ML20127B933
| ML20127B933 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Wolf Creek |
| Issue date: | 08/07/1984 |
| From: | Kniel K Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082310426 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-688 NUDOCS 8408130148 | |
| Download: ML20127B933 (38) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_. _ _ - -. _ _ fff f ff;g gy, . [ pt \\ F ' UNITED STATES. t f t p " (M g - NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 34 ? ** g WASHINGTON, D. C. 205M w- > ~ k..%/ 0 7 1904 ' MEMORANDUM FOR:- Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director w Division of Licensing FROM:- Karl Kniel, Chief Generic Issues Branch Division of Safety Technology i SU3 JECT: STATUS OF INSPECTIONS AND OTHER LICENSING ACTIONS-REQUIRED.FOR A WOLF CREEK OPERATING LICENSE ~ Summary and Reconnendations The task force project type organization to perform the necessary inspections at-Wolf Creek that was proposed by Region IV to the Executive Director of Operations on. July 5 is in place and functioning. The work has been scheduled and the individuals assigned and' A l member of the Region IV senior management (progress has been ongoing. SES) is task force Director and is now involved on a day to day basis in managing the inspection work on Wolf Creek. The supervisors appointed to Section Chief and Task Leaders appear to be well qualified and motivated. Adequate resources have been assigned or are available to the ' task force. Agreement regarding the way Region.III will participate in completing the Wolf Creek inspections has been reached. Additional discussion is provided below with regard to work on allegations and emergency preparedness both of which are proceeding well. F Although the Wolf Creek inspections are currently prbceeding on schedule there is always a potential threat for delay resulting from applicant changes in schedule or new information which is then not' acted on promptly by Region IV or NRR management. However, I believe at this point, that the Region IV project organization and ' individuals assigned will function to respond promptly and decisively to new situations as they develop. The NRR Licensing Project Manager on Wolf Creek has been fully involved in working with Region ,IV during the past several months. The LPM has some significant work in resolving SER open issues but he will'have time to continue contact and review with the region on almost a daily basis. I believe, therefore that the Division of Licensing line management can see this case through to a successful conclusion and there is no need for the continued presence of an additional layer of management oversight. Report on Meeting Regarding Wolf Creek Held with Region IV on July 24, 1984 The need to perform and complete the inspections under 2512 Construction i Inspection Program and 2513 Preoperational Inspection Program and review and l resolution of allegations have previously been-identified as the principal i -licensing actions required prior to issuance of the low power license. In ~ response to this need Region IV made a presentation to the Executive Director ~ e#8ts@NQ n 4 . ~..
y, a -. AUG 0.7 1381 of Operations.and other EDO,cI&E, and NRR top management on July 5 at ' headquarters detailing the organization and individual assignments.and the - work load required to complete the regulatory actions. - The slides from this 7 presentation _ are provided here as attachment 2. <This presentation.resulted in part from' previous discussions between Region IV and K. Kniel and P. ' 0'Connor regarding a definition of the work that needed to be done and the organization and individuals required to accomplish the work. _ The purpose of .further discussions with Region IV reported on here was to confirm that the Region IV' project organization was in pl_ ace and that progress was being made in perforining the_ necessary regulatory actions required as a part of the cinspection process._ The agende prepared for the meeting is presented as attachment 1. Attendees at the meeting held on July 24, 1984 were: 3 NRR Region IV ? Karl Kniel RichardP.Denise,TasIForceDirector Paul:0'Connor, LPM Larry E. Martin, Task Force Section-Chief Richard E. Taylor, Task Leader Construction J. B. Baird, Chief / Emergency Preparedness Section, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards ~ Richard E. Smith, who is task leader, Preop /Startup was at the Wolf Creek Site and did not attend. The task' force project organization as presented to the Executive Director (see attachment 2).is in place and functioning and progress is being made on .the 2512 and 2513 inspection modules.. The only. minor hitch that has-r ' developed is aL delay.in obtaining the second resident inspector at the site as a consequence of requiring additional approvals necessitated by a hiring-freeze imposed from_ headquarters. The inspection work-is broken down under two headings both procedurally and -by organization. These' headings -are the 2512 program reactor construction
- and the 2513 and 2514 programs reactor preoperational testing and reactor
.startup respectively. The latter (2514)'does not need to be completed for fuel. loading'and low power licensing. The 2512 program is performed under R. Taylor,. task leader and the 2513/2514 program under R. Smith, task leader. The two. task force, leaders report to L. Martin, the task force section chief who reports to R. Denise, task' force director who is a senior manager in Region IV (SES). These four_ individuals have the management responsibility in Region IV for completing the. inspection work on Wolf Creek. In terms of work flow the resident reactor inspector (s) also report up through the task 1 m>='a m m . a..: -..u m-
i AUG 0 I 1984 leaders. At our meeting there was excellent participation at all the different levels of management represented. The work on completing inspection modules is progressing and is scheduled to be complete as.follows: Inspection Program MeduledComplete November 1 2512 December 1 to December 15 2513 December 15 to December 30 2514 The present utility projection for fuel load is November 1 to December 31. Region IV.can support the November 1 fuel load date by using additional resources from Region IV, Region III and contractor. resources if the applicant. completes the work to support a November 1 date. In response to a question Region IV' indicated that they could-meet the November 1 date without ' any significant' impact on inspection work on operating plants. The present indications are.that it will be difficult for the applicant to complete the testing schedule necessary for the November 1 date. The plans for assistance by. Region III have been worked out between the Regional Administrators at a meeting on July 23,1984 (slides are presented as attachment 2). Important aspects of the general understanding and agreement arrived at are: - In: general Region III work on Wolf Creek will be in the form of packaged assignments to complete defined inspection modules or portions of modules The and not in the form of the loan of individuals for'-a specific time. exception to this is that Region III will assign a team member to the Region IV team conducting the fire protection review. - Reports on the work packages completed will be provided to Region IV by Region III. - Principal effort of Region III support will be in the 2513 program but additional assistnace can also be provided for the 2512 program should this prove to be necessary or desirable. - Lee Spessard of Region III will coordinate the assistance effort for Region III and individual assignments are in progress. - Richard DeYoung at I&E Headquarters will be promptly informed of any problems that might develop in this cooperative work agreement. The current status of allegations at Wolf Creek was discussed in some detail. The Quality First Program initiated by the applicant has accumulated
