ML20133B146
| ML20133B146 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1983 |
| From: | Yates C NUS CORP. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUS-4514, NUDOCS 8508060083 | |
| Download: ML20133B146 (100) | |
Text
-
I NUS-4514 ANNUAL REPORT FOR'1983 0F THE PRE 0PERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM AT THE PERRY NUCLEAR POWLR PLANT Prepared for The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company by Carl R. Yates July 1984 Environrental Services Division NUS Corporation 5350 Campbells Run Road Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15205
$ Gn 2,:1 R ' (!<
' A. Edgar Mitchell, Jr.jf f
/
Project Manager 2 -
rles J. Marxink ewicz Manage Radiological Laboratory hy*
l l3&g l~~
AS2T R
pn yo
Table of Contents Section Title Page I.
Introduction I-l A.
Site and Station Description 1-1 B.
Objectives and Overview of PNPP Monitoring Program I-2 II.
Program Description 11-1 III.
Sampling Methods and Procedures III-1 A.
Direct Radiation III-2 B.
Fish III-3 C.
Sediment III-3 D.
Airborne Particulates/ Air Iodine-131 III-4 E.
Wa ter III-5 F.
Milk / Silage III-5 G.
Vegetables and Food Products III-5 IV.
Summary and Discussion of 1983 Analytical Results IV-1 A.
Direct Radiation IV-2 B.
Fish IV-3 C.
Sediment IV-3 0.
Air Particulates/ Air Iodine-131 IV-4 E.
Wa ter '
IV-5 F.
Milk / Silage IV-6 G.
Vegetables and Food Products IV-6 V.
Land Use Census V-1 VI.
References VI-1 i
Appendix A Laboratory Quality Assurance Appendix B Reporting of Analytical Results I
f l
L
LIST OF TABLES (Page 1 of 2)
Table Numbers Title Page 1
PNPP Radiological Environmental T-1 Monitoring Program 2
Sample Locations and Media for the Perry Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program T-3 3
Direct Radiation - Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Results for Monthly Exchange Cycles T-6 4
Comparison of Annual and Average-Monthly Direct Radiation Measurements T-10 5
Gassa Spectremetry of Fish Samples T-11 6a Gamma Spectrometry of Sediment Samples T-13 6b Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Sediment Samples T-14 7
Gross Beta in Air Particulate Filters T-15 8
Garma Spectrometry of Composited Air Particulate Filters T-18 9
lodine-131 in Charcoal Cartridges T-21 10 Gamma Spectrometry of Water Samples T-24 11 Gross Beta in Water-T-26 12 Tritium in Water, Quarterly Composited by Location T-28 13 Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Water T-29 14 Gamma Spectrometry of Milk Samples T-30 15 Iodine-131 in Milk T-33 11
J LIST OF TABLES (Page 2 of ?)
Table Numbers Title Page i
16 Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Milk T-35 17 Gamma Spectrometry of Feed / Silage T-36 18 Gamma Spectrometry of, Vegetation Samples T-37 l
19 Summary of Data for the Perry NPP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 1983 T-38 20 Nearest Gardens and Residences Identified During the 1983 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey.
T-42 21 Milk Animals Identified During the 1983 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey.
T-43 22 Control Milk Sampling Locations Identified During the 1983 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey.
T-45 j
i 4
t e
f i
i L
i i
f fii l
LIST OF FIGURES Figure Numbers Title g
1 Sampling Locations Within 5 Miles of F-1 the PNPP 2
Sampling Locations Greater than 5 Miles from the PNPP F-2 3
Average Monthly Ambient Radiation Levels.
in the Vicinity of the Perry NPP - 1983 F-3 4
Average Weekly Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulates in the Vicinity of the Perry NPP - 1983 F-4 I
IV L
I.
INTRODUCTION The preope' rational radiological environmental monitoring program for Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) was initiated in March 1981 and will continue until fuel
- loading, presently scheduled for December 01, 1984.
This program is being conducted by NUS Corporation under contract with The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI).
Th.*? is the third Annual Report for the radiological environmental monitcring program being conducted under the contract.
This report covers the period December 28, 1982 through January 4, 1984 and summarizes the results of measurements and analyses of data obtained from samples collected during this interval.
A.
Site and Station Description PNPP will consist of two BWR units, each designed to operate at a power level of about 1205 megawatts wi th the main condenser circulating water cooled by a system of closed-loop na tural draft i
cooling towers. The plant is located on Lake Erie, on approximately 1100 acres, about thirty-five (35) miles northeast of Cleveland, Chio and about seven (7) miles northeast of Painesville, Ohio. PNPP is situated in borth Perry Village in northeas tern Lake Coun ty,
Ohio.
t i
I t
l I-1 1
I I..
f B.
Objectives and Overview of PNPP Nonitoring Program United States Nuclear Regula tory Commission (USNRC) regulations require that nuclear power plants be designed, constructed, and operated to keep levels of radioactive material in ef fluents to unrestricted areas as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) (10 CFR 50.34). To assure that these criteria are met, each license f
authorizing reactor operation includes technical specifications (10 l
CFR 50.36a) governing the release of radioactive ef fluents.
In-plant monitoring will be used to assure that these prede termined release limits are not exceeded. However, as a precaution against unexpected and undefined processes which might allow undue accumulation of radioactivity in any sector of man's environment, a program for monitoring the plant environs is also included.
The regulations governing the quantities of radioactivity in reactor effluents allow nuclear power plants a contribute, at most, only a I
few percent increase above normal background radioactivi ty.
Background levels at any one location are not constant but vary with tire as they are influenced by external events such as cosmic ray bombardment, weapons test fallout, and seasonal variations. These levels also can vary spatially wi thin relatively short distances reflecting variations in geological composition. Because of these l
spatial and temporal variations, the raciological surveys of the plant environs are divided into preoperational and operational l
phases. The preoperational phase of the program of sampling and measuring radioactivity in various media permits a general characterization of the radiation levels and concentrations prevailing prior to plant operation along with an indication of the degree of natural variation to be expected. The operational phase I
of the program obtains data which, when considered along with the j
data obtained in the preoperational phase, assist in the evaluation j
of the radiological impact of plant operation.
4 j
I-2
Implementation of the preoperational monitoring program fulfills the following objectives:
- 1. Evaluation of procedures, equipment and techniques.
- 2. Identification of potentially important pathways to be monitored af ter the plant is in operation.
- 3. Neasurement of background levels and their variations along potentially important pathways in the area surrounding the plant.
4
- 4. Provision of baseline data for statistical comparison with future operational analytical results.
Sampling locations were selected on the basis of local ecology, meteorology, physical characteristics of the region, and demographic and land use features of the site vicinity.
The preoperational program was designed on the basis of the USNRC Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on radiological environrental monitoring as revised in Revision 1 November 1979.II l
In 1983 the radiological monitoring program included the measurement of ambient gamma radiation by thermoluminescent dosimetry, the determination of gamma emitters in shoreline sediments and fish, the determina tion of gross beta and gamma emitters in airborne particula tes, the measurement of airborne iodine-131, the measurement of gross beta, tritium, and gamma emitters in water, the measurement of iodine-131 and gamma emitters in milk, and the determination of gamma emitters in silage and food products (vege tables). The measurement of strontium-89 and s trontium-90 in milk, water, and sediment was initiated during the third quarter of 1983.
1-3
l II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 4
Thirty-nine locations within a radius of about 15 miles from the PNPP site were included in the monitoring program for 1983. The number and locations of monitoring points were de termined by considering the locations where the highest off-site environnental concentrations have been' predicted from plant effluent source terms, site hydrology, and site meteorological conditions. Other factors considered were applicable regulations, population distribution, ease of access to sampling stations, security and future program in tegri ty.
l The preoperational environmental radiological program for Perry is summarized in Table 1.
Table 2 describes sample locations,
i associated media, and approximate distance and direction from the si te. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the locations of sampling stations relative to PNPP.
i In addition to the described analytical program, a milk animal, vegetable garden, and residence survey was performed in 1983. This survey located the nearest milk animal, garden and residence in each sector (out to 5 miles) and will be updated annually, f
1 P
3 e
i
!!-1 i
III. SAMPLING METHODS AND PROCEDURES I
To derive meaningful and useful da ta from the radiological environmental monitoring program, sampling methods and procedures are required which will provide samples representative of potential pa thways of the a rea.
During the preoperational phase of the program, samples are collected and analyzed not only to obtain background radiological levels, but at the same time to acquire experience with the sampling methodology and procedural forr.at dictated by site specific' requirements.(2)
III-1
\\
l
A.
Direct Radiation Therroluminescent dosireters (TLDs) were used to de termine the direct (ambient) radiation levels at twenty-five (25) monitoring points as described in Tables 1 and 2.
Sampling locations were chosen according to the criteria given in the USNRC Branch Technical Position on Radiological Monitoring (Revision 1, November 1979).(I}
TLDs were located in two rings around the station. An inner ring was located at the site boundary and an outer ring was located at an approximate distance of 4 to 5 miles from the station.
The area around the station was divided into 16 radial sectors of 22 1/2 degrees each.
TLDs were placed in all sectcrs except those which radiated from the site directly out over the lake without in tersecting any unrestricted areas. Additional TLDs were located at three _ nearby connunities and two control locations.
For routine TLD measurerents, two dosimeters of CaSO :Dy in teflon 4
cards were deployed at each selected location.
One set of dositeters were exchanged on a mor.thly basis and the second set was exchanged on an annual basis. Additional sets of dosireters were shipped with each exchange cycle to serve as in-transit controls.
For routine exchanges TLDs were shipped by overnight Greyhound one evening, picked up and exchanged the following day, and returned by overnight Greyhound on the second evening.
This was done to maintain the minimum possible in-transit dose. Due to a Greyhound employea's strike, the October and Novenber TLD shipments were made by Federal Express.
Individual dosimeters were calibrated by exposure to an accura tely known radiation field from a calibrated Cs-137 source.
111-2
B.
Fish The results of gamma spectrometric analyses of fish samples collected during 1983 are presented in Table 5.
The averages, fraction of detectables, and range of radionuclide concentrations are summarized in Table 19.
A total of 23 samples were analyzed; 12 from the indicator location (#20) and 11 from the control location (#32). Sampling ef forts concentrated on the larger edible species of commercial and/or recreational importance. Results are presented from 11 of 12 samples from station #25, since one sample was destroyed in analysis, As expected, naturally occurring K-40 was the major detectable activity j
in the edible portions of the fish. Cs-137 was detected in 6 of 11 samples f rom station #25 and 4 of 11 samples from s tation #32, with activities ranging from 6.1 to 46 picoCuries per kilogram (wet). This isotope has previously been reported in fish flesh in the Perry Power huclear Plant environmental monitoring program and other monitoring programs. Since it is present in global fallout, the occasional cetection of Cs-137 in environmental media is not unusual.
C.
Sediment
)
The processes by which radionuclides and stable elements are concentra ted in bottom sediments are complex, involving physicochemical interaction in the environment between the various organic and inorganic materials from the watershed.
These interactions can proceed by a j
myriad of steps in which the elements are adsorbed on or displaced from the surfaces of colloidal particles enriched with chelating organic materials. Biological action of bacteria and other benthic organisms also contribute to the concentration of certain elements and in the acceleration of the sedimentation process.
!!!-3
D.
Airborne Particulates/ Air Iodine-131 Research Appliance Company continuous low volume air sampler units (Model #209088-2) were used to collect air particulates and airborne iodine-131. Airborne particulates were collected by drawing air through a 47-millimeter diameter glass fiber filter. Air iodine-131 was collected by drawing air through a 57 millimeter diameter TEDA impregnated -charcoal cartridge (F & J Specialty Products, Inc.).
The sampling units are housed in ventilated metal cabinets bolted to utility poles.
The air sampling network consists of six (6) s tations; one is loca ted in Redbird (#1) approximately 3.4 miles ENE of the Perry plant and four are located at the site boundary (#3,4,5 and 35).
The - control location is located at the Concord Service Center (#6),
approximately 11 miles SSW of the plant.
These locations are icentified in Figures 1 and 2 and described in Tables 1 and 2.
The samplers were run continuously and the filter and charcoal cartridge exchanged weekly.
The elapsed time of sampling was recorded on an elapsed-time meter. Total air volume was calculated and recorded by the site technician from the initial and final volumes as registered on the dry gas meter.
III-4
E.
Wa ter The water sampling network consists of four (4) stations as identified in Figures 1 and 2 and described in Tables 1 and 2.
Stations 28 and 34 utilize Horizon Interval Samplers, which cotlect a small volume of water at short intervals, nominally 15 minutes.
Stations 36 and 37 utilize an interval timer (Dayton #2E357) to solenoid valve (Dayton #6X230) on a pressurized sampling control a line.
This arrangement draws small aliquots at the periodic intervals.
The small volumes are automatically composited into a five-gallon container. Monthly grab samples had been taken at station 36 until November,1983. Samples from the four (4) staticns are collected monthly by the site technician.
F.
Milk / Silage Milk samples were collected monthly during the months of January, February, March, Noverber and December, and semi-monthly during the remaining months. The control location, Brockglen Farm (station 33), is located approximately 10.2 miles south of the Perry plant.
Sampling from station 29 (1.4 miles ESE) was initiated February 28, 1983.
Sampling from station 30 (2.3 miles SSW) was begun on March 28, 1983. As a preservative, formalin was added to each sasple at the time of collection. The annual feed / silage sample from stations 29,30 and 33 were taken on August 29, 1983.
A third indicator location (#31) will be initiated during the first quarter of 1984 G.
Vegetables and Food Products The annual collection of food procucts was conducted on September 20, 1983.
Various f rui ts and vegetables were collected from Ste.tions 38 (1.1 miles E), 39 (1.8 miles SSW), and 40 (1.1 miles E).
!!!-5
IV.
SUMMARY
AND DISCUSSION OF 1983 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Data from the radiolcgical analyses of environmental media collected during the report period are tabulated and discussed below. The procedures and specification followed in the laboratory for these analyses are as required in Section 6.0 of the NUS Environmental Services Division Quality Assurance Manual, 9019xx-2, and are detailed in the NUS Radiological Laboratory Work Instructions.
Radiological analyses of environmental media characteristically approach and frequently fall below the detection limits of state-of-the-art measurement methocs.(2) The use of "LT" in the data tables is the equivalent of the less than symbol (<) and is consistent with the NUS Radiological Laboratory practice of data reporting.
The number following the "LT" is a result of the lower limit of detection (LLD) calculation as defined in Appendix B.
"ND" (Not Detected) is used pericdically in the tables presenting gamma analysis results for various media. It primarily appears under the "Others" column, and indicates that no other detectable gasma emitting nuclides were identified. NUS analytical methods meet the " a priori" LLD requiremerits addressed in Table 2 of the USNRC Branch Technical Position on Radiological Monitoring (November 1979, Revision 1).III Tables 3 thrcugh 18 give the radioanalytical results for individual samples. A statistical summary of the results appears in Table 19. The reported averages ara based only on concentrations above the limit of de tection.
In Table 19, the fraction (f) of the total number of analyses which were detectable follows in parentheses.
Also given in parentheses are the minimum and maximum values of detectable activity during the report period.
l IV-1 l
l 1
A.
Direct Radiation Environcental radiation dose ra tes de termined by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are given in Table 3.
Average monthly dose rates are plotted in Figure 3.
TLD badges of four readout areas each were deployed at each location on monthly and annual cycles. The " annual" cycle covers the period January through Decenber. The mean values of four readings (corrected individually for response to a known dose and f or in-transit exposure) are reported.
