ML20133B173
| ML20133B173 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1982 |
| From: | Yates C NUS CORP. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUS-4338, NUDOCS 8508060092 | |
| Download: ML20133B173 (86) | |
Text
e-.
. NUS-4338 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1982 0F THE PREOPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM AT THE PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Prepared for The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company by Carl R. Yates 1983 Environmental Services Division NUS Corporation 5350 Campbells Run Road Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15205
/MA]h=E:
Cha s J. Marci icz Manager Radiological Laboratory R
Nk $ 40 rDR , jf Si
Table of Contents Section Ti tle Page I. Introduction 1 A. Site and Station Description 1 B. Objectives and Overview of 2 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Monitoring Program II. Program Description 4
!!!. Sampling Methods and Procedures 4 A. Direct Radiation 12 B. Fish 13 C. Sediment 13 D. Airborne Particulates/ Air lodine-131 14 E. Water 15 F. Milk /S11 age 15 G. Food Products 15 IV. Summary and Discussion of 1982 Analytical Results 16 A. Direct Radiatior 17 B. Fish 21 C. Shoreline Sediments 21
- 0. Air Particulates/ Air lodine 24 E. Water 26 F. Hilk/ Silage 26 G. Vegetables and Food Products 34 V. Land Use Census 40 VI. References 44 Appendix A Laboratory Quality Assurance A-1 Appendix B Reporting of Analytical Results 8-1 i
i LIST OF TABLES (Page 1 of 2) .
Table Numbers Tit 1e ,Pa,ge ,
i 1 PNPP Radiological Environmental 5 ,
1 Monitoring Program 2 Sample Locations and Media for the Perry 7 i Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -
2 3 Direct Radiation - Thermoluminescent 18
- Dosimetry Results for Monthly Exchange '
Cycles
! 4 Comparison of Annual and Average-Monthly 20 Direct Radiation Measurements l 5 Gama spectrometry of Fish Samples 22 6 Gamma spectrometry of Sediment Samples 23 [
i 7 Gross Beta in Air Particulate Filters 25 8 Gama spectrometry of Composited Air 27 j Particulate Filters
- 9 lodine-131 in Charcoal Cartridges 28 l l 10 Gamma Spectrometry of Water Samples 29 l 11 Gross Beta in Water Samples 30 1 12 Tritium in Composited Water Samples 31 i 13 Gamma spectrometry of Milk Samples 32 ;
l 14 lodine-131 in Hilk '
33 il 15 Gama Spectrometry of Feed / Silage 35 j 16 Gamma Spectrometry of Vegetation Samples 36 i
1 I
4
- t
e-t
- e LIST OF TABLES (Page 2 of 2) ,
Table I
j Numbers Title Page i
- 17 Summary of Data for the Perry NPP REMP-1982 37 i.'
18 ,
Nearest Gardens and Residences Identified During 41 !
i the 1982 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey.
I 19 Milk Animals Identified During the 1982 Perry NPP 42 5 Annual Land Use Survey.
20 Control Milk Sampling Locations Identified During 43 !
i the 1982 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey. !
i l (
4
^
I 1 +
l !
i :
1 :
I l l
[
i
! I i
I !
i l l l
! l i i l I 8
I
l l
LIST OF FIGURES F1gure T1 tie n age Numbers 1 Sampling Locations W1 thin 5 Miles of 10 the Site 2 Sampling Locations Greater than 5 Miles 11 from the Site iv
~
I. INTRODUCTION The preoperational radiological environmental monitoring program for Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) was initiated in March 1981 and will continue until fuel loading, presently scheduled for November, 1983. This program is being conducted by NUS Corporation under contract with The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI).
This is the second Annual Report for the radiological environmental 4
, monitoring program being conducted under the contract. This report
, covers the period December 29, 1981 through January 4,1983 and ,
summarizes the results of measurements and analyses of data obtained i from samples collected during this interval.
1 A. Site and Station Description 1
PNPP will consist of two BWR units, each designed to operate at a
- power level of about 1205 megawatts with the main condenser j circulating water cooled by a system of closed-loop natural draft j cooling towers. The plant is located on Lake Erie, on approximately i
1100 acres about thirty-five (35) miles northeast of Cleveland, Ohio l' and about seven (7) miles northeast of Painesville, Ohio. PNPP is situated in North Perry Village in northeastern Lake County, Ohio, p I
I t
i l !
i i'
1
- t
J
- B. Objectives and ')verview of PNPP Monitoring Program i
, United States Nuclear Rej ai s tory Coanission (USNRC) regulations require that nuclear power plants be designed, constructed, and
{ operated to keep levels of radioactive material in ef fluen ts to i
unrestricted areas as low as reasonably achievable ( ALARA) (10 CFR
- 50.34). To assure that these criteria are met, each license authorizing reactor operation includes technical specifications (10 i
- CFR 50.36a) governing the release of radioactive effluents.
In-plant monitoring will be used to assure that these predetermined release liaits are not exceeded. However, as a precaution against unexpected and undefined processes which might allow undue i accumulation of radioactivity in any sector of mar's environ.nent, a
! program for monitoring the plant environs is also included.
J j The regulations governing the quantities of radioactivity in reactor ef fluents allow nuclear power plants to contribute, at most, only a few percent increase above nonnal background radioactivity.
l Background levels at any one location are not constant but vary with time as they are influenced by external events such as cosnic ray j bombardment, weapons test fallout, and seasonal variations. These f
l 1evels also can vary spatially within relatively short distances l l reflecting variations in geological composition. Because of thesu ;
ytti.11 aid temporal variations, the radiological surveys of the j plant environs are divided into preoperational and operational !
p hases. The preoperational phase of the projram of sampling and i
- measuring radioactivity in various media permits a general c haracterization of the radiation levels and concentrations t
prevailing prior to plant operation along with an indication of the j degree of natural variation to be expected. The operational phase
- of the progras obtains data which, when considered along with the j data obtained in tM preoperational phase, assist in the evaluation of the radiological impact of plant operation, i
e t
I 2
Implementation of the preoperational monitoring program fulfills the following objectives:
- 1. Evaluation of procedures, equipment and techniques.
- 2. Identification of potentially important pathways to be monitored after the plant is in operation.
- 3. Measurement of background levels and their variations along potentially important pathways in the area surrounding the plant.
- 4. Provision of baseline data for statistical comparison with future operational analytical results.
Sampling locations were selected on the basis of local ecology, meteorology, physical characteristics of the region, and demographic and land use features of the site vicinity. The preoperational program was designed on the basis of the USNRC Branch Technical Position on radiological environmental monitoring issued by the Radiological Assessment Branch, Revision 1 (November 1979) (1)
In 1982 the radiological monitoring program included the measurement of ambient gamma radiation by thermoluminescent dosimetry, the determination of gamma emitters in shoreline sediments and fish, the detennination of gross beta and ganna emitters in airborne particulates, the measurement of airborne iodine-131, the measurement of gross beta, tritium, and gasma emitters in water, the measurement of iodine-131 and gamma emitters in milk, and the detenninetton of ganna emitters in silage and food products.
3
- 1 1
1 II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 4 Thirty-five locations within a radius of about 15 miles from the
?1PP si te were included in the monitoring program for 1982. The q
number and locations of monitoring points were determined by considering the locations where the highest off-site environmental concentrations have been predicted from plant effluent source terms, site hydrology, and site meteorological conditions. Other factors considered were applicable regulations, population distribution,
- ease of access to sampling stations, security and future program integri ty.
]
The preoperational environmental radiological program for Perry is summarized in Table 1. Table 2 describes sample locations, associated media, and approximate distance and direction from the
! site. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the locations of sampling stations relative to PNPP.
4 In addition to the described analytical program, a milk animal, l vegetable garden, and residence survey was performed in 1982. This l survey located the nearest milk animal, garden and residence in each sector (out to 5 miles) and will be updated annually. '
j !!!. SAMPLING METHODS AND PROCEDURES i
To derive meaningful and useful data from the radiological environmental monitoring program, sampling methods and procedures l are required which will provide samples representative of potenti al pathways of the area. During the preoperational phase of the l, program, samples are collected and analyzed not only to obtain I
background radiological levels, but at the same time to acquire
! experience with the sampling methodolo y and procedural forr.t dictated by site specific requirements.I2 4
i .
l
TABLE I (Page 1 of 2)
PNPP RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONE NTAL NONITORING PROGRA,H Analysis Sample Media Locations Sampling Frequency Type frequency Airborne radiofodine(a) 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 35 Continuous sampler operation Rad 101odine Weekly following and g with collection weekly or I-131 canister change particulates ,) as required by dust loading, Weekly following whichever is more frequent Particulate Gross Beta (d) filter change Gamma Isotopic (* Compostte,.by location quarterly Direct Radiation I through 24 Continuous sampling, one Gannia Dose Monthly (4 TLDs/ location) plus 35 TLD exchanged monthly Coatinuous sampling, one Gamma Dose Annually TLD eschanged annually Waterborne 28, 34, 36, 37 Monthly Composite III H-3 Composite, by location, surface quarterly
- drinking Gross Beta Monthly Gasma Isotopic Monthly Sediment from 25, 26, 27, 32 Semiannually--spring and Gamma Isotopic Semiannually shoreline fall as weather permits Ingestion 29, 30, 31, 33 Monthly when animals are not I-131, Gamma All samples Milk ID* C' 9I on pasture Isotopic Semimonthly when animals are I-131, Gamma All samples on pasture Isotopic
TABLE I (Page 2 of 2)
- PNPP RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Analysis Sample Media Locations Sampling Frequency Type Frequency
=---......
Fish 25, 32 Semiannually--spring and Gamma Isotopic Semiannually fall as weather permits (edible portion)
Silage (9) 33 Annually Gamma Isotopic Annually Food Products (g) 38 Annually Gamma Isotopic Annually l
' * (a) Sampling initiated at all locations, except 35, on September 29 and 30,1982. Sampling initiated for location 35 on October 28, 1982.
I (b) Sampling begins at least one year prior to PNPP operation. Sampling at the control location was initiated on October 27, 1982.
(c) I-131 to be performed at least for 6 months of the last full pasture season prior to operation.
(d) Particulate sample filters will be analyzed for gross beta 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or more af ter sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air is greater than ten times the mean of the control samples for any medium, gamma isotopic analysis will be performed on the individual samples. ,
(e) Gammaa isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.
1 (f) Composite samples will be collected with equipment that is capable of collecting an aliquot at time intervals that are very short (e.g., hourly) relative to the compositing period (e.g., monthly).
l Sacp11ng at all locations was initiated in September 1982.
(g) Definitive sampling locations will be determined by a milk-animal and garden census to be performed annually.
l _ _ . - - --
TABLE 2 Page 1 of 3 Sample Locations and Media for the Perry Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Location Description Distance Direction Media No. (Miles) i 1 Redbird (Haines Road, North of West Chapel Road) 3.4 ENE APT,AI,TLD On pole 3303609; first pole south of first driveway on left 2 Site boundary; tree line 0.7 E TLD i Ash tree 1000 feet NNW of second transmission tower from road
- On fence surrounding the equipment shelter l 4 Site Boundary 0.7 5 APT,AI,TLD On pole #W79/SPG5-30; inside auxiliary road gate off Parmly Rd.
1 ~ 5 Site Boundary, Quincy Substation 0.6 SW APT,AI,TLD On pole #L1283/9300; east side of substation 6 Concord Service Center (Control) 11.0 SSW APT,AI,TLD
, Auburn Road south of Rt. 90; on inside rear fence next to gate
- 7 Site Boundary; Lockwood Road Bus Turnaround 0.6 NE TLD On tree on right,100 feet past the turnaround 8 Site Boundary; Tree Line 0.8 ENE TLD 1000 feet N of location #2 on tree near rusted manure spreader 9 Site Boundary; Transmission Line Tower 0.7 r.SE TLD i Third tower from Antioch Road toward the plant 10 Site Boundary; Southsoutheast Corner Security Fence 0.8 SSE TLD On pole at turn in the fence 11 Site Boundary; Transmission Line Tower 0.6 SSW TLD On tower at SW corner of Center and Parmly Roads 12 Site Boundary; Transmission Line Tower 0.6 WSW TLD Access road fro.a N side of Parmly just W of location #5, left at first turn after 90 degree lef t; TLD on tower to right '
13 Madi son-on- the-Lake 4.7 ENE TLD At end of Whitewood Drive, N of Chapel Road, NW side of .
turnaround on pole #835803 i
k I
TABLE 2 Page 2 of 3 Sample Locations and Media for the Perry Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program l
I Location Description Distance Di rec tion Media (Miles) l No.
14 Hubbard Road (South of North Ridge Road) 4.9 E TLD On pole #28974 on W side of road, S side of McMackin Creek 15 Madison Substation (Eagle Street) 5.1 ESE TLD First pole next to substation near railroad tracks 16 Dayton Road (North of Interstate 90) 5.0 SE TLD On pole #572203 on lef t af ter dirt driveway which is just af ter the sharp lef t on Dayton after crossing I-90 17 Chadwick Road (Cui de Sac South of Interstate 90) 5.2 SSE TLD On pole #276222/112Z011; last pole on lef t
. 18 Blair Road 5.0 S TLD On pole on left just after road makes 90 degree left curve from south to east heading toward Grand River Bridge.
19 Lane Road and South Rid 9e Road 5.3 SSW TLD On pole #PC5648, 100 feet north of intersection 20 Nursery Road at Route 2 Overpass 5.3 SW TLD On pole #828976, across from entrance to Rt. 2 21 Hardy Road at Painesville Township Park 5.1 WSW TLD '
On pole #378345, east of park entrance y 22 Painesville
- 6.9 SW TLD On 5 side of Main Street across from Evergreen Cemetery entrance, on tree 50 feet west of pole #DBPG296 .
