ML20137M237
| ML20137M237 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 07/26/1985 |
| From: | Madsen E, Miller W, Randazzo T DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137M235 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-850726, NUDOCS 8509130177 | |
| Download: ML20137M237 (48) | |
Text
r- ,
i SP
' 1703.02 (N; Safety Classification V
FERMI 2 PROCEDURE - EMERCENC) PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE TITLE: PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDELINES RECOMMENDATIO!.S PROCEDURE NUMBER: EP-545 REVISION NUMBER: 1 IN'h.0RMATION ONLY Name of preparer: E. F. Madsen ev ed b : D :e: [ M s'/ U I I Reviewed / concurred by: W. E. Miller /s/ Dace:07/26/85 Supv - Operational Assurance Approved by: 7 he Date: 0 87 Responsible Section.Ilead or 0@U! ember / Alt / I Further Approval Required for Safety-Felated or Superintendent-Designated Procedures: ,
1-Recoc:: ended tv: , 'R. S. Lenart /s/ I te:07/26/85 waav we..irman/ Alternate Approved by: _
R. S. Lenart / 's/ c .-t07/26/85 Superintendent - Nuclear Production The fo11ovini, approved pacedure Change Requests are incorporated in this revision: M3626 This revision [\ does j.l does not constitute periodic review.
cr <
nMrfdhDm m
--* / , _,,,,,,,,p
,,,&svs.c 2ge.I P A f'd {i r :t r3 R!. 3 01983 e 9... -
w
. _ . ,t e ,,_
Rf*TWlENTE ,
\ ~~***~~"; YW _ hb..
. l
.< I:
o .1 1. s
1
. EP-545 O ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC PdWER PLANT UNIT No. 2 TYPet EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING FROCEDURE
Title:
PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDELINES RECOMMENDATIONS Prepared by R. F. Madsen 7-6-83 Date Recommended by ~ e M '/-N f CommunicponSystemDivispo Date Recommended by b/f,73 VCosmiunity & CMernment Affaire Date i Recosmended by
" r\ (( ' t< f7p% 8 / T ! b "I
( M t'e
~
' censing L Recommended by C/ ' edical Staff' '
4pMf/
Date Recommended by :w , [T-/3 Nuclear Administratio Date Recommended by #p ~M 'I3 i NuoyarProduction ,
Date Reconnended by ja .
E '/h - (3
\ Nuclear Timining '
Date 1.
Recommended by c' h -@ .h 5
~
F lic InformatioY. Date Recommended b 3k %~bD Security \) Date Recommended by 7 3
- IWayne-Monfoe Division Date
' Date
-Revision No. RERP Comittee Chairperson A307tved Date 1 y l (vg V OT 1 .: .e fT -,
T l 7 i O I loo /RRRP9 )
J
+
EP-545 Rev. 1 O
V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0' Purpose........................................... 1 2.0 References........................................ 1 3.0 Entry Conditions.................................. 2 4.0 Ceneral Information............................... 2 5.0 Immediate Actions................................. 4 6.0 Follow up Actions................................. 9 Enclostares
, Protective Action Recommendation Flowchart (Table 5.1) (071985)............... Enclosure 1 Representative Shielding Factors from Ga==a Cloud Source (Table 5.2) (071985)...... Enclosure 2 Representative Shielding Factors for
,,-s Surf ace Deposited Radionuclides
(,,) (Table 5.'3) (071985)......................... Enclosure 3 1
g ,Gu,idelines for Protection Against
' ilngesrien of Contamination for the Of f-Site Public (Table 5.4) (071985)......... Enclosure 4 Summary ef Pos:ible Off-Site Protective Actions to be Recommended or Implemented During an Emergency (Table 5.5) (071985)..... Enclosure 5 Summary of Evacuation Times (Table 5.6)
(071985)........................... ......... Enclosure 6 Distribution of 1980 Population in Emerge,cey Planning Zone Rings and Sectors, Monroe and Wayne Counties,Hichigan (Table 5.7) (071985). Enclosure 7 p
Distribution of Preliminary 1980 Population in 10-to-50 Mile area around Fermi 2 4
(Table 5.8) (071985)......................... Enclosure 8
, l
'100/RERP9/3.0
. () 072285 s.
a m ,
1 EP-545
. Rev. 1
<-~ l LJ TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd) 10 Mile Emergency Planning Zone (Figure 5.1) (071985)........................ Enclosure 9 Inhalation S.ielding Factors for a Wood House, Snug Doors, Closed Windows (Thyroid)
(Figure 5.2) (071985)........................ Enclosure 10 Schools within the 10 mile Emergency Planning Zone (Figure 5.3) (071985)................... Enclosure 11 Hospitals and Institutions within the 10 mile Emergency Planning Zone (Figure 5.4) (071985) Enclosure 12 Recreational "reas within the 10 mile Emergency Pla 'ng Zone (Figure 5.5)
(071985).... ............................... Enclosure 13 Dairy Farms a chin 10-mile EPZ (Figure 5.6) (J71985)........................ Enclosure 14 0
O
EP-545 Rev. 1 Page 1 m
d 10 Purpose This prccedure provides guidelines for determining protective actions for the general public to be recommended to the appropriate state and local authorities in the event of a radiological emergency.
CAUTION This procedure provides PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS. The authority and responsibility for the selection and implementation of off-site response options rests fully with the appropriate state and local authorities. Detroit Edison Company has no authority with respect to imposing protective response options beyond the boundaries of its site.
2.0 References 2.1 Use References 1 2.1.1 Manual Calculation of Off-S' ' Radiological Dose Rates
, and Doses - Airborne Release - (EP-540) 2.1.2 Manual Off-Site Dose Assessmert Calculational Procedure
- Waterborne Releases (EP-541)
O' s_,4 2.1.3 Micro Computer Off-Site Dose Assessment Calculational Procedure - Airborne Releases (E'-542) 2.1.4 Computer Dose Assessment Calculational Procedure -
Waterborne Releases (EP-543) 2.1.5 Meteorological Data Assesse nt (EP-544) 2.1 6 Manual Calculation of Dose y steent Factor for Lake Breeze Conditions (EP-548) -
2.2 Source References ,
2.2.1 Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2. Radiological Emergency Response Preparedness Plan, Section J.
(Protective Response) (EPA-99) 2.2.2 Hanual of Protective Action Guides and Protective
- Actions for Nuclear Incidents, EPA-520/1-75-001 Sept 1975, Revised June 1979 2.2.3' Estimate of Evacuation Times, Larico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2, PRC Voorhies, Retised Virch, 1982.
(v(
r- R EP-545
- Rev. 1 Page 2 3
3.0 Entry Conditions 3.1 SITE AREA EMERGENCY has been declared and situation degrading.
3.2 GENERAL DIERGENCY has been declared.
4.0 General Information 4.1 Discussion In a nuclear emergency, an estimate is made of the radiation dose which affected population groups may potentially receive. The dose estimate is called the projected potential or projected actual dose. A protective action is an action taken to avoid or reduce the effects of this projected dose when the benefits derived from such action are sufficient to offset any undesirable features or results of the protective action. The Protective Action Guideline (PAG) is the level at which the projected dose
. to individuals in the population warrants taking protective action. A PAG 1evel under njt circumstance implies an acceptable dose. It is used only to minimize the risk from an event which is occurring or has already occurred.
This procedure is a guide for determining recommended protective Since it is impossible to cover all potential situs-O actions.
tions, the judgement of the person responsible for recommending protective actions shall take precedence over the requirements of this procedure. However, since the protection of the general public is the ultimate concern, protective actions less stringent than those required by the procedure should be recommended only if constraints make the required actions a greater hazard to public health.
4.2 PAGs for the Plume Exposure Pathway PAGs for the general population for whole body external asama radiation dose and for thyroid- dose from inhalation of
. radioactive material in an airborne plume are as follows:
Projected Whole Body Caama Dose 1 - 5 Rea Projected Thyroid Dose 5 - 25 Rem PACS for the general public are given in ranges. Protective actions enould be implemented when the lower level PAC values are exceeded unless constraints (such as severe weather conditions) make the proposed actions impractical. When the upper level PAC values are expected to be exceeded, every reasonable effort should be made to evacuate the affected area.
