ML20137X795

Notice of Deviation from Insp on 850923-27 & 1007-15

ML20137X795
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	11/22/1985
From:	Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137X739	List: ML20137X736 ML20137X776 ML20137X795 ML20137X819
References
50-312-85-28, TAC-60632, NUDOCS 8512100631
Download: ML20137X795 (2)

Text

.

f APPENDIX B NOTICE OF DEVIATION Sacramento Municipal Utility District License No. DPR-54 P. O. Box 15830 Docket No. 50-312 Sacramento, California 95813 As a result of the inspection during the period of September 23-27, 1985, October 7-15, 1985, and from telephone discussions held on October 18, 21, 22, 23, and 24, 1985,- and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the following deviations were identified:

A.

In your letter RJR 83-512 of June 17, 1983 you stated:

"The District will commit to provide refresher training involving use of the PASS equipment for a sufficient number of designated equipment users to insure the availability of trained personnel to support post-accident sampling requirements. The frequency of such testing / training will be every six months 25%."

Contrary to the above, training and/or refresher training of users involving the use of the PASS equipment has not been provided since April 1984.

This is a deviation.

B.

In your letter RJR-84-343 of August 30, 1984 you stated:

...The District will submit a schedule by October 26, 1984, for either an in-house design and fabrication or the procurement of vendor supplied shields to be at the Rancho Seco site."

Contrary to the above, as of the time of this inspection, on September 27, 1985, a schedule for either procurement or designing and fabrication of the shields had not been made or determined.

This is a deviation.

C.

In your letter RJR-84-343 of August 30, 1984 you stated in Section III(i):

'"...All three of the above procedures will be reworked to address the recovery of the particulate and iodine media for transport to the analysis station under normal and accident conditions of low and high activity, respectively. The District proposes the proper completion of the three procedures by October 12, 1984."

Contrary to the above, as of the date of this inspection, September 27, 1985, procedures AP.305-24, " Reactor Building Air and Stack Samples,"

AP.305-26, ~" Auxiliary Building Air and Stack Samples" and AP.305-29, "Radwaste Service Area Vent Samples" do not address the recovery of particulate and iodine media for transport to the analysis station under accident conditions.of high activity.

This is a deviation.

8512100631 851122 PDR ADOCK 05000312 G

PDR

4

+,

?

D.

In your letter RJR 84-343 of August 30, 1984, you stated in Section II(f),

"...At any rate, the district should be able to complete this research and development process and finish the installation of remote adjustment capability by September 28, 1984."

Contrary to.the above, as of September 27, 1985, the installation of the remote: adjustment capability had not started.

This is a deviation.

Please submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this notice a written statement or explanation regarding the above items,. describing corrective steps taken, the results achieved (or corrective steps that are planned), and the date when corrective action will be completed.

W. S A) / / A '

d_42: =~

Dated JW[ss A. Scaraso,' Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards s_

i 5

)

~

J

. 9 w