ML20113H205
| ML20113H205 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1984 |
| From: | GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20113H173 | List: |
| References | |
| JPTS-85-002, JPTS-85-2, NEDO-21662-2, NEDO-21662-2-ADD04, NEDO-21662-2-ADD4, NUDOCS 8501250034 | |
| Download: ML20113H205 (8) | |
Text
e-4
)
ATTACHMENT IV TO JPN-85-03 Loss-of-Coolant Accident Analysis Report for James A.
FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (Lead Plant)
(JPTS-85-002) 4 New York Power Authority
' James A.'FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-333 8501250034 850116 PDR ADOCK 05000333 P
FDR
~
l 1
l I{Y
.. s.
NUCLEAR ENERGY BUSINESS OPERATIONS e GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN JOSE. CALIFORNIA 95125 GEN ER AL $ ELECTRIC APPLICABLE TO:
PUBLICATION NO.
~
~
ERRATA And ADDENDA T. I. E. NO.
SHHT 4
TITLE NO.
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR December 1984 DATE POWER PLANT (LEAD PLANT)-
NOTE: Correct allcopies of the applicable July 1977 ISSUE DATE pub // cation as specified below.
REFERENCES INSTRUCTIONS ITEM (CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS)
PARAG APH L NE) 01 Page v/vi Replace with new page v/vi.
02 Page 3-1/3-2 Replace with new page 3-1/3-2.
03 Page 4-3 Replace with new page 4-3.
04 Page 4-11/4-12 Replace with new pages 4-11 and 4-12.
l I Of I PAGE L
ev i
1(
-NEDO-21662-2 LIST OF TABLES
. Table Title Page
'l !
.BWR/4 With LPCI-Modification (Important LOCA/ECCS-Parameters) 2-3 2
~ Significant Input Parameters to the Loss-of-Coolant Accident 3-1
. 3 -~
Summary.of Break Spectrum Results 4-5
.4 -
MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-7 15B
'MAPLHCR,Versus Average Planar Exposure.
4-7 SC MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-8 SD ~
MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-8 SE
'MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-9 5F MAPLHGR'Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-9
'5G-MAPLHCR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-10 SH MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-10 51
'MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-11 SJ MAPLHGR Varsus Average Planar Exposure 4-11 5K' MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4 6' Single Failuce' Evaluation (Plants With LPCI Modification) 6-7
~
A
/
1
'ks, v/vi i
,w
~
-y
~
N -
s ir#
~ NEDO-21662-2 3.
INPUT TO ANALYSIS s
s
' A: list of'the significant plant input parameters to the LOCA analysis is
. presented in Table 2.
1
- Table 2 SIGNIFICANT INPUT PARAMETERS TO THE rLOSS-OF-COOLANT ACCIDENT ANALYSIS'
? Plant Parameters:
TCore Thermal Power 2531 MWt, which corresponds to 105% of rated steam flow
.c Vessel Steam Output 10.96 x 106 lba/h, which corresponds to 105% of rated steam flow Vessel Steam' Dome Pressure 1055 psia Recirculation Line, Break Area
~(DBA) 2 2
2 1.for Large Breaks - Discharge 2.37 ft, 1.89 ft, 1,o ge s
- Suetion' 4.14 ft2
~
- Recirculation Line Break Area-for Small Breaks
' Discharge 1.0 ft2
~
E
.9 ft2, 0.15 ft2 0
- Suction-0.07'ft Number of Drilled Bundles All Fuel Parameters:
? Peak Technical
' Initial
~ '
Specification.
Design Minimum Linear Heat Axial Critical-
- Fuel Bundle Generation Rate Peaking Power-1 Fuel Type Geometry (kW/ft)
- Factor, Ratio *
'A6 Initial - Type 2 7x7 18.5
. l. 5 '
1.2 JB.L" Initial - Type 3 7x7
.18.5 1.5
- 1. 2.
m
=
'C.
18D274H 8x8
~13.4 1.4'
- 1. 2 >
D.-
8D274L 8x8.
13.4 1.4 1.2 E.
8DRB265L--
8x8
.13.4 1.4 1.2-lF..
8DRB283
- 8x8' 13.4 1.4'
'l.2 rG.' LP8DRB265L
-8x8 13.4 1.4 1.2 5H..i P8DRB283 8x8
-13.4' l.4'
- 1.2-
<r' "4
JI; :P8DRB284H 8x8 13.4-1.4 l'. 2 NL TJ.. i P8DRB2991 8x8 13.4 1.4 1.2' 1K.
BP8DRB299 8x8-13.4 1.4 1.2-
- To' account for:the 2% uncertainty in bundle power required by Appendix'K', the T SCAT calculation is performed with 'an MCPR of l.18 (i.e.,1.2 divided by l.02).