Aud 0 : D8' ~ dditional allegations. The labor force at the plant is now being actively areduced at the rate of about 300 employees per week until the end of August 1 and many additional allegations are expected during this period in the exit interviews of departing workers. As a result of Region IV inspections of the Quality First Program they have recommended to the utility that Quality First allegations on _ Quality Assurance need to be reported back at a higher level in the utility organization than the Quality Assurance level in order to get a more objective hearing.. Region IV will continue to audit the Quality First resolutions of selected important issues to maintain our confidence in the program. The number of allegations made to the NRC has not increased significantly indicating that most allegers are giving the utility's Quality First Program .a chance to prove itself. Allegations made to the NRC could increase rapidly and if it happens this is most likely to happen in the near future as a ccnsequence of the rapid rate in the reduction of the work force now taking place. The Office.of Investigation work on allegations made to the NRC is proceeding slowly presumably because of higher priority work on other plants. - Region IV believes that they could obtain faster evaluation of any particular issue by request through their regional OI representative should this prove to be necessary or desirable. In reviewing the status of Emergency Preparedness the work involved was broken down under three headings. (1) Review and Acceptance of the Emergency Plan - Headquarters Responsiblity. (2) Emergency Preparedness Appraisal - Regional Responsibility. (3) Emergency Preparedness Exercise - Regional and FEMA Responsibility. Item (1) is essentially completed. Inspections under item (2) have in the past been performed under TI2515-55, however a new program module 82101 has been developed to replace TI2515-55 as guidance for this work. Inspection of the utilities work under this task in preparation was performed in May and an additional inspection was planned for late July. These are preparatory types of inspection to assist the utility in preparing for the appraisal. The appraisal of the full Kansas Gas and Electric program is to be performed during the period September 17-28. Both Region IV and FEMA will observe the Emergency Preparedness Exercise addressed in item 3 which is to be held . subsequent to.the appraisal. It was indicated that fuel load and licensing up' to 5% power could be authorized prior to the exercise and that full power licensing can be authorized no later than twelve months after a successful completion of an Emergency Preparedness Exercise. O 9 ,,.v.v, -r-.,,~v.- ,-r-- _ -. ~. ~.. - - -,..... -. ~. - -.., ,,-,...wr.,,,-.. -....w.
C. ..t It was agreed that the Harvard Project manager program would continue to be used jointly by Region IV and NRR to track all the regulatory actions required for licensing of the Wolf Creek plant. It was recognized that more detailed tracking system such as for allegations would still be necessary and useful at the working level. P ^ .e_ Karl Kniel, Chief Generic Issues Branch Division of Safety Technology Attachments: 1 - Region IV Wolf Creek Task Force 2 - Meeting on Wolf Creek, Region III and Region IV Cooperative Efforts cc: w/ attachments T. Speis R. Denise L. Martin P. O'Connor B. J. Youngblood R. DeYoung 9 m / i 9
V . ATTACHMENT 1 PROPOSED AGENDA MEETING WITH RICHARD DENISE AND REGION IV PROJECT GROUP ON WOLF CREEK ON JULY 24, 1984 (1) Project Group organization and individuals. assigned (update). _(2) Review of reporting lines of authority and responsibility in the project organization. ~ - What are the responsibilities of the different levels? - How will project organization function in elevating problems or issues in completing task? .(3) Progress report on inspection programs 2512 and 2513. - Report on status and schedule for each inspection module or task identified in PERT schedule preferably by the individual involved. Include proposed revisions to PERT schedule. - Present any proposed revisions to task identification, organization and schedule which would make PERT schedule more useful to Region IV, and more directly reflect the organization of work. - Assignments and participation by Region III. ' (4) Progress report on allegations. - Status of review of outstanding allegations including status of allegations involving 01. - Assessment of KG&E " Quality First Program" How is it working? Will it minimize flow of 911egations to NRC? - Schedule for completing work on allegations. - (5) Emergency Preparedness Drill and Inspection. - Region IV organization and management for this work. - Task and milestone breakdown. .- Schedule for each task. - Potential for present schedule to impact fuel loading. t
i kd ( - ? QQ ATTACHMENT 2 t REGim IV WOLF. CREEK TASK FORCE J ' JULY 5, 1984
PRESENT STATUS OF ROUTINE INSPECTION PROGRAM FOR WOLF CREEK Average Inspection % Inspection Inspection Activity Completed 5/1/84 Comment RIV Status Construction Fire Protection 100 C Site Preparation 100 C Lakes, etc. 100 C Foundations 100 C Concrete 100 C Post-Tensioning 100 C Containment Steel 100 C Noncontainment-Steel 100 C R. C. Pipe Installation (Note 1)- 0 W.C. C S. R. Pipe Installation (Note 2) 70 W.C. C R. V. Installation 100 C R. V. Internals 40 W.C. C S. R. Mech Comp Installation 82 C Pipe Supports 80 S.W. O Elec Comp Installation 90 S.W. O Electrical Cables 90 S.W. O Instrument Installation 90 S.W. O Instrument Cables 90 S.W. O Containment Penetrations 40 W.C. C Cent Steel Welding 100 C Structural Welding 100 C R. C. Pipe Welding 64 W.C. C
- 5. R. Pipe Welding 100 C
Pre-Service Inspection 40 S.W. O Fuel Rack Installation 100 C Internals Welding 60 W.C. C CODE Inspection Comment S.W. = Still Working W.C. = Window Closed Status C = Closed /to be closed 0 = Open - in progre,ss NOTES 1. Resident Insp. 93 hrs. 80% Comp. 2. Comb. RIV & RRI = 113 hrs. 75% Comp. O
WOLF CEIK TASK FORCE 0 ELECTIVE: TO PROVICE A DEDICATED, EXPERIENCED TE#1 TO COMPLETE THE 2512,2513,
- 0 25114 INSPECTION PROGRAMS, INCLIMING AS-BUILT VERIFICATION, ALLEGATION FOLLOWUP, OPEN ITEM CLOSE0UT, No SER INPUT, TO ENSlRE TE INTEGRATION OF SCEDULE NO EXECUTION OF PRC ACTIVITIES ON SCEDULE.
