ML20136B087

Requests That Addl Info Be Provided in Form of Response to Individual Comments or as Revised Pp to Application within 30 Days of Date of Ltr

ML20136B087
Person / Time
Site:	07001113
Issue date:	03/05/1997
From:	Lamastra M NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:	Reda R GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
References
TAC-L10079, NUDOCS 9703100161
Download: ML20136B087 (3)

Text

_.

- March 5, 1997 C

1 g 6 Dr. Ralph J. Reda

^

Manager, Fuels and Facility Licensing General Electric Company P.O. Box 780, MC J26 i Wilmington, NC 28402

SUBJECT:

LICENSE RENEWAL - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NO. L10079)

Dear Dr. Reda:

This refers to your application dated April 5,1996, requesting renewal of Materials License SNM-1097, our request for additional information dated February 19, 1997, and your reply dated February 25, 1997. Our review of your response dated February 25, 1997, has identified additional information that is needed before further action can be taken on your renewal.

The additional information should be provided in the form of responds to the individual comments, as appropriate, or as revised pages to the application, within 30 days of the date of this letter. Please reference the above TAC No.

in future correspondence related to the renewal request.

Sincerely, Original signed by:

Michael Lamastra Licensing Section 2 Licensing Branch Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, NMSS Docket 70-1113 License SNM-1097

Enclosure:

Additional Information DISTRIBUTION: (Control No. 2700)

Docket 70-1113 PUBLIC NRC File Center Region II NMSS r/f FCSS r/f FCLB r/f CBassett, RII

[G:\gechem. mal]

0FC FCLil,,/

h FCLB 8 FCLB b FCLike l k NAME MLamaktra PShea [)l(M DStout 7db GPangburn DATE 3/$ /97 3/I/97' 3/ 5 /97 3/h/97 7 C = COVER E = COVER & ENCLOSURE N = NO COPY 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY h[9)

I 9703100161 970305 PDR ADOCK 07001113 k C PDR 100021 MC FILE CENTER COPY

pm20 9

, p $ UNITED STATES

~

,g j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o g WASHINGTON, D.C. 20565-0001

%, , , , , . *t March 5, 1997 Dr. Ralph J. Reds Manager, Fuels and Facility Licensing General Electric Company i P.O. Box 780, MC J26 l Wilmington, NC 28402 '

SUBJECT:

LICENSE RENEWAL - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NO. L10079)

Dear Dr. Reda:

This refers to your application dated April 5,1996, requesting renewal of Materials License SNM-1097, our request for additional information dated February 19, 1997, and your reply dated February 25, 1997. Our review of your response dated February 25, 1997, has identified additional information that  ;

is needed before further action can be taken on your renewal.

The additional information should be provided in the form of responds to the individual comments, as appropriate, or as revised pages to the application, within 30 days of the date of this letter. Please reference the above TAC No. ,

in future correspondence related to the renewal request.

Sincerely,

,. ,-  % i Michael Lamastra )

Licensing Section 2 Licensing Branch i Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, NMSS Docket 70-1113 License SNM-1097

Enclosure:

Additional Information I

l l

1 I

~

l.

G.E. - Wilmington Additional Questions and Clarifications on RAI Dated 2/10/97 Chapter 3.0 - Conduct of Operations 1 Chapter 3.0, The phrase " written, approved practices" and " documented plant practices" is used throughout Chapter 3.0. What is the definition of practices as used in this chapter and license application? As described in the license application they should be maintained / controlled / approved in the same manner as procedures. j 2 Page 3.12, Section 3.9.2, There does not appear to be a statement that explicitly states that " Licensed material processing will be conducted in accordance with properly issued procedures or instrtUtions". This statement  ;

or similar words should be included in the license application.

3 Fage 3.12, Section 3.9.2, The table listing the review frequency for operating procedures is every three years but the " Reviewing and Approving Functional Manager" does not include the chemical or fire safety function. l They should be included in the License Application.

Chapter 4.0 - Integrated Safety Analysis 4 Follow-up to Question 17 from GE RAI responses dated 2/25/97. It appears that safety controls associated with "Mid-Level Risk" should have a periodic functional test. Based on the Level 2 Likelihood of occurring during the life of the facility and Consequences of serious injury; exceeding permit limits or regulatory limits; lost time injury; or a reportable release. Please review and provide rationale and discussion on the reason for not including a periodic functional test for Mid-Level Risk.

Chapter 7.0 - Chemical Safety 5 Page 7.1, Section 7.1, Follow-up to question # 20 from G.E. 2/25/97 RAI response. What chemicals follow the OSHA Process Safety Management Standard (29 CFR 1910.119)? Elements of the chemical safety program for UFe and hydrofluoric acid should be included in the license application.

ENCLOSURE