ML20126H096
| ML20126H096 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 11/07/1984 |
| From: | Asselstine J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Palladino NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126G811 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-885 NUDOCS 8506180250 | |
| Download: ML20126H096 (7) | |
Text
,,
/
g UNITED STATES f/
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
,i r:ASHIN2 TON,0.c. 20555
\\.....,/
cN'ub[o Ncycrber 7, 1984 MEMORANDUM FROM:
Chairman Palladino 1
i FROM:
James K. Asselstine COMNP 84 h OnofrejRestart
SUBJECT:
Joe, my votes on the San Onofre questions are as follows:
(1) 0ptions paper? - Yes (2) Recomendations?
Yes (3) Public Comission meeting? - Yes
-(i) only with staff? -- No (ii) include' licensee? -- Yes (4) Closed meeting with OI? - Yes cc: Comissioner Roberts Comissioner Bernthal Comissioner Zech OGC OPE EDO 4
8506180250 850326 PDR FOIA DELL 84-085 PDR 6
~
November 14, 1984 SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM BRANCH DOCKET NO. 50-206 l
RECORD OF PHONE CONVERSATION I
DATE:
November 7,1984 TIME: 1:00 pm PARTICIPANTS: NRC - T. Cheng,.
. Chokshi, G. Lear Franklin Researc enter - u Con, A. Hamid (consultant)
Southern California' Edison Company - J. Rainsberry, M. Knarr, R. Ornelas Bechtel Power - S. Atalik
+
Computech - R. Mayes, T. Kelly
SUBJECT:
SAN ONOFRE 1 - MASONRY WALLS
SUMMARY
OF CONVERSATION:
The purpose of the telephone conference was to discuss the conformance between the test samples, the analytical models and the as-built condition of masonry walls. Specifically, wall FB-5 in the fuel storage building was discussed since the wall was not above (elevation 42'-0) grouted as the test samples and there were no dowels The licensee and its consultants noted that the continuous rebar for this wall provides equivalent reinforcement to the walls with dowels which were tested. The licensee agreed to document the following infonnation within four weeks.
1)
This wall is the only one with design differences from those tested; 2)
That equivalent reinforcement is provided by the rebar; 3)
Whether the first course above the bond beam at the 42' elevation is grouted; 4)
Stress / strain profiles, based on the test data and analytic results, to show that compression is in the face shell only; 5) the location and value of maximum critical stresses and strain on wall FB-5; and 6)
The licensee's overall conclusion concerning the applicability of the test / analysis program to this wall.
Based on the discussion, the staff concluded that the masonry wall review, for purposes of plant restart, is complete.
DISTRICUTION:
SEP files t
nu
,a t % PuR I. PDQ b
p
& 4 ^lfu
&A?A.
&nNc
-~~ r 4%- f W G
wp 2.3' s
D&5 ^~1 s 0
T 4
.a
+
m e no y,
y+
x-g %_ Aw
_ fg)j i
a-
+
k.
\\
% m
_C V
p
%[n 7
~
v#
' 'l
+
29p h*
- YA,'
P. l?
!~
i
. y- < y
(
x fyy 6
/
& /g sex + $3 w f priDCt<::/e
4 0
0 Ja g*WA Y
A A_dl; T
n-P C=-
C
_. 9' a s ) _ p -
Ape - w M-Ah 4d
-.-.}- 2 e e ?:2 u,~ m *7~
D
. a_.
-~
_. Sd cc err c T M9 B
^^' -
W~f A =- W -
x py+nuA;_
@ m.i_ 2%A L GM s>BD Md?
(gf'lk3V)
--.TB,&2 - - AN
- ~ W~ -t b
~
~
44.:t i JL-. L e_
~
~ s.
6 SC V
=
w
@ S cio -
s o. r y (V) %
v__-f L h vo -t/ 7 VI d.o ~ -
e e
w -.
h-
.soaa, z1, J+
&e
.c v 3
q 7 Lee-s g s 4 wsss 2.o.
y 4/'! N pb.;,-to-xs go
. w/ - s soss,-i
~
k 9,l,f l7 vc. : w n q.
% i..
g-Jco -
. LSe D
.s.
r9 Lo
~m f.
do nD.c [f.% wE~ e.1_-
s' e Co 4
b[h v.-,
~
i[e r %
.s 4 aA A
@ n c3L (-
(
5 g A A k +
-4
. v ?
E 3-p zw w
sm
/
~.
~
cip Q,
4
- u sg,ags $ n 1 D w
a x -,
W A
f fY W N:A c-A
,ys 9
uhn-m g-; tad a
. c y 3. -
f, % y LB" p!g pop
~
& t, M w-g
.s y L t...
_ j
- _ 0/
-S%
4 EaS
,s e
aao uw asa n
G 4 9 0-
~
573/p u _ _. E m S. /w -
em _
x c a 9 ese
+
M
_ 'eh h
-N+nn 1:
9
_ z? s.
-o a/: r
.y @
C V
& f R P, J n u D m j - O 3
a w y,, y,p,a
.c
9
(<
~
--#=
L A - A &. J
~ w BL4
~6x
.t u
Lk p A
-tk+ &
D A y asLpa M
.cg-
, sus e n q#pt-w
-na su
- m >.
. -m Y
a-4 1
i