(:J> 1
EP-545 Rev. 1 Page 3 O
Q For purposes of recommending p?otective actions, in the immediate vicinity of the plant, the minimta area af f ected shall be assumed to be a 2-mile radius around the plant and the downwind plume centerline sector and a 22.5* sect-r on either side, to 5 miles.
4.3 PAGs for the Ingestion Pathway are as follows:
PAGs for the general population for the injestion exposure pathway (Section 5.4) are for two levels of response (based on infant thyroid).
Preventative Whole Body 0.5 Rem Thyroid 1.5 Rem Emergency Whole Body 5 Rem Thyroid 15 Rem Preventive PAG .oplicable to situations where protective actions causing mir.imal impact on the food supply are appropri-ate. A preventative PAG establishes a level at which responsible officials should take protective action to prevent or reduce the concentration of radioactivity in food or animal feed.
Emergency PAG - applicable to situations where protective actions of great impact on the food supply are justified because of the f-$ projected health hazards. An emerfency PAG establishes a level
. s,,j at which responsib'.e officials should isolate food containing radioactivity to prevent its introduction into commerce, and at which the responsible officials must determine whether condemna-tion or another disposition is appropriate.
4.4 Responsibilities and Authorities 4.4.1 If the Technical Support Ceater (TSC) and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) are not operational, the Shi't Technical Advisor will perform all necessary calculations and will advise the Emergency Director on
,~ protective action recommendations. The Emergency Director is responsible for recommending protective actions to state and local authorities, as appropriate.
4.4.2 If the TSC is operational, but the EOF is not opera-tional, the Radiation Protection Advisor will be responsible for all calculations and will advise the Emergency Director on protecr.ive action recommenda-tions. The Emergency Director.is responsible for recommending protective actions to the state and local auf.orities, as appropriate.
. _ . - - - - ~ . - . - . - - . ..... -. -... . -=.. . - . . . .-
+
Rev. 1 1
. Page 4 k l 4.4.3 If the EOF is operational, the Radiation Protectior. l
. Coordinator will be responsible for all calculations l 1 and will advise the Emergency Officer on protective action recommendations. The Emergency Officer is i responsible for recommending protective actions to the i state and local authorities.
l
. 5.0 Immediate Actions l 5.1 Declaration of a SITE AREA EMERGENCY 3 Enter Section 5.2 and initiate consideration of PAG recommenda-tions to reduce evaluation time when GENERAL EMERGENCY is
- declared.
i 5.2 Declaration of GENERAL EMERGENCY j o Immediately recommend the minimum protective action:
! SHELTER 2-MILE RADIUS i SHELTER 5-MILE THREE DOWh%'IND SECTORS o If Table 5.1, Protective Action Recommendation Flow Chart I l
(Enclosure 1), has been evaluated and a more stringent recommendation is required, include with intial j notification. ]
o Recommend access control.
o Notification of these recommendations to the appropriate state and local authorities must be made within 15 mir>;tes i
cf the declaration.
i 5.3 PACS and Recommended Protective Actions - Enclosure 1 Table 5.1 lists the PAGs and the recommended protective actions for the plume exposure pathway. The actions are classified in two categories:
4
! o The projected potential or projected actual integrated dose i pathway that could be received by the population-at-risk i over an 8-hour period (default value) if no ' protective l actions are implemented. 1
, o The core melt sequence (core / reactor coolant system /
i containment status) pathway for rapidly escalating
. scenarios. Some examples of these sequences are i
1 l
Transient (e.g.', loss of offsite power) plus failure of requisite core shut down systems (e.g., scram) that .
! could lead to core melt in several hours with contain-
! ment failure likely; more severe consequences if pump -
I '() trips do not function.
l l
i L_
~
l EP-545 Rev. 1 Page 5 v?t Small or large Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCAs) witt failure of Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) to per -
form leading to core degradation or melt in minutes to hours; loss of containment integrity may be imminent.
Small or large LOCA occurs and ECCS performance is unsuccessful affecting longer term success of the con--
tainment which could lead to core degradation or melt in several hours with loss of containment boundary.
Shutdown occurs but requisite decay heat removal sys-tems (e.g., RHR) or non-safety systems heat removal means are rendered unavailable leading to core degrada-tion or melt in about ten hours with subsequent con-tainment f ailure.
Any major internal or external event (e.g., fires, earthquakes, substantially beyond desigt basis) which could cause massive common damage to plant systems resulting in any of the above.
5.4 Information/ Data Input Information/ Data Input for use of Table 5.1 o Plant Status and prognosis O o Dose Projections (if available)
Projection based on duration of release or projected duration of release (if available) at Site Boundary, 2, 5, and 10 miles. (A release of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> or less is censidered a puff) 8-hour projection at Site Boundary, 2, 5, and 10 miles (default value if duration not available)
Potential or Actual Release Projected time of release (if available) o Local meteorological conditions (Fermi 2 tower) o Presence of lake breeze (if lake breeze is present, the dose rates and doses will be increased by a Dose Adjustment Factor) o Downwind sectors affected (plume center,1ne plus 22.5' sector on either side) o Estimated time of arrival of plume o Weather forecast at 6 hour6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> intervals for next 12 to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />
[J'1 u (Weather Services International)
EP-545 Rev. 1 Page 6 o Radiological Emergency Team (RET) field measurements (if
- available) o Environmental sample results (if available) o The above information and PAGs should be updated at a miniaua every 15 to 30 minutes or whenever significant 1 changes in plant status, release rates, or meteorology occur.
o Field surveys should be conducted to confira dose projec-tions. If these surveys are available at the time a recom-sendation is made, they should be considered together with the dose projection.
If precipitation is reported, field surveys shall be taken immediately to confira dose projection data. However, a protective action recommendation shall not be delayed until results are reported.
Ingestion pathway PAGs can be recommended for the 10- and o
50-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) based on environmental sa=pling and actual release of radiciodines and particulates.
o Enclosures 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 covering the evacuation -
\ subareas and locations of schools, hospitals, institutions, recreational areas and dairies within the 10-mile EPZ should be used as aids in conjunction with Enclosure 1 and the
, evacuation time estimates presented in Enclosure 6. $.
o Reca==end access control to any area shere either sheltering or e vacuation has been implemented.
5.5 Plume Expcsure Pathway 5.5.1 Ivacuation Effectiveness Tue effectiveness of evacuation in limiting radiation dose is a function of the time required to evacuate.
i NO.*E : Whenever possible, evacuation takes place on routes perpendicular to the plume centerline. }
A map of the 10-mile EPZ should be used as reference.
J
- 1. Estimated Evacuation Time T(EV) is expressed ast
.T(EV) = T(pt) + T(EC) + T(Iy)
Where:
e T(EV) = Time required to evacuate population-O at-risk, hours and minutes
. . _ _ _ . . . _ - . _ . .~. . _ . _ __ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - . - - _
EP-545 Rev. 1 Page 7 Time Delay af ter occurrence of the T(D1) incident associated with interpretation of ;
data, decision to evacuate, and notifi-
- cation of responsible offsite authorities, hours and minutes (use 30 minutes as '
default value) l1 T(EE) = Evacuation time estimate for subarea (s involved from Enclosures 9 and 6 (Enclo-sures 7 and 8 provide population data by sector and sile radii), hours and minutes j
i T(Iy) = Time required for responsible of fsite authorities to independently verify dose projections, make recommendations and notify the general public, hours and 1 minutes.
1 T(Iy) = 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> NOTE: is optional and the T(gy)is time estimated based on past i experience with responsible offsite authorities.
- 2. Estimated Plume Arrival Time
- Plume Arrival Time, T(PA) is expressed as
T(PA) = T(B) + T(T)
! Where:
k T(B) = Time projected before release
- begins, hours and minutes, if known. i i T(T) = Time projected from start of release for plume travel for given wind speed (WS aph) and downwind distance (D,1)
T(T) = D(si)
- S(aph)
- 3. Evacuation Constraints j Compare the estimated evacuation time, T(EV)*
i with the estimated plume arrival time, T(PA)*
to determine if there are constraints against i reconsending evacuation. ,
i 4
. . . . , _ - , , - ~ w - , , , - . , - - - -w-+ ,w .- , 4 -- .,,- - -. . . , , . -, ,_..%. ., . . . + , - - . - - . . . . - , ,r - , - . , > + - , . - . . w
. Rev. 1 Page 8 3 O 5.5.2 Sheltering Effectiaeness o In cases where there is no time to evacuate prior to arrival of the plume, or where the projected evacuation time and time before plume arrival are nearly equal, evaluate the benefits of sheltering versus evacuating and being overtaken by the passing plume.
o If evacuation cannot be carried out in sufficient time to offer significant dose avoidance, reco: mend that officials warn the population-at-risk to seek shelter, close windows, seal cracks in doors with wet rags, and turn off ventilation systems with external intakes.
o Consider the following information for sheltering effectiveness.
