ML20137U281

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to CK-MP3-03-11, Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) Mod Review Checklist,Seismic Qualification Checklist
ML20137U281
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 04/10/1997
From: Neri A, Tenwinkel T
SARGENT & LUNDY, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20137U214 List:
References
CK-MP3-03-11, CK-MP3-3-11, NUDOCS 9704160342
Download: ML20137U281 (17)
v • d • e


Text

_. __ _ . . . . _.. ._ __. _. .__ . - _ .

t Nonheast Utilities Millstone - Unit 3 )

i Independent Corrective Action Verification Program

(ICAVP) i Modification Review Checklist l i.

CK-MP3-03-11, Rev. 0 Seismic Oualification Checklist

]

s Mdf7

! Prepared by: J.L. h otW EL '

Name ,

Migriature Date Approved by: A A /l6X' f/M97 Name Signature Date t

IMPLEMENTATION System i Modification No/ Description Verified by: Date:

Concurrence by: Date: ,

i i

Sheet I of__

g:K-Mrsas.1.new.e)

C:CK3-0311. doc i

970416G342 970411 .'

PDR ADOCK 05000423, O PDR .,

I 1

}- 1 l

Northeast Ut!lities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System i Modification No, '

Sheet of j Seismic Qualification Review Checklist 4- j lastructions j

, This checklist shall be used for the design process document review process described in PI-MP3-02 and l for the modification review process described in PI-MP3-03.

1. The Lead Verifier shall enter the System and, if applicable, the Modification Number / Description l j on the checklist cover sheet. .
2. The Lead Verifier or Discipline Verifiers she.Il determine which components in the System or i
Modification are subject to seismic qualincation and list those components on Attachment A of l l this checklist. Note that components which are identical or similar may be grouped on  ;

i" Attachment A such that only one Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist (CSQRC) i is prepared for that group of components. Grouping in this fashion should be based not only on component similarity, but also on the Millstone seismic qualification documentation. When l

! Attachment A has been completed for the applicable System or Modification, print, sign, and date the bottom of Attachment A.

l:

i .

3. Based on Attachment A, the Lead Verifier or Discipline Verifiers shall complete a CSQRC - see j Attachment B of this checklist - for each component or group of components listed in  !

! Attachment A. Each CSQRC shall be numbered sequentially for the System or Modification as  !

) delineated in Attachment A. Ifit becomes necessary to revise the numbering sequence, f Attachment A shall be updated to agree. In completing Attachment B, the following shall bc l- observed:

)

a. An answer shall be provided to each question; no questions are to be left blank.

. b. Not Applicable (N/A) shall only be used where an "N/A" blank is provided in the i checklist.

L . .

l. c. Whenever the answer to a question is "No," nwaning that the seismic qualification i I
aspect being reviewed is unsatisfactory, a Comment No. shall be entered in the right hand column of the checklist, and a comment shall be entered on the checklist provided at the end of Attachment B. Comments shall be numbered sequentially within an
individual CSQRC. In addition, for each unsatisfactory response, the Preparer shall initiate a Dik.a.pscy Report (DR) in accordance with PI MP3 11. The DR number

{

l. shall be referenced in the comment in Attachment B.

l~

d. When the Attachment B CSQRC has been completed, the Preparer shall print, sign, and date at the end of the document in the space provided. ,

1

! 4. When all of the individual CSQRCs have been completed for a System or Modification, they 4 shall be assembled together with Attachment A and the main checklist for the lead Verifier to

) review. The lead Verifier shall then print, sign, and date the CK-MP3-03-11 cover sheet to i signify that the seismic qualification review has been completed for the applicable System or Modification. i

~

i i

(CK MP343-11,Rev.O Pese2)

CTK34311. DOC g wander %rdsak. doc 1

Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of j Attachment A i List of Components Subject to Seismic Qualification j

l

_ Attachment B Checklist No. Component No.(s) Description ,

l l

l l

l l

(Include additional sheets as necessary. Sign and date final sheet only.)

Prepared by:

Name Signature Date

- (CK-MP343-11. Ray, o, Pay 3) sN s

. . . _- ~ -- - - - .- . . . . . . . - . .