A statistical summary of the 1983 da ta is included in Table 19.
Incivicual measurerents of external radiation levels in the environs of 1
the Pt.PP site ranged f rom 0.15 to 0.33 tR/ day.
Table 4 compares the da ta from the annual cycle TLDs with the annual averages of the monthly cycle TLDs. Agreement between the two types of data is generally qui te good.
Annual averages (from the monthly cycles) ranged from 0.19 to 0.30 rR/ day or 69 to 110 rR/ year.
I Oa kley, calculates an ionizing radiation dose equivalent of 82.2 mA/ year for Ohio including a terrestrial component of 45.6 rR/ year and an ionizing cosmic ray component of 36.6 rR/ year (excludes neutron compcnent).
Since Oakley's values represent averages covering wide geographical areas, the measured arbient radiation average of 80.3 mR/ year for the immedia te locale of Perry is not inconsistent with Dakley's observations.
Significant variations occur t,e tween geographical areas as a result of geological composition and altitude differences. Temporal variations result from changes in cosmic ray in tensi ty, local human activities, and factors such as ground cover and soil moisture.
IV-2
=.
i B.
Fish The results of gamma spectrometric analyses of fish samples collected during 1983 are presented in Table 5.
The averages, fraction of detectables, and range of radionuclide concentrations are summarized in Table 19.
A total of 23 samples were analyzed; 12 from the indicator location (r25) and 11 from the control location (#32). Sampling efforts concentrated on the larger edible species of commercial and/or recreational importance. Results are presented from 11 of 12 samples from station #25, since one sample was destroyed in analysis.
As expected, naturally occurring K-40 was the major detectable activi ty in the edible portions of the fish. Cs-137 was detected in 6 of 11 samples from station #25 and 4 of 11 samples from s tation #32, with activi ties ranging from 6.1 to 46 picoCuries per kilogram (wet). This isotope has previously been reported in fish flesh in the Perry Power Nuclear Plant environnental monitoring program and other monitoring programs. Since it is present in global fallout, the occasion 4i l
detection of Cs-137 in environmental media is not unusual.
C.
Sediment The processes by which radionuclides and s table elements are concentra ted in bottom sediments are complex, involving physicochemical interaction in the environment between the various organic and inorganic ma terials frce the watershed.
These interactions can proceed by a myriad of stepr. in which the elements are adsorbed on or displaced from the surfaces of colloidal particles enriched with chelating organic ma terial s.
Biological action of bacteria and other benthic organisms also contribute to the concentration of certain elements and in the acceleration ci the sedimentation process.
IV-3
s n
7
]
Results of the gamma isotopic and strontium analyses of the sediments sampled from the PNPP environment are given in Table 6 A and 6 B respectively. The average, fraction of detectables, and range of radionuclide concentrations are summarized in Table 19.
Most of the observed gamma emitters were naturally occurring members of the uranium and thorium decay chains. These were detected in their i
l expected concentrations. Similarly, K-40 was observed in all samples at its expected range of activities. The predominant man-made radionuclide observed in the sediment samples was Cs-137 which was detected in 4 of 8 samples.
Because of its presence in global fallout, the detection of this isotope is neither unexpected nor unusual.
The activity levels reported (150 to 310 picoCuries per kilogram (dry)) are within the range of observed values for other environmental monitoring programs. Due to the inhomogeneity typical of sediment samples, wide variations between samples are expected even when the samples are taken relatively near each other.
4 l
Strontium-89 and strontium-90 results are presented in Table 6B.
There was no detectable strontium-89 or strontium-90 activity in the samples.
1 i
I l
l 0.
Air Particulates/ Air lodine i
The results of the gross beta analyses on air particulate filters are i
presented in Table 7.
Average weekly gross beta results are plotted in Figure 4.
A total of 311 analyses were performed; 259 from the 3
indicator locations and 52 from the control loca tion.
Both the l
indicator and control locations had mean gross beta activities of 19 3
)
E-03 pC1/m.
The range of gross bota activity for the indicator and 3
3 control locations was 5.7 to 41 E-03 pC1/m and 7.7 to 34 E-03 pC1/m,
j respectively.
i i
i i
!V-4 9
i
m I
d I
ar Air filters were composited quarterly and analyzed by gamma spectrometry.
The gamma spectrometry results are presented in Table 8.
A total of 24 composite analyses were performed; 20 from the indicator locations and 4 from the control location. Cosmogenic bery111um-7 was the only isotope detected. Be-7 was found in 18 of 24 samples analyzed.
Airborne iodine-131 analyses on charcoal cartridges were also performed and the results are presented in Table 9.
Iodine-131 was not detected in any of the samples.
1 E.
Wa ter The results of the gamma spectrometric analyses of water samples are presented in Table 10. There were 48 analyses performed; 36 from the indicator locations and 12 from the control loca tion.
There was no detectable activity in any of the samples analyzed.
The 48 water samples were also analyzed for gross be ta a cti vi ty.
The average gross beta activity for the indicator and control locations was 4.2 pC1/1. Results of gross beta analyses are given in Table 11.
Water samples were also composited quarterly for the tritium analysis.
The quarterly results are presented in Table 12. Positive tritium activity was detected in 4 out of 16 samples. These activities (pC1/l) were well below the LLD as defined in the USNRC Branch Technical Position on Radiological Monitoring (November 1979, Revision 1).
Strontium-89 and strontium-90 analyses were performed on August and
- November, 1983 water samples.
Positive strontium-90 activity (0.62 + 0.61 pC1/1) was detected in one August sample from station 28.
Results are presented in Table 13.
l l
IV-5 l
A F.
Milk / Silage Milk samples were analyzed by gamma spectrometry and the results are presented in Table 14.
Two indicator locations and one control station were sampled during 1983. There were 54 analyses performed, and as expected, K-40 was the major detectable acti vi ty.
Cesium-137 was detected in 8 of 35 samples from the indicator locations.
Its a acti vity ranged from 1.4 to 3.5 pC1/1. Because of its presence on global fallout, Cs-137 is of ten observed in milk samples at these activity levels.
None of the samples fron the control location contained detectable activf ty of Cs-137.
The milk samples were also analyzed for Iodine-131 and, as expec ted, there was no detectable activity. The I-131 results are presented in Table 15.
Strontium-89 and strontium-90 analyses were performed on August and November, 1983 milk samples. Results are presented in Table 16. There were no results available for 1 of the 3 August samples and 2 of the 3 November samples due to depletion of the samples during re-analysis.
There was no strontium-89 detected in the milk samples.
Strontium-90 was detected in one August milk sample (station 33,1.8 f,0.9 pC1/1),
and one November milk sample (station 30, 3.5 f,1.5 pC1/1).
Feed / Silage samples were collected in August from the 3 milk stations and analyzed by gamma spectrometry.
These results are presented in Table 17. Naturally occurring K-40 was observed in all of the samples.
Cosmogenic Be-7 was observed in both pasture grass samples due to its deposition as stratospheric fallout.
G.
Vegetables and Food Products Vegetables and fruits were collected in September from 3 indicator locations and analyzed by gamma spectrometry. The results are presented in Table 18. Naturally occurring K-40 was tne only nuclide detected in the vegetation samples. K-40 was found in all of the vegetation samples at its expected range of activity.
IV-6 i
L_
V.
LAND USE CENSUS A land use survey was performed in the environs of the Perry NPP on August 10th and August lith 1983. The purpose of this survey was to identify the potential indicator milk sampling locations as well as the nearest vegetable garden and residence in each of the sixteen standard sampling sectors around the plant. The outer bound of the survey for identifying the " nearest" or potential indicator locations was 5 miles.
In addi ti on, candidate " control" milk sampling locations were verified. Table 20 identifies the nearest garden and residence in each sector for which one could be identified wi thin the 5 mile radius. Table 21 identifies all the potential indicator milk sampling locations within 5 miles of the plant. Control milk sampling locations are given in Table 22.
i l
l I
i V-1 l
L
VI. REFERENCES 4
o "An Acceptable Radiological U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Consissi' n," Radiological 1.
Environmental Monitoring Program, Assessment Branch Technical Position, Noverrber 1979, Revision 1.
2.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measuremen ts,
" Environmental Radiation Measurement, "NCRP Report No.
50, Washington, D. C., December 27, 1976 3.
Oakley, D.C., " Natural Radiation Exposure in the United States,"
ORP/SID 72-1 Of fice of Radiaticn Programs, U. S. Environtrental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C., Ane 1972, l
t f
i i
I f
i VI-1
TABLE 1 (Page I cf 2)
PNPP RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL HONITORING PROGRAM Analysis Saaple Hedia Locations Sampling frequency Type Frequency Airborne Radiofodine 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 35 Continuous saspler operation Padioiodine Weekly following with collection weekly or 1-131 canister change and Particulate
- II I 'U"I"9 as required by dust loading, Gross Beta [d) filter change Particulates whichever is more f requent Gamma Isotopic 'I Composite, by location I
quarterly Direct Radiation 1 through 24 Continuous sampling, one Gama Dose Monthly (2 TLDs/ location) plus 35 TLD exchanged monthly Continuous sampling, one Canna Dose Annually 7
TLD exchanged annually
~
Honthly Cosposite *I I
Gross Beta Monthly Waterborr.e 28, 34, 36, 37 Gansa Isotopic Monthly surface H-3 Composite, by location, drinking quarterly i
Sr-89,-90 Quarterly (analyses perforned on one monthly sample per l
station per quarter)
Sediment f rom 25, 26, 27, 32 Sem1 annually--spring and Gamma Isotopic Semiannually i
fall as weather permits Strontium-89, 90 Semiannually storeline Insestion(a, b, f) 29, 30, 31, 33 Honthly when animals are not I-131, Gacea Monthly Hilk nn pasture Iso topi:
Semimonthly when animals are I-131, Gamma Semimonthly on pasture Isotopic Sr-89,-90 Quarterly (analyses perforned on one monthly sample per station per quarter)
i TABLE 1 l
(Page 2 of ?)
i i
PNPP RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL FX)NITORING PROGRAM i
4 Analysis Sample Media Locations Sampling frequency Type frequency li.
]
j Fish 25, 32 Semiannually--spring and Gassa Isotopic Semiannually j
fall as weather permits (edible portion)
III Silage 29, 30, 33 Annually Gansna Isotopic Annually IN
}
Food Products 38, 39, 40 Annually Gamma Isotopic Annually i
i
_e (a) Sampling begins at least one year prior to PNPP operation. Sampling at station 29 was initiated on L
February 28, 1983. Saapling at station 30 was initiated on March 28, 1983.
j I
(b) 1-131 to be performed at least for 6 months of the last full pasture season prior to operation.
i j
(c) Particulate sa yle filters will be analyzed for gross beta 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or more af ter sampling to allow for 4
radon and thorca daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air is greater than ten times the mean l
of the control saeples for any medium, gasma isotopic analysis will be performed on the individual samples.
}
(d) Gamma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the ef fluents from the facility.
(e) Composite samples will be collected with equipment that is capable of collecting an aliquot at time intervals that are very short (e.g., hourly) relative to the compositing period (e.g., monthly).
(f) Definitive sampling locations will be determined by a milk-animal and garden census to be performed annually.
J i
i s
1
l i
l TABLE 2 Page 1 of 3 Sample Locations and Media for the Perry Radiological Environnental Monitoring Program Location Description Distance Direction Media (II No.
(Miles) 1 Redbird (Haines Road, North of West Chapel Road) 3.8 EHE APT,AI.TLD On pole 3303609; first pole south of first driveway on lef t 2
Site boundary; tree line 0.7 E
TLD Ash tree 1000 feet NNW of second transmission tower from road 3
Meteorological tower 1.0 SE AFT,AI,TLD On fence surrounding the equipment shelter 4
Si te Boundary 0.7 5
APT.AI,TLD On pole fw79/SPGS-30; inside auxiliary road gate off Parmly Rd.
5 Site Boundary, Quincy Substation 0.6 SW APT AI TLD On pole #L1283/9300; east side of substation 6
Concord Service Center (Control) 11.0 SSW APT,AI.TLD T*
Auburn Road south of Rt. 90; on inside rear fence next to gate 7
Site Boundary; Lockwood Road Bus Turnaround 0.6 NE TLD On tree on right,100 feet past the turnaround 8
Site Boundary; Tree Line 0.8 ENE TLD 1000 feet N of location #2 on tree near rusted manure spreader 9
Site Boundary; Transmission Line Tower 0.7 ESE TLD Third tower from Antioch Road toward the plant 10 Site Boundary; Southsoutheast Corner Security Fence 0.8 SSE TLD On pole at turn in the fence 11 Si te Boundary; Transmission Line Tower 0.6 SSW TLD On tower at SW corner of Center and Parmly Roads 12 Site Boundary; Transmission Line Tower 0.6 WSW TLD Access road from N side of Parmly just W of location #5, lef t at first turn af ter 90 degree lef t; TLD on tower to right 13 Hadison-on-the-Lake 4.7 ENE TLD At end of Whitewood Drive, N of Chapel Road, NW side of turnaround on pole #835803
TABLE 2 Page 2 of 3 Sample Locations and Media for the Perry I
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program III l
Loca tion Description Distance Direction Media No.
(Hiles) 14 Hubbard Road (South of North Ridge Road) 4.9 E
TLD On pole #28974 on W side of road, S side of McMackin Creek 15 Madison Substation (Eagle Street) 5.1 ESE TLD First pole next to substation near railroad tracks 16 Dayton Road (North of Interstate 90) 5.0 SE TLD On pole #572203 on lef t af ter dirt driveway which is just l
af ter the sharp lef t on Dayton af ter crossing I-90 17 Chadwick Road (Cui de Sac South of Interstate 90) 5.2 SSE TLC On pole #276222/112Z011; last pole on lef t 18 Blair Road 5.0 S
TLD On pole on lef t just af ter road makes 90 degree lef t curve
?
from south to east heading toward Grand River Bridge.
)
19 Lane Road and South Ridge Road 5.3 SSW TLD On pole #PC5648, 100 feet north of intersection 20 Nursery Road at Route 2 Overpass 5.3 SW TLD On pole #828976, across from entrance to Rt. 2 21 Hardy Road at Painesville Township Park 5.1 WSW TLD On pole #378345, east of park entrance 22 Painesville 6.9 SW TLD On S side of Hain Street across from Evergreen Cemetery entrance, on tree 50 feet west of pole #DBPG296 23 Fairport Harbor (High Street and New Street) 7.9 WSW TLD On pole on street side of substation 24 St. Clair Avenue Substation (Control) 15.1 SW TLD in Mentor; on rear fence corner near railroad tracks 25 PNPP Discharge 0.6 NNW SED, FSH 26 Of f shore at Redbird, vicinty of Ohio Water Service Company Intake 4.2 ENE SED 27 Of fshore, vicinty of Fairport Harbor Water Supply System Intake 7.9 WSW SED 28 Ashtabula (Control) CEI Generating Sta+1on Intake 22.0 ENE WTR
_ - -. - - -.. ~.
TABLE 2 i
Page 3 of 3 Sample Locations and Media for the Perry Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Location Description Distance Direction Media No.
(Miles) 29 Milk Farm, J. Wattes, Antioch Road 1.4 ESE MLK 30 Milk Farm, E. Manley, North Ridge Road 2.3 SSW (2) Ml" MLK 31 Milk Farm, to be selected in first quarter 1984 32 Mentor-on-the-Lake (Control) 15.8 WSW SED, FSH 33 Brookglen Farm (Control), Callow Road 10.2 S
MLK 34 PNPP Intake 0.7 NW WTR 35 Site Boundary, Center of Sector, follow tree line around 0.6 E
fields south and west of Locat an #2
?