Shielding factors from external gamma rays for individuals in various types of structures vary widely. These factors for external whole body gamma dose are presented in Enclosure 2. To be conservative assume a shielding factor of 0.9 for residences and 1.0 (no benefit) f or a closed vehicle.
Multiply the projected dose by the external shielding factor to determine the reduction in external ga=ma dose from the plume. Com-pare the projected dose to the PAG for whole body gam = dose.
Shielding factors for an inhalation sge are presented in Enclosure 3. Shielding factors are for a sealed, wood-frame house.
Multiply the projected dose by the inhalation shielding far.6er to determine the reduction in inhalation dose (thyroid) from the plume.
Compare the projected dose to the PAG for thyroid dose.
For final evaluation of sheltering effective-ness, determine whether the whole body or thyroid is the critical organ of ecacern.
o Af ter the plume has passed the sheltered area, ground deposition should be evaluated to determine whether dose rates are sufficient to warrent subsequent evacuation if significant radiolodines and particulates have been released.
O -
t
r i
EP-545 Rev. 1 Page 9 5.6 Ingestion Pathway Enclosure 4 lists Pads for the ingestion pathway and should be considered if significant quantities of radioiodines or particu-lates are released. Environmental sample analysis should be used to confirm these levels.
Enclosure 14 shows the dairy feras within the 10-mile EPZ for use with Enclosure 4 for milk pathway.
6.0 Follow-up Actions
- 6.1 Protective Action Recommendations Continue to evaluate until pre *.ective action recom=endations are no longer required.
Enclosure 5 is a summar of_off-site protective actions recommended for the pos accident / recovery phase of the emergency.
O 4
0
+
O .
m p i IIII jaii
'W,!
d O ? 8 i li i !
- I i=
l!! ji I 1 - pl!il i 1 - IiiL.!I 3 1 jiti : l'il 1 ,,! I 'i - il!l!illl! Best Avci:at: e copy i it !Ili l! i i !!!I!i i:1 ! ;l e ji!!!i ll,i 'li!!-l i I'i - i us;!ii il .
!!i :l!.lllll - -
l ll! -l- 111
!!!! '!.! " ,- 11 i !;
!nii - i -
il i lilli l li
!!j '
lll _ 1 ii- lu I-L F! T.i! 1 I ii!!! -- i
. itill -
i n . iil , ;.i 11.:.31 it i
!!ji
'is I I i ! !!!i! I iiil; !
i ! l !! [!- !!iil
- - < !'!!i!' i O' i l .i iili i[ !!!!"
!:i, -
ll!!!! e - Ii ;r!8! i. ji iu !
. 1 in l lg's i
- l;il!! . i . I
--li!
, ;.l l.l.in._l I -
l'g' i.i il'i i iir
< !!il l
- s. --
l'~ I!!! ,, g, I ail, ' I I ,
!:1 I -
i
- i. !
~
!' !! l il L gig!!!'I!i!I ll
~
.; - l,i llili!li!
~
$, i._.
I' !! u l I;ll,il ii i
- e i: , si .,
lg l _ s !15 f' I ; la i- 7- t II Isl dl l !! [! s l~ i II- I, i F - golrsi, i .
.q), ,'i! ..
i I ~ ~ I lls isi l ,,
, l, g , i, ,.... . . .
s E
r , EP-545
. Enclosure 2 Page 1 of 1 O .
TABLE 5.2 REPRESENTATIVE SHIELDING FACTORS FROM GAMMA CLOUD SOURCE (a) Representative Structure or Location Shielding Factor (b) Representative Range Outside 1.0 -- Vehicles 1.0 -- Wood-frame house (C) 0.9 0.9 (no basement) j j Basement of wood house 0.6 0.1 to 0.7(d) Masonry house (no basement) 0.6 0.4 to 0.7(d) Basement of masonry house 0.4 0.1 to 0.5(d)
. Large office or industrial 0.2 building 0.1 to 0 3(d)
O a. Taken from SAND 77-1725 (Unlimited Release). b. The ratio of the dose received inside the structure to the dose that would be received outside the structure. c. A wood-frame house with brick or stone veneer is approximately equivalent to a masonry house for shielding purposes.
, d. 1;... range ic :: inly due to different wall materials and different j Jeome tries.
- e. The shielding factor depends on where the personnel are located within
?-
the building (e.g., the basement or.an inside room). 1 I e
~'
071985
f EP-545 Enclosure 3 Page 1 of 1 O
\_J -
TABLE 5.3 REPRESEh*IATIVE SHIELDING FACTORS FOR SURFACE DEPOSITED RADIONUCLIDES (a) Representative Representative Structure or Location Shielding Factor (b) Range 1 m above an infinite 1.00 -- smooth surface 1 m above ordinary ground 0.70 0.47-0.85 1 m above center of 50-ft roadways, ' .55 0.4-0.6-50% decontaminated Cars on 50-ft road: Road fully contaminated 05 0.4-0.7 Road 50% decontaminated 05 0.4-0.6 Road fully decontaminated 0.25 0.2-0.5 Trains 0.40 0.3-0.5 f-s One- and two-story wood-frame 0.4(c) o,2 0.5 house (no basement) One- and two-story _ block and brick 0.2(c) 0.04-0.40 house (no basement) House basement, one or two walls 0.1(c) 0.03-0.15 fully exp; sed: One story, less then 2 ft of 0.05(c) 0.01 0.07 basement, walls exposed Two stories, less than 2 ft of 0.03(c) 0.02-0.05 basement, walls exposed Three-orfour-storgstructures, . 5000 te 10,000 ft per floor: First and second floors 0.05(c) 0.01-0.08 Basement 0.01(c) o,001 0,07 Hultistory structures, >10,000 ft2 per floor:
- Upper floors 0.01(c) 0.001-0.02 Basement 0.005(c) 0.001-0.015
- a. Taken from SAND 77-1725 (Unlimit.: Release).
- b. The ratio of dose received inside the structure to the dose that would be received outside the structure.
- c. Away from doors and windows.
() 071985
- . . - - . ~ - . _ . . .
- - . _ . . . . . . . _ _ ~ - -
~ ~
O O O I* TABLE 5.4 O 'CUIBl!I.INES FOR PROTECTION ACAINST INCESTION OF CONTAMINATION FOR THE OFFSITE FUBLIC(a) y
~
o 3 I. Cround Contamination A. Action Levels
- 1. Projected whole body dose above the ground >l Res. "
- 2. Cround contamination level > 2000 Ci/m2 at t= 1 hr post accident.
- 3. Exposure rate >12 mR/hr at 1 meter above ground at t= 1 hr post accident.
B. Recommended Protective Actions
- 1. Evacuation of affected areas. .
- 2. Restriction of entry to contaminated offsite areas until radiation level has decreased to state approved levels.
II. Food and Water Contamination A. Action Levels Concentration in Milk or Water TO.5 Ree WB or bone; ($ Ree WB or bone; Total Intake via All Feature Crees 1.5 Ree thyroid) 15 Ree thyroid) Food in Water Fathueys (Fresh Wetaht) Preventive Level Emergency 1.evel Preventive Emergency Preventive Emergency Nuclide(b) ( C1/1) ( Ci/1) ( C1/1) ( C1/1) ( C1/kg) ( C1/kg) 1-131 (thyroid) 0.012 0.12 0.09 0.9 0.27 2.7 Ca-137 (whole body) 0.34 3.4 7 70 3.5 35 Sr-90 (bene) 0.007 0.08 0.2 2 0.7 7 Sr-89 (bone) 0.13 1.3 2.6 26 13 130 B. Recommended Protective Actions o Removal of lactating dairy cows and goats o Isolate food and veter from its introduction free contaminated pasture and substitu- into commerce after considering: tion of uncontaminated stored feed. a. availability of other possible actions; o Substitute source of uncontaminated unter. b. ierottance of particular food in mm o withhold contaminated milk from enrket to nutrition; 2 X 'T allom radioactive decay. c. time and effort to take action; **yo o- Divert fluid milk to production of dry d. availability of other foods. "E* whole stik, butter, etc. P., 2 w s.