23 Fairport Harbor (High Street and New Street) 7.9 WSW TLD On pole on street side of substation 24 St. Clair Avenue Substation (Control) 15.1 SW TLD In Mentor; on rear fence corner near railroad tracks 25 PNPP Discharge 0.6 NNW SED, FSH 26 Of fshore at Redbird, vicinty of Ohio Water Service Company Intake 4.2 ENE SED 27 Offshore, vicinty of Fairport Harbor Water Supply System Intake 7.9 WSW SED 28 Ashtabula (Control), CEI Generating Station Intake 22.0 ENE WTR
- _. . .. _ =. . - - . - .
TABLE 2 .
Pitge 3 of 3 Sample Locations and Media for the Perry Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Location Description Distance Direc tion Media 1)
No. (Miles) 29 Milk Farm
-f2 HLK 30 Milk Farm -
MlK 31 Milk Farm -
- (2 )
MLK 32 Mentor-on-the-Lake (Control) 15.8 WSW SED, FSH 33 Brookglen Farm (Control) 10.2 S MLK 34 PNPP Intake 0.7 NW WTR 35 Site Boundary, Center of Sector, follow tree line around 0.6 E APT,AI,TLD fie!ds south and west of Location #2 36 Painesville Water Supply Intake 3.9 WSW WTR i 37 Ohio Water Service Company, Lake Erie East, Madison; at end of 4.1 ENE WTR '-
Green Road in Redbird 38 Farm at site boundary, off Antioch Road 1.1 E FP (1) APT = Air particulate AI = Air iodine TLD = Ambient gamma dose rate SED = Sediment WTR = Water FSH = Fish !
MLK = Milk FP = Food Products (2 ) These locations to be determined in the annual milk animal survey :
G 2
I j E : !MEEEEEE E=E E!E!E!.$5. ,j
- s : -
' 8:
"1 G 1
~
$l" r* E)3
~=E :
/A ,e see -
!E I[ Sj ! 2 Il.iel.l.ieeeeeeeeeeeeeee.d..}e g , !!g.! .! .i E8 83 53 5G ;
9* 9 }5 I c
s! ------- 2:===e :-eaunu na
.5
. . .' , g-
"= 'h . ,-
7 , N - ,- . , i, g f l *,
'. N..;,, ;, \ -
_4
./~. ,,3 ,'edl'f -, s_n, t.
.. a,. -
.4 \'3 ' .- ,
. .) - _- 112 'Nh . . . z,J:: . e. s 'I l ,
!.Mi i. ['..<..' h !
.. > .3
.gf' .
m ....g *t.s. .. ~ 5'. - .
., 1
' c, c.o,' - ;- eq ~.,Q ' ,u.-; . .
n - ,
g, __ , .
,h ,d ,
. 'd '
s
. y' U
\< ~ .
- t f,. '.,;h - - - i 'ch y _,. Q (c .. ~
% "' J i ~ ;; ' .'M-f '
' TJ 5, g+
j;ge _ ,
@ e @ e; >. , .
- e. _ Xm--g[w x-
_Jg534@,;hMW-4*$a;y .? % i k 7 %j
$5m%
v m Wi@%n
% w: w.w.. g y. :#cc
'W 7:
.A.m% .
m n e ..
d .
.,y.
I
{
x< f g -
.\
. 'Bf , "' *i; 4bs ,- yg ; .' 3 ~ ; _
E MTp3 3.? '.
[' d.D-o
_s ,
s I . ~ -
~ .
._ r .
t I
\' --',a= .
%, -=
, g #
t
.- g g.
s s \. s_, A.--g-- n <n . A rN -W
. \ sy -_- ,
,-u '
h s
rU l ' g 's ; ,
M . N - -b l -
$ .h -
, Md. .~y
. r l
~
. /
d I QMj. W'.
, v .
. N, ._ .-
q ..g.x, c
-, I
. . s y', i Ili [ ;
1 I
W abl? MW w
\
g
', 1 5
.535155 .-5 \
U
& 3s a \
=%!
3 s 1. t i.5- ~
1
- .5 5
i -
18a i
.s o .\ 1. s g .1"1 ti,o 5q q.s O}lih'.g tu s: a
\
a s p- 'i s. is 1
11 :
.\ gI .ggf.:fE8
- q e ,,
G e >
~*
it g v.S #
m .- 91 r_ht ^ f g hs, l'
j,
- ( ' ,
. %{.a .hi f y sml '/
J
,WM % &}T9 $.M[k
, x QS
\. a't..
j
~
I W%MS9h,1 .,
.s e . 4 2
1 ss _i x.
v
" g. . m_ e M
\
.\
1
~
'..'y s .s 1
e e s e %
a q
by t , q?. w fn hy
, , 'y .;x ,
Y
/
,, L , f .p' . .e
,, \ -%$
- Is T '...
s.
af s
, '*iy[.q' Et
.~e .. g.. q;;
.. h ,
i $p nrqq ,.
~
~.
3.~-
9 q w D
g x .jg.- ,4, w
31
%m
' x ( +.- er 4 , ~
.,e , -
n s ,,
(,)g ~a) 4 2
e .
M -s s s{s
> /
s.
S .,3 \ __>5
's ug 11
.- - p
i A. Direct Radiation
- Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to determine the direct (ambient) radiation levels at twenty-five (25) monitoring
- points as described in Tables 1 and 2. Sampling locations were chosen according to the criteria given in the USNRC Branch Technical Position on Radiological Monitoring (Revision 1, November 1979).III I
TLDs were located in two rings around the station. An inner ring was located at the site boundary and an outer ring was located at an approximate distance of 4 to 5 miles from the station.
The area around the station was divided into 16 radial sectors of 22 1/2 degrees each. TLDs were placed in all sectors except those which radiated from the site directly out over the lake without '
intersecting any unrestricted areas. Additional TLDs were located at three nearby communities and two control locations.
For routine TLD measurements, two dosimeters of CaSO :Dy in teflon 4
cards were deployed at each selected location. One set of dosimeters were exchanged on a monthly basis and the second set was exchanged on an annual basis. Additional sets of dosimeters were shipped with each exchange cycle to serve as in-transit controls.
For routine exchanges TLDs were shipped by overnight Greyhound one evening, picked up and exchanged the following day, and returned by overnight Greyhound on the second evening. This was done to maintain the minimum possible in-transit dose.
Individual dosimeters were calibrated by exposure to an accurately known radiation field from a calibrated Cs-137 source.
4 4
12
, , - - . - - - . , ----c-.-
!t B. Fish l Fish sampling was conducted in May and Dctober at two locations for this program. The immediate vicinity of the discharge was selected as an indicator location, and an offshore location at Mentor-on-the-Lake was chosen as a control location.
Using a passive collection technique, an experimental gill net (mesh ranging from approximately 1.0 to 2.5 inches to maximize catches in
- useful size ranges) was set at each sampling location by biologists under contract to NUS Corporation. Nets were set in the evening and removed the following morning. Entrapped surviving fish not required for sampling were released. A Scientific Collecting Permit was obtained from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources to permit this sampling.
Available edible species were filleted at the time of collection.
The edible portions were packed in ice and shipped to the laboratory for analysis by gamma spectrometry.
C. Sediment Sediment samples were collected in May and Oc tober at four locations. Two locations were nominally the same as the locations j chosen for fish sampling. At Hentor the sediment was collected approximately 400 yards further offshore, and at the Perry discharge the sediment was collected approximately 600 yards further offshore.
Some movement was necessary to find a suitable substrate for l sampling. Sediment samples were also collected offshore in the vicinities of Fairport Harbor and Redbird. Samples were collected
- with a petite ponar grab sampler in about 30 feet of water. A
- sample was composited at each location in a 3 gallon plastic bucket.
Approximately I kilogram was frozen and shipped to the laboratory for analysis by gamma spectronetry.
i l 13 l
1
-- - ~ - ,, - - - - - - - . , - - ,a , , . _ - - - -
D. Airborne Particulates/ Air Iodine-131 Airborne particulate and air iodine sampling was initiated on September 29 and 30, 1982 for Stations 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Air sampling was initiated on October 28, 1982 for Station 35. Sampling was performed by Research Appliance Company continuous low volume air sampler units (Model #209088-2). Air particulates were collected by drawing air through a 47-millimeter diameter glass fiber filter. Air fodin+-131 was collected by drawing air through a 57 millimeter diameter TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridge (F & J Specialty Products, Inc.). The sampling units are housed in ventilated metal cabinets bolted to telephone poles.
The air sampling network consists of six (6) stations; one is located in Redbird, approximately 3.4 miles ENE of the Perry plant and four are located at the site boundary. The control location is located at the Concord Service Center, approximately 11 miles SSW of the plant. These locations are identified in Figures 1 and 2 and described in Tables 1 and 2.
i The samplers were run continuously and the filter and charcoal cartridge exchanged weekly. The elapsed time of sampling was recorded va es elapsed-time meter. Total air volume was calculated and recorded by the site technician from the initial and final r
volumes as registered on the dry gas meter.
I 14
E. Water hater saaipling was initiated in September,1982. The water sampling network consists of four (4) stations as identified in Figures 1 and 2 and described in Tables 1 and 2. Two of the stations (28 and 34) utilize Horizon Interval Samplers, which collect a small volume of
- water at short intervals, nominally 15 minutes. A third location (37) utilizes an interval timer to control a solenoid valve on a pressurized sampling line. This arrangement draws small aliquots at the periodic intervals. The small volumes are automatically composited into a five-gallon container. Currently, a grab sample is taken at Station 36. This will continue until the Painesville Water Supply Co. is completed and a Horizon Interval Sampler is installed. Samples from the four (4) stations are collected monthly by the site technician.
F. Milk / Silage Milk sampling was initiated on October 27, 1982. Milk samples were collected monthly (except for November, when 2 samples were taken) from Brookglen Farm (Station 33), located approximately 10.2 miles south of the Perry plant. As a preservative, formalin was added to .
each sample at the time of collection. The annual silage sample for Station 33 was taken on the initial sampling date, October 27, 1982.
Indicator locatiors will be finalized following a milk animal survey in 1983. The survey and subsequent sample collections will be correlated with the Perry fuel load date.
G. Food Products 1
The annual collection of food products was conducted on September
- 29, 1982. Various fruits and vegetables were collected from Station 38 (Seith Farm, Antioch Road).
15
IV.
SUMMARY
AND DISCUSSION OF 1982 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Data from the radiological analyses of environmental media collected during the report period are tabulated and discussed below. The procedures and specification followed in the laboratory for these rulyses are as required in Section 5.0 of the NUS Environmental Systems Group Quality Assurance Manual, Issue B, and are detailed in the NUS Radiological Laboratory Work Instructions.
1 Radiological analyses of environmental media characteristically approach
! and frequently fall below the detection limits of state-of-the-art measurement methods. The use of "LT" in the data tables is the equivalent of the less than symbol (<) and is consistent with the NUS Radiological Laboratory practice of data reporting. The number following the "LT" is a result of the lower limit of detection (LLD) calculation as defined in Appendix B. "ND" (Not Detected) is used periodically in the tables presenting gamma analysis results for various media. It primarily appears unoer the "Others" column, and indicates that no other detectable gama emitting nuclides were identified. NUS analytical methods meet the LLD requirements addressed in Table 2 of the USNRC Branch Technical Position on Radiological Monitoring (November 1979, Revision 1).III Tables 3 through 16 give the radioanalytical resul ts for individual samples. A statistical summary of the results appears in Table 17. The reported averages are based only on concentrations above the limit of detection. In Table 17, the fraction ( f) of the total number of analyses which were detectable follows in parentheses. Also given in i parentheses are the minimum and maximum values of detectable activity during the report period.
e 16
, - _ . ,- ~ - - -
-, --n--
___ _ _ __ .- _ _ __._ _ . ~
A. Direct Radiation i
! Environmental radiation dose rates determined by thermoluminescent dosiu.eters (TLDs) are given in Table 3. TLD badges of four readout i
areas each were ceployed at each location on monthly and annual cycles.
4 The " annual" cycle covers the period January through December. The mean values of four readings (corrected individually for response to a known i dose and for in-transit exposure) are reported.
A statistical summary of the 1982 data is included in Table 17.
i Individual measurements of external radiation levels in the environs of the PNPP site ranged from 0.10 to 0.36 mR/ day. Table 4 compares the j data from the aqqsal cycle TLDs with the annual averages of the monthly j cycle TLDs. Agreement between the two types of data is generally quite good.
Annual averages (from the monthly cycles) ranged from 0.17 to 0.27 mR/ day or 62 to 99 mR/ year. ,
Oakley II calculates an ionizing radiation dose equivalent of 82.2 mR/ year for Ohio including a terrestrial component of 45.6 nR/ year and
- an ionizing cosmic ray component of 36.6 mR/ year (excludes neutron i component). Since Oakley's values represent averages covering wide geographical areas, the measured ambient radiation average of 71 mR/ year j for the immediate locale of Perry is not inconsistent with Dakley's observations. Significant variations occur between geographical areas as a result of geological composition and altitude differences. '
Temporal variations result from changes in cosmic ray intensi ty, local human activities, and factors such as ground cover and soil moisture.
1 b
I i
17
. . -- ,.-a y _ _ , , - - . . - - - . ,,...-m -- , . , , - , - - - - -,
a i .
1 Table 3
- (Page 1 of 2) !
Direct Radiation - Thermoluninescent Dosiuletry ,
Lsal ts for Monthly Exchange Cycles l PNPP REMP 1982 (Results in Units of 91R/D sy +, Oo(l})
l Location January February Marc h April May June !
i l 1 .19t.03 .142.04 .15 .06 .152.05 . 20 .04 .22 .05 !
