ML20149D916

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to Project Instruction PI-11, Plant Mod Follower
ML20149D916
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 07/29/1982
From:
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20149D694 List:
References
FOIA-84-21 PI-11, NUDOCS 8801130165
Download: ML20149D916 (9)


Text

> j 8* PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY STATION CONSTRUCTION DEPARTNENT

)

DIABLO CANYON PROJECT PROJECT INSTRUCTION oD l

. Instruction PI-11 Rev. O  !

l 1

TITLE: Plant Modification Followei' PAGE 1 of 5 APPROVED: A DATE: M ff, /f/1

' Projett perintendent y g /

1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This instruction defines the eiethods 'and steps taken to implement the Operating Nuclear Plant Modification Program and effect changes to the design of Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2. It is affective upon the date approved for Unit 1 and upon receipt of an operating license for Unit 2, or at such earlier time as directed by the Project Manager.

2.0 DISCUSSION j 2.1 The instructions contained herein are provided to control the activities of personnel working on the Diablo Canyon Project (DCP) with regard to plant modifications. The goal of this instruction is to provide a well structured program for implementing plant modifications.

2.2 This instruction describes the on-site handling, control and implementation of plant modifications, including construction, inspection, acceptance and testing. The documentation package for modification is referred to as a Plant Modification Follower (PMF). ,

3.0 RESFONSIBILITY 3.1 The Senior Site Representative is responsible for the preparation of PMF's for design activities within his delegation of authority.

3.2 The Resident Engineers are responsible for assianment, monitoring and control of PMF's.

3.3 In all areas of this instruction, supervisory personnel who'have been assigned responsibility for this task have the authority to delegate performance of this 1 task to subordinates. This delegation shall be by written job description i

.or by specific written assignment. '

8801130165 871229 PDR FOIA

, _G AR.DE84-21 ,PDR

a- -

Page 2 of. 'S 4.0 APPLICATION .

4.1 This instruction applies to all plant modifications as defined in section 6.0 of this instruction. '

5.0 EXCEPTION 5.1 The System Interaction Program (SIP) as defined per Nuclear Power Generation Department Procedure W-606 and Office Engineering Instruction OEI-1 are excluded from this instruction as there are no approved General Construction (G.C.), onsite personnel to fulfill this obligation.

6.0 DEFINITIONS 6.1 Design Change - A design change is any modification, addition, or deletion to plant structures, systems or components as described on approved specifications, drawings, or supplier documents which could affect:

6.1.1 The function and/or the design operating characteristics of the structure, system or component under normal and/or abnormal operating conditions.

6.1.2 The reliability or failure rate of the structure, system or component under normal and/or abnormal operating conditions.

6.1.3 The safety consequences of a malfunction or failure of the structure system or component.

6.2 Plant Modification Follower (PMF):

6.2.1 A document employed to provide cover for the design resulting from an identified need for a plant modification and to pro'<ide documentation that each step necessary to accomplish design, approval, construction, and verification of plant modifications are documented.

6.2.2 In the text of this instruction, the term PMF is considered to include the design package.

6.3 Important To Safety (as applied to Plant Modifications)

6.3.1 All changes to items designated as "Q" in the Diablo Canyon "Q" List.

6.3.2 All changes to Fire Protection System components. ~

6.3.3 Any change which is itself not safety-related, but which could affect functioning of safety-rtlated equipment. For example, a change to supports t

for the Auxiliary Steam Line which runs through the Auxiliary Feedwater pur room.

~

[ .

- - . . - .-,n.-- - - -

Page 3 of 5' 6.3.4 A change which could msult in a change to equipment, analyzed accidents, etc. as described in FSAR.

6.3.5 Any change which could result in a change to the Technical Specifications, Process Control Program, Off-site Dose Calculation Procedure, or Environmental Radiation Monitoring Program. -

6.3.6 All changes to systems designed to contain radioactive materials including gaseous and liquid radioactive waste, sagling system, etc.,

which are described in the FSAR.

