IR 05000352/1985042

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML20140D866)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Physical Security Insp Rept 50-352/85-42 on 851028-1101.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Security Organization,Physical Protection of Safeguards Info & Status of Inspector Followup Items
ML20140D866
Person / Time
Site: Limerick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/22/1986
From: Bailey R, Keimig R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20140D851 List:
References
50-352-85-42, NUDOCS 8602030128
Download: ML20140D866 (4)


Text

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report N /85-42 Docket N License N NPF-27 Licensee: Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Facility Name: Limerick Generating Station Inspection At: Limerick, Pennsylvania Inspection Conducted: October 28 - November 1, 1985 Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: August 7, 1985 Inspector: dh_t _

< [#

R. J. Bailef/ hysical Sf/curity Inspector

/-

date Yd

' '

Approved by: _

-

/-/2 - 8

.. R. Kei g,Chgi,SafeguardsSection, date DRS Inspection Summary: Routin_e, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection on October 28 - November 1,1985 (Inspection Report No. 50-352/85-42)

Areas Inspected: Security Organization; Physical Protection of Safeguards Information; and, Status of Inspector Follow-up Item The inspection involved 32 hours3.703704e-4 days <br />0.00889 hours <br />5.291005e-5 weeks <br />1.2176e-5 months <br /> on site by one region-based inspector of which 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> were during off shift periods and 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> in the licensee's corporate offices.

Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas inspecte DR D60127 ADOCK 0500035g PDR

.

DETAILS Key Persons Contacted G. M. Leitch, Plant Manager J. Franz, Superintendent - Operations N. R. Carter, PECo Corporate Security J. A. Basilio, Administrative Engineer C. Endriss, Regulatory Engineer B. Kirkpatrick, Quality Assurance V. Warren, Test Engineer G. Lauderback, Quality Assurance J. F. Rubert, Supervisor, Quality Assurance F. Larkin, Nuclear Security Specialist P. Supplee, Administrative Assistant - Security M. V. Annast - Vice President, Nuclear, Yoh Security, In D. F. Johnson, Yoh Security, Inc. Project Manager NRC G. Kelly, Senior Resident Inspector The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel and members of the Yoh Security force contracto . MC 30703 - Exit Interview The inspector met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on November 1, 1935. At that time, the purpose, scope and results of the inspection were reviewe At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspecto . MC 92701 - Status of Inspector Follow-up Item (Closed) Inspector Follow-up Item (50-352/85-29-01): The licensee pre-viously reported to NRC Region I of finding two potential vulnerabilities in the protected area barrie The inspector determined that effective and timely compensatory security measures were taken at the time of dis-covery. During this inspection, the inspector observed that the licensee had permanently corrected the vulnerabilitie . MC 81022 - Security Organization The inspector interviewed Yoh Security, Inc. management personnel and reviewed on site security program audits, resignation / termination inter-view records of security force members and procedures for review of approved security post orders. The inspector found that the security program audits performed by members of the Performance Analysis Group

- . . __

.

'

(PAG) were very professional in terms of scope, depth, documentation .and follow-up and that corrective actions for findings were being taken in a timely manne The inspector also reviewed the contractor's system for maintaining post orders. The post orders were found to have been entered into a computer-ized system to effect easy change / modification and prompt disseminatio The system includes a tracking system to identify when post orders are due for review. Responsibility for monitoring of post orders has been assigned to the PAG Supervisor. The individual assigned to this position recently left Yoh Security; however, the on-site Yoh representative stated that his replacement would be expedited in order to preclude a decline in the effectiveness of the group. The inspector also audited the admini-strative procedures pertaining to and records of resignation and/or termination interviews of security force member No discrepancies were note In addition, the licensee stated that the Quality Assurance staff will include the Safeguards Information Protection Program into the forthcoming annual audit of the Physical Security Program. (Inspector Follow-up Item 50-352/85-42-01).

6. MC 81810 - Protection of Safeguards Information The inspector conducted a review of the Safeguards Information Protection Program and procedures maintained at the Limerick Generating Station, Limerick, Pennsylvania and at the Philadelphia Electric Company, Corporate Headquarters (PECo) located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvani This review included previous commitments made by the licensee to NRC Region I as a result of Region I's follow-up of allegations regarding the removal of potentially sensitive security drawings from the site (NRC Region I Inspection Report No. 50-352/85-34).

,

During this inspection the inspector toured each location and held l discussions with safeguards information repository managers on October 30 and 31, 1985. No violations were identified. However, the inspector identified two potential weaknesses with the protection features on a few storage cabinets in Corporate Headquarters. The licensee acknowledged these and promptly initiated action to correct the The inspector further observed that the licensee had issued a written adminsitrative procedure which established requirements for positive accountability, control, delivery, receipt and storage procedures and assurance that there were no uncontrolled avenues of entry into offices in which safeguards information was store _ _ - _ ._- . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _

.

'

The licensee committed to convening the PECo Safeguards Information Committee to conduct an annual review of the overall protection program for handling and control of Safeguards Information at both facilitie ,

I I

- _ _