+
2 .172.03 .13t.04 .13 .04 .202.05 . 20 .04 .20 .06 1
. 3 .262.05 .13 2.04 .172.04 .16!.05 . 13 t04 .20 t06 '
3 4 .162.03 .171.05 .162.04 .21 .04 . 222.05 .21 .06 5 .132.04 .14 2.04 .182.06 .142.04 . 18 :.04 .19:.06 6 .132.0; .132.04 .212.08 .14 .05 . 16 .04 .172.05 7 .132.03 .152.04 .152.04 .19 2.05 . 162.04 .21 .06 )
! 8 .152.04 .16 .05 .141.06 .11 .05 . 18 .04 .17 :.06 I
9 .142.03 .17 2.04 .132.04 .162.05 . 18 :.04 .18:.05
! 10 .16 .03 .122.03 .14 .04 .18 .04 . 21 .05 .222.05
, 11 .16 .05 .152.04 .17:.05 .18 .06 . 18 .04 .18 .05 f 12 .152.04 .18 2.04 .13 2.04 .18 .05 . 13t.04 .182.05 i
! 13 .161.03 .152.04 .142.03 .19 .05 . 13 .04 .20 :.05 '
i 14 .15 .04 .152.04 .152.05 .17 .05 . 16 $04 .20 $05
! 15 .15!.03 .13 !.04 .14 .06 .21 .05 . 19e.05 .22 .05 1 16 .222.05 .21 2.04 .172.03 .26 !.07 . 24 .05 .27 .05 i
! 17 .172.03 .15 2.04 .172.04 .28 .05 . 18 .08 .26 .06 l 18 .212.04 .212.04 .202.05 .28t.07 . 27 :.04 .29 .0i l 14 .162.03 .132.03 .15 .04 .18 .05 . 18 .05 .20!.05 20 .20 2.04 .132.04 .142.04 .21 .05 . 29 .08 .202.05 21 .222.06 . t6 2.05 .162.05 .132.05 . 17 .05 .23 .05 22 .162.06 .17 .05 . 11 !.10 .24 :.05 !
23 .182.03 .172.05 .152.03 .24 .06 . 18 .04 .24 LOS !
l 24 g3) .23!.03 .18 2.06 .152.06 .15!.05 . 112.05 .16:.05 .
t 35 - - - . . .
! i Average .172.07 .15t.05 .162.04 .19 .09 . 18 L09 .212.07 ;
( 22 e)2 Note: See footnotes at end of table. ]
1 18 ,
_ . _ _ . - - . - , . _ , . _ , . . . . _ .-- - -_ ~ _ . _ y. , _ _ . - - _ _ - _ . . - _ _ - , - ., .
1 :
1
)
i Table 3 (Page 2 of 2)
! Jirect Radiation - Thennoluminescent Dosimetry j Results for Monthly Exchange Cycles l
PNPP REMP 1932 (Results in Units of mR/ Day +_2e )
Location July August September Oc tober November December Average 2o(2)
I 1 .17 .03 .21 .05 .132.05 .202.05 .26t.04 .20 :.04 .19 .08
- 2 .18 .04 .19 .04 .11 .06 .192.04 .26 .06 .19
- .04 .18e.08 ;
3 .162.04 .21 2.04 .12 .05 .20 .04 .26:.07 .22 .05 .192.10 !
4 .18 .04 .22 2.07 .11 2.05 .20 .04 .25 .04 .23 .04 .202.08
! 5 .21:.06 .25 .04 .122.05 .20 .03 .26 .04 .20 .04 .18 $09 6 .182.04 .20 2.06 .11 .05 .17 2.03 .25 .04 *
.17 .08 !
7 .142.03 .22 2.05 .12 2.05 .22 .03 .25 .05 .22:.05 .18:.09 8 .172 .05 .22 .06 3 .11 1.05 .18 3.03 .23 .04 .19 z.05 .17 2.07 9 .10 !.05 .22 .05 .18 .06 .23 .04 .20 .07 .202.04 .17 .08 3
10 .172.04 .20 .05 .13 .05 .21:.08 .23 .06 .20 .05 .18 .07 i 11 .11 .05 .23 2.05 .34 .15 .20 .03 .262.06 .21 .05 .20 .12 j 12 .172.04 .22 .05 .32 2.05 .22 .05 .25 .05 .20 3,04 .19:.11 ,
i 13 .21 .05 .20 04 .26 3.06 .20 t.04 .25 .04 .21 2.04 .19 2.08 i 14 .112.04 .21 2.04 .18:.05 .19 .03 .23 .05 .22 t,04 .18 .07 15 .18:.04 .23 2.05 .212 05 .21 .03 * .21 .04 .19 .07 16 .22:.04 .28 2.05 .21 .05 .26 .04 .28 .04 .28 .04 .24 .07 i 17 .12 .04 .26 .07 .20 1.05 *
.30 2.06 .26 :.04 .21 .12 i 18 .212.04 .36 .09 .232.05 .282.04 .32 !.04 .31 t.04 .27 .10 i 19 .18:.04 .172.04 .172.04 .222.04 .202.08 .22 .05 .19 .08 20 .12 .04 .172.06 .18 .05 .20 .03 .24:.04 .26 2.04 .20 .10 :
- 21 .24 .04 .17 2.04 .19 .05 .222.03 .26 .09 .26
- .04 .20 .09 i 22 .20 :.06 .16 .05 .18 .05 .222.05 .252.07 .24 2,06 .192,09 ,
i 23 .22 05 .17 s 05 .20 s05 .21 s03 .27 t05 .25 t05 .21 t08 j 24 3
.12 2.04 .16 .04 .16 :.05 .252.05 .36 .06 .22 .04 .19 .14 ;
- 35 - - - -
.23 !.04 .19 .04 .21 .04 [
i l
Average .21 .09 .18 .13 .21 .05 .26 .07 .22 .06 i
b 2 c)2 17 .08 {
4
- TLD lost due to vandalism.
(1) Errors for individual measurements are two standard deviations j of the average of four readings per dosimeter. !
! (2) Errors of row and column averages are two standard deviations
, calculated from the same row or column data used to generate the averag?.
(1) TI.0 placement at Station 35 began in November, 1982. :
1 l
t
- 19 ,
l i
- Table 4 Comparison of Annual and Average-Monthly, DTr'e'c't, [R;a dfi,t f6n Te}{u're'ie,6(s[ ' " ,
PNPP REMP 1982 (Results in Units of mR/ day +,2 e)III -
Sampling Period: 12/29/81 to 12!28/82 Station # Annual Cycle TLD Average of Monthly Cycles 1 0.21 0.02 0.19 0.08 i 2 0.19 ! 0.04 0.1820.08 i 3 0.21 : 0.03 0.19 0.10 1 4 0.22 0.01 0.20 0.08 ;
5 0.19 . 0.03 0.18 + 0.09 '
6 0.17 0.08 7 0.18 2 0.03 0.18 : 0.09 8 0.21 0.03 0.1720.07 9 0.18 0.01 0.17 0.08 10 0.19 0.02 0.18 0.07 11 0.20 2 0.02 0.20 2 0.12 l 12 0.18 2 0.02 0.19 0.11
- 13 0.20 2 0.02 0.19 2 0.08 i 14 0.20 0.02 0.18 1 0.07 15 0.19 2 0.07 16 0.24 0.04 0.24 20.07 17 0.21 20.12 i
18 0.30 2 0.03 0.27 0.10 19 0.21 0.04 0.19 2 0.08 1 20 0.22 0.02 0.20 2 0.10
- 21 0.23 2 0.03 0.20 0.09 l
22 0.23 2 0.01 0.19 0.09
, 23 0.22 2 0.02 0.21 z 0.08 j 24 0.22 0.03 0.19 s 0.14
' 35;g) -- 0.21 0.04
- TLD lost due to vandalism
):
(1) Errors of annual TLDs are two standard deviations of the four readout areas on each TLD; errors of monthly averages are two standard deviations of the average of the individual
- monthly results. .
(2) TLD placement at Station 35 began in November 1982, so an annual TLD was not placed here.
20
B. Fish The resalts of ganaa spectro.netric analyses of fish sa nples collected during 1982 are presented in Table 5. A total of 23 samples were analyzed; 11 from the indicator location dod 12 fro.n the control ixation. Sampling efforts concentrated on the larger edible species of commercial and/or recreational it.1portance.
As expected, naturally occurring K-40 war. the major detectable ac tivity in the edible portions of the fish. Cs-137 was also detected in 4 of 23 samples ranging froin 16 to 28 picoCuries per kilogram (wet). This isotope has often been reported in fish flesh in other enviem1 ental monitoring prograns. Since it is present in global fallout, the occasional detection of Cs-137 in environnental media is not unusual.
C. Shoreline Sediments The processes by which radionuclides and stable elements are concentrated in bottom sediments are complex, involving physicochemical interaction in the environment between the various organic and inorganic materials from the watershed. These interactions can proceed by a myriad of steps in which the elements are adsorbed on or displaced from the surfaces of colloidal particles enriched with chelating organic material s. Biological acti.on of bacteria and other benthic organisms also contribute to the concentration of certain elements and in the acceleration of the sedimentation process.
Results of the gama isotopic analyses of the sediments sanpled from the PNPP environment are given in Table 6. The average, fraction of detectables, and range of radionuclide concentrations are summarized in Table 17.
l 21
Table 5 Gamma Spectrometry 0f_ F,i s,h. Samp,1,e,s_
PNPP REHP 1982 (Results in Units of pC1/kg (wet) + 2a)
Location Fish Species Collection Date Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 K -40 l
-.....- ...........__ ==...-- ..... -................. .... ...
LT 60 III 25 Rainbow Smelt 05/25/82 LT 200 LT 60 LT 50 LT 110 LT 50 LT 50 28002 700 25 White Sucker 05/25/82 LT 40 LT 140 LT 50 LT 50 LT 90 LT 40 LT 40 3600 600 25 Yellow Perch 05/25/82 LT 17 LT B0 LT 16 LT 20 LT 50 LT 15 28 s 11 32001 300 25 Freshwater Drum 05/25/82 LT 40 LT 160 LT 40 LT 40 tr 90 f.T 30 f.T 30 3000 ! 600 t s, 32 Rainbow Smelt 05/25/82 LT 40 LT 20 LT 50 LT 30 LT 110 LT 30 1.T 40 2800 600 '
^> 32 White Bass 05/25/82 LT 40 LT 170 LT 40 LT 50 LT 110 f.T 30 LT 40 34002 700 32 Ye110w Perch 05/25/82 LT 17 LT 70 .LT 19 LT 16 LT 50 LT 10 16111 3100 300 32 Freshwater Drum 05/25/82 LT 30 LT 130 LT 30 LT 30 LT 100 LT 18 17 16 2800 2 500 32 White Sucker 05/25/82 LT 50 LT 300 LT 70 LT 40 LT 140 LT 30 LT 30 3200 700 .
l 25 White Sucker 10/14/82 LT 70 LT 200 LT 60 LT 50 LT 150 LT 70 LT 50 3000 1200 25 Freshwater Drum 10/14/82 LT 70 - LT 120 LT 50 LT 80 LT 170 LT 50 LT 60 3500 800 25 White Bass 10/14/82 LT 50 LT 200 LT 40 LT 50 LT 120 LT 50 LT 5 4700 900 25 Stone Cat 10/14/82 LT 60 LT 200 LT 60 LT 80 LT 190 LT 60 LT 60 4000 800 25 Walleye 10/14/82 LT 70 LT 200 LT 70 LT 70 LT 190 LT 60 LT 60 5900 900 25 Perch 10/17/82 LT 70 LT 160 LT 50 LT 7 LT 80 LT 60 LT 50 2500t 700
- 25 White Sucker 10/17/82 LT 50 LT 200 I.T 50 LT 70 LT 14 LT 60 LT 70 3700; 400 I 32 Walleye 10/17/82 LT 50 LT 170 LT 40 LT 50 LT 110 LT 40 LT 40 NO !
32 White Sucker 10/26/82 LT 20 LT 80 LT 15 LT 30 LT 80 LT 20 a.T 20 34002 500 32 Ye110w Perch 10/26/82 LT 16 LT 50 LT 19 LT 20 LT 50 LT 19 LT 16 3800 400
- 32 Walleye 10/26/82 LT 30 LT 90 LT 30 LT 30 LT 70 LT 20 LT 19 30002600 32 Fr eshwater Drum 10/26/82 LT 20 LT 70 LT 20 LT 30 LT 60 LT 20 282 13 3300 400 32 White Bass 10/26/82 LT 40 LT 140 LT 40 LT 40 LT 120 LT 30 LT 20 2900 600 32 Golden Redhorse 10/26/82 LT 30 LT 90 LT 30 LT 20 LT 90 LT 30 LT 20 2900t 500 (1) LT = Less Than (2) ND = Not Detected
. _ . _ _ , . , , . . , - - ---e . . , . .._n . _ _ ,
- . - . . _ . - _ . - . . . .- - - . - - - . . . - _.- -_ - - - . _ . . . _ . = -
Table 6 hana ,5pe,c,trometry of Sediment Saay),es, PNPP REMP 1982 (Results in pCf/kg (dry) + 2e )
Collection Location Date 81-214 Pb-214 Ra.226 Pb-212 T1 208 Ac-228 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Others NO III 1500t300 25 05/25/82 No 16002200 NO 14002500 14,00011000 LT 300(2) LT 180 Ra-224 9 3500t 1200 26 05/25/82 NO 13002300 NO 800t190 NO 11002500 16,00011000 LT 300 400!!70 No u 27 05/25/82 NO 12002300 18002800 0002160 NO NO 21,000 A000 LT 300 3902140 NO 32 05/25/82 NO 8702220 9002610 9002150 NO 7702410 14,00323000 LT 200 6701150 Ra-224 0 19002 900 t 25 10/13/82 690t90 750t120 1300t600 490t70 ND 6302130 8,8002800 LT 80 140110 Hi-212 9 %01 350 26 10/13/82 630t80 590t80 1300t400 320 40 590280 4302120 7,3002700 LT 70 4702320 81-212 9 6102 400 27 10/13/82 430t60 490t90 11001400 270t50 420170 200290 7,500 $00 LT 80 LT 40 No i 32 10/26/82 520t110 570t120 NO 200170 440t130 NO 8,80021300 LT 110 120250 No !
