ML20137U337
| ML20137U337 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 04/11/1997 |
| From: | Tom Ryan, Schopfer D SARGENT & LUNDY, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137U214 | List: |
| References | |
| CK-MP3-04-02, CK-MP3-4-2, NUDOCS 9704160364 | |
| Download: ML20137U337 (10) | |
Text
.
1 I
Northeast Utilities Millstone - Unit 3 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP)
Programmatic Review Checklist CK-MP3-04-02, Rev. 0 1
Channe Process Review
.#d/f7 Prepared by:
T T Muan
- c -
Sigtur[
6/e Name d
Approved by: DE 6cb pkSV "2h,~%
4-//-97 Name Signatur/
I I
Date s
IMPLEMENTATION Change Process:
Verified By:
Date:
Concurrence By:
Date:
(CK-MP3 0442, Rev. 0, Page!)
Sheet 1 of C;TK0402. DOC 9704160364 970411
4 N:rthecst Utilities CK-MP3-04-02 Millstone Uzit 3 Cha:ge Process Sheet of Change Process Review Checklist Programmatic Review Checklist CK-M P3-04-02 Channe Process Review Change Process-Procedure No.
General Review Questions lhese questions should he answeredfor all change processes.
(if a question is not applicable to the partictdar change process, indicate the reason)
A.
Change Initiation 1.
Is an evaluation done to determine if the change involves an unreviewed safety question (10CFR 50.59 review)?
yes no n/a 2.
Is a control form used to document required reviews and approvals of the change?
yes no n/a B.
Change Resoonsibilities 1.
Is the organization or person responsible for processing the change identified?
yes no n/a 2.
Is the organization or person responsible for reviewing the change identified?
yes no n/a 3.
Are the methods for performing the design review identified and documented to an extent consistent with safety, complexity, standardization, state of the art and similarity wit! proven designs?
yes no n/a 4.
Is responsibility established for final approval of the change and, when applicable, its j
installation?
yes no n/a 5.
Is there a controlled process for identifying, reviewing, and approving design input requirements (if applicable)?
yes no n/a (CK-MP34442 Rev.O,Page2)
CTK0402. DOC
-~
.. -. - ~.-. - ~~..-.
- 4 Northmst Utilities.
CK-MP3-04-02
. Millstone Utit 3 -
Chinge Process Sheet of Change Process Review Checklist
' 6.
Is responsibility established, if applicable, for requesting approval of the NRC per 10CFR50.59 or 10 CFR50.90 (Technical Specification or license changes) and are hold points established for how far installation may progress before this approval is obtained?
yes no n/a C.
Change Imolementation 1.
Are personnel affected by the change required to be trained in the applicable procedure when determined necessary by the responsible authority?
yes no n/a 2.
Is the review of the change commensurate with the original review?
yes no n/a
' 3.
Are channels of communication between involved organizations and individuals defmed and is the transmittal of design information between organizations formal?
yes no n/a 4.
Does the process require the identification and revision of affected FSAR/ licensing documentation?
yes no n/a D.
Change Documentation -
1.
Are controls in place for revisions to change documents?
I yes no __
n/a 2.
Is a method established for as-built mark-ups of affected design documentation on an interim basis including appropriate review and approval?
yes no n/a
)
3.
'Is'a program in place to direct users to this interim documentation for testing, maintenance, and future plant change activities until revised documentation is officiallyissued?
yes
'no n/a 4.
Is the incorporation and release of marked-up changes on revised documents required in a timely manner?
yes no n/a
- (CK-MPJ4442, Rev. 0, Page3)
CTK0402. Doc.
m NIrtheat Utilities CK-MP3-04-02 Millstone Uzit 3 Chinge Process Sheet of Change Process Review Checklist 5.
Is there assurance that the documentation of the design and review process including important steps taken during the process such as sources of design input which support the fmal design is transmitted to records storage?
yes no n/a Process Specific Questions These questions apply to a particidar change process.