36 Painesville Water Supply Intake 3.9 WSW WTR 37 Dhio Water Service Company, Lake Erie East, Madison; at end of 4.1 ENE WTR l
Green Road in Redbird 1
38 Farm at site boundary, of f Antioch Road 1.1 E
FP 4
39 Goldings, N. Ridge Road 1.8 SSW FP i
40 Antioch Road 1.1 E
FP (1)
APT = Air particulate A1 = Air lodine TLD = Ambient gamma dose rate SED = Sediment WTR = Water FSH = Fish MLK = Milk FP = Food Products (2)
This location to be determined in the annual milk animal survey t
i
i 1
Table 3 (Page 1 of 4)
Direct Radiation - Thermoluminescent Dosimetry I
Results for Monthly Exchange Cycles PNPP RENP-1983 (Results in Units of mR/ day + 2s)(3)
~
i Location January February March 1
1 0.22 + 0.04 0.20 + 0.03 0.22 + 0.05 2
0.23 7 0.06 0.20 7 0.03 0.22 T 0.04 3
0.22 7 '0.04 0.21 7 0.03 0.21 7 0.03 4
0.22 7 0.05 0.21 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.04 2
5 0.21 7 0.04 0.21 7 0.03 0.22 7 0.04
^
6 0.21.T 0.06 0.21 7 0.03 0.22 T 0.04 7
0.22 7 0.04 0.19 7 0.03 0.20 T 0.04 3
8 0.20 7 0.05 0.18 7 0.03 0.20 7 0.04 i
9 0.20 7 0.04 0.19 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.04 l
10 0.20 7 0.05 0.21 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.04 11 0.23 7 0.04 0.19 7 0.03 0.20 7 0.05 I
12 0.20 7 0.04 0.19 7 0.03 0.21 7 0.05 J
13 0.22 7 0.05 0.21 7 0.03 0.20 7 0.04 14 0.20 7 0.05 0.19 7 0.03 0.18 7 0.04 2
15 0.21 7 0.04 0.22 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.04 16 0.26 7 0.04 0.26 7 0.03 0.27 7 0.04 17 0.24 7 0.06 0.22 I 0.03 0.23 7 0.04 0.32 7 0.06 0.28 7 0.03 0.28 7 0.03 i
18 ~
0.20 7 0.04 0.21 7 0.03 0.20 7 0.04 19 20 0.25 7 0.08 0.23 7 0.03 0.20 7 0.04 21 0.24 T 0.05 0.22 7 0.03 0.20 I 0.03 l
22 0.24 7 0.10 0.21 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.09 23 0.25 7 0.05 0.22 7 0.03 0.22 7 0.04 l
24 0.24 7 0.04 0.18 7 0.03 0.21 7 0.05 35 0.19 7 0.05 0.17 7 0.03 0.19 7 0.03 Average + 2s(2) 0.22 + 0.06 0.21 + 0.05 0.22 + 0.04 1
Note: See footnote at end of table.
i i
i T-6 l
i
Table 3 (Page 2 of 4)
Direct Radiation - Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Results for Monthly Exchange Cycles PNPP REMP-1983 (Results in Units of mR/ day + 2s)III Location April May June 1
0.25 + 0.03 0.23 + 0.03 0.25 + 0.03 2
0.20 7 0.04 0.21 7 0.04 0.20 T 0.03 3
0.21 7 0.04 0.21 I 0.05 0.24 I 0.05 4
0.23 7 0.03 0.22 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.03 5
0.19 I 0.04 0.20 I-0.04 0.21 I 0.04 6
0.18 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.03 0.19 7 0.03 7
0.22 T 0.04 0.24 7 0.05 0.22 7 0.04 8
0.15 7 0.04 0.23 7 0.04 0.17 7 0.03 9
0.17 7 0.04 0.25 7 0.03 0.18 7 0.03 10 0.18 7 0.04 0.17 7 C.05 0.18 7 0.03 11 0.20 7 0.04 0.20 T 0.04 0.20 7 0.05 12 0.24 7 0.03 0.18 T 0.03 0.18 7 0.03 13 0.19 7 0.04 0.21 7 0.04 0.19 7 0.03 14 0.21 7 0.03 0.22 T 0.04 0.17 7 0.03 15 0.21 7 0.04 0.23 7 0.04 (7) 16 0.22 7 0.04 0.26 I 0.05 0.28 + 0.03 17 0.23 7 0.04 0.22 T 0.04 0.25 7 0.04 18 0.29 7 0.04 0.30 7 0.04 0.28 T 0.03 19 0.19 7 0.03 0.21 7 0.03 0.20 7 0.03 20 0.22 I 0.03 0.21 7 0.03 0.22 I 0.03 21 0.23 7 0.04 0.23 7 0.03 0.21 7 0.03 22 0.25 T 0.05 0.23 I 0.03 0.26 7 0.07 23 O.27 7 0.05 0.25 7 0.05 0.23 T 0.03 24 0.24 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.04 0.20 7 0.03 35 0.21 1 0.04 0.20 1 0.03 0.20 l 0.04 verage + 2s(2) 0.22 + 0.06 0.22 + 0.05 0.21 + 0.06 Note: See footnote at end of table.
l l
l T-7 l
Table 3 (Page 3 of 4)
Direct Radiation - Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Results for Monthly Exchange Cycles PNPP REMP-1983 (Results in Units of mR/ day + 2s)II}
Location July August Septerrber 1
0.24 + 0.05 0.24 + 0.03 0.23 + 0.03 2
0.23 7 0.06 0.28 T 0.08 0.24 7 0.03 3
0.20 7 0.03 0.24 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.04 4
0.27 7 0.03 0.25 + 0.03 0.28 + 0.06 5
0.23 7 0.04 0.23 7 0.03 0.27 7 0.07 6
0.24 7 0.05 0.24 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.03 7
0.27 7 0.06 0.27 7 0.08 0.28 T 0.04 8
0.18 T 0.03 0.24 7 0.03 (T) 9 0.20 I 0.04 0.22 7 0.03 0.21 + 0.03 10 0.20 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.03 0.21 7 0.03 11 0.22 7 0.04 0.25 + 0.03 0.22 + 0.03 12 0.22 7 0.04 0.20 7 -0.03 0.22 T 0.04 13 0.23 7 0.04 0.21 7 0.03 0.30 7 0.04 14 0.23 7 0.05 0.21 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.04 15 0.24 7 0.03 0.21 7 0.03 0.22 T 0.03 16 0.28 7 0.03 0.29 7 0.03 0.27 ~T 0.03 17 0.15 7 0.04 0.27 7 0.03 0.25 7 0.04 18 0.31 7 0.04 0.32 7 0.03 0.33 7 0.03 19 0.24 7 0.04 0.22 7 0.03 0.26 T 0.04 20 0.24 0.04 0.22 7 0.03 0.24 7 0.03 21 0.25 I 0.04 0.27 7 0.03 0.22 7 0.03 22 0.25 7 0.05 0.21 7 0.03 0.25 I 0.04 23 0.24 7 0.03 0.24 7 0.03 0.24 I 0.03 24 0.28 7 0.05 0.22 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.04 35 0.20 1 0.03 0.21 1 0.03 0.20 1 0.03 Average + 2s(2) 0.24 + 0.06 0.24 + 0.06 0.24 + 0.06 Note: See footnote at end of table, i
T-8
Table 3 (Page 4 of 4)
Direct Radiation - Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Results for Monthly Exchange Cycles PNPP RENP-1983 (Results in Units of mR/ day + 2',)III Location October November December Average + 2s 1
0.20 + 0.04 0.20 + 0.03 0.23 + 0.03 0.23 + 0.04 2
0.20 7 0.03 0.19 7 0.04 (T) 0.22 T 0.05 3
0.20 T 0.03 0.20 T 0.03 0.24 + 0.04 0.22 7 0.03 4
0.21 T 0.04 0.20 7 0.03 0.23 T 0.04 0.23 7 0.05 I
5 0.21 7 0.03 0.18 T 0.02 0.21 7 0.03 0.21 7 0.05 6
0.21 7 0.04 0.18 T 0.02 0.24 T 0.04 0.22 T 0.04 7
0.20 7 0.03 0.19 7 0.02 0.22 T 0.03 0.23 I 0.06 8
0.17 7 0.03 0.17 7 0.03 0.19 7 0.03 0.19 7 0.05 9
0.21 T 0.05 0.19 7 0.03 0.20 7 0.04 0.20 I 0.04 10 0.19 7 0.03 0.19 7 0.02 0.19 7 0.03 0.20 7 0.04 11 0.18 T 0.04 0.20 I 0.03 0.22 7 0.04 0.21 7 0.04 12 0.19 7 0.03 0.18 7 0.03 0.20 T 0.03 0.20 T 0.04 13 0.22 T 0.04 0.20. T 0.03 0.21 T 0.03 0.22 T 0.06 14 0.19 7 0.04 0.21 T 0.03 0.21 7 0.03 0.20 T 0.04 15 0.22 T 0.03 0.22 7 0.03 0.22 T 0.03 0.22 T 0.02 16 0.25 7 0.03 0.31 T 0.04 0.25 T 0.03 0.27 7 0.05 17 0.22 I 0.03 0.25 7 0.02 0.24 7 0.03 0.24 T 0.03 18 0.31 T 0.03 0.30 7 0.03 0.29 7 0.03 0.30 T 0.03 19 0.23 7 0.03 0.22 T 0.02 0.22 T 0.03 0.22 7 0.04 20 0.21 7 0.03 0.24 7 0.03 0.22 7 0.03 0.23 T 0.03 l
21 0.22 7 0.03 (T) 0.23 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.04 22 0.23 7 0.03 0.22 + 0.02 0.23 7 0.03 0.23 7 0.03 23 0.23 I 0.03 0.24 I 0.03 0.23 T 0.03 0.24 7 0.03 24 0.21 7 0.03 0.21 T 0.03 0.23 T 0.04 0.22 I 0.05 35 0.21 l 0.03 0.20 l 0.03 0.20 1 0.03 0.20 1 0.02 Average + 2s(2)- 0.21
+ 0.05 0.21 + 0.07 0.22 + 0.04 0.22 + 0.05 l
(*) TLD vandalized in field f
(1) Errors for individual measurements are two standard deviations of the average of four readings per dosimeter.
l (2) Errors of row and column averages are two standard deviations calculated from the same row or column data used to generate the average.
T-9 l
l
Table 4 Comparison of Annual and Average-Monthly Direct Radiation Neasurements PNPP RENP 1983 I
(Results in Units of mR/ day + 2s)
Saspling Period:
12/28/82 to 12/28/83 Station humber Annual Cycle TLD Average of Monthly Cycle 1
0.19 + 0.01 0.23 + 0.04 2
0.15 7 0.01 0.22 T 0.05 3
0.17 7 0.01 0.22 7 0.03 j
4 0.18 T 0.02 0.23 7 0.06 5
0.16 T 0.01 0.21 T 0.05 6
0.16 7 0.02 0.22 7 0.04 7
0.17 7 0.01 0.23 7 0.06 8
0.17 I 0.01 0.19 7 0.05 9
0.15 7 0.01 0.20 7 0.04 10 0.16 7 0.01 0.20 7 0.04 11 0.16 I 0.01 0.21 T 0.04 12 0.18 7 0.01 0.20 7 0.04 13 0.16 7 0.01 0.22 7 0.06 14 0.19 7 0.01 0.20 T 0.04 15 0.21 7 0.01 0.22 7 0.02 16 0.21 7 0.01 0.27 7 0.05 17 0.22 7~ 0.02 0.24 I 0.03 18 0.30 T 0.01 0.30- T 0.03 19 0.21 I 0.02 0.22 7 0.04 20 0.23 T 0.01 0.23 7 0.03 21 0.23 I 0.04 22 0.22 + 0.02 0.23 T 0.03 23 0.22 I 0.01 0.24 I -0.03 4
24 0.21 T 0.01 0.22 7 0.05 4
35 0.17 j[ 0.01 0.20 ][ 0.02 TLD lost due to vandalism (1) Errors of annual TLDs are two standard deviations of the four reacoat areas on each TLD; errors of monthly averages are two standard deviations of the average of the individual monthly results.
T-10 i
w
Table 5 (Page 1 of 2)
Ganima Spectrometry of Fish Samples PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/kg (wet) ;t 2s)
Fish Collection Location Species Da te Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 K-40 Mn-54 Zn-65 III 25 Smallsouth Bass 05/24/83 LT 30 LT 30 LT 20 36 f; 15 LT 110 4300j;600 LT 30 LT,70 25 Rock Bass 05/24/83 LT 80 LT 80 LT 70 LT 80 LT 200 3900j;900 LT 70 LT 140 25 Freshwater Drum 05/24/83 LT 15 LT 18 LT 13 38 f;10 LT 60 3400 f;400 LT 15 LT 50 25 White Sucker 05/24/83 LT 20 LT 20 LT 15 LT 20 LT 70 4400j;500 LT 20 LT 50 25 Walleye 05/24/83 LT 9 LT 11 LT 7 LT 8 LT 40 2200 f;300 LT 10 LT 30 25 White Bass 05/24/83 LT 30 LT 30 LT 30 25 + 15 LT 110 8500 + 900 LT 30 LT 80 3.25 Yellow Perch (2) 05/24/83 1
32 White Bass 05/24/83 LT 19 LT 20 LT 12 43j;10 LT 60 5100j;600 LT 18 LT 50 32 White Sucker 05/24/83 LT 20 LT 20 LT 19 LT 20 LT 80 3600j;400 LT 30 LT 60 32 Yellow Perch 05/24/83 LT 40 LT 40 LT 30 LT 40 LT 110 2000 j; 300 LT 30 LT 90 32 Freshwater Drum 05/24/83 LT 30 LT 40 LT 30 46j;18 LT 110 3500 f,600 LT 30 LT 80 32 Walleye 05/24/83 LT 30 LT 40 LT 30 LT 50 LT 140 3100j;400 LT 30 LT 90 l
No te: See footnote at end of table.
i 4
I T
,~_
Table 5 (Page 2 of 2)
Gamma Spectrometry of Fish Samples PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in pC1/kg (wet) + 2s)
Fish Collection Location Species Da te Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Fe-59 K-40 Mn-54 Zn-65 25 White Sucker 10/19/83 LT 6 LT 6 LT 4 6.1 + 3.0 LT 20 3700 1 400 LT 5 LT 18 25 Freshwater Drum 10/19/83 LT 50 LT 60 LT 50 LT 50 LT,140 3100 1 700 LT 50 LT 120 25 Carp 10/19/83 LT 80 LT 100 LT 60 LT 60 LT 200 4600 + 1000 LT 70 LT 140 25 White Bass 10/19/83 LT 17 LT 18 LT 13 24 + 9 LT 50 3600 1 400 LT 15 LT 40 25 Yellow Perch 10/19/83 LT 20 LT 20 LT 16 20 + 11 LT 60 4300 + 500 LT 18 LT 50 i
T 32 White Bass 10/19/83 LT 20 LT 20 LT 18 LT 20 LT 60 4100 + 500 LT 18 LT 50 32 Freshwater Drum.