ORGANIZATION MANAGRENT J. COLLINS REGIONAL AININIS"RATOR NRR R. P. DENISE WOLF CREEK KARL KNIEL PAUL O'CONNDR TASK FORCE DIRECTOR L. E. P M TIN W1F CREEK TASK FORCE SECTION CHIEF R. E. TAYLOR R. E. SMITH TASK LEADER TASK LEADER CONSTRUCTION PREOP /STARTUP t s
r R F CREEK TASK FORCE R. P. DENISE TASK FORCE DIRECTOR REGION IV
- l. E thRTIN EP, S&S, W, ETC.
TASK FORCE SECTION GilEF R. G. TAYLOR R. E. SMITH TASK LEADER TASK LEADER Q)NSTRUCTION PREOP /STARTUP R. E. PiLLIKIN (ELECTRICAL & INSTRUMENTATION) H. BUNDY, RI J. E. BESS (ELECTRICAL & INSTRUMENTATION) B. BARTLETT, RI L. D. GILBERT (WELDING & MECl%NICAL) B. BRESLAU, RIV
- l. A. BARNES (WELDING & MECHANICAL)
Rill SUPPORT 18 N J. l. TAPIA (ILRT/ SIT) 2 N RIV SRI ASSIST FIRE PROTECTION TEAM INSP. (6 N)* W. JOHNSON, 3 N REGION lil SUPPORT FOR AS-BUILT INSP. (18 N ) L. YANDELL, 3 N EGa6 CONTRACTORS D. CARPENTER,11 N WIE: OTER SPECIALIST WILL BE ASSIGNED AS NEEDED TO MEET SPECIFIC REQUIREENTS.
- IlllS TENT SilolLD BE lilE SM1E TEAM AS FOR CPSES AND WILL BE C00RDitMTED BY VURPIIY NJD l'iJLLIK!N OF R!/i
ist V UliuttitlLil1AUlt (LESS TASK FORCES) P. S. GiECK W. SEIDLE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANT ACTING DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF REACTOR PRa)ECTS & SAFETY REACTOR PROJECT REACTOR PRa)ECT BRANCH 1 BRANCH 2 E. J0mSON, CHIEF D. HUNTER, GilEF i I OPERATOR LICENSING , REACTOR PRa)ECT ENGINEERING Ato GROUP SECTION A SPECIAL PRa)ECTS K. MitTTLESLEY R. COOLEY J. JAUDON, CHIEF R. IRELAND, ACTING L. ELLERSHAN J. PELLET - CHIEF S. MCCRORY 89 R. BENNETT P. WAGNER - FSV FM W. JOHNSON, SRI-0 W. McNEILL D. POWERS - TECH REVIEHER P. HARRELL, RI-0 C. HARBUCK M. N - SALP (F.P.) J. BOAR 0 MAN - QA REVIEHER FCS ~ STP FSV L. YANDELL, SRI-0 D. TOMLINSON, SRI-C G. L. PLUMLEE, SRI-0 D. CARPENTER, RI-0 CNS D. DuBolS, SRI-0 RIVER BEND D. Q W EERLAIN, SRI-0 R. FfRRELL, SRI-C
REGION IV NTOL TASK FORCE EFFORTS WATERFORD W. A. Crossman (SER) G. L. Constable SRI T. A. Flippo RI 1 Operations Closecut ) through 1 Construction Closecut) August 1984 -COMANCHE PEAK TRT Inspection Region IV Director - R. L. Bangart NRR Director - T. Ippolito Section Chief - D. M. Hunnicutt Region IV Assignments C. R. Oberg J. E. Gagliardo, Dep. Dir. M. E. Skow C. Hale'- QA ^ D. L. Kelley, SRI-OPS A. R. Johnson - Electrical J. E. Cummins, SRI-C J. I. Tapia - Civil / Structural H. S. Phillips, SRI-C C. Johnson - Coatings W. F. Smith - Test Program WOLF CREEK See other Charts J e ._.________m__
WOLF CEEK ESIDENT INSPECTOR llISTORY Nam E@ DATE SEPARATION DATE-REASON FOR LEAVING t VANDEL, THOM S E. (SRI-C) 11/29/81 02/20/83 RETURNED TO REGION ll! ROBERDS, HAROLD W. (SRI-C) 12/26/82 10/28/83 RETIRED SMim, ALVA (SRI-C) 01/24/83 11/10/83 RETURNED TO PRIVATE. INDUSTRY SCHUM, SCOTT (SRI-0) 02/07/82 04/28/84 FORMED HIS CHN CONSULTANT BUSINESS BUNDY, HAROLD F. (RI-0) 06/10/84 . BARTLETT, BRUCE (RI-0) 07/22/84 6 6 e 4 e
qr j Comp;ris'sn of Inspectien-Effsrt en 2512/2513 Tcchnic31 Modules ~" W)1f Creek - Colicway J a. TOTALS n ya3g Wolf Creek Callaway Creek Callaway / rinsoection Activity Pacion M Recion RI Recion R1 as of 5/1/84 as of 6/7/84 36 6 36 6 -Construction Fire Protection 55 20 20 Site Preparatio'n - 55 86 3 3 Lakes, etc. 86 78 19 Foundations ~ 78 19 Concrete _. 393 92 288 117 485 405 Post Tensioning 98 39 96 23 137 119
- Containment Steel 91 7
53 41 98 94 Non-C$ntainment St', eel 96 27 74 57 123 131 93 57 77 93 134 R. C Fipe Installation j .5. R. Pipe Installation 67 117 96 , 113 184 209 R. V. Instaliation 48 32 44 69 80 113 R. V. Internals 31 32 39 54 64 93 5.~R. Mech Comp Installation 96 56 68 125 152 193 oPipe Supports - 158 63 131 112 221 243 Elec Comp Installation 65 68 182 109 133 291 Electrical Cables 235 100 457 195 335 652 Instrument, Installation 43 65 183
- 44 108 227 Instrument Cables 115 3
202 95 118 297 Containment Penetrations 60 1 45 65 61 110 Cont Steel Welding 76 0 42 18 76 60 Structural Welding 270 7 74 62 277 136 R. C. Pipe Welding 295 20 84 86 315 170 S. R. Pipe Welding 356 27 63 122 383 185 22 22 22 Pre-Service Inspection 22 30 7 7 Fuel Rack Installation 30 3
- Internals Welding 3
TOTAL 2,867 843 2,355 1,584 . GRAND TOTAL 3,710 3,939 93 m/w 98 m/w