Northeast Utilities CK-MP343-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Component Seismic Qualificar.lon Review Checidist Checklist No. Component No.(s)

A. COMPONENT IDENTTFICATION Spec.: Vendor:

Description:

l Manufacturer /Model No.:

B. DOCUMENT AND SOURCE IDENTIFICATION (Identify document no. and rev. or date)

Bl. Qualification Report:

, B2. Postulated Dynamic Loads

! B3. Classification:

B4. Mounting Details:

B5. Other:

C. CONCLUSION OF REVIEW:

Accepted _ _ _ _ Rejected Commente D. REFERENCES.

DI. IEEE-344-1975 "IEEE Recommended Practices for Seisnue Quahfication of Class IE

' Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations"

02. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.61 " Damping Values for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants" DL ' NRC Regulatory Guide 1.92 " Combining Modal RP= and Spatial Components in Seismic Response Analysis" D4. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.100 "Scismic Quahfication of Electric E ppment for Nuclear Ptmer Plants" i

h - M IIo M-u.On h 4) g -_

3

. .- . .- . - . ~ . . . . . - - . . . . _ . - .. . - . . - . . . - _ - . -

NCetheast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Component Seismie Qualification Review Checklist E. CLASSIFICATION AND FUNCTION El. Classification Nuclear Safety-Related Active: Component must operate and/or remain functional:

during and aAer postulated dynamic events only after postulated dynamic events Nuclear Safety-Related Passive: The structural integrity and/or pressure integrity of the component must be demonstrated during and after postulated dymmic events. Operability '

is not required.

Non-Safety Related Seismic: Component has no safety-related function but must remain

_ intact during and aner postulated dynamic events.

E2, The component's safety-related function (s) is:

1 F. LOCATION AND MOUNTING l l

Fl. Location i 4

Building:

Elevation:

F2. Field Mountine Condition Panel / pipe /HVAC duct:

Wall / floor:

Other:

F3. Field Mountmg Method Fvpaneian anchor bolts FmhnMart anchor bolts Welding Other:

(cK.nerse 11,m.v. e, res. 5) s:N

N rtheast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Milistone Unit 3 System Modification No.

fbeet of Attachment B Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist G. REOUIRED VTBRATORY INPUT Gl. Postulated Dynamic Loads to be Considered Seismic

, Seismic and hydrodynamic Other:

G2. Frequency range associated with postulated loads:

1 G3, Postulated dynamic loads defined as: I 1

1 Response Spectra i

a. Method of combining required response spectra-1 Not applicable, only scismic loads postulated.

l Absolute sum .

SRSS l 1

b. Damping:

Upset / Service Level B Emergency / Service Level C Faulted /Senice Level D l

c. Basis for damping:

Seismic Coefficients (Required acceleration in each direction)

a. Upect/ServicelevelB: Hi . H, V
b. Emergency / Service Level C Hi H2 . V Faulted / Service LevelD (m-urse.11.anv. e, Page 6) g __

"=h I

J

9 Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT

. YES N_OQ NUMBER N/A G4. Are these dynamic loads defined at equipment mounting?

II. METHOD OF OUALIFICATION Static Analysis Test Dynamic Analysis Other:

Is the qualification method used capable of adequately demonstrating the component's ability to perform its safety function?

1. OUALIFICATION BY TESTING )

II. Does the qualification report identify the j component tested and is this component I i

identical to the component being installed?

If no, has similarity been adequately I l

demonstrated?

I

12. Mounting i

Does the qualification report identify the test mounting and does the test i

mounting simulate the actual service inounting in regard to-I

a. Mounting method (bolt or weld) l 1
b. Bolt torque requirements or a anti-loosening requuements?
c. Mounting orientation?  !

