ML20127A862

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Std Order for DOE Work: Safety Evaluation of Core-Melt Accidents:Casework Reviews for Gessar,Limerick,Fnp, Awarded to BNL
ML20127A862
Person / Time
Site: Limerick, 05000000, 05000447, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant
Issue date: 08/08/1983
From: Mattson R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML082170592 List:
References
CON-FIN-A-3711-3, FOIA-84-243 20-83-605, NUDOCS 8308240649
Download: ML20127A862 (4)
v • d • e


Text

,

.m

. - ~

h NRC Ecu 173 U.S. NUCLE A n r.EGULATOIlY COMMt. JN ORCE A NUMEEQ

'5 -*

20-83-605

^*

STANDARD ORDER FOR DOE WORK AUG.3 1933 ISSUED TO: (DOE Office)

ISSUED BY: (N AC Office) ~

ACCOUNTING CITATION Brookhaven Area Office Office of Nuclear Reactor

^**aoaa:ATion svMao' Regulation, DSI 31X0200.203 84R NUMBER PERFORMING ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION 20-19-40-41-3 Brookhaven National Laboratory FW NUMBER Upton, New York A3711-3 WOR K PERIOD. THIS ORDER LIN TITLE FIXEDJD ESTIMATED D Safety Evaluation of Core-Melt Accidents:

Casework Reviews FROM:

TO:

for GESSAR, Limerick, FNP 01/14/83 01/15/85 OBLIGATION AVAILABILITY PROVIDED BY:

A. THIS ORDER

$ 90,000

^' *

^" ^' "

Ifs'OER THS$Sb"E* I'i^P A

I i S 80L AND E RS FOUR G3 5 OF T E "B& A NUMB ER" CITED ABOVE.

83 00 _ Od 8s C. TOTAL ORDERS TO DATE (TOTAL A & B) 55,152,045 O. AMOUNT INCLUDED IN "C" APPLICABLE TO Tr8E " FIN NUMBER" CITED IN THIS ORDER.

S 540,000 FINANCIAL FLEXIBILITY:

O FUNDS WILL NOT BE REPROGRAMMEO BETWEEN FINS. LINE D CONSTITUTES A LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS AUTHORIZED.

1

@ FUNDS MAY BE REPROGRAMMED NOT TO EXCEED 210% OF FIN LEVEL UP TO $50K. LINE C CONSTITUTES A LIMITATION ON OSLIGATIONS AUTHORIZED.1/

SEE BELOW STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS PROVIDED DOE ARE CONSIDERED PART OF THIS ORDER

~*

UNLESS OTH ERWISE NOTED.

ATTACHMENTS:

THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS ARE HEREBY SECURITY:

MADE A PART OF THIS CnDER:

D WORK ON THl3 ORDER IS NOT CLASSIFIED.

d STATEMENTOFWORK (Modification) a wCRK ON THl3 OaDER iNvotvES CLAS$1FIED O ADDITIONALTERMS AND CONDITIONS INFORMATION. NRC FORM 187 IS ATTACHED.

O OTHER' REMARKS. (Reference the proposal by number and cats, and indscate if tise"stisched statement of work modifies the DOE proposaq:

This order (1) provides a modification to the BNL proposal dated December 10, 1982 that adds work requirements, (2) authorizes work to commence on the attached modifi-

. cation, and (3) requests that BNL submit a revised proposal within 30 days to S. Boyd, NRR/DSI with a copy provided to B. L. Grenier, PPAS/NRR, After acceptance, please send to the NRC Off'ce of Resource Management, ATTN: D. Dandois, and provide a copy to the Office of Nuclear.eactor Regulation, ATTN:

C. Paugh, m

ISSVING AUTHORITY 1

ACCEPTING ORGANIZATION

[a Mr/rP3 r

,,,E

,,,E

~

Division of Systems Inteoration N

7 Is-79 1/ Reprogramming limited to hanges:C FOmds::withili the same B&R Number and the on Fi ame Appropriation Symbol.

In order for this r Otified within 5 days so that an appropriate NNllocat to ba effectivecan6eissuedalidcounter-signe$tbe this office mu to Form Omplete the action orior to receipt of any bills.

l Y

h c

'h

((

ENCLOS0REl' Modification to Statement of Work

.(Referenced 50W is Enclosure 1 to Letter Mattson to Ogeka of 11/29/83)

~ FIN #.