- a.
Reference:
U.S. Food and Drug Administratio, Federal Register, Vol. 43, No. 242, December 1$,1978.
- b. If other nuclides are present, use Reg. Guide 1.109 to calculate the dose to the critical organ (s).
Infante are the critical segment of the population. .
~
Of O O. TABLE 5.5 o'
- StBSIART OF FOSSIBLE OFFSITE PROTECTIVE ACTIONS TO BE U
REC 000 ENDED OR IMPLEMENTED DURING AN EMERGENCY i N w Accident Phase Euposure rathway Examples of Action To Be Recommended Inhalation of seees, radio- Evacuation, shelter, accese control, respire-EDEBCENCT fodine, or particulate pn4Sg(b) tory protection, prophylaxis (thyrcid protection) (0.5 to 30 heure)(C) Direct whole body exposure Evacuation, shelter, access control Ingestion of milk Take allk animale off posture and prevent f rom drinking surface unter, diccard contasi-noted allk, or divert to stored products such as cheese Ingestion of fruite and I IATE vegetables- Wash all produce, or impound produce, delay pglASE d) harvest until approved, substitute encon-(30 hours to 30 days)(c) taminated produce Irigestion cf unter cut off contaminated supplies, embetitute froe other sources, filter deelneralise Whole body esposure and Relocation, decontaminetton, access control inhalation Ingestion of food and water Decontamination, condemnation, or destruction contaminated from the soil of food; deep plowing, condemnation, or
- either by resuspenelon or alternate use of land LONG-Tam uptake through roote PEASEL')
(over 30 days)(C) Whole body esposure from Relocation, accese control, decontamine-depoettion meterial or Inhala- ,,, tion of resuspended enterial tion, fixing of conteelnation, deep plowing gga
- yif
.s. Ref ev.,: "E*
- b. USEFA
~.-=rgency phase "Meaual
- Time periodof ofFr.tectim Action enjer release andGuides and plume subsequent Protective Actions for Nuclear Incidente." 1975.
exposure. *;
- c. " Typical" post-secident time pertado. ,,
d. Intermediate phase - Time period of ashrate contini,ous releases wit's plume exposure and contamination of
-eewireuseet.
- e. Imag-tere phase - Recovery period.
e
O O O TAst.E 5.6 supuutT or EVACUATION TIMES
- S .
- : : 2 x g.:
- . 8 88 8 8:
- : : 0.8 :.: : ::
- : : : : 2a: 1st ~
- = ::
2 e 2
- L";
28 L"1 : L* t L*
. . . o 2:a t 25 2:a
- : 2* tu tu 0. 3 -tu -t.
=t : 10 se 23 05 "
33 . I Em s :- ::. ::: 2 #: 8 ~5 ::: ES E E$ EE $$E UE2 0 NE$ AE2 Zones Within Two Miles 1 3,607 1,551 200 57 3,600 2:40 2:40 2:40 2:40 2:40 Zones Within Five Miles
- 2 6,030 2.593 8,800 2.514 4,800 3
- 00 4:15 3:00 3:00 4:15 3 3,045 1.309 2,000 571 3,600 2:40 2:40 2:40 2:40 2:40 1
Zones Within Ten Miles a 4 45,001 18,842 100 29 14,400 3:45 5:45 3:45 3:45 5:45 5 8.911 3,6% 0 0 6.000 2:45 3:30 2:45 2:45 3:30 ggq e, a e
! 23,507 9,822 6 e 650 ,,,119 12,600 4:00 . .: ,o5:45 4:00 (:00 5:45 *((
Total 90,101 37,813 11,750 3,350 34,800 4:00 5:45 4:00 4:00 5:45 -
! EFZ " * *
- Estiente of Evecuation times, Enrico Feral Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2. FRC Voorhees, Revised March 1982.
** The confirmation process will begin during evacuation and run concurrently until the evacuation process is complete.
*** 1a all instances, the evacuation s' .---tal populations segmente et _. pe completed prior to the comple-tien of p ral population evacuation.
~
O O O' TABLE 5.7 8 , DISTRIBUTION OF 1980 POPULATION IN EMERCENCY PLANNING G ZONE RINGS AND SECTORS, MONROE AND WAYNE COUNTIES, MICHICAN O Sector Ring (One-Mile) (22 1/2*) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TOTAL N 29 266 179 80 199 233 884 4,341 4,350 5,288 15,849 NNE O 103 82 ~
'2 382 1,2' 956 3,845 7,999 NE O 264 134 12 0 0 0 - - -
410 ENE O - - - - - - - - - 0 E O - - - - - - - - - 0 ESE O - - - - - - - - - 0 SE O - - - - - - - - - 0 SSE O - - - - - - - - - 0 S 42 586 52 - - -- - - - - 680 SSU 0 723 21 - -- - - - - - 744 su O 212 9 - 119 0 0 0 66 887 1,293 USE O 25 861 2.276 1,811 997 4,483 9.444 13,971 6,198 40,066 v 0 59 30 168 611 992 996 1,197 690 696 5,439 emm WNw 0 18 32 53 111 1,953 482 191 619 623 4,087 4 X *P
- a' %
Int 3 77 359 651 324 259 505 371 601 3,295 6.445 "E" lent 0 143 247 65 12 78 224 653 596 681 515 3.202 ~u TOTAL 74 2,476 1,936 3,397 3,335 5,045 9,208 17,462 21,934 21,347 86,214
i O O O TABLE 5.8 DISTRI8UTION OF PRELIMINARY 1980 POPULATION IN 10- TO 50-M11.E AREA AROUND FERNI 2 e 3 Distance (Miles) Dir 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 10-50 N 10,355 95.468 199,44'* 331,196 369,786 316,228 128,588 183,949 1,615,017 NNE 24,993 75,873 87.272 527,834 585,704 440,902 251,639 112,020 2,106,237 NE 7,613 3,567 4.)83 5,600 10,828 8,049 549 0 40,789 ENE 1.319 5,641 4.583 11.964 6,617 7,631 8,227 8,672 54,654 E O 610 1,146 5,910 2,814 14.480 3,207 0 28,167 ESE O O O O 1,704 1,145 0 0 2,849 SE - 0 0 0 401 1,853 , 4,860 11,622 36,051 54,787 SSE O O O 1,052 6,398 10,255 7,664 14,256 39,625 5 0 0 3.693 3.875 9,116 6,539 26.539 8,591 57,353 SSW 0 3,004 36,423 71,520 16,369 6,211 14.170 24,353 172,050 ou 3,858 7.150 ** 3'8 219,699 65.633 l' . '. 5 12,8,52 10,700 432,175 USW 4,482 2,233 6,325 3,206 6,582 3,482 3,526 5,942 35,778 v 4,521 1.119 5,804 5,418 2,246 25,456 23,140 6,747 74,451 WNW 3.351 2,844 9,076 8,195 6,514 4,564 4,558 7,938 47,040 NW O 7,398 23,921 74,264 104,923 11,262 21,742 IEQ 16.059 259.570 g a /, NNW 5,273 14,272 68,913 51,444 56,144 21,463 27,752 41,318 286,579 Total 65,765 219,179 550,524 1,320.578 1,253,231 895.472 545,776 476,596 5,327.121 ** **
es i
- e= r=
s = g 5I
/
c 3
/
/
., sk P w I '
i
]! F J g
g a,, - e i o ( w g -
, :. ,_ ' ,a ' tW/ _ x w ,
i 3 t c . '.o# m { -
. m' 3; -
n
'%e ? l 1 S
- p ,
p x o e
; e
", o a e 5 *
. et a: [P 7
Og
- o m I M
3$ 8m g 1o he t t!! lO it' 9 IEh
EP-545 Enclosure 10 Page 1 of 1 f30LstE 5.2 IINALATION SHIELDING FACTORS FOR A 9000 NOLSE,
$stJG DOOR $, CLOSED W1@0NS (TNYR010)
- 1. 0 i , , , ,
S trN (&S WS)
~ ~
\ I' / / ! w' g 4 WH ( 1. 8 W E) 7 c.
