ML20125B779

Allegation Action Plan for Consumers Power Co,Palisades Plant Re Anonymous Phone Allegation.Action Evaluation: Based on Review,Listed Method of Resolution Is Recommended for Each Allegation or Issue as Noted

ML20125B779
Person / Time
Site:	Palisades
Issue date:	08/04/1988
From:	Creed J, Mallett B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20125B733	List: IA-92-253, Informs of 880408 Fitness for Duty Program Allegation Re Individual Being Hired at Plant W/Prior Drug Use Problem IA-92-271, Provides Listed Info as Required by Section 3.2 of RP 0517A Re Allegation AMS RIII-88-A-0105 Concerning Use of Drugs by Employees Working Midnight Shift at Plant ML20125B730 ML20125B743 ML20125B746 ML20125B779 ML20125B781 ML20125B785
References
FOIA-92-253, FOIA-92-271 NUDOCS 9212100148
Download: ML20125B779 (3)

Text

i Att ac hment ,

i ALLEGATION ACTION PLAN ys g o . $ .t% El- k -o I o J~

License: tea sumus V~c~ co. - V.sr - A Docket / licensee No: So - 3 5S / O f # - 3

• Assigned Division: o<se U 3M Attached Pertinent Documents: g3 - @ r+n a c- o ~ay-r et.--

1. Action Evaluation: Based on our review, the following method of resolution is recommended for each allegation or issue as specified below:

@ Send to Licensee with Rlll Followup * '

8. Priority Rill Followup C. Followup During Next Routine Inspection Within Next 60 Days D. Followup with Assistance from 0.I.

E. No Action - Outside NRC's Charter (see attached memo)

F. No Action - Without Merit (see attached memo)

G. Refer Allegation to H. Other (specify)

II. Concurrences:

A. Prepared by: 9 k,/'4 (/I&Date Technical Staff B. Reviewed by: 122 / 8 56ction Chief Date J

C. Approved by: , o c [ [ k $ //Mll d b S/Date

// Branch Chief' v s

• If proposal is to send to licensee, no action plan needs to be prepared; however, if only a-part of multiple allegation is sent to licensee, then the allegation sent must be clearly defined and an action plan developed for those issues warranting Rill inspection effort.

[Q h aeo f s$ & ~Yls % f )ciL%

q f~ /

9212100148 920625-PDR AK 53 p A, 7 on" . . -

Fanel DeC15io A. Approved As is B. Approved With Modifications As Discussed And P.cumented Below C. Rejected for Following Reasons:

1. ""* 9"# *

8) n )b*o IV, Modifications To Plan As Discussed During Review Parel 2

_- .~ . -

A ALLEGATION /PERlPHERAL ISSUE ACTION rt N f ach allegation and any peripheral issues ' associated witt the allegation should te documented on a separate- page. If peripheral issues tre identified during P? development of this plan, please assure that' the issues correspond to a specific allegation. Each allegation and peripheral- issues, if any, should be cccumented in the followup report exactly as is stated it this plan.

i T T 7 Allegation No. M Peripheral Issues Associated With Allegation No.

cauc4 fa c,L,w gg.gp .Msce ,_,ago @ a s- 1* W A9 A s a yta.w r e.a.e.m %4che w.c s.+ a . % . ,. .w. M M t M4 . rk um ri .44 s ,'

I; f c.M 4 vr a s h tl 4 h*% paf bar M b Sted fM f ac-)L:*d) "

4 A RM ud Qvuith *rf u n w isfar w W '

?

I Inspector's Action _s: The following areas at a minimum will be reviewed during the investigation into the above mentioned allegation and/or peripheral issues.

1. . Persons to be contacted:

I l 2. Documents and/or activities to be reviewed:

i i

J r

i

! 3. Tirne period to be covered:

(

i

4. Locations / specific areas to visit:

5. Causes/ reasons for allegations to arise:

i Otherareas(specify): I I E.

i I:

3

-_..__ _ _.__._ __.._._ _ _ _ _ _ g