A-3711 B&R# --

20-19-40-41-3 The following modifications should be made to the S0W Backoround'and Objective - no change

~ * -

-Work Requirements (1) Task I:

Change level of effort in FY83 to 26MM; in FY84 to 31 MM l(2)- Subtask'I.A: Change " Starting December 15, 1982..." to " Starting

~

March 15.-1983...". Change "...three months..."-

to"... six months..."

(3)

Subtask J.B:

C nge " Starting December 15,1982.[." to " Starting

~

March 15,'1983...". Change "...three months..."

'to"... six' months'..."

(4). Subtask I.C:

Change" Starting December 15, 1982..." to " Starting March'15, 1983...".

Change "...three. months"...

to"... six months..."

1 (5)

Sutitask I.D:-' Add the following after "... analysis (CRAC).)" --

" Include in the set of accident progressions those new sequences and containment conditions described in the " Severe Accident Risk Analysis" provided to NRC by PECO.

j, (6)SubtaskI.D:

Change or add. the following milestones --

1.D.1 should read "I.D.1 GESSAR - preliminary (letter report)...

~~~

......... July 27, 1983";

I.D.2 should read "I.D.2 GESSAR - draft NUREG/CR...

.........Dec.

1, 1983";

I.D.3 should read "I.D.3 GESSAR - NUREG/CR report (final)...

.........Feb. 29, 1984";

I.D.4 should read "I.D.4 Limerick - Base Case input to DES...

.........Aug. 12, 1984";

m q.

]-

C m

I.D.5 should read "I.D.5 Limerick - Advanced Tecbnolo Assessment of Limerick PRA (draft) gy Case.

........ Dec. 15, 1983";

i I.D.6 should read "I.D.6 Limerick - Input to Final NUREG/CR...

.........Jan. 15, 1984";

I.D.7 should read "I.D.7 Limerick - Mark-II Mitigation Assessment

......... Mar. 15, 1984";

I.D.8 should read 31, 1984";

"I.D.8 FNP -. preliminary....... Aug.

I.D.9 should read "I.D.9 FNP - revised.......... Nov.

1, 1984";

(7)

Subtask I.E: Add the following after "... in staff assessments."

" Include in the assessments the " Severe Accident Ris,k Assessment" (SARA) provided to NRC by PECO

..... 7 -a. v (8) Subtask'I.'E:

Change (or~ add)..-the following milestones I.E.1 shou,1dchangedate

" I. E.1........................... May 18, 19 83 "

I.E.2 OK I.E.3 OK I.E.4 should read "I.E.4 Limerick - Provide assessment of SARA' report.......................... Dec. 15, 1983" i

(9) Task II:

Change level of effort in FY-83 to 15MM; in FY-84 to 16MM.

(10)

Subtask II.'A: Change"StartingDecembeE15,1982..." to " Starting March 15, 1983..."; change "...three months..." to

... si x months... "

(11)

Subtask II.A: Also, after "... end of'"the project." add the following.

" Attend relevant ASTP0 meetings and work closely with AEB, RSB, and ASTP0 staff in the source-term activity for Limerick, GESSAR and FNP."

(12)

Subtask II.B: Change " Starting December 15, 1982..." to " Starting March 15,1983..."; Change "... three months..." to

...six months..."

(13)

Subtask II.B: Add a new paragraph as follows:

" Implement at BNL the following codes" CORSOR, SPARC, NAUA, and TRAPMELT III.B.1 CORSOR... August 17, 1983

q

.)

m 1

y

,,1 III.B.2'SPARC.... Augus't 17, 1983 III.B.3 NAUA..... September.17,1983 III.B.4 TRAPMELT.. October 17, 1983 (14)

Subtask-II.C: Add after "...with Subtask I.D." the following "The " base-case and " advanced-technology case" 7