- g. - / /
R ~ q W1te 3*EED = 1 GPH
~
~
( 0. 447 WS)
- O N .4
/
E i W
,g _ _ WYSs 1 W M = 8.447 W S l
g i t i i i 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 i EXPOSLstE TITE (950 1
- e. THE A80VE CURVE AS$tMES THE HOUSE RD4AINS CLOSED UP FOR THE DURATION. ACTUALLY THE DOSE INSIDE THE HOUSE CAN BE FURTHER REDUCED SY OPENING THE DOORS AND WINDOWS AFTER THE CLOUD MAS PASSED AND PURGING THE HOUSE WITH FRESH AIR l
j
- REACTOR SAFETY STUDY,' APPENDIX VI WASH-1400, DCTOBER 1975 071985 ,
j hl!
. . i n * **I!s!e!!!.!!*!!!!!!!!.......
()m - Q ;j,:=;;..;;........;;..;...;;;;;;stIttie...81I ;;;.;;;;iffiiii r s
,j,7 [ Il Best Avai!abte Copy f2 s c- 3!
232 f278Ii3!!It!S178tgrt3I11;tts!Pr[ttlittist!!!! (d !, l3
- , I! . ! . I si l..l 1 -
.. .< .u.f ref arviersdatzessasadaggedgmassverv 5, k E
Y-o *- n
'm
~
w - 3i{ e ng e 6 5 g;
' i is$ - o x,
e-g
.s / -
N M 7 N 3 '- Cr ' " g , / f-
< ?
C ..
, t.
x r Il/l : ;. 9 "b I t g .,
,u' y
, .= 1 -
N, #
- g. -
- 0 )'
f x' l
\ .
\
\ .
. \. . _. . ~f .
x l ! ' s
; -I
(- i . L
.J li
_ 3
+ -
s- . . J q t
, %g. ..e j, ,. ,
5 Eo % , .k;. v
) .
m -
l e! . O =- !!! '
.r,ij .!! I'l tit s 333 3
,e es. .
! 5 I! 5 I it i e en *
- d er n ee u g
N 3I wh )32 O e o di ' ,' ,, 200 5 'sa 5*5 * $$
*/ gw c==> . -
to o
/
. ee .
b . ~ ,
~
u
, w k
g' t i
. -; , 1" M L. ,
/AsrJ i $ ,
i
*. . 4 t A\ ti f f\ l p7 ' 1 J.
! , Q- '
l' g _3 . u 5 , i 5 ~ 5 E y 6 . p w_ i y: t.. s
. .. o = sg ., ,
d tr i .
/
j
.h~
O -
~
e O l Il
. .! .! .?.?.?.?.?
5 n: l ..................a.........I............i.58'
. . ... ,3 u,
o 0$k a i e
" [:e ii 5,3 %
e
%E 0
. 1 o
EE rw o e
'i
- g i e
- k. ' ' ,. v d ;g _
ll; ys e,oI - j .. L
*7 ' >
e -
\ -
l I
/- ( q y
/i
>J -
= it g
i' s ! ! . i l O - a, i f. .
!viel - Ji/' 1 p O 3 s g ,,g ) .
6
EP-545 ! g} RRIE R Rl,l Enclosure 14 j ja 2*** 2 == , , Page 1 of 1 O si 4 Nk k $ kNk$ T t In,!i.1lg,3-n ss i i . lI5 5 - 555 1 aaaa a aaa . Ir-I le * /I li O !o I : l 1 l e 2 Tl/l . i; i ll _.t I rl - n' I E!g f e- I l Li _ c
- r m
. ,s x p, ,.
i Llyl ___j.ql _ _ sl ,q_f _A l . _ _ _l p - i 071985 lil l _ _ q _ __ _. 3 , 3 Il 15 l
.______. __-....._ _ __.__ __._- __., _._._._._ _ _.___ ____ ___ _ .. _ _____. ._________,-.__.__... _____ _ ,1
E: 1 [,f
- 1703.02 s
_ Safety Classification PERMI 2 PROCEDURE - EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING TITLE: METEOROLOGICAL DATA ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE NUMBER: EP-544
- s'o - = 1 INFCF.?.MT:9NONLY Name of preparer: R. A. Foltn.an Technically ,, f reviewed by: [1 fi h s d.e r L. f Date; & lr' '[L~~
/
Reviewed / concurred by: W. E. Miller /s/ Date:07/26/85 Supv - Operational Assurance Approved by: Thomas Randazzo /s/ O Responsible Section Head or'05R0 Member / Alt Date: 36/25/85 Further Approval Required for Safety-Related or Superintendent-Designated Faucedus==. Recommended by: R. S. Lenart / s.! Date:07/26/85. OSRO Chairman / Alternate-Approved by: R. S.'Lerart /s/ Date:07/26/85 Superintendent - Nuclear Production The following approved Procedure Change Requests are incorporated in this revision: M3619 ThisrevisionlyldoeslldoesnotconstituteJeriodic.reviw. -
, 7PDAbm ;,Je:,a :R9 EP 3M/-
. . t.._
n . . . .. . . ,l JUL 301985 !
! r.., . . . . . ~ . ~ . .. . 936 -
***"t~^". . 4 E *. ,,,,,,,,,,,,, NO. _
.. 6 0: .
EP-544 ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC POWER PLANT UNIT No. 2 Best Available Copy, Type: EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE
Title:
METEOROLOGICAL DATA ASSESSMENT - DIAL-UP TERMINALS Prepared by R. A. Foltaan 7/27/83 Date
/ .
Recommended by ' M, /7 b e 4h [-/I-83 Comunicat16vSystem Divisiop Date bk'k 3 '
.Recommenh i by_ \/ Comunity &\/,overnment Af f airs Date Recomment 1 by V icensing h { $ Yursw _
i
/$!k}
~ (Da t'e' Recommsnded by E eA he w 4 [
~ / # Medical Stat! -
~
Date Recommended by w / v d'-// 'i.7 Nuclear Adminiadation Date
/
/[
Recou: mended by n [~ 28 - D Nue/efr Production Date Recommended Sy b Av I-/E-[3 Nuclear Training 9 Date NA ,b
- Recommens , by Pub ic Informa libn Date
' ~
Recommendef. by M h k MN L e'b Security V Date Recommended by A/Mh 4 [!/8Date
/3
' Wayne-Monice Division Approved by /S 83
. RERP Committee ChairpWM6h- Date Revision RERP Committee No. Chairperson Approved Date 1 e_d_,. W 5~
1 Y I e 1 7 - l I - l 1 l l
i f : f' ._ I t > 1 EP-544 i 4, Rev. 1 !. c !O I TABLE Of CONTENTS i e , t i, , i fagg [ i
- )
1.0 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .I ! i j 2.0 References ..................... 1 l f 3.0 Entry Conditions .................. 1 s 4 i 4.0 General Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 t I j 5.0 Immediate Actions . . . ...... . . . . . '. . . 6 } l { 6.0 Follow up Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 l i - I f, . I d' i i j i d O t i $ n n 1 J I r h 1 i } 1 4 h ( i , e I J 100/asRP12/1.0-6 O " i t t
, . , , v._ _ .,- .....yw_.a_,.r ,,-.,._y,. _ . . , , , - . ,
, , , , . , , , , , , . . . , , _ , , , . , . , , . . _ . . % . v., , _ . ,m...,.,.,%,-,,,wJ,,.m,,,-4,,+. f qi p9 p% + ,..
\ q
, EP-544 Rev. 1 Page 1 0 1.0 Purpose This procedure provides general guidelines for analyzing, reviewing, interpreting and using the meteoralogical data from the Enrico Fermi 2 60-meter meteorological tower when using the dial-up terminals in the Control Room (CR) Technical Support Center (TSC) and the Energrney Operations Facility (EOF) by the Shif t Technical Advisor (STA), TS' Meteorologist or the EOF Meteorologist, respectively. In the event these individuals are unavailable, dose assessment personnel may be required to handle these procedures temporarily.