10/19/83 LT 9 LT 9 LT 7-2315 LT 30 2800 + 300 LT 8 LT 20 32 White Sucker 10/19/83 LT 50 LT 40 LT 40 LT 40 LT 110 4700 + 500 LT 40 LT 100 32 Yellow Perch 10/19/83 LT 40 LT 30 LT 30 LT 30 LT 110 3900 + 500 LT 30 LT 80
, alleye 10/19/83 LT 9 LT 9 LT 7 18 + 5 LT 20 3700 + 400 LT 8 LT 20 W
32 32 Carp 10/19/83 LT 7 LT 8 LT 5 LT 7 LT 20 3300 + 400 LT 6 LT 180 (1) LT = Less Than c
(2) Sample was destroyed in analysis.
- 8
.8 n*
n~
f_
.f f.
8 8 8 E
8 8
R E R R 8 8 8 o
~ "
~ ~
- ~
8
~
+i
+1
+1
+i
+i+:
+i +i i
3 R.
.R S, R 3 R R 8
R 8 8 S S o
o.
~ ~
~ -
. ~
,g
+6
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+,+1 8 8 R S R. 8 2 3 8 8 8 R 8
2 o
R
~
~ ~
~ ~
U
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+i
+i+l 8 g 8 2 2 8 2 2
~
R 8 R
8 R o
.o
~
~
,.i
+i.,
~
+
.2 2
8 8 8
R. R R S a n g
g II aa aE Ia
~
..a p
~,
~, ~
~
.l 8
.l af
[f af l =8
- 3 s? :
==
=
-R s-1 R
3 2 hm.
o g
- 8 gt O
.i
+i
+1
+i 5
0 $
U $
U U a
S
~
o o o o g
l C
0 O 2 2
3 8 s
b a:
8 8
8 8 3 8 R~
8
~ ~
+
+1
+1
+1
+1
~
+1
+1
+1 gg sg s8 R
3 8 R 8 3 R
-g n
u n
- A y
g +,
+,
+1
+1
+1
+1 i
2 R g 2 8*
- a.
w 5
3 3
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
~j V
W3 4 A M A 2 2 2 2 I~
38 C 4 4 4 cc cc 0
8 8 8 8 R R R R ma 8 8 F8 a*
="
-d N
N N
n N
N N
_ _N 33 T 13 L
~
Table 6b Strontium-89 and -90 in Sediment Samples PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in pC1/kg (dry) + 2s)
+
Sampling Collection Location Date Sr-89 Sr-90 25 10/18/83 LT 2 LT 0.08 26 10/18/83 LT 2 LT 0.08 27 10/18/83 LT 1.7 LT 0.06 1
32 10/18/83 LT 3 LT 0.10 (1) LT = Less Than i
i f
f l
t 1
T-14
Table 7 (Page 1 of 4)
Gross Beta in Air Particulate Filters PNPP REMP 1983 3
(Results in E-03 pC1/m
+ 2s)
Station Location Month Collection Period 1
3 4
5 6
35 January 01/04/83 to 01/11/83 20 + 7 16 + 7 18 + 7 16 + 7 14 + 7 16 + 7 01/11/83 to 01/18/83 19 + 6 10 + 6 16 + 6 16 + 6 21 + 6 16 + 6 l
01/18/83 to 01/25/83 19 + 6 20 + 6 17 + 6 16 + 6 17 + 6 16 + 6 01/25/83 to 02/01/83 19 + 7 15 + 7 15 + 7 23 + 7 23 + 7 19 + 7 February 02/01/83 to 02/08/83 15 + 7 13 + 6 11 + 6 12 + 6 15 + 7 12 + 6 02/08/83 to 02/15/83 31 + 6 29 + 6 35 + 6 35 + 6 34 + 6 34 + 6 02/15/83 to 02/22/83 28 + 7 23 + 7 24 + 7 16 + 7 18 + 7 21 + 7 l
02/22/83 to 03/01/83 12 + 7 13 + 7 15 + 7 14 + 7 13 + 7 16
+6 March 03/01/83 to 03/08/83 17 + 7 21 + 7 15 + 7 NS (I}
20 + 7 20 + 7 9(2) 8.7 + 6.4 15 + 7 03/08/83 to 03/15/83 18 + 7 18 + 7 13 + 7 14 +
I3) 03/15/83 to 03/22/83 7.2 + 6.1 11 + 6 8.2 + 6.0 LT 9 LT 9
- 5. 7-
+ 5.7 I4I 03/22/83 to 03/29/83 8.1 + 6.7 13 + 7 12 + 7 11 + S 12 + 7 8.7 6.3 j
Note: See footnote at end of table.
Table 7 (Page 2 of 4)
Gross Beta in Air Particulate filters PNPP REMP 1983 3
(Results in E-03 pCi/m
+ 2s)
Station Location 1
Month Collection Period 1
3 4
5 6
35 1
April 03/29/83 to 04/05/83 15 + 7 14 + 7 10 + 6 12 + 7 15 +
6-17 + 7 04/05/83 to 04/12/83 LT 9 9.1 + 6.2 LT 9 LT 9 LT 10(5)
LT 9 I
04/12/83 to 04/19/83 12 + 7 8.1 + 6.1 15 + 7 12 + 6 9.3 + 6.1 9.2 + 6.0 I
[
04/19/83 to 04/26/83 9.6 + 6.4 16 + 7 18 + 7 22 + 7 13 + 7 12 + 6 04/26/83 to 05/03/d3 13 _ 6 14 + 6 16 + 6 14 _ 6 17 _ 6
~12 _ 6
+
+
+
+
i May 05/03/83 to O'/10/83 15 + 7 13 + 7 17 + 7 12 + 7 13 + 6 11 + 6 05/10/83 to 05/17/83 LT 8 LT 8 7.2 + 5.7 8.4 + 6.0 11 + 6 11- + 6 05/17/83 to 05/24/83 11 + 6 9.7 + 5.9 11 + 6 18 + 6 19 + 7 12 + 6 j
1 05/24/83 to 05/31/83 LT 10 8.0 + 6.6 8.6 + 6.5 LT 10 7.7 + 6.4 LT 10 1
June 05/31/83 to 06/07/83 LT 10 LT 10 LT 9 LT 10 8.4 + 6.3 LT 9 i
06/07/83 to 06/14/83 27 + 7 22 + 7 20 + 7 26 + 7 26 + 7 30 + 7 l
06/14/83 to 06/21/83 34 + 7 41 + 8 29 + 7 40 + 8 34 + 7 24 + 6 I
06/21/83 to 06/28/83 14 + 7 6.6 + 6.1 10 + 6 9.8 + 6.2 9.9 + 6.4 13 + 6 4
I Note: See footnote at end of table.
l 1
Table 7 (Page 3 of 4)
Gross Beta in Air Particulate Filters PNPP REMP 1983 3
(Results in E-03 pC1/m
+;2s)
Station Location Month Collection Period 1
3 4
5 6
35 July 06/28/83 to 07/05/83 11 + 6 14 + 6 11 + 6 12 + 6 12 + 6 10 + 6 07/05/83 to 07/12/83 16 + 7 12 + 6 14 + 6 LT 9 15 + 6 11 + 6 07/12/83 to 07/19/83 35 +; 8 28 +; 7 23 + 7 32 +; 7 25 + 7 22 +; 7 f;
07/19/83 to 07/26/83 12 +; 7 LT 10 14 +; 7 12 j; 7 11 +; 7 LT 10 07/26/83 to 08/02/83 27 + 7 29 + 7 25 + 7 24 + 7 20 + 6 26 + 7 August 08/02/83 to 08/09/83 24 + 7 21 + 7 17 + 6 16 + 6 19 + 7 21 + 7 08/09/83 to 08/16/83 11 + 6 LT 9 LT 9 9.8 + 6.2 11 + 6 10 + 6 08/16/83 to 08/23/83 25 + 7 24 + 7 23 + 7 22 + 7 26 + 7 25 + 7 08/23/83 to 08/30/83 31 + 7 34 ' + 7 31 + 7 33 + 7 29 + 7 29 + 7
~
September 08/30/83 to 09/06/83 19 + 7 22 + 7 18 + 7 20 + 7 25 + 7 22 + 7 09/06/83 to 09/13/83 18 + 7 17 + 7 14 + 6 22 + 7 19 + 6 20 + 6 09/13/83 to 09/20/83 19 + 7 23 + 7 23 + 7 16 + 7 25 + 7 23 + 7 09/20/83 to 09/27/83 15 + 7 21 + 7 15 + 6 17 + 7 25 + 7 19 + 6 Note: See footnote at end of table.
Table 7 (Page 4 of 4)
Gross Beta in Air Particulate filters PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in E-03 pC1/m
+;2s)
Station Location Month Collection Period 1
3 4
5 6
35 Oc tober 09/27/83 to 10/04/83 32 f; 8 33 + 8 30 + 7 32 + 8 27
+7 30 + 7 10/04/83 to 10/11/83 13 + 5 9.6 + 5.3 13 + 5 13 + 5 16 + 5 12 + 5 10/11/83 to 10/18/83 25 + 6 27 + 6 21 + 5 23 + 6 29 + 6 26 + 6 j
10/18/83 to 10/25/83 9.9 j; 4.5 11 j; 5 11 +; 4 13 j; 5 13 f; 5 11 f; 4 o*
10/25/83 to 11/04/n3 16 + 4 18 + 5 16 + 4 13 + 4 14 + 4 15 + 4 November 11/02/83 to 11/09/83 21 f; 5 21 f; 5 17 f; 5 21 jt 5 21 f; 5 17 j; 5 11/09/83 to 11/16/83 17 + 5 16 + 5 17 + 5 18 + 5 16 + 5 17 + 5 11/16/83 to 11/23/83 15 + 5 17 + 5 16 + 5 15 + 5 18 + 5 15 + 5 11/23/83 to 11/30/83 26 + 5 24 + 5 26 + 5 28 + 5 22 + 5 21 + 5 December 11/30/83 to 12/07/83 19 j; 5 20 j; 5 17 j; 5 15 + 5 16 + 5 17 j; 5 12/07/83 to 12/14/83 24 + 5 26 + 6 24 + 5 23 + 5 23 + 5 26 + 5 12/14/83 to 12/21/83 23 + 5 22 + 5 20 + 5 29 + 6 22 + 5 24 + 5 12/21/83 to 12/27/83 24 4 6 31 + 6 25 + 6 29 + 6 24 + 6 29 + 6 12/27/83 to 07/04/84 25 + 5 27 + 5 25 + 5 31 + 5 29 + 5 24 +
5-(1) NS r No Sampie (2) Collection start date is 03/10/83.
(3) LT = Less Than (4) Collection start date is 03/23/83.
(5) Collection start date is 04/06/83.
i TABLE 8 (Page 1 of 2)
Gamma Spectrometry of Composited Air Particulate Filters PNPP REMP 1983 3
(Results in Units of E-03 pC1/m 2s) i Location Collection Period Be-7 Ce-144 Cs-134 Cs-137 Hb-95 Zr-95 III 1
01/04/83 to 04/05/83 57 + 15 LT 4 LT 1.4 LT 1.2 LT 1.7 LT 3 3
01/04/83 to 04/05/83 57 + 15 LT 5 LT 1.5 LT 1.6 LT 1.7 LT 2 4
01/04/83 to 04/05/83 44115 LT 5 LT 1.6 LT 1.6 LT 2 LT 4 5
01/04/83 to 04/05/83 46118 LT 7 LT 1.9 LT 2 LT 2 LT 3
]
i 6
01/04/83 to 04/05/83 52 + 16 LT 5 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 4 LT 7 LT 1.9 LT 2 LT 2 LT 4 35 01/04/83 to 04/05/83 39 + 19 1
i l
1 04/05/83 to 07/05/83 LT 80 LT 12 LT 3 LT 5 LT 4 LT 8 3
04/05/83 to 07/05/83 59136 LT 12 LT 3 LT 5 LT 4 LT 12 1
4 04/05/83 to 07/05/83 47 + 30 LT 17 LT 3 LT 3 LT 4 LT 13 5
04/05/83 to 07/05/83 LT 80 LT 14 LT 4 LT 5 LT 5 LT 9 6
04/05/83 to 07/05/83 LT 100 LT 15 LT 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 12 r
35 04/05/83 to 07/05/83 LT 70 LT 14 LT 19 LT 3 LT 4' LT 1.4 Note: See footnote at end of table, i
l l
T-19 i
)
TABLE 8 (Page 2 of 2)
Gamir.a Spectrometry of Composited Air Particulate Filters PNPP REMP 1983 3
(Results in Units of E-03 pC1/m 2s)
Location Collection Period Be-7 Ce-144 Cs-134 Cs-137 Nb-95 Zr-95 1
07/05/83 to 10/04/83 61124 LT 9 LT 3 LT 3 LT 4 LT 6 3
07/05/83 to 10/04/83 53126 LT 10 LT 3 LT 3 LT 5 LT 8 4
07/05/83 to 10/04/83 49 + 23 LT 8 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 5
07/05/83 to 10/04/83 94 + 28 LT 9 LT 3 LT 3 LT 4 LT 7 6
07/05/83 to 10/04/83 64124 LT 10 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 7 35 07/05/83 to 10/04/83 52126 LT 10 LT 3 LT 3 LT 4 LT 8 1
10/04/83 to 01/04/84 LT'50 LT 10 LT 3 LT 3 LT 4 LT 6 3
10/04/83 to 01/04/84 58121 LT 9 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 5 4
10/04/83 to 01/04/84 44121 LT 9 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 7 5
10/04/83 to 01/04/84 52 1 22 LT 9 LT 2 LT 2 LT 4 LT 6 6
10/04/83 to 01/04/84 40123 LT 11 LT 3 LT 1.8 LT 3 LT 5 35 10/04/83 to 01/04/84 LT 50 LT 9 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 7 (1) LT = Less Than
(
T-20 l
l
Table 9 (Page 1 of 3)
Iodine-131 in Charcoal Cartridges PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/m
+/- 2s)
Station Location Month Collection Period 1
3 4
5 6
35 III January 01/04/83 to 01/11/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 01/11/83 to 01/18/83 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 01/18/83 to 01/25/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 01/25/83 to 02/01/83 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 February 02/01/83 to 02/08/83 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 L
02/08/83 to 02/15/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 02/15/83 to 02/22/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03
~
02/22/83 to 03/01/83 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04
(}
March 03/01/83 to 03/08/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 NS LT 0.03 LT 0.03 03/08/83 to 03/15/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03(3) LT 0.05 LT 0.03 03/15/83 to 03/22/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 I4I 03/22/83 to 03/25,83 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 April 03/29/83 to 04/05/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03(5) LT 0.03 04/05/83 to 04/12/83 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.02 LT 0.03 LT 0.02 04/12/83 to 04/19/83 LT U.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 04/19/83 to 04/26/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 04/26/83 to 05/03/83 LT 0.05 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 Note : See footnote at end of table.
Table 9 (Page 2 of 3)
Iodine-131 in Charcoal Cartridges PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/m
+/- 2s)
Station Location Month Collection Period 1
3 4
5 6
35 hay 05/03/83 to 05/10/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 05/10/83 to 05/17/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 05/17/83 to 05/24/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 05/24/83 to 05/31/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 June 05/31/83 to 06/07/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 A3 06/07/83 to 06/14/83 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 06/14/83 to 06/21/83 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 06/21/63 to 06/28/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.03 July 06/29/83 to 07/05/83 LT 0.07 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 07/05/83 to 07/12/83 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 07/12/83 to 07/19/83 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 07/19/83 to 07/26/83 LT 0.05 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 LT 0.04 LT 0.05 LT 0.04 07/26/83 to 08/02/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 August 08/02/83 to 08/09/83
. LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 LT 0.06 08/09/C3 to 08/16/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 08/16/83 to 08/23/83 LT 0.07 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 08/23/83 to 08/30/83 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 LT 0.03 Note : See footnote at end of table.