(answer only those questionsfor the process under review as indicated on page 1)
Drawings / Specifications 1.
Are design inputs (e.g. Calculations) reviewed and approved prior to document issue or, if not, are reviews complete before relying upon the item to perform a safety function?
yes no 2.
Are the same industry codes used as in the original document preparation or is an appropriate reconcilliation perfonned?
yes no Calculations 1.
Are the same codes and Owner's Requirements used as in the original design or, if either is changed, is a design reconciliation performed per Regulatory Guide 1.33, IWA-7200(c) and NCA-35547 yes no 2.
Are other design documents such as drawings or other calculations which are affected by the calculation revision identified?
yes-no 3.
If engineering judgment is used, is the basis for the judgment required to be clearly specified?
yes no 4.
Is a checklist used for the technical review of the calculation or is the review documented consistent with safety, etc.?
yes no 5.
Are calculations that are prepared by an outside vendor / contractor approved by NU?
yes no (CK-MP3-04-02,Rev.O Paged)
CTK0402. DOC
.. _ ~.
i Northeast Utilities CK-MP3-04-02 Millstone Urlt 3 Cht:ge Process Sheet of Change Process Review Checklist t
I Procedures
- 1. - Is an engineering review required for a change in setpoints?
yes no
)
2.
Are user organizations requested to comment on a procedure under preparation / revision?
yes no 3.
Is an engineering review required in conjunction with changes in maintenance i
procedures involving the following:
1 l
- Torque values and sequences
- Compressible gaskets
- Disassembly / Assembly sequences
- Number of heat exchanger plugged tubes
- Equipment vibration limits
- Emironmental(EQ) limits
)
yes no if no, identify item (s)
J 4.
For non-routine procedures is an applicability review performed periodically (say j
every two years) or before use if the procedure has not been used or reviewed? This applicability review should be performed to determine if changes are necessary.
yes no 5.
Is there a requirement that applicable commitments (e.g., current licensing basis, other licensing commitments, INPO, etc.) are met by the procedure or appropriately dispositioned?
i yes no 6.
Is there a requirement that procedures specify proper plant and system conditions and that licensing requirements such as LCOs are met?
yes no-Temporary Alteration.s 1.
Is shift supervisor approval required for installation or Igmoval of a temporary alteration?
yes no (CLMP3-0442,Rev.O Page5)
C:CK0402. DOC
N:rtheast Utilities CK-MP3-04-02 Millstone Ulit 3 Chuge Process Sheet of Change Process Review Checklist 2.
Is there an independent verification o_t functional test for temporary alterations after they are installed and removed 9 yes no 3.
Is a record (log) kept for each temporary alteration which includes the period of time it is expected to be in place?
yes no 4.
Is training required for operators and supenisors on the impact on system operation s
ofinstalled temporary alterations when determined necessary by the responsible authority?
yes no 5.
Is there a means for reviewing the continued need of a temporary alteration and restricting the installed duration to a reasonable time period ( 3 months normal, not to exceed 6 months)?
yes no 6.
Are temporary alterations clearly identified (tagged)?
yes no 7.
Are instructions provided for the operation of equipment which is temporarily modified; i.e. are appropriate revisions made to affected procedures and/or drawings?
yes no 8.
Are periodic checks (monthly) made ofinstalled temporary alterations to verify they are tagged and in good condition?
yes no Modifications 1.
Is the effect of the modification on the following topics considered:
-PRA
- Fire Protection / Appendix R
- HELB/MELB
- Setpoints
- Station Blackout
- Environmental Review
- Radiological Environmental Resiew
- Seismic Qualification
- Equipment Qualification (EQ)
(CK-MP.144-02. Rev. O, Page6)
CXK0402. DOC
N rtheast Utilities CK-M P344-02 Millstone Unit 3 Chrge Process Sheet of Change Process Review Checklist
- Security
-ALARA yes
- no_,
ifno, identify item (s) 2.