analyses are to proceed as described in the Memorandum " Proposed PRA Methodology for Limerick and GESSAR,".B. Sheron DSI/NRR to R. Mattson DSI/NRR,

' dated 7/22/83. (Copies to this Memorandum-have been

'sent-toBNL).

Incorporate into the Limerick analysis the new containment. failure modes (e.g., from seismic events) as described in the SARA PRA.

(15) ~ Subtask II.C: Change-(or add) the following milestone:

II.C.1 GESSAR-preliminary

( l e tte r re po rt ).......................... J u ly 27, 1983" II.C.2 should read "II.C.2 GESSAR-d raft NUREG/CR............Dec._1, 1983"

~"

.II.C.3 should read 3,i

,a.,."II.C.3GESSAR-NUREG/,CRreport(final)...Feb. 29, 1984" l

II.C.4 should read "II.C.4 Limerick-Base Case input to DES..Aug. 12, 1984"

-II.C;5shouldread-

"II.C.5 Limerick-Advanced Technology Case.. Assessment of LimerickPRA(draft).....................Jan. 15, 1984" II.C.6 should read "II.C.6 Limerick-Input to Final'NUREG/CR.Jan. 15, 1984" II.C.7 should read "II.C.7 Limerick-Mark-II MitigA' tion Assessment r.......Ma r. 15, 1984" II.C.8 should read l

"II.C.8 FNP-Preliminary..................Aug. 31, 1984"

~II.C.9 should read "II.C 9 FNP-Revised......................Nov.

1, 1984"

-(16)

Subtask II.D: Add the following after "... in staff assessments."

" Include in the assessments the " Severe Accident

(

Risk Assessment (SARA) prov.ided to NRC by PEC0".

In particular evaluate the three new release categories developed in the SARA report."

(17)

Subtask II.D: Change (or add) the following milestones II.D.1 should change date f

II.D.1.'...................................May 18, 1983"

'II.D.2 OK II.D.3 OK -

-.: L

q Q

II.D.4 should read "II.D.4 Limerick-Provide assessment of 3 ARA report

.........v...Jan. 15,.1984" ~

II.D.5 is identical to original t

II.D.4-II.D.6 is identical to original II.D.E-(18)

Task.III: Change estimat'ed level of effort in FY83 to 7MM; ~ '

(19)

Subtask III.A: Change '" Starting December 15, 1982..." to " Starting March 15, 1983..."; and change "...three months..."

to "...six months..."

(20) Task IV:

Change Estimated Level of Effort in FY-84: 13MM (21)

Subtask IV.A:

Change the milestones to read Completion Date:

IV.A.1 GESSAR-preliminary................May 18, 1983 IV.A.2 GESSAR-revised....................Dec.

1, 1983

.. g>j

. ;IV. A.3 GESSAR-NUREG/CR Report...s........ Feb. 29,1984~

.. c._c m.

IV. A.4 Limerick-Base Case................ Aug. 12, 1983 5.

IV. A.5 Limerick-Advanced Tech Case.......Dec. 15, 1983 IV.A.6-LimerihkNark-'II Mitigation Assessment s

.......Ma r. 15 / 1984 IV.A.

FNP-prel imina ry................... Aug. 31, 1984 IV.A.B.FNP-revised.......................Nov.

1, 1984 (22)

Task IV.B:

Change milestones to read.

IV.8.1 GESSAR................

.'..........Feb. 29, 1984 IV 8. 2 Li me ri c k.......................... Ja n. 31, 1984

,.IV-.B.3-Ma rk.-1Lwith Mi tigat.iUi......._... Apr 15,- 1984 -

(23)

Subtask IB.C:

Change " Quarterly Reports" to "Every 6 months" (24)

Level of Effort: This modification increases the level of effort by 11 man-months.

The overall level of effort is 133 man-months (11.1 PSY) over a two-year period.

