IR 05000397/1997002

Insp Rept 50-397/97-02 on 970127-31 & 0212-14.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Plant Support Security

ML20136B829
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	03/06/1997
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20136B799	List: IR 05000397/1997002 ML20136B793
References
50-397-97-02, 50-397-97-2, NUDOCS 9703110154
Download: ML20136B829 (4)

Text

_ _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _.. _ . - - . * '

i

!

J ENCLOSURE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV j Docket No.: 50-397 License N NPF-21 Report No.: 50-397/97-02 Licensee: Washington Public Power E upply System l

Facility: Washington Nuclear Project-2

'

, Location: 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Washington

!

,

, Dates: January 27-31 and February 12-14,1997 Inspector: Thomas W. Dexter, Senior Physical Security Specialist I

Approved By: Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch j Division of Reactor Safety

i

Attachment

Supplemental information

!

!

!

! ;

} DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS ( l UPON SEPARATION THIS

! PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

,

i- 9703110154 970306 DR ADOCK 05000397 PDR I

-. . . -. _ ., . . -

- - - - - . .~ - . ~ . - - - . _ -- . - . - . -. . .- . . _ .

.

,

i

,

.

-2-i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Washington Nuclear Project-2 NRC Inspection Report 50-397/97-02 Enaineerina e The Updated Final Safety Analysis Report wording was consistent with the observed plant physical security plans and procedures (Section E2).

Plant Support

• A very good records and reports program was in place. The security staff was correctly reporting security events. Trending and analysis of information was very good (Section S1.1).

• Security systems normally were repaired in a timely manner. A very good testing and maintenance program was conducted and properly documcnted (Section 2.1).

• The assessment aids generally provided proper assessment of the perimeter detection zones. Security posts properly compensated for degraded closed-circuit j

'

television cameras (Section 2.2).

• The protected area intro::!or detection system was functional, effective, and l operated as required by the physical security plan (Section 2.3).

• Vital area barriers and detection systems were in place and effective. Unlocked vital area doors caused by a computer software problem were resolved (Section 2.4).

• Alarm stations were redundant and alarm station operators were knowledgeable of their duties. Communications capabilities were in accordance with security plan requirements (Section 2.5).

• Security lighting within the protected area was good (Section 2.6).

• Security plan changes were submitted in accordance with NRC requirements and the changes did not decrease the effectiveness of the plans. Security procedures were consistent with the security plans (Section 3.1).

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS SAFEGU ARDS INFORMATION UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE lS DECONTROLLED

- ~ . - .

>~

.

,

,

3-

The compensatory measures program was effectively implemented. Security personnel were well trained on the program requirements (Section 4.1).

An effective program for searching personnel, packages, and material was in plac Security personnel operating the equipment were well trained. A noncited violation for failure to ensure unauthorized materials or devices did not enter the protected area was identified (Section 4.2).

An effective security training program had been implemented. Lesson plans were updating to cover new program requirements. Management had provided improved training aids for the program (Section 5.1).

• Management support for the security program was excellent (Section 6.1).

The annual security program audit was performance based. The overall quality of the audit was excellent (Section 7.1).

Protection of safeguards information was generally consistent with requirements. A noncited violation was identified for failure to adequately protect safeguards information (Section 8.1)

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED

. . . _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ . - - _ . __ ______ - ._. _ . . _

, _

4'

Washington Public Power Supply System -4- DOCUMENT CONTAINS l

_ bec copy of letter and inspection summary only:

E-Mail report to T. Boyce (THB)

E-Mail report to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS)

E-Mail report to Document Control Desk (DOCDESK)  ;

/ l bec to DCD)lE35I -

oO '

fx ,t 1 Regional Adniinistrator DRP Direct 6r Branch Chief (DRP/E, WCFO)

MIS System Project Engineer (DRP/E)

Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

Leah Tremper (OC/LFDCB, MS: TWFN 9E10)

l bec w/ copy of entire report:

Resident inspector l i

Branch Chief DRS/PSB SRI - WNP-2 RIV Docket File Elaine Koup (NRR/DRPM/S68, MS: 9024)

DRS/PSB Security File (Goines) i l

DOCUMENT NAME: R:\_WN2\WN2702.SGI Te receive copy of document, indicate in boa:"C" - Copy without enclosures *E" * Copy with encJosures "N" - No copy SPSS:PSB lE C:PSB lE AD:DRP lN pD:DRS lN l TWDexter:vih * BMurray* ATHowell*JJ Q gKEBrockgyn/ff)

P 2/28/97 2/28/97 3/2/97 [as 3f, /97 '

• previously concurred OFFIC:AL RECORD COPY

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS S AFEGU ARDS INFORM ATION UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE lS DECONTROLLED