WOLF CREEK TASK FORCE SCHEDULE JU'N ' JUL ' AU S ' SEP ' OCT ' NOV 2512 ROUTINE PROGRAM (CONSTRUCTION) E AS-BUILT VERIFIC ATION g a e I ALLE,GATIONS FOLLOW UP i SIT _ i 'ILRT 2513 (PRE-OPS) g ll O T F U N C T I O N A L _T E S T 3 a s w
OVERVIEW 0F TASK FORCE EFFORT PRE 0P/STARTUP TASK GROUP COMPLETE 2513 PROGRNi START 2514 PROGR#i 2514 QA MDDULES CONSTRUCTION TASK GROUP _ COMPLETE 2512 PROGRNi ACTIVITIES APPLICABLE TO BOTH THESE ACTIVITIES WILL BE HANDLED BY ONE TASK GROUP OR THE OTHER DEPENDING ON THE NATURE OF THE ITEM e OPEN ITEM CLOSURE e ALLEGATION FOLLOWUP (TECmICAL) e QUALITY ASSURANCE e 50.55(E) CLOSEOUT e INSPECTION FINDING CLOSEOUT (VIOLATIONS) e 18 CLOSEOUT e NUREG 0737 ITEM FOLLOWUP l I e SER CONFIRMATORY FOLLOWUP
ATTACHMENT 3 MEETING ON WOLF CREEK PLANT REGION III AND REGION IV COOPERATIVE EFFORTS / July 23, 1984 Arlington, Texas I e e l .. ii,
WOLF CKEK TASK FORCE R. P. DENISE TASK FORCE DIRECTOR l REGION IV
- l. E. fhRTIN EP, S&S, IP, ETC.
TASK FORCE SECTION OllEF ) R. G. TAYLOR R. E. SMITII TASK LEADER TASK LEADER I CONSTRUCTION , PREOP /STARTUP R. E. MJLLIKIN (ELECTRICAL & INSTRUMENTATION)
- 11. BUNDY, RI J. E. BESS (ELECTRICAL E' INSTRUMENTATION)
B. BARTLETT, RI
- l. D. GILBERT (WELDING & N CllANICAL)
B. BRESLAU, RIV l
- 1. A. BARNES (WELDING & NECHANICAL)
RIII SUPPORT 18 $ J. l. TAPIA (ILRT/ SIT) 2 N RIV SRI ASSIST FIRE PROTECTION TEAM INSP. (6 N)* -Wi-10Ff4SONr3-N-REGION lli SUPPORT FOR AS-BUILT INSP. (18 N) L. YANDELL,-3-N-EG8G CONTRAcr 9S D. CARPENTER, il N POTE: 0 TIER SPECIALIST WILL BE ASSIGNED AS NEEDED TO MdET SPECIFIC REQUIRENENTS. " fills TEN 1 Sil0VLD BE lilE SME TEM 1 AS FOR CPSES N1D WILL IIE COORDINATED llY lijRPilY N1D MILLIKIN OF RIV
GENERAL UNDERSTANDING REGION III AND RIV COOPERATIVE EFFORTS 1. Region IV has identified cooperative efforts for the Wolf Creek inspection program which are primarily " stand alone." Region III should schedule, conduct, review, and manace these efforts to produce a final work product, inspection reports. 2. Region III and Region IV will maintain open communication on the progress and results of Region III efforts. The Region IV contacts are L. Martin for technical, and R. Denise for managerial. 3. The Region III inspection reports will be issued-by Region IV in accordance with the Region IV guidance on schedules. The Region III inspection reports will be signed by the Region III inspectors and reviewed / approved by Region III management. 4. Region IV will normally follow up on open items, violations, etc., from Region III inspections. There may be instances where it is more ~ effective for Region III to perform followup; in these, cases, Region IV will request the fol'iowup. 5. . Region IV will maintain a list of "open items"-in the Resident Inspector's office. Region III inspectors may contribute to closure of such items as time becomes available during their assigned inspections. Efforts along this line are aimed at efficiency in the use of NRC resources, are voluntary for Region III, and are not intended as a subs.titute for Region III assigned efforts. A i m* -w - -. - - ~ ~ ' ^ ' ' ' ' ~
WOLF CREEK PROJECT TASK FORCE PROJECTED INSPECTION ALLOCATIONS TO SUPPORT FUEL LOAD SCHEDULE RIV RIII EG&E Task 2512 Program 34 m/wks 10 m/wks 2513 Program 56 m/wks 12 m/wks* 10 m/wks 2514 Program 26 m/wks 2 m/wks 16 m/wks 50.55(e) Followup 10 m/wks IEB Closeout URI_& Violatio'n Closecut 5 m/wks 5 m/wks Allegation Followup 5 m/wks NUREG 0737~ 10 m/wks SUBTOTALS 126 r/wks 34 m/wks 41 m/wks " includes 2 man-weeks for Fire Protection team participation TOTAL = 199 m/wks effort e l l I l l ,n.. - -
~i = l \\ i i RECOMMENDED REGION III TASKS ' 2512 Program: . Module Description Est. Task Time HVAC 50 man-days 2513 Program: Module-Description 70305 Reactor Prot. System 2 man-days 70306 Loss of Offsite 2 man-days Mandatory Test Witnessing 70316 Loss of Offsite Power Test 2 man-days 70317 Reactor Protection 3 man-days Mandatorv Test Result Evaluation 70325 Reactor Protection System 3 man-days Test 70326 Loss of Offsite Power I man-day 35741 QA Program - Audits 3 man-days '35742 QA Program - Document 3 man-days Control 35743 QA Program - Maintenance 4 man-days 35745 QA Program - Surveillance 8 man-days 35746 QA Program - Procurement 3 man-days Control 35748 QA Program - Records 3 man-days QA Program - Test & 3 man-days 35750 Measurements Equipment i e O 1 9
,,,----,,,y.
