ML20137U419

Rev 0 to CK-MP3-04-01, Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) Programmatic Review Checklist, Corrective Actions

ML20137U419
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	04/07/1997
From:	Tom Ryan, Sheppard P SARGENT & LUNDY, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20137U214	List: ML20137U208 ML20137U225 ML20137U251 ML20137U263 ML20137U281 ML20137U305 ML20137U322 ML20137U337 ML20137U346 ML20137U358 ML20137U369 ML20137U374 ML20137U391 ML20137U398 ML20137U410 ML20137U414 ML20137U419
References
CK-MP3-04-01, CK-MP3-4-1, NUDOCS 9704160384
Download: ML20137U419 (3)

Text

_ .. ._

4 i

Northeast Utilities Millstone - Unit 3 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program l I

(ICAVP) 1 l

Programmatic Review Checidist I l

CK-MP3-04 -01, Rev. O Corrective Actions l

l l

l Prepared by: P. Siieonard

~

A/ m '

V!? 7 Name Signature // Ddte' l Approved by: T.L Ryan .

s #/7 7 Ifati Name Si[ure[

IMPLEhENTATION System Document No/Rev.

Verified by: Date:

Concurrence by: Date:

<cx-un w on.a .e. ras.1) Sheet 1 of cxxuno41. ooc '

9704160384 970411 PDR ADOCK 05000423 G PDR

___. _ _. -. . . _ - .. ~ _ . _. _ . . _ . .. __ _ _ . ._

4 s

Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-04-01 Millstone Unit 3 Systsm Document No.

. Sheet of Corrective Actions Checklist l

4 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS CONDITION REPORT EVALUATION REVIEW 4

CONDITION REPORT NUMBER ,

l

.YJS $2

1. Is the nonconforming or degraded item or activity identified?  !

2. Where applicable, is the requirement that was violated identified?

3. Has NU approved the condition report evaluation?

Does the evaluation resolve the specific identified condition adverse to 4'

guality?

1 j 5. Is the extent of the condition sufficiently determined? I

6. Is the effect of the condition sufficiently determined:

a. Does the evaluation identify the effect on items and activities? l 2 b. Have affected plant processes or procedures been sufficiently identified?

' 7. Is the cause of the condition identified?  :

8. Has the root cause been identified for Significance Level A and B issues? ' l

9. Has an apparent cause been identified for other issues identified by NU's ,

CMP or the ICAVP7 i

10. . Is the Significance Level appropriate based on the information developed during the evaluation?

11. Are preventive actions sufficiently determined?

12. Are the planned corrective actions sufficiently documented?

13. Are the planned corrective actions adequate?

14. Are those corrective actions identified as not required for restart adequatelyjustified and appropriate?

(CE.MP3#01. Rev.0, Page 2) cIKMP3041. DOC

.. . .. ~- . - - - . . . - . -. .- . - - . . . . . - - - . = - - = _ _ _ . _ . - - .

NIrtheist Utilities CK-MP3-04-01 Millstone Unit 3 System Document No.

Sheet of

-l Corrective Actions Checidist j

YES NO

15. Is the condition report evaluation sufficiently detailed?

i

16. Has a safety evaluation or screening been performed for "use-as-is" or

" repair" dispositions?

17. Is the evaluation legible and suitable as a QA Record?

18.- Are there any other problems with the condition report evaluation?.

i Describe below 1

i For any "No" items, provide the reason and any appropriate discussion. For any "No" items, which l are determined not to be a discrepancy, provide the basis.

J 2

1 Comments d

Item No. Discussion l

(CK-MP34441. Rev.8. Page 3)

C:rKMP3041. doc

.