(CK-MF34-11.Rev. c.Fase 7) l s:Neos I

. l

Northeast Utilities CK-MP3 03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT YES M NUMBER &

13. Interfacine Connections and Structures Does the qualification report adequately address the effect of the following interfaces:
a. Piping?
b. Electricalconduit?
c. Instrumentation tubing?
14. Test Inout Motion Single Axis; does the qualification report adequately account for cross-coupling effectsin accordance with ,

IEEE-344-1975, Section 6.6.67 )

l Componentis rigid, no possibility of cross-coupling.  ;

i Dependent (pseudo) biaxial 19 dant biaxial iP' triaxial

15. Are the piimher of test orientations in accordance with IEEE-344-1975, Section 6.6.67 l

l (CE-N11.Rev. 4. Page s) 5:N

Northeast Utilities CK-MP343-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT YES N_O NUMBER N/A

16. Test Inout Waveform Sine Dwell (Single Frequency)
a. Does the qualification report adequately account for multimode excitation in accordance with IEEE-3441975, Section 6.6.27 Component is rigid, no possibility of multimode excitation.

b Is the sinusoidalinput

. motion applied at:

1. Frequencies spaced no further than % octave intervals.
2. Each equipment's natural frequency?
c. Is the test durationin accordance withIEEE.

3441975, Section 6.6.5 (equivalent to five OBEs and one SSE where the duration of each eventis equivalent to the duration of the strong motion portion of the SSE7) d Is the peak amplitude of

. theinput greater than or equalto the ZPA of the RRS?

i (CK.MF345-11.Ber.4.Page 9) '

g:Womsfahschse1Ldoc

- l

l i

' CK-MP3-03-11 N:stLeast Utilities  !

Millstone Unit 3 System  !

Modification No.

l Sheet of l i Attachment B l Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist I i

l COMMENT

.YES, MQ NUMBER HS Sine Beat (Single Frequency) j a. Does the qualification report adequately account for multimode excitation in accordance with IEEE-344-1975, Section 6.6.27 Componentis rigid,

]

no possibility of 1 mnitimode excitation.

b. Are the sine beats applied at:
1. Frequencies spaced no further than % octave intervals.
2. Each equipment's natural frequency?
c. Is there a sufficient pause between application of beats (at any one frequency)to avoid superposition of equipment response motion?
d. Is the test duration in accordance withIEEE-344-1975, Section 6.6.5 (equivalent to five OBEs ,

and one SSE where the duratma ofeach eventis equivalent to the duraten of the strong motion portion of the SSE)?

(m-Mrs.as-11.Rev. e, rese 10) s:en h 9

Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of i

. Attachment B l Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT M M NUMBER N/A

c. Is the peak amplitude of 1 the input greater than or equal to the ZPA of the RRS? _

J Random Motion (Mutilfrequency)

a. Is the input motion controlled usicg %

J octave or narrower bandwidth filters?

b. Is the amplitude of the input controlled 4

such that:

1. The peak amplitude

, of the inputis greater than or equal to the ZPA of the RRS.

2. The TRS envelopes j the RRS?

t

c. Is the duration of the test input in accorrlance with IEEE-344-1975, Section 6.6.5 (equivalent to five OBEs and one SEE where the duration ofeach eventis equrvalent to the duration of the strong motion portion of the SSE but is not less than 15 second)?
17. Dynanuc Characteristics Naturalfrequencies not determinad

@MP343-11.Esv. 8. Page Il) g _

.m a

. - . ... _ _ . . - . . . - . -. .. _ _ _ , . = . _ _ _ -

N:rtheast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 I

, Millstone Unit 3 System

Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT YES M NUMBER E Natural frequencies:

Ha H2 V

These frequencies were determined via:

Sine Sweep, frquency range j

input acceleration l

sweep rate Other:

1

18. Normal Operating Conditions Does the qualification report adequately address the following normaloperatingloads:

Electrical Loads?

ll MechanicalImds?

'Ihermal Leeds?

1 Pressure?

Operating vibration?(rotating equipment) i i

(M.MP343-11. Rev. 8. Page 12) s:pah

. . - - . ~ . - = - ._- . . -. _ - . . - .

i Northeast Utliities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist COMMENT YES NO NUMBER N/A

19. Monitoring
a. Was the monitoring of the component adequate to evaluate its performance? .
b. Was the operability of the component verified?
c. Did the component's performance satisfy functional requirements?

