ML20136H227

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission ISSUANCES.July- September 1985

ML20136H227
Person / Time
Issue date:	12/31/1985
From:	NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To:
References
NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I01, NUREG-0750-V22-I01, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I1, NUREG-750-V22-I1, NUDOCS 8601090315
Download: ML20136H227 (69)

Text

--

NUREG-0750 Vol. 22 Index 1 l

l INDEXES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY I

i COMMISSION ISSUANCES i July - September 1985 ga REGog

+

Pg q_

2 5 %.

E o$

U. 5. NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION r

l 0$08 $0t:3 058238 0750 R PDR h

(

I NUREG-0750 Vol. 22 i

Index 1

\\

i INDEXES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY i

COMMISSION ISSUANCES 4

l i

l July - September 1985 I

l I

l I

W I

i i

f

.I i

i

B i

i a

f I

r f

i i

\\

1 I

r i

Available from Superintendent of Documents t

U.S. Government Printing Office l

l Post Othce Son 37082 i

Washengton, D.C. 20013 7082 f

j A year's subscription consists of 12 softbound issues, 4

4 indenes, and 4 hardbound edetions for this publication.

t Single copies of this publication

]

are available from National Technical i

information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 i

l l

l i

i i

i 1

)

i I

r 1

i i

i t

i l

I l

i Errors in this publecation may be reported to the Divieson of j

Technical Information and Document Control, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccara:::':,, Washengton, D.C,20006

]

001/4?2 0326) or f301/482 79es) j I

l i

Foreword Digests and indexes for issuanees of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel ( ALAll), the Atomic Safety and tiensmg lloard Panel ILBP), the Administrative law Judge ( ALJ),the Duccion* Deauons (DD), and the Denials of Petitions of Rulemaking are presented m this document.

Thew digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances.

Information element: common to the cases heard and ruled upon are:

Case name (owner (s)of facihty) l'ull text reference (volume and papnation)

Issuance number issues raised by appe!! ants Icgal citations (cases, regulations, and stat ates)

Name of facihty, Dxket number Subject matter of tuucs and/or ruhngs Type of hearing (for construction perr.ut,operatinglicense,etc.)

Ty pe of luuance (memorandum, ordet, decision, etc.).

These information eternents are displayed in one or more of five separate formats arranged as follows:

1. Case Name Indes lhe case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of the iuuances. l'ach caw name is followed by the type of hearing, the type ofluuance, docket number.luuance number,and full tenI reference.

y

2. Digesti and licaders 1he headea and digests are presented in luuance nuruher order as follows:

the Commimon (CLI), the Atornie Safety and IAensing Appeal Panel (ALAU),

the Atomic Safel) and lAenung llaard Panel (IllP), the Adrmnistrative law Judge ( AlJ), the Duestors' Dedssons (DI)), and the Denials of l'etitions for Hulemaking.

l The headet identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, fauhty name, dothet number, type of hearing,date ofinuance, and type ofissuance.

The digest is a brief naristive of an loue followed by the resolution of the tuue and any legal references used in resolving the luue, if a given issuance covers more than one luue, then separate digests are used for each luue and are designated alphabetically, e,e

1

3. Legal Citations Indes is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or This indes alphanumerical arrangements of Cases Regulations, Statutes, and Others. These citations are hsted as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and Statures may have occurred to cause changes in the number or name and/or applicabdity of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance.

The references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally followed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular issuance. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full test reference.

4. Subject indes Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues and subjects covered in the issuances. The si.bject headings are followed by phrases that gne specific information bout the subject, as ducussed in the issuances being indexed. These phraws are followed by the issuance number and the full test reference.

5. Facility indes This indes comists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from the issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing,date, type of issuance, muance number,and full text reference.

'9 Y

r l

l i

1

w aaasa.-_._

m.

a-.

wmm au m m m--

--&h,M4-iLmhmMw Ma h_smem h J

p l

1 i

CASE N AME INI)EX ARl/ON 4 Pl'HI 10 %I R% H I ( OMP 4%). ci al OPl R A11%G l k i %%8. OR Di R Dl%MlwlNG PROCll DING. Ihn ket %% %IN to 429 Of.

j Si% 4910 4i8 i AslitP Na pa44 ? 01 All L l itP 84-26. 22 NRC llR Il924) 1 RIQClSi iOft ACittIN. tilRICTOR % DilIMON L;NDI R 10 C l R 6 2 2m the bei No 4 928.11D $$ 12, 22 N AC 449 (19sti,110 2019. 22 NRC 64 % (19248 l

l R4 nitIN f (14%O% ( OMP 4%)

OPE R %IING l M i N%l AMI NOMI NI. til CIMON. Disket Nn 41291 Ol 4, At 4H Ala 22 j

NRC 4A1 (192 4 OPl R 41150 t M i %%f AMl NI)Mt.NI. Mt MI)R ANDilM AND OR Di R. Din kel No M29) 08 A I A%l hr No 39 910 01 I 41. I flP $$ 24. 22 NRC 9711949 CApollN A POwl R A IlGill COMP AN) smi Nt) Rill CARollN A l A%Il RN MI,NirtP Al.

POniR A61NC)

Ort R 4IING l N l Nsl. P4R11481%Ill48 DI CIMON ON 5 AlI iY ( ONil Nile 1%%. thbri

. o m.ml nu RP s.,.2 c2 ei ni,. i RP n 2., H NRC m o,.4, i

OPl R 4 TING 1 N i %%I RI Os >N% M +PPOR11%O Sl!MM AR) Dl%N nillON of j

I MI RGI NC) Pt ANNING (t) Nil %ilON% lh be No 40 400 01 ( A%l itP No H c i<ti O n i MP.4 m. n s,C 207 n osu (ll 4 8 8 AND llICIRIC lli t MIN 4IING t OMP ANY, es el l

tlPl R 4 TING (108 %%I. (11N( ll' DING P 4R Il41 INill Al Ol( 1%HIN tlN 1 Mi Rt el N( )

Pt ANN 1%4. li) DNt N el N (ilNikOL A%ll Dil %Il GI NO R AI(lR% lhn bri No, 40 440 0l. 40 441-4 H ( 4%IllP No el 4t ? O4 4 H i, lltP It.)t,22 Nat' $14 t ige ts t)Pl R AllNG L H I %%I. Ml MOR A %lH M 4%D ORDI R. (htet No, %d440EH,4044141[

( A%l MP NPl R A Il%O I ti i N%l Mt MiiN A Niil M A ND OR Di M. the 6e s N w 40 4th 4 H 40 4%7(H 41 4R 817,22 NN4 4'O 1194 4 f

OPl N 4 llNti l H l %%f. Mt Mi su 4 Nilt M lli I All1%O N AlHIN il i IN M l'Ps Of I IH J1 Ni 1

21. Its % E lp lH H iIN AllMinihil II) i H Ni l%i R l Au M% ( ON il N f H IN 4 tit All Re p 41) l%PIInHi%s IF= tre %w to e sa w 4 t '. i hP li 2 7, 22 N R(* l!fi 119:14

( tlMMip%% f 41 IH i lllvi% i fiMP 4 %) AND All libill % 41lll R t M l t He %

IM MI Dl4 Tl A( litlN pl f)41 %I lillit t 14)N % Dill %HIN l>NIH R 10 ( l R I 2 208, lh hei Ni to 294.110 st 80, 22 Nitt letal9ett

()('k l PO% f R ( 11MP A NY, ei el OPl ll 4IlNU lli i N%I til( 1%H IN D.= net 4m 30 41) 08, 30 414 08, Al AR All,22 %WC 99 (1951) il 01t 10 A Pt)% l R A ND l loll t ( llM P A N)

Orl it 4 tit s t k l N41 AMI NDMi %I, Ml Maill 4NDUM AND oltl>l p th ne Nn 40 240 Of A 2. W 211 (H A 2 i A%I RP Na B4 M4 Of l Al 1% wne I uel Pe=4 i sPeawnl.

l.RP89 16. H %RC iwi(1984 6)PI N AilNO i H $ N41 AMl NllMI N f fINI)l R. Din ket Net 90 2%0 Of A t, to 29 0 ill A 1 (4%i DP Nn 84 4% al i Al 1% ewt llus RetfMenal. I RP 8129. H NRt hanfitstl ll l 4%8 H% POW 1 ft I (NP A N Y, et el OPl11 AflNO l N 4 N%I, Ml Molt ANDC4 AND f >RDIII,lhtet No m 462 eil,8 MP 89 22 H NRC19(1980 l

l 0

1 M

G

-Et

e CASE N AME INllf\\

h HIN I N%%I/

Hl t i M % Al%G 1)l N1 %1. lil Ni %1. (H l'l IllitIN I OR RI'! I M 4 Al%G thshet No Pit M 40- 3 4 !)PRM A41,22 %RC I ?t il4248 kl N R MsGi l (. lit MIC Al COM Pt Ht A IlON M % Tl R1 gl % i f( l %%I, MI MON 4 %I1140 A NiliIRill R, lh= 6ct Nos to 7tmi Mi,40 2nril.%C 4 451 ftP %n Al-494 44,M1,64 412 01-%( ). I Itr.h t 14, 22 NNC #4)4 (19496Pi ll l ONU 1%I AN1)iIGilll%G COMP 4%)

OPl N AllNG l H I %%I. CON (ll'lHNG P AN ll 41 1%lIl Al 1)!( ISH)N ON I M1 Rbl NO Pt AN NING, ths hes % 34 422 d H.) Il merycno Plannmp), i ItP 8 4 31, 22 N N C 41011939 4 041%l%% A Pt)Wl R A iinfli COMP % %)

OPl R 4 TING l it I %%f. Ill t 4%HIN. D shti No %L)A2 01. Al All all,22 NNC i (1989 Ml I ROrolli 4 % i 111%s 6% ( t >MP % %), ei.4

%PI( l41 PHOL ii'HNG. %I MON %%IH'M ANil ONI)I R. thshet % 40 289 %P IManagemem 6%wl, Al All Alt. 22 NNC 194 41924

%Pi rl41 PNin t ilHNG. P ARIl41 1%3 fl41 lil CIMON ON till Ni M A%lill) (%l'8 Of Illi lHiC A 4MP 40 All GM 4M. ths hes %i 50 2s9 SP 1 el hr Nn 79 429 09 %PI Glcsim Remast on Managemenit i Itr a 410, 22 N RC.4 82 # 19s u P A(ll N G e ANI)IiiCillN 4 OMP %%)

OPl R 4 fl%G I N I Nsl. Mt MOtl 4%I1136 4%I)ilRill R. Ih= 6et %m 30-2 74 01, 40-321-OL.

(l1A%.14.22 NRC 171al4246 Fill! Al)l l PHI A t ilCINIC ( flMP AN)

IM MI D1411 4Clia)N Nid)t 1 %f,5)lRIC TOR'% IH Cl%le tN t %lll R 10 0 0 R 4 2 206, thunct

%n %i.142, 49141.1)U stil 22 % RC 149 (194 4 0P111411%4 ( H I Nst, lut R TH P 4R il 41 l%Ill Al 1110l%I0%, th= 6ci %m to.392 OL, 40til of f O! HP No $1.4M of 011. I HP 4t24, 22 NN C 1014192 9) 4 DPl N 411%b i H I %%l, M t Mt Ht 4%Ist TI. Ih* 6 0 %n 44192 01, 30 It l Of,( l.l 4 01), 22

%N( l 119a 4 1IPl N 411NG I141 %%I Mt MtIN %%D4 Tl AND ONill N Ih= 60 Noe 40 112 4)!. 90-14) 01.,

Al. 4R 814. 22 %pf 191 (19at e ( ll stit,22 NN( 13 4 l1924 t'PI R %IlNG l H I N55 (IN DI M. Ibu het %n 486192 f H, 40 til d H, ( l l Si 16 22 NRC 449 f 19t 9 11 % M t'fililli % 11lCINH'I a MP4%), ce el OPI N 4 fl%G t k 1 %%8. Ml Main t%Dl'M lh% bo %n 4n 444 01, in 444-OL t el l6P No

'9 4 50 m (H 1. I llP si lt 22 % W( hol (198 41 4 Irl N A ll%4 s I h i N%i. MI MW)N 4 %l)1 M A NI) t ill til N lbg bei % s to 444 4 H At H.2,

%i den (>l At H 2 t 4%l Itr %. 79 4 to sm e tt 1. l eir at 12, 22 NNI diei1944 lill DI Ipf HI I lHVIN ( fiMP %%). et al u l t)4 4 % f I ON At flil% lHals Is tM % lill l MON l %DI N 10 ( l N 4 2 2m lhanet No to 141. (11) A t 11. 22 NM C 4'4 liva t e t %I%lk%II) til 141%)!!

%Pi t 1 %I PNt u f ilHNO. Ml MiiN A%lIl 4 A %D ON Di ll. lbs tet %, 4122 4 %P 4 6t hP 46 41 krf02 %PL iHP #9 2).22 NN( 94 (194 4

% Ipt.1%I4 t i l t IM H 4 %D PuW I N OMPAN)

Ort 114Il%G l N I %%l AMe NI)Mi NI 1%l11 %l Of ( IMON. (b.tet %m to lit ut 41, 44119 4 H A.l l et MP Ni A t 4414118 4 0. litP 19. l4 22 NHC 441 li9sti 1

..a2-6..,E.-

4Ja-.mWmmhn.m,_a.a m_a=

_-a m__--.

I DlGISTS l

lwt 4%( 5 % of lilt %I ( ll 4 N N f 6L'l. A10R) ( OM MiwlON i

1 i

CLI 45-1)

Pill! 4Dl! Plll4 il l CINit ( I N P 4 % Y fi lmern k Gene raimg Wi on tenas 1 and 2),

ihntet Nog 41 342 461, s t IM 411. OPlMAll%G lit i NM. Job 14 19ns e

MS 4f tilt A%llt %t A

T he Comm,w.m renceed the I smcrn k l cology Attum's somments on elles tiscrww ed the 5ccovw.t ami Ib ed Pastial inmal Deuwims of the I a cnwng thi.std il itP 8411. Jil %ltC 44#.

119441, and l i4P lit 14. ll N RC 1719 (19841) T hese sommenes addrewed dency4 hon of mues to the Staff throug h les t nw somt.nons. rw ed for lonal espanerations to apprene thor emcepens, Pla ns. aJcquas t of mur t en v4 IransPorl't$cPendent GFkfRIdumb, pmMhic meas 4fes let menigJ4c tescre ass nicnis. ami pren nforal ruimps t he Commewon also revic=cd the i n enwns lWard de-s moong sua semic T he ( oermnwon dcietmmed that nellhcr the inmments rust the stcowoes ea. ranics) vating the ellet tnenew of the druwims lhes Memoranitum did ems affe e the ( om mnvofit prior dcierminavon that uisoleons envolung hearing reghis of the enmates at the %iale Coerettional lewntus=>n ai Graictiorif. Pennssivame, warrant staying efirsturnew ed the suihori.

Esteem for twuJnn e tef a full Poe f f ofwf at.ng lu ense.

(il 8514 P4(lllC G4% AN D l i l C I N IC ( q )MP ANY llhahin Censon Nus 6 car Pi'me t P la ni.

I'mts I and 21. Ihn het Nos 417't 04. 50.12) 01.; OPl A 4 Il%(i i f( l NM Aupu 1.19 A %.

MI Mt)R 4 %f)t '4 A ND ON Di p 4

T he ( omennuun authorace inc muarse of a full Pomet opres.mg in ense lo, ibe Deshio Canton Nasicat Pouct Plant l'no 2 urw.n finding that all rnatters haic tegn edi quatet, re solved and denic, the joint inactwcones veyaeu to gia, the efterlevenese of sinh authoorainm for f ail use to meet the us, stocria m 10 ( l R t J ?8 Riel (11 SCl3 Pill! ADt ( l'ill 4 t il t INIC ( t hf P ANY fl amern k Gerwraims giaison l'nos i arwt

21. thin net Nim 4) 192 418, M 14 8 411. (fri R 4 flNG l l( I NSI. A uguu 8.194 4. Mi Mt sit 4 %.

Di M AND (>N DI N l

4 t he Commiw..n a l frenc ! vi ihr sommcnig remrd l*v the (statertotif enmaics and foun t s hal e,o he, lhesc iomnwn, no,, hc %, alt h..c ring,emed a,,,

I..,,

w hs h e a,,an.cd e s,.

I mg effestnenew of the I n cwng in.n15 authorisaium for muarw e of a t ali p.eer hicaw for l it'wrn t bencratmg %oon i na l O t.a.jmply, she Cr>mmnuon m dc the suihof usi on im me Aa te r, e ffcs tn e Ill NS<lk PlllI 41)I l Pill % l l I t Illit ( r 3M P % % I il aftwiss h ( a c nc rat iny %f4t i.,ft i nies i sm.l J I (b.i n ct N.,s (e n i t ) i il. to 14 I t il Ili'l 114 IlNt a l l( l NM. \\creenihe # 19 1944 i dilli N I

A li v g oin fli. ' e rty s i g e s itues.kt,st e q of (fng'*geng ) plann r.g igegnq r aswd by t he (ef att rb st l in I

n.as i ehe i i rnsing it...er.1 has no of it>< n ed for the e nempsum vi 111 ( lN 4 m 4 a i amt s

r t he e mis h et h.ed gran.cd Pho,i&lg.h.a i k g ef n (

en May 1994 t he* ( ommnsee n has

~

,,,...,g_ t o,g,. _,..., _.i.s - 1 s,'ottipany

. an,, hc _, r t,.r.g, _ g -,.....

g,ong e k,. h a ttirew d the e sempleon mue I

j

E i

l-l i

I i

i I

l DIG ESTS l*WC ANCIN OF Illi 410%Ill' % %ll I) AND l.lCI N%ING % ppt 41. HO 40til%

}

t i

ALABll2 L OtJlsl%N A POW l R A litiH T CO%IP ANY (%sterford W4m f irstra station i mt I

)l. Ihnkte % h.1A2 Of. OPl R %11N(i ! ICI MI. July 11.1984 lif Cl%lON I

A The Arnal floard denics mou of Jome Intersenors' moima to reopen the reuerd m this I

operaimg lesense priscrdmg on suues of quality anuran(e arkt mansys tNot s hards ter and competerre and refers the rem 4mder to the Commsueon, msofar as si tows inues that may y

3 relaie to matters urkier inscwpahon bs NRC's (Wfne of inscuigatains t he %ppeal Roard sign t

1 denits as moot Jamt intersenors' motum for a profet tne order I

j 8

A sustewiul monum to reopen the reinto of an adiudnatory po= reding muu he tinwl,

[

t j

address a segmin ant safety or ens eronmental euut, and shoe thee a d.flerem rewla might hase heen rea(hed %d the ocols proHered material heen considered initially Bare allegainm, or the f

emple submewon of nce tonient.ons n not enough Louisana Power & light Co ( % aterford l

$leam l'letint bi=m.1:mi l) At AB 786. 20 NRC 1027.1089 (19:41 see alw Peo% ties j

and f lettric Co (Diahio Canum Nuilcar Power Plant. Umts i ami 28. Cl l 814.11 N RC 361

(

36)(19818 i

C At a mimmum, the nem meenal in support of a moteon to reopen muu he set forth moth I

a degree of part% ulard, en esscu of the tiaws and sprofenty requormems commened m 10 l

C I R 4 2 714lbl for admewbie comem.rms 11 must le tantamount to esuknae and poswo the attributes set forth m 10 C l R 4 2 74 H<) defmmg admiwh6e eviderne for 4%uda alory prot (cJ-I j

mas $peofnally. the nce emiense surtsir.mg the motion must he relesani. mairnal and rehe-i bie Paufu Gas and l ies t nc Co (Diehto Canyon Nuclear Poecr Piani. l' mis I and 2A, I

AL All 773.19 N RC 141.14ti 6'. aff d suh nom San L un Obnis Llothers for Pra c s N R C.

f 751 I 2J 1247 (D C Cir 191141. s4 sted m part and reh's en han stamed on ruhcr grounds l

s

'60 F 2J 1320 d !91141 See ele ni as i47 n it i

)

D A motion to reoren that rasws pecuously uncontested euuct muu alw wioils. in addit *on l

5 to other requartmems the uand.eds for admHimg late filed tonienisons emhmt.cd m 10 ( l it I

4 2 714f alf!) Pat ifis (sas ansi l icstrw Co IDiablo Canyon Nuticar Poerr Plam l'nies 1 and 2). Cll 82 39. Ih NH( l'l2. l'1414 (1982) i The burden of wshias.11 of the requirements of a medion to rroivn ihai f ases (we siously uns omcoed mues n a heasy eme %ce Kansas fj4e an.1 f irs tres (o 1% edf ( ree6 Generstmg %gion i mi No la 41 % ft 46 2. 7 N R C )?q, )l3 fl9?pp See ano Al c o ng..),i,n idisam Co ( t hrec %Iac bl.in.1 Ni lcar Woon. Unit No 17, ( l l 114 7, 21 N N( line lloh 11944) l Neither the A b m I nervi b t i41994, as amerkkd. rior the ( ommmiort t impienw nt-n p

my regu64 ums mandre a dem. nur4oon ef errr.r free s onurut tum % hai tho trumre n umply l

a findmg of reew.nahte swura s e ih4 as buits, the faohty a en anil e it he oprearcel euhout en-I dangering the pubtw hc 4it h and %s fe t t 42 U S C. 44 21118 d s. 2212tal 10 ( lR 4 40171ad))M %ce af w l'#oon l icitus-On (Callaeay Plans, I! nit I P, A l A H 7441 10NNC

34) 14Ai194))

U in e nemming slaims of quali's anurante defioenoes, one muu lewik to the empfm aiam of those defioenors in terms of ufe plant opersuon To dr.termine of the requiwie reasim4hle anvrante esius, een queuume muu he addrened ll1 shether att as criainert tonurutiam errors hase been s ured. and f 28 even of so. ehether there has prmethc6eu been so persawse a breakdown en the quatav swuravite protedures as to tasse legihmate doubt shout the cirrall safety rif the feohiy lhof if Ihe tenudcrainms that muu be addressed m teamimag claims of qualdy assurante defe.

f cienots = l e. eheihet all aw cetained toestrusbon errors have been s urest. anil of so, eheiher I

i I

1 i

l

n m s1s ISSUANCt h OF Till. A10%tlO SAll M AND l.lGNSING APPI AL HO ARD%

there has nonetheless been to persauve a breakdown m the quahty suutame prmedures as to raew legitimate doubt about the oseralt safety of the (wihty - are aim pertment to the despai.

ten of a molen to recten on quainy amurarne See Unum i Icstrw Co (Callena, Plant, Uma 11 AL AR-750, IS NRC 1205,12tEll 1198D; Pacific Gas and I 4ectoc Co IDeaMo Canum Nucleae Power Plant Unas I and 21, ALAN 756, la NRC 1340.1)44 4s (19n3), atro sun nom ;

5an t.ues Obmi Mothers for Peme v NRC, 751 12d 1287 (D C. Cir.1954),

• mated in part j amt reh's en banc granted on other grounds, 760 l' 2d 1320 (1935); Diablo Canton, AL All 775, l 19 NRC at 1167.

I The importance of "manasenal anitude'* to an appinant's quahti suurance program -

s e., the =4thngness of company ofrwiels to implemem the program to the futieu - has kms been remsmiett Consumers Poect Co (Mediand Plant, Umts I and 21, Al AR-lon. 6 Al C

!$2,13411973).

3 Remedial measures dretted to conuruction and related qua! sty muurance derwiencies may be considered as part of the appraisal of an appinant's character and competeme llouston j lightmg A Po.er Co. (south Tesas Project, Units I and 21. AL AB 799, 21 NRC 3rio 17174 t1935L

{

A The untimely lastmg of Nosorwal esamries of alleged construcima quahiy amurance defe-j ocnctes es ensufficent to marram reopemng of the record on the suue of management character and competence. Diabki Caeyon, AL AB 775,19 NRC at 1369-70 L

Documents or portions of &numents generated by an appewant or the siaff m connectum l with the construction and regulatory overseght of a fachty are acceptaNe evideme in suppwt of l a motion to reopen Diablo Canynn, CLI $15,13 NRC as 161.

M The NRC rehen upon an apphcant's quahiy anvrance program, arkt no imrtememation, i to ensure that a nusicar power plant and ets tamponent parts are dewgned to accepaNe critene g and standards, and that the plant and ne components are construtted or fahrwated in accordance mth their design See )$ Fed. Reg 14,498 Il970h 10 C F R Part 50 Appendia R.

N Delegalen of quahey anurance actevisies es acceptaNe under the NRC's regulatums. so e

long as an appewant beats the uttemate responsitnhty for quahty suurance performance and es aMe to amure uself that ns driegate es performms adequatety 10 C F R Part 50, Appendia 8, Cnterum I, Common =eahh idison Co (byton Nuclear Power Sianon, Uruis I and 2),

Al AB 79),20 NRC 1$91,1598 (19:43.

i O

5ersmg up eth4tnts m suppnts of a rnotmn to reopen enhnut snaten to pertment porteoris I et an enplanation of the purrow c( the etNhus conitshutes noihmg of talue to a prmtedmg P

Akhnush audiis are an important element of an opptwant's oserell prottram and are re-emted by 10 C F R Part 50, Appendes B, Crnermn h\\ fil, they preside but a therd Icvet of anurarre The prirmeret lesets of auvranre are provided by, first, quahey tratismemhip amt, second, quahey mspestens Q

Praper dannamams of dauments generaied in a quainy a*

wooram la edeiuift amt record dawrepant or thanged snmheeons is a sual part of a e

.ame proeram, he.

+

tauw it es through ins prmesa that the suspent comhtum is etes i..

-fret ted or, in torne tases. Judged by a quehfeed prrwn to be assertaNe m spie of the e ierky Sce 10 C I R.

Part $d, Apperkt 8, Crnena XV, XVI la safaean, certain of these dmumeets murt he evalust, ed for reportabihty to the Commemma under 40 C f R 4 50 $$(el and 10 C f e Fars 21.

R Lengthy $st union of charges devmd of merit is unnesemary See San a w s by Mnth-a ers for Pene,731 F 2d at 1320 21.

5 EaNinta that are unmtelligiNe, are submHted without cdatmn to pertinent pr64ns, are out of date, have no apparent relation to a spenfic charge, arid generally do net suppet the emne for ehwh they are offered, do not conshtute the " relevant, matenal and re'esNe" et dence tequired to support a motion to reopen DiaNo Canyon, AL AB-77),19 NRC at 136647.

T A draft to a workmg dmument and et n enterely reasonaNe that it will go through several revemons tiefore it apprars m final form and presumably tellects the attual entend*d pnotecat of the preparer. As sah, et n not a partwularly useful Hem on obsh to rety en support tf a moima to reopen IJ A bneed may not rety upon ea pane enfarmatmn, presented in camera by the OfNe or it.

tessigations, 6n enskeng lerensme dectouses See Stalement of Polwy; investigahons, inspechens, and Ad#wdwatery Proceedings 49 led Reg 36.012, 36.0)) (1984) 4 6

Ei D&

DIG ESTS twUA%ClS of Ilit Althllr N41 L1) A%ll I.it t %I%e. APPI AI. NO48tlW V

The NkC's derendence on a inenwe for usuraic and imwt, miormaiam shout its fooli-ly makes candor an espeusils emportant element of managemeni sharater. See Metropoleian t omm Co (Three Mae Island Nuclear Semium Umt D, At AH 772,19 NRC 1891, 12ns (1984), res'd in part on other grounds, Cll 8%2, 21 NRC 282 (19 54 See alw ed, Ci l 809, 28 NRC tils, 1836 37 (1985). Souih Tesas. 28 NRC at 371 (nesus of perimular sharatier trasi to particular performance standards contempialed by Atomic Inctgy Act and NRC #cgulata,ns es required).

W Evidence consntmg of the sicus of an mdnedual subnutted m af0dann harm m supperi of a motion to reopen should be submitted en an afTidavit by that mdisntual and not by counwt Dubio Canyon, AL ABAS,19 NRC. at 1367 n 18.