6.4 Important To Environmental Quality:

6.4.1 A proposed change, test or experiment shall be deemed to involve an unreviewed environmental qtiestion if:

6.4.1.1 It concerns a matter which may result in a significant increase ,

in any adverse environmental impact pmviousTy evaluated in the Fiiial Environmental Statement (FES) as modified by Staff's testimony to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, supplements to the FES, Environmental Impact Appraisals, or in any decisions '

of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board:

6.4.1.2 It results in a significant change in affluents or power level

[in accordance with 10 CFR part 51.1 (b)(2)] or 6.4.1.3 It creates a significant environmental effect not previously reviewed and evaluated in the documents specified above.

7.0 ' PROCEDURE 7.1 When a need for modification is identified onsite with approval offsite.

prepare a PMF fom No.69-080 with appropriate sections completed and a Design Change Request (DCR) and fomard to. Engineering through Drawing Control per OEI-1.

7.1.1 The first page'of the PMF must be filled out with coglete description and reason for change.

7.1.2 The first section of page two of the PMF, "Design Activities" must be filled out by initiating organization with all authorizations and drawings.

7.1.3 After cogletion of Sections 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 the PMF will be processed through Drawing Control, per OEI-1, 7.1.4 Drawing Control will distribute all PMF's received from NPO per OEI-1.

- - - - - - - - - .n - , - . --.--,.-,-,-t , - . , - - , - ,, .,-.,,-- -- -- ,,-,, -

,n --,,

Page 4 of 5 7.1.5 Upon completion of the work, the msponsible Resident Engineer will initiate the PMF completion sign off sheet form OE-86, and route to other Resident Engineers for sign off.

7.1.6 The PMF shall be forwarded to Drawing Control with all as-built infomation attached, then Drawing Control will complete Form No.69-080, Section three "Installing Organization Activities," based on information from Fom OE-86.

7.2 When a need for modification is identified onsitie, with approval onsite, based on deligation of authority, prepare a PHF, prepare and approve a DCR, attach the design drawings, sketches, telecons or other applicable documents and safety evaluation and forward to NPO through Drawing Control per OEI-1.

7.2.1 The first page of the PMF must be filled out with coglete description and reason for change.

7.2.2 The first section of page two of the PMF "Design Activities" must be filled out by initiating organization with all authorizations and drawings.

7.2.3 After completion of Sections 7.2.1 and 7.2.2 the PMF will be processed through Drawing Control, per OEI-1.

7.2.4 Drawing Control will distribute all PMF's received from NPO per  !

OEI-1.

7.2.5 Upon completion of the work, the responsible Resident Engineer will initiate the PMF completion sign off sheet Form OE-86, and route to the other Resident Engineers for' sign off.

7.2.6 The PMF shall be forwarded to Drawing Control with all as-built infomation attached, then Drawing Control will complete fom No.69-080 Section Three. "Installing Organization Activities," base.1 on infomation from Fom OE-86.

7.3 When a need for modification is identified off site with approval off site.

Drawing Control will distribute all PMF's received from NPO per OEI-1.

7.3.1 Upon co@letion of work, the Responsible Resident Engineer will l initiate the PMF completion sign oft sheet form OE-86, and route ,

to other Resident Engineers for sign off.  ;

l 7.3.2 The PMF shall be forwarded to Drawing Control with all as-built infomation attached, then Drawing Control will complete form No. l 69-080, Section Three. "Installing Organization Activities," based 1

on infomation from Fom OE-86. .

8.0 APPROVAL 8.1 Regardless of who originated the plant modification or provided the design, all plant modifications and significant changes thereto must be approved by the Plant Manager or his delegate.

Instruction PI-11 Rev. O _

Page 5 of _ 5 960 REVISIONS 9.1 Minor Revisions (MR's) to the' PMF which do not alter the safety classification, safety review, or intent of the origin PMF may be approved by the Resident Engineer and the Power Plant Engineer without PSRC review. MR's will be appropriately documented using the PMF minor revision form No. 69-81.

9.2 If the revision is more extensive than an MR, the Power Plant Engineer shall be notified and the implementing organization shall request a PMF revision from the organization that diveloped the PMF. The revision shall be handled similar to that of a new PMF.