This document provides guidelines for the various meteorological activities associated with emergency conditions at Enrico Feral 2. l The purpose of this document is to describe the procedures and methods to be followed y individuals reviewing meteorological data under ( energency condicions at the Fermi 2 plant, j 1 1 2.0 References 4 2.1 Use References 2.1.1 Meteorological Data Acquisition System (23.615.02) 2.1.2 Manual Calculation of Off-Site Radiological Dose Rates and Doses - Airborne Releases (EP-540) O 2.1.3 Microcomputer Calculation of Off-Site Radiological Dose Rates and Doses - Airborne Releases (EP-542) 2.1.4 Protective Action Guideline Recommendations (EP-545) 2 .1'. 5 Mar.ual Calculation of Dose Adjustment Factor for La Breeze Conditions (EP 548) i, i I t 2.2 Scurce References 2.2.1 Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Radiological Emergency Response Preparedness Plan, Section H, (Emergency Facility Equipment) and Section I (Accident Assessment) (EPA-99) 2.2.2 Enrico Fermi 2 RERP Meteorological Handbook (RERP 85/003) 2.2.3 Weather Services International (WSI) Handbook (RERP 85/004) i 3.0 Entry Conditton,s 3.1 UNUSUAL 4 VENT has been declared and the Shif t Technical Adviso.- in the control Room is available. () ' s n- . .
EP-544 4 - Rev. 1 Page 2 4 3.2 ALERT has been declared and the TSC has been activated with the TSC Meteorologist position staffed. 3.3 SITE AREA ENERGENCY has been declared and the EOF has been e ti-vated with the EOF Meteorologist position staffed. 3.4 CENERAL EMERGENCY has been declared with all positions staffed. 4.0 General Information 4.1 Introduction Primary meteorological support is designed to be centered at the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) under the Site Area and General Emergency levels. Under UNUSUAL EVENT and ALERT classifications, until the TSC is functional, the Control Room (CR) Shif t Technical Advisor is responsible for reviewing the meteorological conditions. Once the Technical Support Center (TSC) is functional, a meteorologist or an Envirenmental Assessment Team member will be available to handle both the on- and off-site meteorological assessment. Under the SITE AREA and GENERAL EMERGENCY levela, the TSC ' Meteorologist may assume the EOF Meteorologist position in the Environmental Assessment Team (EAT) at the Emergency Operations h Facility if he is called by the EOF. Careful analysis of the meteorological conditions is an essen-tial input to the Radiological Emergency Response Preparedness Plan and implementing procedures for Fermi 2. If condition. idia=**
= ,=*ancial for an of f-site impact, the location,
' direction, presence or absence of a lake breeze, and magnitude of 'l any impact are necessary for determining the overall consequences. Use of the meteorological data available allows dose assessment members to assess the dose potential in the region of concern. ,
4.2 Responsibilities 4.2.1 The Shif t Technical Advisor will be responsible for: !
- 1. Access and interpretation of up-to-date meteoro-4 logical data as of ten as required by changes in i plant status and weather. This review initially begins at hourly intervals depending upon plant
.. conditions and may escalate to 15-minute intervals if conditions warrant. The Meteorological Data Acquisition System (MDAS) is the primary source of this information. The Monroe Air Quality Network O '
l EP-544 Rev. 1 yx Page 3 N. l (MAQN), Davis Besse Meteorological Towe r, and the 1 l l Weather Services International Weather Information Service (WIS) are available as the back-ups for the MDAS (WSI also provides forecasts). Tha telephone number for the National Weather Service (NWS), Ann Arbor, MI, appears in the RERP Emergency Telephone Directory. Acquisition includes the following parameters: Wind Speed Wind Direction Precipitation Stability class Lake Breeze conditions ac arding to EP-548 ! 1 l This data is gathered for reporting to offsite agencies, plume prediction, calculations of the dose adjustment factor for the presence of a lake breeze (EP-548), and historical documentation. Potential plume impact and impact distribution can be estimated using this information if conditions require these actions.
- 2. Review of the meteorological data for clarity and potential degradation of weather conditions.
O 3. Recommendations based upon weather conditions to be passed on to the Emergency Director in the event conditions warrant. 4.2.2 The TSC/ EOF Meteorologist will be responsible for:
- 1. Access and interpretation of up-to-date teteor', -
logical data as of ten as required by the plant status, weather conditions, and radiation protec-tion personnel. This will initially begin at hourly intervals.and progress eventually to 15 minute intervals. The Meteorological Data Acqui-sition System (MDAS) is the primary source of the essential meteorological information. The Monroe I Air Quality Network (MAQN), Davis Besse Meteorological Tower, and the Weather Services i International Weather Information Service (WSI) dial up are the available back ups to MDAS. (WSI also provides forecastri. The telephone tamber I for the NWS, Ann Arbor, MI, appears in the RERP Emergency Telephone Diiacr iry. . O -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a
I I i EP-544 t Rev. 1 l Page 4 Essential acquisitions should include.the follow-ing parameters: Wind speed
- Wind direction Precipitation
> Stability class Lake breeze conditions according to EP-548 This data is gathered for reporting to offsite agencies, plume prediction, calculation of the dose adjustment factor for the presence of a lake breeze, and historical documentation. Potential plume impact and distribution can be estimated using this information if conditions warrant.
- 2. Review of data and conditions should include the following:
- a. Checks for erroneous or missing values.
- b. Checks for " reasonable" data which fits the synoptic weather patterns.
- c. Conversion of wind speed from miles per hour O to meters per second as required for refer-ence by other users.
}
- d. Convert wind direction from present fo rmat to sector format. This involves indicating which direction the wind is coming FROM and which direction the wird is going TO. The sectors potentially invotved must be determined.
- e. Determine the atmospheric stability for the Fermi site using one of the available stabil-ity schemes; Pasquill, sissa theta (standard deviation of the horizontal wind direction, ~
signa phi (standard deviation of the vertical wind velocity, or delta temper-ature with height, (46T/46z). The Nuclear
. Regulatory Commission suggests using the temperature change with height (46T/cwz) as
. the primary stability measure.
- f. Determine the type of any precipitation which may be falling for some indication to the potential for washout.
i 1
EP-544 Rev. 1
, Page 5
- g. /*sess the data for lake breeze conditions aad calculate the dose adjustment factor i
.(EP-548), if applicabic.
- 3. Dissemination and frequent updating of the essential information is to be made available to the following personnels
- a. Dose Assessment Personnel Dose Assessment requires meteorological data for dose projections and evaluation of pro-tection actions when necessary. The infor-nation needed includes the wind speed in both sets of units, wind direction, stability class and affected sectors for dose calculations.
- b. Radiation Protection Advisor / Emergency Direc-tor or Radiation Protection Coordinator /
Emergency Officer use the wind speed and y j direction, lake breeze conditiuns, plume nredictions, and sectors impacted for protective action recommendations as necessary. Data updates are only necessary if significant changes occur in the data. ( c. TSC Administrator and Support Coordinator / EOF Administrator file all information for documentation purposes as well as historical use. The information is also posted on the status boards.
- 4. Accessing the National Weather Service (NWS) provides forecasts for determining the persistence of various meteorological phenomenon. This is dene through the Weather Services International system (WSI). Forecasts of predicted conditions f or a period extending to 6 hours should be done on a routine basis or whenever updated forecasts f are available.
As a back-up to the MDAS and MAQN systems, < the NWS
- forecasts for Detroit and Toledo can be used for guidance. The FERMIF command in WSI will give an interratated forecast for the Feral 2 site based upon the Modelled Output Statistics (MOS) fore-costs for Detroit, MI, Toledo, OH and Cleveland, OH. Forecast format and data availability can be found in the WSI Randbook and the Fermi 2 RERP Meteorological Handbcok.-
4 4 .
. EP-544 Rev. 1 . Page 6 .f' 5. Documenting and transmitting of all significant y
i meteorologica* changes (i.e. wind shifts or severe weather) to the status boards and essential personnel. ,
- 6. Using the standard TSC/ EOF forms for documentation of the meteorological conditions and related calculations.
- 7. Making manual plume projections for potential as well as actual releases. Plume projections should be made and plotted as of ten as needed or as of ten as averaged meteorological data is available r (every 10 minutes) for potential and actual releases from the Fermi 2 site. Plots made by MDAS should be made periodically.