(1) NO = Not Detected (2) LT = Less Than
- 4 4
r ,,.2 _ . , - - -_
4 I
i Most of the observed gamma emitters were naturally occurring members of j the uranium and thorium decay chains. These were detected in their expected concentrations. Similarly, K-40 was observed in all samples at its expected range of activities. The predominant man-made radionuclide 4
observed in the sediment samples was Cs-137. Because of its presence in global fallout, the detection of this isotope is neither unexpected nor l unusual. The activity levels reported (120 to 670 picoCuries per kilogram ( dry) ) are within the range of observed values for other-1 environmental monitoring programs. Due to the inhomogeneity typical of sediment samples, wide variations between samples are expected even when }
the samples are taken relatively near each other.
d d
In 1981, detectable activities of Co-60 were observed in 4 of 8 sediment j saiples. Co-60 was not detected in any of the sediment samples during 1
1982.
I D. Air Particulates/ Air Iodine
}
l The results of the gross beta analyses on air particulate filters are i
presented in Table 7. A total of 80 analyses were performed; 66 from j the indicator location and 14 from the control location. Both the indicator and control locations had mean gross beta activities of 21 3
i E-03 pC1/m . The range of gross beta activity for the indicator and 3
control locations was 9 to 42 E-03 pC1/m and 9 to 37 E-03 pC1/m3 ,
respectively.
I i
i I
i 1
24 i
Table 7 Gross Beta in Air Particulate Filters PNPP REMP 1982 (Results in E-03 pC1/m + 2a )
Station ihmber
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Month Sampling Period 1 3 4 5 T. 35 III 19 t 9 152 9 October 09/30/82 to 10/05/82 22 28 18 29 14; 8 -
,; 10/05/82 to 10/12/82 36 t 7 32 27 35 7 42!8 3/ / -
10/l2/82 to 10/19/82 15 26 21 6 15 6 12! 6 15 6 -
10/19/82 to 10/26/82 16 27 LT 10(2) 14 7 16 7 15 7 -
10/26/82 to 11/02/82 20 7 22 7 22t 7 201 7 28 8 15 9 I3I November 11/02/82 to 11/09/82 22 !7 21 t 7 162 7 19 7 171 7 18 7 11/09/82 to 11/16/82 21 t8 19 28 20 8 18 8 15t 7 17 7 11/16/82 to 11/23/82 23 3 8 28 8 27 7 26 7 253 / 241 /
11/23/82 to 11/30/82 26 7 23 7 20 7 20t 7 23t I 1/ t 6 December 11/30/82 to I?/17/12 11 7 9 7 17 7 19 8 9 6 11 7
- 12/07/82 to 12/14/82 20 27 23 3 7 24; 7 26 3 32t 3 27 8 o 12/14/82 to 12/21/82 22 27 18 17 151 6 22t 7 22t 7 19: 7 12/21/82 to 12/28/82 18 t 7 17 7 27; 7 11 6 152 6 22 7 12/26/82 to 01/04/83 20 7 23 7 19 r 7 23 7 21 t 7 16; 7 (1) Sampling Period for Station #1 is 09/29/82 to 10/28/82.
(2) LT = Less Than (3) Sanpling from Station 35 was initiated on 13/28/82. Therefore, the sampling period is 10/28/82 to 11/02/82.
e I
l Air filters were composited for the fourth quarter and analyzed by gamma spectrometry. The gamma spectro.netry results are presented in Table 8.
1 A total of 6 composite analyses were perfor.ed; 5 from the indicator locations and 1 frc.n the control location. Cosmogenic bery111um-7 was the only isotope detected. Be-7 was found in 5 of 6 samples analyzed.
Ai rborne iodine-131 analyses on charcoal cartridges were also performed I during the fourth quarter and the results are presented in Table 9.
- lodine-131 was not detected in any of the samples.
1 E. Water
{ The results of the gamma spectrometric analyses of water samples are 1 presented in Table 10. There were 16 analyses performed; 12 from the l indicator locations and 4 from the control location. There was no
) detectable activity in any of the samples analyzed.
The 16 water samples were also analyzed for gross beta activity. The l average gross beta activity for the indicator and control locations was
, 4.3 pC1/1 and 3.9 pCi/1, respectively. Results of gross beta analyses <
) are given in Table 11.
! Water samples were also composited quarterly for the tritium analysis.
4 The quarter 3 and 4 results are presented in Table 12. Only 1 (station !
37, quarter three) of 8 composite samples had detectable Tritium (
j activity. This activity (310 pC1/1) was well below the LLD as defined l in the USNRC Branch Technical Position on Radiological Monitoring (November 1979, Revision 1).
i
- F. Milk / Silage 1 i Milk samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry and the results are presented in Table 13. Only the control location was sampled during
- 1982. There were a total of 4 analyses perforned, and as expected K-4,0 was the major detectable activity. No other nuclides were detected in the milk samples. The 4 milk samples were also analyzed for Iodine-131 .
i and, as expected, there was no detectable activity. The I-131 results
- are presented in Table 14, i
! t
! 26 !
i l
t t
{ Table 8 Caena Spect,rometry off Composited Air Partic,u,1,a,t_e Flter,s, l
1 PelPP REW 1982 (Results in Units of E-03 pC1/m3 + 2a )
i Sampling 1
Quarter Composite Period Location Be-7 Ce-144 Cs-134 Cs-137 NO-95 Zr-95 u
~
4 09/29/82 to 01/04/83 1 5.1 1.9 LT 7 LT 2 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 j
i 09/3C/82 to 01/04/83 3 LT 2 LT 8 LT 2 LT 3 f.T 3 LT 4 09/30/82 to 01/04/83 4 4.0 2.0 LT 10 f.T 3 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 l 09/30/82 to 01/04/83 5 5.li 1.7 LT 8 LT 3 1.T 1 1. T 1 LT 5 1
1 09/30/82 to 01/04/83 6 4.4 1.8 LT 8 LT 3 1.T 4 3.T 4 LT 5 l 10/28/82 to 01/04/83 35 7.1 2.7 LT 10 LT 3 LT 2 LT 3 LT 7 1
I i
1 l
i l
i .
4 I
! i
, . . M w
N mN4m N@vNN l l C. Q. o. C. C. C. Q. Q. C. o.
e ' s e t IC OoCC CCCCC
' m I >= H W >= >= >=>=>=.>>=
' l J .J _' J J .=' J J ' s e e e e e .
e l .
mxNnw w N et m NwnNN l ,
- o. O. C. C. C. Q. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. O.
, l OOOCC OOOO COccO
. C ,
>= w >= W >= >=h->=>= >=' W
>= >= W
, . , J ' .=' J J J a J.J JJ'
- e. . e e g e
' o '
wNNNm mNeM N C W N f**
cst l 0 0 0 0. C.
Q. C. C. C. C. C. C. 0 0 t zs l m l oOCOo cooO coOOc O
>=>=>-W>= >= H > >= b=>=>=>=>= b c
C l '
JJJJJ JJJJ 'JaaJ W C'
w e e a m 9 C w cNcNm mNwm NewNN
- m o. o. Q. Q. Q. C. O. C. O. C. O. Q. c. o.
e c.
m
,' w QCCOO COCO C0000 5 m
@ l >=W>=>=>= >=>=>=>= W m _J a =J J J eaJJ >=>=>=>=.>=i a J J .-
.V.=
W
- 4 L'e . .' W gl 6
0
' WNNNm mNWM N@TNN ,
W N
9 v.
l QC.000
. C. O. O. O. C.0000 ,
u N +l l , M 'e OO000 0000 00Q00 l -
0 9 'i ci e m * * ' >=>=>==>=>= >=>=>=>= >=>=D-.>=>=
- U O
ul m a
- l l aaaaa aaaa aaaaa l u e ' at
.q i w . n
= .c , u '
' N -
6.J sk ' CO 4 of cs C
.-= %
e N 6n .
>= c w w o N w 0. WNNNm mNwM N@vNN N CQ Q- e o N
.-e z W O. C. O. C. O. C. 0 0 0 0 0. C. 0 0 cc M
m Q. e ==e QQOOC OOOO OOOOO N l3 O %.
W >=>=>=>==>= >=>=>=>= >=>=>=>=>= W Q 8l @
CC JJJJa .J.J=J J JJJJJ N
- =*
@ w CD C C . , N O T , N U C , N =
m
" e e W
. ,e . O 9 w
l @ M
. , ==e , w w
=*
- C
, NNNNN NNNN NNNNm ' e w
, a3 CD CD CO COCOCOCDCO +
U CD
%%%% CD %
CD n'. c". %%%% % % % %. s. m O mN@CN C* @ m O N v ==* CD at C *e
- O w =e N C OmNM OmNNC O E b %%%%N % % %. N %%%% w W QQQCm m s=* *=e s=* NNN .%
=4 # W Q .-. * =e =* c.e e.= ee* N.-e m m o e e=e m .
%N On OOOOO OOOO OOOOO m c0 C deMMM MM99 9@MMM Cs
- = b ON e
Q.
NNNNN NNNN NNNNN O wo WN CO CD CD T CO CD CD CD CD COCOCOCDCO *>=
E N N %. N N N N %. N % N. % % %.
4 e=e m
9 O m N O' @ Nm@M O N 4 ** CD I' 1l2 &e
=* ** N O O *' N mO O m m Q.% =%. %. %. N. .e N %N w e O
, mOCOO me-%. % . . .=* *NNNN l k e 8F W
, o e=e ** e=e e.* m o e=e m o e-o e-o m m , OcO e , G>= k N
, Q. ta= CD
, W %
, CPI e mCD b
C GCN b w .,a w %.
L W m mO 4
C 3 $
N 5
U
.k, m .J m
- k 2 8 8 8 -
- 98. 0 .N .N I
28
Table 10 h _5 '.C.trometry P of Water, samples PEPP REMP 1982 (Results in PCf/1 + 2 e 1 peenth Locatlee Se-140 Co.58 Co.60 Cs-134 Cs.137 Fe-59 La.140 Mn-54 Mb.95 In-65 Zr-95 September 28 LT 30 III LT 9 LT 9 LT 7 LT 10 LT 14 t.T 3tl I. I 7 t.T 12 LT 20 LT 17
- 34 LT 40 LT 9 LT 7 LT 7 LT 7 LT 15 LT 19 LT 11 LT 10 LT 20 LT 13 36 LT 40 LT 7 LT 15 LT 9 LT 15 LT 20 LT 30 LT 9 LT 12 LT 17 LT 20 3 37 LT 50 Li 7 LT 20 LT 12 LT 10 Li 16 1.T 20 LT 12 LT 13 LT 30 LT 20 October 28 LT 30 LT & LT 10 LT 7 LT 10 LT 16 LT 16 LT 8 LT 8 LT 20 LT 15 34 LT 30 LT 6 LT 8 LT F LT 8 Li 13 t.T 15 LT 8 LT 7 LT 18 Li 12 36 t.T 30 LT 9 LT 10 LT S LT 8 LT 20 LT 16 LT 8 LT 7 LT 20 LT 14 37 LT 30 LT 8 LT 10 LT 9 LT 10 LT 20 LT 20 LT 9 LT 7 LT 20 t.T 14 nov e 28 LT 14 LT 4 LT 6 LT 4 LT 4 LT 9 LT 8 LT 3 LT 4 LT 8 LT 2 .
34 LT 13 LT 5 LT 7 LT 4 LT 4 LT 12 LT 13 LT 4 LT 4 LT 11 Li 9 36 LT 12 LT 4 LT 6 LT 3 LT 4 LT 9 LT 11 LT 4 LT 4 LT 13 LT 7 37 LT 16 LT 5 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 LT 5 LT 9 LT 5 LT 4 LT 13 LT 7 Decaneer 28 LT 14 LT 4 LT 3 LT 5 LT 4 LT 11 LT 11 LT 6 LT 6 LT 9 LT 9 34 LT 12 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 t.T 11 LT 5 LT 4 LT 3 LT 9 LT 6 16 Lt 14 LT 4 LT 4 LT 4 LT 3 Li 8 LT 13 LT 5 LT 4 LT 11 LT 8 37 LT 16 LT 5 LT F LT 5 LT 5 LT 10 LT 9 LT 6 LT 4 LT 14 LT 8 (1) LT = Less Than
- _ _ M
Table 11 Gro'ss Beta in Wat,er, 5, ample,s PNPP REMP 1962 (Results in pCi/l + 2a )
t Month Location Gross Beto Ac tli/I *g*
P September 28 5.2 1.3 34 5.0 2 1.3 36 3.8 2 1.2 37 4.4 ! 1.2 Oc tober 28 3.3 : 1.4 34 2.9 : 1.4 36 3.1 e 1.4 37 5.6 2 1.5 November 28 3.0 : 1.3 34 4.4 2 1.4 36 4.9 1.4 37 4.6 1.4 December 28 4.0 2 1.3 34 4.0 1.3 36 3.8 1.3 37 5.1 2 1.3 30 -
t I
Table 12'
! Tritium in ,Composited Water Samp,le,s, PNPP RUIP 1982 i
(Results in pC1/1 + 2e ) i I
i i =_z _....-..... !
4
! Quarter Location Tritium Activity i-III 3 28 LT 300(2) [
j 34 LT 300 i 1 36 LT 300 !
i 37 310+160 J
i 4 I3I 28 LT 300 34 LT 300 36 LT 300 37 LT 300
}
}
1 i
. . . = . . . . .
i !
l (1) Only one water sample was collected for the third quarter, i j so cogosite analyses are not performed. Water sampling
! was initiated on 09/29/82. !
l l i (2) LT = Less Than !
j (3) Tritium water samples were not collected during October, I j the first inonth of the 4th quarter composite. l t
i 2
l i
} l i (
! i
- 1
( I 4 ,
t !