4 Recauw the Commessum must nescuanly depend hcasily on a perpuitee or imenwe to report important mformaison and 10 auume a role of at least partial self potums, n is etwnnat shal the mousatum to dacoter, anahie, and correce pnsentially safety-signifwant problems orige nate meth piant management i

la es entirely appropriale to conwder an applicant's suueufut remedial clYorn m connec-INm with claems that et laks the neccuary shara(ict and compeiense to operaie a plant safety See South Tesas, 21 NRC at 378 74 Not to do no mould have the undewrat9e effed of dw couraging appesants and l=enwes from promptly undertakmg sush torresine measures Z

The adiudwatory teards are not obhged to do a party's rewarch for n see 1auswana Power A Light Co (%sterford Sicam l'acctric Stainm. Umi 3), AL AB 201,21 NRC 479. 481-84 (1985), Phriadelphea f icctric Co (Limernk Generstmg Station, Unns I and 2), AL AB 804, 21 NRC 5117,592 A n 6 41985)

AA A contemion challengmg the adequacy of the siaffs restee of an apptwaiwm is nos litiga-tde m an operanns luenw proceeding See Puific Gas and Ilectnc Co (Diablo Canton Nusicar Power Plant, Units I and 27, AL AR 728.17 NRC 777, 807, reverw decimed. 011 81-32, 18 NRC 1309 (1983). This follows loswally from the fat that et es the aprenant chai ultimately hears the burden of provmg us entitlement to the privilege of an operstmg twenw see Cornum-ers Power Co. (Mattand Plant Umts i A 2), Al. AH-)l5,3 NRC 101,10) 419'6)

BR The NRC's adjudmatory boards are not empoetred to direct the staff en the conduct of its etapettu n and investigatory duties Carolma Power and Lishi Co. 45hearon ilarns Nutlear Power Plans, Omis I,2,3, and 48, C1180-12,11 NRC $14, 51617 f1980s.

CC The staffs retire of contewed technwal tuues es a signdnant mgredient of NRC Inens.

ing perwee-hngs, even though He adequay cannot tw istigated per w, as a consentum_

DD The folh> mg technwal enues are diwuswd Consiruinon Quainy Anurame 404).

StaMng. % clang Audds, impedor Quahrgations. % elder Quahfastums. Q A Dmumentanon.

Pepe Surterft ALAR All DUhl PO%l R COMP ANi, el al (Caia ba Nuslear 5utum. Unets I and 7t. Dahrt Nos M483-OL, M484 UL OPE R A TING l ICI Mi, Juiy 26,19At Di Cl% ION The Appeal fluarJ e hrms three i menwng Hoard pariul minal deuwons that together au-r A

thorire full power operatwen of the too-umt Catasha fauhty, bus leases for tewiutum en a separa att desmon all queumns rettemmg to ihat part of the i etenwng hos J s authontawm permeums the reteers and saorage at Cataeha of spent fuel generated at the appfuants'(konet and McGuire fashries 8

Neither the Atonne i nergy Att n( 1954, as amended, nnr the Commenmn's emplement,,

I l

mg tegulaimns mandate a demonstration of errot. free constructen What they requerg es simply a (mdeng of reavmable suurance shal, as built, the facdely can and will he rperated without en-dangerms the public healih and safety. 42 U S C.

Il 213)(d), 22)2(al. 10 C l-R.

( 50 57(a)(3)h). See alw Umon I'lectric Co. (Caltaesy Plane. Umt 1), AL AB 740,18 NRC 34), 346 (1983).

C la esamming claims of quahty assurance derniencies, one must lemn to the ampluation of show deficienoen m terms of safe plant operanon This inquiry necewtates careful toneders-tum of whether all suertamed consituction errors have been cured and whether there has been a breakdown m quainy amurance prosedures of sufLcient demenwont to raiw legitimate doube as to the overall amegnty of the faulity and He safety-related strus tures ami components lbsd D

The Comnuuun's Rules of Pruiwe require an arpellans to idennfy clearty en its brief the errors of fact or law that are the subpect of the appeal f or each essue appealed, she precew I e

7 l

l l

i

DIG ESTS 1%UANt IS OF Till A10MIC Mil.1Y AND 1. inn %ING APPI Al. HOARDS pirtion of the reowJ relied upm m suppet of the awerinm of error must alw be prmated to C I R 2 762fdfilt E

A party's f ilure to subnue a brief com,simng suihicnt mformainm ami argument to altoe the appellase iribunal to make an mielleyent dnpoutum of the mues prewnted ht its appeal is tantamount to their stundonment Duke Power Co (Catamha Nuclear Statum Umis 1 and 21, AL AB-353,4 NRC 397. 41) 41976L F

A mere referente m a brief to previoud, filed propowd (mdings of Inst and comtuvons of law wishout further dlummation as to why the propswed findmgt are correct will not sufTece lo show why a teard's contrary determmatum is erroneous G

Becauw twenwng boards must he vested with conuderable lahtude in determmmg the courw of the prmeedengs which they a.e called up n to conduct, an appeal hoard stil review hcenwng board scheduhng ruhngs only in the essent necewary to mmte that em party has been denied a fair opportumiy to advance ets cause. Southern Cahforma i deen Ca 6 :n Onofre Nutlear Geneistmg Siaten, Units 2 and 31 Al. AB 212,7 AIC 986,99818974) See ahn Pubis Scrwe Cn of 8mteana (Marbte flill Nutlear Generstmg Stanon, Umts I and 2L ALAB-459, 7 NRC 179,184 0978L ll A mere showing that a twensang board erred by curtailms trou-etaminaten n noe suffb cient to marrant appellate rehef in additen, the complaming party must demonstrate actual pre-Judge - i e. that the ruling had a substantial effect on the outcome of the proteedmg. Blovuon Lighung & Power Co 450uth Tesas Project, Umts I and 2L AL AB-799, 21 NRC 360,176-77 (1985), caims Long Island Lighams Co. (shoreham Nue; tear Power 5 ation, Umt 1). AL AB-788, 20 NRC 1102,1811 (1984L See also Lovmana Power and Light Co (Waterford Steam E lectric Stanon Uma Ja, AL AB 732,17 NRC 1076,10% (198)L Southern Cahforma Idswn Co. (San Orw4re Nuclear Generstmg 5ta ion Umts 2 and 3L AL A847),13 NRC 688. 697 & n 14, affd, e

CLI 82-11. IS NRC 138)(198D 1

la is now nell-settled that the muante of the f ederal I mergency Management Aperwy's (F1 M Al (nel (mdmst on the adequacy of offute emergemy plans and preparedness is not a pre-requmte to the authorushon of a full-poect operalerig twenw. Rasher, prehmmary ll M A reviews and amenm (mdings are sufhcient as lems as such information permeis the l acensing Board to conclude that offuse emergency preparednen provides reawnable assurarne that ade-quste protetine measures can and will he taken m the event of a radiological emergency Paufic Gas and Electric Co (thaNo Canyon Nutlear Power Plant Umts I and 2). AL AB-775,19 NRC 1368,1379 41984L ciong Southern Cahforma idison Cn (San Orw4re Nuticar Generstmg Sia-hon, Uruis 2 and 3), Al. AH-717,17 NRC 346, 380 m $7 (191I3), Cmcmnau Gas & ticciric Co (Wm il /emmer Nuticar Power 5: anon, Umt No I L AL AN 727, 8 7 N RC 760, 775 n 20 (1983) See alw Deiroit I dien Cn f f ntno I erme Ainmic Pomer Plant, Umt 2L AL AH-730.17 NRC 1047, Ith67 048)L J

A fuenung hnard is required so sonsaler all hve fators sprofeed in 10 C f M 2 714(allla hefore admeitmg a late consentum, even of the contenhon n bawd on previouMy una-vastah6e mformaimn Duke Power Cn (Cataehe Nutlear Statiori, Units I and 2), Cll 43-19,17 NRC 1041,1945 (195);

K Sethon 1894 of the Atomsc f nergy Act does not provale members of the pubhc with an unqualified right to a heanns Rather, the Act permits the estabinhment of reasonable threshold requirements for the admisuon of contenhons to NRC fuenens prmeedings Id at 1045 47.

L The Commnsson has provided by rule that neither need for power not financial quahfus-tions quesuuns are to be esp 4ored in certain operstmg hcense perweedings See 10 C.F.R.

$1106(c) (need for powerb 10 C F R. 2104(cH46 as amended effective fktober 12, 1984, 49 i ed. Ret )$,747 )$.732,as corrected 49 Fed Reg 36.631 (19s4) (financial qualifications).

M in meenne factnr three of 10 C F R. 2 714(a)(1) for late favd contente*s, a bare aswr+

tion of the past effecteveness of a party's parncipanon m proceedings, unsupported by spearic in-formatam from ehwh a board could draw an informed anferente that the party can and odl make a valuable contribut on on a partwular mue en the perweeding, will not suffice See Wash-ington Pubhc Power Supply System (WFP1% Nuclear Project No 31, ALAB 747,18 NRC lief, 1981 098)L Minnwppi Pneer & Light Co (Grand Out( Nuclear Station, Uns.s I and 2).

ALAB 704,16 NRC 172$,1730 (1982).

I B

r

DIGl:STS 1%%U ANCIS OF Till. A10Mlf SAltlY AND litl N%3Nti Af'l'l AB, HOAR DS N

An appeal twiard n requwed on appeal of a imenwng leerd detowm to apply the Commn-wem's regulaimns en eflest at the hme of the appeal Polemac l 6cttrn Pneer Co IDouglas Pmnt Nuclear Generatmg Sta.anm, Umts I and 2h AL AR-218,8 Al C 79, A2.Al (19741 0

The folluemg tethnwal mue n dntuned Inter 5ranular Sirew Corrowon Cra, hmg iIGSCCf.

AL All-814 PHILADf LPill A ILICTRIC COMPAN) D emernk Generasmg 5taten. Units I and 2L thkes Nos 30-35201, %353-OL; OPE R AllNG llCI Nst, Augue 13,1981. MI MO.

R ANDUM ANI) ORDI R A

The Appeal Snerd demes emersenors' mosen fiw a stay of the i menwng Board's paruel emual decisson rewiving the last conecued mues en thes operalms twenw prencedmg and authew.

umg the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulanon to mue a full pn=et beenw for the timernk facility H

The hrst criveren for a stay es a strong shnoms that the mosma party n hkely to presail on the ments. A stas motion must alw addren ihree other fa(tors ehether the mosant mill be nreparably harmed m the ahwrwe of a stay, whether the grant of a suy would harm any other party, and ehere the pubhc emerest hes.10 C F R. 4 2 788tc)

C A party's fadute to addren the stay sniena see out en 10 C l R. 4 2 758(el may retutt en j summary demal of a stay mason. See Pubhc Serswe Co of Indiana (Martdc thil Nmicar i Generstmg Staten, Umts I and 27, AL AR-493,8 NRC 253,270 76 019788 D

Under the "smmediate efiedssenen" tule, unten the Commnwon enhereise direus, an emmedtate effectiveness determinatmn by the Commminn as without prejudwe to the Appeal Board's determmalum of a saay moton pursuant to 10 C I' R 4 2 78 Ale). or en appeal on the merm pursuant to 44 2 762 and 2 785, et en any subwquent perneedmg 10 C l' R 4 2 764fsl I

An archcation for a stay must he fded methin ten days of sersne of the ocaseon lot ohnh a suy is requeued 10 C f R 4 2 788(at F

in a motum for a stay when attemptmg to show hkel hinwl of pressibng on the merits, et es not suf1weent simply to stare confidence tw an tapettaten of utumaic suaess Metrornistan f.down Co i Three Mile Island Natear Sisimn, Unit it, Oll-8417,20 NitC 801,804 45 (1924L U

trreparable harm et often the nwns important fattor m determmeeg the need lot a suy, a party muu reasonably demonstrate, rMe merely allege, suth harm Duke Pu*et Co 4Catasha Nuclear $aaten, Umts I and 27, AL AB.794,20 hRC 1630, 86)l-35 t19a48 ALABBl$ METROPOlli AN I DISON COMPANY, et al (Three Mile bland hwicar losine, Unit No IL DmtetNo 30-229 SP (Management l'hawl iPICI Al. PlttWil DING, August 29,198$ MI MOR ANDUM AND 011pl R A

The Appeal hoard demes emetsgruw's mnime in teopen the retord (ne further hearms m the management phaw of ihn restart proterdieg, conttuding that the moton es mas Dmely and does nos demonst# ate that a daffererit result mighl have been teethed had she menty proffered material been Ermsedtred mihally B

In order to tutteed, a moton to reopen a resord must he hmely eruf eMren a segnifitant safety tv environmensal mue il muu alw show that a different tesuN mopht hate heep feathed had she nemey protiered maierial been conwlered on halty I reuswana Pomet A I aght Cu (# ater-ford Sicam Ilettnc Station, Ona 31, AL AR 786,20 hitC 1087, lon9 (1944s C

A year delay betecen the hme mformanon was made asadable to the pernes and the Hme of fdmg a motion to reopen ord'narity tenders omh a monon untamely See, e s. Panfic c Gas and llectric Co (Diablo Canyon Nmlear Power Plant, Uness 1 and 28, AL All 779,19 NatC llel.1369, affd sub tudn San Lem Ohtspn Mothers for Peme 9. bltC, 75$ l' 2d IIS7 ID C, Cat 1984l sassted en part and reh's en hans granted on othet grounds, th0 F 24 4120 (1981h Lousmana Power and Ieght Co Iwaierford Steam flectrie Sutmn, Unet JL AL AR 75),18 hitC 1321,1323 a ) (198D D

in assessens the Hmehness requirement of a notion to teopen the setord, the guesima 64 fint whe*her a imenens board es soft seteisms entdence on an twue to ehnh the new information [

]

telates at the time the informahon comes to the mosant's suemion, but rather, whethet the on..

format on could hase been tuhmeited earher Metropuletan idesnn Co IThree Mde Island Nmto-at Staimn, Unie No. II, Cil 818, il NRC lill, lif e A n ) litsth Vermone tantee Nutlear Power Corp IVermont tankee Nurteet Pooet $tatmni, AL AB ljl, 6 AIC $20, $2) n 12 11973)

I I

9 J

1 4

I

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC NAFETT AND 1.lCLNSING APPLAL HOARDS ALAB.Si6 141510 % I DisON COMPANY Pilgnm Nuclear Power Stainml, Dodes No.

50-293-OLA; OPl R ATING LICINSE AMl NDMI N T; $cp.cmber 5,1985, Di ClilON A

The Aparal Board afTirms the Licenung floard's dem l of miersenor's untimely remion to imersene m this operatmg twense amendment proceedmg for failure to addrew the to C F R

( 2.7141al latenen factors B

Under 10 C F R. t 2.714(a), nomimely petamns in miervene mil not be entertamed abwns a determmaton by the Licensing Board that the pet' tion should be granted thewd upon a balanemy of Gsc factors- (d Good cauw, if any, for failure to Gle on time; (n) The asaitetuhty of other means whereby the petitioner's interest **>ll be r tened. (us) The essent to whwh the petitioner's panicipation magt.nably be espec6ed so abst m descloping a sound record (n)

The essent to whech the glamner's mierest edi be tenesented by ennems panics. (vi The essent to which the petissoner's participation will broaden 64c.ssues or delay the pnweeding C

%' hen Gims a late peinen to mtervene, n n the peinener's obhgation to address the f:ve lateness factors of 10 C.F.R. ( 2.784(a) in the pennica nwif.10 C.F.R. 4 2.714(a).

D

% hen fdmg an untimely petiten to entervene, the burden of persuasion on the lateness factors of 10 C F R, t 2.714(a) es on the petnooner.10 C.F.R. ( 2.714(at E

% hen appeahns purely procedural points, appellants should esplain in their papers pre. J ciwty what mjury to them was occanoned by the asserted error (s). Cf. Long Island Lrghtmg Co. '

(Shoretam Nuclear Power Station, Umt 1), ALAB 78g,20 NRC l102,1151 (1984).

AL A B-887 COMMONH EALTli EDISON COMPANY (Braideted Nuclear Power Station, Umts I and 2), Docket Nos 50-456-OL, 50-457-OL; OPER ATING LICENSE, September 6,1985.

MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER A

The Appeal Board demes a motion by apphcant for directed certifwaten of a Licenung Board ruimg that allowed intervenors to amend - after obsamms discovery from the NRC staff

- a comention that the Board previously found to tie msufGciently speciGc.

L B

in deculms whether to cuercese its dncretionary directed certifwation authoney, appeal f boards apply a two-part test. It considers whether a licenseg board ruimg enher (1) threatens i

the party adverwly affected by it wah immediate and sermus arreparable impact which, as a '

practical matter, could not be alleviated by a later appeal, or (2) afYects the basic structure of the proceeding m a pervasive or unusual manner. Pubhc Service Co. of Indiana (Marbie tidl Nuclear Generstmg Siaten, Umts I and 2), ALAB.405,5 NRC 1890,1892 (1977), see, e g, Metropoli-tan Edison Co (Three Mde Island Nuclear Staten Umt il, ALAB-791,20 NRC 1579,1582 (1984).

C Smce the admrssson of one or more additenal mues mio an ongomg case seldom has a pervauve or unusual effect en the basse structure of a proceedms, appeal boards have tradnional-ly dechned to revice on an interlocutory haus ruimet that simply admn another comenten. See, e s, Cleveland Electnc illummatmg Co (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unns I and 26, ALAB 706,16 NRC 1754 (1982).

D The base structure of an ongoms adjudication is not changed simply becauw the admis-sion of a contemion results from a hcensms board ruimg that is important or novel, Metropolatan ;

Edison Co (Three Male Island Nuclear Station, Umt I), ALAB 791, 20 NRC 1579,1583 '

(1984), or may confhct with case law, pohty or Commissaon regulations. Cleveland Electric illo-mmatmg Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unns I and 2), ALAB475,15 NRC 1105,111213 (1983); see also Pennsylvama Power & Light Co. (Susquehanna Sicam Elecinc Station, Unns I and 2), ALAB441,13 NRC 550,552 (1981). Similarly, the mere fact that a party must htisaie an adddsonal issue, or that a matter mit be subject to adversanal esploranon rather than NRC staff review, does not aher the base structure of the proceeding in a pervasive or unusual way no as to justify enterlocutory review of a hcensms board decinon. See Aruona Puble Service Co.

(Palo Verde Nuclear Generstmg Station, Umts 2 and 3), ALAB 742,18 NRC 380,384 (1983);

Virgima Electrw and Power Co. (Nonh Anna Power Station, Umts I and 23 ALAB-741,18 NRC 371. 378 (1983).

E Although the general standard for mierlocutory revsew is the same whether or not under-taken on certifaation or by referral, see Virginia Electrw and Power Co. (Nonh Anna Power Sta-taon, Unns I.ind 2), ALAB-741,18 NRC 371,375 n 6 (1983), an appeal board is more hkely to antercede where a hcenang board Feheves that its ruhng has the type of overall impact on the proceeding that warrams the appeal board's immediate attention.

le

- - - - - - - - - = - - - - - -

l 1

I I

a t

i l

l l

l I

DIG ESTS 8%t 4NCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICINNING HO4RD%

I i

LBP-85 22 ILLINOIS POWI R COMP ANY. et al. ICimson Power Suison. Unii 2), Dos ket No 50-462-OL; OPE R ATING !!CE N5f. July ll.1985. MEMO 4 ANDUM eD ORDI R A

The Lucnuss Board grants ApplNuls' rwtion to ter inate the proseedmg for an operat-

'l ing imense for Unie No 2 of the Cimion Power Statmn, subject to ceruin cond>tions 1

LBP-85 23 UNI \\ l'R$1TY OF LO% f t L (Tramms and Rewarth Rexiori. Desket No to-223-S P f

( ASLBP No 84A09412 SP). SPt CI AL PROCliDING; July 19. 1985. Mi MOR eDUM AND ORDIR L B P-8 5-24 BOSTON I DISON COMPe)

( Pilgnm N utlear Power Suison L Dos kes No 50-293-OL A ( A%t BP No 85-510-01 L A). OPE R ATING LICI NSI AMI NDMI NT. July 19 1985. MF MOR AN()l:M AND ORDt R A

in thn Memorandum and Order, the Licettung Board dnmmes a penetton to micrvene for fadure to show good cause, untimehness and lack of s'ending B

A petiton in intersene m a bcense amendment case that n late by 9 dass and does not i

show good cause for laic films will he dnmnsed for unterr.chness I

C Ahhough reuden6e 43 wies from a nuclear power plant may be adcovate m c*ubinh standmg with respect to apphemisons for the constructior, or operaison of a nudear power, rtant, this same datance es not adeque, methout a further showmg, to esubinh sursus m a use m.

I solsms a change m allowable A-effecine for a fuel pool.

j L BP.85-25 PHIL ADl! PHI A Elf CTRIC COMPANY (Limerwk Generaims Suieon. Umis i and 3

27. Docket Nos 50-3'

.)t. 50-353-OL ( ASI BP No 81 46007-018 OPI R ATING t ICI NSf.

j July 22.1985. f-OUR Til P ARTI Al INITI AL Di CislON l

A in ihn Partial Inst 41 Decnmn the hoard fmds in favor of the Apptwani with respes-to

]

nsues concernmp ofhate emergency plannmg for the State Correctional insistution al Gralerford.

j and authoeves the issuanic of a full power operating lesense.

j B

Esatuaison ume estimaies (ETF i need not mclude an analnn of worst ose werurms j'

Such an ana'ysn n not contemplated by either the NRC regulations or NURI G4mS4 i TI s are miended na he represenuine and re asonable so that any protestne asimn decmon based im j

them mitt reficct realnin conditions C

Neither NRC regulations nor Ni'Ri G C654 estabbshes a stansl.ita for effectu.itmg esa u-j asums siihm a pnen terne An esas u.sise n i.mc estimaic does not atteriirt to predn t esasi sonde

[

j torn durmy an esa uaimn R ather..: aticmpos in mdwaic the sensiinits ol' she analws to a number of commonly maurrmy csents i

1 HP 8b2o ARl/ON A PUH1IC Sl R\\ ICI ( OMPAN) et al. IPalo \\ crde Nudear Generaimg Su-l inm. Units 2 and 31 Ons k et Nos STN 50 529.Ot. STN Sa 510 OI

( Ast.HP No I

80-447-01-O! p. opt R ATING t 101 NNI. July 22.1985; OR Di R Dl% MIS $1NG PROff f DING LBP-85 27 COMMONWI ALTil 1 D150% COMPANY (Brandmood Nudear Power Station. Umis I and 27. Dotket Nos 50-456. 50-457 OPI R ATING LICE NSE. July 30. 1985. MIMORANDUM DETAILING RATIONALE IN SUPPORT OF JUNE 21. 1985 ORDI R ON ADMISSlHillTY l

OF NEINER FARMS CONTENTION 4 (R AIL 1 TOAD i 4Pt.OSiON) l A

The Lwensrg Board rules on a three-part contenisen allegmg that the use of the ilhnon Central Railroad to transport esplovvc matensis from a federal ammunition plant creates a haiardous condition due to the proximity of the railrsmJ tracks to the nuclear facshiy The Board rules the subpart of the coritention alleging.aootage or a purpinefully mduced euphmon es precluded from the proceedmg under 10 C F R. ( $0.13(at The other subsectmns of the conten.

Ison, addresung the risk (probability and consequences) of an accidenial railroad cuplouon, were found to be admissbie. The Board ruled that those subparts do not insolve "use or deployment l

l l

$h l

i

--~ ~ -. -.- -

-~ ~ --....

. - ~. -.

l l

f I

IHGESTS l

I i

ISSUASCES OF Titt ATOMIC SAFETY AND 1.lCESSISG BOARI)S l

of meapons malent to U 5. defenw acuuhes" mnsideranon of whwh would he pretiuded under 10 CS R. ( 50.13ttd B

Part of the ranonale behmd 6 5013 was the AlC's recogmuun of the pracucal neceswy j

i to esempt apphcants from proicctmg their facihises agamst mahtary or paramshtary attacks threat.

enmg the natonal security, egen af the stiack as detected agamst a nuclear plant, becauw the i

country's uccunty is miended to be left entirely to the naten's defenw esiahhshment and secun-ty agenciet Flonda Power and Light Co. (Turkey Pomt Nuticar Generstmg Units 3 and 41,4 AEC 9,13 (l%7), afTd, Seigel v. Af C,400 F.2d 778 (D C Cir.1968L i

C The AEC determmed that requirms an apphcant to derrumsarate that its facehty n protect.

ed agamst an enemy attack mould "sufle utterly the peaceful utilstation of atomic energy in the Umsed States." Scisel v. AFC,400 F.2d 778,783-84 (19c8).

i j

D Two meumes must be made when deierminmp if a contention is barred under 10 C F R.

l 150.13(al. The first is whether the postulaied sabotage es " directed asamst the facihty" and the second is whether the saboteurs quahfy as an " enemy of the Umted Staiev E

in determinmp mheiher an attack es " directed asamst the facihty." the sutyecuve intent l of the attackers is not matenal. The Board as not required to engage en an enquiry into the mmd !

of an attacker to determme whether the attack was miended to damage the nuclear facihty or whether the damage was merely incidental to some other hosule goal. See Cleveland Electne 11-I f

luminatmg Ca (Perry Nucicar Power Plant Umts I and 2), LBP-St-42.14 NRC 842, 844 a

(1981).

p l

F The Appeal Board m the Indian Pome caw determmed that an appheant is not required to take afTirmative measures agamst an attack by an armed group which es not an enemy of the

. Umsed Staict Conschdated Fason Co. of New York (Indian Pomt Stanon Uma No. 2),

[

ALAB-202,7 ALC 825,829 30 (1974L l

i G

A Board may determme whether an attacking force is an " enemy of the Umted States" j by applymg the objecuve test set out in the Perry decneon. That test quesnons whether a hosth act was committed and whether the damagmg resuh was caused by the hostu act_ If the answers to both quesuons are affirmauve, the group or nation perpetratmg the host & act quahfies as an 5

enemy of the Umted States Cleveland Ilectne litummatmg Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plam.

Umts I and 21.LBP II-42,14 SRC 842,844 (1981).

f II When an enemy act as beyond the type of design basis secunty threat encompaswd by 10 :

d I

CJ R. t 73.l(a). then an applicant es enutled to rely on the government's mahtary or law en-forcement agencies to handle such an atta(k.

I L

l_

l Secuon 73.lf al of 10 CJ R is to be read in pari maiena with { 5013. Carnhna Power &

)

Light Co. (Shearon if arrn Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2) LBP-82-Il9 A.16 NRC 2069, l

2098 (1982), Imt Part 73 refers to ubotage accomphshed with the uw of small weapons carned j

out by small bands of saboteurs whole 4 5013 addre%cs mahtary-style atta(ks. broader in nature and employing heavier mesprms Part 73 contemplates uhntage on the plant site, and the secunty l

measures mandated under Part 73 are not in be cuended beyond the vicemty of the plant's I

i boundanes. See 10 C F R (( 73.45 and 73 4et t

J To determme whether a contentwi n barred under 6 5013(bl the Board must decide mhether the contenison postulates a scenano causing damage to the reactor's mtegnty which is the result of"uw or deployment of weapons incident to U.S. defense a tivines."

t K

When erullery shells or esplouves are transported, their mere movement is not

• deploy-rnent" withm the content of 6 50.13(b) because they are not being strategically arranged m loca-uons appropriate for their use, unkke nuclear missks m selos from which they can be launched, or conventional weapons bems tactically placed in the field with a edhtary unit. It stretches the

{

raaonale on which 10 Cf.R. t 50.13 is premned to accept mere movement of raw ingredients for the manufacture d ammuniuon, or the ammumuon itself, to or from a local ammumuon plant, as deployment of werpons.

l.

An explosion of a nuclear mnsele or other weapon would either be an enemy act, or,if a U.S. nuclear device, would anse from the deployrr-nt of weapons by the U.S. See Philadelphia Electne Co. (Lamenck Genersung Stauon Umts 1 and 2) LBP-82-43A 15 NRC 1423.1500 (1982) and C!cveland Electnc Illummatmg Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2).

LBP-81-42,14 NRC 842,845 (1981).

i 12 t

l T

i 2

-,, - - -. -~

%m-.-

r.-

-<-m 7,

m.

.m

,-..w---

y

-r

<-- - - -. - - -. +

.e.-.'

1 DIG ESTS INNt'ANCES OF illE ATOMIC SAF ETY ANil iICENNING llO ARDN M

le n erreus to sien 10 C I R. 4 5013thi as precluthng the Hoard from conwdermy ansthmg related to the mihtary that might impasi a nuticar fac hiy, on the theory shal such mass-tary actmty n necewanly "use or derknmem of weapsms incidem to 11.5 defense attmtics."

I c, past agency prat'ime has allowed thurds to tonuder the posuNe enks to a nu(lear ptam from crashes of mdiury aerplanes Con urners Power Co lHis Rock Point Planal, LHP.A4 32,20 NRC 601,639 52 (191I4L LBP-85-27A CAROLIN A POwlR A LIGilt C04tPANY and NORTil carol.IN A t ASTE RN MUNICIPAL POwfR AGENCY (Sheaton liarrn Nuticar Pomer Planti. Dm kes N o.

