text
1.-
- - _ - ~. - -.. ~. -..
l 1
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0m lSS10N APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150 0104 (5;92)
EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH
$ WARD S NF L Tl N RE0 VEST LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
OgHR THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (MNBB 7714)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0 m lSS10N.
]
(See reverse for required number of digits / characters for each block)
WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001. AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104). OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. WASH]NGTON. DC 20503
}
Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1 0 000 352 10 4
l TITLE (4) Loose Speed Signal Cable Connector Renders the Singla Train High Pressure Coolant Iniection System Inonerable EVENT DATE (5)
LER NUp6ER (6)
REPORT DATE (7)
OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)
SEQUENTIAL REVISION FAClLlTV NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER NUMBER 05000 FACILIIY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 09 25 96 96 -- 018 01 02 03 97 05000 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 5: (Cnect one or more) (11)
)
MODE (9) 1 20.402(D) 20.405(c) 50.73(a)(2)(iv) 73.71(b) i 20.405(a)(1)(1) 50.36(c)(1)
POER y
50.73(a)(2)(v) 73.71(c)
LEVEL (10) 100 20.405(a)(1)ni) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii)
OTHER i
20.405(a)(1)(i n )
50.73(a)(2)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v111)(A)
(Specify in I
20.405(a)(1)ov) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(vni)(B) ht c b low i
20.405(a)(1)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(x)
NRC Fonn 366A) 4 LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
M.'1E TELEPHONE NUMBER lincluce Area Code)
J. L. Kantner, Manager - Experience Assessment LCS (610) 718-3400 i
COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT F AILURE DiSCRIBED IN lHIS REPORT (13)
{
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER
CAUSE
$YSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER R
R E
g 1
i 4
i j
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
EXPECTED MUNTH DAY YEA I YES SUBMISSION NO
(!f yes. complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
X DATE (15) j ABSTRACI (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spacea typewritten eines) (16)
U At 1104 hours0.0128 days <br />0.307 hours <br />0.00183 weeks <br />4.20072e-4 months <br /> on 09/25/96, during performance of a surveillance test, the High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) system shutdown on an l
overspeed condition and restarted, cycling several times until the i
operators tripped the system.
The HPCI system was then declared j
inoperable.
A loss of the HPCI turbine speed signal caused the turbine control problem.
Manual control of the HPCI system was also not fully available.
This resulted in the inoperability of a single train safety system.
A loose speed sensor connection was tightened and at 2100 hours0.0243 days <br />0.583 hours <br />0.00347 weeks <br />7.9905e-4 months <br />, the HPCI system was declared operable after satisfactory completion of a surveillance test.
There was no accident requiring HPCI system injection and sufficient Emergency Core Cooling Systems were operable to mitigate the consequences of an accident.
The speed sensor cormector was replaced 1/2/97.
Analysis determined that the connector mechanically failed.
The failure was caused by personnel error during maintenance performed in February, 1996 Completed corrective actions include repair of the connector, review of the other unit, and procedu.e revisions.
Ongoing actions include review of this event with appropriate station personnel and
. ~ -.
r -. - - -.. --- ~
a: --
+t -- -.., - -, --.--
LLF FORM M (4.Q7[
9702070097 970203 PDR ADOCK 05000352 S
PDR
. =.
s
'U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150 0104 i
(5-92)
EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATLON COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
NNFORMA NA EC DS V E
B C TEXT CONTINUATION ggggDEh05NE1.YDi0$E A
d REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104), DC 20503.
j 0FFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON.
FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUPEER (2)
LER NUPEER (6)
PAGE (3) yg SEQUENTIAL REVISION Ne NuMen 05000 2 0F 4 Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1 352 96
-- 018 --
01 TEXT Gt more space is required. use acostronal copses of NHC form J6bA) (11)
Unit Conditions Prior to the Event:
Unit 1 was in Operational Conditicn 1 (Power Operation) at 100% power level.
There were no systems, structures or components inoperable that contributed to the event.
Description of the Event:
At 1104 hours0.0128 days <br />0.307 hours <br />0.00183 weeks <br />4.20072e-4 months <br /> on September 25, 1996, licensed Operations personnel l were performing Surv illance Test (ST) procedure ST-6-055-230-1, "HPCI Pump, Valve and Flow Test."