10.0 REFERENCES

Nuclear Power Generation Procedure W-606 Engineering Manual Procedure 3.6 ON Nuclear Plant Administrative Procedures AP C-1 and Supplements General Construction Drawing Control Procedure Operating Instruction OEI-1 10CFR 50.59 - Changes. Test and Experiments Design ' Change Request, Eng. Dept. Form 76-313 DCN/PMF Completion Sign Off Sheet Form OE-86 ATTACHMENTS A. Plant Modification Follower B. PMF Hinor Revision C. Plant Modification Flow Chart es


n -

PLANT MODIFICATION FOLLOWER DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: ,

REASON FOR CHANGEL CHANGE REQUESTED'BY: D TE: .

REQUEST AUTHORIZED BY: ,

DATE:

,w. - -

et DESIGN ACTIVFTIES ITEM DEPT BY Xi E ' ITEM DEPT BY DATE DCND ARTO: _ MAT '.L- R EQ ' S DWG LIST: - . . SAF'ETY E9AL:

REQ'D DWGS: _ _ _ _ . . SUPPORTINB DOC:

APPROVED (GP LDR). A APPROVED (PE) /

APPROVAL FOR DESIGN IF OTHER THAN' ENGINEERING FORML DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY O REF VERBAL AUTHORIZATION O BY (GP LDR)

PROJECT COORD (GO) TRANSMITTED TO POWER PLANT ENGINEER PLANT STAFF ACTIVITIES BY _DATE BY DATE REC BY PPE: ALARA EVAL: '

IMP TO SAFETY: YES/NO TECA SAEC' REVIEW:

ENVIRONMENTAL PSRC RECOMR$NOS QUALITY EVAL: .

APPROVAL OYES ONO -

REASON FOR REJECTION:

PLANT NANAGER APPa0 VAL DATE INSTALLATION ASSIGNED TO OPLANT STAFF O GC: BY DATE PROJECT CONTROL (DC) TRANSMITTED TO INSTALLER: BY DATE INSTALLING ORGANIZATION ACTIVITIES BY DATE BY DATE RECE!VED: INSTALLATION PRELIM SIP COMPLETE:

WALKDOWN: START UP/ POST A 1-BUILTS INST TESTS COMP:

ATTACHED:

PLANT STAFF ACCEPTANCE ACTIVT. TIES BY _DATE BY DATE RECEIVED: PROJ ENG NOTIFIED:

FINAL SIP ACCEPTED PLANT MALKDOWN SUPERINTENDANT:

PLANT MANAGER FINAL APPROVAL- DATF PROJECT CONTROL (DC) TRANSMITTAL TO PROJECT iCOORD. GO: DATE ENGINEERING CLOSE-0UT ACTIVITI,ES ALL DESIGN DOCUMENTS ISSUED FOR OPERATION:

PROJ ENGINEER DATE RMS PURGED BY - RMS INDEXED BY l

,CADD 820495. 06-08-82 J0P

  • DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT PMF MINOR REVISION PMF No. Rev.

Unit No. I 2 1&2 Title

  • Important to safety or environmental' qual-ity? YES[] NO[]

Requesting Department Originator PROPOSED CHANGE: (Does this alter the intent of origina1 PMF

~

Yes No)

(Does it alter the safety or environmental quality evaluation Yes No)

(Does it alter the safety classification?

Yes No) e

/

REASON FOR CHANGE:

Authorizations: '~

GC Resident /DCPP Dept. Head Plant Manager / Engineer Date Distribution to the Plant Modification Follower , Yes No, Initial Di.stribution by:

Distributed To: Project Plant Engineer Follow-up to Rejected Minor Revision Additional Information -

Action Taken/ Remarks:

~

e t

PLANT MODIFICATION FOLLOWER FLOW CHART '

S. E ORIGINATED MOD. WITH AUTHORITY AOaWITHOUT AUTHORITY MINOR REVISION j RESIDENT ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER e o G.C. DWG. CONTROL G. C. DWG. CONTROL POWER PLANT ENGR o

S.E PROJECT ENGR.

S.E RESPONSIBLE ENGR.

o S.E)ROJECT ENGR

. N. R O.

o G.C. DWG. CONTROL ---

RESIDENT ENGINEER e

CONTRACTOR / CONSTR.

If RESIDENT ENGINEER

  • w a wh
  • G.C. DWG CONTROL

<r N. P. O.

i 1