,,-,,-,,,-,,,_,,.e. ,__,,,y,,,-,m--,-w., ,,,-,,y,.,,,,-.
l 2-Review 42452 Emergency Procedures 5 man-days Inspection Witness 70461 Transvering incore 2 man-days Probe System Test 0737 Followup 50 man-days Fire Protection team participation 10 man-days 2514-Program-Module Description hAforSUTesting ~ 10 man-days ~ 35501 TOTAL RIII Est. Task Time 34 man-weeks 4 / E -_.m.
O e e* 5 a 3
- E
- cs o
_E 3 ~ f; r = h l O b i !i E b: ? M l i i = E G.E 3 'E i !i M E i a / C i 1 g n y ~ .e 2 /2 I 0 2 o i EEEI E /a B i i i E 3 s i =s fa 9 5 E EE B E PEE i
- i J
I a a i gE m a-55 gis i ! E E E a = m = l 5 E ! E E /ls s y E j j E M E i g Eid EE r = I j M, / i e E i D. s ./ 1 s" ~ a ~ e sE 55 5 / E i
- E E i
i -5 E i o / n 5G E I x B M E s / / Q i j i 5 5 E. E E / s i ; E - E s 5 l S y a EE 5 5 i j = / ~ i i 3EE n Em E7 s = G E O I g = = ~ = c 3 C R = = e 2 E 3 c ~ 5 = .= _aA.m a---- 4 a* M-, a-aa-4b am m, 4 e ---*a-m-- -a ^^bA-----h-a-e.*---6
WOLF CREEK PLANT REGION III INSPECTION REPORT HANDLING TIME REGION III Las INSPECTION COMPLETION pg \\/ 5 DAYS DRAFT REPORT TO TYPING (5520) v 10 DAYS REPORT TYPED ~ REGION III REGION IV MANAGEMENT REVIEW REVIEW v 23 DAYS REGION III FINAL REPORT a 25 DAYS REGION IV REPORT ISSUE .[,,l zi n 7/ f- "9' "Y 9 ..---,-w .r -e .v- --v-
lII / S E RU I C U R T S L E E I S y ( ) -)6 33 , ( 66 R 00 ) 91 C ) 6 i5 O f i s ) 6 t P 87 5 0 5 N 0 0 13 0 5 3 1 67 1 5 ( 6 00 6 t l 0 50 C ) 2 35 ) 0 U 3 0 5 ( L 7 3 9 9 U 0 5 0 C 0 S 0 0 0 ) N ) 0 t 5 3 5 6 1 I 1 5 f0 ( 5 ( 6 5 N 5 ( 0 0 I C ( S S 7 A 7 S 2 T S T 3 R 3 T N N R 1 ) ( T ( N l 5 E 0 O 6 5 ) I N A P 0 5 N 1 R N l O 5 0 R O i P 1 0 N 1, T P A U 5 I M R S ( T 7 O T S A E A 3 I O T 1 ( T C R 5 C C E & N 1 A N O 6 0 I I 5 3 F H C F D E S I I I 9 C E P M T 7 I I F R T ) R T E A ( I E R 0 A T T R E S 1 E V E L V O 0 L N S A E E Y P 5 C D A P 1 R M S E 0 I T. U T P 0 N S 2 V E Q L U 5 l S ( G 5 R l T I Y I I T U T A N N ( E u S B S F B E C E T I I F N P A C E A P AV R a R S N R S A O I I S C P T l P A O C A P H V C S I E S V A Il B TI LA/ 2 l1 i5 N2 I-I WT L N~ i i J i,,
r;L ~ TASK
SUMMARY
'SPECIAL TASKS 15 ELECTRICAL AB-10 STRUCTURES AB 5 ~ RACEWAYS AB' 30 DESIGN 5 P. SERVICE 5 SEPARATION 15 -PENETRATIONS 10 ~ ~ S.R. COMP. 10 I&C 10 PIPE & SUPPORT-55 HVAC 50 220 MAN-DAYS O
SjlPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS AT WCGS 1. Schedules are based on approximately 4 days oasite each visit except'for " week which is a 3-day visit week. 2. Inspection reports " Documentation" should follow visits, generally as indicated, with all _ routine or basic IPs being done first, with the as-built and TI work following. The following inspection report numbers have been charged.out and should be utilized as follows: a. 84 Period ending August 17 will capture all basic (routine inspections completed to that time. b. 84 Period ending September. 27 will capture the electrical,, as-built, and train separation areas. c. 84 Period ending October 12 will capture the as-built on other than electrical. 3. 766 charges should be as follows: a. All basic program IPs recorded as the 2XXXXX 2P number. -b. All IPs referenced to TI-2512/11 should,be as follows: (1) Pipe Supports and Restraints = 225A11P (2) As-built = 225B11P (3) Craft Qual'fications = 225C11P I e o e 0 e e ,---.._,_._-,q -,w.,,_i,,,_,_. ,w..-,w, ,,,e..,,.,,,_ ,.y,, _.,,,m, - -.