1for a~ bundle'with an initial MCPR of 1.20.
p;
, 3-1/3-2 u
- (
=4.5 RESULTS OF-THE CHASTE ANALYS.IS This code is used, with suitable inputs from the_other codes, to calculate the
' fuel cladding heatup rate, peak cladding temperature, peak local cladding oxidation, _and core-wide metal-water reaction for large breaks. The detailed fuel model in CHASTE considers transient gap conductance, clad swelling and rupture, and metal-water. reaction. The empirical core spray heat transfer and
. channel wetting correlations are built into CHASTE, which solves the transient heat transfer equations for the entire LOCA transient at a single axial plane
~
in a single fuel assembly. Iterative applications of CHASTE determine the maximum permissible planar power where required to satisfy the requirements of 10CFR50.46 acceptance criteria.
.. The CHASTE results presented are:
e Peak Cladding Temperature versus time e
Peak Cladding Temperature versus Break Area
' Peak Cladding. Temperature and Peak Local Oxidation versus Planar e
Average Exposure for the most' limiting break size e
Maximum Average Planar ! feat Generation Rate (HAPLHGR) versus Planar Average Exposure for the rost limiting break size e'
' Rod Perforation Time and Temperature e
Hot Rod Location A 'sussnary of; the analytical.results is given in Table 3.
Table 4 lists the cfigures provided for this analysis. The MAPLHGR values for each fuel type in
-the FitzPatrick core'are presented in Tables SA through 5K.
The MAPLHGR
~
- values are based on the use of 100-mil channels except where noted.
~
4-3 b
NEDO-21662-2 4.6 METHODS In the following sections, it will be useful to refer to the methods used to analyze DBA, large breaks, and small breaks. For jet -pump reactors, these are defined as follows:
a.
DBA Methods. LAMB / SCAT / SAFE /DBA-REFLOOD/ CHASTE. Break size:
DBA.
b.
Large Break Methods (LBM). LAMB / SCAT / SAFE /non-DBA REFLOOD/ CHASTE.
Break sizes:
1.0 ft < A < DBA.
c.
Small Break Methods (SBM). SAFE /non-DBA REFLOOD. Heat transfer 2
coefficients: nucleate boiling prior to core uncovery, 25 Btu /hr-ft _ep after recovery, core spray when appropriate. Peak cladding temperature and peak local oxidation are calculated in non-DBA-REFLOOD. Break sizes: A < 1.0 ft.
4-4 a
4
.1 NEDO-21662-2 Table SI-MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE Plant': FitzPatrick Fuel Type: P8DRB284H Average' Planar
. Exposure MAPLHGR PCT 0xidation
'(mwd /t)
-(kW/ft)
(*F)-
Fraction 200~
11.3 2116 0.026 1000.
11.3 2117-0.026 15000-11.7' 2152
-0.029
~10000-12.1 2185 0.031 15000 12.0 2186 0.031 20000 11.6 2142 0.027 L25000 10.9 2046 0.020 3i00001 10.2 1945 0.014 35000:
9.6.
1852 0.010 f40000-9.0 1768
-0.007
-Table SJ MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE Plant: FitzPatrick l Fuel Type: P8DRB299
- Average Planar Exposure _
PCT Oxidation (mwd /t)
(kW/ft)
.(*F)
-Fraction
!200 10.9 2068 0.022 1000
' 11. 0 -
'2072 0.023 J5000.
11.5 2111 0.025 10000.
12.2 2191 0.031 15000
'12.2:
2198 0.032 "di~'
- 20000 12.1-2195
'O.032
-25000 11.6-
'2139' O.02/
'30000 10.9 2029 0.019
-35000 10.3 1955 0.023 140000
'9.6-1836 0.009 M
I 4-11.
- p..
A NED0-21662-2 Table SK:
- MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERACE PLANAR EXPOSURE TPlant: Fitzpatrick Fuel Type: BP8DRB299*
. Average Planar-Expos _ure MAPLHGR PCT.
Oxidation (mwd /t)
(kW/ft)
(*F)
Fraction
-200
'10.9 2060 0.022
' 1,000' 11.0 2063 0.022 5,000 11.5 2106 0.0241 10,000E 12.2 2192 0.031' 115,000 12.2 2198 0.032 20,000-
' 12.1 -.
2197 0.032 25,000-
' 11. 5 '
2139 0.027
- 30,000, 11.0 2041
.0.019 35,000-10.3 1955 0.028 40,000.
-9.7' 1841.
0.009 45,000-9.0 -
1770 0.007-
- 80 mil channel' thickness.
k 4-12
-,k, m
-r o
e
,