When the High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI, EIIS:BJ) system was started, the operators observed i
l valve motion and an increase in HPCI Pump discharge pressure but the HPCI turbine speed still indicated zero (0) rpms. The HPCI turbine shutdown on an overspeed condition, automatically restarted at the turbine overspeed reset point, and shutdown again on an overspeed condition.
This cycling occurred several times until the operators tripped the system. Tne HPCI system was then declared inoperable.
Maintenance / Instrumentation and Controls (I&C) personnel determined that a loose speed sensor connector at the HPCI Turbine caused the loss of turbine speed signal and Main Control Room (MCR) speed indication.
The connector was tightened and maintenance and engineering personnel determined that the connector could still perform its intended function.
Operations personnel declared the HPCI System operable at 2100 hours0.0243 days <br />0.583 hours <br />0.00347 weeks <br />7.9905e-4 months <br /> following successful completion of the ST procedure.
An evaluation was performed and concluded that the connector was capable of performing its design function provided that the connector is re-connected and tight.
A four hour notification was made to the NRC at 1448 hours0.0168 days <br />0.402 hours <br />0.00239 weeks <br />5.50964e-4 months <br /> on September 25, 1996, in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.72 (b) (2) (iii) (D) since this event resulted in a condition which alone could have prevented the HPCI system frcm fulfilling its intended safety function to mitigate the consequences of an accident.
This report is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.73 (a) (2) (v) (D).
l
_e
.-. _ ~.
~
k
- U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM15S10N APPROVED BY OMB No. 3150 0104 (5 92)
EXPIRES 5/31/95 l
ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
$"# 0FONN A I
EC DS E
B TEXT CONTINUATION (MNB8 7714)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001. AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104),
0FFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. WASHINGTON. DC 20503.
j FACILilY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUPBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION i
" UMBER "UM
- 05000 3 op 4 Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1 352 96
-- 018 --
01
{
TExi at inore space is requirea. use eaartsonoI copies at NRC Forin J66A) (ll)
Analysis:
?
The consequences of this event were minimal in that no radioactive material was released to the environment as a result of the HPCI system being inoperable.
Additionally, an accident condition did not occur during the time period in which the HPCI system was inoperable, and therefore, the HPCI system was not called upon to perform its intended safety injection function. Sufficient Emergency Core Cooling i
Systems and the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC, EIIS:BN) system were available to ensure safe shutdown of the reactor, and to mitigate the consequences of an accident if the HPCI System was not available.
If the HPCI system had been required to operate, HPCI flow would have oscillated above and below its design flow (corresponding to overspeed and reset). Additionally, manual control of the HPCI system was not fully available without the HPCI turbine
] speed indication.
The HPCI system was restored expeditiously by Maintenance /I&C and Operations personnel.
The overspeed shutdown and automatic restart of the HPCI turbine occurred as expected to a loss j
of speed signal feedback in the control system.
1 HPCI system operability was restored at 2100 on September 25, 1996, when the speed connector was properly tightened.
Analysis of the connector upon removal on January 2, 1997, indicated that it had retained sufficient integrity to support system operability from the time it was tightened on September 25, 1996 to its replacement on Jaluary 2, 1997.
Cause of the Event
The loss of speed signal to the HPCI control logic was caused by improper reconnection of the speed sensor connection (personnel error)in February 1996 during a routine turtine inspection.
The improper connection caused a mechanical failure of the speed sensor connector plug.
Subsequent vibration from HPCI turbine operation ultimately caused an electrical discontinuity.
The exact cause of the improper reconnection could not be determined.
The probable cause was misalignment of the connector as it was tightened.
I1
. c, NRC f 0M 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0pmISSION APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150 0104 (5;92)
EXP!RES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSr TO COMPLY WITH THl$ INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
ECWDS Ch LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TH NFOR A
E TEXT CONTINUATION g g. g S,. M $.RE g TOR g g g 0
REDUCTION PR(1)ECT (3150 0104),
0FFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUEET. WASHINGTON. DC 20603.
FACILITY NAE (1)
DOCKET NUISER (2)
LER NUMER (6)
PAE (3)
YEAR SEQUENEAL REVISION
"""BE" 05000 4 OF 4 Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1 352 96
-- 018 --
01 TEXT Uf snore space is required. use acastronal copies 06 hRC form 366A) (1; )
Interviews with the technicians involved with the February 1996 maintenance indicated that no difficulties were noticed reconnecting the speed sensor connector, nor were any tools used to assist tightening the connection.