. 4 j 31 ;
i
Table 13 Gauna Sp_ectrometry,,0f, H,1,1k Samp,1,e,s PNPP REMP 1982 (Results in pC1/1 + 2 a )
Month Collection Date Location Ba-140 Cs.134 Cs-137 K-10 La-140 October 10/27/82 33 LT S III LT 2 LT 2 1300t 200 LT 3 November 11/04/82 33 LT 20 LT 7 LT 10 13001 200 LT 18 U 11/29/82 33 LT 40 LT 8 LT 9 1300t 100 LT 15 December 12/28/82 33 LT 13 LT 5 LT 5 1400t 100 LT 8 (1 ) LT = tess Than
Table 14 Io di ne. . .131. i.n. tii.l.k.
PNPP RDIP 1932 (Results in pC1/1 + 2 a ) ,
Month Collection Date I-131 Activity
. . . . . ...... _=.......
Oc tober 10/27/82 LT 0.7 III November 11/04/82 LT 0.6 11/29/82 LT 0.3 December 12/28/82 LT 1.0 (1) LT = Less Than 33
~
3 A Feed / Silage sample was collected in Oc tober froin the control milk j station and analyzed by gamma spectrometry. Th45t etults are presented
- in Table 15. Naturally occurring K-40 and cosmogenic Be-7 were the only I
two detectable activities abserved in the sample.
.I j G. Vegetables and Food Products l
Vegetables and fruits were collected in Septeider fro.n an indicator j location and analyzed by gamma spectrometry. The results are present d in Table 16. Naturally occurring X-40 was the only nuclide detedted 1. '
the vegetation samples. X-40 was found in all of the vegetation samples at its expected range of activity.
o I
i 4
2 I
d i
1 4
j l
1 i
34
__ _ _._ . . . . _ _ _ _ .- _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ ._ ~ _. __ . . _ . . _ . . . _-
4 i
1 :
Table 15 Gamaa spe,c,tr0;aetry, of, FeedfSi,1, age ,
l PNPP REMP 1982
- i. (Results in Units of pCi/kg (et) + 2c) ,
1 4
h j Collection Date Location Be-7 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 '
i
. . . . . - . . ==... ....... _ -
10/27/82 33 500 260 LT 50 LT 50 49002 700 ,
2 a
i i
i a
i I. - _ . . . .
i (1) LT = Less Than i.
I l !
4 l
1 I
I l
.I 1
J i
t l
1 i
s r
t 35
Table 16 Gama Sy,ec,t,rone,try,,of Vege,t_at,1o,n, Sasp,1,e,s, PNPP REMP 1982 (Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +2a )
Collection Date Location Vegetation Type 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 K -40 09/29/82 38 (Antioch Road) Peaches LT 30 III LT 17 LT 19 1800 1 200 Acorn Squash LT 15 LT 16 1.T 16 2800 300 Pears LT 20 LT 13 LT 15 1200 100 M Cauliflower LT 20 LT 15 LT 15 2700 300 Apples LT 20 LT 12 LT 16 980 l50 Cabbage LT 20 LT 16 LT 17 2100 200 (1) LT = Less Than 6
-- ~ - - - _ - -
4 TA8t0 17
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR THE PERRY NPP RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONME NIAL MON 110 RING PROGRAM - 1982 (Sheet I of 3)
Name of Facility: Perry NPP Units I and 2, Doctet Nos. 50-440 and 50-441 Location of Facility: 35 Miles Northeast of Cleveland, Ohio (Lake Countyl Reporting Period: December 29, 1981, through January 04, 1983 Medium or Pathway Type and Location with Highest Annual Mean Sampled Total Inseber Lower All Indicator Control Location (Units of of Analyses Limit of ggy Locations Name, Distance Mean (f) { Mean (f) I2I Measurement) Performed Detection Mean (f) (Rangel and Otrection (Rangel (Rangel TLDs Gamma Dose 285 0.20 (262/262) Station 18 0.27 (12/12) 0.18 (23/23)
(mR/ day) (0.11 - 0.36) 5.0 miles 5 (0.20 - 0.36 ) (0.11 - 0.36)
Fish Gamma spec - 23 3600 (II/It) Only one Indicator location 3200 (11/12)
(ptt/Kg (wet)) K-40 - (2500 - 5900) sampled for this medium (2000-3600)
LLD ' !
Mn-54 1 30 LLO
- Fe-59 260 LLO LLD Co-58,60 130 LLD LLO In-65 260 LLD LLD Cs-134 130 LLD LLD Cs-137 150 28 (1/11) 20 (3/12)
(28-28) (16 - 28)
Shoreline Gasme Spec 8
. Sediments (ptt/Kg (dry))81-214 500 (3/6) Station 25 6 90 (1/2 ) 520 (1/2)
(430 - 690) 0.6 miles NNW (690-690) (520-520)
Pb-214 970 (6/6 ) Station 25 1100 (2/2) 720 (2/2)
(4 90 - 1500) 0.6 miles NNW (750 - 1500) (570 - 870)
R4-226 1600 (4/6) Station 27 1500 (2/2) 900 (1/2)
(1100-1800) 7.9 miles W5W (1100-1900) (900-900)
Pb-212 710 (6/6) Station 25 1100 (2/2) 5 90 (2/2 )
(270-1600) 0.6 miles NNW (490-1600) (280-900)
TI-208 500 (2/6) Station 26 590 (1/1) 440 (1/2)
(420-590) 4.2 miles ENE (590-590) (440-440) 4 Ac-228 770 (5/6) Station 25 1000 (2/2) 770 (1/2)
(280-1400) 0.6 miles puW (610-1400) (770-770) 1
! K-40 12,000 (6/6) Station 27 14,000 (2/2) 11,000 (2/2)
(7300 - 21,000) 7.9 miles W5W (7500 - 21.000) (8800 - 14,000)
Note: See footnotes at end of table.
- NUS C,GAPORATION y Q a" ^ v m o aoeve.2see Perry SP-810-09 PY-tCS/CEI-896 July 26, 1984 Mr. James Webb h745 The Cleveland Electric Illtrainating Co.
P. O. Box 97 Perry, OH 44081
Subject:
Revised 1982 RD9 Report
Dear Jim:
Addendu:n pages are provided for the 1982 annual report on the Perry Radiological Environmental bbnitoring Program (RDP) . 'Ihese pages reflect the a:x"putational correction to Reports of Analysis for Berrylium 7. The addendtrn pages include the follwing:
Table 8 Table 15 Table 17 (sheets 2 and 3 of 3)
Please enter these pages in your copy of the original report IUS-4338,"leatul Report for 1982 of the Preoperational Radiological Environmental bbnitoring Program at the Perry Nuclear P w er Plant."
The significance of these changes on the stw. of the 1982 report is nil.
Please contact Carl Yates or me if you need further information.
Sincerely, Y f A. Edgar Mitchell, Jr.
Project Manager Enclosures cc: PY/PO/DC R290 NDS File W245 R. Zucker h~245
- STWojtcrf'"W24$
S. Kensicki SB320 L. Lucia (Ihe County Health Dept.)
W. Page (Ohio DtJ1)
- C. Yates C. Marcinkiewicz C
Reference:
Ohio Scientific Collecting Permit #0160 for 1952 D E C E h> r D -
Issued to: Robert Louis Sherrn-N'JS Corporation t , , .
For: CEI-PNPP-Background Radiation Sttdf tb ~ 6. , c , , , , s b f
4 Addendum to 1982 Annual Report III
'$ Table 8 Gamma Spectrometry of Composited Air Partic'ulate Filters PNPP REMP 1982 (Results in Units of E-03 pCi/m3 .+ 2s)
' Sampling Quarter Composite Period Location Be-7 Ce-144 Cs-134 Cs-137 Nb-95 Zr-95 4 09/29/82 to 01/04/83 1 51 + 19 LT 7 LT 2 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 1 09/30/82*to 01/04/83 3 LT 20 LT 8 LT 2 LT 3 LT 3 LT 4
- 09/30/82 to 01/04/83 4 40 + 20 LT 10 LT 3 LT 4 LT 3 LT 3 09/30/82 to 01/04/83 5 51717 LT 8 LT 3 LT 1 LT 1 LT 5 i 09/30/82 to 01/04/83 6 44718 LT 8 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 LT 5 LT 10 LT 3 LT 2 LT 3 LT 7 10/28/82 to 01/04/83 35 71327 LT = Less Than l
(1) Be-7 values in original annual report (NUS-4338).
2 were of f by a factor of ten (10). ,
j i
i
}.
J-July 1984
, - - , . , . ~ , , , , . , m-. e.- --,,,-,,.,-..,-n,.-- ,_.>.m-.e-.e,,.. . - --
Addendum to 1982 Annual Report II' Table 15 Gamma Spectrometry of Feed / Silage PNPP REMP 1982 (Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) + 2s)
Collection Date Location Be Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 .
10/27/82 33 5000 + 2600 LT 50 (2) LT 50 4900 + 700 (1) Be-7 values in original annual report (NUS-4338) were off by a factor of ten (10).
(2) LT = Less Than l
! July 1984 i
i I
r l'
. _ _ . _ . . - _ . - . _ . . _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ . _ _ _ . ...__._._________.m . _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . . _ _ _..___._.. _ m .m. .m _ _ . _ . . - - . . _ _
ADi(NDtti TO 1982 ANWUet DEP0tt TAttt li SipeMRT OF DATA FOR TMt Ptpav NPP RAnlet0GICAL th9tt0antaTAL M0nliceING PROGRAN - 1983
) (Sheet 2 of 3) bene of Factitty: Perry WPP Units I and 2. Doctet Wes. 50-440 and 50-441 tecettee of f actitty: 35 Miles hertheast of Cleveland, ente (tete County) 4 Reporting Perled: Deceder 29, 1998, through Joneery 04, 1903 ;
- Medium er Peth-ey type end -
tecetten with IItghest t ~Annual Meen Semple 4 letal number lower All lediceter (Units of of Analyses CentrolMean location tecetfans (f) (2) limit ef ggg Wome, Dtstence Mean (f)(2)
Mes serement) Pettermed De tec tion Mean (f) (Range) and Direction (Renge) (Renge)
Shoreline ts-134 150 tt0 5edssents tt0 (cent. ) Cs-13T 100 350 (4/6) Stetten 26 440 (2/2) 400 (2/21 3
(140-470) 4.2 miles th( (400-470) (120-670)
Alrtporne Cross Deta-80 10 21 (65/66)
'; Particoletes 3 Stetten I. 3, 5 21 (48/42)I3I 21 (14/14) *
(9r42) 3.4 miles tut (9-42) (9-37)
(E-03 Kt/m ) 1.0 miles St 0.6 miles 5W Comme Spec-6 De-F 53 (4/5) Stetten 35 78 (t/l) 44 (1/l)
(40-71) 0.6 miles E (71-FI) (44-44)
Cc-144 180 '
Cs-134 ttD 50 ttD
- LLO Cs-137 60 ttD '
44-95 LLO 8t0 Fr-95 ltn 110 ttD
. t Air legtne 1-131-90 0.07 110 LLO trCt/m )
L heter Cross Dete-16 4 4.3 (12/12) Stetten 37 4.9 (4/4)
(pts /1) (2.9-5.6) 3.9 (4/4) 4.1 elles ret (4.4-5.6) (3.0-5.2) ce==e S.ec-es t
Be-140 60 (10 Co-5n ttD -
15 IID LLD to-60 15 tto
- L1D i
Cs-83e IS ttD tt0 ,
, ts-837 15 tIO LLD re-SS 30 tt0 ,
i 110 to-leo IS ttu ttn Pm-54 15 180 110 kh-S% IS tto 110 '
in-6S Jo llO tto Fr-95 318 lip I.to po te: 5ee feetnotes e t e=f nI tei.he ~'
i July 1984 ;
j.
i, i
___ _ - - . _ _ _ _ _ __. . . _ . _ _ _ - . _ _ _..__.___._m _--. _ _-.__.-_m_.m
~ m4 _
Alitit hDtH 10 1992 ANhuAt CIPORT TAME 17 I
SUM 1ARY OF DATA F0tt iltF PIRRY hPP RADIOLOCICAL INVIRONMthiAt M0hil0 RING PROGRAM = 1991 (5heet 3 of 3) base of Factitty: rerry NPP Units I and 2, Doctet Wes. 50-440 and 50-441
- location of f actitty: 35 titles northeast of Cleveland, Ohto (late Cotenty)
Reporting Perled: Deccat.er 29, 1981, through January 04, 19a4 Medlue or Pa thway Type and Sampled Total Ihemi.er tower All Indicator location with iJthest Annual Nean
~ ~
1 (Units of of Analyses llenit af t.ecations Name, Distance Neon (f)III Centrol
- Locatton(2)
Mean (f) ,
Measurement) Performrd Detection III Mean (f) (Rangel and Direction (Rangel (Range)
Ise ter T r f t t w=- 8 2000 310 (1/16) -
tte
! (ptt/l) (310-310)
Milk Camma Spec-4 Only one allt station, a control,
- trCl/l) was sospled during 1982 i Ba-140 60 tt0 Cs-134 15 LLO ,
ts-I]F 18 1300 (4/4) ta-140 (1300-1400) 15 LLD 7
l-131-54 I LLD Teed /5tiege Canna $pec-1 Only one Feed /$tlate Statten,
, (pct /tg (wet)) a centrol, was saap.ed during 1992. .
ae-2 5000 (1/I)
(5000-5000)
I Cs-134 ' 60 tt0 Cs-137 90 LLO R-40 4900 (1/3)
(4900-4900) !
Vege ta tion Comma $ rec-6 Only one vegetation station.
', trCt/ng (wet)) en tedicator location, was
! l-131 60 ttD saapted during 19R2.
Cs-134 60 LID g , ts-IJF 80 It0
+
t-40 1900 (4/6) i (980-2800)
(I) LtD ts lower llett of detectica as defined and revletred in U5 hat granch Techalcal Posittna on An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Mont toring Program. Feststen I, Noveneer 1979, 1
(2) (f) is the ratte of pesttive results to the mus4>cr of saaptes analyred for the parameter of Interest (3) Means are tdentical ter the three locattens, j (4) pe-2 values in original annual report (NUS-4338) were ef f try a f actor of ten (10),
. July 1984 I
e f
.. _-. _ _ _ . - - . . . . . . - - _ . . - . . - - ~ -. - - - . _ _ - ~ _ - .