-, - = - - - - _ - - - -
9 e
b b
O. Q. O. O.
Q Q O. Q. Q.
Q Q Q C.
Q Q O. O. O.
D CQQC OQOOO QOOO OOOOO M
Ve & & &
&&&H&
&&&W
&&WWW uddJ JJJJJ JJJJ JJJJJ MWMN TNNNM
@vwM NWW@v QQQOQ Q Q C. Q.
C. O. Q. Q. Q.
Q O. O. O.
... e.
C000 QCOOO COCO COOOO H&&&W AddJ JJJJJ JJJJ JJdJJ M@MN WNNNM
@vvM Nmm@m 1
0000 Q Q Q O. O QQQQ C. Q. O. Q. Q.
e..
e C
D OOOO COOOO OOOO OOOOO O
w WWWWW
&&&WW W
JJJJ JJd4J Jdad Jdddd M
u O
a C
M@MN WNN@M WTTM N@@@@
Q Q O. O.
C.0000 Q Q Q C.
C.O Q Q Q Q
e e e e e a
w W
W OCOO OCOQO COQQ CQQ00 m
e D
m
&&&W WWWWW
&&WW w
w w
J4dd JJadd JJJJ daddd b
6 4
0 WM N
2
+
w@MN WNNNM WTTM NW@@v QQQC C.Q. Q Q O Q Q O. O Q C. Q. Q. Q m
em e o e e
e o e e e M
em O
M M
COCO COOOO OOOO COCOO w
v 8
mO 6L
&&&WW b&&&&
oz w
JJJJ JJadd aaad adaad WM Kw U
e um G
4W em CA C
Hg wm w
A 2
w MA M'
M@MN VNNNM
@TTM NWW@@
M W
OOOO QQCQC O. C. Q. Q C0C00 M
m o e o e
.e
. e e
o e e o
e 3
M OOOO COOOO OOOO OCOOO m
C G
>>>W WWW&&
&&&W WWWWW w
u dadd JJJJJ JJdd daddd V
w 0
m MMM OM@
MMMM MMMMM MMMM MMMMW MNO V
MMT O
@ MON wM@mN m@MC NwMNw QQQ QMNN QMMNQ OMNM QMNNQ "6
MWW mmmm COCOM MMMM NNNNM www A
COCO MMMMM MMMM MMMMO C
0 COO OC OOO 00OO OOOOO O
dM@dd Mdd@@
qg3 Vw w W
MMMM MMMMM MMMM MMMMM U
UWW W
NNNN 666 O@MO NWM@@
NmWM ONTMN CW44 4 m
MOMN NQMMN COMN MOMNN 4eWWW O
S&WWW SOQQQ MMMM MNNNN WE gmmm W
.3858
~~~~
~~~~
~~~~~
www yQMdM w@ UUU W&&
6 4 Neem 6
6 mem L
G G
WMOOO Javuv g
g g
W W
C A
u mmmmm C
T-23 I
=
I I
e O D 0 O D D oD D D D D o D D D D D O D D o D D r
I h
N N N N N W t W N N N W n N W N W N N N N n N N t
O 5
3 8 2 8
4 0 9
7 9 6 7 1 1 1 5 1 7 1 1 9 5 6 6 7 4 4 5 2 2 3 2 r
T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T Z
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 5
3 2
3 7 1 0 3 8 4 4
6 4 1 9 1 1 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 1 F 8 7 8 4 5 6 4 4 4 4 n
T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T 2
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 4 3 4 3 5
0 1
9 4 5 4 4 6 1 7 3 1 6 7 $
5 3 4 3 4 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 b
T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T t
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 3 2 3 2 4
0 1
5 4 6 4 4 6 1 6 3 1 6 7 6
$ 3 3 4 4 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 T T T T T T T T T T T T GT a
T T T T T T T T T T L
L L L L L L L L L L L L M
L L L L L L L L L L 2 1 1 3 04 2 0 2
0 2
1 1
1 9 !
9 1 8 6 1 7 1 9 9 5 8 6 8 4 5 5 1 1 1 1 a
T T T T T T T T T T 1 i T T T T T T T T T T T T L
L L L L L L L L L L 1 t
L L L L L L L L L L L L 9
5 2
0 1 7 1 0 1 4 0 1
$ 1 S 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1
1 5 7 6 7 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 e
F T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 0 0 1 0 se 7
l 3
1 2
p 1
3 5 3 4 7 1 7 3 1 6 6 6
$ 3 4 4 4 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 e
s T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T m
t C
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L l
r s
e 2
t 4
a3 3
0 2
W8 1
4 6 4 3 7 1 S 3 1 6 6 6 F 3 3 4 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2
f1
/
s T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T
)
9 l
0 o
t C
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 1f P
C o
yM p
e ri l1 tD n
0 0
b e
i 6
5 3 4 5
$ 7 5 5 S 7 1 6 5 3 4 4 4 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 ae m
Tg eP s
o T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T a
rP t
C L L L L L L L L L L L L L I L L L L L L L L L L P
tn l
(
cP u
5 4 4
e s
p e
8 0
S s
5 3 6 3 3 6 9 6 3 1 6 6 5 6 3 4 3 4 2 2 3 1 1 2 1 e
o T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T
(
m C
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L ma G
I I
0 I
4 6 9 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 6
2 0 5
0 1
1 1 1 1 2 3 2 9 4 2 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 S 7 1 9 4 9 9
-4 T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T 5
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 3 3 3
3 3 3
3 3 3
3 3 3
3 3 3
3 3 4
8 8 s
8 0 8
8 8 8
4 8 0
0 0 8
8 8 e
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
e f
1 1
1 6 8 8
4 8 0
5 5 5
3 3 3
7 7 l
r 3 3 3
2 2 2
2 2 2
2 2 2
2 2 2
2 2 b
e
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ / 3 /
/ / 3 /
/ / 3 /
/ / 3 3 a
p 1
1 3 1
2 2 3 2 3 3 8 3 4 4 9 4 5 5 8 5 4 6 8 6 t
0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 0 0 / 0 C 0 / /
/
/
8 5
3 7 7 f
n o o1 o o o8 o o o2 o o o2 o o o2 o o o 2 2 o
o t t 3 t t t 2 t t t / t t t / t t t / t t t / /
i
/
/
3 4
5 6 6 d
t 2 2 1 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 0 0 n
c 8 8 0 9 0 0 0 9 8 8 8
8 0 8
8 0 8
8 8 e
e
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
l 9 9 9
i 1 1
8 8 6
8 s 8
5 5 5
3 3 t
l 2 2 2
3 3 3
2 2 2
2 2 2
2 2 2
2 2 a
o
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
/
/ /
C 2 2 2
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 e
1 1 1
0 0 0
0 8 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
C 0 ton a
t e
o l
t 5 4 6 7 8 4 6 7 6 4 6 7 6 4 6 7 4 4 6 7 8 4 6 7 o
a 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 f
c e
o e
L S
y y
r r
e e
h e
a h
l e
t t
u r
c i
n s
b r
r y
n o
o e
e a
p a
u n
M J
F M
A m
J pg l
- s. -
itbli 10 (Page 2 of 2)
Casma spectrometry of hater Samples PNPP RIMP 1983 (Results in pct /l + 2s)
Month loca tion Collection Period 8a-140 Co-58 Co-60 C s-134 C s-137 Fe-59 La-140 Mn-54 Nb-95 Zn-65 Zr-35 Other JuTy 28 06/27/83 to 07/25/83 LT 10 LT 6 LT 4 LT 4 LT 4 LT 18 LT 10 LT 4 LT 6 LT 9 LT 11 ND 34 06/27/83 to 07/25/83 LT 10 LT 6 LT 4 LT 4 LT 4 LT 18 LT 10 LT 4 LT 6 LT 9 LT !!
ND 36 07/25/83 LT 11 LT 5 LT 4 LT 3 LT 4 LT 15 LT 11 LT 4 LT $
LT 9 LT 9 ND 37 06/27/83 to 07/25/83 LT 10 LT 6 LT 4 LT 4 LT 4 LT 18 LT 10 LT 4 LT 6 LT 9 LT !!
ND Au9ust 28 07/25/83 to 08/29/83 LT 150 LT 5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 14 LT 90(2) LT 3 LT 5 LT 6 LT 9 ND I3I 34 07/25/83 to 08/29/63 LT 150 LT 5 LT 3 1.73 LT 3 LT 14 LT 90(2) LT 3 LT 5 LT 6 LT 9 ND I3I LT 5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 14 LT 90(2) LT 3 LT 5 LT 6 LT 9 ND III 36 08/29/t3 LT 150 37 07/25/83 to 08/29/83 LT 150 LT 5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 14 LT 90(2) LT 3 LT 5 LT 6 LT 9 ND I3I I3I I3I
-4 September 28 08/29/83 to 09/26/83 LT 200 LT 5 LT 3 LT 3 Li J LT 15 LT 110 LT 3 LT 5 LT 7 LT 8 ND I3I I3I b
34 08/29/83 to 09/26/83 LT 200 LT 5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 15 LT 110 LT 3 LT 5 LT 7 LT 8 ND I3I I3I 36 09/26/83 LT 300 LT 5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 14 LT 110 LT 3 LT 5 LT 6 LT 9 ND I3I I3I 37 08/29/83 to 09/26/83 LT 300 LT 5 LT 3 LT 3 LT 3 LT 14 LT 120 LT 3 LT 5 LT 6 LT 9 ND I3I I3I october 28 09/26/83 to 10/31/83 LT 100 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 8 LT 50 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 LT 5 K-40 9 LT 20 I3I I3I 34 09/26/83 to 10/31/83 LT 100 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 8 LT 50 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 LT 5 K-40 9 LT 20 I3I I3I 36 10/31/83 LT 100 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 8 LT 50 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 LT 5 K-40 0 LT 20 I3I I3I 37 09/26/83 to 10/31/83 LT 100 LT 3 LT 2 LT 2 LT 2 LT 8 LT 50 LT 2 LT 3 LT 5 LT 5 K-40 0 LT 20 Notester 28 11/28/83 LT 20 LT 2 LT 2 LT 1.9 LT 2 LT 5 LT 12 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 K-40 9 LT 20 34 10/31/83 to 11/28/83 LT 20 LT 2 LT 2 LT 1.9 LT 2 LT 5 LT 12 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 K-40 0 LT 20 36 11/01/83 to 11/28/83 LT 20 LT 2 LT 2 LT 1.9 LT 2 LT 5 LT 12 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 K-40 9 LT 20 37 10/31/83 to 11/28/83 LT 20 LT 2 LT 2 LT 1.9 LT 2 LT 5 LT 12 LT 2 LT 3 LT 4 LT 4 K-40 9 LT 20 December 28 12/05/83 to 12/19/83 LT 50 LT 1.6 LT 1.1 LT 1.1 LT 1.0 LT 4 LT 20 LT 1.1 LT 1.6 LT 2 LT 3 KD 34 11/28/83 to 12/19/83 LT 40 LT 1.6 LT 1.1 LT I.I LT 1.0 LT 4 LT 20 L T 1.1 LT 3.6 LT 2 LT 3 ND 36 11/28/83 to 12/19/83 LT 40 LT 1.6 LT 1.1 LT 3.1 LT 1.0 LT 4 LT 20 LT !.! LT 1.6 LT 2 LT 3 kD 37 12/19/83 LT 50 LT LT 1.1 LT 1.1 LT 1.0 LT 4 LT 20 L T 1.1 LT 1.6 LT 2 LT 3 ND t!) Ll = tess Than (2) ND = Not Detected (3) Lower sensitivity due to delay in counting.
O
Table 11 (Page 1 of 2)
Gross Beta in Water PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/l + 2s)
Month Location Collection Period Gross Beta January 28 12/29/82 to 01/31/83-4.5 + 1.3 34 12/29/82 to 01/31/83 4.5 T 1.3 36 01/31/83 3.6 7 1.4 37 12/29/82 to 01/31/83 5.6][1.6 February 28 01/31/83 to 02/28/83 3.9 + 1.4 34 01/31/83 to 02/28/83 2.7 7 1.3 4
36 02/28/83 2.8 7 1.3 37 01/31/83 to 02/28/83 2.3][1.3 March 28 02/28/83 to 03/28/83 2.8 + 1.3 34 02/28/83 to 03/28/83 2.8 7 1.3 36 03/28/83 3.1 7 1.3 37 02/28/83 to 03/28/83 3.2}[1.3 April 28 03/28/83 to 04/25/83 3.3 + 1.5 34 03/28/83 to 04/25/83 3.0 7 1.4 36 04/25/83 4.1 7 1.5 37 03/28/83 to 04/25/83 3.5}[1.5 May 28 04/25/83 to 05/23/83 3.9 + 1.3 34 04/25/83 to 05/23/83 5.0 7 1.3 36 05/23/83 5.5 7 1.3 37 04/25/83 to 05/23/83 7.2][1.4 June 28 05/23/83 to 06/27/83 6.2 + 1.5 34 05/23/83 to 06/27/83 7.0 7 1.6 36 06/27/83 3. 2 77 1.4 37 06/27/83 9.0][1.3 I
T-26 i
Table 11 (Page 2 of 2)
Gross Beta in Water PHPP REMP 1983 (Results in pC1/1 + 2s)
Non th Location Collection Period Gross Beta July 28 06/27/83 to 07/25/83 5.5 + 1.5 34 06/27/83 to 07/25/83 LT 2 (1) 36 07/25/83 LT 2 37 06/27/83 to 07/25/83 LT 2 August 28 07/25/83 to 08/29/83 6.0 + 2.5 34 07/25/83 to 08/29/83 6.4 7 2.5 36 08/29/83 3.4 7 1.4 37 07/25/83 to 08/29/83 4.7][2.4 Sep tester 28 08/29/83 to 09/26/83 3.7 + 1.3 34 08/29/83 to 09/26/83 3.0 7 1.3 36 09/26/83 1.8 7 1.4 37 08/29/83 to 09/26/83 4.3}[1.5 October 28 09/26/83 to 10/31/83 1.6 + 1.4 34 09/26/83 to 10/31/83 4.3 7 1.4 36 10/31/83 4.7 7 1.3 37 09/26/83 to 10/31/83 3.2][1.3 November 28 11/28/83 6.2 + 1.9 34 10/31/83 to 11/28/83 4.0 7 1.3 36 11/01/83 to 11/28/83 2.7 7 1.3 37 10/31/83 to 11/28/83.