The connection seemed to them to be properly made.
Satisfactory post-maintenance testing in February 1996 confirmed the adequacy of the connection at that time.
The technicians also conveyed their understanding that these style connectors must be hand-tightened.
Existing procedural guidance for maintenance involving these style connectors was deemed to be adequate.
Based on a review of the simplicity of the connector, no special instructions or training are necessary.
Use of this style connector is addressed by standard technician training and is considered skill of the craft.
Corrective Actions
The following corrective actions have been completed.
The connector was replaced on January 2, 1997.
The connesdor continuity checks described in revision 0 to this LER were not required to be performed since the connector was replaced before the next HPCI system operation.
The common HPCI Turbine maintenance procedures that disturb the speed sensor connection have been revised to include a caution statement regarding proper assembly of the connection.
Ongoing and future corrective actions include evaluation of the HPCI speed connection for possible design change and dissemination of information, to station personnel who work with these style and similar connectors, about this event and proper cannon plug connector manipulation techniques.
Previous Similar Occurrence:
None
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000352/LER-1996-001, :on 960111,automatic Isolation of RCIC Sys During Surveillance Testing Occurred Due to Less than Adequate Attention to Details.Counseled Technician & Held Team Meetings to Discuss Event |
- on 960111,automatic Isolation of RCIC Sys During Surveillance Testing Occurred Due to Less than Adequate Attention to Details.Counseled Technician & Held Team Meetings to Discuss Event
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-001-02, :on 960220,condition Prohibited by TS in That Two Independent SGTS Inoperable Due to Personnel Error. Counseled EO & Conducted Operator Standdown Meetings to Discuss Event |
- on 960220,condition Prohibited by TS in That Two Independent SGTS Inoperable Due to Personnel Error. Counseled EO & Conducted Operator Standdown Meetings to Discuss Event
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-002, :on 960118,unit Operated in Excess of 100% Rated Power Due to Core Thermal Power Calculation Methodology Error.Reactor Heat Balance Revised |
- on 960118,unit Operated in Excess of 100% Rated Power Due to Core Thermal Power Calculation Methodology Error.Reactor Heat Balance Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-002-02, :on 960315,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel.Caused by Inadvertent Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Created Necessary Addl Physical Barriers Arounds Units 1 & 2 |
- on 960315,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel.Caused by Inadvertent Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Created Necessary Addl Physical Barriers Arounds Units 1 & 2
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-003-02, :on 960314,failed to Perform Accelerated Surveillance Testing of Unit 2 EDG Due to Inadequate Evaluation Program.Reviewed & Enhanced Program & Associated Implementing Documents for Failure Evaluations |
- on 960314,failed to Perform Accelerated Surveillance Testing of Unit 2 EDG Due to Inadequate Evaluation Program.Reviewed & Enhanced Program & Associated Implementing Documents for Failure Evaluations
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-003, :on 960204,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel Caused by Spurious Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Replaced Relay |
- on 960204,ESFA Occurred Due to Loss of Power to Rps/Ups Power Distribution Panel Caused by Spurious Actuation of Underfrequency Relay.Replaced Relay
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-004-02, :on 960514,reactor Scram Resulted from Main Generator Lockout Due to Actuation of Voltz/Hertz Relay. Caused by Inadequate Design Change Package.Relay 359/381A Drawing Corrected & Relays Inspected |
- on 960514,reactor Scram Resulted from Main Generator Lockout Due to Actuation of Voltz/Hertz Relay. Caused by Inadequate Design Change Package.Relay 359/381A Drawing Corrected & Relays Inspected
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-004, :on 960206,reactor Scram Signal Occurred While in Hot Shutdown Due to Operator Error During Depressurization.Provided Briefing Sheet to Operations Managers |