,e 9 4 RGOMRCE SUNHAltY, GIIbert/Sernos A.'Johnso_D D. Mo rena thil l i kin / Des s T ay l g.c - (t !_LI ripe & Support 55 Sepa ra t ion 15 SR Comp. 10' Elect. AB 10 Structures 5 IIVAc 50 P.S. Insp. 5 Pene. 10 Raceways 30 Design 5 Special 5 IkC 10 .Special 5 Special L 65 15 20 55 .15-I e 4 4 9 6 d l d g a [ l i 1 1 4
.RICION Ill 2513 PHf bl*litAI10HAL SC11t pUL L f elt Wol.r CHrf K b!!!IO .l3 Ll9 t!!!!-!!i!Y1 J!!!Y O!!gles t So!si g,. , og g., . ltggy, Lhig;,. E!!!!! Lu rY In s t _f rsetu!uIn _!!!!Y !!!w 0305 Reactor Prot. System 2 man-days 8/1-8/15 0306 Loss or Orrsite Power 2 man-sinys 8/1-8/15 E!*!!3 LarY_._Le tt.HLt!!911J!ts ~ 0316 Loss or Orristo Power 2 man-days IU/~l-lfi/20 lost 0317 liusctor Protection 3 man-days 9/ lis-12/31 H!!!!E tafY._]y s t _llg gg! LLjya.gliga_1190 0325 Itoactor P otectlun 3 man-days ~10/I-IU/15 ~ System lost 0326 Loss or Orrsite Power I man-day 10/20-11/1 57 sl QA Prog ram - Aud i t a 3 man-days 9/15-9/30 Sis 2 QA Program - Document 3 man-days 8/I-8/15 s Control 5F43 QA Program - 84 aian-days - 8/15-8/30 Ha l n t ena tico $145 QA Program - Surveillance 8 man-days 8/l 9/1 Tusting Sla 6 UA Program - Procurement 3 man-days 9/15-1/20 s Control S l8se QA Program - nocords 3 man-days 8/l-8/I5
- siSD QA Program - Test er 3 man-dcys 8/1-8/15 Hes snreasants Equipment avj cy 7:4 '> 2 (morgency Procodieres 5 man-days 8/5-8/12 Inspection
! !!!"51 J's 61 I ra nsve r l eig incoso 2 man-days 9/i2-9/21 Pr olio System Test 10/1 137 followup 50 man-days' 8/l . i e i s
m m m n N N N N N N N .N. = e-og Ut C 8 8 8 i .= J N e e a e De
- =
8 0 t I 0: .= I 6 I s e .J I l 1 0 ea 1 Ut Cl B I I I I d e e 6 I =w e4 . d I l 4 0 8 D t/Jk' I m m 8 I e I .Q 6-5 .C., e e.- N. N. e4 N i e i E .se i e, C e =. =1 0 .= I I I e N = I = nn. 31 N N N N .J (j 4 W I I 9 4 S e f C C CQ P= N N N .= .= N
== Q em 0 M m C en I 2% )( m m N m 2 .C
- l N
N N N N N N N N = m r-r- e= r= r-r- r-e- r- .C
== =
== n= ( as m es
- m. = >=
T r= O E .C 6 m h. m : C e.a eg e= s e o.= a a. s m MCe XC Um ae = mme 'C T ee 8 CX CXE G.=.=. e = Q =
- C N
N9
- =.
h es.=
na,= T.g es as e = .a T a= .a e== es e, .a w e. 6e n. 6 a. = c 6 es
- E es 6
== 6 O O O== h C h C a= C O *= e OTe 4e oTe e m K
- LT e Xe
&"D - GT A &S6 &==c 3X CCe OOe O 'D C CTe) 'c "O ETE ETT EC -p E E p
== emT 3T e >t 3 es E "3 e e N si es S. e== C G Ce CO
= C.
.C OfO 3 **
- Ce C
e me6
- OC
= C.C
== aC e .c x - s.
== == == .== e s- = 0 as 3 &E -.= E O& e&e ex= m== 6..a es a e== = es e es es "*.J C ah
- x QC
- x as ma x 3 as o =. h a: C h
e ATK e h h h h m e e c 3O@ ee 9eh 3e e..= e==: e a e e "3 e T =X== = e = C 2 or CD &.=, .O c = Eee E es - E6h C e m es C E a. h. s e e s &.T .m O. es es e T.. e C. es as T T "U T f g, es a
- r. = E e===
a m es e o a. C e ** ** 06C 06. C. e e C66 e seeX = C = C
== 6 -E G2=
6 to WZe Q Z a=
U T E s&Z E G TC e e s e ee E Ae 6 E E E E IL 0 e e 406 E C WC E q te a& =* C W:E E 43 Mr W@ es W@C e N C m es & c N N e 3O Ce CX3 C=0 Cem .C N 6 CNe -
- = E e
= = = m== E w =,
== == u= e=== A 6. UEZ r= =e.= w w w C 't e O a O C 6 9 E 95 e E = e e. 3 as a T CE 6 e E m 6 o C 3 = m - T m C e : 3 m Q -3 )) 9 3 G. -
* *
03 EG C. O. > e is 6 6 E n
== 6 6 u: E-es - = k 3 es 6.s c St. T T es e K b b cT 0> =a O .a E OC O es .a =8 O OO.= C es 6 .a .a C CU 8= = .C 40 u as e uO T em C e-6 0 O.e 3 o C 6 0-a .o o g as es &= es 3 .o e 3 E a . s 6. 6 m-m 64 -3 es &C
=
-a c h 6= a6 es b c Ae 3
= =
6 6 ..u. 6 y e :- ad 3 .o E CT .T -) C. = . =. g me .e 6 .= C
- G 3
mC M.C - Q = SC C & 4= 6 &3 ab O =8 es u 3U c .a .s.a C-C- o =.
- h. -
G C 6- .a = C. on e e es as oe =6 es as es c ed s e c> es.a o 6e n. e oo => =c arJ o :: A c e. 6 ( es n. >a w.e a> a= =
- e. E
- a. =a L>
c ca 6 s. -E p ( b cE a ct .= N m .O C N E en .N a.