3.7][1.3 December 28 12/05/83 to 12/19/83 3.0 + 1.4 34 11/28/83 to 12/19/83 3.7 7 1.5 36 11/28/83 to 12/19/83 2.5 7 1.4 37 12/19/83 7.9][1.7 (1) LT = Less Than 4
T-27 L
4 Table 12 Tritium in Water Quarterly Composite by Location PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in pCi/1 f; 2s)
Quarter Location Collection Period Tritium 1
28 12/29/82 to 03/28/83 LT 300(II 34 12/29/82 to 03/28/83 LT 300 36 01/31/83 to 03/28/83 LT 300 37 12/29/82 to 03/28/83 LT 300 2
28 03/28/83 to 06/27/83 LT 300 l
34 03/28/83 to 06/27/83 LT 300 l
36 04/25/83 to 06/27/83 LT 300 37 03/28/83 to 06/27/83 7802;200 3
28 06/27/83 to 09/26/83 240 + 190 34 06/27/83 to 09/26/83 LT 700 36 07/25/83 to 09/26/83 310 + 190 37 06/27/83 to 09/26/83 360[190 4
28 09/26/83 to 12/19/83 LT 300 34 09/26/83 to 12/19/83 LT 300 36 10/31/83 to 12/19/83 LT 300 37 09/26/83 to 12/19/83 LT 300 (1) Less Than i
l l
T-28 1
i
1 1
Table 13 Strontiurr89 and Strontium-90 in Watsr PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in units of pC1/1 + 2s)
Station Collection Date Strontium-89 Strontium-90 III 28 08/29/83 LT 60 0.62 + 0.61 34 08/29/83 LT 60 LT 1.4 36 08/29/83 LT 60 LT 1.3 37 08/29/83 LT 70 LT 1.6 28 11/28/83 LT 20 LT 1.6 34 11/28/83 LT 18 LT 1.4 36 11/28/83 LT 16 LT 1.3 37 11/28/83 LT 14 LT 1.1 (1) LT
- Less Than T-29
Table 14 (Page 1 of 3)
Ganr.a Spectrometry of Milk Samples PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in pC1/1 + 2s)
Collection Location Da te Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 La-140 III 33 01/31/83 LT 14 LT 4 LT 4 1300 + 200 LT 7 29 02/28/83 LT 19 LT 6 LT 6 1300 + 200 LT S 33 02/28/83 LT 19 LT 6 LT 8 1200 1 200 LT 15 29 03/28/83 LT 30 LT 8 LT 8 1500 + 200 LT 7 30 03/28/83 LT 14 LT 4 LT 4 1600 7 200 LT 7 33 03/28/83 LT 20 LT 6 LT 7 1300[200 LT 10 29 04/11/83 LT 30 LT 11 LT 11 1500 + 200 LT 13 30 04/11/63 LT 20 LT 9 LT 10 1800 7 200 LT 12 33 04/11/83 LT 20 LT 9 LT 9 1100{200 LT 10 29 04/25/83 LT 30 LT 6 LT 7 1600 + 200 LT 13 30 04/25/83 LT 20 LT 6 LT 7 1600 7 200 LT 12 33 04/25/83 LT 20 LT 8 LT 8 13001200 LT 7 29 05/09/83 LT 20 LT 7 LT 8 1400 + 200 LT 10 30 05/09/83 LT 20 LT 7 LT 8 1200 7 200 LT 10 33 05/09/83 LT 20 LT 8 LT 8 12003200 LT 9 29 05/23/83 LT 40 LT 12 LT 13 1800 + 200 LT 14 30 05/23/83 LT 20 LT 8 LT 8 1400 7 200 LT 11 33 05/23/83 LT 14 LT 5 LT 5 1400 [ 200 LT 6 29 06/13/83 LT 30 LT 10 LT 10 1700 + 200 LT 13 30 06/13/83 LT 18 LT 4 LT 5 1500 7 200 LT 7 33 06/13/83 LT 30 LT 9 LT 9 13001200 LT 13 hote: Sce footnote at end of table.
T-30
1, 1
Table 14
{
(Page 2 of 3)
Gassa Spectrometry of Milk Samples 4
i (Results in pC1/1 + 2s) i Collection l
Location Date Bh-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 La-140 i
i 29 06/27/83 LT 40 LT 3 3.4 + 2.0 1900 + 200 LT 15 30 06/27/83 LT 16 LT 1.6 2.3 7 1.1 1300 7 200 LT 8 33 06/27/83 LT 30 LT 2 LT3 1100 7 200 LT 13 29 07/11/83 LT 20 LT 10 LT 10 1600 + 200 LT 11 30 07/11/83 LT 30 LT 11 LT 14 1100 7 200 LT 13 33 07/11/83 LT 30 LT 10 LT 13 8601150 LT 15 j
f 29 07/25/83 LT 30 LT 5 LT 6 1700 + 200 LT 15 L
j 30 07/25/83 LT 30 LT 5 LT 5 1700 7 200 LT 15 33 07/25/83 LT 30 LT 4 LT 5 14001200 LT 15 29 08/15/83 LT 40 LT 12 LT 18 1200 + 200 LT 13 1
30 08/15/83 LT 30 LT 10 LT 11 1600 7 200 LT 15 j
33 08/1,5/83 LT 30 LT 10 LT 11
'13001200 LT 15 I
29 08/29/83 LT 90(2)
LT 1.2 3.5 + 0.7 1700 + 200 LT 40(2) 30 08/29/83 LT 190(2) LT 2 LT3 1500 7 200 LT 90(2) 33 08/29/83 LT 100 LT 1.4 LT 1.5 11001200 LT 50(2)
LT 2 1.4 + 1.3 1800 + 200 LT 40(2)
LT 100((2) 29 09/12/83 30 09/12/83 LT11p2)
LT 2 LT3 1900 7 200 LT 50((2) 2)
2)
}
33 09/12/83 LT 70 LT 1.6 LT 1.8 1300 1 200 LT 30 LT 70(2)
LT 1.4 1.8 + 0.9 1800 + 200 LT 30((2) 29 09/26/83 LT 19(2) t 30 09/26/83 LT 40 LT 1.0 2.0 7 0.6 1300 7 200 2) 33 09/26/83 LT 40 LT 0.9 LT1.0 1000 7 100 LT 18 i
kote: See footnote at end of table.
j i
l
}
i j
T-31
[
1 s
1
\\
i i
Table 14 (Page 3 of 3)
Gamma Spectrometry of Milk Samples PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in pC1/1 + 2s )
Collection Location Da te Ba-140 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 La-140 LT 300((2) 29 10/10/83 LT 800(2) LT 3 LT 3 2000 + 200 2) 30 10/10/83 LT 500(2) LT 2 3.1 + 1.3 1700 7 200 LT 200 33 10/10/83 LT 500(2) LT 1.9 LT"2 15001200 LT 190(2) 29 10/31/83 LT 20(2)
LT 2 1.6 + 1.3 1700 + 200 LT 11(2) 30 10/31/83 LT 70 LT 4 LT"5 1600 7 200 LT 30(2) 33 10/31/83 LT 60 LT 4 LT 4 14001200 LT 30 29 11/28/83 LT 40 LT 7 LT 8 1700 + 200 LT 20(2) 30 11/28/83 LT 30(2)
LT 5 LT 6 1700 7 200 LT 13(2) 33 11/28/83 LT 80 LT 9 LT 10 15001200 LT 40 29 12/19/83 LT 30 LT 5 LT 5 1400'+ 200 LT 15 30 12/19/83 LT 30 LT 4 LT 5 1400 7 200 LT 15 33 12/19/83 LT 30 LT 4 LT 5 13001200 LT 15 (1) LT = Less than (2) Lower sensitivity due to delay in counting.
i l
l l
T-32 l
i
'4 Table 15 (Page 1 of 2)
Iodine-131 in Milk PNPP REMP - 1983 (Results in pCi/l + 2s
)
Location Collection Date I-131 III 33 01/31/83 LT 0.3 29 02/28/83 LT 0.2 33 02/28/83 LT 0.2 29 03/28/83 LT 0.3 30 03/28/83 LT 0.3 33 03/28/83 LT 0.2 29 04/11/83 LT 0.2
-30 04/11/83 LT 0.3 33 04/11/83 LT 0.2 29 04/25/83 LT 0.2 30 04/25/83 LT 0.3 33 04/25/83 LT 0.2 29 05/09/83 LT 0.2 30 05/09/83 LT 0.3 33 05/09/83 LT 0.2 29 05/23/83 LT 0.3 30 05/23/83 LT 0.3 33 05/23/83 LT 0.3 29 06/13/83 LT 0.10 30 06/13/83 LT 0.3 33 06/13/83 LT 0.2 29 06/27/83 LT 0.6 30 06/27/83 LT 0.6 33 06/27/83 LT 0.6 29 07/11/83 LT 0.09 30 07/11/83 LT 0.19 33 07/11/83 LT 0.14 Note: See footnote at end of table.
T-33 I
I
Table 15
-(Page 2 of 2)
Iodine-131 in Milk PNPP REMP - 1983 (Results in pCi/l + 2s )
Location Collection Date I-131 29 07/25/83 LT 0.3 30 07/25/83 LT 0.3 33 07/25/83 LT 0.2 29 08/15/83 LT 0.10 30 08/15/83 LT 0.2 33 08/15/83 LT 0.19 29 08/29/83 LT 0.2 30 08/29/83 LT 0.2 33 08/29/83 LT 0.3 29 09/12/83 LT 0.4 30 09/12/83 LT 0.3 33 09/12/83 LT 0.4 29 09/26/83 LT 0.3 30 09/26/83 LT 0.3 33 09/26/83 LT 0.2 29 10/10/83 LT 0.2 30 10/10/83 LT 0.2 33 10/10/83 LT 0.2 29 10/31/83 LT 0.12 30 10/31/83 LT 0.13 33 10/31/83 LT 0.13 29 11/28/83 LT 0.13 30 11/28/83 LT 0.14 33 11/28/83 LT 0.2 29 12/19/83 LT 0.6 30 12/19/83 LT 0.3 33 12/19/83 LT 0.4 (1) LT = Less Than T-34
Table 16 Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in Milk PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in units of pCf /1 + 2s)
Station Collection Date S trontium-89 Strontium-90 29 08/29/83 LT 50 (1)
LT 1.1 30 08/29/83 (2)
(2) 33 08/29/83 LT 90 1.8 + 0.9 29 11/28/83 (2)
(2) 30 11/28/83 LT 50 3.5 + 1.5 33-11/28/83 (2)
(2)
(1) LT = Less Than (2) Sample depleted during analysis l
l l
T-35 l
I
~-._..
~
Table 17 Gamma Spectrometry of Feed / Silage PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) 12s)
. Collection Location Da te Be-7 Cs-134 Cs-137 I-131 K-40 29 08/29/83 240 + 120 LT 20(3) LT 20 LT 50 6500 + 700 III
~
~
30(1) 08/29/83 470 1 90 LT 15 LT 18 LT 60 12000 1 2000 29(2) 08/29/83 ND(4}
LT 40 LT 50 LT 50 6500 + 900 30(2) 08/29/83 ND LT 50 LT 50 LT 60 6000 900 i
33(2) 08/29/83 ND LT 20 LT 20 LT 30 3900 1 400 J
(1) Pasture grass (2) Grain (3) LT = Less Than (4) ND = Not detected 1
I I
T-36 4
l
Table 18 Gamma Spectrometry of Vegetation Samples PNPP REMP 1983 (Results in Units of pC1/kg (wet) j; 2s)
Collection Ve9etation Da te Location Type I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 09/20/83 38 Squash LT 60 LT 60 LT 80 3700f,900 09/20/83 38 Cabbage LT 50 LT 50 LT 50 2000 f,600 09/20/83 39 Apples LT 50 LT 40 LT 50 1700 j; 300 09/20/83 39 Peaches LT 50 LT 40 LT 40 1800 j; 500 09/20/83 40 Tomatoes LT 50 LT 40 LT 50 2400f;600 09/20/83 40 Cucumbers LT 50 LT 40 LT 40 2200 j; 500 09/20/83 40 Peppers LT 40 LT 40 LT 50 630 j; 200 LT = Less Than l
(
I i
T-37 i
f L
T ABLE 19 50pm4RT OF DATA FOR THE PERRY NPP RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROINENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Page I of 4)
Name of Facility: Perry NPP Units I and 2. Docket mos. 50-440 and 50-441 Location of Facility: 35 Miles Northeast of Cleveland, Ohio (Lake County)
Reporting Period: January 04, 1983, thraugh January 04, 1984 Medium or Pathway Type and Location vith Mighest Annual Mean (Units of of Analyses Limit of Locations Name, Distance Mean (f)(2)
Control, location (2)
Sampled Total Number Lower All Indicator
,,,gg) ggg Mean (f) (Range) and Direction (Bange)
(Range)
Measurement)
Performed De tection TLDs Gamma Dese - 296 0.22 (272/272) 5tation 18 0.30 (12/12) 0.22 (24/24)
(as/ day)
(0.15 - 0.33) 5.0 miles 5 (0.29 - 0.33)
(0.18 - 0.28)
Fish Comme Spec - 22 4200 (!!/11)
Only one indicator location 3600 (11/11)
(2200 - 8500) sampled for this sedfus (2000 - 5100)
(PCl/kg (met!) K-40 Mn-54 130 LLO tto I
Fe-59 260 LLD LLD 7
Co-58,60 130 LLD LLD 2n-65 260 LLD LLD w
CD Cs-134 130 LLD LLD Cs-137 150 25 (6/11) 33 (4/11)
(6.1 - 38)
(18 - 46)
Shoreline Gasme Spec 8 5edleents (pCf/tg (dry)) St-214 810 (6/6)
Station 26 1100 (2/2) 770 (2/2)
(540 - 1100) 4.2 elles ENE (1000-1100)
(560-980)
Pb-214 910 (6/6)
Station 26 1200 (2/2) 850 (2/2)
(590 - 1300) 4.2 miles ENE (1100-1300)
(720-970)
R4-226 860 (6/6)
Station 26 1100 (2/2) 810 (2/2)
(570-1100) 4.2 miles ENE
(!!00-1100)
(640-980)
PD-212 610 (5/6)
Station 26 840 (2/2) 530 (2/2)
(310-890) 4.2 miles ENE (790-890)
(380-680)11-208 710 (6/6)
Station 26 930 (2/2) 730 (2/2)
(430-940) 4.2 miles ENE (920-940)
(570-880)
Note: See footnotes at end of table.
~
TA8tt 19 SumARY OF DATA FOR THL PIRRY kPP RADIOLOGICAL thVIRONNNTAL MoulTORitG PR0 CRAM - 1983 (Pete 2 of 4) hane of Factitty: Perry prP Units I and 2 Docket hos. 50-440 and 50-441 Location of Facility: 35 Miles Northeast of Cleveland, Ohio (Late County)
Reporting Period: January 04, 1983, throu9h January 04, 1964 Meetun or Pathway Type and Location with Miehest Annual Mean Sampled Total number Lower All 19dicator Control Location (Units of of Analyses Limit of loca tions Name, Distance Mean (f)III Mean (f) III ggy Measurement)
Performed De tection Mean (f) (Bange) and Of rection (Range)
(Range) 58Hreline Ac-228 714 (5/6)
Station 26 940 (2/2) 790 (2/2)
Sedleents (340-!!00) 4.2 elles ENE (850-1100)
(580-1000)
(con't)
R-40 13,000 (6/6)
Station 26 17,000 (2/2) 13,000 (2/2)
(9600 - 1s,000) 4.2 elles tut (Is,000-Is,000)
(11,000-15,000)
Cs-134 150 LLD LLD Cs-137 100 220 (3/6)
Station 25 310 (1/2) 160 (1/2) 7 (150 - 310) 0.6 elles h4W (310-310)
(160-160) ca Stroatte-4 Sr-89 LLD LLD Sr-90 LLD LLD I
Airborne Gross Seta-311 10 19 (239/259)
Station 5 19 (46/52) 19 (50/52)
Particulates (5.7-41) 0.6 miles SW (8.4-35)
(7.7-34) 3 (E-03 pCf/m )
Gaume Spec-24 Se-7 54 (15/20)
Station 5 64 (3/4) 52 (3/4)
(44-94) 0.6 miles SW (46-94)
(40-44)
Ce-144 LLD LLD Cs-134 50 LLD LLD Cs-137 60 LLD LLD N6-95 LLD LLD Zr-95 LLD LLD Air Igine I-131-311 0.07 LLD LLD (Pct /m I no te: See footnotes at end of table.