- on 960206,reactor Scram Signal Occurred While in Hot Shutdown Due to Operator Error During Depressurization.Provided Briefing Sheet to Operations Managers
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000353/LER-1996-005-02, :on 960527,automatic Actuation of ESF Occurred. Caused by Burnt Circuit Board Trace on Relay Board.Radiation Monitor Satisfactorily Tested & Returned |
- on 960527,automatic Actuation of ESF Occurred. Caused by Burnt Circuit Board Trace on Relay Board.Radiation Monitor Satisfactorily Tested & Returned
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-005, :on 960207,daily RECW Sys Fluid Sample Not Obtained & Analyzed within 24 H as Required by TS 3.3.7.1. Caused by Personnel Error & Inadequate Chemistry Section Sampling Program.Program Revised |
- on 960207,daily RECW Sys Fluid Sample Not Obtained & Analyzed within 24 H as Required by TS 3.3.7.1. Caused by Personnel Error & Inadequate Chemistry Section Sampling Program.Program Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-006-01, Forwards LER 96-006-01 Re Multiple Instances of Loss of Safety Function of Control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys, Resulting in Operating Conditions Prohibited by Tech Specs | Forwards LER 96-006-01 Re Multiple Instances of Loss of Safety Function of Control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys, Resulting in Operating Conditions Prohibited by Tech Specs | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-006, :on 960207,control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys Declared Inoperable.Caused by Flow Switch Coordination Deficiency.Flow Switches Adjusted,Station Guidance Revised & Site Staff Training Performed |
- on 960207,control Room Emergency Fresh Air Sys Declared Inoperable.Caused by Flow Switch Coordination Deficiency.Flow Switches Adjusted,Station Guidance Revised & Site Staff Training Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-006-02, :on 961202,inadvertent Start of D21 Edg,An ESF During Surveillance Testing Was Noted.Caused by Malfunction of Test Switch Box.Test Box Was Repaired & Tested & Generic Implications of Event Was Evaluated |
- on 961202,inadvertent Start of D21 Edg,An ESF During Surveillance Testing Was Noted.Caused by Malfunction of Test Switch Box.Test Box Was Repaired & Tested & Generic Implications of Event Was Evaluated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000352/LER-1996-007, :on 960220,trip of FPC Pumps Resulted in Loss of Core Circulaton & Decay Heat Removal.Caused by Insufficient Procedural Guidance.C/A:Assessment Performed |
- on 960220,trip of FPC Pumps Resulted in Loss of Core Circulaton & Decay Heat Removal.Caused by Insufficient Procedural Guidance.C/A:Assessment Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000353/LER-1996-007-02, :on 961206,manual Scram Occurred Due to Leak in Main Turbine EHC Sys.Caused by Failure of Pressure Switch Support Bracket & Tubing.Replaced Failed Bracket & Tubing & Performed Walkdown of Main Steam Sys |
- on 961206,manual Scram Occurred Due to Leak in Main Turbine EHC Sys.Caused by Failure of Pressure Switch Support Bracket & Tubing.Replaced Failed Bracket & Tubing & Performed Walkdown of Main Steam Sys
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000353/LER-1996-008-01, :on 961214,two Closed Primary Containment Isolation Valves Were Discovered W/Motor Operator Breaker Closed.Caused by Personnel Error.Procedure GP-2 Will Be Revised to Separate Specific Steps |
- on 961214,two Closed Primary Containment Isolation Valves Were Discovered W/Motor Operator Breaker Closed.Caused by Personnel Error.Procedure GP-2 Will Be Revised to Separate Specific Steps
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000353/LER-1996-008, Forwards LER 96-008-00 Which Documents Event That Occurred at Lgs,Unit 2 on 961214.Commitment Made within Ltr,Listed | Forwards LER 96-008-00 Which Documents Event That Occurred at Lgs,Unit 2 on 961214.Commitment Made within Ltr,Listed | | | 05000352/LER-1996-008, :on 960303,HPCI,ESFA & Condition Which Could Have Prevented Intended Safety Function Occurred Due to Personnel Error.Issued Event Training Bulletin to All I&C Technicians by 960415 |
- on 960303,HPCI,ESFA & Condition Which Could Have Prevented Intended Safety Function Occurred Due to Personnel Error.Issued Event Training Bulletin to All I&C Technicians by 960415
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-009-01, :on 960422,main Steam System Safety Relief Valve Setpoint Drift Occurred.Caused by Corrosion Induced Bonding Between Pilot Disc & Seat.Installed Special Modified Pilot Disc in Several SRVs |