50-400-OL ( A(LHP No 82-472434M ), OPrR AIING IICI N51; Auguse 14. 1985; Rf ASONS SUPPORTING SLIMM ARY DISPOSITION OF f Mf RGENC) PL ANNING CONil NTIONS A

This Memorandum supphes the reawns supporung the L scenung Board's carber grant of sescral monons for summary dnpimimn on emergerwy plannmg tuneeniens L HP 85-28 C AROtlN A POW E R & LIGilt COMPANY and NORTil CAROLIN A EASTERN M U NICIP AL POW I R AGENC) (Shearon llarrn N uticar Power Plant), Dot het No 50-4ie-OL ( ASLHP No. 32-47243-OLL opt R AllNG LICE NSE; August 20, 1985, PARTI AL INITIAL Of CISION ON SAFET) CONTENTIONS A

in this Parnal Imual Decmon, the Ltcensng hoard decides nmse of the comested safety twues, including management capability issues, in the Apptwants' favor.

B The forno mg icthnical nsues are diwuwed Accuracy of Thermolummescem Dosame-ters; I nvironmental Quahfranon of f lecincal I quirment; integnty of Contamment Concrete.

L BP-45 29 F LORIDA POwl.R AND LIGili COMPANY (Turkey Pomt Nuclear Generaims Plant, I'mts 3 and 41, Docket Nos 50 250 OLA 1, 50-251-OL A 1 ( A5L BP No 84-4403-L A) (Veswl Flus Reductnint OPIR ATING LICENSL AMENDMI NT; August 16,1985; OR DL R A

in ihn Order the LKenung Board rules on L Aenwe's monons for summary dnposinon of lmersenors' two admstted contemions m thes operstmg hcenw amendment proceedmg The motion for summary dnpowuon of Intervenors' Contenuon (b) n gramed The monon for sum-mary disposinon of intertenors' Contention (di is derued.

B Under 10 C F R. ( 2.749(d) a motmn for summary dnpouten vil be granted when the record shoes that there is no genume issue as to any material fact, and that the mesmg party is emuled to a fasorabic decmon as a matter of 143-C Summary disposition n available m hearirigs on ameridments to licenses D

The folkiemg technsal nwes are dncuwed iCCS esaluatuut model, peak cladd'rts temperature; fuel design hmits, heas transfer coelTwiems; Appendia K; anucal heat flun, depar-ture from nucleate txwlms (DNHR)

LBP 85 30 METROPOLITAN I D150N COMPANY, et at (Three Mile Island Nuclear Statum, Unis No lh Docket No 50-289-SP ( ASLHP No. 79-429-09-SP) (Restart Rcmand on Manage-menth SPI CI AI PROF f E DING. August 19. 1985. PARTI AL INITI AL Of CislON ON Tilf REM ANDED 155UL OF Tile Dlif.K AMP M All GR AM A

in ihn Partul iniual Decmon, the f acensmg Hoard resolges lhe remanded "Decckamp madstam mue" m fasor of the Licenwe.

LBP-85-31 LONG 15 LAND LIGitTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Sianon, Uma 1),

Da ket No. 50-3224)L 3 (Emergency Plannmst; OPE R A TING LICEN5E; August 26, 1985, CONCLUDING PARTI AL INITIAL DLC1510N ON f MfRGENCY PLANNING A

in ilus concludmg Parnal Imual Decauon, the Board fmds no reasonable assurance that adequate prosecuve measures can and wdl be taken m the event of a radiological emcrgency at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Stanon, and therefore no operauns hcense shall be issued.

B Lack of a plan for concerted acuon among the State, local government, and unhty m re-a sponse to a radiological emergency creates a nsk of release to the pubhc of confhctmg and con '

fusms mformanon m the event of a radiological emergency at Shoreham. The State and local I governments have indrated that, m an emergency, they would pursue a courw of acnon mde-I pendent of that of the unhty. The absence of a cooperatne effort constdules a substanual defb l ciency m the Shoreham emergency plan.

I C

%'here State statutes prohibit the unhty from performmg actmues eswnnat to the suc-i cessful emplementauon of the unhty emergency plan, the Board fmds that the utihty does not have an adequase plan to respond to an emergency at the Shoreham Nuctear Power Station.

D The follooms sechnmal asues are discuswd. Relocation centers; Thyroid momtonna.

13

1 DIG ESTS 1%%t'ANCES OF Tile A10%1lC NAILT) AND LICl%ING llOARD%

i HP. A(-32 IEN % Ulit tills I L1 CT RIC COMPAN), et al IComanshe Peak $icam ileonc Sta-tmn, Uma I and 21 Da kes N ot 5tL445-Ot &OL-2, 50-44tiot AOL 2 l A%I HP No

?9-43tHWOL), opt R 4 TING LICENsl ; August 29. 1985, MI MOR ANDilM AND ORDi R A

in thn Memorandum and Order, the twenung Hoard destines to adopt A pplecants' Man.egement Plan as the wie hasa for conimued htigaison of thn case, holdmg that a hearmy nuy be termmated and unresolsed swucs turned over to the Applicants and Stad only aben the taus left to be done are merely confirmatory of plant safei).

H

% here Applecants sought to esclude hispation of pnor QUQC and design practeces be-cause of a comrechensive program of rectammation of the safely of the plant, n would not he proper to determme whether the 3 udy adequately resolses the mues until the results of the sludy are availaNe for esammation and challenge.

O

% here intervenors sought an order to require Apphcants in preserve plant components remmed from the plant for deogn deficiencies but did not provide any authonty for such an order, the crueru for a stay are not met and intenerwrs do not meet dncmery cntena because they are not seekmg access to mformatiort.

D

% here the mformation being collected by Apphcants mas sufreciently important to marrani the d-lay, the ikurd gramed Apphcants an andefimte commuance m their obhganon to respond,

to sumnury dispoution motens bems addressed pursuant to the Management Plan.

E Although a major study of plant safety may not be left solely for Staff esammatson and he escluded from the heanng process when the siudy n relevant to an admnted contention, n l may be poswNe to esclude the fmal stages of the study after the carher stages hate demonstraled !

Hs adequacy and only similar taes are left to be performed.

L B P-85-33 CLL4 LLAND E LLCTRIC ILLUMIN ATING COMPANY, et al (Perry Nuclear Power Plant. Umis I and 2), Dot het Nos. 50-440-OL, 50-441 OL ( ASLBP No SI 4$74)4-OL),

OPER ATING LICENSE; August 30,1985, MEMORANDUM AND ORDE R A

in this Memorandum and Ord-r, the tscensmg Hmrd demes Imervermr's rnotion to reopen the record and submit a new contentmn findmg that Apphrants' request for esempton mas properly filed under the prmissons of 10 C F R. 4 5012 and need not have been presented by petitmn pursuant to 10 C F.R. ( 2 758.

I B

When a request for esempton from a Commmon regulaten does not contend that ap-placaton of the rule or regulaton would not serve the purpmc for which n was adopted. but y

rather that ets apphcation would result m costly delays m operat#on, that request is properly filed under 10 C F R. 4 5012 and need not be the subert of a reteison pursuant to 10 C F R. 4 2.75R.

C When a requesi for esempimn from a Commisuon regulaten es not directly related to a ceqention in the proceedmg. and does not mtoive such senous safety, envstonmental, or cnmmon d fense and securny nutters as to warrant the Hoard's raseng mues on its own musa-tne, the request n properly filed pursuant to 10 C F R. t 5012 and need not he the subject of a peinmn under 10 C F R. t 2.758 L B P-AS-34 VIRGINI A Lt ICTRIC AND POW ER COMP ANY (North Anna Power Station Umts I and 21. Docket Nos. 50 338 0L A-1, 50-339-OL A-1 ( A5LHP No 23 4RI.011. A), OPE R ATING LICENSE AMI.NDME NT, September 3,1985; INITI AL DI CislON A

The Licensms Board suues an iminal Decimon authonimg the swuarse of an amendmem,!

to the operatmg hcenses of the North Anna Power Station, Umts I and 2, uhwh permits the re-teipt and storage of 500 spent fuel assembhes transshipped from the Surry Power Station, Umts I and 2.

B The values in Tah6e S-4 reflect the environmental rnk of accidents mvolvmg the ship-ment of spent fuel m casks as well as accidents which might be caused by employee error m prepenng the cashs for shipment.

C The record, m amphfyms and supportmg the analyss in the Safety Evaluation Report, es-tabhshes that the probabihty es remote of either a sabotage attack bems undertaken or being suc-cessful, and that, even if such an attack was successful, the impact upon the oubhc health and safety and upon the environment would be very small.

D Pursuant to 4102(2)(E) of NEPA, the Environmental Assesunem must dncuss whether a proprned action mvolves unresolved confhcts concerning alternative uses of available resources.

E Consderanon of an ahernative based on economic supenonty (and not environmental su-penorny) is not the responsbahty of the NRC.

14

(

m..

=

_m l

i 1

I DIG ESTS ISSCANCIS OF Till ATOMIC sat ET) AND 1.Irt.SSING IlOAlt DS l

i f

An ulumate NLPA judgment may properly be made on the haws of the enure record f

tefore a($)udicatory tril unals G

The follommg techmcal swucs are dncuwed' Table 5-4 salues. Cimederstma of wha-tage; Conwderation of dry cask storage alternatne.

L SP.115-35 CLEVt LAND 1.Lt CTRIC ILLUMIN AllNG COMPANY. et al (Perry Nuclear Power Phm, Umts I and 28, Docket Nos. 50 440 0L, 50 4414)L ( %t BP No. A l-457-044 )L ),

J Ort R ATING LICENSE; 5ersemtwr 3,1985; CONCl.UDING PARTI AL INITIAL DECISION

]

ON fMi stGENC) PLANNING,IliDROGEN CONTROL AND DlL5[L Gi NI R ATORS A

The twenung Board swues a Partial and Concludmg iminal Deciuon m an opersimg i j

hcense proceedmg. Contemsons on emergency plannmg, d.cwl generator rehabihty and hydrogen contrr4 are rewised m Apphcants' fasor and, the Deciuon authorites issuarke of an operasms hcenw. subject to the completion of several condiuons R

Where NRC rulcs do nos derme the scope of a prelemmary analyses for a facihty's hydro-j 4

gen control stuem, the Board's standard of acceptance is whether a reawnable anurance of j

ufety has been dememurated en the record.

C Banc questions that have to be answered m evaluating a prehmmary analyus required by 10 C F R. t 50 44 for a h=drogen igmier system are whether the system has been mstalled, whether et udl funcuon as desgned, and whether integrety of contamment and esvnual equip-meni mill be retamed.

i i,

D Separate comentens should te proffered to challenge the adequacy of safety components that are not a part of the primary hydrogen control system even though these components might have a safety furstion an an accident that cauws a releaw of hydrogen to contamment-E Tbc follommg technwal issues att discuswd i mergency plan requirements, ifydrogen igruuan system, Containment iniegrity; Weld quahty; Dry well capactly; Hydrogen corrbusuon, States blackoul Containment responw modehng; Contamment spray operaten; Suppreumn pool b)pasa. Equipment wrsiceshiksy; Diffumon of flames, Decay heat removal, Secondary fires; Deesel generator rehahehty; Resahdaemn program for deesel generators; Diewi compment mam-4 I

tenance and survedlance.

LBP 85 36 FLORIDA POWIR AND LIGHT COMPANY tTurkey Point Nuclear Generstmg Piant, j

4 Units 3 and 4), Dmket has. 50-2504)LA 2, 50-251-OLA-2 ( ASLBP No 84-504 07-LA) (Spent l

1 f uel Fool Empansen); OPE R ATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; September 16,1985; MLMO-j y

R ANDUM AND ORDI R j

A in *Ns Order the Lwenung floard rules on a nontimely amended twtitson to miervene, J

grantmg Petitmner's amton that the films date be essended, and admittmg seven contentens for hangauon-B A late meersentism retmoner must addrew the rese factors specified in 10 C F R.

4

( 2.714tal and affermainely demonurate that on balance, they fator his tardy admisson snio the proceedmg The burden es on the penisoner to make suth a demonuranon.

t LBP 85-37 TEX A5 UTILITIES ILECTRIC COMPANY. et al (Comanche Peak Sicam ilectric Sta-l tion, Umts I and 2), Dothel Nos 50-4454)L 50-4464)L ( A5LBP No. 79 430416-OL);

j OPERATING LICEN5E; Seriember 18,1985; M LMOR AN DUM A

The Licenang Board states concerns about the adequacy of the record with respect to a 4

Staff action esempems pamt from Apoendia B quality assurance requirements.

l 8

The foHowmg techmcal issues are discussed; Pame quality; Core blockage by pamt; Sump blockage by paint; Operator error, j

LBP 85-38 KERR-McGEE CHEMICAL CORPORATION (West Clucaso Rare Earths Facihty),,

'e Docket No. 40-2061-ML (ASLBP No. 83-495-01 ML) and (Kress Creek Decontammanon), !

- Doctet No. 40-2061-5C (ASLBP No. 84-502-01-5C); M ATERIALS LICENSE; September 26, !

1985; MEMORANDUM AND ORDEI j

A The Licenang Board rules on aeous discovery disputes includmg requests for drecovery of nonwnness emperts, and claims of setorney chent and work-product pnvilege.

1 B

NRC Rules of Practwe do not contain a provimon smilar to Rule 26(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but NRC decisions have apphed Rule 26(b)(4). Pubbe Service Co of j 4

New Hampshire (Seabrook Stauon, Umts I and 2) LBP-83-17,17 NRC 490,496 97 (1983);

Carohna Power and Light Co. (Shearon Harns Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2),

l LBP-83-27A.17 NRC 971,976 80 (1983); Boston Edison Co. (Pilenm Nuclear Generstmg Sta-

I l

15 1

a f

s e

r wr-re m,.nm,

.,.nm-em

---,e.,,w,re,,-n,.

_ ~ -

-ne n

,,-.,---~,c,ra., - -,,,

.. ~,,,-m-

DIG ESTS 1%l ANCl3 OF lilE AltnllC Su L1) A%il 1.lt i SSl%G HO 4 R DN sum, limi 27, L HP 7542, 2 NRC 159,161 (19751, we alsa Public Scrwe Co of Inaana IMarble Illi Nuclear Generatmp Slauon. Umn I and 21, AI. AH.174.15 SRC 417,421 (19771 f addinonai secos of Mr I arrar, pened by the entire Boardt C

Rule 2etbH4HHI only applies to cuperts who have been retamed or secoally employed m antwipaimn of htigalmn, and MTS not allow %hifIdmg of etpern who dGelop pCrimeni knomI-edge in other contents D

% hether a subpoenaed party is an empert speoally renamed m amiopalmn rI hitsauem n necessenly a faciual determmauon. U%t Corp

v. Amencan Acrowls lac, 631 F 2d 420 424 25 doth Cir.1980L Ager v Jane C. Stormont Hmpital and Traimns 5theml,622 F.2d 4%.

50) (10th Cat.19801, ficaly v. Counit 100 F R D. 49),4% d D Colo.19M4L E

Ar espert may wear two hats. i c., minally he may be an actor who engages in the Irans-sclums at tswe and whwquemly becomes a htigation omwitam See Scifier w f orsy Int'l, Inc,

69 F R D. 69,72-73 & n.3 (D. Kan.1975); Inspiranon Consol Copper Co. v. L umherman Mut Cat Co,60 F R D. 205,210 (5 D N Y.1973L F

One means of deierminmg whether an empert n retamed for htigatum ts to rence the contractual agreements besmeen the empert and the employer it n reawnable to mfer that an expert was not retamed m anticipation of htigatmn if the work speo6cd on the enployment con-tract is of a general nature, or ehen an empert n hired to help his employer fulfill statutory requirements.

G

% hen an empen es ret 46ned m anticipation of heiganon but is not espected to tesufy, the idenuty and other collateral mformation related to the espert are not dmoscrable unless excep-tannal circumstances are shown, I c., the pany scehmg dnroscry must demonstraic that at es im-practicable to obtam facts or opomons on the same subject by other meant Ayer v Jane C. Stor-moni Hospetal and Tramma School. 622 F 2d 4% (10ih Cir.1950L See also Carolma Power and Light Co. (Shearon Harns Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), LhP-83-27 A,17 NRC 971, 976-80 (1983)

H A dispanly m rewurces betecen the parties n not sufTeacnt to demonstrate enceptional oscumstances under Rule 26(bH4)IHL I

The attorney-chent and work product pnvileges are not necessanly maned if the party holdmg those pnvileges reveals mformation on the subject matter of the praileged documents.

Dnclosure of the privileged comem of commumcations may produce a maever because the confa-dential naiure of the pnuieged documents no longer einsit Partial dmiowre of the pnuleged coment of a smgle document can matve pnulege as to the remamder of the daument.

J Waner may occur when speofic pornons of a pnulcred commungation are dncioned The mere dncewon c4 facu mhnh are the subject of a pnsileged communwatum n mwfDoent to conusture maner. 4 Moore's I ederal Practwe 126 60[21,26-203,12e 6414l. 26.109 et wq K

To be pnuleged under f ederal Rule of Cnil Pnnedure 26f hit 3) and SRC Rule of Prac-Ike 10 C F R 4 2 740ib)(2), a document must be prepared m anuoratum of husation by a party, hrs anorney or another reprewnfause of that party Matenals descloped m ordmary courw of I usmess of purwant to pubhc requiremenn unrelated to htiganon are not gnen im.

mumty under 26(bH3) See Advnory Committee's Laplanatory Statement Concernmg Amend-ments of the Dncovery Rules,48 F R D 487,501 t1970L 1.

Inherent m the determmation of whether a corporaison must specifically deugnate who ;

composed the answer to each meerrogatory is the element of reasonableness M

Interrogatones may property enquire about legal conclusions and theones Ihat apply lo the facts of the case, but may not enquire about legal conclusions which do not so relate. See 4 A Moorc's Federal Pracuce 13317121 (1984 ed J.

N It may be permswbie to answer an mterrogatory by staimg spenfic refererwes to pages of other documents filed en it.e case, but a blanket statement that the answers are to be found somewhere m the record is not sausfactory.

O Esecuuve pnvilege may be mvoked m NRC proceedmss. %rgima Electne and Power Co. (North Anna Poect Station, Umts I and 2), CLl 74-16, 7 AEC 313 (1974), Consumers Power Co. 4 Mediand Plam, Umts I and 2), ALAB-33,4 AEC 701 (197D.

I 16

DIG ESTS 155t?ANCth Ol llil AIO% llc $All]) AS il l.lfl N%l%(i BO % N il%

P l secutne priulege n deugned to prevent the "puhiw destowre lod gaseenmemat desu-m,nis reflet teng aduwry opinums, resommendations and delihermines gompriung part ed a pr<w-ess bw mhnh gosernmental decneons and polnies are formulated " I ong Island I aghiens On IShoreham Nuticar l'omer Suuon, ilmt II, Al. AH 773,19 NRC 1333,13N A n 15 t191:4p Q

A governmem agerwy must proterly claim the prtwdeye by haung the agerwy head eswrt the prnd re, proushng a spenfee description of the d wpments for ehwh the panelege is sought and prouding the reawen necessstaung the confident:4hty of the thwumenis R

l'accutne penilege is a tiuahfied prnilege ohwh enay be eserwme by a showing ud need in overcome the geiulege, the lioerd must balarwe the party's need for the dmuments againsi the posernment's need is confntentiahty.

5 Waner of esecuuve prnelege does twee occur merely betauw a gnscenmenul emely has amtiated the hbgation s

17 L

i

,I I

l l

I i

i i

,i l

l IllG ESTS i

IN%t' W IN Of plRI CTORN' DE C1510NN l

i D D-8 5-10 COMMON % t 4t lli I Dl%ON COMPAN) AND All. I Killl-% %II R Ri ACIOR5 l

t/nm Stanon. L'nii II. Dmket No 54295; LMMI DI All. ACTION RI Qt'l %I. July L 19:44 f

DIRI CTORT Di ChlON llNDI R 10 C l' R. 4 2 206 i

4 The Derettor of Nuclear Re.ioor Regulanon demes a petioon Gled by /irun, V Reg tblatt seekmg an immediale pmtp mement of all comamment Icak raic tesis performed for light mater i

l readors based on alleged erron in 6omamment leak rate measurement methmlology Peutmner l

also alleged errors m computer ef tware used to determine sontamment leak raies l he Diret tor (ontluded that the surrent Icak rate methostology was adequate to determme contamment leak rates I urthermore, the NRC Maif has reuemed d.sta wts f rom tesh uung the alkgedly irwortett witmare and has found that the data hate been corredly proceswd in addismn. N RC mspectors.

I as a matter of murse. mdeperkiersily scrdy tontamment leak rste results R

The equatum uwd to cats ulate tnntamment air mass mill produse adeciaic results if test-l l

mg is donc under uahh omditions and tem data are proretty cuiusted I urther the likehhmt l

that meighung etctfnients are rnJreputated to produt'e an ucceptable test rt'sult as small as N RC

(

mspectors regularis ornene the tesa conducted by lwensees and document the results en inspeo

[

uon Reports l

OD 25-11 Pillt ADi t PHI A f i l C1Rle COMPANY tiimeink Generaime Stauon. t!nin I and 2). [)other Nos tam 2. 4015L IMMI Dl %Tl; ACTION RI Ql'I ST. Jut, 24 190. DIRT C-f TORT Of ChlON l'NDI R 10 C f N t 2 2n6 3

j The Dircoor of the titine of Nudcar Reador Regulanon &mes the Pennon of Rohcri j

L. Anthony and i nends of the I arth IPetitioners) seekmg the Direoors' immed6 ate imi suon of i

I show cauw proceedmgs to reuse the ogserstmg hcense for the Limerith Generalmg Stanon t net 1

I of the Phila&lphia I kttrw Company el menscet The Pennoners argued shai certain esemp-

[

).

Onns granted to the ( kensee were improperly granted arkt that i Kensee l^ sent Reports inspec-inm Reports and tertain correspon&nte demonuraic that twenwd acus.nes at the t imern k i

IAility are bemy conduded m an urnafe fashion and marrans Iwen'ic renmai.<m I mally. Peution-

)

ers argue that the Indepenkni Dcugn S enfwauon Program undertaken for the Limernk faohiy j

mdna'es th.it the deugn of the f.s.MV n madequate. In his deowon, the Direttor also tonudered j

ihe mmmenn of Mr l ear k R.imano submmed on Marc h 11.19M. and the mmmenn of Mr

{

Manin i enn submilic<f on I chru.sn 14.19% on i sues retaled to the 1 #meni k imibt,

}

H

% here no spet er raoual Nsn n prouded by the Pensionen to support a 61.om that co n

1 empiums were ampnn niemb grame t the Diredor of the OITwe of Nutlear Reactor Regul.euon l

l need take no further moon un&r 10 ( l' R t 2 206 with resped to Petiimneri staims C

NRC msrethon muuhes may diwoser unlainms of NRC requacmenn both in the ton-I uructitm and at t 'mn of IAthnes $uth uolanons are generally of mermt %gnefwance if truly major dc64 enoes os the part rif a twensee are adenu6ed, the agerny n authorered io nsue orders mcludmg stop

• irk orders. in a$sure appropriate remedial actum D

isolated de6oenues m a twenscei pro $ ram of conurucuon or operatum do rw negewan-ly undermme ttn pmgram to such an cuent as to give rne to a sigm6 cant ufely wrnerri % hai is required is a ur (ut aswsvnent of the segml.cance of the definenoes, and the correttive action taken to preci ade recurrence E

A request 4 suani to 4 2 206 for mustuunn of shsw cause prmeedings shall wt forth the facu that consutute the baws for the request. In the absence of the spenf.c factual baus ulled for by the regulation. any mquiry must necewanly be limsied.

F 11 is the NRC's pohcy to pursue att spranc allegations with potentwl ufety opmfiurne.

However, sague and unspenfied claims do not marram further inquiry.

i t

19 I

I 1

i i

I s

I

DIG ESTS IN%t'gNt'I.N OF DINICIONN' lit CINIONN G

T he remedy aflorded hv 4 2 2 Ort stu>uld mit he uwd as a means to reopen mucs pecuouw ly adentwated in the abscese of any segmficane new mformaimn, neither a gurty to a Commiv senn adjudwatory proteedmg nor a amnparty may raise mues presmusly adpudwated for mnwlera-tum under 4 2 20h DD 85-12 ARl/ON A PUllLIC si RVICE COMPANY, et al IPalo Verde Nuslear Generaung Sia-Inm, Umt I), thshet No. 54528, RIQUIST IOR ACTION August 9,1945. DINICTOR3 DICISION UNDI R 10 C l R. 4 2 20h A

The Deressor of the OtTwe of Nuclear Reactor Regulanon demes the pentum of Mr Myron L Sctus of the Coahtum for Respmsible i nergy Iducatum whnh requested delay m the muance of the PVNGS Unit i Iwenw unid certam concerns mere remised The Penanner mn-tended that the mcenute regulasmns adopted by the Aruona Corporahon Commewon and the fuel load tenus plan adopted by the twenwes had not been adequately resweed for their poten-haf safety impact and that emergency preparedness of State and kwal agencies for P\\ NGS was madequate due to underfundmg D D 85-l)

TIIE DLTROIT IDISON COMPANY, et al. (I nrwn l'erme Atomic Pomer Plant. Unit 2L Docket No 30-141; RIQUEST FOR ACTION; August 12,1985 DIRf CTOR's DICislON UNDE R 10 C f R % 2.20t>

A The Director of the OrTwe of inspection and Enforcement demes the petition of Mr. Sian-ley Nietubscr requestmg legal action to rectify an aucried luk of uable esuuation routes under flood conditumn for certain areas around the ferms 2 facahty.

D D-8 5-14 CLfVf LAND f.LECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY, et al (Perry Nudcar Power Plant, Umts I and 27, lhket Nos. 50-440, 50-441; RIQUEST IOR ACTION, September 13, 1925; DIRFCTOR'S DE CISION UNDER 10 C f R. 4 2 20h A

The Derenor of Nuticar Reactor Regulanon denies a petition under 10 Cl R. t 2 20h Gled by the Ohio Cnuens for Responsible Energy shah requested that a numhet of actums he taken in view of the alleged precanous 6narreal conditon of the twenwes of the Perry plant 8

Although the Commmion has retamed reuems of Gnancial quahfnatmns m some twens-mg proceedings, msntuten of enforcement proceedmps is not required merely because a twenwe may be espenencing Gnarkial difficulues. Whether enforcement acten should be taken turns on whether Gnannel consaraints have had an adverw impact on gafety or are substantully bhely to affect safety adserwly.