Calculate and plot the plume width and length for each plume segment, as needed. As a first approximation, the previous period's plot is used to estimate the next period's location unless wind ? shif ts are expected to occur during- the period. Documentation of the plume projections should be
- made for historical and past release records.
Duplicate plume calculations and plots should also be made if time permits. Indicate where the leading edge of the release ~ should be several time periods ahead and illus-trate where the release has been during the past several periods. Puffs and continuous release plumes should be essentially treated alike. The plume projection information should be passed to the Dose Assessment personnel as well as the Radiation Protection Coordinator /Adtisor for use in protective action recommendations. Documentation of plume projections procedures can be found in the Fermi 2 RERP Meteorological Handbook.
- 8. Transferring the TSC Meteorologist's activities to
- the EOF when a Site Area Emergency is declared if
. required. At this point the primary meteoro-logical responsibilities are transferred to tha -
EOF. 1 I ' 5.0 Immediate Actions 5.1 Shif t Technical Advisor in Contr'ol' Room ()
EP-544 Rev. 1
, Page 7 l
5.1.1 Access as auch meteorologies *. data as necessary using MDA' to document any meteorslogical changes within the las*. several hours. This data should be gathered for clarity and cross checking purposes. Data received should be recorded in the report to of fsite agencies and used to make recommendations to the Emergency Director. Refer to EP-548 to determine if lake breeze conditions exist and calculate a dose adjustment factor (EP-548). NOTE: If necessary, access the Davis-Besse meteoro-logical tower to check for similar conditions or supporting information. Be aware that meteorological data from Davis-Besse may be different from the Fermi 2 data because of ) different locations and because of local eftects such as Lake Erie. Log usage of this system and data also. Directions for use of this system can be found in the Fermi 2 RERP
- Meteorological Handbook.
5.1.2 Access the National Weather Service (NWS) data through the ~4esiher Services International (WSI) system to gain additional background on the local weather from Detroit to Toledt.- This can be compared with the Fermi 2 site
- specific data acquired from MDAS. The following items should be checked using the Fermi W command:
(
- 1. Local past data
- 2. Radat summary map
- 3. f ability. class in the t gion
- 4. R ,Iaual (mesoscale) weather data and conditions
- ' 5. For .aated conditions for precipitation, tempera-tur2, winds and stability
- 6. Other additional information as needed.
Log all activicies and pass along -important information when necessary. Using the WSI Handbook or the Fermi 2 RERP Meteorological Handbook demonstrates how to access the WIS and the various parameters desired. The Meteorological Handbook will also have directions on how to as ess the data from the MAQN. 5.1.3 Log or atchive r11 other essential items (i.e., WSI weather reps, aisc.) as necessary and as it becomes availab' O
1 4 . EP-Si4 Rev. 1 Page 8 5.1.4 As meteorological data becomes available (i.e., every 1' sinutes on MDAS or every hour using MAQN or WSI) or so time permits, gather more information and review for continuous updates. 5.2 TSC/ EOF Meteorologist 5.2.1 Upon arriving at the TSC/ EOF, check in with Security and the TSC/ EOF Administrator so they are aware the meteorological position of the Environmental Assessment Team is staffed. 5.2.2 Determine the plant status, general site weather condi-tions, etc. as part of a general orientation procedure. Begin logging and archiving of all activities and mete-orological conditions. Refer to EP-548 to determine if lake breeze conditions exist. 5.2.3 Check-out all equipment, documentation, and forms. Documentation of all actions, data, and conditiogs is necessary for a complete historical record of a 4-. radiological emergency., . 5.2.4 Access as much meteorological data as necessary using MDAS to document any meteorological changes within the last several hours available. This data should be gathered for clarity and cross checking purposes. Data O received should be recorded for documentation purposes and for reporting offsite. g 5.2.5 Access the Fermi 2 Meteorological Tower using one of two methods:
- 1. Meteorological Data Acquisition. System (MDAS) or,
- 2. Monroe Air Quality fetwork (MAQN). ,
Cather the past and present meteorological data for entrart and reference information. Log the time, meteorological data and conditions. 5.2.6 As a backup measure, as time permits, access the Monroe Air Quality Network (MAQN) to determine if the meteorology at the Fermi 2 site is representative of the 10-mile EPZ. This can be done by first, comparing the respings from the Fermi 2 60-meter tower via MDAS wit:. the Fermi 2 60-acter tower values from the MAQN computer. Second, coepere the readings with any available sites located in the surrounding area as I shcwn in the Fermi 2 RERP Meteorological Handbook. 1 O >
l
.P-54 Rev. 1 Page 9
('%
\-- 5.2.7 Provide the most recent meteorological data to the Dose Assessors, the Radiation Protection Advisor. Emergency D! rector or Radiation Protection Coordinator / Emergency Officer and the TSC/EGF Administator. When in the EOF, pass information to the TSC Dose Assessment personnel, if there is no meterologist in the TSC.
5.2.8 Update the meteorological conditions every 10 to 15 minutes or as often as required by requests and plant status using the TSC/ EOF forms provided. Only significant changes in the data should be reported. 5.2.9 If necessary, access the Davis-Besse meteorological tower to check for similar conditions or supporting inf o rmat ion. Be aware that meteorological data from Davis-Besse may be dif f erent f rom the Fermi 2 data because of different locations and because of local effects such as Lake Erie. Log usagt of this system and data also. Directions for use of his system can be found in the Fermi 2 RERP Meteoro gical Handbook. 5.2.10 Access the National Weather Service JS) data through the Weather Services International (WtI) system to gain additional background on the weather locally from Detroit to Toledo. The following items thould be checked using the Fermi W command: O k/ 1. Local past data
- 2. Most recent upper air data
- 3. Radar summary map 4 Pasquill stability in the regio
- 5. Regional (mesoscale) weather da+ 4.nd conditions
- 6. Forecasted conditions for precip. stion, temperature, winds and stability -
- 7. Other additional information as needed Log all activities and pass along important information as deemed necessary. The WSI Handbook and the Fermi 2 RERP Meteorological Handbook demonstrate how to use the WSI system and access the various paran 'tre desired.
5.2.11 Plot necessary meteorological element, , the plume tracking board as conditions require, eortions of t, tis information will be posted on the status boards.
EP-544 Rev. 1 Page 10 ! ~0 The following data should be included:
- 1. Wind direction FROM
- TO
- 2. Wind speed sph meters /sec.
1
- 3. Stability Class i I
- 4. Precipitation: Type l Rate nun / hour
- 5. Lake Breeze, if present i
- 6. Sectors potentially impacted
- 7. Meteorological forecast (next 2-6 hours) 5.2.12 Direct the deployment of the off-site Radiological Emergency Teams (RETs) by providing the locations and directions for effective plume tracking based on plume {
width, travel time, and release. In the TSC provide this information to the Radiation Protection Advisor; in the EOF advise the RET Coordinator. 5.2.13 ) Log or archive all other essential items (i.e., WSI weather maps, etc.) as necessary and as it becomes available. 5.2.14 Repeat Items 5.2.5 through 5.2.13 as necessary. 6.0 Follow up Actions 6.1 Cortinue to perform those steps in Section 5.2 as appropriate. Begin calculating and plotting the predicted plume location and direction based upon past and pfedicted meteorology out to the next hour of data. Plume plotting methods and directions can be found in the Fermi 2 RERP Meteorological Handbook. 6.2 Remain aware of any off-site readings, protective action zones, evacuation locations, etc. and advise the Radiation Protection Advisor / Coordinator if meteorology will impact any of these l 1e.isions. If conditions change significantly, then be sure to ; update the status board and Radiation Protection Advisor /Coordi- j nator as soon as possible. If in the EOF, pass this information i along to the TSC Dose Assessment personnel to keep the TSC up-isted as information becomes available. l I
.)
EP-544 Rev. 1 Page 11
~
6.3 Be aware of possible release times if plant integrity is weaken-ing as .noted on the status board, or 1; i eld readings come back above baseline levels. If necessary, bac; calculate to obtain j the release time (s) to use in further calculations. The release time or an estimated time is necessary for plume projections. Be aware if the plant conditions are deteriorating to anticipate potential airborne releases. 6.4 Calculate and begin plotting the projected plume positions and
. forecast positions for any actual releases for the next hour based on current or post winds. Include any wind shifts in the plume plot calculations. The procedures for these projections can be found in the Fermi 2 RERP Meteorological Handbook.
