part 20 that can be corrected in the forthcoming set of minor clarifying changes.
See the j
attached file for details.
Please let me know if you see any problem with including this change.
l CC:
JMB2, JEW 2, LJC2 Files:
P20FIX.#34 l
i J
t
\\
lb i
d i
i
[
t
{
f V
i t
i 1
l 1
9707300088 970711 PDR PR
-. ~ ' '
20 61FR52388 PDH 97D1306&SW
s.
"d.
O s
i
/
Y I
34.
10 CFR 20.1703 (b) (1), second sentence:
Add the words
" multiple defined in the preceding sentence" and delete the words
" peak concentration." so that the sentence reads as follows:
"If the selection of a respiratory protection device with a protectio l
factor greater than the multiple defined in the preceding sentenc is inconsistent with the goal specified in 20.1702 of keeping th 4
total effective dose ALARA, the licensee may select respiratory protection equipment with a lower protection factor only if such selection would result in keeping the total effective dose equivalent ALARA."
I l
The current wording is incorrect in referring to a protection i
factor (which has no units) that is greater than a peak j
concentration (which has units of activity per unit volume).
The i
revised wording is consistent with the intended meaning of this t
sentence.
1 1
i i
i i
l v
__