TABLE 17
$UMART OF DATA FOR THE PERGY NPP RADIOLOGICAL INVIRONMENTAL MONITORING P90 Gam .1982 (5heet 2 of 3)
Name of f ac ti t ty: Perry NPP Units 1 and 2, Dociet hos. 50-440 and 50-441 Location of Factitty: 35 Miles hertheast of Cleveland, Ohio (Late County)
Reporting Period: Decamher 29, 1981, through January 04, 1983 leedium or Pathway Type and Location utth Highest Annual Mean Sampled Total Number Lower All Indicator ~
(Units of of Analyses Llatt of ggg Locations Name, Distance Mean (fl(2) . Control,,,,ggg Location (21 Measurement) Performed Detection leean (f) (Rangel and Direction (Rangel (Rangel d
Shoreline Cs-134 150 LtD LLD Sedteents (con'tl Cs-137 180 350 (4/6) Station 26 440 (2/2) 400 (2/21 (140 - 470) 4.2 elles ENE (400-470) (120-6701 4
Airborne Gross Beta-80 10 21 (65/66)
Particulates l Stations I, 3, 5 21 (41/42)(3) 21 (14/14) i (9-42) 3.4 alles ENE, I.0 (9-42 ) (9-37)
(E-03 pct /a l alles 51 , and 0.6 j
elles 5W Be-F 5.3 (4/5) Station 35, 7.1 (1/11 4.4 (1/l) i u (4.0-F.1) 0.6 elles E (7.1-F.11 (4.4-4.4)
O Ce-144 LLD LLO i Cs-134 50 LLD LLD 4
Cs-137 60 LLD LLO ub-95 LLD LLD Zr-95 LLD LLD
. Air Iodine- 1-131-40 0.07 LLD LLD
, 131 4 3 (PC1/e i ,
! Water Gross Beta-16 4 4.3 (12/12) Station 37 (pct /l) 4.9 (4/4) 3.9 (4/41 !
(2.9-5.61 4.1 elles ENE (4.4-5.61 (3.0-5.2)
Gamma Spec-16 i
Ba-It3 60 LLO LLD Co-58 15 LLD
i (LD La-140 15 LLO LLD Ito-54 15 LLD kb-95 LtB 15 LLD ILD In-65 30 LLD LLD Zr-95 30 LLD LLD "
.1 i
hote: See footnotes at end of table.
I f
l l,
F - + r - w-
. - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ . - . .- . - ~ _ . -... .-..- .. . - _ _ . - - . . .. .. -_ - . _ - . . . ._. - .. - _ _ ~ . . - . . . . .
TA8tt IF 5tsetAAV 0F 041A FOR THE PtRRY HPP SA010 LOGICAL ENVIRONMth1At MoulicalNG PROGRAM - 1982 (5heet 3 of 31
) meme of Factitty: Perry NPP units I and 2, Docket uns. 50-440 and 50-441 Location of Factitty: 35 Miles hortheast of Cleveland, fmto (Late County)
Reporting Period: Decomer 29, 1901, through January 04, 1983 leedte or Pathway Type and Location utth -
Highest Annual Mean Sampled Total haaber tower All Indicator ControlMeanlocation (Units of of Analyses Lielt af ggy Locations mese, Distance mean (f){ (f) (2) d feessurement) Performed Detection mean (f) (Rangel and Strection (Rangel (Rangel l Water Tritte -8 2G10 310 ft/6) Ltc .
I l (pct /Il (310-310)
Milk Gamma Spec-4 Only one milk station,a control, (pC1/II wes sampled during 1982.
Ba-140 60 LLO 1
Cs-134 15 LLD
.~
- 4 (1300-1400)
La-140 15 LLD i u
c l-131-4 1 LLO Feed / Silage Gaana 5.aec-1 Only one Feed / Silage (pC1/kg (metli Station, a control, was Be-7 sampled during 1962. 500 (1//11 (500-500)
- K-40 4900 (1/11 l
- (4900-4900)
Vegetation Gasuna 5pec-6 only one vegetation station, t (pct /tg (metll an indicator location, was ,
.I-131 60 LLD sampled during 1982.
Cs-134 60 LLS Cs-137 to LLD E-40 1900 16/61 4 (900-2000) 4 I (Il LLD is louer llett of detection as defined and regatred in USNBC Branch Technical
- Position on An Acceptable Sadiological Lautrommental Monitoring Program, Revision I,
! hoved er 1979.
(2) (f) is the rette of posttive results to the number of samples analyzed for the parameter of interest (3) Means are identical for the three locations.
)
i
l f
! V. LAND USE CENSUS e
A land use survey was performed in the environs of the Perry NPP on July 19 through July 21, 1982. The purpose of this survey was to .
identify the potential indicator milk sampling locations as well as the nearest vegetable garden and residence in each of the sixteen standard j sampling sectors around the plant. The outer bound of the survey for identifying the " nearest" or potential indicator locations was 5 miles. !
j In addition, candidate " control" milk sampling locations were [
identified. Table 18 identifies the nearest garden and residence in !
each sector for which one could be identified within the 5 mile radius.
Table 19 identifies all the potential indicator milk sampling locations
! within 5 miles of the plant. Candidate control milk sampling locations ;
are given in Table 20.
r I
[
i l
i i 1
t i
i
,j j
l l ;
5 f
h i !
i t
, 40
TABLE 18 Nearest Gardens and Residences Identified During the 1982 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey Nearest Residence Nearest Garden Direction (Distance / Address) (Distance / Address)
NE 0.5 miles 0.5 miles 4384 Lockwood 4384 Lockwood
, ENE 1.2 miles 1.2 miles 4611 Lockwood 4611 Lockwood E 1.1 miles 1.1 miles 2656 Antioch 2656 Antioch ESE 1.3 miles 1.3 miles i 2861 Antioch 2861 Antioch SE 1.2 miles 1.2 miles 4521 North Ridge 4521 North Ridge SSE 0.8 miles 0.8 miles 3119 Parmly 3119 Parmly 5 0.9 miles 0.9 miles Next to 3153 Center 3298 Center SSW 0.8 miles 1.5 miles Corner of Clark and Center 3787 North Ridge SW 1.3 miles 1.3 miles Perry Park, half way between 3078 Perry Park Clark and Parmly WSW 1.2 miles 1.2 miles Parmly, east of Perry Park 2970 Perry Park 41 i
TABLE 19 Milk Animals Identified During 1982 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey Number / Type Location of Animals Comments 1.2 miles E 2 Cows 2821 Antioch 2 miles E 8 Goats 2541 Townline 3.7 miles E Cows Major dairy Green Farm herd ident-Green & North Ridge ified by Ag.
Agent not seen AlsoIargeveg.
farm 1.3 miles ESE Cows? Hay / barn seen 3000 Antioch 2.6 miles ESE 1 Cow?
3234 McMackin -
3.5 miles ESE Cow? Barn, 4-legged across fr. 5851 beast seen Middle Ridge 1.3 miles SSE Cow 3608 Call Rd.
4 miles SE Goats Large herd 5638 South Ridge identified by Ag. Agent, not seen 1 mile SSE 2 Goats 3291 Parmly 2.4 miles SSE Cow?
3841 Call Rd.
3.5 miles SW Cow 77 Narrows Rd.
l 42 l
t
( TABLE 20 Control Milk Sampling Locations identified During the 1982 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey Location Description 12 miles SSE Brookglen Farm, 8187 Callow Rd. Major dairy herd 11 miles SSE Ruttger, Major 13863 Painesville-Warren Rd. dairy herd 10 miles SE Cross, goats 6717 Williams e
0 9
43
i )
4
{ VI. REFERENCES 1
l
)! :
i l 1. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conslission, "An Acceptable Radiological
- Environmental Manitoring Program, " Radiological Assessment j Branch Technical Position, November 1979, Revision 1.
- 2. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, ;
" Environmental Radiation Measurement, "NCRP Report No. 50, Washington, D. C., December 27, 1976 i
! 3. Oakley, D.C., " Natural Radiation Exposure in the United States,"
ORP/SID 72-1 Office of Radiation Programs, U. S. Environmental
! Protection Agency, Washington, D. C., June 1972.
1 ,
i i
I i
i
}
i i
h 1
i
?
=
i '
l l r
, 44 l
I APPENDIX A LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE l 1. Introduction The quality assurance program of the Radiological Laboratory of NUS is briefly descrioed in this appendix.
Information on each incoming sample is entered i t, a permanent log book. A sample number is assigned to each sample at the time of receipt. This sample number uniquely identifies each sample.
^
Laboratory counting instruments are calibrated, using radionuclide standards obtained from the National Bureau of Standards, the EPA, and reliable commercial suppliers, such as Amersham-Searle. Calibration of counting instruments is maintained by regular counting of radioactive reference sources. Background counting rates are measured regularly on all counting instruments. Additional performance checks for the gamma-ray scintillation spectrometer include regular checks i and adjustment, when necessary, of energy calibration.
i Blank samples are processed, with each group of samples analyzed for specific radionuclides, using radiochemical separation procedures.
Blank, spiked (known quantities of radioactivity added), and replicate samples are processed periodically to determine analytical precision and accuracy.
4 s
t l
l A-1 l
, - - - - - ,_ -y , y --r..--,. , - - .
- 2. Laboratory Analyses for Quality Assurance I i
) The quality assurance procedures employed in the conduct of I
! radiological monitoring programs by the Environmental Services l Oivision Padiological Laboratory are as required in Section 5.0 of the NUS Environmental Systems Group Quality Assurance Manual and detailed in the NUS Radiological Laboratory Manual. These procedures include the requirement for (1) laboratory analysis of samples distributed by appropriate government or other standards-maintaining agencies in a laboratcry intercomparison program, (2) analysis of so ne of the client's environmental samples split with other independent laboratories, and (3) analysis in duplicate of a specific fraction of the client's environmental samples.
3 The N"5 Radiological Laboratory participates in the U.S.
Environ') ental Protection Agency Radioactivity Intercomparison Studies (Cross-check) Program. The NUS results of analyses performed on samples pertinent to the Perry program and the known values are listed
- in Tables A-1 through A-17.
4 I
i i
I o
1
! A-2
O l
A-1 3\)l0NUCLIDES IN S0IL USEPA INTERCWARIS0N PROGRAM 1982 EPA Results NUS Results Collect. ion Date Nuclides + la pCi/gm + lo pC1'O.n 09/24/82 P0-210 5.2 2 0.5 --
RA-225 5.2 1 0.5 2.120.2 TH-230 5.720.3 4.4 0.5 U-238 5.0 t 0.4 2.3 0.2 (4.6 + 0.5) *
- Error in reported value was due to calculation. Activity was estiuated with 1 nilliliter of tracer added to the sample, whereas actually 2 milliliters of the tracer solution was added to the saiaple.
A-3
A-2 RADIONJ'LI W.S IN 414 FILTER
- USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1982
=... ............
EPA Value NUS Value Collection Date Radionuclide + le pri/ filter + la pCi/ filter 03/26/82 ' ALPHA 2724 2923 BETA 55 : 3 63 : 6 Sr-90 15.9 1 0.9 2023 C s-137 23 3 30 t (232 2)*
09/24/02 AlpitA 32 2 5 23 23 BETA 67 3 61 6 Sr.90 20 2 0.9 19.5 2.0 l Cs-137 2723 38 1 5 (292 3)*
i
- Reported value was calculated using composite air filter geometry, I
which was wallable at the tii.ie of analysis. Corrections were made later on using single air filter geometry.
1 A-4
A-3 l GROSS BETA IN WATER USEPA INTERCOMPAR! SON ht0diust 1932 EPA Results WX Results Collection Date + lo pCf/ lit + 13 pCi/ lit
............ ..... ==............ . .......
f 03/19/82 19 23 21 1 2 05/21/82 29 13 27 t 3 l 07/16/82 23 23 18 2 2 I
09/17/82 40 + 3 39 24 11/19/32 24 23 22 13
! 01/21/83 31 23 33 23 4
l 1
l l
l s
A-5
I J
A-4 l TRIT!UM IN WATER
.1 Collection Date f, lo pCi/ lit ; lo pCi/ lit l
04/09/82 2860 2 210 2%)
- 2id 1
06/11/32 1830 2 200 1900 190 ,
t 08/13/82 2390 2 210 2710 e 270 i 256) 10/08/82 204 2023 200 l I
t I
12/10/82 1990 2 200 2340 2 230 1 !
i l
t 1
i i
I i
l A-6
A-5 l
GAftM IN WATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1982
.........-=
EPA Results N:JS Results "ollection Date Nuclides + lopCi/ lit
+
- apCl/ lit I ;
} 02/05/82 CR-51 0 LT 55 CO-60 20 t 3 22 2 2
! ZN-65 15 2 3 LT 7*
RU-106 20 t 3 LT 28*
CS-134 22 2 3 21 2 2 CS-137 23 3 23 2 2 06/04/82 CR-51 23 2 3 LT 30' C0-60 29 2 3 30 2 3 ZN-65 26 2 3 26 2 3 RU-106 0 LT 30
- CS-134 35 2 3 35 2 3 CS-137 25 t 3 28 2 3 10/01/82 CR-51 51 2 3 43 2 8 CO-60 20 2 3 21 2 2 ZN-65 24 3 25 2 4 RU-106 30 2 3 LT 40' CS-134 19 t 3 19 2 2 CS-137 20 3 23 2 3 I
- Low sensitivity due to short counting time, and short half lives of the nuclides.
A.
A.6 GA!NA IN MILK USEPA INTERCOMPARISON Pa03 RAM 1982 EPA Results 111J$ Res alts Collection 0.ite 'lucl ides + lo pCl/ lit 1 lo pC1/11t 04/23/82 Co.60 30 2 3 12 2 3 CS.137 28 2 0.9 33 2 3 BA.140 0 LT 33*
K.40 14101 40 mg/11t 13402 130 10/22/92 CO-60 0 0 C5 137 34 2 3 34 2 3 BA.140 0 LT 7*
K.40 15602 45 ng/11t 1300 2 130
- Low sensitivit/ due to short count time, and short half Ilves of the nuclides.