6.5 Continue to advise the Rasiation Protection Advisor / RET Coordinator of the sampling team locations relative to the present or forecast plume. If conditions are changing, the teams will have to be moved ei*.hte away from potential hot spots or g into new regions as conditions change. It is necessary to forewarn the Radiation Protection Advisor / Coordinator as soon as possible so necessary actions can be taken. Parameters to watch include the wind direction . wind speed, stability, projected plume characteristics, and release characteristics such as particulate and iodine releases of any magnitude. 6.6 O Shade any areas the plume may impact on the plume plot board and indicate the potential region (s) soon to be impacted. 6.7 Update and correct any predictions or information placed on the plume plot boards or status boards. .New on-site seteorological data averages are gathered from the NDAS systes every 15 minutes. Octa frca thc MAQN is available every hour with hourly averages. 6.8 Update meteorological data with field observa. tons to check for local weather discrepancies. The Radiological Energency Teams (RET) will be available in the field for radiological readings and weather feedback. 6.9 Repeat the above steps as required until either relieved, termin-ation, facility shutdown, or emergency downgrading. Official notification must be ande before the position can be vacated. It may be necessary to summarize the conditions for the period using
- the data gathered after smergency conditions have been downgrad-ed. 'All logs, data and calculations must be saved as archives' of any incident. Post-release estimates of dose levels can be made using the archived met orological data.
6.10 When relieved from tk< p..sition, organize documents and sign out. END w-
s' *
'SUP EP-50I hf ety-Desig:.a tion
~-
Rev. 1
.?
O . Ih"FICO FIRMI ATOP.IC PCNTR FIA%7 W:7 2 POM PROCED"RE - E. ERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING
=
TITLE: USE OF NUC. EAR NETWORK DURING AN EMERGENCY / EXERCISE PROCEDURZ ElNBER: EP-501 , RITISION FJMBER: I.... r-PREPAtID IT: K. Connell /s/ MTE: 6-13-84 .._
'~
AIFEDVED IT: T. Randazzo /s/ MTg: 8-2-84
.; -. . . . TResponsible Sectio:. Esad/ Delegate)_ ,, ,. ,,
RZOO M NDED IT: W. E. Miller /s/ MTE: 7-9-84~~ TSupervisor-Operatf or.a1 Assurance / Delegate) COSMETIC CHANGE g7g g el.I.xrMEhTED IT: 105R0 Chairman / Alternate) eAyygorgs gy: COSMETIC CHANGE' g7g .
~
TSuperintendent-Nuclear Produer. ion / Delegate) . t
~
e!!gnatures required for Safety-Related or superintendent-Designated procedures. ' e e. ItiFORMATISM ONLY
/opQ, p
, %o=Q%lfb m/2 y-~en4! -e" s m.,w .2.. M - y ep ,e,4 .
s
#p -
SEP 101;M
, ,.. . ..___.-.....i.
u__. . O . F e e ~-- - - w , r-n-e-
~
EP-501 REV.I ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC POWER PLANT UNIT NO. 2 sI g th Type: EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE
Title:
USE OF NUCLEAR NETWORK DURING AN EMERGENCY / EXERCISE Prepared by K. Connell 4/22/83 Date Recomended by /1 c/ b 44MW 'I '83 Communigstion System DivigAon Date Recommended by / ["d'b y Comunity & ti/vernment Affairs Date Recoc=lended by ' h u/ f, icensing / ~ l.-E fcd germw $ $
/Dat'e l Recomended bv _ g/ t.e /#V& h//h [
9 ' jtiedic~al StafY ' '/ Date Recommended by scr y / /f 3 Nuc ea'r Administ tion / Date Recommended by 4p,, [ 8 F'3 Date
~Nug//ar Production Recommended by A ~/8-6 Nuclear Traihing Date Recommended by hhW) h-}h h3
}ub ic InforkAtion Date Recommended by M\ Td SMD Security M Date Recommended by M l Wayne-Monrce Division
[ Date 8 ( Approved by # d!/8 83 RERP Committee Chairteh' son I Dite Revision RERP Committee No. Chairperson Approved Date 1 JW 1- b Ac O!2!bi, i - Ov 3 4 5 6
. _ - .. ~ . - - . - . . .-
EP-501
' # Rav. !
TABLE OF CONTENTS
/
Page 1.0 Purpose........................................ I 2.0 Re f e r e nc e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - ,1
^ 1 3.0 Entry Conditions...............................
1 4.0 Ge ne ral In f o rma t io n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 Immediate Actions.............................. I 6.0 Follow-Up Actions.............................. 2 Attachments NUCLEAR NETWORK ENTRY F0RM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Att achment 1 l I g% I d 1 l l i 1 g i 1 l a i i l 100/RERP20/7.0 082584 1 1 i
. , - - ~ . . - . - - , . ,, - , . - - - - - + - . - , , . . - , - - , . - - _ , , - - - , - - .
. EP-501 Rev. 1 Pega 1 s~
1.0 Purpose (~)j The purpose of this procedure is to provide the guidelines for use of Nuclear Network for transmission of information regarding an I emergency / exercise when the Radiological Energency Response Prepardness (RERP) Plan is activiated. 2.0 References
*2.1 INPO - Nuclear Network Users Manual, April 1984 (INPO 84-014).
I 2.2 Nuclear Network Operating Experience Review, Nuclear Operations - Nuclear Engineering Procedure (NE-2.12, Rev. 2,1-31-84). 3.0 Entry Conditions Once the RERP Plan is activated for an emergency / exercise, this procedure will be implemented. All information regarding the emergency / exercise transmitted via Nuclear Network will be at the I discretion of the Emergency Of ficer (or Emergency Director prior to activation of the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)) and the Director-Public Information (or designee).
+
() 4.0 General Information Nuclear Network is the trade name of a computer telecommunications inf ormation exchange sys tem unde r the administration of the Institute of Nuclear Power Organization (INPO). The Nuclear Network " Emergency l Hotline" will be used during actual emergencies (See Reference 2.1). The Nuclear Network " Emergency Planner Information Exchange" will be used during emergency exercises (See Reference 2.1). The only information that will be transmitted via Nuclear Network during an emergency / exercise will be information approved by the Emergency Of ficer (or Emergency Director prior to activation of the EOF) and the Director-Public Information (or designee). 5.0 Immediate Actions 5.1 All entries for Nuclear Network during an emergency / exercise will I be sent to the Emergency Of ficer (or Emergency Director prior to activation of the EOF) ISee Attachment #1).
- Denotes "Use" Reference l
l l i _-__ _ ,=
EP-501 Ray,1 Page 2 5 5.2 For all Nuclear Network entries the Emergency Officer (or I
)
Emergency Director prior to activation of the EOF) will contact the Director-Public Information (or designee) for concurrence of entry approval. 5.3 Upon approval of an entry the Emergency Officer (or Energency Director prior to activation of the EOF) will forward the signed s entry form to the eargency facilities administrative group for g transmittal via Nuclear Network. 5.4 The emergency facilities administrative group will process the entry via the applicable Nuclear Network line as designated in g Section 4.0 of the procedure. 6.0 Follow-Up Actions A copy of all Nuclear Network entries transmitted, and responses received, will be sent to the Emergency Of ficer (or Emergency ll Director prior to activation of the EOF) and Director-Public Information (or designee). O '
r - EP-501 e- R:v. I
,1 NUCLEAR NETWORK ENTRY FORM I EMERGENCY HOTLINE OR EMERGENCY PLANNER INFORMATION EXCHANGE .
Originator (Name) (Phone) (Date) (Time) MESSAGE (WRITE /PRIt.T CLEARLY): t V) C0!. TACT MADE TO PUBLIC INFORMATION: Person Contacted: Timer Date: Comments: APPROVED BY: ~~ Emergency Otficer (Phone) (Date) (Time) 0,, R, Emergency Director. (Phone) (Da te) (Time) COMMUNICATOR: (Name) (Date) (Time) () Attachment 1 Page-1 of 1
- E ND
.}}