- on 960422,main Steam System Safety Relief Valve Setpoint Drift Occurred.Caused by Corrosion Induced Bonding Between Pilot Disc & Seat.Installed Special Modified Pilot Disc in Several SRVs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-009-03, :on 961224,unit Scram & Reactor Protection Sys Actuation Occurred Due to Failure of Bill Joint That Connects Recirculation Pump Motor Generator Set Scoop Tube to Tube Positioner.Failed Ball Joint Was Replaced |
- on 961224,unit Scram & Reactor Protection Sys Actuation Occurred Due to Failure of Bill Joint That Connects Recirculation Pump Motor Generator Set Scoop Tube to Tube Positioner.Failed Ball Joint Was Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000353/LER-1996-009, Forwards LER 96-009-00,documenting Event That Occurred at Limerick Generating Station,Unit 2 on 961224.LER Is Being Submitted Pursuant to Requirements of 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv) | Forwards LER 96-009-00,documenting Event That Occurred at Limerick Generating Station,Unit 2 on 961224.LER Is Being Submitted Pursuant to Requirements of 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv) | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000352/LER-1996-009, :on 960314,five of Six as-found Setpoint Tests on Main Steam Sys SRVs Found Outside Required Pressure Ranges.Caused by Setpoint Drift Due to Corrosion Induced Bonding.Modified Pilot Disc Installed in SRVs |
- on 960314,five of Six as-found Setpoint Tests on Main Steam Sys SRVs Found Outside Required Pressure Ranges.Caused by Setpoint Drift Due to Corrosion Induced Bonding.Modified Pilot Disc Installed in SRVs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-010, :on 960423,discovered Two Remote Shutdown Panel (RSP) Control Circuits Inoperable.Caused by Inadequate Procedures.Rsp Surveillance Test Procedures Revised by 960731 and RSP Cleaned by 960731 |
- on 960423,discovered Two Remote Shutdown Panel (RSP) Control Circuits Inoperable.Caused by Inadequate Procedures.Rsp Surveillance Test Procedures Revised by 960731 and RSP Cleaned by 960731
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-011, :on 960425,manual Operation of CREFAS Sys Resulted from Initiation of Toxic Chemical Detection Sys. Caused by Insufficient Guidance in Planning Process.Work Packages for Cleaning & Sealing Reviewed |
- on 960425,manual Operation of CREFAS Sys Resulted from Initiation of Toxic Chemical Detection Sys. Caused by Insufficient Guidance in Planning Process.Work Packages for Cleaning & Sealing Reviewed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-012, :on 921103,identified Improper Fuse Sizing. Caused by Personnel Error.Approved Design Change Re Proper Fuse Coordination & Reviewed Modifications Associated W/Fuse Ratings |
- on 921103,identified Improper Fuse Sizing. Caused by Personnel Error.Approved Design Change Re Proper Fuse Coordination & Reviewed Modifications Associated W/Fuse Ratings
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-013, :on 960521,Unit 1 Reactor Scram Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Procedural Guidance & Undetermined Equipment Malfunction.Procedure Will Be Revised to Ensure Appropriate Barriers,In Place to Minimize Risk of Scram |
- on 960521,Unit 1 Reactor Scram Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Procedural Guidance & Undetermined Equipment Malfunction.Procedure Will Be Revised to Ensure Appropriate Barriers,In Place to Minimize Risk of Scram
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-014, :on 960702,discovered Improperly Controlled Safeguards Information.Cause Undeterminate.Corrective Actions Will Be Provided by 960930 |
- on 960702,discovered Improperly Controlled Safeguards Information.Cause Undeterminate.Corrective Actions Will Be Provided by 960930
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000352/LER-1996-015, :on 960726,failure to Maintain Equipment Needed for Operator Actions to Assure Fire Safe SD Capability. Caused by Unclear Ownership & Accountability of Procedures. Interim Procedure Revs Implemented |
- on 960726,failure to Maintain Equipment Needed for Operator Actions to Assure Fire Safe SD Capability. Caused by Unclear Ownership & Accountability of Procedures. Interim Procedure Revs Implemented
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-016, :on 960725,core Thermal Power Exceeded Licensed Power Limit During Power Transient.Caused by Defective EHC Sys Component & Reactor Scram.Defective Primary Frequency/ Voltage Converter Replaced & Calibration Performed |