D D-8 5-15 arf /ON A PUBLIC SERVICL COMPANY, et at (Palo Verde Nuclear Generatmg Sta-non Umis I and 2L Dothet Not 50-528,30-529 RIQUE ST IOR ACTION, Seriember 16, 1985. DIRICTOR'S DI C1510N UNDF R 10 C f R. t 2 2tw A

The Direnor of the otLce of Nudear Reactor Regulanon demes a pennon f. sed by the Crwbton for Respnnuble incrgy regocumt suspenwin of the Umt I operahng lwinse and fur-ther twensmg.chunes at Umt 2 untd the mue of mwrobuilognally influerked wrrnvon m the spray pmd ppmg spicm is rewived.

k 20 i

1 l

I i

1)IG ESTS 1%%4 W i OF lit N1 \\l. OF Pi11180N iUR R L 16 %I ulN4

() R M M L t Js ill N 1. N gN1/ liioet No PR \\l Ad 14, Rl'l ! %I ulN(. Di Ni \\1. July

.%. 190 til NI%L Of Pt 111141% ieIR Nt ii \\1 ulNG A

The Nusicar Regul.iior, ( ommimon demes a peieium for rulemaking submitied h, John L Nanis T he Peiin.ner requesied ih.ii the Commimon adopt regulaisons in esia*issh a formal prtwedure for Commiw.on res sem og deouons lo tlose aduwiry svmmittee mecirngs or swiriums of those meetings T he peineon is being demed on the grourkis ihai s urrent prisedures are ade-quale ir awu e that Ahiwiry somminices' use of esemptuins from lhe reywrement for. pen r

meelmts are adequateln fusiilied and heuuse Commswum reuen would be an melk sen* and un.

m utanted use of the Commisuon's rew ur es s

B The Comm, won tonstades te st iurrent prisedures for rulings on ilosure determinaieons for adsivery somrnistec meelings are adequ.ste C

in the abwrwe of any waiutors prohibeinert, she Commewon 6orstudes that its dels gation of duihority to rule on almure determinations for adsesory commellee meciengs ss a proper eser.

me of its a ut hority pursuani to 416ln of the Atomic l nergt ht of 1944. as amended D

t siablishrow ns of' a format prisedare for Commswon reuem of adsisiir) tommettee slo-sures enutd diserge from a strong potet y of the Commimon to esirs aic siself from ns.neswntial procedural niatters 10 sonserse ns rew uries for paranwiunt respimuhit iers i

21 o

l l

1 l

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX l

CA%EN l

Adsmory Committee's I spianatory Statement Consermns Amendments of the lhoser) Rules. 48 j

f R D 487,503 41970)

I difTeculty an determimns esperts to whom i ed R Civ P. 26thit411H) apphet i HP 8538,22 NRC 613119858

. Agrr v Jane C 5'ormont limpital and Trainmg khool. 622 F 2d 496. 501 (10th Car 19tt0s determemns whether a subpoended party es an cupert spenally rttamed m antnipainon of htigaten, L8P-85 38, 22 NRC 613 (1985)

Alatsma Power Co (Jowph 4( l erley Nudear Plant, Umts I and 2), Al AH 182. 7 Al C 210. 217 (1974) l standar(t apphed by Boards conudenns summary dnpowison motions, i HP ll027 A 22 NRC 2011 l

(1985), LBP 85-29,22 NRC 310 (19851 i

l Amerran Farm I snes v. Blad Hall I reight scriwe,397 U S 532,540 (1970s l

authonty tc resunuder deowon after the fihng of a retelmn for Judwial ressem. ( l18014.22 NRC IN n 3 (1985) l Artions Pubhc 5e vwe Co (Palo Verde Nadear Generaims Station. Umts 2 and 36, Al AH 742.18 l

NRC 380,384 (1943 l

etTect on a preseedmg of admnwon of a ungle addisonal contenison for purrow of ustifpng i.

t J

interlmatory reuen. AL AB 817,22 NRC 475 vs it (1985) l l

i BAS Dnthns Co. v I;ainburton (hl well Cementing Co 24 F R D 1,4 (1959s need to divulge source of answer to mierrogatory, LBP 85-38,22 NRC e22 41985)

Baks v B F. Diamond Construt urm Co, 71 I' R D 179,182 (D. Md.1976)

>>ommg necswary to obtain duoscry of esperts reiamed m aniecepation of htigation but not l

1 mpu,ed to tesidy; I HP-85-38. 22 NRC 617 n 1611985)

' t l

Smton i dann Co (Pdgnm Nudear Genersteng Statmn, Umi l), AL AB 191, 7 Al C 417119748 s -" a7 d+mison m thense amendment heanngt L BP-85-29, 22 N RC 310 (19851 Bmton.uwm (o (Pagnm Nudear Generaimg Stanon. Umt 2), ! HP-75-42, 2 N RC 159, itel (19751

)

apptKahihty of I ed R Gs P 2Mbital to NRC proteedmgs. I BP 85-38. 22 NRC 6sN (1984 Bosson f dnon Co iPitynm Nwicar Power Siation. Umt 2), AL AB432,13 NHC 91,93 n 2 (19811 l

apMalabihty of detiuon uhnh does nos authorsie issuance of a IKenw or resolse all pending safety issuet L HP-85-28,22 NRC 2% n 21 f1985)

Car 4hna Power and Light Co (shearon liarra Nudear Power Plant Umts I and 2), i BP 82-Il9 A.16 NRC 2069,2098 (1982) l readmg of 10 C F R. 4 5013 m pan maiena with Part 73. LBP 85-27,22 NRC 137 (1985) l Carohna Power and Light Co. ($hearon lf arns Nudear Power Plant Umts 1 and 2), L BP-83 27A,17 NRC 971,976-80 (1983) apphcabihty of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(bif 4) to NRC proceedmss, LBP 85 38. 22 NRC 609,610 (1985)

Carchna Power and Light Co (Shearon liarns Nudcar Power Plant, Umis I,2,3 and 48. CLi 7a-9. 7 '

AEC 1% (1974) f' Licensms Board authorny to conuder challenges to Commismon autinnty to grant esemphons from regulations; LBP-85-33,22 NRC 444 (1985)

Carohna Power and Light Co. (Shearon liarns Nuclear Power Plant, f> mis I,2,3 and 41. CLI-74-9,7 AIC 197,198 (1974)

Commamon authonty to direct twenung Board to consider trents of 50.12 request, LBP-85 33, l

22 NRC 446 (1985) 23 j

t m

LEG Al, CITATIONS IN DEX j

CA%LS Carchna Power and Light Ca (5hearon liarris Nuclear Power Plans, Umas I,2,3 and 4), Ct I 80 82, il NRC 514,5l617 (1980) authoney of a4udicatory tmards over NRC 5taff, ALAB 812,22 NRC 560 (1985)

Carohna Power and Light Ca (5hearon f(arns Nuclear Poner Plant, Umts I,2,3 and 4), LBP 79-19, 10 NRC 37 (1979) standard for detenmmns management competence; LBP-g5 28,22 NRC 236 (1985)

Cmemnatt Gas and Electnc Ca (%Iham II. Zimmer Nuclear Po er staimn), CLI-82 33,16 NRC 1489 (1982) comparison of standards apphed in Staff rer,ew of quahty amurance deficencies at other facihties, ALAB 812,22 NRC 25 (1985)

Cmemnau Gas and Electrw Ca (Wilham il ZA.nmer Nuclear Power Staten), LBP-80-14, il NRC y

570, 576 (1980) t weight given to entervenor's abihty to contnbute to sound record in decidmg late mtervenuon request, LBP45 36,22 NRC 594 (1985)

- Cinemnsu Gas and Electne Co (Ulham it. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station, Unit l), ALAB 727,17 NRC 760,775 n.20 (1983)

FEM A findmss surrecient for authonrahon of full-power operstmg hcense; ALAB-813,22 NRC 78 n 98 (1985)

Clescland Electne litummaung Ca (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Una 2), DD 84-23,20 NRC 1549, 1553 (19841 hasard to pubhc health and safety of slowdoen or halt in construction of a stuclear plant; DD-8514,22 NRC 64142 (1985)

Cleveland Electrw Illummatmg Ca (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 21, ALAB443,6 NRC 741, 752 (1977)

Board authonty to requesa oral tesumony where record is maufToent to allow summary dispositen; LBP 85 29,22 NRC 307 (1985)

Oeveland Electne Illummaung Co (Perry Nwicar Power Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-443,6 NRC 741, 753-54 (1977) tourden on movent for summary dispetten; L BP 85-27A 22 NRC 208 (1985) consequence of summary disposmon opponent's fadure to submit evulence; 1BP-85 29,22 NRC 310 (1985)

Cleveland Electru Illummatmg Ca (Perry Nurtear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB475,15 NRC

!!05,111213(1983) effect on a proceeding of admmuon of a ungle addmonal contenemn-ALAB-Il7,22 NRC 474 i

n.17,478 n 12 (1985) i Cleveland Electrw Illummaung Co (Perry Nwicar Power Plant Umts I and 2), ALAB-706,16 NRC 1754 (1982) mterlocutory review of deciseens admetims one or more addeuonal consentens, ALAB-Sl7,22 NRC 474 n.15 (1985)

Cleveland Electnc illummaung Ca (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-736,18 NRC 165. 164 (1983) appealatnisty of order dismneme some but not all ofintervenor's contentions, LBP-85 29,22 NRC 331 (1985)

! Cleveland Electnc Illummaung Ca (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), LDP-81-24,14 NRC 175, 179 (1981) residency requirements for standmg to intervene in operating hcease proceedings; LBP-85 24,22 NRC 99 n 7 (1985)

! Cleveland Electree litummatmg ca (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unas I and 2), LDP Il42,14 NRC 842, 844-45 (198 0 contentions postulating enemy attacts against nuclear plants that are htigable under 10 C F IL 5013; LBP-85-27,22 NRC 140 (1985) interpretshon of the phrase " directed against" for purpose of determimns heigabihty of contention postuisung anack agamst nuclear facihty; LDP-45 27,22 NRC 135,137 (1985) i 24 4

s' N -M,.

Li'G AL CITATIONS IN DEX CAMA Clewland Electnc luummatmg Co. (Perry Nwlear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), LBP 82 89,16 NRC 1355, 1356 (1982) obhgatons of tardy intervenuon peuuoners; ALAh 816,22 NRC 467 a 22 (l985)

Common =calth Ednon Co. (Byron Nuclear Pomer Stauen, Umts I and 2), ALAB 770,19 NRC 1843 (1984) effect of fatal flee in amplementauon of ernergency plans on operaung hcense issuante; LBP-85 31,22 NRC 431 (1985)

Common =cahh FAnon Co. (Byron Nuclear Power Stauen, Unus I and 2), AL AB 793,20 NRC 1591 l

(1984) effect on a proceedmg of addmg one qua.ty assurance contenuen; ALAB-8 87,22 NRC 474 n.ll (1985)

Commonwealth Edison Co. (8 ron Nuclear Po.er Stanon, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-793,20 NRC 1594, 3

1598 (1984) delegauon of gushty assurance responsehehtics' ALAB-812,22 NRC 22 (1983)

Commonocahh Edison Co. (Byron Nuclear Power Stauon, Umts I and 2), LBP 80 30,12 NRC 683, 692 93 (1980)

I l

hugatshty of contemson challengmg 10 C.F R. 50.13, LBP-85-27,22 NRC 138 n.2 (1985)

Commonwealth Ednen Co. (Byron Nuclear Power Staten, Unns I and 2), LBP-84 2,19 NRC M.

I 209 13 (1984)

Licemms Board delegauan to NRC Staff of poseheanns resoluuan of emergary planmns issues.

LBP-85-27A,22 NRC 222 (1985)

Common =calth F4ison Co (Byron Nuclear Power Station, Umts I and 2), LBP-24-2,19 NRC h, 262 43 (1984) reason for need for accuracy in evacuauon ume esumanes. LBP 85 27A 22 NRC 215 (1985)

Commonwealth FAnon Co (Byron Nuclear Power Station, Units I and 2), LBP-84-41,20 NRC 1203, 1216, aff'd, ALAB-793,20 NRC 1591 (1984)

NRC Staff tesumony in another proceedmg as basis for contenuon; ALAB 817,22 NRC 472 m.)

(1985)

Common =calth FArnon Co (LaSalle County Siauon, Umts i and 2), DD-844,19 NRC 891 (1984) htigauon of concerns about contamment leak rate tesims methodoingy; DD-8510,22 NRC 145 nI(19851 Common =ealth Fdnon Co. (Zion Stanon, Umt 1) DD-85-2,28 NRC 270 (1985) huganon of concerns about contamment leak rate tesung meilu%y; DD-85-10,22 NRC 143 nI(1985)

Consohdowd FAison Co. of New York (Indian Pomt Station, Uma 2), AL AB-202,7 ALC 825,829 30 l

(1974) i need for protecten of nuclear power plant against band of armed satmicurs LBP-85 27,22 NRC l h (1985)

Consohdated FAnon Co. of Nc= York (Indian rome Station, Unit 2), CLI-74 23,7 ALC 947,958 (1974) termmation of proceedings pnor to compteuon of safety analyses LBP-85-12,22 NRC 4% n 2 (1995)

! CoHh Edison Co. of New Yort (Indian Point, Units I,2, and 3) CLI 75 8,2 NRC 173,176 f

(1975) w

_ _ apprepnete for issuance of show cause order, DD-55-il,22 NRC 152 n.2 (1985) l Consumers Power Co. (Big Rect Point Plant), ALAS 4M,13 NRC 312,332 (1981) j need for StaN of alternetwas to ayens fuel treneshipments; LDP-85-34,22 NRC 491 (1985) i Consumers Power Co. (Big Rock Potat Plant), ALAB 725,17 NRC M2, M4 n 2 M748 (1983) espionsoon of K eGective concept; ALAB-816,22 NRC 463 n.2 468 n.29 (1985)

, Consumers Power Co. (Big kock Point Plant), LDP-84 32,20 NRC 601,639 52 (1984) i hingeodity of nek to nuclear power plants of crashes of nuhtary airplanes; LBP-85 27,22 NRC 140 (1985)

,. Consumers Po.et Co. (2dland Plant Umts I and 2), ALAB-33,4 AEC 701 (1971) apphcebehty of executive pnvilege to NRC proceedings; LBP-85-38,22 NRC 626 (1985) l 2$

i l

LEG AI, CITATIONS IN DEX CASL5 l

1 i

Consumers Power Ca (Mediand Plant, Umis I and 2), ALAB 106,6 ALC 182,184 (1973) i s

importance of managerial attuude to an opphcant's quakey assurarwe program; AL AB-812,22 k

NRC 15 st5 (1985)

Consumers Power Ca (Madiand Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-38 5,3 NRC 101,103 (1976) burden of provmg enutlement to en operaung twense, ALAB-812,22 NRC 5611985)

Consumers Power Ca (Midland Plant, Umts I and 2), AL AB-379,5 NRC 565,568 n 13 (1977) apphcabihty of Fed. R. Ov. P. 264bH4) to NRC pronedmas, t BP.85-38,22 NRC 610 (1985)

I Detroit EAson Ca (Ennco Ferme Atomic Power Plant, Uma 2), AL AB 730,17 NRC 1057,10#447 (1983)

F LM A fendmss sumcient for auttonistion of full-power operarms twense; ALAB 813,22 N RC 78 n.91 (1985) i Detreet Edison Co. (Entwo Ferme Atomic Power Plani, Unit 2), LBP 78 37,8 NRC 575,583 (1978) apphcabihty of Fed. R. Ov. P. 26(b)(4) to NRC proceedings, LBP 85 38,22 NRC 609 (1985) 1 Duke Power Ca ( Amendment to Matenais License 5NM l?73 - Transportauon of spent Fuel from Oconee Nuclear 5tauon for Storage at McGuire Nuclear Stanon), ALAB451,14 NRC 307 (1981)

+

need for Staff analyses c(dry cask storage alternahve to spent fuel transshipment, LBP-85 34,22 NRC 490 (1985)

Duke Power Co (Cata=be Nuclear Stanon. Umts I and 2), ALAB-355,4 NRC 397,413 (1976) drspomuon of emproperty bnefed issues on appeal, ALAB 813,22 NRC 66 n 16 (1985) l i

Duke Power Ca (Catamba Nuclear Staten, Units I armi 2), ALAS 447,16 NRC 460,46547 (1982),

aff'd in pertment part, CLI-8319,17 NRC 104I (1983) esercise of mterlocutory review where test is not sanctly sausfied, ALAB-817,22 NRC 474 n 12 j

(1985) t j

Duke Power Ca (Cata=be Nuclear Staten, Umts I and 2), ALAB487,16 NRC 460 448 (1982),

4 aft'd in perunent part, CLI-83-19,17 NRC 8041 (1983) i spec ficity regarement for admissaon of contenuons; ALAB-Slf,22 NRC 477 nn 6 & 10 (1985)

Duke Power Co. (Catantia Nuclear Stanon Units I and 2), ALAB 794,20 NRC 1630,1633 35 (1984) specificity required of stay motions, ALAB-814,22 NRC 196 (1985)

Duke Power Ca (Catawbe Nuclear Stauon, Units I and 2), ALAB 813,22 NRC 59,85 (19851 hugabihty of the adequacy of the ANSI Standard for determmsmg performance indes for doometers, LBP-85 28. 22 NRC 260 n 17 (1985)

Duke Power Ca (Perkms Nuclear Stauon, Umts I,2 and 3), ALAB415,12 NRC 350,352 (1980s t

j five factors to be addremed by retiuoner films amended penemn to miersene; LBP-85 36,22 N RC 592 (1985)

Duke Pomer Ca (Perkms Nuclear Staten, Umts 1,2 and 3), AL AB415,12 NRC 350,352 53 (1980s burden of persuason on lateness factors apphed to unumely mierventen peuteon, ALAB-816,22 NRC 466 n 21 (1985) l Duke Power Co. (Witham B. McGure Nuclear Staten Umts I and 2), a LAB-128,6 AlC 399,410 (1973)

]

mdependence reemred of quahty assurance manager; ALAB-813,22 NRC 67 (1985)

' Evans v. Local Union 2127,let'l Brotherhood of Electncal Workers, AFL CIO,313 F. Supp.1354, f 1360(1969) need to divulge seurue of answer to ineerrogatory; LSP 85 38,22 NRC 622-23 (1985)

Plonda Power sad Light Co. (St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2), ALAB-$53,10 NRC 12,14 a.7 (1979) role of NRC 5estla lesenses prW ALAB-812,22 NRC 56 (1985)

Flo k (rida Poeur sad IJohn Co. (Tur6ey Point Nuclear Generating Station, Uruta 3 and 4),4 AEC 9, il 1967), aK'd, Seteel v AEC,400 F.2d 778 (D.C. Or.1968) l need for special dessen fessures to prosect nuricar facchty against attacks from enemies of the Umled Senees; LBP-85-27,22 NRC 133 (1985) i

Florida Power and Light Co. (Turtcy Pomt Nuclear Generaung 5tauon Units 3 and 4),4 AEC 9,13

' (1967), an'd, Seigel v. AEC,400 F.2d 778,78)44 (D.C. Or.1968) base for Commission esctuman of hoeule acts from huganon; LBP-85 27,22 NRC 133-35 (1985) 26

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CAM.S i

Florata Power and Light Co. (Turkey Point Nuclear Generstmg Stanon, Unas 3 and 4), LBP 79-21, 10 hRC 183,190 (1979) weight given to good cause factor there late entervennon peutenner es pro se husant, L BP45 36, 22 NRC 554 n,3 (1985)

General Electre Ca (Vallecnos Nuclear Center, General Ilectric Test Rewior) LBP 78 33,8 NRC 461 (1978) apphcabihty of Fed R. Ov. P. 26(b)(4) to NRC proceedmss; L BP-85 38,22 NRC 609 (1985)

General Pubhc Utahtees Nucles Corp. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon, Umts I and 21. CLI-85-4 28 NRC 561,56344 (1985) une of 2 206 procedures to seek reconsulcrahon of issue dismissed from operating hcense proceeding; DD-85-II,22 NRC 159 (1985)

Guard v. NRC 753 F 2d 1144 (D C. Or.1985) comphance eith future emergency plannms requirements, l.BP 8545,22 NRC 525 (1985) scope of medical arrangements to be provided undet emergency plannms; CLI-8515,22 NRC 186 (1985) j Haranmowica v. McCatiister,78 F R D. 319 (E D. Pa.1978) esperts so whom ied. R. Cev. P. 26(b)(4)(B) apphes; LBP 85 38,22 NRC 612 (1985)

Healy v. Counts,100 F.R.D. 493,4% (D. Cola 1984) determimns whether a subpoenaed party is an espert specially retamed en anucipatoon of htisanon, LEP45 38,22 NBC 613 (1985)

Houston Lishung ams Power Ca (Allens Creek Nuclear Generstmg Station, Unit 1), AL AB-535,9 NRC 377,384 (1979). ALAB425,13 NRC 13 (1981); LBP-82-94,16 NRC 1399 (1982) standard for meervenuon by mdevedual who has had prior esperience en NRC proceedmes; ALAB416,22 NRC 467 a 25 (1985)

Houston Lighung and Power Ca (A!Iens Creek Nuclear Generstmg Station, Uma 1), ALAB-565,10 NRC 521. 523 (1979); ALAB 574,11 NRC 7,13 (1980) authonty of Licenang Boards to shorten ume pere &J for fihng contennons, LBP45-36,22 NRC 593 (1985)

Houston Laghung and Power Ca ( Allens Creek Nuclear Genermung 5tauon, Unit 1), ALAB 565,10 NRC 521, $25 (1979) nght of tardy intervenor to respond so Board schon on contention; ALAB 816,22 NRC 466 n 22 (1985) llouison Lighung and Power Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Genersung Stauen, Uma 1) ALAB 609,12 NRC 172,173 n 1 (19160) standard for intervenuon by pro se htigants. ALAB 816,22 NRC 467 n 24 (1995)

Houston Lightmg and Power Co. (South Tenas Project. Units I and 2), ALAB 799,21 NBC 360, 371 74 (1985) relauonship between quahty assurance deficiencies and management competence and character, j

ALAB 812,22 NRC 15,48 (1985)

Houston Lighung and Power Ca (South Tesas Promt, Units I and 2), AL AB 799,28 NRC 360, 376-77 (1985) ahowing m by party challenging cross esamenatson ruhng; ALAB-813,22 NitC 76 a.78

+

(1985) i Houston Linhung and Poner Co. (South Tesas Prolact, Units I and 2), LBP44-13,19 NRC 659, i 669-98 (1984)

{

aiandard for desernumaB sinnagement competence; LBP45 28,22 NRC 237 (1985) i leapirauen Conant Copper Ca v. Lumbannan Mut. Cas. Ca 60 F.R.D. 205,210 (5 D.N.Y.1973) difficulty in desernunens esparts to whom Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4)(B) appises; LBP-85 38,22 NRC 613 n II (1985)

I Kansas Gas and Electne Ca (Wolf Creeti Generating Stauon, Unet 1). ALAS 462,7 NRC 320,338 ~

(1978) burden for smaafyme regewonnenes for grant of monons to reopen ALAB-812,22 NRC 14 (1985) 27 4

h

_m

_..___.-____m

_. _ ~ _ -

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ =. _ _

t

]

1 1

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CAht5 I

Lons Island Lishung Co Oamestort Nutlear Power Staten, Umts I and 2), AL All 292,2 NRC 638, j

650 & n 25 (1975) i factors taken mio account in determening delay and twoodemns of assues that leie miesvention

[

41 cauw; LBP 85 36,22 NRC 595 (1985) 3:

Long Island Lishung Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stauon), CLt 851,21 NRC 275 (1185) i effect of Commasmon smmediate eRectiveness determinauon on Appeal Board's determmanon of

[

a stay monen ALAB-814,22 NRC 195 (1985)

Long Island Lighung Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stauon, Unit 1), AL AB 77),19 NRC 1333,1339 l

& nl5 (19841 l

l purrone of esecuuve pnvdege; LBP 85 38,22 NRC 626 (1985)

[

c d

Ions idand Lightmg Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power 5laton, Uma 1), ALAB-788,20 NRC 1102,1851 (1984) l 1

responsbehues of parties appealing procedural puents, ALAB-816,22 NRC 468 n 28 (1945) i I

Long Island Lightmg Co (shoreham Nuclear Power Stanon, Unit I), ALAB 800, 21 NRC 386, 392 98 (1985) effect of Commasmon immediale effectiveness determinaten on Appeal Board's determmanon of

{

e stay mouan, ALAB 814,22 NRC 195 (1985) 1 Long Island Lightang Ca ($horeham Nuclear Power Stauon, Umt l), CLl-8313,17 NRC 743 (1983) uw of uuhty-sponsored emergency plan enstead of State and local government emergency plan, I

LBP-85-31,22 NRC 427 (1985)

I Long Islar:d Lighung Co (shoreham Nuclear Power Staten. Uma 1), CLI 84-8,19 NRC ll54 (1984)

I regulation,ander whach party an an adjudicatory proceeding must submit request for esempoon I

from regulanon, LBP-85 33,22 NRC 446 (1985) i Long Idand Lighung Ca (5horeham Nuclear Power Stanon, Uma l), LBP 33-72,18 NRC 122 6 i

(1983) rev'd on other grounds, AL AB 773,19 NRC 1333 (1984)

I demonstranon of esecuuve pnvdese LBP-85 38,22 NRC 626 (1985)

Long latand Laghung Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stauon, Unit 1). LBP-8518,21 NRC 1637, 1643-44 (1985) confict betecen NRC Office of Investiganons and adrudecatory boerds. ALAB-812,22 NRC 47 6

n53(1985)

Louivana Power and Light Ca (Waterford Steam Elecinc Stauon, Umt 3), ALAB-220,8 AFC 9),94 (19741

[

appealabihty of demal of rnouon for summary disposihon, LBP-85-29,22 NRC 338 (1985)

Louniana Pomer and Light Co (Waterford 5 team Liecinc 5: anon, Umt 3), ALAB 732,17 NRC 1076, i

l 10 % (1983) l shomme necessary by party challenging crossesammanon tuhns, ALAB-813,22 NRC 76 n 78 (1985) l Louisaana Power and Light Ca (Waterford Stearn Electnc Sisuon, Uma 3), ALAB-732,17 NRC 1076, i106-07 (1983) nature and litigabehty of emergency plan implemenung procedures; LBP-85-27A,22 NRC 212 n.l 220 (1985) 1 i

Lovimene Power and Light Ca (Waterford Steam Electric stehen, Une 3), ALAB-75),18 NRC 1321, e

1325 n.3 (1983)

I 4

I timehness of motsens to sospen a record; ALAB-815,22 NRC 201 n9 (1985)

Louemene Power and Light Co. (Weterford 5,eem Electne Station, Unst 3), ALAB-786,20 NRC 1087, 1089 (19541 t

test for reopenses a record; ALAB 815,22 NRC 200 n 4 (1985)

, Louemene Power and Letha Ca (Wanerford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3), ALAB-812,22 NRC 5,54 (1985) responerhohty for providing record support for appellate bnefs, ALAB-SI),22 NRC 67 n 22 (1985) l Maine Yankee Atonne Poser Ca (Maine Yankee Atom 6c Power Staten), CLI-83-21,18 NRC 157, 160 (1983), afr8 DD-83 3,17 NRC 327 (1983) determeens whether financial constroents should lead to enforcernent actson; DD 85 I4,22 NRC 637 38 (1985) l i

28 1

4

l 3

LEG Al. CITATIONS INDEX l

l

[

CANI%

i a

Mantime C6 nema Servue Corp. t. Moues In Route, Inc.,60 l' R 11 $87, $98 t 1973) need to identify persons asninung en prepersuon of answers tu interrogatories, L BP-85-38, 22 1

NRC 62) (1985)

Metropohtan Idison Ca (Three M4 tstand Nuclear Station, Unet I). AL AB-698,16 NRC 1290, 1298-99 (1982), rev'd in part on other grounds, CLI 83 22,18 NRC 299 (1983) legal force of NUREG ernene; LBP-85 27A,22 NRC 210,224 (1985) i Metropohten Edison Co. (Three M4 Island Nuclea'r Station, Umt 1), AL AB-729,17 NRC 814 (1983) use of poss-heenne procedures, LBP 8$-32,22 NRC 4M n 2 (1985)

Metropohten Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Sunon, Unst II, AL AB.772,19 NRC 1193, 1206, 1208 (1984) mandard for determining managernent competence; LBP-85 28,22 NRC 2M (1985)

Metropohtan Edison Ca (Three Mile Island Nwlear Station, Umt 1). AL AB.772,19 NRC lt93, 1208 (1984), rev'd in part on other grounds, CL185 2,21 NRC 282 (1985) candor es en element of management's character; ALAB.812,22 NRC 48 (1985)

Metropohian 14 son Co. (Three M4 island Nuclear sianon, umt it. AL AB 791,29 NRC l$79, IS$2 (1984) test for esercise of Appeal Board's discretionary directed cerufocanon authonty; AL AB-817,22 NRC 473 a 10 (1985)

Metropohtan Edsson Ca (Three Mile Island Nuclear Suison, Umt I), ALAB 791,20 N RC 1$79, l$53 (1984) effect on a proceeding of admission of e omste additional consention; ALAB-8 87,22 NRC 474 n 16 (1983)

Metropohtan FAson Co (Three M4 island Nuclear 5:stion, Unal 1), ALAB-807,28 NRC 1195, 1200 n 12 (1985) esplanation of"no signermans hazards determmanon"; AL AB 816,22 NRC 46) n 4 (1985)

Metropuhtan FAson Co. (Three M4 Island Nuclear Stauon, Umt II, CLI 80.$, ll NRC 400,40910 (1980) sundard for determmins manesement competence. LBP 85 28,22 NRC 2M (1985) l

' Metropohtan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Natear Station Umi 1), CLI-8016. Il NRC 674 (1980) cniena for submanmg hydrogen control contenuens; LBP-85 35,22 NRC $29 (1985) j Metropohtan Edison Ca (Three M4 Island Nuclear Staten, Uma 1), CLI.8016, ll NRC 674,675

[

I l

i1980) htigabihty of hydrogen generation tenues, AL AB SI),22 NRC 00 t1911$)

j Metropohten f dnan Co (Three M4 Intend Nmlear Suunn, Uma l), Cil 84 l7,20 NRC 801, 8044$ (1984) i j

l spenfuity required of star motions ALAB-814,22 NRC 1% (1985)

Metropohtan I'dison Co (Three M4 liland Nwlear Sutson, Uma l), CLI 85-7,21 NRC 1804,1106 (1985) i I

burden for saavifying requerements for Brant of monons to reopen; ALAB-812,22 N RC 14 (1985)

Metropohtan 14 son Co (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon, Umt I), CLI-85 8,21 NRC lill,1814 A n.)(1985) cntical factor in deternmensas tunehness of monon to reopen; ALAB-81$,22 NRC 202 a ll (1985) i Metropohten Eason Co. (Three Mde leland Nuclear Steuon, Uma l), CLI-85-9,21 NRC 1918, ',

t 1136 37 (1985) candor as en element of menessment's eherector; ALAB 812,22 NRC 40 (1985)

Metropohten Edienn Co. (Three Mole latend Nuclear Station, Uma 1), LSP-8132,14 NRC MI (1982) i 1

seendard for deternunang neonagement eempetence; LDP 85 28,22 NRC 2M (1985) i Metropolnan Edesen Co. (Three Mae latend Nuclear Sianon, Uma 2), ALAB 4%,7 NRC 63,65 l (1978) j Iruseheury of contenhon challenems 10 CTR. 5013; LSP 85 27,22 NRC 131 a 2 (1983)

, Mesmemppi Power and Lisha Ca (Grand Outf Nuclear Stauen, Umts I and 21. ALAB-704, le NRC

! 172$ 1730(1982)

}

demoneiration oflose inservenuma poin6sner's stehty to conenbute to e enund record; L

, ALAB-813,22 NRC 8$ n.134 (1983) ; LSP 4$ M,22 NRC $94-9$ (1985) _

29

• h

.g.

y :'

P v

w.