===. .= C O = C = =
- C C
5 C O N T'*> m m m m m m m m a m m m m m
. !'l !!9 }ll!9-UdH dlyi July 6!!gt!s t
- Sppt, Oc t,_
[(gy, Rocc 1308 Intograted llot lunctional (f man-ilays) 7/I6-l/27 lost Procedure Review 1362 RCS tlydro lost Procedure Complete, Report 8ts-01 Procedure Review (2 man-days) . 1314 ESFAS lost Procedure (3 man-days) 7/9-7/27 Revlow 8336 Residual linat' Removal Complote, Hoport 84-09, System lost Procedure Not Enteroef in 166, Review 4 131:3 DC Power System lest Complete, Report 84-03 Procodesro Review 1341 [morgency Stan$lby Power (3 man-days) 7/23 8/10 Supply System Procedure Review 1348 Main Icontwater Control (3 man-days) T/23 8/3 System Tost Procedure Hovlow 13*8s ' Containment Spray Comploto, Report 84-09, Not Entered in 766 1313 containeerit System (5 man-days) 8/22-8/30 Intergrated leak Rate lost (witnessing) 1314 Intergrated flot (10 man-days) 7/13 8/1 f ainc t iosia l lust (witnessing) 1315 Ingincored Saroty 15 mast-ilnys) 7/9 9/14 lostuvos lost (witnessing) 1316 Loss of f sito Power Test (2 man-slays) 10/7-10/20 (witnessing) 12/31 33 t f Hnactor Protection System ( 3 man-days) 9 / 18s Test (witnessing) 1462 Heactor Coolant System Completo, Heport 84-05 ' ilyd ro (tost witnessing) (30 man-hours) 18:33 Clionical Control Systems ( 3 most-days) 4 lost (witnessing) Cold 7/9-7/20 llo t 7/25 8/10 t i f
-3'. - "!"l9 Ilt!9 Ili!D-312Y1 ill!!Y 6!!!al!1L
- ?!U L
!!S t a lit!h l!99. e438s - leeginoured Sainty (2 m.in-days) 9/18s-9225 Fes tiss es Activation Systems. Isst (witnessing) s436 Rusidnal-Ilost Itomoval (2 man-days) System lost (w l t eio s s i ng ). Cold 7/9-120 llo t 1/25-8/10 se640 Inc Power System Test (2 man-slays) IU/T-10/20 (witnessing) Is 43 containment Spray System - (2 man-days) 9/14-9/25 e Tost (witnossing) 1452 Rrmote Heactor Sliutdown (2 man-days) 10/6-10/12 isst (witnessing) 1451 Iransversing incoro Probe (2 man-days) 9/12-9/27 System lest (witnessing) !nt!1Lgry lost _jtgitsi ts [va luatioD 4 1322 Engineered Saroty I,satuses Test (2 man-days) 10/1-10-15 1323 Centainment System: (4 man-days) 9/1-9/15 Integrated Leak Rate Test 1324 Integrated llot I tenc t iorna l (4 man-days) 8/15-8/30 12/30 1325 neactor Protuction system (2 man-days) 9/15 Test 8326 Loss of Of fsite Power (1 man-day) 10/20 11/1 last l'262 Huactor Coolant System (2 man-days) 7/18-7/30 Ilydrostatic lost
- Jeat 125 t. fin!!LLL n11!a ttell f> 32 Control Rud System (2 mate-days) 10/l-10/15 t*> 3 3 Clicalca i Coritrol System (2 more-days) 9/15-9/30 1535 Safoty and Hollor Valves (1 mate-day) 11/3-11/15 6537 Hain Steam isolation (1 man-day) 12/I-12/15 Valvos 1538 Auxiliary Feedwater (1 man-day) 11/15-11/30 System
. s, Oct[ ' Hi J!!(y 6,1!gt!s t Se)pt. tjigv (!a c,. (2 man-da!!!.spys a 818!,! 9. Illl9 9 l5-9/30 54; Corita inneset floa t leeg, ys, Colling, Vontilation, System lost 541 riossierizar and I.ovel (2 masi-days) 9/1-9/15 Coes t ro l System inst 11/1-11/15 558e Nuclea r. Ins t rumente-(2 man-days) tion System lost 560 Manical* Hosctor Control (3 man-days) 12/l- /15 System 1est 12/l-l551 Integrated Hoactor (3 mart-days) /15 Control System 4 nrat19ns e 301 Operational Starring (2 man-days) 8/I-8/15 inspection 301
- Inspection or Upora-(10 man-days) 50% Completo, 8/15-8/30 tional Starr Trainieng 53 man-liours expended
) 800 Plant P rocodie re s (10 man-days) 74 hrs 8/1-8/30 1 Inspection Exponded, 10% Complete 450 Oporating Procedures ( 7 part-days) 16 liours Expended, 30% Complete 8:52 [morgency Procedures (5 man-days) Begion 110 8/5-8/12 l eispec t ions + 301 lochnical Spocifications Complete, 21 firs. fxpended Review 0 i.Inl103!W9 I is51 Halntonarico Procedures 35 lirs. Exponded. 20% done 10/1-10/15 Inspection (3 man-days remain l 18s2 QA Prog ram - Document (3 man-days) nogion III 8/l-8/15 Cosit ro l 4 78s 3 QA Program - Halntonseico (Il man-days) Region ill 8/15-8/30 78 sis QA Program - Oosigni (8 man-days) 8/15-8/30 Cleangos & Modi fica tlosis fuujing Sol fuol Recolpt and Storage ( 2 man-slays) 5 t rucks 7/I5 9/15 recolvoel to more - I a wook 1 a i
e c: l .._z,. . d, = 2: s u31 a se ot - WL = .a F1 Zi ? , =. M te I mo .1 7 ~, w c et o = c' e X l -w mt L 6 .= a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ~ e .o 28 o a C wo y 2 a o e wc e. ) 1 J-.8 g oo -a o L .g = g g-yw C...k 4' 08 3d* d I e. CO "o c a. o . n s. 2 s e e -=J w. m e. u o, OS 33 C. d g gg => g g g. )& E3 EF = m gg g a w we _c ? O C .E 6 s-6 g. g-K9= C OC O ~ ag. _. ) -. -= 5 m= . =- o au L L =C g
- C"
~ ga o 20 C= D .m = 0 C= 4 b C= 3 6
- b'
.3 s. dC = = WE D, -,,3 g -= -6 -O "3 3 w
== == e. sw s-dC U ** g, c 3s N x) .* 6 'J ? -Up-O ad O ** } J ge g g6 -s O "g3 gg ;Q =O e e-QC C" DS 46 gM _w - 15 GC 13 y g; gg Da b) a. b. 4 .s-wu oc so .>C -{ _=.c,. =..c..s ww. :.0
- o o za 6
mm --w =s D .s*. .f% -2 o. Q C C O $ O 3: g g m
=
7,3.. .O. 3 .O. g m =. P.=-
- =.