- on 960725,core Thermal Power Exceeded Licensed Power Limit During Power Transient.Caused by Defective EHC Sys Component & Reactor Scram.Defective Primary Frequency/ Voltage Converter Replaced & Calibration Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-017, :on 960820,4 EDGs Inoperable Resulting from Separate Crankcase Pressurization Events.Caused by Plugging of Exhaust Stack Bird Screens by Rust Debris in Stream Gas Flow.Exhaust Stacks Scraped,Cleaned & Vacuumed |
- on 960820,4 EDGs Inoperable Resulting from Separate Crankcase Pressurization Events.Caused by Plugging of Exhaust Stack Bird Screens by Rust Debris in Stream Gas Flow.Exhaust Stacks Scraped,Cleaned & Vacuumed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-018-01, Forwards LER 96-018-01 Which Discusses Event That Occurred on 960925 Re Inoperability of HPCI Sys Due to Loss of HPCI Turbine Speed Signal Caused by Loose Speed Sensor Connector | Forwards LER 96-018-01 Which Discusses Event That Occurred on 960925 Re Inoperability of HPCI Sys Due to Loss of HPCI Turbine Speed Signal Caused by Loose Speed Sensor Connector | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000352/LER-1996-018, :on 960925,single Train HPCI Sys Was Declared Inoperable Due to Loose Signal Cable Connector.Connector Was Replaced on 970102 & Common HPCI Turbine Maint Procedures Have Been Revised |
- on 960925,single Train HPCI Sys Was Declared Inoperable Due to Loose Signal Cable Connector.Connector Was Replaced on 970102 & Common HPCI Turbine Maint Procedures Have Been Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-019, :on 961026,capability to Reject Electrical Load of RHR Pump Not Fully Verified.Caused by Inadequate Test Procedure.Tests Will Be Revised Prior to Next Performance & TS Change Request Is Being Pursued |
- on 961026,capability to Reject Electrical Load of RHR Pump Not Fully Verified.Caused by Inadequate Test Procedure.Tests Will Be Revised Prior to Next Performance & TS Change Request Is Being Pursued
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000352/LER-1996-020, :on 961205,primary Containment Isolation Valves Inadvertently Closed Due to Personnel Error.Reopened Valves & Counseled Individual Involved on Work Techniques |
- on 961205,primary Containment Isolation Valves Inadvertently Closed Due to Personnel Error.Reopened Valves & Counseled Individual Involved on Work Techniques
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000352/LER-1996-021-01, Forwards LER 96-021-01 Re Ability to Achieve Safe Shutdown in Event of Fire as Provided by Fire Protection Program | Forwards LER 96-021-01 Re Ability to Achieve Safe Shutdown in Event of Fire as Provided by Fire Protection Program | | | 05000352/LER-1996-021, :on 841026,determined Fire Safe Shutdown Made in Fire Safe Shutdown Repair Would Not Function as Desired Due to Incorrect Assumption.Revised Fire Safe Shutdown Procedures |
- on 841026,determined Fire Safe Shutdown Made in Fire Safe Shutdown Repair Would Not Function as Desired Due to Incorrect Assumption.Revised Fire Safe Shutdown Procedures
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000352/LER-1996-022-01, Forwards LER 96-022-01 Re Event Which Occurred on 961102 Re Amount of Fuel Oil Contained in D14 EDG Fuel Oil Storage Tank.Challenging Method for Determining Tank Oil Level Resulted in Operator Obtaining an Incorrect Level Re | Forwards LER 96-022-01 Re Event Which Occurred on 961102 Re Amount of Fuel Oil Contained in D14 EDG Fuel Oil Storage Tank.Challenging Method for Determining Tank Oil Level Resulted in Operator Obtaining an Incorrect Level Reading | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-022, :on 961102,D14 EDG Was Declared Inoperable Due to Low Fuel Oil in Storage Tank.Caused by Challenging Method for Determining Tank Level.Increased Operator Awareness of Potential for Error Is Being Utilized |
- on 961102,D14 EDG Was Declared Inoperable Due to Low Fuel Oil in Storage Tank.Caused by Challenging Method for Determining Tank Level.Increased Operator Awareness of Potential for Error Is Being Utilized
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000352/LER-1996-023, :on 950403,FPS Surveillance Tests Not Performed.Caused by Personnel Error.Individuals Involved Disciplined & New Supervisor Assigned to Onsite Fire Protection Group |
- on 950403,FPS Surveillance Tests Not Performed.Caused by Personnel Error.Individuals Involved Disciplined & New Supervisor Assigned to Onsite Fire Protection Group
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) |
|