LEGAI. CITATIONS INI)EX CA%h Neder v Dunlop,370 F. Supp I?? (D D C.1973) requirernents for closure of advnory commutre meetmas, DPR M-85-),22 NRC 175 (19:58 Ne= England Coahuon on Nwlear Polluuon v. NRC,727 F.2d 1827 (D C, Or.19846 hugshehey of financel qual fmahons contentions m operating licenne proceedings. Al AB SI),22 NRC 84 n.l26 (1985)

Northern staics Power Ca (Monmello Nuclear Genersung Plant, Unn l), CLI 72 81,5 Alc 25,26 (19723 standard for grant of *siver or esempton from regulanons, LDP 85 3),22 NRC 445 (19858 Northern States Power Co. (Prene Island Nwlear Genetsung Plant, Unds 1 and 2), AL AB 107,6 Al C 188,192, effd, CLI.7212,4 ATC 241 (1973), ofTd sub som. SPI v. AFC, $02 F.2d 424 (D C. Or.1974) need for desovery to produce adequately specific contenuens, ALAB Slf. 22 NRC 477 p.S (1985)

Nuclear fuel Services,Inc. (nesi Valley Reprocessing Planti, CL1754,1 NRC 27),275,276 (1975) five factors to be addremed by peuteoner flhng amended petiuon to 6atervene; L8P.85 36,22 NRC 592. 595 (1985)

Pmfw Gas and Dectrw Co (Deblo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unses I and 2), ALAR 334,3 NRC 809,819 n 24 (1976) esp 4anetion of K. effective corwept; ALAB.816,22 NRC 46) a 2 (1985)

Pmfic Gas and flecttw Co (Duble Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Unds 1 and 2), AL AB 728,17 NRC 777,907, revwe dechned, CLI-83 32, I8 NRC I)o9 (1983) inisatmhty of adequacy of Staff rewww oflicenans opphcanon, ALAB 882,22 NRC $4 (1985)

Pacifw Gas and Dectrw Co. (Dubio Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unds I and 21 ALAB 756,18 N RC 1340,134) (19833 toard authonty so request oral tesumony where record is ensuffuwns to allow summary dispneuon; LBP 85 29,22 NRC 307 (1985)

Pacifw Gas and Doctrw Co (Disteo Canyon Nuclear Power Plani, Unas i and 27. AL AB-754,18 NRC 1340,1344-45 (1983), effd sub nom. San Luis Obespo Moehers for Peace v. NRC, fil F.2J 1287 (D C. Chr.1984), wa6a4 6a part and reh's en hent granted on other grounds,760 F.2d 1320 (1985) conssderanons addresned en enanunent claims of quahty assurance deficwncws in motions to l

reopen; ALAB $12,22 NRC 15,44 (1985)

Pmfac Gas and Hectrw Co. (Dublo Canyon Nuclear Pomer Plant, Unns i and 2), ALAb 76),19 N RC $71, reswe denied, CLI 4414,20 NRC 285 (19841 effect on a proceedmg of adding one qualdy assurance contenunn; Al.AB 817,22 NRC 478 a il !

(1985) l Pacifw Gas and E lectrw Co. (Dublo Canyon Nuclear Power Plani, Onets I and 2), AL AB 775,19 i

NRC IMl, 1366 47, effd sub nom. San Lun Ohnpo Mothers for Peace v. NRC,758 F 2d 1287 (D C. Cir.1964), vaceted an part end reh's en bai a granted on other grounds, 760 F 241320 (190Si particulenty requered of evidence supporting mt.taons to reopen; ALAS-812,22 NRC 14,4)

(1985)

Pacific Gas and Elseene Co. (Dutto Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Uness I and 2), ALAB.775,19

NRC IMI, IM7,1349 70 (1984) senadoremens addsessed in enamenens ele 6sne of gush *y ensurense dancioneios in motione to i

roepen; ALAS-012,22 NBC 15, $) (1905)

Persfic Gee and Elesaris Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plaat Unse i and 2), ALAS 773,19 l NRC IMI,1300 m22 (1984) forines esenkd 8er evidenes supperung nietsene to reopen on gushty esaurence centennon; ALAB-812,22 MRC 17 (1985)

, Pacinc Gas and Eiseene Co. (Diotte Canyon Nuclear Power Plent, Usues I and 2), ALAB.77$ 19 NRC IMI,1369, effd est main. San Lens Otsepo Mothere for Poece v. NRC,751 F.2d 1207 (D C.

Or.1984), vesseed in part and reh*g en tone granted on other grounds,760 P.2d 1320 (1985) timehness of nieneens se roepen a ressed, ALAB-8tS 22 NBC 208 n.9 (1983)

I M

I1G Al, CITATIONS IN DEX 04%l%

Paufw Gas semi liestric Co (DiaNo Canyon Nutlest Power Plani Umts 1 and 2), Al AR 775,19

%RC 1361,1379 (19164)

I l 44 4 findings sufhtient for suiNwtratism of full power operating letense Al A B II),22 NRC 78 n 91 (19556 Paoric Gas and llestric Co (Dialski Canyon Nuticar Power Plans, Umis I and 2), AL AR 811,21 NRC 1622 (l985) uw of post-heanns pnwedures, L BP 85-12,22 NRC 416 n 2 (1993)

Pauric Gas and Ilettru Co IDiaNo Canyon Nutleer Power Plant, Units I and 21 CLI SI-3,13 NRC 361, 36) (19816 t~niene to be sausfied by motions to reopen Al AH 812,22 NRC 14 (19456 Paufw Gas and Ilutnc Co (DiaNo Canyon Nutlest Power Plant Unns I and 2), Cll-815, 8) NRC 361, 364 (1981)

L nenwns haard responwNhip to demand temphanie with laieness fa tors of 10 C f R 2 714, L BP 85 36,22 NRC $92-9) t1985)

Pauric Gas and llectric Co 4DiaNo Canyon Nmlear Power Plant, Units I and 2), C1182-19,16 NRC 1712,1714-85 (19821 standard for grans of motion to reopen that raiws pressously uncontested issues, AL AR 812,22 NB C 14 (1985)

Pennsylvsma rimer and tisM Co (Sumauchanna 5icam Ilectrw 5taixm, Uneis I and 2), AL Ah 441, 13 NRC 550,55218981) effect on a ermeedmg 14 admission of a single additional comenteon, Al AB 417,22 NRC 474 n 17,478 n 12 l19115)

Petitum for i mergency and Remedial Action, CLl 78 4,7 NRC 400,405 (1978) safety manifwante of imhted dern1 ens ses m a Iwenwe's operatumal actmues, DD 85-18, 22 NRC 162 n 811949)

Petitum for E mergency and Remedial Action, Oll 78 4,7 NRC 400,40341h (1978) responwbiluy for shaung adverw safety impacts cauwd by a twenwe's finanual d flicuhies, 1)D4 514,22 NRC 638 (1981)

Philadelphia ilettru Co (lamerah Generstmg 5tation, Units I and 2), AL AB-262,1 NRC 16),197 n $4 (1975) baus for ludgment rd safety of spent fuel tra nssNpments, L 8P 8 5 34,22 NRC 49) (198 5)

Philacelpba f inirw Cn (limer4h Generating Sianon, Unos I and 21, AL AN 804,21 NRC 587,192 A n 6 (19til oNigatum of partmes to prosule denumtniary support for alleganons Al AR 812,22 NilC 54 (l'til rewnnvNbly for provnfing record support for appellaie 64:efs. AL AB 81),22 NRC 67 n 22 l

(1989)

PNiadelphia lintrw Co. Il emern k Generstmg Station, Units I ami 27, AL AB 809,21 NRC 1609 1610 a $ (1985) standards apphed in consaderms requests for esemptions under 80 C l' R $012, t BP-813),22 NRC 443 (1981) l Phdadelphia 1.lectne Co (Limerwk Genersung 5tauon, Umis 1 and 2), DD-82-1),16 NRC 2115, 2121 (1982) responstnhty of Directae in consdenng 2.206 requests, DD-85 il,22 NRC 154 a 4 (1981)

PhiladelpNa Dectne Co (Limeiwk Genersung Stanon, Units I and 2), LBP-82-4) A,15 NRC 142),

1500 (1982) contentione postulaung enemy attacks assmst ntulear plants that are htigable under 10 C F R.

50.13, LBP-85-27. 22 NRC 140 t1983)

Ponland General Dectnc Co. (Pebble Spnngs Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2), CLI.76 27,4 N RC 610, 614 (1976) stand ng so 6ntervene on bass of ratepayer status, ALAB-816,22 NRC 465 n 19 (1985),

LBP Si 24,22 NRC 94 n 5 (1981)

Pontand General Doctne Co (Trolan Nmlear Plant), ALAB 531,9 NRC 26) (1979) need for Staff analysis of dry cast storage alternauve to scene fuel tronasherment, LDP-85 34,22 NRC 490 (1983) 31

- ~

I.LG AI. CITATIONS IN DEX CAhl%

i i

Pmomac Electrw Power Ca (Douglas Pome Nmlear Genersims 56.uan, Units 1 and 21, AL AB 218, 8 AI'C 79,85 (1974) hugabihey of hydrogen generauon issues that are the subsect of onsome rulemakms; ALAB 883, 22 NRC 85 a135 (1985)

Potomac t lectne Power Ca (Douglas Point Nmlest Generstmg 5tauon, Umts I and 2), AL AB 218, 8 AEC 79,89-90 (1974)

Lacensing Board authority to consider challenges to Commission authonty to grant esemptions from regulanons LBP-85-33,22 NRC 444 (1985)

Pubhc Service Co. of Indiana (MarNe Ital Nuclear Generating Stanon, Units I and 2), AL AB 374, $

NRC 417,421 (1977) apphcanon of Federal rules and practices en the absence of analogous NRC rules, LBP 85 38, 22 F RC 609 (1985)

Pubhc 5erswe Ca of Indiana 4 Marble lidt Nuclear Genernung Station Units I and 2), AL AB405, $

N RC 1190,1i92 (1977)

I test for esercise of Appeal Board's discreuonary direded cerufmanon authonty; AL AB Sl7,22 l

NBC 473 n 10 ()*45)

Pubtw Senice Ce d indes (MarNe Ilill Nmlest Generstmg 5tauon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-459,7 NRC 179,188 (19781 appellate review of L6ceneeng Board scheduling rulings, ALAB 813,22 NRC 74 a 68 (1985)

Pubhc 5ervice Ca of Indiana (MarWe tidl Nuclear Generating Stauen, Umts i and 2), AL AB 493,8 NRC 253,270 71 (1978) demal of stay monon for fadure to address eniena; AL AB-814,22 NRC 193 n I (1985)

Pubhc Service Ce of New ilampehare (Seabrook 5tauon, Uruts i and 2), ALAB-278,1 NRC 478, 482 83 (1975) enohon for directed ceruficaten of ruime allowmg sntervenors to amend brned, nonspecific comenuon; ALAB-887,22 NRC 472 n I (1985)

.Puww Service Ca of New flampeture (Seabrook Sianon, Units i and 21, DD 79-20,10 NRC 703, t

J 706 4 7 (1979) determinauon of hcensee's financial quehficauons to complete piant construchon DD 8514,22 NRC 639 (1985) l PuNw Servre Ca of New flampshire (sembrook Stauon, Umts I and 21, DD 82-8,16 NRC 394,395 41982) i determin ng whether fmancial constremts should lead to enforcement action, DD-8514,22 NRC 638 (1985)

J PuMe 5eruce Ca of New ifaminhere (Seabrook Sisuon, Units 1 and 2) L BP 74-%,7 AlC 877,897 j

i1974) bghi en whwh the record te verwed for purpose of determimns summary dispositmn moenm, LBP-85 27A,22 NRC 20s (1985); LDP 85 29,22 NRC 310 (1985)

Pubhc Service Ca of New llampshers (Seabrook Stauon, Umts i and 2), LBP-8317,17 NRC 490, 496-97 (1983) apphcabihty of Fed R. Ov. P. 26(b)(4) to NRC proceed nos; LBP 85-38,22 NRC 609 (1995)

Sea Lme Otuspo 68eehese for Peace v. NRC,751 F.2d 1287 (D C. Or.1984), vecstad 6a part and i

roh's en tone esensed en schot grounds,740 F.2d 1320 (1985)

. need for lessier Besse dissummon of esseent6ene devend of morte; ALAS-812,22 NRC 42 (IMS)

Sealed Case,6M F.3d 793,818 (D.C.Or, IM2).

i

waiver of eseepump4 hest and west predest privelsges by diertosure of eastems ofIstvileged e t i

eesemassassioma, LDP 85 M,22 NRC 619 a.23 (IMS);

~e Sedfor v. Teper's ime'i, Inc M F.R.D.49, 72-73 & nJ (D. Kaa.1975) '

I l

ddReusty in desoriatsses emporte is wheen Ped. R. Ov, P. 26(b)(4)(B) apphes, LDP 85-M, 22

, NBC 61)(IMS)

Seegel v. AEC,400 F.2d 778,782 (D.C. Cir,1968) i need for leasession of pastoor power piens aga6 net bend of armed embonews; LDP 8$ 27,22 NaC IM (IMS)..-.

1

' 32 l

i

i I EG AI. CITAllONS IN DEX l

CAstN l

l shopping Carts Antitrust litigston. 95 F R D 299, 3064)# (% D N i 1982P uw of scry bniad mierrogatories m NRC patweedings, I HP 5038,22 NRC 6M)(19846

%n6mg of the Barge " Ranger 1," 92 i R D 486 (5 D Tes 1981) espens to them i ed R Ciw P 26tbH4HB) apphes. I HP 85-38,22 NRC 612 (19:46

%nkmg of the Bege Ranger I," 92 F R D 486,489 (S D Tes 19 sis dislifwison heieren esperts shone mformaison was not a(quired m preparsioon for tnal and tNwe sprofwally empksyed m anuopainon of laugation, i BP 80)S,22 NRC 614 (1989 i

%>uth Caroima ilettnc and Gas Co (%rgil C Summer NutIcar $ latum, Umt 1), AL AS442,13 NRC 881, 892 93, 895 (198 0 j

oc gbi given to farines (nl. (m) and (n) of 10 C l R 2 714(aHI) in determimns admewebehty (4 late-filed comentiont ! BP 5036,22 NRC 594 (1985) i buih Carohna lintnc and Gas Co (s ergit C Summer Nutleer Maison. Uma D, Al AB 663, le NRC il40, 11 4 (1981), reste= dnhned. CLI 8210,15 NRC 5377 (1982) n4e of NRC Siaff in inenung prmeedmst, AL AB 812,22 NRC $6 (1989 Lwthern Cahforma 1.dium Co than Onofre Nutleer Generating Statum, Ilmit 2 and 3D, Al AB 212, 7 41 0 986. 991 (1974) latitude of I wenung Boards in condating prmeedmst, Al AB 813,22 NllC 74 n 67 (1985p kehern Cahforma lawm Co 45an Onofre Nutlear Generaims haimn. Umts 2 and 31, AL AB 673, 15 NRC 688. 697 & n 14. afCd. CLI-8211.15 NRC 1383 (1932)

I showing nettuary by par 1y challengmg cross-etaminatum ruhng. Al AB 413,22 NRC 76 a 78 I

119843

%iuthern Cakforma iden Co (San Onofre Nutlear Generstms Stamm. Umts 2 arid 31, Al AB 717, j

17 NRC 346,380 m 57 (1983)

I il M A find.ngs suffwient for authontainm of full power operaisng inenw. AL AB II),22 NRC '

78 n 91 (1985) kiuthern Califorma idium Co thn Onofre Nutlest Generaimg 5tahon, limts 2 and 38, L HP 82-39, 15 NRC 116),1216-17 (1982)

I menwns Board delegat.on to NRC 5ta i nf post hearms rewiution of emergenty planmns issues.

r LHP 85-27 A. 22 NRf' 222 (1985)

Termewee Valley Authonty (Waits 84r Noticar Plani, I'mts 1 and 2), Al AB-41),5 NRC 1418,1421 n 4 41977) teudency requerernents for stand,ng to mier.cne in operstmg luenw onweedingt i HP-8024,22 NRC 99 n 711989 Ietas l'hhtees Generstmg Co IComanc he Peak heam iIctern 5ww Ua,ts 1 and 2P Dil 8 bil.18 Na C 294,295 (198)p authority of Director of Nut best Reat u.e Regulaimn over prewdmg (isenung Board to suspend an oggratmg luenw prmeedmg. I)D 8514. 22 NRC 642 n 4 (1989)

Thomas Organ Co s Jadranska %hodna Plowedba, 54 i R D 367 IN D lil 1972p determmmg whether a subgn=ensed party is an espert speoally retained in anticipalum of hogaimn. L BP 84-38,22 NRC 613 (1985)

Union ilectnc Co (Callaway Plant, Omi 1), AL AB-740,18 NRC 343 (1981) quality of coristruction required for plant biensing AL AB 813,22 NRC 65 n 10 (19859 Umon Elecinc Co (Calisesy Plant, Unie 1), ALAB 740,18 NRC 34),346 (1983) quahty of puolear powet plant construcuan required for issuarue of operstmg imense Al AB 812, 22 NRC 14,44 (1985) standard of comphante with NRC requirements espected for facdtty cperation, DD-85-ll,22 NRC 161 n 7 (1985)

Union lies-inc Co (Callaeay Plant. Uma l), AL AB 750,18 NRC 1205,120911 (1981) consdershone addreswd m esammme claims of quahiy amurnfue dernienues in monons to ieopen. ALAB 882,22 NRC 15 (1985) 05M Corp v Amerwan Aerovas, Inc,631 F 2d 420,424-25 (6th Car.1980J determimng whether e subpnenaed party is an espen scenally tetamed m antenpaleon of I,'isshon, LBP 85 38,22 NRC 613 (1985) 31 l

l

11G AI, CITATIONS INIEX I

CANIN I

Vermont Yankee Nmlear Power Corp (Vermont )ankee Nmicar Power Statum), Al AH 138,6 AlC 520. 523 n 12119731 entnal fxtor m determining timchness of monon to repren, AL AH 815,22 NRC 202 n ll (1985)

Virginia Electne and Power Co (North Anna Power Stauen, Units I and 2), Al AB $84,11 NRC I

451, 456 (1980) need for Staff conuderation of alternauves to spent fuel shipment. L BP-85 34,22 N RC 490,492 18985)

Verg nia E lectne and Power Co (North Anna Power Stanon, Units I and 2), AL AB 741,18 NRC g

371, 376-78 41983)

I efTect on a proterdies of adnuswan of a sangle addeuonal contenuon for purpose of usiefpng l

J meerlocutory revice. AL AB 817,22 NRC 475 nn 11 A 19 (1985)

Virginia I.lcstnc and Power Co (North Anna Power Station. Umts I and 21, C'l 74-16,7 AFC 313 (19748 arpinabihty of esecuuse privilege to NM proceedmss, LBP-85 38,22 NRC 626 (1985)

%adunston Pubhc Poect Surr y Spiem (% NP Nos 4 A $1 DD-824,15 NRC 1761 (1982) e hasard to pubhc heshh and safety of slowdown or halt in constructson of a nuclear plant, DD 8514,22 NRC 642 (1985)

%ashmginn Public Power Surrty System (% FP55 Nuclear Protect No II, LBP 8346,18 NRC 780

?!) (19:31 hugatehty of contennons possulaims enemy attads agamst nuclear facihues. L BP 85-27,22 NRC 139, 140 (1985)

% ashmaton Pubhc Power Supr8y Sywem (% PPSS Nutlear Project No. 2), f)D 84-7,19 N RC 899,906 (14841 standard of comphance with NRC requirements espected for fuihty operrion, DD 85 11,22 NRC 161 n 7 (1985)

% ashmston Pubhc Power Sur:4y intem ( A PP55 Nuclear Project No 2), DD 84-7,19 NRC 899,923 l (1984) i circumsuntes arpropriate for issuance of sP on cause order, DD-55 ll,22 NRC 152 n 2 (1985)

% ashingion Pubhc Power Surrty Syves (% PP55 Nu(lear Project No. 3), AL AB-747,18 N RC 1167, litt (19838 showmg necemery for a party to demonstrate als abihiy to contr+ute to the record of a j

penceding. AL AB 81) 22 NRC 85 n 134119n5)

% ashmston Pubhc Po et Surr y Svsiem (W PPs5 Nutlear Proped Non 3 and Si, C1177-11,5 NRC l

e 719. 723 i1977)

I cirsumuarues arprorriate Ior reh'Wmms for waiser or esempium from regulatums. I HP-85 33.

22 NRC 4451191141

% monwn liestric Power Co tromt Scash Nutlear Plant, Unis 2), CLI 73-4,6 Al C 6 (1973) termmation d prmeedmss pnor to completum of safety anaines, LBP 8512. 22 NRC 416 n 2 (1985)

Wisconsin IJearw Power Co (Point Beach Nuclear Plani, Units i and 2) DD-43-13,18 NRC 721, 722 (1983) safety significance of isolated deficwncws in a hcensee's operauonal actmtws DD 85-II,22 NRC 161 n.8 (1985) l 34 i

.___.m_

1 t

I

(

l I

i l

I IJG AI, CITATIONS INDEX i

R F Gl't.4 ll()NS 10 C f R. 2.104tc)t41, as amended eITettise Richer 12.1984.49 led Reg 3 5,74 7. 3 5. 7 5 2, as j

corrected,49 Fed His 3c.631 (lv44)

(

hiiphihty of 6nantun qual.rnatiow comem.ons m operaims twenw prmecoings, Al 48 813, 22 1

NRC 84 n.126119848 j

l 10 C F R 2 201 j

l NRC Siaff treatment of inenwe w@ums of NRC requirements DD 85 'l,22 NRC loi n 7 (1985) 10 C F R. 2 2tm dental of peutum iequesting as tum m bght of luenwes' allegei precarmus 6nantaal condinon, l

DD-85-14, 22 NRC 636 (1985) i demal of petit.on requestmg delav m inenw muance pending review n(intentise regulations and emergency preparednew. DD-85-12. 22 NRC 449 (1985) demal of petiton requesong legal astron to rechfy an aswrted luk of esatuanori routes under lbst i

i condeisons, DD 85-13. 22 NRC 494 i1985) i l

demal of peutum requesong show<auw prmeedmgs and revaatmn of operaung inenses o i bau.

that esemptions were improperly granted to luensee; DIF85 ll,22 NPC 15141984) l l

den +al of petehon requesung suwnsum of operaung twenws pendmg reso utum of ciwrouon in spray pond ppmg system. DD 85-15. 22 NRC 643 (19858 denial of petition weksfig puestpotiement of containment leak rate tests pending corretieon of asieged j

errors m meswrement rnethodoh.gy. DD e5-10,22 NRC 144 (1985) j forum for films permons for inense amendmeni suspenuon or revmateon, I isP 85-29,22 NRC 322 i

(1985)

I prmedure for shallengmg litenwe's tomrharke *iih hcenw sondaimns, i HP-8035,22 N RC 513 (1985) 10 C F R 2. 704 f c l surrett for Jnquahlkanon motions. ( l I ti'-li. 22 NRC 185 n 3 (198is I

10 C F R. 2 711(as

(

authority of I atenung Perds to shorten tmic perux! for 6lmg contentmns, I HP H5 36. 22 NRC 49) l (1985) 10 C F R 2 714 Hoard critena for evaluation of late-ftled contentmns, AL AH 817,22 NRC 472 il985p deadhne for fihng rehtums 10 meervene, i HP $i-24,22 NRC 98 n I (1985)

,l Luenung Board recmsibehty to demand compharwe with lateness fat tors of, i BP-85-36,22 N RC 592 (1985) speculation by Arecal Board manniy on Enenens Board app 4Kanon of 6se futor test to hypothetwat laie contention. AL AR 817,22 NRC 478 n.ll (1985) 10 C F R. 2.714(at factors balanced for unnmely interventwn Al AB 816,22 NRC 465 n 14,466 (1985) l 6ve factors to be addreswd by petmoner filing amended guten to emersene. LBP-85 36,22 NRC 591-92, 594 (1985) j showmg necessary for unnmely meerseni on. Al AR-816,22 NRC 463 (19856 i

10 C F R 2 714(aHI) admmihihty of late-filed comenton bawd en mue raswd by Stord and damiswd on appeal.

AL AB-813. 22 NRC 80 (1985) applKabehty of Ove-fator tesi to late filed diewi generator conten mn, Al AH 813. 22 NRC 82 (1985) 35 i

l

m

. ~. _..... -- __

_.__.m 1

i I

I.EG Al. CITATIONS IN DEX RIGt!I.ATIO M l

j L five-factor test for adnusson of laie-fed contentons, ALAB-813,22 NRC 79 (1985), LBP 85 24 j

22 NRC 98 n 3 (19856

. need for lateness of an meervenuon peutento he challenged by another party to trigger apphcanon f

f of Eve-factor test; 4 LAB-816,22 NRC 466 (1985)

?

penalty for failure ta address five factors for admisuon of late-filed contenuons. AL AB-Sle,22 NRC 468 (1985) rejecuan of contention allegmg madequale currection of control room design denciencies; j

ALAB-813,22 NRC 84 (1985)

I standard for grant of monon to reopen that ranes prewmusly uncontested issues; ALAB-812,22 f

NRC 14 n 4 (1985) j 10 C F.R. 2.714(b)

" vicarious advice of counset" as cause for late fihng of conteniens. LBP-85 36,22 NRC $93 (1985) i bans and specincity requirements for admisson of contentens; CLI-8515,22 NRC 187 (1985)

I parucutanty requeed of evidence supportmg motions to reopen; AL AB-812. 22 NRC 14 (1985)

}

rejection of nonspecific contenteon; ALAB-887,22 NRC 473 n.) (1985) 10 C F R, 2.714a appeal of denal oflate mtervenuon, ALAB-Ste,22 NRC * ** (1985) 10 CT R. 2.715 arleganons of prejudmal rulings by a Licenung Board, Ct. 55-15,22 NRC 185 n.)(1985) 30 CJ R. 2.71801 3

monon for directed ceruncaten of ruims allowmg intervenors to amend broad, nonsgecific j

contenuon, ALAB-817,22 NRC 472 n.1 (1985) 10 C F R 2.720th)(2)(0 and (m)

+

i f

use of discovery to Gesh out nompecinc contentons, ALAB-817,22 NRC 477 nn 8 A 9 (1985) i 10 Cf.R. 2.722(a)(Il and (b)

Board authonty to appnmt technical mterrogator and mformal asustent; LBP 85-26,22 NRC 520 (1985) 10 Cf.R. 2.730(c) f n' ens of smwers m support of motions; ALAB-88 7,22 NRC 479 n 12 (1985) i motmn to sinke as repew to answer to summary disemitwi monon; LBP 85 29,22 NRC 304 n I

(

(198')

]

10 C F.R. 2.7401bHis use of descovery to Gesh out nompecific contennons; Al AS-517,22 NI'C 477 n.7 (1985) 10 C F R. 2 740tbH2) claim of wrwk product pnvkge for documents reistmg to decontammaten costs; LBP-8138,22 NRC 620 (1985) j j

cntena for sta. mms work prodwt pnvdese; i BP-85-38,22 NRC 621 (1985) 10 C F R. 2.742 l

deadhne for service of discovery responses; LI'P 85 38,22 NRC 631,632 (1985) i i

10 CIR. 2.74)(c)

(

1 peruculenty required of evidence supporum, monons to reopen; ALAS-812,22 NRC 14 (li45) t I

10 CJ R. 2.749

]

. apphcebehty of,in operating license aniendment proceedmss; LBP 85-34. 22 NRC 485 (1985) i I standards opphed by Boards canadonne sumniary dispamuon mouona, LDP 85 27A,22 NRC 208 (1985); LSP-85-29,2' NRC 310 (1985) l

,30 Cf.R. 2.749(a) l docuenents to be feed with sumniary despeseuon motions; LBP 85-29,22 NRC 302 (1985) l fihng requerennents for opponents of summary dispombon notens, LBP 85 29,22 NRC 302,305 (1985) i 2

.10 C P.R. 2.749(b) i 3

Board authnnay to request oral tesumony where record is msuff.ceens to allow summary despomuon; LDP-85 29,22 NRC 307 a.) (1985) burden on party oppnems mouon for summary discomuon; LBP 85-27A,22 NRC 229,231 (1985);

j LBP-85 29,22 NRC 303 (1985) f g

i I

l I

r i

i

}

=

IJ.G AI, CITATIONS IN DEX RIGt't.ATIO M l

10 C.F.R. 2.7491di standard for grant of summary disemetion in hcense amendment proteedmss, IItP-85 29,22 NRC 3IO (1985) standard for grant of summary dispoution motion LBP 85-27 A,22 NRC 208 (1985) 10 C.F.R. 2.751af d) objection to admismon of amended quahty assurance contention; AL AB-817,22 NRC 476 n 2 (1985) 10 C F R. 2.754(b) i nature of Board's authonty to dismiss contentions, L BP-85-35,22 NRC 521 (19115) 10 C F R. 2.758 fihng of esemption from 10 C F R. Part 50, Appendit J, Ill D 2(b)(u),1BP-85-33,22 NRC 444 (1985) litigatnhty of hydrogen control contentions; AL AB 81),22 NRC 56 n.142 (1985) means for changmg regulatory hmits of worker esposure to radiation; I BP.85-28,22 NRC 266 (1985) petitions for naiver or esemption from 10 C F R. Part 50, Appendit J, !!! D 2(b)(u); LBP-45-3),

22 NRC 445-46 (1985) 10 C F.R. 2.758(a)

I scope of nsues to be considered by a Licensing Board LBP-85 33,22 NRC 444 (1985) 10 C F R. 2.758(b) i btigabihty of need for power and financial quahfications issues in operating hcense proceedings.