~ p.
o'
- '1!!!!! 9 J.llio tig!!-i uys Jt![y 6ttig!g L Sijg tm.
Octn lgeh Eh l 2512 t ow Powe r I n s t P rocesitero 2 masi-days 9/l 10/1-Rovlev (Hodorator Tesopor-atuto Courricient Hussesso-secent snel po r os Itcactivity Wo r tii, Croup it, and Rod Wortle and Pscsedo Hod EJoction, Group A) 25f6 rower Ascension fost 2 man-day 9/l 10/1 Procedurn Hevlev ( Na tstra l Ci rciela t ion, Crosip A, and Powe r fle-activity Contriclunt floa sta remon t, Group 8) 2570 rower Ascesiston test 3 man-days 10/I 11/1 Proceduro Itoview ([ve l-tea t ion or Coro Ferror-manco) (Croup A and 8) 2580 rowor Ascension lost 2 man-days 10/1 II/l Proceduro lloview ( Turbine Irlp, Group D, and Irlp, Group A !)e2 rower Ascension Test 2 man-days 10/l-10/15 Proceduro lieview: Loss of Orrsito Powor (Croup A and B) ?>83 rower Ascension test 2 man-days 10/I-10/15 Proceduro Hoview: Shut-down form Dietside Lisa Control Itoom (Croup 8) ?>nes Power Ascension Proco-2 man-days 10/I-10/15 duro Hoview ([valuatiore or flux Asymmetry or Pseuilo Rod EJoction lost) (Csoup Al !592 initial t:riticality 3 man-days 11/15 12/15 Witnessing !596 Proc ri t ica l Da ta Itoview 2 man-days 10/1 11/1 ?600 rowe r l o ve l Plateau Date 2 man-days 12/1-12/30 Itoview (25%) i w e 5 i
E' Coritrol Ha. ~Usto 7/12/84 ^
SUMMARY
OF WOLF CREEK OPEN ISSUES i l Kay to Tracking Numbers Key to Discipline Codes Key-to Completion Categos ~ A - Allegations A - Independen't Assessment 1 . Prior to OL-B - IE Bulletins, Circulars, Information B - Bolts, 2 - Fuel Loading. { Notices C - Concrete /Rebar 3 - Initial Criticality C - CAT Inspection Findings D - Design of Pipe and Pipe Supports' 4 - Zero' Power. Testing D - Deficiency Reports 50.55(e) and (Buck to NRR) 5 - Low Power Testing. 'Part 21 Reports E - Electrical 6 - Power Ascension Test ( i .F:- Inspection Findings (Violations, F - Fire Protection 7 - Full Power Unresolved Items,.and Open Items) H - llangers G - Generic Letter Issues I - Intimidation 11 - Hearing Open Issues K - Cable Terminations l I - Investigation Report Issues M - Miscellaneous j L ,SALP Open Issues N - NDE M - Congressional Concerns or Issues 0 - Coatings j 0 - Operator Licensing Open Items P - Pipe (Construction of) { P - Inspection Program Status Q - QA/QC Q - Final QA Reinspection Issues R - Records R - Room / System Turnover Status (those 5 - Instrumentation to do) T - Test Program. l 5 - SER Open Items U - Procedure / Instruction Review ] T - Task Force Special Inspection Items V - Vendor or Generic U - Unfinished PunchIlst Items W - Welding V - IDVP Open Issues X ' Emergency Preparedness Z - Vendor Open Issues j I i i e l i w
t; 1 l' E
- grgl 4) l
= W ] \\ 1 . 6' \\ tA E a= C = en m NE ... a5= w - ama
= =
m amp me C EC= ta fi3 en w a and b EEu ww-6 en tad O W has > B"* E .Cnsx .n I.n EE 4A en TE w
- e. L se O Y
4A ene Er -w em =b Vld = a taf p= 40 ths the ese E5 .s .e2 th has i es se ,e m A A A e 9 O y
== um = .=, se - es of es ed e. e. m.- = e m o m e e E er b e b e b 9 6 3 b b b e = 8 = e = 3 es E =8 E E ed w e w e w a w C s. b b b C 6 C 6 C a. C n= g e o e o e o m E E 2 = E
== == es es., w ee w as w w .? m =L L L L C C C =w C
== as a. o b o a. O b on y y
== w
== W
== W
== ( e es e of a of e s e V e w e u e u. s= g ( Q 4 C 4 Q C e w = w = r,-. e., -.y c-- ---,,-.-,,m-w- --w -ye--r-r- - -, - w<-
'y5 5 8_5 g And
- A
- law 5=Em ~ -s : $ *.12 E _W = v _ m MM lEW m-N e= EE - =, 4 W -E mr =g =%~ is $4NA ww e k". E k m Ezl N EE is E a x es E S' i wv I ~E Umw I f i EC .:n k~ a1 u-M i
- l i
l u, Mw WB , :E m ,---,,.-,-,w-w-._,- ~ - - - - -~. -.., - -. ,-,.}}