A.8
l
. i A.7*
I 10'1t?F.131 IN MILK USEPA INTERCOMPARISi.1N 9 0.1 WI i PJ
- .. == ..........
1 EPA Resalts ifJS Results Collection Date 11 e pCi/ lit 11 e pC1/11t
..== ....~.... ................
4
- 07/23/82 5.4 e 0.5 4.8 : 0.5 j 10/'42/82 42 e 3 41 1 4*
I
- This result was not reported to EPA.
r 4
j 1
n j
i
}
A.9
A-8 L l
L ABORATORY :)WORMANCE EVALUATION ST00Y di4PA PROGRAM INTERCOMPARIS0ri NOMAi 1932 Radionuclides in Water: "Bl i nd" EPA Value NUS Value Collection Date 14uclides 1 10pCi/ lit 11opC1/11t 04/19/82 Al pha 85212 80 t 4 Beta 10623 100 10 SR-89 2423 'J0 t J 7t 93 1220.9 14 t 1 RA-226 10.910.9 22 e3 RA 228 11.021.0 13.2e2.1 C0-60 0 t.T 5 CS-134 15 t 3 11 12 CS-137 1613 1812 0 16.523 --
10/15/82 Al pha 5518 4825 Deta 8123 7417 SR-89 0 LT 1.1 SR-90 17.220.9 17.522 RA-226 12.5t 1.1 14.4t1.0 RA-228 3.620.3 2.4t1.0 CO 60 0 LT 3 CS-134 1.8t0.3 220.2 CS 137 20t3.0 2122 U 1623 IS t 2 i
i A-10
A-9 GAtt'tA l'1 S'A! is O'.1321 of 21 l N'JS Radiological laboratory Internal Quality Control Program 1982 OUPLICATE ANALYS!S Result #1 Result #2 Collection Date Nm:111.rs - Ro % I/kg f.2epCf/kg 05/25/82 Co-58 LT 50 LT 40 Co-60 LT 50 LT 60 CS-134 LT 40 LT 30
- 1. Cs-137 LT 40 LT 40 I
Fe 59 LT 140 LT 200 K-40 3600t 600 31002 600 Hn-54 LT 40 LT 40 I Zn-65 LT 90 LT 110 07/15/82 Be-7 13002 200 19002 200 C s-134 LT 20 LT 30 CS 137 LT 20 LT 30 1-131 LT 50 LT 70 K 40 3400 400 48002 500 08/24/82 C s-134 ,'
LT 130 LT 80 C5-137 LT 140 LT 110 Pb 212 120e 70 100t 50
- Ra-226 LT 1200 LT 1100 10/17/82 Co 58 LT 30 LT 40 Co 60 LT 60 LT 50 Cs-134 LT 30 LT 40 CS-137 LT 40 LT 40 Fe-59 LT 150 LT 110 K-40 2200t 700 LT 3000
=
LT = Less Than 1
i A 11
. j i
i A.9 GA!NA IN SOLIDS (Page 2 of 2)
N'JS Radiological Laboratory Internal Qua11ty control Program 1982 DUPLICATE, ANALYS,1,S, [
Result #1 Result #2 Collection Date Nuclides 12opCi/kg 1 2a pCi/kg 10/17/82 Mn-54 LT 40 LT 50 Zn.65 LT 150 LT 110 10/26/82 Co.58 LT 15 LT 20 Co-60 LT 30 LT 30 Cs-134 LT 20 LT 20 Cs-137 LT 20 LT 20 Fe-59 LT 80 LT 80 K-40 34002 500 3700 400 Mn-54 LT 20 LT 20 Zn-65 LT 80 LT 70 SP!KES OR DLIND ANALYSIS Expected Result Reported Result Collection Date Nuci bles t2opC1/kg t2,op,Ci/kg 09/21/82 Cs-134 0 LT 110 Cs-137 0 LT 120 12/17/82 C s-137 1100t200 1200 2 200 LT = Less Than A 12
1 s
J
! A-10 ;
.! GROSS BETA IN AIR fit.fER r i NOS Radiological Laboratory [
, Internal Quality Control progra..i ;
l 1982 OPLICATE ANALYSIS !
T '
I j Result #1 Result #2
- Collection Date + 2e x E-03 pC1/m 3
+ 2e x E-03 pCi/m3 l
l 01/09/62 3017 2728 - t j 05/22/62 16 i 7 19 2 7 05/J1/82 LT 8 LT 9 I 06/22/82 19 6 18 6 j 07/13/82 826 10 i6
) 07/14/82 12eti 9.7 2 S.6 l 03/04/82 1226 11 5 l 08/21/82 28 i 7 2827 ,
8.116.2 8.6 26.2
! 08/31/82 -
09/07/82 16 26 18 7 ,
09/14/82 28 i 7 25 2 7 l 09/21/82 24 9 2529 i
10/09/82 2728 27 28 i 10/23/82 1926 22 7 j 10/;!G/32 15 7 16 e7 4
10/26/87 20 26 27 2 6 j 11/06/82 1927 1227 '
i 11/23/82 58 16 53 214 i 11/30/82 30 28 34 28
) 12/07/82 11 z 7 12 27 l 12/14/82 2327 24 2 7 !
1 12/21/82 4426 42 26 1 12/25/82 26 7 28 27
) 01/01/83 2727 27 27 l 01/'J4/83 31 t 6 31 26 I i j -
i 4
h l l
A-13 -
I 1
A-11 GAP 94A IN AIR FILTER :
1 (Page 1 of 2)
NUS Radiological Laboratory i Internal Quality Control Prograa 1932 J
DUPLICATE ANALYSIS l j
Result #1 3 Result #2 3
- Collection Date Nuclides + 2e x E-03 pCi/m + 2a x E-03 pC1/m i ....... ..... ......._ -
i 10/02/82 Be.7 4.9 1.7 4.8s 1.6 3
Ce-144 LT 6 LT 6
- Cs-134 LT 2 LT 2 i Cs-137 LT 2 LT 1.6
! Nb-95 LT 1.9 LT 3.9 1 Ir-95 LT 2 LT 2
)
01/04/83 Be-7 7.12 2.7 5.82 1.2 Ce-144 LT 10 LT 3 *
- Cs-134 LT 3 LT 0.8 Cs-137 LT 2 LT 0.8 Nb-95 LT 3 LT 0.7 ll Zr-95 LT 7 LT 0.7 l SPIKES OR, B, LINO ANALYSIS i
i Expected Result Reported Result Collection Date Nuclides 2,o pC,1/ filter 2 2e pC1/ filter L
!' 08/04/82 Co-57 162 4 182 4 Co-60 1602 30 170 30 Cd-109 560 110 540s 120 Ce-139 102 2 11 3 160 20 Cs-137 150 30
, Hg-203 1.31 0.3 LT 2.5
- Sn-113 272 6 302 11 l
' LT 4.3 Sr-85 7.72 1.5 i j Y-88 472 10 572 21 1
LT = Less Than i
i A-14
l t
A-11 GAMMA IN AIR FILTER (Page 2 of 2)
NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Quality Control Prograia 1982 SPIXES OR , BLIND ANALYSIS Expected Result Reported Result Collection Date Nuclides + 2a pC1/ filter + 2 e pCi/ filter 09/27/82 Co.60 1200 200 1400: 200 Cs-137 110 20 932 19 7 12/14/32 Cs.137 562 11 50 e 9 ;
r i
V A-15
i A-12
. 10 DINE-131 IN CHARC0AL FILTER TJS Radiological Laboratory Interrul Qaality Control Program - l 1982 ;
DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result #1 Result #2 3 l
Collection Date + 2e pCi/m + 2 epC1/m j - _ . . . ...... ...
j 10/19/82 LT 0.07 LT 0.015 11/09/82 LT 0.01 LT 0.01 11/18/82 LT 0.05 LT 0.07 12/21/82 LT 0.04 LT 0.02 ;
. 11/26/82 LT 0.03 LT n.03 i
s I-LT = Less Than l
l A-16 i
L L
1 A-13 GROSS BETA IN WATER NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Quality Control Program 1982 DUPLICATE _ ANALYSIS Result #1 Result #2 Collection Date + 2e pCi/ lit + 2e pCi/ lit 05/03/82 3.2 1.5 3.6 1.5 05/20/82 LT 8 8.52 5.2 4
06/14/82 3.52 1.3 1.71 1.2 l 06/14/82 1101 20 1001 10 l 06/21/82 2.11 1.2 LT 1.8
~
l 07/03/82 3.52 1.4 3.01 1.4 07/12/82 1002 10 932 10 07/15/82 1.92 1.4 2.51 1.5 07/20/82 4.02 2.5 4.72 2.5 07/29/82 71,000 8,000 71,3502 8,000 08/04/82 2.61 1.2 4.32 1.3 08/05/82 LT 8 LT 8 10/21/82 6.6t 5.5 LT 9 11/30/82 LT 6 LT 6 01/15/83 LT 2 2.3 1.4 SPIKES OR_ BLIND ANALYSIS Expected Result Reported Result Collection Date 2_c pCi/ lit 2e pCi/1,it
_11/03/82 900 200 1200 200 ,
LT = Less Than A-17
A-14 TRITIUM IN WATER (Page 1 of 2)
J JS Radiological Laboratory Internal Quality Control Prograin 1982 DUPLICATE E , ANALYSIS Result #1 Result 82 Collection Date + 2a pCi/ lit i 2a pCi/ lit 02/13/82 1000 500 1300 400 05/18/82 LT 370 7 LT 370 07/20/82 (3 2 0.3) x 10 7 (3 0.3) x 10 77 03/18/82 (2.9 0.3) x 10 (2.8 !0.3) x 10 09/01/82 LT 300 LT 300 09/08/82 LT 300 LT 300 09/15/82 3300 2400 2900 300 SPIKES AND REFERENCE ANALYSIS Expected Result Reported Result Collection Date 2_ o pCi/ lit 2, e pCi/ lit 03/25/82 '
2000 2400 2000 2200 04/21/82 2000 400 2000 2200 05/08/82 4500 900 4500 2500 07/01/82 4200 800 4000 400 07/03/82 4500 900 4700 2500 07/13/82 4500 900 4200 500 07/27/82 4500 900 4700 500 08/03/82 2000 400 2000 400 08/04/82 4503 9dd 4dd0 2400 03/11/82 4503 9]O 4400 600 09/01/82 4200 800 4300 2500 09/07/82 4200 :800 4600 500 09/07/82 2000 400 1800 200 09/17/82 4500 2900 4200 2500 LT = Less Than r
A-18
2 A-14 j TRITIUM IN WATER (Page 2 of 2)
N;JS Radiological Laboratory
, Interasi lJality Control Program j 1982 SPIKE AND REFERENCE ANALY_SI,S, I , Expected Result Reported Result Collection Date + 2e pCi/ lit + 2e pCi/ lit
= . . _ _ _ . . . . . . . .
11/01/82 4500 900 4700 500 11/03/82 11,000r 2,000 -10,000 1,000 i
j 12/03/82 45002 900 3800 400 ,
j 01/03/82 4500 900 4300 400 4
4 i
B A-19
A-15 1 GAMt1A IN WATER (Page 1 of 3)
N;JS Radiological Laboratory Internal Quality Control Program 1982 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS Result #1 Result #2 Collection Date Nuclides f;2opCi/ lit j; 2 e pCi/ lit 03/27/82 Ba-140 LT 300 LT 300 Co-58 LT 40 LT 40 Co-60 LT 40 LT 60 Co-134 LT 60 LT 60 Cs-137 LT 50 LT 50 Fe-59 LT 200 LT 110 La-140 LT 200 LT 160 Mn-54 LT 60 LT 60 Nb-95 LT 60 LT 60 Zn-65 LT 110 LT 110 Zr-95 LT 110 LT 110 07/03/82 Ba-140 LT 90 LT 110 Co-58 LT 20 LT 20 Co-60 LT 20 LT 30
< Cs-134 LT 20 LT 20 Cs-137 LT 20 LT 20 4
Fe-59 LT 40 LT 40 La-140 LT 60 LT 60 Mn-54 LT 20 LT 20 Nb-95 LT 20 LT 30 Zn-65 LT 50 LT 50 Zr-95 LT 40 LT 50
, LT = Less Than P
A-20 i
I A-15 GAMMA IN WATER (Page 2 of 3) 4 NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Quality Control Progra:a 1932 DUPt.ICATE ANALYSIS Result #1 Result #2 Collection Date Nuclides + 2a pCi/ lit + 2a pCi/ lit 10/30/82 Ba-140 LT 19 LT 40 Co-58 LT 4 LT 8 Co-60 LT 5 LT 11 C s-134 LT 3 LT 8 Cs-137 LT 3 LT 7 Fe-59 LT 11 LT 16 La-140 LT 14 LT 13 Mn-54 LT 7 LT 7 Nb-95 LT 4 LT 8
, Zn-65 LT 4 LT 18 4
Zr-95 LT 8 LT 14 4
11/16/82 Ba-140 LT 9 LT 9 Co-58 LT 3 LT 2 Co-60 LT 3 LT 4 Cs-134 LT 3 LT 3 Cs-137 LT 3 LT 2 Fe-59 LT 5 LT 7 La-140 LT 5 LT 5 Mn-54 LT 3 LT 3 Nb-95 LT 2 LT 3 Zn-65 LT 7 LT 7
, Zr-95 LT 5 LT 5 I
LT = Less Than A-21
l A-15 l GARiA IN WATER (Page 3 of 3)
HUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Quality Control Program 1982 DUPLICATE ANALY,S,I,S, Result #1 Result #2 Collection Date Nuclides + 2e pCi/ lit + 2e pCi/ lit
......- =-=....... ....