ALAB-813,22 NRC $4 n.127 (1985) i 10 C F it. 2 758a htigabihty of contenuon challensms 10 CJ R. 5013, LBP-85 27,22 NRC 131 n 2 (1985) 10 C I.R. 2 760ta) limits on Board junadiction, LBP-85-35,22 NRC 518 (1985) scope of issues heigable in licensmg proceedings; LBP-85 33,22 NRC 446 (1985p 10 C F.R. 2 760s Board authonty to raise inues sua sponte; ALAB 813,22 NRC 80 (19s5) 3 hmetation on safety matters heigable in management capabihty proceedmg. LBP-85-28,22 NRC 298 f

(1985) 10 C F R. 2.762(dl(I) i need for record citations in appellate tweefs. ALAB 813, 22 NPC 66 n.16 (1985) 10 C F R 2 764(f'(2) effect of Commewon immediale effectivenen determmaton on Appeal Board's determmation of a stay monon, AL AB-814,22 NRC 195 (1985i scope of Commewon review of partial mitial dension, Cl185-15,22 NRC 185 (1985) 10 CJ R 2.764(f)(2)fil cniens apobed m conductins immed, ate effesuveness review, CLI.8513,22 N5 C 2 3 (1985) 10 C F.R. 2.764fsp effect of Commimm,n authontation for full-pomer hcense on pendmg motions e e reopen, ALAB-812,22 NRC L3 n.3 (1985l effect of Commission immedisia effecuveness determinauon on Appeal Board's determmation of a star monon; ALAB-814,22 NRC 495 (1985)

10 Cf.R. 2.785(li)(i) l mouon for directed certificauon of ruhng allooms intervenors to amend broad, nonspecifie contention; ALAB-817,22 NRC 472 n.1 (1945) 10 Cf.R. 2.788(a) j deadhne for filing stay apphcanon; ALAB-814,22 NRC 195 (1985) 10 C.F.it 2.788(e) denial of stay mouon for failure to address critena of, ALAB-814. 22 NRC 193 n I (1985) factoes consdered en determirung stay requests, CLI-8514,22 NRC 178 n.1 (1985) forum for fihng peuuons for hcense amendment suspension or revocation; LBP 85 29,22 NRC 322 (1985) 37

_m___

m _

m.

._m

.,_m.

.m P

d I

1.EG AL CITATIONS IN DEX l

RIGL!LATIOM l

IO C F R,2 788(e)(1) need for Board findings enor to hcense issuance as ground for stay request. ALAlt-814,22 NRC 193 (1985) 10 Cf,R. 2.788(e)(2), (3),(4) factors to be addressed by stay mouons; ALAB-814,22 NRC 194 (1985) 10 CJ R. Part 2, Appendia C descnpien c(5ystematic Assessment of Licensee Performance process, DD-85 II,22 NRC 165 (1985) 10 C F R. Part 2. Appendia C,I standard of comphance with NRC requirements espected for facihty operation. (10-8511,22 NRC i 161 n.7 (1985) l 10 C F.R. 20.202(al i

edequacy of Shearon 1(arns personnel monotonns system; LBP 85 28. 22 NRC 265 (1985) 10 C F R. Part 21 adequacy of Perry survedlance and maintenance program for diesel generator engines, LBP 85-35, 22 NRC 554 (1985) reportabihty of crankst.sh oil plus defect under. LBP-85-35,22 NRC 554,582 (1985) i reportabihty of nonconformances to NRC; ALAB.812,22 NRC 29 (1985) 10 C.F R. 50.12 Lscensing Board authonty to consider challenges to Commrsuon authonty to grant enemptions from regulatsons; LBP 85 33,22 NRC 444 (1985) 10 Cf.R. 50.I2(a) request for enempoon from 10 Cf R. Part 50, Appenden J, til D 2(b)(n); LBP-85 33,22 NRC 443 (1985) 10 C F.R. 5013 heigabihty of radroed esplosion contention whuh challenges, LBP-85 27,22 NRC 13133 (1985) rauonale behind regulanon; LbP-85 27. 22 NRC 133 34,139-40 (1985) 10 Cf R. 50 lb) enterpretauon of, LDP-85-27,22 NRC 135-37 (1985) 10 C F R. 50.13(b) anterpretation of the word " deploy"; LBP 85-27,22 NRC 138-40 (1985) 10 CJ R. 50.3)(f)

I determmation of heensee's financul quahficanons to complete plant construcuan, DD-8514,22 NRC 641 (1985) 10 C F R. 50 40(b) ongin of the terms " management competence" and " management capabihip"; L BP.85-28,22 NRC I

236 n.2 (1985) 10 C F R. 50 44 comphance of Perry hydrogen control system with, LBP-85 35,22 NRC 530 (1985) descripuan of hydrogen control systems et Perry plant, LBP-85 35,22 NRC 568 (1985) g 10 C.F.8L 50 44(cH3) adequery of onelyes of Perry hydresen ignetson system; LDP 85 35,22 NRC SSI 0985) htagetsher of hydressa control consentases; ALAB-413,22 NRC 86 a.141 (1985) i 10 Cf.R. M d6(c)O)(iv), (v), (vi) eenient eremelysis of hydresen cenerel syneeme; LSP-85 35,22 NRC 530 (1985) d 10 Cf.R. M.d4(s)OHvn)(A), (B) deedhas Ier suhausman of analyes of hydrogen control system; LSP-85-35,22 NRC 530 (1985) 10 Cf.R. M.46(a)(1) cnierie 8st osapuner modets used to ceiculees peak claddies semperatures; LBr.85 29,22 NRC 311 0985)

J l

j 10 Cf.R. M 46(bHI)

~

odeguser of computer siedels used to predict peak cladding temperatures. LBP-85 29,22 NRC 315 316, 321 0 985)

I interpseesecen of the term "sperepriate margen"; LBP 45 29,22 NRC 0985) 38

l i

1.EGAL CITATIONS INDEX R t GUI.ATIOM 10 C F R. 50 47 need for inctumon of evacuaison time esumate for specut facility 6n emergency responw plan, LBP 85 25,22 NRC 115,116 (1985) sianord for determining adequacy of emergency response training; LBP.85-25,22 NRC 107 (1985) 10 C.F R. 50 47(a) and (b) sacanon of decimons addresses esemption fromi CL18516,22 NRC 459 (l'85) 10 CF R. 50 47(a)(l) demat of opereung licenses tucause of deficwncers in unlaty-arr,nsored emergercy plan, L BP-85 31, 22 hRC 427,428,451,432 (1985) 10 C.F R 50 47(b) legal force of NURLO cnierw; LBP 85 27A 22 NRC 210 (1985) 10 C F R. 50 41(bH2) l edequacy of emergency response times for onsste emergency staff et Sheaton liartir; LDP-85 27A.

22 NRC 218 (1985) minimum onmie stamns required of Lkensee for radiological emergency; LBP 85 2; A,22 NRC 209 I1985) 10 C F R. 50 47(b)(10) conaderstaan of adverse weather conditions la evacuauon time esumates, LSP45-27A 22 NRC 226 (1985) effect of conwrvausme in evacuanon time study on protecuve action decimons dunns a radiological emergency; LDP45-27A,22 NRC 21) (1985) need to provide potaemum iodide to emergency workers, LBP45-27A,22 NRC 223 (198?)

requirement for Apphcants to make sad maintain current evacuauon urne esumates, LBP 85 27 A, l

22 NRC 21415 (1985)

I 10 C F R. 50 47(b)(ll) i means for contro6hns radiation esposures to emergency workers,1BP.85-35,22 NRC $67 (1985) l 10 C F R. 50 47(b)(12) requerements for dealing with contaminated ergured indmduals dunne a radioingical emergency, LDP-85 35,22 NRC 524,525 (1985) 10 C F R. 50 47(DMil) indmduals for whom radiological emergency reiiponse training is required LBP IS 25,22 NRC 104 (1955) 10 C F R. 50 47(bH16) deadime for submssuon of emergency plan emplemenung procedures, LBP 85 27 A 22 NRC 225 (1985) 10 C F R. 50 47(d(t)

I effect of legal empediments to vulity-spuntored emergency plan; LBP 85-)l. 22 NRC 428 (1985) l 10 CF R. 50 49 equipment required to be enveronmemally qualtied under, LBP-85-28,22 NRC 268 (19851 10 C F R. 50 49(c)(4)

, calculsuon of does for a rednesson environnient for purpuee of enveronmental qualificannn of I

equipment. Lbr45 20,22 NRC 285 (IMS) 110 C F R. 50.496) f seenwomenes Air emolul>6as tipdresse igalelen synesats; LDP-85 35,22 leRC 544 (1985) 10 C.F.R. N.54(m)(2)(t) and (th)

, seassel esem seemse segumenesses; L8P45 N,22 NRC 296 (IMS) le C.F.R. N.354e) -

edequery of Pony neveesteme and nio6aesammes progrom for diesel genereest enganes, LDP4$ 35 i

P 22 NRC 554 (IM5) i poed for diestemme of apphaent's 6asernel audies so NBC', ALAS 412,22 NRC 21 a IS (1985)

I repareekshey of menseaformanses to NRC; ALAS 412,22 NRC 29 (IMS)

(10 C F.R. 50.37(e) condiesen precedent to lemusees of an opereesne Issense; ALAB413. 22 NRC 64 n 7 (1985)

)$

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX RIGULATIONS 10 C F.R. 50.57(aH3)(a) quahty of construction required for p8 ant hcenung; ALAB-813,22 NRC 65 (1985) quahty of nuclear power plant construction res;uired for muance of operstmg license;.ALA9412,22 NRC 15 (1985) 10 C.F.R. 50.59 responsibehty for decesson as to whether a matter consistutes an unreviewed safety quesuon; LBP-85-36,22 NRC 598 (1985) 10 C.F.R. 50.72 operaung record of Diablo Canyon Uma 2 dunng first 2 months of operation; CLI-85-14 N NRC 182 (1985) scope of independent renew of reportable events at Lamench facihty; DD45-il,22 NRC 166 (1985) 10 Cf.R. 50.73 deadhnes for heensee event reports; DD-85-ll,22 NRC 165 (1985) scope of review to discover exe'ence of personnel error trend ar Limenck facihty; DD-8 >-II,22 NRC 167 (1985) 10 C.F.R. 50 91(a)(4) need for heanns on proposed operaung hcense amendments; LBP-85-29,22 NRC 302 (1985) 10 Cf.R. Part 50, Appenden A snierpretanon of the terms

• fuel design hmit," " anticipated operauonal occurre nce" and "appropnate margin"; LBP-85 29,22 NRC 311 (1985#

10 C F.R. Part 50, Appendia A, GDC l. 2,4 and 23 equipment required to be environmentally quahfied under; LBP-85-28,22 NRC 268 (1985) 10 Cf.R. Part 50, Appendix A, GDC I,17 adequacy r4 Perry comphance with; LBP-85-35,22 NRC 553 (1985) 10 Cf.R. Part 50, Appendia A. GDC 17 need for onsite electnc power system for nuclear power plants; ALAB-813,22 NRC 79 n 96 (1985) purpose of emergency diesel generators; LBP-85-35,22 NRC 551 (1985) 10 Cf.R. Part 50, Appendsz A GDC 62 potential of increased spent fuel pool storage capacity for enticality accident; LBP-85-36, 22 NRC

$99 (1985) 10 C F.R. Pan 50,,\\ppendia B "atructural independence" of Shearon liarns construction inspection; LBP 85 28. 22 NRC 283 i

(1985) adequacy of Pert / comphance with; LBP 85-35,22 NRC 553 (1985) alleganons of deficiencies in Wawrford quahty assurance program; ALAB 812,22 NRC 16 (1985) exempnon cf pome comungs insede containment from quahty assurance requirements of, LBP-85 37, 22 NRC 602 (1985) function of gashty assurance programs; ALAB-812,22 NRC 18 (1985) independence required of quahty assurance manager; ALAB-813,22 NRC 67 (1985) quahry assurance requirements for environmental quahfication test facihues; LBP-85-28,22 NRC 288 (1985) 10 Cf.R. Part 50, Appendix B, introduction deferution of"t,uahty control"; ALAB412,22 NRC 18 n.9 (1985) means of provident reasenable assurance of a plant's proper c,e A., ALAB-813,22 NRC 64 n.8 (1985) scope of term "quehty assurance"; ALAB-813,22 NRC 63 n.I (1985) 10 Cf.R. Part 50, Appendix S, I adequacy of Owners Group requehficanon of diesel generasors; LDP-85-35,22 NRC 553 (1985) deleganon of quality assurance responsbehties; ALAB-812,22 NRC 22 (1985) 10 C F.R. Part 50, Appendix B,II penaky for inadequate control of activines effecting quahty; ALAB-812,22 NRC 18 (1985)

10 C.F.R. Part 50, Appends: B,III and XI equipment required to be environmentally quehfied under; LBP-85-28,22 NRC 268 (1985)

I de.) )-

/

l

,g.

l l

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX RIGULATIONS 10 C F.R. Part 50, Arpendia B, V, XVII means of complying with documentauon requirements of; ALAB.813,22 NRC 68 (1985) 10 CF.R. Part 50, Appendin B, XV, XVI importance of dispostening of Nonconformance Reports; ALAB.812,22 NRC 29 (1985) 10 CF.R. Part 50, Appendin B, XVill importance of applicant's audits in providmg assurance of construcuon quahty; ALAB-812,22 NRC 28 (1985) 10 CF.R. Part 50, Appendia E need for inclusion of evacuation ume estimate for special facihty in emergency response plan; LBP-85-25,22 NRC 115,116 (1985) 10 CF.R. Part 50, Appends E,IV considerauon of adverse weather conditions m evacuation time esumates; LBP-85-27A,22 NRC 226 (1985) 10 C F R. Part 50, Appendin E,IV requirement for Apphcants to make and maintain current evacuation time esumates; LBP-85-27A.

22 NRC 214 (1985) 10 CF.R. Part 50, Appendia E. IV.D.2 responsbihty for actavaung pubhc noufication system during radiolossal emergency; LBP-85-31,22 NRC 427 n.2 (1985) 10 CF.R. Part 50, Aprendia E, V deadlme for subrussion of emergency plan implementing racedures, LBP-85-27A,22 NRC 220 (1985) 10 CF.R. Part 50, Appendix J appropriateness cf grant of enemption from, for Limenck facihty; DD-85-ll,22 NRC 153,155 (1985) vahdity of methodology for contamment leak rate tests; DD.85-10,22 NRC 144 (1985) 10 C F.R. Part 50 Appendia J, III.D.2(b)(u) condinon to oc fulfilled in order to obtain enemption from; LBP-85-33,22 NRC 444 (1985) requirements for fihng of exempuon from; LBP-85-33,22 NRC 443 (1985) 10 CF.R. Part 50, Appendix J, III.D.2(b)(iii) testing of airlock neals in heu of tesung of entire airlock; LBP-85-33,22 NRC 443 (1985) 10 CF.R. Part 50, Appenden K critena for computer models used to calcatate peak claddmg temperatures; LBP 85 29,22 NRC 311, 316. 317 (1985) i I

10 CF.R. 51.35 Staff assessments and find.ngs required to obtam exempoon from regulations; LBP-85-33,22 NRC 444 (1985) 10 C.F.R. 51.52. Table 5-4 applicabihty of,in operating bcense amendment proceedmss; LBP-85 34,22 NRC 484 (1985)

.10 C.F.R. 51.106(c) litigabihty of need for power issues in operaung hcense proceedings; ALAB-413,22 NRC 84 a.126 (1985).

t 10 C.F.R. Part 53 Federal sesress of udiisias' spent fuel; LBP 85 34,22 NRC 509 (1985) ?

necessier for minimamismus fbil cose reserve in spent fuel pool; LBP-85-34,22 NRC 505 (1985).

10 C.F.R. Port 78 ;A

...y:.

/.. ~, -

, presues for f

's immunene of a license to procure end store suelaar fuel; DD-85-14,22, ~

,.... MRC 09 (1985)

t *.

~

G 2

~

IC C.F.R. Port 71 '

h accident someneas that spect fuel casks should be demaned to wit ma+ LBP-45-34,22 NRC 501 (1985) r-employes error la peparuig spent fuel casks for shipment; LBP-85-34,22 NRC 494 (1985) 10 CF.R. 71.7)

. design reeuwemenes for spent fuel Wiipping casts; LBP-85-34,'22 NRC 497 (1985) el

. - - -.., ~

= _ _ -. -

.?

4 e

I i

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIOM 4

10 C.F.R. Part 73 readmg of 50.13 in pari nut.na with; LBP45-27,22 NRC 137 (1985) scope of contenuons hugable under; LBP-85-27,22 NRC 138 (1985) 10 C.F.R. 73.l(s) acope of secunty threats encomnessed by; LBP-85-27,22 NRC 137 (1985) 10 C.F.R. 73.l(a)(Iland (b) 4 scope of threats e--

-; by; LBP-85-27,22 NRC I37-38 (1985) 10 C.F.R. 73.37 preventwwi of asbotage of spent fuel transshipments; LBP-45-34,22 NRC 502 (1985) probstmhty of success of sabotage attack against spent fuel shipment; LBP-85-34,22 NRC 489 (1985)

=

10 C.F.R. 73.41 and 73.46 i -

entent of riant vicinity requinns secunty protection; LBP 85 27. 22 NRC 138 (1985) 10 C.F.R. Part 100 need for w'dten procedures for ope-ation of hydrogen igniuon system to be scrutmired in heanng; LBP-85 J5,22 NRC 532 (1985) i potential ofincreased speru fuel pool storage capacity for enticahty accident; LBP45-36,22 NRC 599 (1985) 44 C.F.R. Part 350 guulehnes for fulfillment of requirements of FEM A's regulations; ALAB-81),22 NRC 77 n 86 j

(1985) 44 C.F.R. 350.7(b) j need to consider are and configuration of emergency plannmg zone in partsat iniual decimons; j

ALAB-814,22 hRC 194,195 (1985) i I

t 3,

4 t

\\l k'

1 1

4' i

5 f

L e

a 1

s

-i i.

l-42 4

a 0

W

,e

<t 0*

.... ~ -.

• ..m,_

a

,h g

j f.. h[;hs'7[ j

f. -. [ Ngf.j;.k.k.., (....

],.'M.. fj P'7 h,

k M fo,.7

[k-. 4 - l.I$k((((

k

_ _ - ~. -

i l

i l

l

.l l

i d

I i

i I

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX ST AT U1 E*i Atomic Energy Act,161n Commewon authority to delegate furktion of decidmg meeting closures, DPRM 85 3. 22 NRC 174

{

(1985) i Atomic Energy Act,182(at. 42 U S C 2232 j

origin of the terms

• management mmretence" and " management capabihty"; LBP.85 28. 22 NRC j

236 n 2 (1985) 1 Atomic Energy Act, 1894. 42 U S C. 2239(a t right of intersenor to hearms on 1*'ense conditnms. CLI-85-13,22 NRC 3 (1985) d

]

right of puNic to a hearmg. AL AR-nl3. 22 NRC 82 (1985)

Atomic Energy Act,189a(ll. 42 U.S C. 2239(aHI) need for Board to awaii final i EM A findings before approving emergerwy response plans.

AL AB-813,22 NRC 78 (1985p Atomic Ericrgy Act. 42 t r.5 C. 2133(dl. 2232f as i

quahiy of construction required for plani luenung: AL AB-813,22 NRC 65 (1985) l qualdy of nuclear power plant consiruction required for muance of operatmg hcense; AL Ah-812,22 NRC 15 (1985)

Federal Advisory Committee Act. 8(b>

authority for ruhng on appeals of closure determmations for meetmas of adusory committees.

DPRM-85-3, 22 NRC 174 n 1 (1985) i Federal Advisory Commatice Act. 5 U.S C. Appendin 1.10(d) requirements for ckxure of adviery committee mecimss. DPRM-85-3,22 NRC 175 (1985)

Freedom of Information Act. 5 U.S C 552 g

means for producmg wealec contentwrns without resorimg to discovery; AL AB.817. 22 NRC 477 n 5 (1985)

National Envirr,nmental Polwv Act.102(21fi 1. 42 U S C. 4332(2)(f )

need for preparaison of enuronmenial impict statement to coser proposed recci *t. storage and I

transshipment of spent fuel assemt bes. I BP-85 34. 22 NRC 490 (1985) i need to consider ahernaines to shipmeni of spent fuel. LBP-85-34. 22 NRC 484. 4919) d l985)

I Nwicar Waste Polwy Act of 1942. 42 U S C.10.155(bHI)( A), (B) 11982) l Federal storage of utehtici spent fuel. I BP-85-34. 22 NRC 509 (1985) j Nuclear %aste Pohcy Act of 1982. t ilf a)(5),42 U S C.10.151(a)(1) j responsibihty of utihtses for storage of spent fuel.1.BP-85-34. 22 NRC 509 (1985)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Aci of1982.135(bH2),42 U.S C.10,155(bH2) necessity for mamtammg full core rewrse m spent fuel pot,1; LBP-85-34. 22 NRC 505 (1985) i Nuclear Waste Pohcy Act of 1982. 218(a). 42 U.S C.10.198(a) i content of dry eask storage demonstration program; LBP-85-34,22 NRC 568 (1945) l Uraniuni Mill Tailmgs Radiation Control Act, Pub L.95-604,42 U.S C. 2113 requirement for maste disposal prior to termination of hcense; LBP-85-38,22 N RC 614 (1985) r 1

i 43 9

\\.J-

%)

l l

l l

t i

I l

i I

i j

I.EG Al. C1 FATIONS INDEX OIlit R %

i I

l ll l

Fed R Civ. P.12t hi j

maner of obiections to suNett matter junstit teon of' t menung lioard.1 HP.MC27. 22 NRC 131 n 7 i

t1985) f i

l ed R Civ P. 264bli41 apphcaNhly of, to NRC proceedings I HP A t3M, 22 NRC 609-17 419A4)

I'ed R Civ P. 2#d hat 4H Rs I

dncenery of cepens in NRC proteedmg i HP-801A. 22 NRC 630119M58 i ed R Civ. P. 52(af general consulerations in determmeng managemeni comresence. LHP 85 2h 22 NRC 237 n 41198%)

i Fed R. Civ. P. 56 standards apphed hv iWrds convdenng summary dnpoution monons I HP 44-27 A. 22 NRC 208 (1985p f ed R Civ. P. So

)

standards for summary dnposinon. I HP-8 029. 22 NRC JIO (19A51 4 Monre's Federal Prattwe 126 tol21.26-203.126 e4l4L 26 390 ci seg (19M41 maner of pnulege shrough dncuwon of fatis that are the subect w a pris deged tommunnatum.

i L BP-85-38. 22 NRC 619 (19856 4 A Mmre's iederal Pr.stwe t 3313 (1914 ed a refusal in answer interrog4 tory on ground that information n known to internyatory party; L BP-85-38. 22 N RC 625,629 (198s t

^

4 A Moore's Federal Prattwe t 331712141984 ed I legal corkluvons about whnh interropiories mas enquire. I BP A5-34. 22 NRC 625 (198it 6 Moore's Federal Prutne.156 t ill 61 i

Board authoney to request oral resumony wherc retord n insulTaient to altne summary dnpemnon.

1 LBP-45-29,22 NRC 307 (19251 i

N C. Gen Stat. t il 5C 242(6p use of students as bus drners durmg radiologal emergency. I HP-A3-27 A. 22 NRC 229 f 191I5)

A % right & Miller. Federal Prxine and Prenedure 4 2024. at 209 (1970s applKabfhty of prntlegd in d.M uments ton'unang suheett mJller umslar in that an drwlosed j

documems. L BP R$.14. 22 NRC 621 f 19M5s A W right & Miller. I ederal Pr.ntsc and Procedure 4 2172, at $!4-39 (1970p I

1 need in idenor) pervirn awsting in prepar.iimn of answers to mierrogarones. I HP 115-381. 22 N RC f

i 22 (1943) l 45 e

f

---

w----- m v,---._

. ww-w--mmew w- - *. * - -g

l 1

l I

I i

l l

I l

1 I

SUIU ECT INDEX l

l l

l ACCIDENT (5) ai Three Mile Island, hydrogen esplouon durmg, LBP-85-30,22 NRC 332 (19856 cask drop, adequacy of uow calculations for. LBP-85-36,22 NRC 590 (1985) degraded core, contaenment spray austabihty dunng: LBP-85 35,22 NRC 514 (19858 i

degraded core, pmutnhly of difTuvon flames occurnns m; LBP-85-35,22 NRC 514 f1985) l sesere, mcluson of deogn alterneines to mitigaie, in Final Environmenial Statemem. Ci! 8513.

22 NRC I (1985)

ADJUDICATORY BOARDS authonty of, over NRC Staff, ALAB-812. 22 NRC 5 (1985) l l

obbgation of, to do a party's rescarth for it. AL AB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985) 1 ADJUDICATORY llE ARINGS l

en quahty assurance defeciencies, scope of. AL AB 812,22 NRC 5 (1985)

ADJUDIC ATOR Y l(E ARINGS g

{

scope of review of claims of quahiy assurarne derciencies in; ALAB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985 l

l j

ADVISORY COMMITTEE l

meetmas, authonty to rule on closure determmations for DPRM-85-3,22 NRC 173 (1985) i

(

AFFI ANTS J

i burden on intervenors in demonstrate competence of. LBP-85-29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

AIRCR AFT CR AS11 i

rwk, conuderation of. under 10 C F.R 5013(b), i BP-85-27,22 NRC 12611985) l ALCOilOL AliUSE at Waterford site, treatmeni of AL A B 812,22 NPC i (1985)

I A LLEG ATIONS mith potential safety signr6cance, NRC pohcy contermns pursuit of; DD-85-il,22 NRC 14911985) j ALTE R N ATIVES l

io spent fuel tranwhipment, need for conudcranon of, I.BP 85 34,22 NRC 481 (1985) j l

AMINDMENT l

l of Environmental Aswwment, I BP 85-34 22 NRC 481 (19856 See alw Operstmg Licenw Amendment Protecomg(s) Operalms License Amendmentisi A NSI ST AN D A R Ds i

for determimng tolerarne hmsts of thermolummescent dosimeiers, hiegabably of adequay of.