Reporting Requirements - Add to this section the following:

FEE RECOVERY COST STATUS SECTION (Requirements and identifying information provided in NRC Form 173 dated 12/30/82)

l,.. :l q*

Pursuant to the provisions of-NRC Regulations,1.'O CFR 170, provide the total amount of funds expended (costed) during the period and cumulative -

'to date by facility (work assessment), and report them.on a separate pagd aslpart of this report in the following format:

' FIN:

3711

' TITLE:.

PERIOD:

Docket Costs-

~

' Facility Name Number Period Cumulative Comon' Cost

  • 50-900

' MEETING AND TRAVEL - Add:

5.

One 3 day meeting in Paris, France to attend CSNI working; group #2 specialist meeting on Thermal Hydraulic Phenomena Associated with

. Core-Melt Accidents (one person) (Fall 1983) w w apw m,

w.

.x,.

NRC Furnis'hed Materials ~U Add:'" Severe Accident Risk Assessment;-

~

Limerick Generating Station" Vals I

'and IIl April 1983.

n. '..

  • comon costs should be reported against Docket 50-900..fomon costs are for those costs incurred for effort such as preparatory or start-up efforts to interpret and reach agreement on methodology, approach, acceptance. criteria, regulatory position, or TER format; efforts associated with the " lead plant" concept that might be involved during the first one or two plant reviews as estimated by the contractor; meetings / discussions involving the above efforts to provide orientation, background knowledge, or guidance at the begipning or during performance of wor.k; and any technical effort applied'to a category of facilities,

.e.g., some effort on Task IV might b'e appropriate common cost.

In the-case of the latter example, these costs should be prorated equally to

,,, only.those facilities to which the effort aglies.

Development of methodologies, criteria or technical positions are not fee-recoverable costs.

Manageme,and, therefore, should not be categorized as comon nt and'related support costs chargeable directly to the effort are not to be reported.as common costs'and should, therefore, be f

' charged in proportion to the other direct costs associated with those

^

facilities during the reporting period.

NOTE:

Comon costs are to be accrued on a nionthly basis and prorated equally among the facilities identified under the effort at the end of each' fiscal year or at the completion of the effort, whichever occurs first.'

-5.

TECHNICAL I1SISTANCE PROGRAM SUPPORT" OSTEMS PAGE 422

^

y, PROJECT ~ IDENTIFICATION

SUMMARY

(PIUS) 7 AS DF:

07/27/83 gd

/

Q N: A3711 TITLE: SFTY EVAL OF CORE-MELT ACC: GESSAR-FDA LIM-OL', FNP-ML VISION: DOSI B&R 4: 20-19-40-41-3 NRR OPERATING PLAN INDEX NO:

ANCH: RSE CONTRACT 4:

PROJECT MANAGER:

J.

MEYER NTRACTOR: BNL CONTRACT METHOD (HON-DOE):

TY, STATE (NON-DOE):

SMALL BUSINESS / MINORITY D CONTRACTOR (S):

CONTRACT (NON-DOE):

RIOD OF PERFORMANCE START DATE:

01/14/83 END DATE: 01/15/85 NANCIAL DATA COMMITMENTS AS OF

/

/

OBLIGATIONS / COSTS AS OF 06/83 CARRY CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT CURRENT OVER FY BUDG FY COMIT FY OBLS FY COSTS ACTUAL 0

456,uuu 450,000 450,000 297,932

$0 W f

-PROJECTED hMj W

bd~0 W 1