11/29/82 Ba-140 LT 13 LT 17 Co-58 LT 5 LT 4 Co-60 LT 7 LT 6 Cs-134 LT 4 LT 4 C s-137 LT 4 LT 3 Fe-59 LT 12 LT 9 La-140 LT 13 LT 13 Mn-54 LT 4 LT 5 g Nb-95 LT 4 LT 4 Zn-65 LT 11 LT 8 Zr-95 LT 9 LT 8 SPIKES OR BLIND ANALYSIS Expected Result Reported Result Col 1 ec ti,on, ,D,a te, Huclides ,2,o pCif,1,1,t 2,c p,Cif,1,1 t.
07/19/82 Cs-134 29 6 21 5 C s-137 39 8 38 7
, 07/19/82 Cs-134 43 8 3926 Cs-137 60 12' 49 8 09/08/82 C s-134 96 20 82 ! 19 Cs-137 97 20 110 20 11/03/82 C s-137 790 160 820 90
~.............. _ ...
LT = Less Than t
A-22
A-16 GA!tiA IN MILK '
(Page 1 of 2) ,
NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Quality Control Program 1982 DUPLICATE, ,AN_ALYSIS Result #1 Result #2 Collection Date Huclides + 2 opCi/ lit +_ 2 opCi/ lit 07/31/82 Ba-140 LT 17 LT 14 Cs-134 LT 3 LT 3 Cs-137 LT 4 LT 3
- I-131 LT 8 LT 4 K-40 1100 200 13 tit) 200 La-140 LT 9 LT 9 08/10/82 Ba-140 LT 14 LT 13 C s-134 LT 4 LT 3 Cs-137 LT 4 LT 4 I-131 LT 5 LT 7 K-40 1300 700 1300 200 La-140 LT 9: LT 8 09/11/82 Ba-140 LT 19 LT 20 Cs-134 LT 7 LT 8 Cs-137 LT 8 LT 8 K-40 1200 e200 1300 200 La-140 LT 9 LT 15 12/14/82 Ba-140 LT 40 LT 12 Cs-134 LT 12 LT 4
I A-23
__ _ . _ , , . . _ , , _ _ - .~. ,,. - . _ . . , . _ .
A-16
, GAT 1A IN MILK (Page 2 of 2)
NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Quality Control Program 1982 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
_....__.................- ___ .. . _-=-
Result #1 Result #2 Collection Date Nuclides + 2e pCi/ lit + 2a pCi/ lit
- _ . . . _ . =- - ......... . . .. .
12/25/82 Ba-140 LT 20 LT 16 C s-134 LT 9 . LT 6 Cs-137 LT 11 LT 7 K-40 1200 200 1300 2200 La-140 LT 13 LT 7 l
SPIKES OR BLIND ANALYSIS Expected Result Reported Result Col 1ection Date Nuclides ,2a p,C,1/1it 12e p,C,if,1,1,t 09/21/82 Cs-134 220 40 200 30 Cs-137 220 40 230 !40 I-131 50 10 59 25 10/19/82 C s-137 110 20 120 30 11/16/82 C s-137 110 20 110 20 4
12/14/82 C s-137 110 40 100 30 LT = Less Than i
1 A-24
A-17 10 DINE-131 Ir4 r4 ILK NUS Radiological Laboratory Internal Quality Control Prograa 1932 SPIKE OR BLIND ANALYSIS 1 __ -
Expected Results Reported Results Collection Date + 2e pCi/ lit + 2e pCi/ lit 3 07/20/82 1300 300 1400 : 200 ,
07/20/82 0 LT 1.0 10/19/82 11 2 9.7 1.0 11/16/82 20 4 18 2 12/14/82 11 2 9.9 1.0 1
i J
I i
i '
LT = Less Than i
I 4
1 1
i
.i A-25
APPENDIX B REPORTING OF ANALYTICA'. RESULTS In the tables presenting analytical measurements, t he calcula ted val a s is r v arted with the two signa counting error (2e ) derived from a statistical analysis of both the saiyle t Lt 51:%yound count ra tes. The precision of the resalts is influenced by the size of the sample, the background count rate, and the method used to round off the vain htsic:t to reflect the degree of significance of the resul ts. For analytical resul ts obtained from gamma spectral analysis, the precision is also influenced by the composition and
! concentrations of the radionuclides in the sample, the size of the s+aple, and the assumptions used in selecting the radionuclides to be quantitatively determined. T he two signa error for the net counting rate is:
R R s b 2e=2 +
t t s b w here R = sample counting rate 3
Rb = background counting rate t s= sample counting time t b= background counting time 1
s B-1
." 1 If the measurements on the saisiples are not statistic.tlly significant (i.e., the two sig.:14 comit errar is equal to or greater than the net measured value), then the radioactivity concentrations iri the s.s.aple are considered not detected.
Results reparted as less than ("LT") are below the lower limit of detection (LL3). The U.0 is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95 perceqt jenability with only 5 percent probability of falsely concluding that blank observation. represents a "real" signal.
B-2
-_ _ _ ~ . . _ .
For a particular .neasureinent system (that may include radioc temical separation): ,
- 00S LLD = b E x V x 2.22 x Y x exp (- A a t) where:
. LL3 is the lower limit of detection as defined above (as p01 per unit mass or volume) s b
is ?.he standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute)
E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration) j Y is the sample size (in units of mass or volume) 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie Y is the fractional radioctemical yield (when applicable)
A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide at is the elapsed time between sample collection and counting B-3
l The following are definitions or descriptions of statistical terms used in the reporting and analysis of environ 11 ental monitoring resul ts.
Precision relates to the reproducibility of niess jee.aents within a set, that is, to the scatter or dispersion of a set about its central value.
Measures of the Central Value of a Set. Mean (or Average or n
Aritivnetic Mean) is the sa.n I X of the values of individual results divided by the number of"desults in the set. T t.s mean is given by:
n X = (X1 . + X 2 ****X n
!"
- I /
1" i=1 Measures of Precision with a Set. Standard Deviation is the square root of the quantity (suin of squares of deviations of individual results from the mean, divided by one less than the number of results in the set). The standard deviation, s, is given by:
n s= r (X'. - X)2 / (n-1) i=1 Standard deviation has the same units as the measurement. I t.
becomes a more reliable expression of precision as n becomes larger.
When the measurements are independent and normally distributed, the most useful statistics are this 4tto for the central value and the standard deviation for the dispersion.
B-4
. o
. , . . . .- _ - - - . . -. - - . . . . . . - . ~ . - - - .... -
Relative Standard Deviati,on is the standard deviation egrassed as a i j Fraction of the inean, s/X. It is sometimes multiplied by 100 and j expressad as a percentage, j Range is the difference in magnitude between the largest and the staallest - re321 ts' in a set. Instead of a single value, the actual limits are saiietities expressed (minimuin value/ maximum value).
}
i 1
i o
I i
4
.i c
B-5 l
f t
-,. . _ . . . _ , _ - - - , - _ . . _ . . - _ . _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ , , _ - - - _ _ - ~ . ,
,g w -.--+ _. . .. . g. .. - ---m- wmu,,. . -
- 4 p , ~r y ~m -~ --
. . y , .
- e- p'
- 3. .g
., , 4 ~
- - s a+- -
q
. i s.., ,.
q.
- v , ^ , . .
wc', A.- . u u ..,x ,
.. >... ,4 .
. . . . . . t o.. , .
. s
' : / y . -
- b. ,
, . r , w; c ;
s.. _ . ,
m .. s . .- - ..#. ) ,. s ., ..
- n
,s. <
0.
- . , . .w _/ - , 8
.s e -4, ,. ,
+>~ .. - . .
~....,
m.
, ,, w ,.
'",.c. . ,
- m. , .y .
ec.
,. - . .g
- g T' 3y.*q.
NUS Corporatioer , . @4' {t.- Domestic Offlees J , (intuational Offices
.% 2_m _. m, -. _. _._g ,-,,.-w..n-..s,. ,-
- n g.n., ---
m p ?fNken' n.~.,- .
910 Clopper Road .
c i on Brazil
_ Chicago _ yt,y' L_ Q Germany
.s. w. ,- o, cleannater . m ,C
~
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
. 1: 301 - : riei ,
. ,.9 Japan s TWX:7104280540 ' '
t~ . Columbia .. , . .... Sh. eSaudi Arabia
^." ^ -Venezuela
. NUSWASH . a; e Denver <
_ _ w' ~ x.- 7.m 2 Houston ~
v ' Yugoslavia
,. .a
.< ^ , Menio Park ; '4 y ,, 4-M* , s
>..w yc g..;V ? Portland ~
%, e.
,,B* *~4 g . g f' - F
'g- , ..
- . San Diego : ... , ,y ,:z., y'
~
- 1- ,,
.e .n- 3,y, ,. . . . .c.m 1-u,,Qf. -
.,. 4 0 -- g @- ', . 't k j of.l ' n .d. , .a , s->s4,p',"--'s.,,
c .. . . . .
' -**' ' ... ' *. -- ' ' ,,. a, 9:' .
.my -
<.'-.p=,.;, ggs
%m' f,,.: e 'a'
%" .a *,s. pg,^ .
y b 8** f' g
~
-- f 'e%.Ts
.8, 6
- $ 4L t g"U ' A' :*l"
5,. w ,% 4 $[.*,,$-"p+g,'.*.f
- p,0' , ,,, .
.G.
- - , . ,i
, , ,, .j *% ' . -. s.-
~.,e, 4-g g s 4..y...-4 ..,
,.,.p
- ,,, w
. , . '*,. _,..= =
d
> , _48. [M.
+ .M $ .
- y. ,.I a
.. . , ~ ._.; w . 4. ,1
..e,4, ,
e a. y g % 'b .n'e,~. l ,. > g,
,. w- , , > ~ S, , f., ) "b.2* ,, , . J' :.
< g *,y . , f v. ,,.V4 . ;. 3 .
f.,,sy 9. w. 4 g*, g e . - , .
g g g, n 4a, ..p,-
- Yf**
^ ye _ ',' f m + .y*l,[4 .l , g --f n) ,
,9 #
..%~ ~-
.a g. .
. , ,.Q
}., .-,,-.,.,.#.
5 e- ('-
2,~,._, ~ p ,. u, . .g. Y _ ' '
e*g e
. e- gqg_, ; .,., ,c.s. ..s.4.'s. ,, ,t..$,e .," ""s"^
, , . , ,s 'c
~
- 4. .*,* .
z t
-: /aee. . .
.gc , ,i - s , f.# y: , e . .
. , p. .- y y e,y ,
.u >
~+ ,- : s } ' , .
s-N ., ,j
'f+ ' s y ,*.,, * ^ M, ,e i s 4
m
.,*.,e..
e s
4 V a ) y,.. s ;,c' ,9 '7, y3,.3
'"a 2 , ' " * - e
,i , .s , _j r _*e.a,]
{ g , T.'\ e g
,..y,--* W.
e -y,~ ,
y..%-
,, ~.
..~ ,,,.
~'m- n .~ , Q J, ,
g
- . ., m i,. t a
,z. 'e
- m. %',.
," s e g e / g .,
y sv. . , %. ,s %,
' s
- h g.y 4
[- .. a 9
9~,'
M. > ,) .i r'y'q{m -.
j [ is .,
b &
'# ',4 D. >f a m+
[ , ;,
.'=< # ?. 5$ ' ,,. ,* <*ye *,. t, g ~, . '
> , , .e, .4..,. * ., .,4 . . 1 .g r),4 ,
, .,s**h g*f.*,-s*c , = . ' a a s. . . 3 f
g r ' I {!
n
- s~
r * -. 4 k - #!
., . e .,^ {g j $4y 't.,C [
,-x .< . ", - -+,yg .. . . . , , d. 6-! ',.Y}y k i. . ,
- e;
.t .
a
- ,j ., )f' 1,,c*.
, *; ;. ~ - . -? , s .t : - ; ~ f %. e' l 5. ">. -*, 's'; <4 ** M, . s-p., s % i. ,s.. , . , * . ! -M
..rs ,w" , "' 44. -., .. . Mt'.ne.
,~ c-,. . > 1e. . . , r. ,,, . ts *, - . , .*' , ,. *' .s. e. 'M
- . ' " A', g -
F a.
- _ g*g,'- e. t 3
- =e.I e j ,. m.* ' e*' ,', h'
'6
' ** k,lU. ' ~7 s n...- 4.,- n s
- ,/ [ %,, , p*.s, ki - # . .. c g.t'
- ._,_ *y"
- b M ,%59g% -
mg g.' p / - 4 ,," 9 ,t .,* * + N e*[ h A ,
,M'.
- ~i -
n_ L -
',&'*f
- y;' v4
.> ~ -f A # k: ',}' < ~ -
+qggM s+a u ,
- .MA.h"$,b%g%pg,'le,l,M.'Q?yg&%
- Qp w ,u .
-yg- w.-
- ~ ?W g yQ: x'
'- l e
- , g g,
4-- ,
= d r
+ - h
'; Inr .h
, . ..- I,. r
+v. g aa g..
J'
& 4 -
.#e' 8=~, ;
r q, +
, - a >w ,
- ,, r l .
. * . g ,
\. %.e','
6
?#
^om-i,.-
, i
- '*y' . . ,
g a,, e -
an I O 4 O
e h
,
- W g e '
n * .
.. j 8%
'( E
_g'_,_
g_- '
j
~
m i - , as
.a . .
=[ 4
^
fj
- + i ,
,', , ' e' s .
+
. 4 I ,-==Ww
- % ' A e 4
y.-
I s
e .
4 ,. " '% "4 4'-
n I -
9 or i .
. 4
, . :,[ , $
~
+ J
a"'. A s 'q
-(+ ,
e ., .- - .. . .
A A 5-- -, - ^ E , a_'A , . ,, p . L. a. __3a ..L - - _a s = . - m. _m -
___me, ,,g a ,.
, g P'_-A -
,,, M, , ,,
. - , - -. . - - _ _ . . _ .._ _ . . .,,, , . . ._ - - . ., _____.. ___ _ - _