LBP-85 28,22 NRC 232 (1985)

(

A PPE AL(5) t apphcabehty of new regulations to mues on. AL AB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985) interlocutor), of Licensmg Board ruhng admittmg contention previously found msufTsciently specific; ALAB 817,22 NRC 470 (1985i of demals of summary disposition monons, LBP-85-29,22 NRC 300 (1985) of purely procedural points, content of. AL AB-816,22 NRC 461 (198$)

i APPLICANTS responsibehty of, for nuclear power plam phyncal secunty; LBP 85-27,22 NRC 126 (1985)

ATOMIC ENERGY ACT publec's heanns rights under; ALAB 813,22 NRC 59 (1985) l safety findmgs required by, for nuclear power plant hcensing; ALAB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985) l f

AUDITS of construction work, weighi given to efTectiveness of, by Licenung Board. ALAB-812,22 N RC 5 (1985)

I 47 f

I l

l i

l i

I l

I i

l

m SUBJECT INDEX BOARDS See Adjudicatory Boards Lecensms Board BOLTS, filLTI allegauons ofimproper installation of, at Waterford, ALAB-812. H NRC 5 (1985)

BRIEFS appe!! ate, content of. ALAB413,22 NRC 59 (1985)

BURDEN of persuasion on lateness factors of 10 C.F.R. 2.714(a); ALAB-816,22 NRC 461 (1985) of satisfymg requirements of monon to reopen; ALAB-812,22 NRC $ (1985) on petiimner seeking unumely intervenuon; ALAB-816,22 NRC 461 (1985)

BURDEN OF PROOF on movant for summary dispoetion; LBP-85 27A,22 NRC 207 (1985)

CABLES connel, truual and twman, env roamental quahfication of LBP 85-28,22 NRC 232 !!985) instrument, leakage currents from; LBP-85-28,22 NRC 232 (1985)

CASKS See Dry Cask, Spent Fuel Cask (s)

CERTIFICATION See Directed Certifcanon CHARACTER and competence, reflection of appicant's remedial quahty assurance efforts on; ALAB412,22 NRC 5(1985) heensee, clernents of; ALAB-882,22 NRC 5 (1985)

D trensee, factors determimng; ALAB415,22 NRC 198 (1985)

Ci! EATING on licensed overator exams, determinauon of management competence and character on bass of management's response to; ALAB-$l$ 22 NRC 198 (1985)

' CLADDING mtegnty of, dunns reflood of the core after a loss-of-coolant accident, dunns normal operation and dunns other occurrences other than LOCAs; LBPJ5-29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

CLADDING temperature, peak, calculanon of, LBP-85 29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

CLOSUR E of advisory committee meetings, authonty to rule on; DPRM-85-3,22 NRC 173 (1985)

COMMUNICATIONS See Ex Parte Communications COMPUTER MODLLS for predictmg peak claddmg temperatures; LBP45 29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

CONCRETE contamment, integnty of, LBP-85-28,22 NRC 232 (1985)

CONDITION of site redress reemrod for dienuseal of proceeding; LBP45-22,22 NRC 89 (1985)

CONSTRUCrlOh.

~

gushey reeuwed for opermans hausse issumace; ALAB412,22 NRC 5 (IMS); ALAB413,22 NRC 1 59 (1985) ',

e cJ%'

~

CONTAINMENT /.

k.

-- I f "

.v a

^'

concrete, ineegrity or, LBP-85 28,22 NRC 232 (1985).

7:T

-integrity at Perry plant, analysis or, LBP45-35,22 NRC $14 (IM5) ~ y

~

i=aa-aaa valves, propnety of NRC grant of esemption from requunnects for; DD45-II,22 NRC 149 (1985) c

. +.;

a leek rete testing program, proprtety of NRC prent of esempoon from regarements for, DD45-II,*

22 NRC 149 (1985)

~

' leak rate tests, vahdety of methodeiogy for enessurement of; DD45-10,22 NRC 143 (1985) leekushiness, challenge to use of ASME service level C hmins to ensure; LBP45 35,22 NRC 514

.. (1985)

~

. spray avesletniny during degraded core occident, chauence to; LBP45-35,22 NRC 514 (1985) f

l SUllJ ECT IN DEX CONTFNTION(5) challengmg adequacy of Staff review of operstmg license apphcanon, hiegabihty of AL AB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985) concernmg deployment of U.S. = capons, admewbihty of LBP 85-27,22 NRC 126 (1985) hydrogen generauon, htigabihty of, ALA B-813,22 NRC 59 (1985) late-filed, means for pany to demonstrate its abihty to contribute to the record on issue submitted in: ALAB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985) late-filed, test for admission of; ALAB-81),22 NRC 59 (1985) on sabotage, cntene for determming admembihty of, LBP-85 27,22 NRC 126 (1985) pressously found insufDciently specific, interlocutory appeal of ruhng admittms; ALAB 817,22 NRC 470 (1985) quality assurance, effect on a proceedmg of admimon of AL AB-817,22 NRC 470 (1985) use of discovery to flesh out; ALAB-817,22 NRC 470 (1985)

CONTINUANCE mdefinite, in obl*gation to respond to summary disposition motions, gram of, LBP-85 32,22 NRC 434 (1985)

CONTROL ROOM design derriencies, correction of, at Catamba. ALAB-81),22 NRC 59 (1985) staffing, regulatory requirements for; LBP-85 28,22 NRC 232 (1985)

COOLING SiSTEM See Emergency Core Coohng System COOLING TOWER dnft, effect of salt deposition from, LBP-85-26, 22 NRC 118 (1985)

CORE integnty of fuel claddmg dunns reisood of, LBP-85-29,22 NRC 300 f1985) spray system at Limerxk, adequacy of design of, DD 85-il,22 NRC 149 (1985)

See also Emergency Core Coohns System, Reactor Core CORRESPONDLNCE

, between NRC StafT and Lacensee as bases for alleged safety concerns; DD-85-II,22 NRC 149 (1985)

CORROSION microbiologrally mfluenced, m spray pond pipmg system; DD-85-15,22 NRC 643 (1985)

See also Intergranular Stress Corrosion Crackmg COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS of alternatives to spem fuel shipments, need for, LBP-85 34,22 NRC 441 (1985)

CRITICAL llE AT FLUX techmcal discuwon of, LBP-85 29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

CRITICALITY CONSTANT emptanation of concept of, ALAB-816,22 NRC 461 (1985) of 0 95, operat on of spent fuel pnot with; LBP-85-24,22 NRC 97 (1985)

CROSS-EX AMIN ATION ruimas, appellate review of, ALAB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985)

DECAY HEAT R.EMOVAL from suppresson pool during degraded core accident, aJequacy of means for, LBP-85 35,22 NRC

- $14 (1985) i

~

DECISION (5) ' ~.r; _

~

addressms esemption from reenrements of 10 Cf.R. 50.47(a) and (b), vacation of, on mootness grounds; LBP-85-459,22 NRC 459 (1985) y not authorizing Bcease issuance or resolving all pending safety issues, appealabihty of; LBP-85-28,

' 22 NRC 232 (IM5).,

partial initial, scope of Commismon review of, CL1-8515, 22 NRC 184 (1985)

DECONTAMINATION.

of property L1 reception centers; LBP-85-35,22 NRC 514 (1985) protection for bus drivers during an emergency, need for. LBP-85-35,22 NRC 514 (1985)

! 49

SUHJ ECT INDEX DEFICIENCILS disposit onmg of reports en; ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985) emert.ency Manning, cited by FEM A, adequacy of offste emergency Nans in light of; LBP-85-35, 22 NRC 514 (1985) m control room design as Catamba, correction of, ALAB-81),22 NP.C 59 (1985) m design, construction and operation of Diablo Canyon, treatment of allegatons of CLI-85-14,22 NRC 177 (1985) quahty assurance, resolution of; ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985) quahty assurance, scope of acudicatory heannas on; ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985) quahty assurance, scope of review of claims of; ALAP 813,22 NRC $9 (1985)

DEPARTURE FROM NUCLLAIL BOILING technical dwussion of; LBP-85-29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

DESIGN abertauves to mitigate severe accident nsks, inclusion of, in Fmal Environmental statenent; CLI-85-13,22 NRC I (1985) deficiencies, control room, correction of, at Catawba; ALAB-813,22 NRC $9 (1985) of spent fuel shippmg casks, safety-related features of, LBP-85-34,22 NRC 481 (1985) spent fuel pool, high-densty rerack, safety of, LBP-85-36,22 NRC 590 (1985)

DIESEL GENERATORS at Perry plant, rehabihty of, LBP-85-35,22 NRC 514 (1985)

Transamenca Delaval, rehabihty o(, at Catawba; AL AB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985)

DIRECTED CERTIFICATION l

authonty, discretionary, test for exercise of, ALAB-817,22 NRC 470 (1985) 1 DISCLOSURE wasser of attorney <hent and work product pnvileges through; LBP-85-38,22 NRC 604 (19a5)

DISCOVERY access to plant components remmed for design deficiencies as; LBP 85 32,22 NRC 434 (1985) mfnngement ofintervenor's heanng nghts Decause of expedited schedule for; CLI-85-15,22 NRC 184 (1985) of nonwitness experts; LBP-85-38,22 NRC 604 (1985)

I use of, to flesh out contenuons; ALAB-817,22 NRC 470 (1985)

DISQUALIFICATION of Licensms Board, support of motion for; CLI-85-15,22 NRC 184 (1985)

DOSE aneuments dunr, radiological emergency, tramma necessary to perform; LBP-85-27/, 22 NRC 207 (1985)

I calculations for a sk drop accident; LBP-85-36,22 NRC 590 (1985)

DOS! METERS thermolummescent, accuracy of; LBP 85-28,22 NRC 232 (1985)

DRUG ABUSE at Waterford site, treatment of; ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985)

DRY CASK storage as alternauve to spent fuel transshipments; LBP-85-34,22 NRC 831 (1985)

DRYWELL POOL

. loads from hydrogen combustion; LBP-45-35,22 NRC $14 (1985) iEFFECTIVENESS -

! of authorization for operating bcense, denial of request for stay of, CLI-85-14,22 NRC 177 (1985) i ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT i at Waterford, flood damage to: ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985) f environmental quahrecation of; LBP-85-28,22 NRC 232 (1985)

ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE 6 caused by nuclear missile or other weapon, need to protect nuclear plants against effects of; j

LBP-85 27,22 NRC 126 (1985)

EMERGENCY ACTION LEVEL t indicators, incomplete, in erergency plan; LBP 85-35,22 NRC 514 (1985)

Se l

l l

SUBJ ECT IN DEX EMERGENCY CORE EDOLING SYSTEM j

evaluation models, adequacy of, LBP-85-29,22 N RC 300 (1985)

EMERGENCY PLAN (5) contene of, regardmg mmimum staffing a Licensee should have durms an emergency; LBP 85-27 A, 22 NRC 207 (1985>

defecuacies m, with respect to hospital demsnations and medical services; LBP-85-35,22 NRC 514 (1985) efTect of State statutes rechibitmg utihty from implementms; LBP 85-31,22 NRC 410 (1985) l irnpicmentmg procedures, htigatwhty of, LBP-85-27A 22 NRC 207 (1985) length of, t.BP-85-27A,22 NRC 207 (1985) i need for completion of emergency action level andtators m; LBP 85-35,22 NRC 514 (1985) offsite, adequacy of, in light of plannma deficiencies ested by FEM A; LBP-85-35,22 NRC $14 1

(1985) scope of medical servues arrangements to be included in; CLI-8515, 22 NRC 184 (1985)

EMERGENCY PLANNING efTect of lack of State and local government participation in; LBP-85-31,22 NRC 410 (1985) need for final FEM A findmss on, as prerequisite to trenung; ALAll-813,22 NRC 59 (1985)

EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE need for mstallation of mdependent data monitorms systems m; LBP 85-35,22 NRC 514 (1985)

EMI RGENCY PREPAREDNESS of State and local agencies, adequacy of, in hght of underfunding; DD-85-12,22 NRC 449 (1985)

EMERGENCY %ORKERS prousson of potanium eodide to; LBP-85 27A,22 NRC 207 (1985) requirements for tramms of, LBP-85-25,22 NRC 101 (1985)

ENFORCEMINT history of Brunswick nuclear plant; LBP-85 28,22 NRC 232 (1985)

ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS l

institution of, on basis of hcensee's financial constramts; DD-85J4,22 NRC 635 (1985)

ENVIRON M ENT rad ation, calculation of done for; LBP-85-28, 22 NRC 232 (1985)

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT content of, concernmg alternative uses of available remurces, LBP-85 34,22 NRC 481 (1985) i of method for sae redress, need for; LBP-85 22,22 NRC 89 (1985)

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS of trans*pment of s,ent fuel casks vs. con irwtion of dry cask storage facihty; LBP-85 34,22 NRC 481 (1925) j ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEM ENT need for preparaison of, for spent fuel pool capansion; LBP-85 36,22 NRC 59011985)

See aim Fmal Environm:ntal Statement ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION effect of physical onentatson of equipment on; LBP-85-28,22 NRC 232 (1985) e,(electrwat equipment; LBP-85 28,22 NRC 232 (1985)

EQUIPMENT I

! effect of phyncal orientation of, on environmental quahrsation; LBP-85 28,22 NRC 232 (1985) safety-related, lack of visualinspectaos of, at Waterford; ALAB-812,22 NRC $ (1985) i aurvivabihty, adequacy of analyms of, LBP-85-35,22 NRC 514 (1985) i See also Electrical Equignent

EVACU A110N of schools during radiologral emergency, use of students as bus dnvers for; LBP-85-27A,22 NRC 207 (1985) routes through flood areas, denial of 2 206 petition requesting letal action to rectify; DD-8513,22 NRC 454 (1985)

EVACUATION TIME EST1 MATES accuracy of methodology for compihng; CLI-85-15,22 NRC 184 (1985) factors considered in makms; LBP-85-27A,22 NRC 207 (1985)

$1

s SUHJECT IN DEX need for analyses of worst-caw scenanos for; LBP-85 25,22 NRC 101 (1955) need for review of, by State or local organizanons; LBP 85-35,22 NRC 514 (1985) requirements for makms and mamiaming current; LBP-85-27A,22 NRC 207 (1985) g

. use of conservas sms in; LBP-85 27A,22 NRC 207 (1985)

EVIDENCE supporung mouon to reopen, particularity required of; ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985) supporting, for reopenmg of record, nature of. ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985)

EX PARTE CT)MMUNICATIONS from Omce ofInvesugauons, Board rehance on, in making heensing decisions; ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985)

EAEMPT10N(3) from regulanons, fihng of pennons for; LBP-85 33,22 NRC 442 (1985) from regulauons, standards apphed by Commission in considering requests for; LBP-85-33,22 NRC 442 (1985) from requirements of 10 CER. 50.47(a) and (b), vacauon of decision addressing, on mootness grounds; LBP 85-459,22 NRC 459 (1985) improvidently granted, support for claim of; DD-85 il,22 NRC 149 (1985) of pamt comungs in containment fre,i quahey assurance requirements, LBP-85 37,22 NRC 601 (1985)

EXPERTS non=>tness, discovery of, LBP-35 38,22 NRC 604 (1985) to abom Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) is apphcable; LBP 85-38,22 NRC 604 (1985)

EXPLOStVES effect on spent fuel shippmg casks of, LBP-85 34,22 NRC 48 8 (1985) from Federal ammuninon plant, hazard to Brandonod facihty from railroad transport of, LBP-85-27, 22 NRC 126 (1985)

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY final findmss on emergency plannms, need for, as prerequisite to hcensms; ALAB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT scope of design alternauves to mitigate nevere accidents to be included in; CLI-8513,22 NRC 1 (1985)

See also EnvironmentalImpact Statement FIN ANCIAL QUALIFICATIONS essues, httBabihty of,in operating hcenw proceedmss; ALAB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985) of hcensees,insutunon of enforcement actens on bam of, DD-8514,22 NRC 635 (1985)

FINANCIAL RESOURCES dispenty in, as demonstration of exceptional circumstances under Fed. R. Cav. P. 26(b)(4)(Bl; LBP-85-38,22 NRC 604 (1985)

FINDING $

safety, required by Atomic Energy Act for operating heense issuance; ALAB412,22 NRC 5 j

(1985); ALAB-883,22 NRC 59 (1985)

FIRES

~.

h secondary,in

, inteissed by hydresen burnms, potential for, L8P-8545,22 NRC 514 J ~ (1985) -

, a;, ; ',

FLOOD,,,

s-u damesse to electrieel sedyment at Waterford; ALAB 812,22 NRC 5 (1955) -'

FLOODING J 1

s I of e-- seuesst DD-45-13,22 NRC 454 (1985)

FUEL

. design limies, interpreension of; LDP45-29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

See also Spent Fuel '

>s f' FUEL LOADbonus pies, ash 6y ' impact oP, DD-8512,22 NRC 449 (1985) '

$2

f SUHJ ECT IN DEX l

i G ALLION ELLA corrosion in spray pond pipmg system 6nfluenced by; DD-85-15,22 NRC 643 (1985)

GENERATOR 5 See Diesel Generators l

HEARING (5)

Apphcant's Management Plan as a proper focus for; LBP-85 32,22 NRC 434 (1985) l need for, pnor to issuance of spent fuel pool hcense amendments; LBP 85-36,22 NRC 590 (1985) nghts of members of the public under Atomic Energy Act; ALAB413,22 NRC 59 (1985) i nghts on hcense conditions, CLI-8513,22 NRC I (1985) rights, infna ement of, through adverse procedural ruimgs; CLl-8515,22 NRC 184 (1985)

See also A4pudscatory Heannes,1scensms Heannes HEAT TRANSFER COEfTICIENTS calculation of; l.BP45-29, 22 NRC 300 (1985)

HYDROGEN detonation in Three Mile Island contamment; LDP-85 30,22 NRC 332 (1985)

HYDROGEN CONTROL SYSTEMS standard of acceptance of LDP45-35,22 NRC 514 (1985) liVDROGEN GENERATION contenuens, htigabihty of; ALAB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985)

HYDROGEN IGNTTOR SYSTEM quesuons to be answered in evaluatmg prehmmary analysis of, LBP-85 35,22 NRC 514 (1985)

IMMEDIATE EFFTITIVENESS determmanon, effect of, on Appeal Board's determmation of a stay monon; ALAB 814,22 NRC 198 (1985)

INMATES at State correctional insistuuon, evacuanon of, durms radiological emergency; LBP45-25, 22 NRC 101 (1985)

INSPECTION PROGRAM NRC Staff, otgectives of; DD-85-II,22 NRC 149 (1985)

INSPECTORS QA/QC, at Waterford, adequacy of quahficauons of, ALAt 812,22 NRC 5 (1985)

INTERGR ANULAR STRESS CORROSION CR ACKING caused by high interpass temperatures on welds, potemial'or; ALAB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985)

INTERPRETATION of the phraws and terms " directed agamst the facihty," *ene'ny of the United States," and

" deployment'; LBP45-27,22 NRC 126 (1985)

INTERROGATORIES need to demsnate who composed answer to; LBP-8548,22 NRC 604 (1985) scope of; LBP 35-38,22 NRC (44 (1985)

INTERVENORS cntena for establishms staneng of,in operstmg hcense amendment proceedmss; LBP45 24,22 NRC 97 (1985)

'IPfTERVENTION

' ' is oposselaB eemse smassdrnest proosedians, standens for. AbAS416,22 NRC 461 (1985) h

~ petseios, ofInst of wishdrosal of; LSP45 23,22 NRC 95 (IM5) posissosi, lese-Aled in open tasas license assendment proconding, desmissal of; LDP-85 24, 22 NRC 97 (1135) untar uly, by pie se Seigent, Ave 4 actor seet for; LDP-85-36,22 NRC h(IM5) untinely, Ave-faceer east for; ALAB-816,22 NRC 461 (IM5)

LEAF RATE TESTING

} prepnety of NRC grees of esempuen front requironments for, DD 85-ll,22 NRC 149 (1985)

, LEAR RATES j valusity of niethodology for meessrement of; DD45-10,22 NRC 143 (1985)

[ LETTERS OF AGREEMENT I reestding avaitetshey of area =8 buses, osed for, LBP45 35,22 NRC 514 (f M5)

\\

53

, t.", -

Q#

V Ih (p s,

4$'h M8M^

i i

I l

i SUHJ ECT IN DEX l

l t

LICENSEE character, elements of. ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS as basis for alleganon of madequate desgn and poor plant performance. DD45-II,22 NRC I49 (1985)

LICEN5tNG BOARD reliance on en parte information from Omce of Investigations in making heensms decisions, ALAB-812,22 NRC S (1985)

LICENSING HEARINGS exclusaon of fmal stages of major safety study from; LBP45-32,22 NRC 454 (1985) e M AN AGEMENT CAPABILITY of Shearon llarns apphcants; LBP45-28, 22 NRC 232 (198$)

relevance of apphcants' managemeni of one facility to its capabihty for managmg another facihty;

)

LBP45-28,22 NRC 232 (1985)

M AN AG EM ENT COMPETENCE factors determining; ALAB 815,22 NRC 198 (1985)

MANAGEMENT PLAN Applicant's, as sole bass for conunued hugation in operaung license proceeding, LBP 85 32, 22 NRC 434 (1985)

M ATERI AL FALSE STATEMENT

)

mailgram by Licensee management staung erroneous mformation as; LBP45-30,22 NRC J32 (1985)

MEDICAL SERVICES scope of arrangements for, to be included in emergency plans; CLI-85-15,22 NRC 184 (1985) to be provided dunns radiological emergency, need for agreement with Red Cross for; LBP-85-31, 22 NRC 410 (1985)

MODELS See Computer Models MONITORING equipment, thyroid, at relocation centers, adequacy of; LBP45-)l, 22 NRC 410 (1985) ofimpact of salt deposmon from coolms tower dnft on agricuhural lands, program for LBP 85 26, 22 NRC 118 (1985)

MONITORING 5YSTEMS independent data, need for mstaltauon of,in Emergency Plannmg Zone; LBP 85-35,22 NRC 514 (1985)

MOOTN E55 vacanon of decmon addressms esemption from requirements of 10 C.F.R. 50 47fa) and Ib) on grounds of, LBP 85-459,22 NRC 459 (1985) j MOTION TO REOPEN I

burden of sausfyms requirements of, ALAB412,22 N RC 5 (1985)

)

particulanty required of matenal supporung, ALAB412,22 NRC 5 (1985) i)

that raises previously uncomested issues, entens for acceptance of; ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985)

See also Reopening of Record MOTION TO STRIRE

'~

manmary P-mayonne and -Was sindavits; LBP45 29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

NEED M)R POWER -

6ssues,litagelmhty of,in operating license pW ALAS 41),22 NRC 59 (1985)

NONCONR)RM ANCE REPORTS t shepoememas of, at Waterford; ALAB412,22 NRC 5 (1985)

NRC POLICY l eencernes delegaaion of authonty to rule on sonessential procedural matters; DPRM45-3,22 NRC 173 (1985)

'l concerning proeection of plants against an enemy attack; LBP-85-27,22 NBC 126 (1985) 10 punue aBegations with potential safety significance; DD45-II,22 NRC 149 (1985) i i

l Se 4

i l

-- ~

~

I l

l I

I l

l t

SUBJ ECT IN DEX f

NRC PROCFE DINGS aprimaten of I-ed. R Civ. P. 26(bJt4) in; LBP 85-38,22 NRC 604 (1985)

NRC REGULATIONS

. arricable to enemy attacks on nuclear plants; LBP $5-27,22 NRC 126 (1985) 1 NRC STAFF authonty of NRC adsudicatory boards over; AL AB 812,22 NRC 5 (1985) inspection program, objectives of. DD 85 II,22 NRC 149 (1985) post-heanns resoluuon of hco se conddions by; CLI 85-13,22 NRC I (1985) responsibihues; ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985) review of operaung hcense opptration, hugabihty t4 contention shallengmg adequacy of.

ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985)

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (5) hcenang requiremems for protection of, agamst attacks by an enemy of the Untied States.

LBP-85-27. 22 NRC )26 (1985)

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (5) responsituhty for handhne beyond<temen basis threats agamst; LBP-85-27,22 NRC 126 (1985)

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION authonty to direct Board to conader ments of request for esempuan from regulatoons, LBP 85 33, s

22 NRC 442 (1985) challenges to authoney of; LBP-85-33,22 NRC 442 (1985) delesauon of authonty by, to rule on closure determmations for advisory committee meeungs, DPRM-85-3,22 NRC 173 (1985) review of paniel iniual decierons, scope of; CLI-8515,22 NRC 184 (1985)

OFFICE OF INVLSTIGATIONS Board rehance on es pane informatson in making hcensing decimons; ALAB 812,22 NRC 5 (1985)

OPER ATING LICENSE apphcanon, heigabihty of contention chattengang adequacy of NRC 5taff review of ALAB-412,22 NRC 5 (1985) authoritsuon, need for f.nal FEM A findmss on adequacy of emergency response plans as prerequesne to; ALAB 813,22 NRC 59 (1985) conditions, heanns rights on; CLI-8513,22 NRC I (1985) denial of request for stay of effecuveness of authorustion for issuance of; CLl-8514,22 NRC 177 (1985) issuance, safety fmdmg necennary for; ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985)

OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT PROCEEDING (5) avadsbehty of summary dispostion en; LBP 85 29,22 NRC 300 (1985) basis for standmg to intervene in; ALAB-816,22 NRC 461 (1985) rewdency requirements to estabhsh standmg to intervene 6n; LBP 85 24,22 NRC 97 (1985) treatment oflate-filed intervenuon petiuono m; LBP-85 24,22 NRC 97 (1985) j

, OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT (5) for spens fuel pool espannon, need for heanns pret to inauance of, LBP-85 36,22 NRC 590 (198$)

I permentsng receipt and storage of spent heel assembhes transahipped from another nuclear facihty; LSP-85-34,22 NRC del (1985) i suspoumon or a of; Lar-85-29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

OPEAATING LICENSE PROCf EDINGS a

' Appheent's ManaBoment Plan as sete tosia for sentinued liusauen in; LBP-85 32,22 NRC 434 t

- (1985).

> besastehty of need for power and Ansacial gushncations issues in: ALAB-883,22 NRC 59 (1985) eenninessen of, when there are analyses to be completed, LBP-85 32,22 NRC 434 (1985)

RATINO RECORD i

for DioMo Canyon Unit 2; CLI-85-14,22 NRC 177 (1985)

ORIENTATION i

f physical, of equepment, effect on environmental quehfication of; LBP 85-28,22 NRC 232 (1985) i i

i

, SS e

- ~

SUBJ ECT IN DEX 4

PAINT core and sump blockage by; LBP-85-37,22 NRC 608 (1985) is contaminent, esempimn of, from quahey amurance requirements LBP 85-37. 22 NRC 601 (19854 l PE N ALTY caut, largest lewed by NRC; LDP-85-28,22 NRC 232 (1985) j for failure to provide adequate support for issues on appeal. ALAB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985) l PilV51 CAL SECURITY l

of nuclear plants, responsebehty for handhng beyond design-basis threats to; LBP-85 27,22 NRC f

126 (1985)

PIPE II ANGERS j

safety related. fabncanon of. ALAB-812,22 NRC $ (1985) i PIPE SUPPORTS at Diablo Canyon, scope c( NRC review of, CLI-8514,22 NRC 177 (1985) temporary, use of, at Waterford. AL AB 812. 22 NRC $ (1985)

PIPING SYSTEMS at Diablo Canyon, scope of NRC review of. CLI-8514,22 NRC 177 (1985)

POPULATIONS transport dependent, to be evacuated during radiological emergency, means for idennfying, CLI-85-13,22 NRC I (1985)

POTAS$ LUM IODIDE prowmon of, to emergency workers; LBP-85 27A. 22 NRC 207 (1985)

PO%ER See Need for Power PREJUDICE to intervenors from adverse procedural rulings, CLI-8515,22 NRC 184 (1985)

PRIVILEGE attorney-chent or work product, waiver of, thrs.,ish disclosure; LBP-85-38,22 NRC 604 (1985) execuuve, invocanon of. in NRC proceedings; LBP-85-38,22 NRC 604 (1985) work product, apphcanon of, LBP 85 38,22 NRC 604 (1985)

PROTECTION of nuclest power plants agamst attacks by an enemy of the United States, licenant requirements for, LBP-45-27,22 NRC 126 (1985)

PROTECTIVE ACTIONS use of redsoprotecove drugs as, LBP 85 27A. 22 NRC 207 (1985)

QUALIFICATION (5) of QA/QC inspectors at Waterford, adequacy of; ALAB 812,22 NRC $ (1985) of welders at Waterford, adequacy of. ALA8-812,22 NRC $ (1985)

See aho Environmental Quahricaten, Finanaal Quahrscations QUALTTY AS5URANCE breakdown at Waterford, entent of; ALAB-812,22 NRC $ (1985) contention, effect on a proceedmg of sdminason of. ALAB-817,22 NRC 470 (1985) deficiencies, resoluuan of. ALAB-812,22 NRC $ (1985)

I deficiencies, scope of studicatory hearings on; ALAB 812,22 NRC 5 (1985) deficiencies, scope of soview of clasma ef. ALAB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985)

( deficiencass, standard for reopening reased on; ALAB 812,22 NRC $ (1985) i

! program et Waterford, edesimacy of. ALAB-412,22 NRC 5 (1985)

[ programs,importance of manager 6al atentude 80; ALAB-Sl2,22 NRC $ (1985) 1 I remedies espHed By appiscent, reflectaon of, on Apphcant's character and competence, ALAB-Sl2. !