Is there a requirement to revise afTected maintenance, insenice inspection, and testing requirements for new or altered components or equipment?
yes no 3.
Are operating procedure revisions made prior to declaring a modification operable?
yes no 4.
Is training conducted for operation and maintenance of modified components and equipment prior to pt ing into senrice?
yes no 5.
Is responsibility assigned for identification of applicable post-modification testing requirements other than ASME Section XI insenice testing ?
yes no 6.
Is post-modification acceptance testing required to be performed (if applicable)?
yes no 7.
Are test results evaluated for acceptance prior to declaring the modification operable?
yes no 8.
Are vendor manual updates initiated if the modification affects the contents of the manual?
yes no biinor Modification _s 1.
Are the following required to catgorize the change as a minor modification:
- No change to licensing or design basis
- No effect on emergency operating procedures
- No effect on technical specifications
- No complex calculations or engineering design required yes no if no, identify item (s)
(CK Ml"J-0&O2, Rev. O, Page7)
C0CK0402.D0C
.. _ ~
. = _ -
Northeist Utilities CK-MP3-04-02 Millstore Udt 3 Change Process Sheet of Change Process Review Checklist t
4 1
2.
Flas a prior review determined that, due to the nature of the modification, some or all of the reviews / evaluations needed for modifications above are not applicable?
t yes no Licensing 1.
Are appropriate criteria established defining when a licensing change (operating license or Technical Specification) should be initiated?
yes no 2.
Is a "No Significant llazards " analysis done for proposed licensing changes?
yes no 3.
Are required changes to the FSAR and supporting or other licensing documents identified?
i
.yes no 4.
When required, was the proposed Technical Specification or operating license change or unreviewed safety question submitted to the NRC for review?
yes no 5.
Are provisions made for the revision of surveillance requirements and procedures j
affected by an operating license amendment such as a change to Technical Specifications?
yes no 6.
Are revisions made to the Updated FSAR within 6 months of each refueling outage 1
(but not more than every 2 years)?
yes no 7.
Is a process established for sceening safety evaluations and NRC correspondence to identify changes to the FSAR7 yes no i
i Vendor Manuals l.
Is a procedure in place for incorporating industry / plant experience notices into vendor manuals as appropriate?
yes no i
?.
(CK-MPJ-04 42 Rev. G. Page8)
CXK0402. DOC k
Northe st Utilities CK-MP3-04-02
' Millstone U11t 3 Change Process Sheet of Change Process Review Checklist 2.
Are vendor manuals updated to incorporate the effects of modi'ications? Is concurrence obtained from the vendor for such updates, when required?
yes no 3.
Is there a process for identifying deficiencies in vendor manuals and obtaining appropriate updates?
_yes no 4.
Are vendor recommendations pursued through the use of VETIP for the NSSS
. vendor and contact with the suppliers of other key safety-related components per NRC Generic Letter 90-03, and are the recommendations incorporated into appropriate plant procedures? If not, is the basis for deviation documented?
yes no 5.
Are vendor drawings maintained as part of the manual? If not, is there cross reference between vendor drawing files and the appropriate manual?
yes no 6.
Is there a mechanism for assuring that vendor information which is recieved is forwarded to the appropriate plant department?
yes no j
Like-for-Like Replacements.
1.
Is an evaluation of acceptability required for deviation of the following:
- size j
- materials
- model number
- lubricant
- bolting material -
- manufacturer yes no if no, indicate item (s) 2.
Is an evaluation required for use of" manufacturer's equivalent"?.
J yes no 1
(CK-MP34442. Rev. O, Pagr9)
C:CK0402. DOC
Nrrtherst Utilities CK-MP3-04
- Millstone Ucit 3 Chinge Proccss Sheet of Change Process Review Checklist I
' Comments For any "no " Items, provide the reason and any appropriate discussion.' For any "no"
^ items which are determined not to be a discrepancy, provide the basis.
Item Na Discussion a
(CK-MP34442.Rev 0,Pagel0) _
CXK0402. DOC