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL NEXT FY NEXT +1 VALUE OBLS COSTS BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL 1,170,000 450,000 297,932 BTOTGGG--

[

N#

/} 0 0,M

/

PROJECTED I

g W,W PLICATION (RELATE THE PROJECT TO A SPECIFIC PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENT) p analyses provided under this' contract will form the basis for p lleensing decisions required on GESSAR-238 FDA review (PRA rtion), Limerick - OL review (PRA portion), and Floating Nuclear

nt - ML - followup PRA review (as per NTC/ML rule) with respect aavoro accident considerations.

RR REOUIREMENTS (DESCRIBE WHAT IS TO BE PERFORMED) lp fallowing analyses and assessments will be performed by this pjact:

core-melt ac.cident progressions with emphasis on containment edingo (pressure and temperature) and containment failure aracteristici evolution and release of radio 1'ogical source term ring core-melt accidents from fuel, primary system, and containment stcal radiological consequences to the public from core-melt cidcnts; and safety benefit from features to mitigate the nscquence of core-melt accidents.

To support these analyses, the ntrcctor will be required to maintain and modify the MARCH, CORRAL, TA, DOR and CRAC Codes as required in light of the current RES MARCH-2 d MELCOR development program and assimilate results of encoanological studies (RES, ID00R, foregin, and DOE) and gineering research programs.

In addition, an overall integrated h h(){ f/0

.A b M

Q%

FV 8f AG

X.

e t[ s 2,

'_)

PAGEt 424

.~.

I o;,,

_p

RK REQUIREMENTS (Continued) 20secont..which considers,all of these factors will be prepared for

~

2h.plcnt.

-Major. products:

(1) Q1s, (2) Q2s, (3).NUREG/CR reports, d.alecollaneous letter.r,eports.for input to SERs, input to hearing 3ticony.

DIFICATIONS (DESCRIBE MAJOR CHANGES TO THE PROPOSAL)

DN PRbV.AL (COMPLETE AS APPLICABLE) 1ST LINE: (INITIALS) 2ND LINEt (DATE)

COMMENDED:

ENDORSED:

ENDORSED:

ENDORSED:

ENDORSED OJECT MANAGER SECTION LEADER BRANCH CHIEF ASST. DIRECTOR DIVISION DIRECTOR FICE DETERMINATION APPROVAL CODE:

DATE:

//

Nors:

For etres-/nuo isevos>o, fnoirear toiu 8c fVl0 Dt PIED 7'o

. DEL 2TE

~77+Ar Pdti toAJ

  • ^

OP T/4E L.fm ERtc g AGV/f?W fr$YoOi/+TGA T5SuG~

0)171J Rc610 57J-r m i12G4 no/J f RA) 66/A)G

/bDD2255'Elh 96NBEiOpLt.y RS/97A?T~

O P 'T HG S E Y W es~

Acei o e-

.Au G7"AM^le -

DRY;4 Oh)

/. I m E M ! O K.

O> / L L 00'USEO f%te rue G50E2ic-ID0R 0 "'-V A5 l-irn27 tic c iS A

Su%GM MA

-ry be.R L-M&Rx.

2c Dest &)J (d/ '1b k-4 I

l

"l:r @ @35L 6 g55153;ycgpgog,_,g _ }lfbs7@l. $ %

P{M

... =.. _.

,;,w.s.:...i y ;- qg 7Ecynicg g

, ;;g_ =;_3:..,9.gg ;.,;v

... ~..

=

PPAS ACTION SUM...RY SHEET.

'w+

2... ;

DdTE RECEIVED BY PPAS:

'TI g.

0

./;

FIN (S):

/M3Y4

~

Y 00 g),

g

+.

5 4\\

hf7 ll

_ r.

Q, 9

.kU 3

p.3 ql

~

TYPE OF ACTION:

r g

h bb b'hnkb

.[,', [.

~

., ~...

x,,

-e og a

/

. e + ;.

..~.

..s.,
.. gn,...

,/ C PPAS REMARKS, COMMENTS, IDENTIFI'0ATION OF DEFICIENCIES. g,

.h s.

y 5

.U

~

e.-

DOCUMENT (S) MISSING FROM FILE 3..

)

^

L

(

DdTEACTIONCOMPLETEDBYPPAS:

4

%e 8

A"-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20127A862&oldid=4270774"