_.g _
1ABLL 19 SupetARY OF DAT A FOR TML PLRRY hPP RADIOLOGICAL LNVIRONMLNTAL MONITORim. eni. NAM - 1983 (Pa9e 3 of 4)
Name of Factitty: Perry NPP Units I and 2. Docket Mos. 50-440 and 50-441 Location of Factitty: 35 Miles Northeast of Cleveland, Ohio (Lake County)
Reporting Partod: January 04, 1983, through January 04, 1984 Medtum or location with Highest Annual Mean Pathmer Type and All Indicator Control Location Sampled Total Number Lower (Units of of Analyses Limit of Locations tame, Distance Mean (f)I2I Mean (f) III ggy Measureeent)
Performed De tection Mean (f) (Range)
..*d Direction (Rangel (Range)
Wa ter Gross Beta-48 4
4.2 (33/36)
Station 37 5.0 (11/12) 4.2 (12/12)
(pct /li (1.8-9.0) 4.1 elles LNC (2.3-9.0)
(1.6-6.2)
Gauna Spec-48 Ba-140 60 LLD LLD Co-58 15 LLD LLD Co-60 15 LLD LLD i
Cs-134 15 LLD LLD Cs-137 18 LLD LLD
-4 Fe-59 30 LLD LLD E
La-140 15 LLD LLD o
Ma-54 15 LLD LLD bb-95 15 LLD LLD Zn-65 30 LLD LLD Zr-95 30 LLD LLD r
Trittum-16 2000 400 (3/12)
Station 37 570 (2/4) 240 (1/4)
I (310-780) 4.1 miles thC (360-780)
(240-240)
Stronttur 8 Sr-89 LLD LLD Sr-90 LLD 0.62 (1/2) 4 (0.62-0.62)
Milt Gaana Spec-54 (pCf/I)
LLD Ba-140 60 LLD Cs-134 15 LLD LLD Cs-137 15 2.4 (8/35)
Station 30 2.5 (3/17)
LLD (1.4 - 3.5) 2.3 miles $5W (2.0 - 3.1)
K-40 1600 (35/35)
Station 29 1600 (18/18) 1300 (19/19)
(!!00 - 2000) 1.4 miles LSE (1200-2000)
(860-1500)
LLD La-140 15 LLD LLD l-131-54 I
$r-90 3.5 (1/2) 1.8 (1/l)
(3.5 - 3.5)
(1.8 - 1.8)
Note: See footnotes at end of table.
0 T ABL E 19 SUMARY OF DATA FOR THL P[RRY NPP RADIOLOGICAL [NVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 1983 (Page 4 of 4)
Name of Fact 11ty: Perry NPP Units 1 and 2. Docket hos60-440 and 50-441 ge Location of Fac111ty: 35 Miles Northeast of Cleveland, Ohio (Lake County)
Reporting Period: January 04, 1983, through January 04, 1984 Medium or Pa thway Type and Location with Highest Annual Mean Sampled Total Number Lower All Indicator Control Location (batts of of Analyses Limit of Locations Naw, Distance Mean(fb Mean (f) ggy Measurement)
Performed De tec tion Mean (f) (Range) and Direction (Range)
(Range)
Feed / Silage Gasma Spec-5 (pC1/kg (wet))
Be-7 360 (2/4)
Station 30 470 (1/2)
}
(240-470) 2.3 miles $5W (470-470)
ND Cs-134 60 LLD LLD Cs-137 80 LLD LLD p
t-40 7800 (4/4)
Station 30 9000 (2/2) 3900 (1/1)
(6000-12,000) 2.3 miles 55W (6000-12,000)
(3900-3900) w w
1-131 60 LLD LLD Vegetatt on Gasma Spec-7 (pct /kg (wet))
1-131 60 LLD Only indicator 60 LLD locations sampled h
Cs-134 Cs-137 80 LLD for this medium E-40 2!00 (7/7)
Station 38 2900 (2/2)
(630-3700)
(1.1 alles E (2000-3700)
(1) LLD is lower Ilmit of detection as defined and required in USNRC Branch Technical Position on An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Revision 1. Novee6er 1979.
(2) (f) is the ratto of positive results to the number of samples analyzed "or the parameter of interest (3) Means are identical for the three locations.
4
Table 20 Nearest Gardens and Residences Identified During the 1983 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey Nearest Residence Nearest Garden Direction (Dis tance/Aadress)
(Dis tance/Adoress)
NE 0.6 miles 0.6 miles 4384 Lockwood 4384 Lockwood ENE 1.1 miles 1.1 miles 4611 Lockwood 4611 Lockwood E
1.2 miles 1.2 miles 2684 Antioch 2674 Antioch ESE 1.2 miles 1.2 miles 2774 Antioch 2774 Antioch SE 1.2 miles 1.0 mile 4495 North Ridge 4495 North Ridge SSE 0.8 miles 0.8 miles 3119 Parmly 3119 Parmly S
0.9 miles 0.9 miles 3121 Center 3298 Center SSW 0.9 miles 1.5 miles 3850 Clark 3787 North Ridge SW 1.3 miles 1.3 miles 3032 Perry Park 3078 Perry Park WSW 1.2 miles 1.2 miles 3462 Parmly 2970 Perry Park i
i I
l T-42 I
t I
1 Table 21 (Page 1 of 2)
Milk Animals Identified During 1983 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey Number / Type Location of Animals 1 mile SSE 2 Goats 3291 Parmly (and 2 Kids) 2 miles E 12 Goats 2541 Townline 3.7 miles E 12 or more Cows Green Farm Green and North Ridge 2.6 miles SSE 1 Goat 3907 Call.
1 2.9 miles S 1 Cow,1 Goat 4312 Call 1.1 miles S 2 Goats 3830 Center 3.6 miles ESE Cows, number 5960 Middle Ridge undetermined 1.4 miles SE 2 Goats 4776 North Ridge 1.4 miles ESE 2 Goats 2908 Antioch 3.1 miles E 1 Cow 2565 Haines 2.6 miles SW 2 or more Cows Blackmore Road 2.6 miles SSE 4 Cows 4761 Davis T-43 4
Table 21 (Page 2 of 2)
Milk Animals Identified During 1983 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey Number / Type Loca tion of Animals 3.7 miles SE 3 Cows 5378 South Ridge (may be heffers) 3.9 miles ESE 6 Cows, also sheep Dayton Road next to 3352 4 miles ESE 2 Cows 3587 Dayton 2.6 miles ENE 2 Cows
$297 Lockwood 4.4 miles SSE 2 Cows, 2 horses Turney and River Rd 2.3 miles SSW Goats 3203 North Ridge 4
T-44 1
i
Table 22 Control Milk Sampling Locations Identified During the 1983 Perry NPP Annual Land Use Survey Loca tion Description 12 miles SSE Brockglen Farm 8187 Callow Road Major Dairy Herd 11 miles SSE Rettger 13863 Painesville -
Major dairy herd Warren Road 9
T-45
N 0
Y
\\
S 4
g.
e#
v
/
\\
~
~.
gi e
t i
i i
AI$N El 13
- .V'33 I
{g!,' 9.l.
.. c.
A.
!(
.:(!
J'L g-
)
s
. ~g
. n g
- ,,b q
m A
s r.;
l
.9.
}e p
4 ', y
~~j-U j
O,.
~
\\
[
, /"
U 31_jil*
\\
s n
.g y,
.2...- rg
,1
,~
J.
'r *
.. '.. - t W..
M' Je q
-s i
. f.
,P I
8 Q
'h f
.,e
,, 4
- y,
- 7' ' '
)
/
s&c.. :..>.
, ;a,4;t[ = ?, y'Q(,-g* %g'w Yf.
- ~
^'
- l p
,y
.[;#
f J
i
_., a,
e
..~:
\\
. s.,,, > e,.
u.g,,.
..w
. s.Lc g
gW. -
a
=
n,. cPt
(
N gp i
g
'ff,
~
L, L:
-i
^
t s
,$yw.:.;..J... cg,s 1;; zu?.. -
2 m
l T2 %
- 3, -
e i
e-
- K' f.,,
['
hbh~ ^/jj
{
- ^w.
W-
.y
~.
m....
k
')& 4 J
a
~
e
- - - - - ~
Wahle O" Prlare Card TI h
APERTURE
_. m CARD
.DH d
l C'
, c e
,.e.
, I. '\\
- + '
,;.. "16,
..., e 0
Q,g
,-,i*
1 2
3 4 Miles 4
, g..'. k S
LEGEND h [3
'(-
Station No Media Direction
L 1
Air - TLD ENE M,~ p<
8 8,'
- 7.',-) '[',,
2 TLD E
M 1
%.7 g,
-[.
3 Air-1LD SE a,.'
.1
..,.e 4
Air - TLD S
i' h
U
, vi~
e.8 j,. h,4'~ ;-
h3*
w 7
TLD NE Q[e.v '
[y
.. J f d.1 a 8
TLD ENE
~*1 9
TLD ESE
', 3 "* _. *)
J'-
~
aMLmi it TLD sSw
-~.-'
4 l
'q i-- p
,a 12 TLD WSW
-- r * - c 4! ' --
13 TLD ENE he 14 TL D E
' w' Ib7%
~-
[ ' [t * *., ('['
15 TLD ESE
- 7.fal, :."-2,' q,. E*o..',
l a r.
16 TL D SE k
17 Ti. D SSE h 'q,. M1A..s
.s (j
(l ;
g ,
18 TLD S
~,,,
.', {-i ',,',' *,%*[_Ye*
,8 21 TLD WSW g,j i
(
?> t
+
,S l'~T -d, Ii.,I"'. y, n.
25 Sediment - Fish NNW 26 Sediment ENE
,.3_.
' d,'
% '" 7 ff1, C'**
l 29 Milk ESE 4 f '.' '
- 3, [.
30 Milk SSW
,7,s.- elf
-N'..
'. /* *.
34 Water NW
$p'.d.[*ee ' b
{
- je-35 Air - TLD E
f* b,
,8)/
l 36 Water WSW Q, ' -
~
s' O, p, b E k
37 Water ENE d-
~y 38 Food Product:
E p'
7 39 Food Products SSW 40 Food Products E
s
.- 1
']
'e
%f
(
PNPP ENVIRONMENTAL bl.
4, e
%[
i' M s
H AOlOLOGIC AL MONITORING PROGRAM T,fi, c. _ _; N n
H SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN 5 MILES OF SITE l y/"
A {, f ' C PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 1 & 2 lL LUMIN AflNG COMPANY THE CL f Vf L AND ELfCTRIC i" **
Figure 1 N #7Cd>
SN t
V
.me' j
.e, r:
N LAKE gagg NNW NNE "e*l NW NE
~
.J
~,
r
,r
' ~
C< a ,
e WNW
/
?b P
~~
d,\\p p,y,
'50 & 6
'o w,,De*pi'a ground
~
J o
n, p.,
+
e m
s Y-V W
y (qF '
f s
ft r,
L 4'j or. %,
/
) 'j
... ~
/
v,,,
,'W w
h te93-0t m,
/Luets,
/,
t
.y
.g s
, v..,,
2
=,
5 w
4 ~, g m, s (7 y ls y u....,.
fs..r...
,w
~
c:
i 8>
, ;. ', C 4 g y,ge.gp
,k Q w (F P gl'\\ s hp e <-
7 A. w,. '/, dj r
h c
3
.4#
t n :e z
w
- I
@A,
4 h,T',, 'h?$xkk$.0Yhn?
J*-
e
,a xv ffgc\\Ql3.- g,cujf~.g 3
1m 1
n,9~4.y
],,
?g f 1
e, nsa s,4,'l;1 '. y>.29% *u..
=
m'i'}.1 4 (
' ' %,v. Y jyr
+,
i M99
./ l g
.v.
,a
" Isv w.c c w n g
. g. g g 3,g/ c y"'.
phan, -
r.CAYAH0fi4 C GEAflGA CO s
.:,.(~
.. m j
I a w m
'Y,'
- II
(
\\,x k_.
/k_..n I
i
........ p N,E )
0Wu l
.ia j
/, (22 le J N{n rn he-take 4*5
.... -d -,
-?
?'s i/
t 1
(A-1 3 545 4
- '$ 'M C
- ki 7,,,
p'.q_
. 7b t
2,c :,,.
. <r, L r% '
jV
~~ - [
LEGEND g
Station Nc.
Media Direction i
I
[
e%
d 7[-] p t[jf.
-?
G Air - TLD -(Control)
SSW i
=-
-,9.. i y
1 1
SW I,
W; y'
fi 27 Sediment WSW bgW a47t=
~
i f '[
28 Water (Controll ENE p
1 32 risti - Sediment (Controll WSW
,i. Ce T
=atea,T -
, y#
A, nic 33 M,ix iConi,oii S
j m.
~.
v-v, Ri.
M O s{ h u
[6
, s '{ Qj, Em
- y.,'
. y M fare g;rd s
>l" y -,",. l,q '..,r h{0
~
U" k
\\^#y'
-- y {.. -l(.:L L./-,2
.,i,,
neui amu.hi],yJQ.y T1 n.q wy v q; g,ERTURE 3
CAny t,~ ; '.; * ;gj7.a u C
e'
..Q'.,. ' *
?
.,. \\ ~._..\\
3.
dhikeae e
4 PNPP ENVIRONMENTAL ist R AOlOLOGIC AL MONITORING PROGR AM M ',
SAM 2 LING LOCATIONS >5 MILES FROM SITE t.
(
PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 1 & 2
,e l
THE CLEVEL AND ELECTRIC q y.p-ILLUMIN A TING COMPANY Figure 2 F-2 75o9o6o ces-o?.
um w
t
+
i i
1 i
t I
e i
[
i I
o 4
i a.
I*
j
.lue 4
i a
I I
i i
l i
n m
,a y
F 3
I i
=
2 m
8v
=J r
3 w
3m
.J
+
w m
i JM i
2 e
I Em 1
cm W
l 1
.=
i i
N O w g r
5 t
a.
S.:I 2
i 9
i 4
j t
5.
t
- ac t
==
n m
ww W
3, l
- a.
Iw I
t z
.E 1
p l
=
4 z8 m
e
.J i
f W
W v
v 2
i 1
=
m 4
w-WU
.J
=>
a.
t w
w i
- 2. w a
v i
<z z
t m
e.
E
=
i a
5 ee 1
e
.l n
w 1
r I
1 a
i i
i 1
0 I
pee 4
i z
i
+
t i
I j
a L
I l
m F
F I
i d'
E
]
i n
j W
3 j
9 l
I W
W F
T T
T T
I I
W T
T y
g ge o
M.
N.
M.
i e
o o
F3
$2 -/+ AV0/WW t
I N
I.
o W
~
L
=
7 l'
.x o
g-a o
m x
3 C
M 5.
