ML20129J349

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Clarification of Table 16 of Recent Health Physics Paper,Including Method Used to Calculate Relative Risk Estimates from Which Doubling Doses Derived
ML20129J349
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/06/1978
From: Whitfield S
NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT
To: Mancuso T
PITTSBURGH, UNIV. OF, PITTSBURGH, PA
Shared Package
ML20129J281 List:
References
FOIA-85-309 NUDOCS 8507220506
Download: ML20129J349 (1)


Text

< MAR 6 1978 Dr. Thomas Mancuso University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health 130 DeSoto Street Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261 -

Dear Dr. Mancuso:

As a radiobiologist with the Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Office of Standards Development, I am greatly interested in your work regarding radiation exposures of ilanford employees dying from cancer.

I am, however, having some difficulty in interpreting Table 16 of your recent Health Physics paper, and wocid greatly appreciate it if you could provide some clarification in this regard. Specifically, I can't datarmine what method you employed to calculate relative risk estimates

' (utilizing the U.S. Vital statistics for deaths of white males,1960) from which I presume the doubling deses were derived. I am particularly interested in any application of an assumed risk plateau to calculate total cancer deaths from a cancer death rate. Feel free to call me collect on 301 443-5900 if it would be more convenient. Thank you.

Sincerely, Stephen Whitfield Environmental Standards Branch Office of Standards Development DISTRIBUTION:

Central File SD ALPHA SD RDG ESB RDG ESB Subject 8507220506 850524 0

A AR -309 PDR t )

Roberts Kastner Parsont TASK NO: ES 702-9 SEE PREVIOUS C0ilCURRENCE --

WhitfiESB/SHS/SD ESB/SHSqD

' " ' ' ' * -SWh44f4 eld / ]gJKastnehj AD/SHS/SD Smith for i.9fo ,

-IGRoberts-

. . . . . , 2/27/78(SW) _2/_2.8LZ8(JK _2428/_38 ICR _

l3 om > .-'7-T- R J ~_ -

unc roax a. c,.7 3 uncx o24. *o.....~.~..>c.i.>.-

/3

%