ML20138F370

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Discusses Re Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation for St Lucie Units 1 & 2.Requests Review of Proprietary & non-proprietary Copies of CEOG Rept CEN-405-P,rev 2, Application of Reactor Vessel Surveillance Data
ML20138F370
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/16/1996
From: Wichman K
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Hebdon F
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
Shared Package
ML20136C539 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-96-485 TAC-M95484, TAC-M95485, NUDOCS 9609180337
Download: ML20138F370 (3)


Text

- _

s pa arrog Q - 33 3

UNITED STATES j

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o,

[

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20eeHoot

%,,,,, /

iSEP 1~6 %

MEMORANDUM TO:

Frederick J. Hebdon. Project Director Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactor Projects. I/II FROM:

O R. Wichman. Section Chief C

cFiaterial Integrity Section

/r/ Materials and Chemical Engineering Branch gp(,/Yo Division of Engineering

SUBJECT:

ST. LUCIE UNITS 1 AND 2 PRESSURIZED THERMAL SHOCK EVALUATION Plant Name:

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 License:

Florida Power and Light Company Skatus:

i on ng By letter dated May 14. 1996, the licensee submitted a pressurized thermal shock (PTS) evaluation for St. Lucie Units 1 and 2.

In addition, proprietary and non-proprietary copies of the Combustion Engineering Owner's Group (CE0G) report CEN-405-P. Revision 2. " Application of Reactor Vessel Surveillance Data for Embrittlement Management" was enclosed for NRC review and approval. By teleconference conducted on August 27. 1996, the staff suggested that the licensee submit new proprietary and non-3roprietary reports that reflect that data extracted from the power reactor em]rittlement database (PR-EDB) are

'non-proprietary.

In a memorandum to F.J. Hebdon from K.R. Wichman dated August 1. 1996, the staff described its objections to one approach proposed in the report. the margin reduction approach (HRA).

The MRA does not give a sound technical basis for the proposed reduction factors, es)ecially since the limiting material is not present in the subject or a lost reactor vessel.

In addition.

the MRA propces a methodology that is not in accordance with the PTS rule.

Therefore, the staff intends to conduct no further review on Section VI. of CEN-405-P which de cribes the MRA.

NRC FR.E CENTER COPY CONTACT:

A. Lee. NRR 415-2735 3-Upp M M W

k,.

6 09 &

3 i

O 16 Im The Materials and Chemical Engineering Branch of the Division of Engineering has reviewed the St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 PTS evaluation and has developed additional questions needed to complete its assessment.

In the Attachment.

Request for Additional Information (RAI), the staff has listed the outstanding questions.

Docket Nos.:

50-335 and 50-389

Attachment:

As stated cc:

.L. Wiens J. Strosnider DISTRIBUTION:

Central Files MMayfield EMCB RF/PF EHackett Glainas SSher.g BSheron MMitchell JHedoff G:\\ LEE \\STLUCIE.RAI

  • See Previous Concurrence To receive a copy of this document indicate in the box C= Copy'w/o aftachment/ enclosure E-Copy with attachment / enclosure N = No copy

/

OFFICE DE:EMCB*

E DE:EMCB*

C DE:EMC[,O E.

NAME Alee BElliot M[

DATE 9/11/96 9/11/96 M/d96 i

i 4

I

' h, O 16 im The Materials and Chemical Engineering Branch of the Division of Engineering has reviewed the St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 PTS evaluation and has developed additional questions needed to complete its assessment.

In the Attachment.

Request for Additional Information (RAI), the staff has listed the outstanding questions.

I Docket Nos..

50-335 and 50-389

Attachment:

As stated cc:

L. Wiens J. Strosnider DISTRIBUTION:

Central Files MMayfield EMCB RF/PF EHackett GLainas SSheng BSheron MHitchell JMedoff G:\\ LEE \\STLUCIE.RAI

  • See Previous Concurrence To receive a copy of this document. indicate in the box C-Copy w/o attachment / enclosure E-Copy with attachment / enclosure N - No copy

/

OFFICE DE:EMCB*

E DE:EMCB*

C DE:EMC[,L, E.

NAME Alee BElliot M

DATE 9/11/96 9/11/96 M//h96 I