Q f
5%
8
.N f
w a
0" g
- ~
gr N, _
o GW
_ M ~4 v
4
<3 a
58 E
'f.
i m
u m>
c e-8 f
"3 M=
0 o-CW W Q
o~
=
3=
~
1 M
8 sw z
wx d *m 8
' N_
B w
w t_
l
- e
<m SC S
e
~
a y '".
z
_X
.r -
a I
~
.c d.1 3
.N
~"
~
.c
.N N'
f; x
W W~
w a
a J ',
1 N'
I i
i i
e o
o e
o e
't M
N w
g hod to-3 r.4
$2 -/*
w
0 b
f
.l I
1 I
t 1
4 l,
i I
,I L
1 1
1 t
t i
1 I
i i
l I
(
r r
1 1
i Appendtx A 1,
s i
I d
i i
Y 4
l l
1 i
]
t J
l i
4 4
a l
[
s I
h i
I l
6 1
1 I
i d
}
l u
I, s
1 P
i P
f i
1 n
V h
O I
4 1
4 I
l I
f I
i 6
i
.m m.-m
. m...-
- m
- m. -
APPENDIX A LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE 1.
Introduction The quality assurance program of the Radiological Laboratory of NUS is briefly described in this appendix.
Information on each incoming sample is entered in a permanent log book.
A sarple number is assigned to each sample at the time of receipt. This sanple number uniquely identifies each sample.
Laboratory counting instruments are calibra ted, using radionuclide standards obtained from the kational Bureau of Standards, the EPA, and reliable commercial suppliers, such as Amersham-Searle.
Calibration of counting ins truments is maintained by regular counting of radioactive reference sources. Background counting rates are measured regularly on all counting instruments. Additional performance checks for the gamma-ray scintillation spectrometer include regular checks and adjustment, when necessary, of energy calibration.
Blank samples are processed, with each group of samples analyzed for specific radionuclides, using radiochemical separation procedures.
Blank, spiked (known quantities of radioactivity added), and replicate samples are processed periodically to determine analytical precision and accuracy.
1 2.
Laboratory Analyses for Quality Assurance The quality assurance procedures employed in the conduct of radiological' monitoring programs by the Environmental Services j
Division Radiological Laboratory are as required in Section 5.0 of the NUS Environmental Systems Group Quality Assurance Manual and detailed in the NUS Radiological Laboratory Manual. These procedures include the requirement for (1) laboratory analysis of samples distributed by appropriate government or other standards-maintaining agencies in a laboratory intercomparison program, (2) analysis of some of the client's environmental samples split with other independent i
laboratories, and (3) analysis in duplicate of a specific fraction of the client's environmental samples.
The NUS Radiological Labora tory participa tes in the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Radioactivity Intercomparison Studies (Cross-check) Program. The NUS results of analyses performed on samples pertinent to the Perry program and the known values are listed in Tables A-1 through A-17.
l i
r i
sy i
A-1 GROSS ALPHA IN WATER
.1 USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 i
EPA Results NUS Results Collection Date
+ 1s (pC1/1) 1 1s (pCi/1) i 01/21/83 29 14 30 11 03/18/83 31 14 31 12 05/20/83 11 13 16 12 07/15/83 7.0 1 2.9 11 11 t
11/18/83 14 15 11 1 0 (1)
(1) Value not reported to EPA in time to be included in report.
- l 1
)
4
'l'.
I r
l a
f B-1 r
GROSS BETA IN WATER
{
i USEPA INTERCOMPARIS0N PROGRAM 1983
[
i l
I i
i Collection Date 1 1s (pC1/1) 1 1s (pC1/1) r
]
01/21/83 31 13 3311 03/18/83 28 13 24 12 l
05/20/83 57 16 46 1 5 l
07/15/83 22 + 3 27 + 2 f
11/18/83 16 1 5 14 1 1 (1) i 1
]
i l
i i
I
-(1) Value not reported to EPA in time to be included in report.
l i
y i
l I
i i
i 4
i i
i i
1
i i
i s
i i
I C-1
[
j GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF MILK
[
j USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 f
i l
s I
Collection EPA Results NUS Results Date Nuclide
+ 1s (PC1/1) 1 1s (pC1/1) l i
t 02/25/83 Cs-137 26 + 3.0 28 + 1 i
i Sa-140 0.0 + 0.0 LT 15 I
l K-40 1512 1 40(og/1) 1530 1 200(og/1) f i
i 1
06/10/83 Cs-137 47 + 3 46 + 3 1
j K-40 1444 1 43(ag/1) 1500 1 100(ag/1) i i
10/28/83 Cs-137 33 1 5.8 32 1 2
{
K-40 1550 1 90( mg/1) 1633 1 57
[
j l
l I
i I
i e
f l
r r
I f
1 l
[
i LT = Less Than I
e, 6 s*
4 h
f f
i I
i l
l l
I
i t
i l
i i
j 1
4 i
i i
C-2 GAMMA SPECTROMETRY OF WATER
[
USEPA IhTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 l
i I
l Collection EPA Results hul Results Da te kuclides 1 1s (pC1/1)
+ 1s (pC1/1) 02/04/43 Cr-El 45 + 3 LT 40 l
Co-60 22 1 3 22 + 2 l
l Zn 66 21 13 19 + 1 Ru-106 48 f, 3 41 1 8 t
Cs-134 20 1 3 20 + 1 Cs-137 19 + 3 20 + 0 t
t l
06/03/43 Cr-El 60 1 3 LT 80 I
1 Co-60 13.+. 3 14
+
2n-66 36 + 3 37 + 6 L
i i
Ru-106 40 + 3 LT to l
Cs-134 47 + 3 42 + 2 l
(
j Cs 137 26 + 3 26 + 2 I
l 10/07/43 Cr-51
$1 + $
36 + 6(1)
[
j Co 60 19 + $
19 + 1 Zn-66 40 + 6 39 + 1 Ru-106 5216 40 + 3
(
Cs-134 15 f, 5 13 f, 1 l
Cs-137 22 + $
22 + 1 q
t 1
I l
i LT - Less Than j
(
]
(1) Average counting error for these analyses was 114 which l
1 overlaps the EPA warning and control Itatts, I
i i
i i
)
i 3
I i
i D-1 100!NE IN MILK USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 Collection EPA Results NUS Results Date 1 1s (pC1/1) 1 1s (pC1/1) i j
i h
1 2
l-02/25/83 5513 56 1 6 i
{
06/10/83 30 1 3 43 1 0(1) f 10/28/83 40 + 6.93 27 + 1.7 3
T
~
i 1
t i
I
),
I i
I (1) Only one number reported due to improper preparation of sample, i
i Insufficient data to determine statistics.
i k
i i
t i
f I
j.
l i
i I
i i
i i
I t
i i
I
}
t r
4 l
I
.m.
~
D-2 100!NE-131 IN WATER USEPA INTERCOMPARIS0N PROGRAM 1983 EPA Results NUS Results Collection Date 1 1s (pci/1) 1 1s (pC1/1) 12/03/82 37 13 3513 04/01/83 27 13 25 13 08/05/83 14 16 11 11 12/16/83 20 16 16 1 1 1
4
E-1 PLUTONIUM IN WATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 EPA Results NUS Results Collection Date 1 is (pC1/1) 1 1s (pci/1) 07/08/83 8.9 1 0.5 8.310.9 i
I.
i l
i i
I i
l 4
a e
I 4
1 I
l L
i F-1 RADIUM-226 & 228 IN WATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 Collection EPA Value NUS Value Date Nuclide 1 is (pCi/1) 1 1s (pci/1)
'12/17/82 Ra-226,
11.0 1 1.0 11 12 Ra-228 0.0 1 0.0 LT 1 03/11/83 Ra-226 12.7 1 1.0 10 11 Ra-228 0.0 1 0.0 LT 1 06/17/83 Ra-226 4.8 1 0.4 6.2 1 1.4 Ra-228 0.0 1 0.0 LT 1 09/09/83 Ra-226 3.1 1 0.47 5.3 1 0.7(1)
Ra-228 2.0 1 0.3 1.9 1 0.5 LT = Less Than (1) anomalous results under investigation.
i
\\
t
I G-1 STRONTIUM IN MILK USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 EPA Results NUS Results Collection 1 is (pci/1) 1 1s (pCf/1)
Date Nuclide i
5 02-25-83 Sr-89 37 13 30 16 Sr-90 18 11 16 10 1
I 4
I F
?
i I
i i
a e
-=
1
.i G-2 STRONTIUM IN WATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 i
Collection EPA Results NUS Results Date Nuclide i is (pCi/1) i is (pCi/1) 01/07/83 Sr-89 29.2 1 2.9 29 13 i
Sr-90 17.2 + 0.9 15 + 1 4
05/06/83 Sr-89 57 13 64 15 Sr-90 38 11 42 13 09/02/83 Sr-89 15 15 22 12 Sr-90 10 1 1.5 7.3 10 i
1
't i
-,,,, ~..... _, -,
H-1 TRITIUM IN WATER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 EPA Results NUS Results Collection Date 1 is (pCi/1) i is (pCi/1) 02/11/83 2560 1 204 2530 1 140 04/08/83 3330 1 210 3500 10 06/10/83 1529 1 194 1333 1 58 08/12/83 1836 1 198 1900 1 200 10/14/83 1210 1 190 1167 1 58 12/09/83 2389 1 203 2333 1 58 A
l l'
1
H-2 TRITIUM IN URINE USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 EPA Results NUS Results Collection Date 1 is (pCi/1) i is (pCi/l) 03/18/83 2470 1 210 1967 1 404 06/10/83 1589 1 195 1367 1 58 3
11/04/83 1008 1 338 1474 1 320 (1) i (1) Value not reported to EPA in time for report.
J
i
\\
4 J-1 i
URANIUM IN WATER 4
USEPA INTERCOMPARIS0N PROGRAM 1983 4
EPA Results NUS Results Collection Date 1 is (pC1/1) i is (pCi/l) 02/18/83 31 13 33 11 08/19/83 26 13 27 11 1
4 f
4 4
e 4
i 4
1
?
l 1
f r
o l
a i
V i
i r
I
K-1 RADIONUCLIDES ON AIR FILTER USEPA INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM 1983 i
Collection Date Radionuclide 21s (pC1/ filter) 11s (pC1/ filter) 03/25/83 Alpha 26 1 3.7 27.3 12 (1)
Beta 68 13 68 11 Sr-90 20 11 22 12 Cs-137 27 13 29 16 08/26/83 Alpha 13 15 10 12 Beta 36 15 35 15 Sr-90 10 1 1.5 125 15 (2)
Cs-137 15 15 13 15 11/25/83 Alpha 19 1 2.9 26.7 1 1.5 Beta 50 1 2.9 53.7 1 1.2 j
s Value from original EPA report was incorrect. Report value is l
(1) recalculated with correct efficiency. Original reported 'value was 79.7.
l (2) Anomalous results under investigation.
l l
L-1 EPA " Blind" Analysis (water)
USEPA INTERCOMPARIS0N PROGRAM 1983 Collection EPA Value NUS Value Date Nuclide 1 1s (pCi/1) i is (pC1/1) 05/09/83 Alpha 64 1 16 57 14 (1)
Beta 149 1 7.5 123 16 (1)
Sr-89 24 13 27 13 Sr-90 13 11 17 11 Ra-226 8.5 1 0.8 9.2 1 0.1 Ra-228 4.7 1 0.4 3.3 1 0.4 Co-60 30 13 31 11 Cs-134 33 13 29 12 Cs-137 27 13 25 12 U
25 13 25 12 11/14/83 Alpha 22 1 5.5 21 12 Beta 63 15 58 + 4 Sr-89 17 15 25 13 Sr-90 8 1 1.5 10.57 1 2.21 Ra-226 5.1 1 0.8 5.5 1 0.3 Ra-228 2.8 1 0.4 1.73 1 23 Co-60 11 15 15.33 1 3.1 (2)
Cs-137 15 15 9.17 1 3.0 Cs-134 15 15 9.9 1 1.82 U
11 16 12 10 (1) Original EPA report was incorrect, corrected EPA value did not include an error (2) NUS value is average of one positive value and two LLD's which were reported.
f i
~
M-1 Results of Sixth International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeters Expected Value NUS Value ils (mR) ils (mR)
Field Exposure 43.5 1 2.2 51.2 1 7.9 Field Exposure 202 1 10 218 1 13 (pre-irradiated)
Lab Exposure 158 18 161 1 11 1
l l
l l
l I
t e
--,-e e.,
y w-e
4 i
,t
+
i s
f 5
1 t
f 4
I i
.a 4,
j Appendix 8 e
d.
5 t
I f
I f
1 i
l, I
t f
I.
I
- ^W'~'""-+vev e-g e.emm
APPENDIX B REPORTING 0F ANALYTICAL RESULTS In the tables presenting analytical measurements, the calculated value is reported wi th the two sigma counting error (2s) derived from a statistical analysis of both the sample and background count rates. The precision of the results is influenced by the size of the sample, the background count rate, and the method used to round of f the value obtained to reflect the degree of significance of the results.
For analytical results obtained from garna spectral analysis, the precision is also influenced by the composition and concentrations of the radionuclides in the sample, the size of the sample, and the assumptions used in selecting the radionuclides to be quantitatively determined. The two sigma error for the net counting rate is:
'R R'
1/2 s
b 2s = 2
+
~
lI t
s b
where:
R = sample counting rate s
R = background counting rate b
t = sample counting time s
b = background counting time t
If the measurements on the samples are not statistically significant (i.e.,
the two sigma count error is equal to or greater than the net measured value), then the radioactivity concentrations in the sample are considered not detected.
l
[
s Results reported as less than ("LT") are below the lower limit of detection (LLD).
The LLD is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will y; eld a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95 percent probability with only 5 percent probability of falsely concluding that blank observation represents a "real" signal.
For a particular measurement system (that may include radiochemical separation):
4.66s b LLD =
E x V x 2.22 x Y x exp (- A At) where:
LLD is the lower limit of detection as defined above (as pC1 per unit mass or volume) s is the standard deviation of the background counting b
rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute)
E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration)
V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume) 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie Y
is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable)
A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide at is the elapsed time between sample collection l
and counting h
7 i
The following are definitions or descriptions of statistical terms used in the reporting and analysis of environmental monitoring results.
Precisior: relates to the reproducibility of measurements within a set, that is, to the scatter or dispersion of a set about its' central value.
i Neasures of the Central Value of a Set. Mean (or Average or Arithmetic Mean) is n
of the values of individual results divided by the number of the sum d Xi F
results in the set. The mean is given by:
i n
1 * *
- I ) I" gfg Y X = (X 1X2 g
n J
Measures of Precision with a Set. Standard Deviation is the square root of the j
quantity (sum of squares of deviations of individual results from thI mean, divided by one less than the number of results in the set).
The standard i
dQviation, s, is given by:
j n
s=
I.
(X - X)2 / (n-1) g i
i=1 i
I Standard deviation has the same units as the measurement.
It becomes a more j
reliable expression of precision as n becomes larger. When the measurements are independent and normally distributed, the most useful statistics are the mean d
for the central value and the standard deviation for the dispersion.
i hote: In the USEPA Intercomparison Program, the standard deviation given by EPA i
j is the expectei laboratory result f rom three analyses. The standard deviation given by NUS is the standard deviation from the mean of three reported values, i
l l
Relative Standard Deviation is the standard dwviation expressed as a fraction of the mean, s/X. -It is sometimes multiplie'd by 100 and expressed as a percentage, f
Range is the difference in magnitude between the largest and the smallest i
results in a set. Instead of a single value, the actual limits are sometimes j
expressed (minimum value/ maximum value).
I p
-