Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
Results
Other: ML20045H047, ML20067A102, ML20080H339, ML20081J757, ML20091K244, ML20094H536, ML20094S522, ML20100G721, ML20101K436, ML20105B971, ML20105B979, ML20134E334, ML20149G216, ML20198G616, ML20217F911
|
MONTHYEARML20091K2441992-01-10010 January 1992
Forwards Rev 28 to Security Plan,Addressing Issues Raised in NRC .Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20094H5361992-02-20020 February 1992
Forwards Rev 29 to Security Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20058M1741992-04-0303 April 1992
Evaluation of DG 2 Cooling Water Pump Cooler Fan a & B Min Starting Voltage
Project stage: Request
ML20094S5221992-04-0303 April 1992
Forwards Rev 30 to Security Plan.Rev in Response to 10CFR73.56 & Reg Guide 5.66.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20101K4361992-06-23023 June 1992
Forwards Rev 30 to Security Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20105B9711992-09-11011 September 1992
Forwards Rev 31 to Security Plan.Rev Adds Alternate Perimeter Alarm Reporting Sys & Redundant Access Control Sys to Security Plan.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20105B9791992-09-17017 September 1992
Forwards Rev 32 to Security Plan.Rev & Addendum Address Concerns Listed in Cd Pederson .Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20045H0471993-06-17017 June 1993
Forwards Rev 31 to Security Plan,Addressing Issues Re Use of Alternate Perimeter Alarm Sys & Redundant Access Control Sys.Rev Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20067A1021994-01-24024 January 1994
Forwards Rev 33 to Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Security Plan.Rev Withheld Per 10CFR73.21
Project stage: Other
ML20149G2161994-10-0404 October 1994
Forwards Rev 34 of Security Plan.Rev Identifies Generic Security Changes Being Implemented at Comm Ed Six Nuclear Generating Stations.Changes Allow for Implementation of Util Watchmen Program.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20080H3391995-02-0707 February 1995
Forwards Rev 35 to Security Plan.Signed Original & Copies of Security Plan Revs Being Provided to Ofc.Encl Withheld
Project stage: Other
ML20081J7571995-03-21021 March 1995
Forwards Rev 36 to Security Plan.Plan Withheld
Project stage: Other
ML20100G7211996-02-20020 February 1996
Forwards Rev 39 of Security Plan,Containing Listed Changes. Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
Project stage: Other
ML20134E3341996-10-18018 October 1996
Forwards Original & Three Copies of Rev 40 of Plant Security Plan.W/O Encl
Project stage: Other
ML20198G6161997-08-25025 August 1997
Forwards Rev 41 of Plant Security Plan Which Identifies Implementation of New state-of-the-art Security Sys.Plan Withheld
Project stage: Other
ML20217F9111997-10-0202 October 1997
Forwards Rev 42 of Qcs Security Plan Which Reflects Changes in Organizational Structure of Util Nuclear Security Dept. Plan Withheld
Project stage: Other
1994-01-24
[Table View] |
Text
_ __
( ommonwcaiin wu>n o,mpany I M Notith ( lark Street 1 o um <,-
( hicago.11. (mM H r(i-February 20,1996 CERTIFIED MAIL U.S. Nudear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Quad Oma= Nuclear Power Stations Units 1 and 2 Quad Cities Station Security Plan NRC Docket Nos. 50-254 & 50-265 TAC Nos. 65386/65387 Enclosed is the original and three (3) copies of Revision 39 of the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Security Plan. This submittal contains the following changes:
Chapter 1:
CECO definition changed to Comed Defines the Vehicle Barrier System Chapter 3:
Reduces the frequency of security patrols Chapter 5:
Identifies the Vehicle Barrier System Chapter 9:
Eliminates the need for an armed member of the security organization to process through the firearms detector during the course of official duties subsequent to their initial entry and search.
Chapter 15:
Clarifies the personnel involved in conducting independent security audits.
Appendix B Eliminates the polygraph examination due to the Access Authorization requirements which have surpassed any benefit received from the polygraph examination. Therefore, the polygraph is considered to be a duplication of effort and no longer provides benefit.
960226Y6Y960220 PDR ADOCK 05000254 F
PDR
-/n o h
[
[.
h T Enicom Company 1
U.S.N.R.C.
Page Two Pursuant to 10CFR 50.54(p), the signed original and three copies of the security plan revisions are being provided to your office. A copy of this letter and two copies of the secunty plan revisions are being sent to Region Ill.
j We have concluded that these changes do not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the plan. These enclosures contain Safeguards information which must be protected from pubhc disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 73.21.
Sincerely, cn.
h/4 hu,/
.t s c L L M M. Johnson Uconsing Operations Director Enclosures cc: H. Miller (w/two encis.)
THE ENCLOSURE CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Upon separation. this pace is decontrolled i
j i