22 NRC $ (1985)- -

requirements, esemption of paint contings in containment from; LBP 85-37,22 NRC 601 (1985)

' R ADI ATION eNocts on lubricame and seals; LBP-85-28,22 NRC 232 (1985) environment, calculation of does for; LBP-85 28,22 NRC 232 (1985s

~ RATEPAYER status as basis for standing to 6ntervene; LBP-85 24,22 NRC 97 (1985) a d

$6 4

s-n

SUHJ ECT IN DEX RE ACTOR CORE damage followms Three Mile Island accident; LBP 85 30,22 NRC 332 (1985) l See also Core RECEPTION CENTERS handims of contanunated property in; LBP 85-35,22 NRC 514 (1985)

RECOR D(S) management system at Waterford, adequacy of, ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985)

See also Operaung Record REGULATIONS challenges to, in operstmg license proceedings, LBP 85-27,22 N RC 126 (1985) comphance of pro se htisants with procedural requirements of, LBP-85 36,22 NRC 590 (1985) films of pensions for exempuons from, or waivers of, LBP-85 33,22 NRC 442 (1985) incentive, potential safety impact of DD 8512,22 NRC 449 (1985) mierpretsuon of; LBP 85-34,22 NRC 481 (1985) not m effect untd time of appeal of a decimon, apphcabihty of, ALAB 813,22 NRC 59 (1985)

See also NRC Regulanons RELOCATION CENTERS for evacuees,idenuricahon,locanon and adequacy of, LBP-85-31,22 NRC 410 (1985) l REMOTE Sill 1TDOWN SYSTEM REDUNDANCY i

propnery of NRC grant of exempnen from requirements for; DD-85 II,22 NRC 149 (1985)

REOPENING of issues previounty adjudicated, use of 2.206 procedures for. DD-85-II,22 NRC 149 (1985)

REOPENING A RECORD cnteria for; AL AB 812,22 NRC 9 (1985); ALAB 815,22 NRC 198 (1985) nature of supportmg evntence for. AL AB 812,22 NRC 5 (1985) on quality amurance deficiencies, standard for; ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985) i

' REstSTANCE TEMPERATURE DETECTORS I

thermal agms of, LBP-85 28,22 NRC 232 (1985)

REVIEW emmediaie effectiveness, crueria apphed in conducung; CL1-85-13,22 NRC l (1985) interiocutory, standard for; ALAB-817,22 NRC 470 (1985) of claims of quahty amurance deficiencies in adjudmatory hear ngs, scope of, AL AB 813,22 NRC 59 (1985)

I of esacuanon time esumates by 5 tate or Irmal organusuons, need for; LBP-85-35,22 NRC 514 (19856 of parnal minal decevons by Commisuon, scope of, CLI 8515,22 NRC 184 (1985)

RLVilW, APPfl LATE of Lnenwns Board cross-enammation ruhngs. ALAB-813,22 NRC $9 (1985)

{

of Licenung Board scheduhng ruhngs-ALAB413,22 NRC 59 (1985) i REVOCATION of hcense amendrnents; LBP-85-29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

RISK of mahtary aircran erash, conaderauon of, under 10 C.F.R. 50.13(b), LBP-85 27,22 NRC 126 (1985) to surroundmg community from opersuco of spent fuel pool, LBP 85-24,22 NRC 97 (1985)

RULEMAKING effect of, on ongoing proceeding; ALAB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985)

J l RULES OF PRACTICE 6

! access to plant components removed for design deficiencies as discovery; LBP-85 32,22 NRC 434 (1985) i admissbility of comentions concernmg deployment of U,5. weapons; LBP-85 27,22 NRC 126 (1985) appellate review of Licensms Board cross-enamination ruli.s; ALAB 813,22 NRC 59 (1985)

't appellate review of Licensing Board schedulms ruhnas, Al sB-813,22 NRC 59 (1985) a.

Apphcant's Management Plan as a proper focus for hearings; LBP-85 32,22 NRC 434 (1985) 57 F

\\

i SUHJ ECT IN DEX arpinason of Fed. R. Cev. P. 26(6)(4l in NRC proceedmgs; LBP-85-38,22 NRC 604 (1985) apphcation of work product pnvilege; LBP 85-38,22 NRC 604 (1985) avaalathhty of summary distuniuon en hcense amendment heannes. LBP 85.9. 22 NRC 300 (1985)

Board reliance on en parte informauon from ORice of Invesugations m makmg twensms deossons; ALAB412,22 NRC 3 (1985) burden of persuasion on lateness factors of 10 C.F.R. 2.714(a); ALAB 816,22 NRC 461 (1985) burden of seusfyms requirements of monon to reopen; ALAB $12,22 NRC 3 (1985) burden on pennuner seek 6ng unumely intervention; ALAB416,22 NRC 461 (1985) content of 2.206 petehons for instituten of show cause proceedmst. DD45-II,22 NRC 149 (1985) consent of oppellate bnefs; ALAB413,22 NRC 59 (1985); AL AB 816,22 NRC 468 (1985) cntena for acceptance of moseon to reopen that raises prevmusly uncontested issues, ALAB-812,22 NRC 5 (1985) cntena for determenmg admieuluhty of comennons on salmtage; LBP 85 27. 22 NRC I26 (1985) critens for reopenmg a record; ALAB412,22 NRC 5 (1985); ALAB-815,22 NRC 198 (1985) entena to be addressed by stay mouons; ALAB 814,22 NRC 198 (1985) discovery of nonwitness emperts. LBP-35 38,22 NRC 604 (1985) dispanty in Anencial resources as demonetretson of enceptional circumstances under Fed. R. Civ. P.

26(b)(4)(B); LBP45 38,22 NRC 604 (1965) eNect of Commismon imenedente effecuveness determination on Appeal Board's determmanon of a stay motion; ALAB-814,22 NRC 198 (1985) eNect on a proceedmg of admannmn of emsle quahty assurance contenuon; ALAB 817,22 NRC 470 (1985) esperts to whom Fed. R. Ov. P. 26(b)(4) is applicable; LBP45 38,22 NRC 604 (1985)

Ave-factor test for unumely 6ntervenuon; ALAB 816,22 NRC 461 (1985) grant of indenruse conimunnce en obhgauon to respond to s. ** op disposinon monons; LDP45 32,22 NRC 434 (1985) invocanon c(enecuuve pnvilege in NRC proceedmss. Lbr45-38,22 NRC 604 (1985) htigabihty of contenteon challenoms adequecy of Stan review of opersung hcense applicaten; ALAS 412. 22 NRC 5 (1985) husabihty of need for power and Ansacial quahncauons issues 6n operstang hcense proceedings; ALAB413,22 NRC 59 (1985) means for a party to demonstrate its abihty to contnbute to the record on 6ssue submitted en late Aled contenuon, ALAB BI),22 NRC 59 (1985) means of claimms execuuve pnvilege; LBP45 38,22 NRC 604 (1985) means of determmmg whether empert is retained for htigauen; LBP $$.38,22 NRC 604 (1985) nature of supportmg evidence for reopenens of record, ALAB412,22 NRC 5 (1985) need to designale mho composed ansmer to interrogatones. LBP 85 38,22 NRC 604 (1985) nonumely interventen by pro se hvisant. Sve-factor test for; I BP 5 36,22 NRC 590 (19851 pertaculanty required of matenal supportmg monon to reopen; AL AB 8 82. 22 NRC 5 (1985) penalty for failure to provide adequate support for issues on appeal, A LAB SI),22 NRC 59 (1985) purpose of esecuuve pnvilege; LBP45-38,22 NRC 604 (1985) remedial acuens imposed by NRC for maeor dennencies on part of licensees; DD45 II,22 NRC 149 (1985)

. reopening of record to consider quehty assurones danciencies, siendard for; ALAS 412,22 NRC 5 (1985)

) responsibilities of NRC Stefr. ALAB4!2. 22 NRC 5 (1985) scope of interrogatones; LDP-85 38,22 NRC 404 (1985) i siendard for grant of summary disposition; LDP-85 29,22 NRC 300 (1985) j standard for interlocutory review; ALAB-Il7. 22 NRC 470 (1985)

. standard for overcoming esecuuve pnvilete; LDP-85 38,22 NRC 604 (1985)

! standard of accepeance for hydrogen control systems; LDP-85 35,22 NRC 514 (1985) support for claim that esempuons were improvidently grensed; DD-85-II,22 NRC 149 (1985) test for admisson etlete-nied contenuons; ALAB-813,22 NRC $9 (1985) test for exercise of discretionary directed certancation authoney; ALAB 8t?,22 NRC 470 (1985) tunehness of motions to reopen a record; ALAB-815,22 NRC 198 (1985) 95

SUHJECT IN DEX esmeliness of request for stay; ALAB414,22 NRC 198 (19853 une of 2.206 procedures to reopen 6ssues pressously e4vdicated, DD 85-11,22 NRC 149 41985) wasser of attorney-chent and work product eermleges through dialosure; LitP 85-)$,22 NRC 604 (1985) wasser of esecunve envilege; LDP-85 38,22 NRC 604 (1985)

RULINGS 1

cross-esammanon, appellste renew of; ALAB-81),22 NRC 59 (1985) procedural, ininneement of heanns nshts through; CLl4515,22 NRC 184 (1985) sLheduhns, appellate review of; ALAB-SI),22 NRC 59 (1985) 5AIN)TAGE consentenns, cntena for c'eterminmg admiseitnhty of, LBP45 27,22 NRC 126 (1985) of spent fuel shipments, scenanos for, and chance of success of, I BP 85 34, 22 NRC 481 (1985) 5AFETY components thei are not part of pnmary hydrogen control system, challenges to adequacy of, LBP-85 35,22 NRC Sie (1985) findings required by Atomac Energy Act for 6esuance of operaung beenw, ALAB412,22 NRC 5 (1985) findings required for nuclear power plant licensing; AL AB41),22 NRC 59 (1985) impact of 5 tate incenave reguianonse DD 8512,22 NRC 449 (1985) of spent fuel pnot lush density rerect dcsegn; LBP-85 36,22 NRC 590 (1985) study, excluseon of, from heeneng heant.gs, LBP-85-32,22 NRC 414 (1985)

SALT DEPO 5ITION from cooling tower dnft, impact of, on productmty of agncultural lands near Palo Verde plant, LDP-85-26,22 NRC 118 (1985)

SCl4:DULING ruhnss, appellate renew of ALAB 81),22 NRC 59 (1985)

,5CilOOL BUS DRIVERS use of students as, dunne radiological emergency evacuanon, LBP 85-27A,22 NRC 207 (1985) 5CHOOL BUSES need for letters of agreement regardmg availabihty durms radiokpal emergency; LBP45 35,22 NRC 514 (1985)

SCllOOLS evacuanon of, by student bus drivers dunns radiological emergency; LBP-85-27A,22 NRC 207 j

(1985)

SECURITY See Physical Security SilOW CAUSE PROCEFDING I

on haus ofimprovidently granted esempoons; DD 85 II,22 NRC 149 (1985)

SilU1DOWN 5ee Remote Shutdown System Redundancy SITE REDRESS t

need for environmental aseceament of method for; LBP-85 22,22 NRC 89 (1985)

$ PENT FU L shipmerr<, need to consuler eherneuves so; LBP 85-M,22 NRC 481 (1985) t simppens cooks, safety-related denen fessures of; LDP-85 34,22 NRC 441 (1985) i trenessupment of, LDP 85 M 22 NBC 481 (1985)

$ PENT FUEL CA5K(5) effect of emplosives on; LDP-85 M,22 NRC ett (1985) for simponent, employee error in propering; LBF 85.M 22 NRC 441 (1985) handhns procedures; LBP 45 M,22 NRC 481 (1985)

{

SPENT FUEL POOL boehng event, need for sne-specific enelyses of does limits of, LBP 85 M. 22 NRC 590 (1985) esponeson, need for heenne pnot to issuence oflicense amendments for; LBP-85 M,22 NRC 590 (1985) i M

... ~ ~. ~ - - - ~ ~ - - -

., ~ ~.. -

.-.--.. _ - - - -. - - - -. - -. -~ - -

1

(

l i

I t

i i

f i

SUBJ ECT INI)EX l

I L

tapensen, need for preparaten o(environmental empact statement for; L8P-85 36,22 NRC $80 (le85) modificanon of techmcal specificanons governms; AL AB-816,22 NRC 461 (198$)

I cretaten of, enh cnucality constant of 0.95; LDP-85 24,22 NRC 97 (1985)

SPR AY POND piping system, microbiologically mfluenced sorrosion in DD-83-13,22 NRC 64) (1985) i STANDBY O A5 TREATMLNI StSitM propnety of NRC grant of enempteon from regerenwnts for, regarding refuehng connecten ta; i

DD-85 il,22 NRC 149 (1985)

STANDING

)

to entervene m operauns hcense amendment proceedms, bens for; ALAB-816,22 NRC 441 (1983)

J to entervene en operaung heense amendment proceedmss, ressdency requirements for; LBP-85-24, 22 NRC 97 (1985) to imervene on been of rasepayer status; ALAB-816,22 NRC 461 (1983); LBP-85 24,22 NRC 97 (1985)

STATUTE 5 i

Sease, prohibitms vidny from emplemenung emergency plans; LBP 41-)l,22 NRC 410 (1983) 5 FAY motums, entena to be addressed by; AL AB 814,22 NRC 198 (1983) nunions, effect of immedupe effecovenese determmahon on Appeal Board's determinaten of.

ALAB-814,22 NRC 193 (1983)

{

of effecuveness of authoruaten for operaung hcense, denial of request for, for feelure to meet 1

crnens of 10 C F R. 2.784(e); CL18$.14,22 NRC 177 (1983) j of effecuveness of Lscenens Board deceuon, critena apphed en deterrnmme whether to grant; l

CLI 83-l),22 NRC I 0983) 4 l

umehness of request for; ALAB-814,22 NRC 190 (1983) i SUMM ARY DISPOSITION appestatnhty of denial of monon for; Lar 85-29,22 NpC 300 (1983) burden of proof on movent for; LDP-33 27A,22 NRC 207 (1985) a j

burden on opponent of monon for; LDP-85-27A. 22 NRC 207 (1983) en hcenw emendment heanngs, availatnhty of; LDP 85 29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

[

l moiens, grant ofindefmeie conunuance en obhganon to respond to; LBP 85 32,22 NRC 434 (1985) j oral tenemony on; LBP 83 29,22 NRC 300 (1983)

J standard for grant of. LBP 85 29,22 NRC 300 (1985) standards apphed by Bastds m conadenns molens for; LBP-85 27A 22 NRC 207 0983) l' SUPPRES$loN POOL In pau, challenges to consamment eniegnty from; LRP 8913,22 NRC Sie U983)

SU5PF N5N)N l

of hcenw amendments. LBP 8$-29,22 NRC 300 0903)

SYSTEMATIC ASSES 5MLNT OF LICEN5f E FIRf ORM ANCP.

reports on Carchna Power end La8 t facihues LBP-85 28,22 NRC 232 (198$)

h TECllNICAL 5PECIFICAT10N5

+

governms spent fuel storage pool, medireceuen of, ALAS-816,22 NRC 461 (1983)

TEMPERATURE

' peak cladding, computer models of, LDP 8$ 29,22 NRC 300 (1985)

. TERMINATION of operaung license proceedmes when there are snelyses to be completed, LDP-8$.32,22 NRC 414 0983) d of proceeding bocesse of withdromel of petitaon to intervene; L9P-8$-2),22 NRC 93 (1983)

TESTIMONY eral, on summary dispomuon, LDP-83-29,22 NRC 300 (1983) '

r TESTING containmens leek este, methodolasy for; DD-85 lo,22 NRC 14) (198$)

containment test rete, propnety of NRC Staat of esempnon from requirenwnts for; DD-85 il,22 NRC I49 0985) i l

l i

et i

f l

I L

I y

---

.n.r--1 e--,

w

--n.

-au.,,.,+n,--

,.-en

, -,-n.,e,,_

~n-m

--n..e...

l SUHJ ECT INI)FX Tif f RM AL AGING of resistance temperature detenors,1BP 83-28,22 NRC 232 (1985)

THY RotD momsorms equipment as rekwaion ceniers, adequacy of, LBr $5-3 8,22 NRC 410 (1981)

TIMLLINI S5 of pnotions to reopen a record. ALAB 8IS,22 NRC 192 (1985) of request for stay; AL Alb 814,22 NRC le8 (1983)

TR Al%:NG necennary to make done aswimments during radelogical emergerictes, L8P 85 27A. 22 NRC 207 (1985) of emergency respone earners, requirements for; L BP.83 2$,22 NRC 101 (1985) program foe Sheaton Harris nuclear plant twtsannet, adequacy of LBP-85 28,22 NRC 232 (1984)

T R AN5 MITT E R$

ITT Barton, environmental quahrwei.on of L BP-2548,22 NRC 212 (1985)

TR AN5POR T of espknsve maierials from Iederal ammunition plant, hasard to Brantonod facibiy from, L8P-8$ 27,22 NRC 126 (19851 l

VACATION of decmon addresens esempien from requirements of 10 C F R $0 47(a) and ib); thP-81-459,22 N RC 459 (1985)

VALVE (5) contamment hniaison, rropriety of NRC grant of esempton from requirements for DD-85-ll,22 NRC 149 (1983) operators, Limitrirque, environmemal quahficaten of,i BP 85 28,22 NRC 232 (198$)

safety related, at Waterford,inspenson and mamtenance ed. AL AB 812,22 NRC $ (1983)

VIOL ATIONS of NRC requirements, treatment of, DD-85 il,22 NRC I49 (1985)

W AIVER(5) of attorney <lsent and wert prratuct remieses through dmkisure. LBP-83 38,22 NRC 604 (1985) of esecutive prmlege, L8P 85 38,22 NRC 604 (1983) of regulaimns, fihns of petiemns for; LBP-85-3),22 NRC 442 (1985)

WLATitt R l

adverw, consideraten of, en ensimating evacualma times, t BP.83-27A,22 NRC 207 (1985) f

% LLD ROD g

reliabihry of tracestwhty remrds nn, si %alerford, A1 AB.812,22 NRC $ (198$)

WfIDiR5 adequacy o(quabfusimas of, at %sterford. AL AR 812,22 NRC $ (1981) f

% f LDING of stainless sseel tubing at Weierford, adequacy of, ALAB 812,22 NRC 3 (1985)

%iLD5 defective, adequacy of analyses of L8P 85 J$,22 NRC $14 (198$)

WITHDRAWAL of intervention petsten, effect of, on peaceeding; LBP 85 23,22 NRC 9$ (1983) iZONE See Emergency Planrung lone i

\\

e e

'68 r

o

1 l

l t

{

,I I

FAril.IIT INDEX BR AfDWOOD NITil AR PO% l N %i A llil%, if nus I and 2 ths het Nm to 45a 50 457 OPl R AIING I K l %%I Juli 10.1989 Mi MOR ANDUM DIi AllING R A110% Ali IN il PPORT 4il Jt'NI 21,194% ORDI R ON ADMi%MHilII) Of Nil %l R I ARM %

CONil Nikl% 4 IR AllllO AD i %PlInH)N). L BP 89 27,22 NR( 126 119846 OPl R All%G l H I NSI. %ctwmher 6,1914 Mi MOR ANDUM AND I>RDI R. Al AH 817. 22 NRC 4 ?O t 19:45 CAT, % R A NITil AR %i Alli)N. l'nas I and 2. thuket Nos 50 41) Of. 50 414 ell

{

OPl R AllNG l R l NSI. Juli 26.144%. Di t 1% ION, Al AM 81),22 NRC 49119R51 l

Cil% ION lHWI R %T 4 TH e%. I mt 2. Dm hei No $0.462-OL i

OPl R 411%G L H I %%I July 11, 1944 MI MOR ANDUM AND ORDI R. I HP 59 22,22 NRC 49 (19448 i

COM ANCilE Pl A A %Il AM iiiC1RK' %I AIlON, Umle 1 and 2, thwhet Nm 30 44% 01 A01. 2, l

in 4464)l AOL 2 4 A%litP No 79 4 hlH6 Ol )

OPl R All%U l H'l N%l. Auguu 29.1945 MI MOR ANDUM AND ORDI R,i BP 84-32. 22 NRC 414 (19X 9 >

Orf R A11%G l N l %%I. %criember la 1989. MI MOR ANDUM, i HP 8911, 22 N R C 601 (19til DI ABLO CAN)ON Ntf 1 i AR Pil%l R Pl ANI, UnHe I and 2, iha kel Nm 50 713 01. 4012.1 Ul OPI R Ail %G l K'l %%I. Auguu 1,1989. Mi MOR A NDUM AND ORDI R. ( ll 19 14. 22 NRC 177 (19A41 l %RK u ll RMI A TOMH' POwl R Pi AN T l'no 2. thshet No 30-146 RtOlIsi! Oil ACIH)% Augue !! 1944. DIRICTOR's DI CIMON UNDI R 10 ( lR l

6 2 20n, DD I41). 22 NRC 454 I19a t e l

ARi %% CRil K Dif i>NT A MIN 4 floN, D.shei No 40 20hl %C I A%I BP No 844020140)

MIOW C AU%l. septemher 2h.199 9, MI MOR ANDUM AND OR DI R. I HP A1 )$,22 NRC M4419R51 L IMI RICK GI NI R AllNG %I A IlilN Unos I.end 2. Ihm kei Nm 40 )(2 40 lil IM MI Di gil ArilON Rit)4 1%I Jo,29 lytt, DIRl r!OR'5 Di g l%H)% UNiil R to e

C l' It i 2 2m, 1)D 4 5 I I, 22 N R r 141 s 19 s p d)PI R All%U l H l %%I J A 22 195 9 l e tt 'RIO P ARil Al 1%lIl gi Di t 1%H)N l it P R t 24 22 NRC list tIwate OPl R AIING it i NSI JA24 1945 Mi MinR 4%lillM,(l1 pt il,22 NRC 1 (letti I>Pl R Ail %(i ! H I N%I. Aorust B 1984 MI MOR ANDUM AND ORlpt R. (l1 mi-li. 22 NRC 184 (19 Rip OPI R ail %G l K I NSI, Auguu 13.19s 5, MI MOR ANDUM AND I1R Di R, Al AH 814. 22 NRC 19141984)

OPl R ATING I K I NNI. %criember 19,1989 ORDIR.CLI 85-16,22 NRC 459 (19til NORip ANN A POWI R S T AllON, Umit I and 2, Draket Nos $0-338 01 A.1, 50 319 Of A.1

( A5l.RP No I).481018 A)

Orf R ATING l101 Nil AW NOMI Ni %eriemher 3,1981. INIll Al. DI Cl% ION, I BP 81-34, 22 NRC 441 (1985) pal.O %1RDE NUCI1 AR G1 NI N All%G ST ATION. Umt 1. D<xhet No 50 928 RIQUI'$ T IOR ArilON. Ausuu 9.19 9. DIRIciOR'S DI Cl% ION UNDI R 10 C l R

( 2 206. DD 8912. 22 NRC 44911924 P Al.0 %I RDE NifCll AR GB NI R AllNG 5T AllON, Dnot i arid 2. thuket Nos 50~ 5 24,30-129 RIQUIST IOR A( ilON. %eciemher 16,19a3. DIRICTOR'S DI ChlON 81NDI R 10 C F R l 2 206. DD ti 13,22 NRC 64) (19tip i

h

{

l 1

.m FACll,lTY INDE A f

P 410 % I NDl NITll.AR bl %8 R 411%O ST AIlON, times 2 mi ). O,=6cl Nm %) N 40 429 Of.

%IN 40 510-01 I A%t hP No 8044701418)

OPl R A11%O LICI %%l, July 22, 1984,ORDi R lil%%flMING PRf M ii Ol%U, i HP 89-24, 22

%RC l18 41984 i

Pl R R) NUCII AR POwl R Pi ANT, Unns i and 2, lhtet Nm to 441, %d 441 RlQUl.5T IOR ACIlON. Screembre 13, 1984, Olkl( ION'% Dit 1% ION UNDI R 10 C I N 4 2 2tm, DD 8914,22 NRC 6)$ 41985)

OPI R AllNO 1ICIMI, Auguu 30,1989, MI MOR ANDUM AND ORDi R t MP-BS.)),22 NRC 442 (1984 i

OPE R A11%O LICI N51, Screembre ),1989. CONCE UDIMI PAR 11 Ai 1%lil AL DI Cl% ION ON l 49 RGI NC) PL A%%ING,it) DROOL N WN1ROL AND Del %I L UI NI R ATOR%,

l L8P 83 35,22 NRC $14 (1984 l

Pl! URIM NUCIi AR N)WI R Si AllON, lhhet No 30 29)4it.A OPI R ATING LICI NNI AMIND4fl NT,2uly 19,198%, MI MOR ANDUM AND ORDI R; i hP-85 24,22 NRC 97 0989 OPI R ATING t ICI.N5L AMI NDMt NT, Sersemhet 5,1983, DIC3% ION. Al AR 816,22 NRC 4el (1989 SilEARON il4RRl5 NUCLI AR PO%f R PL ANT, Dahet No 30 ein)OL ( A5Lhr Na

$2-472413 4)L )

l Ort R ATING LICE N%f, Augue 14,1983, iti A%ONS SUPPORil%O SUMM ARY Dl%PO%IlloN Ol' I Mi ROI NCY Pt. ANNING (ONil NilONS. I HP 83 27 A 22 %RC 207

~

(1983)

OPIIt ATING t K iN51, Augue 20.198$. PARIIAL INifl AL DiCl%HIN ON $ Ali T)

CON T F NilONS. L BP 84-28,22 NRC 232 (1985) 4 5HOstiil AM NUCIl AR POWI R 5f AllON, Umt 1,lhket No 30-322 01..I fl nwesenry Planmngt OPl R ATING LK I N%f. Augese 26,1983, CONCI UDlNO P ARIl %L INiil AL DI CislON ON

]

IMIRGl NCY PL ANNING LBP R$.)l,22 NRC 410 t1984 f

THRil MILI: l%L AND NUCLI AR STATION, Uma No 1. Dmhet Na 30 289 %P j

SPICI AL PROClIDING, Augua 19, 1985, PARilAL INifl4L DICIMON ON fill RLM ANDI D 8%Ul. Ol' Tilt DilCK AMP M AllUR AM, i BP.89.)o,22 NBC })2 (1989 SPICI AL PROF fIDING, August 29,1989, MI'MOR ANDUM AND OR DI R, At AB 815,22 NRC 198 (1989 t

TR AINING AND ltl5f ARCil RI: ACTOR th-het No 50 22) %P ( A%I hr No 85 t<N OMPs 3

SPICI AL PROCI'IDl%U, July 19,1989, Mi MOR ANDUM ANI) 04 04 R, t RP 55 2),22 NRC 95 (1984 i

TUR Al Y POINT NUtt i AR Ul NI R ATING PLANT, Ume. I and 4. Ihte Nog 50 2$0 Ot A,a t

50 2314)L A.I ( A%l.HP Na 84 440) L Al (Venel f lus Redias.nni 3

OPI R All%U lICI N48 AMI NDMI NT, Auguu let 1984, ON DI R I HP A4 29,22 NRC lim (19411 f t'R Ali POIN T NUri f AR GI NI R AilNG PL ANT, lfmes 3 smi 4. Dmhet Nm 30 250 01.4 2, j

50 211UL A 2 i A%l hr Na 84 $344)71 A # (5 pent i vel Pont I spanwons OPI R A TING llCI N%f AMI NDMf N T; Seriemhet 16,1985 Mt MOR ANDUM AND i

ORDI R i hP 8136,22 NRC $90 (1981)

% ATl Rf ORD Sil' AM ElICTRIC ST ATION, Umt 3. Dmnet No 50182 OL OPI R ATING LICf N513 luty ll,1985, DiCIMON, ALAB 812,22 NRC 5 (198H WI.ST ClilCAGO R ARE l' ARTH1I ACILITY; Dacket No 442061 ML (A%LBP No 8) 49341 ML)

M ATlRf ALS LICI N5F. Septemher 26,1985; Mi_MOR ANDUM AND OROf R LRP 85 18, 22 NRC 604 (1983) 7 TON STATION, Uma 1 Dmkei No 50 29$

IMMEDIATE ACT*0N plOUEST,Jufy 3.1985, DIRICTOR*5 DrCisloN UNDER IOCl' R l 2.206, DD 8510,22 NRC 141 (1981) l 64 e

.