110. Discosition oftest Anomalies Have all test anomatics been adequately dispositioned? _

J. QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS J1. Type of Analysis Static Analysis Simplified Dynamic Analysis Response Spectrum Analysis l

1 Titne History Analysis i i

Other: I J2. Analytical Model Finite Element Other:

(CK-MP34s-11. Rev. e, Page 13) passtenuesakadao

Northeast Utilities CK-MP343-11 Millstone Unit 3 System

. Modification No.

Sheet of

., Attachment B Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist 1

[QF. MENT Xf4 E! EMEB E4 J3. Method of Analysis

! Computer-Aided Calculation 4

a. Programs used:
b. Is there evidence that the programs used have been validated?

Yes No Hand Calculation 1 J4. Operating Loads i

i Does the qualification report adequately address the following i normal operatingloads?

a. Piping nozzle reactions?

! b. Electricalconduit reactions?

c. Pressure?
d. Thermal expansion?
e. Startup torque for rotating equipment?

~

J5. Static /Simphfied Dynamic Analysis  !

l

a. Is the analysis method usedjustified in I accordance with the guidelines established 4

by NRC Regulatory Guide 1.100, Section Cl?

j (M.MF34311.Eer. 8, Fuge 14) g -_ ==h i  %

. - . .- -. . - - . . - _ . _ . - . - . _ . . . ..= . . . . - _ . - . _

i N:rtheast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 I

Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

4 Sheet of Attachment B Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist

.C.Q,MMENT l YE.E 5,Q NUMBER E!/A

b. Do the seismic coefficients used in the j analysis envelope the required input postulated to occur at the equipment base?
c. Are the seismic coefficients applied in l cach of the three orthogonal directions  !

simultaneously?

i J6. Resoonse Socctra Modal Analysis j

a. Do the response spectra used in the analysis envelop the RRS?
b. Does the model used adequately I represent the equipment's:
1. Mass distribution? i
2. Stiffness characteristics?
3. Boundaryconditions?
c. Is the cutoff frequency for the analysis adequate to ensure that the effect of all significant modes is considered?
d. Is the method of combining modal responses in accordance with NRC RegulatoryGuide 1.927 ,

J7. Results I

a. Are the correct allowable stresses identined?
b. Does the analysis demonstrate that all stresses are below the allowable?
c. Does the analysis adequately assure operabdity by dan-eratir4 that all dedections/ clearances are within the allowables?

(m-Mrse-11,ase.e, Page 15) s w ah

_._ . . . _ , . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ .. . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . .. . - ~ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ -

N rtheast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11

. Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist t

i COMMENT yIE HQ NUMBER N/A 1

K. DESIGN REOUIREMENTS/ CONSTRAINTS l Kl. Does the qualification report identify any

design requirements / constraints which t need to be implemented by parties other
than the supplier (and/or his subcontractor,if any)? __ ,

If no, go to Section L.

e Ifyes, list these requirements /constratuts in the comments section and provide

, references. Then complete Item K2.

K2. Are these design requirements /

mostraints incorporated (as applicable)

. in the:

a. Design Change Documents for existing configurations?

Ifyes, specify in the comments section.

b. appropnate design documents (including vendor drawings) for new or i = alternate replacement components or new construction within the design scope?

L. DOCUMENTATION L1. Does the qualification report define all e

input data and sammytions? __

L2. Does the report indicate that it has been

reviewed and approved by the origmating 1

orgam anan?

3 L3. For test reports-

a. Is the test facility idenhned?

~

b. Is the tat ecluipinent along with date of last calibration utentified? i l

i

. (cE-Mrse-11.ase.e roseis) )

s s w ah '

I i

Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-03-11 Millstone Unit 3 System Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist i

COMMENT YES EQ NUMBER M

c. Is the report complete (i.e., no pages missing)?

i M

E l

I i

l I

Prepared by:

Name Signature Date 1

j s

(cK-Mr54511. Rev. 6, Page 17) e nu

Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-0311 Millstone Unit 3 System j Modification No.

Sheet of Attachment B Component Seismic Qualification Review Checklist l

Comment No. Comment 2

4 4

i l

l l

l 1

4 4

d 1

Attach additional pages as necessary.

(cK-Mne.11, new. e. Page Is) v;. ' _ ' ' a dmo

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20137U281&oldid=2935969"